1987-02-10 40
TOWN BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 1987
TOWN BOARD MEMBERS
Mrs. Frances Walter-Supervisor
Mr. George Kurosaka, Councilman
Mr. Stephen Borgos, Councilman
Mr. Ronald Montesi, Councilman
Mrs. Betty Monahan, Councilman
7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN MONTESI
PRESS:Glens Falls Post Star, WENU
PUBLIC OFFICIALS: Ralph VanDusen, Stuart Mesinger
PUBLIC HEARING-REZONING OF WEST SIDE OF BAY ROAD - NOTICE SHOWN
SUPERVISOR WALTER-The first order of business this evening is a Public Hearing regarding
the re-zoning of Bay Road, the proposal is to rezone a portion of the West side of Bay Road
from a UR 5 to Highway Commercial. The area we are looking at is the portion of Bay Road
that is already zoned commercial, approximately 600 north of the Cronin Road.
GARFIELD RAYMOND-320 Bay Road, I am speaking neither in opposition or in favor of...I
am looking at the proposal you have and where you are attempting to change the zone from
a UR5 to a HC15 and the extension goes out and borders my property and I have approximately
30 acres of land which it abuts to, and I would like to extend the HC15 to the northerly end
of my property which would be an additional 800 feet up the road. If you are going to extend
that out to my property, the logical thing to do is to extend it out to the northern end of my
property which would then be right up to the swamp area.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked if he was the land owner who has the 16.8 acres?
GARFIELD RAYMOND-I have two parcels, one is 16.89 and the parcel adjacent to that is
13.98, plus another parcel which is 100 x 100 which is on Bay Road.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-..you are indicating that although you are not for or against where
it is, you would like to see it in another place?
GARFIELD RAYMOND-I would like to have it extended, I would be in opposition, if you are
not going to change the whole area, but if you are going to change and extend it I would not
be in opposition because it would incorporate my parcels also.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Would you give me some reasoning behind your statement as to why
you would be in opposition to where it is now and yet you feel it would be proper if your property
was included.
GARFIELD RAYMOND-Because what you are doing is rezoning a UR5 area which is comprised
now of only one or two parcels which are vacant and most of the property you are rezoning
has already been constructed on and already has existing buildings and you are rezoning it
for what I call independent use from individuals and what I am saying is that the property will
abut against my property I am asking if it can be extended out?
COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-You can't do that at this Public Hearing, you have to request
a rezoning on your own.
GARFIELD RAYMOND-Then I am saying I can also oppose it.
COUNCILMAN MONTESI-The property of Singleton's is not going to UR5 it is going to Highway
Commercial because as you say the property has already been established...the use of...it has
always been zoned something other than its actual usage. We felt in rezoning that property
we were rezoning it for what it is being used for, commercial and the reason we haven't gone
beyond that line is that there are residents in there and we didn't want to push the Highway
Commercial up Bay Road. The property you own, seems to have a little more sensitivity in
terms of streams going through there, wetlands for the environment, we certainly would be
forcing Highway Commercial Development onto what I consider a somewhat sensitive area.
We drew the line logically where the last property was developed for Highway Commercial
41
use.
GARFIELD RAYMOND-I really don't think that is the case, your Highway Commercial does
not extend beyond the land just purchased by Woodbury's and I don't think that was zoned
for Highway Commercial, so you are looking at the properties which would be south of that
parcel, the corner of Glenwood and the corner of Bay which is zoned already...and what you
are trying to do is to extend that to an additional 680 feet in depth and then an additional
eight or nine hundred thousand feet north and that property is zoned commercially but not
Highway Commercial 15 and I don't think they fall in that. We are looking again at already
existing businesses and these businesses have filed for variance applications in order to erect
those businesses, and if you are going to extend a HC15 of an additional thousand feet. I think
you ought to extend it to include my property, otherwise you are going to have a HC15 bordering
UR5 property and I don't want commerical property adjacent to my potential duplex that we
would be building.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-That looks like an extremely wet area you are talking about.
GARFIELD RAYMOND-The land is no wetter than the land south of that which is the property
dealing with Singleton, Hughes property.
MRS. HOWE-I own two houses there and one is in the HC15 and the other isn't and asked why
this was?
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked if Mrs. Howe wanted to be in the zone. Said at one point a zone
went through the property, and now they are trying to take it down the property line and it
would be that different uses could happen on that land.
COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Whether it is zoned noncommercial or commercial the tax bill won't
change, the only advantage is that if it is zoned Highway Commercial, and someone wants
to buy your house or your lot, they can buy it for more than just a house...they can buy it for
the potential of a business.
TED BIGELOW-Representing Woodbury...We have purchased the Westcott property and just
for the public sake gave a brief history as to why this rezoning came about...Its about 15 acres...The
front parcel is between Evelyns Florist and Dr. Westcott's property, both are commercial uses.
The zoning line between HC 15 and UR 5 goes down approximately the center of the front
portion of our property. There is also a requirement in your zoning that when you have a
boundary change you have to stay back fifty feet from that boundary which renders almost
the front part of this property useless to us. I think the intention is to end it at Singleton simple
because that is where the commercial use is ended. There is commercial uses all around that
area and all we are asking is to be able to use our property for its best use and we feel that
is commercial.
COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Asked Mr. Bigelow if the Howe property would have any impact on
his property?
MR. BIGELOW-No and as far as the rear portion of our property is concerned, we plan on having
it remain residential in its existing zone.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for further comments, hearing none public hearing was closed.
DISCUSSION
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for a consensus of the Town Board?
COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Asked if Mr. Mesinger had reviewed this with the Planning Board
and referred to the problem of access flow onto Glenwood.
STUART MESINGER-We haven't reviewed that aspect of it right now and I can't say but it
is already zoned for that. We do that under normal procedures and as far as the two other
points raised, while I am up here, the Planning Board felt for the individual homeowners on
Glenwood who were included in the Public Notice, if they didn't want to be in, it is really up
to them, but it is for their benefit because it makes a straighter line. As far as Mr. Raymond's
proposal this recognizes an existing situation that is already commercial.
COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Noted that Glenwood Avenue is a very narrow road and busy road,
right now it has commercial on one side that creates quite a bit of traffic,and asked about
the traffic increase?
42
STUART MESINGER-Agreed. There may eventually need to be signalization on that intersection
and if the road continues to develop that will happen.
OPEN FORUM
GARFIELD RAYMOND-Stated that if an area was going to be rezoned then it should include
the whole area and if they were going to pick and choose which properties will be in and out
then it will create a problem.
SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for further comment, hearing none the Open Forum was closed.
OPEN FORUM CLOSED
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES
RESOLUTION NO.52, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr.Stephen Borgos.
RESOLVED, that the Town Board Minutes of January 13, 1987, January 20, 1987, January, 27,
1987 be and hereby are approved.
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE BINGO LICENSE
RESOLUTION NO.53, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos, who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. George Kurosaka.
f
RESOLVED, that Bingo License No. 2707 be and hereby is approved allowing V.F.W. Post 6196
to hold Bingo Occasions from February 3rd. 1987 through June 30, 1987 and be it further
RESOLVED, that Bingo License No. 2703 be and hereby is amended to allow G. F. Lodge #81
B.P.O.E. to add additional occasions as follows: February 21, 1987, March 7, 14th, and 28th,
1987.
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT
RESOLUTION NO.54, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos, who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. Ronald Montesi
WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to expand the number of Directors now serving on the Queensbv
Economic Development Corporation, and
WHEREAS, the By-Laws of the Corporation authorize the Town Board of Directors by inclusion
of people from various professions,
i
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that Thomas Clausi of Honey Hollow Road, Queensbury is hereby appointed Director
of the Queensbury Economic Development Corporation.
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
43
Noes:None
Absent:None
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DETAILS OF $150,300.00 BOND FOR THE CLENDON BROOK
WATER DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.55, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan, who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. George Kurosaka.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York,
asJollows:
I
SECTION 1. Of the $4799800.00 serial bonds authorized by bond resolution dated September
24, 1985, for the construction of a water system to serve the Clendon Brook Water District,
including original furnishings, equipment, machinery or apparatus required in connection therewith,
and also including the acquisition of land and rights in land required in connection therewith,
there shall be issued and sold a as a statutory installment (serial) bond, a $150,300.00 bond.
It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object
or purpose is forty years pursuant to subdivision 1 of paragraph a Section 11.00 of the Local
Finance Law, computed from September 25, 1985, the date of the first bond anticipation note
issued therefore. It is hereby further determined that the sum of $37,575.00, from a source
other than the proceeds of bonds or bond anticipation notes, will be used to reduce outstanding
bond anticipation notes of such Town for such purpose.
SECTION Z. The serial bond described in the preceding section shall be designated substantially
CLENDON BROOK WATER DISTRICT STATUTORY INSTALLMENT (SERIAL) BOND, 1987,
shall be dated February 11, 1987, and shall be in the amount of $1509300.00. The bond shall
mature in the amount of $20,300.00 on March 15, 1988, $20,000.00 on March 15 in each of the
years 1989 to 1994, both inclusive, and $10,000.00 on March 15, 1995 (the "Maturity Date"), and
shall bear interest payable on March 15, 1987 and semiannually thereafter until the Maturity
Date, on September 15 and March 15. Such bond shall bear interest at five and one-half (5.50%)
percent per annum, which rate was determined in the manner provided in Section 63.00 of
the Local Finance Law. Such bond shall be in registered form and shall not be registrable
to bearer or convertible into bearer coupon form. Principal of the bond will be payable to
National Savings Bank of Albany at its principal office which is located at 90 State Street,
Albany, New York. Interest on the bond will be payable by check or draft mailed to National
Savings Bank of Albany, at its principal office. Principal of and interest on the bonds will
be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Such bond shall be executed
in the name of the Supervisor, and a facsimile of its corporate seal shall be imprinted thereon
and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of its Town Clerk.
SECTION 3. All other matters, except as provided herein relating to such bonds shall be determined
by the Supervisor. Such bonds shall contain substantially the recital of validity clause provided
for in Section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law and shall otherwise be in such form and contain
such recitals, in addition to those required by Section 51.00 of the Local Finance Law, as the
Supervisor shall determine.
SECTION 4. The faith and credit of said Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York,
are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on such bonds
as the same respectively become due and payable. An annual appropriation shall be made
in each year sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such bonds becoming due and
payable in such year.
SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote on roll call,
which resulted as:
Ayes: Mr. George Kurosaka, Mr. Stephen Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW AUTHORIZING OWNERS AND
OPERATORS OF AVIATION MALL TO ISSUE PARKING VIOLATION SUMMONSES
RESOLUTION NO.56, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. George Kurosaka.
44
WHEREAS, a proposed Local Law to authorize Owners & Operators of Aviation Mall to issue
parking violation summonses, has been prepared and
WHEREAS, the proposed Local Law is worthy of consideration for legislative action,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that a public hearing be held concerning the proposed adoption of a Local Law
and that said public hearing be held at 7:30 p.m. in the Meeting Room of the Town of Queensbury
(Warren County), New York on the 24th day of February, 1987 at which time all persons will
be heard both in favor of and opposed to said Local Law and it is further
RESOLVED, That the Town Clerk be hereby directed and authorized to publish and provide
notice of said public hearing as may be required by Law.
RESOLUTION IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN PENDING FURTHER INFORMATION
DISCUSSION HELD-Proposed Local Law -The Aviation Mall has requested the proposed local
law -owners and operators of Aviation Mall to issue parking violations summonses-noted a
problem with fire lanes and handicapped parking areas...Councilman Kurosaka questioned if
the town should be doing this on private property and should we be spending money for constables
to subsidize the mall...Councilman Borgos suggested that the fine be raised to $25.00 and $50.00...it
was suggested that the local law be tightened as to who can give out tickets...it was the decision
of the entire town board to withdraw the proposed local law for further information...
COMMUNICATIONS
BID OPENING
Used Crawler Loader, Bid Opening February 3, 1987 at 2:00 P.M.
State Equipment-Latham, New York-Non-Collusive attached - 1972 Dresser International -
$24,500.00 - (with cab and heater) $28,400.00 - 1978 Dresser International - $19,000.00, $19,000.00
- (with cab and heater) $22,900.00.
Scott McLaughlin-Glens Falls, N.Y.-Non-Collusive attached - caterpillar Loader - $9,000.00
Williams-Houston,Texas - Non-Collusive-none - caterpillar 983 1974 - $58,000.00
- International 1979 - $39,500.00
LTR., James Coughlin, Superintendent Landfill recommended that the Town Board accept
the bid of Scott McLaughlin, Truck and Equipment Sales.
RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT BID
RESOLUTION NO.56, Introduced by Mr. George Kurosaka who moved for its adoption seconded
by Mrs. Betty Monahan.
WHEREAS, James Coughlin Superintendent of the Queensbury-Glens Falls Landfill did recommend
that we advertise for bids for a used Crawler Loader, and
WHEREAS, three bids were submitted and received and opened at the specified time and place
by the Director of Purchasing/Town Clerk Darleen M. Dougher, and such bid were then turned
over to James Coughlin for his recommendation, and
WHEREAS, James Coughlin by letter has recommended that the bid be awarded to Scott McLoughlin
in the amount of $9000.00, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby accepts the recommendation
of James Coughlin as mentioned above, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the financing for such used Crawler Loader is in the 1987 Queensbury-Glens
Falls Landfill Budget. —'
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
45
Ltr.-Mrs. Kathaleen P. Choppa-regarding the speed limit on Bay Road—on file
RESOLUTION REQUESTING FEASIBILITY STUDY TO REVIEW SPEED LIMIT
RESOLUTION NO.57, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption seconded
by Mr. George Kurosaka
WHEREAS, a resident of Bay Road have approached the Town Board over the existing speed
limit on Bay Road to be lowered to 45 miles per hour, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
kRESOLVED, that the Town Clerk be authorized to send the proper form to the Department
of Transportation through the Warren County D.P.W. requesting that the speed limit be lowered
on Bay Road from Haviland Road to Sunnyside Road.
Duly adopted by the following vote.
Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
REPORTS
Town Clerk and Building & Code Enforcement Report for January, 1987, on file.
RESOLUTION AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO RE-ZONE PORTION OF WEST SIDE
OF BAY ROAD FROM UR-5 to HC-15
RESOLUTION NO.58, Introduced by Mr. Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mrs. Betty Monahan.
WHEREAS, Michael and Ralph Woodbury requested in writing that the Town Board of the Town
of Queensbury make a change of zone in an area more particularly described in Schedule A,
j and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Queensbury has heretofore approved the said
re-zoning, and
WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Board by resolution dated January 14, 1987, recommended
approval of said re-zoning, and
WHEREAS, public comment on the issue was received at a duly advertised public hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the Town Board finds that Highway Commercial-15 within the area described in
Schedule A is consistent with the purposes and goals set forth in the Town of Queensbury Zoning
Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to re-zone
from UR-5 to HC-15 the west side of Bay Road more particularly described in Schedule A,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the zoning map for the Town of Queensbury is hereby amended
to provide for the change of zone on lands described in Schedule A, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment shall be effective upon completion of all
requirements of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Ronald Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: Mr. Borgos
Abstain: Mr. Kurosaka
Absent: None
46
DISCUSSION BEFORE VOTE
COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Referred to Counsel as long as we don't enlarge upon the advertised
area may we go ahead and pass this if we were to take out a section?
TOWN COUNSEL-Noted that you have to have a basis to take it out and I am not certain of
that I would have to search the records.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LEAD AGENCY AND ADOPTING DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIEIC:AI
OF ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGES
RESOLUTION NO. 59, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr.Ronald Montesi.
WHEREAS, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law established the State Environmental
Quality Review Act, and
WHEREAS, such act requires environmental review of certain actions undertaken by local
governments, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board proposes to enact certain changes in the Town Zoning Ordinance
after a public hearing on February 10, 1987, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified as lead agency with
respect to the zoning ordinance changes proposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is hereby designated lead agency
for purposes of SEQRA compliance in the adoption of the zoning ordinance amendment re-zoning
certain lands on the west side of Bay Road from UR-5 to HC-15, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury adopt the annexed notice of determination
of non-significance, and that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Commissioner of
the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Region 5 offices of the D.E.C.
I
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: Mr. Kurosaka
SEQRA
Negative Declaration
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulation pertaining to Article
8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has determined that the proposed action described
below will not have significant effect on the environment.
1. Title of Action : Amendments to the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance changing
a zone classification from UR-5 to HC 15.
2. SEQRA Status: Unlisted action.
3. Description of Action : To enlarge the areas permitting commercial uses.
The general area proposed is more particularly described in Schedule A.
Detailed maps of the area affected were made available for inspection at the Town's
Clerk's Office from January 27, 1987 to February 10, 1987 during normal business hours.
47
4. Reasons Supporting Determination:
a) The area in question is already commercial.
Rezoning would recognize and legitimatize the existing situation.
b) The other side of Bay Road is already zoned highway commercial to approximately
600 feet north of Cronin Road.
c) No major changes in land use would occur. Rather, the proposal would allow infill
development of two vacant parcels. Incompatible land uses would result if the vacant
property was developed for high density residential uses as currently allowed under
the UR-5 zoning (i.e., we would have a strip consisting of commercial, residential,
commercial, residential, and commercial uses).
d) The proposal does not impact residential properties.
5. For Further Information:
Contact Person: Frances J. Walter
Town Supervisor Town of Queensbury
Bay & Haviland Roads.
Queensbury, NY 12801
(518) 792-5832
6. The Town of Queensbury maintains a file of its proceedings and determination and the
supporting reasons therein, which file is available for public inspection.
Dated: February 10, 1987 Town Board
Town of Queensbury
Bay & Haviland Rds.
Queensbury, NY 12801
Suggested description of the zone of HC-15 proposed expansion at the northwest corner of
Bay and Glenwood Avenue
All that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the Town of Queensbury,
p p y� g g ' Queensb
County of Warren and the State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as
follows: BEGINNING at said intersection of the center of Bay Road and the center of Glenwood
Avenue; running thence westerly along the center of said Glenwood Avenue approximately
680 feet to a point therein at the southerly prolongation of the westerly bounds of the lands
of Wheeler and Irene Howe and the easterly bounds of the lands of John and Leone Curley
intersects said centerline; thence running northerly along said prolongation and the said westerly
bounds of said lands of Curley and through the lands of Michael and Ralph Woodbury, a distance
of 660 feet more or less to a point; thence running easterly along a line that is the prolongation
westerly of the southerly bounds of the lands of Richard Hughes Jr., a distance of 66 feet more
or less to the southwest corner of said lands of Hughes, Jr.; thence running northerly along
the westerly bounds of said Hughes and the westerly bounds of the lands of James F. Singleton,
Inc. to the northwest corner of said lands of James F. Singleton, Inc. on the southerly bounds
of the lands of Garfield Raymond and Ronald Newell; thence running easterly along said lands
of Raymond and Newell and the northerly bounds of the lands of James F. Singleton, Inc. and
a prolongation easterly of said lands, a distance of 650 feet, more or less to the center of said
Bay Road; thence running southerly along said centerline, a distance of 1340 feet, more or
less to the point and place of beginning.
Van Dusen & Steves
Land Surveyors
NY St. Lic. #35617
RECESSED FOR THE SIGNING OF BOND FOR THE CLENDON BROOK WATER DISTRICT
( RECONVENED
iT
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AUDIT OF BILLS
RESOLUTION NO.60, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. George Kurosaka.
RESOLVED, that Audit of Bills as appears on February 10, 1987, Abstract and numbered 119-570
and totaling $320,506.96 be and hereby are approved
Duly adopted by the following vote:
4S
Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
DISCUSSION held on Memorandum of Understanding with developers regarding Local Law
#4 of 1986 it was agreed that a standard form should be established and a performance bond
will be required—regarding the agreement with Salvatore Beltrone and Thomas Farone Counsel
noted that the new or prospective owners submitted a different subdivision plan which included
arrangement of the transmission line within the development and Dennis Dickinson, an engineer, -
compared the new map, plan and report to determine whether any kind of engineering would
result. I discussed this with Dennis and his findings in terms of changes was a slight decrease
in the amount of pipe to be placed within the district, it is my legal opinion that the changes
between the existing map plan and report and the proposal is minimal in nature and does not
require a resubmission of a map, report and hearing.Supervisor Walter requested that a resolution
be considered regarding an agreement between the Town and Mr. Beltrone and Mr. Farone...agreed
'`�
to by the Board.
RESOLUTION OF AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TOWN WATER
DISTRICT.
RESOLUTION NO.61__Introduced by Mr. George Kurosaka who moved for its adoption, seconded
by Mr. Stephen Borgos.
RESOLVED, that the Supervisor Walter is authorized by the Town Board to enter into agreement
with Salvatore Beltrone and Thomas Farone relating to the establishment of a Town Water
District.
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter
Noes: None
Absent: None
ON MOTION MEETING WAS ADJOURNED
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
DARLEEN DOUGHER, TOWN CLERK®