Loading...
ZBA Staff Notes (Allen & King) 8.25.21 Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 61-2021 Project Applicant: Merl Allen & Holly King Project Location: 505 Ridge Road Parcel History: RC 173-2021; RC 713-2020 SEQR Type: Type II Meeting Date: August 25, 2021 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to complete converting an existing 3-unit home into a two-unit duplex. The project site is 1.10 ac with a home built in the 1800's. The existing building is 3,556 sq. ft. with an attached garage. A portion of the home is 2-story. Alterations include interior and some doors/window replacements. Relief requested for lot size for duplex. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for lot size to maintain a duplex under construction in the Moderate Resdential zone, MDR. Section 179-3-040 dimensional, Section 179-5-100 multi-family The applicant had started interior renovations and was issued a stop work order. The project was to convert the existing home to a duplex. There was a site visit and it was discovered 3 units in the building and the applicant proposes two units for a 1.10 ac parcel where 4 acres is required. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood character may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited as the existing building had been converted to a 3 unit building by a prior owner illegally and the applicant proposes a 2 unit building. The project is subject to variance due to lot size for a proposed duplex. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant to the code. Relief requested is 2.9 acres. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. S. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes to continue work on an existing home to convert from 3 units to 2 units. The applicant has shown the interior two unit proposal where some of the interior work has already been started. The plans show the location home on the existing parcel.