Loading...
01-24-2022 MTG #3 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 332 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING MTG#3 TH JANUARY 24, 2022 RES#57-71 7:08 P.M. B.H. 4-6 LL#1 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT SUPERVISOR JOHN STROUGH COUNCILMAN ANTHONY METIVIER COUNCILMAN HARRISON FREER COUNCILMAN GEORGE FERONE COUNCILMAN TIMOTHY MCNULTY TOWN COUNSEL ROBERT HAFNER, ESQ. PRESS LOOK TV, STEVE THURSTON, ZOOM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN GEORGE FERONE SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Called meeting to order… 1.0 RESOLUTION ENTERING QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. 57, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns and moves into the Queensbury Board of Health. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None PUBLIC HEARING SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF MICHAEL CAREY, JR. PUBLICATION DATE: JANUARY 14, 2022 AGENT TOM HUTCHINS, HUTCHINS ENGINEERING, APPLICANT, MICHAEL CAREY SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Reviewed Resolution before opening public hearing. MR. HUTCHINS-I do have a plan that is updated based on the discussions we have had at our field meeting. This is a four-bedroom design. There are two bedrooms in two separate structures on the property. It is a somewhat constrained lot. Most of the lots in the neighborhood are rather small as is this one. The property transferred ownership in 2021. It did fail a transfer inspection. It is functional at the present time. It is working. It was having issues. However, it did fail inspection criteria and is mandated to be replaced. We developed a replacement system, which is a vast improvement over the conventional system that is there. It is an antiquated conventional type system. Again, this involves an Enhanced Treatment Unit and an ultraviolet disinfection of the ETU Effluent. Pump station to an absorption bed. A slightly shallow configuration with some soil amendments. I think we looked at it in the field. We developed the best design that we can, but it is short in the two aspects of separation of eighty-two feet from the neighboring well and separation from the lake of ninety-five feet. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 333 COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-Tom can we get copies of that? MR. HUTCHINS-Of course. (Presented new map to Town Board and Clerk) TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-Ninety five feet? The Resolution says eighty-seven feet. MR. HUTCHINS-I was going by memory. There were two changes on that. The notation on the bedroom…. With that, I think we turn it over to the Board for questions. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Did you agree to put ultraviolet in? MR. HUTCHINS-I did and it is in there. If you look at the detail, it is on the inlet coming out of the ETU inlet of the pump station. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Before I open the public hearing any questions from the Town Board members? COUNCILMAN FREER-I am interested in how you selected this specific unit. This is one of the few that we have seen from this manufacturer. Can you give us just a very quick summary. Is it something special in terms of the size or cost? MR, HUTCHINS-This is a unit, there are a number NSF-40 Enhanced Treatment Units out there, and there is going to be a whole lot more. Currently there is going to be a whole lot more. This is a unit I have used in the past. It is also a unit they service locally. It is serviced by the installer that is going to be doing this system. In that case, I thought that was appropriate. They know the system better than any others do. I think local service is very important. COUNCILMAN FREER-Thank you. MR. MCNULTY-I also think it is important to know that you did include the suggestions that we had in the site visit. I appreciate you putting in the UV protector. MR. HUTCHINS-Happy to do it. MR. MCNULTY-Do we need to read that letter? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We received two correspondences from neighbors. One was from… COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Brian Hogan and the other one from Ms. O’Connor. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Brian Hogan if I remember right asked if we could move the bed over. We looked at those alternatives. Is it Mrs. O’Connor? DEPUTY CLERK, O’BRIEN-Yes. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Mrs. O’Connor didn’t like the system because of the proximity to the wells and the lake. Where it is located, it seems to be the best location. They are going to put the ultraviolet on. Let us see what the public has to say. I will open the public hearing. Anybody that has a thought or comment you are welcomed to share it. It is in relation to the Michael Carey Application for Sanitary Sewage Disposal Variances. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED SUPERVISOR STROUGH-The absorption field ideally is supposed to be a hundred feet away from wells. This is proposed to be eighty-two from the well. Eighty-seven from Lake George ideally that should be a hundred feet. They do have a pretreatment Norweco. It is an ETU or an Enhanced Treatment Unit. They are putting in an ultraviolet filter on all water going to the absorption bed. It is getting pretreated more so than most of your conventional units and there is going to be a UV, but we want to hear from the public on this. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 334 BRIAN HOGAN-I am the author of that letter. Did everyone get a chance to read that? The specifics related to that. By the way, I want to thank Tom Hutchins for reaching out to me and explaining to me the system initially Mr. Freer reaching out to me as well. I appreciate that. It really helps when you guys take a genuine interest. My only real issue with that was that there were two wells involved. Tom had indicated to me that the absorption field could be moved so it would not be near my well it would be near to a neighbor’s well. In this particular instance, that neighbor happens to be the seller of the property to Michael. The only other comment I wanted to make and my reason for coming here this evening is I am somewhat…with this. Years ago, the previous owner of the property had indicated to me that he wanted to put in an enclosure around the existing screen porch. At that time, they were informed by the Town that it was not really possible. If they wanted to do that, they would have to abandon the two bedrooms in the garage technically that apartment because it was nonconforming. They let it go. The owner at that time decided to complete that work without a permit. He did say to me at that time I am going to do that without a permit do you have a problem with that being a neighbor and everything else, you try not to be difficult. At that time, I said okay. They went ahead and did the work and now, of course, the property has changed hands at this point. My new neighbor Mike is a great guy by the way. He had indicated to me that in order to make ends meet and everything the way for him to accomplish that was to do some short-term rentals. Of course, no one wants to live next to short-term rentals. Mr. Freer has explained to me a lot about what you guys are trying to do to improve that situation. I am somewhat guilty of that. I think a lot of these things that happen I have had two other neighboring properties that have done work on their properties that have made an impact on myself. I have to imagine this happens all over the Town. I am not sure what you guys can do to alleviate that. We have had neighbors put in fill changing the property to the east of mine. To the north, I have had a neighbor that bought the property, Mr. Abele a great guy. The owner prior to him saw fit to falsify documents in order to get a subdivision approved. These things negatively impact the lake. I am not sure what you can do with these things after the fact. It negatively impacts the new owner at that time. That is my two cents. I hope I used less than four minutes. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Are you comfortable with what we have done with Tom and the Enhanced Treatment Unit? MR. HOGAN-The Enhanced Treatment Unit is fine. I think that is not a bad thing to have. Tom did not share with me what any of the additional plans would be. Obviously from my perspective, I would much more appreciate being closer to the other neighbor’s well. If you are giving me a choice between two wells I would choose, the neighbor that sold the guy the property not the guy that just happens to live next-door and it is a more convenient place to locate it. I have not seen the plans. I did talk to Tom he did indicate that it was possible to relocate it. I have no detail on what that was. Tom did make a couple of modifications to the plans at my request, one of which, that he originally had it as three bedrooms in the main house and one bedroom in the garage. He changed that to two and two. This whole thing with permits and everything else. If we can do something about that, it would be huge. Like I said if you could do something about the well, I would appreciate it. If it is not possible, it is not possible. One way or the other might be the septic system there is no question about that. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-What they currently has failed. This is done with the Enhanced Treatment. It is better than what is in place right now. MR. HOGAN-Thank you for reminding me Mr. McNulty. One of the other things is one of these properties fails. It would be great how we ahere to the law or try an accelerate the process a little bit. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-Explain that to us. MR. HOGAN-In this particular instance I think the law indicates that you are not supposed to occupy the property if the septic system fails. Am I correct? COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I believe if I am not mistaken….. MR. HOGAN-I believe that is what it is. You are supposed to immediately rectify the system or you are supposed to, if it fails, you are not supposed to occupy the property. In this particular instance, the property closed in July. We are in the third week of January almost February at this REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 335 point. We went on six, seven, months and we have a situation where the property is being used much more heavily than it was by the prior owner. That would be another suggestion I could make to you. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-I appreciate you sharing. Thank you. MR. HOGAN-Thank you all. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Anybody else like to speak to the variance application? COUNCILMAN FREER-Based on Mr. Hogan’s my sense is when we were there it is a very safe system. I know that it says a hundred, but with this unit, I feel very safe in regard to protecting the lake and this well. I am curious how you would like to respond to that. MR. HUTCHINS-I guess I would not want to put a percentage on it in terms of risk. It is a vast vast, vast improvement. COUNCILMAN FERONE-Tom I have a question. Can you speak to after the system failed inspection? Can you go into detail what it was that failed. MR. HUTCHINS-This is going by my understanding with discussion with Codes. I wasn’t involved with the inspection process. My understanding is that when they found the distribution box of the existing absorption field, it was somewhat surcharged, which is an automatic failure. It does not mean that there is wastewater surfacing. It means it failed the inspection. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Right. COUNCILMAN FREER-We don’t actually surcharge in our inspection right? MR. HUTCHINS-In Queensbury’s inspection they do a hydraulic test, where they run every fixture and make sure everything is going to that system. They verified that the field functions. In this case, it surcharged somewhat when they did that again. That is my understanding. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Did you say you had the notes updated to reflect the UV System? MR. HUTCHINS-I showed the UV on the detail. It is on the pump station detail. On the inlet of the pump station. Southcore Ultra Violet Disinfection Unit. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Southcore Ultra Violet Treatment. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Thank you. When these UV lights go off do they get notified? MR. HUTCHINS-It is a regular service. SUPERVISOR STROUGH- Any additional questions for the Board? I don’t see any questions from the public either online or here. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Any Town Board member want to put forward a motion? COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Do we want to talk about moving the well or is everyone comfortable, not the well… SUPERVISOR STROUGH-That is what I want to know. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-We talked about this on site. The fact that the sidewalk would have to be taken up. As the Gentlemen said if we move it, it will be closer to the other existing wells because it is the ultra-system and it is an Enhanced Treatment. Like it was just said, it is going to be a significantly better system than what existed before. Now, of course, this has failed I am okay with the location and having to tear up those pavers. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 336 MR. HUTCHINS-I did look at another location. There were a number of problems that came up with it. In addition to the fact with the walkway issue, we discussed. My thought this is the best technical location. It did not provide any improvement for the well setback. It was a different well, but it was still the same general eighty-two feet. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I think I asked Dennis MacElroy this when he was here last. Have you come across any updated setbacks with these new Enhanced Units where municipalities I do not know what it would be…their setbacks to meet…. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-That is State… MR. HUTCHINS-State Code does not change the setbacks utilizing Enhanced Treatment. With most of the Town’s I deal with it is a trip to this Board. Unfortunately, there are a lot of properties out there they can’t hold a hundred feet from a water supply well or water bodies. From our prospective, we do the best that we can with the current technology…best improvement. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-If this were a conventional system I would agree with Mrs. O’Connor. This Board more than any other Board is very concerned about the waterbodies adjacent to the systems. If you do a Pretreatment Unit an Enhanced Treatment Unit in addition to that, you are putting in a UV System, a filter system that is a pretty safe operation given the constraints of the property and everything else. Eighty-seven feet is asking for some relief thirteen feet. The one hundred foot is for the worse condition. These are the worst conditions. You are amending the soil and everything. I think you have gone to a great…. I am comfortable with what is being proposed. MR. HUTCHINS-There has been some time that has elapsed since this transaction. Part of that is scheduling and part of it timing. Part of it is materials and probably most of it is scheduling on my part. We would just like to clarify if we go forward we would like to have until June 15thin order to do this under favorable weather conditions. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-Is that completed by June 15th? MR. HUTCHINS-Yes. COUNCILMAN FREER-That is an extension from the six months that is standard right? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-That would be within the six months. We are approving it now. It is the end of January. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-It is supposed to be six months of when the transfer happened. Has the six months already passed? COUNCILMAN FREER-It is getting there. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I do not know when the transfer took place. COUNCILMAN FREER-In July right? TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-I do not know. COUNCILMAN FREER-Someone said July. th MR. CAREY-It was July 16. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-We are past the six months. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-We are. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Can we add an amendment allowing until the end of June for this system to be put in at the same time we are allowing and approving the system? REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 337 TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-Is that the will of the Board? You could add it to this if that is what the will of the Board is. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Let’s see what the will of the Board is. COUNCILMAN FREER-We need you to apply for it right or make the request? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-He is making a request. I don’t know if we have to do it formally or we could do it as part…. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-I am okay with this approach. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-This is the first I have heard of it. I am not prepared for it. I thought the rule was after six months it is the Town’s. If the Town Board is willing to take it, you can take it in formal…on the public record it is in the Town record. If that is the will of the Board, I can write some language to put in your Resolution right now. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Do you know if they put any in escrow for this? MR. CAREY-In our Real Estate Contract it was held in escrow. I negotiated it out of my contract so the seller it was his responsibility to get this taken care of. I became more involved in it probably around August. I checked to see if the application had been submitted. That is when I realized there was some hiccups with the sign off letter that was required by the neighbor. Brian had came and talked to me about it to me about it because he was not really comfortable with signing off on it. It kind of just took off from there I guess. It just seemed to get more and more delayed because of some of those concerns. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-Whose money is it? It was the seller’s. MR. CAREY-It is the seller’s, right. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-This isn’t the person who should be asking. It is not his money. MR. CAREY-It is in escrow. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-It is someone else’s….has to make that request. COUNCILMAN FREER-That was kind of my point. In the past, we had people request the extension right. This is after the fact. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-It is after the fact. COUNCILMAN FREER-By the wrong guy. MR. HUTCHINS-I sometimes get a reminder from the Codes Department about these…. I didn’t come into this until the transaction was well underway. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Here is where we are. They cannot put it in now. Having it in before the end of June before summer hits I think is reasonable, but that is me and that is Tim. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I concur. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-The neighbors have already said the property transfer took place in July. The system failed and continued to be used. To delay it any further is not taking care of the neighbors. MR. CAREY-As far as the property being heavily used, we do not live there. The property is not used heavily at all. We are not renting it at all right now to anyone. It is just my family here and there. If we are there once a month it is a lot right now. The system is not being over used. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-No dispersions here. It might be being used more now than it was with the previous owner. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 338 MR. CAREY-Sure. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-It has failed. We have a chance to fix it by June 15. I do not think we should be the ones that hold it up. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-We are not. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Tony you okay with it? COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I am good with it. I think it is the best solution we have. COUNCILMAN FREER-I don’t think we should allow any short-term rentals until the thing is fixed. MR. CAREY-I have no problem with that. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-That seems fair. MR. CAREY-I want this fixed as soon as possible. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Can you write up something Bob? TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-Certainly. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We will take a little break and let Bob write up something. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-The important part is the no short-term rentals. He is supposed to get it done by June 15. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-John are we setting a precendent now? Maybe we want to for sewer systems, systems like this. After sale, that they cannot use it as a short-term rental until it is corrected. I think that is what we are saying, right? TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-We are saying for this particular. When other people come forward, you can bring it up with them. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I see what you are saying. You are saying we are kind of orienting our direction here for future people that may want to rent the place out, but they have a failed system. We are saying no. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-I am definitely good with that. I just want to make sure we understood. This day forward, we would have to have Codes Enforcement as part of that as well. They will have to be the ones that deal with it. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Yes. COUNCILMAN FREER-He has agreed to it in the Resolution. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-He has agreed to it as part of getting his permit. If you want to make it general, it should be changed to be part of the Code or something you bring up every time a permit comes. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-For now. Now you have mentioned it, it might not be a bad addition to the Ordinance. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-We still have time to do that. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We could work on that, not today. COUNCILMAN FREER-You have any more surprises for us? MR. HUTCHINS-No. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 339 COUNCILMAN FREER-I will make a motion to approve. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-All right. Let us wait until we hear what Bob has to say. If you are comfortable with the amending of the Resolution then we will go ahead. COUNCILMAN FREER-Okay. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Do we need to talk to Dave if these systems are failed are they prohibited from being in the house. Have we taken that step yet? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I do not know. We are going to be meeting with Dave on Manufactured Homes on the seventh why don’t you bring that up. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I will. I will make a note. COUNCILMAN FREER-Tony the other point of the stuff that John is working on for Lake George Park Commission will not allow for the thirty-three percent reduction of the absorption field in the critical environmental areas as well. This would be even tougher because this one does take that into account, which is what is in the 75 (a) State Code. They allow it, but they don’t allow it in the New York City Watershed. The Lake George Park Commission and their Technical Team is proposing that we don’t allow it in our area again either. That is just going to make your life more difficult in terms of some of these small lots. MR. HUTCHINS-Perhaps. Instead of asking for eighty-two feet, I am going to be here asking for seventy-four feet. Sooner or later, we are going to draw a line where I am going to be asking for a holding tank. We are certainly not there in this case. It will create more variances. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Or an Assembly Point Municipal System. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-We have the land. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Let’s get Rockhurst first. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-I can proposed a Resolved. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We are ready if you are. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-I am thinking to add it before the Resolved that the Town Board is going to have the Town Clerk send it to the APA. Resolved, that this Resolution and the permit shall provide that the system will be installed by June 15. The property shall not be used for short-term rentals until after the system is properly installed to the satisfaction of the Town. Let Dave do his review. Does that seem to be what you are looking for? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Is that okay. MR. CAREY-We are allowed to use the property as the owners correct? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Yes. TOWN COUNSEL, HAFNER-Yes. This does not restrict that. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Are you okay with that. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-We just have to talk to Dave about it. We just do not have anything in place right now. The system has failed, they still can use it. I am not picking on you at all. MR. CAREY-That’s fine. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-That is an issue that we have to discuss. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 340 SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I am going to leave it up to you to bring it up. COUNCILMAN FREER-I will make a motion as amended. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Motion made by Councilperson Freer. Seconded by Councilperson McNulty. RESOLUTION APPROVING MICHAEL CAREY, JR.’S APPLICATION FOR SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCES RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 4, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Timothy McNulty WHEREAS, Michael Carey, Jr., (Applicant) filed an application for variances from provisions of the Town of Queensbury On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, Chapter 136 to install a replacement wastewater treatment system with its Enhanced Treatment Unit (ETU) Effluent Absorption Field to be located: 1. 82’ from the neighboring well instead of the required 100’ setback; and 2. 87’ from Lake George instead of the required 100’ setback; on property located at 28 Holly Lane in the Town of Queensbury, and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk’s Office published the Notice of Public Hearing in the Town’s official newspaper and the Local Board of Health duly conducted a public hearing concerning the th variance requests on January 24, 2022, and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk’s Office has advised that it duly notified all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that 1. due to the nature of the variances, the Local Board of Health determines that the variances would not be materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of this Ordinance or other adjoining properties nor otherwise conflict with the purpose and objectives of any Town plan or policy; and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 341 2. the Local Board of Health finds that the granting of the variances is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and are the minimum variances which would alleviate the specific unnecessary hardship found by the Local Board of Health to affect the Applicant; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health hereby approves the application of Michael Carey, Jr., for variances from the Sewage Disposal Ordinance to install a replacement wastewater treatment system with its Enhanced Treatment Unit (ETU) Effluent Absorption Field to be located: 1. 82’ from the neighboring well instead of the required 100’ setback; and 2. 87’ from Lake George instead of the required 100’ setback; on property located at 28 Holly Lane in the Town of Queensbury and bearing Tax Map No: 239.12- 2-57, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Enhanced Treatment Unit shall be maintained by the property owner in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations for the life of the system, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that this Resolution and the permit shall provide that: 1. the system will be installed by June 15; and 2. the property shall not be used for short-term rentals until after the system is properly installed to the satisfaction of the Town; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to forward by certified mail a certified copy of this Resolution to the Adirondack Park Agency for its review, and BE IT FURTHER, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 342 RESOLVED, that this approval Resolution shall not be effective until 30 days after such notice to the Adirondack Park Agency and shall be subject to any lawful action by the Adirondack Park Agency during such period. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF FRANK C. COTTONE RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 5, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board serves as the Town’s Local Board of Health and is authorized by Town Code Chapter 136 to issue variances from the Town’s On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, and 1. dispersal system to be 3.2’ from the property line in lieu of the required 10’ setback; 2. septic tank to be 7.2’ from the property line in lieu of the required 10’ setback; and 3. pumping station to be 4’ from the dwelling in lieu of the required 10’ setback; on property located at 16 Genista Lane in the Town of Queensbury, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Local Board of Health will hold a public hearing th on Monday, February 14, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, to consider Frank C. Cottone’s sewage disposal variance application concerning property located at 16 Genista Lane in the Town of Queensbury (Tax Map No.: 289.10-1-38) and at that time all interested persons will be heard, and BE IT FURTHER, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 343 RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health authorizes and directs the Queensbury Town Clerk to publish the Notice of Public Hearing presented at this meeting and send a copy of the Notice to neighbors located within 500 feet of the property as required by law. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION ADJOURNING QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. BOH 6, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Timothy McNulty WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. George Ferone RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Board of Health hereby adjourns from the Queensbury Board of Health and enters back into the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone NOES: None ABSENT:None 2.0 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO AMEND CHAPTER 179 “ZONING” OF QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE TO CHANGE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO (CI) TO COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (CLI) –LUZERNE HOLDING, INC. PUBLICATION DATE: JANUARY 14, 2022 SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Reviewed Resolution before opening public hearing. We do have a SEQRA on this tonight. There is a Part 1 that the Town Board has reviewed. Then the Town Board will do Part II. If there are any questions or any thoughts on this from the public present, I will open the public hearing and allow you do so. Anybody here tonight wish to speak to this application for a zone change? Anybody on Zoom? No member of the public here or afar appears to be interested in speaking to this proposed zoning change. I will close the public hearing. Any further thoughts on behalf of the Town Board? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No Comment PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-Just a question. As we get ready for this Comprehensive Review, would instances like this be brought up? This sounds like over the years rezoning occurred and then we have one lot that is not connected to another. Would that be part of the Master Plan Review as well? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-It would be part of the input. The Comprehensive Land Use process, which is going to take a year at least. It includes public hearings from all stakeholders. Various…business people, general public, whomever. They will all have chance to speak to this. We will look at the existing map and the existing uses they will have to consider that as we go forward with any zoning changes. In addition, you will probably get zones created that have descriptions to them. Like we did the last one. We created a Main Street Zone. We wanted the buildings leaving REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 344 the City of Glens Falls going towards Exit 18 to look more urban than suburb. To have the parking lots back instead of dominating the view in front. That they would be walkable. To some degree, I think we have accomplished that as Main Street has redeveloped. There have been conversations now that as we are going forward we should be a more walkable Community. Why should anyone have to get into their car, drive, and get a pizza, haircut or coffee? I am expecting to see more mix uses in the new Comprehensive Plan. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-It would be an annual review like the septic is. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Let us see what the public says. COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-I have no issues with this. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-If there is no further comment I will entertain a motion. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-We have to do the SEQRA. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART 2 – IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL PROJECT IMPACT 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1.D.1) If “yes”, answer questions a-j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. _X__No ____Yes 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2g) If “Yes”, answer questions a-c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. __X__No ____Yes 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2h) If “Yes”, answer questions a-l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. __X__No ____Yes 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1.D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a-h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. __X__No ____Yes 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. (See Part 1.E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a-g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. __X__No ____Yes 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. (See Part 1.D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a-f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. __X__No ____Yes 7. Impact on Plants and Animal The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1.E.2 m-q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. _X__No ____Yes 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1.E.3.a. and b.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. __X__No ____Yes REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 345 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in short contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1.E.1.A, E.1.b, E.3.h). If “Yes”, answer questions a-g. If “No”, go to Section 10. __X__No ____Yes 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological resource. (Part 1.E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-e. If “No”, go to Section 11. __X__No ____Yes 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a reduction of an Open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1.C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-e. If “No”, go to Section 12. __X__No ____Yes 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1.E.3d) If “Yes”, answer questions a-c. If “No”, go to Section 13. __X__No ____Yes 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. (See Part 1.D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a-g. If “No”, go to Section 14. __X__No ____Yes 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. (See Part 1.D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a-e. If “No”, go to Section 15. __X__No ____Yes 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-f. If “No”, go to Section 16. __X__No ____Yes 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure To new or existing sources of contaminant. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1.d.f.g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-m. If “No”, go to Section 17. __X__No ____Yes 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. (See Part 1.C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a-h. If “No”, go to Section 18. __X__No ____Yes 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. (See Part 1.C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a-g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. __X__No ____Yes RESOLUTION ENACTING LOCAL LAW NO.: 1, OF 2022 TO AMEND CHAPTER 179 “ZONING” OF QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE TO CHANGE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE (CI) TO COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (CLI) RESOLUTION NO.: 58, 2022 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 346 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHEREAS, Luzerne Holdings, Inc. (Applicant) submitted a Petition to allow a change of zoning district designation for a portion of the property known as Tax Map No.: 302.8-1-28 from Commercial Intensive (CI) to Commercial Light Industrial (CLI), and WHEREAS, applications for zoning map changes are forwarded to the Town Planning Department and Planning Board for recommendations in accordance with §179-15-040 of the Town Zoning Law and following such recommendations, the Town Board reviews the applications and takes such other action as it shall deem necessary and proper, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 377,2021, the Town Board accordingly authorized the Town Clerk to forward the Applicant’s Petition for Change of Zone Application to the Planning Board for review, report and recommendation and consent to the Town Board seeking SEQRA Lead Agency status, and WHEREAS, the Town Planning Board adopted a Resolution on December 14, 2021 consenting to the Town Board taking Lead Agency status for SEQRA review, and WHEREAS, at their December 14, 2021 meeting the Planning Board also adopted a Resolution making a favorable recommendation on petitioned change of zoning map designation, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 51, 2022 the Town Board accordingly authorized the Community Development Department to forward the Applicant’s Petition for Change of Zone application to the Warren County Planning Department for GML 239-m review, and WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Department responded on January 19, 2022 with a recommendation to approve the proposed zoning change, and WHEREAS, Municipal Home Rule Law §20 requires the Town Board to hold a Public Hearing prior to the adoption of any Local Law and the Town Board duly conducted a public hearing, heard all interested parties and closed the public hearing concerning the legislation on th Monday, January 24, 2022, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 347 WHEREAS, the Town Board, as Lead Agency for the environmental review required under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), has reviewed a Full Environmental Assessment Form to analyze potential environmental impacts of proposed Local Law No.: 1, of 2022 and finds that no significant adverse environmental impacts are expected to result, and WHEREAS, the Town Board has considered the conditions and circumstances of the area affected by the proposed Local Law and wishes to consider adoption of Local Law No.: 1 of 2022 as presented at this meeting, hereinafter referred to as the “legislation,” NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby finds that the proposed changes to the Town Zoning Map will not result in any large or important detrimental impacts and will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and therefore declares a Negative Declaration under SEQRA and authorizes the filing of the attached SEQRA Negative Declaration - Notice of Determination of Non-Significance for this action, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Clerk and/or Director of Planning, Zoning and Code Compliance to file any necessary documents relating to this Negative Declaration in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby adopts Local Law No.: 1 of 2022, “A Local Law To Amend Chapter 179 “Zoning” Of Queensbury Town Code To Change Zoning Of Certain Property From Commercial Intensive (CI) To Commercial Light Industrial (CLI),” and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to send a copy of this Resolution and a copy of the Local Law to the Town Planning Board, Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Town Zoning Administrator and Warren County Planning Department in accordance with §179-15-080(D) of the Town Zoning Law, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 348 BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to file the Local Law with the New York State Secretary of State in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law and acknowledges that the Local Law will take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty NOES: None ABSENT:None LOCAL LAW NO.: 1, OF 2022 A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND CHAPTER 179 “ZONING” OF QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE TO CHANGE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE (CI) TO COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (CLI) BE IT ENACTED BY THE QUEENSBURY TOWN BOARD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Intent; Authority – The Town Board seeks to change the zoning district designation for a portion of the property known as Tax Map No. 302.8-1-28 from Commercial Intensive (CI) to Commercial Light Industrial (CLI). This Local Law is adopted in accordance with the New York State Municipal Home Rule Law. Section 2. Amendment of Zoning Map – The Town of Queensbury Zoning Map referenced in Town Code §179-3-010 is hereby amended to reflect a zoning district change for a portion of the property known as Tax Map No. 302.8-1-28 from Commercial Intensive (CI) to Commercial Light Industrial (CLI), with said property to now be entirely within the CLI zoning district. Section 3. The map appended to this Local Law is hereby adopted as the official Town Zoning Map of the Town of Queensbury and supersedes the previously adopted Town Zoning Map. Section 4. Severability – The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph or provision of this Local Law shall not invalidate any other clause, sentence, paragraph or part thereof. Section 5. Repealer – All Local Laws or Ordinances or parts of Local Laws or Ordinances in conflict with any part of this Local Law are hereby repealed. In particular, this Local Law is specifically intended to supersede the amended provisions of the current Town of Queensbury Zoning Law. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 349 Section 6. Effective Date – This Local Law shall take effect upon filing by the office of the New York State Secretary of State or as otherwise provided by law. 3.0 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR FOR RESOLUTIONS ONLY (LIMIT -3 MINUTES) No Comment 4.0 RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ROTARY 5K ROAD RACE/WALK RESOLUTION NO. 59, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of Glens Falls has requested authorization from the Queensbury Town Board to conduct its annual 5k road race/walk to benefit the Ben Osborn Memorial Fund and Southern Adirondack Independent Living (SAIL) as follows: SPONSOR : The Rotary Club of Glens Falls EVENT : 5k Road Race/Walk rd DATE : Saturday, April 23, 2022 TIME : Approximately 9:30 a.m. PLACE : Beginning and ending at SUNY Adirondack NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby acknowledges receipt of proper proof of insurance and authorizes the Rotary Club of Glens Falls to conduct a 5k Road Race/Walk within rd the Town of Queensbury on Saturday, April 23, 2022, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby approves this event subject to the Town Highway Superintendent’s approval of the race, which approval may be revoked due to concern for road conditions at any time up to the date and time of the event. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES : None REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 350 ABSENT: None RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.: 371, 2010 AUTHORIZING TOWN WASTEWATER DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO OUT-OF-DISTRICT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE TOWN AND CERTAIN CUSTOMERS OUTSIDE OF QUEENSBURY SEWER DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO.: 60, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 371,2010, the Queensbury Town Board authorized the Town Wastewater Director to enter into Out-of-District Agreements, on such terms as he deems appropriate, concerning the Town of Queensbury’s Sewer Districts with those users to be designated by the Town Wastewater Department for all of the Town’s Sewer Districts, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Queensbury Consolidated Sanitary Sewer District; 2. Pershing-Ashley-Coolidge Sewer District; 3. Queensbury Technical Park Sewer District (District); 4. Reservoir Park Sewer District; 5. Route 9 Sewer District; 6. South Queensbury – Queensbury Avenue Sewer District; and 7. West Queensbury Sanitary Sewer District; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 203,2021, the Town Board authorized the Final Consolidation Agreement for consolidation of the Queensbury Consolidated Sanitary Sewer District, Route 9 Sanitary Sewer District, West Queensbury Sanitary Sewer District, Technical Park Sanitary Sewer District and the Pershing, Ashley & Coolidge Sanitary Sewer District into one District named the Greater Queensbury Consolidated Sanitary Sewer District, and WHEREAS, the Town Board therefore wishes to Amend Resolution No. 371,2010 to recognize the consolidation of the aforementioned Sewer Districts and clarify the Town Wastewater Director’s authority to enter into Out-of-District Agreements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 351 RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby amends Resolution No.: 371,2010 in order to recognize the recent consolidation of the Town’s Sewer Districts and authorizes the Town Wastewater Director to enter into Out-of-District Agreements, on such terms as he deems appropriate with those users to be designated by the Town Wastewater Department for all of the Town’s Sewer Districts, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Greater Queensbury Consolidated Sanitary Sewer District; 2. Reservoir Park Sewer District; and 3. South Queensbury – Queensbury Avenue Sewer District; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby affirms and ratifies Resolution No.: 371,2010 in all other respects. th Duly adopted this 10 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING FRANCIS CABANA TO TOWN OF QUEENSBURY RECREATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 61, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury previously established the Town of Queensbury Recreation Commission in accordance with applicable New York State law, and WHEREAS, the term of Recreation Commission member Francis Cabana expired as of st December 31, 2021 and Mr. Cabana wishes to be reappointed to the Commission, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to reappoint Mr. Cabana to the Recreation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 352 RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby reappoints Francis Cabana to the st Town of Queensbury Recreation Commission with his term to expire as of December 31, 2028. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH ADIRONDACK PARK LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO.: 62, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Adirondack Park Local Government Review Board (Review Board) was created by the New York State Legislature and is composed of representatives appointed by the County Legislatures of those counties lying in whole or in part within the Adirondack Park, and WHEREAS, the State Legislature provided only partial funding for the Review Board to perform its statutory functions as set forth in Executive Law §803-a, and recently reduced such funding by fifty-three percent (53%), and WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury wishes to provide $300 in funding to support the Review Board’s work in representing the interests of the Adirondacks’ local governments, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the Town of Queensbury to enter into an Agreement with the Adirondack Park Local Government Review Board and authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to sign the Agreement in the form substantially presented at this meeting, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs payment of $300 to the Review Board as provided for in the Agreement, to be paid from Miscellaneous Contractual Account No.: 001-1220-4400, and authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer to amend the Town Budget and/or take any actions necessary to provide for such payment, and BE IT FURTHER, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 353 RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor and/or Town Budget Officer to execute any other needed documentation and take any other necessary actions to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND WARREN COUNTY TOWARD COMBATING AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES IN GLEN LAKE RESOLUTION NO.: 63, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 597 of 2021, the Warren County Board of Supervisors authorized Agreements with certain Towns regarding funding earmarked for combating aquatic invasive species in publicly accessible water bodies other than Lake George in Warren County for the year 2022 including $25,000 in funding to the Town of Queensbury toward combating such aquatic invasive species in Glen Lake, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to enter into such an Intermunicipal Agreement and accept such funds, and WHEREAS, such proposed Intermunicipal Agreement is presented at this meeting, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves and authorizes the “Intermunicipal Agreement between Warren County and the Town of Queensbury for Combating Aquatic Invasive Species in Glen Lake a Publicly Accessible Water Body Within the Town of Queensbury,” substantially in the form presented at this meeting regarding $25,000 in Warren County funding to the Town of Queensbury and authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to execute such Agreement, and BE IT FURTHER, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 354 RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town’s Accounting Office to take all action necessary to amend the 2022 Town Budget and increase revenue 051-0000-52189 and increase appropriation 051-8790-4400 by the $25,000, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor, Town Clerk and/or Town Budget Officer take any further action necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND RATIFYING EMERGENCY WATER SYSTEM REPAIRS IN VICINITY OF 323 QUAKER ROAD, QUEENSBURY RESOLUTION NO.: 64, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury’s Water Superintendent advised that as a result of a break that occurred in a Town water line located near 323 Quaker Road in the Town of Queensbury th on or about December 30, 2021, he arranged for immediate repairs due to the depth of excavation, traffic issues and uncertainty about the cause of the break on an emergency basis for public health and safety reasons as time would not allow for the receipt of bids, and WHEREAS, the Water Superintendent engaged Edward & Thomas O’Connor, Inc., for such repair work, and WHEREAS, the Town Board hereby determines that such repair services constituted an emergency procurement needed to best serve the Town’s residents and such repairs needed to be completed immediately to protect public health and safety, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 355 RESOLVED, due to the emergency nature of the above-described repairs, the Queensbury Town Board hereby waives its requirement under General Municipal Law §103 and the Town of Queensbury’s Purchasing Policy and authorizes, confirms and ratifies the Town Water Superintendent’s engagement of Edward & Thomas O’Connor, Inc., for the provision of emergency water system repairs in the vicinity of 323 Quaker Road, Queensbury as delineated in the preambles of this Resolution, as such emergency repairs were needed to maintain public health and safety to best serve the Town’s residents and should have been made as soon as possible, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs that payment for such services in the total amount of $15,862.53 as delineated in Edward & Thomas O’Connor, Inc.’s 1/5/2022 Invoice shall be made from Misc. Contractual Account No.: 040-8340-4400, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer to amend the 2021 Town Budget to transfer $15,862.53 from Fund Balance Account No.: 040-0000-0909 to Misc. Contractual Account No.: 040-8340-4400 and take any and all other necessary actions to effectuate payment, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes the Town Supervisor, Water Superintendent and/or Budget Officer to take such other and further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF 2021 BRIDGE NY GRANT FUNDS FROM NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR LUZERNE ROAD CULVERT PROJECT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CAPITAL PROJECT FUND NO.: 242 RESOLUTION NO.: 65, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 153, 2021, the Queensbury Town Board authorized engagement of C.T. Male Associates for preparation of a 2021 New York State Department of Transportation (NYS DOT) Bridge NY Grant Funding Application regarding a culvert replacement project on Luzerne Road at Clendon Brook in the Town of Queensbury (Project), and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 356 WHEREAS, NYS DOT has notified the Town that the Town has been awarded $839,212 in such grant funds for this Project, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to accept these grant funds, establish the Luzerne Road Culvert Capital Project No. 242 and establish and fund the Revenue and Expense Accounts in the total amount of $839,212, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to also authorize a temporary loan from Capital Reserve Fund No. 64 up to $839,212 until such time as such grant funds are received, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the acceptance of $839,212 in New York State Department of Transportation (NYS DOT) Bridge NY Grant Funds from NYS DOT, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further establishes the Luzerne Road Culvert Capital Project No. 242 in the amount of $839,212 and authorizes and directs the establishment of the following accounts for such appropriations and revenues as necessary:  Revenue Acct No. – 242-0000-53597 (State Aid Transportation) - $839,212;  Expense Acct No. – 242-8540-2899 (Capital Construction) - $839,212; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes a temporary loan from the Capital Reserve Fund #64 up to $839,212 until such time as grant funds are received, and BE IT FURTHER, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 357 RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer to amend the Town Budget, make any adjustments, budget amendments, transfers or prepare any documentation necessary to establish such appropriations and estimated revenues, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to sign any needed grant agreement in form acceptable to the Town Supervisor, Town Budget Officer and/or Town Counsel, as well as any other associated documentation, and the Town Supervisor, Town Highway Superintendent, Town Counsel and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and further action necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that this Resolution is subject to a permissive referendum in accordance with the provisions of Town Law Article 7 and the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to publish and post such notices and take such other actions as may be required by law. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION TO AMEND 2021 TOWN BUDGET RESOLUTION NO.: 66, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the following Budget Amendment Requests have been duly initiated and justified and are deemed compliant with Town operating procedures and accounting practices by the Town Budget Officer, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 358 RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town’s Accounting Office to take all action necessary to amend the 2021 Town Budget as follows: To Code Appropriation Code Appropriation $ 001-1110-1010 Salary 001-1110-1010 Salary 2,585 001-1220-4090 Training Ed 001-1220-1010 Salary 15 001-1315-4451 Computer Processing 001-1315-1010 Salary 12,200 001-1355-1010 Salary 001-1330-1010 Salary 14,400 001-1355-1010 Salary 001-1410-1010 Salary 1,350 001-1420-4130 TC Retainer 001-1420-1010 Salary 6,200 001-1440-4720 Consultant 001-1460-1010 Salary 2,000 001-1990-4400 Contingency 001-1680-4400 Misc. Contr 33,000 001-1990-4400 Contingency 001-1680-4720 Consultant 14,000 001-1620-1010 Salary 001-3410-1010 Salary 11,000 001-3310-4800 Eq Repairs 001-3620-1010 Salary 17,600 001-3310-4800 Eq Repairs 001-5010-1010 Salary 14,700 001-1620-1010 Salary 001-7110-1010 Salary 10,000 001-1990-4400 Contingency 001-7110-1010 Salary 5,400 001-1990-1010 Contingency 001-7020-1010 Salary 35,000 001-8010-4090 Training Ed 001-8010-1010 Salary 1,900 001-3120-1010 Salary 001-8010-1010 Salary 1,600 001-9060-8060 Health Insurance 001-8020-1010 Salary 24,600 002-9060-8060 Health Insurance 002-8810-1010 Salary 7,500 004-5130-1010 Salary 004-5142-1010 Salary 21,000 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 359 009-9010-8010 NYS Retirement 009-8160-1010 Salary 1,790 020-0000-0909 Fund Balance 020-5182-4305 Street Lighting 120 032-8110-4130 TC Retainer 032-8110-1010 Salary 950 040-8330-440 Misc. Contractual 040-8330-1010 Salary 980 001-9060-8060 Health Insurance 001-5132-4500 Heating Fuel 12,000 009-0000-0909 Fund Balance 009-8160-4447 Trash Disp. Burn 7,000 009-0000-0909 Fund Balance 009-8160-4449 Trash Disp. Rec 1,000 th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED LOCAL LAW NO.: ___ OF 2022 TO AMEND CHAPTER 179 ‘ZONING’ OF QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL BOAT SALES, SERVICE AND STORAGE IN THE COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (CLI) ZONING DISTRICT BY SITE PLAN REVIEW RESOLUTION NO.: 67, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, Hacker Boat Company, Inc. (Hacker) submitted a zoning change application to the Queensbury Town Clerk's Office on or about September 1, 2021 to allow for the addition of Commercial Boat Sales/Storage/Service as an allowable use by Site Plan Review in the Commercial Light Industrial (CLI) Zoning District, and WHEREAS, by Town Board Resolution No.: 301, 2021, the petition for zoning changes was forwarded to the Town Planning Board for consent to the Town Board acting as Lead Agency for SEQRA and review and recommendations in accordance with §179-15-040 of the Town Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021 the Town Planning Board consented to the Town Board as SEQRA Lead Agency for the proposed zoning change, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 360 WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021 the Town Planning Board issued a positive recommendation to the Town Board regarding the proposed zoning change, with a recommendation that boat storage not be an exclusive use of the property, and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021 the Town Board discussed the Planning Board recommendation at a Workshop Meeting, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to consider adoption of Local Law No.: ___ of 2022 To Amend Chapter 179 ‘Zoning’ Of Queensbury Town Code To Allow Commercial Boat Sales, Service And Storage In The Commercial Light Industrial (CLI) Zoning District By Site Plan Review, and WHEREAS, before the Town Board may amend its Zoning Law, it must hold a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Town Law §265, the Municipal Home Rule Law and the Town of Queensbury Zoning Law, and WHEREAS, in accordance with General Municipal Law §239-m, the Town must first refer the proposed Zoning Law amendments and obtain a recommendation from the Warren County Planning Department before enacting the legislation, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to set a Public Hearing concerning adoption of this Local Law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk or Director of Planning and, Zoning to forward copies of the proposed zoning changes to the Warren County Planning Department for its review and recommendation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board shall meet and hold a Public Hearing at the th Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury at 7:00 p. m. on Monday, February 14, 2022 to hear all interested persons concerning proposed Local Law No.: ___ of 2022 which provides for certain amendments of the Town of Queensbury' s Zoning Map, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 361 BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to provide the public with at least 10 days' prior notice of the Public Hearing by causing a Notice of Public Hearing to be timely published in the Town's official newspaper and by posting the Notice of Public Hearing on the Town's website and public bulletin board at least ten (10) days before the date of the Public Hearing, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to send the Notice of Public Hearing, together with copies of the proposed Local Law if necessary, to any public officials, agencies, municipalities or individuals, in accordance with New York State Town Law § 265 and any other applicable State Laws or Town Code provisions, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk and/or the Town’s Director of Planning, Zoning and Code Compliance to take such other actions and give such other notices as may be necessary in preparation for the Public Hearing and for the Town Board to lawfully adopt proposed Local Law No.: ____ of 2022. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING NORTH QUEENSBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC.’S PURCHASE OF NEW PIERCE PUMPER TRUCK RESOLUTION NO.: 68, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury and the North Queensbury Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. (Fire Company) have entered into an Agreement for Fire Protection Services for 2021-2023 (Agreement), which Agreement sets forth a number of terms and conditions including a condition that the Fire Company will not purchase or enter into any binding contract to purchase any piece of apparatus, equipment, vehicles, real property, or make any improvements that would require the Fire Company to acquire a loan or mortgage or use money placed in a “vehicles fund” without prior approval of the Queensbury Town Board, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 362 WHEREAS, the Fire Company has advised the Town Board that it wishes to purchase a 2022/2023 Pierce Pumper Truck (Truck) to replace its year 1998 Saulsbury Truck for a sum not to exceed $874,800, such purchase included in the Fire Company’s five (5) year capital plan that forecasts future capital needs and expenditures, including anticipated vehicles, equipment, tools, other apparatus, facilities or improvements to facilities to be used for firematic purposes, and WHEREAS, the Fire Company plans on making payments for the Truck by using funds from its vehicles fund account, such monies included in the Fire Company’s approved budget and Agreement, and WHEREAS, the Town Board feels that this new Truck will provide additional safety protection for the Town and therefore the Town Board wishes to authorize such purchase, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves of the North Queensbury Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.’s purchase of a 2022/2023 Pierce Pumper Truck for an amount not to exceed $874,800, with payments to be from the Fire Company’s vehicles fund, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer to take any and all action necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS FOR SALE OR DISPOSAL OF OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT RESOLUTION NO.: 69, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 363 WHEREAS, in accordance with New York State Town Law §64(2), the Queensbury Town Board may authorize the sale of items which are no longer needed by the Town or obsolete, and WHEREAS, the Town’s Budget Officer requested that Town Departments advise of any surplus items in their respective Departments and the Town Budget Officer did receive lists of items from various Departments which are considered to be surplus, and WHEREAS, the Budget Officer advised the various Town Departments of the surplus items and did not receive any requests from the Departments for such surplus items and therefore has requested Town Board authorization to sell the surplus items by using the auction company GovDeals to dispose of such surplus property, or, if deemed unsafe and/or inoperable by the Department Manager(s), to be sold or disposed of as scrap, and WHEREAS, the following is the list of surplus items provided by the various Town Departments: Lot of keyboards IT n/a HP Storage works x1400 server (2) IT n/a lot of towers IT n/a Ethernet cable category 5E CM IT n/a Acer veriton x4620G (2) IT n/a Juniper EX4200-48PX (network switch) IT n/a Juniper EX3200-24POE (4) IT n/a Juniper EX3200-48 (1) IT n/a Juniper EX2200 POE IT n/a Juniper EX3300 48 POE IT n/a Dell Power Connect 3448 IT n/a Linksys srw 248g4 IT n/a Ethernet cable category 5E CMR IT n/a KHX1600 C9D3K4 ram (4) IT n/a PE222192 ram (10) IT n/a Assorted ram opened IT n/a Lenovo thinkcenter edge 92z IT n/a Dell Vastro desktop IT n/a Epson ex5220 projector IT n/a Scan snap scanner IT n/a REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 364 Digital MP3 recorder IT n/a Hard drives Sata serial ATA high speed storage IT n/a Verizon droid IT 9298 Apple iPhone S IT 9357 Samsung Galaxy S7 IT 9388 Apple iPhone Xr IT 9628 Apple iPhone 7 IT 9250 Samsung Droid IT 9143 Samsung Galaxy S7 IT n/a Apple iPhone s IT n/a Apple iPhone 6 IT n/a computer IT 9060 computer IT 9301 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves of the sale of the surplus items that are no longer needed by the Town or obsolete by using the auction company GovDeals to dispose of such surplus property, or, if deemed unsafe and/or inoperable by the Department Manager(s), to be sold or disposed of as scrap, as follows: Lot of keyboards IT n/a HP Storage works x1400 server (2) IT n/a lot of towers IT n/a Ethernet cable category 5E CM IT n/a Acer veriton x4620G (2) IT n/a Juniper EX4200-48PX (network switch) IT n/a Juniper EX3200-24POE (4) IT n/a Juniper EX3200-48 (1) IT n/a Juniper EX2200 POE IT n/a Juniper EX3300 48 POE IT n/a Dell Power Connect 3448 IT n/a Linksys srw 248g4 IT n/a Ethernet cable category 5E CMR IT n/a REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 365 KHX1600 C9D3K4 ram (4) IT n/a PE222192 ram (10) IT n/a Assorted ram opened IT n/a Lenovo thinkcenter edge 92z IT n/a Dell Vastro desktop IT n/a Epson ex5220 projector IT n/a Scan snap scanner IT n/a Digital MP3 recorder IT n/a Hard drives Sata serial ATA high speed storage IT n/a Verizon droid IT 9298 Apple iPhone S IT 9357 Samsung Galaxy S7 IT 9388 Apple iPhone Xr IT 9628 Apple iPhone 7 IT 9250 Samsung Droid IT 9143 Samsung Galaxy S7 IT n/a Apple iPhone s IT n/a Apple iPhone 6 IT n/a computer IT 9060 computer IT 9301 and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and engagement of the services of auction company GovDeals to sell/dispose of the surplus item(s) and all Town proceeds from the sales shall be deposited into the appropriate revenue account(s) in accordance with the Queensbury Town Code and New York State Laws, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer and/or Purchasing Agent to accept or reject any bids received online for any online auction bids, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor, Town Budget Officer, Purchasing Agent and/or Town Counsel to take such further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 366 th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:None RESOLUTION APPROVING AUDIT OF BILLS – WARRANT: 01252022 RESOLUTION NO.: 70, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Harrison Freer WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board wishes to approve an audit of bills presented as Warrant: 01252022 with a run date of 01/20/2022 and a payment date of 01/25/2022, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the audit of bills presented as Warrant: 01252022 with a run date of 01/20/2022 and a payment date of 01/25/2022 totaling $405,653.22, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and further action as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES : Mr. Metivier, Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES : None ABSENT :None 5.0 CORRESPONDENCE None 6.0 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR (LIMIT -4 MINUTES) PAUL PREUSS, 59 WAVERLY PLACE-Spoke regarding the Petition he presented to the Board sixteen months ago regarding moving the EMS boundary line due to the travel time during an emergency from Meadowbrook Road west so that they would be under the jurisdiction of the Bay REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 367 Ridge Rescue Squad instead of West Glens Falls EMS. Noted it has been sixteen months since the Petition was presented to the Board, questioned the status of the situation. JOHN HODGKINS, NORTH QUEENSBURY-Spoke to the Board regarding the placement and regulations of drilled wells in the Town. 7.0 TOWN BOARD DISCUSSIONS COUNCILMAN MCNULTY (WARD IV)  Spoke regarding West Mountain Expansion and how they are looking to go forward. I hope to meet with Spencer Montgomery and talk to him how he is going to involve the Communities in how this goes forward. I would like him to get involved with the residents. This expansion will change that whole side of Town. COUNCILMAN FERONE (WARD III)  Commended North Queensbury Fire Company for getting twenty-three years out of their fire truck. COUNCILMAN FREER (WARD II)  Spoke regarding the need to work on a Climate Action Plan.  Rode with EMS on Sunday evening.  Spoke regarding the Short-Term Rental Advisory Committee Meeting. It was a good meeting. I submitted three recommendations. Agreed to make a fourth recommendation. Everyone seemed to be in consensus of where we were in strengthening the plan. We will discuss this in a Workshop then follow the steps of a public hearing. Think they are doing the right thing by taking a good look at the short-term rental. COUNCILMAN METIVIER (WARD I)  Spoke regarding the ice on Lake George and Glen Lake and Sunnyside noting the ice not safe.  Spoke regarding the passing of Michael Dubray. He was an extraordinary person who left a mark on the Community. We are going to miss him. SUPERVISOR STROUGH  Spoke regarding the 1973 Directory of the Town of Queensbury and the Comprehensive Sewage Study for the Lake George Upper Region that he found while cleaning out the basement.  Attended the West Glens Falls Volunteer Fire Company’s Banquet and Queensbury Central Volunteer Fire Company Banquet.  Spoke regarding a letter received from Jane Arnold former SUNY Adirondack Professor who now lives in Rhode Island regarding the people who do the gardening at Hovey Pond.  Thanked Joel Barlow and Jessie Jackson from Look TV, Town Counsel, Bob Hafner, Karen O’Brien and Betty Murphy, Deputy Town Clerks, the Town Board and the public for coming tonight. RESOLUTION ADJOURNING REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING RESOLUTION NO. 71, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. George Ferone RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its Regular Town Board Meeting. th Duly adopted this 24 day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Freer, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING, 01-24-2022, MTG#3 368 NOES: None ABSENT:None Respectfully Submitted, Caroline H. Barber Town Clerk Town of Queensbury MINUTES PREPARED BY KAREN O’BRIEN, DEPUTY TOWN CLERK II