Loading...
09-22-2015 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 INDEX Site Plan No. 33-2015 Harold & Patricia Taylor 1. Tax Map No. 289.7-1-39 Site Plan No. 53-2015 Omall Family L.P. 6. Tax Map No. 296.18-1-5 Subdivision No. 8-2015 Burnett Family Trust 8. PRELIMINARY STAGE Tax Map No. 239.18-1-12 FINAL STAGE THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING 1 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT CHRIS HUNSINGER, CHAIRMAN PAUL SCHONEWOLF, SECRETARY DAVID DEEB STEPHEN TRAVER GEORGE FERONE JAMIE WHITE, ALTERNATE MEMBERS ABSENT THOMAS FORD LAND USE PLANNER-LAURA MOORE STENOGRAPHER-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. HUNSINGER-I'll call to order the meeting of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board, Tuesday, September 22, 2015. Welcome, everyone. There's only three items on the agenda and two of them we will be tabling. OLD BUSINESS REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARING: SITE PLAN NO. 33-2015 SEAR TYPE TYPE II HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR AGENT(S) ETHAN HALL — RUCINSKI HALL ARCHITECTURE OWNER(S) TAYLOR FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST & OTHERS ZONING WR LOCATION 27 REARDON ROAD EXTENSION APPLICANT PROPOSES TO RENOVATE AN EXISTING HOME ENCLOSING AN OPEN PORCH AND ALTERING INTERIOR LIVING AREA AND BEDROOMS WITH A 289 SQ. FT. ADDITION; NEW FLOOR AREA OF 589 SQ. FT., NEW HOME WILL HAVE 2,399 SQ. FT. FLOOR AREA. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 179-6-050, 179-13-010 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALTERING SHORELINE WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE SHORELINE WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE SHORELINE AND EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE IN A CEA SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE AV 27-15, BP'S APA, CEA, OTHER GLEN LAKE CEA LOT SIZE 0.24 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 289.7-1-39 SECTION 179-3-040, 179-6-050, 179-13-010 HAROLD TAYLOR, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. This application is proposed to be tabled. I would like to give you some information. I know the applicant's here to give you additional information about the project. At the Zoning Board meeting the Board tabled the application requesting the applicant to provide additional information about possibly increasing the permeability available for the site. So the applicant is here. He can give you additional information about the project. MR. TAYLOR-Thank you. I'll try to be quick because I know you didn't expect me. MR. HUNSINGER-If you could give us your name for the record, please. MR. TAYLOR-Harold Taylor, my wife Patricia. I think you all know what has happened so far. I came to you guys first and you conceptually approved the project. I went to the Zoning Board and they were okay with the project but they were concerned about permeability. So I found some things since then that didn't make a lot of sense that permeability was a problem. Because the addition that we're putting on is on the same footprint of the house that we have now. Back in 2012, 1 came to both Boards here and I asked for a variance so that we could construct a carport, and that variance was granted and one of the things that was allowed was an additional 116 square feet of impermeable surface, and now we've got the same area. We're not expanding on the lot, and yet they're saying that, well, we've got to try to reduce that area. One of the, the packet that I gave you includes several items, pretty simple, but the first thing I did, I was on the Planning Board in Glens Falls for over 20 years and I knew that it was always helpful if the neighbors didn't oppose the project. So I took the time and went around to the neighbors, and you've got a sheet there with people that are, that live on Reardon Road or Dineen Road, which are close to my house. That's all of the people that I visited. I didn't have 2 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) anyone who refused it. Everyone that I stopped at was okay with it. I actually took the plans with me and showed them the plans before I asked them if they would be willing to sign on. The next item on there is the approval on February 29, 2012 from the Zoning Board of Appeals, and the reason I included that, I know you guys know how to get that, it's on the internet and everything but I included it so that you wouldn't have to go looking it up. Essentially it is the final approval stating that that 116 square feet of additional impermeable space was granted, and then the Zoning Board minutes are also attached. We talked about different ways to mitigate the problem that they're concerned with, and what we were able to come up with, we have an area down right next to the shore. It's roughly 100 square feet and has two inch concrete patio blocks on it, and what we would be willing to do is to take that out and plant grass in its place and put some shrubbery along the shoreline. So that's pretty much where we stand. If you guys have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. MR. FERONE-Did the Zoning Board indicate how much they wanted from you in terms of permeable? MR. TAYLOR-I've got to tell you, they didn't state the amount of permeable space we had. What they kept referring to, and maybe Laura can help us here, what they keep referring to is the, what's the factor? MRS. MOORE-Seventy-five percent, the requirement? MR. TAYLOR-Yes, but they don't refer to it. They keep going back to the floor area. MRS. MOORE-The floor area ratio? MR. TAYLOR-And they're comparing the floor area to the total square footage of the lot, and they're saying I should be at 22 and I'm at 27, but I don't believe that has anything to do with permeability. MRS. MOORE-No, I got them impression that some of the concern was adding additional floor area and they felt that maybe they'd be more favorable on the site if there was additional permeability, sort of like a give and take. So I think that was the primary concern was looking at the project, seeing that it did fit into the area where they're proposing. They're not increasing the impermeability, but the Board was looking for additional enhancements on the site. MS. WHITE-Do you think they would be satisfied with the 100 square feet that Mr. Taylor is suggesting? MRS. MOORE-As long as, they are looking for something. MR. TAYLOR-A pound of flesh. MRS. MOORE-A pound of flesh. So just for myself, because I don't know exactly where that 100 square foot, so I pulled up this screen here, and you said it was on the, is it on the south dock area, if you look on this screen? MR. TAYLOR-Yes. MRS. MOORE-So is it about? MS. WHITE-Can you point it out to us? MR. TAYLOR-You see where the one dock, the single dock? MRS. MOORE-This one? MR. TAYLOR-Yes. You see that area right next to it on the shore? MRS. MOORE-This? Or this area? MR. TAYLOR-There, that's it. MRS. MOORE-This whole area. MR. TAYLOR-That's the area I'm talking about. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. 3 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) MRS. MOORE-1 think that's a reasonable approach. MS. WHITE-That's what it sounded like to me. That seemed very reasonable. MR. TAYLOR-I would also mention, and I thought I had this on the package that I gave you, but we've owned the property now, what, about 10 years? PATRICIA TAYLOR MRS. TAYLOR-2001. MR. TAYLOR-2001. Since we bought the property, we took out two 55 gallon drums. One on the side of the house, we took out, if can remember, I suffered through all of it, we took out one 55 gallon drum on the north side of the house, and that was dedicated to the kitchen sink. So we took out another 55 gallon drum down in front of the camp, about, I'd say probably 12 feet from the lake, and that was dedicated to the sink in the basement, and we also took out the septic tank. If you can see where the patio is near the entrance going in, no, the other patio on the other side there. MRS. MOORE-This one? MR. TAYLOR-Right there. Under that patio was a concrete block septic tank. It had never been pumped out and it was failing. So what we did was we put a new septic system in the back of the house. We pumped all of the sewage up to that point, and then it feeds out into that leach field to go toward the carport. The other thing that we did was that we put a drywell in out near the road, in the front near that carport and we put gutters in that feed all of the rain that comes to that roof of the carport over to that drywell. As well as, we also put a new driveway in, and we had the driveway pitched so that would drain to the drywell. So if anything we're in better condition now. Maybe our numbers don't look good, but the property, we never have any puddling on it. We've never had any problem whatsoever with it. MR. SCHONEWOLF-These guys, three of these guys that adopted your resolution for a variance in 2012 come around and vote the other way this time. MRS. MOORE-It was tabled. There was not a vote. MR. SCHONEWOLF-Well, it was tabled, but three of the guys that voted to table it are three guys that voted the other way before. I mean, either they have short term memory loss or something. There's nothing different, right? MR. TAYLOR-We're going up with that porch that deck that was there before. That's going to be different, but in my opinion what we're coming up with looks better than what we have now. It's an improvement. MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions or comments from the Board? MRS. MOORE-1 could suggest something here. The Board does have the opportunity, knowing that you have a public hearing that you're opening, you can also provide additional information to the Zoning Board that I can share with them. If you see that this is, explanation by the applicant enhances the project, then you can refer again, you know, some information to the Zoning Board that says, look, this applicant has made an effort to reduce, or increase the permeability by doing X, and we the Planning Board have seen this and we find this a reasonable asset to the project. MR. DEEB-All for it. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, especially offering up non-permeable space right next to the lake. That's a real plus. MR. DEEB-So we'll just make a recommendation that we've heard it. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, we do have a public hearing scheduled. Did anyone wish to address the Board? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. HUNSINGER-Were there any written comments, Laura? 4 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) MRS. MOORE-1 have no written comments. MR. TAYLOR-I had originally had a letter from a neighbor on each side, but the Zoning Board didn't have it. MRS. MOORE-1 don't think I have it in this one, either. MR. HUNSINGER-Do you have it in the file? MRS. MOORE-There's a signature page, yes. MR. SCHONEWOLF-There's a lengthy signature page. MR. TAYLOR-There actually isn't that many neighbors on that road. I've got husband and wives there. MRS. MOORE-Okay. So, Mr. Chairman, I do have two public letters in here. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. If you could read those into the record. MRS. MOORE-1 can, yes. Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Do you think you read them into the record before? MRS. MOORE-1 did not read them into the record before. These are, we had a change of Staff, obviously, the Board's aware of that. So finding information is sometimes a little bit difficult. MR. HUNSINGER-Is this from 2012? MRS. MOORE-No, this is from 2015. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-And so because Pam's not here, usually there's information that's pulled out for me to be prepared for. So this was dated on June 11, 2015, and I don't believe I read it into the June agenda. This is addressed to Mr. Brown. "Please accept this letter as our approval of Mr. and Mrs. Taylor moving forward with the addition to their home located next door to us. We have seen the plans and understand how the changes to the house will change the landscape. We were asked to provide this letter as proof that we are in agreement. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you. Dennis G. Defayette Nancy M. Defayette" The next letter is addressed to Mr. Brown again. "I live at 25 Reardon Road Ext. and have reviewed the drawings of the proposed change to the property. I have no objection to the project. Dorothy Smith 25 Reardon Road Ext." MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. MS. WHITE-Is that the other direct neighbor on the other side? MR. TAYLOR-One on the north and one on the south. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. Obviously we will table the public hearing and I guess I like Laura's idea of providing additional comments to the Zoning Board. We don't have a sample recommendation, but I would certainly encourage someone to make a recommendation. MR. SCHONEWOLF-Do you want a tabling first? MR. HUNSINGER-We should really make a recommendation first before we table it. MRS. MOORE-That's fine. MS. WHITE-1 don't think I can repeat what Laura said, but I would be happy to make a motion based on that. That we've reviewed this and I don't have anything to read. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, we could just say that the Planning Board has reviewed the revised plans and finds that the additional mitigation measure offered by the applicants to be a very positive addition to the overall project. 5 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) MS. WHITE-And in addition we also note the list of 15 additional signatures to be an addition to the positive that we didn't have before. MRS. MOORE-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-So are you making that in the form of a motion? MS. WHITE-1 am. RESOLUTION RE ZBA RECOMMENDATION FOR AV # 27-15 HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to renovate an existing home enclosing an open porch and altering interior living area and bedrooms with a 289 sq. ft. addition; New floor area of 589 sq. ft., new home will have 2,399 sq. ft. floor area. Site Plan: Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040, 179-6-050, 179-13- 010 of the Zoning Ordinance altering shoreline within 50 feet of the shoreline and expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief requested from minimum property line and shoreline setbacks, maximum allowable height and floor area ratio requirements and expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA. Planning Board shall make a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RE: AREA VARIANCE NO. 27-2015 HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR, Introduced by Jamie White who moved for its adoption, seconded by David Deeb: That the Planning Board has reviewed the revised plans and finds that the additional mitigation measure offered by the applicant to be a very positive addition to the overall project. In addition we also note the list of 15 additional signatures to be a positive that we didn't have before. That the Planning Board agrees with this plan and is pushing to get it back to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Duly adopted this 22nd day of September, 2015, by the following vote: MRS. MOORE-This information to be shared with the Zoning Board of Appeals. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. Yes, it's a recommendation. MR. FERONE-Can we emphasize even stronger that we agree with this and that we're pushing to get it back to the Zoning Board? MR. HUNSINGER-1 think you just did. Would you like that included as part of the recommendation? MR. FERONE-Yes. AYES: Mr. Deeb, Mr. Schonewolf, Ms. White, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford MR. HUNSINGER-Now we would also be looking at a tabling resolution to table this until the November 19th with new information to be submitted by October 15tH RESOLUTION TABLING SP# 33-2015 HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR 6 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN 33-2015 HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR, Introduced by Paul Schonewolf who moved for its adoption, seconded by Jamie White: Tabled until the November 19, 2015 Planning Board meeting with information due by October 15, 2015. Duly adopted this 22nd day of September, 2015, by the following vote: MRS. MOORE-You did say November 19th, correct? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MRS. MOORE-Okay. AYES: Mr. Deeb, Mr. Schonewolf, Ms. White, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford MR. HUNSINGER-Good luck. MR. TAYLOR-Thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-We'll see you in a couple of months. MR. TAYLOR-All right. I guess it's November I'm supposed to go back. Is that automatic? MRS. MOORE-You're coming in November for both the Zoning and the Planning Board. MR. TAYLOR-Okay. All right. Thank you. MRS. TAYLOR-Thank you. SITE PLAN NO. 53-2015 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED OMALL FAMILY L.P. AGENT(S) JARRETT ENGINEERS OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING CI LOCATION 63 QUAKER ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES A 339 +/- SQ. FT. ROOF CANOPY OVER THE NORTHERN LOADING DOCK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO FACILITATE BETTER MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT TRANSFER DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-9-020 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGES TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE AV 49-15, SV 16-13, SP 59-00, AV 65-93, AV 42-93 WARREN CO. REFERRAL SEPTEMBER 2015 LOT SIZE 3.18 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 296.18-1-5 SECTION 179-9-020 TOM JARRETT, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. The other evening the Zoning Board granted the floor area ratio for this application. This is an applicant who's proposing to put a covered canopy over an existing loading dock. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Good evening. MR. JARRETT-Good evening. Tom Jarrett, representing Al Boychuk who's here in the audience. You saw the project last week. It's pretty simple. Any questions, I'll answer them. MR. HUNSINGER-Questions, comments from the Board? We do have a public hearing scheduled. I will open the public hearing. Were there any written comments? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments for this one. MR. HUNSINGER-Let the record show no comments were received. We'll close the public hearing. This is an Unlisted SEQR. The Short Form, I believe, was submitted. Are there any 7 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) items that the Board has identified of any concern on the SEQR form? If not, I'll entertain a motion for a Negative Declaration. RESOLUTION FOR NEGATIVE SEQR DECLARATION SP # 53-2015 OMALL FAMILY L.P. Site Plan: Applicant proposes a 339 +/- sq. ft. roof canopy over the northern loading dock on the east side of the building to facilitate better material/equipment transfer during inclement weather. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-020 of the Zoning Ordinance changes to the exterior of the building shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 53-2015 OMALL FAMILY L.P., Introduced by Paul Schonewolf who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone; As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Duly adopted this 22nd day of September 2015 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Mr. Schonewolf, Ms. White, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford MR. HUNSINGER-And unless there's any other questions or comments, I will entertain a motion for approval or denial. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP# 53-2015 OMALL FAMILY L.P. The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: a 339 +/- sq. ft. roof canopy over the northern loading dock on the east side of the building to facilitate better material/equipment transfer during inclement weather. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-020 of the Zoning Ordinance changes to the exterior of the building shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board provided a recommendation to the Zoning Board on 9-15-2015; the Zoning Board approved the variance request on 9-16-2015, The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance; 8 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 9-22-2015 and continued the public hearing to 9-22-2015 when it was closed; The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 9-22-2015; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval; MOTION TO GRANT SITE PLAN 53-2015 OMALL FAMILY L.P., Introduced by Paul Schonewolf who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request for G. lighting, J. stormwater, K. topography, L. landscaping, O. alterations and new construction details, Q. soil logs, and R. disposal rg anted: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution Duly adopted this 22nd day of September 2015 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Ms. White, Mr. Schonewolf, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. MR. JARRETT-Thank you. Sorry I dragged the meeting out. SUBDIVISION NO. 8-2015 PRELIMINARY & FINAL STAGE SEAR TYPE UNLISTED BURNETT FAMILY TRUST AGENT(S) STAFFORD CARR & MC NALLY OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING WR LOCATION 11 ANDREW DRIVE APPLICANT PROPOSES SUBDIVISION OF A 1.32 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS OF 0.66 & 0.66 ACRES. SUBDIVISION WILL PLACE EXISTING HOUSES ON SEPARATE PARCELS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER A-183 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION OF LAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE AV 51-15, BP 04-677 (2 DOCKS) WARREN CO. REFERRAL AUGUST 2015 APA, CEA, OTHER L G PARK CEA LOT SIZE 1.32 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 239.18-1-12 SECTION CHAPTER A-183 MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. We do have Subdivision 8-2015 for Preliminary & Final Stage on the agenda. There is a draft resolution for that to be tabled. We'll open the public hearing and table the public hearing. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING TABLE OF SUB# 8-2015 BURNETT FAMILY TRUST MOTION TO CONFIRM THE TABLE OF SUBDIVISION 8-2015 BURNETT FAMILY TRUST, Introduced by Paul Schonewolf who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: Tabled until the November 17, 2015 Planning Board meeting with information due by October 15, 2015. Duly adopted this 22nd day of September, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Schonewolf, Mr. Ferone, Ms. White, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford MR. HUNSINGER-Laura passed out copies of the flier for the Planning & Zoning forum on Thursday, October 1St. I hope everyone who's interested can make it. The Town will pay the $25 registration fee. How many have signed up? MR. TRAVER-I did. 9 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/22/2015) MRS. MOORE-And then there's a handful of Zoning Board members that did as well. MS. WHITE-Is it too late if I call you tomorrow? MRS. MOORE-You can call me tomorrow. That's fine. That is all. I didn't have anything else additional. Thank you for attending the stormwater public informational meeting. It's a requirement under our agreement. MR. HUNSINGER-it was interesting. MR. DEEB-The kid did a good job. MR. HUNSINGER-1 concur. MR. TRAVER-It was nice to see and hear some more data on the permeable stuff. MR. DEEB-Yes, Tom would have loved it. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. TRAVER-1 mean, you can see where the circle sort of comes up through the gravel, but I didn't realize, of course, you know, you don't go kayaking in the pouring rain. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, right. MS. WHITE-Yes, just to hear the change in the Highway Department. MRS. MOORE-Yes, perspective. MS. WHITE-You know, after experiencing it. That was good. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, very encouraging. Anything else from the Board? Would anyone like to make a motion to adjourn? MOTION TO ADJOURN THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2015, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone: Duly adopted this 22nd day of September, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Schonewolf, Mr. Traver, Ms. White, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Ford On resolution meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Chris Hunsinger, Chairman 10