Loading...
Complete Staff Notes Packet for ZBA Mtg Wed., November 15, 2017 Stiff Hatec ZBA Meeting Wednesday, November 15, 2017 Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Meeting: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 Time: 7:00- 11:00 pm Queensbury Activities Center-742 Bay Road Agenda subject to change and may be found at: www.queensbury.net Approval of meeting minutes: October 18&October 25,2017 Administrative Item: Further Tabling Request: Use Variance Z-UV-3-2017 Errol Silverberg Area Variance Z-AV-59-2017 Errol Silverberg Approval of Year 2018 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Calendar OLD BUSINESS: Applicant(s) Robert Fulmer Area Variance No Z-AV-29-2017 Owners Robert Fulmer SEQRA Type II Agent(s) Curtis D.D bas Lot Size 3.2 Acre(s) Location 54 Country Club Road(Country Club Manor) Zoning MDR Ward No. Ward 1 Tax Id No 296.14-1-49 Section 179-5-020 Cross Ref P-SP-31-2017;P-FWW 3-2017;BP 2007-084 Warren County Planning April 2017 2-car att.Gar./res.add. Public Hearing Aril 26,2017;November 15,2017 Adirondack Park Agency n/a Project Description Applicant proposes construction of a 750 sq.ft.2-door detached garage. Relief requested for a second garage. Planning Board: Site Plan Review and Freshwater Wetlands review required for site work within 100 ft.of a wetland. NEW BUSINESS: Applicant(s) Beth&Tom Portuese Area Variance No Z-AV-71-2017 Owners Beth&Tom Portuese SEQRA Type II Agent(s) n/a Lot Size 1.21 Acre(s) Location 271 Big Bay Road Zoning WR Ward No. Ward 4 Tax Id No 316.9-1-27.1 Section 179-3-040 Cross Ref I n/a Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing I November 15,2017 Adirondack Park Agency n/a Project Description Applicant proposes a 5,850 sq.ft.residential unit that involves interior alterations to the first floor of a pre- exisiting dwelling.Relief requested for a second dwelling(apartment)on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed in the WR zoning district. Also relief requested from the minimum size restriction of 800 sq.ft.for such dwelling. Applicant(s) Craig Zarz cki Area Variance No Z-AV-72-2017 Owners Jessica LaFave SEQRA Type II Agent(s) n/a Lot Size 0.34 Acre(s) Location 328 Ridge Road Zoning MDR Ward No. Ward 2 Tax Id No 303.5-1-48 Section 179-3-040 Cross Ref I n/a Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing I November 15,2017 Adirondack Park Agency n/a Project Description Applicant proposes to complete construction of a 350 sq.ft.second story to an existing 2,974 sq.ft.home. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Page 1 of 2 Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Meeting: Wednesday, November 15,2017 Time: 7:00- 11:00 pm Queensbury Activities Center-742 Bay Road Agenda subject to change and may be found at: www.queensbury.net Applicant(s) Michael J.Badera Area Variance No Z-AV-74-2017 Owners M Dream,LLC Michael Badera SEQRA Type II Agent(s) n/a Lot Size 0.45 Acre(s) Location 55 Mason Road Zoning WR Ward No. Ward I Tax Id No 226.16-1-20 Section 179-3-040; 179-13-010 Cross Ref P-SP-66-2017;P-SP-50-2017 I Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing November 15,2017 1 Adirondack Park A ency I ALD Project Description Applicant proposes construction of an 85 sq.ft.deck addition to an existing 569 sq.ft.open deck of an existing 6,611 sq.ft.home. Project includes 95 sq.ft.of new deck to north side of deck.Relief requested from minimum shoreline setback requirements for the WR zoning district. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required. Applicant(s) Mike Weber Area Variance No Z-AV-73-2017 Owners Mike Weber SEQRA Type II Agent(s) n/a Lot Size 0.48 Acre(s) Location 519 State Route 149 Zoning RR-3A Ward No. Ward 1 Tax Id No 278.-1-31 Section 179-3-040 Cross Ref n/a Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing 1 November 15,2017 1 Adirondack Park Agency ALD Project Description Applicant proposes to maintain an already constructed 260 sq.ft.deck with stairs at the front of the 1,232 sq.ft. home. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks for the RR-3A zoning district. Applicant(s) Richard Kukuk Area Variance No Z-AV-75-2017 Owners Richard Kukuk SEQRA Type II Agent(s) Dennis MacElro ,PE Env.Design Partnership Lot Size 0.78 Acre(s) Location 155 Assembly Point Road Zoning WR Ward No. Ward 1 Tax Id No 239.7-1-29 Section 179-3-040 Cross Ref n/a Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing 1 November 15,2017 Adirondack Park Agency ALD Project Description Applicant proposes to demolish existing 1,409 sq.ft.dwelling and construct a new 4,265 sq.ft.single-family dwelling and maintain 783 sq.ft.garage. Relief requested from minimum property line setback requirements and from maximum height restrictions for the WR zoning district. Applicant(s) Joe Orlow Area Variance No Z-AV-76-2017 Owners Joe Orlow and Michael Alund SEQRA Type II Agent(s) Garry Robinson Lot Size 0.07 Acre(s) Location 11 Wagon Trail Zoning WR Ward No. Ward 1 Tax Id No 290.5-1-21 Section 179-3-040; 179-4-050; 179-5-090 Cross Ref n/a Warren County Planning November 2017 Public Hearing 1 November 15,2017 Adirondack Park Agency n/a Project Description Applicant proposes to maintain and complete construction of a 891 sq.ft.single-family home. The home will have two open decks;one is 144 sq.ft.and the other is 36 sq.ft.Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks,permeability, and road frontage requirements as well as relief from the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio(FAR)requirements for the WR zoning district. Any further business that the Chairman determines may be properly brought before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Final Version ZBA Agenda: 10.25.2017 CB/LM/sh Page 2 of 2 ZBA Meeting Agenda Item: Wed., November 15, 2017 Administrative Item Approval of Year 2018 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Calendar Zia Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town of Queensbury Resolution to Approve Zoning Board of Appeals Schedule of Meeting Dates for Calendar Year 2018. ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) of the Town of Queensbury has received from Community Development Staff the ZBA Schedule of Meeting Dates for the year 2018. MOTION TO APPROVE the ZBA Schedule of Meeting Dates for the year 2018 Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November,2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ,-- OC) 00 tf) CK 00 k N O1 6 M O � MO 1` 't � io d -� 00 00 RF 00 0o0 N -� 00 � 4) 00 V-) �- N C.� O [� �t D d 00 Q D Lr)Q+ [� M N [� '-- N N ci H -- N a A O N dl D N 01 �O O N "oM O g u7 t V1 M �-- N M V1 -� N N M '-- N03 N lool i-4 N S M O 6 � M O t` N 01 \C M O Q W CN r--� N M W pro--� N N 00r-+ N M 00 N 01 N C1 \C .0 N O\ 00 N N 00 [—r Ln I,—� —� N 00 w ,-- v N N Q M O O 00 In 00 00 kn00 N +, NH-I 00 N 00 [-C-I N N p .[�-� d � N N Cei c l y r N M NC� I'D r0., D �O M O � O w O O 00 V') O 00 V) N O1 00 kn O t-- d d •� DO M Nai N U1 N N U1 Ln N •— 00 00 kn i, �} .� 00 Q) —A N 00 w N N Q 00 O [� •-- N 00 [� M N M N E-1 � M-� N N el 00 N d1 D '-- 00 V) N r, OO ,— DO V1 O O [� O ,--i 00 � N � Lcq M Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518)761-8238 Town of Queensbury Use Variance Resolution To: Table Applicant Name: Errol Silverberg File Number: Z-UV-3-2017 Location: 230 Lockhart Mountain Road Tax Map Number: 252.4-38.1 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Errol Silverberg for a variance of Section(s) 179-3-040 and 179-5-020 of the Zoning Code of the Town of Queensbury. Applicant proposes construction of a 2,304 sq. ft. addition to the existing 8,400 sq. ft. garage. Relief is required as the construction of the addition to the private garage is on a parcel where a principal use (single-family dwelling) does not exist. Additionally, an area variance is required as the structure is proposed to be in excess of the maximum allowable square footage for a private garage. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required for the expansion of a private garage. MOTION TO TABLE USE VARIANCE Z-UV-3-2017 ERROL SILVERBERG, Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Tabled until a December 2017 meeting date with a submission deadline. Duly adopted this 15th day of November, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 _o Town of Queensbury Area Variance Resolution To: Table Applicant Name: Errol Silverberg ` T File Number: Z-AV-59-2017 Location: 230 Lockhart Mountain Road Tax Map Number: 252.-1-38.1 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Errol Silverberg. Applicant proposes construction of a 2,304 sq. ft. addition to the existing 8,400 sq. ft. garage. Use Variance is required as the construction of the addition to the private garage is on a parcel where principal use (single-family dwelling) does not exist. Relief required as the structure is proposed to be in excess of the maximum allowable square footage for a private garage and to have an accessory without a principle. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required for the expansion of a private garage. MOTION TO TABLE AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-59-2017 ERROL SILVERBERG, Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Tabled to a Zoning Board of Appeals meeting in December with a submission deadline of Duly adopted this 15th day of November, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 29-2017 Project Applicant: Robert Fulmer Project Location: 54 Country Club Road Parcel History: P-SP-31-2017; P-FWW 3-2017; BP 2007-084 2-car att. Gar./res.add. SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes construction of a 750 sq. ft. 2-door detached garage. Relief requested for a second garage. Planning Board: Site Plan Review and Freshwater Wetlands review required for site work within 100 ft. of a wetland. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for a second garage. Section 179-5-020—Accessory Structures—garage: The applicant proposes a second garage that is detached. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. The project may be considered to have little to no impact on the neighboring properties. The applicant has indicated the garage will be located in an existing small clearing on the property and has trees surrounding a majority of the proposed building location. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The feasible alternatives may be limited as the applicant would like to use the building for storage of lawn equipment and recreational vehicles. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief may be considered substantial relevant to the code. Relief is requested for second garage where only one garage is allowed. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project as proposed may be considered to have minimal to no impact on the environmental conditions of the site or area. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The project as proposed may be considered self-created. Staff comments• The applicant has revised the plans showing a 750 sq ft garage, the 1800 sq ft black top area has been removed and that area has been seeded. The plans show the garage to have 2-garage doors and an open floor plan. The garage is to be 20+/- ft in height and the area in front of the garage is to remain lawn no drive is to be installed. The applicant has included photos of the existing and proposed conditions where the garage is to be located including locations from the bike trail. The applicant has indicated there will be no stairs or pull down stairs and the rear of the building is to be the same as the front without doors. The plans also show a regular door on the south side of the building. The applicant has indicated the garage is to be used for the storage of recreational vehicles and lawn equipment for yard maintenance. Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town of Quccrosbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Robert Fulmer File Number: Z-AV-29-2017 Location: 54 Country Club Road `" Tax Map Number: 296.14-1-49 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 Applicant proposes construction of a 750 sq. ft. 2-door detached garage. Relief requested for a second garage. Planning Board: Site Plan Review and Freshwater Wetlands review required for site work within 100 ft. of a wetland. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for a second garage. Section 179-5-020—Accessory Structures—garage: The applicant proposes a second garage that is detached. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,April 26,2017 and tabled to July 19,2017; and tabled to November 15,2017. Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is /is not self-created because Page 1 of 2 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-29-2017, Robert Fulmer, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15�h day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Page 2 of 2 Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 71-2017 Project Applicant: Beth& Tom Portuese Project Location: 271 Big Bay Road Parcel History: n/a SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes a 5,850 sq. ft. residential unit that involves interior alterations to the first floor of a pre- exisiting dwelling. Relief requested for a second dwelling (apartment) on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed in the WR zoning district. Also relief requested from the minimum size restriction of 800 sq. ft. for such dwelling. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for a second dwelling(apartment) on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed in the WR zoning district. Also relief requested from the minimum size restriction of 800 sq. ft. for such dwelling. 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements—number of residence on a parcel, 179-5-090 dwelling unit size The applicant proposes to have a second dwelling unit included within the main home where only one dwelling unit is allowed per lot in the WR zone and the minimum dwelling size is 800 and proposed is 540 sq ft. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination,the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. The applicant has indicated the space is internal to the main home and allows for the caring of a relative. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited due to the applicants request to have an in-law apartment where the wr zone allows only one unit per parcel. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant to the code. Relief is requested for having two units on one parcel. Relief also requested for having 260 sq ft less than the minimum of 800 sq ft. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal impact. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes to finish housing renovations to include a 540 sq ft in law apartment in an existing home. The plans show the in-law apartment to be located on the side of the home with the garage. The floor plans show the arrangement and access to the in-law apartment. WOMBZoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town of( uccnsbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Beth and Tom Portuese File Number: Z-AV-71-2017 ` i ` Location: 271 Big Bay Road Tax Map Number: 316.9-1-27.1 ' ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Beth and Tom Portuese. Applicant proposes a 5,850 sq. ft. residential unit that involves interior alterations to the first floor of a pre-exisiting dwelling. Relief requested for a second dwelling (apartment) on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed in the WR zoning district. Also relief requested from the minimum size restriction of 800 sq. ft. for such dwelling. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for a second dwelling (apartment) on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed in the WR zoning district. Also relief requested from the minimum size restriction of 800 sq. ft. for such dwelling. 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements—number of residence on a parcel, 179-5-090 dwelling unit size The applicant proposes to have a second dwelling unit included within the main home where only one dwelling unit is allowed per lot in the WR zone and the minimum dwelling size is 800 and proposed is 540 sq ft. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is /is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is /is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed by (,denial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE / DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-71-2017 Beth and Tom Portuese, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: +) gyp Nov17-11 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Portuese, Beth &Tom Owner: Portuese, Beth &Tom ID Number: QBY-17 AV-71 County Project#: Nov17-11 Current Zoning: WR Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes a 5,850 sf residential unit that involves interior alterations to the first floor of a pre-existing dwelling. Relief requested for a second dwelling (apartment) on a parcel where only one such structure is allowed, relief also requested from the minimum size restruction o 800 sf for such dwelling. Site Location: 271 Big Bay Rd Tax Map Number(s): 316.9-1-27.1 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: Approve Local Action:/Final Disposition: 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 72-2017 Project Applicant: Craig Zarzycki Project Location: 328 Ridge Road Parcel History: n/a SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to complete construction of a 350 sq. ft. second story to an existing 2,974 sq. ft. home. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. 179-3-040 Dimensional Requirements The applicant has under construction a 350 sq ft addition that is located 12.8 ft on the north side property line where a 25 ft setback is required. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the location of the existing home and the portion of the addition that is already constructed. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered moderate relevant to the code. The relief requested is 12.2 ft to the side setback. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal impact on the physical or the environmental conditions of the area. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant has proposed to complete construction of a residential addition that does not meet the north side setback. The applicant was informed a building permit and variance were required as part of the project. The plans show the location of the addition on the home in relation to the property lines. Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town of Queensbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove / Applicant Name: Craig Zarzycki cz 1- >= r File Number: Z-AV-72-2017 Location: 328 Ridge Road Tax Map Number: 303.5-1-48 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Craig Zarzycki. Applicant proposes to complete construction of a 350 sq. ft. second story to an existing 2,974 sq. ft. home. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. 179-3-040 Dimensional Requirements The applicant has under construction a 350 sq ft addition that is located 12.8 ft on the north side property line where a 25 ft setback is required. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is /is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is /is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-72-2017 Craig Zarzycki, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Nov17-12 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Zarzycki, Craig Owner: LaFave, Jessica ID Number: QBY-I7-AV-72 County Project#: Nov17-12 Current Zoning: MDR Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to complete construction of a 350 sf second story to an existing 2,974 sf home. Relief requested from minimum setback for the MDR zoning district. Site Location: 328 Ridge Rd Tax Map Number(s): 303.5-1-48 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: NCI Local Action:/Final Disposition: 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: AV 74-2017 Project Applicant: Michael J.Badera Project Location: 55 Mason Road Parcel History: P-SP-66-2017; P-SP-50-2017 SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes construction of an 85 sq. ft. deck addition to an existing 569 sq. ft. open deck of an existing 6,611 sq. ft. home. Project includes 95 sq. ft. of new deck to north side of deck. Relief requested from minimum shoreline setback requirements for the WR zoning district. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required. Relief Required: The applicant requests the following relief. Relief requested from minimum shoreline setback requirements for the WR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements/ 179-4-080 Setbacks for porches, canopies and decks. The applicant proposes an 85 sq ft addition to the south side of an existing 569 sq ft open deck where it is to be 44 ft 11.5 in from the shoreline where a 50 ft setback is required. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the location of the existing deck in relation to the beach area on the property. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered minimal relevant to the code. The relief requested is 5 ft 6 in to the shoreline setback. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal impact on the physical or the environmental conditions of the area. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes to construct an 85 sq ft deck addition on the south side of the deck and a 95 sq ft addition to the north side of the deck. The applicant has indicated the additions will allow for more useable space on the deck. The plans show the location of the deck and the supports needed for the additions. The south side addition does not meet the shoreline as the site has a pre existing beach area where the shoreline boundary is taken from where the north side addition does not require a variance due to the location of the shoreline. Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Torn of Qcensbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Michael J. Badera File Number: Z-AV-74-2017 , Location: 55 Mason Road Tax Map Number: 226.16-1-20 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Michael J. Badera. Applicant proposes construction of an 85 sq. ft. deck addition to an existing 569 sq. ft. open deck of an existing 6,611 sq. ft. home. Project includes 95 sq. ft. of new deck to north side of deck. Relief requested from minimum shoreline setback requirements for the WR zoning district. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required. Relief Required: The applicant requests the following relief. Relief requested from minimum shoreline setback requirements for the WR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements/ 179-4-080 Setbacks for porches, canopies and decks. The applicant proposes an 85 sq ft addition to the south side of an existing 569 sq ft open deck where it is to be 44 ft 11.5 in from the shoreline where a 50 ft setback is required. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is/is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed by (denial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-74-2017, Michael J. Badera, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Nov17-13 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Badera, Michael Owner: M Dream , LLC- Michael Badera ID Number: QBY-I7-AV-74 County Project#: Nov17-13 Current Zoning: WR Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes construction of an 85 sf deck addition to an existing 569 sf open deck of an existing 6,611 sf home. Project includes 95 sf of new deck on the north side. Relief is request for shoreline setbacks. Site Location: 55 Mason Rd Tax Map Number(s): 226.16-1-20 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: Approve Local Action:/Final Disposition: 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 73-2017 Project Applicant: Mike Weber Project Location: 519 State Route 149 Parcel History: n/a SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to maintain an already constructed 260 sq. ft. deck with stairs at the front of the 1,232 sq. ft. home. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks for the RR-3A zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setbacks for the RR-3A zoning district. 179-4-080 Setbacks for porches, canopies and decks. The existing deck is currently 10.1 ft from the steps to the front property line, 17 ft from the deck to the front property line and 17.5 ft from the deck to the side property line. The setbacks for the RR3A zone to the front is 100 ft and to the side is 75 ft. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination,the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited due to the location of the existing home on a parcel less than 3 ac. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant to the code. Relief requested for front setback to the steps is 89.9 ft, and 83 ft to the deck, relief for the side setback to the deck is 57.5 ft. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal impact. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant has constructed a 260 sq ft open deck addition to the front of the home. The applicant was informed by building and codes to complete a building permit application and the zoning office of the compliance for the setbacks in the RR3A zone. The applicant had a survey completed and submitted the applications for the building permit and area variance for review. Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town of CLccnsbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Mike Weber File Number: Z-AV-73-2017 `1' !; Location: 519 State Route 149 Tax Map Number: 278.-1-31 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Mike Weber. Applicant proposes to maintain an already constructed 260 sq. ft. deck with stairs at the front of the 1,232 sq. ft. home. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks for the RR-3A zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setbacks for the RR-3A zoning district. 179-4-080 Setbacks for porches, canopies and decks. The existing deck is currently 10.1 ft from the steps to the front property line, 17 ft from the deck to the front property line and 17.5 ft from the deck to the side property line. The setbacks for the RR3A zone to the front is 100 ft and to the side is 75 ft. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is/is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed by (denial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-73-2017, Mike Weber, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Nov17-14 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Weber, Mike Owner: Weber, Mike ID Number: QBY-I7-AV-73 County Project#: Nov17-14 Current Zoning: RR-3A Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to maintain an already constructed 260 sf deck with stairs at the front of the 1,232 sf home. Relief requested from minimum setbacks. Site Location: 519 State Rt 149 Tax Map Number(s): 278.-1-31 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significanti nter-munici pal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: NCI Local Action:/Final Disposition: fj 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 75-2017 Project Applicant: Richard Kukuk Project Location: 155 Assembly Point Road Parcel History: n/a SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to demolish existing 1,409 sq. ft. dwelling and construct a new 4,265 sq. ft. single-family dwelling and maintain 783 sq. ft. garage. Relief requested from minimum property line setback requirements and from maximum height restrictions for the WR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setback requirements and from maximum height restrictions for the WR zoning district. Section 179-4-010 Design requirements WR—setback and Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements The new home is to be located 101 ft setback where the average setback for the two adjoining homes is 182 ft setback. The new home is also to be 30.5 ft where a 28 ft height is maximum allowed. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited as the applicant proposes to locate the new home in a similar location as the existing home in regards to setbacks. The height adjustment may also be limited due to the location and slight grade change in that area of the property. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief may be considered moderate relevant to the code. Relief for the shoreline setback is 81 ft and height relief is 2.5 ft. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project as proposed will have minimal impact to the neighborhood. The applicant has included in the plans the location of the new septic system on the site. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: Applicant proposes demolition of an existing home to construct a new 4,265 sq ft home. The new home does not meet shoreline setback because the average of the two adjoin homes is 182 ft and the home is to be located 101 ft setback. The plans show the location of the home on the site, site conditions, and elevations of the home. Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Tbim of Oucenshury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Richard Kukuk File Number: Z-AV-75-2017 ` "v Location: 155 Assembly Point Road Tax Map Number: 239.7-1-29 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Richard Kukuk. Applicant proposes to demolish existing 1,409 sq. ft. dwelling and construct a new 4,265 sq. ft. single-family dwelling and maintain 783 sq. ft. garage. Relief requested from minimum property line setback requirements and from maximum height restrictions for the WR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setback requirements and from maximum height restrictions for the WR zoning district. Section 179-4-010 Design requirements WR—setback and Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements The new home is to be located 101 ft setback where the average setback for the two adjoining homes is 182 ft setback. The new home is also to be 30.5 ft where a 28 ft height is maximum allowed. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is/is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-75-2017, Richard Kukuk, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: �f A� Nov17-15 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Kukuk, Richard Owner: Kukuk, Richard ID Number: QBY-I7-AV-75 County Project#: Nov17-15 Current Zoning: WR Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to demolish existing 1,409 sf dwelling and construct a new 4,265 sf single family dwelling and maintain 783 sf garage. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks. Site Location: 155 Assembly Point Rd Tax Map Number(s): 239.7-1-29 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: NCI Local Action:/Final Disposition: 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 76-2017 Project Applicant: Joe Orlow Project Location: 11 Wagon Trail Parcel History: n/a SEQR Type: Type H Meeting Date: November 15,2017 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to maintain and complete construction of a 891 sq. ft. single-family home. The home will have two open decks; one is 144 sq. ft. and the other is 36 sq. ft. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks,permeability, and road frontage requirements as well as relief from the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)requirements for the WR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setbacks, permeability, and road frontage requirements as well as relief from the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)requirements for the WR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements The applicant proposes to complete construction of a home on a .07 ac pre existing parcel. The building under construction is 24.9 ft from Sunnyside North, 6.2 ft from Wagon Trail, 4.6 ft from the rear east property line, and 6.8 ft from the rear south property line. The zone requires a 30 ft setback from the front property lines and rear property lines as the lot is a corner lot. Relief is requested for permeability where 67.4% is requested where 75%permeability is required and a floor area of 29.6 % is proposed where a 22% is required. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination,the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. The applicant has indicated the project is currently incomplete and will be completed as presented. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the size of the parcel,the location of the existing home and location of the septic area. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant to the code. The relief requested is 5.1 ft from Sunnyside North, 23.8 ft from Wagon Trail, 25.4 ft from the rear east property line, and 23.2 ft from the rear south property line. Relief is requested for permeability-7.6% in excess and floor area of 7.6 % in excess. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal impact on the physical or the environmental conditions of the area. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes to complete construction of an 891 sq. ft. single-family home. The home will have two open decks; one is 144 sq. ft. and the other is 36 sq. ft.. The plans show the location of the home on the parcel with the deck areas. The elevations show the exterior and interior of the home including a storage loft area. The applicant has received a Local Board of Health septic variance. The applicant had been informed a building permit and variance application were required for the project. Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Zoning Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Town d Queensbury Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: Joseph Orlow File Number: Z-AV-76-2017 Location: 11 Wagon Trail Tax Map Number: 290.5-1-21 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday,November 15, 2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Joe Orlow. Applicant proposes to maintain and complete construction of a 891 sq. ft. single-family home. The home will have two open decks; one is 144 sq. ft. and the other is 36 sq. ft. Relief requested from minimum property line setbacks,permeability, and road frontage requirements as well as relief from the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)requirements for the WR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum property line setbacks,permeability, and road frontage requirements as well as relief from the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)requirements for the WR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 Dimensional requirements The applicant proposes to complete construction of a home on a.07 ac pre existing parcel. The building under construction is 24.9 ft from Sunnyside North, 6.2 ft from Wagon Trail, 4.6 ft from the rear east property line, and 6.8 ft from the rear south property line. The zone requires a 30 ft setback from the front property lines and rear property lines as the lot is a corner lot. Relief is requested for permeability where 67.4% is requested where 75%permeability is required and a floor area of 29.6 % is proposed where a 22% is required. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday,November 15, 2017; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty is /is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) / would be outweighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE /DENY AREA VARIANCE Z- AV-76-2017,Joe Orlow, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 15th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Nov17-16 Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on November 8, 2017 Project Name: Orlow, Joseph Owner: Orlow, Joseph ID Number: QBY-I7-AV-76 County Project#: Nov17-16 Current Zoning: WR Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes a 24 sf X 24 sf cabin with a 4'x 9'porch stairs, 6'x24' open deck and a 3.5'x 9.33' laundry area. Home is to be single story , one bedroom. Site Location: 11 Wagon Trail Tax Map Number(s): 290.5-1-21 Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date(if any): County Planning Department: NCI Local Action:/Final Disposition: 11/9/2017 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION