Loading...
2012-115 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY IF4esilra 742 Bay Road, Queensbury,NY 12804-5902 (518) 761-8201 Community Development - Building & Codes (518) 761-8256 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Permit Number: P20120115 Date Issued: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 This is to certify that work requested to be done as shown by Permit Number P20120115 has been completed. Tax Map Number: 523400-289-007-0001-039-000-0000 Location: 27 REARDON Rd Owner: HAROLD & PATRICIA"TAYLOR JR Applicant: HAROLD & PATRICIA TAYLOR JR This structure may be occupied as a: Demolition By Order of Town Board TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Issuance of this Certificate of Compliance DOES NOT relieve the / ,-' property owner of the responsibility for compliance with Site Plan, ` � • ,,. y 17 .(r) ! Variance, or other issues and conditions as a result of approvals by the Director of Building& Code Enforcement Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals. 011.4 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 9.4 742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804-5902 (518)761-8201 F .31 Community Development- Building&Codes (518) 761-8256 BUILDING PERMIT Permit Number: P20120115 Application Number: A20120115 Tax Map No: 523400-289-007-0001-039-000-0000 Permission is hereby granted to: HAROLD &PATRICIA TAYLOR JR For property located at: 27 REARDON Rd in the Town of Queensbury,to construct or place at the above location in accordance with application together with plot plans and other information hereto filed and approved and in compliance with the NYS Uniform Building Codes and the Queensbury Zoning Ordinance. Type of Construction Value Owner Address: HAROLD &PATRICIA TAYLOR JR 6 LAKE Ave Demolition GLENS FALLS,NY 12801 Total Value Contractor or Builder's Name /Address Electrical Inspection Agency Plans&Specifications 12-115 garage/shed $30.00 PERMIT FEE PAID-THIS PERMIT EXPIRES: Thursday, March 21, 2013 (If a longer period is required,an application for an extension must be made to the code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Queensbury before the expiration date.) Dated at the T n o ueen ry • 1- s :y, March 21,2012 SIGNED BY ! \ for the Town of Queensbury. Director of Building&Code Enforcement TAX MAP NQQ 1 ti)–I"3pinpf OFFICE i PERMIT NOE ONLYM//c� _FEE PAID3D D__ E Vv E_i_V_ Permission is h anted to above na -. A•plicant to demolish the building(s) described her in as se rth in A mat'. ',el./. _ _ MAR 2 1 1012 r �. Director of Building&Codes Date TOWN OF QUEENSBURY, BUILDING & CODES APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION PERMIT: Fill in applicable spaces and submit two(2) plot plans, drawn to scale,showing lot boundaries with dimensions and adjacent roads I streets. Show all existing structures on the property and indicate which are to be demolished. Indicate on the plot plan the location of all utilities. APPLICANT/BUILDER: tct 4-aa-46111 17D1 - OWNER: 44Ne» 21 R ReP+D ADDRESS: _ __ _ — ADDRESS: PHONE NOS.__- ex_-ate_ l02. —_— PHONE:__ —___— PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK: C4410.5 $Uot40 --___—_-PHONE: LOCATION OF DEMOLITION:_ r _ -10c:3.A 1 QuGs31,(P''f /-arYAL- ASBESTOS WHERE WILL DEMOLITION MATERIAL BE DISPOSED? JNkSEY24h 111.) DuAlPST13e-INFORMATION: ✓ Is there any asbestos within the building to be demolished? YES NO ✓ If YES, our office needs the following information: o Name of firm removing the asbestos: o License number of firm: o Indicate where the asbestos material will be disposed: NOTE: A copy of Asbestos Removal Report must be filed with our office before demolition begins. STRUCTURE INFORMATION: ✓ Indicate which structure(s)will be demolished: RESIDENCE GARAGE/BUSINESS__ STORAGE DG_ OTHER I Size of structure: �f? BLX I Number of stories: I / vi / ✓ Foundation type: FULL CELLAR CRAWL SPACE SLAB✓ Foundation: WILL BE REPLACED `� WILL NOT BE REPLACED ✓ StrUCtUres(S): WILL BE REPLACED b"WILL NOT BE REPLACED__ UTILITIES INFORMATION: ✓ Indicate utilities for this structure: GAS_ ELECTRIC ✓ PROPANE PUBLIC WATER____ ONSITE WELL-WATER PUMP PUBLIC SEWER__ Have you notified the Town Water Dept.for public water and public sewer disconnect? YES NO Have all unities en isconnected: YES ✓ NO QUESTIONS? CALL 761-8256 OR EMAIL _ ..-__241,-- 47-1i57– .-_2 1 4 codes aqueensbury.net SIGNATURE OFF APPLICANT VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE INFORMATION ib4 g7./, / �— ;?7, -,•4/9t/c4/1/7- www.queensburv.net Town of Queensbury • Conmuniity Development Office • 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 Town of QueensburyEdilding & Code Enforcement Office No. (518) 761-8256 Demolition Inspection Report Inspection request received: Name: 1 - .61( (st(Vca I' Inspected on: Location: t ~I eegz r'd o n Arrive: ���j�.m. Permit No.: / .A 'II O Inspector's Initials: �A Comments .nd/or diagram Y N N/A c 3 - H3 Gas Shut-off Water Shut-off Electric Disconnected Asbestos Removed /Documentation Property Cleaned Up and Graded Okay to Issue Certificate of Compliance Demolition Inspection_11 2012 t BENEFIT SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT CAN BE ACHIEVED BY SOME METHOD, FEASIBLE FOR THE " I APPLICANT TO PURSUE OTHER T} IAN AN AREA VARIANCE SCALING IT TOWN WOULD BE A METHOD, [ BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF,QUEENSBURY, NEW YORK IN ACCORDANCE TFIAN le SUBSTANTIAL. THE REQUEST F9R 15.4 FEET OR 52% RELIEF FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK \ EXISTING SITE PLAN 4 'MIH THE FOLLOWING;' 17% FOR BOTH THE NORTTI AND SIDE SETBACK REQUESTS FROM THE 12 FOOT SIDE SETBACK1"REQUIREMENT [DRAWN 1" = 10'-0° I SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACING REDUCING THE ON—SITE PERMEABILITY'FROM 67.17 DOWN TO sr 60.6% MAY BE CONSIDERED MODERATE. +WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE WILL HAVE AN INTRODUCED BY BRIAN CLEMENTS WHO MOVED FOR ITSADOPTION, SECONDED BY JOYCE HUNT: 1: ADVERSE EFFECT OR ,IMPACT ON THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE DRAWING THLE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THE PARC_L HAS EXISTING PERMEABILITY ISSUES, ANY DECREASE MAY HAVE SOME IMPACT BUT PROBABLY NOT ADVERSELY. .WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY WAS SELF— CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF—CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA 27 REARDON ROAD EXTENTION, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 500 FOOT , ". VARIANCE! NO. 7-2012.' PROPOSED DULY ADOPTED THIS 29th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: - p IVl URRICO, MR. S11 E LAN ENCLOSED:GARAGE 'AND CONSTRUCTION OFA 900 SQUARE FOOT NEW CARPORT. THE RELIEF' {s NOES: NONE` THE PARCEL WILL REQUIRE AREA VARIANCES AS FOLLOWS: 1. FRONT SETBACK - REQUEST i I s , " sx FOR. 15.4 FEET OF, FRONT SETBACK RELIEF. 2. SIDE SETBACK OF 3.5 FEET OF NORTH SIDE SETBACK DRAWING No. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE .RELIEF. , 3. SIDE, SETBACK FOR } 2 FEET OF SOUTH :SIDE .SETBACK RELIEF. 4. PERMEABILITY FOR AN SITE DATA - "ADDITIONAL 116 SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACING REDUCING ON-SITE PERMEABILITY FROM GENERAL NOTES 61.1% DOWN TO 60.6%. ; IN Mt';KING THE DETERMINATION, THE BOARD SHALL CONSIDERED: 1. u "" ,WHETHER ,AN UNDESIRABLE CIIANGE WILL BE, PRODUCED IN THE CHARACTER OF THE b- ,NEIGHBORHOOD.'MINOR IMPACTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAY BE ANTICIPATED. 2. WHETHER THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS TAKEN FROM o PROPERTY ZONING CLASSIFICATION: WR - WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL A SURVEY PLAN DRAWING PREPARED BY VAN DUSEN,AND SIEVES. J MINIMUM LOT SIZE:2 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT OR NON-RESIDENTIAL PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 150 FEET LEGEND ACTUAL LOT SIZE: 10,679 SF ACTUAL FRONTAGE ON REARDON ROAD EXT: 50'-0" — - - — - - — - -- PROPERTY LINE - 0 FINAL REVISIONS'PER 5IIAR2012 ZONING BOARD APPROVAL -------------------- PROPERTY LINE 'SETBACKS No. DESCRIPTION DATE TAX MAP NUMBER: 289.7-1-39 ----------330---- EXISTING CONTOURS REVISIONS SETBACKS REQUIREQTS ING PROPOSED 330 NEW CONTOURS FRONT 30'-0" 8'-1" 14'-8" **** SHORELINE 50'-0" 161'-9" 164'-4" SIDE 12'-0" <0'-7" OVER> 8'-6" ** —E E E — E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE W o 12'-0" 25'-6" 10'-0" *« — REAR 30'-0" N\A N\A ss — ss ss — ss = SANITARY SEWER D z o MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 26'-0" (16'-0") 12'-0"t 16'-O" I— MINIMUM PERCENT PERMEABLE 75% 61.7% 60.6% ** — W — w w — w— WATER SERVICE U z a ** INDICATES E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT W f o - VARIANCE REQUIRED w w J — cns —cnsc —GAS UNDERGROUND GAS SERVICE _ _�o 0 PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE CONDITIONS cq 0 COMPONENT~ Af3EA PERCENTAGE Q o w 0 F.. z 4 TOTAL SITE 10,679 SF 100.0% 0 ti BUILDINGS 2,291 SF 21.5% � _ o PAVING & WALKS 1,920 SF 17.9% 16 } u N t GREEN SPACE 6,468 SF 60.6% 0 0 Y L=� C N co v �/'� U) L Q O Z T 7 U '4' .'N in 00000 00 O 0 F Q J ¢ S O W D_' W '0 In >L LANDS N OF BENEFIT SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT CAN BE ACHIEVED BY SOME METHOD, FEASIBLE FOR THE " I APPLICANT TO PURSUE OTHER T} IAN AN AREA VARIANCE SCALING IT TOWN WOULD BE A METHOD, [ BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF,QUEENSBURY, NEW YORK IN ACCORDANCE TFIAN le SUBSTANTIAL. THE REQUEST F9R 15.4 FEET OR 52% RELIEF FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK \ EXISTING SITE PLAN 4 'MIH THE FOLLOWING;' 17% FOR BOTH THE NORTTI AND SIDE SETBACK REQUESTS FROM THE 12 FOOT SIDE SETBACK1"REQUIREMENT [DRAWN 1" = 10'-0° MOTION TO APPROVE AREA VP.RIANCE N0. 7-2012 HAROLD AND PATRICIA TAYLOR, SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACING REDUCING THE ON—SITE PERMEABILITY'FROM 67.17 DOWN TO sr 60.6% MAY BE CONSIDERED MODERATE. +WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE WILL HAVE AN INTRODUCED BY BRIAN CLEMENTS WHO MOVED FOR ITSADOPTION, SECONDED BY JOYCE HUNT: 1: ADVERSE EFFECT OR ,IMPACT ON THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE DRAWING THLE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THE PARC_L HAS EXISTING PERMEABILITY ISSUES, ANY DECREASE MAY HAVE SOME IMPACT BUT PROBABLY NOT ADVERSELY. .WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY WAS SELF— CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF—CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA 27 REARDON ROAD EXTENTION, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 500 FOOT , ". VARIANCE! NO. 7-2012.' PROPOSED DULY ADOPTED THIS 29th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: - p IVl URRICO, MR. S11 E LAN ENCLOSED:GARAGE 'AND CONSTRUCTION OFA 900 SQUARE FOOT NEW CARPORT. THE RELIEF' AYES: GARB,\ND, MR. UNDERWOOD, MR. CLEMENTS, MRS. HUNT, MR. JACKOSKI I NOES: NONE` THE PARCEL WILL REQUIRE AREA VARIANCES AS FOLLOWS: 1. FRONT SETBACK - REQUEST i I s , " sx FOR. 15.4 FEET OF, FRONT SETBACK RELIEF. 2. SIDE SETBACK OF 3.5 FEET OF NORTH SIDE SETBACK DRAWING No. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE .RELIEF. , 3. SIDE, SETBACK FOR } 2 FEET OF SOUTH :SIDE .SETBACK RELIEF. 4. PERMEABILITY FOR AN ",. C-2 - "ADDITIONAL 116 SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACING REDUCING ON-SITE PERMEABILITY FROM 61.1% DOWN TO 60.6%. ; IN Mt';KING THE DETERMINATION, THE BOARD SHALL CONSIDERED: 1. "" ,WHETHER ,AN UNDESIRABLE CIIANGE WILL BE, PRODUCED IN THE CHARACTER OF THE b- ,NEIGHBORHOOD.'MINOR IMPACTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAY BE ANTICIPATED. 2. WHETHER THE BENEFIT SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT CAN BE ACHIEVED BY SOME METHOD, FEASIBLE FOR THE " I APPLICANT TO PURSUE OTHER T} IAN AN AREA VARIANCE SCALING IT TOWN WOULD BE A METHOD, t ' BUT 1HIS,LOOKS LIKE A GOOD, PROJECT.. 3. WHETHER THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE IS .FILE NA7LA1E\CAR1I1R1\C—I TFIAN le SUBSTANTIAL. THE REQUEST F9R 15.4 FEET OR 52% RELIEF FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK \ REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED MODERATE. THE REQUEST FOR 3.54 FEET OR 29% AND 2.0 FEET LEOR 17% FOR BOTH THE NORTTI AND SIDE SETBACK REQUESTS FROM THE 12 FOOT SIDE SETBACK1"REQUIREMENT [DRAWN MAYBE CONSIDERED MINOR, AND ADDITIONALLY, REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL 116 SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACING REDUCING THE ON—SITE PERMEABILITY'FROM 67.17 DOWN TO sr 60.6% MAY BE CONSIDERED MODERATE. +WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE WILL HAVE AN 1: ADVERSE EFFECT OR ,IMPACT ON THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE DRAWING THLE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THE PARC_L HAS EXISTING PERMEABILITY ISSUES, ANY DECREASE MAY HAVE SOME IMPACT BUT PROBABLY NOT ADVERSELY. .WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY WAS SELF— CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF—CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA , ". VARIANCE! NO. 7-2012.' PROPOSED DULY ADOPTED THIS 29th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: - p IVl URRICO, MR. S11 E LAN AYES: GARB,\ND, MR. UNDERWOOD, MR. CLEMENTS, MRS. HUNT, MR. JACKOSKI I NOES: NONE` i I DRAWING No. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE ",. C-2 - GL LA Dock IPF FT APPLICANT TO PURSUE, OTHER THAN AN AREA VARIANCE,SCALING IT DOWN WOULD ;BEA METHOD, SITE DATA GENERAL -NOTES BUT THIS LOOKS LIKE A GOOPIPROJECT. 3. WHETHER THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE IS cao FILE NAME INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS TAKEN FROM c:\EmnN\Toa\cLENe\ctiRPatT\c 1 PROPERTY ZONING CLASSIFICATION: WR — WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL " A SURVEY PLAN DRAWING PREPARED BY VAN DUSEN AND S'GEVES. MINIMUM LOT SIZE:2 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT OR NON-RESIDENTIAL PRINCIPAL BUILDING REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED MINOR, AND :ADDITIONALLY, REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL 116 - MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 150 FEET SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE URFACING REDUCING THE ON-SITE PERMEABILITY FROM 67.1% DOWN TO .. LEGEND 60.6% MAYBE CONSIDERED MQDERATE. WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE ,WILL HAVE AN a ACTUAL LOT SIZE: 10,679 SF DRAWING TiILE - - ACTUAL FRONTAGE ON REARDON ROAD EXT: 50'-0" _. — — —. — — — — — PROPERTY LINE CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF-CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA ---------------------- PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS TAX MAP NUMBER: 269.7-1-39 SITE PLAN LAN ----------330---------- EXISTING CONTOURS AYES: MR.-URRICO, MR. GARR/SND, MR. UNDERWOOD, MR. CLEMENTS, MRS. HUNT, MR. JACKOSKI SETBACKS BEgUIREQ EXISTING i 330 NEW CONTOURS <u FRONT 30'-0" 8'-1" SHORELINE 50'-0" 161'-9" —e —e —e —r — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE T SIDE 12'-0" <0'-7" OVER> m 12'—U" 25'-6" —ss —ss—ss —ss — SANITARY SEWER n i REAR 30'-0" N\A i MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 26'-0" (16'-0") 12'-0"t ' w —w w —w — WATER SERVICE FINAL REVISIONS MINIMUM PERCENT PERMEABLE 75% 61.7% TONING BOARD MPROVAL No. DESCRIPTION DATE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT ' EXISTING SITE COVERAGE CONDITIONS —GAS—GAS— GAS— GAS—UNDERGROUND GAS SERVICE COMPONENT AREA PERCENTAGE TOTAL SITE 10,679 SF 100.0% BUILDINGS 1,941 SF 18.2% PAVING & WALKS 2,154 SF 20.27. GREEN SPACE 6,584 SF 61.7% 3 O LANDS N/F OF O % HARRIS U I� 671/567 w Z � n w � lJcz. o UI f— f— a 0 Z U ASPHALT / IRS 0 _ m -__x _ - _ 00 15.0'1 —� X N 64'3717" E 195.67 0 DRIVE IPF FT WORK IS TO BE AS SHOWN & NOTED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, TRADE ASSOCIATION PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED LOCAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PRACTICES. ' / p I i I:VNI:KtIt EXISTING PATIO ------SEPTIC L------`---- TANK 12'-0" SIDE SETBACK ^_~ 1 o - I. U I j - - _77 -------------- 1 CONCRETE 1 \ I WOOD ` PATIO DECK EXIS IRF\ o 15:0'1 IPF I DIST. \. IRS ---X-----X----- X �_---------- I I OVER 0.74' — �--------- S 64'3717" W I Ii / LANDS SMI / nn 935/ EXISTING SITE PLAN 1" = 10'-0" APPLICANT TO PURSUE, OTHER THAN AN AREA VARIANCE,SCALING IT DOWN WOULD ;BEA METHOD, BUT THIS LOOKS LIKE A GOOPIPROJECT. 3. WHETHER THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE IS cao FILE NAME SUBSTANTIAL. THE REQUEST FUR 15.4 FEET OR 527 RELIEF FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK c:\EmnN\Toa\cLENe\ctiRPatT\c 1 REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDEI'ED MODERATE. THE REQUEST FOR 3.54 FEET`OR 29% AND 2.0 FEET SCALE OR 17% FOR BOTH THE NORTI,I:AND SIDE SETBACK REQUESTS FROM THE 12 'F00T SIDE SETBACK 1 " 10'-0 REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED MINOR, AND :ADDITIONALLY, REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL 116 - SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE URFACING REDUCING THE ON-SITE PERMEABILITY FROM 67.1% DOWN TO .. DRAWN BY 60.6% MAYBE CONSIDERED MQDERATE. WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE ,WILL HAVE AN a ADVERSE EFFECT OR IMPACT CN THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL`CONDITIONS IN THE DRAWING TiILE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THE PARCE HAS EXISTING PERMEABWTY ISSUES, ANY DECREASE MAY HAVE SOME IMPACT BUT PROBABLY kJOT ADVERSELY. WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY, WAS SELF- CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF-CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO. 7-2012. EXISTING DULY ADOPTED THIS 29th DA OF FEBRUARY, 2012 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: SITE PLAN LAN AYES: MR.-URRICO, MR. GARR/SND, MR. UNDERWOOD, MR. CLEMENTS, MRS. HUNT, MR. JACKOSKI NOES: NONE <u T m n 0 FINAL REVISIONS PER 5 NAR 2012 TONING BOARD MPROVAL No. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS m W 3 O U O % Z =mQ U D0- L w Z � n w � lJcz. o UI f— f— 0 Z U O }w0 m Z O o 0 r- O w LL O w cy Q 0 of 10 Go w o N o N N 0 O r N N o w o 7 Z O Q p> O Z v L = crn a) C o�> 3w O — �,— w006 Lo— OZ }ZZ ? Q z U dN W ort a z ao 1'j7)� U.�Q � C O -Eo p ,._. Q J – Q D O C O 0 O F - (y Of W (D (n >L W WORK IS TO BE AS SHOWN & NOTED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, TRADE ASSOCIATION PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED LOCAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PRACTICES. ' / p I i I:VNI:KtIt EXISTING PATIO ------SEPTIC L------`---- TANK 12'-0" SIDE SETBACK ^_~ 1 o - I. U I j - - _77 -------------- 1 CONCRETE 1 \ I WOOD ` PATIO DECK EXIS IRF\ o 15:0'1 IPF I DIST. \. IRS ---X-----X----- X �_---------- I I OVER 0.74' — �--------- S 64'3717" W I Ii / LANDS SMI / nn 935/ EXISTING SITE PLAN 1" = 10'-0" APPLICANT TO PURSUE, OTHER THAN AN AREA VARIANCE,SCALING IT DOWN WOULD ;BEA METHOD, BUT THIS LOOKS LIKE A GOOPIPROJECT. 3. WHETHER THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE IS cao FILE NAME SUBSTANTIAL. THE REQUEST FUR 15.4 FEET OR 527 RELIEF FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK c:\EmnN\Toa\cLENe\ctiRPatT\c 1 REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDEI'ED MODERATE. THE REQUEST FOR 3.54 FEET`OR 29% AND 2.0 FEET SCALE OR 17% FOR BOTH THE NORTI,I:AND SIDE SETBACK REQUESTS FROM THE 12 'F00T SIDE SETBACK 1 " 10'-0 REQUIREMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED MINOR, AND :ADDITIONALLY, REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL 116 - SQUARE FEET OF IMPERMEABLE URFACING REDUCING THE ON-SITE PERMEABILITY FROM 67.1% DOWN TO .. DRAWN BY 60.6% MAYBE CONSIDERED MQDERATE. WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE ,WILL HAVE AN a ADVERSE EFFECT OR IMPACT CN THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL`CONDITIONS IN THE DRAWING TiILE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THE PARCE HAS EXISTING PERMEABWTY ISSUES, ANY DECREASE MAY HAVE SOME IMPACT BUT PROBABLY kJOT ADVERSELY. WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY, WAS SELF- CREATED. THE DIFFICULTY MAY BE CONSIDERED SELF-CREATED, AND I MOVE TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO. 7-2012. EXISTING DULY ADOPTED THIS 29th DA OF FEBRUARY, 2012 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: SITE PLAN LAN AYES: MR.-URRICO, MR. GARR/SND, MR. UNDERWOOD, MR. CLEMENTS, MRS. HUNT, MR. JACKOSKI NOES: NONE