Loading...
03-22-2016 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2016 INDEX Subdivision No. 8-2015 Burnett Family Trust 1. PRELIMINARY & FINAL STG. Tax Map No. 239.18-1-12 Site Plan PZ 73-2016 Faden Enterprises 2. Special Use Permit PZ 68-2016 Tax Map No. 309.10-1-47, 48, 49 Site Plan PZ 51-2016 Switchco, LLC (Holiday Inn Express) 2. Tax Map No. 309.13-1-73 Site Plan PZ 54-2016 Big Bay Lodging, LLC (Hilton Home2 Suites) 12. Tax Map No. 309.13-2-2 through 9 Site Plan PZ 80-2016 Frank DeNardo 18. Tax Map No. 240.-1-31 Site Plan PZ 75-2016 William Rudenko 20. Tax Map No. 279.-1-9 Site Plan PZ 81-2016 Apex Solar Power 25. Tax Map No. 309.10-1-10 Site Plan PZ 88-2016 Tom Rosecrans & Susan Beddle 30. d/b/a TRSB Enterprises Tax Map No. 308.20-13.5 Site Plan PZ 92-2016 Ray &Wendy Kraft 37. SUP PZ 82-2016 Tax Map No. 240.9-1-16.12 THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. 1 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2016 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT CHRIS HUNSINGER, CHAIRMAN STEPHEN TRAVER BRAD MAGOWAN GEORGE FERONE DAVID DEEB JAMIE WHITE, ALTERNATE MEMBERS ABSENT PAUL SCHONEWOLF LAND USE PLANNER-LAURA MOORE STENOGRAPHER-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. HUNSINGER-I'd like to welcome everyone to the Town of Queensbury Planning Board on Tuesday, March 22., 2016. Members of the audience, welcome. There are copies of the agenda on the back table over here. There's also a handout for public hearing procedures. I believe every item on the agenda does have a public hearing scheduled. The first item of business is under Old Business. OLD BUSINESS: SUBDIVISION NO. 8-2015 PRELIMINARY & FINAL STAGE SEAR TYPE UNLISTED BURNETT FAMILY TRUST AGENT(S) DEBORAH SLEZAK — COIFFI, SLEZAK AND WILDGRUBE, P.C. OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING WR LOCATION 11 ANDREW DRIVE APPLICANT PROPOSES SUBDIVISION OF A 1.32 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS OF 28,639 SQ. FT. & 28,754 SQ. FT. SUBDIVISION WILL PLACE EXISTING HOUSES ON SEPARATE PARCELS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER A-183 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION OF LAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE AV 51-15, BP 04-677 (2 DOCKS) WARREN CO. REFERRAL N/A APA, CEA, OTHER LGPC, CEA LOT SIZE 1.32 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 239.18-1-12 SECTION CHAPTER A-183 MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Actually there's no one here for the applicant for the Burnett Family Trust. It's to be tabled. It was tabled at the Zoning Board. MR. HUNSINGER-To the 19th, May 29th meeting? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-If anyone would like to make that motion. RESOLUTION TABLING SUB # 8-2015 BURNETT FAMILY TRUST MOTION TO TABLE SUBDIVISION 8-2015 PRELIMINARY & FINAL STAGES BURNETT FAMILY TRUST, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: Tabled until the May 19, 2016, Planning Board meeting with any new information due by April 15, 2016. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE 2 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-Is there anyone here that wanted to speak to the Board on this project? We will table the public hearing as well to the 19th of May. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN SITE PLAN PZ 73-2016; SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 68-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED FADEN ENTERPRISES AGENT(S) LANSING ENGINEERING OWNER(S) ROBERT GOODWIN ZONING MS LOCATION 75-79 MAIN STREET APPLICANT PROPOSES DEMOLITION OF THREE MAIN BUILDINGS, SHED AND SOME SITE GRADING TO CONSTRUCT THREE NEW BUILDINGS IN THREE PHASES. FIRST BUILDING TO BE 4,200 +/- SQ. FT. WITH PARKING FROM MAIN ST. TO PINE ST. PROJECT INCLUDES MERGING PARCELS CREATING TWO PARCELS. SECOND PHASE TO BE REMAINDER OF FIRST BUILDING 4,200 +/- SQ. FT., THEN THIRD PHASE IS TWO ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS 2,400 SQ. FT. AND 1,600 SQ. FT. WITH A DRIVE THROUGH. PROJECT INCLUDES LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING IN PHASES ALSO. STORMWATER TO BE COMPLETED FOR WHOLE SITE IN PHASE ONE CROSS REFERENCE BP 91252 SEWAGE ALT.; 2005-221 SIGN PERMIT; 2002-0208 WALL SIGN WARREN CO. REFERRAL FEBRUARY 2016 LOT SIZE 0.24, 0.42, .046, TOTAL 1.12 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 309.10-1-47, 48, 49 SECTION 179-3-040, 179-7-030 , 179-7-070, 179-10-040, 140-7 MRS. MOORE-This is also to be tabled, but it's going to be tabled to your second meeting in April. MR. HUNSINGER-The 28 th? MRS. MOORE-April 28tH MR. HUNSINGER-Is there anyone here for that project? Would anyone like to make a motion? RESOLUTION TABLING SP PZ 78-2016 & SUP PZ 68-2016 FADEN ENTERPRISES MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN PZ 73-2016 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 68-2016 FADEN ENTERPRISES, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: Tabled until the April 28, 2016 Planning Board meeting pending Zoning Board of Appeals meeting April, 27, 2016. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote. AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf SITE PLAN PZ 51-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED SWITCHCO, LLC (HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS) AGENT(S) BOHLER ENGINEERING OWNER(S) SWITCHCO, LLC ZONING Cl LOCATION CORINTH RD. & 1-87 APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A PORTION OF A 16.38 ACRE PARCEL FOR A 13,800 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT) 4 STORY (55 FT.), 100 ROOM HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOTEL. SITE WORK INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESS ROAD, INSTALLATION OF PARKING SPACES, LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MOTELS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP 28-2008; AV 41-2008 WARREN CO. REFERRAL FEBRUARY 2016 LOT SIZE 16.38 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 309.13-1-73 SECTION 179-3- 040 JON LAPPER, CHRIS BOYEA & JOSH O'CONNOR, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MRS. MOORE-Okay. This applicant proposes to develop a portion of a 16.38 acre parcel for a 13,800 sq. ft. footprint, four-story, which is 55 feet in height, 100 room Holiday Inn Express hotel. Under my Staff Notes I identified the applicant is requesting a waiver for the accent lighting as the lights shine upward on the building and in the front. I've identified some items to 3 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) be clarified at this meeting in reference to light fixture cut sheets, floor plans for each level that you may wish to discuss. I also provided a draft resolution that includes information about the traffic that we discussed during SEQR. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MR. LAPPER-Good evening, everyone. For the record Jon Lapper with the applicant Jerry Nudi and Chris Boyea from Bohler Engineering. We're pleased that the first two applications had to table at the Zoning Board last week so we got to go first which is rare, but we were granted the height variance after you had recommended it, and we appreciate that. So after listening to this board last week we made some changes to the site to address the access to McDonald's, the fence on the back, and adding some additional trees, maple trees along the Northway, and so I think we'll start off and let Chris show you the changes that were done to address what you had asked us to do. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. MR. BOYEA-Okay. For the record I'm Chris Boyea with Bohler Engineering, and at the last meeting we had given a general overview of the project, and for those in the public that are here listening, to are proposing to build a four story, 100 room hotel that is in the land behind McDonald's at Exit 18. This rendering shows the driveway and how the parking lot would circulate and it's really the exact same thing that you saw at the last meeting last week, but this Board had asked for some additional improvements, and for us to consider making those, and so there was a handout, an eight and a half by eleven that looks just like this, only three pages or so, that we had provided tonight. Did Laura get a copy? Okay. Perfect. This just contains the changes that you guys had asked at the last meeting. So I'd like to j just walk through that briefly. We had talked that it would be nice to add some trees or maybe consider adding trees was the wording used along the interstate, along the Northway that's there. So we had added six to eight maple trees that are here to be substantial in size, two inch in caliper, Town planting, and so those have been provided at the top of the infiltration basin here and then continuing down to help establish a tree row. We're also keeping some of the trees in the right of way. We just can't touch those. Those are owned and controlled by New York State DOT. So those will be there as well. It was asked about the fence in the rear. So some of the neighbors had asked, and Laura had given us a heads up when we came in for some preliminary meetings, that it would be great if we could incorporate a fence between our property and the residential uses to the rear. So we have provided that fence here, but the Board had asked just for some substantial or a little bit more clarification or details on that fence to make sure that the fence achieves the desired impact that the neighbors had, and some of the neighbors did speak at the last meeting and they were happy to hear that we would do a solid fence, not a chain link fence. It would be a solid fence. So we have provided a detail of the maximum height allowed by the Town, which is six foot tall, wood solid stockade fence that would be provided. The impact of our project, so anywhere where headlights would, in the parking lot would turn, we've provided that fence through that whole portion of the site there, and then, just to reiterate, the reason why the fence was talked about was we're leaving a very large buffer here of trees that currently exist, very mature trees that are there. So the higher vertical has already got a good buffer. It's that lower through the trunks, and then there was some concern about people migrating between, not so much the hotel guests going back to the residence, but some of the residences are kids that have had past, I don't know, they come into the woods at night or something of that nature, but we wanted to stop that flow, and so we have provided that. We were asked to take a look generally and just confirm the elevation of the interstate to the building. It was just a question and we didn't know at that time, but we've gone back and researched and done the math and figured out that the interstate right here is approximately going to be, well, I shouldn't say, the interstate's not changing. The interstate is here, and the top of our building is approximately going to be 25 feet above the height of the interstate that's here. So right now it's about 25 feet below the interstate, the grade is, but by the time we're done building about a 55 foot total, 55 fill at the same time, we're basically splitting it. So the parapet would be about 25 feet higher by the time we're done. Now that's not very much when you look at a distance over this far, 25 feet. I mean, it'll be higher, but I don't think your head is going to go up too high to look at that. The point of us looking at that, and why the Board asked for it, is just to make sure that you won't see the mechanicals on top, and so being 25 feet, I think we've got a good angle where there's a comfort level that the mechanicals would not be seen with the parapet. MR. MAGOWAN-That 25 feet, is it straight out from the, it's not ramping up. Is that, that's a gradual upgrade to go over the bridge. MR. BOYEA-To be precise where we took it, there was an elevation marker right around here, and so that's that, we didn't have accurate all the way down there. 4 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. MAGOWAN-So it's 25 feet on the higher side. I mean, it's actually lower back near the hotel. MR. BOYEA-Right. It could be a little bit there. MR. MAGOWAN-How many times do you travel that? MR. BOYEA-Well, the last couple of weeks, quite a bit. MR. MAGOWAN-No, it is lower. So those numbers, I think, are even better. Because I know it does ramp up going, you know, gradually up to. MR. BOYEA-The last item that we were asked to investigate was a pedestrian connection to the McDonald's to prevent what we were calling that cow path from forming. So what we've talked about, and I'm going to just look this over because there should be a blow up. So this is just a blow up of the area. It's maybe a little easier to see. It's much easier probably to see on the handout. What we did is we widened a four foot additional strip here, striped it as a pedestrian safe travel path, from here, right to the property line. Now we can't go over into McDonald's, but we chose a spot where you can see even on the aerial and exhibit that it's right there, but McDonald's parking and paving and everything is right there, very close to the property line. We can work with McDonald's further, probably to bridge that last 18 inches. We just don't have the authority to do that, obviously, right now, but we did re-develop that site and I was part of that plan, and the franchisee's been very accommodating. So I don't see it being, but anyway, even if they said no, we're within 18 inches of hard surface. So that really does provide that path of connectivity, and so those are the changes that have been made to address the Board's comments, and we're here tonight to answer any other questions, comments, concerns, and hopes to move forward. MR. HUNSINGER-Thank you for those updates. Yes. MR. BOYEA-1 didn't take credit for one last thing. Also included in the package was a truck turn. So Laura had asked for us to make sure that recreational vehicles turn here, and we knew that they did, but we just didn't have a document per se, and so I guess you can see the truck turn, but it's in there that we've checked to make sure that if somebody's pulling a boat or a big Winnebago or something like that that they can maneuver the site accurately, and that's been provided. MR. HUNSINGER-Is there anything else? MR. LAPPER-We worked out the traffic language with Laura and Town Counsel for your resolution. Since we were here last and that was one item that we discussed last time and I think we're all comfortable with that language. MR. HUNSINGER-Questions, comments from the Board? MR. DEEB-That height, if we can go back to the height thing. So you're saying it's 25 feet from the highway itself. MR. LAPPER-From the travel lane. MR. DEEB-From the travel lane. Well, the off ramp comes down. MR. LAPPER-So it's going to be more than that. MR. DEEB-Right, because the top of the ramp is going to be where the travel lane is? MR. LAPPER-Yes. MR. DEEB-So it's 25 feet from that. MR. LAPPER-Yes. MR. DEEB-That point right there. Okay. MR. LAPPER-At least 25 feet is Brad's comment. We measured from a higher spot. 5 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. FERONE-The path on your driveway, you said you put in the extra four foot or whatever for pedestrian. When you get down to the point where it's going to be close to where the McDonald's is, is that just a gravel path? Is that going to be asphalt? MR. BOYEA-Asphalt. MR. FERONE-Asphalt. Okay. Up to, except that last foot and a half. MR. BOYEA-And it might even, I mean, we're working off of an aerial there, but, I mean, yes, it's close. MR. FERONE-And again, I would think McDonald's would be open to that. Thank you. MR. BOYEA-All day breakfast. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. Depending upon any future development in that site, would there be any ability or willingness to extend that walkway down the Corinth Road? MR. LAPPER-Yes, Jerry would, as I said last time, would really like that to get developed quickly and hopefully now there's more activity at Exit 18 because it's got a larger site, it would be nice to have some nice commercial or offices uses there. So the amenities that are required for that, you know, I landscaping, a fence continuing along the back, all that'll happen, you know, including the pedestrian access, when it comes back in for, hopefully next winter two or three projects back there. He didn't buy it to just do a hotel. MR. HUNSINGER-I think a striped four foot wide, you know, I think that's a pretty good compromise. MR. LAPPER-It can get plowed. So it's easier than having a separate sidewalk. It's just easier to maintain, you know, if we ever get snow again. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. One of the comments that I had neglected to bring up last week was on your lighting plan. I thought the lighting plan seemed a bit bright, especially when you compare this with the other hotel, Big Bay Lodging. The parking area on the entrances were a lot brighter than the other one, just as a comparison. I don't know if you want to comment on that. MR. BOYEA-Well, there is another party involved here. There's a hotel operator, and they have a lot of experience with hotels, and their concern is that the site look welcoming. It's got a 500 foot long drive, and actually if you look at the amount of trees, we were going to clear less trees for the drive and just kind of sneak the drive through the woods, and they said, no, that's going to turn off motorists that are coming in to this place, where am I going, you know, I'm driving back into this, those are big trees through there. I'm driving back. They actually said can you clear as we've shown here, a little bit more on the other side of it and light this up so that it's welcoming and appealing for tourists that come in and so it was something that was looked at for sure. It's definitely unique that it's 500 feet driveway and, you know, it should work well, and that really came at the recommendation of a hospitality expert. MR. HUNSINGER-Anyone else have concerns about the lighting plan? Okay. Any other questions or comments? MR. DEEB-And you said you're comfortable with this Number Eleven in the proposal, draft proposal? There's quite a bit added about the traffic we talked about last week. MR. LAPPER-Yes. MR. DEEB-And so this is, in essence, if you have a full build out within that property, these things have to be, mitigations have to be taken into account. MR. LAPPER-Yes, as Chris had said last time, the traffic report that we got from Creighton Manning Engineering indicated that because a hotel is a low traffic generator and there's new infrastructure on Corinth Road, nothing would be needed now, but we understand at full build out these'II be needed. So we're agreeing now, Jerry's agreeing now, that these'II be constructed at full build out, and we'll be in here for site plan review for all of those projects hopefully soon, but at least it's in writing now that he's agreeing to that. MR. DEEB-Okay. 6 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions or comments from the Board? We do have a public hearing scheduled for this project this evening. Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to address the Board? You want to comment, sir? Okay. The purpose of the public hearing is for interested parties to make comments to the Board. We do tape the meeting and the tape is then used to transcribe the minutes. So I would ask anyone that wishes to comment to speak clearly into the microphone and give us your name for the record and if you could address your questions to the Board. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED GARY SPRINGER MR. SPRINGER-My name's Gary Springer, Queensbury. I live right around that development. My question is about the fence. I want to know where it's going and if he's doing just around his hotel or if he's doing the property. MR. HUNSINGER-That's a good question, and we can have him show you. MR. O'CONNOR-Here against the disturbance area, pressing along the rear of the parking lot and ending at the end of the parking lot. MR. LAPPER-Forty-five feet from the property line. MR. O'CONNOR-It's plus that. We have a 50 foot buffer and the fence is along the edge of that. MR. SPRINGER-So what my question is, is you're not doing just your property? The whole property is going to be done in phases with the fence? MR. HUNSINGER-At this point, that's the limit of the fence. So do you have a specific concern? MR. SPRINGER-Yes, kids and stuff going in there and partying and throwing garbage and, you know, out there. The same as I did last week. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, we weren't here last we so we don't know what comment you might have made. MR. SPRINGER-So, and I know when Mr. Schermerhorn was going to do it, he was going to put a fence up. So, you know, I mean, if it's going to be done in phases, as long as it's going to be done is all I really care about. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. I see them nodding their heads behind you. MR. SPRINGER-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-So is that a current issue that goes on in those woods? MR. SPRINGER-Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, thank you. Did you want to comment, sir? AUDIENCE MEMBER-Just what he said about the fence deal. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Did anyone else wish to comment? Were there any written comments, Laura? MRS. MOORE-I have no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-All right. MR. LAPPER-One of the advantages is that we'll have 24 hour management on site. So, you know, if the kids are hanging out there now, it'll be different if there's hotel management on site. It's not going to be just vacant woods anymore. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, I mean, I like the idea of the fence, but I was looking at the picture here, and, because you're tying in your water and that, and that's right there at the end of whatever road that is, one of the State roads, right? What do you think maybe the possibility of bringing 7 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) that westerly fence, you know, into the thickets of the woods a little bit more instead of, because I just see them, you know, getting around that. MR. LAPPER-Well, there's going to be a whole swath the whole rest of the site where if somebody wanted to get around, they could and to put that fence in we'd be taking down trees, and grading it to make it suitable. MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, not the whole way, you know, just bring it, from the picture it looks like. MR. LAPPER-You mean come around the corner is what you're suggesting? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes. JERRY NUDI MR. NUDI-It does come around the corner a little bit. Maybe it should keep going straight that way? MR. BOYEA-Yes, I think what I'm understanding is that if we could extend the fence. MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, just bring it in so they'd have to walk into the woods. You'll get the thickets and that. Then you're really saying stop. I mean, they're going to get in the woods no matter what. MR. NUDI-Yes, I think there's a tendency in all those old streets for people, I think they used ATV's and I know that my brother had said that at least one of the neighbors was so irritated he cut trees down and tried to block the roads and everything, but they removed them. They just come in and they move the trees. They keep playing there, and I think they ride across Corinth Road and go out to the woods. MR. MAGOWAN-But I think by opening that up, clearing that up and putting a building here, you're taking a substantial, you know, party spot, putting up lights, too. I mean, that deters a few things, too. I'm just, you know, I just kind of noticed that fence there and it looked like it was diving into the woods like another 10 feet. MR. LAPPER-Jerry's agreeing to that. MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions or comments from the Board? If there's no outstanding issues, is the Board comfortable with moving forward? MR. FERONE-Yes. MS. WHITE-Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-Then I will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-One of the things that Staff has prepared is a revised SEQR resolution that was distributed to us this evening. I don't know if members have had a chance to review that. All it really does is it clarifies the traffic improvements that have been discussed last week, and if there's no questions or comments, if anyone would like to propose the draft amended SEQR resolution. RESOLUTION RE: AMENDED SEQR RESOLUTION FOR SP PZ 51-2016 SWITCHCO, LLC The applicant proposes to develop a portion of a 16.38 acre parcel for a 13,800 sq. ft. (footprint) 4 story (55 ft.), 100 room Holiday Inn Express hotel. Site work includes construction of an access road, installation of parking spaces, landscaping, lighting and stormwater management. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, motels and hotels shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; 8 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. AMENDED MOTION FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 51-2016, SWITCHCO, LLC, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver; 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. 3. Additionally the applicant will be updating EAF Part 1. Question #20 to a yes, and signoff to complete the Short Form 4. The project site was identified in the Exit 18 Rezone Study. The Exit 18 Rezone Study contemplated full buildout of the project site to generate 302 vehicles/hour AM and 418 vph PM. The planned project will generate 53 vph AM and 60 vph PM. Based on the analysis included in the Exit 18 Rezone Study the following improvements are to be installed in advance of full buildout of the site: a. a new eastbound left turn lane into the project site from Corinth Road b. a two lane southbound egress from the site, including one dedicated left turn lane to eastbound Corinth Road and one shared right turn lane westbound and through lane southbound. c. The applicant agrees to formalize the installation of the noted traffic mitigation in the form of a Developer's Agreement to memorialize the conditions of approval. The purpose of such development agreement shall be to establish, in writing and for the benefit of both parties, the specific parameters of the approval which has been granted by the Planning Board and upon including the timing of said improvements and/or land dedications required in connection therewith. d. This provision applies to the subject parcel and/or parcels established by further subdivision of the subject parcel regardless of ownership Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016 by the following vote: MRS. MOORE-Just to say the resolution as prepared by Staff, so it includes the whole concept. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. It includes the whole. MRS. MOORE-Okay. AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-So in terms of any approval, it sounds like the only real change is to extend the fence to the edge of the woods on the western boundary. I did have a question on the proposed maple trees. You said they were two inch caliper. So how tall would those be? MR. O'CONNOR-1 would be guessing about a range, but I would be saying that those are probably eight to ten feet at planting. MR. HUNSINGER-That was what I expected, but. 9 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. LAPPER-And you might as well reference the plans that Chris submitted tonight as part of the resolution with those changes. MR. HUNSINGER-I think the resolution, and I'll double check it, does include all materials and comments made up to today. MR. MAGOWAN-So we've got the property line running for 365 feet, and if we're going to be extending the west side. MR. LAPPER-We'll come around the corner. MR. O'CONNOR-1 would say 10 feet. MR. LAPPER-To the fence. MR. MAGOWAN-To 375. MRS. MOORE-Can I ask a question? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, go ahead, Laura. MRS. MOORE-In reference to currently the way the plan's set up, it looks like it's 45 feet from that north property line and you mentioned maybe it's 50 feet. MR. BOYEA-No that's the total buffer, that green area. It is about 45 feet to the fence. So your math is correct. MRS. MOORE-Okay, and for the Board's benefit, the applicant has asked for a waiver for the accent light, and whether you're going to consider that. MR. HUNSINGER-The blue lights. MRS. MOORE-The blue lights. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. Is everyone comfortable with that? MR. FERONE-Yes. MS. WHITE-Yes, after the discussion we had last week. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-Okay. So within that resolution I identified that there would be no exterior building lighting above the first floor. So that addresses any neighbors behind the building, and I believe that that would be acceptable. I just want to make sure that the Board is clear on that. MS. WHITE-And all of those blue lights are on the front of the building. Correct, the blue upward facing? MR. BOYEA-That's correct. There's none in the rear. MS. WHITE-None on the sides or the rear. MR. O'CONNOR-That's correct. MR. HUNSINGER-There's none on the sides either, or the end? MR. BOYEA-Well, I don't believe so. Josh, you can pull up the elevations. MR. O'CONNOR-So there are actually four fixtures. There's one located here, up, one here up and one on each of the front columns. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. So it's just on the front. MR. LAPPER-Right. MS. WHITE-It's on the center of the front. 10 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. LAPPER-The center, too. MRS. MOORE-Okay. The other item is the applicant requested to be able to clear the trees prior to March 31St, and so I've included items that it's up to the Board if they wish to include that as part of their resolution allowing the applicant to develop the clearing plan and get that submitted prior to the final plans being approved. Usually everything happens simultaneously. So right now the applicant needs to proceed with getting a final engineer signoff, and that could take a couple of days, and March 31St happens next week. So we're trying to assist that process. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, we had talked about that a while back. MRS. MOORE-So, okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Is the Board comfortable with that? Thank you for clarifying that for us. MR. DEEB-Yes, I'm okay. MR. MAGOWAN-If they get approval they're going to go anyway. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Are there any other. MR. MAGOWAN-So, should I make note of that? MR. LAPPER-It's in there. MRS. MOORE-It's already in the resolution. The last item I have is more of a technicality. Currently the plans show two signs and the applicant's only permitted one. So final plans should show the one sign until the applicant comes forward with the sign variance if they wish to proceed that way. MR. MAGOWAN-And that's in there, too? MRS. MOORE-That is not in there, but just to be clear that the final plans should not show two wall signs at this time. MR. DEEB-Is that okay? MR. LAPPER-Yes. That decision comes later. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, well, we can't approve it is what Laura is saying. MR. LAPPER-Right. MR. HUNSINGER-It has to go before the Zoning Board. MS. WHITE-So we're approving with just the one sign. MR. DEEB-The plans should reflect that. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Are you ready? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 51-2016 SWITCHCO, LLC (HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS) The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance to develop a portion of a 16.38 acre parcel for a 13,800 sq. ft. (footprint) 4 story (55 ft.), 100 room Holiday Inn Express hotel. Site work includes construction of an access road, installation of parking spaces, landscaping, lighting and stormwater management. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, hotels and motels shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; 11 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration - Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016; The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 51-2016 SWITCHCO, LLC; Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1. Waivers requested granted; 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. b) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, clearing limits are to be professionally (through surveyed methods) located and are to be clearly marked on the site and flagging (highly visible) is to remain after clearing and field verified by Community Development Staff. c) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; d) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; e) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan); ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this Resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) The project site was identified in the Exit 18 Rezone Study. The exit 18 Rezone Study contemplated full buildout of the project site to generate 302 vehicles/hour AM and 418 vph PM. The planned project will generate 53 vph AM and 60 vph PM. Based on the analysis included in the Exit 18 Rezone Study the following improvements are to be installed in advance of full buildout of the site: a. A new eastbound left turn lane into the project site from Corinth Road b. A two lane southbound egress from the site, including one dedicated left turn lane to eastbound Corinth Rod and one shared right turn lane westbound and through lane southbound. c. The applicant agrees to formalize its commitment for the installation of the noted traffic mitigation in the form of a Development Agreement to memorialize the conditions of approval. The purpose of such development agreement shall be to establish, in writing and for the benefit of both parties, the specific parameters of the approval which has been granted by the Planning Board including the timing of said improvements and/or land dedications required in connection therewith. 12 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) d. This provision applies to the subject parcel and/or parcels established by further subdivision of the subject parcel regardless of ownership. 1) There will be no exterior building lighting on the North or West Side of the building above the first floor. m) The fencing to be installed is a 6 ft. stockade fence that is to be 45 ft. from the north property line for 375 ft. running along the parking area on the north side of the project to allow the applicant to extend the fence towards the west. n) The applicant has explained, per NYSDEC and US Fish and Wildlife Service, that clearing of the project site as noted in the submitted plans needs to be completed prior to March 31St due to a concerned species. a. The clearing (per #2) is allowed to occur prior to March 31St where limits of clearing vegetation (trees) are to be marked and field verified by Community Development Department Staff upon submission of a clearing plan separate from final plans. b. The applicant is to include in the final sets of plans a copy of the clearing plan. o) This Resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: MR. DEEB-We need to add in there the final plans to show one sign. MR. HUNSINGER-1 don't know if we need to add that, do we? MRS. MOORE-It wouldn't be considered compliant. MR. DEEB-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Because we can't authorize that. MR. DEEB-Right. AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. LAPPER-Thanks. MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. Good luck. MR. LAPPER-We really appreciated Laura jumping on this today and getting this all worked out. SITE PLAN PZ 54-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED BIG BAY LODGING, LLC (HILTON HOME2 SUITES) AGENT(S) BOHLER ENGINEERING MA OWNER(S) FRANK J. PARILLO ZONING CI LOCATION BIG BAY RD., SE CORNER OF CORINTH RD. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A 15,095 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT), FOUR STORY (66 FT.) HILTON HOME2 SUITES HOTEL BUILDING WITH 89 ROOMS, ASSOCIATED PARKING AND INTER-CONNECT BETWEEN CORINTH AND BIG BAY ROADS. PROJECT INCLUDES SITE WORK FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND CONNECTION TO MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MOTELS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. VARIANCE: RELIEF IS REQUESTED FROM HEIGHT, FAR, PHYSICAL ACCESS. CROSS REFERENCE AV 74-2016, SV 53-11, & SP 54-11 TACO BELL; SP 31- 12 & SP 2-13 CLEARING; 9/97 OFF PREMISES SIGN; P23-94 ZONE CHANGE. RECOMMENDED, DENIAL; SP 31-96 PRODUCE STAND; UV 35-97 DENIED MOBILE HOME WARREN CO. REFERRAL FEBRUARY 2016 LOT SIZE 2.3 ACRES PORTION OF 6.70 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 309.13-2-2 THROUGH 9 SECTION 179-3-040 CHRIS BOYEA &JOSH O'CONNOR, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-And we're going to table this to the April 28th meeting. MRS. MOORE-No, this'll be May. MR. HUNSINGER-I'm sorry. May 19th. I have it right in front of me. Yes, we're going to hear a little presentation and we'll give you an opportunity to make some comments, ma'am. Laura 13 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) had indicated that you wanted to spend a couple of minutes on this to update a couple of items to the Board. MR. BOYEA-Again, for the record, my name's Chris Boyea. I'm with Bohler Engineering, and this application seems pretty straightforward. We had initially reviewed this proposed hotel that will be located behind Taco Bell at the Exit 18 interchange, and it seems to fit well. There wasn't a lot of request for changes or items that have been made. We did provide some snow storage and for the general public that's here, it will be a four story hotel, just like the prior project. It's a smaller room count. It's in the 80's, not 100, and it would be utilizing the existing curb cut on Corinth Road, and then we would be going out the Big Bay Road with a shared access drive. This site plan looks pretty straightforward. We do need a variance for this. It's a height variance and a floor area ratio variance, and so we were at the Zoning Board and they reviewed this and it was an item, with the recent Code changes that are proposed, where the height would be allowed, potentially, but the Code would need to be updated. Obviously if you increase height then it increases your floor area ratio. So I think that that's getting worked out. I see Laura shaking her head. So that's good. So we're working through that now. So that's the reason for being tabled here tonight is because until we get those variances, you know, there's not much more we can talk about here, but we're certainly happy to listen to any comments, questions or concerns on this, as we feel we have a great project. We just have those technicalities to work through at the Zoning Board level, which is the height and the floor area ratio. I do know that there are a few folks in the public that were at the Zoning Board and they will want to comment here as well, and we will be happy to listen and take good notes and continue moving forward with a successful project. We understand, though, that the Board will be taking, most likely, no action here tonight and that we'll have to go back to the Zoning Board to wrap that up, but like I said, we're happy to get any information. It's good to share information. Thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-If I could ask, Laura, if you know, what were the reasons for why the Zoning Board tabled it? MRS. MOORE-The Zoning Board was concerned with the height and the parapet proposed. They thought it was too tall. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-And then they were concerned about the floor area ratio because in this zone it was .3, or 30%, and the applicant was requesting 60%, and at this time the new revisions potentially will say a 70 foot height is permissible through Site Plan Review or Special Use Permit, and with the floor area ratio, it looks like that will not be part of that particular overlay zone, but that's still up to the Town Board. MR. HUNSINGER-So is it fair to say then that the Zoning Board isn't comfortable with the proposed changes to the zone? MRS. MOORE-I don't know that. MR. HUNSINGER-If they were concerned that the height was too high and the proposed zoning change is even higher than this project. MRS. MOORE-They were concerned about a proposed feature on the building itself. It wasn't the building, it was a feature of the building. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. BOYEA-To elaborate on that just a little bit more, we did bring an elevation here, and as you can see, the general roofline of this is 52 feet here, and so that's actually less than they granted for the hotel across the street, but what you'll notice is that there's a piece here that sticks up, like a cupola or a turret, that sticks up here, and that in itself brings it up to 66, 67 feet, and so they were just concerned that, you know, that's very close to the 70 foot. That's not just a five foot or a six foot. That really pushes you up there. So, I mean, that has left to be worked out, whether that stays. I mean, the Board might, the Town Board may approve the zoning that allows the 70 foot for that turret to stay, or, you know, it's potential that that turret might come down a little bit, or it might be gone all together. I think we need to work through that for sure. MR. HUNSINGER-What's the purpose of the turret? MR. FERONE-Yes, I was just going to say, is that elevator or mechanical? 14 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. BOYEA-Well, there is an elevator shaft in there. However, it doesn't need to occupy the full, I mean, I can't tell you that it needs all of it. I think there is some room to cut it down, if the Zoning Board feels that intense about it. I think that the end of the meeting, when we looked at those numbers and we said it's not just this one number but it's the overall roof is down, my sense was, I guess this is a feeling not a fact, but my sense was that the bigger hurdle was the lot coverage for it because it was running over twice of what was allowed. I think that was the bigger hurdle. MR. HUNSINGER-Which is always interesting, you know, kind of illustrates the difference between what the Zoning Board looks at and what the Planning Board looks at, and, you know, we think the lot coverage, floor area ratios is an environmental concern, you know, is there enough room for stormwater management and things like that. So to me as the planner I'm not as concerned with floor area ratio, but to someone on the Zoning Board, when you're looking at a variance that's double, you know, what the Code allows, it becomes a big concern. MR. BOYEA-Yes, but, and just for some additional color here, this is a great project. It's a very successful project, and in our opinion it's definitely going to move forward because there are solutions to all of it, whether we could lower this, get this removed, you know, that's a potential. Whether we adjust property lines potentially here, because that would be the other option. If we were to occupy or control more land, it brings the ratio down. This is a subdivision so we could work something out with the current property owner Mr. Parillo. There's options here. So I'm very comfortable that I will be back in front of this Board and you will see me again here because there's a lot of give and take. That's how it's going to happen. There's a lot of adjustments that we can make to address those two issues. MR. MAGOWAN-Is that a signature tower or something? MR. BOYEA-It's something that they like to have, yes. MR. HUNSINGER-And they're proposing a bright color? Is that a fair depiction? MR. BOYEA-That's correct. Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-Is there a sign on it or just a color? MR. BOYEA-There is not. Well, there are options with signs, yes. However, we're allowed one wall sign and one freestanding sign. So that's what we're proposing is to be zoning compliant, and we have no application pending before the Zoning Board for additional signage. So they've just opted to not put the signs on. MR. HUNSINGER-Based on what you just said for the last project, the elevations of the Northway and the elevations of the land around the building, what's the likelihood that you'll even see that? Or is that towards the front of the building? MR. BOYEA-It is towards the front of the building. Well, and as you can see here, actually, this is a great picture actually. So here's the port cochere, and you can see it's just towards the front of the building, yes, it doesn't extend the whole. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. FERONE-One of the discussions last week was traffic as well with this project, and there was some discussion between the hotel developer and the property owner who was going to be responsible for that. Do you know if they came to any consensus on that? MR. BOYEA-I know that all the discussions have started and they probably would have been done by now if we didn't get tabled. So, and depending on the outcome of that, it might not be necessary, and actually I think the outcome of the application just prior to us have paved the way probably to really make that all go away because this application was reviewed with the application before us. Creighton Manning Engineering has reviewed both of them and so I believe the finding's going to be the same is that based on this hotel only, with 80 plus or minus rooms, there isn't any mitigation warranted at this given time. However, there is future development that's proposed here, just as in the application prior, that potentially could warrant additional. So I actually think that it's going to go away based on, you know, we'll have to work with Staff. Thankfully we have a month to do that, to work out some things, while we're going back to the Zoning Board. MR. FERONE-Thank you. 15 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. HUNSINGER-An additional question. We do have a, are you aware of the revised SEQR resolution that was prepared? MR. BOYEA-I'm not, but is that the same thing to address? MR. HUNSINGER-Well, it's really just one brief sentence. It specifically talks about the traffic mitigation measures, and it says these improvements include a new northbound right hand turn lane from Big Bay Road to Corinth Road. MR. BOYEA-Okay. That sounds different than the prior application. Where it said, you know, I think it would be tied to future buildout. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, no, it is. MRS. MOORE-It is. MR. BOYEA-Okay. Yes, not looking at it, that sounds great. If it was the same as the application before, the same spirit? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. BOYEA-That sounds good, makes a lot of sense. That's great. Thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Any other questions from the Board? Okay. As I mentioned, Laura had indicated there were going to be some people that wished to comment. We will open the public hearing, and as I mentioned earlier, the purpose of the public hearing is for members of the audience to address any questions they have to the Board, and I would ask anyone that wishes to address the Board to speak clearly into the microphone. So do you want to come up? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED FLORENCE GOEDERT MS. GOEDERT-Yes. Good evening. My name is Florence Goedert. I live over at 469 Big Bay Road across the road from where this is happening. Well, first of all I thought this meeting was concerning the sewer and water that was supposed to be put in. Because that's what the letter said. Is that correct? MRS. MOORE-I apologize. I don't know what letter you received. MS. GOEDERT-You can look at it if you'd like. I says right down here about the sewer and water. MRS. MOORE-The project includes site work for stormwater management and connection to municipal water and sewer along with construction of the hotel. So it's everything. MS. GOEDERT-Okay. Because I was at the Zoning Board meeting last week, you know, we had several concerns about the hotel being here. I don't know if this is the time to bring them up. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, it is. Go ahead. MS. GOEDERT-Because we brought up, and they told us make sure we came to this meeting of the Planning Board. Because we brought up concerns about lighting, about buffering for the noise level, the overflow of traffic this is going to create in this area, especially when you're having three major hotels going in in this area. There's going to be a big overflow of traffic. I don't know what the Town plans on doing about that. We're concerned with the water and sewer. It was my understanding when I e-mailed you that this sewer will go on the east side of Big Bay Road. I'm hoping that's correct, that it would be on the same side as the hotel's going to be on. MR. HUNSINGER-Boy, I don't know. Do you know, Laura? MS. GOEDERT-Because there's a water, in our yard. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, they're going out to Corinth Road. 16 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. O'CONNOR-We're proposing sewer connection along the interconnect to an existing manhole out here on Corinth Road. MS. GOEDERT-Because another big concern we have with the hotel being there is how it's going to affect our water pressure and such for the residents in that area. I'm trying to think. Can you just give me a moment. I just want to make sure I covered everything. I think that was all our concerns. They kind of addressed the type of people that would be staying there and such, because we had concerns about that, of people getting out of prison, sexual offenders, for example, and such staying in these hotels. I mean, like I stated last meeting, I'm a survivor of rape and such and I don't care to be across the street from any sexual offenders or anything. So those were our main concerns, the lighting, the traffic, the noise level, and the water uses and such. So, I mean, that's our concerns. I don't know when those concerns will be addressed. MR. HUNSINGER-We'll ask him to. MS. GOEDERT-Okay. I know last time, at the last meeting when I brought up the noise level, he brought up the A/C units and stuff on top of the roof. We're not concerned with that. We're concerned with the people noise levels and stuff, you know, so thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, you're welcome. Was there anyone else that wishes to address the Board? Okay. We will be tabling the public hearing as well. If the applicant wants to come back to the table. I don't know if you want to address some of the concerns while the neighbor's here. She talked about lighting, noise, traffic and water pressure specifically. MR. BOYEA-So I guess we'll go one by one. The water demand and flow here. So when you build, you know, four stories, as you go higher the pressure drops. So it's not uncommon that we would put in booster pumps for our own uses that are here, and that's so that we don't necessarily put an undue draw on the system that's out there. There is an established water main that's out here, and it has plenty of capacity and what we have to do is we eventually have to get a permit. These are construction permits from the utility that operates this. So we need to get a permit from the sewer district and the water and the people who maintain this, and they're looking at those types of things as well. The only really big fire, or big flow for water systems that we would be drawing is in case of an emergency, and that would be limited, and the general area may be impacted. We have a sprinkler system for this whole building, and if that, God forbid, was to kick on, yes, we're going to draw a lot of water and we're going to have a large water service. So when you see on the plans that we have, you know, a six inch line coming in, that's really for fire, or, you know, catastrophic conditions. It's not for daily flow. We would probably operate this whole hotel on an inch and a half to two inch service for just general everyday use. So the reason for the large service is for fire protection. So it's therein case we need it. As far as the type of occupants, again, I just want to re-iterate that this is exciting. This is a Hilton brand Home2 Suites. We are looking, you know, I'm guessing our average room rate might be around $150 a night. So we are not looking to attract people who might want to use this as a residence for weeks at a time or months at a time. We are looking for that business traveler or family vacation, those types of things. As far as noise goes, yes, we did talk about the HVAC up top, and that will be protected by the parapet of the roof. It will be protected just by sheer elevation that we're having any of our HVAC noise on a higher elevation than the general surrounding area, but you have brought up a good point. We didn't talk about this in the past is the general operation noise of the hotel. So there has been some thought put into this, and I'm glad that the question was asked so we can discuss it in more detail. The design of this general hotel and how it interacts with the established residential area that's there, what we thought was the best way to do this was we have established a very large green space next to the residential area, and in green space we can put our stormwater. So we've designed our stormwater to be in the green space that's over there. It provides a buffer and it provides green separation that's there. We will have an outdoor gathering space. There's actually two of them, where a lot of action would happen or occur. Again, 89 rooms. So we don't have a very big population here, but, you know, we expect everybody to be welcomed and greeted through the port cochere that's out front, and so this is a high traffic area, and it faces Corinth Road for that specific reason. Then if there is any outside, somebody wants to smoke, you can't smoke inside this facility, but if you want to smoke, you have to step outside. We have created that amenity over here on this side. So any type of people noise or talking, those types of things should be on the Northway side of things, and I would venture to say that the noise that was generated by the guests or the actual operations would be less than the ambient noise of the interstate and/or the business of the industrial use when it's in operation. So we've tried to address and lay something out that is logical. There's no way you would know any of this unless you came to this meeting, and so I encourage more participation, etc. so that we can make sure we have a great plan. 17 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. FERONE-Chris, what about things like deliveries, carting garbage, that kind of thing. Is that all in the back of that? MR. BOYEA-Boy, you're making me feel like I didn't do my job. I guess I should have told you where the garbage is. There is a trash facility that's over here. So, yes, to answer the question we're trying to keep any of the nuisance noise over on this side and the trash enclosure is in this back right corner down here. MR. MAGOWAN-So what about the service entrance then? MR. BOYEA-Well, I'm not really sure that we have a service entrance. What we do have is, it's pretty standard of the hotels, well it's long this way, and we have a door at the end of each, those are the card key readers, but if they were going to take trash out, it would be out, yes, the end of the facility and to the dumpster and then back out, but there is not going to be, the size of this is a boutique-ish type hotel where it's small room count. There is no loading dock. There is no raised platform. There is no receiving necessarily. There is no convention center. It's not that big. It's 87, 89 rooms. MR. MAGOWAN-So most of that's going to be taken care of. MR. BOYEA-Right through the front door, yes. Any type of delivery they usually just come right through the front door. MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions or comments from the Board? So we do plan to table this to the May 19th meeting. There is, however, before we consider that, a draft amended SEQR resolution that we received this evening. Are there any questions or comments on that before we entertain the motion? MRS. MOORE-I do have one amendment to that. MR. HUNSINGER-Go ahead, Laura. MRS. MOORE-Instead of a Developer's Agreement it's called a Development Agreement. MR. HUNSINGER-Development Agreement. On the back, Item Three, Development. MR. MAGOWAN-Development? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. Whenever you're ready. RESOLUTION RE: AMENDED SEQR RESOLUTION SP PZ 54-2016 BIG BAY LODGING, LLC The applicant proposes to construct a 15,095 sq. ft. (footprint), four story (66 ft.), Hilton Home2 Suites hotel building with 89 rooms, associated parking and inter-connect between Corinth and Big Bay Roads. Project includes site work for stormwater management and connection to municipal water and sewer. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, motels and hotels shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. AMENDED FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SP PZ 54-2016, BIG BAY LODGING, LLC, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver; 18 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. 3. During the environmental review of the short form under question 5 the board indicated there would be no or small impact may occur because the applicant agreed to enter into a Developer's Agreement establishing the timing and cost contribution to traffic mitigation measures identified in the Exit 18 Rezone study included for the Big Bay Road/Corinth Road intersection. Those improvements include: 1. a new northbound right-turn lane from Big Bay Road to Corinth Road Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-And also in our package is a draft resolution to table this to the May 19th meeting. We will also table the public hearing to the same meeting. Would anyone like to make that motion. RESOLUTION TABLING SP PZ 54-2016 BIG BAY LODGING, LLC (HILTON HOME2 SUITES) MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN PZ 54-2016 BIG BAY LODGING, LLC, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone: Tabled until the May 19, 2016 Planning Board meeting. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Ferone, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-Ma'am, you're certainly welcome to come and make comments again on May 19th and also in the meantime if you have any questions you can stop in to the Planning Office at Town Hall. MS. GOEDERT-Okay. Thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, you're welcome. SITE PLAN PZ 80-2016 SEAR TYPE TYPE II FRANK DENARDO OWNER(S) FRANK DENARDO ZONING RR-5A LOCATION 2380 RIDGE ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES TO ALTER EXISTING HOME WITH NEW PORCHES — FRONT AT 230 SQ. FT. AND REAR PORCH AT 224 SQ. FT. PROJECT INCLUDES ALTERATION TO THE ROOFLINE FOR A PORTION OF THE HOME TO CREATE A 23' 11" HEIGHT. ALSO A NEW BALCONY ON THE REAR PORTION OF THE HOME. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-13-010 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, EXPANSION IN A CEA OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE BP 2015-493 FRONT/BACK PORCHES; BP 2015-357 FIREPLACE WARREN CO. REFERRAL MARCH 2016 LOT SIZE 100' X 150' TAX MAP NO. 240.-1-31 SECTION 179-10-0130 FRANK DE NARDO, PRESENT MRS. MOORE-Okay. This applicant did receive the variance last week in reference to the setbacks on front, side, rear, and this is to develop, renovate an existing house with a front porch and rear porch, as well as a balcony and to increase the height to 23 feet 11 inches. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. 19 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. DE NARDO-For the record, I'm Frank DeNardo. MR. HUNSINGER-Did you have anything that you wanted to add? MR. DE NARDO-I do not at this time. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Questions, comments from the Board? MR. FERONE-I think we reviewed this pretty well last week. MR. DEEB-They came right through the Zoning Board. MR. HUNSINGER-You got your variances? MR. DE NARDO-Yes, we did. WE do have a public hearing scheduled this evening. Is there anyone that wishes to address the Board? Any written comments, Laura? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. We will open the public hearing and let the record show no comments were received. We will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-This is a Type II SEQR so no SEQR review is required, and unless there's any other questions or comments from the Board, there is a draft resolution in your package. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 80-2016 FRANK DE NARDO The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to alter existing home with new porches — front at 230 sq. ft. and rear porch at 224 sq. ft. Project includes alteration to the roofline for a portion of the home to create a 23'11" height. Also a new balcony on the rear portion of the home. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-0130 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion in a CEA of a non-conforming structure shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016, and continued the public hearing to 3/22 2016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 80-2016 FRANK DENARDO; Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by David Deeb: Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request rg anted: 2 Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. 20 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) a) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; b) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; c) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; d) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. Good luck. NEW BUSINESS: SITE PLAN PZ 75-2016 SEAR TYPE TYPE II WILLIAM RUDENKO OWNER(S) JAMES VALASTRO ZONING NC LOCATION 982 STATE ROUTE 149 APPLICANT PROPOSES TO PLACE A 20 FT. X 20 FT. CANOPY STRUCTURE ON AN EXISTING LOT FOR A PRODUCE STAND. THE STAND WE OPERATED SEASONALLY FOR 10 YEARS PER AGREEMENT. SITE ALSO CONTAINS A RESTAURANT. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179- 3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, PRODUCE STANDS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP 60-12 ENLARGE DECK, BP 2003971 INT. ALT., 2012484 DECK, 2002714 CONSTRUCT SIGN, 2002049 WALL SIGN, 2000530 SEPTIC ALTERATION WARREN CO. REFERRAL MARCH 2016 LOT SIZE 2.74 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 279.-1-9 SECTION 179-3-040 BILL RUDENKO, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. This applicant proposes a seasonal produce stand, a 20 by 20 foot canopy structure. They have an agreement with a project site, and it is to extend for a 10 year agreement, and it's called the Adirondack Bar& Grill. So it's on that site. MR. RUDENKO-Good evening. My name is Bill Rudenko. I am a partner with Bull Hill Farms Orchard. So I've been elected to make the presentation here tonight by my wife and my three daughters who are also partners in the business. We do operate a number of produce stands in Washington and Warren County. We have the Queensbury Church of Christ on Aviation Road and the Elks Lodge on Cronin Road. Both of those locations provide safe egress and access to this site, I mean to their sites, and this site is no exception to the rule. It's safe for cars to pull in, relatively safe, considering Route 149 during July and August, which is the peak months of our business, but there are two 70 foot wide curb cuts along Route 149 where traffic can pull in and out of that parking lot and I believe the curb cut on Route 9 north it's about 30, 35 feet. The parking is ample, more than ample, I believe. I believe during the hours when the restaurant is most active would be primarily dinner time, maybe four o'clock on. So the parking lot is essentially, perhaps 50% ours, and we only need parking for about six to eight vehicles at any given moment. So we're pleased with the site. If there are any questions or concerns, I'd be more than happy to do my best to answer them. MR. HUNSINGER-Any questions or comments from the Board? MR. FERONE-Where would your stand be exactly? I was kind of looking there and there's a lot of property next to the restaurant on the side there. Is it going to be more towards the front kind of right on the edge of where the parking is? MR. RUDENKO-Are you familiar with the lilac bush? MR. FERONE-Yes. That's it? MR. RUDENKO-That's going to be moved. MR. FERONE-Okay. See that was another question. 21 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. RUDENKO-Yes, yes, that will be moved. It will be transplanted over on the other border. MR. FERONE-Okay, because that's the only thing that was there. Everything else was grass, and you won't conflict with parking required for the restaurant because it seems like they're pretty busy. MR. RUDENKO-Yes, they can get pretty busy in July, up until about August 15tH MR. FERONE-1 mean, they've got plenty of parking on the Ridge Road side. MR. RUDENKO-Yes. There is. I think I show some excess parking. MR. DEEB-They're looking for 10 years. We talked about this for the last one, about 10 years. I thought we did five. MRS. MOORE-The applicant has an agreement with that tenant or that property owner for 10 years. MR. DEEB-All right. So our approval would be based on how many years? MRS. MOORE-That is up to the Board. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, it's up to us to decide. I had a similar thought. I don't know if we've ever provided a 10 year approval. MR. DEEB-Yes, we discussed this with the last one we had, the one up on Ridge Road. MR. HUNSINGER-Did we give it 10 years? MR. DEEB-No. I think we gave them five. MR. FERONE-We gave them five. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. Any other comments on the term? Any other questions or comments from the Board? Okay. We do have a public hearing scheduled this evening. Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to address the Board? No hands. Written comments? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-We'll open the public hearing and let the record show no comments were received. We will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-Any further discussion from the Board? MR. RUDENKO-May I just comment on the request for the 10 years? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, go ahead. MR. RUDENKO-Well, we have, I come here regularly. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, we know. MR. RUDENKO-We have the Aviation, the Church of Christ on Aviation Road and the Elks Lodge and this would be our third location in Queensbury. I like coming here but I'm trying to cut down on the number of trips where I have to come back because the agreement is non- binding between the owner and myself. I mean, if the property changes hands a new owner could say, that's it, you're out of here, or the owner may not be satisfied with our agreement at any given moment. He could say, well, without notice, I'm sure he'd give us three or five weeks' notice, but at any time he could say, well, I'm not happy with the way this is working out, you're taking up too many parking spaces or you're way too busy and my customers don't have, when they show up for lunch or dinner there's no parking places because of your business. So there's a lot of flexibility. Of course, and then again if the business, Route 149 is very, very odd. We opened one location on 149 where the first year we were extremely busy. It was the 22 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) star of all of our locations. The next year it dropped by 50%. The third year it went down by another 25%, and that was our last year there. So there are so many variables that come into play. I would appreciate the option of the 10 years, if it please the Board. That raises another question. I'm going to be 70 years old next year. My wife, of course she's 20 years younger than me and my youngest daughter who's a partner in the business is 17. So I was hoping when I come back for the Queensbury Church of Christ and down the road for the Elks Lodge, I was going to ask for 25 years, because maybe I'll bring my wife and let her get it in her name, but the point is if the businesses are established and he Church is happy and the Elks Lodge is happy, if everybody's happy, we will keep going on and on. It won't be in to perpetuity. Eventually somebody will have to come back in here and get the application re-upped, but I would just appreciate a little flexibility. MR. FERONE-Would it be advantageous to you to get all three lined up so that they're all on the same schedule, instead of having to come back three times for three different sites? MR. RUDENKO-Yes, if that would work out, but it's like calling prescriptions in to Wal-Mart. MRS. MOORE-We'd have to, as Staff, we'd have to do a little bit of research and they'd come in for a site plan modification basically to align the dates, basically. MR. DEEB-And if that were done, then I would say we'd go five years and agree to go another five years, just without. How did you do it the last time? You just came in, you had to come back in. MRS. MOORE-It's the same thing, it would be the same process. MR. DEEB-The same thing, but we're not trying to limit what you can do. MR. FERONE-Would he be able to come in and have all three all done together at one time? MRS. MOORE-1 believe if the applicant currently standing, come in for a site plan modification, and have all of them lined up, then the applicant could say I have, from now, from this point further, we'll attend to this every 10 years, and then you'd see that set of applications come back every 10 years. So I think it's possible through a modification, and that's something that the applicant can explore. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MRS. MOORE-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Certainly it would be in your best interest. MR. DEEB-Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-And then you wouldn't have to worry, well, am I up this year or next year or, you know, yes. MR. FERONE-And the other two seem to be ongoing. MR. RUDENKO-Yes, they are. MR. DEEB-Well, didn't last year we just do the one at the Elk's Lodge? MR. RUDENKO-No, this year will be our third year at the Elk's Lodge. Third year, time passes so fast. MR. HUNSINGER-It does. MR. RUDENKO-This season will be our third year. MR. HUNSINGER-So, I mean, personally my own feeling is I can see it kind of both ways. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan encourages farm stands. I don't know if we've ever turned one down. I don't think we've ever asked for any significant modifications. We've pretty much approved what gets proposed. Added to that, it's kind of hard to imagine what may go wrong that would cause us to not approve it, you know, unless there was some, you know, major traffic issue, but it's kind of hard to imagine that happening with a seasonal farm stand. 23 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. RUDENKO-Regarding the traffic issues, the three locations, if this location is approved, they have some most ample parking and the best ingress and egress from the site. They're relatively safe compared to some of our other locations. One of them's downright dangerous in Kingsbury, but it's also our busiest location. These three, there's plenty of existing parking. MR. MAGOWAN-They're used to that traffic out there anyway. MR. RUDENKO-Are you familiar with across from Falls Farm and Garden? That's a speedway. MR. HUNSINGER-But then the flipside is we've never approved one for more than five years. MR. DEEB-We didn't do the last one for more than five years. It wouldn't be fair to him. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. DEEB-He asked for 10 and we did not give it to him. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. MR. DEEB-So I think we should remain consistent as a Board. MR. HUNSINGER-Give them five. MR. DEEB-And then get everything lined up and come back in and you only have to do it once every five years for all three of them. You just get a modified site plan. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. So whenever your next one is up, which would probably be the one at the Elk's, in two years. MR. RUDENKO-After this season there'd be two more years remaining on the Elk's Lodge. MR. HUNSINGER-So when you come back for the Elk's, you can have this modified and your other one modified so that they all would be up at the same time. MR. DEEB-What about the Aviation Road? When's that due. MR. RUDENKO-That's what I'm thinking, two more years there also. MR. HUNSINGER-I think we just extended that one last year. MR. DEEB-I can't remember. There were so many. MR. HUNSINGER-Jamie thinks it was last year, too. MR. DEEB-I thought it was last year. I thought we talked to you last year. We might not have. I don't know, but I think that's the way we should probably go. MR. HUNSINGER-I'm looking at the draft resolution here. I don't see where it has the term. MRS. MOORE-It's not subject to a term. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-So that's something that the Board has done through consistency. MR. DEEB-We need to add that. MRS. MOORE-It's not part of the Code requirements. MR. MAGOWAN-So could we add it? MRS. MOORE-As a condition, yes. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. FERONE-We approve this for five years and it's up to the applicant to try to line up the other two so he only has to come here once. 24 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. DEEB-Yes, it'll be a site plan modification and then he'll have them all lined up, and I would be okay if it was two years from now to have all of them for five years from that date. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. RUDENKO-You're saying you will approve this location here at the Adirondack Bar and Grill for five years, which means the last year would be in 2020. So when the Elk's Lodge on Cronin Road comes up in 2018, what will happen at that point? It won't be for five years, it'll be for two years? MR. HUNSINGER-Ask to have this one and the one at the Church modified so that they all would have five years from that date. MR. DEEB-From that date on. MR. RUDENKO-What date? What year specifically? MR. DEEB-Whichever comes up first, all right. Then we'll modify the other two so that they'll all be approved for five years, which would be 2023, for all of them. MR. RUDENKO-All of them. MR. DEEB-Right. So you'd only have to come back once. MR. MAGOWAN-So when you come back for one of them, you'll have to get an application for modification on the other ones. Right? MS. WHITE-The other two. MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. MAGOWAN-With the other ones, and then we'll modify them all from five years on from that. MR. DEEB-We're trying to make it as efficient as possible for you. You'd only have to come back once. MR. RUDENKO-All right. So if I come back in 2018 for just Cronin Road, I can throw in the Aviation Road property and this one and go for five years. So I only have to do that once to make the adjustment and then every five years after that. Yes, that would be good. Yes. MR. DEEB-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. RUDENKO-So it would only be one $100 fee? MRS. MOORE-That's something that we'll have to review. MR. RUDENKO-All right. That sounds reasonable. That would simplify things for me. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. It would make it easier for you. MR. MAGOWAN-But you did write down for a modification. MR. RUDENKO-Application for modification. MR. MAGOWAN-Right. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. RUDENKO-And I would obtain this from you, Laura? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. DEEB-Laura will work with you. 25 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. RUDENKO-So I'd have to actually get two applications for modification, one for Aviation Road and one for Cronin Road. MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. RUDENKO-All right. MR. DEEB-We'll get you straightened out. Laura's really good at this. MR. HUNSINGER-All right. Would anyone like to make a motion? RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 75-2016 WILLIAM RUDENKO The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to place a 20 ft. x 20 ft. canopy structure on an existing lot for a produce stand. The stand we operated seasonally for 10 years per agreement. Site also contains a restaurant. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, produce stands shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016, and continued the public hearing to 3/22/2016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 75-2016 WILLIAM RUDENKO, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone: Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted: 2 Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; b) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; C) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; d) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. e) This approval is for a five year stand. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. 26 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. RUDENKO-Thank you very much. MR. DEEB-You're welcome. SITE PLAN PZ 81-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED APEX SOLAR POWER OWNER(S) BENJAMIN ARONSON ZONING MS LOCATION 64 MAIN STREET APPLICANT PROPOSES TO RENOVATE THE EXISTING WEST SIDE PARKING AND RENOVATION OF THE FRONT FACADE. INTERNAL ALTERATIONS OF OFFICE AREA. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-30-040 & 179-7-030 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ALTERATIONS TO COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP64-2015, SUP64-2015, SP21-2012, AV 10-02, SP 49-99, AV 83-99, SP 22- 97, AV 19-97, US 18-97, UV 14-94, AV 15-94, AV 94-92, AV 29-92, AV 1287, VAR. 777 WARREN CO. REFERRAL MARCH 2016 LOT SIZE 1.272 ACRE WEST SIDE & 0.496 ACRES EAST SIDE TAX MAP NO. 309.10-1-10 SECTION 179-3-040 & 179-7-030 ANDY ALLISON, SARA TUTTLE & STAN DOBERT, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. The applicant proposes to renovate the existing west side parking area and renovation of the front facade and internal alterations of the office area are proposed. I did speak with the applicant today. We talked about some of the items under the summary where I suggested that additional information on signage materials be provided. The applicant has indicated it's a metal sign with gooseneck lighting that's going to be installed. There's a proposal for a sidewalk access from the building to Main Street is being considered and probably will show up on the final plans. The dumpster area screening materials. It's understood that there's no chain link fencing to be installed and the applicant will decide what sort of features will be used to screen the dumpster area. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MS. TUTTLE-Good evening. MR. HUNSINGER-If you could identify yourselves for the record. MS. TUTTLE-Okay. I'm Sara Tuttle and I am an architect from AJ Architecture and Planning. I'm here with Stan. MR. DOBERT-Stan Dobert. MR. ALLISON-And Andy Allison with AJ Architecture and Planning. MS. TUTTLE-So we're proposing to do some exterior modifications as well as interior modifications for Apex Solar Power. There's also been significant parking plan changes to try to make that work better as well. We're proposing a new conference room to close in the existing loading dock that's on the site, which will be glass and large glass facades on the front of the building as well to really make that look a lot better. The existing building itself looked not so good before so we've really jazzed it up with some new facades, makes that a lot friendlier and keeps in scale with the surrounding buildings and some of the new buildings that are going up. We've tried to match all of the new planning requirements as far as we possibly can, as far as we have not changed the existing footprint of the building. So we were kind of restricted in some of the aspects of what we could do, but we met every requirement as far as we could. MR. ALLISON-We did present the project I think at the last meeting. So I don't know if you want us to walk through a detailed review of the design. We certainly can do that, but we're here to sort of answer the questions that may come up I think at this point. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. MAGOWAN-I'll never forget that. It was a beautiful design. I love it. I just, I like the look and it's going to turn that building right around. MR. FERONE-1 agree. MR. DEEB-It's a very attractive building. MR. ALLISON-She did it. 27 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. MAGOWAN-Your presentation was very nice. You can tell you were very intent but nervous. MS. TUTTLE-Public speaking isn't really my thing yet. MR. MAGOWAN-You have a great eye for design, though. The rest will come. MR. HUNSINGER-Can you comment on the few comments that Staff had regarding the sign materials, sidewalk access to Main Street, dumpster screening? MS. TUTTLE-So the sign materials we're proposing new metal signs. The existing signs that were there, if you'll remember we had some problems with it at our sketch meeting because they were interiorly lit, internally lit. So we plan on replacing them with new metal signs. It's new exterior lighting on the building to light the signs. The dumpster screening will not be chain link fence. It'll probably be wood. MR. ALLISON-We'll probably do a wood stockade fence around that, and the same for the property line fence. MS. TUTTLE-And then the connection to Main Street, Stan's exploring that option. I believe right now there's existing sidewalk connecting our proposed parking to the front of the building, and that's a green space, and that's where the existing sidewalk that's already going down Main Street will remain. So we could explore some more options connecting that sidewalk to the main sidewalk, if that was desired by the Board. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, you have an ADA compliant sidewalk that runs parallel with the front of the building, but doesn't connect down to the Main Street sidewalk. So it seems like there's certain space to have some sort of connection. I think that's all we're looking for. MR. ALLISON-We could easily take that sidewalk that runs parallel to the east side of the building and just extend that straight out to this. MR. DEEB-Traffic flow, you've got an ingress from Main Street, but there will be no egress on that, at that area. MR. ALLISON-Right, and the new parking. MR. DEEB-And the new parking lot on the west side. You go in, you come around, you go back out on the other side. How are you going to keep that as a one way? MR. ALLISON-Well, that side is mainly for Stan's workers. So that's also going to, we're going to have to control that with some signage, a service and employee entrance only. MR. DEEB-Any trucks entering that way? MR. ALLISON-His own, probably his box trucks would come in. MR. DEEB-They won't come in from the other side, from the side street? MR. DOBERT-They come in from both directions, both entrances. MRS. MOORE-This is a two way entrance on Second Street. MR. DEEB-Yes. I know that. MR. ALLISON-Second Street is two way and the one on Main Street is just one way in. MR. DEEB-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions or comments from the Board? MR. DEEB-I think he's trying to fit in with the Main Street concept. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, I do, too. MR. DEEB-And again, you did a good job there. 28 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. HUNSINGER-1 mean, it already looks a lot better. MR. DEEB-And everything going on on that road, I think it's starting to come along. I think if Bob Sears was here, I think he'd be happy. MR. HUNSINGER-If there's no other questions or comments from the Board, we do have a public hearing scheduled this evening. Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to address the Board? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-And the only other item is in reference to the engineering comments. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. MR. DEEB-There were a lot of those. MR. HUNSINGER-Did you have any comments on the engineering comments that are right in front of you? It's mostly related to stormwater. MR. DOBERT-1 spoke with Tom Jarrett about it and we reviewed all the items and the main points that Chazen had were compliance with New York State, and everything is compliant, but he just had some comments. There's an infiltration of the swale which should require a per test, from what they said, but it's the same as the east side parking lot that we just did. It's the same make up. So most likely a per test a couple of hundred feet away isn't going to be necessary. That was one thing, and that was really, you know, there's an endangered species thing that you have to provide, and an architect, historical. So there's no endangered species that we know of. MR. ALLISON-Yes, those should just be quick researches. MR. DEEB-But you haven't gotten those yet. MR. DOBERT-No, he's got half of them done but it's a little, we'll get all of them take care of for sure. Nothing crazy that was sticking out. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. So the new light on the sign, what will that consist of? MS. TUTTLE-The new lighting for the sign, there is no like monument signs. There's the two on the building which you can see up there. They're going to be cut offs. MR. ALLISON-Those will be LED dark sky compliant. We'll light those from above, shine back on the building. We're not going to come up and light from the ground. MRS. MOORE-This version that's up here is from the sketch version. I don't have the version that they submitted with their application. So that's in your packets. I don't have it on this laser fiche. MR. DOBERT-The existing sign, is there an issue with the existing sign? Is there something that you don't like about it. Because we did pay for them and they work and, you know, in order to put the siding up we have to take the signs down and then I figure just put the signs back up. MR. HUNSINGER-So the metal signs that you talked about a couple of minutes ago are the ones that are there now? MR. DOBERT-These are metal signs. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Yes, the sign issue was the one that was going to be internally lit. MR. MAGOWAN-Isn't that what they are? MRS. MOORE-No. The versions that they provided in your materials is an externally lit sign with goosenecks. So very similar to the Dollar General. 29 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. MAGOWAN-That's what I thought. I just wanted some clarification. MR. HUNSINGER-Anything else from the Board? This is an Unlisted SEQR action. The applicant did submit a Short Form. Before we consider that we'll need to close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-Let the record show no comments were received. Are there any environmental concerns that we have not discussed? Any items that may be considered a moderate to large impact? Okay. There is a draft SEQR resolution in our packets if anyone would like to move it. RESOLUTION GRANTING A NEGATIVE SEQR DEC SP PZ 81-2016 APEX SOLAR POWER The applicant proposes to renovate the existing west side parking and renovation of the front facade. Internal alterations of office area. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-7-030 of the Zoning Ordinance, alterations to commercial building and site development of a previously approved plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 81-2016 APEX SOLAR POWER, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by David Deeb; As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part 11 of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-So there's a draft resolution. The couple of items that aren't included in there is the sidewalk access to Main Street and then the fencing along the dumpster area and buffer, and the applicant has indicated the placement of the stockade, and that they would extend the sidewalk from the front of the building to the Main Street. Was there anything else that we need to put in there? It already has language relative to the engineering signoff. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 81-2016 APEX SOLAR POWER The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to renovate the existing west side parking and renovation of the front facade. Internal alterations of office area. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-7-030 of the Zoning Ordinance, alterations to commercial 30 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) building and site development of a previously approved plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016, and continued the public hearing to 3/22/2016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 81-2016 APEX SOLAR POWER; Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) Waivers requested granted; 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. f) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; g) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; h) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; i) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. j) The applicant will extend the sidewalk down the east side to access Main Street. k) A stockade fence around the dumpster. I) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: 31 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. Good luck. MS. TUTTLE-Thank you. MR. DOBERT-Thank you. SITE PLAN PZ 88-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED TOM ROSECRANS & SUSAN BEDDLE D/B/A TRSB ENTERPRISES AGENT(S) HIGHLANDER ENGINEERING OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING CLI LOCATION LOT 2, 54 CAREY ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP AN EXISTING VACANT SITE WITH AN 8,400 SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND INFRASTRUCTURE. COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR ROCK SPORT CLIMBING, YOGA, INDOOR RECREATION USAGE. PROJECT INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP 43-2003 WAREHOUSE-FLAGGED FOR CO NEEDED WARREN CO. REFERRAL N/A LOT SIZE 2.437 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 308.20-1-3.5 SECTION 179-3-040 DAN BRUNO, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT; TOM ROSECRANS, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. I'll read this and maybe the Board can take a minute and I can sign some things. The applicant proposes to develop an existing vacant site with an 8,400 square foot commercial building with associated parking and infrastructure. The commercial building is for a Rock Sport climbing and yoga center and an indoor recreational usage. The project also includes at this time an on-site septic system. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MR. BRUNO-Good evening. I'm Dan Bruno with Highlander Engineering representing TRSB Enterprises. MR. ROSECRANS-Tom Rosecrans, president and emperor of Rock Sport. KEN STANKEVICH MR. STANKEVICH-I'm Ken Stankevich. Stankevich Architecture. MR. HUNSINGER-Thank you. MR. BRUNO-TRSB, Tom and his wife are proposing a rock climbing fitness facility at 54 Carey Road, and as I stated in the introductory letter here if you want to look at the facility's an 8400 square foot building, two levels. There's a lower level in the front which will house the yoga room, offices, and then probably 2/3 ds of the back portion of the building is probably 50, 55 feet in height. That's where the actual rock climbing will occur in that area. We have, I talked to, met with the Town engineer, Chris Harrington regarding sewer and water. There's a water service extended across the road right at that location which we'll tie into. That will serve the fire protection and the domestic water. I had been advised by a couple of different people or entities that there is a possibility of municipal sewer being extended up there. However, at this time, that's in flux. We're not really sure what's going to happen with that. So we have designed a standard, if you will, septic system, although it's not standard, soils being what they are here, perc a little too fast for a standard design. It's going to be a mound type system. So I've designed that, but if it comes to pass that municipal sewer would be available before the completion of this project then we would probably tie in to that. There is no landscaping per se. In keeping with the nature, aspect of rock climbing, the owners desire to keep as much of the natural vegetation, woods, etc. there. That lends itself to rock climbing, you know, you think of rock climbing, you're outdoors, maybe the mountains, whatever. So we want to keep as much of that natural vegetation, some tall trees. I've included some photographs in here, if you're not familiar with the area. 32 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. FERONE-Well, there's plenty of vegetation there. MR. BRUNO-Yes. So anyway, landscaping, if you want to call it that, is limited to some what we call river stone. I don't know if you're familiar with that, between the sidewalk and the building, a strip about four or five feet wide. It's multi-color stone sort of small cobblestone type stuff. Parking has been designed in accordance with the Town regulations there. It's based on the square footage and the occupancy. We've provided, I think, more than what would be required by strict calculations. The reason I'm mentioning that, we did not show the dumpster location on the plans at this time, but probably on the west side of the building around the back, accessed off that parking lot, would be a small path with a dumpster there. If need be, we'll just block off one parking space for service to that. MR. HUNSINGER-Do you think you'll need a dumpster? MR. ROSECRANS-Well, I'm hoping not. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. BRUNO-They're not serving any food or anything. MR. MAGOWAN-You should be able to do it with a couple of totes. MR. ROSECRANS-We would like that to happen, and we want to be, I mean, where we are now, we have to be environmentally sound because we only have 1100 square feet at the Sports Page. I don't know if you're familiar with where we are now, and space is so tight. So recycle and minimize our. MR. MAGOWAN-You probably have that carry in, carry out policy. MR. HUNSINGER-I mean, if you're not going to need a dumpster, you don't need to show one on your plan, but if you are going to need one then you need to show one that complies with the Code. MR. BRUNO-Exactly, and we're not really there yet. If it comes to pass that we need one, we'll have to modify that site plan. Additionally, on the site plan we have tried to make it, the access to it friendly, pedestrian wise, etc. That's why I mentioned there's a crushed stone walkway/bikeway off Carey Road into the site to encourage people traveling by bike or foot, what have you, into the site. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Questions, comments from the Board? MR. FERONE-What are your hours of operation? Is it a five day? MR. ROSECRANS-We're going to open like ten in the morning until ten at night. MR. DEEB-Seven days a week? MR. ROSECRANS-We don't do that now because we're just rock climbing. So it's more afterschool, you know, four to ten during the week, weekends. So our busiest hours will probably be when everybody else leaves the development. MR. TRAVER-What about signage? MR. BRUNO-We haven't gotten to that point just yet. We've talked about it, but we realize, if it comes to pass, they probably will have some signage, we'll need another application. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, as long as it's compliant. MR. BRUNO-Yes. MR. MAGOWAN-A little suggestion. When you're digging in that, if you come across a big rock, put it out there and then have it edged, you know. MR. ROSECRANS-Well, I was thinking of getting some sort of like pillar and standing it upright and putting that out. MR. HUNSINGER-We like rocks. 33 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. ROSECRANS-Me, too. MR. HUNSINGER-1 mean, my main comment was on landscaping, and you addressed that, but, you know, rocks are landscaping, too. So, but it would be nice to see some sort of vegetation other than just gravel. MR. FERONE-Do you have any options for signage on Corinth Road so that, you know, people would be directed to your business? MR. ROSECRANS-I'm not all that, I don't think we need it in this day and age. I thought that, oh, I'm going to have to have it, you know, why not have it, but in this day and age most of the people who come in our place are, and I'm an old fart so I don't get it, but, you know, my kids do, the kids do. MR. DEEB-Number Four on the comments, the project engineer states that the building is 8400 square feet, but the information on the hydroCAD indicates it's 10,900 square feet? MR. BRUNO-That's a mistake. I'm addressing those. I did the hydroCAD. MR. DEEB-What is the building? MR. BRUNO-The building's 8400 square feet. MR. DEEB-Okay. MR. BRUNO-But actually the footprint is, what, 7200. The building footprint is 8400 square feet, but there's a mezzanine in there. So that mezzanine bumps it up a little, but that was incorrect. To be honest with you, I don't know how they got in there with. Additionally on those comments, the septic system, the stormwater, etc. were based on historic data from when the original subdivision was designed, the test pits and perc rates. Those, the perc rates, etc., will be confirmed prior to construction. We'll get in there. When we initiated the design the ground was frozen and what not. We couldn't get anybody to get in there and eat up any of their equipment with the frost, but anyway, we will confirm that and submit that data regarding seasonal high groundwater level and also the perc. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. I mean, that whole park is all sand. MR. BRUNO-Right. That's good for the stormwater, bad for the septic. Mechanically, there will be one large air handling unit inside the northern two thirds. MRS. MOORE-Do you want me to do the interior? MR. BRUNO-Sure. The point I'm going to make here is that most of the mechanical will be contained inside the building. There won't be any rooftop units, exterior units. There'll be possibly a couple of small condensing units outside because the one large unit on the northern portion of the building, the portion with the rock climbing wall, there's a large unit only behind the wall interior with a louver, intake louver, exhaust louver. Then there'll be two smaller units, one in the mechanical room and possibly one on the mezzanine against the wall to serve those areas there. Those two small units may require an exterior small condensing unit, which would be placed outside. Back to your point, Mr. Hunsinger. Regarding the landscaping, if that's what the Board desires, you know, we can add some shrubs or whatever to the front. MR. DEEB-It can't hurt. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, you know, it's one of those things where, I mean, it's an industrial park, but all of the other uses, all of the other site plans that we've reviewed, we required them to have some sort of landscaping plan. I don't know, I bring it up for discussion. I'm not sure how strongly I feel about it, but it is worth discussing. MR. BRUNO-We have not done that because, again, it was the owners desire to have it look as natural as possible, but whatever the Board feels. MR. FERONE-Are you going to keep the development, the disturbance tight so that you're just going to in with the building, your parking, etc. MR. BRUNO-Exactly. Right. MR. ROSECRANS-Keeping as much of the existing vegetation as possible will remain. 34 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. BRUNO-And the areas that are disturbed will be graded, top soiled and seeded, but, you're right, we're trying to minimize it as much as possible. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, it is a metal building. I applaud you for trying to keep the vegetation as close as you can to the building. With those pines and that in there, you're going to have definitely a moss problem. That'll be one thing, and I'm more concerned of the sun not getting enough, you know, for the parking lot and stuff like that, or it would be icier in the winter. Just thoughts for you, not for me. Those are the two things I've come up with, because I've dealt with people that, you know, want the trees right up to the building. MR. BRUNO-There's roughly 50 feet around that we need to provide access for fire and emergency access. So there is some distance there. It is indicated on the site plan. MR. MAGOWAN-But, you know, some spruce around there just to break it up, just so it's not a metal building in the middle of the woods, you know. MR. ROSECRANS-Yes, we want it to look better than the other buildings that are back in there. They're more spread out so they can clear cut, you know, we're going up more. When you look at it from the road you'd be looking at it through the trees somewhat, and what we saw is that the trees are much higher than the top of the building's going to be. So I won't be able to see it from skiing at West Mountain if that ever happened. MR. HUNSINGER-How high are the rock climbing walls? MR. ROSECRANS-They'll be 45 feet. MR. HUNSINGER-Wow. MR. DEEB-They'll have harnesses, right? I'm sure they'll have to have harnesses. MR. HUNSINGER-Here I was thinking I might go try it. MR. BRUNO-There's a variety of wall heights in the facility for different climbing abilities. So Tom can address that more than I, but it's not all 45 feet inside there. That is the highest part there. MS. WHITE-How high are they on current facility? MR. ROSECRANS-Twenty-four feet. MR. DEEB-A little more of a challenge. I can't wait to see it. MR. ROSECRANS-Me, too. The layout is, the high wall is on the north side and then you can explain. MR. ROSECRANS-It kind of tapers down around the sides. There's like a new bouldering it, they don't use ropes, but they do really hard stuff close to the ground. So that'll be like 12 feet tall, and there'll be a freestanding boulder that they can get on top of and climb down the back of and then big stuff in the middle and then what we call kiddie city on the side which would be kind of like what we have now. MS. WHITE-You have a relationship with the College with the Adventure Sports program at SUNY Adirondack. MR. ROSECRANS-SUNY Adirondack, yes. MS. WHITE-And that will continue? MR. ROSECRANS-Most definitely. I teach all the courses. They've got to come. MRS. MOORE-The one thing you mentioned that you'd have a pathway into the site. Is there a proposed bike rack? MR. BRUNO-Yes. MR. DEEB-Nice, cater to bicyclists, naturalists. 35 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. ROSECRANS-Parents are going to be psyched that their kids can ride bikes to it now, because Quaker Road is not the greatest thing in the world. MR. BRUNO-We have shown a somewhat minimal bike rack but as the need arises it will be expanded. MR. HUNSINGER-Any comments from the Board? MS. WHITE-Will there be opportunities for other fitness things? I mean, just in this one briefly you mentioned, you know, that they're starting to associate with yoga. MR. BRUNO-There is like a yoga room in there at this point. MR. DEEB-Are you going to have hot yoga? MR. ROSECRANS-No. I like yoga. I don't like hot yoga. MR. HUNSINGER-Any other questions from the Board? We do have a public hearing scheduled. Anyone in the audience wish to address the Board on this project? There are people left. Any written comments, Laura? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There were no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. We'll open the public hearing and we will close the public hearing, and let the record show no comments were received. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-Anything else that we didn't talk about, and I'm not sure how we want to leave the landscaping discussion. MR. DEEB-If something would fit in there that Tom would like. I know he's got a vision of what he wants. I know you said you'd like to have some landscaping. MR. HUNSINGER-Like I said, I brought it up for discussion. I'm not sure how strongly I feel. MR. DEEB-I'm sure the other buildings around there were made to have landscaping, too, for approval. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, but he's also trying to project an image. MR. DEEB-I know that. It's a natural image. I'm okay with it. MR. HUNSINGER-1 can appreciate it as well. MR. BRUNO-He may, after it's completed, developed, he may step back and look at it. MR. DEEB-Look at it and say I need something here, here, and here. MR. HUNSINGER-So I don't know if you're familiar with the Stewart's here on Bay Road. They have some boulders at the edge of the parking area, and when they came in for a modification we had asked them about that and they said, well, do you like them or not like them and we said we like them. They kept them, but that might be a feature that you might want to consider. MR. ROSECRANS-We have them outside our building, outside our entrance right now, but I'm not moving them. MR. HUNSINGER-So unless you uncover some, you're probably not going to have any boulders. MR. ROSECRANS-The lot's about this size, by the way. MR. FERONE-It's all sand in that area. I don't think there's any rocks. MR. HUNSINGER-So is the Board okay with what's been proposed? 36 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. DEEB-Yes, I'm excited. MR. HUNSINGER-Do you have the SEQR resolution ready? This is a SEQR Unlisted action, and the applicant submitted a Short Form. Are there any outstanding environmental concerns that the Board has? MR. DEEB-No. MR. HUNSINGER-Go ahead. RESOLUTION GRANTING A NEGATIVE SEQR DECLARATION SP PZ 88-2016 ROSECRANS The applicant proposes to develop an existing vacant site with an 8,400 sq. ft. commercial building with associated parking and infrastructure. Commercial building for rock sport climbing, yoga, indoor recreation usage. Project includes installation of an on-site septic system. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial development shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 88-2016 TRSB ENTERPRISES, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver; As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-Would anyone like to, we did have some engineering comments we didn't ask you about, though. They mostly relate to your stormwater. MR. BRUNO-I will address those. There's nothing there. MR. HUNSINGER-Nothing stuck out. Okay. Would anyone like to make a motion? RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 88-2016 ROSECRANS & BEDDLE d/b/a TRSB ENTERPRISES The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to develop an existing vacant site with an 8,400 sq. ft. commercial building with associated parking and infrastructure. Commercial building for rock sport climbing, yoga, indoor recreation usage. 37 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) Project includes installation of an on-site septic system. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial development shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016, and continued the public hearing to 3/22/2016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 88-2016 TRSB ENTERPRISES, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) Waivers requested granted; 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. f) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; g) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; h) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; i) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. j) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger 38 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf SITE PLAN PZ 92-2016 SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 82-2016 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED RAY & WENDY KRAFT OWNER(S) RAY & WENDY KRAFT ZONING WR LOCATION PRIVATE RD. 1 OFF CLEVERDALE ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES A SIX SLIP CLASS A MARINA. APPLICANT PROPOSES NINE PARKING SPACES AT THIS TIME WITH PORTABLE REFUSE UNITS, RESTROOM FACILITIES ARE AT EXISTING HOME AT 46 CLEVERDALE ROAD. PROJECT SUBJECT TO LAKE GEORGE PARK COMMISSION REVIEW FOR CLASS A MARINA. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-10-160 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, LOT ARRANGEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE MARINA USAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE N/A WARREN C.O. REFERRAL MARCH 2016 APA, CEA, OTHER LOT SIZE 2.28 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 240.9-1-16.12 SECTION 179-10-060 RAY &WENDY KRAFT, PRESENT MR. HUNSINGER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. The applicant proposes a six slip Class A Marina. The applicant proposes nine parking spaces at this time with portable refuse containers. Restroom facilities are at the existing home at 46 Cleverdale, and the project is subject to Lake George Park Commission review for Class A Marinas, and at this time the Lake George Park Commission has their application and it's under review and no different than this application being part of this Board, both are being reviewed at the same time. MR. HUNSINGER-Good evening. MR. KRAFT-Hi. I'm Ray Kraft. MRS. KRAFT-I'm Wendy Kraft. MR. HUNSINGER-Do you want to tell us about your project? MR. MAGOWAN-No cookies? MRS. KRAFT-It's not Friday. MR. MAGOWAN-That's right. MR. KRAFT-We've got a lot on Cleverdale for sale and it's been on the market for seven years. My mother used to rent docks there, and we just, when she died, we just didn't renew the commercial permit she had on it. We figured it would sell quick. Well seven years later it didn't. So we just decided to fix the docks up and rent them until we can get it sold. So that's where we're at. I've talked to the guys over at the Park Commission and I'm on the schedule for next month for the Marina permit and I'm waiting 15 days on the public notice part of it for the neighbors on either side that may have any comment. MR. HUNSINGER-So how far are you going to move those, the comment that you're going to move the one dock away from the garage. MR. KRAFT-That one is still going to, the grip part of it is still going to go right down the edge of the rock, and the "H" used to go to the north. Now the "H" is going to go to the back. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. KRAFT-And then the single finger is just going to go over right to the 20 foot setback on the south side, just so I can get folks in here safely, and then as soon as it sells, it would be up to the, you know, most people that are going to spend that kind of money on a piece of property, it's a lot that's pre-approved by the Town for a 4,000 square foot house. So whoever buys the lot and builds the house probably won't renew the marina permit on it anyway if they're going to have it for private use. So it's just a matter of getting it sold and Davies has had it for seven years. MRS. KRAFT-And we're paying $12,000 a year taxes on that lot. 39 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. HUNSINGER-1 saw that in your application. MR. KRAFT-So we're just trying to help the sale, that's all. MR. FERONE-Sure. Are you going to clear off some of that area where those cars are going to park that use the docks down there? MR. KRAFT-Down there? No. MR. FERONE-Just park there? MR. KRAFT-Yes, there used to be a gravel path down there, but I'll have to clean it all up, but I haven't bothered to do anything until I get approval from both agencies to do what I want to do. MR. FERONE-And that's all it's going to be is a path down? MR. KRAFT-Yes. MR. FERONE-Because it seemed kind of steep, you know, going down. MR. KRAFT-Well, depending on which way you go in, but I'll grade it off. Seeing as it's already pre-approved for all that stuff, you know, it's what I have to do to make it easy to get down there. I'll do that. One of the papers that was submitted for the Lake George Park Commission was part of that pre-approval stuff that I went through for this. I probably went through this Board and all the other ones. It took four years almost to get the approval on that, on all that. MR. HUNSINGER-1 vaguely remember it. MR. FERONE-Are you going to have like eight slips or something like that? MR. KRAFT-Six. MR. FERONE-Six. Okay. MR. KRAFT-Yes. MR. FERONE-Do you have a boat? MR. KRAFT-I have a pontoon boat that I was out on it once last year. The kids go out more than we do. MRS. KRAFT-We work, all the time. MR. DEEB-The kids don't. MR. KRAFT-Well, when you borrow almost a million bucks to buy your sister out of the estate, and you're paying four to six thousand a month on that because you can't sell this lot to pay it off, it's tough, and I'm 65 years old. Everything's getting old, and I'd like to retire, or at least slow down. So now is the point when you do everything you can do to kind of bring a little more revenue to help pay the, you know. It's not you, but all this money is going to the Town of Queensbury. It's the taxes and so you do everything you can do to, you know, we really don't own the property. We lease it from. MRS. KRAFT-The Town and County. MR. KRAFT-So you do your best, and that's why we're back in here. We went seven years thinking it would sell and didn't bother to rent the docks. Now we're at a point where we almost have to. So are there any comments from anybody? MR. FERONE-It's a nice piece of property. I don't know why it's not selling. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, it's a beautiful piece of property. MR. KRAFT-I can't figure it out either. MRS. KRAFT-The bank doesn't like to loan money on just property, when it's a million dollars. So it's going to have to take somebody with deep pockets. 40 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. KRAFT-But most of those places up there are going for cash anyway. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, I was going to say, how many houses do people buy and then knock them down. I mean, with yours it's already cleared. MRS. KRAFT-I know, and this is two and a quarter acres, too. MR. KRAFT-It's cleared and pre-approved, and where do you find over two acres for a building lot on Lake George. MR. HUNSINGER-Right. Yes, you don't. MR. KRAFT-So, there's where we're at. We want to put two boaters down there, and they're just going to park on the grass. Like I said, there's no need to do really anything to it other than what you have to do to make it safe for them to get down to the docks, and put the new docks in, because whoever buys it is going to tear it up anyway and then the bathroom facilities, you can walk across the street to the house and that's where they're going to. MRS. KRAFT-Most of the boats that'll be there are going to be 30 footers. They all have their own bathrooms. MR. KRAFT-We have assigned slips between the Lake George Boat Company and the Yard Arm. MRS. KRAFT-For pump out. MR. KRAFT-Yes. MR. FERONE-And you said your neighbors are going to be okay on either side there? MR. KRAFT-On my north is my cousin and I've never even talked to the guy that just bought the place on the south. MR. FERONE-That seems to be the farthest away, though. MRS. KRAFT-We don't rent to kids. All of our people are our age or maybe 10 years younger, but there's no teens. There's no kids. So it's a nice group of people. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, after a 30 foot boat and dock rental, there aren't too many kids nowadays that can afford that. MRS. KRAFT-No, and you know we're finding more and more that the adults don't let their teenage kids come on up and use the boat because it's too big an investment. So once upon a time we had to worry about that, but not anymore. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Any other comments or concerns? MR. FERONE-It seems pretty straightforward. MR. HUNSINGER-We have a public hearing scheduled. There's no one left in the audience. Were there any written comments, Laura? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. We'll open the public hearing and close the public hearing and let the record show no comments were received. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. HUNSINGER-This is an Unlisted action. They did submit the Short Form. Are there any, I mean, it is a Critical Environmental Area, but are there any specific environmental concerns that the Board may have? There is a draft SEQR resolution in the packet if anyone would like to move that. RESOLUTION GRANTING A NEGATIVE SEQR DECLARATION PZ 92-2016 & SUP 82-2016 KRAFT 41 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) The applicant proposes a six slip Class A marina. Applicant proposes nine parking spaces at this time with portable refuse units, restroom facilities are at existing home at 46 Cleverdale Road. Project subject to Lake George Park Commission review for Class A marina. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, lot arrangement to accommodate marina usage shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 92-2016 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 82-2016 RAY & WENDY KRAFT, Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver; As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. KRAFT-You asked me about the two neighbors. I would assume that they would, I know my cousin got a notice from the Board, and she called me, she's in her 80's, and she saw two refuse things and said what are they for, dumping the toilet things in it? So I had to explain the whole thing to her. So, I mean, and she said I'll just sign the thing and send it back. So I would assume the other neighbor got one, too. MRS. MOORE-They did. MR. KRAFT-So if anybody had any problems, they would have said so. MR. DEEB-They would have written a letter. MR. HUNSINGER-Anyone within 500 feet gets a notice. Go ahead, we're ready. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP PZ 92-2016 SUP 82-2016 RAY &WENDY KRAFT The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes a six slip Class A marina. Applicant proposes nine parking spaces at this time with portable refuse units, restroom facilities are at existing home at 46 Cleverdale Road. Project subject to Lake George Park Commission review for Class A marina. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, lot arrangement to accommodate marina usage shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. 42 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 3/22/2016, and continued the public hearing to 3/22/2016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 3/22/2016; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 92-2016 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 82-2016 RAY & WENDY KRAFT; Introduced by Brad Magowan who moved for its adoption, seconded by David Deeb: Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request rg anted: 2 Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; b) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; c) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; d) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Duly adopted this 22nd day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver, Mr. Hunsinger NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Schonewolf MR. HUNSINGER-You're all set. MR. DEEB-There, now you're done. MR. FERONE-You realize now that you have this done, now somebody's going to want to buy that property. MRS. KRAFT-From your lips. MR. HUNSINGER-Good luck. MRS. KRAFT-Thank you very much. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, you're welcome. Is there any other business to be brought before the Board? MRS. MOORE-No, there's not. Can you just, the Board notify Staff who is going to be here in April? Because there's two meetings coming in. MR. HUNSINGER-Is there anyone here that won't be here in April? MR. TRAVER-No, I'll be here. 43 (Queensbury Planning Board 03/22/2016) MR. MAGOWAN-I'm planning on being here. MR. HUNSINGER-So the question, I think Tom's going to be back, but I'm not positive. MRS. MOORE-As far as I know, he'll be back. MR. HUNSINGER-But I think, was Paul going to be out in April orjust March? MRS. MOORE-And that's what I don't know. So I'm trying to follow up. Okay. MR. DEEB-I'll make a motion to adjourn. MR. HUNSINGER-Thanks, everyone. On motion meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Chris Hunsinger, Chairman 44