Loading...
Staff NotesTown of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 32-2024 Project Applicant: Daniel Zotto & Carrie Hedderman Project Location: 306 Glen Lake Road Parcel History: SP 29-2024; AV 30-2022; SP 42-2022 SEQR Type: Type II Meeting Date: July 17, 2024 Applicant proposes a 400 sq ft deck to be added to an existing home. The existing home of 828 sq ft and floor area of 1,356 sq ft are to remain with no changes. The deck is to be located to face the shoreline. The area beneath the deck is to be gravel and filter fabric. The deck is to be 12 inches in height from the ground and to have a step to the ground. There are no other site changes. Previous approval of 2022 has expired. Site plan for new hard surfacing within 50 ft of the shoreline and expansion of a nonconforming structure. Relief requested for setbacks. The applicant requests relief for setbacks for construction of deck addition in the Waterfront Residential zone- WR. The parcel is 0.29 ac. Section 179-4-080 decks/porches The 400 sq. ft. deck addition is to be 21.5 ft. to the shoreline where a 50 ft. setback is required and 8 ft. to the east side property line where 15 ft. is required. In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the location of the existing home. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered minor relevant to the code. Relief requested for shoreline setback is 28.5 ft and relief for the east property line is 7 ft. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project may be considered to have minimal to no impact on the environmental conditions of the neighborhood. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Applicant proposes construction of a 400 sq ft deck addition to the existing home as shown on the survey. The deck is to be 12 inches off the ground per the plans. The deck will allow for additional space for deck items. The applicant’s previous approval had expired. Description of Proposed Project: Relief Required: Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: Staff comments: