Loading...
Staff Notes Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 25-2012 Project Applicant: John & Pamela Cembrook Project Location: 121 Birdsall Road Meeting Date: May 16, 2012 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes demolition of a 1,524 square foot SFD with 816 square foot detached garage and reconstruct a +/-6,646 square foot SFD with 858 square foot garage. Relief requested from side setback requirements for single-family dwelling and height relief for proposed detached garage. Relief Required: Parcel will require area variances as follows: 1.Side setback (South) – Request for 6.75 feet of relief from the 20 foot side setback requirement for the WR zone. 2.Height – Request for 10 feet of relief from the 16 foot maximum height requirement for accessory structures in the WR zone. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives would include building the house in a compliant location to avoid the side setback relief requested. As far as the height relief, feasible alternatives would be to construct a garage that is 16 feet in height. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The request for 6.75 feet or 34% relief from the 20 foot side setback requirement for the WR zone as per §179-3-040 may be considered moderate relative to the ordinance. The request for 10 feet or 62% relief from the 16 foot maximum height requirement of 16 feet for accessory structures in the WR zone as per §179-3-040 may be considered moderate to severe relative to the ordinance. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor impacts on the physical or environmental condition in the neighborhood may be anticipated. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self created . The difficulty may be considered self-created. Parcel History (construction/site plan/variance, etc.): SP 27-12 SFD w/in 50 feet of 15% slopes and hard surfacing w/in 50 feet of shore Pending BP 06-272 Dock Approved 5/19/05 Staff comments:  The Zoning Board may wish to inquire about future plans for the dock and associated deck as in its current location the dock may be within the 20 foot setback from the extended property lines.  Stormwater and Erosion and Sediment control measures to be installed as well as an upgraded wastewater system. SEQR Status: Type II Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes L:\Keith Oborne\2012 Staff Notes\Zoning\May 16\AV_Cembrook.doc Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes