Loading...
1994-03-17 SP "" /- ( ~ ORIGINAL QUEENSBURY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 17TH. 1994 Use Variance No. 111-1993 Harris Bay Yacht Club, Inc. 1. THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. QUEEBSBURY ZOBIBG BOARD OF APPEALS SPECIAL HEETIBG MARCH 17TH. 1994 7:30 P.H. HBHBERS PRESEBT THEODORE TURNER, CHAIRMAN LINDA HAUSER, SECRETARY FRED CARVIN ANTHONY MARESCO DAVID MENTER CHRIS THOMAS ROBERT KARPELES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-JAMES MARTIN PLABRER-SUSAN CIPPERLY TOWB ATTORBEY-PAUL DUSEK STEBOGRAPHBR-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. DUSEK-Some of you are new since some of the really heavy duty decisions this Board has had to make. Back awhile ago. the Board was faced with a very complicated case involving the Parillo boat launch up on Lake George. Fred was here. Ted was here. MR. THOMAS-I was here for the second time. MR. DUSEK-Okay, and, Bob, didn't you come in on the tail end of that, or something? MR. KARPELES-I don't believe so. MR. DUSEK-Well, it was a very complicated type of case, and it was probably what I consider one of the best examples of what this Board is frequently faced with, in terms of these very complicated cases where you have to really get a sound grip on the law, and then seek to apply the law to the facts, and it was also, I thought, a good case, because what it did was show that when you do that, when you really take a good hard look at the law, and you take a good hard look at the facts and you analyze them and you talk about them, and you make a well thought out motion, the courts are going to pay attention to that, and in that case, of course, they upheld (lost word) on the decision that was made, and you've had a couple of those type of decisions where I'm happy to say that the court looks at that, because that's what they're looking for. They're looking for you, they understand that sometimes, you're not going to always be perfect on the law, and in those cases, obviously, they will overturn you, but when you really, when you're on the money, as far as the law's concerned, I mean, you evaluate the facts, and you make the judgement call on the facts, for the most part, they're going to honor that. Your Board is the first one in line, and they're looking towards you and your expertise in that regard. The reason why I start off with (lost word) because the case that you're faced with again tonight, Harris Bay Yacht Club, is one of those cases that's going to require, I think, some conversation and some thought, and you mayor may not want to make a decision tonight, after you've gone through the proceedings and you've heard anybody else that you've got left to hear. I don't know how much more. I guess the public hearing, as I understand it, was left open, but it depends on how much more you're going to hear and how much time you'll have to discuss this, but you're not pressed, and that's the first, I guess, point I want to make. You should all be aware of the fact, you're not pressed to make a decision tonight. If after you've talked about it for a while, you want to just go home and think about it and come back and meet again, either at your next regular meeting or if you want to call a special meeting, that's entirely up to this Board to do that. - 1 - '- Wi th that being said. what I thought I'd like to do tonight is that. I'm not so much interested in getting the facts with you. because I think you're probably aware of what the facts are up there. in reviewing the paperwork that was submitted to you. and certainly the applicant can fill you in more on the facts. What I'm interested in doing is just going over the legal points with you as your Counsel to the Board. so that you can be better prepared on the law. perhaps. so that when you are evaluating the law and the facts. you can hopefully reach a decision that you feel comfortable with. I tried to explain to you. in a letter dated February 23rd. what I found in terms of doing some research on your behalf on this topic. and what I found. basically. was this. that you have. of course. three variances that they've asked for. Two of them are standard stuff that you do routine run of the mill. So. I didn't bother to get into that. but one of them deals with a Use Variance request. and in connection with that request. I think that the first consideration that the Board has to make is. first of all. whether or not a Use Variance is needed. That. to me. is the Number One question. and the reason why I say that is because this is what we call a nonconforming use up there on the property. It means if the property has been zoned one thing. which I think. Jim. is that residential up there? MR. MARTIN-Yes. It's a Waterfront Residential and Land Conservation. It's a combination of that. MR. DUSEK-And under those particular zones. if you were to go through your book. you would find that a marina is not an allowed use. MR. MARTIN-And as a matter of fact. a marina is not allowed anywhere in the Town. MR. TURNER-Any place in Town. MR. DUSEK-Well. we know it's not allowed there. So. we know right away. of course. that what we have up there. then. is not allowed under the Zoning Ordinance. So we know we're operating under that one little Section of the Zoning Ordinance that's 179-79. which basically controls nonconforming uses. and the first thing. this is as an aside. of course. and I know the more experienced members of the Board already know this. and it's probably a repeat of some of this. but maybe some of the newer members are not as familiar with it. You have to understand the concept of zoning. and that is. if they zone an area Waterfront Residential. or Land Conservation. and they allow certain uses in that area. basically. if the planners had it their way. it would be like that today. and everything that was there that's not consistent would be erased. That would the planners dream come true in bUilding a community. if they could eliminate. right. Jim. eliminate all this stuff. they'd be more than happy. They'd have the perfect community. They'd have it designed just the way they have it. The problem we have. though. is ever since zoning came about in this Country. the courts have recognized and the legislators have recognized that you can't do that to people. If somebody's had a marina there for endless numbers of years. you just can't come in and say. you can't have one there tomorrow. because they have vested rights. We have property rights. They've paid money. They've earned stuff. and we respect that in this Country. So we call it vested rights. and that's what happened up here. We rezoned it. These people have vested rights. So. with that in mind. then. you say. okay. well. what's the big deal then? All right. So they have a right to stay there. That's the second point I want to make. and that is. the laws. although recognized in this right. are very harsh on this right. The theory is. not to give it an inch. and hopefully it'll go away eventually and the property will be zoned as you want it to be. residential. So whenever you have a nonconforming use. then. they have a very. you're trying to keep it very confined. and you're basically hoping that it'll go out of business some day. and it'll be residential. but you don't want to force it out of - 2 - /-'\ U L) business. obviously. because you can't. and they also have. because they have vested rights. you want to respect that. and you don't want to infringe upon those rights. so when the laws are written. and you'll see it in our own status. what they say is the nonconforming use can continue. which is consistent with what I've just said to you. However. they can't enlarge it. They can't extend it. they can't increase it. So they're basically putting a stop on this thing. because. consistent here. again. with what I just said. we don't want to see these things happen. We're hoping that. maybe. the plan will be as zoned. and that's one of the reasons why. later on in the Chapter too. you'll see there's an 18 month provision. If they stop using the nonconforming use for 18 months. they've lost the right completely. and the courts have upheld this type of thing. to try to get the land zoned the way the Town wants it. So. understanding that. as you go into this. then. you have to say to yourself. okay. if that's the case. anything that they do on that property. just about. as Jim reacted to it. he's going to be very careful. because he's going to think. well. if they want to add something. maybe they're going to need a variance because it's an expansion. or an increase. or something that they're not supposed to be doing up there. So therefore he's steered it right into your court. as far as these different uses. and of course immediately. just based upon what we've been talking about. you might say. well. they're adding a dock and they're adding a porch and they're putting in a parking lot. then they must be increasing the area they're using. and therefore they must be unlawfully expanding that use. not unlawfully. because they haven't done it yet. but what they want to do is not consistent with our restrictions. That would be. I think. his initial reaction. just based on what I've told you. However. the courts. though. haven't made it quite that easy. They have said. well. all right. you have nonconforming uses and you can't increase them and you can't restrict them and you can't increase them. but. on the other hand. sometimes we think that there's a natural expectation that certain things will be allowed as part of an existing nonconforming use. So the courts have looked at that and said. well. sometimes we think that you £An. do certain things that might look like an expansion. but it's really not. because it's really part of their vested right of what they had to do. and in this letter I sent to you. I tried to outline that. in a couple of cases. As an example. on the second page. down near the bottom. I'm quoting from Anderson's Treatise on Zoning. and he says. "The courts have recognized that some uses. by their nature". okay some uses. basically nonconforming uses. by their nature. "must expand. or reflect an intention on the part of the landowner to employ additional land". In other words. what he's doing is he's going back to the time when the Zoning Ordinance and there was a nonconforming use. and he's saying. at that moment. there was. obviously. an intent on the part of the landowner that he would have certain rights. those are vested rights. and they shouldn't be taken away from him. just because he has a nonconforming use now. and he gives you an example. He says. a nonconforming airport was not unlawfully extended by the construction of a new building on land wi thin the airport. and what he's saying there is that everybody obviously knew the configuration of the airport. I'm not quite sure how big the building was. but when they stuck a building in the middle of the airport. they're saying. even though that's a new structure. and you might initially say. well. that's an increase. he's saying. well. everybody kind of knew that that's an airport and there would probably be some changes going on. and it's really not offensive. and it's really a continuation of an expected right that they would have as a nonconforming use. Then he goes on and he adds. a floating dock. anchored by pylons. was not a prohibited extension of a nonconforming marina. In other words. the marina was there. It was expected that there would be certain attributes to a marina. and this doesn't violate what was to be expected in terms of a nonconforming use. Then he goes on again and says. expansion of a nonconforming orphanage and a home for the elderly to the remainder of a tract which was situated was not unlawful. So here's some place where they added new buildings. but - 3 - '-~ r they're saying, here again, this was to be expected. It was part of the nonconforming use. Now comes the tricky part, though. Lets stop for a moment and reflect on the next part, where he says, now he gives you examples of where they shouldn't be allowed to expand, and he goes, where expansion of a nonconforming use involves a physical extension of the use to land not enacted for prohibitive purpose prior to the enactment of the restrictive Ordinance, the courts have undertaken a careful examination of the size and character of the use, and dropping down a little further he goes, enlargement of a nonconforming parking lot on the land previously used for parking was held an unlawful extension of a main nonconforming use served by the parking lot. So here he's saying there was an area that was used as a parking lot. They tried to extend it, now, he says, that is a nonconforming use extension, and that shouldn't be allowed. He also gives an example of a junkyard occupied two acres of a fourteen acre tract, and he says, well, if you extend that junkyard onto it, that is a prescribed use. Now I don't know about you, but as soon as I saw that junkyard extension, right away flew into my mind that orphanage up above where he says, well, that isn't an unlawful extension, but down here a junkyard is an unlawful extension, and I think that what I try to do is look for what is the difference, all right, and there, again, I think lies the problem. This is where the thing is very tricky, and here's where the judgement call of fact comes in, and that you folks come in, and this is what I wanted to discuss with you, in talking with you tonight, when you look at these things, I think you have to look at the character. I think you have to look at the size. I think you have to look at the type of use that the land is being currently put to. I think you have to look at the proposed use. I think you have to look at the impacts. You have to look at that whole issue and say, is this an extension or is it an increase, and I think if you do this in a reasonable fashion, your judgement is going to control. If you're looking in the cases that I cited, because I tried to do this, look for the magic answer, you're not going to find it, because it's a judgement call that lies within you folks. There's no black and white answer here, and it's going to have to be your interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as it is applied to the facts that are before you. That's why, as I continued to evaluate it myself, I started saying, well, I wonder if you should take a look at it from the whole picture, is the whole proposal an extension of a nonconforming use, or is, should you evaluate the individual projects that they're doing, the dock, the parking lot. I don't know the answer to that, all right, because, there again, it's a judgement call that you have to make. So I think, to summarize, then, what I'm seeing here is, the first thing you have to do is evaluate, is it a nonconforming use or isn't it a nonconforming use, and to do that, extension or enlargement, and to do that, you have to, first of all, identify, quantify, make sure you understand all of that part of it, and then you have to ask yourself the question, I think, first, do we consider it as a whole, or do we divide it up into pieces? You've got to answer that question, I think, first, because, if you're going to treat it as a whole, that might get you the one result. Whereas, if you're going to do it piece by piece, obviously, you could have different results. You might say the dock is okay, but the parking lot is not. I'm not trying to suggest any answers to you. I'm just using that by way of example, but whereas you've decided as a whole, obviously, that's going to have a different implication, too. The applicant has presented it to you as an entire program. He's said, this is what I want to do, and so if you decide that, on that basis, that's the criteria that you want to use, treat it as a whole, that's certainly could be your choice. So once you decide whether you're going to treat it as a whole or whack it up into pieces, then you'll know, obviously, you'll go to the next point, and you'll either be doing it piece by piece, or you'll be treating it as a whole, and that is, is this an enlargement or increase or an extension. Okay. Now your Zoning Ordinance unfortunately doesn't define any of those terms. So that doesn't help you much either. So you're really going to have to look around at 179-79, kind of look at that Section and try to get - 4 - -"-' a feel for the overall Ordinance and then weigh the facts here against everything that I've just indicated to you. I hope this helps a little bit. I wanted to take a moment to go over all this. That's as I see it. and I think it's. like I say. in the end. it's going to be a judgement call. and I think the applicant's going to make some arguments to you to. I presume. and you should certainly listen to him. because. here again. you're going to be evaluating all of these things in trying to get to. hopefully. the right answer. as to what you're going to do here. Are there any questions? MR. TURNER-All right. MR. DUSEK-I'll sit over on the side. MR. TURNER-Okay. Thanks. I think what we ought to do right up front. whether this is a Use Variance or not. letter from Mr. O'Donnell. We have a letter from Jim. them. Lets decide if that's a Use Variance first. and go on with the meeting. is decide. We have a We'll read then we'll MR. DUSEK-Mr. Chairman. are you in the middle of a public hearing on this particular project. on this Use Variance. or no? MR. MARTIN-I think you are. You opened it uP. and left it open. MR. TURNER-We left it open. yes. MR. DUSEK-You should finish the public hearing before you make any decisions. That's my only suggestion. MR. TURNER-You think so? Okay. MR. CARVIN-Well. that's what 1 was wondering. because I do have a couple of specific questions. with regards to the Use Variance. I think what Ted is saying is. we as a Board. do we want to determine whether we even want to continue the discussion on the Use Variance. if the Board feels that it is no longer relevant. in other words. that a Use Variance is not necessary. then just to go on to the Area Variance. MR. DUSEK-Right. I understand what you're saying. That makes sense. but the only suggestion I would have. though. is even before you did that. I think you still would want to finish the public hearing at least to get that done. procedurally. so that you've been correct. procedurally. and the public hearing can address. obviously. both issues. the need for the use variance. or whether a use variance is supported. but I would recommend. just so that you're tight. procedurally. that you get through that step. and then certainly address the first issue of whether or not a variance is needed. but I think just mechanically. just to go through the process. at least on the one. You don't have to go through it on all the variances. but just on the one. close down the public hearing. and get that over with. MR. CARVIN-Okay. So. actually. we have introduced this as a use variance. MR. MARTIN-Yes. It's been scheduled and noticed that way. MR. TURNER-Advertised that way. MR. CARVIN-So then we would have a public hearing. So any questions that any of the Board members might have could be answered at the public hearing. MR. DUSEK-Sure. You can do this whole thing. discussion. public hearing. everything. and then after you're done with that. then you can decide whether or not you need a use variance. and if you feel you do. then you can go on and evaluate the criteria for the use - 5 - '- variance. OLD BUSINESS. USE VARIANCE NO. 111-1993 TYPE I LC-42A WR-1A CEA HARRIS BAY YACHT CLUB, IRC. OWRER. SAME AS ABOVE ROUTE 9L, ON LAKE GEORGE IN ORDER TO URDERTAKE A SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS, APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EXPAND EXISTING NONCONFORMING USE BY CONSTRUCTING A DECK INCORPORATIRG A HANDICAPPED ACCESS RAMP ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ITS CLUBHOUSE. THIS WILL ENTAIL EXPARSIOR OR REPLACEMENT OF TWO EXISTING DECK AREAS ARD A STONE SURFACED PICNIC AREA. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CLUBHOUSE WILL BE ONE THOUSARD FIVE HUNDRED SIXTEEN (1,516) SQUARE FEET. AN ADDITION OF TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN ( 216) SQUARE FEET IS ALSO PROPOSED FOR A PREEXISTING, RONCONFORMING SHED. A NEW SIX THOUSAND (6,000) GALLON, CONCRETE ABOVE-GROUND FUEL TARK IS PROPOSED TO REPLACE TWO (2) EXISTING IR-GROUND METAL TANKS TOTALLING SEVEN THOUSAND ( 7 ,000) GALLORS. A NEW DOUBLE CONTAIRMERT FUEL LIRE IS PROPOSED TO CONNECT THE NEW FUEL TARK WITH THE FUELING DOCK. PROPOSED TARK LOCATION IS PARTIALLY OUTSIDE THE CURRENT USE AREA, AND SET BACK SIX ( 6 ) FEET FROM THE WETLAND BOUNDARY, REQUIRING AN AREA VARIANCE. A NEW SIX-FOOT HIGH WOODEN ENCLOSURE MEASURING TWENTY-TWO (22) BY EIGHT (8) FEET IS PROPOSED TO SCREEN A RECYCLING STATION FROM VIEW. APPLICANT PROPOSES EXPANSION OF EXISTING GRAVEL AREA TO CREATE SIX (6) ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES. EXPANSION INTRUDES INTO WETLAND BUFFER, AND REQUIRES AR AREA VARIANCE. THE EXISTING SITE DEVELOPMENT IS A NONCONFORMING USE, AS SECTIOR 179 -13D DOES NOT ALLOW HARIRAS . SECTION 179-79D REQUIRES THAT ANY NONCONFORMING USE HAY BE INCREASED ORLY BY VARIANCE. (WARREN COUNTY PLANNIRG) 1/19/93 (DEPT. OF ERV. CONSERVATION) TAX HAP NO. 10-1-1.1 LOT SIZE. 18.16 SECTIOR 179-79D, 179-13D SEQRA TO PLANNING BOARD. DECEMBER 21, 1993 SEQRA. PLANNING BOARD FEBRUARY 22, 1994 BRIAN O'DONNELL. REPRESENTING APPLICANT. PRESENT MR. TURNER-Okay. Well, then I think the first step is to accept the SEQRA. and then we'll go on with that. MOTION TO ACCEPT THE SEORA REVIEW BY THE PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION OF DECEMBER 21ST. 1993 FOR LEAD AGENCY STATUS AND THE SEORA REVIEW WAS DORE FEBRUARY 22ND. 1994 ARD THE RESULT WAS A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Introduced by Theodore Turner who moved for its adoption. seconded by Fred Carvin: Duly adopted this 17th day of March. 1994. by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Karpeles. Mr. Carvin. Miss Hauser. Mr. Thomas. Mr. Maresco. Mr. Menter. Mr. Turner NOES: NONE MR. MARTIN-Just to be noted on the record. the public hearing was opened on all three actions. the use variance. area variance. and sign variance. and left open. MR. TURNER-Yes. but there was no comment. MR. MARTIN-I think we had ~ comment that first night. MR. TURNER-Yes. but very brief. MR. MARTIN-Yes. MR. TURNER-Okay. So. with that in mind. I will. you didn't read the application. So lets read the application for the Use Variance. first. STAFF IRPUT - 6 - \J L) Notes from Staff. Use Variance No. 111-1993. Harris Bay Yacht Club. Inc.. Meeting Date: January 26. 1994 n APPLICART: Harris Bay Yacht Club. Inc. PROJECT LOCATIOR: Route 9L. on Lake George PROPOSED ACTIOR: In order to undertake a site improvement plan and comply with Federal Regulations. applicant proposes to expand existing nonconforming use by constructing a deck incorporating a handicapped access ramp on the north side of its clubhouse. This will entail expansion or replacement of two existing deck areas and a stone surfaced picnic area. Additional structural area on the north side of the clubhouse will be approximately one thousand five hundred sixteen (1.516) square feet. An addition of two hundred sixteen (216) square feet is also proposed for a preexisting. nonconforming shed. A new six thousand (6.000) gallon concrete above-ground fuel tank is proposed to replace two (2) existing in- ground metal tanks totalling seven thousand (7.000) gallons. A new double containment fuel line is proposed to connect the new fuel tank with the fueling dock. Proposed tank location is partially outside the current use area. and setback six (6) feet from the wetland boundary. requiring an Area Variance. A new six-foot high wooden enclosure measuring twenty-two (22) feet by eight (8) feet is proposed to screen a recycling station from view. Applicant proposes expansion of existing gravel area to create six (6) addi tional parking spaces. Expansion intrudes into wetland buffer. and requires an Area Variance. CORFORHARCE: The existing site development is a nonconforming use. as Section 179-13D does not allow marinas. Section 179-79D requires that any nonconforming use may be increased only by variance. THE FOLLOWIRG ITEHS ARE THE CRITERIA TO BE USED BY THE BOARD IR GRAJlTIRG USE VARIARCES: REASORABLE RETURR: As stated in the narrative. Harris Bay Yacht Club is a preexisting. nonconforming use. a private club for which ownership of a boat slip is a requirement for membership. In order to maintain the quality of the facilities and update items such as the fuel tank. and provide handicapped access. a master plan has been drawn up. Trying to market the property for some other use in order to satisfy the requirements for a Use Variance is really not an option. As stated in the narrative. there are no permitted uses which would allow HBYC to generate funds necessary to pay their current level of taxes. URIQUERESS: Marinas. in general. have a unique status. as they are not allowed in any zone in the Town of Queensbury. so expansion of facilities by any marina would require a Use Variance. Harris Bay Yacht Club appears to be the only marina in an LC-42A zone. which means greater limitations. in some respects. such as setbacks and permeability. In fact. the parcel appears to be one of only two north of Route 9L that is zoned LC- 42A. the majority of the land in the area is zoned WR-1A. with minor amounts of Neighborhood Commercial areas. CHARACTER OF THE REIGHBORHOOD: If granted. this Use Variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. This is an existing use. and the proposed actions would have to be considered an improvement over the existing situation and an asset to the neighborhood. SELF-CREATED HARDSHIP: The existence of the marina prior to zoning would not appear to constitute a self-created hardship. nor would the requirement to provide handicapped access. or the attempt to upgrade the fuel storage system. HIHIHUH VARIAJlCE: The expansion of the deck and incorporation of handicapped access into it appears to be reasonable. considering the space requirements for such use. It appears the fuel tank could be sited further from the wetland. and the additional parking area could be addressed differently. possibly with a variance for fewer spaces. These two items are addressed in the Area Variance application being reviewed concurrently. PARCEL HISTORY: Previous permits and reviews for this site include: Siqn Variance No. 168: To erect a sign 36 feet from the front property line in a R-3 zone (7/15/70). Special Permit No. 22: Boat storage facility on parcel south of Route 9 (10/21/70) Variance No. 642: To place an addition 104 ft. by 60 ft. on an existing boat marina storage building. Special Permit No. 88: To replace Clubhouse and Deck with new Clubhouse and Decks (2/20/80) Site Plan No. 24-91: Installation of lights. dumpster enclosures. replacement of precast boat launch ramp (9/26/91) STAFF COHHERTS ARD COHCERRS: This type of application. where a use - 7 - ~\ ( \ '- already exists, does not fit readily into the criteria required for granting of a Use Variance, though the code requires one. The intent of the application is clearly to maintain and upgrade the site. This project has to undergo review under site plan, wetlands permits, DEC, APA, and possibly more. It seems that concerns with the site, wetlands, shoreline amendment, etc. will be scrutinized thoroughly if the initial go ahead is given via the Use Variance." MISS HAUSER-And in a meeting of the Warren County Planning Board, held on the 8th of December, 1993, an application for the raised waterfront walkway along the shore, a raised wood deck on the north side of the clubhouse, existing stockade fencing will be removed and the vacuum tank. ice machine and vending machines will be relocated to an addition to the existing shed. the Warren County Planning Board approved this application, and also they approved the Use Variance and Sign Variance as presented by Attorney Brian J. O'Donnell. and that was on December 8th, 1993. MR. TURNER-Read that letter right there. MISS HAUSER-Okay. On January 3rd. 1994, there was a letter sent to Jim Martin, regarding the Harris Bay Yacht Club, Inc., from Rowley, Forrest, O'Donnell. and Hite. It says. "Dear Mr. Martin: I am wri ting in response to your letter of December 9, 1993. As you know, Harris Bay disagrees with your initial assessment that a Use Variance is required to undertake the work envisioned by the capital improvement project, which we have discussed with you. The purpose of this letter is to ask you to reconsider your initial position and I ask that you submit copies of this letter to the members of the Zoning Board at the time they are considering our pending applications. As I understand it, you initially felt that a Use Variance would be required in order to perform the decking work proposed for the clubhouse and the extension of the storage shed at C-Dock. As far as I know. you did not feel that any other portion of the proposed work would require a Use Variance. In your December 9,1993 letter you state that '...a Use Variance is needed for the expansion of the Harris Bay Yacht Club Marina on Route 9L. . .' and you cite 5179-79 (D) of the Zoning Ordinance as the authority for your position. 'Expansion' is a term of art defined in 5179-7 of the Zoning Ordinance as 'any growth of activity which requires the enlargeaent of facilities. including buildings, parking spaces, storage yards or any other facilities which are required to acco..odate such growth.' (emphasis added) In the addition the Town Law is the source of authority for the enactment of the Town of Queensbury' s Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance must, of course, be consistent with the Town Law. N.Y. Town Law 5267(1)(a) defines 'Use Variance as ...the authorization by the Zoning Board of Appeals for the use of land for a purpose which is otherwise not allowed or is prohibited by the applicable zoning regulations.' Neither the decking work on the clubhouse nor the extension of the C-Dock storage shed falls within these definitions. There are two hundred seventy-one (271) memberships at Harris Bay. There never will be anymore. The capital improvement project does not involve any change of 'purpose'. All the functions performed at Harris Bay are legal pre-existing non- conforming uses which will continue as they currently exist whether or not the capital improvement program can be implemented. There is no 'growth of activity' at Harris Bay and neither the clubhouse decking nor the C-Dock shed are being enlarged to accommodate growth. The clubhouse decking will permit handicapped access and tie together the existing porches and decks so that there is a connected hard surface access to three of the clubhouse doors. It will also provide a sitting area with cover from the sun immediately above what is currently the stone barbecue area. The extension of the C-Dock storage shed will allow consolidation and screening of the pay phone and vending machines which currently reside on the existing clubhouse decks. Section 179-7 of the Zoning Ordinance distinguishes between the terms 'use' and 'structure'. Under the Ordinance. the enlargement or extension of a structure is not synonymous with the term ' increase in non- - 8 - conforming use' and should not be treated as such. It is Harris Bay's position that the extension of the C-Dock shed (which is an allowable accessory use under S179-13[D][2][b] and the decking work on the clubhouse falls under S179-79(E) of the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, it is the position of Harris Bay that the decking work on the clubhouse falls within the exception to site plan approval under S179-79(F). While there are certainly setback requirements that will necessitate an Area Variance, there is nothing in the proposal which will necessitate a Use Variance and Harris Bay requests the Zoning Board to so find. I have spoken by phone with James Hotaling, the APA staff member who will be responsible for reviewing the Town's determination on Harris Bay's Variance Application. Mr. Hotaling told me that his work would essentially consist of reviewing the record before the Zoning Board of Appeals to see that it followed the statutory criteria of the Town Law (S267-B). He also told me that the APA would be likely to overturn the Town's determination only if there was an insufficient record or if on the record it appeared that the Zoning Board had not followed the statutory criteria. Accordingly, I am enclosing with this letter a set of proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law which Harris Bay requests the Zoning Board to find. Very truly yours, Rowley, Forrest, O'Donnell & Hite P.C. By Brian J. O'Donnell" "Findinqs of Fact and Conclusions of Law 1. Harris Bay Yacht Club, Inc. (HBYC) is a New York Type A Not-For-Profit Corporation owned by its members. 2. There are two hundred seventy-one (271) memberships at HBYC each corresponding to a specific docking slip. 3. HBYC operates a marina consisting of two hundred seventy-one (271) docking slips and one (1) service slip, storage facilities, a ship's store, launching and hauling facili ties, boat repair facilities, fuel storage and sales and pump-out facilities. This use predates the Town of Queensbury's Zoning Ordinance. 4. There are currently on-site a pay phone, ice machine and vending machines now located on eXisting porches or decks of HBYC clubhouse. 5. HBYC is situated on two parcels of land totaling approximately 43.7 acres of land. The larger parcel (25.5 acres) is undeveloped, except for HBYC sewage disposal system and no changes are proposed. All of the docks, club facilities, parking areas and boat storage facilities are located on the second parcel (18.16 acres). 6. The 18. 16 acre site is divided into three sections by Route 9L and Lake George. The three sections are: a 4.4 acre undeveloped section west of the clubhouse area, a 10.6 acre section south of the clubhouse area separated by Route 9L used for storage and overflow parking and the 3.2 acre clubhouse section which is the portion of the site where all variance requests and most of the proposed improvements will occur. 7. The existing conditions plan submitted with HBYC's application shows the site as surveyed on September 10, 1993. The clubhouse is a log building on a pile foundation. A ship's store, restrooms and showers and a club room are located on the first floor and offices for the manager and secretary/bookkeeper are located on the second floor. The proposed architectural renovations will result in no increased store and a decrease in the office area because the second floor is being removed above the existing store area. 8. The majority of the existing site is utilized for parking during the summer season and boat storage during the winter. The parking area is crushed stone surface and currently provides approximately 125 spaces. Additional overflow parking is located across Route 9L. There are no permanent parking lines on the parking lot. The existing parking area is located within 5' of the shoreline and is within the mean high water line in some areas. There are 5 dock entries which connect to the main dock walkways. There are no pedestrian walks on the site and pedestrians use the crushed stone parking area. A barbecue and picnic area of approximately 2,000 sf is located on the north side of the clubhouse. The surface of this area is round #2 stone contained by railroad tie edging. There is a concrete boat launch and crane platform used to launch and haul boats. There is no public day launching at the Club. The launch facilities are used for spring launching of members' boats, fall haul-out of members' boats, haul-out and launching for service (primarily for members and other boats stored at HBYC mainly during - 9 - winter) and occasional launching of large boats for dealers or other marina facilities on the lake. A small shed is located at the shoreline next to the launch area. This shed houses the electrical distribution equipment and a storage area for launching and dock equipment. There are two wood fence enclosures that house dumpsters. The fenced area at the front of the clubhouse also encloses the sewage pumpout vacuum tank, the portable toilet cleaning station and an ice machine. Two underground fuel tanks (3,000 gal. and 4,000 gal.) are located in the parking area covered by an earth mound because of the high water table. The tanks are single wall steel tanks registered with DEC and currently comply with bulk fuel storage regulations and are regularly pressure tested. The fuel dispenser is located on the end of C-Dock, approximately 250 feet from the shore. 9. HBYC has submitted a Master Plan under which it proposes to perform the following improvements over a period of years. (a) A waterfront walkway is proposed along the shore. The walkway will be crushed stone (rubble) surface edged with 6 x 6 pressure treated timbers. The walkway will connect the dock entrances to the clubhouse and parking area. The walkway will be constructed in an area currently occupied by parking. The parking lot will be moved back from the lake by 5 to 10 feet to allow room for the walkway. The walkway will include benches, low 3' high walk lights, a yardarm, a barbecue area, dock entrances with enclosures for trash/recyclables and dock carts and landscaped areas with small trees, shrubs and groundcover. The shoreline side of the walkway will be existing natural vegetation. The new walkway will be constructed with the existing parking surface as a base to raise the walkway to elevation 320.8, slightly above the mean high water level. The raised walkway will provide a barrier between the parking lot and the lake, will reduce flooding of the parking area during normal high water levels. (b) A raised wood deck is proposed on the north side of the clubhouse replacing the stone surface barbecue area and connecting three existing porches or decks. The deck will provide a handicapped ramp access to the parking area. The deck will provide a hard surface from the access ramp to the three main entrances to the clubhouse. The portion of the deck directly behind the club room will be covered with a canvass awning for protection from weather. (c) The eXisting stockade wood fencing will be removed and the vacuum tank, ice machine and vending machines will be relocated from the front of the clubhouse. Plant beds separated from the parking area by wood edging will be installed in this area facing the road and will be landscaped. New pedestrian height (12') lighting fixtures to match the walkway bollards will be installed to light the entrances and to accent the clubhouse. (d) An addition to the existing shed at C-Dock is proposed that will house the ice machine, vending machines and telephones. This will help minimize the visual clutter and protect the machines from weather. (e) The existing fuel tanks will be removed and a new 6,000 gallon above ground tank is proposed to be located at the west end of the parking area. This tank will be concrete with an inner steel tank complying with current DEC and EPA regulations. The tank will be approximately 10' high by 10' wide by 15' long. The tank will be located on a concrete pad away from the building and active use areas. Planting will be installed to screen the tank from the road. New underground fuel lines will be installed to the fuel dock. (f) One additional parking lot light is proposed at the west end of the parking area for security and safety. Two high pressure sodium vapor lights mounted at 20' height to match the existing lights at the east side of the parking lot are proposed. The lights will be directed downward to prevent glare on Route 9L. (g) The parking area will be reconfigured as indicated on the Plan to provide 124 parking spaces including 5 handicapped spaces. The parking lot will be resurfaced with 2 to 3 inches of crushed stone (rubble) and the edge defined with timber curbing. Three driveways exist from the clubhouse parcel onto Route 9L and no modifications to the driveways are proposed. HBYC has a Lease Agreement with NYS Department of Transportation for parking and the storage of boats within the Right of Way. The area where the eXisting fuel tanks are located will be repaired and - 10 - -- incorporated into the parking area. (h) The existing free standing identification sign located on the gas tank mound will be removed and a building mounted sign will be located on the clubhouse. (i) A new wood fence enclosure 6' high will be constructed to screen the recycling dumpster from Route 9L and will be accessible from the back. It will be located next to and match the existing enclosure on the east of the parking lot. 10. Because of the size and shape of the portion of HBYC's parcel on the north side of Route 9L. there are overlapping setback requirements of front yards. rear yards. side yards. wetlands and shoreline. 11. The proposed double containment fuel storage tank proposed by HBYC is safer than the existing underground storage tanks. 12. The consolidation and enclosure of ice and vending machines is the aesthetically preferable to the existing dispersed unscreened machines. 13. Handicapped access to multiple doors of the clubhouse is desirable and handicapped access would be required if the clubhouse were built under the current code. 14. The other modifications proposed by HBYC will aesthetically enhance the site. improve safety by improving lighting for pedestrians and vehicles on site. will improve approaches to the docks and will protect the lake by moving the parking area back from the shoreline. CO.CLUSIONS OF LAW 1. No Use Variance is required because none of the proposals made by HBYC involves any increase in or change of the existing legal non-conforming use of the property. 2. An Area Variance from setback requirements is required for the relocation of the fuel storage tank. the extension of the C-Dock storage shed and the decking for the clubhouse. 3. The variance setback requirements on this particular site create practical difficulties for HBYC in the utilization of its property and the benefits to HBYC if the variance is granted are relatively high when compared to the criteria of N.Y. Town Law S267-b(3) of detriment to the heal th. safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community. 4. The removal of the existing underground fuel storage tanks and relocation of a new double containment above ground storage tank out of the trafficked and parking area will not produce any undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or create a detriment to nearby properties. In fact. because of the increased safety of the double containment tank and its placement above ground where it may be observed and inspected. it will have a positive impact on the neighborhood and surrounding properties. 5. HBYC has no feasible al ternati ve to the grant of an Area Variance. Al though the tank could be replaced at its present location that is not feasible under HBYC's Master Plan since the parking area will be moved back away from the shoreline. 6. The variance requested is not substantial. Although HBYC proposes to move its fuel storage tanks from eighty-eight feet (88') from the wetlands to six feet (6') from the wetlands. the Board concludes that the change is not substantial because of the increase in safety afforded by an above ground double containment tank located outside the trafficked and parking area. 7. The proposed variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district and because of the enhanced safety of the proposed replacement tank. the effect will be positive. 8. The difficulties in relocating the tank are not self-created. They are the result of the shape of HBYC's property and the existence of the various setbacks applicable to the site. 9. The variance sought by HBYC is the minimum variance necessary and adequate to relocate the tank and protect the character of the neighborhood and health and safety and welfare of the community. 10. The extension of the C-Dock shed proposed by HBYC will not produce any undesirable change in the character of neighborhood or a detriment to surrounding properties because it will consolidate and screen vending machines which are currently dispersed on the decks of the HBYC clubhouse. 11. There is no feasible method for accomplishing this function other than the variance sought. It is not feasible to move the machines inside the clubhouse because they would be inaccessible to the members when the clubhouse is closed. Consolidation of the vending machines anywhere else on the site wi thin the vicinity of the clubhouse would require a variance. 12. The variance is not - 11 - ---- L\ c\ substantial. The existing C-Dock shed is located at the shoreline and the proposed addition would extend away from the shoreline into what is currently parking lot. 13. The proposed variance will not have any adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 14. The difficulties in relocating and screening the telephones and vending machines are not self-created. They are the result of the shape of HBYC' s property and the existence of various setbacks applicable to the site. 15. The variance sought by HBYC is the minimum necessary to consolidate and screen the vending machine and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health. safety and welfare of the community. 16. The decking which HBYC proposes for its clubhouse will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Its effect will be entirely limited to HBYC's site and will consist of tieing together three (3) existing decks and porches and providing hard surfaced handicapped access to three (3) entrances to HBYC's clubhouse. 17. There is no feasible alternative to the variance sought by HBYC. The provision of a handicapped access ramp to any entrance of the clubhouse would require a variance of some setback requirement. 18. The variance by HBYC is not substantial. Although the deck which is proposed would go to the existing mean high water mark. it is located immediately above a stone picnic area which currently extends to the mean high water mark. In addition. HBYC has proposed as part of its Master Plan to install a crushed stone walkway between the deck and the shore raised slightly above the mean high water mark. 19. The proposed variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 20. The difficulties in connecting the clubhouse decks and providing handicapped access are not self-created. They are the result of the shape of HBYC' s property and the existence of the various setbacks applicable to the site. 21. The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to install the handicapped access and connective decking and protect the character of the neighborhood and the heal th. safety and we lfare of the community. 22. The Area Variance sought by HBYC is approved. 23. A Sign Variance is required by the substitution of a single building mounted sign for the free standing sign over the gas mound and the building mounted sign over the store. 24. There is no adverse impact on the character of the neighborhood by the substitution of signage proposed by HBYC. In fact. the proposed signage will result in a reduction both in number of signs and square footage of signs. The relocation of the fuel storage tank will necessarily require some change in signage on the property since HBYC' s current identification sign is located on top of the gas mound. 25. The Sign Variance sought by HBYC is granted." MR. TURNER-Okay. Mr. O'Donnell. do you have anything else to add to that statement we just read? MR. O'DONNELL-I do. Mr. Turner. I've got a few things that I'd like to add. I'd like to talk to you. first. about the existing conditions at Harris Bay. both in the structure of the operation itself and the physical plan. I'd like to talk to you a little bit about the proposal. although what was in my letter and the proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law pretty well layout what Harris Bay's position is. I'd like to talk to you about the issue of whether a Use Variance is required. The Area Variance and Sign Variance. we agree. are required. The Use Variance. although we think we'd be entitled to it. if you found it was necessary. we feel that it's not required and we would prefer you find that it was not. and finally I'd like to address some comments that have been submitted in opposition to Harris Bay's proposal by various members of the public. and I'd also be happy to answer any questions that any member of the Board has about the project. I'm going to defer to Jim Miller on the technical aspects of it. however. Harris Bay Yacht Club is a member owned facility. Technically. it's not accurate. but it's close enough. You can think of it as a dockominium. a condominium for docks. There are - 12 - ( '- (' 271 member docks in Harris Bay, and there's one service for them. Each one of those docks corresponds to a membership that must be held by an individual human being. It can't be held by a corporation or partnership, or anything other than an individual. Those are all the docks that are ever going to be at Harris Bay. Those are all the memberships that are every going to be at Harris Bay. Now, regardless of whether the capital improvement project goes forward or does not, the same number of people, the same number of boats, and the same type and extent of activities are going to continue at Harris Bay, next year as they did last year and the year before, and the year before that. The existing conditions, physical plant wise, right now, are pretty much the way that they've been since the early 1980's. I've got here a couple of photographs that, we'll start one at each end. They're the same photograph, blown up in two different ways, to focus on the area that we're talking about, the improvements. I believe that the photograph was taken in 1983. I first saw it as part of the promotional material for Harris Bay going private and becoming a dockominium. As you can see, there's a parking area there, which corresponds to the parking area here. On the plans, you'll see some areas marked edge of crushed stone, within the parking area, for example, here. The edge of crushed stone does not correspond wi th the edge of the parking area that's been used since about 1980. The edge of the crushed stone is the result of some resurfacing of potholes that was done in 1990 and didn't extend out to the edge of the parking area. Another thing that was mentioned in the staff's comments is the location of the fuel storage tank we're proposing is within, now, what is parking lot. It's not off the parking lot. You can see on the plans, the edge right here, which is the edge of the existing parking lot, and you can see cars parked on it right now. I think there's a red and a white car parked there, in 1983. That's essentially where we're proposing to put the fuel storage tank. Also, if you'll look on the photographs, you can see some vending machines on the decks. The white ice machine, there next to the boat house, is the most easily visible. Those are the things that we're talking about taking and putting in a small addition on the C-Dock shed. This shed here is gray in the picture, and you can see it there at the edge of C- Dock. On the subject of the fuel storage tank, we're proposing to put a double containment tank on top of a concrete pad, which will have curbing at three sides, the open side being the one into the parking lot, and place spill containment equipment over there. So, essentially, it's a triple containment. Let me turn, now, to the issue of the Use Variance. I spoke with Mr. Dusek about this, and Mr. Martin and I, and Mr. Dusek corresponded about it, and I gather you've seen all the correspondence. I've taken a look at some of the same cases that Mr. Dusek is talking to you about, and there are a couple that really illustrate it pretty well. The case is told that an expansion is not to be taken quite literally. If you've got a use which is a prior nonconforming use, and the action being proposed is within what was contemplated as the original use, it's not an expansion, so the is told. In fact, there's a case that says it's constitutionally protected, and that was the case that Mr. Dusek talked to you about, about the orphanage. There what they had was an orphanage and elderly care facility on a tract of land whiqh was later within a single family residential zone. It was perfectly proper at the time it was built, as Harris Bay was perfectly proper at the time it was built, and over the years, what this orphanage started to do was get into elder care, and this particular case came up when they wanted to construct some detached residential units for elderly people who were ill but didn't require nursing home care, and their spouses, and the court there held that that was really within what was contemplated by the use, the preexisting nonconforming use, and the court said that is something that would be constitutionally protected. In this particularly case, the Zoning Board had given them the Use Variance, and somebody was challenging, saying they shouldn't have done that. The end result was, what they did was perfectly proper. There's another case which talks about the expansion of a quarry. A man had a piece of property that was about 25 acres in size, and - 13 - he had a quarry on it that was six acres. and someone raised a stink. as the quarry started to expand out into the site. and the court took a look at that and they said. no. this is the kind of thing that you would expect with that type of a use. That's what quarries do. It's perfectly proper. The airport case that Mr. Dusek talked to you about. someone had an airport. I believe it was down on Long Island. They used it for years as an airport. and what they wanted to do was put an airport building on there. something that would be used for arrivals and departures. on a piece of property that had been separated by a fence. although it was still airport property. The court said. that's the kind of a thing which is contemplated by this type of a use. It's perfectly proper. There's another case which sort of outlines a difference. and you can see two different things in it. There was a lady who had a beauty shop on the first floor of a rented building. and wanted to do some renovations and expand up into the second floor. In the course of doing that. she also added some body toning equipment. which was not in the beauty shop before. and it was different from what the beauty shop did before. The court took a look at that. and they said. you're changing your use. The body toning equipment is different from what you were doing there before. You need a use variance for that. The court also said. but it would be perfectly okay to go up into the second floor. That is the same thing that was there before. At Harris Bay. this capital improvements program is not proposing any change in the use which has been there for years. It's going to be the same next year as it was last year. and it's going to be the same next year as last year. whether Harris Bay is permitted to do this improvement. or whether it's not. It's not proposing to expand anywhere else on Harris Bay's site. or anywhere off Harris Bay's site. In fact. when you take a look at it. the two areas that we're talking about. that Mr. Martin said brought the Use Variance issue up in the first place. is right here. which is an area currently used by Harris Bay's parking lot. and right here. which is an area currently used by Harris Bay as a porch. a deck. and a deck and a picnic area. It's simply raising and connecting and allowing us to provide handicapped access to the inside of the building. At the present time. Harris Bay is renovating the inside of the building with a building permit from the Town of Queensbury. One of the things that's being done in there is the installation of handicapped toilets and showers. There are no more showers or toilets than there are right now. but the stalls are being modified to provide handicapped access. There's no way a person in a wheelchair could get into that building right now. There are steps at every entrance. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that. to the extent it's possible to do so. to provide the same accommodations for handicapped individuals as for individuals wi thout handicaps. There's no way that Harris Bay can do that without coming to you for the Area Variance. and we submit that that does not require a Use Variance. Any place on this site we wanted to put a handicapped ramp would violate some setback requirement or another. and what Harris Bay is proposing to do is put the access not just to one entrance. but three entrances. Now. let me turn briefly to respond to some of the comments that have been submitted in writing to this Board. and what I expect you're going to hear from other people after I sit down. At the Planning Board. there was a great deal of discussion about Harris Bay's septic system. and there is no proposed change in Harris Bay's septic system whatsoever. except the movement of the vacuum tank. and the port-a-potty dumping station from here to here. Other than that. the septic system is going to be exactly as it now is. and has been. There was a considerable effort to direct the Planning Board's attention away from the project which Harris Bay has proposed. and onto whether the septic system is good or bad. Regardless of what this Board does. Harris Bay is now and always has been subject to inspection of its septic system. and you can be quite confident that because of all the comment that's been raised about the septic system in the course of the Planning Board meeting. that whether you approve or disapprove the capital improvement project. Harris Bay is going to get visits this summer - 14 - - by septic system inspectors from the Town of Queensbury. probably from the Lake George Park Commission. They've had visits in the past. All the evidence which currently exists indicates that Harris Bay's septic system. while located in a parcel surrounded by wetlands. is functioning as it is supposed to do. There is not a single shred of evidence of failure. One man. Mr. Roulier. went onto the property and took water samples. and tested for the wrong thing. He tested for something called. total coliform. and came up with some high numbers. Retests were done by the Park Commission. for the right thing. fecal coliform. which is a bacteria found in the intestines of warm blooded animals. from people to sea gulls. and those tests showed levels below what the Lake George Park Commission considers acceptable levels. In other words. it's okay. If there is a problem with the septic system. the people with the authority to inspect will do so and tell Harris Bay about it. regardless of what you do here tonight. If there is a problem with the septic system. Harris Bay will have to deal with it at the time. If there is no problem with the septic system. as there has not been in the past. Harris Bay has the right to continue to function as it is. Some of the other comments that I saw submitted in letters were claims that the improvements are going to generate increased use. That simply is not so. The use depends upon the number of members. The number of members depends upon the number of slips. and the number of slips is fixed at 271. The proposals that Harris Bay is making will do things which Harris Bay believes are entirely possible. It'll get rid of metal single wall underground fuel storage tanks. and replace it with what I believe to be a superior storage tank of a smaller size. It'll provide handicapped access. It will provide a barrier between the parking and the lake. It will provide landscaping. It will collect and screen vending machines and dumpsters. and it will raise the grade across Route 9L. in the area of the boat storage sheds slightly above the mean high water mark. That's all the project will do. The project is not going to bring a single person onto Harris Bay's property who wasn't there last year. or the year before. I'd be happy to answer any questions that any member of the Board has. MR. TURNER-Any questions? MR. THOMAS-The only one that I've got. that I've been thinking about is. is there any way that the public has access to any of the facilities of the Harris Bay Yacht Club? For example. can somebody go into the Clubhouse and buy something. from the public? MR. O'DONNELL-It's theoretically possible. I can tell you in practice that it's extremely rare. The store is. essentially. for the members there and the vast majority of the use is by the members. MR. THOMAS-But it's not "open to the public"? MR. O'DONNELL-If somebody did come into the store and say. I'd like to buy a sponge or a can of soda or something like that. I'm sure that they would sell it to them. They wouldn't throw them out. but it almost never happens. MR. THOMAS-Okay. MR. CARVIN-How about your gas sales. is that to the general public also? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. It is. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Has there been occasion where somebody comes to the gas pumps and sees your picnic areas and decides to purchase a lunch and then eat. maybe. on the outside facilities? MR. O'DONNELL-Not as far as I know. MR. CARVIN-Is that a conceivable situation. though? - 15 - .- MR. O'DONNELL-I would think not. and the reason that I would think not is the gas dock is located out on the end of C-Dock. It's not on the plans. You might be able to see it in the photograph. No. You can't see it on the photograph. Where's the other one. You can see it on here. This is the gas dock right here. It's a single dock with two sides. You can have a boat pull up on one side and a boat pull up on the other side. and Harris Bay does not permi t boats to tie up there. They can be there while they're getting fueled and pumped out. and once they're finished with that. they'd have to clear the area. So. no. somebody's not going to come up. tie up to the gas dock and go in and have a picnic. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Would you have a feel for what percentage gas sales are non member related? MR. O'DONNELL-I don't. There are a fair number of power boats. There are a lot of power boats at Harris Bay. I happen to have a sailboat. and I take great delight in getting my six gallons of gas in front of the power boaters. but there are a lot of power boats there. and I think the majority of the gas sales are to Harris Bay members. but a significant amount of gas sales is probably to people who are not members. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Well. my question then would lead. you're looking at reducing the overall gallonage. If memory serves correct. I think you currently have seven. and you're going to go to six. okay. Even at a normal use. in other words. expecting no increase or decrease. you would have to assume that there would be increased or more frequent refuelings of that tank. Is that a safe assumption? MR. O'DONNELL-I think not. and the reason I think not is. I believe that the amount of fuel that historically gets pumped in a weekend. and that's when most of your gas sales occur. is below six thousand gallons. and I believe what currently happens is Harris Bay gets a fuel delivery once or perhaps twice a week. during the week. when fuel tank people around. MR. CARVIN-Okay. but you said you feel that there is a significant amount of gas that is sold to the general public? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. Bay members. but significant. I believe the majority of it is sold to Harris the amount sold to the public would be MR. CARVIN-Okay. If you were to lose that public gas sales. for example. would that have a severe impact upon the financial health of the Club? MR. O'DONNELL-It would be real unpleasant. yes. MR. CARVIN-And I'm assuming that. from your previous comments. that the store does not represent a significant impact to the Club? MR. O'DONNELL-No. The store sales have never been significant to the members or anybody else. It's essentially there as a convenience. MR. CARVIN-Okay. The Club building itself. is this a restaurant? I mean. could somebody go in there and get a dinner or a lunch? MR. 0' DONNELL-No. There's no restaurant. In this area. right here. is the store. and it stocks things that you would expect for a boating place. sponges. line. MR. CARVIN-Life vests. things like that. MR. 0' DONNELL-Yes. I think there may be a few life vests and cleaning supplies. teak oil and things like that. soda. beer. newspapers. magazines. and I think there may be. there's donuts and - 16 - - things of that nature, some food items. MR. CARVIN-Snack items? MR. O'DONNELL-Snack items. Correct. In this area here are bathrooms. There's a ladies room here and a men's room here. They're going to be reconfigured and moved, basically turned on their side. but it'll still be in the same general area that it is. In this area here, is one open room with a few chairs and tables, easy chairs and coffee table type things. MR. CARVIN-Okay, but there's no hot grill? There's no hot food. other than coffee, we'll say. MR. O'DONNELL-Out here, in the picnic area, stone picnic area. there are barbecue grills and typically what they're used for is. somebody buys hotdogs or brings hamburgs from home or something like that. and they can cook them. MR. CARVIN-Self-serve, in other words? There's no full time staff or cook or anything like that? MR. O'DONNELL-No. You'd have to have something, your picnic lunch be brought up before you go out. and you could cook it and eat it on the picnic tables in the picnic area. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Is there any kind of mechanism to check membership cards, in other words. access to the Clubhouse? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. That's primarily done on access to the parking lot. particularly in the heavy use weekends in the summer. Only people with membership stickers are allowed to park over on this side of the road. Guests are required to park in the overflow area on the other side of the road. One thing that Harris Bay had a problem with a few years ago was people coming in and using its bathrooms, and the way that that problem was solved was they put locks on the bathrooms, combination locks, and that problem is now solved, and typically that was late at night. or early in the morning. MR. CARVIN-Okay, but there's no formal identification check. say, like at the Elk's Club, or something like that, where you have to insert a special key to gain access? MR. O'DONNELL-No, there isn't. MR. CARVIN-Okay. could wander in? So it is conceivable that the general public MR. O'DONNELL-It's not that big of a place. It's unlikely. MR. CARVIN-Are there any plans to put in a hot or restaurant type of facility there, in other words. to expand it for membership dances or things like that. if that would be feasible? MR. O'DONNELL-No. We don't have the room, and I can tell you flat out. there are no such plans. MR. CARVIN-Maybe this is way off the track, but I know in some of the correspondence. that the cost of the average slip, I think somebody said was anywhere from $10,000 to $40,000. Does that just buy you the dock? I mean, is there any other privileges that membership, like with the American Express card, membership has its privileges? MR. 0' DONNELL-What do you get for that? There's no American Express card to go with it. The difference in the dock prices depend upon the size of the slip, and they differ in length beam and graft. The bigger they are, the more they cost. In addition to having the right to use that slip during the season, a member - 17 - , '\ Li ( '\ o has a right to a launch at the beginning of the season, and a haul and winterization at the end of the season, boat storage on site over the winter, the right to run for office in the Club, the right to vote in elections, and the right to use the rest of the facilities, obviously. MR. CARVIN-Okay. MISS HAUSER-What hours is the Clubhouse open? MR. O'DONNELL-It varies depending upon the time of the year. Right now, it's closed. During the height of the summer, the Clubhouse, portions of the Clubhouse, are physically open to allow access to the bathrooms 24 hours a day. Other times of the year, early spring, later fall, it would be essentially open during, I think eight to five or nine to five, somewhere around there. MR. CARVIN-Regarding your boat storage, are they just member boats that are stored, or will you store general public boats? MR. O'DONNELL-Harris Bay stores some boats for people who are not members there. MR. CARVIN-Okay. MR. O'DONNELL-As space permits. MR. CARVIN-Okay. I know in some of the correspondence that I read through, it indicated that you also will do launches for other, I reluctantly use the term, marinas, but other, I guess, if somebody buys a boat from some boat company, I guess you will provide a launch? MR. O'DONNELL-From time to time, there have been a few occasions over the years where somebody has purchased a large boat that can't be put in where they're going to store it, for example, if you were to buy a 30 foot sailboat, I doubt that Yankee Yacht has the ability to launch that, a 30 foot big steel sailboat. Harris Bay has the ability to launch that, because it's open here and there's a crank, and on contract basis, whoever's delivering the boat will make arrangements and Harris Bay has launched boats on an occasional basis, over the years. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Would you consider that to be a significant part of the funding of the Club? MR. O'DONNELL-No. The funding from the Club is primarily from the members themselves, the maintenance fee. There is now a special assessment to fund the capital improvement program, and it's offset, to some extent, by sales in the store, which are not very large in volume, and by gas sales. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Do you have any idea of what the cost, I know I think at the Planning Board this situation is going to be spread over several years. Do you have any rough idea, at this point, of what your total cost might be? MR. O'DONNELL-No, we don't, for this reason. Number One, we don't know what the soft costs are yet, and they've been high, gOing through the permitting process, and what Harris Bay intends to do is collect money in the special assessment, and as it gets enough to do a phase, bid the phase and get the prices there. So we're not going to have prices until probably 1995, for anything beyond what's being done in the Clubhouse. I can tell you what's being done in the Clubhouse is $114,000, and that's internal renovations. MR. CARVIN-Okay, and I'm assuming that all the slips are currently bought at this point? MR. 0' DONNELL-There are about 15 that are not owned by any - 18 - \. (' '- individual. Harris Bay still owns them. typically those with narrower beams. Those are smaller slips, MR. CARVIN-Okay, but I guess what I'm leading at is, that would it be conceivable that once a price is established, that you have members who may be reluctant or financially incapable of meeting the assessment, for example? Now they've bought their condo and all of a sudden you're now laying a bond issue on them that they have to purchase, and they say, well, why can't we expand our use of the store or why can't we sell more gas or do more advertising, or, to compensate for the increase in assessment? MR. O'DONNELL-I can tell you we've had the capital improvement assessments on for about a year and a half, Harris Bay has, and that has not been a problem. Proposals to expand the store really are not practical, for a couple of reasons. Number One, historically the store has never been a big money maker. It truly is a convenience for the members. So if this store were expanded, it would be a net loss, I would expect, and, Two, in order to expand the store, Harris Bay would have to go through this process again, and I'm confident they wouldn't do it. MR. CARVIN-Okay. So that still leaves your gas, in other words, you could increase gas sales possibly to the general public, or you could increase your contract fees to outside launches, or you could increase the fees to the general public for boat storage. MR. O'DONNELL-That's possible. I'm not sure how gas sales could be increased. If someone comes to you for gas, you'd sell them gas. MR. CARVIN-Okay, but, and, again, I'm not saying that this is in the plans, but if you have a wonderful picnic area and now you may say, well, fine, we will allow the general public to use some of the facilities. MR. O'DONNELL-They simply can't. MR. CARVIN-At this point. MR. O'DONNELL-Where would they put their boat? MR. CARVIN-You've got 15 open slots. MR. O'DONNELL-They're rented. The fact that no individual owns them doesn't mean that they're unoccupied by a boat during the year. You can't pull up to Harris Bay during the summer with a boat and put it anywhere, anyone of those slips, as a general proposi tion. There may be one or two that weren't rented last year, I'm not sure, but as a general proposition, everyone of those slips has a boat assigned to it, and in it, or out on the lake, and likely to come back at any point. It's not a place you could pull up to with a boat and spend the day. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Have you given any thought as to how you ~ going to finance it? Is it going to be a bond issue to the members? MR. O'DONNELL-It's an assessment. It's levied with the January and April maintenance payments. MR. TURNER-Is this going to be phased over seven years? Is that going to be your request? MR. O'DONNELL-It's going to be phased over the length of time that it takes us to complete it, which my best guess is probably five to seven years. MR. TURNER-Okay. Any sequence to the construction? MR. O'DONNELL-We have started working on that, and we'll have that - 19 - firmed up more for the Planning Board. but. yes. In general terms. we've come up with some areas that we think that's logical to do at the same time. For example. the entire walkway would be one project. as opposed to doing this side of it one year. and that side another year. The fuel storage tank would be another phase. The decking and stuff like that another. We mayor may not have enough (lost words). The object of the exercise of the phasing is to do something and complete it and move on to another physical area of the site. so that we go through an area once. MR. DUSEK-Mr. Chairman. while he's looking for that. may I ask a couple of questions? MR. TURNER-You sure can. MR. DUSEK-And if I may. I'd like to put this up. I was sitting over to the side there with the Town Planning Department. and they had drawn up a diagram. or this is a diagram that was furnished by the applicant. but they had drawn on the diagram. in yellow. where the improvements are to the site. and I just thought that was extremely helpful. as ~ was sitting there. to try to get a grip on exactly what is being done and what currently exists. If I understand the color coding correctly. essentially. what is in pink here is currently on the site. What is in yellow is what is being either changed or added to the site. For instance. the gas tank and mounds to be removed are here in this area right here. are being moved from here to here. The shed that's being extended is here. and the addition is being put on here. The building area. I believe it's the decking area that they want to add. not this right here. but right around this side here. this area is the proposed new parking area. which Jim tells me is basically a dirt type area now. with the edge of gravel being along this line right here. so you can see what they're going to do here. Down in this area here. you can see where there's an existing. I'm sorry. existing dumpster. and then they're now going to put in a recycling area here. and then what is not colored. as I understand it in talking to Jim. along through here. this is currently. I guess. a graveled area. They even park up in through this area. but that's the area they're going to turn into the walkway. and then down in here is where they're going to do some filling. The question on parking. Mr. O'Donnell. you've been here while I've been going over this with the Board. is that a fair representation of what the project is at this point? MR. O'DONNELL-In part. yes. and in part. no. and if you'll hold on to the map. let me tell you where I disagree. This area right here. the parking marked in yellow. is area which is now and has since 1980 been used for parking and boat storage. and if you take a look at the photograph. you'll see a boat stored over here. and I think maybe a car parked over here. The edge of the gravel. as I mentioned earlier. in 1990. Harris Bay did some work filling potholes that had developed throughout the parking lot. and did not gravel the entire parking lot. The gravel stopped here. and that's what the surveyor picked up. but this is not an expansion of the parking area. Other than that's. it's correct. This area here. under what's shown as awning. is currently the stone picnic area. Other than that. yes. you're correct. MR. DUSEK-I thought this was important to have in the records. because I think it's helpful. first of all. Also. with Mr. O'Donnell's confirmation. then. we understand. I think. a little bit better exactly what the nature of the improvements are. in the event that you have any questions on the particular improvements and the effects of those improvements. because like right here. I was confused. for instance. just on this parking area. that Mr. O'Donnell indicated. apparently. they used in some fashion in the past. So I think these are all things that the Board would want to consider. MR. MENTER-It sounds as though the difference in the parking area - 20 - is the difference between partial gravel coating and perhaps an area that is more grassy, but in either case, used as parking. MR. O'DONNELL-It's basically dirt. This entire, during the summer months, on a sunny weekend, this entire area here, right to the edge of vegetation, is filled with cars, and has been since 1980, and we've now found what we were initially thinking, or Harris Bay's been thinking about as phasing. The Clubhouse area and the recycling dumpsters are tentatively scheduled for Phase I. The Clubhouse internal renovations are going on now. Phase II, I mis- spoke before. is walkway and landscaping, and the addition to the C-Dock shed. Phase III would be walkway in this direction. Phase IV is the modification to the parking area and the movement of the fuel storage tanks and Phase V would be the edging along vegetation and landscaping over there. That is not cast in stone, but that's tentatively what Harris Bay's looking at, at the moment. MR. TURNER-Okay. That's fine. MR. DUSEK-Mr. O'Donnell. as a result of the improvements that you're making in the parking area, is the parki~g area going to be enlarged anywhere on the site? MR. O'DONNELL-It's going to be one space smaller than it now is. MR. DUSEK-Why is that? MR. O'DONNELL-To tell you the truth, I'm not sure, but the count that we've got now is 125, and as we figured it out, it's going to be 124. The parking area now is out to here. It's going to move in here, although we are going to pick up spaces where the gas mound is. Perhaps the recycling area is going to go where there's now parking. the walkway, that's why. There's parking up here now. MR. MENTER-And you're considering those 10 by 20 spaces. JIM MILLER MR. MILLER-Yes. What we did is. right now. it's just gravel, and it's not delineated. It's kind of haphazard. What we're essentially doing is decreasing the size of the parking lot to accommodate the landscaping and the walkway and some of the other improvements, but at the same time, we're trying to organize it so it's more efficient. We kept the layout as being larger, only because of the nature of the gravel parking lot. We have over 100 cars capacity across the road. So the total number of cars is not an issue. It's more of one to just get the most efficient layout and the best circulation on this side. MR. MENTER-Which, it's going to be unmarked anyway, right? MR. MILLER-Right. Sometimes, what happens is. the center aisles of where the parking are, the layout, timbers, or something like that. to mark them during the season, and then unfortunately they have to be removed in order to haul and store boats. So nothing permanent can be placed in the gravel area. MR. O'DONNELL-And it's not going to be lined. MR. DUSEK-Mr. O'Donnell, a question as to that porch area that's going to be added on to the building, is that going to be enclosed or covered. or is that going to be an open deck? How is that going to situated? MR. O'DONNELL-It's going to be open deck, tying this porch. this deck, and this deck together. So the entire area right here. and the ramp area here will be open. Over the top of what is now picnic area, Harris Bay is proposing a canvass awning, essentially a sun screen. MR. DUSEK-Is there going to be tables or some type of seating - 21 - '- facilities out there? MR. O'DONNELL-I would expect picnic tables. MR. DUSEK-And that's what exists now in part of it. MR. O'DONNELL-There are picnic tables now down here. MR. DUSEK-And then you're going to add, what, tables to other area as well? MR. O'DONNELL-That I'm not sure. The plan hasn't developed in that level of detail. There, I expect, will be some seating out there. MR. DUSEK-And what was the addition onto the shed going to be used for? MR. 0' DONNELL-The collection of vending machines. Right now there's an ice machine around here. There's a telephone here. There's a Coke machine, I believe, up here. We're going to collect the vending machines, move them down into this area, put an addition on the shed which currently houses, it's some storage and electrical equipment, and screening. MR. DUSEK-My recollection was, too, from, I think, the previous meeting, wasn't there going to be some sort of sewage pumpout booth around some place? MR. 0' DONNELL-There's a vacuum tank and a port-a-potty dumping station right here now. The proposal is to move them right here. MR. DUSEK-Are they going to remain the same size? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. They're just going to move from one side of the building to another. MR. DUSEK-I mention that, because when we were looking at the map earlier, it just occurred to me that we didn't describe that change. MR. MENTER-That's a self-contained situation anyway, right? MR. O'DONNELL-I'm sorry. I don't understand the question. MR. MENTER-That pumping station and the port-a-potty, that's all self-contained. It's not tied into the regular sewer system, or is it? MR. O'DONNELL-It's tied into Harris Bay's septic system. There's a pumpout facility on the gas dock, and there's a port-a-potty dumping station here. It goes into a holding tank, and it's pumped out to the leach field, the septic tanks and leach fie Ids, and there's no change at all proposed in that, other than moving the vacuum tank into the pumping station, and if that stands between Harris Bay and the permits, I'm confident that the Board will delete that aspect of it. MR. TURNER-Okay. Any other questions? None? Okay. I'll now open the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARIHG OPEHED KARL KROETZ MR. KROETZ-I want to ask a question. It's very simple. Did everyone read the letters that were submitted, every member of that Board? MR. TURNER-No, not yet. - 22 - MR. KROETZ-Well. what's the purpose of submitting them. then. to the Town. of your objections of the public. if they are not read by the very people who are going to make the decision? MR. TURNER-We haven't gotten to that point yet. them. because I haven't seen them. only tonight. I haven't read MR. KROETZ-When are you qoinq to read them? MR. TURNER-We can read the ones that people want read into the record. We'll read them right tonight. the ones that are submitted. MR. KROETZ-You're going to do that? MR. TURNER-We can. MR. KROETZ-Well. you understand my point? MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. KROETZ-There were things that I said and dozens of other people said that I think bears a thought on this process. MR. TURNER-That's fine. Do you want to explain your position any different than you explained in the letter? Step right up to that microphone and explain it. That's why I opened the public hearing. MR. KROETZ-I'll read you my letter. MR. TURNER-That's fine. Read your letter. MR. KROETZ-There's no point in doing this if nobody looks at it or hears it. "Dear Mr. Martin: I am very concerned about the action the Planning Board has taken in regard to the proposed 5 to 7 year Master Plan to upgrade and rehabilitate the facilities of the Harris Bay Yacht Club (HBYC). It was shocking to me to be present at the February 22 meeting of the Planning Board to see them give SEQR approval for the project. Those of us who live at Harris Bay and are familiar with the problems. believe that the approval of this project will have a detrimental short term and long term impact on the lake. The HBYC is by far the largest marina on the lake. with the dockage for 272 boats. most of which are equipped with toilets. cooking facilities. etc. The sewage disposal system for all these boats. plus the clubhouse toilet facilities and the public boat pump-out facilities. all ends up across the road in the wetlands. All of the other area marinas (Mooring Post. Castaway. Lake George Boat. Co.. Dunhams Bay Boat Co.. Fisher's Marina) have boat pump-out facilities which discharge into holding tanks. The sewage is then taken by tank truck to a proper disposal site away from the lake. It is inconceivable to me that the Town Attorney and Planning Board agreed with the HBYC position that the Town has no authority to determine or even discuss the adequacy of the present sewage disposal system. May I remind you of the hundreds of people who live along the shores of Harris Bay that depend on the lake for their drinking water. I respectfully request that the Town not approve any part of the HBYC Master Plan until the Town can determine that the existing sewage system is not polluting the lake or the wetlands. and that it can also safely handle the increase in activity and use resulting from the proposed 5 to 7 year Master Plan. Sincerely. Karl C. Kroetz" MR. TURNER-Thank you. application? Who wishes to be next. opposed to the FRANK ENGLAND MR. ENGLAND-My name is Frank England. I live on Hillman Road. I'd just like to answer a question that Mr. Thomas asked. and respectfully disagree with Mr. O'Donnell. about the use of the gas - 23 - booth at Harris Bay. In fact. I've used them myself. last summer. Harris Bay had a gas war going with the Lake George Boat Company. and they were selling gas for five and six cents a gallon cheaper. So I'm sure that many boats from allover the lake were coming to Harris Bay and using the gas facilities. I don't know if any of you gentlemen own boats on the lake. taken your children or grandchildren out. one of the places that you always buy gas is where there's sanitary facilities for the children and probably for yourself. So I would like to disagree with what Mr. O'Donnell has said. because you come there. you can use them. You can walk into their place and buy whatever is there. if you want it. Now. I'd like to start on just what I prepared before I came. I used to live about 400 yards from where the Harris Bay Yacht Club is. and we have been discussing with them and talking to Boards for some past 30 years. and I've seen the water around the dock. I've seen it change. in fact. I finally sold my place and moved around to the other side of Takundewide. It seems to me that we've been discussing expansions with these gentlemen for some 30 years. In fact. I've got a list of things I gave here to Betty Monahan back on 10/4/86. when I was quite concerned with what was going on there at Harris Bay Yacht Club. and it lists various letters. I won't bore you with them. but at one time. I did try to write to ENCON in Albany. I have a daughter who's an attorney. We tried to write to them. It didn't do us much good. Things just kept going on. I just think this newest approach which they euphemistically called an upgrade is a little bit more expansion. I think they're doing a better job of taking care where they filled in before. whether it was legal or not. I don't know. All I know. in the past 30 years. it's gone from about a 30 slip dock that Cliff (lost word) started. went through various owners. and now has some 272 docks which stretch some 300. or 50 feet out into the lake. over State land. I've often wondered how they can build over State land and then sell it. Now a couple of us. when we were trying to fight this thing back in 60's or 70's. I've forgotten now it's so long ago. thought. gee. we ought to go and get permission to build 300 foot docks out. and we could kind of close off the bottom of the Bay. but what has happened has happened. so lets take what we've got here now. and lets take a look at what they want to do in this upgrade. First. I'd like to speak about the lights. Unfortunately. I used to sleep out on the porch at my house. which is about 400 yards. or 300 yards. and a couple of those big lights there happened to shine right on my porch. So. I'd have to move my head if I wanted to sleep without a light on. I don't think they should be allowed to put these twelve foot lights up. because it's going to bother the residents in Harris Bay. Unfortunately. it seems to be they're more concerned about the light shining on 9L than it is shining on the people that live there and pay their taxes along Harris Bay. The outdoor deck. I am sure. what I can see from. it's going to be an attractive place. and I'm sure it'll generate some more use. How much. I can't say. The fuel tanks. I just don't understand. If you're going to move the fuel tanks. why are you leaving them near the water? Why don't we put them across the road? Put them up on high ground. I was told you can't get permission to go under the highway. and I asked. where did they find that out. I asked if anybody has checked with DOT. To me. that's where the answer should come. I think if you're going to move them. if they can. and go across. under the road. they should go over there. and put them up on the high ground. Get them away from the water. The fill. I think they're just going to put more fill on top of fill that was put in. Whether that's legal or not. don't know. but it's there. So that's a fact that you can't do much about. However. I'm just kind of interested. I drove by there today. I don't know. if you look at the map that came with their application. you'll notice in there there's a picture. there's a State park (lost word). I don't know if their map shows this. no. it doesn't. but if you look. Harris Bay. here's the bottom of the Bay. like this. Harris Bay Yacht Club is in here. and if you look down. there's a stream that goes down here. and this is a State park. and if you look at the picture. in your opinion. they sent to you. you'll see it's all wetland. In 1970. - 24 - they got a special variance to put the sheds in. They put the sheds up right in the middle of a wetland. Now they say they're going to put parking across the street. Take a look at where can they park across the street. unless they fill in some wetlands or use the wetlands already filled. Another thing is. I told you. I just drove by there today. I have a Queensbury Zoning Ordinance. 1982. now mind you there's a stream that goes behind there. It's probably over here like this. and comes back to a State park. I'll read you just a part. and I'll leave this with you. It says if you have a dock that's attached to the shore. no dock shall extend more than 40 feet off shore at mean low water mark. Of course they got an exception. they're at 340. No dock shall extend off shore more than 20 percent of the width of the stream or the brook at the point of construction. If you go up to Harris Bay right now. and take a look. the stream is here. You see the configuration of their docks. The docks come entirely across both sides of the stream. like it's a big H. from the stream. What does this do? It's a cinch no fish or anything can get back up into that swamp back up in the State park. unless they go by the propellers of all the boats. I would like to leave this Ordinance with you. because they keep citing 1980 here. This is Queensbury' s Ordinance in 1982. and the part about the docks is right there. I think now we come to. probably. my last item. One thing that I'm very concerned. quite overwhelmed by. listening to the reading of this. how concerned they are about the neighborhood of Harris Bay. It seemed very strange. after 30 years. now they're becoming very concerned with us. Now we get to the septic tank. I've been told it's some 20 years old. and I don't know the technical stuff about inspecting things. Let me tell you. just give you a picture in the summer time. Two hundred and seventy docks. lets give them the benefit. There are only two hundred and. maybe. thirty of the families up. So there's two hundred and thirty families using those docks. You've got shower facilities. I don't know if any of you have lived on a sailboat or lived on a boat. It's sure hard to take a shower on it. They've got shower facilities there. sanitation facilities. and I just wonder how big a septic tank should be. for two hundred and thirty families. Now. mind you. that this is in the summer time. when everything is fairly dry. and. of course. if you go back and look where their septic tank is. they'll even admit to you that it's right on the shoulders of a wetland behind. to the east of 9L. Plus. I was shocked. today. to learn. I've always know that they've had this pump out there. commercial pump out facilities. and I was shocked today when I went into the Town Hall and found out. the pump house facilities which they just told you. they pump and they pump it right down the road down into their septic system. You've got a septic system down there that's supposed to take care of. lets say. in the summer time. two hundred and thirty families. plus the commercial. whatever they get. and I've been down there. and I know how many people who are not members of Harris Bay Yacht Club that use that. and I'm sure. I can't give you any numbers. but when I'm down there getting gas many times during the summer. I've seen quite a few big boats in there having their tanks pumped out. and they weren't members of Harris Bay Yacht Club. So what I'm saying to you gentlemen. and I know your problems that you have when you're sitting on a Board. because I've been a town official myself. in Massachusetts. and I know we've had to deal with many developers. They have a lot of high paid engineers. high paid lawyers. and unfortunately the town and you people do not have enough people to check on everything that's told to you. So what I'm asking you to do tonight is what the gentleman just ahead of me did. Do not give them anything until we make sure that that septic system is up to the regulations. because I don't think it's anywhere near what it should be. and I think we're all concerned about the quality of Lake George. and I've got my old files. I used to keep when we were trying to ask these gentlemen to do certain things and cut down on the side. This is August 1975. State Health Engineer Sees Merky Future for formerly crystal clear Lake George. and most of that is coming from septic systems that go down into the lake. What I'm asking you people. one other thing that I made a note here. There - 25 - should be no use of a hardship from these gentlemen asking you for any kind of variance. Any hardship they have is of their own doings. We've been after them to do certain things in the past since 1960. So any hardships they're facing now are of their own making. So I would ask you again. do not give them anything. or any variance until we see that that septic system is up to snuff. I think that they should be required for any pump outs to be done just like any other marina on the lake. Thank you. MR. CARVIN-Mr. England. now you made a comment here that you had been in Harris Bay and had observed non member boats being pumped out. Is that correct? MR. ENGLAND-Yes. MR. CARVIN-Okay. How would you determine that. or how did you determine that they were non members? MR. ENGLAND-Well. because I knew a couple of them. because they were from way up Harris Bay, the end of Assembly Point, and they came and they asked, they said to me. what do you charge for a boat that isn't a member. It's a public facility. MR. CARVIN-Okay. May I ask, direct a question here, is this a common practice, or is this a service that you do provide for non members? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes, it is. I believe that we're required to by the Lake George Park Commission. MR. CARVIN-Okay. MR. ENGLAND-I would have no idea of how many there are or anything like that, but I know it's a public facility. It's used by people who are non members. MR. CARVIN-Okay. It seems we have a little problem here. In other words, you're saying you have to do it. Is that correct? MR. O'DONNELL-It's my understanding, yes. MR. ENGLAND-Well, there's no doubt it's a nice thing for people on the thing, but I think, my concern is that they should be made to use, not let it go into their septic system. which I don't think is adequate now. Do like any other marina does. here. Put it into a holding tank and have it hauled away. MR. TURNER-Okay. MR. CARVIN-Thank you for your comments. MR. TURNER-Thank you. Who wants to be next? MARY ARTHUR BEEBE MRS. BEEBE-I'm Mary Arthur Beebe. I'm from the Lake George Association, and I apologize because I'm filling in for staff person Kathy Vilmar who's been at all your meetings and she's out with strep throat. I have a question, because the LGA has, over the years, received enumerable phone calls about this facility and about the septic system, and has followed and received a lot of information about inspections and complaints from other agencies that have received similar complaints, and there's an awful lot of inspectors that have visited that site, and I'd like to know, first of all, if the Town has collected all the information from Warren County's inspections that were done over the years, and from the other people like the Health Department or any of the other people from DEC who may have been involved with some of the site visits, because before you make a decision, I think you should do a thorough search of every relative enforcement agency and try to - 26 - find out exactly what that situation is, and that question relates to the other question that I have is, looked at all the maps and listened carefully to the presentation, visually, it looks like rather small changes to a site, but what does it really mean about the rate of use that it projects? It shows, to me, that the membership of the Harris Bay Yacht Club wants to use the site more, and if they're going to be using that site, instead of going out to the islands on their boats and being there for the weekend, more frequently they're going to be using the interior of the building and the shower and their restroom facilities more frequently, and that's why it relates to the septic system. Rate of use is not just determined by more feet added to a deck or walkway, but when projects like this were approved previously, there were all kinds of statistics given in the past about how often the people who actually keep their boats in the docks really use their boats, and how often, and when they did, how much time they spent at the on land facility and how much time they went out on the lake, and you really didn't need quite so many parking places because they wouldn't all be there at the same time, and they really wouldn't be spending that much time on this site, because they'd be going out and dispersing around Lake George. Has any information been provided to show just exactly what the rate of use really is and what it's proj ected to be as a result of these improvements, aesthetically to the site, and I'd encourage you to look at those and see if there's a connection to the use of the septic systems, before you make any great decisions on this. Thank you. MR. TURNER-Okay. Thank you. Mr. Salvador? JOHN SALVADOR MR. SALVADOR-My name is John Salvador. I'm a resident at Dunhams Bay. I had addressed a letter to the Planning Board, mentioning my concerns about the fill, and the Planning Board received an answer from Rist-Frost, their consultant. In effect, Rist-Frost didn't say that my concerns were to be discounted. They said that more information was needed. I'm concerned, the repeated use of fill to raise the level of the parking lot is nothing more than filling in the lake. You have one issue that you are filling in a wetland. I think all of that area at one time, north and south Route 9L, was wetland. So whether or not the fill was put in initially with a permit, the applicant is continuing to fill a wetland. I don't know what the Town's wetland regulation is in this regard. I don't know how the APA gets into this, but I do know the Army Corp of Engineer has jurisdiction. The Consultant, Rist-Frost, suggested that some borings be taken. It's not too difficult to take shallow, undisturbed samples, but you see the extent to which fill material has gone down into the lake, into the wetlands. The DEC has jurisdiction only to the point where you're filling below the mean high water level. As long as they keep this fill up above the mean high water level, they just keep pushing it down. So the fill they put in this year doesn't become fill below the mean high water level until three or four years from now, and then another layer goes on top, and I think, then, as the Consultant suggests, more information is needed to determine what's happening, because I'm sure you're not getting consolidation of that underlying silt. It's moving. It's going some place. It's going out into the lake. I have a letter here that I addressed to the Planning Board. You don't have it. MR. TURNER-We have the letter. MR. SALVADOR-You have it? MR. TURNER-Yes. I believe that's the one we have. Yes. MR. SALVADOR-And you have Rist-Frost's? MR. TURNER-Yes. - 27 - MR. SALVADOR-With regard to parking. I believe the Harris Bay Yacht Club has a Class A Marina Operator's Permit from the Lake George Park Commission. and. by the way. I should preface my remarks. I am not here tonight to defend the Lake George Park Commission. okay. The Lake George Park Commission presently has a rule. regulation. that calls for adequate parking. if you have a Class A Marina Operator's Permit. I know it's nebulous. What is adequate parking? I heard the number 125 here tonight. is that both sides of the road? MR. TURNER-No. one side. MR. O'DONNELL-One side. MR. SALVADOR-What's the total? MR. TURNER-One hundred and ninety-two. I think. that's what's required by Code. MR. MILLER-That's what's required (lost words) what we proved we could show. but I believe we have two hundred cars. both sides of the road. It's been my understanding that even maximum overflow. Fourth of July weekend. nice weather. maximum overflow on the other side of the road. you'd get maybe (lost word) cars. MR. TURNER-Eighty-one you've got here. on the map. 117 on the Clubhouse side. 81 are provided on the property south of Route 9L. MR. MILLER-The total number there is. Mr. Chairman. was based on the Zoning Ordinance requirement. There's actually more than that. MR. TURNER-Right. Okay. MR. SALVADOR-So the applicant meets the Town's parking requirements. Mr. O'Donnell mentioned lease agreements with the DOT. Are they. have they been submitted? MR. TURNER-I have an affidavit that I asked Mr. Miller to get from DOT. for the sewer line. this is 1970. MR. SALVADOR-They have some kind of an easement permit to use a culvert through which to put a. and to run a sewer line parallel to the road on DOT property. or DEC property. as the case may be. MR. TURNER-Yes. they do. MR. MARTIN-Yes. It's described in the permit. MR. SALVADOR-I'd like to know what the nature of the permit is. Is it an agreement? Is it a lease? Is there a consideration? Has there been consideration? MR. TURNER-It's a Highway Work Permit. MR. SALVADOR-Issued by? MR. TURNER-Issued by DOT. New York State DOT. signed by Mr. Keis. who was the resident engineer at the time. in 1970. the date being 6/29/70. MR. SALVADOR-A Highway Work Permit? MR. TURNER-That's correct. Install two inch diameter sewer force main within right-of-way crossing highway through structure. at Station 382+50. Plan approved by Lake George Sanitary Inspector. No pavement to be disturbed. MR. SALVADOR-Does that meet your requirements. the Lake George Sanitary Inspector is. I don't know who - 28 - MR. TURNER-I don't know who it was at the time. MR. DUSEK-I don't understand your question, John, when you say, does it meet our requirements. This was 1970. You'd have to go back and take a look at what then existed at that time, in terms of rules and regulations. I don't know why Lake George investigated as opposed to the Town. MR. SALVADOR-I don't know who the Lake George, was. Maybe that's worth looking into. The other thing is, at the time they did that, I think they owned the property, both north and south of the road. Since then, I believe the property has probably been sold, on the south side. So they don't own any land parallel to the road, from that culvert to their septic system. Now, the permit is just for the use of the culvert. MR. TURNER-Yes, that's what it appears to be. Let me read you part of what the ending here is. The proposed sewage line will service a large marina operating adjacent to the causeway section of the Fort George/Brayton, Point 2SH1869 which crosses the south end of Harris Bay and Lake George. Installation is necessary because of a new sanitary regulation covering boats and use on Lake George. The applicant proposes to cross the highway by laying a proposed line directly on the invert of our 54 inch diameter corrugated pipe structure at Station 328+50. This is an equalizer culvert and has no appreciable flow, so that the proposed pipe will have no effect on the efficiency of the culvert. The New York State Department of Health has examined the proposal and has no objections thereto. Approval of this application is strongly recommended. MR. SALVADOR-Without studying it, it sounds to me like the permit is confined to the use of the culvert. MR. TURNER-Yes, right. I would say that. MR. SALVADOR-I don't know how this bears on the application, but it appears to me they don't have an easement or an agreement or whatever you might call it to the use of the land on which that pipe is supported that runs parallel to 9L. The property on which the septic tank is located and the property of Harris Bay Yacht Club that we know are not contiguous pieces of land. They're not contiguous. MR. TURNER-No, you're right. MR. SALVADOR-Well, for whatever you think. Talking about toilets in the building, again, the Lake George Park Commission requires that Class A Marinas have toilet facilities open at all times, whatever that means. Mr. 0' Donnell mentioned the fact that somehow they want to get these vending machines outside so that when they secure the building people can still get at the vending machines, but then they can't get at the toilets. Now the idea of toilets open at all times is to allow people, eleven, twelve o'clock at night, if they must, to use the toilet. What is the source of water supply at the Harris Bay Yacht Club? MR. TURNER-Lake George, probably. MR. SALVADOR-It's my understanding that the Health Department is beginning to inspect water supplies of marinas with over 40 boats. I don't know how this plays. The pump out facilities, when the Lake George Park Commission first started it's pump out regulations, every marina on Lake George was required to have a pump out facility, and of course that didn't happen. That's not practical. So the Park Commission backed off and they said, well, you don't have to have a pump out facility, if you have proven access. What does that mean? Proven access means that you have an agreement, as a marina operator, by the way, this is Class A and Class B marinas. The small mini marinas, if you have an agreement with somebody that has a pump out facility to accept your clientele - 29 - to pump out their boats. Now, under that program. Harris Bay Yacht Club entered into many, many, many agreements with marinas. I don't think that's required today, the agreement, but the program was set in motion, under a signed agreement, and I know that Harris Bay Yacht Club is one of the focus points of this. It was mentioned earlier that you're recruired to pump out by the Lake George Park Commission. That's not the case. In fact, we have a pump out station. and we refuse to pump out the public. We pump out the boats who rent dock slips from us, and those boats only, and it's by appointment. Okay. So, it's not a requirement of the Lake George Park Commission. I'd like to talk about the pit that's being relocated, that sump, what is being relocated from one side of the building to the other? MR. MILLER-The vacuum tank that creates the vacuum for the boat pump out. It's just a visual thing to get it away from the front of the building. MR. SALVADOR-So the pit that it discharges into stays, and the port-a-potty dumping station? MR. MILLER-Now, they just lift the cover of the pit and dump directly into that. and the intention is to create an area to the side that they can dump into that will go into the pump pit, so they're not dumping directly into the pump pit. MR. SALVADOR-It requires some kind of a receptacle (lost word). I don't know to what extent this disturbs the system, adds to it. whatever. MR. MILLER-Well, right now, they're using the pump pit directly, and, again, just to take it away from the front of the building, we feel is an appropriate use of the front of the building. and just provide it off to the side. It's an existing use that's there now. MR. SALVADOR-So, it requires a modification to the system that involves laying a piece of pipe and putting in some kind of a receptacle that's going to be accepting raw sewage. and really uncontrolled. Don't the people go up and just dump their own port- a-pottys? Handling sewage like that, that's why we don't do it for the public. I'll be honest with you. Okay. MR. TURNER-Thank you. Next? GILBERT BOEHM MR. BOEHM-My name is Gilbert Boehm. I can understand why the applicant is very careful to avoid discussing, or getting into any harangue relative to the sewage system. It is a significant hot potato. You've heard some comments already. I don't really believe you understand exactly what this facility looks like. The pipes running from that system that they were talking about relocating goes through the culvert, as they pointed out, and it runs along parallel to the highway, drapes in and out of the wetland, on a bunch of (lost words) and goes into two septic tanks which are located within 10 feet of the wetland on a high bank. Sometimes the covers on those have been off. as a matter of fact. Now. I as a private citizen couldn't push any pipe. any sewage pipe, into the lake if I tried. I couldn't put my septic tank within 100 feet of the lake. Yet. here is a commercial facility, and you've heard all the usage it gets, and to my knowledge it's never been pumped out. It's going somewhere, and since the septic tanks are so close to the wetlands, it's my assumption that the drain field is also pretty close. You need to walk that facility, I think. before you really make a final determination here. By far the better solution would be to insist on having a holding tank facility there, on their property. and, as it's been pointed out. that pipe line that runs from the culvert to their septic tank is about 200 feet. in and out of the water, and not on any land that they own. They don't want to get into any harangue on that, I'm - 30 - sure. That's why they're trying to keep from talking about it, but I guess you should consider this, as part of this application. Thank you. MR. TURNER-Thank you. CHARLIE ADAMSON MR. ADAMSON-I'm Charlie Adamson from Assembly Point. I won't repeat things that have been said, necessarily, but I'm sure that you're all aware, at least I hope you are, I don't remember the Planning Board was, maybe you people are, of the septic requirements in the Town of Queensbury that apply to homeowners. As far as I know, they haven't been changed. If you have a house, in theory, you have to have a septic system that provides for taking care of 150 gallons per day per bedroom, okay, and so in a four bedroom house you're up to, what, 600 gallons, and so forth. Okay. It's interesting to multiply, lets assume we have 272 boats or so, and lets figure that maybe two boats form a bedroom, in which case, you have to have a septic system that will handle 20,000 gallons a day. If each boat is a bedroom, you have 40,000 gallons a day. Now, I've never heard this sort of thing, but there is a septic problem, okay. Let me go back to the, the statement was made that this building activity won't necessarily increase usage. I think other people have spoken to that, but I think that's clearly not true. I think they're upgrading, and there will be considerably more activity there, and if there's going to be considerably more activity, you have got to look at the facilities that handle that activity. In other words, you really have to look at the Town, with all due respect to the opinion of the Town Attorney, the Town has to look at that, if you are going to provide any protection for what has to be the main asset of this whole area. Okay. So there is going to be increased usage of that area. The facilities are going to be better. There are going to be more people cooking their hotdogs. There are going to be more people bringing their beer, and on rainy days, they'll have big parties there, maybe even on Sundays. Okay. We've already established the fact that they do have to have pump outs. Maybe more and more people will come. In other words, the usage of that place, the nicer it gets, is going to go up, and there's no question about the gas. We've already heard that there was a gas war last year, so that you could get cheaper gas there. The store, too, I believe, within the last two years, and my memory's getting weak. I'll admit that, and maybe I can't see now because of the winter, but that building has signs on it, something for sale. I can't remember what it was that is for sale, but it's a sign that is directed at somebody coming along the road. So, who's to say how many people are going to stop, and if they stop, come in to use the store. I have gotten newspapers there, I know, in the past. I don't know if they sell them there now, but one thing can lead to another. There's no question that more activity is going to go on at this point. I prepared a something for you, as Ted knows, and I'll leave you a copy. I won't read the whole thing, but I will read, because basically the first part of it says what I've just said, but let me just read the end of it. "I do not see how the Planning Board and the Town Attorney allowed this variance application to reach this Board without careful, professional scrutiny of the HBYC septic system. I cannot believe that there is not a serious threat to the waters of Lake George as the situation stands now. And this threat can only become worse if nothing is done before, or as, the facilities are upgraded. 3. It would be an unbelievable example of environmental callousness if you take no action to check the adequacy of the HBYC septic system. 4. If you were to schedule this hearing at a more auspicious time - anytime from the middle of June on - when the shoreline properties were more fully occupied, you would have dozens more residents urging you to exercise your responsibility for the historic and economic jewel that is Lake George." Thank you. MR. TURNER-Who's next? Joe? - 31 - JOE ROULIER MR. ROULIER-Good evening. I'm Joe Roulier. There's several issues that I would like to discuss. and the first thing that I would like to say is that I hope that all the letters that have been sent into this Board. and I understand there are several letters that have been sent in. after anyone that wants to speak. that the letters can then be read into the record. because I agree with what Mr. Adamson just said. that if this was the middle of the summer. this building right now would be packed to the doors. Unfortunately. a lot of these events go on when the people are out of town. for one reason or another. and they're never aware of what takes place in the winter. and I think that we have had some response from the letters. and I think it's imperative. before this Board leaves tonight. that every letter that has been turned in is read. so that you fully understand the feelings of the property owners within Harris Bay. Regarding the septic. I'd like to speak on that briefly. if you don't mind. I don't know how many members of the Board actually have been to the site. You obviously have a feeling. right now. as to how the residents generally feel about it. One of the concerns that I have regarding the system. not only is the leachfield. that I feel as though is totally inadequate. but also a significant amount of chemicals that are added to the actual sewage itself. If anyone of you are familiar with the holding tanks that are on boats. it's not a system generally that's associated with a septic tank type system that you're familiar with. What holding tanks are is literally raw sewage. no dilution. whatsoever. of this sewage, and to that sewage is added various chemical additives that reduce the smell of the sewage. so you don't have all these boats up there, all 271 boats sitting around with a tremendous sewer gas or smell coming out of them. That is the sewage that is pumped into the particular system that you've heard about tonight. We have no idea. we have some idea of the composition of sewage, but as ~ sit here, I have no idea of the composition of the chemicals that are added to that sewage, and I want you to know that Mr. O'Donnell wants you to think that this is not a significant problem. We're looking at 271 very large boats. I would say the largest boat is up to 38 feet in that marina. I'm told some of these boats have multiple toilets on it. They have kitchens on it. They have not only their own families that are on the boat. they have routine visitors. In fact. in the height of the summer, they have a certain parking lot. to the south side. that's designated for visitors only. In addition to that. you have all of these people showering, using toilet facilities in the main Clubhouse building. If that's not enough, the facility is open to the general public, and anyone, I have no idea of the number of boats, if it's one to one thousand, has the free use of that facili ty to go in there, to obtain gas and also to have their bilges removed of sewage. It is a significant problem. I would like to believe that they would have adequate disposal of it. When you read the application, they make reference to. the septic system is located on a 25 acre parcel. There's no question it's located on a 25 acre parcel. but the actual size of the septic is probably not much bigger than from the edge of this table to that wall. and from that wall to there. and that's the entire area where the sewage is disposed of. To compound the problem is that the, it is located immediately adjacent to a wetland area, and I tend to think that there's never any visual evidence of any failure of it, only because it's essentially located on top of a swamp. The swamp is a huge absorber of all this leach or septic that's pumped into there, and there would be never any trace, never any visible trace, of any problem that could be associated with it. In addition to that. you're never going to get a smell. If anything's leaching into the swamp itself. you'll never have any indication of any sewage from smelling it. because of the chemicals that are added in in the actual holding tank (lost word) the boat. I would like to clarify one thing that was improperly stated by Mr. O'Donnell. I did do water tests in the fall of the year. in December. I did two water tests. The first water test was for total coliform. I took those tests to the Lake George Park Commission. who at the time - 32 - told me they did not have the money to go and do the test on their own. and then went and did a second test. and that test was for fecal coliform. and the fecal coliform count was so high that the people that did the test for me. which was over here at the Hudson Environmental Services. the chemists/biologists that did the test told me that there was no question in his mind that the results of this test indicate that there is human sewage going into the wetland area of Lake George. SUbsequent to that. and probably out of some embarrassment. the Lake George Park Commission decided that they would then go and do a test. The test indicated that there was no sewage. I went and I asked the person that actually did the testing where he had obtained the samples from. if it was in the area that I had obtained my water sample from. which was immediately adjacent to the disposal area. He told me that that particular area was frozen and that he did ~ take the sample area from the area immediately adjacent to where this leachfield area is. I think there's enough said on that. I hope that you get the idea that it is a huge problem. The proposals that they have placed before you. there is no question about that. that they want to expand it in a way that there will be additional activity in the area. Hr. O'Donnell was able to give you a couple of examples. I would like to give you an example also. Last year I had an opportunity to ski on a mountain in Vermont. It's called Okemo. Okemo had a 10 year master program whereby they were continually upgrading. changing the facilities. putting in new lifts. etc.. etc. The sole purpose of that master plan. and that upgrading was to increase the acti vi ty at that particular facility. I have absolutely no reason to believe that this master plan will not also increase the activity at this facility. One follows the other. If it's more attractive. more people are going to stop there. Hore people will be using either the gas facility. the pump out facili ty. or going to the store. and subsequent to that. more people will be using the sewage facility. but absolutely it's imperative that we look at that. I would like to touch upon one other issue that really has me concerned. I have watched this marina. since the time the first shovel full of dirt was put into the parking lot. I've been in Harris Bay for in excess of 35 years. They have 271 docks. They've had those docks. lets say. for 20 years. Twenty years ago. the average boat on Lake George was approximately twenty feet. The average boat in that marina today is probably 30 feet. It's 30 foot with all the amenities that go with all the new boats today. In my opinion. that is an expansion of that marina of 50 percent. So that has increased 50 percent over the last 20 years. without any consideration for anyone in our area. Hr. O'Donnell speaks of the benefits to Harris Bay. I don't think that all of a sudden looking out your front window and seeing a marina grow 50 percent is any benefit to Harris Bay. and I would like to know why. if there is a 52 percent expansion. why they have not had to conform to some type of Board for variances to that effect or why. within that period. they have not had to upgrade their septic system to accommodate. call it what you may. RV's. trailers. or whatever. They're all little hotel units that are sitting up on the shore of Lake George right now. I would have a hard time telling the Board that I approve of the balance of the project for a couple of reasons. Increasing the size of the shed. I would not want to be in your position. and approve of a structure. and increase in a structure on Lake George solely for the purpose of housing vending machines. It would be very easy with. granted. they're all outside right now. and I think that goes to show you what they think of North Queensbury as a whole. that they just randomly have left the vending machines outside. I think that there is absolutely no reason that the current construction that is going on within the Clubhouse. while they cannot put in two additional exterior doors. and house the vending machines within a small combined area. within the Clubhouse. I absolutely. with that in mind. I would hope that they would turn down the shed area. The gas area. they have 40 some acres of land. and the best that they can do. for installing a new gas tank. is immediately adjacent to a wetland. immediately adjacent to Route 9L. and from a visual standpoint. probably the - 33 - worst location that they could possibly come up with. Every car that goes by there is going to be looking at a gas tank. There are areas over on the east side. which is the yellow area over to the right. which would be considerably less visible. I think the only reason that they want that gas tank there is because of the easy access of the gas line to the gas docks. There is no consideration for the neighborhood. Everything that Mr. O'Donnell says. by the way. is benefits to Harris Bay Yacht Club. I didn't hear one thing say benefits to North Queensbury or the surrounding neighbors in that area. and the extension of that is the lights. They want to go in there and they want to put in additional 12 foot high lighting. The next thing that we'll have. it'll look like Ames Department Store or K-Marts. The neighbors. the residents in that area don't want to look out and see some well lit up parking lot. In fact. I would encourage the Board to not only say they cannot have additional high lighting. but to have them remove the existing lighting that's currently in place. I'm absolutely against the fill. I think Mr. Salvador touched upon that quite well. There are huge ramifications. It's something that has to be looked at. and quite honestly I'm not qualified to make the final ruling on that. but I would think that the Boards. that are proposed. apparently. by Rist-Frost. would be the place to start. My other major concern. of course. is the Clubhouse and the increase of the deck with the awning over the top. I don't know of very many facilities. in fact. I don't know of any. that need 1500 square feet for the handicap. for a ramp. There are alternate areas where they could put an access ramp for the handicap that would allow them to enter that building. I am absolutely afraid that if they increase the size of the patio as proposed. put an awning over the top. the next thing you know. we will have a lot of tables out there. We're going to have music out there every Saturday night. We're going to have parties out there. and although there's no plans right now. who is to say that five years from now we don't have a bar and restaurant. It is something that we have to make absolutely sure of. if they are going to be allowed a patio. that there are restraints put on that. so that the items that I'm presenting to you all of a sudden don't crop up out of the clear blue sky. and the people in Harris Bay. in the middle of the Fourth of July. all of a sudden have 300 people on a deck over there hooting and hollering until four o'clock in the morning. I hope that the Board considers everything that I've said. and turns down their total application. because they have done nothing to benefit Harris Bay. and the last point that I would like to make is. and I hope all of you have been up to the marina within the last couple of weeks. Do you see the mountains if you're standing in the marina? Do you see the lake? All you see is huge boats on the shore. covered with blue tarps. How much benefit is that to the people that live there. to have to go there every day and look at this nonsense? Twenty years ago. the boats were all taken out of the water. They were carted up to Pilot Knob. and they were put in storage buildings. but the people that still reside in that Bay all of a sudden have to look at this sea of blue. Granted. there's not many people around. but that doesn't change what your decision has to be. Your decision is based on the facts as they are. not the time of the year that it is. I want you to consider all this before you make the decision. and I thank you for your time. MR. TURNER-Thank you. ROBERT EVANS DR. EVANS-My name is Dr. Robert Evans and I'm Public Health Officer for the Town of Queensbury. Ted and members of the Board. I live on Harris Bay. but also I've walked. crawled. and slimed through the muck along that line. and I get more calls every year from the Harris Bay area than I get probably anywhere else in Queensbury. My concerns are it's great for them to beautify the area. I think that's fantastic. but I think it's time that they had a. get their septic regulations up to snuff. How in God's name they ever got the permission. in the 70's. to put in their system. I don't know. - 34 - I've been for about eight or nine years, and without question, the amount of use, and the number of boats, the number of people in that area, there should have holding tanks, without question. They replaced that line about five years ago, and we cultured, and cultured, and cultured that line. We had many leaks, five years ago, before the new line was put in. It's extremely difficult to pull cultures out of that swamp, where they have their dump site, and some of their septic tanks back in the woods. I don't know if you've ever been there, but, in all honesty, we've crawled every inch of that. Lately, it's been good, but it's extremely difficult to tell how much residue, etc., is being dropped into that swamp. My comment would be, fine, beautify the area, as long as it's not an expansion, but my concern is bring the site up to date. It should have big enough pumping stations. I think that's fine. I think they really should have in dwelling wells that are pumped out, rather than the septic system they have. That would be mY comment, in terms of, the continued improvement on site, would be to have this as a pumping station, a holding tank. MR. TURNER-Mrs. Monahan? BETTY MONAHAN MRS. MONAHAN-Betty Monahan. As most of you know, I am the representative that represents this area of the Town of Queensbury on the Town Board. It's been a concern of the municipalities, organizations, residents around the lake, to stop the downgrading of the quality of Lake George. To such an extent, it's also a concern of the State of New York that we have got a million dollar grant, Warren County has a million dollar grant, to assess the quali ty of Lake George, as far as sewage, impact on it. Last night, we spent hours up at the North Queensbury Firehouse at a sewer scoping session run by Warren County and Clough Harbour, who are the engineers of record. Their job will be to assess the impacts of the sewers, sewage systems, I should say, on Lake George, and the remedial actions, and what the alternatives are for Queensbury. To remedy what's going on in Lake George, we're looking at millions and millions of dollars. Having sat here in the audience, there are some things that I think have to be determined. Number One, that you need to quantify, I keep hearing the Yacht Club say, there has been no increase because the docks are the same, the pump out facilities are the same. I think you have to quantify the number and the volume of the sewage of the boats that are non members, that are using that facility. I also think, as Mr. Roulier says, you have to look at the comparison of the size of the boats, the motors, the water displacement, the carrying capacity of the boats that are using the slips, and as someone said, I believe it was Mr. Roulier or Mr. Adamson, if you add a bedroom in a Critical Environmental Area, you have to prove that your septic system can carry the impact of that bedroom, and when you increase the size of boats, when you start having guests, when you use them as a motel, an overnight residence, you are having impact on the amount of sewage that has to be disposed of. I would also have another question. I hear about raw sewage being handled in this area for pump out. I also hear about food being sold. I also hear about members serving food and preparing food. I would wonder what the Department of Health regulations are about having raw sewage in that close proximity to food handling, and I think that should be checked out. I thank you for your consideration. MR. TURNER-Anybody else for the first time? Okay. John? MR. SALVADOR-I would like to ask Dr. Evans the practicality of taking water samples in December, when we know what the water temperature is, and testing it for coliform and fecal coliform. It's been stated that some samples were taken in December, and taken to a laboratory and checked for coliform and fecal coliform. Now we know what the water temperature is in December. I ask the practicality of taking tests at that time of the year. What do you - 35 - find? DR. EVANS-You're not gOing to get results. MR. TURNER-Thank you. MR. SALVADOR-Thank you. MR. TURNER-Anyone else? JOHN SKINNER MR. SKINNER-My name's John Skinner. and I'm a resident at Cleverdale. I felt that since I'm here I probably ought to come forward and just to let you know that I am here because I'm opposed to the expansion. We've been residents. my father and I. you have a letter that I wrote. of Lake George since about 1920. I've seen the water quality deteriorate in Pilot Knob where my family home is. and I've seen it just in the last six years deteriorate where I am. on Cleverdale. I have a submersible pump in the lake with a filter in my basement. and in the summer time I have to change that filter almost on a daily basis because of these large boats that come by. I have a neighbor who's been scuba diving in front of my house in 30 feet of water. and it's incredible the silt that is turned up. Any time you fill anywhere around the lake. some of that fill's gOing to get into the water. I looked at an early Audobon Society magazine. an aerial photo of an area that was developed. I believe. somewhere near Lake George Village. and it was incredible. You could just see the sand and the silt on the bottom of the lake. Harris Bay. as ~ view it. is an unfortunate facility that we have. I recently read the Freshwater Institute's report on the lake. and I guess the southern basin of the lake is about 10 years ahead of the northern basin of the lake. as far as deterioration. and if you read that report. it's very depressing. because people come to Lake George because of the water quality. because of the mountains. They don't come for any other reason. This is such a precious resource that we have. and if we don't take all of these things into consideration. that have been mentioned by the people here. and I'm sure most of their concerns. then I think it's a real travesty that's going to occur. MR. TURNER-Anyone else? PUBLIC HEARIRG CLOSED MR. CARVIN-Mr. Chairman. before we get started as to rebuttals and reading of letters and everything. I would just like to question the Board on a couple of issues that I'd like to bring us back to focus. if I can. I think the first hurdle that we really have to address is whether we are going to hear this as a Use Variance. I think the applicant has made a case that the Use Variance is not necessary. and if the Board agrees with the fact that the Use Variance is not necessary. then I think it's going to just delay the process in reading the letters and whatnot. because obviously the Use goes out. and we can move on to the Area. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-If. however. the Board determines that the Use Variance is necessary. then I think we'd have to come back to the criteria that we have written. for approval for a Use Variance. So I'm doing this in the effort to shorten the evening somewhat. So. I'm going to leave it to the Board. here. whether they feel that this really should be a Use Variance or not. MR. TURNER-All right. Any thoughts anyone? Do you want to start out the discussion? MR. CARVIN-Okay. Well. my feeling is that. right up front. a Use Variance is required. The basis for my argument here is that I - 36 - - think that. as you've indicated. the natural expectations of a marina would be that this would follow into place. The problem with that. as far as I'm concerned. is that this is not a private marina. and that there is. whether large or small. a certain aspect of public participation in this. and correct me if I'm wrong. I feel that at one point. that this was a public marina. in other words. anybody could rent slips or spaces. It then decided to become a condo. where they were sold as ownership. and they also have allowed public access. So it's not a pure. private situation. In that vein. I think that any improvements does have the potential for increased usage. and therefore I think it does fall within our realm to look at that. this situation. from a Use Variance perspective. That's pretty much my feeling on this. that this is a. this will constitute an increase in usage. whether by membership or by non membership. I think your argument would be much stronger if it was a pure private club. but that does not appear to be the case. So. I'm very firmly convinced that this. the Use Variance is necessary. MR. TURNER-I had the same feelings. because even though it's a 271 member club. it's private in the sense those 271 members own that facility. and they're doing with the rest of it what they care to do with it. by opening up the public participation. as far as selling gas and other supplies that go with the boating industry. and so forth. and allowing the access to that facility. So. it's a multi use facility. and I think a Use Variance is required. It's an expansion. Does anybody else have any thoughts? MR. THOMAS-Yes. I'll agree with you and Fred. To me. the expansion on this is just the size of the boats. and that more of the boats have heads on them that require them to be pumped out. The septic system. the sewer system. seems to be a big bone of contention. I think it's something that should be looked at. but I think the increased use of the septic system would require a variance. MR. TURNER-Anyone else? MR. MENTER-To me. the big dilemma is the septic. and it's unfortunate. because I don't really believe that it's an expansion. I think the modifications to the economic structure of the organization are typical. should be expected. and they have a right to do that. so I don't think making condos out of the slips changes the use. and they do have a right to make certain changes to continue to exist. Again. I think the dilemma is the septic. which there's just a lot of concern about. MR. TURNER-Okay. Bob. do you have anything? MR. KARPELES-Well. I agree with. pretty much. everything that's been said. I think that the improvements have got to increase the use. even if it doesn't increase it for the public. I think that the people that are there are going to use the facility more often. Alone. that would increase the usage. MR. TURNER-Okay. Brian? MR. O'DONNELL-I'd like to return to where I started. Regardless of what you do tonight. the people with the power to inspect septic systems are going to go out there and inspect. If you vote this project down or if you vote it up. they're going to be out there. It has nothing to do with the project which before you. and I'd like to focus on the project which is before you. The septic system is separate. and Harris Bay is going to have to deal with that. With respect to the theory that it's going to increase the use. let me ask you to consider it in parts. and ask yourself. will the reduction in the size of the fuel storage tanks and their movement from underground to above ground increase the use? Will the crushed stone walkway. where there's now a parking lot increase the use? Will the movement of the vacuum tank increase the use? - 37 - Will the consolidation and the screening of vending machines increase the use? Will the screening of a recycling dumpster increase the use? And will the addition of a handicapped ramp and decking over the picnic area which is currently there increase the use? If the answer to each of those questions is no. the answer to the entire question is no. and it is no. Harris Bay is a seasonal facility. It's owned by people who have boats. People come up there and they get on their boats and they go boating. That's the reason that they purchased memberships there. As a practical matter. you see people at Harris Bay at the beginning of a weekend and at the end of a weekend. and if you go by there in the summer time. you'll see many boats out. That's what the people at Harris Bay actually do. The proposals which they've made are proposals to spend a substantial amount of money increasing the appearance. but not increasing the use. You're gOing to have the same number of people. all of whom will still be boaters. all of whom will still get on their boats and go boating. MR. CARVIN-I would agree with that assessment. if it was a limited membership to the two hundred and some odd number of slips. MR. O'DONNELL-And it is. MR. CARVIN-However. it is still open to the public. In other words. you still have public facilities that are available. and if a person driving by in a motor boat happens to see that. and it is available. because of anyone improvement. now I can't tell you whether one or all are going to lure another person into that particular marina. but I just know that. as a public facility. that these types of improvements. if taken in total. will increase the usage there. and. as I said. I am very strong that the Use Variance criteria should be applied. In other words. for this Board to make a determination to grant a Use Variance. that there has to be. and I can read the Section. it says. "The Board of Appeals on appeal from the decision or determination of the administrative official charged with the enforcement of such Ordinance or local laws shall have the power to grant Use Variances as defined here in. No such Use Variance shall be granted by a Board of Appeals without a showing by the applicant that the applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. In order to prove such unnecessary hardship. the applicant shall demonstrate to the Board of Appeals that for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulation for the particular district where the property is located that. One. the applicant cannot realize a reasonable return provided by the lack of return is substantial by demonstrated by competent financial evidence. That the alleged hardship relating to the property in question is unique. and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood. and that the requested Use Variance. if granted. will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. and that the alleged hardship has not been self-created. The Board of Appeals. in granting of Use Variances. shall grant the minimum variance that it deems necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proven by the applicant and at the same time. preserve and protect "the character of neighborhood. and the health. safety and welfare of the communi ty. " And if the Board does agree with me that a Use Variance is needed. then I would ask the applicant to address these particular changes in relationship to our criteria for granting a Use Variance. MR. O'DONNELL-Shall I do that now? MR. TURNER-No. I think the first thing is to. MR. CARVIN-I think the first thing that we have to do is determine whether the Use Variance is necessary. MR. TURNER-Whether the Use Variance is necessary. MR. CARVIN-Now. I don't know whether we do that by a vote. or? - 38 - MR. DUSEK-I would recommend a vote. MR. TURNER-Yes. HOTIOR THAT A USB VARIARCB RBGARDIRG APPLICATIOR RO. 111-1993 IS RBCBSSARY. Introduced by Fred Carvin who moved for its adoption. seconded by Theodore Turner: The reasoning is that the cumulative effects of the proposed changes will result in a more extensive utilization of the facilities by both the members of the Harris Bay Yacht Club. but more importantly will increase the potential use by non-members and the general public. Duly adopted this 17th day of March. 1994. by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Karpeles. Mr. Carvin. Miss Hauser. Mr. Thomas. Mr. Maresco. Mr. Turner NOES: Mr. Menter MR. TURNER-A Use Variance is required. The determination is a Use Variance is required. MR. O'DONNELL-Okay. Lets talk for a minute about the criteria. Harris Bay is a member owned facility. At present. there are 210 residents. approximately. who own the slips. some own one. a few own more. The zoning for the facility is Land Conservation 42 acres. and for a portion. it's off the map here. Waterfront Residential One Acre. There is absolutely no permitted use under your zoning law. as it exists today which would allow the owners of that property to have any return of it whatsoever. The price of the membership varies with the size of the slip. and they range from I think 10 is low. I don't know of any that have sold for 10. up to about $40.000. The individuals have a substantial investment in the lake. In addition to the substantial financial investment in the lake. the water source for Harris Bay is the lake. The people's recreation is the lake. They swim in it. They boat in it. They fish in it. The Clubhouse is the facility for the members. and Harris Bay is seeking to bring the Clubhouse up to what the Americans with Disabilities Act requires. that is handicapped access. in the (lost word). in the showers. and the entrance to the building. There is no way at all that that could be accomplished without a ramp. and I believe your current building code requires ingress and egress for multiple access. which is why the configuration that has been proposed has been proposed. It will tie together three of the exits to the building. It will also provide a sitting area over what is now crushed stone picnic area. The facility itself is unique in the Town of Queensbury. and in fact unique on Lake George. There is no other member owned docking facility on Lake George the conditions which require variances at all are not self-imposed. They come with the site. It's a site which. when created. was perfectly proper. and now is subject to zoning restrictions which didn't exist before. The modifications which have been sought are really quite minimal. when you think of the site. Some of them involve reductions in what is currently there. for example. the fuel tanks. The others are aesthetic. for example. the screening of the vending machines and the landscaping and the screening of the vacuum tanks. I submit to you that the facts on the record do not support finding that any of these modifications will increase the use by the members or by anyone else. and I submit that. in order to maintain the financial health of Harris Bay. in order to keep up the value of the property and keep up the tax base necessary to pay the taxes in the Town of Queensbury and for the school district. it's important that Harris Bay be permitted to make aesthetic improvements to its facility. the aesthetic improvements which have been proposed. I submit that we have met the criteria for the granting of the Use Variance. MR. CARVIN-I have a couple of questions. Is the Club currently in - 39 - financial difficulty? MR. O'DONNELL-No. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Will the financial health of the Club be either increased or decreased by these particular improvements? MR. O'DONNELL-I expect that it will be increased. Now. by not being in financial difficulty. what I mean is the Club is paying it's bills. The Club is a not for profit corporation. The source of the Club's funds. overwhelmingly. is the members. and the members have an ownership interest attributable to their dock. but it's an undivided interest in the property as I whole. When I told you. at the outset. that dockominium is not technically correct. it isn't. This is more similar to a co-op. in which the individual owns an interest in the corporation. and the corporation the physical (lost word). In order to make the memberships more valuable. or to have any value stand up over time. it's important to be able to beautify the facility. and to make it accessible to people who may have difficulties moving. and that is the type of thing that Harris Bay is proposing in its capital improvements project. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Now you mentioned taxes. distributed equally among the members? Is the tax burden MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. Harris Bay. in 1993. school district over $40.000 in taxes. gets the tax bills and pays the taxes. the members. paid to Queensbury and the Harris Bay Yacht Club. Inc. The source of the money is MR. CARVIN-Okay. I guess the zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardships. I'm not sure that by moving the tank is the fault of the zoning. I guess. In other words. there's nothing wrong with the tank as it is right now. is that correct? MR. O'DONNELL-The tanks as they are right now meet all applicable regulations. However. they are single wall steel underground fuel storage tanks. Harris Bay proposes to change that because. environmentally. the Club has the feeling that a double wall containment tank is safer. MR. TURNER-There's a pretty good liability with those tanks being in the ground, single wall as they are, isn't that correct. also? MR. O'DONNELL-If they leak. there's a real problem. MR. TURNER-If they leak. MR. O'DONNELL-They have not leaked. They're containment pressure tested. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. O'DONNELL-But if they leak, there's a serious problem, but that's the reason that Harris Bay is proposing to build the double wall containment tank. The reason it's proposed for there is because it's out of the parking area, and here in front of it, we're going to have steel bollards, steel cement bollards. If the tank were to be moved to here, there's flagged wetlands right next to this as well. If the tank were to be placed across the street, it's doubtful that we could get permission from the Department of Transportation to bore under the highway, and across the street is next to flagged wetlands as well. MR. CARVIN-Okay, but, technically. the tank could be replaced in the current location. Is that correct? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes, it could. That's in the middle of the parking lot. One of the things we're trying to accomplish is get it out of - 40 - the parking lot. MR. CARVIN-Okay. but again. I guess what I'm trying to determine is. is that a hardship imposed by the Ordinance. MR. O'DONNELL-This has nothing to do with the Use Variance. This is Area Variance stuff. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. O'DONNELL-And anywhere that tank goes. if the tank were left here. it would violate a setback. MR. TURNER-Yes. that's true. that's shoreline and rear setback. MR. CARVIN-Okay. but I still come down to the hardest thing. in granting this variance. is to protect the character of the neighborhood. the health. safety and welfare of the community. MR. O'DONNELL-If the fuel storage tanks underground leak. the leak is going to contaminate the soil and the water. not just Harris Bay's water. but the area's water. That's the reason that Harris Bay wants to get them out of there. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Again. we're going to keep coming right back to the same issue. and that's issue of the sewage. That's the big stumbling block about granting the Use Variance. because there seems to be significant evidence or comment that the character of the neighborhood would be changed. that the health. safety and welfare of the community is in question. MR. O'DONNELL-One thing that struck me. with the people coming up here to comment. almost to a man. they said. I don't know. but. and then they proceeded to tell you that they didn't like the system. because it has a main that runs along the Department of Transportation's right-of-way. with permit. because it crosses the highway near the DOT culvert. with permit. because it's on a parcel of land that's surrounded by wetlands. but there's no evidence that it's failed. If it does fail. that's an issue that Harris Bay will have to deal with. Regardless of what you do tonight. you can give us permission to do everything we've asked for. You can give us permission to do nothing. The septic system is not an issue in this project. The project before you are the changes that are outlined up there. MR. CARVIN-No. but I think it is an issue before the Board. because before we can grant the variance. I think I want to be satisfied that the health. safety and welfare of the community is not in jeopardy. and I think that the issue is that there will be an expansion of use there. MR. O'DONNELL-I disagree with you there. and I submit there's absolutely no evidence. not a single fact. that's been placed before you. that supports that. not one. MR. DUSEK-If I may jump in here. maybe. I think that the Board. since you've determined that a Use Variance is necessary. I think what you need to do is take a look at what has been offered to you. in terms of proof. testimony. records that are before you concerning the project. and ask yourself the questions that are posed in the law. which is. One. for instance. has the applicant shown you that they can't realize a reasonable return. all right? In other words. forgetting about the sewage for a moment. looking at the facility. they're saying. we want a Use Variance to put these facilities in. Well. in order for you to say. yes. you can do that. the law says you have to look at. can they not realize a reasonable return as they are currently situated? Do they need this to make a reasonable return? Has there been evidence submi tted before you. and the law goes on to say. it must be demonstrated. be substantial as demonstrated by competent financial - 41 - evidence. What do you have for financial evidence before you right now? I know you have the testimony of an attorney. I presume. are you a member of the Club? MR. O'DONNELL-Yes. I am. MR. DUSEK-Okay. So you have an attorney and a member of the Club who's given some testimony as to financial. I don't know whatever else your records show. but the question you have to ask yourself is. has the applicant demonstrated that he cannot realize a reasonable return without these improvements? That's a question for you folks to answer. Number Two is that the hardship relating to the property is unique. Three. that the requested Use Variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Will allowing the various improvements alter the character of the neighborhood. in and of themselves. or you've indicated concerns about an increase in the numbers of people. etc. Four. that the hardship. is it self created. I think if you just ask yourselves those questions as compared to exactly what the variance is. you may be able to work yourselves right through the process easier. and obviously if one of those or all of those elements haven't been shown. then that would indicate you to one result. If you feel all of those elements have been shown. then you'll go to another result. Then you have to ask yourselves last. I guess. is it the minimum. I think you've got to get through the first four questions first. I think. in looking at the general Use Variance that's been requested. just go right down through and either they've been met or they haven't been met by the proof that's before you. MISS HAUSER-I don't think that we can answer some of those questions unless we have more information on the septic system. It's been brought up in different meetings by different people that the septic system is adequate or it's not inadequate. but we don't have any records as to what is actually there. and the point was brought up tonight. has the Town collected information on the water inspections. If the Town hasn't. maybe the applicant can provide us with that information. because I can't answer the se other questions unless I know something about the water quality and how it's being effected. MR. O'DONNELL-As far as I know. all the tests that have been taken by any agency with the authority to go out there and take it have shown that the system is working properly. Harris Bay. to my knowledge. has never received an order to close or to do anything with the septic system. In the course of this project. we have looked for engineering drawing of the septic system. and weren't able to find any. It was put in before Harris Bay Yacht Club became Harris Bay Yacht Club. We have talked to the people who put it in. and we've been told what the system contains. It's the pump and the line. and there are septic tanks gOing into leaching tanks. MISS HAUSER-And what are the size of those tanks? MR. O'DONNELL-Thousand gallon tanks. MISS HAUSER-How many? MR. O'DONNELL-Three. MISS HAUSER~To support 210 boats? MR. TURNER-The membership's 271. that's the total amount of slips. and there's 15 slips that they rent in the summer. Is that correct? MR. O'DONNELL-We understand. also. that this leach field is firm in clay. and I don't know whether sand was imported or whether it was natural soil that was out there. In considering the use of the septic system. you have to consider how the facility is used. and - 42 - that is primarily on the weekends. On the weekends, you get heavy use. During the week, very little use, and in the months outside of June, July, and August, very little use at all. MR. KARPELES-Have you ever considered going to holding tanks? From all the testimony here tonight, it would appear that that's the accepted practice. Have you investigated the price? MR. O'DONNELL-No, we have not. MR. KARPELES-It would seem as though that would make your neighbors much happier. MR. O'DONNELL-Obviously, this year there's going to have to be an investigation, because we're going to be crawling with septic inspectors, but up to this point, no. The system, as far as we know, is functioning as it was designed to do, and functioning properly, and we know of no evidence to the contrary. MR. KARPELES-Well, I think just the fact of when it was put in and what it was put in for, the number of people, will raise questions right off the bat, as to whether it's adequate or not. MR. O'DONNELL-It's my understanding that it was put in at a time when the size of the facility was essentially the same as it is today, and the fact that a boat is 26 feet as opposed to 20 feet doesn't do anything for the size of the septic system. It's the number of boats. MR. KARPELES-Age alone would have an effect on the septic system. MR. O'DONNELL-As I said, regardless of what you do tonight, the system is going to get inspected, and, in fact, last night I was in a meeting at the North Queensbury Firehouse where Warren County was discussing its overall Master Plan to deal with sewage disposal in the Lake George Basin. Harris Bay's Board of Directors would be very supportive of a sewer system, and one of the things that ~ think should be done by the engineers doing this Environmental Impact Study is a failure analysis of all the systems in that area and the Lake George Basin. One of the options they're going to consider is the doing nothing option, and they should know how the systems are working, not just Harris Bay's, all of them. Lets face it, the water quality in Lake George is effected not just by septic systems, and not just by Harris Bay's septic system. It's effected by stormwater runoff to a much greater extent, and nothing in this project and nothing any of us here tonight can do is going to change that. The project is just what's been proposed to you. MR. CARVIN-If the Use Variance were turned down, to what extent do you think the Club would suffer a financial setback? MR. O'DONNELL-If the Use understanding that the Use the shed, and nothing else. and that's my understanding that? Variance was turned down, it's my Variance is required for the deck and That's all Mr. Martin's told me about, of your resolution. Am I correct about MR. TURNER-The tank is an Area Variance. MR. CARVIN-The tank is an Area Variance? MR. TURNER-Yes, and the shed's an Area Variance. MR. CARVIN-It's listed under the Use. MR. TURNER-The tank is? MR. CARVIN-Yes, a 6,000 gallon concrete above ground fuel tank. That's under the Use Variance. - 43 - MR. TURNER-That's the general description. That's a general description of the whole project. but if you look over here and read the other. MR. CARVIN-That's for the Area Variance. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-That's for the setbacks. MR. TURNER-Yes. the setbacks of the tank. yes. MR. CARVIN-But again. if it ~ turned down. would you have any idea of what the financial impact might be? MR. O'DONNELL-It would not be positive. I can tell you that. In dollars and cents. I can't. and I also can't tell you whether Harris Bay's Board would simply abandon the project. do absolutely none of this stuff and continue to operate just as it has been. MR. CARVIN-Well. if the Use Variance ~ passed. do you have any concrete financial documents that would support your position? MR. O'DONNELL-The cost of the slips. the number of the slips. is concrete evidence to the value. I do not have an analysis of how the values would change with the additions. It's quite subjective. The changes will make the place appear nicer. It's not going to get any more people in there. The people who are there will have a nicer looking facility and a nicer functioning facility. That I expect will enhance the value of the memberships. but I don't believe that there's any way to tell you how much. MR. TURNER-You're claiming you're paying $40.000 in taxes. To what degree does the sale of gasoline and other products contribute to the overall picture. the income of the Club? MR. O'DONNELL-The sale of gasoline is about $50.000 a year. MR. CARVIN-And you said that that's a substantial portion. before. I believe? MR. TURNER-Yes. That's what he said. MR. CARVIN-The majority is sold to the members? MR. O'DONNELL-The majority of gas is sold to the members. but a significant portion of it is sold to other people. MR. CARVIN-Okay. I guess I want. the $50.000. is that a total figure. or is that just the genera~ public? MR. O'DONNELL-That's a total figure. MR. CARVIN-Okay. and. again. how would you define substantial? We have to have competent financial evidence. I mean. substantial could be anything from one percent to fifty percent. MR. O'DONNELL-I'm not certain of the figure. I believe probably non members purchase around 25 percent of gasoline. MR. TURNER-Okay. Does anyone else have anything else? Okay. Are we going to move it? MR. MENTER-Just to clarify this. the Use Variance is referring only to the shed and the deck. right? None? MR. TURNER-No. MR. CARVIN-No. no. broader. According to the application. it's much - 44 - MR. TURNER-They've got the tank listed. MR. CARVIN-Basically, the Use Variance, if I've got the right one. I mean, I've got about 14 corrections here. MR. MENTER-Those were the two areas right? Jim, wasn't that the original and the deck, they were the two Variance? that were cited as required, interpretation, that the shed things that required a Use MR. MARTIN-That's correct. MR. CARVIN-The attached narrative, the proposed use of the property, no change is proposed. improvements are to upgrade the quality of the facility. So I think, by implication, so, is a reasonable return is possible if the land is not used as zoned, and then, see attached narrative. There's no, the narrative goes into all of the areas. MR. MENTER-I'm just trying to isolate the points of that Variance, because they're sort of all tossed together in the same, in the Use Variance application. MR. TURNER-I think the Use Variance applies to just what it says, the deck and the shed. The tank is an Area Variance, because they already have a tank there, and they just want to move it so they're violating the setback. MR. MENTER-Right. That's my interpretation of what's going on. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. MENTER-It doesn't seem to be documented quite that way, though. MR. TURNER-No. MR. CARVIN-It sure isn't. MR. TURNER-It's just a general narrative telling you the same thing twice. MR. CARVIN-Well, does that also include the sidewalk, or the walkway? MR. MARTIN-Ted, were you going to read the letters in before you get much farther? MR. TURNER-Yes. Lets go ahead with the letters. MR. CARVIN-Okay. MR. TURNER-We're going to try to condense the letters and just try to highlight the issues that are in the letters and who they're from, because we've got quite a few letters. CORRESPORDBRCB MISS HAUSER-Okay. The first is from Dr. Robert Evans, it says. "I've been following the Harris Bay Yacht Club for nearly 10 years. I have walked the current septic line multiple times and through the years this has been repaired time after time. We have had mul tiple evidences of leaks from this line in the past and how Harris Bay ever got permission from the DEC to put this expansive line beneath the road, up the swamp and got away with the current system they are using is beyond me. In any event and without question from all I have read in their current application it appears that there will be increasing use in this area. I have seen this club under water year after year and they really should have a holding tank that is pumped out. It is questionable whether the marginal system they are using really is currently operating. - 45 - The current septic system is certainly inadequate by 1990 for standards. I would strongly urge the board to review their application in light of the increasing use and the need to bring them up to date in terms of 1994 standards for septic treatment. I would also appreciate being present at the time of the next hearing. Perhaps your office could contact me. Sincerely. Robert L. Evans. D.O." That was dated March 10th. The second is from Charles Locke. it's dated March 17th. It says. "I am the third generation in my family to have been raised every summer at our home on Hillman Road. Cleverdale. I wish to add my voice to the chorus of neighbors who oppose the request of the Harris Bay Yacht Club ("HBYC") for an Area and Use Variance. Certainly. improvements by a property owner are to be encouraged provided they do not adversely effect the Lake or the neighboring properties. However. no single property in the past ten years has impacted Harris Bay more than the HBYC. It is indisputable that the boat traffic has increased significantly over the years due to its presence and expansion. I share the very real concern that the proposed changes to the HBYC's facilities will exacerbate the boat and traffic congestion. and. most importantly. further burden the ecology of the Bay. I understand that HBYC does not propose any improvements to its existing septic system and that a review of the system is not permitted in the absence of any anticipated increase in utilization of the facilities. I fervently hope that the Planning Board will consider all of the proposed changes as a whole in determining whether they will result in increased usage. Taken in context. the proposed modifications to the parking area. walkways. addition of a covered terrace. and any improvements to the interior effecting or expanding the kitchen or rest room facilities. will no doubt make the facility more attractive. In so doing. however. it will necessarily increase utilization. Although technically the HBYC may be a "not-for-profit" organization. it is by no means a private club in the same sense as the Lake George Club. but rather. it clearly encourages public use (i.e. fuel sales and sewage pump-out services) and derives a portion of its revenues from the public. The prospect of the Club eventually providing means and/or entertainment to the public as well as to members and guests on the proposed terrace conjures images of the crowds at establishments such as the Algonquin in Bolton Landing. The argument that these improvements will not increase usage and. hence. not effect the septic situation in our fragile Bay is not credible. It flies in the face of the experiences encountered by other locales on the Lake. Secondly. those portions of the HBYC's proposal which effect the ambiance of this predominantly residential area should not be permitted. In such instances. there are alternative means to accomplish the Club's goals. For example. the proposed lighting of the parking area using high pressure sodium vapor lights mounted on twenty foot poles would certainly be a disturbance to the immediate neighbors and would create a shopping mall climate. Instead. low level lighting would accomplish the same purpose without impinging on the Club's neighbors or creating an eyesore for residents and visitors travelling along Route 9L. Similarly. allowing the Club to place vending machines and garish signage (i. e. neon and florescent advertising) only serves to denigrate the Adirondack ambience of this residential community. Surely machines and signage could be located inside the Club's facilities. We. the residents and homeowners of Harris Bay. look to you and members of the Planning Board as the "guardians" of the environment and bucolic character of this Bay. Our area remains a model of controlled growth and change while maintaining the unspoiled nature of our area. I am not opposed to progress or improvement but I am very wary of the blight of "creeping commercialism" which has effected other regions around the Lake. Thusfar. our residential area has retained its original character. As I am sure you are aware. decisions by your Department can and will have a long lasting effect on our quality of life and are not easily reversed. Please consider carefully the ramifications of the HBYC's proposals. When you do. I hope you will decline to approve the requested variances for the reasons stated so that we may preserve the ecology and beauty of Harris Bay - 46 - for future generations. Very truly yours. Charles T. Locke" The next letter is from John Skinner. III. who spoke tonight. "I am very disturbed to see the proposed changes for Harris Bay Yacht Club. The situation there is already a travesty. The flooding that occurs over ground that is covered with the oil and grease from cars and boats parked there in the summer and winter. cause these elements to enter the lake. I can't imagine where the septic goes from this operation. If you look at early aerial photos of Lake George sites where fill has been used you can see where it has fil tered into the lake. Adding fill to this area is not the solution. This facility is in an area of very delicate balance because it is a wetland area. so anything done here should have the closest scrutiny of all agencies involved. I happen to live on Cleverdale and the depth of the water does not exceed fifty feet between the point and Long Island. I have a submersive water pump with a filter in the basement. In the summer the large cruisers from Harris Bay churn up the bottom so much that I must change my filter weekly. These large boats and increased usage will carry the fill further and further into an already distressed bay. You might want to look at the Freshwater Institutes study of the lake. It doesn't bode well for the future. and I believe it mandates you to make very careful decisions where Lake George is concerned. Lake George is too important to the economy of the region. and something we need to care for as we care for our children. because they are our future. Respectfully. John Skinner III. Cleverdale. NY John Skinner. Sr. Pilot Knob. NY" The next person who was not here this evening. Charles Freihofer. III. letter's dated March 8th. written to Joe Roulier. "Dear Joe. Thank you for sharing your letter of March 7th and the related material of February 22nd relative to The Harris Bay Yacht Club application with me. While I am all in favor of anyone improving their property. especially for the good of the community. there are some points here which I think do merit some special consideration. 1. I found the issue regarding the fill to be interesting and I might say from observations along the Intercoastal Waterway. sadly on the mark. If my suspicions are correct they will most likely be confirmed by. as you suggest. a thorough evaluation by (more) qualified persons. 2. The septic system also poses an interesting. to me at least. questions. If your points are accurate. one can only surmise that the authorities (Lake George Park Commission?) have ignored both the issue and their responsibility. which from what I've seen in some other instances does not surprise me. The good news. however. is that this is Queensbury; and we both know from experience that Queensbury will enforce the rules. 3. The sign issue is sadly humorous - "Lake George Village comes to the East Side". Sounds like the time is finally right for us to open that T-Shirt Shop up on Assembly Point. Your position is of course correct but... 4. The tax situation is quite intriguing and I'm sure that if pursued could provide employment for several attorneys until something more lucrative comes along. Seriously. Joe. this is not an easy one. As I recall. the boat slips at Harris Bay were sold to individuals on a sort of condominium type basis; as a matter of fact I distinctly remember hearing the term "boataminium" as first being applied to this project. If so. the question then naturally follows - why are they not valued and taxed individually to the owner like condominiums and houses. Of course. the value of the boat (at least those with live aboard facilities) should be included. You are not going to make any friends by raising this one Joe. On the one hand. you are going to alienate those who live on the boats - a $100.000+ (in many cases) residence with for all practical purposes. no property taxes. Not bad! On the other hand are an awful lot of Queensbury residents living in a lot less than a $100.000 boat who are paying their property taxes and are already unhappy with those who live up at the lake; and if they found out about this... Well. Joe . it could be messy. There are several matters which you raised which I did not address because I believe that they can be very easily and satisfactorily resolved. It is important to keep in mind that you are dealing with several very separate issues here; and they should not be considered as a "package" or you stand to lose some in compromising. One last - 47 - observation. Experience in other areas compels me to ask why, when one considers the proximity to large areas which must be considered "wetlands", these situations even exist. Hopefully, the authorities will correct the situation now; leaving it to the future will only make the inevitable more costly and unpleasant for all (except the attorneys). Yours truly, Charles" The next letter is dated March 14th, from Theodore Arnstein, "Dear Mr. Martin: I have spent 71 summers on Harris Bay (not counting the Way Years) The Boat Yard now known as Harris Bay should never have been built in the first place. It is on filled land which is an important wetlands area. Any "improvements" or changes only encourages more use of this facility to detriment of Lake George. Harris Bay unlike Dunhams Bay is very shallow particularly for the first mile. On summer weekends the bottom is so churned up that one can not see deeper than 2 or 3 feet as opposed to 20 or 30 feet in the off season. Large clumps of seaweed cut by boat propellers pile up on my small beach. Rocks and boat bottoms are covered by algae partly stirred up by boat movements from this large boat storage. Please do not let them expand further. Send the message that we want to keep Lake George at least the way it is. Much of the tax base in Queensbury (about 1/3 comes from lake front properties not to mention the Town's economy) depends on the quality and value of properties. Say no our children (yours and mine) will thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas G. Arnstein P.S. I know from our service together last summer on the sewer committee that you see the danger of the constant expansion on the Lake. Here is something that can be done about it." The next letter is from Robert O'Brien, March 15th, 1994. It says, "I am a year-long resident of Cleverdale in the Town of Queensbury, and I am concerned with any change to the HBYC in the form of Area Variance or Use Variance. My reasons are numerous: 1 - As you know, this entire premise was born from a swamp. All one has to do is drive past this marina in the early Spring, and one views most of the facility under from one to three feet of water. What affect does this have on our lake waters, specifically from the oil and gas, plus other debris left over from the daily and seasonal use of the premises? 2 - Septic and sewage problems - I personally have observed foul sewage and sewer odors from the south side of Route 9L, directly opposite this premises. I can't believe the wet lands are being properly protected. 3- Traffic congestion during the summer is already too much! Many weekends, if not everyone between July 4th and Labor Day, cars are parked on the shoulders of Route 9L causing a serious safety problem. I could recite other problems which exist under current conditions, and which should have been addressed before now, and which have not. However, it is very clear to me that allowing any Variance to either Area or Use, would only further increase the existing concerns enumerated above. As a resident of the Town of Queensbury; a tax payer; a voter; and last but in no way least, a lover of Lake George, please do not approve these Variances, but indeed, encourage the proper use for not only short term, but long term a well, of the existing facilities at the HBYC. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Robert J. O'Brien Cleverdale, NY" The next letter is dated March 12th, and it's from Richard Meyer. It says, "Dear Mr. Martin: I am writing in opposition to application of Harris Bay Yacht Club as a resident on Harris Bay. More specifically I raise the following objections: 1. The purpose of the deck and awning is to increase the use of the facili ty. This will increase the load on the septic system, increase traffic congestion & increase noise level. It will especially appeal to pump out customers putting an even greater load on the septic system. 2. The fuel tank will be obvious and ugly. It will be too close to the lake thus increasing impact of spill from tank and loading tankers. Why not put it across the street where both tank and tankers will be out of the way and less likely to affect traffic, environment and aesthetics? 3. The lighting is too much and too high. We don't need every homeowner in the neighborhood to be bothered by such a glow in the sky. 4. An attractive building sign will be an improvement but only if you get rid of the gas and other ugly, garish neon signs that exist. 5. Fill addition will not solve their problem. They are on a bog - 48 - ----- ----- _._---_.__._.~_._, which continually subsides with their heavy use. Adding fill will merely force additional organic bog material out into the water of the lake. Don't allow it. 6. The most critical item is the septic system. Do you know that the existing system is safe for current use? I think not. Before increasing septic load due to increased use you must test the existing system under full load use and do whatever is necessary to make it safe. We draw our water from Harris Bay and I don't want to drink their waste especially with the added chemicals due to come from increased pump out use. Their are serious defects and oversights in this application and if you don't correct them who will? Sincerely. Richard A. Meyer" the next letter is dated March 11th. from Raymond Roulier. "This letter is to object to those items proposed by the Harris Bay Yacht Club as outlined in the Variance Application for what they refer to as "site improvements". 1 - A waterfront walkway will require more crushed stone fill. Year after year "HBYC" continues to fill the Lake in order to provide parking space for its members. The continued addition of crushed stone is compressing the silt that has accumulated for years and pushing it out further in the bay. In essence not only are they limiting the purifying factor of this sil t. but they are literally filling in the Lake. 2. Proposed fuel tank location. If a new tank is to be installed let it be well away from the Lake. In spite of certain precautions. accidents resulting in leaks seeping into the Lake are always a possibility and should be a foremost consideration. 3. Parking Lot Light - Forget it. Who needs a "Super Market Parking Lot". The area was meant to be attractive. The same goes for the building mounted sign. Leave the lights and the signs at the Village. While it is not part of the proposal I would suggest that the town inspect the Septic System currently in use by HBYC. It is my understanding that there are 271 dock spaces. and they all appear to be filled. If each space is represented by a member and their guests in many instances the septic system is getting a work out well beyond the capacity of the system. Where does the overflow go? In the Lake. In addition to the personal use of the restroom facilities the HBYC also provides a pump out service not only to its members but also to the general public. Now we're talking serious sewage. I live on Harris Bay. It's a beautiful bay. I would like to see it remain so. The HBYC should be restricted from going any farther than it has for the good of the Lake and the surrounding area. Sincerely. Raymond J. Roulier P.O. Box 233 Cleverdale. N.Y." Another letter on March 11th. from an Ed and Marge Doyle "I would like to take the opportunity to add my comments to the Harris Bay Yacht Club improvements. The Lake and surrounding environments are currently threatened by the Harris Bay Yacht Club (HBYC) and its acti vi ties. Si te Improvements as outlined in the Variance Application Project Narrative would promote increased use of the HBYC facility. Increased use in all probability will lead to environmental violations. These violations could be avoided if the Board chooses to deny the request for improvements. Property Owners in the lower Harris Bay area suffer from lower property values due to the presence of the Harris Bay Yacht Club ( i. e.) Visual Impact (size) noise from activities. and heavy boat traffic in lower Harris Bay. Improvements as suggested in the HBYC Narrative will promote increased use of the HBYC. and further aggravate the situation as described above. Thanking you for the opportunity to comment. E. Doyle 129 Roosevelt Rd. Hyde Park. NY 12538" Next letter is from Karl Kroetz who spoke this evening. "Dear Mr. Martin: I am very concerned about the action the Planning Board has taken in regard to the proposed 5 to 7 year Master Plan to upgrade and rehabilitate the facilities of the Harris Bay Yacht Club (HBYC). It was shocking to me to be present at the February 22 meeting of the Planning Board to see them give SEQR approval for the project. Those of us who live at Harris Bay and are familiar with the problems. believe that the approval of this project will have a detrimental short term and long term impact on the lake. The HBYC is by far the largest marina on the lake. with the dockage for 272 boats. most of which are equipped with toilets. cooking facilities. etc. The sewage disposal system for all these boats. plus the - 49 - clubhouse toilet facilities and the public boat pump-out facilities. all ends up across the road in the wetlands. All of the other area marinas (Mooring Post. Castaway. Lake George Boat. Co.. Dunhams Bay Boat Co.. Fisher's Marina) have boat pump-out facilities which discharge into holding tanks. The sewage is then taken by tank truck to a proper disposal site away from the lake. It is inconceivable to me that the Town Attorney and Planning Board agreed with the HBYC position that the Town has no authority to determine or even discuss the adequacy of the present sewage disposal system. May I remind you of the hundreds of people who live along the shores of Harris Bay that depend on the lake for their drinking water. I respectfully request that the Town not approve any part of the HBYC Master Plan until the Town can determine that the existing sewage system is not polluting the lake or the wetlands. and that it can also safely handle the increase in activity and use resulting from the proposed 5 to 7 year Master Plan. Sincerely. Karl C. Kroetz" The next letter is from Judy and William Wetherbee. It's dated March 16th. "We write to express our profound concerns over and objections to the proposed rehabilitation and renovation measures described and discussed in the Harris Bay Yacht Club's Variance Application Project Narrative submitted to the Town of Queensbury. We have been Harris Bay property owners since 1962 and have been year-round permanent residents of that property since 1976. We believe that the Harris Bay Yacht Club's lengthy period of development and growth and its many "improvement projects" have served only to damage and/or destroy the environment and ecology of Harris Bay and the southeast basin of Lake George. It is time for our governmental representatives to demonstrate wisdom and fortitude to say. with respect to this facility. "Enough is enough." We have reviewed the Variance Application Project Narrative as well as written narrative responses forwarded to the Queensbury Planning Board by the Lake George Association. Mr. John Salvador. Jr.. and Mr. Joseph Roulier. While we do not represent ourselves as scientists or environmental engineers. a few common sense observations are blatantly obvious to all residents of Harris Bay and anyone else who has the interest to observe the impact that the Harris Bay Yacht Club has had and continues to have upon this locality. The facility is a source of alarming visual pollution. Efforts to maintain the grounds. especially the parking areas. have produced consequences which surely have compromised the quality of Harris Bay and its waters. The degree and nature of marine traffic which the facility generates are a continuing source of shoreline damage. erosion. and related problems. Despite the Project Narrative's implicit contentions that the proposed steps are intended only to address problems at or with the facility. the actual consequences are not difficult to project: growth. more (or continued) threats to the environment. added visual pollution. and further indifference to those who own property and reside on Harris Bay. In all probabili ty. had current-day environmental knowledge. thinking. and standards existed when what is now the Harris Bay Yacht Club was conceived. it is highly unlikely that anything other than the original wetlands would now exist at that location. Clearly. it does exist and it is going to neither recede nor "go away". However. does this mean we must ignore what history has taught us about the fragile nature of the environment? We believe it is time that the objectives of the Harris Bay Yacht Club be measured against the concerns of all citizens. not only its owners and members. We. like other Harris Bay residents. lack the resources which a business can muster to employ legal counsel to prepare polished narratives which seemingly respond to variance requirements. However. our resources are being used to finance governmental representatives and agencies whose task it is to balance the equation between power and people. It is our hope and expectation that you will respond to this challenge accordingly. Thank you. Sincerely. Judy S. Wetherbee William B Wetherbee" Another letter by Linda and Mark McCollister. It's dated March 16th. "Dear Mr. Martin: We are writing to register our opposition to the changes proposed by the HBYC. We are deeply concerned by this obvious attempt to avoid public scrutiny of the project by - 50 - submi tting this application in the off season. when many area residents are away. This concern is compounded by the revelation that an upgrade of the existing septic system is. technically considered ·unnecessary· and the ridiculously low tax assessment on this commercial property. Having recently found it necessary to replace our septic tank. we are well aware of the demands placed upon a homeowner to comply with these regulations. How can any responsible town official claim that a review of the sewage system. for a facility with this concentration of use - is not required? Now we discover this facility and the many boat owners are taxed but a small fraction of our rates and they expect relief from town setback requirements. The tax assessment on this property is an insul t to every shoreline property owner in North Queensbury. Despite HBYC claims to the contrary. these changes will encouraged increase use of this facility. There is no other reasonable justification for this level of expenditure. In the last few years we have witnessed first hand. persistent increases in the size of boats docked and stored at this facility. This increase in size must translate into more people. more pump-outs and more traffic. Just look at the number of boats stored in-the-water. this year; Too big to remove? Too large for the storage area available? Perhaps the actual number of boat slips has not increased. but we all know there are many more people using this facility. These may sound like emotional arguments. unrelated to the technical issues - but they frame our feelings about the specific changes. We wish to record our express objections to the following; Fuel Tank Location: We are opposed to the installation of an above ground fuel tank on the property North of RT. 9L. This will be an eye-sore and is unnecessary. The existing location has worked well for years and there is ample real estate across the road if an above ground tank is necessary. Bxpanded Deck & Awning: There are no doubt several more effective means to add ramp access to the clubhouse. without expanding the deck. awning and fill along the shoreline. This condition existed when the facility was purchased. there is no hardship that should warrant a variance. Lighting: Improved lighting may be appropriate. but we oppose the addition of 12' high fixtures or other such arrangements. This will result in general illumination of the entire area. creating an ugly night-time glow for all area residents. Accent lightening of the clubhouse you've got to be kidding I Shed: We oppose the expansion of this shed for vending machines. Here again. there is ample space in the existing facility for this type of service. This expansion is merely for convenience and there is no hardship that would necessitate a variance from setback requirements. Frankly. the entire plan seems destine to promote a significant increase in the commercial activity of this facility. Every aspect is intended to create more convenient access. for boat owners and the general public. As year-round residents. we look to the Town of Queensbury to provide leadership in enforcing Town laws and protecting our environment & community. We urge you to reject the HBYC proposal and to insist upon a plan of action that complies with our zoning ordinances. Sincerely. Linda McCollister Mark McCollister" MR. TURNER-All right. What's the Board feel as far as the Use Variance goes? Do you want to deal with it tonight. or do you want to review it? MR. THOMAS-I'd rather chew on it for awhile. MR. TURNER-I kind of would myself. MR. MENTER-I would just like to make one comment. and this 1s something. also. that should be chewed on for awhile. It seems like there may be an opportunity somewhere here. if Harris Bay is willing to work something out. perhaps. with the septic. or at least discuss it. rather than possibly just deny the whole thing and leave things status quo as they are. There may be an opportunity to give and take where you could have an end. better situation than you have. rather than just leave it go. however that works. - 51 - MR. TURNER-Clean up the whole situation. MR. MENTER-Well, yes, if that's something that can be worked into that, beneficial to both interests. That's not something that I'm talking about doing tonight, but it's just that, if there's an opportunity there, I'd hate to see that passed up. MR. CARVIN-While we're chewing, I'd like to throw out the issue of, that this situation will probably evolve over several years, and I know that I have somewhat of a challenge about granting a blank check, essentially, or passing a variance on something that may not be constructed for several years down the line. So if we're going to be chewing, I think we ought to be chewing on that. MR. TURNER-Yes. I know at the Planning Board, on the SEQRA Review level, that they indicated seven years was more appropriate than what they asked for, I think, initially. MR. O'DONNELL-We didn't ask for a specific period of time. MR. TURNER-Well, you indicated, I think somebody said something about five years, and you said, no, I'd rather have seven years. MR. O'DONNELL-Initially, Harris Bay's Board was thinking this would take five years. The length of time it takes is going to depend on the cost, because the money's being raised through the membership. Your regulations permit and actually require an applicant to come before you with the entire project and get whatever permits are required at one point, and then go forward. Under your regulations, as long as the applicant starts the project within a year of the granted permit, it has as long as it needs to finish it, and that's what Harris Bay is seeking. MR. TURNER-That's your position, then? MR. O'DONNELL-That's our position. MR. TURNER-Okay. MR. CARVIN-I don't know if we want to address it in the whole or in the part, is what it basically boils down to. MR. TURNER-Does anyone else have any feelings about it? MR. MENTER-Referring to what, on the whole or on the part, the separate issues, there? MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-In other words, fine. If they feel that the deck is what the project's going to be this year, then the deck is granted, and then the next year, if they're going to feel that the gas tank is going to be the issue, then, fine, grant it at that point. MR. MARTIN-This came up in the past, at some point in the discussion of this, and I suggested, I can't remember if it was to this Board or the Planning Board, because they have Site Plan Review over this. I feel very uncomfortable, as an enforcement agent for the Town, given what I've seen in the past happen, that we would give approval to such a project of such length and magnitude. Although Brian is correct about the time frames that he just quoted, you also have the power, as you know, with certain conditions that would place maybe a conceptual approval. at this point, with a final approval of the phase in the future to come at that point when it's going to actually be put into place. So I think it was the Planning Board I suggested that conceptual approval be given to the later phases, then require the applicant to come back for final approval, because who knows what the enforcement will be at that time, who the person will be checking on that, how thorough the understanding will be of the intent and - 52 - feeling of the Board at that time. several years down the road. I just think it would be better to have them come back and even if it's. essentially. a short presentation. reiterating what was said ini tia11y. I think it would be worth while. at least from an enforcement standpoint. to make sure that what was actually approved is actually put in place seven years down the road. MR. O'DONNELL-Let me suggest to you. that's not necessary. What Harris Bay has done is come to the Town of Queensbury with the entire program now. If permits are granted. that's what Harris Bay is permitted to do and that's what Harris Bay is going to go do. It's not going to change two years from now or three years from now. Requiring Harris Bay to come back multiple times is going to do two things. It's going to increase the time and expense that you and Harris Bay has to put into this. and it's gOing to delay the project. because whatever money is required to go into soft costs. is not available to do the improvements. The facts aren't going to change. The project isn't going to change. If the Town enforcement people want to take a look at what's being proposed. that's what it's going to be and that's what it's going to stay. The entire record is here. They can come out two years from now. three years from now. however many years from now. and take a look. and see whether what was done is what was permitted. Multiple trips through the Planning process are not going to add anything of value to this. MR. TURNER-I don't think it's necessary for you to come back every time. but I do say this. and I agree with Fred. I think over the long haul. I think what should happen is you should have your phases organized. You should come and get your permit for your phase. your first phase. when that's completed. and they inspect it. and you meet all the criteria for that phase. then you get your next phase. and do it that way. Not make you come back. MR. MENTER-And not subject to full review each time? MR. TURNER-No. no. not make them come back. but if they change it. then they come back. MR. O'DONNELL-If the project is changed. obviously. we'd have to come back. MR. TURNER-Right. you'd have to come back. but I'm saying. every time you start a phase. you finish that phase. you don't go to the next phase until it's totally inspected. you meet the criteria for that phase. then you go to the next phase. MR. O'DONNELL-I don't think Harris Bay would have a problem with that. as long as Harris Bay gets. MR. TURNER-I mean. that would give them a handle on it. They'd know what you had to do the first phase. and so on. and every initial phase after that. MR. O'DONNELL-As long as Harris Bay gets all the permits that are required up front. I don't think there's any problem in putting off Phase II until Phase I is completed. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. O'DONNELL-What I want to avoid is multiple trips through this process. with the uncertainty and expense that is involved. MR. TURNER-Right. I don't think you have to come back. like you say. unless you change something. and then you'll have to come back. MR. O'DONNELL-Right. If we change something. we'll have to come back. - 53 - MR. TURNER-Yes. MRS. MONAHAN-Mr. Chairman. may I ask a question, please? Did if Harris Bay gets all their permits now, and construction of one phase doesn't start until seven years from now, will he be bound to do only today's standards. or will he have to comply with any increased standards that we make around the lakes at that time? MR. O'DONNELL-If I may, Mr. Chairman, we're applying under the Zoning Ordinance as it exists today. Your law allows us to make that application and requires you to act on it. Once the permit is granted. if we start within a year, under your law, we're allowed to continue, and you're required to allow us to continue. MR. TURNER-He's right. MRS. MONAHAN-That may give you a clue as to why he's asking for permission for what may not be done until seven years from now. I ask you to look at this Town, and if all this Town were developed under our standards seven years back, what kind of conditions would we have in the Town? MR. O'DONNELL-The reason I'm asking for the period of time is if Harris Bay was rolling in money and it was no object, we could do all this in a year. That's not the case. MR. TURNER-Yes. but obviously some of it you can't do, you can't do in the summer months anyway. MR. O'DONNELL-Right. MR. TURNER-You're limited by the situation that exists there. So you have to do them in the spring and in the fall, some of it. MR. O'DONNELL-Right. MR. TURNER-But I'm saying to Betty, you know, what he's got in front of us is this right here, and that's all he's going to get, if he gets it, and if he changes it, he's got to come back and see the powers to be at the time he changes it. MRS. MONAHAN-I'm just concerned about standards that may change around the lake in the years, stormwater, etc., and so on. MR. TURNER-I hear you. MISS HAUSER-I'm definitely against giving them approval for a seven year period. MR. TURNER-Okay. MISS HAUSER-I have a further comment. Last night. we made a man reposition his house because one neighbor made a complaint. We have sixteen letters here, and we have people in this audience. and we better seriously consider their concerns that they've brought here tonight. MR. TURNER-Okay. Anyone else? MR. O'DONNELL-Hiss Hauser. Twenty-six members of Harris Bay are Queensbury residents. MISS HAUSER-Then they should have come in support. MR. O'DONNELL-That's what I'm here for. The number of people telling you the same thing doesn't make it more or less true. HR. CARVIN-Are we going to table this? opinion? Is that the general - 54 - MR. TURNER-It is. I think there's just too much here to look at. and I think we've got to. MR. CARVIN-Okay. Well. I didn't know if we were going to reopen this. whether we were. because I don't think the applicant has demonstrated competent financial evidence. which is the criteria for Use. here. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-And whether he'd be given the opportunity to present that information. and any arguments with regards to our Use Variance criteria. MR. TURNER-He can if he wishes. MR. DUSEK-I think if you're going to get back into further proof. then you're looking at. really. scheduling another public hearing going through the process. I think the proof the applicant had has been submitted. and I thought you were past that point. otherwise. you really have to go back through and do the whole procedure. MR. CARVIN-Well. that's my question. As it stands right now. I don't feel comfortable that competent financial information has been provided. MR. DUSEK-That was his job. and if he didn't do it. then. MR. CARVIN-I mean. if the opinion is that we move this. in order words. to mull this over and decide on a motion. based upon what we've got. MR. TURNER-Anyone else? MR. MENTER-I think I'm afraid that I'd have to agree with Fred. as much as I hate to. I mean. that is the position that we're in. We are determining on the Use Variance. and based on what we've heard. I don't see where they failed to realize a reasonable return. I don't think that's been shown. I personally think he's going to have a tough time doing that. given further time. MR. TURNER-Okay. So lets table this thing and mull it over. and we'll give him a decision. MR. CARVIN-Until when? MR. TURNER-We've got 45 days. correct. from the time the application is submitted. after the public hearing is closed. 45 days? MR. DUSEK-Let me checked. MR. MARTIN-It's been revised. It's 62 days now. MR. TURNER-That's from the time you close the public hearing though? MR. MARTIN-That's right. You have two 62 day time frames now. when the application is received. to open the public hearing. then once the public hearing's closed. to make your decision. HR. DUSEK-The Board shall decide upon appeal within 62 days after the conduct of the hearing. MR. MARTIN-The thought being they give you two 31 day time frames. MR. TURNER-Right. So we've got 62 days. right? MR. CARVIN-Okay. I guess my natural extension of the question would be. does the Board feel that they have adequate information? - 55 - Are we going to be requesting any additional information from the applicant or any of the general public? MR. MARTIN-I think if you do that. like Paul says. you've got to. basically. treat it as a whole new application. MR. TURNER-You've got to open the whole thing up again. MR. CARVIN-I just want to know where the floor is. whether we just come back with a motion and that's it. MR. DUSEK-I think everything you have before you should be your record at this point. See. when you come into a Use Variance. such as the applicant has done here. it's up to him to prove his enti tlement to that variance. and then. of course. you have to consider. obviously. the other information that comes before you by way of the public hearing. That's why you hold that. and then when you have all that information. and you weigh it and balance it and consider what the applicant said. and you balance it against that cri teria. either he's proven a case for a Use Variance. or he hasn't. and I think that's where you're at right now. unless you're suggesting you want to go through another rehearing of some kind. MR. CARVIN-The Use Variance has nothing to do with the Area Variances. is that correct? MR. TURNER-Right. MR. DUSEK-That's my understanding Administrator has decided. from what your Zoning MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-Okay. ,So we will have to go through a second public hearing for the Area and the Sign. is that correct? MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-Does that require re-advertising. because it was listed for this evening. or do we have to table the Area Variance. because we aren't even going to get to that. MR. O'DONNELL-No. It was my understanding that we were doing all of that at once. three variance applications were before you all at once. and it was advertised as a meeting for all three. all at once. and I can't imagine what facts you're going to get doing this twice more that you didn't get tonight. MR. DUSEK-My suggestion may be. another thing we could just take under advisement at this point. and by the time you get to the meeting again. we could have all these issues cleared up. You're going to have to have. you know you're going to have at least one meeting to decide the Use Variance. You know that. So then. at that point. my recommendation would be. we could check this issue out for you. to see whether or not we feel comfortable enough that the public hearing satisfied the Area Variance or didn't. I think it ought to be taken a look at. The only thing that bothers me is that at the time you went into that public hearing. you didn't read the typical thing that you would normally read to go into it. and so I have some reservations about agreeing that you did. in fact. conduct a proper public hearing. MR. CARVIN-That's my reservation there also. because we really only addressed the Use issue. MR. TURNER-We only addressed the one issue. MR. MARTIN-You only read in the Use Variance application. MR. TURNER-That's all. That's the only thing we read in. So I - 56 - think that's still fair game. MR. CARVIN-And address. there whatsoever. So in favor of it. then the third is the Sign. and we didn't even has be~n no public discussion on the Sign I have no idea if there's any public opposition or MR. DUSEK-I think you have a number of issues that you really need to think about. and if you schedule a meeting in the near future. you could address a lot of these and come to grips with what's left over. MR. MARTIN-We have one more meeting next week. right? MR. TURNER-Right. MR. O'DONNELL-Am I correct that the Use Variance applies to the deck and the shed only? MR. TURNER-That's right. It's the deck and the shed. That's just general information. because he's got an application for the setback for the tank. He's just relocating this tank. He needs relief from that. That's all. MR. MARTIN-And the proposed tank is smaller in size than the existing tank. MR. TURNER-One thousand gallons less. Yes. MR. CARVIN-The original Staff Notes on the Use Variance it was noted some place. in other words. MR. TURNER-It's definitely an Area Variance. because if he only came here for just the tanks. that would be an Area Variance. MR. CARVIN-Well. I guess as stated by the applicant's narrative. Harris Bay Yacht Club is a preexisting nonconforming use. a private club for which ownership of boat slips is a requirement for membership. In order to maintain the quality of the facilities and update items such as the fuel tank. and provide handicapped access. a master plan has been drawn up. Trying to market the property for some other use in order to satisfy the requirements for a Use Variance is really not an option. As stated in the narrative. there are no permitted uses which would allow HBYC to generate funds necessary to pay their current level of taxes. Well. I take exception to that. because the taxes come from the membership. all right. but they do address. through the Staff Notes. and. again. Staff Notes. I'm assuming. are just a reflection of the application. MR. TURNER-Yes. the application. MR. CARVIN-That it is in the whole. and not necessarily. so I think we have to take it. in parts. The Area Variance I think can be addressed as a separate issue. Fine. I mean. if you shoot down the Use Variance and decide that the tank is okay to move. I don't see where we have a problem in that. MR. TURNER-No. MR. CARVIN-Because essentially what we're saying is that that does not fall under the realm of a Use. MR. TURNER-That's right. Variance encompasses. We've already identified what the Use MR. CARVIN-I just want to make sure that my understanding of this Use Variance is on the total program. not just on the two Areas. In other words. this is the conceptual plan that they want to put together. - 57 - MR. TURNER-But again. if they came for an Area Variance just to move those tanks. they had to move them for some reason or another. that would be just an Area Variance. and that's all that is right now. MR. CARVIN-Correct. MR. TURNER-The Use is identified with the expansion of the Clubhouse and the expansion of that shed. that's it. MR. CARVIN-That's correct. motion, is that correct? We're moving to table just for a MR. TURNER-Just for a motion, yes. MR. MARTIN-Do you want to try and table until next week, Ted, or do you want table and just notify when you want to consider it? MR. CARVIN-Well, I still come back to the fact that if we don't address the Area Variance, do we have to re-advertise for the Area? MR. DUSEK-I'm going to have to take a look at that for you. MR. TURNER-I think you're going to have to. MR. DUSEK-That's what I'm kind of afraid of, but I don't want to really say that absolutely. MR. CARVIN-We can make a motion, we can address the Use Variance next week. That. hopefully, is not a problem. By then we should have all digested much of the material, but that still leaves the issue of the Area Variance. and that. I don't think, is going to be addressed properly. MR. DUSEK-So, even if you were to decide to set another public hearing, though, you could never get one set by next week anyway. MR. MARTIN-Right. MR. CARVIN-That's why I'm wondering whether we want to move that off into April some time to address the Area Variance as a whole separate issue. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. O'DONNELL-What day would it be next week? MR. MARTIN-It would be a week from yesterday, next Wednesday, the 23rd. MR. TURNER-The 23rd. MR. DUSEK-What you could do is address the Use Variance next week on Wednesday, and then on that same day set the public hearing for the Area Variances. MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. CARVIN-Which MR. TURNER-Yes. MR. MARTIN-Yes. would more than likely be at some point in April. We'd do it as a matter of your regular agenda. MR. TURNER-Yes. We have a meeting the 23rd anyway, Brian. So we could address the Use Variance then, the motion on it. Okay. So, 1'11 make a motion to table the application. HOTIOR TO TABLE USE VARIARCB RO. 111-1993 HARRIS BAY YACHT CLUB. IRC., Introduced by Theodore Turner who moved for its adoption. - 58 - seconded by Chris Thomas: To deal with the Use Variance and the motion attached to that, we'll deal with next week, the 23rd. Duly adopted this 17th day of March, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Menter, Mr. Karpeles, Mr. Carvin, Miss Hauser, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Maresco, Mr. Turner NOES: NONE - 59 -