1980-04-16
3~
Official minutes of the Oueensbury Zoning Board of Appeals meeting held April 16, 1980
at '1:30 P.t1.
">0.,,'''''-'
"~er:¡bers Present:
Kirkham Cornwell, Chairman
Ted Tor ner
Sjoerdje Richardson
Charles Sicard
Ì'1ather Reed
Dan Gr iff in
R. Case Pr ime
:3taff:
Steve Lynn
Lea,c;ue of Women Voters Observer:
Betty t1onahan, Sue Levandowski
Un a motion by !1r. Sicard, the minutes of the March 19, 1900 meeting were approved with a
çorrection on Page 1; Insertion of the word 'Planning'. Seconded by :r. Turner.
;1r. Robert Lawrence, representative of United Parcel Service, came before the Board
¡or an interpretation of the Zoning Laws as they pertain to the proposed distribution
plant to be located in an ~1-1 Zone.
>1r'. Lawrence submitted pictures of other buildings owned and operated by United Parcel
:ervice in other areas. A letter from the Town Attorney, Mr. Brennen, was read. He stated
that if the Board decides that the proposed building will be used as a 'freight distribu-
ti01'1 ' center, then no action will be necessary relative to a Variance, or a Special Permit.
:r. Prime asked ~r. Lawrence why a Special Permit could not be filed by his c~npany so the
Joard may review the plans for the proposed center. 11r. Lawrence stated that United Parcel
:;,ervice, as a nation wide company, does not wish to ever be classified as a 'freight ter-
.:1inal' as they feel they are a unique operation, and able to function wi thin an 11-1 Zone
,,¡ithout causing any difficulty.
The definition of the word 'freight' was discussed. The present Ordinance doesn't
Jefine freight terminal or distribution cen tel'. 1'X'. Prime fel t the Board .should require
that a Special Permit be applied for. The new Zoning Ordinance was consul ted.
:1r'. O'Connor appeared in behalf of 1.)1'. Lawrence stating SOf.1e background information
and requesting that the Board consider the proposed building as a distribution center.
~1r. Cornwell asked for the Board's opinion for the classification.
¡Jade a motion that the United Parcel Service proposed building be termed
center'. Second by t1r. Griffin. Mr. Prime voted 'no'. Carried.
Hr. Sicard
a 'distribution
--
..
"~~"t ,:~'-~
JU, ~·&~.b':l, ,:i¢-1I!Jl'1.iMIì 4i-.r<.~'~i'_'iJt,.;,
""_'~'~";'i'"
35
::£\\1 BUSI¡IESS:
Variance #660 - Walter J. Barthel
Pilot Knob Road
R-1 Zone
Variance to use an existing rental cottage for a woodworking and gift shop.
~r. Cornwell inquired as to why this application could not be considered a home
occupation as Mr. Barthel resides at the sarne address. Hr. Barthel stated he plans to
purcha:3e additional items, other than those rranufattured in the woodworking shop, and
offer them for sale in the gift shop.
During the public hearing portion, tT. John Gurba and t-rs. Hildred Harr is, property
owners adjoining at the north and south respectively appeared in opposition to the appli-
cation. >1r. Ja11es Ayers, appearing for himself and 3 other property owners appeared
in opposition. '11"'. Russell Harris appeared in faver of the appl ication prov iding that
outside articles are not offered for sale and if a new septic system is installed.
The exact wording of the Ordinance was discussed.
The Town Planning Board recommended disapproval of this Varia'1ce stating lack of
hardship shown and lack of reasonable use of the land as zoned. The County Planning Board
concurred with the Town.
!'1r. Cornwell explained the Zoning restrictions to i1r. Barthel.
111"'. Sicard nade a motion to disapprove the Application as it concurs with both
Plannin~ Boards. 'lI"s. Richardson seconded. Carried. All Board members visited the site.
';pecial Permit 1'91 - Emily & Merile Latterell
Fuller Road
R-2 Zone
Special Permit to place an animal kennel for the sole purpose of providing an area
to f'aise and train pure bred dogs.
,
\ '--
..
''''''~'k''".:''''11I'- ._
~'-V'-~~~' "'!":'_ "~"¡~~iJW:'iøi:at~-:-! .,__;",~,_, ¡.',_.·t'J'1.jl!i;';<_,,:ti~;~""'·'
3C
~rs. Latterell stated she has purchased a pure bred dog license and is not interested
1'1 boarding dogs nor does she wish an identification sign as she is only a hobby breeder.
3he added that she would not object to a stipulation as to the number of adult dogs she
has at one tir.1e, and that applying fa- the Special Permit would give her a chance
to put her neighbors' minds at ease.
The Board discussed the dog crdinance in relation to the application. Fencing and
land dimensions were explained to the Board by frs. Latterell.
:·Ir. Albert Fuller, ;'Ir. Ray Bailey, 11r. Richard White, r-frs. Robert Byers and t1r. Robert
<etchell appeared in opposition. t1r. Cornwell e'xplained the terms of a Special Pernit.
:r. Latterell requested that the application be withdrawn at this time. No action was
taken by the Board. All members visited the site.
','ariance #665 - Thomas E. Lindstrand
30 Twicwood Lane
R-3 Zone
Variance to place a pool with a 10ft. rear setback in lieu of the required 20 ft.
rear' setback.
'!r. Lindstrand explained that the pool is an in-ground pool and therefore subject
to a grade which would have to be filled in and that there is also ground water to be
considered. The Board inquired about the dimensions of the pool and its relatiomtlip to
existing power lines.
The Town Planning Board recommendations were read. The County concurs with the town.
>ír. Griffin rrade a motion for approval of the application as it concurs with both
Planning Boards. t·1r. Reed seconded. Carried. All members visited the site.
Variance #666 - Sheraton Inn of Glens Falls
Abbey Lane off Aviation Road
R-5 Zone
Variance to remove a 50 sq. ft. sign and place a 140 sq.ft. free-standing sign.
'-
"f$~'~-rillllt1~" lJ1_~~ _. """""""'~\\i:""::"^';'.'imJtf;.ci1!Þi~j~'!l!IfttjM";~~'AiJt.:!!~..!~~..O'HJ.":~J"_';-';
37
l',r. Steve Glenn, of ~eraton Inn, explained the existing signs and presented pictures
showing the visibility of the signs fr:om the Northway. He added that the present signs
present a practical difficulty and the elevation of the proposed sign would not cause an
msightly obstacle but rather offer travelers infcrmation.
Hr. Cornwell stated that it is not the intent of the Ordinance to allow advertising
frO:'! a distance. Previous requests to alter the signs at this location were reviewed.
:Jiscussim of the sign ordinance relative to the application followed. Mr. Prime stated
he felt the applicant had a practical difficulty.
Le~jue of Women Voters representative ~rs. tbnahan, read a statement reflecting the
League's stand on the applicatiQ1. t·fr. Mark Lebowitz, of Highway Hosts, appeared stating
If the applicants request is granted, then his motel will also file far additional signage.
The Town Planning Board recomnendation for approval was read. The County Planning
;ioard disapproved.
;fr. Cornwell stated that the State of ¡:ew Ycrk is undertaking an informational sign
pror,rau whereby one sign with space for 4 cr 5 major chain operations' logos Hill be placed
.\~ar· appropriate exits m the Northway and other Interstate Highways fer the purpose of
directing people traveling these roads. He fel t that when this program is implemented in
'h'~ near future, it will offer the ~eraton Inn ad additional advertising opportunity,
creating a reasonable alternative.
¡ irs. Richard son made a motion to deny the appl ica tion. !1r. Ccrnwell seconded.
The vote: rfr. Reed, tIoj I'fr. Griffin, Yes; ¡·fr. Turner, ¡¡OJ Hr. Cernwell, Yes; t-fr. Sicard,
Yes; ¡fr. Prime, No. Application denied by a vote of 4 to 3. All members visited the site.
'Jariance !f.667 - Samuel J. Pierce
Bay Road and Homer Avenue
:1-1 Zone
Variance to construct an attached 2 car garage with a 12 ft. set back in lieu of the
required 30 ft. set back.
..
·'""",!..t,~·"_~ r·"7i,,~'~··,a::·~:;;c·,;';':ä:ak~~~~~~"';""-"'--·'---"""""'·_·_"
3cY
;1r. Pierce stated there is room fer only 1 car to be parked at the present time and
he requires space for 2 cars.
Elevations and ground water were discusses. ~r. Pierce submitted dimensials and
the proposed building ::!aterials for the Board IS cO'1sideration.
The Town Planning Board recommendations were read. The County Planning Board concurred
1.JÌ th the Town.
~1r. Sicard lIBde a motion for approval stating reasonable use of the land and as it
concurs with both Planning Boards. Br. Turner seconded. Carried.
All Board members visited the site.
;eetin.s adjourned at 10:37 P.:'!.
·1'~('ðÞ
{; -
v
'--
...
'.~'~'I!'*''''''~~1~.'''''''.~ ~,..".I!_,~~"-...r"'tl'~":¡':"'.'" :,:,'¡"U~;W'::~~I~o;.·~;:_:_'!'''IO:·J.~·;,~t·,D ". -_~1i't:'1',
·'\'''f':..~·~I!fi-~~5fi~··