Loading...
Site Plan application 8/20/028/20/02 Application No. (Office Use Only) Project Location: Tax Map ID: Zone Classification: Compliance with Zoning Ordinance Detailed Description of Project: (include current & aroposed use Site Plan Review General Information Skew +ton A Uv- .3®9v5-1- 3 jLG - 15 Section: T i Ar J�47of S �,✓� � Modification to existing Site Plan, Yes: (If so, indicate Site Plan No. & approval date) _ Square Footage of proposed structure: Applicant: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: Applicant's Agent: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: No: 1c.1 5 i Y�YrS - J-�L.. � `C�✓ 4t9 76- 1 5 kS Property Owner: ebr5� maw ^—���tbf Address:oT�ayvw�� Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: Directions to Site: k S �- 1 z L✓jc1 l `v Z ■1 8/20/02 Site Plan Review 8 Site Development Data Area /Type Existing sq. ft. Proposed Addition sq. ft. Total sq. ft. A. Building Footprint B. Detached Garage C. Accessory Structures) � CA 0 D a pp D. Paved, gravel or other hard sulfated areas 4-S, Sid � S33 E. Porches /Decks _ F. Other Total Non -Permeable Sum A through F) 3 lLo 45 8 .314, 4 5 8 Parcel Area b S`M 171 8�� �7 f Percent Non -Permeable Total Non-Permeable/Pazcel,Area Z �o • 35.L Setback Requirements Required Existing Proposed Front (1) 30 59 7 Front (2) Shoreline — — Side Yard (1) 4ie s � 10 Z Side Yazd (2) was 6- 10 `i Rear Yard (1) 0 CI 7_- Rear Yard (2) — •— Buffer /Travel Corridor -Zp 6 Z, Height -7 g -78 Permeability � - $ Z„ Sign Setback No. of Parking Spaces /(y f 8/20/02 Site Plan Review Checklist — please prepare a map depicting existing and proposed conditions. Failure to complete the following checklist or include all required information may result in a determination of incompleteness and a delay in the rocess" rour armlication PR NA WR GENERAL. A. Title, name, address of applicant & person responsible for preparation of drawing B. North arrow, Tax Map ID, date prepared and scale (minimum 1 in. = 40 ft.) C. Boundaries of the property plotted to scale, zoning boundary D. Location of principal structures, accessory structures with exterior dimensions E. Location of site improvements incl. outdoor storage areas, driveways (existing & proposed) parking areas, etc. F. Setbacks for all structures and improvements G. Elevations of proposed structures WATER & SEWER A. Location of on -site sewage disposal facilities, design details, construction details, flow rates, and number of bedrooms proposed B. Location of water supply (i.e., well) and septic on adjoining lots with separation distances to existing or proposed on -site water supply and septic C. Separation distances for proposed sewage disposal system to well and waterbodies D. Location and description of existing public or private water supply (well, lake, etc.). Method of securing public or private water, location, design and construction of water supply including daily water usage / E. Percolation test location and results PARKING / PERMEABLE AREAS A. Number of spaces required for project including calculations and justification B. Number of existing parking spaces, number to be removed, number to maintain and type of surfacing material e.., gravel,paved) C. Provision for pedestrian and handicap access and parking D. Location and design details of ingress, egress, loading areas and cutting E. Location and character of green areas (existing and proposed), modification to green area, buffer zone to remain undisturbed F. Lighting, location and design of all existing or proposed outdoor lighting ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS / A. Location of on -site & adjacent watercourses, streams, rivers, lake and wetlands B. Location of proposed & existing: utility/energy distribution systems (gas, electric, solar, telephone) C. Location, design and construction of all existing and proposed site improvements including: drains, culverts, retaining walls, fences, fire & emergency zones and hydrants D. Location and amount/portion of building area proposed for office, manufacturing, retail sales or other commercial activities E. Signage: Location, size, type, design and setback F. Waiver Request: provide letter with application requesting any waivers G. Commercial / Industrial Development requires submission of a Landscaping Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, Grading Plan and a Lighting Plan H. The Bd. may request other elements as considered necessary. I. Identify any Federal, State or County permits required for the project. J. Please submit record of application for approval status of all necessary permits required from Federal, State and Coun officials. Legend: PR — Provided; NA — Not Applicable; WR —Waiver Requested I TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY. 12804-5902 Town of Queensbury Planning Board Waiver Request I hereby request that the Planning Board grant me a waiver from the requirement for the submission of the following plans. o Stormwater Management Plan ❑ Grading Plan a Lighting Plan ❑ Landscaping Plan ❑ Sketch Plan approval (Subdivision ) 1 acknowledge that these plans are required and I seek such walver(s) knowingly and for the following reasons: L:\Craig\Templates\w aiverReg8602.doc Y, 4e-- 46a 11) 8/20/02 Signature Page Site Plan Review This Page includes the Authorization to Act as Agent Form, Engineering Fee Disclosure, Other Permit Responsibilities and Agreement to provide documentation required. Complete the following if the OWNER of the property is not the same as the applicant Owner's Agent Form Owner: Gteo:je Designates: As agent regarding _ Variance 2C_ Site Plan %4 Subdivision For Tax Map No.: 30 `1.5 Section i Block ,� Lot Deed Reference: ok Page Date SIGNATURE: l/�(Owner) Z_:jE0f(Date) Complete the following if the APPLICANT is unable to attend the meeting or wishes to be represented by another party: Applicant's Agent Form —� Owner: 0i -,"-c Designates: `:Tlc e A �p,jP— As agent regarding: Variance Site Plan ?4Subdivision For Tax Map No.: S,.,Section Block ?_ Lot SIGNATURE: (Owner) S/ /Uy(Date) Engineering Fee Disclosure: Applications may be referred to the Town consulting engineer for review of septic design, storm drainage, etc. as determined by the Zoning or Planning Department. Fees for engineering review services will be charged directly to the applicant. Fees for engineering review will not exceed $1,000 without notification to the applicant. Please Note: Other permits may be required for construction or alteration activity subsequent to approval by the Zoning Board or Planning Board. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain any additional permits. Official Meeting Minutes Disclosure: It is the practice of the Community Development Dept. to have a designated stenographer tape record the proceedings of meetings resulting from application, and that minutes transcribed from those tapes constitute the official record of all proceedings. If there is a discrepancy between such record and the handwritten minutes taken by the designated stenographer, the handwritten minutes shall be deemed the official record. I, the undersigned, have thoroughly read and understand the instructions for submission, agree to the submission requirements and completed the checklist. 41 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: SIGNATURE OF AGENT: - Date - Date S N 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Pan 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially -large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ® A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ® C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions DOUG MILLER SPORTS COMPLEX - SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 L a PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action DOUG MILLER SPORTS COMPLEX - SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) SHERMAN AVENUE, QUEENSBURY, WARREN COUNTY Name of Applicant/Sponsor DOUGLAS MILLER Address 14 STONE PINE LANE Cfty / PO QUEENSBURY State NY Business Telephone 518-793-7132 Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO Business Telephone rlccmrintinn of Artinn' Zip Code 12804 State Zip Code PLAN MODIFICATION OF A SPORTS COMPLEX INCLUDING AN INDOOR MULTI -USE SPORTS FACILITY. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question --Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: F Urban r_1 Industrial ElCommercial ❑ Residential (suburban) © Forest M Agriculture 11 Other 0 Rural (non -farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: 19.42 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested 19.4 acres 1.9 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 7.3 acres Other (Indicate type) LAWN - LANDSCAPING - PLAYFIELDS acres 10.2 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: S Well drained 100 % of site © Moderately well drained _% of site. 0 Poorly drained —% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ril No a. What is depth to bedrock 10+ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F 0-10% 100% E]10-15%_% ®15%or greater_% 6, Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes 0 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Q Yes [ENo B, What is the depth of the water table? 8+ (in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes F±] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ® Yes ❑E No Page 3 of 21 C-1 • 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes F No ,ccording to: NYSDEC 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑Yes ❑E No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes FINo If Yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes 1ENo 15. Streams within or contiguous to Droiect area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is 16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NONE b. Size Page 4 of 21 • 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑E Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? RE Yes ® No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ® Yes ®No 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? EfYes Fol No 19, Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ©Yes Ei No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 1:1 Yes 0 No B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 19.42 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 19.4 acres initially; 19.4 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 175 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 294 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 68+/- height; 223 width; 430 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 700 f . 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed nYes ® No 11 N/A . it yes, for what intended purpuse is me sire ueuiy reaaimeur LAWN & LANDSCAPING b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? F Yes ❑ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E Yes ® No 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 17.5 acres. Page 5 of 21 1i 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes F No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: _ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi -phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 7 month 2005 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 12 month 2008 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes M No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes M No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes El No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 51 Yes ❑ No Type SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ® Yes M No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑ Yes ❑� No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? E]Yes ❑ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 1 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If yes, give name WARREN/WASHINGTON CO. ; location HUDSON FALLS d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes E No Page 6 of 21 u e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes FM1No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? FM Yes ❑ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑ Yes 0 No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑ Yes E No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F]Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) ELECTRICITY AND GAS 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1.300 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑ Yes R No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type City, Town, Village Board Yes ❑ No SITE PLAN MOD. City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board 0 Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No State Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes M No If Yes, indicate decision required: 17 Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑ Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. i What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? r 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposea zoning r NA 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? El Yes No AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjomingrsurrounaing Jana uses wan a Y4 mile r I M I rec Lj I'lu 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 Cl • 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes F01 No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? lil Yes M No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? R Yes R No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ® Yes Q No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. FlYes 0 No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name DOUGLASS MILLER Signature Title PROJECT ENGINEER Date 6/14/05 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 '' ROBERTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. 273 HAvrLAND ROAD QUEENSBURY, NY 12804 518.761-6605 PHoNE 518-743-9315 P,AX/PHQNE May 12, 2004 Kathy O'Brien NYS DEC Endangered Species Unit 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4754 Dear Kathy: 4 _JC'. TOWN Cf 'mi(-` NISBURY PLLj� , 13 OFFICE As requested in your conversations with Tom Nace of Nace Engineering, and on behalf of Douglas and Terry Miller, I am providing information on the occurrence of the endangered species, the Kamer blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) or state -listed threatened species, frosted elfin (Incisalia irus), on a property on Sherman Avenue in the Town of Queensbury, NY. The t20.6-acre site is the location of the proposed Adirondack Sports Complex. Wild lupine (Lupines perennis) is the larval host for both butterfly species. The preferred habitat of lupine are areas of sandy soil and areas of limited canopy cover that may have been subjected to some disturbance that has reduced or removed vegetation. The primary habitat of the species is pitch -pine scrub oak barrens. On May 6, 2004, I conducted a site visit with Tom Nace of Nace Engineering on the Miller Property. The purpose of the site visit was to survey the site for the occurrence of wild blue lupine. Based on comments from your recent site visit, and my observations of the site conditions, the survey focused on areas with open canopy at the south west corner of the property, clearings along the eastern edge of the property, and areas of less dense canopy along the northwestern edge of the property, as well as the entire length of the trail that winds through the parcel. The majority of the site consists of upland forest dominated by white pine. The western boundary of the site follows a small utility corridor, which runs parallel to high tension lines (Niagra Mohawk Right of way or NiMo ROW) located further to the west. There is an area of previously documented wild blue lupine patches adjacent to the NiMo substation, approximately 300+ feet west of the Miller property and separated from the Miller Property by a section of forest, the high tension lines (NiMo ROW running north -south) another strip of forest, the narrow utility corridor, and a dense shrub buffer along the Miller site boundary. We examined the area around the substation and numerous lupine plants were observed, having germinated to heights of 4-8 inches, but not yet in flower. Following the open trail to the NiMo ROW, no lupine plants were found outside of the clearing immediately adjacent to the substation. No plants were found in the north -south NiMo ROW parallel to the Miller site, nor were plants found within the small utility line corridor near the western edge of the Miller property (due in part to dense undergrowth and shrub cover). No lupine plants were found in any part of the Miller property proposed for the Adirondack Sports Complex. May 12, 2004 Page 2 ... _ ......v o.. ,m as.✓uln.�vi::w�+w.�u.ud<t+.. > �;.� Lwa. W[n:., au_wee�.a3 �'�wm...u1r..,..�.:::v.w. The only portions of the site having the open canopy characteristics suitable for wild lupine habitat, were along the trail and in clearings in the southwestern comer of the site, and along the eastern site boundary (these clearings were marginal). A careful survey of the clearings did not result in the location of any lupine plants. Although an open canopy and sandy soils, which favor lupine were present, the herb layer was fairly well developed with dense grass and wild strawberries as dominant cover species. Similarly, no lupine plants were found along the trails through the woodlands. In most areas the canopy cover over the trails was too dense to provide good habitat for lupine plants. The borders of the trails were dominated by shade species in the herb layer, such as Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense) and Prince's pine (Chimaphila umbellata). The results of the survey indicate that there are small very limited areas of potential habitat suitable for wild blue lupine on the site. However, field surveys did not document the occurrence of the plant, and is consequently not likely habitat for the protected butterfly species of concern. Thank you for your assistance in this matter Sincerely, Deborah A. Roberts, Ph.D. President cc: Tom Nace, Nace Enginering Mike Stoll, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Craig MacEwan, Town of Queensbury SP-- / >--_Zudy United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045 June 24, 2004 Mr. Craig MacEwan Chairman Town of Queensbury Planning Board 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 Dear Mr. MacEwan: M HUH 3 V_ 20c ToVm or C%; 'r � :URY The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has been working with the Town of Queensbury Planning Department for almost two years to determine how we can work together towards the conservation and recovery of the Federally- and State -listed endangered Kanner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). The Service appreciates the efforts of all of our partners, especially local governments such as the Town of Queensbury, towards this goal. As you are aware, the Federal Kanner Blue Butterfly Recovery Plan (Service 2003) designates the area between Glens Falls/Queensbury and the Albany Pine Bush as the Glacial Lake Albany Recovery Unit. Recovery Units are geographic or otherwise identifiable subunits of the listed entity that individually are necessary to conserve genetic robustness, demographic robustness, important life history stages, or some other feature necessary for long-term sustainability of the entire listed entity. Within the Glacial Lake Albany Recovery Unit, three viable populations of Kamer blue butterflies are required for the species to be downlisted to Threatened or delisted from the Endangered Species List. These three viable populations might include the Albany Pine Bush, the Saratoga Sandplains, the Saratoga West (near the Saratoga County Airport), and/or the Queensbury Sandplains. Further details are included in the Federal Recovery Plan, which can be viewed on our website at http://nyfo.fws.gov or at http://endangered.fws.gov. In addition, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) has drafted a New York State Recovery Plan (NYSDEC 1998) which prescribes the requirements for the species to be downlisted or delisted from the List of Endangered, Threatened and Special Concern Fish and Wildlife Species of New York State. While the Queensbury Sandplains may be optional for the Federal Recovery Plan requirements, depending on the success of the other three Glacial Lake Albany areas, the New York State Recovery Plan requires that a viable population be established in the Queensbury Recovery Unit, in addition to three other viable populations. It is clear that the Town of Queensbury plays an important role in determining whether Kamer blue butterfly populations can ever be restored to the levels needed to remove Federal and State regulatory requirements. As you may understand, after our staff has spent a considerable amount of time working with Planning Staff to brainstorm proactive conservation actions that the Town could possibly take towards conserving the species and to develop protocols to clarify the role of the Service and NYSDEC in the review processes that potential applicants face when proposing actions to the Planning Board, it was especially disheartening to read the words of Vice Chairman Larry Ringer in the May 27, 2004, Planning Board Meeting notes published on the Town of Queensbury's website. It appears that Mr. Ringer finds that Kamer blue butterflies may impede development projects. The Service understands that the ESA may be complicated to understand and may frustrate those that are new to the process of reviewing actions that may result in the "take" of a Federally -listed species. However, that is exactly why we are committed to working with local governments, such as the Town of Queensbury, to help people understand the necessary review processes. We continue to offer this service to the Planning Department and can meet with members of the Planning Board to provide further assistance, if requested. Mr. Ringer's comments were made during discussions of a proposed sports complex/recreation center on Sherman Avenue. As the habitat within the proposed property is currently unsuitable for Kamer blue butterflies, there is no risk for "take" of the species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (we sent a letter to Ms. Deborah Roberts on June 2, 2004, regarding this project). However, we continue to urge the Town to protect at least a portion of the remaining potentially suitable habitats found within the Town's boundaries. There are few Kamer blue butterfly sites remaining in the Town and many of these are small sites with small populations scattered throughout fragmented portions of habitat. As you are aware, many of these sites are found within poweriine right-of-ways, which face considerable threats due to unauthorized all -terrain vehicle use. The slow loss of the remaining restorable habitats will continue to reduce the viability of the currently extant sites and further diminish the potential for ever creating a viable population within the Town. However, there is still habitat and time left for us to work together on this issue. The Town's Open Space Vision Plan already describes opportunities to work on protecting or restoring habitat for the Kamer blue butterfly. The NYSDEC an4 Service may have funding opportunities to assist the Town or local groups, such as the Queensbury Land Conservancy, with such efforts. Opportunities also exist to partner with other agencies and organizations. There is much that can be done, if it is made a priority. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions, please contact Robyn Niver of this office at (607) 753-9334. Again, we continue to appreciate the efforts of the Town of Queensbury towards the conservation of the Kamer blue butterfly. Sincerely, David A. Stilwell Field Supervisor Literature Cited: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1998. Draft Kamer Blue Butterfly New York State Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final Recovery Plan for the Kamer Blue Butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 273 pp. 2 1. cc: Planning Department, Queensbury, NY (Attn: M. Ryba) NYSDEC, Albany, NY (Endangered Species; Attn: P. Nye/K. O'Brien) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Endangered Species Unit 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-4754 (518)402-8864 fax (518)402-8925 EMAIL ADDRESS: KMOBRIEN@GW.DEC.STATE.NY.US January 15, 2004 Mr. Craig MacEwan Chairman Town of Queensbury Planning Board 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 Dear Mr. MacEwan: �i Erin M. Crotty Commissioner RECEIVED AN 16 20Cr6�1 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING OFFICE I am writing in regard to the indoor sports facility proposed by Doug and Teresa Miller at the 23 December 2003 planning board meeting. The applicants requested rezoning of the location from residential to recreational land. Prior to the 23 December board meeting, I received no information about this project. I have since received a copy of a letter from New York Natural Heritage Program (NHP) dated 24 December 2003 replying to their request (via Nace Engineering) for information on rare and endangered species in the vicinity of the project. The NHP reply listed the endangered Kanner blue butterfly, threatened frosted elfin butterfly and special concern buckmoth in the vicinity. The map provided to NHP shows this site is located within the area of concern for Kamer -� blue/frosted elfin recovery in the Town of Queensbury and is adjacent to the Kamer blue and frosted elfin populations in the Sherman Avenue powerline rights of way. Since I have not seen any information on the proposed building, parking or other aspects of its layout, I cannot evaluate potential impacts at this time. However, I do have concerns about increased traffic on Sherman Avenue due to this facility and the effect on the dispersal of the Kamer blue and frosted elfms between the habitat on the north and south sides of the road. I also have concerns regarding the possibility of lupine on the property, especially within or adjacent to the Niagara Mohawk powerline rights of way and along ATV trails. Regardless of the actual presence of lupine, because this is a potentially large project so close to an important Kamer blue/frosted elfin population, DEC will want to closely review any plans for development there. We request that the'Town include us in distribution of information on this project and, by copy of this letter to Nace Engineering, I am requesting copies of maps/ and other project material for review. I have appreciated the cooperation of the planning board in protecting the Kamer blue and frosted elfin and their habitat in previous project reviews. I look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kathy O'Brien Biologist L Wildlife Endangered Species Unit cc: Peter Nye, Endangered Species Unit Leader Paul Jensen, DEC Region 5, Warrensburg Ken Kogut, DEC Region 5, Raybrook Robyn Niver, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland Mike Stoll, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland Marilyn Ryba, Town of Queensbury Planning Department Chris Rounds, Town of Queensbury Planning Department Tom Nace, Nace Engineering xJrf✓we4.4, FA L/nvaivI4 dclamn/VG FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE— Ideal for use in car lots, street lighting or parking areas. CONSTRUCTION — Rugged, .063" thick, aluminum rectilinear housing. Continuously seam welded for weather -tight seal and integrity. Naturally anodized, extruded, aluminum door frame with mitered corners is retained with (two) .188" diameter hinge pins and se- cured with (one) quarter -turn, quick release fastener. Weather- proof seal between housing and door frame is accomplished with an integrally designed, extruded silicone gasket that snaps into door frame. FINISH — Standard finish is dark bronze (DOB) polyester powder. Other powder architectural colors available. OPTICAL SYSTEM — Reflectors are anodized and segmented for supe- rior uniformity and control, which allows the flexibility to mix distri- butions without compromising the overall lighting job. Reflectors attach with tool -less fasteners and are rotatable and interchange- able. Five cutoff distributions available: Type 11(roadway), Type III (asymmetric), Type IV (forward throw, sharp cutoff), Type IV (wide, forward throw), and Type V (square symmetrical). Lens is .125" thick, impact -resistant, tempered, glass with ther- mally -applied, silk screened power door shield. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM — Constant -wattage autotransformer is 100% copper wound and factory tested. Removable power door and positive -locking disconnect plug. Porcelain, horizontally -oriented, mogul -base socket with copper alloy, nickel plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 150OW- BOOV, 4KV pulse rated. INSTALLATION — Extruded, 4" aluminum arm for pole Orwell mounting is shipped in fixture carton. Optional mountings available. LISTING — UL listed for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). KSF2 250S R2 TB SP04 DDB Notes Type SINGLE SETUP A Area Lighting KSF2 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 25OW, 40OW 25' to 35' Mounting Specifications I EPA: 2.0 ft.z(.28m21 —Arm}-- L --I (includes arm) All dimensions are inches (centimeters) Length: 25-5/16164.3) unless otherwise specified. Width: 18-1/2 (47.0) Mounfina notion Brill no Temolatea Depth: 8-5/10 (21.11 Weight: 5516s (24.9kg) SNBROAI2WBP xx 6 Arm: 400.2) wwxc 7 ORDERING INFORMATION Example: KSF2400SR3120SPNSFDOB Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suite your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Order accessories as separate catalog number. KSF2 400E Series vokege KSF2 200S 120 KSF2 250S 2081 KSF2 400S 2401 Distribution 277 • 347 --' R2 IES Type II roadway 4801 ��R3 IES Type III asymmetric T02 C R4SC IES Type IV forward throw, sharp cutoff "7 R4W IES Type IV wide, forward vv throw R5S IES Type V square NOTES: I Consult factory for availability in Canada. 2 Optional multi -tap ballast (120, 208, 240, 277V). (120, 277, 347V in Canadel. 3 SPO9, Fl or ydbw9 must be used when two or more luminaires are oriented on a go- drifling pattern. 4 May be ordered as accessory. 5 Additional architectural colors available; see Ar- chitectural Colors brochure. 6 For arm mounting, see technical data section in Outdoor binder for drilling template. Mounting- SP04 Square pole 14' arm) Istandi l3 SP09 Square pole IT arm) RP04 Round pole 0" am lz RP09 Round pole 19" arm) WWO4 Wood pole or wall (4' army WW09 Wood pole or wall (T arm) WB04 Wall bracket (4" arm) W809 Wall bracket (9" arm) L/ARM When ordering KMA, DA12 OPTIONAL MOUNTING (shipped separately) DA12P Degree arm (pole) DA12WB Degree arm (wall) KMA Mast arm adapter KTMB Twin mounting bar Shipped Installed In Fixture Architectural Colors SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V, n/a TB) (powder finish)' OF Double fuse (208, 240, 4BOV, n/a TB) Standard Colors PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only DOB Dark bronze Ina photocontrol) Itandard) ORS Quartz restrike system (75W max, OWN White lamp not included,120V only) DBL Black EC Emergency circuit Classic Colors CR Corrosion -resistant finish OMB Medium bronze CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards DNA Natural aluminum Shipped separately' OSS Sandstone PE7 NEMA twist -lock PE (120, 208, 240V) DGC Charcoal gray PE3 NEMA twist -lock PE (347V) DTG Tennis green PE4 NEMA twist -lock PE (48OV) DBR Bright red PE7 NEMA twist -lock PE (277V) DSB Steel blue SC Shorting cap for PER option KSF2HS House side shield (R2,R3) KSF2VG Vandal guard Accessories, Tenon Mounting SUP titter fOrderseparately) Number of fixtures Tenon O.D. One Tw00180- Two®9V Three®120" Threeifli Fourd,K0°t 2-3/8" T20-190 T20-280 T20-290 T20-320 T20-390 T20-490 2-7/8" T25-190 T25.280 T25-290 T25-320 725.390 T25.490 4" T35.190 T35-280 T35-290 T35-320 T35-390 T35-490 OUTDOOR Sheet#: KSF2-S AL - 340 KSF2 400S Arm -Mounted Rectilinear Cutoff Lighting Coefficient of Utilization — Initial Footcandles KSF2 400S R2 Test No. 1193031601 KSF2 400S R3 TestNo.TESTNO.1194O91S01 KSF2 400S R4SC Test No.1193042201 rnrfFlmFNT OF ImI1L1TION mEFnaFNTOF unINATION COEFFICIENT OF UTILIZATION —�—�..■■ .A4&: 0 F5 1 2 sit 0 3 4 400W High Pressure Sodium lamp, 50000 rated lumens. Footcandle values based on 35' mounting height, Distribution II , cutoff. KSF2 400S RO Test No. LTL8506 COEFFICIENT OF MII7ATION t� `SIL r■ ■ IN IN i �11A %l1\■ �! �."■ 51- !�f! 40OW Hide Pressure Sodium lamp, rated lumens. Fooaaldh values based on 35' mounting hdgN, Distribution III, cutoff. KSF2 400S R5S Test No.1193051704 COEFFICIENT OF UTILI7ATION 1 r It r l 3 4 5 5 I f 2 0 3 4 S 40OW High Pressure Sodium lamp, 50000 rated 40OW High Pressure Sodium lamp, 50000 mind lumens. Faotcandle values based on 20' lumens. Footcandle values based on 35' mounting height, Distribution IV wtde,frowatd throw. mounting height, Distribution V, cutoff. NOTES: 1. For electrical characteristics, consult technical data tab. 2. Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. Various operating factors can cause differences between laboratory and actual field measurements. Dimensions and specifications are based on the most current available data and are subject to change. 3. Photometric data for other distributions can be accessed from the Lithonia Lighting website. (www.lithonia.com) IA L/THON/A L/GHT/NG AnQ%wityBrands Company KSF2-S 02000 Lithonia Lighting, Rev. 2102 KSF2-S.P65 1 M �A' awa, IRISH ■■■ .■■H■. 2 0 9 40OW High Pressure Sodium lamp, 50000 retail lumens. Foohandle values based an 35' mounting heiot Distribution W, sharp cutoff. Mounting Height Correction Factor (Multiply the fc level by the correction factor) 25 It-1.44 32 ft.- .88 35 ft.= .73 existing Mounting Height' = Oerroetlon Pse[or Now Mounting Hol Litnoma Lignong Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. Outdoor Lighting One Lithonia Way, Conveys, GA 30012-3957 Phone:770-922-90DO Fax: 770-918-1209 In Canada: 110050th Ave., Lachine, Quebec HOT 2V3 www.Irmoma.com r-VA Ato41 ��(71t _ A G+ 39wkt,Ale0 f FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE — For entrances, stairwells, corridors and other pedestrian areas. CONSTRUCTION— Rear housing is rugged, corrosion -resistant, die-cast alumi- num. Front cover is one-piece UV -resistant injection molded polycarbonate, internally painted. Captive external hardward is specially treated for corro- sion resistance and includes slotted hex -head and tamperproof fasteners. OPTICALSYSTEM—One-piece die -formed reflector is diffused aluminum. Re- fractor is clear polycarbonate, providing IES cutoff distribution and maximum lateral light output. Front cover is sealed and gasketed to inhibitthe entrance of outside contaminants. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM — Ballast is reactor normal power factor, copper wound. HPS ballasts are 100%factory tested and UL listed. Components are heat- sinked directly to the cast housing for maximum heat dissipation (For 50 hertz availability, consult factory.) Porcelain, horizontally oriented medium -base socket with copper alloy, nickel -plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 660W, 600V and 41kV pulse rated. Medium -base lamp included with fixture. INSTALLATION —Mountto anyvertical surface orto a 4'round square outletbox. Back access through gasketed slot. Top wiring access through 1/2" threaded conduit entry. (Through -wiring requires us of a conduit tee). Photocells are field -installable. LISTING — UL listed for wet locations. IP65 listed. Listed and labeled to comply with fanadian end Mexican Standards [see oodons). Cutoff Mini-WallPaks TWAC HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 35W, 5OW, 70W, 10OW Height: 10' (25.4cm) Width: 11-1/2' (202cm) Depth: B-15/16' (22.7cm) Weight: 10 lbs. (4.53kg) ORDERING INFORMATION Example: TWAC MS 120 LPI Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature mat best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Order accessories as separate catalog numbers (shipped separate(yl. TWAC Series Wattage/ Voltage TWAC lamp 120 35S] �t a 5OS2 208' 240' 70S 277 4-96' ' W00S 347 TO Shipped Installed in fixture SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V)4 DF Double fuse (208, 24OV)4 XHP High power factor ballast EC Emergency circuit5,a ORS Quartz restrike system5.6 CR Corrosion -resistant finish (rear housing only) CRT Corrosion -resistant taflon finish (rear housing)7 PE Photocell Architecture[ Colon (options]) DNA Natural aluminum DBL Black DMB Medium bronze DWN White LPI Lam LPI Lamp included as standard I/LP Less lamp CSA Listed and labeled to comply with NOTES: Canadian Standards 1 12oVunly. NOM Listed and labeled to comply with 2 120 or 277V only. Mexican Standards (Consult factory) 3 Optional multi -tap ballast (120MW240/277V;120/277; 347V for Canada). 4 Not available with mutt tap ballast 5 Lamp not included. 6 Quartz lamp wattage not to exceed ballast wattage rating. 7 Black finish on housing only. Accessories e Consult factory for availability in Canada. Order as separate catalog number RK1 PEBI Photocell kit (120V only) RK1 PEB7 CSA Photocell kit (120V only) RKi PEB2 Photocell kit (208, 240 or 277V) RKf PEB3 CSA Photocell kit (347V) TWAWG Wireguard Outdoor Sheet#: TWAC-S BM - 705 TWAC High Pressure Sodium Wall -Pak TWAC 35S Test No. LTL8358 TWAC 50S Test No. LTL8357 TWAC 70S Test No. LTL8356 COEFFICIENT OF UTILIZATION COEFFICIENT OF ITTILOATION COEFFICIENT OF UTILIZATION ►;f WRi\■■■ a■■■■ ■■\I■■■ ■■■I■■■ ■■E■■■ 35W High Pressure Sodium lamp, 40DO rated lumens. Foubcandle values based on 20' mounting height, Distribution , cutoff. 1 0 0 1 2= 3 z 4 TWAC 100S Test No. LTL8337 COEFFICIENT OF UTILIZATION 1 II 1 1 2 3 4 5 IDOW High Pressure Sodium lamp, 9500 rated lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' mounting height, Distribution , cutoff. ■N■■■■ id■■■■ ■■R1■■■ ■■■I■■■ MIKE■...111111110 1 0 1 � 2 3 4 0 5OW High Pressure Sodium lamp, 6300 rated 70W High Pressure Sodium lamp, rated lumens. FootcaMle values based on 20' lumens. Footeandle values based on 20' mounting height, Distribution, cutoff. mounting height, Distribution , cutoff. Mounting Height Correction Factor (Multiply the fc level by the correction factor) e' s 19 8ft. =6.25 - 8ft.. 6.25 10 ft: 4.00 10 it. 4.00 - 12 ft. 2.78 12 ft.- 2.78 12 ft.= 2.78 f'A L/THON/A L/GHT/NG is Lighting Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. Acuity Outdoor Lighting �,�,�.,n��� AnQAwftV8ra17d5`0M ^'7 One Uthonia Way, Conyers, GA30012-3957 Phone:770-922-9000 Fax: 770-918-12M In Canada: 110050th Ave., Lachine, Quebec HOT 2V3 .Sheet *: TWAC-S 02000 Lithonia Lighting, Rev. 3J02 TWAC-S.P65 wvnv.lilhonia.com Uo,i.A C1 t-/1 A*e 'C" ( V 4 1- L/THON/A L/GHT/NG® Ca elaA Numher FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE Far use with LP8F. LP8, and LPBH frame -ins. CONSTRUCTION Aluminum clear specular upper reflector. Flat clear, fresnel glass or T73 tempered prismatic lens. White integral flange. INSTALLATION Maximum ceiling thickness 1-1/2". LISTING U.L. Listed to U.S. and Canadian safety standards. Wet location listed. ORDERING INFORMATION Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Series SUP! White Splay Flat Clear Lens it Black Baffle Flat Clear Lens 81.4 White Splay Fresnel Lens 81.134 Black Baffle Fresnel Lens BLF73 White Splay T73 Tempered Prismatic Lens BLFB73 Black Baffle T73 Tempered Prismatic Lens Specifications Height: 12-1/8" (30.8) Lamp Opening: 7-7/8' (20) Diameter. 9-1/2' (24.1) 113 All dimensions are inches (centimeters). Se Finishing Reflector 8L GLASSLENS Vertical Lamp Fluorescent Example: III Housing Compatibility Housing and trim ordered separately. Application Source Max. wattage Housing Non -IC Incandescent 100W A LP8 150 PS UPS 150 PAR38 LP8 150 BR40 LP8 Fluorescent 42W TRT LP8F Metal Halide 100W LPBH High Pressure Sodium 150W LPBH Downlighting and Track Sheet#: SL-COM CLNS-100 0 0 8L 8" Glass Lens Vertical Fluorescent Reflector Distributioncurve Distribution data Outputdata Coefficient ofutilization Single luminairedate 30•above floor BL4, 42W TRT lamp, 1.0 s/mh, 3200 rated lumens, test no. AN 1 LTL11743 pf 20% % 70% 50% cp Lumens Zone Lumens%Lamp Pw 50�30%50%30%50%30% 0 874 0° - 30' 556.5 17.4 0 43 43 42 42 40 40 5 823 75 1 39 38 38 37 37 36 15 677 196 0' - 40' 797.7 24.9 2 35 33 35 33 33 32 25 638 286 0' - 60' 1067.0 33.3 3 32 30 31 29 30 29 35 384 241 0' - 90' 1155.9 36.1 4 29 27 29 26 28 26 45 218 169 5 27 24 26 24 26 23 55 109 100 90' - 180' 0.0 0.0 6 25 22 24 22 24 21 65 58 58 0'-180' 1155.9 •36.1 7 23 20 22 20 22 20 75 26 28 *Total Efficiency 8 21 18 21 18 20 18 85 90 1 0 4 0 18 16 18 16 18 16 Teak Height: 2.57t. nnal FC Mounting Center 50% beam - 52.4. 10% beam - 87.8' He' ht Beam Diameter FC Diameter FC 8.0 28.9 5.4 14.4 10.6 2.9 10.0 15.5 7.4 7.8 14.4 1.6 12.0 97 9.3 4.8 18.3 10 14.0 6.6 11.3 3.3 22A 07 16.0 4a 13.3 2.4 26.0 0.5 80, 100W M lamp, 0.9 s/mh, 7500 rated lumens, test no. LTL11735 pf 2 % Task Height: 2.5tt. 0 cp Lumens Zone Lumens %Lamp PC 80% 7S% 50% 30% pw 50% 30°/ 50%30/ 504e Inital FC 5 10 p 2 gggggg 2809 255 0--30' 1923.9 25.7 0 52 52 50 50 48 48 Mounting Center so% beam - 54.3' 10%beam - 77a' 15 2161 635 0'-40' 2501.3 33.4 1 47 46 46 42 45 40 44 41 43 39 Height Beam Diameter FC Diameter FC 1w 25 8744 1577 0' - 60' 3024.8 40.3 2 3 43 39 41 37 39 36 38 35 e.0 9e.6 5.6 49.3 B e 9.9 1 e so 35 446656 44211133g 323U 4 36 33 36 33 35 32 10.0 53.0 7.7 26.5 12.1 5.3 0' - 90° 3252.8 43.4 90' 180° 0.0 0.0 5 33 30 33 30 32 30 27 12.0 33.1 9.7 16.5 15.4 3.3 2.3 2 65 75 138 76 137 79 - 0' - 180° 3252.8 •43.4 6 7 31 29 28 26 31 29 28 26 30 28 25 14.o 16.0 22.6 11.8 16.4 13.8 11.3 8.2 18.6 21.8 1.0 2 85 6 13 8 27 24 27 24 26 24 gp 0 *Total Efficiency 9 25 22 25 22 25 22 3 10' 30 10 24 21 24 21 23 21 BL4, 100W HPS lamp, 0.9 s/mh, 8800 rated lumens, test no. LTL11737 pf 20% Task Height: 2.511. cp Lumens Zone Lumens Pc 80% 70% 50% pw 50%30%50%30/50%30% Inital FC 0 3646 0'-30' 22112 251 0 55 55 54 54 51 51 Mounting Center 50%beam-54.3- 10%6eam-80.7- 5 3425 310 0' - 40' 3030.0 34.4 1 50 49 49 48 47 46 Height Beam Diameter FC Diameter FC 15 2471 716 2 45 43 45 42 43 41 So 120.5 ss e0a 9a 12.1 25 0° - 42.9 3 41 39 41 38 40 37 34 10.0 64.a 77 32.4 12.7 6.5 35 1258 1258 819 819 90' 0° - 90' 4054.1 4054.7 46.1 4 5 38 35 35 32 37 35 35 32 36 34 31 12.0 40.4 9.7 20.2 16.1 4.0 45 594 466 90' - 180' 0.0 0.0 6 32 29 32 29 31 29 14.0 27.6 11.8 13.8 19.6 2.8 55 302 276 0° - 180' 4054.7 •46.1 7 30 27 30 27 29 26 16.0 20.0 13.8 too 22.9 2.0 65 176 175 •Total Efficiency 8 9 26 25 25 23 28 26 25 23 27 25 24 23 75 85 90 7 94 14 10 25 21 24 21 24 21 90 0 ft L/THON/A L/GHrIma LthoniaLinggrou Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. Recessed Downlighting An'*qcuAYBrandsCompany One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA30012 Phone: 800-315-4935 Fes:770-860-3106 Sheet##: BL-COM 02003 Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. 07103 81-com.p65 w .lhhonia.00m