1997-06-16
REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING
JUNE 16, 1997
7:02 P.M.
MTG#29
RES#240-254
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
SUPERVISOR FRED CHAMPAGNE
COUNCILMAN BETTY MONAHAN
COUNCILMAN THEODORE TURNER
COUNCILMAN CONNIE GOEDERT
COUNCILMAN CAROL PULVER
TOWN COUNSEL
MARK SCHACHNER
TOWN OFFICIALS
HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT - P AUL NAYLOR
CONTROLLER - HENRY HESS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - JOHN GORALSKI
SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING AND GROUNDS - CHUCK RICE
PRESS
POST STAR
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN BETTY MONAHAN
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Opened meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING
LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BY ADDING A NEW
CHAPTER 182 ENTITLED "CIVIL ENFORCEMENT"
OPENED 7:02 P.M.
NOTICE SHOWN
TOWN COUNSEL, MARK SCHACHNER-The proposed local law would actually be a new section of the
Town Code, it would relate to any Town Code enforcement matter. The proposed local law would add an
option to the town enforcement staff to enforce the code in what's called a legally civil manner as opposed
to a criminal manner. If somebody is deemed to be in violation of a provision of the Town Code the
appropriate enforcement person, whether that be the Animal Control Officer, Code Compliance Officer,
Zoning Administrator, or whomever would have the option to start a civil action in the Queensbury Town
Court against that person as opposed to a criminal action which is the way the current Town Code
Enforcement Provisions are written. We believe that the civil option affords more flexibility
and is more, I guess what I'll call user friendly and will facilitate the ability to gain our principal goal in this
case which is not punishment but is compliance.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Okay. The public hearing is opened, anyone care to voice an opinion pro
or con, questions?
JOHN SALVADOR, QUEENSBURY -As I understand a civil enforcement requires less on behalf of the
town bringing the action by way of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a very delicate and very
precious privilege right that we have if we are accused of something that the accuser establishes beyond a
reasonable doubt that we're guilty of something.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-That's true.
MR. SAL V ADOR-I can see a parade, I could just see a parade. This is to be brought before Town Court?
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-Yes, this is in Town Court.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-These would exclusively be brought in Town Court. We already
have the authority under existing New York State Law and Code Provisions to start a civil action in New
York State Supreme Court if we decide we wish to do that. This would be a separate layer that would only
be in Town Court.
MR. SALVADOR-That's my only comment there. In the local law Section 182-4 exempts this Chapter.
This Chapter shall not apply to Chapter 94 of the Code, Freshwater Wetlands is there a particular reason for
that?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-That section of the Town Code is based on State Code, it has its
own enforcement provision.
MR. SALVADOR-Has what?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-It's based on the sections of State Law that have their own
enforcement provisions.
MR. SALVADOR-All other town codes are based on State Law.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-No.
MR. SAL V ADOR- They're not?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-They maybe authorized by State Law....
MR. SALVADOR-Exactly.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-That's not the same thing as based on State Law in the contexts of
the Freshwater Wetlands Law.
MR. SALVADOR-So it will be left to someone else to enforce the Freshwater Wetlands part of your code?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-No.
MR. SAL V ADOR- Y ou won't bring them into Town Court then?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Wrong. We just won't have them in civil actions in Town Court.
MR. SAL V ADOR- That's the way you want it?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-That's what we want.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Anyone else care to speak? Pro or con, for or against, questions that you
may have?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-I have a number of questions. John 182-3, Civil Enforcement, how did we
come up with the $3,000.00 penalty?
MR. SCHACHNER-I think it's the maximum authorized by State Law for a Town Court action.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-The last sentence of that same, Enforcement Officer may only seek a civil
penalty not exceeding the lesser amount?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Some sections in Town Code actually specify certain civil
penalties up to a maximum dollar amount less than $3,000.00.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-My question would be how many of those do we already have that state; are a
lesser amount than the $3,000.00?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-I don't know the answer, several.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-Most of the local laws and codes state a specific amount,
there are a few that do not state any amount at all.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-In many cases the ones that state an amount state $1,000.00 and
numbers less than $3,000.00.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-I'm a little confused with the fact that we have other codes that state a lesser
amount then we put in this to cover the codes that don't have that amount. Get me to a point where I can say
we're writing codes kind of unified instead of spotty.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-I probably can't do that, I was not here when the other provisions
were selected. Three thousand dollars is the maximum allowed under State Law, but you know it's not a
hundred percent consistent.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-I can't quite remember why we went forward with this. It was recommended
by somebody, was it a Judge?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-We've collectively all recommended this and it was actually my
idea to begin with. The focus of it is not the different amount that you are seeking it's the different type of
process. The way the Town Code Enforcement Provisions are currently written, every single Town Code
violation action is in essence a criminal action. The person is charged with a set of criminal documents,
they are subject to a New York State Statue called a Criminal Procedural Law. In fact most of the offenses
in the current Town Code are technically subject to incarceration
even though we never seek that, obviously. This would give the option of bringing the action strictly in a
civil non-criminal context.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-We went with this because of it not being as offensive as a criminal action for
something that's not.....
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-That's a very good characterization.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-When we serve someone with a criminal summons often
times it is very upsetting to them.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-I recall now, thank you.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Remember the case we had with the septic tank issue we didn't have
evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think this would have probably eliminated the problems we
experienced with that. Any other comments from the board? Mark do you have something more to add?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-The only thing I would add for the benefit of the board is that we
did provide both Town Justices, well let me back up, we met with both Town Justices to discuss this
concept before we went forward. I think the Town Board is aware of that already cause we reported about
that before. We also provided the Town Justices with a copy of the actual proposed Local Law to make
sure they were comfortable with it before we took action on it. Unfortunately Judge Muller has not had a
chance to review it, he wasn't the Judge last week Judge Bacas has reviewed it, he is comfortable with it.
I spoke with Judge Muller earlier this evening, he will get to it very soon but he just didn't have a chance to
do it before tonight's public hearing. As a result, I would be inclined to recommend that the Town Board
not enact this tonight because I would hate to go through the paper work of enacting it and then have Judge
Muller come up with some good comment that we didn't take into account. My suggestion would be that
the Town Board consider closing the Public Hearing, but then await action until our first meeting in July.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Want to do that?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Yes, I agree with that.
COUNCILMAN TURNER-Yes.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Public Hearing closed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 7:15 P.M.
CORRESPONDENCE
DEPUTY TOWN CLERK O'BRIEN-Read following letter into the record.
Town Supervisor
Town Board
c/o Town Clerk
Town of Queensbury
Bay Road
Queensbury, NY 12804
Dear Sir or Madame:
The steering committee of Citizens for Queensbury has carefully reviewed proposed designs for road
construction relating to Aviation Road, Dixon Road and Potter Road. We offer the following comments:
1. The current levels of service as calculated in both the Transportation Concepts traffic study and
the Harza traffic study demonstrate no urgency for major road construction at these intersections. We
believe there is time for a more calm and deliberative approach to determining the best way to mitigate
potential future traffic impacts at these intersections.
2. There are a number of discrepancies between earlier versions of the Harza study and later
versions. We are concerned that decisions regarding major Town expenditures, with potential long-term
impacts on community planning, should be made on the basis of objective analysis of the facts and not be
clouded by bias that may have been introduced as a result of concerns about recent litigation.
3. The Harza study indicated that the major construction proposed in the "preferred" alternative
would have little, if any, long term mitigating effect on projected levels of service at the most problematic
intersection: Dixon Road! Aviation.
4. The Harza study raised several serious safety concerns regarding the proposed widening of
Aviation Road and Potter Road.
5. The Harza study was unclear as to which aspects of the Town's "preferred" plan were responsible
for any potential improvements in projected levels of service. Again, the proposals were developed in the
context of an adversarial relationship between community members and the Town which interfered with an
open and deliberative analysis that could have clarified some of these issues.
6. Projected levels of service in the Harza study were based on full build out of a 190 unit planned
unit development with major access via the Dixon/Aviation intersection. Future analysis of traffic and road
construction needs should look at the impact of a lower density of development at this site, as called for the
Town's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and in its current zoning.
7. Any future improvements at or near these intersections should include provisions for safe bicycle
and pedestrian movement parallel to and across these roads and for safety of children waiting for and
exiting school buses.
8. Any future improvements at or near these intersections should require careful restoration of
aesthetic features disturbed by the improvements and their construction.
9. State mandated environmental review for any proposed road expansion or widening should be
careful and substantive. A public hearing would also be constructive.
10. Decisions regarding the expenditure of substantial amounts of public funds should be weighed
carefully against competing needs for those funds or against possible tax relief.
11. Finally, in our zeal to cut motorists commuting time by a few minutes, lets be careful not to
destroy the character that has attracted so many to our Town in the first place.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
Sincerely,
Mark Hoffman
on behalf of the
steering committee,
Citizens for Queensbury
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR
REVOCABLE PERMIT TO LOCATE A MOBILE HOME OUTSIDE OF
A MOBILE HOME COURT FOR TRUMAN AND JULIANNE GLEASON
ON BIG BAY ROAD, LOT 136-2-5
RESOLUTION NO.: 240, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is authorized pursuant to ~113-12 of the
Code of the Town of Queensbury to issue permits for mobile homes to be located outside of mobile home
courts under certain circumstances, and
WHEREAS, Truman and Julianne Gleason have filed an application for a "Mobile Home Outside
of a Mobile Home Court" Revocable Permit, in accordance with said ~113-12 of the Code of the Town of
Queensbury, to locate a mobile home at property situated on Big Bay Road, Lot 136-2-5, Queensbury, New
York 12804, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury determines it to be appropriate to hold a
public hearing regarding said permit application,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury will hold a public hearing on July
7, 1997 at 7:00 p.ill., at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Town of Queensbury, Warren
County, New York, to consider the application by Truman and Julianne Gleason for a "Mobile Home
Outside of a Mobile Home Court" Revocable Permit on property situated on Big Bay Road, Lot 136-2-5,
Queensbury, New York, and at that time all persons interested in the subject thereof will be heard, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury be and is hereby directed and
authorized to publish and provide notice of said public hearing in the official newspaper of the Town of
Queensbury, to post a copy thereof on the bulletin board of the Office of the Town Clerk, and to mail a
copy thereof to the Town Planning Board Chairman, at least ten (10) days prior to said hearing.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE:
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Questioned the meaning of the words under the section of Definitions.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted Motor Vehicle, Vehicle, Person, and Park, are defined in
the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Recommended having the law present the night of the public hearing.
Questioned the definition of a period of time?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Doesn't believe it is defined in the Vehicle and Traffic Law or in
the proposed law. Noted law officers typically interpret that to mean if a vehicle is parked and nobody is
getting in and out.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Questioned if there was part of the law which allows them to unload?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Doesn't think there is anything expressed in the Vehicle and
Traffic Law that allows unloading in No Parking Zones. Noted if somebody is in the process of loading or
unloading they are not considered to be parked, typically.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Questioned under Penalties who would enforce this?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted that the penalty provisions should be Sheriff enforced.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Questioned if all the businesses will be notified on this road?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted there is no legal provision that says that, but you could do
that.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Recommended that this be done.
RESOLUTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED LOCAL LAW
REGULATING PARKING ON DUNHAM'S BAY ROAD
IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
RESOLUTION NO.: 241,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
WHEREAS, at this meeting there has been presented for adoption by the Town Board of the Town
of Queensbury, a Local Law which would provide for the regulation of parking on Dunham's Bay Road in
the Town of Queensbury, and
WHEREAS, such legislation is authorized pursuant to the Town Law, Vehicle and Traffic Law,
and the Municipal Home Rule Law of the State of New York, and
WHEREAS, before the Town Board may take action with regard to the proposed Local Law, it is
necessary to conduct a public hearing on said proposed Local Law,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the proposed action is determined to be a Type II Action under the rules and
regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation relative to SEQRA, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury shall meet and
hold a public hearing at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, Warren County,
New York at 7:00 p.rn., on the 7th day of July, 1997, to consider said proposed Local Law and to hear all
persons interested on the subject matter thereof concerning the same and to take such action thereon as is
required or authorized by law, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury is hereby
directed to publish and post the notice that has also been presented at this meeting concerning the proposed
Local Law in the manner provided by law.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RETENTION OF SERVICES OF
AMTEK MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP. (AMTEK) FOR 1997
RESOLUTION NO.: 242,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Betty Monahan
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury previously retained the services of
Amtek Management Services Corp. (AMTEK) to provide various personnel consultant services during
1996, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury desires to again retain the services of
AMTEK to perform personnel consultant services during 1997 in accordance with the terms and provisions
of the Employee Management System Agreement presented at this meeting at a cost of $100 per hour for
one year immediately following the signing of the attached Agreement, plus travel expenses at .30 per mile,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby approves and authorizes
the retention of the services of Amtek Management Services Corp. (AMTEK) during 1997 at a cost of $100
per hour for one year immediately following the signing of the attached Agreement, plus travel expenses at
.30 per mile, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Amtek shall only perform consultant work upon authorization of the Town
Board by project on an estimated hours basis, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Employee
Management System Agreement presented at this meeting, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the costs of the services authorized herein shall be paid for from Account No.
01-1430-4400.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE:
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Questioned the length of time of the contract?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Noted they will only charge for the hours used within that year.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Questioned if they should be contracting with them for only the special
project?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted it is a special project plus some other services that we may require
based on a telephone call. The board will need to approve any and all services that are called for and set
limits as the issues are identified. Questioned if Councilman Goedert would like to put restrictions on this?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Recommended hiring them for a hundred dollars an hour per project.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted you could put a sentence in the resolution saying, each project and
the numbers of hours allotted to such project shall be approved by the Town Board.
TOWN BOARD-Agreed.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted to add after the first resolved, that Amtek shall only
perform consultant work upon authorization of the Town Board by project on an estimated hours basis.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Recommended that this be included in the contract.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CARRY OVER OF VACATION TIME
RESOLUTION NO.: 243,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHEREAS, Pam Martin of the Town Counsel's Office has requested that she be allowed to carry
over two (2) vacation days past her hiring anniversary date of July 5, 1997,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby authorizes Pam Martin to
carry over two (2) vacation days past her hiring anniversary date of July 5, 1997, such vacation days to be
utilized prior to July 5, 1998.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR
EXCAVATION AND DEBRIS REMOVAL AND NEW CONSTRUCTION OF
BOCCI BALL AND SHUFFLE BOARD COURTS AT THE
QUEENSBURY ACTIVITIES CENTER
RESOLUTION NO.: 244,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Betty Monahan
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury previously advertised for bids for the
excavation and debris removal of two existing bocci ball courts and the construction of one new bocci ball
court and one new shuffle board court at the Queensbury Activities Center, and
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury received one bid for the project and the Town Facilities
Manager has recommended that the Town reject the bid as it exceeds the budgeted amount allocated for the
work, and
WHEREAS, the Facilities Manager has further advised the Town Board that he will seek
alternative materials and methods for the Town Building and Grounds Department to complete the
excavation and debris removal and construction project "in-house,"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby reject the bid received for
the excavation and debris removal and new construction of bocci ball and shuffle board courts project at the
Queensbury Activities Center and further authorizes and directs the Facilities Manager to take whatever
steps may be appropriate or necessary for the Building and Grounds Department to complete the project
"in-house. "
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RETENTION OF NACE ENGINEERING
TO REVISE CURRENT HIGHWAY GARAGE RE-ROOFING SPECIFICATIONS
RESOLUTION NO.: 245, 1997
INTRODUCED BY : Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY : Mr. Theodore Turner
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 364.96, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury authorized
the retention of the services of Thomas Nace of Haanen Engineering for the purposes of creating bid
specifications regarding roofing upgrades to the Highway Garage Building, and
WHEREAS, the Facilities Manager has advised that the existing bid specifications need to be
modified to allow for a more standardized roofing system, and
WHEREAS, Thomas Nace (now of Nace Engineering) has offered to perform the additional
engineering services and modify the bid specifications for an amount not to exceed $1,600,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby authorizes and directs the
Town Supervisor to retain the professional engineering services of Thomas Nace of Nace Engineering to
modify the bid specifications regarding roofing upgrades to the Highway Garage, for a sum not to exceed
$1,600, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement consistent
with the terms and provisions of this resolution and in a form to be approved by Town Counsel, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the costs associated with this resolution shall be paid for from the Highway
Garage Improvement Miscellaneous Capital Construction Account #089-5132-2899.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT NOTED SHE WOULD VOTE YES AS LONG AS THE COMPLETION
DATE IS INCLUDED.
DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE:
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Questioned if a completion time should be put in the order for Mr. Nace?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted there is a construction schedule.
SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING & GROUNDS, MR. RICE-Noted he has put together an
engineering/construction time line.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Questioned if this would be part of the contract?
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-The resolution states that you are authorizing entrance into an
agreement consistent with the terms and provisions of this resolution and in a form that we approve. Noted
the resolution by itself does not expressly incorporate that time frame, but the agreement can if you wish.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Recommended putting the completion date in.
RESOLUTION TO AMEND 1997 BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO.: 246, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
WHEREAS, certain Town Departments have requested fund transfers for the 1997 Budget and the
Chief Fiscal Officer has approved said requests,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the funds be transferred as follows for the
1997 budget:
WATER:
FROM:
TO:
$ AMOUNT:
40-8340-2020
(Vehicles)
40-8340-4330
(Equip. Maint.)
8,203.
40-8340-1580-02
(Meter Man O.T.)
40-8340-4330
(Equip. Maint.)
2,217.
and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the 1997 Town Budget is hereby amended accordingly.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INCREASE IN FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES IN
CONNECTION WITH THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. 247, 97
(PULLED)
INTRODUCED BY: MRS. CAROL PULVER
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: MRS. BETTY MONAHAN
DISCUSSION HELD:
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Noted the resolution is to increase their engineering cost for a $110,000.
Questioned who asked for assistance from O'Brien and Gere and if it was needed?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Noted most of this was done for changes of replacing and repairing the new
filter.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Referred to the letter of December 4th, 1996 noting she questioned Mr.
Flaherty and O'Brien and Gere asking what this entailed this is why the follow-up letters came and broke it
down.
After further discussion it was the decision of the Town Board to pull this resolution and have Mr. Flaherty
explain this at the next workshop session.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY
AT WEST MOUNTAIN SKI CENTER
RESOLUTION NO.: 247,1997
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Fred Champagne
WHEREAS, Bay Fireworks, Inc., on behalf of Entertronics, Inc. - WCKM Radio Station, has
requested permission to conduct a fireworks display as follows:
SPONSOR: WCKM FM! AM Radio Station
PLACE: West Mountain Ski Center
DATE: July 3, 1997
TIME: 10:00 P.M. (approx.)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk, in accordance with the Penal Law of the State of New York,
~405, is hereby authorized to issue a permit subject to the following conditions:
A. An application for permit be filed which sets forth:
1. The name of the body sponsoring the display and the names of the persons actually to be in
charge of the firing of the display.
2. The date and time of day at which the display is to be held.
3. The exact location planned for the display.
4. The age, experience and physical characteristics of the persons who are to do the actual
discharging of the fireworks.
5. The number and kind of fireworks to be discharged.
6. The manner and place of storage of such fireworks prior to the display.
7. A diagram of the grounds on which the display is to be held showing the point at which the
fireworks are to be discharged, the location of all buildings, highways, and other lines of communication,
the lines behind which the audience will be restrained and the location of all nearby trees, telegraph or
telephone lines or other overhead obstructions.
B. Proof of insurance be received which demonstrates insurance coverage through an insurance
company licensed in the State of New York, and that the Town of Queensbury is named as an additional
insured and that the insurance coverage contain a hold harmless clause which shall protect the Town of
Queensbury;
C. Inspections and approval must be made by the Queensbury Fire Marshal and the Chief of West
Glens Falls Volunteer Fire Co., Inc.,
D. Cleanup of the area must be completed by 10:00 a.rn., the following day, and all debris must
be cleaned up including all unexploded shells, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the permit or letter of authorization by the Town Clerk of the Town of
Queensbury shall, pursuant to the Penal Law of the State of New York, ~405, provide:
the actual point at which the fireworks are to be fired shall be at least two hundred feet from the
nearest permanent building, public highway or railroad or other means of travel and at least fifty feet from
the nearest above ground telephone or telegraph line, tree or other overhead obstruction, that the audience
at such display shall be restrained behind lines at least one hundred and fifty feet from the point at which
the fireworks are discharged and only persons in active charge of the display shall be allowed inside these
lines, that all fireworks that fire a projectile shall be so set up that the projectile will go into the air as
nearby (nearly) as possible in a vertical direction, unless such fireworks are to be fired from the shore of a
lake or other large body of water, when they may be directed in such manner that the falling residue from
the deflagration will fall into such lake or body of water, that any fireworks that remain unfired after the
display is concluded shall be immediately disposed of in a way safe for the particular type of fireworks
remaining, that no fireworks display shall be held during any wind storm in which the wind reaches a
velocity of more than thirty miles per hour, that all the persons in actual charge of firing the fireworks shall
be over the age of eighteen years, competent and physically fit for the task, that there shall be at least two
such operators constantly on duty during the discharge and that at least two soda-acid or other approved
type fire extinguisher of at least two and one-half gallons capacity each shall be kept at as widely separated
points as possible within the actual area of the display.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT LARRY RINGER TO
TOWN PLANNING BOARD
RESOLUTION NO. 248, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury has previously established the Town of Queensbury
Planning Board pursuant to applicable New York State Law, and
WHEREAS, a member of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board has recently resigned creating
a vacancy,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby appoints Larry Ringer to
serve as a member of the Town Planning Board, effective immediately, to fill the unexpired term of David
West, said term to expire on December 31, 1997.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT ROBERT MC NALLY TO
TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
RESOLUTION NO. 249, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury has previously established the Town Zoning Board of
Appeals (ZBA) pursuant to New York State Town Law Section 267, and
WHEREAS, a member of the ZBA has recently resigned creating a vacancy,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby appoints Robert P.
McNally to serve as a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, effective immediately, to fill the unexpired
term of Donald O'Leary, said term to expire on December 31, 1998.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
RESOLUTION ISSUING POSITIVE DECLARATION
ON PROPOSED LOCAL LAW NO. , 1997
A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 177 TO BE ENTITLED,
"ZONING - EXEMPTION FROM SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
FOR CONFORMING DEVELOPMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES"
WHICH CHAPTER SHALL PROVIDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS
FOR GAINING APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
RESOLUTION NO.: 250,1997
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, by Resolution No. 210, 97, set a public
hearing to consider Local Law No. _, 1997 to Amend the Code of the Town of Queensbury by adding a
new Chapter 177 entitled, "Zoning - Exemption From Site Plan Review Procedures for Conforming
Development in Industrial Zones," which Chapter shall provide an administrative process for gaining
approval for industrial development, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held on June 2, 1997 to consider the Local Law and all
persons interested on the subject matter were heard, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified to act as lead agency
with respect to compliance with SEQRA which requires environmental review of certain actions
undertaken by local governments, and more specifically, is the lead agency for purposes of the review of
the proposed Local Law, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is being treated as a Type I action pursuant to the Rules and
Regulations of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board after considering the action proposed herein and thoroughly
analyzing the said action with respect to potential environmental concerns, determines that the action may
have a significant effect on the environment, these effects including, but not limited to impacts on traffic,
waterbodies and threatened or endangered species, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that pursuant to SEQRA, the Positive Declaration presented at this meeting is
hereby approved and the Town Clerk's Office is hereby authorized and directed to file it in accordance with
the provisions of the SEQRA regulations.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE:
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted the step of going through the long form Environmental
Assessment Form is somewhat difficult on something this abstract. Noted the proposed local law will be
the subject of an Environmental Impact Statement. Noted it is not needed to go through the long form
Environmental Assessment Form. The purpose of going through an Environmental Assessment Form is
basically to decide whether or not to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted as long as they are going to do the full EIS this is insignificant and
has no real value.
TOWN BOARD-Agreed.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted to delete the first whereas clause. Delete in the first
resolved, second line of the phrase reviewing the environmental assessment form. Delete the entire second
resolved clause and the next resolve, but leave the last one.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF VERANDA LANE
LOCATED IN THE VISTAS ON WEST MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION NO. 251,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHEREAS, Harold T. Raven has offered a deed to dedicate Veranda Lane in Phase I of the Vistas
on West Mountain Subdivision to the Town of Queensbury, which is more particularly described in the
survey map presented at this meeting, and
WHEREAS, Paul Naylor, Town Highway Superintendent, has recommended acceptance of this
road, and
WHEREAS, the form of the deed and title to the road offered for dedication have been reviewed
and approved by Town Counsel,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the aforementioned deed for dedication of Veranda Lane is hereby accepted and
approved contingent upon receipt of title insurance adequately insuring the Town's ownership, which shall
be in a form acceptable to Town Counsel, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the $12,000 Escrow Account be properly established.
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized to execute, sign and affix the Town
seal to any and all documents necessary to complete the transaction, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause said deed to be
recorded in the Warren County Clerk's Office, after which time said deed shall be properly filed and
maintained in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the road be hereby added to the official inventory of Town Highways to be
described as follows:
Name:
Veranda Lane
Road Number: 514
Description: Beginning at West Mountain Road and continu-
ing in a westerly direction, a distance of
1357' and .26 hundredths of a mile and ending
at a dead end.
Feet:
1357.26
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE:
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Questioned that in the resolution there isn't anything setting up the account
for the $12,000. Noted normally when we take something like that for an escrow account we mention it in
the resolution.
TOWN COUNSEL, MR. SCHACHNER-Noted that you could add a resolve clause in the resolution.
Recommended adding a new second resolve saying, Be it Further Resolved, that the $12,000 Escrow
Account be properly established.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND THE COUNTY OF WARREN REGARDING
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
RESOLUTION NO.: 252,97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Carol Pulver
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 121, 1997, the Warren County Board of Supervisors authorized
intermunicipal agreements between Warren County and any interested Town therein for solid waste
disposal and the hauling of processible and non-processible solid waste to the Adirondack Resource
Recovery Facility, and
WHEREAS, Warren County has prepared an agreement between the County and the Town of
Queensbury for the acceptance from the Town for disposal of processible and qualified non-processible
municipal solid waste, provided that the Town of Queensbury arrange for the hauling of the solid waste,
and
WHEREAS, Warren County has set the fees for the disposal at fifty-five dollars ($55) per ton of
municipal solid waste delivered to the facility, and
WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed agreement has been presented to this meeting,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby approves of the proposed
intermunicipal agreement between the Town of Queensbury and Warren County relating to municipal solid
waste disposal and authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to execute the agreement and any other
documentation to effectuate the terms of the agreement.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mr.
Champagne
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
OLD BUSINESS/TOWN BOARD MATTERS
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Questioned the status of the Town of Moreau water?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Has spoken with Attorney Hafner, noting he will be putting together a
draft contract, would hope to have it by next workshop. Questioned if the board would like to review
contract?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Recommended having the Water Department attend meeting.
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Noted she would like to receive the draft ahead of time.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Thanked Tom Flaherty and Ralph VanDusen for their help and information
they gave the Town Board.
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Seconded that motion.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Questioned the status of Sweet Road?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Noted there is a Highway Committee Meeting scheduled for Thursday, at
10:00 a.rn. in reference to Sweet Road. Also noted there will be other topics discussed at this meeting.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Spoke to the board regarding the time frame of the contract documents of
the re-roofing of the Highway Garage?
SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING AND GROUNDS, CHUCK RICE-Noted he will have the body of
the contract drafted for review with Town Counsel before he sits down with the contractor.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted this should be done before the work is awarded. The specimen
contract should be in the bid specifications when they go out.
SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING AND GROUNDS, MR. RICE-Noted that it's already in the original
bid documents that went out the first time and it will still be in the bid documents this time.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted that it may be an unrealistic time schedule.
SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING & GROUNDS, MR. RICE-Noted it is a time line that he will try his
best to follow.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Spoke to the board regarding the reconstruction of Route 9, noting the
merchants are concerned and would like to see some pro-action by the Town Board, Warren County
Supervisors and Lou Tessier. They are concerned about the service road behind which includes the State
and County and the lighting system. Noted the businessmen are looking for a meeting with the Town
Board and the Board of Supervisors and Lou Tessier to find out what is needed.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted there is a meeting scheduled for Tuesday at 10:30 a.m. in the
Supervisor's Conference Room.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted they are looking for a meeting in addition to the one that is
scheduled.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-Noted he has just received the draft of the Million Dollar
Half Mile Study that breaks it down into two phases. Phase I is the short term work that New York State
DOT will be undertaking. Phase II is the long term plan which is the loop road and the Warren County
Tourism Center etc. Noted if it is the wish of the Town Board, County Board to move up the Phase II time
table, that is something that can be done.
OPEN FORUM
MR. SALVADOR-Spoke to the board regarding the proposed local law concerning Parking on Dunham's
Bay Road. Questioned if the local law has been drafted?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-The local law has been drafted.
MR. SALVADOR-Questioned if there is a plan associated with the law?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted the plan is to resurface the existing road. All of the parking areas
that are there now will no longer be there. There will be No Parking on the road and signs put up on the
one side.
MR. SALVADOR-Noted there are only three abutting property owners to this road the fourth one being the
NYS DOT. Questioned if DOT will be put on notice?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Noted she is sure all involved agencies will be notified.
MR. SALVADOR-Hopes the improvements will be such that the ban on two-way traffic can be lifted.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Doesn't expect this will happen.
MR. SALVADOR-Spoke to the board regarding the increase in fees for engineering services for the Water
Plant Expansion. Questioned if the contract with the engineers for the project itself cover the procedure to
be followed in the event extras are incurred, also questioned if each extra includes its fee?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted he would have to go back to the minutes to confirm it.
MR. SALVADOR-Questioned who will prepare the Environmental Impact Statement regarding the
Positive Declaration for Industrial Development?
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-Noted the Community Development Department in
conjunction with Miller, Mannix, and Pratt will prepare it, possibly Rist Frost if necessary.
MR. SALVADOR-Questioned if Warren County is going to include hookup costs in the sewer project for
North Queensbury?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Not to his knowledge.
MR. SALVADOR-Questioned where the three million dollars came from?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted there has been an inflation cost since the project was first
engineered. Secondly some of the engineering work that was done hasn't passed through O'Brien and Gere
and now we are looking for alternatives that will be more costly to put in place.
MR. SALVADOR-Spoke to the board regarding supplying town water to the Jenkinsville Road area, noted
there should be money in the landfill closure budget to do this.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted this was only a proposal that Mike Brandt put forth and it never had
any substance to it. All the tests that the Department of Health did, there is no contamination in any well
that she is aware of in that area.
ROBERT EDWARDS, HOLDEN AVENUE-Spoke to the board noting his concern regarding the condition
of his street. Questioned if Holden Avenue is scheduled to be repaved?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Noted that could be something that Councilman Goedert could discuss at the
Highway Committee Meeting.
PLINEY TUCKER, QUEENSBURY-Spoke to the board regarding the Local Law, Industrial Parks.
Questioned how this would affect Carey Road Industrial Park?
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. GORALSKI-Noted it is a subdivision in a light industrial zone, it will be
included and looked at as part of the Environmental Impact Statement. If the local law is passed as written
now, if anyone wanted to come in, develop a site along Carey Road there would be an extensive list of
criteria that they would have to meet. If they met all of the things in that criteria they would get an
administrative approval similar to a building permit, they wouldn't have to go to the Planning Board for site
plan review.
MR. TUCKER-Questioned the status of the landfill closure?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted it should be soon.
MR. TUCKER-Questioned if Malcom Pirnie, contractor for the landfill if their time is going on
continually?
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-That is part of the contract. They have to certify that this is complete and
up to the standards of the contract.
MR. TUCKER-Questioned if additional charges are incurring?
TOWN BOARD-No.
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-Noted they are waiting for the warranty to expire.
MR. JOHN STROUGH-Thanked Supervisor Champagne for coming to school to talk to his classes.
Questioned the status of Aviation Road?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT -Noted she hasn't seen any confirm set of plans from Mr. Scudder the engineer
that was hired to do the job.
MR. STROUGH-Noted his concern for the need of a pedestrian, bicycle path to be incorporated in the
project. Questioned if it was agreed with the State to have some sort of bicycle, pedestrian path?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-There was an Ice Tea Grant that was being seeked, noted it was not granted.
They are discussing with the school when they get their project done that maybe the bike path could go into
their campus area.
MR. STROUGH-Questioned if a meeting could be set up to outline a Comprehensive Plan?
COUNCILMAN GOEDERT-Noted they are not at that stage yet.
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Recommended that he speak with the Recreation Commission regarding his
proposal for a bike path.
DENNIS BROWER, QUEENSBURY-Congratulated the board on the successful sale of water to the Town
of Moreau. Questioned if the money for the buy-in is going to be used to retire debt immediately?
SUPERVISOR CHAMP AGNE- The money will be used to off set the cost of what the town has to do on
our side in order to get the water to the middle of the river. The board has agreed to take the water to the
center of the river at which point Moreau would tie into it there.
MR. BROWER-What are the projections regarding the plant, could you supply the City of Glens Falls?
SUPERVISOR CHAMPAGNE-At this point in time with Hudson Falls coming on and Moreau it is
doubtful. Noted the plant is module, could always add another module. Tom Flaherty has indicated that we
could go thirty million gallons a day.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Noted if they were to help Glens Falls permanently, it would be another
module that would have to go to the plant. Whoever needs the water would be responsible.
MR. BROWER-Questioned when they projected the size of the plant did they project that Glens Falls
would buy into the plant?
COUNCILMAN PULVER-No.
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-We didn't project anyone buying into that plant.
MR. BROWER-Questioned if Kingsbury was a new customer?
COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-They have been a customer.
COUNCILMAN PULVER-Noted all the money will stay with the Water Department because they are a
special district. Anything that isn't spent to collect with the City of Moreau will go into their surplus which
will eventually reduce their budget which reduces the debt.
HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT, P AUL NAYLOR-Spoke to the board regarding a request from Tom
Jarrett to use the backhoe to dig test holes regarding the sewer project in Cleverdale. After further
discussion it was the decision of the Town Board to wait for further information regarding this matter.
OPEN FORM CLOSED 8:35 P.M.
RESOLUTION ENTERING EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 253, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns Regular Session and
moves into Executive Session to discuss Cole's Woods and a grievance issue.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Turner, Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr.
Champagne
Noes: None
Absent:None
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING EXECUTIVE SESSION AND
REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING
RESOLUTION NO. 254, 97
INTRODUCED BY: Mrs. Connie Goedert
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns from Executive Session
and moves back into Regular Session, and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its Regular Town Board
Meeting.
Duly adopted this 16th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
Ayes: Mrs. Goedert, Mrs. Pulver, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Champagne
Noes: None
Absent:None
No further action taken.
On motion the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully Submitted,
Darleen M. Dougher
Town Clerk
Town of Queensbury