Loading...
3.4 3.4 Zoning\\Rezoning App to Planning Board – APEX Capital – West Mt Ski Area – 8-5-19 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TOWN CLERK TO SUBMIT APEX CAPITAL, LLC’S PETITION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION TO QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD AND REQUESTING PLANNING BOARD TO SEEK LEAD AGENCY STATUS RESOLUTION NO.: ___________________________________________________, 2019 INTRODUCED BY: ___________________________________________________ WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: ___________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Apex Capital, LLC submitted a zoning change application to the Queensbury Town Clerk’s Office on July 11, 2019 to allow for the expansion of the West Mountain Ski Area parking lot, and WHEREAS, Apex Capital, LLC has also submitted to the Town a site plan review application for the expansion of the West Mountain Ski Area parking lot, construction of a zip line attraction, and approval of an existing mountain biking venue, and WHEREAS, the applications have been reviewed by the Town Planning Staff and deemed complete for purposes of review, and WHEREAS, applications for zoning changes and site plan review are subject to Warren County Planning Department review in accordance with §239-m of NYS General Municipal Law, and WHEREAS, applications for zoning changes that include projects requiring site plan review may be forwarded to the Town Planning Board for recommendations in accordance with §179-15-040 of the Town Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, following such recommendations, the Queensbury Town Board will review the application and take such other action as it shall deem necessary and proper, and WHEREAS, prior to making a decision about whether to approve the zoning change, it is necessary to conduct a review under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), for potential environmental effects, and WHEREAS, the projects proposed with the zoning change application are also subject to SEQRA review and the Planning Board has the necessary knowledge and experience to conduct any necessary SEQRA review and evaluate the potential environmental impacts for both the proposed zoning change and the proposed project, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to forward Apex Capital, LLC’s application received by the Town Clerk’s Office on July 11, 2019 to the Queensbury Planning Board for SEQRA review, report and recommendation, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby consents to the Planning Board acting as Lead Agency for any needed SEQRA review of this project, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to execute any necessary documents and the Town’s Department of Community Development to notify, if and when appropriate, any other Involved Agencies of the Town Board’s consent to the Planning Board serving as Lead Agency for SEQRA Review of the project and the Town Supervisor, Town Clerk and/or Department of Community Development to take any other necessary actions to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted this 5 day of August, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: StU 10 . A Landscape Architecture, D.P.C. r 2 , 44 Response to 12.14.2018 Comments Q . t` Ms. Laura Moore 11, Planner o C� �� Town of Queensbury, NY "�� RE:Proposed West Mountain Ski Area Zip-Line Project an• = ' .- - one Change related to parking lot expansion. Question 1.a) Petition of rezone of parcels 315.5-1-3.2, 315.5-1-2, what other parcels are involved? Answer 1.a) No other parcels are included in the zone change request. Only parcels 315.5-1-3.2 and 315.5-1-2 are proposed to be re-zoned from RMD Residential Medium Density to RC Recreational Commercial. Question 1.a.i) What is the existing size of the parking area? Answer 1.a.i) The existing parking lot at West Mountain is 5.5+/-acres in size. Question 1.a.ii) What is the proposed size of the parking area? Answer 1.a.ii) Total acreage of the two parcels to be rezoned is 4.54+/- acres. However, only 2.07 acres will be developed for overflow parking. House/garage complexes on both parcels will be maintained along West Mountain Road and used for ski area purposes. Addition 50-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained between the parking area and adjac . I . Question 1.a.iii.1) ,`ti Condition of existing parking area? r JCL , LLD ?U�R1?lilg Answer 1.a.iii.1) a' C RleN8844Y cp FlC� w�4 The existing parking lot consists of a gravel surfaced finish. 8 Z 0 � sb £ � 480 Broadway,Suite 324 I P.O. Box 272 I Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1518.832.4005 Question 1,a.iii.2) Condition of proposed parking area? Answer 1.a.iii.2) The proposed parking lots on the 43 West Mountain Road and 57 West Mountain Road parcels will be gravel. A 50-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained between the parking area and adjacent residential uses. Stormwater will be managed on-site. Biofiltration is proposed with a discharge to an existing stormwater pipe. (See SWPPP and engineering drawings attached to applications). Question 1.a.iv.1.a) Describe parking arrangement on site—Number of vehicles—Cars-location? Answer 1.a.iv.1.a) The existing gravel parking lot can accommodate+/-558 cars and the proposed parking lot expansion an additional+/- 150 cars for a total of+/- 708 cars, excluding buses. Question 1.a.iv.1.b) Describe parking arrangement on site—Number of vehicles—Buses-location? Answer 1.a.iv.1.b) Bus parking varies as per time and day of the week. Buses will park in the existing gravel parking lot at its south end.This will reduce the total number of cars by 68 if this lot is fully used by buses (which varies day to day). However, under holiday and event periods total car and bus parking is anticipated to be adequate with the addition of the new over flow parking lots which will have a +/- 150 car capacity. Question 1.a.iv.2.a) Describe parking arrangement on site—Parking process—Entrance used/exit used? Answer 1.a.i v.2.a) No change to the entrance/exit system is proposed at this time.All cars and buses will enter into the existing parking lot and subsequently exit from that lot. Cars and buses using the proposed overflow parking lot will enter from and exit to the existing parking lot. In the future, a new driveway may be considered to access West Mountain Road between 43 and 57 West Mountain Road. Question 1.b) Zip-line—confirm parcels Answer 1.b) The proposed zip-line is totally on parcel 307.-1-29 which is the existing West Mountain Ski Area site zoned RC Recreation Commercial. (See attached drawings Z0.0,Z1.0,Z2.0,Z3.0,Z4.0,S1.0 and S2.0). Question 1.b.i) Number of stations? Answer 1.b.i) There are seven stations or towers proposed. At the summit is a "launch tower".At the base lodge is a "landing tower"There are five intermediate towers or stations. Question 1.b.ii) Number of features? Answer 1.b.ii) There are several features on the zip-line system. Double lines are proposed between each tower or station for each of the six runs so that a total of 12 riders can be accommodated at any one time. The landing tower will be equipped with three "fall jumps" located at the heights of 80', 60', and 30'to accommodate exits.A spiral staircase will also be included for those not wishing to "jump". Question 1.b.iii) Lighting? Answer 1.b.iii) The zip-line will not be illuminated to highlight the towers. Some very low-level LED strands will be added along the ride. Focused lighting will also be added within the zip-line towers beneath the roofs. Question 1.b.iv.1) Ground disturbance—Que pad? Answer 1.b.iv.1) The que pad or launch tower(Tower A) includes the access platform to the zip-line. A total ground disturbance of 184 SF is proposed. Question 1.b.iv.2) Ground disturbance—Station locations? Answer 1.b.iv.2) Station locations at intermediate towers B, C, D, E and F require a ground disturbance of 120 SF per tower or 600 SF total.The landing tower or base tower(tower G) requires a ground disturbance of 900 sf.Therefore,a total ground disturbance for all seven towers is 1,684 sf. Question 1.b.v.1) Hours of operation—Season—year-round? Answer lb.v.1) The primary operating season for the zip-line will be the summer which coincides with the tree top aerial adventure.Some operation will take place during the shoulder season in spring and late fall primarily for corporate events, school programs and parties.The summer hours will mirror the tree top aerial adventure hours which are 10:00am to 10:00pm. The zip-line may occasionally operate during the ski season. The hours of operation would coincide with the hours of operation of the ski area. Question 1.b.v.1.a and.b) Traffic counts and Parking Demand? Answerl.b.v.1.a and.b) Parking and traffic counts for the proposed project are variable by both season and function.The only way to assess this is to evaluate the required parking according to the Queensbury Zoning Law and actual historic use. First,the Town of Queensbury Zoning Law requires, for a ski area,the following parking to be provided: - 1 car space for every 2 employees - 1 car space for every 300 SF of enclosed public space. Using these requirements,the following parking must be provided at West Mountain Ski Area: - 120 employees at peak winter season/2 =60 parking spaces - 15,000+/-SF of enclosed public space (includes non-public)/300=50 parking spaces. Therefore, a total of 110 parking spaces are required.This is far less than what is actually experienced at the ski area during peak operating periods. As such,West Mountain Ski Area currently provides approximately 558+/- parking spaces in its existing parking lot(less space used by buses which varies) and is proposing to add an additional 150+/- parking space capacity in its overflow parking lot. No bus parking is proposed in the new overflow parking lots on 43 and 57 West Mountain Road. For all practical purposes, the 708+/-car capacity is expected to accommodate cars and buses at peak operational periods such as holidays and special events. The 708+/-volume represents the peak demand or peak traffic/parking expected for the ski area during winter months. Allocation of parking demand or traffic for individual activities or uses during winter months for snow sports/tubing, canopy walk, and zip-line is not possible to isolate since there is no expected tangible increase in parking or traffic due to operating the zip-line or other activities during the winter ski season.This is due to the fact that there is expected to be a redundancy of use among existing ski area customers. In other words, providing these additional activities is an "add on"for customers who are already at West Mountain Ski Area who are already either skiing or tubing and are historically included in the parking demand/traffic count. While there may be some increase in customer visits above and beyond the aforementioned redundancy,this parking demand will be readily managed by the proposed increase in parking availability that is the subject of this proposal.This potential increase is expected to be minimal and not cause parking or traffic volume issues. An attempt to quantify total parking demand,or users at one time, relies on historic attendance data/records from West Mountain ticket sales and facility capacity of existing and proposed activities. The busiest day on record at West Mountain had a total attendance of approximately 2,000 patrons.This included 300 people tubing and 1,700 skiing. Maximum people tubing is limited at West Mountain to 300, which is the total number of tubes available.An average weekend has a total of 1,000 people per day. An average weekday has a total of 500 people per day. According to the US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, "Winter Sports Master Development Planning Handbook", parking demand is calculated at three to four people per car. Using the more restrictive number of three, a total of 667 (2,000/3) cars are required. The total number of parking spaces existing and proposed at West Mountain is+/-708. The actual attendance at one time, includes the ski area operating at total capacity.This also varies in that some people ski and tube for only a portion of the day. Therefore, there is a turnover of available parking spaces. The approximate attendance of 2,000 people at West Mountain was for the entire day. No turnover of attendance is included in that figure. As such, as previously stated, the expansion of parking capacity at the West Mountain Ski Area is proposed to alleviate parking demand during peak holiday and special event times.This will eliminate the practice of overflow parking on the shoulders of West Mountain Road for parking during these periods in the peak winter months. The only activities that will produce a parking demand during the shoulder seasons (spring and fall) and summer months are the canopy walk, zip-line, and mountain biking. These activities will not generate parking demand nor traffic volumes that ever approach those of the winter ski season which is the peak parking demand period for the West Mountain Ski Area for which the project is planned. Question 1.c) Secondary Base Lodge? Answer 1.c) No secondary base lodge is proposed. Question 1.d) Site improvements—plaza drop off? Answer 1.d) No plaza or improved drop off is proposed. Maintenance of existing facilities will be performed. Question 1.e) Base lodge renovation? Answer 1.e) No expansion or renovations to the existing base lodge are proposed. Kitchen area improvements that have been previously approved and now under construction are the only renovations/improvements anticipated. Question 1.f) Mountain Bike operations and trails—needs approval(parking, hours of operation—confirm parcels)? Answer 1.f) West Mountain Ski Area has historically hosted mountain biking, even during the Brant ownership.Since purchasing the ski area in 2013,Apex Capital has operated the mountain biking venue and revived this activity.The ski area has been fortunate enough to have the Town of Queensbury participate in this activity by providing funds to purchase bike hooks for the chair lift which has made the operation a more enjoyable experience for the customers. West Mountain Ski Area intends to continue offering this activity to its customers and provides approximately 27 existing trails as well as cross country riding opportunities across the top of the mountain coupled with its hiking trails.This is an "add on"feature to customers who will be using the canopy walk and zip-line. Again,this activity along with the canopy walk and zip-line, will in no way breach the parking capacity and traffic volumes experienced during the winter ski season. Trail maps for the West Mountain Mountain Bike venue are attached. West Mountain Response to Comments Petition for Change of Zone COMMENT NO 1. Page 1,Question#1. Applicant's response indicates current ownership of one of the subject parcels,with the second parcel under contract for purchase. However,Town assessment records show that both parcels are currently owned by the applicant. RESPONSE NO. 1. Comment noted. The response to Page 1, Question#1 has been revised. COMMENT NO.2. Page 3,Tax Map ID: First parcel should be 315.5-1-3.2(decimal point, not dash) RESPONSE NO. 2. Comment noted. The response to Page 3, Question#4,Tax Map ID, has been revised. COMMENT NO.3. Page 3,Question#10—Map/Survey(Site Plan West Mountain Road dated 10/29/18) o B: Current and proposed zoning district boundaries must be shown o E&G: Proposed Site Conditions must show proposed driveway and parking layout o F: Location of existing water and sewer facilities for the two residences must be shown o H: Identification of uses on properties within 500 feet of both subject parcels must be provided RESPONSE NO. 3. The Site Plan West Mountain Road dated 10/29/2018 has been revised to illustrate B: Current and Proposed Zoning District Boundaries, E&G: Proposed driveway and parking layout and F: Location of Existing Water and Sewer facilities for the two residences. See attached revised Site Plans. Also, item H: Identification of uses on properties within 500 feet of both subject parcels are illustrated on the attached "Area Map illustrating uses within 500 feet." COMMENT NO.4. Other. In Project Information box,proposed use must note the residential use of both homes will also continue. RESPONSE NO.4. Comment noted. The "Project Information Box" has been revised to note that the residential use of both homes is proposed to continue. Full Environmental Assessment Form COMMENT NO. 1. The EAF must be completed for all parcels subject of the rezoning and site plan review applications. Page 1 of the Full EAF Assessment Form—EAF Mapper Summary Report shows that only parcel 315.5-1-2 was used as the basis of this current draft. Please submit a Full EAF for all parcels that are subject of both the rezoning and the site plan review applications. RESPONSE NO. 1. Comment noted. The "EAF Mapper Summary Report" has been revised to include all parcels subject to rezoning and site plan review applications. Tax Parcels No. 307.-1-29, 315.5-1-3.2 and 315.5-1-2 are included. The "EAF Mapper Summary Report" is attached to the revised Full Environmental Assessment Form. PAGE 1 COMMENT NO.2. Name of Project must include the rezoning and site plan review applications. RESPONSE NO.2. Comment noted. The name of Project has been revised as requested. COMMENT NO.3. Project location: Addresses provided must encompass all parcels subject of the rezoning and site plan review applications. RESPONSE NO .3. Comment noted. Addresses for all involved parcels have been added to the "Project Location." The "EAF Mapper Summary Report" attached to the Full Environmental Assessment Form includes a location map. PAGE 2 COMMENT NO.4. C.2(c)Response must be"Yes,"as the action is in an area identified in the 2003 Town of Queensbury Open Space Vision Plan. RESPONSE NO .4. Comment noted. The response has been revised as requested. PAGE 3 COMMENT NO.5. C.3(a). Response must clarify that most of the properties involved (subject of the actions noted on Page 1)are currently zoned RC,and that two parcels are proposed by have the zoning change for MDR to RC. RESPONSE NO. 5. Comment noted. The response has been revised as requested. COMMENT NO.6. C.3(c). Fire protection is provided by the West Glens Falls fire department. EMS is provided by West Glens Falls EMS. RESPONSE NO. 6. Comment noted. The response has been revised as requested. COMMENT NO.7. C.3(d).Project site is served by all Town of Queensbury parks. RESPONSE NO. 7. Comment noted. The response has been revised as requested. COMMENT NO.8. D.1(a). Proposed action description should match that on Page 1,noting actions that require both the rezoning and site plan review applications. RESPONSE NO.8. Comment noted. The response has been revised as requested. COMMENT NO.9. D.1(b). Acreage figures must reflect all proposed actions. RESPONSE NO.9. Comment noted. Acreage figures have been revised to reflect all proposed actions that involve physical disturbance of the total acreage controlled by the applicant. COMMENT NO. 10. D.1(c). Figures should reflect all actions proposed,and units must be provided. RESPONSE NO. 10. Comment noted. Figures have been revised to reflect all actions proposed including parking expansion and zip line construction. The mountain bike trail venue exists and no new construction is proposed. Units have been included. COMMENT NO. 11. D.1(e). Anticipated period of construction must be provided. RESPONSE NO. 11. Comment noted. The duration of construction has been included in the response. PAGE 4 COMMENT NO. 12. D.1(g)and(i&ii). Number and dimensions of structures proposed(zip line) must be provided. RESPONSE NO. 12. The towers for the zip line have been determined by the Town Planning Department to not be structures. They are elements of an amusement ride, therefore, response to D.1(g) and (i& ii) are not required. COMMENT NO.13. D.1(H). Response should be'yes,"as proposed stormwater management includes storage systems. Items i through vi must be answered. Plans&Reports submitted do not include any stormwater management for structures proposed for the zipline. D.2(a).Items v through vii must be answered. RESPONSE NO. 13. The proposed stormwater practices are not storage systems or impoundments. Silt fence sediment control practices and biofiltration practices are intended to manage stormwater volumes and, prevent sediments from migrating down gradient and "filter"or purify the stormwater. They temporarily retard water movement but are intended to allow all water to pass in a controlled manner over a specified period of time so as to not increase runoff flows at any time and not leave the site at a greater volume than pre-construction rates. Plans for the zip line erosion controls were submitted and include three sheets of plan/details prepared by Boswell Engineering. Zip line disturbances for tower construction have since been added to the revised SWPPP. As to Item D.2(a), Items v through ii, do not require responses since the stormwater practices are not impoundments. PAGE 6 COMMENT NO. 14. D.2.(e) Impervious surface calculations must reflect all proposed work(parking lot& zip line structures). D.2(iii)refers to overflow going to existing stormwater pipe. The site plan for the parking shows a proposed stormwater pipe,but not an existing one. Response required: Will stormwater flow to adjacent properties,i.e.West Mountain Road? RESPONSE NO. 14. (By Boswell) PAGE 7 COMMENT NO. 15. D.2.(h)response required;D.2.(ii) response required. RESPONSE NO. 15. Comment noted. Both (h) and (i) have been responded to as"no." COMMENT NO. 16. D.2(k)No additional energy demand for zip line. RESPONSE NO. 16. Zip line patrons will be transported uphill by an existing chair lift. This will consume some additional energy over and above existing usage when operated in the shoulder and summer months. Any lighting on the zip line towers will be low energy, consuming LED fixtures. Manufacturers literature for the fixtures is included in the response to comments. PAGE 8 COMMENT NO. 17. D.2(n) Lighting proposed along zip line? RESPONSE NO. 17.The towers will have general task lighting on the landing and launch platforms.A cut sheet of the proposed string lights to be installed is attached in the response to comments. It is anticipated that 10 to 12 lights will be placed at each platform. Do to the low wattage of the bulbs, lighting will be minimal in comparison to that of the ski slope,with footcandles ranging around 1.0 or less. PAGE 19 COMMENT NO. 18. D.2(t) Response required for"If No"final question. RESPONSE NO. 18. Comment noted. A response has been added as requested. COMMENT NO. 19. E.1(b) Responses are incorrect and must reflect all proposed actions(parking&zip line) RESPONSE NO. 19. Comment noted. Existing acreages, acreages after project completion and change have been calculated and are included in the table. PAGE 10 COMMENT NO.20. E.1(h) Response should be"Yes." See NYSDEC Spill#1206507. Complete subquestions I through v. RESPONSE NO. 20. Comment noted.The "Yes" box has been checked and subquestions i through v appended. PAGES 11&12 COMMENT NO. 11.E.2 responses should reflect all properties subject to the rezoning and site plan review applications. RESPONSE NO. 11. Response to E.2 in the Full EAF responds to conditions on the site in the "area of potential effects," that being the expanded parking lot area and zip line towers. SHEET S-1 COMMENT NO. 1. Timeline needs to be updated. RESPONSE NO. 1. Comment noted. The timeline on Sheet S-1 has been updated as requested. COMMENT NO.2. Projects with prior approval should be clearly labeled as such. RESPONSE NO. 2. Comment noted. Previously approved projects have been labeled as such. COMMENT NO.3. Plan references Sheet S1-A,which was not submitted RESPONSE NO. 3. Comment noted. Sheet S1-A has been submitted with this document. West Mountain Response to New Comments by Laura Moore Site Plan Application COMMENT A. Answer 1.a.ii—The maintaining use of the two residential homes as homes should be identified in the project description of the Full EAF. RESPONSE A. Comment noted. The Full EAF has been revised as requested. COMMENT B. Answer 1.a.iv.1.a—The plans should show a parking scheme layout for both existing and proposed and plan should include bus locations as well. This confirms there is square footage for the parking,drive-aisle. RESPONSE B. Comment noted. The plans have been revised to show parking layouts for cars and buses on both existing and proposed lots. See revised Drawing, "Parking Layout" by Boswell Engineering dated October 29, 2018. COMMENT C. Answer i.b.ii—The zip line plans—need additional description for items on the drawings elevation,the physical location and the tower itself. RESPONSE C. The tower locations are shown on drawings Z0.0 thru Z4.0. Leader notes have been added to each of the drawings showing the exact location of each tower. Drawings Z1.0 thru Z3.0 show the proposed profile of each zipline run along with the anticipated height of each tower. COMMENT D. In Plan Z2.0 Tower C has four dark boxes with no label—is this a concrete block for support the lines are tied to or is a wooden backstop? RESPONSE D. The square boxes on the 1"=20' scale site plan, on drawings Z1.0 thru Z3.0, consist of concrete anchor blocks. The blocks will be 4X4X4' in dimension and cast flush with grade. A leader note has been added to the zip tower site plans to indicate such. COMMENT E. The Tower bases are they buried concrete or leveled to sit on top of the ground? RESPONSE E. The tower base will site above grade 2' to 6' depending upon the slope of the land. COMMENT F. Answer i.b.iii—Lighting- All lighting fixtures cut sheets with wattage/footcandles will need to be included. RESPONSE F. The towers will have general task lighting on the landing and launch platforms.A cut sheet of the proposed string lights to be installed is attached. It is anticipated that 10 to 12 lights will be placed at each platform. Do to the low wattage of the bulbs, lighting will be minimal in comparison to that of the ski slope, with footcandles ranging around 1.0 or less. COMMENT G. Answer 1.b.iv.2—ground disturbance. Ground disturbance for the towers will need to be included in the SWPPP. RESPONSE G. Comment noted. The SWPP has been amended to include ground disturbance for the zip line towers. COMMENT H. Answer 1.b.v.1.a and.b. Numerical information about each use should be provided.What is the anticipated patrons for each use? RESPONSE H. Comment noted. Please refer to'Response to 12.14.2018 Comments'Answer 1.b.v.1.a and b. COMMENT I. Answer 1.f mountain biking. A trail map will need to be included. RESPONSE 1. Comment Noted. A trail map for the West Mountain Bike Trail Venue is attached. Site Plan Application and Long EAF COMMENT A. Phasing Plan. The Phasing Plan will need to be updated to reflect approvals,current activity and future activity. RESPONSE A. The Phasing Plan on Sheet S-1 and S-1A has been updated to reflect approvals, current activity, and future activity. COMMENT B.Attachment A. Previous approvals will need to be included. RESPONSE B. Previous approvals have been included on Attachment A COMMENT C. Long EAF. Zip line parcel,disturbance,grading and erosion control needs to be included. RESPONSE C.Zip line drawings Z1.0 through Z4.0 have been upgraded to illustrate disturbance and details for the proposed towers. The SWPPP has been upgraded to inc►ude zip line disturbance and erosion control. Drawings have been prepared to illustrate site preparation and erosion control for the zip line area. Revised Oct,2008 TOWN OF OUEENSBURY TOWN BOARD APPLICATION 234g 6� PETITION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE Q . Petition No. (Office Use OnlY)� cr RECI ° Applicant's Name: Apex Capital,LLCcis Address: 59 West Mountain Road Queensbury,NY 12804 e e9 £ Z � To the Applicant: The Queensbury Planning Board will review this Petition and make recommendations to the Town Board. As part of this review, the Planning Board will consider the following questions and submit answers to the Town Board. As the applicant, you will have the option to provide answers for the Boards to consider. 1. What need is being met by the proposed change in zone or new zone? See Attached 2. What existing zones, if any, can meet the stated need? See Attached 3. How is the proposed zone compatible with adjacent zones? See Attached 4. What physical characteristics of the site are suitable to the proposed zone? See Attached 5. How will the proposed zone affect public facilities? See Attached 6. Why is the current zone classification not appropriate for the property in question? See Attached 7. What are the environmental impacts of the proposed change? See Attached 1 Revised Oct.2008 8. How is the proposal compatible with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan? See Attached 9. How are the wider interests of the Community being served by this proposal? See Attached These questions are based on criteria used to review all zoning amendments. 2 Revised Oct.2008 Application-Petition for Change of Zone The applicant must submit a fee of $250 with the original & seventeen (17) copies of all documentation requested in this application to the Town Clerk's office. [Copies are distributed as follows: Town Board (5), Town Clerk(1),Town Counsel(1), Planning Board (9), File Copy(1), and Planning Staff(1). Petition No. (Office Use Only): Date Received by Town Clerk: Date Received by Planning Office: 1. Application For: (check where applicable) Amendment of Zoning Map x Amendment of Zoning Ordinance 2. Current Zoning: MDR-Moderate Density Residential Proposed Zoning: RC-Residential Commercial 3. Project Location: 43&57 West Mountain Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 4. Tax Map ID: 315.5-1-3.2 and 315.5-1-2 5. Applicant: 59 West Mountain Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 Address: Phone: 518-745-9892 6. Applicant's Agent: MA Architecture Studio A Landscape Architecure DPC Address: 9 Broad Street 480 Broadway Suite 324,PO Box 272 Glens Falls,NY 12801 Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Phone: 518.792.1651 518.832.4005 7. Property Owner: Apex Capital,LLC Address: 59 West Mountain Road,Queensbury NY 12804 Phone: 518-745-9892 8. Directions to Site: West Mountain Road adjacent to south end of West Mountain Ski Area parking lot. 9. Statistics and Data on Property: a. Total Area: 197,762 sq. ft. or 4.54 acres b. Dimensions: Minimum Width: 231' Average Width: 263' Minimum Depth: 196' Average Depth: 298' 3 Revised Oct 2008 Physical Irregularities(describe): None c. Existing use(s): include structures, outdoor uses, rights of way, easements, deeds and limitations to use of property: Parcel 315.5-1-3.2 :House,garage,driveway,fence(will continue use as a residence) Parcel 315.5.-1-2;House,garage,driveway,fence(will continue use as a residence) d. Adjacent uses within 400 feet: (state direction, location, use,zone&owner): Ski area parking lot to north,residential uses to south and west and across street from West Mountain Ski Area.Adjacent lands zoned residential. Ski area lands zoned RC(Recreational Commercial) e. State, County or Town property within 500 feet: N/A 10. A Map/Survey of the property to be rezoned must be submitted with the application; items A through H must be included on the plan and addressed in the submission A. Map of property at a scale of 1 inch=40 feet or less with scale, north arrow and topography. B. Boundaries of property with dimensions in feet, including zoning boundary. C. Identification of wetlands, watercourses or waterbodies on site. D. Location of any current structures on site,their exterior dimensions, use and setbacks. E. Location of any proposed easements and driveways. F. Location of existing public or private water and sewer facilities. G. Location of existing and proposed parking and loading facilities. H. Identification of uses(i.e. residential, commercial, industrial) on property within 500 feet. 11. If Petition is for an amendment to Zoning Ordinance, cite the section(s) to be changed, and wording to be substituted: N/A 12. In support of this petition, the following statement is made: Lands proposed for re-zoning are adjacent to the existing parking lot for West Mountain Ski Area,which is zoned RC Recreational Commercial as is proposed for the zone change. 13. The following documents are submitted herewith: Petiton for Zone Change including map/survey,Site Plan Review Application, Environmental Assessment Form,Stormwater SWPPP 4 studioA Landscape Architecture, D.P.C. Petition for Change of Zone Q.1) What need is being met by the proposed change in zone or new zone? A.1) West Mountain Ski Area is in need of additional parking for special events and holiday periods. During such times patrons are often faced with having to park on the shoulder of West Mountain Road.This causes congestion for neighborhood residents as well as a safety issue for patrons. In order to alleviate this situation Apex Capital has purchased two parcels adjacent to the southern boundary of the existing West Mountain Ski Area parking lot. These parcels are zoned MDR, Medium Density Residential. In order to be used for additional "overflow" parking for the ski area they need to be rezoned to RC(Recreational Commercial) as are lands of West Mountain Ski Area. Q.2) What existing zones, if any, can meet the stated need? A.2) Only the existing RC zoned lands on West Mountain Ski Area can accommodate the need. Expansion of the parking lot cannot extend to the north due to the presence of existing residences that are not owned by Apex Capital. Expansion of the parking lot is only feasible to the south on lands that are currently not zoned RC but are owned by Apex Capital. Q.3) How is the proposed zone compatible with adjacent zones? A.3) Development of an "overflow" parking area on the proposed parcels is compatible with adjacent residential zoned lands in that a 50-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained between the proposed parking area and adjacent parcels.The parking area will be an "overflow"facility and used for special events and high use holiday periods. 480 Broadway,Suite 324 I P.O. Box 1272 I Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1518.832.4005 Q.4) What physical characteristics of the site are suitable to the proposed zone? A.4) The site is a relatively level parcel that requires little re-grading to accommodate parking of cars and buses. There are no wetlands, or rare,threatened or endangered plant or animal species known to exist on or use the site. The proposed expanded parking is adjacent to the existing parking lot for West Mountain Ski Area allowing for ease of expansion. Q.5) How will the proposed zone affect public facilities? A.5) The proposed expanded parking lot will not require any public services. It will be a privately maintained lot. In fact,the proposed expanded parking lot will have a positive effect on public facilities in that it will accommodate cars and buses which, at certain times, use the shoulders of West Mountain Road on which to park.This will,therefore, alleviate congestion on the road and improve public safety. Q.6) Why is the current zone classification not appropriate for the property in question? A.6) Current zoning of the parcels is residential and precludes their use for commercial parking of vehicles. The RC zone allows for such use as are lands at the West Mountain Ski Area currently used. Q.7) What are the environmental impacts of the proposed change? A.7) Environmental impacts of the proposed change are minimal.Trees must be cleared to allow for construction of the parking lot. The land must then be minimally graded, and grass planted. Stormwater will be treated on the site with biofiltration.Any runoff not infiltrated will be directed to an existing storm pipe.There will be no increase of runoff to adjacent properties.A stormwater management plan and stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) have been prepared and are attached. As stated in A.3 above, a 50-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained adjacent to other existing residentially zoned lands to mitigate any visual impacts to such properties. Q.8) How is the proposal compatible with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan? A.8) Yes, the proposal is compatible with the comprehensive Land Use Masterplan. It is a logical expansion of an existing RC zone and facility that has been in existence for over 50 years. Q.9) How are the wider interests of the Community being served by this proposal? A.9) As stated in A.1 and A.5 above, development of these parcels for an "overflow" parking lot will alleviate congestion and parking on West Mountain Road.This will improve public safety in that neighborhood. TOWN OF QUEENSBURY • Site Plan Review Application Review Process: 1. Required Pre-submission meeting with staff to determine general completeness to be held no later than 1 week prior to deadline day. Call (518) 761-8265 or(518) 761-8220 for an appointment. 2. Submittal of complete application: 1 original and 14 copies of the application package by monthly deadline. 3. Determination of application completeness. All necessary information must be provided and appropriate fee(s)paid for consideration for placement on an agenda for that month. 4. Incomplete applications will not be considered for placement on any agenda until all missing information has been submitted. 5. Submittal to Warren County Planning, if applicable. 6. Planning Board meeting, generally the third & fourth Tuesday of each month. You will be advised in writing as to which meeting to attend. 7. Following the meeting you will be provided with a copy of the resolution stating the Board's decision on your application. If your application was approved, the next likely step is a Building Permit. Final drawings must be provided for the next phase of review. If your application was denied, your project cannot proceed as submitted. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (hard copy & electronic): Please submit 1 original& 14 copies of the completed application package to include: • Completed Application pages 2-9, signed &dated • Pre-Submission Meeting Notes: signed by staff • Copy of Deed • Checklist& Plot Plan • Environmental Assessment Form for any non-residential project • Fee: $100 (0 — 10,000 sq. ft.); $250 (10,001 — 30,000 sq. ft.); $500 (30,001 -100,000 sq. ft.); $1,000 (100,000+ sq. ft.) Staff& Contact Information: Craig Brown, Zoning Administrator craigb(a,queensbury.net Laura Moore, Land Use Planner lmoore(a,queensbury.net Sunny Sweet, Office Specialist—Planning sunnvs ar,queensbury.net (518) 761-8220 Visit our website at www.aueensburv.net for further information and forms 1 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 General Information Tax Parcel ID Number: 307.-1-29,315.5-1-3.2,315.5-1-2 Zoning District: Recreation Commercial and Moderate Density Residential Lot size: 382.34 acres Detailed Description of Project [includes current&proposed use]: The proposed project includes the construction of a zip line with seven towers that traverses an existing ski trail down to the base lodge of West Mountain.Construction to start Summer 2019,completed Spring Also included is the grading and construction of an overflow parking area for 150+/-vehicles.Note that the parking areas on 43&57 West Mountain R will have a gravel surface.The SWPPP calculated both areas as gravel.Approval of a mountain biking venue is also requested which already exists and includes existing trails. Location of project: 59 West Mountain Road,Queensbury,NY 12804(zipline)and 43 and 57 West Mountain Road(temporary parking lot) Applicant Name: Apex Capital,LLC Address: 59 West Mountain Road,Queensbury, NY, 12804 Home Phone - Cell: 518-745-9892 Work Phone - Fax E-Mail: spencer@westmtn.net Agent's Name: Address: 480 Broadway, Suite 324/PO Box 272 Studio A Landscape Arch.DPC Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Home Phone Cell: Work Phone Fax 518-832-4005 - E-mail kcatellier@studioadpc.com AJA Architecture Andy Allison 9 Broad Street 518-792-1651 Chris Jones Glens Falls,NY 12801 Owner's Name Address - Same as Applicant Home Phone Cell Work Phone Fax E-mail 2 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 i Site Development Data Area/Type Existing sq. ft. Proposed Total sq. ft. Addition sq. ft. A. Building footprintlncludes Base Lodge on 59 West Mt. &buildings on 43 &57 West Mt.Rd. 19,680 n/a 19,680 B. Detached Garage n/a n/a n/a C. Accessory Structure(s)Includes previously annroved 60x 100 addition to metal storage building 9,000 n/a 9,000 D. Paved,gravel or other hard surfaced area 305,860 (additonal lawn and gravel parking lots) 90,170 396,030 E. Porches/Decks n/a n/a n/a F. Other 0 0 0 G. Total Non-Permeable [Add A-F] 334,540 90,170 424,710 H. Parcel Area [43,560 sq. ft./acre] 16,654,730 16,654,730 16,654,730 I. Percentage of Impermeable Area of Site [I=G/H] 2.00% 0.54% 2.54% Setback Requirements Area Required q Existing Proposed Front [I] 30' n/a 30' Front [2] n/a n/a n/a Shoreline n/a n/a n/a Side Yard [1] 20' n/a 20' Side Yard[2] n/a n/a n/a Rear Yard [1] 20' n/a 20' Rear Yard [2] n/a n/a n/a Travel Corridor n/a n/a n/a Height [max] 35' n/a 35' Permeability 30%Min. 98.00% ° 97.46/0 No. of parking spaces 160 558+/- 708+/- 3 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 Additional Project Information 1. Will the proposal require a Septic Variance from the Town Board of Health? No 2. If the parcel has previous approvals, list application number(s): See Attachment'A' 3. Does this project require coverage under the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES)Permit Program ? Yes(SWPPP attached) 4. Estimated project duration: Start DateSummer'19 End Date Spring 2020 5. Estimated total cost of project: $2,000,000 6. Total area of land disturbance for project: 2.07 acres-Parking Expansion .04 acres-Zip Line Towers Floor Area Ratio Worksheet FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) -- The relationship of building size to lot size, derived by dividing the total building floor area by the lot size in square feet, yielding a percentage. Zoning District Symbol Floor Area Ratio [FAR] Waterfront Residential WR 0.22 Commercial Moderate/Intensive CM/CI 0.3 A. The combined area of all square footage, as measure from exterior walls of all structures on the property, including all floors of the structures, garages, basements and attics with more than five (5) feet of ceiling height and covered porches. Building square footage does not include: Open deck, docks and that portion of covered docks extending over water and one storage shed of one hundred twenty (120) square feet or less. Any additional sheds will be included. (See "FLOOR AREA RATIO"). B. Commercial or industrial: the total area in square feet as measured from the exterior of the outside walls of a building or structure, and when applicable, the sum total of all floor areas of the principal and accessory buildings or structures on the project site. A. Parcel Area n/a sq. ft. B. Existing Floor Area n/a sq ft. [see above definition C. Proposed Additional Floor Area n/a sq. ft. D. Proposed Total Floor Area n/a sq. ft. E. Total Allowable Floor Area n/a (Area x see above table *If D is larger than E. a variance or revisions to your plan may be needed. Consult with Staff. Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 4 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 § 179-9-080 Requirements for Site Plan Approval. The Planning Board shall not approve a Site Plan unless it first determines that such site plan meets the following Standards. Please prepare responses to each of the following topics: See'Attachment B' STANDARDS A. The proposed project furthers or is consistent with the policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed project complies with all other requirements of this Chapter,including the site plan review standards as set forth in Paragraph F of this section,the dimensional,bulk and density regulations of the zoning district in which it is proposed to be located(Article 3 and Table 1),the applicable requirements of all other Articles that apply. C. The site plan encourages pedestrian activity internally and,if practicable,to and from the site with pedestrian paths or sidewalks connected to adjacent areas. D. The site plan must conform to Chapter 136 Sewage and Sewage Disposal,Chapter 147 Stormwater Management Local Law,and other applicable local laws. E. The proposed use shall be in harmony with the general purpose or intent of this Chapter,specifically taking into account the location, character and size of the proposed use and the description and purpose of the district in which such use is proposed,the nature and intensity of the activities to be involved in or conducted in connection with the proposed use and the nature and rate of any increase in the burden on supporting public services and facilities which will follow the approval of the proposed use. F. The establishment,maintenance and operation of the proposed use will not create public hazards from traffic,traffic congestion or the parking of vehicles and/or equipment or be otherwise detrimental to the health,safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the town. Traffic access and circulation,road intersections,road and driveway widths and traffic controls will be adequate. G. Off-street parking and 19oading facilities will be appropriately located and arranged and sufficient to meet traffic anticipated to be generated by the new use. The establishment of vehicle links between parking areas of adjacent properties are provided where feasible. This furthers the Town's goal of reducing curb cuts and reducing congestion. A twenty-foot wide connection is required. If adjacent properties are either undeveloped or previously developed without having made provision for future linkage,then a future connection must be identified and provided for in the site plan under review for such future linkage when the time arises. The Planning Board may require proof that the applicant has made contact with adjacent property owners for purposes of coordinating linkages with adjacent properties. H. The project shall not have an undue adverse impact upon the natural,scenic,aesthetic,ecological,wildlife,historic,recreational or open space resources of the town or the Adirondack Park or upon the adequate provision of supporting facilities and services made necessary by the project,taking into account the commercial,industrial,residential,recreational or other benefits that might be derived from the project. In making the determination hereunder,the Planning Board shall consider those factors pertinent to the project contained in the development considerations set forth herein under§ 179-9-080 of this Chapter,and in so doing,the Planning Board shall make a net overall evaluation of the project in relation to the development objectives and general guidelines set forth in§ 179-9-080 of this Article. l The provision for and arrangement of pedestrian traffic access and circulation,walkway structures,control of intersections with vehicular traffic and overall pedestrian convenience shall be safe and adequate for pedestrian movement. Pedestrian connections between adjacent sites shall be provided to encourage pedestrian use. J. Stormwater drainage facilities will prevent an increase of post development drainage flows as compared to pre-development drainage flows. Drainage of the site shall recharge ground water to the extent practical. Surface waters flowing off-site shall not degrade any streams or adversely affect drainage on adjacent properties or public roads. Facilities shall be in conformance with the drainage standards of Chapter 147 of the Town Code and the Town of Queensbury Subdivision Regulations where applicable. K. The water supply and sewage disposal facilities will be adequate and will meet all applicable and current requirements set forth by Department of Health regulations and Chapter 136 of the Town Code. L. The adequacy,type and arrangement of trees,shrubs and other suitable plantings,landscaping and screening shall effectively provide a visual and/or noise buffer between the applicants and adjoining lands,including the maximum retention of existing vegetation and maintenance,including replacement of dead or deceased plants. M. Fire lanes,emergency zones and fire hydrants will be adequate and meet the needs and requirements of emergency service providers. N. The design of structures,roadways and landscaping in areas susceptible to ponding,flooding and/or erosion will minimize or avoid such impacts to the maximum extent practicable. 0. The site plan conforms to the design standards,landscaping standards and performance standards of this chapter. 5 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 § 179-9-050 Checklist-Application for Site Plan Review. Application materials and site plan shall include sufficient information for the Board to review and provide a decision. The applicant is to provide a site plan drawing and all attachments that address items A-V. The applicant may request a waiver from A-V and is to provide reasons for waiver(s)requested. Please label information to be submitted. REQUIREMENTS Sheet# A. A vicinity map drawn at the scale that shows the relationship of the proposal to existing community facilities which affect or serve it,such as roads,shopping areas,schools,etc. The map shall also show all properties,identify owners, 1 of 2 subdivisions,streets and easements within 500 feet of the property. Such a sketch may be superimposed on a United States Geological Survey map of the area. B. The site plan shall be drawn at a scale of forty feet to the inch(1"=40 feet)or such other scale as the Planning Board may deem appropriate,on standard 24"x 36"sheets,with continuation on 81/2"x 11"sheets as necessary for written 1 of 2 information. The information listed below shall be shown on the site plan and continuation sheets. C. Name of the project,boundaries,date,north arrow,and scale of the plan. all dwg's D. Name and address of the owner of record,developer,and seal of the engineer,architect or landscape architect. If the applicant is not the record owner,a letter of authorization shall be required from the owner. all dwg's E. The location and use of all existing and proposed structures within the property,including all dimensions of height and floor area,all exterior entrances,and all anticipated future additions and alterations. n/a F. The location of all present and proposed public and private ways,off-street parking areas,driveways,outdoor storage areas, sidewalks,ramps,curbs,paths,landscaping,walls and fences. Location,type and screening details for all waste disposal n/a containers shall also be shown. G. The location,height,intensity and bulb type(sodium,incandescent,etc.)of all external lighting fixtures. The direction of illumination and methods to eliminate glare onto adjoining properties must also be shown in compliance with§ 179-6-020. n/a H. The location,height,size,materials and design of all proposed signs. n/a I. The location of all present and proposed utility systems including: 1. Sewage or septic system; n/a 2. Water supply system; 3. Telephone,cable and electrical systems;and 4. Storm drainage system including existing and proposed drain lines,culverts,catch basins,headwalls,endwalls, hydrants,manholes and drainage swales. J. Plans to prevent the pollution of surface or groundwater,erosion of soil both during and after construction,excessive runoff and flooding of other properties,as applicable. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)for all land development 2 of 2 activities(excluding agricultural activities)on the site that results in land disturbance of one acre or more. A SWPPP shall comply with the requirements of the DEC SPDES MS-4 General Permit and Chapter 147 of the Town of Queensbury Code. It shall be at the discretion of the Planning Board as to whether a SWPPP or an erosion and control plan shall be required for a site plan review project land disturbance of less than one acre. K. Existing and proposed topography at two-foot contour intervals,or such other contour interval as the Planning Board shall allow. All elevations shall refer to the nearest United States Coastal and Geodetic Bench Mark. If any portion of the parcel All DWG's is within the 100-year floodplain,the area will be shown and base flood elevations given. Areas shall be indicated within the proposed site and within 50 feet of the proposed site where soil removal or filling is required,showing the approximate volume in cubic yards. L. A landscape plan showing all existing natural land features than may influence the design of the proposed use such as rock outcrops,stands of trees,single trees eight or more inches in diameter,forest cover and water sources and all proposed All DWG's changes to these features,including sizes and types of plants. Water sources include ponds,lakes,wetlands and watercourses,aquifers,floodplains and drainage retention areas. M. Land Use District boundaries within 500 feet of the site's perimeter shall be drawn and identified on the site plan,as well as any Overlay Districts that apply to the property. 1 of 2 6 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED) Sheet# N. Traffic flow patterns within the site,entrances and exits,loading and unloading areas,as well as curb cuts on the site and within 100 feet of the site. The Planning Board may,at its discretion,require a detailed traffic study for large developments or All for those in heavy traffic areas,which shall include: DWG's 1. The projected number of motor vehicle trips to enter or leave the site,estimated for weekly and annual peak hour traffic levels; 2. The projected traffic flow pattern including vehicular movements at all major intersections likely to be affected by the proposed use of the site; 3. The impact of this traffic on levels of service on abutting public streets and at affected intersections. Existing and proposed weekly and annual peak hour traffic levels and road capacity levels shall also be given. O. For new construction or alterations to any structure,a table containing the following information shall be included: n/a 1. Estimated area of structure to be used for particular purposes such as retain operation,office, Storage,etc.; 2. Estimated maximum number of employees; 3. Maximum seating capacity,where applicable;and 4. Number of parking spaces existing and required for the intended use. p, 1. Floor Plans. 2. Elevations at a scale of one-quarter inchorn/a and/or alterations to or expansions of existing facades,oneshowing design featuresfe and indicatexterior ing hee typs of e and colorf materials e proposed )to be used. Q. Soil logs,water supply well and percolation test results,and storm water runoff calculations as needed to determine and mitigate project impacts. n/a R. Plans for disposal of construction and demolition waste,either on-site or at an approved disposal facility. n/a S. Plans for snow removal,including location(s)of on-site snow storage. n/a T. An Environmental Assessment Form("EAF")as required by the SEQRA regulations,with Part 1 completed by the Applicant shall be submitted as part of the application. If the proposed project requires a special use permit and an EAF has been Attached submitted in conjunction with a special use permit application,a duplicate EAF is not required for the site plan application. U. If an application is for a parcel or parcels on which more than one use is proposed,the applicant may submit a single application for all such uses,provided the proposed uses are accurately delineated on a site plan drawn pursuant to the n/a requirements set forth above. The Planning Board may grant the application with respect to some proposed uses and not others. For purposes of reviewing an application(and for SEQRA compliance)all proposed uses on a single parcel or on contiguous parcels shall be considered together. V. A brief narrative statement on how the project proposed for review furthers or is consistent with the vision,goals and policies See attached in the Town's Comprehensive Plan. "Standards" 7 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 Town of Queensbury Site Plan Pre-Submission Conference Form /Section 179-9-040 1. Applicant Name: Apex Capital,LLC 2. Tax map m 307.-1-29,315.5-3.2 Location: 59 West Mountain Road 315.5-1-2 3. Zoning Classification RC,MDR 4. Reason for Review: Site Plan Review 5. Zoning Section#: r 1:79-4--t' lexi-s-04C) 6. Pre-Submission Meeting Notes: Provided Outstanding; Please provide by Deed V General Jtfortnation complete Site Development Data Complete Setback Requirements Complete _Z Additional Project Information Complete FAR addressed jA Requirements for Site Plan-Standards Checklist items addressed Environmental Form completed jA F Signature Page completed Aw; 0/v( l y-,N O0,0.,$rudii)11 &F-- Cc �( 4lD4-t C 'Ztp,t4 `e CoL3z99 C.,A €,ctshtrtt (. o4` MA-A S io,,t) ar cr li -rht 0 r 0' re 1( &tat CL.V) I.1t;Lt tan • . ,.° s .. G p ri,V4cJ + e e e t,nvpt-!( tads 1t lc'l+ ,rl (.{.,'l 1 cA t(J r�s ck,rvIct,/• .rice. lo,A i r11,f„ Titt pro.) ec #' t ete Li r S far -ivt led LC9( t.�► -two P r ae( 4 t ' )i.4i/)j AACS4 n4..,_ - I D4I t —4t ) (10✓tt ctreci calve_ fLuo pt, t ttv ( ape /G.r 4'- 64 at re-z nt t 1 pavc4 4 ray n-4 PA t FZ k C. ed or frruthri LO ADvueil Q(cn ," 4 l,n r k V rAl;. 1teGnt'01vA CO miller(t!h I Too My ci 1 c) ,, s►.vek1 SIvrlMwc1-ec PPe t^Acta {7.{pltn4 1,n ltc►ctc,4-M+/e.Q4(( Cc)Ail f It4 Z pif A e_ cot( cezoA _. i c.rcet}Cti:'t. ;mtt'1D✓1 (Lc to , c/fxl r 3,0 SimrYl,,y ', t�nt.(v j icu� „b:�i5 C,�v\i ( ( 1,5 Plannt,w ogee zS C r fror\tso -Jlc S.SLoPei 2 .0 c,A\ )i S�r m M L fy } `� lac �,��i�y� icy r S ff Representative: 4, t"�--t . U ,p eni. c, Applicant/Agent: Date: c /zl/22 i i 'r it 5 C ri)akleS 4t3k g.cl Led s Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 Signature Page This page includes the 1.) Authorization to Act as Agent Form: 2.) Engineering Fee Disclosure; 3.) Authorization for Site Visits; 4.) Other Permit Responsibilities;5.)Official Meeting Disclosure and 6.)Agreement to provide documentation required. OWNER'S AGENT FORM: Complete the following if the OWNER of the property is not the same as the applicant Owner: Designates: As agent regarding: Variance Site Plan Subdivision For Tax Map No.: Section Block Lot Deed Reference: Book Page Date OWNER SIGNATURE: DATE: APPLICANT'S AGENT FORM: Complete the following if the APPLICANT is unable to attend the meeting or wishes to be represented by another party: Owner: Apex Capital,LLC/Spencer Montgomery Designates: S.Jeffrey Anthony(Studio A)and Andrew J.Allison(AJA Architecture) As agent regarding: Variance X Site Plan Subdivision For Tax Map No.: Section Block Lot Deed Reference: Book Page Date OWNER SIGNATURE: -2/=1.-z”44-,tr-u. DATE: 2.) ENGINEERING FEE DISCLOSURE: Applications may be referred to the Town consulting engineer for review of septic design, storm drainage,etc. as determined by the Zoning or Planning Department. Fees for engineering review services will be charged directly to the applicant. Fees for engineering review will not exceed$ 1,000 without notification to the applicant. 3.) AUTHORIZATION FOR SITE VISITS: By signing this page and submitting the application materials attached herein,the Owner,Applicant, and his/her/their agent(s)hereby authorize the Zoning Board or Planning Board and Town Staff to enter the subject properties for the purpose of reviewing the application submitted. 4.) OTHER PERMIT RESPONSIBILITIES: Other permits may be required for construction or alteration activity subsequent to approval by the Zoning Board or Planning Board. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain any additional permits. 5.) OFFICIAL MEETING MINUTES DISCLOSURE: It is the practice of the Community Development Department to have a designated stenographer tape record the proceedings of meetings resulting from application, and minutes transcribed from those tapes constitutes the official record of all proceedings. 6.) AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION REOULRED: I,the undersigned,have thoroughly read and understand the instructions for submission and agree to the submission requirements,I acknowledge no construction activities shall be commenced prior to issuance of a valid permit. I certify that the application,plans and supporting materials are a true and complete statement/description of the existing conditions and the work proposed, and that all work will be performed in accordance with the approved plans and in conformance with local zoning regulations. I acknowledge that prior to occupying the facilities proposed,I or my agents,will obtain a certificate of occupancy as necessary. I also understand that I/we may be required to provide an as-built survey by a licensed land surveyor of all newly constructed facilities prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy I have read and agree to the above. BpZ- Spencer Montgomery 8/15/18 Signature [Applicant] Print Name [Applicant] Date signed Signature [Agent] Print Name [Agent] Date signed 9 Site Plan Review application—Revised October 2016 Town of Queensbury Planning Office-742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 studioA Landscape Architecture, D.P.C. Attachment 'A' The following is a list of the Site Plans and an Area Variance for the West Mountain South End Base Lodge Site Plan Review Application: Area Variance 92-2002 Create two non-conforming lots Site Plan 65-1996 Site Plan 67-1996 Site Plan 3-1997 Site Plan 4-1997 Site Plan 22-2008 2,000 SF of Addition to Main Lodge& 1,230 SF Deck Site Plan 34-2011 Alpine Slide and Zip Flyer Site Plan 61-2011 576 SF Shed Addition Site Plan 60-2018 Base Lodge kitchen renovation, 100'x 60' maintenance building addition, and Treetop Aerial Adventure(Canopy walk) 480 Broadway,Suite 324 I P.O.Box 1272 I Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1518.832.4005 stud . A 0 Landscape Architecture, D.P.C. Attachment 'B': 179-9-080 Requirements for Site Plan Approval:STANDARDS A. The proposed project furthers or is consistent with the policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan in that the existing ski area property is zoned RC-1(Recreational Commercial) and the proposed zipline improvements are located within that area. Parcel proposed for overflow parking is to be rezoned to RC-1 and will be consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed project complies with all other requirements of this Chapter, including the site plan review standards as set fourth in Paragraph F of this section, the dimensional, bulk and density regulations of the zoning district in which it is proposed to be located(Article 3 and Table 1), the applicable requirements of all other Articles that apply. The proposed project complies with the dimensional requirements of the bulk and density regulations of the RC-1 zone district. C. The site plan encourages pedestrian activity internally and, if practicable, to and from the site with pedestrian paths or sidewalks connected to adjacent areas. The site plan does not encourage pedestrian activity internally in that there are no proposed pedestrian paths or sidewalks that connect to adjacent areas.Sidewalks along West Mountain Road are not proposed since it is not anticipated there will be any pedestrian access to the ski area. The overflow parking area will promote on-site parking which is adjacent to ski area uses and activities and will eliminate the need for overflow parking on West Mountain Road. D. The site plan must conform to Chapter 136 Sewage and Sewage Disposal, Chapter 147 Storm water Management Local Law, and other applicable local laws. Existing sewage disposal facilities at the ski area will remain. The proposed improvements will not precipitate the need to modify or increase existing sewage treatment systems. This phase of the project will not generate additional stormwater runoff since it will be treated on-site with biofiltration. (see SWPPP). E. The proposed use shall be in harmony with the general purpose or intent of this Chapter, specifically taking into account the location, character and size of the proposed use and the description and purpose of the district in which such use is proposed, the nature and intensity of the activities to be involved in or conducted in connection with the proposed use and the nature 480 Broadway,Suite 324 I P.O. Box 1272 I Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1518.832.4005 and rate of any increase in the burden on supporting public services and facilities which will follow the approval of the proposed use. The proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Law in that the site is zoned and/or will be zoned RC-1.Activity and use intensity are expected to remain consistent with current activity at the ski area with the exception that the proposed zipline will be a year-round attraction. The project will not increase the burden on supporting public services or facilities. F. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed use will not create public hazards from traffic, traffic congestion or the parking of vehicles and/or equipment or be otherwise detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the town. Traffic access and circulation, road intersections, road and driveway widths and traffic controls will be adequate. The proposed improvements will not create a public hazard from traffic,traffic congestion or the parking of vehicles or maintenance equipment or be detrimental to the health, safety,or general welfare of the neighborhood. In fact,the project will improve such conditions by providing overflow parking on-site and eliminating it from West Mountain Road. G. Off-street parking and loading facilities will be appropriately located and arranged and sufficient to meet traffic anticipated to be generated by the new use. The establishment of vehicle links between parking areas of adjacent properties ore provided where feasible. This furthers the Town's goal of reducing curb cuts and reducing congestion. A twenty foot wide connection is required. If adjacent properties are either undeveloped or previously developed without having made provision for future linkage, then a future connection must be identified and provided for in the site plan under review for such future linkage when the time arises. The Planning Board may require proof that the applicant has made contoct with adjacent property owners for purposes of coordinating linkages with adjacent properties. The proposed improvements are appropriately located and arranged to meet anticipated traffic demands.The parking area and access and egress to West Mountain Road is defined and circulation routes appropriately arranged. H. The project shall not have an undue adverse impact upon the natural, scenic, aesthetic, ecological, wildlife, historic, recreational or open space resources of the town or the Adirondack Park or upon the adequate provision of supporting facilities and services made necessary by the project, taking into account the commercial, industrial, residential, recreational or other benefits that might be derived from the project. In making the determination hereunder, the Planning Board shall consider those factors pertinent to the project contained in the development considerations set forth herein under§179-9-080 of this Chapter, and in so doing, the Planning Board shall make a net overall evaluation of the project in relation to the development objectives and general guidelines set forth in§ 179-9-080 of this Article. The proposed improvements will not have an undue adverse impact upon the natural, scenic, aesthetic, ecological, wildlife, historic, recreational or open space resources of the Town or Adirondack Park.The site is currently subject to the proposed uses and activities.The location of the proposed zip-line is within an existing ski trail, will not exceed the height of adjacent trees in wooded areas, and will not impact any resources.The mountain bike trail already exists. I. The provision for and arrangement of pedestrian traffic access and circulation, walkway structures, control of intersections with vehicular traffic and overall pedestrian convenience shall be safe and adequate for pedestrian movement. Pedestrian connections between adjacent sites shall be provided to encourage pedestrian use. The provisions for and arrangement of pedestrian traffic access and circulation, walkway structures, control of intersections with vehicular traffic and overall pedestrian convenience is completely safe and adequate for pedestrian movement.The parking and circulation system in the parking lot accommodates safe pedestrian access to connector walkways adjacent to the base lodge and secondary lodge via walkway. 1.Stormwater drainage facilities will prevent an increase of post development drainage flows as compared to pre-development drainage flows. Drainage of the site shall recharge ground water to the extent practical. Surface waters flowing off-site shall not degrade any streams or adversely affect drainage on adjacent properties or public roads. Facilities shall be in conformance with the drainage standards of Chapter 147 of the Town Code and the Town of Queensbury Subdivision Regulations where applicable. The Zip-Line development will not generate any change in stormwater runoff.All stormwater generated by the proposed overflow parking area will be treated on-site by biofiltration. Any excess water not infiltrated will be directed to an existing stormwater pipe. (See SWPPP attached) K. The water supply and sewage disposal facilities will be adequate and will meet all applicable and current requirements set forth by Department of Health regulations and Chapter 136 of the Town Code. The proposed project will not increase the water demand or sewage discharge over and above currently existing volumes.Therefore, no improvements to potable water service or sewage treatment facilities are proposed. L. The adequacy, type and arrangement of trees, shrubs and other suitable plantings, landscaping and screening shall effectively provide a visual and/or noise buffer between the applicants and adjoining lands, including the maximum retention of existing vegetation and maintenance, including replacement of dead or deceased plants. The proposed zip-line project is within an existing ski trail that is developed with existing trees and other vegetation.The zip line towers will not exceed the height of adjacent trees in wooded areas. The proposed parking lot expansion will maintain a 50-foot vegetated buffer between it and adjacent residential land uses. M. Fire lanes, emergency zones and fire hydrants will be adequate and meet the needs and requirements of emergency service providers. Fire lanes, emergency zones, and fire hydrants within the parking lot and adjacent to the main lodge are adequate to accommodate emergency vehicles. N. The design of structures, roadways and landscaping in areas susceptible to ponding,flooding and/or erosion will minimize or avoid such impacts to the maximum extent practicable. No structures, roadways, parking areas, or areas to be landscaped occur in areas susceptible to flooding. 0. The site plan conforms to the design standards, landscaping standards and performance standards of this chapter. The site plan, as designed, conforms to the requirements of Section 179-9-050 of the Town Zoning Law. .1.uu cn vtrunmenaat Assessment corm Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: West Mountian Ski Area Site Plan Review for"Overflow"Parking Lot,Zip Line,Mountain Bike Trail System and rezoning of"overflow"parking lot parcels Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 43 and 57 West Mountain Road,Queensbury,NY 12804 for overflow parking lot and 59 West Mountain Road for Zip Line and Mountain Bike Trail System Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): The project involves the re-zoning of two parcels of land(315.5-1-3.2 and 315.5-1-2)from MDR(Moderate Density Residential)to RC(Recreational Commercial)to allow for the expansion of the West Mountain Ski Area parking lot to accommodate"overflow"parking.Additionally,site plan approval is also requested for the parking expansion as well as zip-line and existing mountain bike venue on the existing West Mountain Ski Area parcel tax no.307.-1-29.Existing residential uses on lands to be rezoned will continue and be used for West Mountain Ski area support purposes.. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:518-745-9892 Apex Capital,LLC E-Mail: Address:59 West Mountain Road City/PO:Queensbury State: ZipCode: New York 12804 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone: same E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: same E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 --- •. u.. r, u a.uun wouia anect mat waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? If Yes,describe: ❑Yes�No iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? If Yes: ❑Yes�No • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? If Yes: ales ONo i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? gallons/day If Yes: [Wes[]No • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ❑Yes El No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes[]No If Yes: Yes�No • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? If,Yes: ❑Yes�No • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? If Yes: ❑Yes®No i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial; if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? IfEl ❑No Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes[]No • Is expansion of the district needed? ['YesDNo ['Yes ON° Page 5 of 13 ,.,u existing sewer Imes serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 2.07 acres(impervious surface) for parking expansion(no new impervious for zip line) Square feet or 382.34 acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. biofilter discharge iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? On-site biofiltration system with overflow to existing stormwater pipe. • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes❑No ®Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation, structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N2O) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Wllullle species mat occupy or use the project site: Urban-Suburban Wildlife n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? I Yes Flo f Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): Pitch Pine-Scrub Oak Barrens and Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: 700.0 acres and 5,232 acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑Yes®No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑Yes®No special concern? q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ['Yes Eallo If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes ONo Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? i. If Yes: acreage(s)on project site? ❑Yes�IVo ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑Yes ON° Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 L,.,os piuje.4site comam,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ['Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii. Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes®No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature illiVoitdC, / Title (III PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, December 03, 2018 8:55 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assis R5.6-1 2 i315.6-1-331 i s' project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environments 315.E-1-3g assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 56_1-22315_6.1-32 )35.6146 answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 9 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although !315.6 1 2 . the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 307.-1 29 �i— 15 6-1-35 DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 1 to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a 15.E,24315.6.4-3 rs . 3 6-1 tit® substitute for agency determinations. I �, f ',Y. l _ ,-- -6------ ,15.6-1- ;15_6-1-30 315,6-1-11 of a aritell f 3 5.6.1-1.2 r44> 315.-1-1.15 ''jt en'All li . f .151) 3 e 315_6-1-29 ! I .�_--1 ,315.E-1-13, Tor 10 fi e_.---- -�� 6 15. 1 . ,r3i5'6_-1-1 Ivz ,, is # i. 315.E-1-1 \, r� €o 1 .-1 1_1k, -z\ ,15 ,-;J..� 1 r ratr #ryes i 315.E 1-14, \ oes AEsri,t ..07c,e,piti,fp--..... ..,„..e, . frfe,c-fahr iP"iifittfirl 4 y - k -t k ITT tr$ Esri_ . "�. 2, a v 4 ,.. s22€' m't�rl*cm E Ci8�"ri6C7. ,15.-1-1.1 ', -ter 'k e Err ? a�te#rat. 1 -1 1 €=3 �� butt W 15. 1 1.12 eta _ l ,, f fa F' Bs .I T ECs ,t:srr lea„h` r7w < -1-3T° -.,„ :+1oti if i-ia Asti r_ � � 1' _ _. . _ 3> a �� _ .arm B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation No T T__ T. -------- Site] _ E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] -- No E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.I. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.I. A uifer Names]q Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities] Yes — Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report I E.2.n.i [Natural Communities-Acres] 700.0 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:46 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist 315.5-1-+ 1315.6-1-19 {a'15 6_1_36 project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 315.6-1-2 315-6-1-34i • assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although ; 15.6-1-37 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 315.6-1-33 DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 3l 5 6-1- to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a � 15.6-1-21 ,- substitute for agency determinations. 347.-129 15.61- 315.6-1-38 315.6-1-32 't15.6-1-3iet #E- 3i596-1-39 ` , 4.{ ,,-44P a �ttte Ei",T QuB£ b 315:6-1-24315-6-4-3t7._3.2 :s ' . "F , T fb • NA.' a,i, rtifVfaXto �_.�--. 15:61-25 i5.61 30 st F, �Rocfw r t 31 5.5-1 2 315.-1-1.15 +yes:Etai4 Setztere r ' pewehie 4 ------ fntamac.14C Can gsri a Kong).Ekri + ) ffi.6126 �r Rt is-ch far 315.-1-1-14 ee ap°° ' +d i t- 4 -P r U431611/e j pan,.Ebk tT t' PT- s#traae,EsrtJn t 1.745r.e ` ity"r45.16 1 66i 315.x;1 21 is[stt�r, p fry (Hong B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No 'B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No i C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h[DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF ' Potential Contamination History] Workbook. ! E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF i Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i[DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF ~ w l !Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii[Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation No — _ ` __ �� "-_ -�— ________ __ Site] .2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i[Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii[Surface Water Features] Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. I E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] No v_�_ _ _ �._ Yw__,_____ E.2.i. [Floodway] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF I Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.I. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.I. [Aquifer Names] !Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities] !Yes Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report i -"......_...••�� .•... w� r IWII r utc-ot4 uu VOA DdI ICI15 E.2.n.i [Natural Communities-Acres] 700.0 --- E.2.o.[Endangered or Threatened Species] No `�`���---�---- E.2.p.[Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a.[Agricultural District] No -�"--- —�-- ---1 E.3.c.[National Natural Landmark] No IE.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No - E.3.e.[National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No -- E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No -- ��--1 Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, January 22,2019 11:43 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist { project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental - assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF A-- - question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. ARhough r - - the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to ' 0.l DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order ilk to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. `fit ' - Ottawa cetsat # iv,;a_-. ai 4,G• Toronto F Roca tt1 } d ij t t" r r pccicn �x :Esti,HERE,Gamin,ISSGS. - ti&ntland pneaider Werrelap,INCREMENT P htRCen,Esti Japers,VIET!.Est i China f�,i,,�,�r�,,�,,, r •0'�!`Z!"'^7!I'•i:5r1 .'e. `let� _ {Hang t�7,i;ti �� � 2?:b,�,i,$'g1 rt. Gamin. Kates,Esri{Thaiiend).NGCG,O C s Ira :.INCREMENT it OpanStreetMap noafribaitois,and the GIS c fsetCarrstumity 'tfsetr - . _ _,LG. � r err B.i.i[Coastal or Waterfront Area] No ;B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF _ i Workbook. i E.1.h[DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF ;Potential Contamination History] Workbook. _ iE.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF i 1 'Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i[DEC Spills or Remediation Site Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF i ;Environmental Site Remediation Database] _Wor_kbook. �E.1.h'iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation No _.______.._____ ____ ________._.__.__ __-_�-, Site] __... _ I,E.2.g[Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i[Surface Water Features] Yes i IE.2 h ii [Surface Water Features] Yes 1 'E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. I E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Stream 941-397 'Name] E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Stream C(T) i Classification] E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Wetlands I Federal Waters Name] E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] 'No E.2.i. [Floodway] 'Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF ;Workbook. Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 _ [Workbook. E.2.I. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] Principal Aquifer E.2.n.[Natural Communities] Yes [E.2.n.i[Natural Communities- Name] Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest, Pitch Pine-Scrub Oak Barrens E.2.n.i[Natural Communities-Acres] 5232.0, 700.0 -� E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No —`-�"— E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] — No i E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] NoJ Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 EW YORK Department of STATE OF OPPORTUNITY Environmental conservation Spill Incidents Database Search Details Spill Record Administrative Information DEC Region: 5 Spill Number: 1206507 Spill Date/Time Spill Date: 10/01/2012 Spill Time: 08:07:00 PM Call Received Date: 10/01/2012 Call Received Time: 08:07:00 PM Location Spill Name: WEST MT. SKI AREA Address: 59 WEST MOUNTAIN RD City: QUEENSBURY County: Warren Spill Description Material Spilled Amount Spilled Resource Affected unknown petroleum UNKNOWN Soil , Groundwater Cause: Equipment Failure Source: Commercial/Industrial Waterbody: Record Close Date Spill Closed: 01/17/2013 "Date Spill Closed" means the date the spill case was closed by the case manager in the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department). The spill case was closed because either; a) the records and data submitted indicate that the necessary cleanup and removal actions have been completed and no further remedial activities are necessary, or b) the case was closed for administrative reasons (e.g., multiple reports of a single spill consolidated into a single spill number). The Department however reserves the right to require additional remedial work in relation to the spill, if in the future it determines that further action is necessary. If you have questions about this reported incident, please contact the Regional Office where the incident occurred. Refine This Search https://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternal/spills/details.cfm?pageid=2 1/1 NoveltyLights corgi HTENN U P 1 All Orders Placed Before 5pm MST Ship The Same Day CONTACT THE EXPERTS 800-209-6122 MENU SEARCH Home / Outdoor String Lights / Patio and Garden String Lights /Warm White 514 LED Medium Base e26 Bulbs w/16 LEDs-25pk 25 PACK S14 E26 .r { BASE LED I. N s a ... � LR� MCK Ara W40P.0 - }O(McAfee 44,01 SECURE` Warm White S14 LED Medium Base e26 Bulbs w/ 16 LEDs - 25pk 0 Add to wishlist L Add to compare list SKU:PG-LED-S14-WW Availability:141 in stock-Ships Thursday Manufacturer:Novelty Lights Inc Write a review PRICE BREAKS Quantity ._._ Price -... - _.---- .-- -- - - - - 1-3 4-19 $161.00 20+ $140,00 1 Add to cart $195.00 Overview Customer Reviews Speufications Q andA Contact Us Bulb Type LED Bulb Size S14 Light Color Warm White Watts/Amps Per Bulb 1.1 Watts/.01 Amps LED/Diodes 16 LED Light Display Steady Burn Bulb Finish Transparent Bulb Material Glass Base Size e26 Medium Base Base Material Nickel Dimensions 3-1/2"(fall)x 1-3/4"(Wide) Dimmable No Stringer Included No Voltage 120V Bulb Life 40,000 Hours Use Indoor/Outdoor Warranty 2 Year Package Quantity 25 Bulbs Case Quantity 4 Boxes of 25 Bulbs . r; Related products McAfee SECURE' s 100'Black Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) 37.5'Black Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) 9 Reviews i 1 rtevews From$62.97 to$89.95 From$27.97 to$39.95 t 330'Black Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) 100'Suspended Black Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) d= str,cb Out of stock b kev,ews E Reviews From$212.40 to$236.00 From$66.12 to$94.45 McAfee SECURE' i -' 37.5'White Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) 330'Suspended Black Commercial Grade Stringer(E26 Base) 11 Reviews I's,_, ,, From$27.97 to$39.95 From$220.50 to$245.00 Contact I Welcome to our store Phone:1-800-209-6122 Christmas Lights Rope Lights I String Lights&More �' CustomerService@mAylights.com Mon-Fri 8am to 5pm MST At Novelty Lights, Inc., we pride ourselves in being the Christmas light and Outdoor String light experts with a sales staff that has years of experience with 9800 E Easter Ave Suite 160 Centennial,CO 80112 all types of Christmas and outdoor lighting projects We've got it all from the classic incandescent Christmas lights and the newer LED Christmas lights. Social U irilAct worTED i BBB Ratin5r A• BUSINESS CiifR to-e v+h, Ilerf McAfee 4,011 SECURE I Company Info I Customer services About US • Contact us Pi ivacy iloticc • FAt? r•tt ,ii. `-tst: • Sitetrao Conditions offlcp • lli1-.1(1 elMcAfee SECURE- Our i3iog I My account I Helpful Links Customer info • New products Addresses • Recently viewed products Orders • Customer Reviev.s Wishlist • Search Real Reviews From Real Customers s; 6205 Reviews 01/23/19 01/23/19 01/23/19 50 ft 100 mini white lights Happy They are exactly what I ` ® Used ten strands of these Bought these for my son.He They are exactly what! lights to add ambiance to my wanted the old fashioned wanted,perfect! P daughters indoor tented lights.He was so excited!! Tracy T. winter white wedding.We was happy to find them here couldn't have asked for a... and got great servic... ,.c,,r, Read More cn251 �str;,a`' Read More C725 SthrVJrwav,lre s&Awned Snadrg(tunY t re[nfaras Robin C. eut th-?eenYvtre Linda M.!Aft!, Powered by 0 .opyrigh� 2014 ttic'eity:.,y:1ts. tip,. .Alt r,giit.reserk,ed.XtvL Sue A;hL '��� '1 '� t-:J PayPa1 Nog McAfee SECURE' ES1" i `-�MOS4T39i MOUNTAIN j SKI AREA (HTIPSI/WWW,WESTMTN,N ET HOME(I-ITIPSJ .WESTMTN.NET/) MOUNTAIN(HTTPSIAMMN.WESTMTN.NET/MOUNTAIN/) UPCOMING EVENTS(H I I PSJ N.WESTMTN.NET/DATES-TO-REMEMBER/) WINTER SUMMER/FALL(HTTPSJ/WVVVV.WESTMTN.NET/SUMMER-FALL/) LODGING/DINING(HTTPSJ/WVWV.WESTMTN.NET/LODGING-DINING-2/) GROUPS(H I i t'SJMWVWV.WESTMTN.NET/GROUPS✓) SPECIAL EVENTS(H I I PSJAAA W.WESTMTN.NET/SPECIAL-EVENTS-2J) STORE(HTTPSJ/WVWV.WESTMTN.NET/STORE/) MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL MAPS WEST MOUNTAIN BIKE PARK UPDATE:West Mountain's Bike Park,due to the mountain being under construction this summer with the new chairlift,the West Express chairlift being retrofitted for downloading as well as other major projects for future summer business;will not be open this summer.We will resume as soon as possible, hopefully late this fall but most likely next summer.Sorry for the interruption.Please stay up to date on all West Mountain's improvement updates at westmtn.net or on Facebook and Instagram. For Information call 518-636-3699 ext.0 Welcome to the West Mountain Bike Park Trail Map Page!We are adding trails daily so please visit westmtn.net for updates!Our XC and Downhill trail maps are located below!All West Mountain Bike Park trails are serviced by our West Express Chairlift during scheduled business hours Thursday-Sunday.Mountain Biking on West Mountain Property is strictly prohibited without an access band,and mountain biking is only allowed on West Mountain property during scheduled business hours.We will only allow uphill travel on our designated uphill trail. XC Map/Downhill Map (https://wwN.west ntn.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/XC-Trail-map-ver-3.j pg) , • kmeac.ate� Caa emon�tylptgYr�0lar ter"' . I. w=ti c k SPORTS, 'yy� w e v . " .�C Trails: s - 1( C;7,,... ..:_C 0.5mi r i - optwe. ,- 2 L.. Coyote Run 0.3mi �.r`' ..„. .Y• pep` e, 4 s 3 Deerfield0.6mi 'L!�'t •:°+s Si j{ 4 lm lane 0.3m1 ,. 4 tt rtr: 5 r ': 0.4mi A) ft7G@ e - Nr ,ems•. 6 t`._ ti O.Imi Nt �Sc�N WSY�`J� - 2 � � . \\ �eekti 6 _ . n,f 4r1,,,W NE-24) 7$ Little Sere 0.2mi 6MFC.,k. `;. watt E,car&s Ow f i 8 , Porcupine Pass 0.2mi — - - 5.4]Q '' 9 ib. QoaSTrail 0.7m1 > rssl 10let 3lfet,:".t 1.3mi d 13 91,Me-Trail 0.5m1 Downhill Traits: Si t.`Big Eary 1.5mi t 18 HOT Trali 0.4mi � w Cros Hest Picnic Area WEST ""'""r'4 (��''+��y! scenk Platform MAPS=Custom• LW (Lookout MOUNTAIN 1„: (CY0W6 NCgPtdtlt A,Ea f .65 a.-l !„. V 1J:�J;'S 31. EiEYrAiPaa l �' �., ��„,�2 _.� - -.{1 Sawmill Pump Track `More Lairs will be added as they are finalized.Check:-estntr,.net for details - , � m�1 • l� r SPOPTS 401 i xc Traasi 10f_ s _ um, r `,t 0o 1,0aTr,es: c1 [ Oka Easy 1.Sm1 s 9 f Ale'FroS 0.5M fp'�r ,..'''` 4 �'bar Voesge 04m1 fr.. 4 5 Fleece 0.,, r-' , - °" ' ,,, - ,wrTraa 04r,,, -(bfps://www.westmtn.net/wp-contenVuploads/2ot7/05/DH- • �' (,,,,®) 19®4v°acke Droc 0.1mi q f 90 4r aaeory oats r ▪ @•t.. � .d - 1 21+toes.. 0.1m1 OR kir--) L 5cemcvbHrnn Cr ._s loekavl .LI Samna amTract m MOUNTAIN • r �-. car Ae&6 4,11.t,s..: r . ...Y .i.t , °More trials 6,111W add.-sd as they ere linefeed.Check r e.Rndn hit for detach trail-map-ver-34pg) Home(https://www.westmtn.net/) Mountain Information(https://www.westmtn.net/mountain/) COME HOME TO WEST MOUNTAIN Lessons/Camps(https://www.westmtn.net/snow-sports!) Security Policy.Privacy Policy.Employment Opportunities. Ticket/Food/Drink Specials(https://www.westmtn.net/gifts-and-specials/) Copyright©2013•West Mountain Groups(https://www.westmtn.net/groups/) studioA STUDIO A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING MAILING: is PO BOX 272 I ' i SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 X �¢ jA ..y- ,., _-� §_ ,,.,.,.,, -, �;,• ., � ., � '� ;. OFFICE LOCATIO N: 4'­eww, Vq B AY SUITE SARATOGA SPRINGS, 66 , I s ' L , . r a (518) 832 4005 = x^' "* �E u 1, x. *44 u { # PHASING IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK ST ATE ol a EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS i • ..s.: * . THEY AREA TIN ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A MOBILESKI PATROL TRAILER AND .. ,. _, .", .. .. . ,., �. -•... ..,.' ,.,,.: '';.;. ,�g ,, y, LICENSED PROF ,. ,:�' ,: -,. _,:^ ,a �.�o ,,, � _fie ,,. ,.,,,., ,, •,, ` -� "* ESSIONAL ENGINEER, .,_. . ., .y; �., :::. .: .;, ,,. ., ,, x: w.:. ,.. -r. 3 � ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR A , . .. ,, „: y� _- _ ,,,. ,. r- _ _ SURVEYOR TO ALTER ANY ITEM IN ANY ., ... _ _ t : : s :- >. WAY. FIRST AID (SUMMER LOCATION - � _ , , � , . -, _ _� - �' , �;. _ '<" IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A ) - . . : �. � } . � €� _ . �_. : .. - � < _. . � a� � � �. ., � PHASE 1 . TO BE COMPLETED .4 .. I � ' LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS A �, .��.. LTERED. THE .> ALTERING LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE J N E NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR pepU 1 JULY42019 t : `�- a r,�;,' < .:-`u r � � •�' `'`+�"�' �^ - � ♦ � SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERNATION, r > I000000" \ \ I'll 1, I --� AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE `♦ ALTERATION. z �. . 00, do PHASE 2A■ PREVIOUSLY 4: wpw ` l IOUSLYAPPROVED LIP •� CONSTRUCTION — — — UCTION TO START DRAWINGS , NOT FOR SUMMER PHASE 2A: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED : t � � 2019 � - � � _ .�'� _ � CONSTRUCTION '� �� 5 ACRE CANOPY - =TOUR WITH NEW i a 12 X 24 CONCRE E PAD �� 3 �x , .n HASE 2B■ SUMMER 2019 — SPRING 2020 y . o — - - _- I PHASE 3: FUTURE o - - - -1 — — - -1 - w U z w o w o37 1 ( CO C) co 2: i \ LU O W Q� U co Lu oll Q CV i + / 0� O 00 04 i U z tV PHASE 213 : ZIPLINE Q I - 57 cn PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW 100 ' X -- -`i �\ w "J ui z w w 60 ' METAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING _ ,� O w (I- os, D 11 .10 0000 ®xf ram I \� ...■■—"woman EXISTING CHAIRLIFT TO BE RELOCATED ! •" COMPLETED(PROJECT ) � -- mm Lu • , U o w PHASE 1 : PREVIOUSLY APPROVED -� I I s °° KITCHEN RENOVATION I z e , w (� PHASE 213 : PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS — _ e ` __�I L1i,L---L---• = z ®s O MOBILE WAR`1ING HUT AT OLD BUILDING FOOTPRINT, BUNNY HILL WINTER ONLY z z NO LONGER REMAINS �— a z z s UJ " MOBILE SKI PATROL TRAILER AND 0 o PHASE 3 . NEW RETAIL SKI _ _,- . . ,. , _ FIRST AID 0A' INTER LOCATION) z � �—SCHOOL RENTALS & FIRST AIDw o w Q w o DATE: 10/22/2018 SEE SHEET S- IA FOR PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE 18005 ENLARGED AREA 400 0 200 400 800 DRAWING NO. I INCH = 400 FEET S - 1 DWG I OF 2 stu ioA s-; i STUDIO A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .. ..-. ., .. .- tY '�,_a^wf° - ,. .. t , ,. , :' .. �a .. ... .. <.:.�„ .. ,- ., ,.., ...,. r:r ... �, ,. .._.fir" .,.. ,, �s u v MAILING:�: PO BOX 272 ,I r , , r , ,.. ,. e. t .._..fix x _ _ _ SA ATOGA SPRINGS NY 12866 M u r. PHASING LEGEND __ r _ .x _ � _ l OFFICE LOCATION. .r 4 z a 480 BROADWAY SUITE 324 _ �. .. � . .,, ,. _ . u ._ ,. SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 1286 y _. _ 6 ZW __ _ . ._.. ;_ PHASE 1 . TO E COMPLETED - - 5 832-4005 JAI z JUNE 1 JULY4 2019 , . :� y+� F. ,. ._ _. _. : IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE EDUCATIONLAW FOR ANY PERSON N U LESS ..... _. _ THEY RE ACTING N E A UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A 5_ , fi �. . U LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ,. w,. � L ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND r,.. ! r . >': a." , ;•:- do . � ,. ..._ _ . .- . .,. ,._.. �, .. SURVEYOR TO ALTER ANY MIN A_ a ITEM ANY WAY . .... .,. _ _,. ... i .. ; , IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A ...,4.,Y. .." .. t . . �.. . m, s_. _ „ a ,. ..a ,. .-. �„r., _, ,r,., ., '' r + .._..,. , ,.... t ,,. LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ALTERED THE r. { A 2A• PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED �, �. ,. � ,,r. ,.� , .> q I ;,, ® ALTERING LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL + STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE wN-As EXISTING CHAIRLIFT TO BE RELOCATED (( C \\ <r . C S T R U CT I ® T START PRE V I 0 U V L Y A P P R O APPROVED 60 SIGNATURE,THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERNATION, t `;`" ¢�� �'"� a" b '"'� � ``'�""`" '�` NOTATION ALTERED BY' FOLLOWED BY THEIR ° d I AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE r � (PROJECT COMPLETED) NEW 100 X 60 METAL , ALTERATION. ti � X i SUMMER 2019 ir MAINTENANCE BUILDING r < ; I PHASE . PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PHASE 2B : SUMMER 2019 — SP ING 2020 F , / DRAWINGS r l �� xo " KITCHEN RENOVATION ; NOT FOR �., Y i CONSTRUCTION max . , s PHASE 3: FUTURE I i , Wk v I is 3 G FRONT A �- - - - - - - - SETB I N. i I— . 42 I 4 '� ` I've a w, ( �� � Lij � of �; 0op __ �--�-__��_,.--- __—__— _— 0 U � W a X. , r w IL �. I i s k 37 �v,g , 0 S r i 1 � I Q PHASE I : co i PREVIOUSLY I MOBILE WARMING HUT AT ; I I i 1 r _ I BUNNY HILL (WINTER ONJ) I o r � APPROVED NEW ( , COMPACTOR N U I 1 a ! � � . . v a i i � i ° i 1 ; i i J Q >— I LOCATION �� rLu < I , s cra I a I I ; z Z __J I ` ® i t Q 0 1 I (�fii fry I PHASE I . — I I I I I 0 �- r PREVIOUSLY ; o U �, W P ED NEW I I I � x w Iz i APPROVED I ; i Q w � w i i i IL I ROOF DRAINAGE w IILp. D TRENCH --a--s® I MOBILE SKI rATROL TRAILER AND I i I ; ; FIRST AID (JINTER LOCATION , TO � r 0 PHASE 2B : PARKING OLD BUILDING FOOTFRINT, � o I BE RELOCAED EACH YEAR TO i NO LONGER REMAINS ; ; i i Jo w I LOT IMPROVEMENTS CANOPY TOCJR AREA) I j I I I Q w I , L I i i i m � 0 a FR -- _ — PHASE 3 : NEW RETAIL SKI F-- � ; i i Q °NT SETB w ! I I I A„K SCHOOL RENTALS FIRST AID c� ; ; ; Lz 1Q W I I I I I z � Q _ i 0 _ IW , , , i Z Z I 'f ; o I I I I I Q Q I I I I woo i .. 30 FRONTc� kib i SETBACK T B A __ ___.--_---L----__--__ _-----. L ._� ----- ""`. 0 — V) J I I z Lu DATE: 10/22/2018 PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE 18005 0 30 60 120 DRAWING NO. •- G` INCH = 60 FEET S - 1A [DWG 2 OF 2 PLOTTED BY: AROBERTS SAVE DATE: 7/8/2019 9:06 AM DESIGN BY: ACR DRAWN BY: ACR CHECKED BY: SJA FILE NAME: Z:\PROJECTS\2018 PROJECTS\18005-WEST MOUNTAIN BASE LODGE\DWG\WEST_MTN_ADJACENT_LAND_USE_M AP_.DWG r ll� o woo n PSI- 00 o vN no SN a3idM v ook 110-r 100- N .r P PD�p, cr � o 1 � L too 1001 D r Z r C - 1 rn 1 � , o C z io 0 OC)4 rnrn U O --� 3 ' fld N � 1 W u, rn o -� m NCD � � o rn rn ❑£� N � z D � o . rn o � 0 001\007- S rnp p 4�z \1 p D �E Q po o WW co � m 9 r.55 -6A R; - i '� 110 N 1 p N �-A pd O Zti J �oA > Z L 66 -4 O) cn W w D O cn v N G N o " D j w qj;'Z6 v D p/ D l.i 0) 000 w Z 4 D 250.89 22 N 19§00 W O 9 Z $0��2 w co n�� WA N PNO v$`'°2 A (J` 2 � LL Olti ��` 66Z9 C \V Dcn Z oo� P go�y� o CID w w w D �8 00 -a4 cn D co 151.37 'moo FOUNDERS Esccool 15437 p � O 0 C4 D N N 236 D D W p H31VM �93 � C� o So N -4 0 ul D °o D cn °o D �� u w m goo 'Ss�s oo OD O �'O D '16' 74 0 70, r- r ■ rn � rn � ■ o ■ ' 0 i NJ cn —) 3 —I r In N �u N 0 oOp -Oj 3p Crni) � �u m 3 rn o rn o n rn rn o rn o D � Cq , Z rn DoC) DIn Do z rn O J rn 3 � r- Zc/) Orn D n oD D n -Irn � -_I = o � z 3 � � -I p r ro rn 3 rn 3 3 Z O M (/) cn rn n — rn z oD D m O r O C o � D � 3 � o PROJECT PREPARED FOR REVISIONS C� m zo Z z D m m C A rn= "' r "' 3 r (J') D Dam D<_ <m- D �l DOD _p D O -1 D--I T1 m m c Cl1 (/♦ may. D O > n�omzmzomm�DD D W C� D O sz-ic"o- momo 00 Z DESCRIPTION Z ornm = mA� z c.N p � m O X z N rn !?� DATE z /� z��DmC�3�r mro ^' G� D t- O N n — o O ' O n — to �1 mmr-, 0>zmzk C� Iv 59 WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD =�omo OD c) � D o o D m o pmmzmrnro�c� (n (n m Doa DDm�oomo o� 0D m D D z CD z C.11 T om�mapz��Nzo�z �7 �7 D o DRAWING TITLE QUEENSBURY, NY 12804 c ® z c�zAD�{nD�zo z O 'v CD ^ o=r�rT"loo> m=rmmm Z m Z -1 c �J J o o_ z mm{ (n (n = • o N -< m m AREA MAP ILLUSTRATING USES WITHIN 500 ' -� ZDAZOD�3n goo NN - o 0 O � -IOm DZ mDZ� m 1 N � O oZ<orrnmZozoZz rn rn ;on Dim noo<zc�zzo o> of m O m D 1 m D D m c m D =z-=r= jz u)m F 4 / d e i< ez M.—Mtn Rd,S Mam•1•m NY € / / WWW.rNIo-M•naamA•m F / s C / / Y Proper&O'Leary S / Engineering,dpc Y ` STRUCTURAL 2 OML CONSULTANTS 516.670.5331 Www.poelp.mm 1JIt ) i iI 10 00 IT6 A WOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION IAW FOR ANY PERSON TO ALTER THESE PUNS,SPKIFCATIONS.OR REPORTS IN ANY WAY. UNLESS HE 6 ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PR OFMIONAL ENGINEER. _ �t FOR IOWERDSIIE PLAN \ :� \ O_ _ _ PSON: 76097.0 _7 ( ,/ SEE DRAWNGZ \ \\ _ _ _ RiOWERSSIIEPLAN / (/ \ .-� 'ZA \ _ _ DATE: 11/tYN18 'SEf DRAWING Z.IA \ \\ rr .� \ ,\.. ( 1 \ �ti - �• — /• ,1y� DESIGNED Y: 00P Y r } REVISIONS: d '.� F '.'.1 I �ZIPI NE td. 1- ',. i $b'�'I�5oA$5�:: %�Ci�. �.,!�. .� •, $ �:�_/, �� ,.� i0 Y SEEDRAWWGZIA ..'\ H. .® BRFN \ _ DATE DESCRIPTION FOR ZIPLINE l9,� -�'.,ti.� SEE DRAIN i-20 C \ SEE DRAwwG �,.., '�C-emu. _• �° N-15-15 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION \ ' FRq`, -.•; Cl G \�: � ,1 , J \ \ _ \, '.'\\I 12- SITE PLAN SUBMISSION S \ _ 1a1e ET R TOWER F SITE PLAN.\ - - -v�� - • UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION WING 23. V� ) Ke�REL .1 \ -,\'',' '.`.`;.... ,.• '`.: I': I` \ \' t rER '.. 1^ °l. /*!f:,, ...,.'°° `+R•ao _ -9= ---— ' =: •'.\ $zp ".\ \ �. '' SEE i3, if ,R ZIPLINE i6. J w .(.}�yy^�'.Lf�'{ _... FORiDWER F SITE PLAN, • �77• SEEDRAWNGZ3.0 ♦. i,\'., \ \,'�SEE DRAWING SEE DRAWING Z-6.0 _ \ - FORDPLNEtIER E•: ` \ {s I _ L \ ,.0,, G// _ -^ �; \ ` \� �. \" .,q .�:•.� \}` �' `CC , .Irk: .. SEEO"NG Z.9DLAN \: _\- -,\.. RiOWERASiTE PLAN'±.,\ �: '�'\ '� `i• .�}1SEEDRAWING22.0 �,•S1 y`Y� ri / • - 7} �-5� ACF S� YyF..,�y�, � z ` THE iEnD"Y �� 'S �./ INAR l9✓RLL .� I I �,, \ A.r \. .('. •CL ) - - _r O_ a. LU ,`\ � ( l , J I IA ' _ 1 \ 1-- 76 DRAWING SUMMARY: w N SITE PLAN I SCALE:l-2" WEST MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE TOUR Z0.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN = in Z1.0 - RUN#1 & #2 PLAN AND PROFILE Via. Ui Z2.0 - RUN#3& #4 PLAN AND PROFILE ti Z3.0 - RUN 45& #6 PLAN AND PROFILE ~ Z4.0 - TOWER G-JUMP TOWER SITE PLAN OVERALL S1.0 - PLATFORM PLANS&TOWER ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN a WEST MOUNTAIN JUMP AND ZIPLINE TOWER x S1.0 ISOMETRIC VIEWS&RENDERING R W S2.0 - GROUND FLOOR&LOWER TOWER PLATFORM PLANS SCALE:I"=200 S2.1 TOWER TOP PLATFORM&ROOF PLANS S3.0 - ELEVATIONS&STAIR SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET ZO . 0 W - -- -- - r• \ \ \ wMacerMB Re.Ea4c�eamNY . -71Hu Proper&O'leary �• FR�Lt- =� - \` 'FO?( OG ,' _sake: -� � ae� '( 1� Engineering & ••\ \ _ _ ,\, .\ \ \ .�`>.-.,` \ - \ _ _ _ \1 STRUCTURAL•CMLCONSULT- 4\., -\ _ \•. MaVk tam 3aM y .\ \ \• Q'' .��"'' ✓� \ PROP \ / \ Vaktle,NY t2180 ACCESS BRIDGE `\ ASCHEANIIC SHOWN 518.810.8331 OHDR www.PoenR.wm .� ,'1' ,�•/ - _ - '�-�- `��`-� � T � ON DRAWING I/S1A77 \ ` �.\ \•: ,�� `� ` •CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK \'. _ f-UW-W -T LENGTH WE TYP. \ 5. - 1 \ A VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK SPATE i \ \' \ •'r\ \'\ a` -`\ a \ I `' V r 1 _ EDU IT 8 CA710N LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO ALTER THESE \' PUNS,SPECIFCATIONS.OR REPORTS IN ANY WAY. -_,\ \ - \ \ \ ..\\ 'a ' .. ,, •.\ �• i a, 1 �!1�' ,' r ' 1 UNLESS HE IS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A ,_../ LIC94ED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. ! \'' ` '.� \ \ I RO SOVEf� \ ` - TOWER A SITE PLAN PBor , SCALE:1"=2IY ero1.0 - >:o DATE: 71/152018 scaLE: As sHown \ ICY♦}\ r .` .\ 'i , DRAWN BY: A CHECKED BY. DBP , .\ \``'.\� \ ; \ a • :.. /i- -\., ``' `- / ` '✓\— �� 1 �• DE316NEO SY. P APRiDVEt)Bv� DSP L \- m I \ — '♦ R. Y0. . 4i I �p REVISIONS: SITE PLAN , DATE I DESCRIPTION 1500 SCALE:I-IOU 11.1578 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET ZIPLINE#I 01-24-19 UPDAI'EDs1TE PLAN SUBMISSION I CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK SLOPE-1 -5 1w w 2s IT w Tw �/ f.01N'-0IN'V'LENGTH SSE TYP. SLOPE 13S% L;ikajIm_&III 1400 TOWERA KFTRAI SET TENSION:ODDL.&S sIB-1RaL SCALE-I'-LW i' �• i �� . PLAT#1:6.0 APPROX.CADIEwJ SAG 1300 _ ---_*_ •I•��, I GRCUNDOFFSET,25' / /1/ I// t� \N / t_ TOWER B V //r-B, iOWEtBSCHEAunc 0 - I I SHOWN ON DRAWING 2/S1A/I O PLAT#1:65.3 1211D / I 9 -" PLAT#2 53.7 / ILL 1100 `Z - Al v t; - aoo s Z 1 1 is ZIPLINE#1 0 W =10D'HORZ:1" �-r- 1400 VERT:I"=10O TOWER B L11 PLAT#1:65.3' 1300 PLAT TOWER B SITE PLANZIPLINE#2 I Sp-TRNL SID-TRaI 81%TRAIL SPAN:12629 SCALE:1"=29 SLOPE:I3.OR I SET TENSION:2200 LISS I 2 1200 II I �- I W „ 1 s o I . � APPROX. SCALE:1'-20' O GROUND OFFSET.25 F. noD _--- --_ _-- - RUN#1 &#2 -- TOWER PLAN &PROFILE PUT#2 65S 1000 PLAT#3:d9 3 d SITE PLAN z1 . 0 ZIPLINE#2 VERF:1"=10D Rr:1"=100 SUBMISSION SE I VE \ .1• t \ - 7 A�� I \ Proper&O'Leary 1 , I I T 'f % 1022 �Z-2 �— / ,qYE cswEAu1 TT Engineering.dpc ]� I' ��\ //� L• SHOWN ON DRAWNG 3/51.0 1 STRUCTURAL•CMLCONSIATANTS �' \ , 4 Maple Late SoM 18 valaBa.NY 12186 518 610 8331 1021.444 \ • ^� _ \ \ I, .\\ •'\ L _ ,. \`•' ,\... ` \\• �COHCREM ANCHOR BLOCK / ~ '� -___ /,• \-_ \` \ ' � ;\.. \ , I' \. r, •1', � _�•, \ ` 'raxraua uNGTH s¢E TYP. �, 21 EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO ALTER THESE `\ ` ' ,•' \ \ \ \- ,,• \ ,\ ' - • •, 1 \pi -- V,\ THRU PLANS.SPECINCATIONS,OR REPORTS N ANY WAY, 1" \- �' 3\ Via;✓� �\'.' +1 / LK:LESS HE 5 ACTING ENSED P8031.0 ONA NDER THE BIGWEERDR2ECDa!OF A PEON: 1803i.0SLIEg17HT .�' .• L� u<��\ 1 �. 1,. ,\� _ 1, J� DATE: „nsrmta SITE PLAN / / SCALE: ASSHOWN - I ONAWN BY: JCL CHECKED BY: DPP SCALE:I—IOD + \ - 1 oESHaE�o er: a APweawa_ z REVISIONS: x o TOWER C SITE PLAN DATE DESCRIPTION 12DD SCALE:I"-2'1' 11-1b18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION i SCALE:1"=100' \ � 12-1318 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET ZIPLINE#3 � ----- _ 01.24-19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION Iwo TOWER C SPAN:643.4 \ \ PLAT#2:65S SLOPE:14.0)6 BXt-TRaL PLAT#3:8.0 SET TENSION:2200 L85 - - - /�/ \ / •�\� \ �•__ _ APPROX.CABLE-/SAG CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK // / / 4'4r f-0W-V LENGTH SIZE M. - 1000 _ _� ----'_--_•-� I'__�_--_ T//__ GROUND ORSEf•2S \ \`_--` / \\' TOWER D o PLAT ft.64.3' 900 PLAT#4:39.7 \Y'\\ \ \ \ w Q / \ \ \ 3 am TOWER ON ' \ / SHOWN ON DRAWING 4/S'A + ' D I 1 I I 7N i i \ T—D'. it �' \ ' ZIPLINE#3 O w • `\ \\ \ / ' \ 'r z \ $I \ ,N (/) CL ZIPLINE#4 Ilk \` /Z-3 \ ��'.Z-4N, \ i w N /p Ioro TOWER D SPAN:711.4' \\ > PLAT#3:64.3' SLOPE:14.d16 \ \ '/ \ ./\ \ SET TENSION:3.000 LBS \ /•, m PLAT#4:39.7 \ / / to 8q-T/WL•___ Bq-TRAIL ` \ - \ '/ / \1 Z UJI 90D - ` I APPROX,CABLE w/SAG X --- - \ a(•Y GROUND OfiSE.15' BDo TOWER E TOWER D SITE PLAN SCALE:1=27 RUN#3&#4 PLAT#4:61.9' PLAT#5:14.z - PLAN &PROFILE o � a .a m mod 700 SCALE.1'-20' 3 3 600 8 9 SITE PLAN Z2 . 0 ° ZIPLINE #4 SUBMISSION SE-1 HORZ:1"=IX VERT:,"=IC' \, \ BRANjT.' g. 3 ,, 6i � v E G v a [ t.. `h. V g �, I � �; � I ''� ••:as�l, � � I '� I� � I I `�\gyp. ,1� v �—� 1 1 - ---�---�`�'��, Y I 11 I T, .T_ ``il \� \ 1• :.\. - •'\_ ate, - �,' \ 82Me M Rd,Eatl Gtlu um NY �] r 2 i I /: \.\ ?./ \ 't +i"PPY• .jam \. \ \�y •�"� = " r - //\` \ �• , \ —.TnesMenbouR can ER HIP�LN z_# \ \ / ). : 1 \ 1 1 \;'. 1 l i _ �{ I ' �' Proper&O'Lealy `, 1 '\ • \ \ 1 \ )I g { I ? ,� I THOW AESCH&AAI G6 ,A i \ Engineering dpc % , \ I 1 { .1 I STRUCTURAL-CAVIL CONSULTAMS \ \ \ , ` I \'•r6 1 1 .\ \� ` 4 IaW.fare 184 £ ) `` VabUe,NY 1218d T \ \ •\ \,7ERFt141N pA�K - � a� { \ \ 518.810.833t rew.Pa RnR.axn • ` CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK ` \ \ 4b' \ =r\ '- "� 4'1Tkf4hV-W LENGTH S¢E/YP. THE FACE$ a' �\ 3\y r\'� �'�� T\\` \ , 9• I \\` \��\ �/ A. \. �, �.';,\ \ ; I\ 1 .`� \.•�.1 , ' '�� \ �� � . ��• �; TtlsitGPAR�. 'I ,fir" ' SITE PLAN \\ \ R G A VKLAW FOR OF THE NEW YORK STALE EDUCATION LAW TOR ANY PERSON TO ALM THESE ' \ PUNS.SPECWCATN)NS.UNLESS HE 5 ACTING OR REPORTS N ANY WAY, SCALE'1" 100' \ j --I \ LICENSED PROFSSRNUL ENG HERDIRECtION OF A I�----- P80/- 11031.0 \ \ _ DATE: 11/15=18 SCALE: AS SHOV,N 900 DRAWN BY' w 1s o JCL G4ECKED BI: OBP ZIPLINE#5 TOWER E SITE PLAN,ao sP 1ao DESIGNED ffI: OBP APRiOVED BY: DBP ® TOWER E SPAN:316A SCALE:1"-217 PLAT 84:61 9' SLOPE:13.0% _ SCALE:I"=100• REVISIONS: PLAT 05:14.2 SET TENSION:3,5OD LBS DATE DESCRIPTION 800 SK TRAIL APPR01.CA1LE111AG 11-15-18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION GRouND oFFSD.2s' I 12-13.18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET TOWER F 8 I I I 01.24-19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 700 PLAT#S:44.0 PLAT#6:2B.9' I . _ _ _`` CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK �4'-0'k4'4T1W'4 U31G1H S¢E IYP. /{ I bao I / / z it TOWERFSCHEMATic •\ Q SHOWN ON DRA..,.0 . __ r ZIPLINE #5 T- � I 1 I m HORZ:1'=100 \ 1 z/ \ ® w eoo TOWER F ZIPLINE#6 SKYTRNL/PATRON AREA' PLAT#5 c /:44.0 SPAN:1450.4 �� �� PLAT#6:�.9' SLOPE:13.5% I Z-5 __ — SET TENSION:220D LES 700 — APPROK.—U2L /SAG m TOWER F SITE PLAN 60D _ - _ --____ I Z ___ GROUND OFFSET,2S SCALE:I••=22Y � W SDo TOWER G(JUMP TOWER) yy 's PLAT#6:88.0 SCALE:1201"= RUN#5&#6 r PLAN & PROFILE 40D 3 300 - L4 it I. - SITE PLAN Z3 - u ZIPLINE#6 CI InhATr1rTf-W Ir' RZ:I'=100 VE VERT:1'=100 8M—,MN Rd,EN EN NY CIVXum __ I .Tree-Man! 422.4 \ \ x \ -� Proper&O'Leary 420.8 \ 420'6 \ •_ , Engineering. dpc STRUCTURAL CMLCONSULTANTS 3 \ \ \ \\ -420\ d .... Velatie,NY 171SC� P• � � \ \ 518.810.8331 Lx�w.poeny.eom a '® 4A3 3 \ \ �.o — X422.7 424 tR 6 A VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO ALTER THESE PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS,OR REPORTS IN ANV WAY, LICENSED PROFESSONAUNUESS ME IS ACTING NENGINEER,DER THE DIRECTION OF A - / TOWER F SCHEMAnC PLANS.SEE DRAWING P804: 1eml-0 SET vWEST MOUNTAIN JUMP AND ZIP TONER' TATE T-F SCALE: I-X 8 DRAWN aTccK®er: mP Z-6 �+/ ��l,� ��`� f MGNEDBY: . APPROVED OY: OBP ya XX °?O REVISIONS: 14 425.2 I / \ /' i ,�-� x422.9 DATE DESCRIPTION 11-15-18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION X427.3 // ` y4\ 12-13-18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET fir _ 01-24-19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMIS510 < / O ' z X426.7 // / x 4. o / U Z W <428.6 // X476.8 X426.3 O � x 423.9 3 z / O -� :D I I I I X426.5 Q\� :) m Z I I � H° J i to N x ,a = a m SCALE:1"=20' Z LU tu O O H TOWER G-JUMP TOWER SITE PLAN } SITE PLAN Z4 . 0 I SUBMISSION SE7" g o s s� � 5 cl 6'a -A 92 M Rd,Ent ._. I W—.Ter .M..d— um Nr A CL I ) W8Q1 COL.I27YP.i PREFABSPIRALSTABt i Proper&O'Leary 6'0 COL.(,ITYP.) Engineering.dpc STRUCTURAL-CMLCONSULTANTS § § § R — .. _ --E�_ — — - 2870 Ft A 9.PO B.7/5 '•' CL518AO.B331184 wnwVomgmm I I I .... PREFAB SPIRAL STAIR CONSIRUCIgN DDCLIMB/IS PROVpED AS 6'0 COL 11 TYP.) I I INSIRUMEMS OF SERVKE AND ALL DESIGN -- - I _. _ I INFORMATION SXOWN HEREON ARE PROVpJFO N _. .. _... CONFp]ENCE ANO REMAIN IXE SOLE PROPS W OF PROPER A OAE ENN`OR NG OPC 7FE Ll3F OF DIE DESIGN AND ALL IR mERIION FILE S ED aN I I TXBE CI I_EN6 FOR OIXER 1MAN 11ff SKOK _ 'i L— — -- -- -- --- —'J BRED PROJECT NAMED XBEON S STRICRY PROM WRXOUf IXPRESSAT ORIREN CTO TE § -- "" UNAUMORIIED ALIERP. OR AODIIION TO 116 l5 PROMHIf®. _.. .—.._ .. P809: 18031.0 I1 SCALE: NTS T — — DRAWN W.' Im CIEC�BY:DF.&g1ED BY: OHP APPR]VED BY: REVISIONS: A LAUNCH PLATFORM B LANDING PLATFORM DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE'1N'1 1' 12.13.18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET SCALE 1/p'•T 01.24.19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION T�Op OFTOVISi FOPOF TOWEL ��80-55/S' BD$ STOP OF lOWE9 T9S 5/S' ^TOPOF TOWER TT-0 3/! a § § 7 O § U PUT x2 ..2 b Z PU1p3 W 65'J 5/S 65'-0' D: PU11 61'-Lo 7 r z 3 $TOPOF TOWER _ 59'7 — — PUT pI z O 534 3/B' .... LL D r _a 5O 7 PUT xs ` `_ J PUT p� a. 3P-2 3/8' W N �PIAl Ir 25-10pb 7, m co LU O F '`PA1.5 PLATFORM PLANS V 1a•-23/a &TOWER PUT 13 ELEVATIONS PUTpi 3 6'il" GRADE:VIF GRADE:VIF GRADE:VIF GRADE:VIF GRADE:AF GRADE:W tom- E-0 D-0" LY-0' "� SITE PLAN S1 . 0 TOWER A 2 TOWER B 3 TOWER C 4 TOWER D 5 TOWER E 6 TOWER F (�SCALE:1/S=1' SCALE:I/S=I' SCALE:1/$�1' SCALE I/8'e l' SCALE:IB'=1' SCAlf:l/8"�1' SUBMISSION SET- ir 8R Z;:L1N ft.Fast C.9—NY www.T..MR ft— uRDw Proper&O'Leary Engineering dpc STRUCTURAL,dVR CWNSULTAN 4 KUple lase SwN Vstwk NY 12184 518.610b331 —Poe V9 IT 8 A VIDIAMIN OP 1NE NEW TOR` STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO LATER TNESE PLANS.SPEQRCARONS.OR REPOM W ANT WAY, UN185 NE 5 ACING UNDER THE DIRE(.'80N Of A LxyN I PROFSSIONAL P EER. P808: 18031.0 DATE: 12MSMS SCALE: DRAWN W: OBP ClQC1�D Sr DBP DERIGt�O BY: DRP APPROVED OY: OBP REVISIONS: / I DATE DESCRIPTION 12-13.18 SRE PLAN SUBMISSION SET - 5 -R- OUPDATED19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSI --- `"� -M7� `.� ice¢ �> "c •t ? 177 �°' '. :i+�K r frs✓',+' ry .a �d Tom,' ` r "¢ �„®a¢,:1 •-$ ':C•• Z LU a; 9 i - r � ' r.A4� ` A• � ` „�.. ma's ' ,,,� -I � ' ON I r .r - / t F- Z LLJ ,� T' �• 8 t icy 5 I I Y co lip r' - LU ISOMETRIC B A TOWER RENDERIN ISOMETRIC VIEW VIEWS& G SCALE:N$ SCALE:NIS RENDERING SITE PLAN S1 . 0 SUBMISSION SET R a 9 2 OU OU 6 82M—,MM Rd.EM CheOlvn NY ' I ,•aW.T,9oMe,WMa,<MI Proper&O'Leary Engineering.dpc A POLE — — — — — STRUCTURAL.CIVIL CONGMTNJTS /1 66f 4Map%Lana SMAI, 2 Valle,NY 12184 — 518.610E331 w.0a'M9mm Z R S A MOLASON OF THE NEW YCM SIAM EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO ALTER THESE PUNS.SPEOFICATONS,OR REPORTS IN ANY WAY. UNLESS HE 6 ACING UNDER THE OatKl10N OF A BPIXE — — — — — UCEHSEC PRONSUONAL ENGNEER. Cl PSOX, 1801.0 DATE: 12JMMS SCALE: IM•V DMWNtrc: TBP CIEfxED BY: DBP 2' DE6 6 8 DBY: asP APPRDYED W: D6P REVISIONS: DATE DESCPoPTION 12-13-18 SITE PLAN SUBMISSION SET C MID-PLATFORM Q U-G' 01-24-19 SCALE: 1' UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION \ / 1/e'e 0 POLE / !1 CL W W 3 I � Z a II I 0 I + i c ° 5 [L N cl \\ / v~j Q \ p POLE — — — — — — — — u - co co z N GROUND& LOWER TOWER A GROUND FLOOR B LOWER PLATFORM 32'-0" kV PLATFORM PLANS 3 SCALE:,/<•.,• SCPLE 1/4••1' Ay c A 2 1 0 2 C SITEPLAN SCALE:,,4"=,'-T S2 . 0 SUBMISSION SET e 3 G d F >r 82 M—MIA Ttd.E MChW—W .r1e.xNmsopm C y� 5 Proper&O'Leary Engineering,dpc a STRUCTURAL:CML CONSULTANTS d Maple La Soj 1 V.I l..NY 1218. s+es1oa121 � � ou ou ea 0.0u Y'u ou �u ou' I I I I I 1 I R IS A vglATION OF THE NPV'M STATE �I I --r /' \\ FUUFT&SSFECCATION mCCAMNs OR R�tPO 1SO-WAAT. i 1 , \ U HE ACTING UND DREQpN OF A uCENSID PROFMOFA ENGPEEt.DATE: 12MMS SCALE: 19-1. I I I I gtAVrtJ BY: DeD C1ffC�BY, OBv ry1 ftv _ I — — — I— — T — - OF9IGI�Der: I)BP APPNOV W. DSv V I I _ _ REVISIONS: A POLE _ _ I — — — — — — — — — — TE DESCRIPTION a I 2A13-18 SITE PLANK SUUBM1SS10N SET I I I I i I I I I 01.24-19 UPDATED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION I I I I I I "112 1 1 4/12 . I I I 1 I I I U I p I w I N � POLE I w ? L.1� Pcc-LL Feea I Z \\\ 0 N — — — — — — — — - O N cL I I r I C Q I G IL I I I I I L--- --------- ---------------------I --------- I---J F— Z A TOP PLATFORM 88'-0" B ROOF PLAN W Q SCALE TIPa1' SCALE I!P i' 1 I I I W 0 s N TOWER TOP PLATFORM&ROOF PLAN 3 TE gL 2 1 0 2 d c SIDE PLAN SCALE:I/4"=1'-0" S2 . 1 A SUBMISSION SET o W F oIG ou gu g�G ou oG o8 oG gu SG 4 nll TOP Oft\_ BIL CO, &2wM—Mft PAE.WChW— Y .TisN.lbppwmin 5 IOD$ tl E 9 ` X. . 1 POLE POLE Proper&O'Leary — — SPlM2 — — — — — — — SPLICE — _ — — — UPPERPUT. I STRUCTnMe,CM COerg CONSULTANTS Maple aPiR lane8 g 4 apl,NY 12164 3 I I I I I I I � 518.6t0.8331 wmvyoelgmn \ I I ALL DIAGONAL BRACES I ` $HAIL CONSISTUST.4-""DIOA I _ I I \ I I I I E D w Vg OF THE YO SLATE LAW EDUCATION FOR ON TO ALTER RE PWd,ME 5 ACTING U OR REPORM DIE ANY WADY. I ——— UNLESS ME R FESSIO UNDER THE DWECEON Of A I UCEME9 PROFESSIONAL ENGR1®2 1 I PW0 : 28031.0 DATE: 11/15/2018 SCALE: 311611' LE POLE DR.WNBY: DBP DFECI(®!N: pBV POLE _ I SpOUCt SPLICE _ — _ — DESI6NE "; — APPROV w: DBP SPLICE \ I ' _ _ _ — _ — _ REVISIONS: \ / DATE DESCRB'TION I I I I 12.1318 SRE PLAN SLIBMISSION SET I --- I 01-2419 UPDATED SfTE PLAN SUBMISSION HS I I I I z 0 \ / U W INTERIOR POLE SHA CONSIST OF GUN BARREL S I I I Q IP D1A.SYP R 1.Pi. POLE POLE _ POLE SPLICE SPLICE O SPLICE I I I I LOWE31�RLOWERPUi _ _ — — — — — _ — I \ IX I I I I I \ I I `W`^^ CL \ VJ HORLz.scour L 1 I C I I / RE.STRUt \ I I STEEL PIPE dCH80 NO / srEEt PIPE 4SCHBFI8 0 \ Z I to I Iu D I I --- I ELEVATIONS& � iOP STAIR SCHEMATIC 3—'S lY l7 --- — 3 — a SITE PLAN L________J L________J L-- _______-J L---------- SUBMISSION SET S3 . 0 B C EAST ELEVATION STAIR SCHEMATIC 2 , D 2 < A EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:3/16'=1' SCALE;7/16"=1' SCALE:3/16'•1' SCALE:311 G'=I-T NOTE STAIRS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARET NOTE-.:STARS NOI SNOWN FOR CLAIM JJ UNDISTURBED NATURAL APi } � � STURBED VEGETATED NA EA UNDISTURBED EARTH _..._..______ # /#3 STONE iA 6 S8T24'30" i ! I `�>AR2ZESI�E SETBACK 9 II _._._ _. N - _ � { co I i Pp ASPHALT bRI111= s� 8 i - _ o: . z xU NOTE: _ ' 15 l j p`N{: M' ( I I ACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT UP IS LEVEL TO UNIFORMLY SPREAD DISCHARGE. m ,-�-- � N I iI LA GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM DETAIL N OF _ f € 2 STORY FRAMED � w 1 SCALE: NO SCALE rt C.�r T os _ a I „ ,CONC, a r 11 'r � _ 48. cu 't \t 11 uni -i PARKING AREA IN PURPOSES ONLYOR SCHEMATIC O R _ I r, li t �} 1 W t �SETBACK � 1 it � XISTt __ ' I � PLANTINGS AS SPECIFIED :8.24' G F 4"DOMED PVC RISER NCI €� C �i 2"-3"MULCH WITH LEAFT COMPOST w 400.009 � I OR SHREADED WOOD AVOID WOOD CHIPS o - 5" CONC. PIPE ��.. S TB _- 36"SOIL M . 134t L 4" PV 0 0.50% j S70 SIDE RrI PiF MEDIA o i F t 12"WASHED STONE IN FILTER FABRIC WRAP Z TABLE 5.11 SUGGESTED RAIN GARDEN PLANT LIST O SHRUBS SFES INV. UT = 416 64 a L -WATCH HAZEL HAMEMEUS VIRGINIANA j OVERFLOW RISER \ Q WINTERBERRY-ILEX VERTICILLATA i # STABILIZED- CO STRUT INVERT = 419.00 y ARROWWOOD-VIBURNUM DENTATUM BROOK-SIDE ALDER-ALNUS SERRULATA i0 RED-OSIER -C IFE NUS STOLON RA # { ✓ W3 si 3 SWEET PEPPE BUWSHOD-CLETHRA ALNIFOUA HERBACEOUS PLANTS CINNAMON FERN —OSMUNDA CINNAMOMEA �11 i I t 23 20 't 1 fCUTLEAF CONEFLOWER-RUDBECKIA LAgNIATA NEW ENG 5 1 . . - . ,i. . . . . . / .`•. �\ ;•. ; �,� \/ WDOLGRASS-SCIRPUS CYPERINUS ; f # f V"I . . . I.AND ASTER-ASTER NOVAE-ANGUAE . . .. CA• O \�� \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ ' \\ \\ \\ \ / SWEET PEPPERBUSH-CLETHRA ALNIFOUA SPOTTED JOE-PYE WEED-EUPATORIUM MACULATUM �j' / j % SNATCH GRASS-PANICUM VIRGATUM W \\\\\\ \i GREAT BLUE LOBELIA-LOBEUA SIPHATICA �I yy RED MILKWEE TED N�Y G AS INCARNATE s y ,f ' I } # s� .. \.'. .. 4 / �.. • 'f` Cn �v 'f 5,..> ;l._ t ._},r ..-�L... Z.. 4- j-. � ..I�l C_,l".}4::: 1...> _ L._ j .. a°� 'tC..1 }S 'i...4 / SPEMICrATIOM BM1Q�AN.BROOILYN cI . . . . . . . . . `r \ ` iT1 i /'�-�; ...> - -_.,,•.;: ..1-, -,�..,.�.° '.f / BOTAMC GARDEN, i ; ; r ;,e. . ._. .. .'. 1 - OU11ET PIPE P7 � � N \\••� ,� t.._.2C yC C �C,. C C. C C • C C C_ C C C.` C C. CNI t IN W , I � In „�> t t ! I a. 9 M s :. r C. C C C.�. ,. . .-1, c:.,?f ?< s =( .,J,a ,.�` >,i,''' \:/��'`•���`�/•�,,,/� `,,'..,' ``./' `' � °//' .'���0 � �'`I /.`%; I , P I PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN WHEN REQUIRED T22 ' :1 E ". � �° UNDISTURBED EARTH z c• NOTE: UNDERDRAIN NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS APPLICATION ,.4" _-� \ � �r� 108.4't � BIO RETENTION AREA DETAIL 7t is C: .� SCALE: NO SCALE r_- } I 4 B19RETENTION AREA=4,500t SF f-�S E\ ,.. f L,.` `mow AMBER ..e{. I I £ - t `.. S t F4��,�t {i __ i V \ 1I o 9 ', l r 00 1 ` .. �� ��' �r�. � � � �; �, y,'. 5 . � S � � ,,�� � �1 F= t�a ��_ �.---- q ` ZONE45 \ 1 _ - - i�spJHtvLj ZONE 3-4 tVF 73 2't 421 \ ZONE 2-3 L \ Lo fr to S � i � \ t Z l F QVERF� I 1;I�t SILT FENCE (TY I ; _ w OW p 'sis �o �i 72,2f NG q t _ r v Ld u, � 4 `e ON — ! ZONE 2 ZONE 4 RA�\ m .G DIAP M ��[ i^' c V l v:t ' ; BUTTON BUSH —2'-3' APART CARDINAL L WER FLOWER 6 TO 1' APART � ✓ �� i � � \ ,` BLUE FLAG IRIS — 12" APART SLIPPERY ELM — SEEDS 15 PER LINEAR FOOT BROOMSEDGE — 8 LBS. PER ACRE YOUNG TREES 4'-6' APART 4 H. t BUSHY BEARDGRASS — 18" APART BUTTON BUSH — 2' TO 3' APART ?, 4_1 � ZONE 3 SWITCHGRASS — 12" APART MIN. \ ARROWWOOD VIBURRIUM — 8'-10' ZONE 5 a BUTTON BUSH — 2' TO 3' APART SWITCHGRASS — 12" APART MIN. �— ELDERBERRY — 1 METER APART CARDINAL FLOWER — 6" TO 1' APART ..�'..•• � �— , SILKY DOGWOOD — 5'-6' APART BIG BLUESTEM — 24" APART SETBACK. 25' SIDE '," NOTE: PLANTINGS ARE SUGGESTED ONLY AND ALTERNATE NATIVE SPECIES MAY BE , I � 00� PLANTED AND SPACED AS PER SPACE REQUIREMENTS 400 4 � S82.32 ; BIORETENTION PLANTING DETAIL TYP IRE � REQUIRED ELEMENTS SCALE: NO SCALE t SITING: RAIN GARDENS SHOULD BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE (WITHOUT CAUSING DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES) TO THE IMPERVIOUS AREAS THAT \ THEY ARE INTENDED TO TREAT. ALTHOUGH SOME VEGETATED AREAS WALL DRAIN TO THE RAIN GARDEN, THEY SHOULD BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM TO MAXIMIZE THE TREATMENT OF IMPERVIOUS AREAS. RAIN GARDENS SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET OF THE DOWNSPOUT OR IMPERVIOUS AREA TREATED. ' ROOFTOP CONVEYANCE TO THE RAIN GARDEN IS THROUGH ROOF LEADERS DIRECTED TO THE AREA, WITH STONE OR SPLASH BLOCKS WITH DISPERSIVE STONE SPREADERS PLACED AT THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO THE RAIN GARDEN TO PREVENT EROSION. \ RUNOFF FROM DRIVEWAYS AND OTHER PAVED SURFACES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE RAIN GARDEN AT A NON-EROSIVE RATE THROUGH SHALLOW _ I SWALES, OR ALLOWED TO SHEET FLOW ACROSS SHORT DISTANCES (FIGURE 5.44). / LOT . � , LE i � SIZING: THE FOLLOWING CONSIDERATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO DESIGN OF THE RAIN GARDEN (AFTER PA STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL, BANNERMAN T` _ ( v ( I E f\ L�, ( ! 3 3 f I 2DO3 AND UD CENTER): 1.PONDING DEPTH ABOVE THE RAIN GARDEN BED SHOULD NOT EXCEED 6 INCHES. THE RECOMMENDE MAXIMUM PONDING DEPTH OF 6 INCHES 3 PROVIDES SURFACE STORAGE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF, BUT IS NOT TOO DEEP TO AFFECT PLANT HEALTH, SAFETY, OR CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT OF g PP STAGNANT CONDITIONS. ON PERFECTLY FLAT SITES, THIS DEPTH IS ACHIEVED THROUGH EXCAVATION OF THE RAIN GARDEN AND BACKFILLING TO THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL; ON SLOPING SITES. THIS DEPTH CAN BE ACHIEVED WITH THE USE OF A BERM ON THE DOWNSLOPE EDGE, AND EXCAVATION/BACKFILL TO THE REQUIRED LEVEL 2. SURFACE AREA IS DEPENDENT UPON STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENTS BUT SHOULD NOT EXCEED A LOADING RATIO OF 5:1 (DRAINAGE AREA TO INFILTRATION AREA, WHERE DRAINAGE AREA IS ASSUMED TO BE 10OX IMPERVIOUS; TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DRAINAGE AREA IS NOT 10OX IMPERVIOUS, THE LOADING RATIO MAY BE MODIFIED). 3. A LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO OF 2:1 WITH LONG AXIS PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE AND FLOW PATH IS RECOMMENDED. SOIL: THE COMPOSITION OF THE SOIL MEDIA SHOULD CONSIST OF 50%-70% SAND (LESS THAN 5% CLAY CONTENT), 50%-30X TOPSOIL WITH AN AVERAGE OF 5X ORGANICMATERIAL., SUCH AS COMPOST OR PEAT, FREE OF STONES, ROOTS AND WOODY DEBRIS AND ANIMAL WASTE. THE DEPTH OF THE AMENDED SOIL SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE DEEPEST ROOT BALL. ENVIRONMENTAL/LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS THE RAIN GARDEN SYSTEM RELIES ON A SUCCESSFUL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY TO STABILIZE THE PONDING AREA, PROMOTE INFILTRATION, AND UPTAKE POLLUTANTS. TO DO THAT, PLANT SPECIES NEED TO BE SELECTED THAT ARE ADAPTABLE TO THE WET/DRY CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE PRESENT. THE GOAL OF PLANTING THE RAIN GARDEN IS TO ESTABLISH AN ATTRACTIVE PLANTING BED WITH A MIX OF UPLAND AND WETLAND NATIVE SHRUBS, GRASSES AND HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL ARRANGED IN A NATURAL CONFIGURATION STARTING FROM THE MORE UPLAND SPECIES AT THE OUTERMOST ZONE OF THE SYSTEM TO MORE WETLAND SPECIES AT THE INNERMOST ZONE. PLANTS SHALL BE CONTAINER-GROWN WITH A WELL-ESTABUSHED ROOT SYSTEM, PLANTED ON ONE-FOOT CENTERS, TABLE 5.11 PROVIDES A REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF SUGGESTED PLANT SELECTIONS. RAIN GARDENS SHALL NOT BE SEEDED AS THIS TAKES TOO LONG TO ESTABLISH THE DESIRED ROOT SYSTEM, AND SEED MAY BE FLOATED OUT WITH RAIN EVENTS. THE SAME LIMITATION IS TRUE FOR PLUGS. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED UP TO 2" TO HELP KEEP SOIL IN PLACE. Ur fit aDS��0 OVERFLOW PARKING EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BRUCE D. BOSWELL, t NEW YORK STATE LIC.N0.067219 WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD Lu OSWELL r� oC ENGINEERING m = TOWN OF QUEENSBURY COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW YORK CEl9 SURVEYED BY: MPW CHECKED BY: MPW DATE: OCTOBER 29, 2018 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS — PLANNERS — SCIENTISTS ,0 067y1g DRAWN BY: TMR JOB No. A18-011 DWG No. West mt lot surv1 REVISIONS 799 MADISON AVE., ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 R�FESSANP SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 3 OF 6 1 ui i ( �/ r 1 N II _ 1 S8T " 1 � X N - ui i \ .� S87'24 30 I I I t96:03.. . . . 1 � � 196.03 jj 0 k FRAMED ry p N . r . . . . Cy MED AR2XESI E SETBACK AR�ESI FRAMED E SETBACK , � ' TR f •— . `� ... N I ! ! s u �1 —yLJfJjpf oi ( 3S € P �..,... ASPHALT DRIVE `9 �$( I I JillaW �° 28.2'f � 1 _�..- • ; . : . : �`� : : : : :: ; `: : ::" W AsPl-�,�L-r DRIVE 1 9.� ` { I r. 7 cC3N 1 as tt _mac 1 4 y ! }} _._AA J N/F O ✓' ... U zz.Q' c c, _A Ste.,` N - OF APEX CAPITAL. 2 STORY W t s s" -- ){jI fr 1 NDS — FRAMED ®at�,st,,,; jjfF( APEX CAPITAL,I �, �L. (€ . !� {. '. .`. . � S1UR . +. � •r sMMK T.ram• jjj{! l h , LW.. f. .v.,...1. ..�_.. _ IFt ,7ry I �' 1 # ' wJ C d v`3vE r--� r—. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . e� ME G9_a,.r„i;cQ -.. fr I PCB• 272 APEX CAP AL, LLC 2 1 _. z �, rIL �I{`rr ? 16 L. �8 6 P 295CoNc. 0 4 t APES ,.A. '.� . .A ; cO� a. o _ - .. AREA — 1 .134± Ac. . . . . ,. . . . ` r 4 ; s SITE LOCATION & ZONING D _ OAN SSE 1]s 000°f _ 1 0� T. ... i PF ____ PARKING AREA FOR SCHEMATIC - o� O 57 W.gST �!IOUN AIN ROAD pp r>� PURPOSES ONLY ? .. Y NTAN �P'.`_' l I t � � �� � W I I �0�.• i � 14 2 I t : . .. . . . . .wi w t 1 !� ! SETBACK �— O t SEi AC� t 2 B K 1'50" � 248.24' �'.`:".`. :"��.-:�:.� ". . .`.: .-. . .��° E o •.'. .' S 1.5.0"E 400.00v -- N ' -- 25' SIDE .`I .5" CONC. PIPE , t SETBACK ' f STORE 25' SID } } I ;., 134t LF 4 PV ® 0.50� t toT ITT P, .. OWNER/APPLICANT: _ I { 1 { OVERFLOW RISER tFESINV. UT = 416.64 APEX CAPITAL LLC I ` INVERT = 419.00 1 q t 59 WEST MOUNTAIN RD QUEENSBURY, NY 12804 I I t t _ t i ■ L+1 CV N<V<Y tV ry N N *t i �",,^ i T i0"€'i t�*Fe. h V xa - - _- - . . `"���"�'��'^�,� Q .} et cf`t v eF Y t:. p '^�-� t It .wt N Y C.f C`i='f N �.'. - -. .': . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . .. �> .� tt t PREPARED BY. \ _ jO o f mil• F I t . . .. .`. .`. `...,.,... . . . . . . . .. • / '.`'- W 4 4, BOSWELL ENGINEERING `� w ►�,� I a } 799 MADISON AVENUE I o 41 i Ig . . t+� I Z O O ! i t Z. ALBANY, NEW YORK 12208 -M I �' ,nI o w 1 ( f \ w/1IO ! ' � 1 m r N W.r- . , � Tel.. (518) 436-6310 I I -� rT, I Fax.: (518) 436-0859 I I % ' VIQLJNT IN R f D o 1 N I o to ' 3 www.boswelien ineenn .com 9 9 I 1 I s._AN D QF J ,{ 111III � f 0 U NLOT 22 T A N R 0 D, F.(.__ _ tI=1 ; _ . _77 Pg. 44 { { L.OT' 22 i . ; ; ; t t {4 tS 4 t x. I K, v AREA- r wiz."_ � r i � .. � . . .4 ACr 108.4't wt } 1 } I 1 t ` 1 D n t } 4 ! c � ! _ i i } BIQRETENTION AREA=4,500t SF I I (} LANDS N t F ! E�� a wo�ns �' , ' t " , _ 1 , t LANDS N/F OF �� � �; �.� e. .�GRAVE � . . . �. � u OF r o 1 WOODS e t ! h �DRE V �, & ,AIB -�R J. FRFNYE/`� t O , / 1?ARKt o �1 `� t PIC ., �n �rj l ANDREW C AMBER J. FRENYEA �� � \� . . ��, `�� Ei L_. 4 9 9 6 f J l L. 4996 Pg. 1 �'\ !, . . . . . . �7 1��' r it — P — . ' ...±... . . .: N . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sp AL _ , f } ,r \� �°j GA Lc) 73.2't t � A O OI 1V __ i rn a 421t t ;r ." ° ca RAGS '" 73 2 t } O n to rn �\ GA. 421 1 j` c rr c�•\ \ '`^ ".... ! J C0 or ' z C Y- 22.6 .�. 72•�L < 1 \ .} `�Ow , O �� \ �n 2' i.2 4— ul S 0 ����\�� NCi q 1, � Y� 51 yr C" 1 } +i j J� A4'pP,OX. {#+ I k- V.acr-r e:"' 1 � f] i DROX. AT}OC� �v� ti `~— A�'p001 >tm ✓' x�a: � t f ` O 71.1 , i �3lVe 1 i% TOWN OF QUEENSBURY �� / I,1 FtELt 24.E DIA__.PkiM 71.1 t { ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION - r -- - _ CROP At��---•---._ . ..�------ - � t I i � � � 'ti., `-> .�, :- ��- ; t pjt DESCRIPTION REQUIRE PROPOSED `^ "` ' `t I � � - A f A te_ 1 R MDR - MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BAC _� 25' SIDE S� K r S E SETBACK MINIMUM LOT SIZE 43,560 SF (1.000t AC) 49,39 SF MIN.. (1.134t AC) 1 25, f ; i f( 400.00 1 \ 7 1 E tt 4 j MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FT 100 FT t t 400•00 FRONT SETBACK 30 FT 30 FT j S8732! 0"_--LINKN� l 32'i 0CE - __--- ✓ J i , SIDE SETBACK 25 FT (EACH SIDE) 25 FT EACH SIDE - , C "-I I `t 1, REAR SETBACK 30 FT 30 FT IRF t � 1 IRF MAX. LOT COVERAGE 50 % < 50% i 13 MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 40 FT. < 40 FT PROJECT INFORMATION LOT 23 LANDS N/F OF LOT 23 _ LANDS N/F OF � ADDRESS 43/57 WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD S TE P N E N P. & C YN TH I A J. BISHOP I / T P I� h P. t CBISHOP QUEENSBURY, NEW YORK 12804 YNT1� A J. SITE COORDINATES N 43'17'03" W 73'43'24" � L. � � Pg. �7 ' PP ' �L. 610 P g• � f �$� ;=�= TAX MAP No. 315.50-1-3.2, 315.50-1-2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS SCALE: 1"=40' SCALE: 1"=40' TOTAL PROJECT AREA 4.54 Ac.f EXISTING USE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED USE OVERFLOW PARKING / COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE ALONG 561' WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD SITE INFORMATION PRE- POST- DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT FORESTED AREA 1.28t ACRES 0.77f ACRES J�E o. eas��p�� OVERFLOW PARKING SITE PLAN GRASSED AREA 3.00t ACRES 2.18t ACRES B R U C E D. B O S W E L L GRAVEL AREA O.00t ACRES 1.33t ACRES O S W E L L NEW YORK STATE LIC.NO.067219 aG WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD ENGINEERING m = TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PAVEMENT AREA 0.12t ACRES 0.12f ACRES rrw COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW YORK tCEL V BUILDING AREA 0.14f ACRES 0.14t ACRES ° ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS — PLANNERS — SCIENTISTS �� SURVEYED BY: MPW CHECKED BY: MPW DATE: OCTOBER 29. 2018 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY A 06 7 2. S DRAWN BY: TMR JOB No. A18-Ot 1 DWG N0. w°st mt lot survt REVISIONS 799 MADISON AVE., ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 R�FESS IONP SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 1 OF 6 fi a II a - a a. CU ZZf 0- a U �{ 0- n �rr�s�rn o ss —420— Q�og 0" _-421 a 0924'00" _ — _ 168.50 3 a _ 0- off 42o-161.50 231.37' V8r - i yid OH 420— a a U W N. � -- = t� 30 E a ROW �r�_ , r • +� 30' \ N c°3v SETBACK 419 a 42o N p Q Y dJ o < a Z o W :F,rg 1 w`� !'os 0 4 } CL f T19"69 r j Q 0 x Q Q YS r N= O / U W b Nam= Q ,19$I i ld �-� Fn 41g rn � F-i / W 2 a 33 $.Z"S LL 00 xOOW� O Q f < o < Z - y ^ avFti 2 m f 4 \d N �419 \��g ao �Z T.0•S co 9 � � 04 6 c U o 0 N ono 40 15 N to 1 w N Z R w LL J � 42p Q t0 ?p O 15 �� ti v / JCL f M 1 U W J 00 \ 07 kry1 X W 2 7- Ld 42 34 , 5 � _ O 0 . ? U3 NO\ 9 2.��z�»E 5 \ 216. 20 O f , cV < 4 co Lli 44 36 ly— \ (/) Q f 42 I W 5 —423_ 23 4}424�j f 43 kti3 �— 423 Alq 424 --423— N 425 _�_ —4 24— 40 46 26 �a��__ "�--- 425-- —426�— —426 —`_ 30 EAR SE Q —425 _ —�� 424—r —422 Q: 413 Of cM _ N f Z a- M„Oi.50SON 48 24 \�? U ,8 �Z b Q LLJ 44 � J JX QLd f LL 00Of \ rn _ 0- N \w co Q Lij W Q0 �- o o J-- TOWN OF QUEENSBURY + ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT RC-RECREATION COMMERCIAL �u �`-� --� - ��'/ MINIMUM LOT SIZE 15,000SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 75 FT / �• � \ � FRONT SETBACK 30 FT z SIDE SETBACK 20 FT \ _ — — - _ j �_ f �/ ��� _� J� -{- �✓ REAR SETBACK 20 FT �/ \_ _ - PERCENT PERMEABLE 30°� /�� MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 35 FT ¢J D. gos�` PARKING LAYOUT PLAN BRUCE D. BOSWELL, WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD OSWELL ENGINEERING NEW YORK STATE LIC.N0.067219Lu< m w TOWN OF QUEENSBURY -^ 2 COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW cP +CEt1oa ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS - SCIENTISTS oe7LS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY .o REVISIONS 799 MADISON AVE., ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 R�FESSIONP SCALE: 1"=50' SHEET 2 OF 6 E y a i e � ¢e V Ye i x e 4 1.. C e -- 44 s. s a R88 S. 1, All "v i.� r. a m a y L t e r : �, ,. • .. F ., 'V. ,- r vv `°w..d ». "gyp.... ,b `' r�Y ! ,. ;'. .. ., '.. '+., c > �.., .• � ., ....., wpm �� _-"'"� Aw g 4 F rT01NE�R 'BLOI t , pp SEE. ,SHE 2 ti TOWER BLOWU � ` KA . x. V 9 SHEET 2 , s x 4. ,... r L,,. x ...- � TOWER BLOWF � r zE SHEET Ar 14 £ , •a ',...shy ....., s:..x ...-•..,. ..:.� <"' q �.; ,. �: a »�, a a a a � TOWER $LOWUP C g6 P ,�+ S TO R BLOWUP E <, � � � � SEES: SHEET 2. , < r, { 1 '-. � pp� } k w c . � � E� ego , ... �. SHE t! .. r.-. .. .. .,... , .,;.. �—. ,n ., z a~�- � z�.. r a �', '-%' Vie..-''. � ;. :�„ " '• r.. ,.. q ... . � —a ,.: .� -r ..,.. .;:.;:.,.. .: }asi4� � - emu 3 . 41 .•s^ � l x ,. �..' t � ...,,. BLOWUP A _ > ,r TOWER', S�^E. SHEET 2 t , r �u £ x ': •.� " a. x a OVERALL PLAN SCALE: 1"=100' �J 0 SOS 0 ZIPLINE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN BRUCE D. BOSWELL, WEST MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE OSWELL NEW YORK STATE LIC.N0.067219 ENGINEERING < m w TOWN OF QUEENSBURY A-11 COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW YORK SURVEYED BY: XXX CHECKED BY: RJD DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2018 92' ENGINEERS—SURVEYORS-PLANNERS-SCIENTISTS 0 °67219 �, DRAWN BY: STW JOB No. A18-011 DWG No. ZIPLINE EROSAWG NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY ES SIONP 799 MADISON AVE.,ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET 4 OF 6 REVISIONS r a u a 4 1 f a �\ T O. SILT FENC `•y / \, 1 SILT �` b, r `� r ��L cirYP) r 102 - Ak 1021 1 I .4 T J ! J Ile \ I f r -[ Y _ lool w TOWER A BLOW UP PLAN ��rr . �� �� � ���. �� �,� � � � �� � �� 5� TOWER B BLOW UP PLAN SCALE: 1"=20' SCALE: 1"=20' .,.. .�., ,, .. �, 4 > TOWER C BLOW UP PLAN TOWER D BLOW UP PLAN SCALE: 1"=20' SCALE: 1"=20' ,RCb 4 � M CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA a -_ _ _. - CONTRAiCfOR MAY RELOCATE X422.7 ``� O FAC MOST ILITATE�S� `' 424 omi tj I .. . / ! - - ! `kl t 1 fm J tf l Z ` �'"' � ,mot i l STABILIZED I ► CONSTR ENTRANCE Fat>rR�►I�CE SIT FENCE �) � 4A.2 �' - _ SILT FENCE �) \ - \ f / O, 1 �. Ile ff ll 40 O X4 .8 TOWER F BLOW UP PLAN - TOWER E BLOW UP PLAN SCALE: 1"=20' TOWER G BLOW UP PLAN SCALE: 1"=20' SCALE: 1"=20' �JQF NE w ZIPLINE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TOWER BLOWUPS D. Q0S�� BRUCE D. BOSWELL, WEST MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE OSWELL ENGINEERING NEW YORK STATE LIC.N0.067219 <� w TOWN OF QUEENSBURY COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW YORK ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS-SCIENTISTS SURVEYED BY: xxx CHECKED BY: RJD DATE- DECEMBER 11. 2018 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1s2a 799 MADISON AVE., ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 '0 0 0 721gN DRAWN BY: sTw JOB No. A18-011 DWG No. ZIPLINE EROS.DWG REVISIONS ESSIO SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET 5 OF 6 HARDWOOD POST OR STAKE, 10.0' MAX. O.C. SPACING. POSITIONED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF SILT FENCE WOVEN, UV RESISTANT POLYPROPYLENE PRE-ASSEMBLED SILT FENCE OM GUIDE TO MULCH MATERIALS, RATES AND USES 24" LAY THE TOE-IN FABRIC FLAP IN BOTTOM OF TRENCH BACKFILL MULCH MATERIAL QUALITY STANDARDS PSRQ 1�000 PER ACRE APPLICATION REMARKS TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL & TAMP. �-FLOW WOOD CHIPS OR AIR-DRIED. FREE 500-900 LBS. 10-20 TONS 2'-7' USED PRIMARILY AROUND SHRUB AND TREE SHAVINGS OF OBJECTIONABLE PLANTINGS & RECREATION TRAILS TO INHIBIT COARSE MATERIAL WEED COMPETITION. RESISTANT TO WIND BLOWING. DECOMPOSSES SLOWLY. -- � � 6" MIN. WOOD FIBER CELLULOSE AIR-DRIED. FREE 50 LBS. 2,000 LBS. --- APPLY w/ HYDROMULCHER. NO TIE DOWN EMBEDMENT (PARTLY DIGESTED OF OBJECTIONABLE REQ'D. LESS EROSION CONTROL PROVIDED - - WOOD FIBERS) COARSE MATERIAL THAN 2 TONS OF HAY OR STRAW. GRAVEL, CRUSHED WASHED: SIZE 2B 9 CU. YDS. 405 CU. YDS. 3" EXCELLENT MULCH FOR SHORT SLOPES AND STONE OR SLAG OR 3A-1X2" ORNAMENTALS.AROUND PLANTS &WHERE SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC (APPROX.2,000 I I� LBS./CU. YD.). FREQUENTLY USED OVER FILTER 6» FABRIC FOR BETTERWEED CONTROL 24" HAY OR STRAW AIR-DRIED. FREE 90-100 LBS. 2 TONS (100-120 COVER ABOUT USE SMALL GRAIN STRAW WHERE MULCH IS OF OBJECTIONABLE 2-3 BALES BALES) 90% SURFACE MAINTAINED FOR MORE THAN THREE MONTHS. COARSE MATERIAL SUBJECT TO WIND BLOWING UNLESS ANCHORED. MOST COMMONLY USED MULCHING MATERIAL PROVIDES THE BEST MICRO-ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL GERMINATING SEEDS. JUTE TWISTED YARN UNDYED, UNBLEACHED PLAIN 48" x 50 --- --- USE w/o ADDITIONAL MULCH. TIE SCALE: NO SCALE WEAVE. WARP 78 ENDS/YD., YDS. OR 48" DOWN AS PER MANUFACTURERS WEFT 41 ENDS/YD. 60-90 x 75 YDS. SPECIFICATIONS. GOOD FOR CENTER NOTES: LBS./ROLL LINE OF CONCENTRATED WATER FLOW. EXCELSIOR WOOD INTERLOCKING WEB OF 8" x 100" 2-SIDED --- --- USE w/o ADDITIONAL MULCH. EXCELLENT FOR 1. THE LENGTH OF SLOPE ABOVE THE SILT FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FIBER MATS EXCELSIOR FIBERS w/ PLASTIC, 48' x 180" SEEDING ESTABLISHMENT. TIE DOWN AS PER FOLLOWING LIMITS: PHOTODEGRADABLE PLASTIC 1-SIDED PLASTIC MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. APPROX. NETTING 72 LBS./ROLL FOR EXCELSIOR w/ PLASTIC ON SLOPE MAX. SLOPE LENGTH BOTH SIDES. USE TWO-SIDED PLASTIC FOR CENTERLINE OF WATERWAYS 1 V:2H (50%) 25 FEET COMPOST UP TO 3" PIECES, 3-9 CU. YDS. 134-402 CU. YDS. 1'-3' COARSER TEXTURED MULCHES MAY BE MORE 1 V:3H (33%) 50 FEET MODERATELY TO EFFECTIVE IN REDUCING WEED GROWTH AND HIGHLY STABLE WIND EROSION. 1 V:4H (25%) 75 FEET STRAW OR PHOTODEGRADABLE MOST ARE 6.5 FT. 81 ROLLS --- DESIGNED TO TOLERATE HIGHER VELOCITY 1 V:5H (20%) 100 FEET COCONUT FIBER OR PLASTIC NET ON ONE x 3.5 FT. WATER FLOW, CENTERLINES OF WATERWAYS.COMBINATION OR TWO SIDES 60 SQ. YDS. PER ROLL FLATTER THAN 1 V:5H (207.) 100 FEET REFER TO NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 3.29). AS PROVIDED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER, DATED AUGUST 2005. 2. DRAINAGE AREA SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 0.25 ACRES PER 100 L.F. OF SILT FENCE. 3. ALL SILT FENCES SHALL BE PLACED AS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA AS POSSIBLE, AND THE AREA BELOW THE SILT FENCE MUST BE UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED. 4. WHERE ENDS OF FILTER CLOTH COME TOGETHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED, FOLDED AND STAPLED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT BYPASS. 5. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS TO PREVENT BLOCKING OR IMPEDING STORMWATER RUNOFF. ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SIGN INDICATES THE AROUND WASHOUT STRUCTURE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT BERM AROUND PERIMETER. AREA COMPACTED EMBANKMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT 1. ALL EROSION do SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL ADHERE TO THE PROJECTS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). ALL APPROPRIATE STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES IDENTIFIED III-ITT' MATERIAL 50' MIN. IN THE SWPPP SHALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION OF ANY SEGMENT OF THE PROJECT THAT REQUIRES THESE MEASURES. 2. INSPECTIONS: THE OPERATOR SHALL HAVE A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION & CERTIFY IN AN INSPECTION REPORT 3H:1 THAT THE APPROPRIATE EROSION do SEDIMENT CONTROLS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY INSTALLED OR IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE OVERALL PREPAREDNESS OF THE SITE FOR THE SIDE SLOPES COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. FOLLOWING THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, SITE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY THE QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL AT LEAST EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS do 8'X8' MIN. WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A STORM EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER. INSPECTIONS SHALL LOOK FOR EVIDENCE OF SOIL EROSION ON THE SITE, POTENTIAL OF POLLUTANTS ENTERING DRAINAGE OR AS REQUIRED TO 3' 7 SYSTEMS, PROBLEMS AT DISCHARGE POINTS, I.E., TURBIDITY IN RECEIVING WATERS, do SIGNS OF SOIL do MUD TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. REPAIRS & CLEANING SHALL BE MADE GROUND CONTAIN CONCRETE VS IMMEDIATELY. SURFACE WASTE 3. SITE LOG/CERTIFICATION: THE OPERATOR MUST MAINTAIN A RECORD OF ALL INSPECTION REPORTS IN A SITE LOG BOOK. THE SITE LOG BOOK MUST BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE & BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY UPON REQUEST. SECTION A-A' I - MOUNTABLE BE M III -II I I 6" MIN. OPTIONAL 4. STABILIZATION: THE OPERATOR SHALL INITIATE STABILIZATION MEASURES AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE ON PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY PROFILE VIEW STABILIZATION FABRIC, TC MIRAFI, INC. NYSDOT50OX, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT CRUSHED N0. 2 I�I I�I-11�I1�I1-1 I1�I I- BERM AROUND PERIMETER. CRUSHED STONE 5. MAINTENANCE: SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS OR PONDS WHENEVER THEIR CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 5OX OF THE DESIGN CAPACITY. INSTALL ADDITIONAL I Ia 11�I�El I I=I I Itl I IM 11-211111�T"' COMPACTED EMBANKMENT SEDIMENT TRAPS & BARRIERS AS NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 11 I II�II- PROFILE MATERIAL -� 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO CAPTURE MUD & DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES BEFORE THEY ENTER A PUBLIC ROADWAY, AS DETAILED. SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAYS SHALL BE REMOVED OR CLEANED ON A DAILY BASIS. ALL BARE AREAS, E.G., ENTRANCES. CONSTRUCTION ROUTES, do EQUIPMENT PARKING AREAS, SHALL BE �11�I /r/ // _ EXISTING STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AS CONSTRUCTION TAKES PLACE. PLACE GRAVEL ON THESE AREAS OR MAINTAIN THE EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER. I I�I I / i/ j/ %r / / i%r 10' MIN. /// /rrr/ir//irr GROUND 7. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCES, STRAW BALE DIKES, OR TRIANGULAR SILT DIKES SHALL BE PLACED ON OR PARALLEL TO CONTOURS WHERE THERE IS NO CONCENTRATION OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING TO THEM & WHERE EROSION OCCURS IN THE FORM OF SHEET EROSION, AS DETAILED. THE AREA BELOW THESE TEMPORARY STRUCTURAL MEASURES SHOULD BE UNDISTURBED/UNEXCAVATED EARTH. I // %/ I 11 I I 1 �ij. /// 1�1 I =I P OP (TABLE STABLE AREAS. HIGHLY ERODIBLE SOILS do STEEP SLOPES TO MORE SUITABLE RE S. INSTALL OFF FROM DI STURBED AREAS. CONVEY RUNOFF FROM S ALL TRIANGULAR - R RUNOFF I it STORMWATER U 8. INERT OFFSITE OR CLEAN /D r G XI IN THE VELOCI TY OF CONCENTRATED RUNOFF. / EXISTING E DAMS TO REDUCE � 11�1 K TOM CHECK SILT DIKES OR E / I N T/ T r PAVEME r r 2 MIN.��: ALL BE STOCKPILED, PROTECTED STABILIZED / - A PRACTICABLE. TOPSOIL SH OCK LED do ZED IN AN AR MUCH SEA LOCATED MA IN EXISTING TAT( COVER AS / - TO MAINTAIN G VEGETATIVE 5 ��I / 11 EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES II IT AKIN do C 9. UM ALL CLEARING / / u i II / / / AWAY M DRAINAGE CHANNELS.WA FROM OR GE ORANGE / GE CON TRUCTI / - S ON FENCE M APPROPRIATE MEA R BY SEED MULCH, OR OTHER TE SU ES AS POSSIBLE, ONSTRUCTION SOIL STOCKPILES do EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE STABILIZED SOON AS - NG C EASE DURING 10. WHEN ACTIVITIES TEMPORARILYC / / / / r I / - FOLLOWING / r CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. PERMANEN T VEGETATION do LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELYOLL G FINAL GRADING. / A AFTER CON BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 14 DAYS 11. NO GRADING, FILLING, OR OTHER DISTURBANCE IS ALLOWED WITHIN EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALES, UNLESS INDICATED ON THE GRADING PLANS. �fi 1111 11 11�11 -(1=� -1 IEE I I1-- �1I�I1=1I1=III-- \-12.0' MIN. WIDTH, BUT NOT LESS THAN 10' MIN. 12. BACKFILL do STABILIZE ALL UTILITY TRENCHES DAILY. NOTES• �II�" �'I r THE FULL WIDTH OF POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. 24.0' MIN. WIDTH IF THERE 13. SEEDING: A. SOW CRASS SEED BETWEEN APRIL i do MAY 31ST OR BETWEEN AUGUST 15TH do OCTOBER 15TH, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. NO SEEDING SHALL IS ONLY ONE ACCESS TO THE SITE. OCCUR ON FROZEN GROUND, HIGHLY MUDDY SOILS, OR DURING EXTREME HEAT OR DROUGHT CONDITIONS. B. SEED MIXTURE: 40% FENWAY RED FESCUE, 30% ABBEY KENTUC KY BLUEGRASS BLEND, 20XXX 1. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEVINE PERENNIAL RYE, do 10% ENCHANTED PERENNIAL RYE. PROVIDE SEED MIXTURE EQUAL TO SCOTTS PURE PREMIUM SUN & SHADE NORTH GRASS SEED MIXTURE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. VARIETY CONCRETE PLACEMENT ON SITE. P� MAY BE ALTERED DEPENDING ON AVAILABILITY OF SEED FROM MANUFACTURER. 2. VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL IS REQUIRED AT CONCRETE WASHOUT 14. TOPSOIL: A. PROVIDE TOPSOIL FROM EXISTING STOCKPILES STRIPPED FROM THE PROJECT SITE & APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IF REQUIRED, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL CONFORMING TO THE ENTRANCE IF ACCESS TO CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS OFF FOLLOWING. B. ORIGINAL LOAM TOPSOIL, WELL DRAINED HOMOGENEOUS TEXTURE do OF UNIFORM GRADE, WITHOUT THE ADMIXTURE OF SUBSOIL MATERIAL do ENTIRELY FREE OF DENSE MATERIAL, HARDPAN, PAVEMENT. TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL SOD, OR ANY OTHER OBJECTIONABLE FOREIGN MATERIAL C. CONTAINING NOT LESS THAN 4%NOR MORE THAN 20X ORGANIC MATTER IN THAT PORTION OF A SAMPLE PASSING A 1/4 INCH SIEVE WHEN 3. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE REPAIRED AND/OR DETERMINED BY THE WET COMBUSTION METHOD ON A SAMPLE DRIED AT 105 DEGREES C. D. CONTAINING A PH VALUE WITHIN THE RANGE OF 5.5 TO 7.5 ON THAT PORTION OF THE SAMPLE THAT PASSES ENLARGED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CAPACITY FOR WASTE SCALE: NO SCALE A 1/4 INCH SIEVE. CONCRETE. 15. FERTILIZER: A. MIXED COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS SHALL CONTAIN TOTAL NITROGEN, AVAILABLE PHOSPHORIC ACID & SOLUBLE POTASH IN THE RATIO OF 10-6-4 (50% N/UF). 50% OF TOTAL NITROGEN 4. WASTE MATERIAL FROM CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE �QT� REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF WHEN IT HAS ACCUMULATED SHALL BE DERIVED FROM UREAFORM FURNISHING A MINIMUM OF 3.5% WATER INSOLUBLE NITROGEN (3.5% WIN). THE BALANCE OF THE NITROGEN SHALL BE PRESENT AS METHYLENE UREA, WATER-SOLUBLE TWO-THIRDS OF THE WET STORAGE CAPACITY OF THE STRUCTURE. 1. ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF UREA, NITRATE ac AMMONIACAL COMPOUNDS. OTHER FERTILIZERS MEETING NYSDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 713-03 FERTILIZER CAN BE USED. 5. AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 1V.5H SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 16. MULCH: A. DRY APPLICATION, STRAW. STALKS OF OATS. WHEAT, RYE OR OTHER APPROVED CROPS THAT ARE FREE OF NOXIOUS WEED SEEDS. WEIGHT SHALL BE BASED ON A 15X MOISTURE CONTENT. FROM THE SITE AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED WASTE B. HYDRO APPLICATION: COLORED WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER PRODUCT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR USE AS A HYDRO-MECHANICAL APPLIED MULCH, BY CONWED HYDRO MULCH. CONWED FIBERS, OR SITE. 2. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 6. WHEN THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS REMOVED, THE DISTURBED TRAPPING DEVICE. ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING STORM DRAINS, DITCHES, OR WATERCOURSES. 17. JUTE MESH: A. HEAVY JUTE EROSION CLOTH WITH 12 INCH LENGTHS OF NO. 11 GAGE WIRE BENT TO FORM A "U" WIRE STAPLE, BY JUTE PRODUCTS, INC., OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED IN A MANNER ACCEPTED BY THE TOWN. 1& EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS: A. FOR USE IN PLACE OF MULCH ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 5700E AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONSISTING OF UG14TWEIGHT PHOTODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE NETS CONCRETE WAS H O U T AREA DETAIL WITH AN APPROXIMATE WEIGHT OF 1.64 LBS/1,000 SQUARE FEET, DEGRADABLE THREAD, STRAW FIBER WITH AN APPROXIMATE WEIGHT OF 0.5 LBS/SQUARE YARD, MATH MANUFACTURER'S DOT STAPLE SYSTEM do 6 INCH BIOSTAKE'S BIODEGRADABLE BLANKET PIN FASTENERS. USE DEGRADABLE DOUBLE NET STRAW BLANKET, PRODUCT NO. S150 BY NORTH AMERICAN GREEN, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. SCALE: NO SCALE 0• BOs� p ZIPLINE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS BRUCE D. BOSWELL, << WEST MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE OSWELL NEW YORK STATE LTC.N0.067219 ENGINEERING < W TOWN OF QUEENSBURY COUNTY OF WARREN STATE OF NEW Y( s ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS- PLANNERS-SCIENTISTS SURVEYED BY: XXX CHECKED BY: RJD DATE: DECEMBER 11.a .0 0B72�9 sTw NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 799 MADISON AVE., ALBANY, N.Y. 12208 518-436-6310 DRAWN BY: JOB No. A18-011 DWG No. ZIPLINE ERGS ESSIONP REVISIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET 6 OF 6 SUMMARY OF STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) Prepared October 2018 and Revised March 2019 by Boswell Engineering This SWPPP was prepared based on the requirements set forth in the Construction Stormwater General Permit, NYS Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Design Manual,January 2015 and NYSDEC GP-0-15-002 Permit Requirements.The report is divided into seven main sections with several appendices that include stormwater related reference materials. This SWPPP includes the following: • Identification of the SWPPP coordinator with a description of this person's duties; • Description of the existing site conditions include existing land use for the site(i.e. wooded areas, open grassed areas, pavement, building, etc.) and if applicable the location of surface waters which are located on or immediately adjacent to the site (wetlands,streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, etc.); • Identification of the water bodies which will receive runoff from the construction site, including the ultimate body of water that receives the stormwater; • Identification of drainage areas and potential stormwater contaminants; • Description of stormwater management controls and various Best Management Practices (BMP) necessary to reduce erosion, sediment and pollutants in stormwater discharge; • Description of the facility monitoring plan and how controls will be coordinated with construction activities; • Description of the implementation schedule and provisions for amendment of the plan. Supporting documentation and standard forms are provided in the following Appendices: • APPENDIX A: Certification Statements • APPENDIX B: Site Location and USGS Quadrangle Maps • APPENDIX C: Inspection Report and Miscellaneous Forms • APPENDIX D: Copy of SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Construction Activity Permit No. GP-0-15-002 • APPENDIX E: Copy of MS4& Notice of Intent • APPENDIX F: Maps and Figures • APPENDIX G: Stormwater Management Report and Drainage Summary • APPENDIX H: Supporting Date and Calculations for P-1 Micropool Extended Detention Pond • APPENDIX I: Hydrographs and Supporting Data • APPENDIXJ: Soil Data and Classification Summary • APPENDIX K: Construction BMPs • APPENDIX L: Alternative Construction BMP list • APPENDIX M: Estimated Annual Operation and Maintenance Manual The proposed land use will modify the existing site by increasing impervious area. Accordingly, 7.68+/-acres, or 2.0%of the entire project parcel area (382.34+/-acres)will contain impervious • area (buildings and pavement). In an effort to reduce the stormwater run-off and provide stormwater quality control near the source, a series of Green Infrastructure Practices (GIP) are planned for this project.The intended GIP a gravel diaphragm to pretreat runoff from the gravel parking lot and a bioretention area to retain and treat stormwater runoff.These measures provide groundwater recharge and removal of stormwater pollutants. All or nearly all of the new impervious area will be directed to the bioretention area.The discharge from the stormwater management basin and all pre-development flow will to flow the same general 2 locations that the pre-development drainage is currently discharging. The following summarizes details regarding site areas: • Total site area: 382.34+/- acres • Percent impervious area before construction: 2% • Percent impervious area after construction: 2% • Disturbed area during construction: 2.11 acres • Disturbed area that is characterized as impervious (i.e., access roads, staging, parking): 0 acres • 2-year stormwater runoff peak flow prior to construction (existing); 90.20 cfs • 10-year stormwater runoff peak flow prior to construction (existing): 136.27 cfs • 2-year stormwater runoff peak flow after construction: 90.20 cfs • 10-year stormwater runoff peak flow after construction: 136.27 cfs All stormwater flow calculations are provided in Appendix F. The proposed stormwater drainage pattern will continue to drain from the west to the east. There are four(4) proposed drainage areas A, B1, B2, and C within the limits of the post- development parcel area. See (Appendix F,Stormwater Drainage Maps Post-Development Drainage Area)for the site underdeveloped conditions. Sheet flow to the roadway will be intercepted by gravel diaphragm and conveyed to the new bioretention area. In the post-development condition,the overall drainage pattern does not change significantly. Water quality management and stormwater detention will be provided by the stormwater management practice. See Appendix G, Stormwater Management Report for detailed descriptions of the drainage basin,stormwater discharge and design parameters. Waste materials that may be generated on the project site during the course of construction will be typical of site clearing operations conducted for other subdivision projects in the area.A roll- off dumpster will be located near the construction activity for the collection and disposal of waste material brought onto the site. Marketable timber, if any, will be removed from the site. Non- marketable timber, brush and stumps will be chipped on-site or buried within a non-structural fill area (to be determined).There will be no burning of waste material on the site.