Loading...
1981-03-10 5 ON MOTION THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. RESPECTFULLY, DONALD A. CHASE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF QUEENSBURY TOWN BOARD MEETING MARCH 10 , 1981 TOWN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: SUPERVISOR FRANCES WALTER COUNCILMAN DANIEL OLSON COUNCILMAN DR. CHARLES EISENHART � - COUNCILMAN DANIEL MORRELL COUNCILMAN HAMMOND ROBERTSON TOWN COUNSEL JOSEPH BRENNAN PRESS: G. F. POST STAR , WWSC GUESTS: MR. SPECTOR, MR. JOHN STREET , MR. LEE .REEVES TOWN OFFICIALS: MR. f NESTLE , MR. FLOYD MARTINDALE MR. THOMAS FLAHERTY PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE LED BY SUPERVISOR WALTER. MEETING OPENED 7 :38 P. M. RFSniIITTnN N �?, INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. HAMMOND ROBERTSON : RESOLVED, THAT THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON, DR. EISENHART , MR . MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , MRS . WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE RESOLUTION TO POST HIGHWAYS RFgnIIITTnN Nn ,, INTRODUCED BY MR. HAMMOND ROBERTSON WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL : WHEREAS, SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS , DANIEL R. DEALT , HAS RECOMMENDED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1660 , SUBDIVISION ( A ) 11 OF THE NEW YORK STATE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW , THAT CERTAIN HIGHWAYS WITHIN THE TOWN SHOULD BE CLOSED TO ANY VEHICLE WITH THE GROSS WEIGHT IN EXCESS of 3 TONS PER AXLE EFFECTIVE FROM THE TIME OF THE ERECTION OF THE SIGNS AND i WHEREAS, THE RESTRICTION WILL BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE REMOVAL OF THE SIGNS •- AS DIRECTED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN of QUEENSBURY , THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE FOLLOWING ROADS BE CLOSED UNDER THIS ORDER AND FURTHER RESOLVED , THAT PROPER NOTICE BE MADE IN THE LOCAL PRESS. AVIATION ROAD - POTTER ROAD TO MOUNTAIN ROAD GURNEY LANE MT. - COUNTY ROAD To TOWN LINE BUTLER POND ROAD - MOUNTAIN ROAD To END FULLER MOUNTAIN ROAD - MOUNTAIN ROAD To BOOT JACK CLENDON MOUNTAIN ROAD - MOUNTAIN ROAD To TOWN LINE LUZERNE MOUNTAIN ROAD - MOUNTAIN ROAD To TOWN LINE PITCHER ROAD - VANDUSEN ROAD TO MOUNTAIN ROAD VANDUSEN ROAD - CORINTH , ROAD TO LUZERNE ROAD RICHARDSON STREET - CITY LINE TO CORINTH ROAD LUZERNE ROAD - CITY LINE TO MOUNTAIN ROAD SHERMAN AVENUE - CITY LINE TO MOUNTAIN ROAD PEGGY ANN ROAD - OLD FORGE ROAD TO MOUNTAIN ROAD 76 HIGHLAND ROAD Dix AVENUE To BOULEVARD EAST SANRQRD STREET QUAKERIR)OAD TO CITY LINE CHESTNUT RIDGE ROAD - FROM 9L To SANFORD RIDGE ROAD - TOWN LINE CRONIN ROAD - FROM 9L To BAY ROAD MANNIS ROAD - BLIND ROCK ROAD TO END GLEN LAKE ROAD - OxBow ROAD To ROUTE 9 TEE HILL ROAD - BAY ROAD To MOON HILL ROAD JENKINSVILLE ROAD - SUNNYSIDE EAST TO 9L MUD POND ROAD - JENKINSVILLE TO TOWN LINE CLEMENTS ROAD - FROM 9L To TOWN LINE CLEVERDALE ROAD - FROM 9L To END ASSEMBLY POINT ROADS - ( BOTH ROADS ) - FROM 9L TO END LOCKHART MOUNTAIN - BAY ROAD TO 9L ELLSWORTH ROAD - BAY ROAD TO END PICKLE HILL ROAD - FROM 9L To BAY ROAD SWEET ROAD - ROUTE 9 TO COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MEADOWBROOK ROAD - FROM 9L To HAVILAND ROAD MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE - AVIATION ROAD To WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , MRS. WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE RESOLUTION TO APPROVE BINGO LICENSE RFSnii]TTON NO . 74 , INTRODUCED BY MR . DANIEL MORRELL , WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION-, SECONDED BY MRS. FRANCES WALTER : 4 RESOLVED , THAT BINGO LICENSE N0 . 17007 BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED ALLOWING THE GLENS FALLS LODGE #81 ELKS TO HOLD GAMES OF BINGO FROM MARCH 25 , 1981 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 16 , 1981 . DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART, MFG. MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , j MRS. WALTER i NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE RESOLUTI(N SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDING AMBULANCE CONTRACTS RFSOIUTTnN N0 . 75. INTRODUCED BY DR . CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON : WHEREAS, THERE HAS BEEN DULY ESTABLISHED IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AMBULANCE SERVICE FOR TWO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANIES AND ONE PRIVATE AMBULANCE SERVICE AND THE TOWN BOARD HAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SERVICE BY CONTRACTS WITH THESE THREE SERVICES , AND WHEREAS, A CONTRACT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE ABOVE MENTIONED AMBULANCE SERVICES FOR THE YEAR 1981 , AND WHEREAS, IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ALL CONCERNED TO HAVE A CONTRACT LONGER THAN ONE YEAR , AND WHEREAS THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY WISHES TO AMEND THE 1981 AMBULANCE CONTRACT TO INCLUDE TWO MORE YEARS , AND WHEREAS, SECTION 184 OF THE TOWN LAW REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING I UPON THE AMENDED CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR SUCH AMBULANCE SERVICE NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID PROPOSED AMENDED CONTRACT TERMS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN BOARD OF SAID TOWN AT THE TOWN OFFICE BUILDING, MYAND HAVILAND ROADS IN SAID TOWN ON THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH , 1981 AT 7 : 30 P. M. OF THAT DAY AND THAT THEN AND THERE THE SAID TOWN BOARD WILL HEAR ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE MATTER AND THE TOWN CLERK OF THIS TOWN BE AND HE HEREBY IS DIRECTED TO PREPARE AND HAVE PUBLISHED AND POSTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW , THE NECESSARY NOTICES OF SUCH HEARING. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : i 77 AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , MRS. WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE . COMMUNICATIONS BID OPENING AT 2 : 00 P. M. 3-10-81 MEADOWBROOK ROAD BRIDGE- LANE METAL PRODUCTS BALLSTON SPA NEW YORK ITEM 1 $21 , 373. 20 16'8"X7' 6" _ ITEM 2 $23 , 722 . 56 18 ' 9''X7 ' 3` NON COLLUSIVE ATTACHED DISCUSSION HELD-THE BOARD TURNED THE BID OVER THE THE HIGHWAY DEPT . AND THE HIGHWAY COMMITTEE FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS BID OPENING AT 2 : 00 P. M. 3-10-81 LANDFILL SCRAP MFTAL JOHNSON AUTO CRUSHERS WILTON, N.Y. $5 . 51 PER TON NON COLLUSIVE ATTACHED DISCUSSION HELD-TOWN BOARD TURNED THE BID OVER TO THE LANDFILL COMMITTEE REPORTS THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE PLACED ON FILE : TOWN CLERK-MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1981 D.C. O . - MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1981 BUILDING E ZONING - MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1981 OPEN FORUM 7: 48 P. M. MR. RICHARD SPECTOR-APPLEHOUSE LANE-PRESENTED THE TOWN BOARD WITH A PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF WEST MT. ROAD , FROM POTTER ROAD TO SHERMAN AVENUE , BRONK DR. , BRAYTON AVE. , APPLEHOUSE LANE , LESTER DRIVE , LADY SLIPPER DR. , JUDMAR LANE, FOREST LANE , MORGAN DR. , JOHN ST . , TAYLOR ST. , CHEROKEE LANE , TOMAHOWK RD. , ALGONQUIN DR. , AMY LANE , MICHAELS DR. , LAMBERT DR. , & TIMMONS LANE. REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A WATER DISTRICT IN THEIR AREA . (ON FILE ) NOTED THAT PEGGY ANN AND FULLER ROAD WERE NOT LISTED ON THE PETITION BUT ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DISTRICT. . . COUNCILMAN ROBERTSON- THAT IS A VERY ENCOURAGING SIGN BECAUSE WE HAVE LOOKED FOR A LONG TIME AT HOW WE MIGHT SERVE THIS AREA. WE WANT TO REACH INTO THIS AREAjTO SEE THAT THERE IS THAT MUCH PUBLIC SUPPORT IS VERY :ENCOURAGING TO ME. WE HAVE GONE FURTHER, WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF CONTRACTING WITH AN ENGINEER TO ACTUALLY GIVE US SOME DETAILED DIVISIONS O.F THE _DISTRICT. THE NEXT STEP IS OURS WHICH IS UNDERWAY , WHICH -IS TO OUTLINE THE DISTRICT, TO OUTLINE PROPOSED COSTS OF THE DISTRICT AND THEN SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO INFOPM THE PEOPLE OF THE FINDINGS AND HOW THIS WOULD BE FINANCED. I WOULD SUSPECT THAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS. AT THAT TIME THE PEOPLE WILL THEN BE ABLE TO II; DETERMINE WHETHER THEY CAN AFFORD THIS DISTRICT. ONCE THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN HELD, THE BOARD MAY CREATE THE DISTRICT AND IT CAN DO ONE OF TWO THINGS. WE CAN CREATE IT SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM OR THE BOARD CAN REQUIRE A REFERENDUM, MY GUESS WOULD BE THAT THE BOARD WOULD DO IT BY PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM. COUNCILMAN EISENHART- DID A LOT OF PEOPLE REFUSE TO SIGN THE PETITION . . . MR. SPECTOR- NOTED THAT OF THOSE THAT HE CONTACTED ONLY FOUR DID NOT SIGN THE PETITION. . COUNCILMAN MORRELL- OF THOSE THAT SIGNED THE PETITION ARE THEY AWARE THAT THERE WILL BE A COST FACTOR? MR. SPECTOR- NOTED THEY DID TELL THE PEOPLE OF COSTS ; SUCH AS TAXES AND WATER RENTS. . . MR. TIM MILLER- 19 CHEROKEE LANE- I DID NOT SIGN THE PETITION , I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT THE COST WILL BE , BEFORE I SIGN 78 THE PETITION? SUPERVISOR WALTER- NOTED THE' BOARD WAS TRYING TO GET A DETERMINATION AS TO HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE INTERESTED , RATHER THEN TO GO OUT AND HAVE AN ENGINEERING STUDY DONE AND TO HAVE PUT THE MONEY INTO IT AND FIND OUT THAT NINETY PERCENT OF TH5 PEOPLE WERE NOT INTERESTED. THIS WA;' WE HAVE AN INDICATION,, WE CAN SOME PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDIES AND YOU WILL GET YOUR ANSWER AS FAR AS COSTS ARE CONCERNED. . . COUNCILMAN ROBERTSON- SPOKE ON THE EXTENSIONS OF THE WATER DIST . NOTED THAT THE FIRST YEAR COST FOR EACH DISTRICT WERE DIFFERENT. .THE BOARD WILL PROBABLY AFTER A ONE YEAR PFRInn CONSOLIDATE THE DISTRICT , TO THE MAIN DISTRICT AND THAT WOULD PUT YOU ON THE SAME TAX FOOTING AS EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WATER DISTRICT. . .THE TAX RATE NOW IS $7 . 78 J PER THOUSAND. . .CONSOLIDATION IS ALSO SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM. . i UNKNOWN- IF THIS GOES THROUGH , WHEN WOULD CONSTRUCTION START? COUNCILMAN ' ROBERTSON-WE ARE AIMING TO DO SOME OF THE CONSTRUCTION THIS YEAR. UNKNOWN- WILL YOU DO PROBLEM AREAS FIRST BEFORE OTHER AREAS? COUNCILMAN ROBERTSON- YES , ONCE YOU GET THE MAIN LINE DOWN WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD. . . UNKNOWN- NOTED A PROPLEM ON .JOHN STREET. . . COUNCILMAN ROBERTSON-EXISTING PUMP SYSTEM CANNOT BE INTERCONNECTED WITH THE MUNICIPAL SYSTEM , YOU CAN LEAVE THEM TO THE OUTSIDE FACETS BUT NOT CONNECTED TO THE MUNICIPAL SYSTEM. . .THIS IS TO PREVENT POTENTIAL CROSS POLLUTION. . . MR. TUGAS- QUESTIONED IF ANY OF THE HUD FUNDS WOULD BE USED IN THE EXTENSION OF THIS DISTRICT. . . SUPERVISOR WALTER- NO WE ARE TRYING TO HAVE A COMPLETE CIRCLE FROM THE PLANT SO THAT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A FLOW OF WATER IF THERE WAS A BREAK IN A PARTICULAR AREA . . . j i MR. LEE REEVES-UPPER SHERMAN AVE. PRESENTED A PETITION TO THE TOWN --- BOARD REGARDING THEIR OPPOSITION TO THE POSSIBLE REZONING OF ANY LAND ON OR NEAR SHERMAN AVE. TO BE USED AS A MOBILE HOME SITE WITHOUT INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPROVAL . . ( ON FILE ) 90% OF THE PEOPLE ASKED TO SIGN THE PETITIONS DID SO. . . SUPERVISOR WATER- THANKED MR. REEVES AND ACCEPTED THE PETITIONS . . . TOWN COUNSEL .JOSEPH BRENNAN-I HAVE RENDERED MY OPINION TO THE TOWN BOARD AS WELL AS THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD , THAT THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IN THE TONNOF QUEENSBURY WOULD NOT AUTHORIZE THE PLANNING BOARD TO APPROVE A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION. IN THE PARTICULAR ZONE IN WHICH THE PROPOSED MOBILE HOME PARK IS LOCATED� EVEN IF A MOBILE HOME COURT UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCE WAS PROPOSED IT COULD NOT BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT A VARIANCE BEING GRANTED, BY THE ZONING BOARD OF 'APPEALS. MY OPINION IS THERE CAN BE NO MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION WHERE AN INDIVIDUAL WOULD BUY AN INDIVIDUAL LOT AS OPPOSED TO A MOBILE HOME 'COURT IN WHICH THE OWNERS OWN THE COURT ITSELF AND MF-PELY' LEASE THE LOTS IN IT. EVEN IF A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION WAS PERMITTED UNDER` THE EXISTING ORDINANCE IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY YOU COULD NOT BY-PASS THE PROCEDURE WHEREBY THE PERMANENT LOCATION OF A MOBILE HOME WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT AN APPLICATION BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD AND APPROVAL ON THE BASIS OF HARDSHIP OR EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. IT IS MY OPINION THAT IT CAN NOT BE DONE UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IN THE TOWN. MR. REEVES- DOES THIS MEAN THE ORDINANCES COULD BE CHANGED? TOWN COUNSEL JOSEPH BRENNAN- ANY ORDINANCES ADOPTED BY THE TOWN BOARD COULD BE AMENDED , REPEALED OR CHANGED IN ANY RESPECT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE LEGAL AUTHORITY, OF THE TOWN BOARD. UNKNOWN- WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MOBILE HOME COURT AND A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION. TOWN COUNSEL .,JOSEPk BRENNAN-THE PROPOSAL WAS THE CREATION OF WHAT WAS BEING TERMED A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION , IN OTHER WORDS THAT THERE WOULD BE APPROVAL BY THE PROPER BOARDS AND THAT IN FACT t THEN THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS WOULD BE SOLD ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS IN THE SAME FASHION AS ANY SUBDIVISION , WHAT WAS BEING CONSIDERED, AS I UNDERSTAND IT THAT THEN IF THAT WAS APPROVED THEN THE INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO PERMANENTLY LOCATE A MOBILE HOME WHICH IS NOT A MOBILE HOME COURT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED AS THEY WOULD BE NOW, TO COME BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD TO RECEIVE APPROVAL AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING TO LOCATE A MOBILE HOME ON THE LOT. A MOBILE HOME COURT WHICH IS PERMITTED IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURYp IS A SPECIAL USE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN CERTAIN ZONES. A SPECIAL USE BEING) AN INDIVIDUAL CAN CREATE SUCH A MOBILE HOME COURT, BUT ONLY AFTER IT GOES THROUGH 1HEAPPROPRIATE BOARDS WHICH CAN IMPOSE REASONABLE CONDITIONS UPON IT , THEY WOULD NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REJECT IT IN THAT ZONE. THE ZONING ORDINANCE HAS DETERMINED THAT IT IS PERMISSIBLE SUBJECT TO THE IMPOSITION I OF REASONABLE CONDITIONS. IN A MOBILE HOME COURT THE INDIVIDUAL SITES ARE NOT OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUALS PLACING THE MOBILE HOME ON THEM , THEY ARE OWNED COLLECTIVELY BY THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF THAT MOBILE HOME COURT WHO MUST SEEK A PERMIT FROM THE TOWN BOARD TO OPERATE A MOBILE HOME COURT. UNKNOWN- WHERE IS THE PROPOSED MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION . . . COUNCILMAN ROBERTSON- ABOUT TWO THIRDS THE WAY OUT SHERMAN AVENUE. . . COUNCILMAN EISENHART- THERE IS FIFTY ACRES. . . AND THEY PROPOSED FORTY-SIX LOTS SUPERVISOR WALTER- THIS WAS A MATTER BEFORE THE PLANNING-,BOARD] THEY TABLED IT BECAUSE THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THEY COULD TAKE ACTION AND THEREFORE ASKED THE QUESTION OF THE TOWN BOARD, WE REFERRED IT TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY, WHO GAVE HIS OPINION TONIGHT. . . IT HAS NEVER COME BEFORE THE TOWN BOARD I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE PLANS IT WAS JUST A CONCEPT OF IT. . . RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AUDIT OF BILLS RESOLUTION NO. 76. INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION, SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON : I f RESOLVED, THAT AUDIT OF BILLS AS LISTED ON ABSTRACT NO . 81-3A AND NUMBERED 293 THROUGH 462 AND TOTALING $220 , 512 . 13 BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , THAT COUNCILMAN OLSON WILL ABSTAIN ON VOUCHER NUMBER 459 . DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON, DR. EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , MRS. WALTER NOES: NONE ABSENT : NONE ABSTAIN : MR. OLSON NUMBER 459 . RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE SUPERVISOR TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH ADIRONDACK REGIONAL CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE RFI;IIIIITTON Nfl _ 77 - INTRODUCED BY DR. CHARLES EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION, SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL MORRELL : WHEREAS, THE ADIRONDACK REGIONAL CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE HAS SOUGHT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY IN ORDER TO OPERATE AND MANAGE ITS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU AND WHEREAS, THE CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICIZING AND PROMOTING THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND THE SURROUNDING REGION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ATTRACTING TOURISTS , CONVENTIONS , MEETINGS AND OTHER FUNCTIONS , AND WHEREAS, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE TOWN AND ITS RESIDENTS TO PUBLICIZE THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND THE SURROUNDING REGION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROMOTING ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND INCREASED REVENUES TO THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND ITS RESIDENTS , AND 80 WHEREAS, A PROPOSED CONTRACT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY TO FORMALIZE A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ADIRONDACK REGIONAL CHAMBER3OF COMMERCE FOR THE YEAR 1981 AND WHEREAS, IT APPEARS THAT THE INTERESTS OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY ARE ADEQUATELY AND WELL PROTECTED BY THE TERMS OF SAID CONTRACT . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY ENTER INTO A WRITTEN CON- TRACT WITH THE ADIRONDACK REGIONAL CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE , A COPY OF WHICH IS ANNEXED HERETO , UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED THEREIN AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , THAT THE SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY BE AND .t SHE IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTED SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND BE IT FURTHER J RESOLVED, THAT UPON EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT , THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PAY FROM THE APPROPRIATE FUND, THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ( $5 , 000 . 00 ) TO THE ADIRONDACK REGIONAL CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SAID AGREEMENT. DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR . EISENHART, MR. MORRELL , MR. ROBERTSON , MRS . WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE RESOLUTION CALLING FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION RFgni IITTnt\i non 7Q , INTRODUCED BY DR. EISENHART WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION , SECONDED BY MR. DANIEL OLSON : RESOLVED , THAT THE TOWN BOARD HEREBY MOVES INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL CONTRACTS AND POSSIBLE LITIGATION . DULY ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : MR. OLSON , DR. EISENHART, MR . MORRELL , MR . ROBERTSON , MRS . WALTER NOES : NONE ABSENT : NONE ON MOTION THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED, RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED , DONALD A. CHASE TOWN CLERK i