Loading...
1983-01-11 TOWN BOARD MEETING JANUARY 11 , 1983 77 TOWN BOARD MEMBERS MRS. FRANCES WALTER-SUPERVISOR MR. DANIEL OLSON-COUNCILMAN DR. CHARLES EISENHART-COUNCILMAN MR. DANIEL MORRELL-COUNCILMAN MRS. BETTY MONAHAN-COUNCILMAN PRESS : G. F. POST STAR GUESTS : RESIDENT OF DIXON ROAD, MR. TURNBULL , MR. JOSEPH DAIRE TOWN OFFICIALS : MR. PAUL NAYLOR, MR. LYNN PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAHCE: :LED BY COUNCILMAN EISENHART MEETING OPENED O'F THE QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH REOPEN PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BALTIS PROPERTY-UNSAFE STRUCTURE ADJOURNED TWICE DECEMBER 14 , 1982 AND DECEMBER 28TH 1982 HEARING OPENED 7 : 44 P. M. SUPERVISOR WALTER- ASKED FOR INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE UNSAFE STRUCTURE ON AVIATION ROAD , THE BALTIS PROPERTY MR. BALTIS AND HIS ATTORNEY WERE PRESENT FOR THE HEARING SUPERVISOR WALTER-THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPT. HAD NOTIFIED THE TOWN BOARD THAT THERE WAS AN UNSAFE STRUCTURE AND THE CONCERN OF THE TOWN BOARD ACTING AS THE BOARD OF HEALTH THAT THIS INTERFEF9- WITH THE SAFETY OF THE RESIDENTS IN TFE AREA. WE HAVE HAD A PUBLIC HEARING WHICH HAS BEEN ADJOURNED UNTIL THIS EVENING TO DETERMINE IF ANY ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN AND COULD BE DONE TO SHORE UP THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY SO THAT IT WOULD NOT BE DEEMED UNSAFE. ATTORNEY OF BALTIS- WE ALSO ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE STRUCTUREjAS YOU KNOW THERE WAS FORMRRLY A DINER THE E. FIRST LET ME SAYj THIS IS THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING THAT WE HAD NOTICE OFj SOMEHOW IT GOT LOST IN THE MAIL. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER-WELL THERE IS NO PROBLEM AT ALL AND THIS IS WHAT LEGAL COUNSEL HAD INDICATEDJWE WANTED TO BE SURE THAT YOU HEARD ABOUT IT. ATTORNEY- 1'1HEN THE DINER WAS TO BE REMOVED ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF ALLOWING THAT DINER TO BE REMOVED) WAS THAT THEY GO TO THE TOWNjTHE SWINGLES , AND PUT IN A PLAN FOR DEMOLITION AND -REMOVAL AND SECURE, WHICH THE PLAN HAD TO BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN TO INSURE. US THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE EXACTLY THE PROBLEM THAT HAS OCCURED. THE APPLICATION FOR THE BUILDING DEMOLITION PERMIT INDICATES THAT THERE WAS A PLAN APPROVED BY THE TOWN , BY THE BUILDING DEPT. AND A PERMIT ISSUED. UNFORTUNATELY IT APPEARS IN RETROSPECT-. THE TOWN IS DISPLEASED WITH THE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED AND AS A MATTER OF FACT ,, .WE WERE SOMEWHAT DIS- PLEASEDjWE THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT. I CALLED THE TOWN AND ASKED THEM TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE BUILDINGjAFTER WE SAW THE CONDITION IT WAS LEFT INS LET ME SAY WE DO NOT WANT TO LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS PERMANENTLY MR. BALTIS IS CURRENTLY TALKING TO SEVERAL DIFFERENT PROSPECTIVE TENANTS AND WE HOPE TO HAVE A NEW BUILDING PROPOSAL BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE . SUPERVISOR WALTER- OUR CONCERN REALLY WOULD BE� THAT SOMEONE WOULD BE INJURED ON THE PROPERTY-THE FACT THAT WE HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT AND WERE NOTIFIED OF IT4 PUTS US IN A VERY PRECARIOUS POSITION . I DO NOT KNOW WHEN YOUR PRaSPECTIVE TENANTS WOULD BE OCCUPYING THE PROPERTYp BUT IF IT WERE ANY TIME IN THE FUTUREj_AND SOMEONE WOULD HAPPEN TO GET HURT THEREjI THINK THERE WOULD BE A CASE FOR SOME KIND OF LIABILITY . HAVING LOOKED AT ITj AND I THINK I HEARD - ^ YOU SAY, THAT YOU WERE NOT VERY HAPPY WITH THE WAY IT LOOKED RIGHT NOW , IS THAT RIGHT . . . ATTORNEY- WE ARE NOT TOTALLY PLEASE'DWITH THE CONDITION THAT IT IS IN . SUPERVISOR WALTER- WOULD YOU IN THE MEANTIME BE TAKING ANY ACTION BEFORE YOUR TENANTS COME TO PERHAPS MAKE THAT AREA A LITTLE MORE SAFE? ATTORNEY- WHAT ACTION WOULD YOU. . . THE ONLY ACTION THAT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED TO US IN TALKING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN A LETTER , IS THAT WE FILL IN THE BASEMENTaTO DO THAT WE WOULD SUFFER A SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC HARDSHIP'S WE WOULD HAVE TO TAKE THE FILL OUT OR DIG A NEW BASEMENT BEFORE WE COULD PUT A NEW BUILDING IN THERE . 78 COUNCILMAN EISENHART- HOW ABOUT FENCING IT? COUNCILMAN MORRELL-IT IS FENCED. SUPERVISOR WALTER- THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT] IT IS A SNOW FENCE) WHICH IS NOT VERY GOOD FENCING. COUNCILMAN OLSON- IF WE COULD GET A MORE SECURE FENCE. SUPERVISOR WALTER- THAT IS ALL WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS A MORE SECURE FENCE. SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE THAT STRUCTURE A LITTLE MORE SAFE-I DO NOT THINK IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE BOARD AT ALL TO PUT YOU TO ANY ECONOMIC HARDSHIPS AS MUCH AS WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT SOMEONE FALLING INTO THE BASEMENT. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-WHAT WAS IT THAT I HEARD OUTSIDE HERE, THAT YOUR J PERMIT FOR DEMOLITION RUNS THROUGH FEBRUARY 1ST. ? ATTORNEY- THE PERMIT RUNS THROUGH FEBRUARY 1ST. COUNCILMAN EISENAHRT- IN OTHER WORDS TECHNICALLY YOU HAVE UNTIL FEBRUARY 1ST . TO COMPLY WITH THE RESTFRICTIONS .ON IT? ATTORNEY TECHNICALLY WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE RESTRICTIONS ON IT . COUNCILMAN MORRELL- THEY COMPLIED WITH THE SUPERVISOR WALTER- FOR THE RECORDVYOU HAVE THE PERMIT THEREIWOULD YOU PLEASE READ THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT? ATTORNEY- PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMOVAL' 'OF A 56 BY 84 ' DINER MODULEy ENCLOSE BASEMENT WITH FENCING, SEAL OFF KITCHEN PER APPLICATION SUBMITTED. SUPERVISOR WALTER- NOW , WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? ATTORNEY- FIRST OF ALL WE DID NOT DO ANY OF IT , SWINGLE DINER DID THE WHOLE THING. THEY DID REMOVE THE DINER MODULE , THEY DID ENCLOSE THE BASEMENT WITH FENCING ADMITTEDLY WITH SNOW FENCINGjAND THEY DID SEAL OFF THE KITCHEN WITH BAGGIES. . .THEY BOARDED IT UP WITH SOME TYPE OF WOOD AND THEN PUT PLASTIC OVER IT. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- THAT DOES NOT REPRESENT MUCH OF A DANGER. . . IS THERE ANYTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT GETTING A FENCE AROUND THERE THAT IS A LITTLE MORE THAN A SNOW FENCE JTHAT ANYONE CAN LEAN AGAINST AND WALK OVER SUPERVISOR WALTER- PART OF THAT FENCE IS DOWN ATTORNEY-PART OF IT IS DOWN PRESENTLY COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- WHETHER OR NOTE A SNOW FENCE IS VERY INADEQUATE ANDACHILD CAN GET AROUND A SNOW FENCE, OVER IT , UNDER IT WHATEVER. YOU ARE CONTRIBUTING, PART OF THE STATE LAW THAT SAYS YOU CANNOT HAVE AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE TO CHILDREN AND I THINK YOU HAVE A VERY GOOD CASE FOR SAYING THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE THERE . NOT ONLY THE TOWN THAT YOU ARE CONTENDING WITFJ YOU ALSO HAVE THE STATE LAW THAT YOU ARE CONTENDING WITH. COUNCILMAN OLSON- DO YOU THINK YOU WILL HAVE SOME DEFINITE PLANS , CONCRETE PLANS OF WHEN YOU ARE GOING TO BE BUILDING THERE? ATTORNEY- MR. BALTIS SAYS THAT MR. MARZOLA HAS BEEN TALKING WITH YOUR BUILDING INSPECTOR WITHIN THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS , THEY HOPE TO HAVE AN APPLICATION BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD WITHIN THE NEXT NINETY DAYS. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- STEVE HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS? MR. LYNN- MR. MARZOLA DID CONTACT USA THEY HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING A NEW ENTERPRISE, TO MY KMOWLEDGE� DID NOT GIVE ME ANY TIME FOR WHICH THE APPLICATION WOULD GO TO ;-THE PLANNING BOARD FOR THE SITE PLAN REVIEW . COUNCILMAN EISENHART- IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT THE FENCE? MR. LYNN- I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING MORE SUBSTANTIAL� IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- STEVE , HOW LONG HAS THE SNOW FENCE BEEN THERE? 79 MR. LYNN— SINCE RIGHT AFTER THE BUILDING WAS REMOVED COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- IT WOULD BE WHAT FOR A DATE , APPROXIMATELY MR. LYNN— DO NOT PIN ME DOWN TO THAT, COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— A COUPLE OF MONTHS? MR. LYNN— THE BUILDING WENT OUT OF THERE THE END OF OCTOBER. . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— SO IT HAS BEEN LEFT IN THAT CONDITION FOR TWO AND to A HALF MONTHS AT LEAST. THE TOWN HAS BEEN PATIENT ENOUGH. _ COUNCILMAN OLSON— THEY WERE DOING WHAT WAS OUTLINED COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— BUT A SNOW FENCE IS PRETTY POOR EXCUSE DAN. COUNCILMAN OLSON—. . . I THINK WE HAVE TO COME UP WITH A MORE SECURE TYPE OF FENCING. ATTORNEY— WE WILL GO AND MAKE REPAIRS TO THE SNOW FENCE ALMOST IMMEDIATELY AND TRY AND MAKE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS. COUNCILMAN MORRELL— A MORE EXPENSIVE FENCE WOULD BE MORE THAN CAPPING OVER THE FOUNDATION . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— IF WE LCISE A CHILD IN THERE, IT IS GOING TO COST A LOT MORE THAN A FENCE. COUNCILMAN EISENHART— BUT, IF YOU CAN PUT UP THE SNOW FENCE AND PUT TWICE AS MANY POSTS ON IT , SOMETHING TO HOLD IT UP . ATTORNEY— WE CAN MAKE IT MUCH MORE SECURE SUPERVISOR I.IALTER— MR. BALTIS, HAVE YOU BEEN OVER THERE TO SEE THAT PROPERTY? MR. BALTIS— NOT IN THE LAST TWO WEEKS , I WAS HERE SOMETIME BEFORE CHRISTMAS , ONE WEEKEND BEFORE CHRISTMAS . SUPERVISOR WALTER— SO , YOU REALLY HAVE NOT SEEN THE CONDITION THAT IT IS IN AS OF THIS EVENING. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS IT TO MONfJTOR' :THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR YOU TO SEE THAT IT IS KEPT IN THE CONDITION IT IS SUSPOSED TO BE KEPT IN . MR. BALTIS— MY REALIESTATE REPRESENTATIVE , MR. MARZOLA ATTORNEY— WE WILL DOUBLE UP THE POSTS AND SECURE THAT FENCE AND MAKE THE FENCE MUCH STRONGER MR. LYNN— THAT WOULD BE MUSH BETTER THAN WHAT EXISTS NOW. COUNCILMAN EISENHART— I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THEIR PLAN TO DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF POSTS AND STRENGTHEN THAT FENCE UP ATTORNEY— WE WILL INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SIGNS COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— DOC, ARE YOU GOING TO PUT THE STIPULATION THAT BY FEBRUARY 1ST. THERE WILL BE A BETTER SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM? COUNCILMAN OLSON— I THINK THAT IF THEY PUT IN LETTER FORM TO THE TOWN WHAT WE HAVE STATED TO THEM AND ALSO THAT THEY HAVE A LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE TO WATCH THE AREA THAT WE CAN CONTACT GIVING HIM AUTHORITY THAT THEiTOWN CAN CONTACT THEIR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE. IF SOMETHING GOES WRONG SO WE CAN GET DIRECT IN TOUCH IMMEDIATELY. COUNCILMAN EISENHART— YOU CAN GET THOSE POSTS IN TOMORROW? MR. BALTIS— BY THIS COMING WEEKEND. SUPERVISOR 'WALTER— WE ARE LOOKING AT TWO THINGS ONE—TO SECURE , MAKE THE FENCE MORE ADEQUATE RIOR THE JOB IT IS TO D01 WHICH IS TO PROTECT ANYONE FROM OPEN BASEMENT, AND THE OTHER IS TO INCREASE THE SIGNS IN THE AREAS . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN— I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW LONG THE )TDWN IS GOING TO BE so SATISFIED WITH THIS SITUATION? COUNCILMAN EISENHART-- I DON 'T KNOW, BUT I HATE TO PUT A DATE IN IT COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- ARE YOU WILLING TO PUT A FIRST OF FEBRUARY DATE ON IT? COUNCILMAN EISENHART- IF IT DRAGS ON ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO MONTHSjIHEN I THINK WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE MORE ACTION . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- BUT , IF WE DO NOT PUT SOME KIND OF A DATE ON YOUR AMENDMENTjWE MAY BE LOCKING OUTSELVES INTO A SITUATION WHERE WE CANNOT DO ANYTHING FURTHER . SUPERVISOR WALTER- I WOULD SAY THEIR DEMOLITION PERMIT RUNS OUT ON THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY WE SHOULD CHOOSE AN ADEQUATE TIME FOR SOMETHING MORE PERMANENT TO BE DONE TO THE AREA. STEVEN WHAT ABOUT A DEMOLITION PERMIT? THE PERMIT THAT WAS ISSUED FOR DEMOLITION HAD THOSE THINGS LISTED ON IT THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE AND THE PERMIT RUNS OUT ON THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY , WHAT DOES THAT MEAN: MR. LYNN- THAT MEANS THAT ALL THE CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED BY THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY. COUNCILMAN MORRELL- WHICH'. ACCORDING TO THE PERMIT THEY WERE. MR. LYNN- ONCE AGAIN I THINK THERE WAS A LACK IN THE DESCRIPTION OF WHAT KIND OF A FENCE. . .THE PROBLEM BEING A SNOW FENCE FOR A SECURITY MEASURE . COUNCILMAN MORRELL- WHAT HAPPENS AFTER FEBRUARY FIRST , DO THEY NEED A DIFFERENT PERMIT TO MAINTAIN. . . MR. LYNN- ESSENTIALLY THEY WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST ONE . COUNCILMAN MORRELL- IN WHAT WAY? MR. LYNN- IF THE FENCING WAS INADEQUATE iTHEN THEY DID NOT FULFILL THE COMMITTMENT OF THE PERMIT. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-THEY STILL HAVE UNTIL FEBRUARY FIRST TO MEET THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEMOLITION PERMIT. MR, 66VI - THE PROBLEM IS THE FENCE , THE IDEA OF THE SNOW FENCING THE QUESTION IS, ^, THAT FULEVC;L__ THE OBLIGATION , IT IS OUR POSITION IT SHOULD HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE SECURITY , WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT CAPPED BUT OBVIOUSLY THAT WOULD PUT A HARDSHIP ON THE OWNERS. SUPERVISOR WALTER- I WOULD INDICATE FROM THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY THAT THERE BE THIRTY , SIXTY OR NINETY DAYS FOR SOMETHING MORE PERMANENT THAN. . . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- YOU ARE LEAVING THE TOWN WIDE OPEN , IF YOU LET THIS KEEP GOING ON . ,'IE HAVE GOT AN AREA OF HAZARD- THERE , SNOW FENCE IS NOT CORRECTING A HAZARN0`, IT NEVER WOULD, IT SEEMS LESS THAN ADEQUATE. COUNCILMANd OLSON- HOW DEEP IS THE CELLAR , IS THAT A DEEP CELLAR? MR. BALTIS- SEVEN FEET SUPERVISOR ';!ALTER- HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN SINCE THE PROPERTY WAS IN THAT CONDITION? ATTORNEY- THE END OF OCTOBER THE BEGINNING OF NOVEMBER MR. BALTIS- I MUST POINT OUT THERE IS APPROXIMATELY TWO 'FEET OF 1 FOUNDATION ABOVE GROUND, IT IS'`! CONCRETE WALLjTWO FEET IN SOME AREAS THREE FEET WHERE THE EXISTING BUILDING IS FOR EXAMPLE, IT IS THREE FEET ABOVE THE PARKING LOT. COUNCILMAN OLSON- THEN IF YOU PUT THE FENCE ON TOP OF THE FOUNDATION YOU WOULD GAIN ANOTHER THREE TO FOUR FEET , IF YOU PUT HIGH ENOUGH POSTS IN, MAYBE YOU COULD PUT IT ON THE FOUNDATION . COUNCILMAN MORRELL- THE FENCE IS IN THE GROUND. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- I WOULD SUGGEST THIRTY DAYS FROM THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY- I.£ THERE IS NOT SOMETHING DONE THEY WOULD HAVE TO PUT SOMETHING MORE PERMANENT FENCING OR ADEQUATE FENCING. , WE WOULD REVIEW THE SITUATION ON THE FIRST OF MARCH. 81 COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- THE HAZARB IS THERE� WE CANNOT KEEP CONDONING THIS, KEEP PUTTING IT OFF FOR THIRTY DAYS . COUNCILMAN EISENHART- WHAT IS YOUR ALTERNATIVE COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-BY THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY THEY HAVE TO HAVE A GOOD STRONG METAL FENCE AROUND THE PLACE. SUPERVISOR WALTER- I HAVE ONLY ONE PROBLEM WITH THAT-IF THERE IS SOME KIND OF TENANT THERE WITHIN THE NEXT THRITY OR SIXTY DAYS THAT IS AN UNNECESSARY EXPENSE. . . - COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- IF HE CAME IN WITH A SIGNED LEASE BETWEEN NOW AND THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY I WOULD FEEL DIFFERENTLY ABOUT IT BUT I THINK THAT THIS THING CAN JUST DRAG ON FROM WEEK TO WEEK MONTH TO MONTH. COUNCILMAN OLSON- I WOULD HOPE BY THE MARCH , APRIL YOU HAVE GOT GOOD PLANS AND A TENANT MAYBE WE WILL 'HAVE A LEASE BY THEN ,THEN IT IS A DIFFERENT SITUATION. SUPERVISOR WALTER- ASKED COUNCILMAN EISENHART TO RESTATE HIS RESOLUTION.; COUNCILMAN EISENHART- MY RESOLUTION IS THAT CONTINGENT UPON THEIR I STRENGHENING THAT FENCE WITH APPROXIMATELY DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF POSTS, THAT WE WILL PERMIT THE CONDITION TO EXIST UNTIL THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY- AND INCREASING SIGNS . ATTORNEY- REQUESTED THAT THE RESOLUTION BE RESTATED AGAIN. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- THE CONDITION WILL BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE FOR THIRTY DAYS PAST THE FIRST OF FEBRUARYS PROVIDED THAT ALMOST IMMEDIATELY THERE ARE ADDITIONAL POSTS PUT IN THE FENCE� THE FENCE BE RE-ERECTED, PUT UPS AND ADDITION- AL POST, TWICE AS MANY TO MAKE THE FENCE STEADY ENOUGH SO THAT NOBODY IS GOING TO WALK THROUGH IT AND ADDITIONAL WARNING SIGNS POSTED. COUNCILMAN OLSON- WE WOULD HOPE THAT YOU KEEP US ABREAST OF THE DEVELOPMENTS AS THEY COME ALONG. . . yy T COUNCILMAN EISENHART- WE DO NO#A� POSE ANY ECONOMIC PROBLEMS ON YOU BUT WE DO NOT WANT ANYONE GETTING HURT IN THERE . RESOLUTION REGARDING UNSAFE STRUCTURE RESOLUTION NO . 1 1..983 QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON WHEREAS, THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY HAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE TOWN BOARD OF HEALTH THAT AN UNSAFE STRUCTURE EXISTS ON THE AVIATION ROAD, PROPERTY BEING OWNED BY DONNA BALTIS AND WHEREAS, THE QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH ADVERTISED FOR AND HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE UNSAFE STRUCTURE ON DECEMBER 14TH 1982 ADJOURNED UNTIL DEC- EMBER 28TH 1982 AND AGAIN ADJOURNED UNTIL JANUARY 11 , 1983 AND WHEREAS , THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD AND ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO BE HEARD WERE HEARD , NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH WILL ALLOW THE CONDITION ON AVIATION ROAD TO EXIST FOR THIRTY DAYS PAST THE FIRST OF FEBRUARY 1983 "- PROVIDED THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BE MET IMMEDIATELY: A. THE EXISTING SNOW FENCE MUST BE RE-ERECTED WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF POSTS TO STRENGTHEN THE FENCE B . MORE WARNING SIGNS BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPERTY AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT THE QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH WILL REVIEW THE SITUATION ON MARCH 1ST. 1983 - AND BE 1t FURTHER E2 RESOLVED, THAT A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION BE SENT TO THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MRS. WALTER NOES : MRS. MONAHAN ABSENT : NONE DISCUSSION HELD ON THE LETHBRIDGE PROPERTY COUNCILMAN EISENHART- ASKED WHAT HAPPENED TO THE LETHBRIDGE PROPERTY? MR. LYNN- MR. FOLSOM CALLED ME� I EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT HE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THE BUILDING LOOKED AT BY SOMEONE IN THE BUILDING PROFESSIONSVTO ADDRESS THE BOARD WITH THEIR REPORT TO REFUTE OURS . MR. FOLSOM FIGURED THAT THE COST WOULD BE TOO MUCH. MR. LETHBRIDGE, AT HIS AGE, WOULD NOT BE UP TO GOING ANY FURTHER WITH IT AND THEY ARE LOOKING TO SELL THE PROPERTY. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- AS SOON AS YOU CAN GET TO ITS GO OVER THERE AND RIP IT OUT ( SPEAKING TO PAUL NAYLOR ) SUPERVISOR-CLOSED THE BOARD OF HEALTH- TOWN BOARD MEETING RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES RESOLUTION NO , 22 , INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL : RESOLVED, THAT THE TOWN BOARD MINUTES OF DECEMBER 28 , 1982 AND JANUARY 4TH 1983 BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR. 'MORRELL , MRS. MONAHAN , MRS. WALTER NOES :: NONE ABSENT : NONE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A $192 , 000 . 00 BOND ANTICIPATION RENEWAL NOTE OF THE TORN OF QUEENSBURY, COUNTY OF WARREN , STATE OF NEW YORK TO RENEW IN PART A $240,000 . 00 BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE OF SAID TOWN TO PAY THE COSTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LAND O ' PINES WATER DISTRICT RFSf1111TT0N N(l _ 23, INTRODUCED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MRS . BETTY MONAHAN : WHEREAS, THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY ON JANUARY 6 , 1982 ADOPTED A BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE RESOLUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $240 ,000. 00 AND ..�� WHREAS, SUCH BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE SUBSEQUENTLY WAS SOLD BY THE SUPER- VISOR OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY TO THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK NA OF GLENS FALLS , NEW YORK ; AND WHEREAS, SAID BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS OF JANUARY 5 , 1983 ; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , THAT THE SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BE AND SHE HEREBY IS AUTHORIZED TO ( A) PAY TOWARD SAID BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE THE SUM, OF $48 ,000 ; AND ( B) RENEW PARTIALLY SAID BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE 83 WITH A BALANCE OF $ 192 ,000 . 00 WITH THE GLENS FALLS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. , GLENS FALLS , NEW YORK FOR A PERIOD RUNNING FROM JANUARY 12 , 1983 TO JANUARY 11 , 1984 WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF SIX AND TWENTY-FIVE HUNDREDTHS PERCENT ( 6. 25% ) PER ANNUM. ( A COPY OF THE RENEWAL BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE IS ATTACHED HERETO ) . DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR. MORRELL , MRS . MONAHAN , MRS . WALTER 1 NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE RESOLUTION TO APPROVE BINGO LICENSE RESOLUTION NO . 24 , INTRODUCED.-:-BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DA41EL OLSON : RESOLVED, THAT BINGO LICENSE NO. 17026 BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED ALLOWING QUEENSBURY V. F.W . POST 6196 TO HOLD BINGO OCCASIONS FROM JANUARY 25 , 1983 TO MARCH 29 , 1983 , AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , THAT THIS LICENSE INCLUDED TWO SUNDAY BINGO 'S DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : 'AIYES : MR. OLSON , MR. MORRELL, MRS. MONAHAN , MRS. WALTER NOES : DR. EISENHART ABSENT: NONE DISCUSSION HELD ON INCREASING THE RATE FOR GRAVEL BEING TAKEN FROM THE 4 LANDFILL- SUPERVISOR PRESENTED TO THE BOARD A PROPOSAL> TO RAISE THE RATE FROM . 15 PER YARD FOR GRAVEL TO . 30 PER YARD THE . 15 PER YARD FOR GRAVEL WAS SET IN 1978- NOTED THAT WARREN CO. AIRPORT WILL BE USING ELEVEN THOUSAND YARDS OF GRAVEL FOR A NEW TAXI WAY. . . AS A MATTER OF COOPERATION THE PRICE WILL BE SET LOWER THAN THE GOING RATE.-. I RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION 139 OF 1978 AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF GRAVEL FROM RIDGE ROAD LANDFILL SITE TO OTHER MUNICIPALITIES RFS0111TION NO . 25 , INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON WHEREAS, THE QUEENSBURY/GLENS FALLS LANDFILL COMMITTEE HAS RECOMMENEDED THE SALE OF GRAVEL TO THE COUNTY OF WARREN AND THE CITY OF GLENS FALLS IN ORDER TO ATTEMPT TO MAXIMIZE THE ANTICIPATED LIFE OF THE EXISTING RIDGE ROAD LANDFILL SITE AND OPERATION AND WHEREAS, IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THE OPERATION OF THE RIDGE ROAD LAND- FILL TO HAVE THIS GRAVEL MINED IN ORDER TO AVOID THE LOSS OF A VALUABLE RESOURCE AND WHEREAS, THE GRAVEL LOCATED AT THE RIDGE ROAD LANDFILL SITE IS A SURPLUS �.� ASSET OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND WHEREAS, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT A PRICE OF THIRTY ( . 30 ) CENTS PER YARD WILL BE A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE FOR THE SALE OF SAID GRAVEL TO THE COUNTY OF WARREN AND THE CITY OF GLENS FALLS WITHTHE CONDITION THAT SAID GRAVEL IS TO BE MINED AND LOADED FOR REMOVAL BY THE PURCHASING MUNICIPALITIES . NOW , THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , THAT THE SALE OF GRAVEL FROM THE PIDGE FOAD LANDFILL SITE TO OTHER MUNICIPALITIES BE AUTHORIZED WITH THE SPECIFIC CONDITION ATTACHED THAT THE PURCHASING MUNICIPALITIES WILL CONDUCT GRAVEL MINING OPERATIONS IN AN AREA OR AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY , AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT SAID GRAVEL BE SOLD AT A PRIVE OF THIRTY ( . 30 ) CENTS PER YARD WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE PURCHASING MUNICIPALITIES WILL LOAD AND $4 REMOVE SAID GRAVEL AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONTINUE IN FORCE AND EFFECT FOR SUCH A PERIOD OF TIME AS MAY BE UNILATERALLY DETERMINED BY THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY . DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR. MORRELL , MRS. MONAHAN , MRS . WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE COMMUNICATIONS LTR D.O .T. WILL REPLACE YEILD SIGN AT MONTRAY AND ROUTE 9 WITH STOP SIGN ON FILE BID OPENING-RECREATION 3/4 PICKUP TRUCK BIDS AS OPENED. . . -� FORD GARAGE GREENWICH , N.Y. 1983 FORD MODEL F250 $11 , 773. 00 MALTBIE CHEV. RT. 9 LAKE GEORGE , N. Y. 1983 FLEETSIDE PICKUP $12 ,091 . 11 NON COLLUSIVE WERE ATTACHED TO EACH OF THE ABOVE BIDS LTR. -MR. HANSEN- RECOMMENDING THAT THE LOW BID OF CARMODY FORD BE ACCEPTED 11 , 773. 00 ON FILE DISCUSSION WAS HELD, MR. HANSEN REQUESTED THAT A HEAVY DUTY COOLING SYSTEM AND AUXILIARY TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER BE INSTALLED AT THE COST OF $95. 00 COUNCILMAN OLSON- MR. NAYLORjHOW DOES THIS BID COMPARE WITH THE BIDS THAT YOU HAD COME IN RECENTLY? MR. NAYLOR ONLY A FEW HUNDRED DOLLARS DIFFERENCE ^ COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- AS FAR AS YOU WORKING ON THEM DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO YOU FORD OR CHEV. ? MR. NAYLOR-NOS COUNCILMAN MORRELL- MR. HANSEN WHAT ABOUT DELIVERY DATE? MR. HANSEN -THEY HAVE SOME COMING IN , FORTYFIVE DAYS OR LESS MALTBIE HAS FIVE TO SIX WEEKS APPROXIMATE y THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME . . . MR. OLSON- HOW LONG IS THE WARRENTY ' MR. HANSEN-I BELIEVE IT IS 12 , 000 MILES- MR. OLSON-THE 'ONLYVTHING THAT BOTHERS ME IS YOU HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF $318. 00 YET WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE DEALER IN GREENWICH MORE THAN A FEW TIMES FOR WARRANTEE WORK OR REPAIRS WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE THE VEHICLE BACK AT OUR EXPENSE-ARE WE GOING TO SAVE OR ARE WE GOING TO SPEND MORE MONEY THAN -WHAT OUR SAVING I$? COUNCILMAN EISENHART- 318. 00 IS A LOT OF MONEY. . . COUNCILMAN OLSON- GREENWICH , IS GOING TO KILL A DAY TO SEND A PERSON OVER. . . COUNCILMAN EISENHART- IT IS A POINT BUT I THINK WE COULD GET IN TROUBLE IF IT MEETS THE SPECS . DOES THE SPECS SAY ANYTHING ABOUT NEARNESS TO THE TOWN? MR. HANSEN- N0t'COUNCILMAN EISENHART- MAYBE THAT SHOULD BE IN FUTURE SPECS? RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT LOW BID RFSOIIITTON NO _, 42r, , INTRODUCED BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART : WHEREAS, MR. HAROLD HANSEN , RECREATION/YOUTH SERVICE DIRECTOR FOR THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY DID RECOMMEND THAT WE ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR A 3/4 TON PICKUP WITTH PLOW AND WHEREAS, TWO BIDS WERE SUBMITTED AND RECEIVED AND OPENED AT THE SPECIFIED TIME AND PLACE BY THE DIRECTOR OF PURCHASING/TOWN CLERK DONALD A. CHASE , AND SUCH BIDS WERE THEN TURNED OVER TO MR. HANSEN FOR HIS RECOMMENDATION; AND WHEREAS, MR. HANSEN BY LETTER HAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BID ;BE AWARDED TO CARMODY FORD OF GREENWICH , N.Y. , NOW , THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE TOWN ROARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY HEREBY ACCEPTS THE BID OF CARMODY FORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $11 , 773. 00 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT THE TOWN BOARD ALSO ACCEPTS THE OPTIONS OFFERED FOR AN AUXILIARY TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER AND HD COOLING SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF NINETY FIVE DOLLARS AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT THE FINANCING FOR SUCH MATERIALS IS INCLUDED I 85 1983 RECREATION BUDGET. N THE DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : 'APES : MR. OLSON, DR. EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MRS . MONAHAN , MRS. WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE 1 COUNCILMAN MORRELL-I HAVE RECEIVED TWO OR THREE PHONE CALLS IN THE LAST WEEK FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE CONCERNED ABOUT HEAD SHOPSJI THINK THAT IS THE TERM, SELLING DRUG PARAPHANALIA IN THE TOWN AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE THE STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW PUTTING THE RESPONSIBILITY ON THE MUNICIPALITY TO LEGISLATE EITHER FOR OR AGAINST IT. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME CONCERN WITH SOME THESE PLACES OPENING IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND SELLING THE WARES ASSOCIATED WITH ILLEGAL DRUG PRODUCTS. IT WILL BE UP TO THE MUNICIPALITIES TO PASS LOCAL LAWS RESTRICTING THIS] IF THEY SO DESIRE . SUPERVISOR WALTER- IF THE BOARD IS INTERESTED IN PASSING SOME SORT OF LEGISLATION THE THING TO DO WOULD BE TO GET AHOLD OF OTHER PIECES OF LEGISLATION , ORDINANCES OR LOCAL LAWS AND MAKE A DETERMINATION WHICH WAY WE WANT TO GO. TOWN CLERK- SUGGESTED THAT THE GENERAL CODE PUBLISHERS BE CONTACTED WHEN THE ASSOCIATION OF TOWN MEETING IS HELD , THEY WOULD POSSIBLY HAVE COPIES OF LEGISLATION ON THIS. REPORTS THE FOLLOWING MONTHLY REPORTS WERE PLACED ON FILE : DECEMBER 1982 TOWN CLERK AND BUILDING AND ZONING THE FOLLOWING YEARLY REPORTS WERE PLACED ON FILE : 1982 .TOWN CLERK , BUILDING AND ZONING AND RECEIVER OF TAXES MR. CHASE- GAVE AN ORAL REPORT ON THE BINGO FEES RECEIVED BY THE TOWN. OPEN FORUM 8 : 34 P. M. MR. JOSEPH DIARE- ASKED IF THE RECREATION DEPT. COULD RENT A TRUCK FROM THE HIGHWAY DEPT. INSTEAD OF BUYING ONE. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER- NOTED THAT THE RECREATION DEPT. USES THE TRUCK YEAR ROUND. MR. .JOSEPH DAIRE- SPOKE ON THE CONDITION OF THE PAVILION ON SUNNYSIDE ROAD, NOTED THAT THE TOWN COULD BUY THE PROPERTY AND MAKE IT INTO A RECREATION PARK . . . COUNCILMAN OLSON- WE DID LOOK " INTO PURCHASING THE PROPERTY BUT QUESTIONED THE LIMITED PARKING. . . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- NOTED THAT SHE FELT THERE WAS ADEQUATE PARKING FACILITIES. . . MR. ARTHUR TURNBULL-NOTED THAT THE PAVILION IS A FIRE HAZARD. . . IT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN CARE OF. ASKED THAT THE TOWN BOARD LOOK INTO ITS ORDINANCES AND STRENGTHEN THEM. . . WE HAVE TO UP-DATE OUR ORDINANCES. RECOMMENDED TO THE TOWN BOARD THAT THE RECREATION I DEPT. HAVE A ONE TON DUMP TRUCK RATHER THAN A PICK UP TRUCK. . . WOULD HAVE MORE USE FOR A ONE TON DUMP TRUCK CARRf NG PICNIC TABLES AND �--- DIRT ETC. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER- IF WE HAD A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WE COULD HAVE OUR EQUIPMENT POOLED, THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE BOARD OVER THE YEARS HAS REQUESTED THAT THE VOTERS GO ALONG WITH A DPW RATHER THAN AN ELECTED HIGHWAY SUPT. MR. ARTHUR TURNBULL- ASKED WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE TO THE HOVEY POND HOUSE. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER-THERE IS ON-GOING PROGRESS] AS FAR AS PUTTING SOMETHING TOGETHER, THE BOARD WILL BE GETTING SOMETHING WITHIN A MONTH TO SIX WEEKS TO MAKE THEIR DETERMINATION AS TO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO . s6 DISCUSSION HELD IN REGARD TO THE BROADACRES WATER DISTRICT MRS. BENNETT-DIXON ROAD- REQUESTED THAT THEIR AREA BE TAKEN OUT OF THE BOARD ACRES WATER DISTRICT , THE RESIDENTS IN THIS AREA ARE HOOKED UP TO THE MAIN TRANSMISSION LINE OF THE CITY OF GLENS FALLS . NOTED THAT SHE REALIZED THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM IN BROAD ACRES BUT FELT THAT BEING ON THE MAIN TRANSMISSION LINE ANYEMEAKS-� WOULD BE TAKEN ,.CARE OF BY THE CITY. SUPERVISOR WALTER- REVIEWED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT , NOTED THAT THE RESIDENTS COULD PETITION TO BE TAKEN OUT OF THE DISTRICT BUT FELT THAT THE BOARD WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF THIS . NOTED THAT AT ANY TIMEJTHE CITY OF GLENS FALLS COULD CUT WATER OFF TO RESIDENTS OF QUEENSBURY. COUNCILMAN EISNEHART- SPOKE ON THE FACT THAT MORE FIRE HYDRANTS WOULD BE PLACED IN THE DISTRICT GIVING BETTER FIRE PROTECTION TO THE RESIDENTS` MR. TURNBULL- NOTED THAT THE TOWN SHOULD SELL WATER TO THE CITY OF GLENS FALLS . . . COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- MR. TURNBULL WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN WILLING TO SELL WATER TO ANY MUNICIPALITY THAT WANTED TO BUY IT . COUNCILMAN OLSON- NOTED THAT THE BOARD IS LOOKING INTO AN ALTERNATE METHOD OF DISPOSING OF GARBAGE. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER- NOTED THAT IF WE EVER WENT INTO RESOURCE RECOVERY, OPERATION WOULD BE WITH THE CITY OF GLENS FALLS BECAUSE WE WOULD NEED THAT MUCH GARBAGE TO MAKE A PLANT, TO MAKE IT FEASIBLE TO OPERATE... . ,COUNCILMAN MORRELL- NOTED THE SYSTEM FOR MAKAN#TEAM WAS NOT FEASIBLE AND THE POSCESS OF MAKANELECTRICITY IS NOW BEING LOOKED INTO , ELECTRICTT.Y' COULD BE SOLD T- o NIAGARA ' MOHAWK. . . MRS. FALL- ASKED WHEN A NEW TOWN COUNSEL WILL BE HIRED? SUPERVISOR WALTER- WE HAVE NOT YET HAD A RESOLUTION TO HIRE A NEW TOWN COUNSEL . . . I HOPE WE WILL HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT SOON. RESOLUTION APPROVING AUDIT OF _BILLS RESOLUTION N0 , ,27 , INTRODUCED BY MR . DANIEL MORRELL WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MRS. BETTY MONAHAN : RESOLVED , THAT AUDIT OF BILLS AS LISTED ON Ai3_STRACT NO . 83-1A AND NUMBERED 9 THROUGH 71 AND TOTALING $33 , 129 . 98 BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR. MORRELL , MRS. MONAHAN , IMI2S. WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE ON MOTION THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. RESPECTFULLY , DONALD A. CHASE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 87 RESOLUTION TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING. CONCERNING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO QUEENSBURY ZONING ORDINANCE RESOLUTION NO. 401 INTRODUCED BY MRS. BETTY MONAHAN WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL WHEREAS, THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD HAS RECOMMENDED CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING QUEENSBURY ZONING ORDINANCE UPON THE REVIEW THEREOF, AND WHEREAS, SAID PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING QUEENSBURY ZONING ORDINAN- CE `ARE SET FORTH WITH PARTICULARITY IN A MEMORANDUM TO THE TOWN BOARD FROM THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD DATED DECEMBER 3 , 1982 , A COPY t OF WHICH IS ANNEXED HERETO , AND p -- WHEREAS, SAID PROPOSED AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN REFERRED TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FOR A RECOMMENDATION OF THAT BOARD PRIOR TO ACTION BY THE QUEENSBURY TOWN BOARD, AND WHEREAS , THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS APPEAR TO BE WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION IN THE FORM PRESENTED, AS ANNEXED HERETO , AND WHEREAS, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED BY LAW PRIOR TO ANY ACTION BY THE QUEENSBURY TOWN BOARD TO AMEND THE QUEENSBURY ZONING ORDINANCE , NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AT THE QUEENSBURY TOWN OFFICE BUILDING , BAY AND HAVILAND ROADS , TOWN OF QUEENSBURY , WARREN COUNTY , NEW YORK ON THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY , 1983 AT 7 : 30 P. M. ON THAT DATE TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE QUEENSBURY ZONING ORDINANCE AS SET FORTH IN THE EXHIBIT ANNEXED HERETO , AND TO HEAR ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT THEREOF AND CONCERNING THE SAME AND FOR SUCH OTHER ACTION ON THE PART OF SAID TOWN BOARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW OR AS MAY BE PROPER IN THE PREMISES , AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT THE TOWN' CLERK BE DIRECTED TO CAUSE NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND TO TAKE ANY AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTION REQUIRED BY LAW FOR THE ::HOLDING OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR. MORRELL , MRS . MONAHAN , MRS . WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE RESOLUTION TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING RESOLUTIONNO . 402 , INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MRS. BETTY MONAHAN WHEREAS, THOSE PARCELS OF LAND IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BOUNDED BY QUAKER ROAD, GLENWOOD AVENUE , WOODVALE ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD, AS SHOWN ON WARREN COUNTY TAX MAP NO . 8 , SECTION 62 ARE PRESENTLY ZONED IN A CLASSIFICATION OF UR-5 , AND WHEREAS, AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE TOWN BOARD FROM MARK C. DOYLE AND ELIZABETH B . DOYLE AS THE PURPORTED OWNERS OF THOSE PREMISES IDENTIFIED ON THE WARREN COUNTY TAX MAP AS 8-62-1-1 REQUESTING THE REZONING OF THOSE PREMISES BOUNDED BY QUAKER ROAD , GLENWOOD AVENUE , WOODVALE ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD FROM THE PRE- SENT CLASSIFICATION OF UR-5 TO A NEW ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF HC-15 , AND WHEREAS, SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE QUEENSBURY PLAN- NING BOARD AND THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF SAID BOARDS CONCERNING SAID APPLI- CATION., AND WHEREAS, THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD HAS RECOMMENDED THE REZONING WHICH WOULD ACCOMPLISH THE EXTENSION OF THE HC-15 ZONE TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTIES BOUNDED BY QUAKER ROAD, GLENWOOD AVENUE , p o WOODVALE ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD , AND WHEREAS, THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD HAS RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT THE PREMISES NOT BE REZONED WITH THE REASONS OF THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD BEING SET FORTH IN A MEMORANDUM DATED DECEMBER 10 , 1982 TO THE QUEENSBURY BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTOR , AND WHEREAS, THE APPLICATION CONCERNING SAID POSSIBLE REZONING APPEARS TO BE WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION , AND WHEREAS, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED BY LAW PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF THE AFORESAID APPLICATION FOR THE REZONING OF THOSE PREMISES IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BOUNDED BY QUAKER ROAD , GLENWOOD AVENUE , WOODVALE ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD , NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED, THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD BEFORE THE -TIOWN BOARD OF ..� THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AT THE QUEENSBURY TOWN OFFICE BUILDING , BAY AND HAVILAND ROADS , TOWN OF QUEENSBURY , WARREN COUNTY , NEW YORK ON THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY , 1983 AT 7 : 30 P . M. ON THAT DATE TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED REZONING OF THOSE PREMISES IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BOUNDED BY QUAKER ROAD , GLENWOOD AVENUE , WOODVALE ROAD AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD FROM THE PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF UR-5 TO A NEW ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF HC-15 AT WHICH ALL PER- SONS INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT THEREOF WILL BE HEARD AND FOR SUCH OTHER ACTION ON THE PART OF THE TOWN BOARD WITH RELATION TO THE REZONING APPLICATION AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW OR AS MAY BE PROPER IN THE PREMISES , AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , THAT THE TOWN CLERK BE AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO :CAUSE NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED AS IS REQUIRED BY LAW AND TO TAKE ANY AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTION REQUIRED BY LAW FOR THE HOLDING OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING AND THE NOTICE THEREOF. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART , MR . MORRELL , MRS . MONAHAN , MRS . WALTER i NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE i i