2009-06-15 MTG. #25
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 60
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING MTG. #25
JUNE 15, 2009 RES. 207-229
7:00 p.m. BOH 14-15
Formatted: Height: 14"
TOWN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
SUPERVISOR DANIEL STEC
COUNCILMAN ANTHONY METIVIER
COUNCILMAN RONALD MONTESI
COUNCILMAN JOHN STROUGH
COUNCILMAN TIM BREWER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN MONTESI
1.0 QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH
RESOLUTION NO. 207, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
RESOLVED,
that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby moves into the
Queensbury Board of Health.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
1.1 PUBLIC HEARING – Sewage Disposal Variance Application of Larry Clute
Concerning San Souci Restaurant Property
NOTICE SHOWN
PUBLICATION DATE: June 5, 2009
Supervisor Stec-We set this public hearing a couple of weeks ago the property of the San
Souci Restaurant is located at 333 Cleverdale Road in Queensbury. It has been an
established restaurant as a non-conforming use until very recently up in North
Deleted:
Queensbury for many, many years. The Town Board when we adopted the new zoning
code did make this an allowed use that is permitted through special use permit. Which I
understand that they are heading in that direction toward seeking that special use permit
for some other things that they are doing to the restaurant or they would like to do to the
restaurant, but before they can do that they has asked to seek a sewage disposal variance
in that they would like the Town Board to consider granting a variance to allow them to
go with a holding tank for their property as it moves forward as opposed to it’s current
system. So, with that said why don’t I turn this over to Larry and his engineer Tom
Center if you guys want to go ahead and present it I will declare the public hearing and
we will let you guys make a presentation first and then we will take some comment.
Mr. Tom Center-Nace Engineering with Mr. Clute. We are here today to propose a
holding tank system to replace the existing on site wastewater system. The new holding
tank system would be a six thousand gallon capacity system with the interlocking
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 61
celluloid valve on the water line when it reaches capacity it shuts off water supply until
the system is pumped down. It is sized for a hundred the entire seating capacity which is
a hundred and five seats the actual dinning room arrangement is only fifty seats. The
plan that we hope to go thorough with the special use permit is to bump out the rear of
the building for an expansion to the walk in refrigerator and renovate the kitchen and
bathroom areas to bring them closer into code compliance. The area that we are looking
to do the system is the front parking lot the tanks will be traffic rated and have covers on
all of them. Are there any questions?
Councilman Brewer-I have just one question, Tom, what is the expected time frame for
pumping, is it going to be weekly, monthly?
Engineer Center-I think it will probably be, it is a seasonal type of use I probably, from
our calculations and talking with Larry, it probably be once a week, you know probably
scheduled you know, before the weekend so that the capacity is there to get them through
and then it would be one of those things where they would have to work on it and
monitor the flow.
Councilman Brewer-I understand that you will have to figure it out.
Engineer Center-Some weekends probably during the holidays it might be twice a week,
you know when you have the fourth of July and Labor Day. But, other than that you
know figuring on his seating capacity is fifty seats it is sized for a hundred and five at
fifteen gallons per day per seat, it is six thousand gallons we almost sized it for almost
double what the DEC, DOH ratings are for a restaurant system so I think its
Councilman Brewer-It is just a curiosity that is all.
Engineer Center-I think you know our best estimate is once a week.
Councilman Montesi-The new restrooms will be handicapped accessible.
Mr. Larry Clute-Yes, Sir.
Engineer Center-Yes, Sir.
Councilman Montesi-Watersaving flushes too?
Mr. Clute-Absolutely, yes.
Supervisor Stec-I know it is standard, you mentioned it before that there will be an alarm
and a shut off interlocked with the level when the level gets so high both an alarm and a
lockout on the water..
Engineer Center-There is an alarm when it is close to three quarters full that tells him hey
we have got to get this thing pumped out and then the second alarm is when it is at
capacity it shuts off water supply to the building that is all town code.
Supervisor Stec-I do not believe it is a condition of ours, it is a town code requirement?
Engineer Center-It is the same thing with a pump up system and a normal septic system,
any pump station.
Councilman Strough-This is more unusual than your usual one but your alarm you have a
visual alarm that goes of that, the first tank fills, the second tank fills and the third tank
when it is half way you got the visual and then it is when ninety five percent of the way
you have an audio.
Engineer Center-Correct.
Councilman Brewer-State of the art.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 62
Councilman Strough-Now, I have noticed that you got ground water at five feet five
inches and one inch equals thirty feet and I am not sure the plan, that scale applies to the
details as well? But, how deep do the holding tanks go?
Engineer Center-The holding tanks have been sized to resist floatation based on the depth
the cover of soil over the top and plus their weight as empty or you know they still have a
slight amount of liquid, they never get pumped down completely to the bottom. With the
weight of the tank and the minimal amount of liquid in the bottom they are sized to resist
floating that was checked at the height of say ground water was at the top of the tank.
Councilman Strough-Ok. That is good, sometimes if you put notes to that effect on there
because that is something that we have to look at when we look at holding tanks, but
thank you. Now this is located above the hundred year flood plain?
Engineer Center-I believe so. I do not have the exact elevation.
Councilman Strough-The criteria list is about holding tanks and one of them is supposed
to be above the hundred foot year flood plain. I believe yours is. Now, the top of it
seeing it is in the parking area it has got to be designed to withstand H20 highway load.
Deleted:
is
Engineer Center-The tanks are sized for traffic rating and the heavy duty manhole frame
and cover are spec out.
Councilman Strough-I also noticed when I was up there, I just got back from up there,
why are you locating where it is, I mean, the reason why I ask is I see a small parking
area and probably you need that parking area to meet your minimum parking
requirements. But, it even appears that some of your parking area goes in to your
neighbors property and I am sure you must have some, what is the relationship you have
with your neighbor to the north?
Mr. Clute-The Chalet?
Councilman Strough-Yea, with the new garage, with a garage there that is not on the
plans?
Mr. Clute-Oh, there is a shed, the Chalet is actually mine, I am the neighbor.
Councilman Strough-The reason why I asked is
Councilman Brewer-That is a good relationship.
Councilman Strough-that is the best relationship, because I noticed the stone work goes
from your patio right into one of the steps going to the San Souci so I said to myself they
must have an unusual relationship. Not only that but there is a stairway going from, well
now that I know it is your place, from the back of your place up to the parking lot so I
said they are pretty cozy here. But, to get back to my question, over on the south side
you have that step with the ten by ten treated timbers and you got your air conditioning
unit there now why can’t that space be used? I mean just so I am considering all the
alternatives.
Mr. Clute-We just recently put the LP tank there was an above ground LP tank in that
center terraced area that you are describing right in the center terrace is a thousand gallon
LP tank. So, essentially that whole space it is a pretty healthy LP tank.
Councilman Strough-I see the LP tank and I am assuming it got buried.
Mr. Clute-Yes.
Councilman Strough-Ok. That would take up that space.
Engineer Center-Plus you would probably be seeking additional variances, you know, we
have our building set backs side line set backs, this spot was chosen so that we have
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 63
enough room for our set backs from our property lines, the building and for the
possibility of if we find that we need to install another tank at some future date that, that
possibility is there for additional holding tank. If it is, if he is finding that he is pumping
out too frequently then you know they could add an additional holding tank to the system
and not disturb the neighbors as much.
Councilman Strough-Ok. Is this, do these tanks have to be vented?
Engineer Center-They are vented back through the house system.
Councilman Strough-Ok, and up through. Very good. Do you have any plans for
expansion and will this meet the needs for that, because I see on the map the proposed
addition and I know that you have been before us before for a handicapped bathroom as
Tim had brought up. So, you are going to be expanding that and this will accommodate
all that?
Supervisor Stec-The proposed addition is on the drawing.
Mr. Clute-The capacity of the restaurant is not going to change really what it is doing is
increasing the kitchen size to actually be able to accommodate the cliental a little bit
better. So, the actual usage is not going to change, the expansion is really for kitchen
purposes only. And this system here as Tom said if it turns out that it is we are too
frequent in cleaning the system out he has got enough room where I can add a couple
more tanks if necessary in series to try and slow down that volume or cycle.
Councilman Strough-All right, so to get back to the bottom line the reason why you were
going to holding tanks is because with the building and the parking area and propane you
just don’t have any room for a filtration system.
Mr. Clute-There really isn’t.
Councilman Strough- Now, I like holding tanks because I know were it is and I know
where it is not going. But, you know we are approving these holding tanks and I am just
wondering you know someday we are going to get a more comprehensive review of this
and I know for at least Rockhurst and a lot of talk about Cleverdale because of similar
situations that we were, we are feeling out the idea and we have not made much progress
on that lately, but we probably get a, I should give Dave Decker a call. Feeling out the
Deleted:
idea of creating a septic district. Now if that is the case these people with holding tanks
will get like a gross rate probably, because this is probably going to be expensive. Like
Tim says you add it to the beer prices.
Mr. Clute-Absolutely.
Councilman Strough-Well, thank you.
Supervisor Stec-Any other questions from the Board?
Councilman Metivier-Do you have any plans to go year around or is this going to be
strictly seasonal?
Mr. Clute-No, the restaurant does stay year round, we limit our days open typically we
are shut down a couple of days like a Monday, Tuesday during the winter months. We
actually may shut down an additional day this winter, it has been kind of a feel out
process, we have been at this for three years now. But, I am there to accommodate the
neighborhood so I am definitely open year round.
Councilman Montesi-Great Super Bowl Party.
Councilman Metivier-And no issues in the winter time with these holding tanks? As far
as pumping them out, freezing, caps …
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 64
Engineer Center-No it is similar to a septic tank they you know with their volume they
keep their heat. They have got covers on top of them.
Councilman Brewer-You don’t know where they are.
Engineer Center-Plugs you know where they are it stays in its box.
Councilman Montesi-There is a letter from Helene Horn I have no objection to the
Deleted:
objextion
installation of the holding tank system at the Sans Souci Restaurant. I live across the
street on the east of the restaurant.
Councilman Metivier-I just think anything has to be an improvement over what you have
today, so, based on just the area involved.
Supervisor Stec-The public hearing is open, if there are any members of the public that
would like to comment on this public hearing regarding the septic variance for San Souci
Restaurant just raise you hand. Chris Navitsky
Mr. Chris Navitsky-Lake George Waterkeeper Good evening A couple of comments, or
questions really. First off, is there a requirement if the tank is being pumped in the Town
of Queensbury where does that have to be discharged, or can that cross municipal lines?
Concern being is that transported to Lake George Treatment Plant which is nearing
capacity concerns. Secondly, with the restaurant is there a need for a grease trap? I
imagine these are float systems for the alarms and grease can have quite an impact and it
does get in and clog the floats would that be a problem? So, I do not know if there needs
to be a separate grease trap for the kitchen line? I think that was our question and clarify
Deleted:
ould
it, seems on the drawings that there is an alarm in each tank but presentation made it
sound like there is only going to be an alarm in the second and third so if that could just
be clarified.
Councilman Montesi-Just a question for you, if Lake George is nearing capacity do they
still, do you know if they still take a lot of septage in from haulers?
Mr. Navitsky-They do take a lot of septage in I mean I don’t have the exact numbers but I
am thinking thirty to fifty thousand gallons a day.
Councilman Montesi-A day.
Councilman Brewer-Why would it be restricted though, I mean, it is a business
proposition for who ever does it I would presume that if whomever goes up there and
pumps these tanks out they shouldn’t be restricted to go to Lake George only. I mean I
am certain that there are many vendors that do that type of work that go to Fort Edward
or may go to Glens Falls or as long as they
Councilman Montesi-I think the point that you are making Chris is that you would hope
that they wouldn’t all go to Lake George because it has limited capacity in deference to
going to Glens Falls Sewer Treatment Plant.
Mr. Navitsky-I am not sure if there is a requirement in sewer use laurel?
Supervisor Stec-No
Councilman Brewer-No, there is not.
Mr. Navitsky-That restricts it from crossing municipal boundaries, that is my only
question.
Supervisor Stec-Not here.
Councilman Brewer-Not that I am aware of.
Councilman Montesi-The Great Lakes may have a concern.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 65
Councilman Metivier-That was what I was thinking.
Mr. Navitsky-But not local municipalities.
Supervisor Stec-We are going to get answers to all three of those questions.
Mr. Navitsky-Thank you.
Supervisor Stec-Is there anyone else that would like to comment on this public hearing?
Tom do you want to take a swing at answering those three questions, in case somebody
thinks of another question that they have? I had the clarification of how many alarms
would you have one for each tank and then where you think you are going to be taking
the effluent when it goes, and then the grease trap question.
Engineer Center-The alarm is on the final tank as it comes in, it comes in the front tank
fills up the next tank and it goes thorough. If you put an alarm in each tank you get
nuisance alarms for the first two and then people are less likely to check it to get it
pumped out. That is why
Supervisor Stec-One alarm on the third tank.
Engineer Center-Well, two alarms on the third. The first is to say hey pump it out the
second alarm is to shut everything off and it needs to be pumped out.
Councilman Strough-I think part of the confusion is on the diagram it shows alarms on all
the tanks, but
Engineer Center-That alarm you know picks up at the same level because when it reaches
the third tank it shuts everything off.
Councilman Strough-The alarms are on the third tank, there is no need the first tank will
flow into the second tank and is going to flow into the third tank.
Engineer Center-It is the same level. As far as where does the sewage go to, between
IBS, it depends on who gets the job I think most of them go to Glens Falls, and I think
most of them working with Sanitary Sewer Service, IBS, Queensbury Septic most of
them go to Glens Falls and discharge in there. They have some requirements about the
grease the quality of the effluent things like that, where it is coming from they monitor
that they work with that. As far as grease trap talking with the restaurant manager they
recycle their grease within the restaurant it does not go into the septic system.
Councilman Strough-But if Larry sells it to somebody else they may not. Wouldn’t it be
a good idea to put in a grease trap inbetween?
Engineer Center-The existing septic tank had not had any issues currently.
Councilman Strough-No, but I mean what is New York State Law on that matter
regarding restaurants? I mean that maybe something that you investigate it maybe it
ought to be on there.
Engineer Center-We still need to go through the Department of Health ..they may require
it, I am not sure I have not done a holding tank system through DOH. I know when you
have a septic system where it is going out into the field they have required a grease trap.
But I do not know on a holding tank system it is all going to the same place anyway. The
grease trap gets pumped out by the same septic trucks that pump out the sewage tanks.
Councilman Strough-But you have got to go through the DOH on this?
Engineer Center-Yea, DOH anything with food service needs to go through the
Department of Health due to the size and capacity.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 66
Supervisor Stec-Is there any other public comment on this public hearing. I see none, I
will close the public hearing.
RESOLUTION APPROVING SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL
VARIANCE FOR LARRY CLUTE CONCERNING
SAN SOUCI RESTAURANT PROPERTY
RESOLUTION NO.: 14, 2009 BOH
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, Larry Clute applied to the Local Board of Health for a variance from
§
Chapter 136, 136-11, which requires applicants to obtain a variance for holding tanks and
the applicant wishes to install a holding tank system as a replacement wastewater system on
the San Souci Restaurant property located at 333 Cleverdale Road in the Town of
Queensbury, and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk’s Office published the Notice of Public Hearing in the
Town’s official newspaper and the Local Board of Health conducted a public hearing
th
concerning the variance request on Monday, June 15, 2009, and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk’s Office has advised that it duly notified all property
owners within 500 feet of the subject property,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that
1. due to the nature of the variance, the Local Board of Health finds that the
variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of this
Ordinance or other adjoining properties nor otherwise conflict with the purpose
and objectives of any Town plan or policy; and
2. the Local Board of Health finds that the granting of the variance is necessary for
the reasonable use of the land and is the minimum variance which would
alleviate the specific unnecessary hardship found by the Local Board of Health
to affect the applicant; and
BE IT FURTHER,
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 67
RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health hereby approves the application of
Larry Clute for a variance from the Sewage Disposal Ordinance to allow installation of a
holding tank system as a replacement wastewater system on property situated at 333
Cleverdale Road in the Town of Queensbury bearing Tax Map No.: 226.12-1-43.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
1.2
RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON SEWAGE
DISPOSAL
VARIANCE APPLICATION OF SEAN AND DEBORAH QUILLINAN
RESOLUTION NO.: 15, 2009 BOH
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board serves as the Town’s Local Board of
Health and is authorized by Town Code Chapter 136 to issue variances from the Town’s
On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, Sean and Deborah Quillinan have applied to the Local Board of Health
for variances from Chapter 136 to allow a leach field to be located:
1. 74.7’ from their well in lieu of the required 100’ setback; and
2. 0’ from the eastern property line in lieu of the required 10’ setback;
on property located at 4 Sullivan Road in the Town of Queensbury,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Local Board of Health will hold a public
th
hearing on Monday, July 6, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742
Bay Road, Queensbury, to consider Sean and Deborah Quillinan’s sewage disposal variance
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 68
application concerning property located at 4 Sullivan Road in the Town of Queensbury (Tax
Map No.: 289.09-1-30) and at that time all interested persons will be heard, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health authorizes and directs the Queensbury
Town Clerk to publish the Notice of Public Hearing presented at this meeting and send a
copy of the Notice to neighbors located within 500 feet of the property as required by law.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING BOARD OF HEALTH
RESOLUTION NO. 16.2009 BOH
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
RESOLVED,
that the Town of Queensbury Board of Health hereby adjourns its meeting.
Duly adopted this 15, day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
TOWN BOARD MEETING RESUMES
2.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.1 PUBLIC HEARING – AUTHORIZING/NOT AUTHORIZING
REVOCABLE PERMIT TO LOCATE A MOBILE HOME OUTSIDE
OF MOBILE HOME COURT FOR WILLIAM WHIPPLE
NOTICE SHOWN
PUBLICATION DATE: JUNE 5, 2009
Supervisor Stec-This property is located at 11 Katherine Street and the proposal is to
replace an existing mobile home with a new 2009 Mobile Home again at 11 Katherine
Street. Is there anyone that wants to comment on this public hearing? Anyone at all?
Seeing none I will close this public hearing.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 69
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVOCABLE PERMIT TO LOCATE
A MOBILE HOME OUTSIDE OF
MOBILE HOME COURT FOR WILLIAM WHIPPLE
RESOLUTION NO.: 208, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHEREAS, in accordance with Queensbury Town Code §113-12, the Queensbury
Town Board is authorized to issue permits for mobile homes to be located outside of mobile
home courts under certain circumstances, and
WHEREAS, William Whipple filed a Town of Queensbury “Application for Placing
a Mobile Home Outside of a Mobile Home Court" to replace his mobile home with a new,
2009 mobile home on his property located at 11 Katherine Street in the Town of
Queensbury, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board held a public hearing concerning this application on
th
Monday, June 15, 2009 and heard all interested persons,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the issuance of a
revocable permit to William Whipple in accordance with the terms and provisions of
Queensbury Town Code §113-12.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
2.2 PUBLIC HEARING – AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL FROM
LANDFILL EQUIPMENT RESERVE FUND AND AWARDING BID
FOR STATIONARY TRASH COMPACTOR AT TOWN SOLID
WASTE TRANSFER STATION AT RIDGE ROAD
NOTICE SHOWN
PUBLICATION DATE: JUNE 5, 2009
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 70
-
Supervisor StecThe Town Board has been discussing this off and on with Keith Sheerer
our Landfill Superintendent for some time now people may recall that a couple of years
ago or a year or so ago we did the compactor at Luzerne Road, this is the other transfer
station that the Town operates at Ridge Road that we want to replace. The only bidder
that met all bid requirements was United Services GP Inc. for an amount not to exceed
$46,495. This is going to come from the funds landfill equipment reserve anticipating the
next question what that balance currently is the current balance is approximately
$202,000. and again we would be withdrawing $46,495. from that. I think the vintage of
these things they last approximately thirty years, we just did the one a year or two ago
and now we are doing the other. The resolution also includes the necessary information
to make the budget transfers and it authorizes us to take action to execute and get the
compactor delivered. So, with that said I will open the public hearing if there are any
members of the public that would like to comment on this proposed purchase just raise
your hand and I will call on you one at a time. All right seeing none.
Councilman Montesi-Dan I just have a question, a long time ago we formed this our
landfills I thought was a joint venture with the City. We manage the money, we manage
it, it is in our locality are they part of this in terms of any decision making?
Supervisor Stec-No, they are not. In fact at Luzerne Road they actually own the property
and we own all the equipment and operate on top at Ridge Road we own the actual
property and everything on it. Of course it is our old abandoned or capped landfill.
Nope, they are, we have a contract with them I think it is a ten year contract we renewed
it a couple years ago, I think the Attorney that helped us do that is in the room tonight by
happenstance. We did renew that I think it was a ten year term and really the City
doesn’t have and has not really asked for anything, when there was a short fall they
weren’t asked to contribute any money. Of course a few years ago we raised the rates for
the first time in many years there and now it is back in the black and so it is a self
sufficient fund. But, the short answer to your question is that no, the City is not really
involved here. Nor have they ever expressed any interest in wanting to be. Any public
comment before I close the public hearing? All right hearing none I will close the public
hearing.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL FROM LANDFILL
EQUIPMENT RESERVE FUND AND AWARDING BID FOR
STATIONARY TRASH COMPACTOR AT TOWN SOLID WASTE
TRANSFER STATION AT RIDGE ROAD
RESOLUTION NO.: 209, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury's Landfill Equipment Operator previously
advised the Queensbury Town Board that he wishes to purchase a stationary trash
compactor to replace the aging equipment currently in operation at the Ridge Road
Transfer Station, such purchase to be funded from the Town’s Landfill Equipment
Reserve, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Resolution No.: 156,2009, the Town of
Queensbury’s Purchasing Agent duly advertised for bids for the purchase of such stationary
trash compactor in accordance with bid specifications prepared by the Town’s Engineer and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 71
bid package prepared by the Town Purchasing Agent, and
WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent and Landfill Equipment Operator have reviewed
the submitted proposals and have recommended that the Town Board award the bid to only
bidder meeting all bid requirements, United Services GP, Inc., for an amount not to exceed
$46,495.00, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board duly conducted a public hearing concerning the
th
proposed purchase on Monday, June 15, 2009 and heard all interested persons, and
§
WHEREAS, in accordance with New York State General Municipal Law 6(c), the
Town Board is authorized to withdraw and expend funds from the Landfill Equipment
Reserve Fund subject to permissive referendum,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the purchase of a
stationary trash compactor to replace the aging equipment currently in operation at the
Ridge Road Transfer Station to be funded from the Fund’s Landfill Equipment Reserve
for an amount not to exceed $46,495.00 as delineated in the preambles of this Resolution,
and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby finds that the withdrawal and expenditure
for such purchase is an expenditure for a specific item of equipment for which the reserve
account was established, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby awards the bid for the purchase and
installation of a stationary trash compactor, and the removal of the current compactor at the
Ridge Road Transfer Station, to United Services GP, Inc.,for an amount not to exceed
$46,495.00, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes the Town Budget Officer to
take any and all actions necessary to effectuate the following 2009 Budget Amendment:
?
Increase Appropriation 009-9901-9006-112 by $46,495.00;
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 72
?
Increase Revenue 009-0000-55031 Interfund Transfer by $46,495.00;
?
Increase Appropriation 009-8160-2040 Heavy Equipment by $46,495.00;
and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor, Town Budget Officer and Landfill Equipment Operator to take any and all
actions necessary to effectuate all terms of this Resolution, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that this Resolution is subject to a permissive referendum in
accordance with the provisions of Town Law Article 7 and the Town Board hereby
authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to publish and post such notices and take such other
actions as may be required by law.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
Discussion held before vote: Councilman Montesi-It was a rather contentious situation
with Fran Walters the Town Supervisor and Ed Bartholomew the Mayor in order to get
this agreement signed. It was not an easy agreement. Supervisor Stec-It was difficult to
get it renewed and I think not because anyone didn’t have an entrenched position this is
going from memory a few years ago now. As I recall it was one of those things that there
were so many things higher in the pecking order of things that had to be done that no one
was in a rush to really get it done, but in the end of the day all sides were agreeable.
HEARINGS
3.1 HEARING – APPROVING/DISAPPROVING LAKE GEORGE
CAMPSITES, LLC’s APPLICATION FOR THIRD VARIANCE/WAIVER
REQUEST FROM SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION REQUIREMENT
SET FORTH IN TOWN CODE CHAPTER 136 – SEWERS AND SEWAGE
DISPOSAL
Supervisor Stec-I think the applicants agent Mr. Noordsy is here tonight, Mark good to
Deleted:
e
see you again. I will let you add in anything that I may have left out, but the Town Board
has discretion to grant these waivers, we have granted them, in fact I cannot recall ever
not having granted one with that said the idea here that eventually we do want all these
properties to actually physically connect to sewer on Route 9. The Route 9 Sewer is
approximately three years old in full operation now and we have granted some other, for
a variety of reasons, properties future is in question whether or not they will be
redevelopment or whatnot. But, it is important that I always remind everyone that the
bills still go out as though you were connected so there is no financial lost to the Town or
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 73
to the District itself. Obviously presumably there a financial convenience to those that
are seeking the waiver to hold off and basically tie in at a time more convenient or
financially or physically or otherwise. But, with that said, is there anything that you
would like to add for the Board’s consideration?
Attorney Noordsy- Mark Noordsy of Lemery Greisler LLC for the applicant. It is again a
Deleted:
e
matter of convenience of looking to tie in to have the tie in, to the sewer system occur at
Deleted:
e
the same time as improvements to the facility add amenities, adding more sites and
actually when a member of our firm was here last year I do not think we anticipated
being back. We were going through the application process as far as planning and zoning
that got held up and basically we are going back to the drawing board. There was a lot of
issues raised with regard to that plan so we have gone back and are having it redone by
the engineers. Again the basic purpose is or desire is to not to do it separately, not to
have to tie into the sewer system at one time and then go back and do the improvements
separately. We would rather do them all at once. We have got, the engineers are
working on a new plan which we will resubmit to the planning board and go from there.
Hopefully we will not be back next year.
Councilman Strough-Part of your expansion plan is to tie in though.
Attorney Noordsy-Correct.
Deleted:
e
Councilman Brewer-That was what I was going to ask earlier the intention was last year
when, I cannot remember who came in, whether it was John or who it was, it doesn’t
matter. They would redevelop the property so you are saying that this summer or this fall
there will be an application in and hopefully next spring they will tie into the sewer.
Attorney Noordsy-Correct. I am not exactly sure of that time frame but that is the intent
Deleted:
e
to get a new application.
Supervisor Stec-Any other questions from the Board for Mr. Noordsy?
Deleted:
e
Councilman Brewer-I just want to add one more comment. The reason I asked you that
Mark and not to pick on you, but these things I know for the last three years we have
been doling these out like they are candy and at some point there has to be a time to say
you know, enough is enough. It has been five years, seven years lets start getting people
hooked up to this thing and start using it. I think that is the, was the intention when we
built it or put the system
Supervisor Stec-Eventually everyone will have to tie in.
Councilman Brewer-I am one of the favor that lets set a time frame whether it be five or
seven years that you know, the year before you come in next year no more variances you
are going to tie in, you know, some people are going to be hurt by it, you know, but it is
for the best thing that we can do for the environment in that whole corridor I think.
Councilman Strough-Everybody has a unique story, some people put in brand new
systems and some people are waiting for future plans.
Councilman Brewer-And I understand that, I have no issue with that.
Councilman Strough-And they do pay all their charges as if they were.
Councilman Brewer-I know that.
Attorney Noordsy-You would have a system that is
Deleted:
e
Councilman Brewer-But, my point is John is if everybody pays and everybody has
unique circumstance why did we put the system in and spend the million of dollars that
we spent?
Supervisor Stec-The majority of our Town has tied in, but you have a handful that hasn’t.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 74
Councilman Brewer-There is a good amount of people that haven’t.
Supervisor Stec-Well we are going to get them.
Councilman Strough-The driving energy behind that was to make sure the Great Escape
was tied in and then the Municipal Center got tied in.
Councilman Brewer-I know, I was there.
Councilman Strough-And the outlets. So, you know a lot of these we try to let them tie in
as they expand.
Supervisor Stec-Are there any other questions? Mark do you have any other questions
for us?
Attorney Noordsey-No, thank you.
Deleted:
¶
¶
APPROVING
RESOLUTION
LAKE GEORGE CAMPSITES, LLC’S APPLICATION FOR THIRD
VARIANCE/ WAIVER REQUEST FROM SANITARY SEWER
CONNECTION REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN TOWN CODE
CHAPTER 136 – SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL
RESOLUTION NO.: 210, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board is authorized by Town Code Chapter 136
§
to issue variances from 136-44 “Connection to sewers required” which requires Town
property owners situated within a sewer district and located within 250’ of a public sanitary
sewer of the sewer district to connect to the public sewer facilities within one (1) year from
the date of notice, and
WHEREAS, Lake George Campsites, LLC (Applicant) applied to the Town Board
§
for a third variance/waiver from 136-44 to connect its property located at 1053 State Route
9 to the Town of Queensbury’s Route 9 Sewer District, as the Applicant states that it is still
working towards completion of sewer connection plans and the property’s four (4) on-site
septic systems continue to be used to treat and dispose of sanitary waste, and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk’s Office mailed a Notice of Hearing to the Applicant
and the Town Board conducted a hearing concerning the variance/waiver request on
th
Monday, June 15, 2009,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 75
RESOLVED, that
a) due to the nature of the variance/waiver request, the Queensbury Town Board
determines that the temporary granting of the variance/waiver would not be
materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of Queensbury Town Code
Chapter 136 and/or adjoining properties or otherwise conflict with the purpose
and objectives of any plan or policy of the Town of Queensbury; and
b) the Town Board finds that the granting of the variance/waiver is reasonable and
wouldalleviate unnecessary hardship on the Applicant; and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves Lake George
Campsites, LLC’s application for a variance/waiver from Queensbury Town Code Chapter
§
136, 136-44 “Connection to sewers required” and hereby grants Lake George Campsites,
th
LLC a one-year extension of time or until June 15, 2010 in which to connect its property
located at 1053 State Route 9, Queensbury (Tax Map No.: 295.12-1-6) to the Town of
p
Queensbury’s Route 9 Sewer District, rovided that if there is any change in property use,
increase in septic use or additional bathroom facilities added, then such variance shall
immediately terminate unless the Queensbury Town Board review and approves a new
,
application for a variance/waiver and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED,
that Lake George Campsites, LLC shall pay all charges due as if its
property was connected to the Route 9 Sewer District, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes the Town Supervisor, Wastewater
Director and/or Town Budget Officer to take any actions necessary to effectuate the terms of
this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 76
4.0 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR (Limit – 4 minutes)
Mr. Bill Brown-8 Colonial Court- On behalf of the Officers and participants of the Soap
Box Derby thanked the Town Board for their continued support. Forty Two participants,
two from Warrensburg, twenty from the Town of Queensbury and eighteen from the City
of Glens Falls and two from South Glens Falls TV8 and the Post Star covered the event.
Fund raising auction on July 11 at the Tyrer Gallery need donations and purchases at the
auction, proceeds to be used for the shipping to and from Akron of the three cars and for
each winner has to spend seven nights and six days in Akron to participate. One Boy
Formatted: Font: Bold
from the City will get participating and two boys from Queensbury. Thanked Tim
Brewer for coming to the race. Another winner was the Granddaughter of Mr. Brown.
Mr. Pliney Tucker-41 Division Queensbury Acquiring land at Exit 18, will be bonded?
Supervisor Stec-We have to acquire property and then there is the matter of how to pay
for the underground utilities. Roughly half of the properties have been purchased already
we figure at the end of the day between property acquisition and the cost of consultant
that you are look at nine hundred thousand dollars and that may be bonded.
Mr. Tucker-Why isn’t this part of the project why do the people of Queensbury have to
pay for this land when everyone will use the road?
Supervisor Stec-The town is acquiring property for utilities like water and sewer lines.
Councilman Montesi-The County has monies for the widening of the road.
Mr. Tucker-The Warren County program for prescription drugs, how much did it cost the
County for the program?
Supervisor Stec-Nothing.
Mr. Tucker-Noted Hanneford and Walmart have similar programs…
Supervisor Stec-If you already have insurance the card might not be better than the
insurance you have, but if you have no insurance it would help.
Mr. Charles Baker-749 West Mountain Road - Questioned where the money goes for a
burial in the Town of Queensbury?
Supervisor Stec-When you buy a plot in the Town some of that money goes into the
operations of the cemetery, the rest for perpetual care. There are legal requirements of
what the Town has to do for abandoned cemeteries.
Mr. Baker-Passed out photos of the cemeteries in the Town of Queensbury. Noted for
burials you do charge the same price for outside cemeteries as you do for Pine View.
Councilman Montesi-The State Law says that a Town has to accept abandon cemeteries
and maintain them.
Mr. Baker-Mt. Herman is not abandoned in any way shape or form my wife was buried
their last year.
Councilman Brewer-The Town is speaking about ownership abandonment. I believe as
much as we can pay respect to the dead and maintain these as well as we do.
Mr. Baker-Presented the Town Board with a petition containing 82 signatures requesting
improved care for outside cemeteries.
Supervisor Stec-I will ask our Attorney and the Cemetery Superintendent to help us out
on understanding what our responsibilities are for making sure that we are doing the best
we can.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 77
Mr. Baker-Spoke about broken and tipped stones, and sites where veterans are buried,
need maintenance. Listed many of the well know Town residents that are buried at Mt.
Herman Cemetery. Noted that grass needs cutting and the road into the cemetery has
good size ruts in the road that need to be repaired. The Town should be ashamed of
themselves letting these cemeteries deteriorate to that. Spoke on stones in the
Jenkinsville Cemetery that were broken and left on stone walls, that is no way to show
appreciation to our forefathers. If it wasn’t for these people the town would not be what it
is today.
Superintendent Mike Genier-I spoke to the head of the division of cemeteries for New
York State regarding abandon cemeteries, the law says that we have to mow abandon
cemeteries three times per year, we do it much more than that. We have started mowing
the abandoned cemeteries, we started at Harrisena and are working south. Regarding
head stones, have gone to conferences on restoration, most of the stones that are turned
over are fairly weathered, and marble is porous and it weathers, become weak and cannot
support their own weight. Spoke on different methods of repairing stones. Noted
headstones are traditionally private property.
Supervisor Stec-I do not know how much you can do with the older stone work that you
are talking about, some other items can be kept up with such as mowing and repairing
access roads to be graded maybe receiving help from the Highway Dept.
Councilman Strough-Sometimes the family members pay for the restoration of the stones.
Councilman Brewer-I know what the minimum standards are I would agree with the
fellow that was just up here I think we should be above the minimum.
Superintendent Genier-We definitely are.
Councilman Montesi-Questioned if the crews working on the outlying cemeteries report
back on conditions in the cemetery?
Superintendent Genier-Yes they do.
Mr. Paul Naylor-Division Road - Question the resolution for sale of the obsolete truck
Supervisor Stec-That will be sold on GovDeals.
Deleted:
¶
¶
5.0 RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS
FOR SALE OF OBSOLETE TRUCK
RESOLUTION NO.: 211, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, in accordance with New York State Town Law §64(2), the Queensbury
Town Board may authorize the sale of items which are no longer needed by the Town or
obsolete, and
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 78
WHEREAS, the Town’s Director of Building and Codes Enforcement (Director)
has declared a 2000 Ford Ranger Pick-Up Truck as surplus, and
WHEREAS, the Director advised Town Departments of the surplus truck and the
Director received no requests from the Departments for the surplus truck and therefore he
has requested Town Board authorization to sell the truck by using auction company
GovDeals to dispose of such surplus truck,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the sale of the
Department of Building and Codes Enforcement’s 2000 Ford Ranger Pick-Up Truck that is
no longer needed by the Town or obsolete, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and engagement
of the services of auction company, GovDeals, to sell/dispose of the surplus truck and
authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to execute any needed Agreement with such
company in form acceptable to the Town Supervisor, Town Budget Officer, Purchasing
Agent and/or Town Counsel, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that all Town proceeds from the sale shall be deposited into the
appropriate revenue accounts in accordance with the Queensbury Town Code and Laws of
the State of New York, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Budget
Officer and/or Purchasing Agent to accept or reject any bids received online for any online
auction bids, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor, Town Budget Officer, Purchasing Agent, Director of Building and Codes
Enforcement and/or Town Counsel to take such further action as may be necessary to
effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 79
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR
LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENTS
RESOLUTION NO: 212, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 159.2009, the Queensbury Town Board
authorized the Town’s Community Development Department to prepare and distribute a
Request for Proposals for lead-based paint risk assessment services as recommended by
the New York State Housing Trust Fund Corporation and Office of Community Renewal
(OCR), and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department prepared and distributed
Requests for Proposals to qualified businesses in the Queensbury and Capital District
areas, and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department duly received and opened
proposals from four (4) qualified businesses, and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has recommended that the
Town Board authorize and accept the lowest responsible proposal as submitted by RTK
Environmental who has offered to provide Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessments to the
Town on an on-call/as-needed basis for a three (3) year term beginning June 1, 2009 for a
per single unit cost of five hundred forty-five dollars and no cents ($545.00),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes engagement of
RTK Environmental to provide Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessments on an on-call/as
needed basis for a three (3) year term beginning June 1, 2009 for a per single unit cost of
five hundred forty-five dollars and no cents ($545.00), and
BE IT FURTHER,
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 80
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to sign any documentation, including any agreement in form acceptable to
Town Counsel; and the Town Supervisor, Purchasing Agent and/or Budget Officer, or
Senior Planner to take any action necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
Discussion held before vote: Supervisor Stec-The Town has just received another
Affordable Housing Grant - $195,000 since 2001 this brings the total to a little over 2.3
million of State grant money for the Towns affordable housing strategy.
Deleted:
¶
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ALL TOWN PROPERTY
AS NON-SMOKING AREAS
RESOLUTION NO.: 213, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, the American Lung Association in New York State has issued a
Memorandum in support of tobacco free parks, playgrounds and beaches, with the purpose
of promoting public health and well-being through the passage of legislation which restricts
the locations in which individuals subject others to the deadly effects of secondhand smoke,
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that tobacco is a known asthma trigger and that
children are particularly susceptible to the dangers associated with tobacco smoke even if
out of doors, and
WHEREAS, according to the American Lung Association in New York State,
secondhand smoke is responsible for 54,000 deaths each year in the United States, and
WHEREAS, New York State Town Law §64(3) gives the Town Board authority to
manage and control Town property, and
WHEREAS, New York State Public Health Law §1399-r reaffirms the right of a
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 81
property owner, including the government of any political subdivision of the State, to
designate its entire property or any part thereof as a non-smoking area, and
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board wishes to safeguard the health of its
citizens, particularly children, from the dangers of secondhand smoke on all Town property,
including Town Park property, and
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury’s Recreation Commission has indicated its
support for a ban on smoking on all Town property, including Town Park property,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby designates all Town
Property, including but not limited to, all Town Parks, as non-smoking areas, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town’s
Facilities Manager and/or the Department of Building and Grounds to erect such signs as
reasonably necessary to inform the public of the prohibition against smoking, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor and/or Town Facilities Manager to take all actions necessary to effectuate the
terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
Discussion held before vote: Recognized Courtney Smith the outreach coordinator for
Southern Adirondack Tobacco Free Collation thanked here for all her work.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF
TOWN OF QUEENSBURY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK §1004
CONCERNING SMOKING POLICY
RESOLUTION NO.: 214, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 82
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board previously adopted a Town of
Queensbury Employee Handbook (Handbook) delineating Town Employee Policies and
Procedures, and
WHEREAS, the last version of the Employee Handbook was adopted in 2001, and
WHEREAS, the Town’s Smoking Policy is included within the Handbook as §1004,
and
WHEREAS, the Smoking Policy currently prohibits smoking in Town vehicles
occupied by more than one (1) person unless all occupants of such vehicle agree that
smoking may be permitted, and
WHEREAS, the current Smoking Policy is inconsistent with the Public Health Law
which prohibits smoking in any place of employment including “company vehicles,” and
WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to amend its Smoking Policy to be consistent
with the Public Health Law, also known as the New York State Clean Indoor Air Act of
2003, and
WHEREAS, a number of the Town’s employees are represented by Civil Service
Employees Association, Inc., (CSEA) Unit 9007 which was advised of the proposed
st
change to the Town’s current Smoking Policy by letter of April 21, 2009 and CSEA has
not raised any questions or concerns,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby amends the Town’s
Smoking Policy as set forth at §1004 of the Town of Queensbury’s Employee Handbook
to amend subsection 3 to read: “Smoking shall be prohibited in all Town vehicles.” and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor’s Office to distribute copies of the amended Policy to all Town Employees and
Elected Officials and amend the Handbook accordingly, and
BE IT FURTHER,
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 83
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to take any and all action necessary to effectuate all terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
RESOLUTION CONCERNING TOBACCO ADVERTISING AND
CHILDREN’S HEALTH
RESOLUTION NO.: 215, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHEREAS, tobacco use kills over 25,000 New Yorkers every year, yet is the
leading preventable cause of death in our communities, and
WHEREAS, in New York State alone, the tobacco industry spends $516 million
annually to market its deadly products, and
WHEREAS, every day another 4,000 American children start to smoke and another
2,000 become regular, daily smokers, and
WHEREAS, in New York State the average age at which smokers try their first
cigarette is 14½, and
WHEREAS, studies have shown that tobacco advertising in retail stores has a
powerful influence on teens who are significantly more likely to smoke due to advertising
than to peer pressure, and
WHEREAS, in the Capital Region, the 2008 Annual Community Survey
undertaken by the Southern Adirondack Tobacco Free Coalition in conjunction with
Syracuse University shows that 52% of adults think tobacco advertising in stores should
not be allowed on the outside of store buildings, and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 84
WHEREAS, in the Capital Region, 70% of adults surveyed in the above-
mentioned research think tobacco advertising should not be allowed on the outside of any
stores or gas stations within 1,000 feet of schools, playgrounds or daycare facilities, and
WHEREAS, retail stores are an integral part of our community and there are
many ways that retail stores can help keep children and teens from viewing tobacco
advertisements, which are a major factor in youth initiation of tobacco use,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, for the health of the youth of our community, the Queensbury Town
Board hereby calls all retailers to voluntarily reduce overall tobacco advertising in their
place of business and to eliminate tobacco advertising from areas likely to be seen by
children, including ads placed below five feet (5’) high, near candy, ice cream and toy
displays and on counter tops, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Southern Adirondack
Tobacco Free Coalition.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF MARSHALL &
STERLING UPSTATE, INC., AS TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
INSURANCE AGENT
RESOLUTION NO.: 216, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 324,2008, the Queensbury Town Board authorized
engagement of Marshall & Sterling Upstate, Inc., to provide insurance coverage to the Town
stth
of Queensbury effective July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009, and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 85
WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to authorize renewal of such coverage with
stth
Marshall & Sterling Upstate, Inc., effective July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the
renewal and engagement of the services of Marshall & Sterling Upstate, Inc., to provide
stth
insurance coverage to the Town of Queensbury effective July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010,
and
BE IT FURTHER,
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to execute any agreements and any other documentation, and the Town
Supervisor, Town Counsel and/or Town Budget Officer to take any actions necessary to
effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HIRING OF SEASONAL
EMPLOYEES TO WORK FOR DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND
RECREATION
RESOLUTION NO. : 217, 2009
INTRODUCED BY Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY : Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, the Department of Parks and Recreation has requested Town Board
authorization to hire Kaitlin O’Shaughnessy, Kelly O’Shaughnessy, Meghan Dougher,
Arinne Stiller and Fredericka Ramsey to work part-time for the Department on a seasonal
basis, and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 86
WHEREAS, Town Policy requires that familial relationships must be disclosed
and the Town Board must approve the appointment of Town employees’ relatives, and:
?
Kaitlin O’Shaughnessy and Kelly O’Shaughnessy are the daughters of Assistant
Director of Parks and Recreation Lori O’Shaughnessy;
?
Meghan Dougher is the daughter of Town Clerk Darleen Dougher;
?
Arinne Stiller is the daughter of the Executive Assistant to the Town Supervisor,
Leesa Stiller; and
?
Fredericka Ramsey is the mother-in-law of Parks and Recreation Department Senior
Typist Simone Ramsey;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the
hiring of the above-named employees to work for the Town’s Department of Parks and
th
Recreation on a part-time, seasonal basis effective June 16, 2009, to be paid at the
appropriate hourly wage approved for seasonal recreation positions and subject to the Town
successfully completing background checks as reasonably may be necessary to judge
fitness for the duties for which hired, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor, Director of Parks and Recreation and/or Town Budget Officer to complete any
forms and take any action necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENGAGEMENT OF BUSINESS
AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC. FOR UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM
AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
RESOLUTION NO.: 218, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 87
SECONDED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury’s Town Clerk and Technology Coordinator
requested proposals for a utility billing software system and implementation services, and
WHEREAS, proposals were received and reviewed by the Town Clerk and
Technology Coordinator and they have recommended that the Town award the proposal to
Business Automation Services, Inc. (BAS) for an amount not to exceed $53,460.00 in
th
accordance with BAS’ May 11, 2009 Proposal presented at this meeting, and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk and Technology Coordinator met with the Town
th
Board to discuss such proposal at a Workshop Meeting held on Monday, June 8, 2009, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board concurs with the Town Clerk and Technology
Coordinator’s recommendation, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs
engagement of Business Automation Services, Inc. (BAS) for the provision of a utility
billing software system and implementation services for a total amount not to exceed
$53,460.00, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that payment for such system and services shall be paid from
Computer Software Account No.: 040-1680-2032, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes the Town Budget Officer to
take any and all actions necessary to transfer $53,460.00 from unappropriated,
undesignated Fund Balance to Account No.: 040-1680-2032 and effectuate such 2009
Budget Amendment, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes the Town Supervisor to
execute any needed Agreement or documentation and the Town Supervisor, Town Clerk,
Technology Coordinator and/or Town Budget Officer to take all actions necessary to
effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 88
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGE IN EMPLOYEE GROUP
HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN RATES
RESOLUTION NO. 219, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 542,2008, the Queensbury Town Board approved
and authorized renewal contracts for the year 2009 with Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield
(Blue Cross), and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 137,2009, the Queensbury Town Board approved
and authorized a change in its health insurance rates renewal contracts for the year 2009 as
a result of the New York State Legislature’s adoption of the New York Deficit Reduction
Plan which included a provision providing for a surcharge on health insurance policies in
New York State, which resulted in Blue Cross thereby passing on such surcharges to the
Town of Queensbury resulting in an increase of the Town’s health insurance rates for its
employees and retirees, and
WHEREAS, since that time the Governor changed his mind about the amount of
taxation placed on State health insurance policies and therefore Blue Cross has adjusted
their rates for each Town policy to reflect this decrease in rates, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board therefore wishes to authorize a revised rate schedule
accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves and authorizes a
change in its health insurance rates as described in the preambles of this Resolution with
st
such rates effective July 1, 2009 as follows:
Town of Queensbury
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 89
2009 Group Health Insurance Premiums
Employee Premium Sharing
2009 Total PremiumEmployee ShareTown
AnnualMonthly%AnnualWeeklyAnnual Cost
6,424.92535.41 5,461.18
Individual15% 963.74 18.5334
Family 18,769.441,564.1215% 2,815.42 54.1426 15,954.02
5,920.56493.38 5,506.12
Individual7% 414.44 7.9700
17,295.721,441.31 16,085.02
Family7% 1,210.70 23.2827
DENTAL
301.0825.09 217.08
Individual$7.00/mo 84.00 1.6154
726.0060.50 600.00
Family$10.50/mo 126.00 2.4231
Town of Queensbury
2009 Retiree Group Health Insurance Premiums
2009 Total PremiumRetiree ShareTown
AnnualMonthly%AnnualMonthlyAnnual Cost
6,424.92535.41 5,461.18
Individual15% 963.74 80.31
Family 18,769.441,564.1215% 2,815.42 234.62 15,954.02
Medicare
5,898.72491.56 5,013.91
15% 884.81 73.73
Individual
Medicare 2
11,757.72979.81 9,994.06
15% 1,763.66 146.97
Person
18,259.441,521.62 15,520.52
Medicare Family15% 2,738.92 228.24
EMPIRE EPO
Individual5,920.56493.387% 414.44 34.54 5,506.12
17,295.721,441.31 16,085.02
Family7% 1,210.70 100.89
Medicare
5,435.28452.947% 380.47 31.71 5,054.81
Individual
Medicare 2
10,830.48902.54 10,072.35
7% 758.13 63.18
Person
16,826.041,402.17 15,648.22
Medicare Family7% 1,177.82 98.15
and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to execute any contracts and/or documentation and the Town Supervisor and/or
Town Budget Officer to take such other and further action necessary to effectuate the terms
of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 90
RESOLUTION TO AMEND 2009 BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO.: 220, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHEREAS, the following Budget Amendment Requests have been duly initiated
and justified and are deemed compliant with Town operating procedures and accounting
practices by the Town Budget Officer,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the
Town’s Accounting Office to take all action necessary to amend the 2009 Town Budget
as follows:
From To
CodeAppropriationCodeAppropriation$
001-1110-4030Postage001-1110-1020Overtime3,500
001-1680-1010IT Wages001-1680-2001IT Equipment20,000
001-1990-4400Contingency001-7550-4400Celebration Misc Contr.2,000
001-3510-1010ACO Wages001-3510-4110Vehicle Repair2,200
002-9040-8040Workers' Comp 002-8810-4070Building Repair & Maint5,300
002-0000-52680Insurance Recoveries1340*
002-8810-4400Misc. Contractual1340*
032-9040-8040Workers' Comp032-8110-4131Litigation1,000
* Increase to Revenue and Appropriation to reflect proceeds for insurance recovery.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough,
NOES : None
ABSENT: Mr. Brewer
RESOLUTION APPROVING AUDIT OF BILLS –
TH
WARRANT OF JUNE 16, 2009
RESOLUTION NO.: 221, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 91
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board wishes to approve the audit of bills
thth
presented as the Warrant with a run date of June 11, 2009 and a payment date of June 16,
2009,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the Warrant with a
thth
run date of June 11, 2009 and payment date of June 16, 2009 totaling $552,709.75, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and further action as may be
necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Stec
NOES : None
ABSENT: Mr. Brewer
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENGAGEMENT OF MATTHEWS CREMATION
GROUP TO PERFORM CREMATORY RETORT REPAIRS
RESOLUTION NO.: 222, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHEREAS, by Memorandum dated June 3, 2009, the Town of Queensbury
Cemetery Commission requested that the Town Board authorize Matthews Cremation
Group as a single source vendor to perform annual Crematory Retort inspections and repairs
on the Crawford and Power Pak Cremation Unit at the Pineview Cemetery, and
WHEREAS, such inspections and repairs shall not exceed $20,000, and
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 92
WHEREAS, Matthews Cremation Group has performed annual Crawford and
Power Pak Retort inspections, is accepted by the New York State Department of
Environmental Services as meeting statutory requirements regarding inspections, and is the
manufacturer of these retorts, possessing proprietary engineering drawings and
specifications for such equipment, and for these reasons, the Town Board wishes to waive
the Town Purchasing Policy’s two (2) quotes, self-imposed bidding requirement in this
instance, and
WHEREAS, the Town will adhere to all New York State Law bidding requirements,
and
WHEREAS, this will ensure that the Town’s retorts will continue to operate in a
safe and efficient manner while continuing to meet DEC’s regulatory requirements, and
WHEREAS, the cost of inspections and repairs currently needed at the Pineview
Cemetery, proposed to be provided by Matthews Cremation Group, will cost $4,800 per unit
th
(under $20,000), not including freight charges, as delineated in its January 5, 2009
proposal, and the Cemetery Superintendent and Cemetery Commission have requested
authorization for such repairs,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that for the reasons outlined above, in these circumstances the
Queensbury Town Board hereby waives its requirement under the Town of Queensbury’s
Purchasing Policy for two (2) written quotes, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs
engagement of Matthews Cremation Group to inspect and repair the Crawford Cremation
th
Unit at the Pineview Cemetery as set forth in Matthews Cremation Group’s January 5,
2009 Proposal presented at this meeting, for an amount not to exceed $4,800 per unit (under
$20,000), not including freight charges, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that such authorization is contingent upon Matthews Cremation
Group providing the Town with satisfactory proof of insurance prior to commencing
work for the Town, and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 93
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs that payment shall be
made from Building Repairs Account No.: 002-8810-4070, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor, Cemetery Superintendent and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and
further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CREMATORY SEWER PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO.: 223, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHEREAS, by Memorandum dated June 9, 2009, the Town of Queensbury
Cemetery Commission advised the Town Board that it solicited bids for completion of a
sewer connection from the Crematory to the Town Sewer along Quaker Road (Project), and
WHEREAS, such total Project cost shall not exceed $10,438.68, as follows:
?
$6,400 for grinder pump installation, piping to the sewer manhole connection
and core drilling to be provided by Sanitary Sewer Service (lowest bid) as set
th
forth in their June 4, 2009 proposal presented at this meeting;
?
$838.68 for electrical work to be performed by Dean Electric Electrical
rd
Contractors as set forth in their April 23, 2009 proposal presented at this
meeting; and
?
$3,200 for a grinder pump and installation work to be supplied by Rolfe
th
Industries, Inc., (lowest bid) as set forth in their April 20, 2009 proposal
presented at this meeting;
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 94
and
WHEREAS, the Cemetery Commission and Cemetery Superintendent have
requested Town Board authorization of the Project as well as the coinciding 2009 Town
Budget Amendment and transfers to fund the Project,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the sewer
connection from the Crematory to the Town Sewer along Quaker Road (Project), such total
Project cost not to exceed $10,438.68 as follows:
?
$6,400 for grinder pump installation, piping to the sewer manhole connection
and core drilling to be provided by Sanitary Sewer Service (lowest bid) as set
th
forth in their June 4, 2009 proposal presented at this meeting;
?
$838.68 for electrical work to be performed by Dean Electric Electrical
rd
Contractors as set forth in their April 23, 2009 proposal presented at this
meeting; and
?
$3,200 for a grinder pump and installation work to be supplied by Rolfe
th
Industries, Inc., (lowest bid) as set forth in their April 20, 2009 proposal
presented at this meeting;
and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes the Town Budget Officer to
take any and all actions necessary to effectuate the following 2009 Budget Amendment:
?
Increase Revenue Account 002-0000-52770 Misc. Revenue by
$10,438.68;
?
Increase Appropriation Account 002-8810-2899 Capital Construction by
$10,438.68;
and
BE IT FURTHER,
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 95
RESOLVED, that such authorization is contingent upon the respective contractors
providing the Town with satisfactory proof of insurance prior to commencing work for
the Town, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor to execute any needed Agreements and/or documentation, and the Town
Supervisor, Cemetery Superintendent and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and
further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
Deleted:
¶
¶
RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AWARD FOR CASE #5764
IN CONNECTION WITH TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NEIGHBORHOOD
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY RENEWAL
CDBG PROGRAM #962HR37-08
RESOLUTION NO.: 224, 2009
Deleted:
¶
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
Deleted:
¶
#5764
WHEREAS, a single family property Case File has been determined to be
eligible for rehabilitation grant assistance and the owner of the property has requested
such assistance, and funds were approved via Resolution 416.2008 through the Town of
Queensbury Housing Rehabilitation Program using HOME 20073216 funds, and
WHEREAS, due to the complicated nature of the required septic system
replacement additional funds are needed, and
WHEREAS, property rehabilitation specifications will be provided to three (3)
qualified contractors for bid, and
WHEREAS, the low bid cost to complete the work specified will be verified upon
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 96
receipt of bidding documents, and
WHEREAS, Shelter Planning & Development, Inc. has overseen the grant
process and has verified that it has been followed in this case and recommends approving
this grant, and
WHEREAS, a lien will be filed against the property for the benefit of the Town
for a period of five years from the completion of the rehabilitation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
#5764
RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury approves a grant for Case File ,
Twenty-five thousand dollars and
Queensbury, New York, in the amount not to exceed:
no cents ($25,000.00)
and authorizes and directs either the Town Supervisor or Town of
Queensbury Senior Planner to execute Grant Award Agreements and take such other and
further action as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
h
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough
NOES: None
ABSENTNone
:
RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AWARD FOR CASE #5761
IN CONNECTION WITH TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NEIGHBORHOOD
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY RENEWAL
CDBG PROGRAM #962HR37-08
RESOLUTION NO.: 225, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
#5761
WHEREAS, a single family property Case File has been determined to be
eligible for rehabilitation grant assistance and the owner of the property has requested
such assistance, and funds were approved via Resolution 413,2008 through the Town of
Queensbury Housing Rehabilitation Program using HOME 20073216 funds, and
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 97
WHEREAS, due to the complicated nature of the project additional funds are
needed, and
WHEREAS, property rehabilitation specifications will be provided to three (3)
qualified contractors for bid, and
WHEREAS, the low bid cost to complete the work specified will be verified upon
receipt of bidding documents, and
WHEREAS, Shelter Planning & Development, Inc. has overseen the grant
process and has verified that it has been followed in this case and recommends approving
this grant, and
WHEREAS, a lien will be filed against the property for the benefit of the Town
for a period of five years from the completion of the rehabilitation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
#5761
RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury approves a grant for Case File ,
Twenty-five thousand dollars and
Queensbury, New York, in the amount not to exceed:
no cents ($25,000.00)
and authorizes and directs either the Town Supervisor or Town of
Queensbury Senior Planner to execute Grant Award Agreements and take such other and
further action as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
h
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Stec, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SETTLEMENT OF PENDING
ARTICLE 7 REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT CASES
COMMENCED BY GLENS FALLS COUNTRY CLUB, INC.
RESOLUTION NO.:226, 2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 98
WHEREAS, the Glens Falls Country Club, Inc., (Petitioner) previously
commenced Article 7 Real Property Assessment Review cases in 2005 - 2008 against the
Town of Queensbury concerning the assessments on certain parcels of property located
on Round Pond, Mannis and Country Club Roads, Town of Queensbury, having Tax Map
(
Nos.:289.18-1-37, 296.5-1-6, 296.6-1-12, 296.7-1-19 and 296.10-1-20,hereinafter
collectively the “Property”), and
WHEREAS, the Town Assessor has reviewed the cases with Town Counsel and
the Assessor has recommended a settlement proposal to the Town Board, and
WHEREAS, the Queensbury Union Free School District has approved the
proposed settlement,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the settlement of
the pending Article 7 proceedings filed by Glens Falls Country Club, Inc., as follows:
1. The Petitioner will discontinue the 2005 and 2006 Petitions, without
refunds or assessment reductions by the Town, and the total of the assessments on the
parcels comprising the Property shall be revised as follows on the 2007 and 2008
Assessment Rolls, with the Assessor to allocate the reductions among the parcels as she
deems appropriate:
2. The assessments on the Property on the 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
assessment rolls for certain property located on Round Pond, Mannis and Country Club
Roads, Town of Queensbury – Tax Map Nos.:289.18-1-37, 296.5-1-6, 296.6-1-12,
296.7-1-19 and 296.10-1-20,the shall be set as follows:
AGGREGATE
AGGREGATE
ASSESSMENT ROLL CURRENT ASSESSMENT REDUCED ASSESSMENT
2007 $5,376,900 $3,100,000
2008 $5,376,900 $3,100,000
and
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 99
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes payment of a total Town refund,
combined for taxes based on the 2007 and 2008 Assessment Rolls, of approximately
$5,250, with the final amount of the Town’s refund to be as calculated by the Warren
County Treasurer’s Office and to be equal to the Town’s proportional share, based on tax
rates, of a total combined refund of $50,000 from the Town, County and School District,
with such Town refund to be paid, with interest if ordered by the Court, within 60 days
after Petitioner serves a copy of the filed Court Order, with Notice of Entry, approving
the settlement on the Warren County Treasurer, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Aggregate Reduced Assessment of $3,100,000 shall be
effective for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 Assessment Rolls, as provided for under Real
Property Tax law Section 727, subject to the exceptions provided for in Section 727, and
the Assessor shall allocate the aggregate amount among the parcels of the Property as she
deems appropriate, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town
Supervisor, Town Assessor, Town Budget Officer and/or Town Counsel to execute
settlement documents and take any additional steps necessary to effectuate the proposed
settlement in accordance with the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 15 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
6.0 CORRESPONDENCE
6.1 May 2009 Report from Community Development on file
7.0 TOWN BOARD DISCUSSIONS
Ward I COUNCILMAN METIVIER
1. The Highway Dept. will be starting their paving projects, if anyone has any
areas on their streets that need attention please let us know as soon as
possible. Contact the Highway Superintendent or a Councilman with your
concerns.
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Outline numbered +
Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3,
+ Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left +
Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" +
Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Outline numbered +
Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3,
+ Start at: 4 + Alignment: Left +
Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" +
Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start
at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
0.5" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
0.75"
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 100
th
2. Read an Article from the US News and World Report (June 4) listed our area
as one of top ten housing markets that will appreciate handsomely over the
next decade.
3. Congratulations to all the graduates and please be careful over the new few
weeks.
Ward II COUNCILMAN MONTESI
Formatted: Superscript
1. This week starts those that are running for election getting petition signed it is
also a very humbling experience.
Ward III COUNCILMAN STROUGH
1. Attended the Lake George Association Annual Meeting – Speaker Colleen
Hickey from the Education and Outreach Coordinator for the Lake Champlain
Basin Program of which Lake George is part of that basin. Title of Address
Lawn to Lake, Tips For Green Lawns Not Green Lakes. Also toured the
floating classroom which provide the local youth an opportunity to understand
the integration and balance of mother nature
2. Ron and I met with Time Warner Cable, hope to have an agreement by
September
Ward IV COUNCILMAN BREWER
1. It was a pleasure to go down to the Soap Box Derby it is always interesting to
watch the kids see their faces going down the hill and then see them when
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
they come back up either won or lost. In my mind it is a worthy project.
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start
SUPERVISOR STEC
at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
1. Queensbury’s web site www.queensbury.net all meeting minutes for Town
0.5" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board and agendas available on the site
along with other announcements and information
0.75"
2. Thanked TV8 and our Sponsors for televising our meetings
3. Housing strength article-covers Warren and Washington County
4. Executed the Kingsbury Water Contract 350,000 gallons
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start
RESOLUTION NO. 227.2009
at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
0.5" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
0.75"
RESOLVED,
that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby moves into an
Executive Session to discuss Union grievance.
th
Duly adopted this 11 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 228
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start
at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
0.5" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
0.75"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start
at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
0.5" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
0.75"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Superscript
Formatted: Font: Bold
TOWN BOARD MEETING JUNE 15, 2009 MTG. #25 101
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
RESOLVED,
that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its
Executive Session.
th
Duly adopted this 11 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
No Action taken during Executive Session
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING TOWN BOARD MEETING
RESOLUTION NO. 229,2009
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
Formatted: Superscript
RESOLVED,
that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its
Regular Meeting.
th
Duly adopted this 11 day of June, 2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Montesi, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Respectfully submitted,
Miss Darleen M. Dougher
Town Clerk-Queensbury
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Superscript
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Bold