Loading...
1987-02-10 40 TOWN BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 1987 TOWN BOARD MEMBERS Mrs. Frances Walter-Supervisor Mr. George Kurosaka, Councilman Mr. Stephen Borgos, Councilman Mr. Ronald Montesi, Councilman Mrs. Betty Monahan, Councilman 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN MONTESI PRESS:Glens Falls Post Star, WENU PUBLIC OFFICIALS: Ralph VanDusen, Stuart Mesinger PUBLIC HEARING-REZONING OF WEST SIDE OF BAY ROAD - NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR WALTER-The first order of business this evening is a Public Hearing regarding the re-zoning of Bay Road, the proposal is to rezone a portion of the West side of Bay Road from a UR 5 to Highway Commercial. The area we are looking at is the portion of Bay Road that is already zoned commercial, approximately 600 north of the Cronin Road. GARFIELD RAYMOND-320 Bay Road, I am speaking neither in opposition or in favor of...I am looking at the proposal you have and where you are attempting to change the zone from a UR5 to a HC15 and the extension goes out and borders my property and I have approximately 30 acres of land which it abuts to, and I would like to extend the HC15 to the northerly end of my property which would be an additional 800 feet up the road. If you are going to extend that out to my property, the logical thing to do is to extend it out to the northern end of my property which would then be right up to the swamp area. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked if he was the land owner who has the 16.8 acres? GARFIELD RAYMOND-I have two parcels, one is 16.89 and the parcel adjacent to that is 13.98, plus another parcel which is 100 x 100 which is on Bay Road. SUPERVISOR WALTER-..you are indicating that although you are not for or against where it is, you would like to see it in another place? GARFIELD RAYMOND-I would like to have it extended, I would be in opposition, if you are not going to change the whole area, but if you are going to change and extend it I would not be in opposition because it would incorporate my parcels also. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Would you give me some reasoning behind your statement as to why you would be in opposition to where it is now and yet you feel it would be proper if your property was included. GARFIELD RAYMOND-Because what you are doing is rezoning a UR5 area which is comprised now of only one or two parcels which are vacant and most of the property you are rezoning has already been constructed on and already has existing buildings and you are rezoning it for what I call independent use from individuals and what I am saying is that the property will abut against my property I am asking if it can be extended out? COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-You can't do that at this Public Hearing, you have to request a rezoning on your own. GARFIELD RAYMOND-Then I am saying I can also oppose it. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-The property of Singleton's is not going to UR5 it is going to Highway Commercial because as you say the property has already been established...the use of...it has always been zoned something other than its actual usage. We felt in rezoning that property we were rezoning it for what it is being used for, commercial and the reason we haven't gone beyond that line is that there are residents in there and we didn't want to push the Highway Commercial up Bay Road. The property you own, seems to have a little more sensitivity in terms of streams going through there, wetlands for the environment, we certainly would be forcing Highway Commercial Development onto what I consider a somewhat sensitive area. We drew the line logically where the last property was developed for Highway Commercial 41 use. GARFIELD RAYMOND-I really don't think that is the case, your Highway Commercial does not extend beyond the land just purchased by Woodbury's and I don't think that was zoned for Highway Commercial, so you are looking at the properties which would be south of that parcel, the corner of Glenwood and the corner of Bay which is zoned already...and what you are trying to do is to extend that to an additional 680 feet in depth and then an additional eight or nine hundred thousand feet north and that property is zoned commercially but not Highway Commercial 15 and I don't think they fall in that. We are looking again at already existing businesses and these businesses have filed for variance applications in order to erect those businesses, and if you are going to extend a HC15 of an additional thousand feet. I think you ought to extend it to include my property, otherwise you are going to have a HC15 bordering UR5 property and I don't want commerical property adjacent to my potential duplex that we would be building. SUPERVISOR WALTER-That looks like an extremely wet area you are talking about. GARFIELD RAYMOND-The land is no wetter than the land south of that which is the property dealing with Singleton, Hughes property. MRS. HOWE-I own two houses there and one is in the HC15 and the other isn't and asked why this was? SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked if Mrs. Howe wanted to be in the zone. Said at one point a zone went through the property, and now they are trying to take it down the property line and it would be that different uses could happen on that land. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Whether it is zoned noncommercial or commercial the tax bill won't change, the only advantage is that if it is zoned Highway Commercial, and someone wants to buy your house or your lot, they can buy it for more than just a house...they can buy it for the potential of a business. TED BIGELOW-Representing Woodbury...We have purchased the Westcott property and just for the public sake gave a brief history as to why this rezoning came about...Its about 15 acres...The front parcel is between Evelyns Florist and Dr. Westcott's property, both are commercial uses. The zoning line between HC 15 and UR 5 goes down approximately the center of the front portion of our property. There is also a requirement in your zoning that when you have a boundary change you have to stay back fifty feet from that boundary which renders almost the front part of this property useless to us. I think the intention is to end it at Singleton simple because that is where the commercial use is ended. There is commercial uses all around that area and all we are asking is to be able to use our property for its best use and we feel that is commercial. COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Asked Mr. Bigelow if the Howe property would have any impact on his property? MR. BIGELOW-No and as far as the rear portion of our property is concerned, we plan on having it remain residential in its existing zone. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for further comments, hearing none public hearing was closed. DISCUSSION SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for a consensus of the Town Board? COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Asked if Mr. Mesinger had reviewed this with the Planning Board and referred to the problem of access flow onto Glenwood. STUART MESINGER-We haven't reviewed that aspect of it right now and I can't say but it is already zoned for that. We do that under normal procedures and as far as the two other points raised, while I am up here, the Planning Board felt for the individual homeowners on Glenwood who were included in the Public Notice, if they didn't want to be in, it is really up to them, but it is for their benefit because it makes a straighter line. As far as Mr. Raymond's proposal this recognizes an existing situation that is already commercial. COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Noted that Glenwood Avenue is a very narrow road and busy road, right now it has commercial on one side that creates quite a bit of traffic,and asked about the traffic increase? 42 STUART MESINGER-Agreed. There may eventually need to be signalization on that intersection and if the road continues to develop that will happen. OPEN FORUM GARFIELD RAYMOND-Stated that if an area was going to be rezoned then it should include the whole area and if they were going to pick and choose which properties will be in and out then it will create a problem. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Asked for further comment, hearing none the Open Forum was closed. OPEN FORUM CLOSED RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES RESOLUTION NO.52, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr.Stephen Borgos. RESOLVED, that the Town Board Minutes of January 13, 1987, January 20, 1987, January, 27, 1987 be and hereby are approved. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes:Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO APPROVE BINGO LICENSE RESOLUTION NO.53, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos, who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. George Kurosaka. f RESOLVED, that Bingo License No. 2707 be and hereby is approved allowing V.F.W. Post 6196 to hold Bingo Occasions from February 3rd. 1987 through June 30, 1987 and be it further RESOLVED, that Bingo License No. 2703 be and hereby is amended to allow G. F. Lodge #81 B.P.O.E. to add additional occasions as follows: February 21, 1987, March 7, 14th, and 28th, 1987. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO APPOINT RESOLUTION NO.54, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos, who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Ronald Montesi WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to expand the number of Directors now serving on the Queensbv Economic Development Corporation, and WHEREAS, the By-Laws of the Corporation authorize the Town Board of Directors by inclusion of people from various professions, i NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Thomas Clausi of Honey Hollow Road, Queensbury is hereby appointed Director of the Queensbury Economic Development Corporation. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes:Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter 43 Noes:None Absent:None RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DETAILS OF $150,300.00 BOND FOR THE CLENDON BROOK WATER DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.55, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan, who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. George Kurosaka. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, asJollows: I SECTION 1. Of the $4799800.00 serial bonds authorized by bond resolution dated September 24, 1985, for the construction of a water system to serve the Clendon Brook Water District, including original furnishings, equipment, machinery or apparatus required in connection therewith, and also including the acquisition of land and rights in land required in connection therewith, there shall be issued and sold a as a statutory installment (serial) bond, a $150,300.00 bond. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is forty years pursuant to subdivision 1 of paragraph a Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law, computed from September 25, 1985, the date of the first bond anticipation note issued therefore. It is hereby further determined that the sum of $37,575.00, from a source other than the proceeds of bonds or bond anticipation notes, will be used to reduce outstanding bond anticipation notes of such Town for such purpose. SECTION Z. The serial bond described in the preceding section shall be designated substantially CLENDON BROOK WATER DISTRICT STATUTORY INSTALLMENT (SERIAL) BOND, 1987, shall be dated February 11, 1987, and shall be in the amount of $1509300.00. The bond shall mature in the amount of $20,300.00 on March 15, 1988, $20,000.00 on March 15 in each of the years 1989 to 1994, both inclusive, and $10,000.00 on March 15, 1995 (the "Maturity Date"), and shall bear interest payable on March 15, 1987 and semiannually thereafter until the Maturity Date, on September 15 and March 15. Such bond shall bear interest at five and one-half (5.50%) percent per annum, which rate was determined in the manner provided in Section 63.00 of the Local Finance Law. Such bond shall be in registered form and shall not be registrable to bearer or convertible into bearer coupon form. Principal of the bond will be payable to National Savings Bank of Albany at its principal office which is located at 90 State Street, Albany, New York. Interest on the bond will be payable by check or draft mailed to National Savings Bank of Albany, at its principal office. Principal of and interest on the bonds will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Such bond shall be executed in the name of the Supervisor, and a facsimile of its corporate seal shall be imprinted thereon and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of its Town Clerk. SECTION 3. All other matters, except as provided herein relating to such bonds shall be determined by the Supervisor. Such bonds shall contain substantially the recital of validity clause provided for in Section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law and shall otherwise be in such form and contain such recitals, in addition to those required by Section 51.00 of the Local Finance Law, as the Supervisor shall determine. SECTION 4. The faith and credit of said Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on such bonds as the same respectively become due and payable. An annual appropriation shall be made in each year sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such bonds becoming due and payable in such year. SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately. The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote on roll call, which resulted as: Ayes: Mr. George Kurosaka, Mr. Stephen Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW AUTHORIZING OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF AVIATION MALL TO ISSUE PARKING VIOLATION SUMMONSES RESOLUTION NO.56, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. George Kurosaka. 44 WHEREAS, a proposed Local Law to authorize Owners & Operators of Aviation Mall to issue parking violation summonses, has been prepared and WHEREAS, the proposed Local Law is worthy of consideration for legislative action, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a public hearing be held concerning the proposed adoption of a Local Law and that said public hearing be held at 7:30 p.m. in the Meeting Room of the Town of Queensbury (Warren County), New York on the 24th day of February, 1987 at which time all persons will be heard both in favor of and opposed to said Local Law and it is further RESOLVED, That the Town Clerk be hereby directed and authorized to publish and provide notice of said public hearing as may be required by Law. RESOLUTION IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN PENDING FURTHER INFORMATION DISCUSSION HELD-Proposed Local Law -The Aviation Mall has requested the proposed local law -owners and operators of Aviation Mall to issue parking violations summonses-noted a problem with fire lanes and handicapped parking areas...Councilman Kurosaka questioned if the town should be doing this on private property and should we be spending money for constables to subsidize the mall...Councilman Borgos suggested that the fine be raised to $25.00 and $50.00...it was suggested that the local law be tightened as to who can give out tickets...it was the decision of the entire town board to withdraw the proposed local law for further information... COMMUNICATIONS BID OPENING Used Crawler Loader, Bid Opening February 3, 1987 at 2:00 P.M. State Equipment-Latham, New York-Non-Collusive attached - 1972 Dresser International - $24,500.00 - (with cab and heater) $28,400.00 - 1978 Dresser International - $19,000.00, $19,000.00 - (with cab and heater) $22,900.00. Scott McLaughlin-Glens Falls, N.Y.-Non-Collusive attached - caterpillar Loader - $9,000.00 Williams-Houston,Texas - Non-Collusive-none - caterpillar 983 1974 - $58,000.00 - International 1979 - $39,500.00 LTR., James Coughlin, Superintendent Landfill recommended that the Town Board accept the bid of Scott McLaughlin, Truck and Equipment Sales. RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT BID RESOLUTION NO.56, Introduced by Mr. George Kurosaka who moved for its adoption seconded by Mrs. Betty Monahan. WHEREAS, James Coughlin Superintendent of the Queensbury-Glens Falls Landfill did recommend that we advertise for bids for a used Crawler Loader, and WHEREAS, three bids were submitted and received and opened at the specified time and place by the Director of Purchasing/Town Clerk Darleen M. Dougher, and such bid were then turned over to James Coughlin for his recommendation, and WHEREAS, James Coughlin by letter has recommended that the bid be awarded to Scott McLoughlin in the amount of $9000.00, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby accepts the recommendation of James Coughlin as mentioned above, and be it further RESOLVED, that the financing for such used Crawler Loader is in the 1987 Queensbury-Glens Falls Landfill Budget. —' Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None 45 Ltr.-Mrs. Kathaleen P. Choppa-regarding the speed limit on Bay Road—on file RESOLUTION REQUESTING FEASIBILITY STUDY TO REVIEW SPEED LIMIT RESOLUTION NO.57, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption seconded by Mr. George Kurosaka WHEREAS, a resident of Bay Road have approached the Town Board over the existing speed limit on Bay Road to be lowered to 45 miles per hour, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT kRESOLVED, that the Town Clerk be authorized to send the proper form to the Department of Transportation through the Warren County D.P.W. requesting that the speed limit be lowered on Bay Road from Haviland Road to Sunnyside Road. Duly adopted by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None REPORTS Town Clerk and Building & Code Enforcement Report for January, 1987, on file. RESOLUTION AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO RE-ZONE PORTION OF WEST SIDE OF BAY ROAD FROM UR-5 to HC-15 RESOLUTION NO.58, Introduced by Mr. Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mrs. Betty Monahan. WHEREAS, Michael and Ralph Woodbury requested in writing that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury make a change of zone in an area more particularly described in Schedule A, j and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Queensbury has heretofore approved the said re-zoning, and WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Board by resolution dated January 14, 1987, recommended approval of said re-zoning, and WHEREAS, public comment on the issue was received at a duly advertised public hearing, and WHEREAS, the Town Board finds that Highway Commercial-15 within the area described in Schedule A is consistent with the purposes and goals set forth in the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to re-zone from UR-5 to HC-15 the west side of Bay Road more particularly described in Schedule A, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the zoning map for the Town of Queensbury is hereby amended to provide for the change of zone on lands described in Schedule A, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment shall be effective upon completion of all requirements of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Ronald Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: Mr. Borgos Abstain: Mr. Kurosaka Absent: None 46 DISCUSSION BEFORE VOTE COUNCILMAN BORGOS-Referred to Counsel as long as we don't enlarge upon the advertised area may we go ahead and pass this if we were to take out a section? TOWN COUNSEL-Noted that you have to have a basis to take it out and I am not certain of that I would have to search the records. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LEAD AGENCY AND ADOPTING DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIEIC:AI OF ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGES RESOLUTION NO. 59, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr.Ronald Montesi. WHEREAS, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law established the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and WHEREAS, such act requires environmental review of certain actions undertaken by local governments, and WHEREAS, the Town Board proposes to enact certain changes in the Town Zoning Ordinance after a public hearing on February 10, 1987, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified as lead agency with respect to the zoning ordinance changes proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is hereby designated lead agency for purposes of SEQRA compliance in the adoption of the zoning ordinance amendment re-zoning certain lands on the west side of Bay Road from UR-5 to HC-15, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury adopt the annexed notice of determination of non-significance, and that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Region 5 offices of the D.E.C. I Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Mr. Kurosaka SEQRA Negative Declaration Notice of Determination of Non-Significance This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulation pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has determined that the proposed action described below will not have significant effect on the environment. 1. Title of Action : Amendments to the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance changing a zone classification from UR-5 to HC 15. 2. SEQRA Status: Unlisted action. 3. Description of Action : To enlarge the areas permitting commercial uses. The general area proposed is more particularly described in Schedule A. Detailed maps of the area affected were made available for inspection at the Town's Clerk's Office from January 27, 1987 to February 10, 1987 during normal business hours. 47 4. Reasons Supporting Determination: a) The area in question is already commercial. Rezoning would recognize and legitimatize the existing situation. b) The other side of Bay Road is already zoned highway commercial to approximately 600 feet north of Cronin Road. c) No major changes in land use would occur. Rather, the proposal would allow infill development of two vacant parcels. Incompatible land uses would result if the vacant property was developed for high density residential uses as currently allowed under the UR-5 zoning (i.e., we would have a strip consisting of commercial, residential, commercial, residential, and commercial uses). d) The proposal does not impact residential properties. 5. For Further Information: Contact Person: Frances J. Walter Town Supervisor Town of Queensbury Bay & Haviland Roads. Queensbury, NY 12801 (518) 792-5832 6. The Town of Queensbury maintains a file of its proceedings and determination and the supporting reasons therein, which file is available for public inspection. Dated: February 10, 1987 Town Board Town of Queensbury Bay & Haviland Rds. Queensbury, NY 12801 Suggested description of the zone of HC-15 proposed expansion at the northwest corner of Bay and Glenwood Avenue All that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the Town of Queensbury, p p y� g g ' Queensb County of Warren and the State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at said intersection of the center of Bay Road and the center of Glenwood Avenue; running thence westerly along the center of said Glenwood Avenue approximately 680 feet to a point therein at the southerly prolongation of the westerly bounds of the lands of Wheeler and Irene Howe and the easterly bounds of the lands of John and Leone Curley intersects said centerline; thence running northerly along said prolongation and the said westerly bounds of said lands of Curley and through the lands of Michael and Ralph Woodbury, a distance of 660 feet more or less to a point; thence running easterly along a line that is the prolongation westerly of the southerly bounds of the lands of Richard Hughes Jr., a distance of 66 feet more or less to the southwest corner of said lands of Hughes, Jr.; thence running northerly along the westerly bounds of said Hughes and the westerly bounds of the lands of James F. Singleton, Inc. to the northwest corner of said lands of James F. Singleton, Inc. on the southerly bounds of the lands of Garfield Raymond and Ronald Newell; thence running easterly along said lands of Raymond and Newell and the northerly bounds of the lands of James F. Singleton, Inc. and a prolongation easterly of said lands, a distance of 650 feet, more or less to the center of said Bay Road; thence running southerly along said centerline, a distance of 1340 feet, more or less to the point and place of beginning. Van Dusen & Steves Land Surveyors NY St. Lic. #35617 RECESSED FOR THE SIGNING OF BOND FOR THE CLENDON BROOK WATER DISTRICT ( RECONVENED iT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AUDIT OF BILLS RESOLUTION NO.60, Introduced by Mr. Stephen Borgos who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. George Kurosaka. RESOLVED, that Audit of Bills as appears on February 10, 1987, Abstract and numbered 119-570 and totaling $320,506.96 be and hereby are approved Duly adopted by the following vote: 4S Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None DISCUSSION held on Memorandum of Understanding with developers regarding Local Law #4 of 1986 it was agreed that a standard form should be established and a performance bond will be required—regarding the agreement with Salvatore Beltrone and Thomas Farone Counsel noted that the new or prospective owners submitted a different subdivision plan which included arrangement of the transmission line within the development and Dennis Dickinson, an engineer, - compared the new map, plan and report to determine whether any kind of engineering would result. I discussed this with Dennis and his findings in terms of changes was a slight decrease in the amount of pipe to be placed within the district, it is my legal opinion that the changes between the existing map plan and report and the proposal is minimal in nature and does not require a resubmission of a map, report and hearing.Supervisor Walter requested that a resolution be considered regarding an agreement between the Town and Mr. Beltrone and Mr. Farone...agreed '`� to by the Board. RESOLUTION OF AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TOWN WATER DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO.61__Introduced by Mr. George Kurosaka who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Stephen Borgos. RESOLVED, that the Supervisor Walter is authorized by the Town Board to enter into agreement with Salvatore Beltrone and Thomas Farone relating to the establishment of a Town Water District. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mr. Borgos, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None ON MOTION MEETING WAS ADJOURNED RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED DARLEEN DOUGHER, TOWN CLERK®