2004-06-28 SP MTG28
1
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING MTG. #28
JUNE 28, 2004 RES. 335-338
7:00 p.m.
TOWN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
SUPERVISOR DANIEL STEC
COUNCILMAN ROGER BOOR
COUNCILMAN THEODORE TURNER
COUNCILMAN JOHN STROUGH
COUNCILMAN TIM BREWER
TOWN OFFICIALS
BUDGET OFFICER JENNIFER SWITZER
MEMBERS OF THE RECREATION COMMISSION
SCHOOL OFFICIALS
GUESTS
SUPERVISOR DANIEL STEC – Opened the Meeting Noted that
Councilman Brewer will be at the meeting shortly.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AUDIT OF BILLS- ABSTRACT OF
TH
JUNE 28, 2004
RESOLUTION NO. 335.2004
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Roger Boor WHO MOVED FOR ITS
ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
WHEREAS,
the Queensbury Town Board wishes to approve the
th
audit of bills presented as the Abstract with a run day of June 28, 2004,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,
that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the
th
Abstract with a run date of June 28, 2004 numbering 24278300 through
24290900 and totaling $375,677.93, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED,
that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the
Budget Officer and/or Town Supervisor to take such other and further action
as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 28 day of June, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Boor, Mr. Turner, Mr. Strough, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
2
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
ABSENT: Mr. Brewer
Discussion held before vote: Councilman Strough-Page 5 Water for Fort
Amhurst – is that because Glens Falls supplies Fort Amhurst with water?
Supervisor Stec-Yes. Councilman Strough-Ambulance Service on page 27
and 28 for D. Harrington First Aid Jennifer Switzer-There are certain
cases where if an EMS or Fireman is hurt they are covered under workers
compensation, and there are certain cases where it is not prudent to be
covered under workers comp. we paid first aid under a certain dollar
amount. Councilman Strough-Bingo Fee on page 19 Jennifer Switzer-
Bingo Fees that is money that is not the towns money it is in and out, we
collect from local entities and we basically hold it in trust and then turn it
over to the State of New York.
??
Queensbury School Tennis Court Informational Session
Supervisor Stec-Introduced Dr. Howard the Supt. of School is here and Mr.
Tim Place Director of Finance and Rob Chapman Director of Facilities,
Dr. Howard- We have been authorized by the Board of Education to present
the districts position. Introduced Mr. Tim Place
Mr. Place-Gave handout to the Board Members relating associated costs
related to the tennis courts. There are a total of ten tennis courts and a
basketball court, including fencing and special drainage so four of the courts
can be flooded for winter skating. There was a verbal commitment on both
sides that we would enter into a joint venture to build tennis courts, some of
which the Town would pay for and also those specific courts would be
flooded to allow for ice skating. The project was bid in December of ’02 we
set up the four tennis courts as an alternate that could be awarded separately.
That would include all associated costs with the general construction of the
courts including fencing and special drainage. Bid-$140,000. Alternate to
relocate lights - Bid $47,500. Relocation of the Gas Line estimated cost
$27,251. Adjacent Parking $18,000. following five items, pro-rated non
direct construction costs; architect and engineer design the project,
construction management fees, testing and inspection, insurance to the
project, legal bonding fiscal advisory fees – Total costs for courts $265,131.
of which we have requested through the recreation commission $176,250.
the balance we are not requesting is $88,881.
Councilman Turner-Questioned where the gas line goes?
Rob Chapman-Reviewed the location of the lines on a map.
Councilman Strough-I see the pro rated fees the 17,936, the architect and
engineering fees and the $10,221 management fees, testing and inspection
$1635. pro rated insurance $818. and legal bonding and fiscal advisory fees
$1,770. the Town is not being charged any of that.
Councilman Boor-Are the pro rated fees only for the four additional or they
for the ten?
3
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
Mr. Place-Just the four.
Chairman Irish-The reason that the Town Board is here is because the total
fee is $265,131. had somebody from the School come to the Commission at
an appropriate time you guys would not be sitting here today. The problem
as I see it, we learned about the cost of these courts at the time the school
was ready to start construction on the courts if not later. We had the
assumption that the courts would be around $120,000.
Unknown-Spoke on problems with construction noting they are now on
track with time and quality…would like to have seen a written agreement,
and we would like to have this resolved to both groups benefit
Unknown- Issue of cost at 35,000 per court was not a surprise…One of
Doug’s concern was did we agree or not to pay a portion of the relocation of
the lighting
Chairman Irish-We agreed to I did not feel obligated to, the Commission
agreed to pay it.
Councilman Turner-Questioned if the old gas line would be removed?
Mr. Chapman-The line will be removed.
Dr. Howard-We do not use the lights for our day program, it seems to me if
you are talking about the true costs of just the four courts and the lights then
the direct cost would be $187,500. The benefit or using the original lights if
you will were really for town benefit rather than the school benefit.
Chairman Irish-Does the school see any benefits to the Recreation
Commission operating its program there? I certainly see a benefit to the
school district for the town having their programs there even though we
don’t pay for rent, lights, heat, O&M any of that, I certainly see a benefit to
the school district.
Dr. Howard-I think we can agree that we have a symbiotic relationship and
we would like to continue to build on that. We calculated what we thought
was fair, we went through the board they authorized us to come and explain
our position and our costs and how we determined them. We are not trying
to take the town we see you as partners, we would like a partnership and we
have every plan of continuing it.
Councilman Boor-The one seventy six figure was voted on by the
commission and it was five to one that, that was an ok figure, is that correct?
Commission Member Connie Goedert-That is correct.
Councilman Boor-I think Dr. Howard has made some good points relative to
mistakes in the past, not having things in writing, not a firm contract,
obviously not a good understanding, but as a Town Board it is our
responsibility to authorize the expenditures and I see this as recreation funds
not general fund money. I see a commission whose sole purpose is to make
4
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
recommendations, develop programs and they voted that this was an ok
figure. I am a little reluctant to micro manage and reverse their decision
however I am also for being as fiscally prudent as we can from the towns
point of view. I do not want to get into a heated thing, granted these are
thousands of dollars but we are talking about a lot of benefit to the
community. Myself I would not want to fore go or see these tennis courts
not happen and the Town not have the ability to have ice skating in the
winter and night time programs, but certainly in the future it would be my
hope that we do not ever have to go through this kind of thing again.
Member Recreation Commission-The relationship between the School and
the Town particularly the Recreation Commission has been so good over the
years, the last thing we want to do is jeopardize that relationship, but we do
have to be fiscally sound and I think just having the discussion shows that
there are a concerned people here that are concerned about the budget of the
Town of Queensbury but also the services that are available through the
school and through the commission.
Councilman Brewer-The alternatives for moving the power and gas lines is
that cost regardless of whether we participate or not?
Unknown-The Board would have to decide if they want to go ahead and
move the lights or not. It is my understanding with the pipe lines that they
are pretty much they are going to have to be moved.
Unknown-The west side courts the gas line has got to be moved because it
would be at the level of the base. The other two courts to the north of that
not necessarily. There is associated drainage with having two courts that
want to be flooded because we have to get rid of the water. So, we probably
wouldn’t have to, but should it be, yea, because of what you mentioned
earlier as far as not good to have large pipes underneath something you
really want level and flat.
Dr. Howard-Going back to the agreement which at some point will have to
be updated the ten year agreement that the Town and School entered into, if
you read the agreement it says six because that is all that exists currently.
Basically, it says that during the summer we turn over the courts all the
courts to the town recreation for your full use, so it is not I would assume
that we are still intending that the summer time we are basically now
planning to open the ten courts for the town use. So, while we are proposing
you pay a portion of the cost of the four, it has been of the agreement that we
really are turning over the entire ten. I know we all want to be fiscally
prudent but the cost of ten courts is really what you are getting the benefit
of.
Unknown-The courts are used heavily in the evenings, only when the lights
are on.
Councilman Brewer- I am in favor of paying the hundred forty, that is how I
feel at this point, the Recreation Commission in my mind should have come
to the Town Board and said what ever the number was and let us be aware of
it. I think one hundred and forty thousand dollars out of our recreation fund
is a substantial amount and I think it is a reasonable amount.
5
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
Chairman Irish-You got those figures the same time the recreation
commission did, that is why this is an issue now.
Supervisor Stec-My understanding was the number that I have had in my
head until a couple months ago, the previous years before that, was that we
were talking about four courts for a hundred and twenty five thousand
dollars. I understand pro rating, I understand the math that went into these
numbers but what we are talking about then is really, is instead of it being a
hundred and twenty five, two sixty five is the true cost. That is more than
twice of what we were thinking two years ago up until two months ago, I
think that is where the Town got its hair raises, this is substantially different.
I think we in our minds had budgeted from the Recreation Commission the
rec. funds about a hundred and twenty five. I understand we have inflation
to think about.. I think we are all on the same page that we want this project
as planned now to go forward…I am sure the board will want to talk more
about this…we have told other people that weren’t budgeted, no, for much
less than thirty six thousand dollars recently.
Councilman Strough-I think this is a unique situation so comparing it to
others maybe not too fair, a genuine and unique relationship between the
School and the Town over the tennis courts. The School is willing to pick up
part of the cost of lighting which basically is a town benefit. The school is
willing to pick up the fees pro rated fees associated with the engineering, the
town is not going to be charged any of that but the Town will get the benefit
of it. The School is not charging the Town for management fees, inspection,
insurance, and other fees but the town is getting the benefit of it. When you
balance this out and you look at the use of ten tennis courts that the Town
will use in the summer I think it is actually it is a fairly good deal for the
town. The Recreation Commission has put their stamp of approval on it I
think that has to be taken into our consideration.
Commission Member Connie Goedert-I just feel that it needs to be said that
this has been going on for a few months now and I am sure everybody is
sick and tired of hearing about tennis courts but I just think we need to bring
to light the fact that one seventy six two fifty was voted on by the Recreation
Commission mainly to bring this to an end. Tonight I have learned probably
more than I learned other nights because if we don’t move the gas lines so
therefore they can’t put in the wall so we then we will not be able to flood
the courts for the ice skating. So, there is another rec. program that will be
lost. If we don’t pay the share of the lights then the lights will not be moved
because the School doesn’t need the lights moved. We can always go back
as to what we were told and what was said by this one and what was said by
that one but we have to get past that and look at what figure we are looking
at today and what programs it brings and what programs it will take away.
As far as working together for years I worked on campus, I plowed snow
there in the winter time with a plow truck that the town gave us for a dollar,
and there were a number of those. So, this inter municipality practice has
been going on for a long time. It was done without written contracts and it
was paid on both sides. So, I just think that if we can just put to bed the part
of well we should have known this figure a long time ago, with everything in
life we should have known it a long time ago but we just got to look at what
programs we are going to have for the one seventy six two fifty and what
6
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
programs we will have if we don’t have the one seventy six two fifty and try
to come to a conclusion with that. The Recreation Commission voted in
favor of it five to one with it being taken from rec. funds to be given to the
Board for approval. My understanding that resolution never got to the Town
Board because it got pulled for more information. There were steps taken it
wasn’t like the Recreation Commission just went and spent money that they
can’t spend. It is more than just tennis programs that we are looking at here.
Councilman Boor-The four courts that the Town is considering are the ones
that are going to be flooded the other ones cannot be flooded the way they
are being proposed. I look at it from a marginal utility point of view I hate
to lose skating and lighted tennis courts because of twenty five or thirty
thousand dollars that is in somebody else’s budget it is not coming out of
general fund. If they want to spend it on this they are not going to be able to
spend it somewhere else, it may be over their budget but it is not like they
are borrowing it. I just cannot see throwing away all of that because of what
is relatively small amount of money.
Supervisor Stec-Anything else?
Dr. Howard-I am going to recap for you, that we came tonight being
authorized by the Board of Education, to present the cost associated with the
tennis courts and how we calculate it, what we thought was reasonable. It
would have been nice if we had a written agreement. All the cast characters
have changed, you have a new Supervisor, there is a new Superintendent,
and there are different recollections on both sides of the table. My guess is
probably they are all accurate. Somewhere along the line people have
different conversations and have different pieces. That is what we are here
to do a list to go through and outline the cost associated with each of those
pieces, present it and see how the Town and the School can continue to work
together.
Councilman Boor-I would like to caution my board, if we vote this thing
down you can rest assured there is going to be a public out cry when there
are not lit tennis courts guaranteed. Whether it is six or ten, if there aren’t
any tennis courts that are lit up we are going to look bad, whether it is our
fault or not is irrelevant.
Chairman Irish-I do not know that is accurate because the bids have already
been let. In our discussion a month ago I think Rob said whether we pay for
this or not the school is committed to it because they are not going to get any
money back from the contractor.
Unknown-I am not sure that is true.
Unknown-They might have bases and power to them but we might not move
the lights.
Chairman Irish-That might not be a bad thing because we might be able to
move them for less than what they are quoting you.
Unknown-I think it would make it ten times the work for me and muddy a
lot of waters with contractors….
7
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
Chairman Irish-Who put them up originally the school or the town?
Director Hansen-The contractor….I think they worked for the town.
Unknown-Noted this is no time to redesigning the project…
Dr. Howard-This is something that has to be resolved to every bodies
benefit…
Supervisor Stec-I would only add that I think I for one and everyone from
the towns perspective cherishes the relationship on the rec. front that we
have had for several decades, it has been very in vogue in the last hand full
of years for everyone to talk about how consolidation and cooperation…here
is something that has been in place since practically since I have been
walking the earth and so I think that it is a good example. It is amazing it has
survived this long without a written form and hopefully we will have several
more decades to come where we have collaborated. We appreciate your
efforts in helping us try to get to some sort of closure on this issue. By the
end of the week I think we will get back to you.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 336. 2004
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Roger Boor
WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer
RESOLVED
, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby
moves into an Executive Session to discuss contracts and security plans and
personnel.
th
Duly adopted this 28 day of June, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Boor, Mr. Turner, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING EXECUTIVE SESSION
RESOLUTION NO. 337.2004
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS
ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. John Strough
8
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING 06-28-2004 MTG. #28
RESOLVED
, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby
adjourns its Executive Session.
th
Duly adopted this 28 day of June, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Boor, Mr. Turner, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
No action taken in Executive Session
Discussion held and decision of board to go with $140K for Queensbury
School Tennis Courts, Not $176,250.
RESOLUTION ADJOURNING TOWN BOARD MEETING
RESOLUTION NO. 338.2004
INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Tim Brewer WHO MOVED FOR ITS
ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner
RESOLVED
, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby
adjourns its Special Session.
th
Duly adopted this 28 day of June, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Boor, Mr. Turner, Mr. Strough, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Stec
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Respectfully submitted,
Miss Darleen M. Dougher
Town Clerk-Queensbury