2009-03-19 SP MTG#12SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING MTG. #12
MARCH 19, 2009 RES. 97-99
6:00 p.m.
TOWN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
DEPUTY SUPERVISOR TIM BREWER
COUNCILMAN ANTHONY METIVIER
COUNCILMAN RONALD MONTESI
COUNCILMAN JOHN STROUGH
TOWN BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
SUPERVISOR DANIEL STEC
DISCUSSION: NORTH QUEESNBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
List of concerns:
(Dry Hydrants)
Representative of Fire Company- Notified by Insurance Company that we cannot
continue with the current coverage to perform a survey of the hydrant system, we do not
have the training or expertise to do that. We will continue to report malfunctions but
cannot undertake a survey of the hydrants.
Councilman Metivier-The intent was to have you let the Town know if you
discover the dry hydrants don't work, we want to know if something is broken that it can
be fixed. We are not putting the emphasis on you guys getting it fixed.
Fire Company Representative-We agree with that stance, if we come across a
hydrant that is not operational we will absolutely undertake that duty to let you know
that. The insurance company draws a line at the annual inspection. Also noted that all
the hydrants except one on Pickle Hill in North Queensbury are privately owned.
Requested that it not be made a part of the contract but a handshake that we will make
sure the hydrants are working, we have not had any failures in our district. We are
agreeable to reporting any malfunctioning hydrants, we can put that on paper but not
commit to any inspection and maintenance program. Questioned why the Water Dept.
isn't testing the dry hydrants in North Queensbury?
Town Counsel Hafner-We own the water hydrants we don't own the dry
hydrants.
Councilman Metivier-Paragraph C -The fire company shall provide the town with
an inventory and if the fire company wishes to request the Town's assistance with repairs
the fire company will properly notify.
Board agreed to changes.
Fire Company Representative-Requested that the dry fire hydrant on Pickle Hill
be dredged out.
Town Board -Will notify the Highway Dept. and have them on a routine basis
dredge out that dry hydrant.
Fire Company Representative-Thanked the Town Board for offering to do dry
hydrants I have come up with one spot, the landowner has agreed.
(Section 5 Paragraph D)
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12 2
Fire Company Representative-It has to do with if the Fire Company ceases
operation, it provides that all assets of the fire company will go to the Town. We do not
think that is proper, however North Queensbury Fire Company is not going out of
business so if you folks need that in there fine. Discussed the Creation of the Village,
want to be able to continue to provide fire service for the same area that we do now, I do
not want my client in a position where this reduces their ability to do that.
Councilman Montesi-Questioned who would pay for the fire protection in the
Village?
Town Counsel Hafner-I will be researching that.
(Separate Corporation)
Fire Company Representative-There is a philosophy of how you look at the
relationship between the Town and the Fire Company and the services they company
provides. We are paid for fire protection and we understand that a vast majority of our
funding for fire protection comes from the Town, however we have been acting on good
faith advice from both from the Town Board in the past and from principals of Loftus and
Ross that the tax money, town money and the non town money should be separate.
Based on advice I got and gave to the fire company a separate corporation was founded
which is a separate legal entity. That entity is not intended to nor will it be allowed by
law to take one dime of taxpayer funds. All they can do is raise money on their own and
provide services and goods to the fire fighters of North Queensbury that cannot be paid
for from tax dollars, or in some cases and this is a nice one way street for the Town I
think, the taxpayers of the town, they can provide things that probably should be paid for
by the taxpayers. There has been six wheelers in the past, generators, other pieces of fire
fighting equipment that have been paid for with bequests and donated money. We are
very much willing to continue to do that. Conversely not a dime of tax money is used for
anything that is not proper. We have fifteen years of audits to back up where the money
goes and where it doesn't go and to separate those out we think the best way to do that is
to have a separate corporation. I also spoke to the same attorney, who is the same
attorney who probably represents more fire companies and fire districts than any other
attorney, in fact he wrote most of the legislation having to do with fire districts in the
State, he lobbies for the association of fire districts. He is the guy that recommended to
me that we set up the separate corporation a couple years ago. I asked him about this
question based on your comments at a Board meeting, are you aware of any other
companies having audits on it. I have never heard of such a thing, I cannot image anyone
would agree to it. Based on that, our good faith our history of fiscal responsibility, we
are not willing to agree to an audit of the separate corporation.
Councilman Montesi-What if you could not get the Town to agree with the
contract what would happen.
Representative of Fire Company-I do not know. As I said North Queensbury is
not going out of business, if the Town wants to contract with somebody else I do not
know that they could stop that.
Councilman Strough-Isn't there two of those entities?
Representative of Fire Company-There are one was set up in 2005, it was never
funded, it was filed with the Dept. of State and then nothing more was done. We are in
the process of dissolving that.
Councilman Montesi-One of my concerns, I do not care where the money comes
from that you raise I do not need an audit to tell me that Mr. Jones gave you five
thousand I do not want to know that, if the beginning of the year you had twenty
thousand in there and the end of the year you have twenty five thousand that is great, the
only thing I am concerned about that I would like to see audited if you will is just a list of
where you spent the money. The reason why is you come in and ask in your budget for
things in your budget all of a sudden you might have a six wheeler and you might have a
new boat I do not know about that because it isn't part of my budget process, whose asset
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12 3
is that, how do you keep that separate from what the Town is giving you to build a
building or to buy a truck? It is not to say you did right or wrong in that, gee I need take
out gear, we have ten new members, two thousand dollar a piece there is twenty
thousand, that is all, that is what I am looking for. Even though I understand it is a
separate corporation, I understand that you do not have to do it, but in good faith all I am
saying is I would just like to have a little handle on where the money is going.
Councilman Strough-As you know West Glens Falls is here for the same reason.
Noted other companies may follow, we are going to get the Comptroller's reading on
this, they will look into this and tell us one way or the other. I represent the community
and I have to be cautious because I do not fully understand what is going on. The
auditing thing might go way if the Comptroller says those guys are doing fine.
Representative of Fire Company-When the company comes to you for another
piece of equipment, you say did your service corporation buy anything new for you, or
what do we not know about. I think those are legitimate questions. There is a list of
assets that the company is required to file with the County Clerk every year. We are the
only company in the County that files that list. That is always an option for you. If the
service corporation decides to use those donated monies, bequested monies for equipment
that the taxpayers would otherwise buy, I do not think that should be used against the
service corporation. I think that is a benefit to the taxpayers, I think you should
encourage that. It is a separate entity, it is our time and effort and we are raising these
funds and we are going use them for proper expenditures for that type of corporation, we
are audited every year by the IRS. That is a separate business with no taxpayer money
there. I am going to make a prediction that the Comptroller will say there is no legal
requirement for you to audit them.
Town Counsel Hafner-I think that the Board feels this is a charitable entity and I
do not think and if I am not saying what you guys are thinking, don't understand why you
won't provide the audit of how this charitable entity is doing things that is so closely tied
in with the entity we fund. We can understand you saying you do not want to but you are
a charitable entity it is not like you are a private business, you have to make certain things
available it is not that much more that they are asking for. I think that is a summary of
the comments I have gotten from the various town board members.
Councilman Metivier-We are tying to keep check and balances in place, how
about like the IRS does anything over 10,000 in or out has to be disclosed? Is that off
base?
Councilman Brewer-My own personal opinion is that I met with West, Sunday to
get a better understanding and I talked to Jeff on the phone, I did not know what these
organizations were, and Jeff and West both explained to me and these are my words, they
want to separate the charitable donations they get and if someone donates some money
and they do not what the whole town to know what he donated then that is his business,
and it probably should not be our business, that is the way I understood from both
companies as to what they are trying to do. Personally it really does not make that much
of a difference to me. I do not want town monies co-mingled with donations or vice versa
and that is just the way I feel.
Councilman Strough-Shifting assets, money, buildings, equipment one entity to
another, does the public have an interest in monitoring those assets? If they get shifted
out into another organization, and out of our purview and out of our ability to audit and
yet it is a 501-C3 a non profit related to the other entity you are not really trying to hid
anything I assume, so ...
Representative of Fire Company-There is a critical distinction that you may be
missing in that analysis, no asset, no Town Tax paid for assets can every be shifted to a
service corporation. That would be illegal and not the purpose of the service corporation.
No town assets can ever be transferred to the service corporation. We have had an audit
over the last fifteen years and they are very specific, they list out what the contract
monies have been spent on and what the non town monies are spent on. Second item
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12 4
here, we are a new corporation where we will be filing a nine, ninety every year, which is
available for you to go and pull out anytime you want, it is a public record. The reason
why we do not want an audit because frankly there are restrictions in the contract, the
contract says how you are supposed to purchase things the rules of purchasing, how you
engage those things, what are we using it for, and quite often the question comes up the
co-mingling of funds and somebody says they spend twelve thousand on a banquet well
we have to go and explain that is ok to do that was somebody else's funds, the
explanation comes back it gets on the TV set everybody is looking at you saying oh my
god you spent that and you have explain that, it is ok to spend that, it is not town funds.
This eliminates that, it is no longer in there. What we spend in the other corporation is
set and what we spend in town money is set and you can look at it line by line. If you
want to look further into our other corporation you can simply go and request the 990 and
look at it.
Councilman Brewer-To solve the problem would you just forward a copy of the
990 to us? That shows what we are asking for doesn't it?
Councilman Strough-It doesn't show or prove that the assets moved from one
entity to another.
Councilman Brewer-Does the 990 show expenses?
Representative of Fire Company-Sure.
Councilman Brewer-That resolves the issue.
Councilman Montesi-The only other question I have is you come in next year and
want a new pumper, lets say it is $200,000 to make it work the fire company we will put
in $60,000 of our 502 into it what happens to that $60,000 does that become a fire
company asset?
Representative of Fire Company-It will not be a service corporation asset.
Councilman Montesi-It is a donation to the fire company it can only go one way.
Representative of Fire Company-The Service Corporation will give the Town a
letter of assurance that they will provide a copy of the 990 within forty five days after the
filing with the IRS. The letter will address the term of the contract.
DISCUSSION: WEST GLENS FALLS VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
Councilman Strough-Reviewed for West Glens Falls the North Queensbury
Contract... noted that West Glens Falls was more complicated due to the assets that were
transferred... questioned if any town funds were used in Station II, upkeep or
maintenance of that building?
Representative of Fire Company-I am sure you understand the difference between
acquisitions of assets vs operations of a fire company maintenance of a building.
Councilman Montesi-Your audit income will be donations plus fire company is
paying you back for the asset, you will have a continuing growing cash.
Representative of Fire Company-The town monies the taxpayer money, are kept
separate in a separate bank account and they are audited. None of those monies have been
used or transferred to this association, zero nor will they be.
Councilman Montesi-West Glens Falls Volunteer Fire Co. comes in with a budget
that includes a mortgage payment to the association for the building on VanDusen?
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12
Representative of Fire Company-No. We use the fund raising account there is a
rent payment and off setting debt payment.
Councilman Montesi-Who pays the rent?
Representative of Fire Company-That comes from the Company but that comes
out of separate fund raising account, not the Town account.
Councilman Montesi-Where is the other account is that another 501.
Representative of Fire Company-No.
Councilman Montesi-Here is what I understand the fund raising that took place
through the years had enough to transfer the building and $20,000 all of this was fund
raising that we did in years past and now it is over here.
Representative of Fire Company-The Company has their Town account and the
Company still has a fund raising account.
Councilman Montesi-Why isn't it part of the SO1C?
Representative of Fire Company-Because there is some minimal fund raising that
it still does. There is a separate account from the Town funds. The mortgage payment
will go first and the lease payment will go back. Our justification for transferring the
property is there an asset protection and liability protection. So, you do not want to just
shift the asset for no value you shift the asset at fair value.
Councilman Brewer-So you will charge your association rent and the non fire tax
money is going to pay for that .. .
Councilman Montesi-If you established a SO1C to put your assets in to avoid
liability why would you still have a fund raising account?
Representative of Fire Company-We only put real property in there, for example
equipment, if I am going to give twenty five thousand dollars to the company because I
want to buy uniforms for everybody I will write the check to the fund raising account
they are going to take the donations and they will buy whatever equipment that I want
them to buy. Or if they buy trucks we don't put any personal property, equipment in the
association because we want to keep every single aspect of fire protection separate other
wise our whole base is the asset protection that liability shield falls away.
Councilman Strough-It gets more complicated because of the moving of parcels
of land into this.
Representative of Fire Company-That is our land.
Councilman Strough-How do we know? How do I know that those properties
weren't given to you somebody said Warren County give it to you? How did they get
them, taxpayers dollars?
Representative of Fire Company-No. They were donated.
Councilman Strough-I need some way of confirming that those assets being
shifted in that the Town has no interest in, that is all. Can we put something in there that
when we shift assets you will show that they were your assets?
Councilman Brewer-If they shift anything it has to be in the 990.
Representative of Fire Company-And we agreed not to do anything with fire
station II .. .
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12
Councilman Strough-If you are going to shift any more tangible assets in there
you are going to run it by us?
Representative of Fire Company-I think your contract pretty much says that.
Councilman Brewer-The part of the contract that they don't like is the audit.
So give us a copy of the 990 when you file it with the government IRS.
Representative of Fire Company-If money was given from the Association to the
fire company to purchase a truck the truck would be owned solely by the fire company.
Noted there are two trucks at Station II that were totally paid for out of fund raising
account in 1994.
Councilman Strough-So you have agreed to give us a copy of the 990. Tangible
assets if shifted will be run by us before shifted.
Representative of Fire Company-Will that also be in North Queensbury's
contract?
6
Councilman Brewer-It is already in there. Regarding the 990 just send us a letter
that you will comply to giving us a copy annually. I did talk to MMA today and should
have an executive summary tomorrow and the draft by next Friday.
Representative of Fire Company-We are definitely behind the eight ball in
apparatus.
Councilman Brewer-Will try and get this on the agenda for next Monday.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 97.2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby moves into an
Executive Session to conduct interviews for the Town of Queensbury Planning Board
alternate position.
Duly adopted this 19th day of March, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mr. Stec
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 98,2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby adjourns its Executive Session
Duly adopted this 19th day of March, 2009 by the following vote:
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETIGN 03-19-2009 MTG. #12
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mr. Stec
7
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING TOWN BOARD MEETING
RESOLUTION NO. 99.2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough WHO MOVED FOR ITS
ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its Town
Board Meeting.
Duly adopted this 19th day of March, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Monesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mr. Stec
Respectfully submitted,
Miss Darleen M Dougher
Town Clerk-Queensbury