1986-04-16
¡J
Meeting of the Queensbury Zoning Board of ~ppeals held
Wednesday, April 16, 1986 7:30 P.M.
'............
Present: Mr. Behr, Mrw Griffin, Mrs. Goetz, Mr. Turner, Mr.
Sicard and Mr. Kelley.
Absent: Mr. Muller
'B'irst i tern on the agenda was the approval 0 f the February
and March, 1986 minutes.
Motion by Mr. Sicard, seconded by Mr. Kelley, all voting
affi rmat i vely , it was
RESOLTED THM~ the minutes of the February meeting were
approved as corrected.
Motion by Mr; Sicard, seconded by iJIrs. Goetz, all vo t ing
affirraatively, iti.rras
RESOLV1~D THAT the minutes of the March, 1986 meeting ,,{ere
approved as corrected.
OTJD BUSINmSS
'- V ARIA1'TC 0) i'fO. 1054 - i-Iarvey re. )\1aille, north side Rout e 1 49
east of Route 9L.
This was a rehearing of Variance No. 1054. An amendment to
be a 250 ft ~ setback [rOJ11 the southern boundary which is
Route 149~
~ttorney Nealon stated that he talked with his client and he
was in agreement to this amendment.
Motion by Mrs. Goetz, seconded by Mr. Turner, all voting
affirmatively, it was
RESOIJVBD THAT Variance No. 1054 be approved as amended.
Commercial activity will be limited to those lands lying
within 250 ft. from Route 149~ The balance of the property
will remain residential~
Approved~
NEW BTJSIW1!JSS
~ VARIA~CE NO~ 1061~ Wayne A. Mechanick, 16 Columbia Avenue -
to continue to operate an auto repair shop in Urban
~ú
2
'Residential 1 0 ~one:
~ qepresented by the owner, Wayne Mechanick and Attorney
Garfield Raymond.
~ttorney Raymond stated this property has been used as an
auto repair shop for many years. Property purchased l)y He.
Mechanick in 1976. Trial was held recently because of a
complaint by a neighbor. At the time of the trial, ,Jud ge
Bacas told them they should apply for a Use Variance. <Judge
Bacas also indicated he thought the Variance should be
granted because of the length of time the shop has been
there and the fact that there are many related businesses in
the area~
Mr. Turner inquired who the previous owner was.
'Raymond stated Mr. Howard Ladd was the previous
Attorney
o'Ñner.
Mr~ Behr stated the problem was not the shop itself but the
junk in the yard surrounding the shop~ The day Mr~ Behr
visited the site there were 20+ cars, a pile of wheel rims
and even an old truck body and flat bed trailer, etc. Mr.
Behr suggested that perhaps if this junk were cleaned up it
might help~ 1'1r~Turner stated when he was there, the junlc
had been cleaned up~
........,
Mr~ Turner asked if it was the owner's intent to fence in
the area to which Attorney 'Raymond respon(led i twas. This
subject will be addressed at a later date.
Public Hearing Open.
Mr. James Hermance stated in the 40 years he has lived at
this location there has never been a junk yard or an auto
repair shop; He also is concerned about the added traffic.
Mrs~ Hermance stated she believes her property will
depreciate in value. Mr. and Mrs; Hermance both believe the
juak will return and the property will look as bad or worse
than it did.
Mr. 'Rick Moon purchased property in the area, at the corner
of Feld and Nathan, about a year ago with the intention of
fixing it up and reselling it~ Mr~ Moon stated had he known
this was going to happen he would not have purchased this
property: Mr~ Moon has cleaned up his property and he hopes
the town will take measures to clean up the rest of the
property in this area~
.,---,
3
81
''"-
1\ïr ~ Kenneth Mosher, Hovvard Street, vlest Glens Falls stated
there was in fact a Used Car Lot at this location and that
Mr ~ Ladd did in fact repair some cars~ He has bOl.1.ght and
sold many cars to lJIr~ JJadd when Mr. Ladd owned the business.
Mr~ Mosher's comments were unsolicited. He was at the
meeting for his own variance hearing.
Public Hearing Closed.
~ttorney Raymond stated his client would accept any
stipulations the board requests since this business is his
livelihood~
Mr. Sicard suggested a one year trial for this Variance.
Property must be kept clean and only 4 car s along 'Ñi th
personal vehicles (3) be kept on property.
Motion by Mr~ Kelley, seconded by Mr. Sicard, one negative
vote (Mr. Behr), it was
RBSOTJV8]n rrfiA.T Variancel'ifo. 1061 be approved because a
specific hardship has been proven in that Mr. Mechanick
makes his li ving in the garage ane} there has been Gestimony
that the same kind of preexisting use existed when he
"--- purchased the property. Thi s would not be detrimental to
the ordinance ~ It is a preexi sti ng, no ncon forming use.
There will be three stipulations: 1. That visible from the
outside the customer cars will be limited to 4. 2. There
will be a one year limitation to this Variance. If Mr.
Mechanlck can conform to the Variance for one year with no
problems The Zoning Board will reconsider a Variance with
no time limit at the end of that year. 3~ The fence that
should remain is the TJ shaped fence behind the garage. Car
parts should be stored within this L shaped fence.
Approved~
VARIANCE NO. 1062 - David and Melanie Wrye, Lot 30, Fox Road
off Upper Ridge Road - to construct a single family dwelling
with less than the required 50 ft. setbacks required in Land
Conservation 4~ ~cre Zone.
Represented by the owner, Mr. David Wrye~
Similar Variances have been granted previously to others in
this subdivision~
"--
4
83
'-
Mr ~ Sicard i n'1ui red whether thi s setback would comply with
other setbacks in this subdivision: The answer from Mr.
Wrye was affirffiative~
Public Heari ng Opened and Closed, wi th no comment from
Public ~
Warren County Planning Board approved.
Motion by Mr ~ 8 i(:a1'd, seeonded byr'[r 8. Goet'~, ;1.11 voting
affirmatively, it was
RESOLVED THAT Variance No ~ 1062 be approved. There is a
practical diffieu.l by in that these 8.re pr~:Hlesignated lots
made previous to the adoption of this ordinance. The
proposed set;1)acks comply with others in the neighborhood.
l{p.provecL
VARIåNCE NO. 1063 - David ìVilliams, north side Dream Lake
Road - to construct a two-car detached garage with 22 ft.
front setbaek in lieu of the reQuired 30 ft. front setback.
Represented by the owner, Mr~ Williams~
',,---
Mr~ Behr asked if business will be conducted in this garage.
Mr~ Williams said no business will be conducted on the
property. The garage will be 28 x 40 ft~
Mr~ Sicard asked if present building will be removed~ Mr~
Wïlliams stated not now but possibly in the near future~
~il('~ (}riffin asked
well 8.8 vehicles.
if garage would be used for storage as
WIre il[illiarns replied yes.
Public Hearing Opened~
Mr~ Richard Kilmartin stated that Mr. Williams is running a
Used Car Lot and that he also repairs (':ars. He stA.ted. he is
in the farming business and he can never get by this piece
of property i,vi th his tractor because there are always
sevel'al cars in the road.
WIrs; Barbara Kilmartin is concerned about the cars from this
property raeing up and down the road~
."--"'
~{r; Kilmart in stated he wo rks with a gentleman that
purchased a car from Mr~ Williams last fall. There was also
5
11
a sign on existi'1.g 1)llild.ing (garage) advertising business.
'-' Mr: Williams responded to these statements by saying he di d
have a used car lot which he lost~ He said there were cars
there but that they are now gone. He also stated he never
parks cars in road unless he is plowing (snow).
Mr; Turner QuestLO'1.C3d\rrhether there had been a sign up
stating used car business to which Mr: Williams stated the
state reQuired si gn: T1:e also stated there has never been
any ~repair ,¡york done there:
Mrs. Goetz inquired whether Hr. 1,Hlliams was aware he could
not run a business in a residential district. TJIr. ìVilliams
stated he understood.
Mr. Behr inquired if Mr. Williams had a State Inspection
license. Mr~ Williams responded no he did not.
Mr. Kilmartin stated he could give the Board the name of the
mechanic who works for Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams responded
that the ol'lly repairs done IJlJere to his son's car which was
in a accident.
Public Hearing Closed.
',---,
Motion by Mr: Griffin, seconded by Mr~ Sicard, one negative
vote (fJIrs :10etz), it\!yas
RESOLVED THAT Variance No: 1063 be approved~ They have
(leìnonstrate(l practical difficulty in that construction of
this garage Or1 0 ther parts of the property would be in the
wetland s~
Approved:
VARIANCE NO ~ 1064 - Kenneth and Dora 1\[0 sher, H(Hmrd Str eet -
to divide property into two (2) lots of 15,000 SQ. ft. each
in lieu of the required 20 ~OOO sq: ft: per lot in Suburban
Residentia120 Zone:
Represented by Kenneth Mosher, the owner.
Mr: Turner asked if Mr: Mosher was going to put a trailer on
this property to which he resporuled yes:
Mr~ Kelley asked if all other setbacks will be met. Mr.
'---' Mosher stated that there is ample room for all other
6
70
setbacks to be met~
'-"
Public T{earing Ope'1.ed.~
A letter from Mr. David Eastwood was read. His only concern
was whether there was town water on the property: There is,
so he has no problem with the division~
Public Hearing Closed~
Motion by Mr ~ Sicard, seconded by I1r. Turner, all vat i ng
affirmatively; it was
-qHJ30TJìTED THA'r Variance No~ 1064 be approved~ There is a
practical difficul ty in that the lots in this area are
anticipated GO be set IIp by thf3 TOI,vrl Board for mobile homes.
The other lots on this street are under 20,000 sq. ft~ This
will not be detrimental to the nf3:Lghborhooc1.
i\PlJi~oved. :
',---
V~~IÆNCE NO~ 1065 - Keith and Cherie Coe, on Glen Lake off
Birdsall Road - to construct a one-family dwelling with less
than the requiretl 30,000 sq. ft~ and on property that does
not front on a public right-of-way in Single Family
Residential 30 Zone~
Represented by Mr~ Keith Coe who will purchase property from
Mr~ Cross if Variance passes~
Mr~ Behr stated that there was a feasible alternative
because the piece of property next to this lot \rfas
available~ Mr~ Coe stated that this piece of property was
CO-o\,Vtl8(1 by i3(3verr1l p(30ple in the area to allow them access
to the l~{e~ Mr~ Coe's attorney advised him against trying
to purchase this property because of the way the deed was
wri tljen: 1'tr~ COf3 stated. these people have access and he
does not want to assume liability when so many people use
this piece of property~
PU.blic Hearing Opened~
rlr: ~nthony Or iSini, Birdsall Road purchased his property in
1968 from ii1r. DuBois~ He is totally opposed, lot is too
sm.all.
Mr; Bil_l ~aJ_J.~on, "Birdsall ~Road also opposed because lot is
too small~
'--
7
1/
Mr; Tom Valenti, Birdsall Road stated he vloul(l li1ceto see
__ proposed house plans first before Variance is granteí}. ~le
purchased property from Mr; Coborn~ Concerned where house
would be set on property~ :\~r. Sicard said if he has proper
setbacks he could build~
Mr; Harley Dewey and 'wife Rita, Birdsall Road both object
because lot is too small~
~r. Don Bettelston stated that the Town of Queensbury told
him no one could build on this lot because there is no road~
The lot is too small and he's afr;.::¡,id his property would
depreciate if this house is built.
A letter was read from Mr. Wïlliam Andrews~ He is also
opposed to Variance;
It v¡as stated atthi s t irllethat ;JIr; Coe does not actually
own the property yet; It is presently owned by Robert and
~Jfary Cross~ The turnaround was brought up and TJIr. Cross
stated that it was not a problem to which everyone objected.
It was stated that part of this turnaround is ae tiu.ally Oil
the lot in question; Long discussion followed on the
easement for the turnaround problem;
"--.....-
Mr~ Kelley inquired; since l\ir~ Valenti owned the house next
door to this lot, would he be interested in purchasing this
piece of property; Mr; Valenti stated it was a possibility.
William and Betty Merritt also oppose because lot is too
small 2 They are also concerned about the crowding on the
beach:
'Public Hearing Closed~
Warren County Planning Board disapproves which means the
Board must have a majority plus one vote to approve.
]\1ot ion by ~'1r. Be hr to deny, seconded by 1VJ:r s ~ Goetz, all
voting affirmatively to deny, it was
RESOLVED THAT Variance No. 1065 be denied on the basis the
lot is considerably substandard in size: This iffOlllJ have a
detrimental affect on the neighborhood and the setbacks
\rrould be difëi.clllt I;o,naintain if a house '\",as (~onstructed on
the lot~
'---
8
92
Denied~
"""-
VARI~NCE NO. 1066 - Mobile Oil Corp., Route 9/Aviation Road
- ~o construct a canopy with a 7 ft. front setback in lieu
of required 50 ft~ and 1 2 ft~ side setback in lieu of
required 20 ft; in Highway Commercial 15 Zone~
Represented by Attorney ,John Carusone and T10bile Oil
representative, Arleny Burrios~
Attorney Carusone explained the existing station bulldlngÎ.s
to be demolished and ì.rrill be replaced by a convenient stor'e
wi th sale of gas. There will be no service station~
Planning Eo'.:¡,rrl prop003C,1(1 !1lOving one gas islancÌ off Route 9 be
moved due north which has been accepted by Mobile: Attorney
C!.:¡,rnsone pointed out that no matter where you place the
hui lrÌ L ng on thi s PI' operty there will be setback pr oblems.
f1r ~ Behr stated he was concerned about the traffic coming
and going. ~ttorney Caruso ne stated there really was no way
of situating the building to improve ingress or egress.
Discussion followed on the placement of the buildi ng and
canopy for gas pUJtlps.
"-'
Public Hearing Opened and Closed, with no comment from
Public~
IN'arren County Planning BoaI'ci approved ~
Traffic patterns were agai n di sCl.li3sed:
Motion by Mr. Sicard, seconded by Mrs. Goetz, all voting
affirmatively; it was
RB80TJVRD rraA!i~ Variance,\fo~ 1066 be approved. There is a
hardship: There is no other location available to put
building~ New York State took much of the property by
eminent domain: The conditions of the Queensbury Planni'1.g
Board will apply to this Variance relavent to Route 9
~'I ." <:7r "" ,., S fA <:7r e SS 1
.. 1..1 0"-' oJ \ I -J (::>' J 1 .
A.ppl'OVl'1rl ~
VA~IANC~ NO: 1067 - Mobile Oil Corp., Route 9 at Exit 20 -
to construct a canopy at 17 ft~ front setback in lieu of the
re~uired 50 ft~ setback.
~ Represented by Attorney John Carusone and 1'10bile Oil
representative, Arleny Burrios~
',-"
Attorney Carusone stated the eanopy
efficient than the umbrella canopy.
better lighting and \YÌ 11 offer more
for the eustomers~
proposed is much more
New canopy will have
protection from weather
Long discussion on 14 ft~ canopy versus 17 ft~ canopy~
Public Hearing Opened~
Mr~ and Mrs~ Jones, owners of the motel tobhe ~orbh Or the
station; represented by Attorney JVI ~ 0' Con!1o r;
~ttorney O'Connor stated they are not necessarily opposed
but would like to see the s(~t1)ack ::;d ~O ft ~ instead of 17
ft~ Their main concern is having thert:' sign visible~
Public Hearing Closed~
1.,yarren County Planning Board recoirlfl1en(led smaller canopy that
will stay within approximate setback of existing umbrella
along highw'ay andu.t il iZ8 :3111all eanopy.
'",--, TJIotion by Mr. Behr, seconded by rJIr ~ Turner, all voting
affirmatively, it was
RESOLVED THAT Variance No. 1067 be approved, since it will
not be detrimental to the neighborhood and recoífirllei1cl that
the same stipulation as the Warren County Planning Board
,ue n1~ 1. 0 n8 d. () (-3LI1C or po r at eel .
lI.pproverl ~
VARIANCE NO~ 1068 - Mobile Oil Corp~, south side Corinth
Hoad U''[ain Street) - to construct a canopy at 4 ft ~ setback
from front property line~
Represented by Attorney John Carusone and TJIobile Oil
representative, Arleny Burrios~
Mr: Behr stated his
from the curbline;
sidewalks there anù
the area.
concer~s t,rL th canopy 1H~i>1g only if ft.
Attorney Carusone stated there are no
there are several o'cher gas stations in
'...........
Public Hearing Opened and Closed, with no comment from
Public~
9
73
10
9'1
Warren County Planning Board approved.
',-,
Motion by Mr~ Sicard; seconderi by T1J:rs.8-oetz, one negative
vote (Mr. Behr), it was
RESOLVED THAT Variance No~ 1068 be approved~ There is a
practical difficulty i nthat the i3tatLon anli the pl.lmpS have
a close proximity to the road and this is a smaller canopy~
Approved~
VARIANCE NO~ 1069 - Marcel Demeri3 (Queensbury Automotive
Center)~ Lafayette Street - to place a free-standing sign 3
ft: from property line in lieu of the required 15 ft.
setback from property lines~
Represented by the owner, Marcel Demers~
'-
Sign is to be approximately 9 :ft~ tall and to be placed 2
t't~ t'ro;n property line~ r<Tr~ Demers has also requested that
Niagra Mohawk permit him to use their property for this
sign: He shou..ll hear frOi!l thern i.n (jhe ned:; eel" \r'Teelcs. If
the sign is placed further back on property it cannot be
seen from Quaker Road~
Public Hearing Opened and Closed, v¡i.l::;h r10 l~(),l}.(lent t'rOr!l
Public~
Warren County Planning Board approved.
11J:otion by Mr~ Griffin, seconded by ]\lr~ Behr, all voting
affirmatively, it '4as
i'1.fTI30TJlmD TFlt\.T Variance No. 1069 be approved~ The practical
difficulty is there is no other position on the property
thaÎj \<Toul<l keep it fror!l l.)eing blocked by the Niagra Mohawk
poles~ The applicant has contacted Niagra Mohawk to put it
on their right-of-'.vay.
åpprovec1~
VA.RI~l'ifCF, TW2 1070 - David ROlleston/Julie Harrington, Lot 17
Lady Slipper Drive - to place a one-family dwelling with
attached two car garage - found.ation is 2 ft 2 short of
required total of 30 ft: side setback:
"'-"
Represented by the builder, Mr~ Pliney Tucker~
95'
1 1
'-.--
~lr' mll~lr::>r c.'- ,,- 1 t" J" , 6,,'" f
[' .L J",e ·.c>lJalJ(3(¡. '-Q¡·tG crus i1011Se \rras U70' inished when the
surveying error was found by Leon Steves~ Many other lots
in this Subdivision have same problern:
Public Hearing Opened and Closed, \4'ith !10 GOilliletlG êrO(ll
Public;
Motion by Mr. Kelley, seconded by Mr~ Sicard, all voting
affirrnati vely, it Irras
RESOTJVED trriAtr Variance N'o~ 1070 be approved~ The practical
difficulty seems to be a series of errors between the
contractor and the Building Inspector's Office; The error
was discovered when the house was 60% completed:
Approved:
VARI~NQ]:!1 NO. 1071 - Clifford i:fewell,F'rench:'"lountain Drive -
to have a duplex dwelling in Rural Residential 3 Acre Zone:
Represented by the owner, Clifford Nffwell:
\...........
Mr.' Turner asked if anyone was living in thi s apartrnent. TJIr.
Newell stated his daughter 1 i ves there now but that she is
considering moving to Wlorida: This house has been there
since 1968. Both units are 2 bedrooms; The owner lives
upstairs; He would like to rent the downstairs apartment~ 2
units a,re completely aeparate: Neighbors are not opposed.
HOQse is painted every spring and is in excellent condition.
Plibl:Lc j:learing Opened and Closed, with no comment from
Public~
Motion by Mr~ Sicard, seconded by Mr: Behr, all voting
~ffirmatively, it was
1iESOTi\Ti~D r~:iA(i~ Variance !'Jo.' 1071 be approved ~ There seems to
be a hardship~ no reasonable return. The house is existing
as a duplex already. Stipulation will be that the Variance
will be valid only as long as this applicant oÍ'ms the house ~
Neighborhood character not changed;
A.pproved:
'-..-'
V A.B.I A.l'Wli1i'W ~ 1072 - ~Uchael A: Kaidas, 100 Quaker Road - to
construct a warehouse for kitchen and bath firm in Highway
Commercial/Single Fa:11ily Residential 10 Zones \rrith 50 ft;
12
~¡,
setback from rear property line~
',-- Represented by the O1rrner, Michael Kaidas.
Mr~ Kaidas stabed ~hqt to meet 50 ft: setback it (new
building) would run into other building (existing)~
Mr: Behr stated that property is large enoilgh to aecolllrrloda be
building without any boundary problems. Mrs~ Goetz as~ed if
building could be rotated: Mr~ Kaidas stated that if he
pushes the building 50 ft: to his westerly line he would
create a spot that would eventually turn into a storage
;'3..1'e8.: Tlong discussion ensued on placement of building.
Building to be wood pole barn with metal siding: Mr~ Kaidas
stated if the building is si'tuated the way he proposes, it
\rrould almost be hidc1an frorll site on quaker Road~
Public Hearing Opened and Closed, with no comment from
Public:
Warren County Planning Board approved:
Queensbury Beautification Committee approved: Applicant h8.s
agreed to plant shrubs or trees in the 50 ft~ buffer ,~one
toward the residential Zone to the south of the propo~3e(1
~ warehouse: This will screen out the building adequately
¡rrith varyi'1.g vTLl<l sehrllbs 8.ncl trees: fJIr: Kaidas agreed to
¡,his proposal:
Motion by Mr~ Sicard; seconded by Mr: Turner, one negative
vote (Mrs: Goetz); it was
RESOLV1TID THN~ Variance :ifo. 1072 be approved: The hardship
is that the single family residential zone property couldn't
be use(l for anything else (lue to the configuration and the
size of the property~ No negative neighborhood impaet.
Approved:
\,,~<þ
}.\..
Variance No: 1073 - Hannaford Bros~ Co., south side QuaJcsr
Road - to construct a 60,000 sq~ ft: retail grocery store
wi th attendant parking and amenities in Highway Connnercial
15 /Li ght Industriall 1 A/Single Family Residential 10 ZOI18S.
.~
Represented by Attorney Robert Stewart; Larry Platkin, Steve
Culver an<i Freel Calo'1.e fc'olrl TIarli:1afot'<l -8t'os~; Bob TJever and
Jeff Anthony from L: A~ Associates; Tom Perry from Cleveland
Petersson (traffic experts):
13
77
Mr~ Platkin; Vice President, Corporate Development gave a
~ short background of Hannaford Bros~
Attorney Stewart gave a short overview of the proposal and
1.vhy the Variance was needed~ Attorney ste\!vart also tloted
that the proposal concerning the tra:ffic\rras reviewed by '\It'.
Fred Austin of the County High1fray Depar tlnent atld he eonCllrs
with plans. Ingress and egress will be off Quaker Road.
Quaker Roadvvill be vvidened and a traffic light 1,nlill be
added approximately 400 ft~ west of the existing light at
Quaker Road and Bay Street~ There will also be a smaller
'neans of ingress an<l egress on Bay Road~
Mrs; Goetz asked ~)out the length of the light at Quaker and
Hay and how that would be affected by the ne\'" light.
Attorney Stewart explained that the phasing of that light
would be coordinated with the new light; Long discussion
rollo\verl on fjhe ijraffic sitt1.ation~
A representative of Hannaford explained how the drainage
vrotÙ (1 be handlel'J. ~ The main drainage 1rrill be handled by a 24
ë--t; ~ C Ill.. vert ~
',--,
Mr~ ~elley asked how many people would be employed by
Hannaford ~ ìVJ:r: Platkin stated the number would be somewher e
between 200 and 300.
:,/[r: Turrrer asked if the store would be a 24 hour operation.
Mr2 Platkin stated that since most stores in the area are
Hannat'orrl also \ATOIJ.ld hebu.t that could change depending on
circumstances~
Mr; Sicard asked what they propose to do with sewage. Mr;
Bob Lever from L: A. Associates explained the entire sewage
pl an ~
Public Hearing Opened~
Mr: Fred Pliafco, representative from USCI Div~ of Bard,
ad j acent property O',vner to the southvTest 0 f proposed stor e
stated they were in favor of the project but wanted to go on
recor,l \"ith GvvO 'aajor cOY1cerns~ One concer ní!vas the
drainage problem but after talking wi th the Hannaford
]~ngi neers they ar.e cornfortable with the proposal~ They ar e
s ij ill V(~r~Y ;l1IJ.e h G,) nee[~ned í",i th the traffic pr oblem. Traffic
was again discussed at length~
'",--,
14
12
Public Hearing Closed:
'-' The Queensbury Planning Board c'eeol\1¡ae'1.ds approval of this
Variance as it is a good use of land: Engineering input
from our TOIrm Consul ting Engineer, Dic1{ 1\10rse, the dl>d,:la8.ge
is being properly handled~ Traffic study seems adequate to
control flow on Quaker and Bay as planned. Reeor11Hlen(i Die k
Morse continue to be involved ';¡vith <lrainage plans unt-Ll
final plans are produced to his satisfaction.
'¡{arran County Plarming Board approved: Applieant
l'epresented a com.mittrnent to be tota11y responsible to all
neeeGsaryi..raprovements to highway as recommended by traffic
j. rrlpae t ;3 t LvI] ~
Qileen<3bury Beautification Commi ttee approves~
Mr: Behr asked when the road would be widened and traffic
light installec1= ~tr: Platldn stated I:; he storeÿvould not
open until these projects are completed.
Motion by Mr: Kelley, seconded by Mr: Griffini all voting
a:: n (> 1118.1; i ve ly, it \Vas
"""-
q8]S')TJV!~D T!IA.T Variance No ~ 1073 be approved . Criteria for
Use Variance has òeen met~ Hardship is split zoning~
ReasoaaJÜe retur n 110t pO;3sible in si ngle family residential.
This use fits ì..vhat Town\yas looking for when the Ordinance
I,vas drafted: Not detrimental to the Ordinance. The
approval of the Variance is based on the agreement that all
highway Iyork' traffic light work, se\rrage treatrûc.mt and
drainage, as outlined~ be completed before the store 02el1s:
Sec 7:072-1 indicates 5~5 parking spaces for each 1,000 sq.
ft~ of floor space or 330 par1dng spaeGs: rrhe a,greements
made with the Queensbury Committee for Beautification will
be follo1rred ~
Approved:
T'10tion by itr-: Sie,tr{l~ sé.woncled ~oy 1\Ir~ Kelley, all voting
affirmatively; it was
RESOI,v:~D THAT the meeting ad journ; 12: 20 a~;n:
"'-
~p~
~