The URL can be used to link to this page

Application cont'd._6 N IXON PEABODYLLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604 (585) 263-1000 Fax: (585)263-1600 Jared C. Lusk Direct Dial: (585)263-1140 Direct Fax: (855)402-1491 E-Mail: jlusk @nixonpeabody.com August 9, 2013 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Town Board Town of Kingsbury 210 Main Street Hudson Falls, NY 12839 Re: Application for a Use Variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals and Site Plan Approval from the Planning Board (along with a Freshwater Wetlands Permit and Stormwater Management Permit) by Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, to Construct and Operate an 86' Wireless Telecommunications Facility (with an Additional 5' of RF Transparent Pine Branches) Near 441 Lockhart Mountain Road on Lands Owned by Lost Chalets, LLC (Tax Parcel No. 265.-1-52) in the Town of Queensbury, New York(Verizon Wireless' "Pilot Knob" site) To Whom It May Concern: The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance requires that we notify adjacent municipalities of the above-referenced application to the Town of Queensbury's Zoning and Planning Boards. Verizon Wireless will soon make application to both the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board to construct and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility in the Town of Queensbury. The proposed facility will consist of an 86' monopine (with an additional 5' of simulated pine branches), an approximately 12' x 30' equipment shelter, and associated improvements. It will be located near 441 Lockhart Mountain Road in the Town of Queensbury and will be designed to afford maximum co-location potential. Very trul y rs, J red C. Lusk 14555387.1 VERIZON WIRELESS 175 Calkins Road Rochester, NY 14623 CO-LOCATION POLICY Verizon Wireless' co-location policy is as follows: Verizon Wireless encourages and promotes co-location, both by allowing other providers to locate on its towers, and by attempting to locate its facilities on other providers' towers. Verizon Wireless maintains the following requirements for other wireless telecommunication providers who desire to locate on Verizon Wireless' facilities: 1. The other provider must pay Verizon Wireless appropriate and fair compensation reflecting Verizon Wireless' investment in the engineering, legal, construction, material, and related costs for the site and facility; 2. The co-location must be technologically feasible both in terms of radio frequency transmissions and structural integrity of the tower; and 3. The other provider must have a similar policy of co- location for Verizon Wireless and its affiliated/related companies. \- <- vert7pftl wireless Network Engineering 175 Calkins Road Rochester,New York 14623 August 8. 2013 Craig Brown Zoning Administrator Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 RE: Application for a Use Variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals and Site Plan Approval from the Planning Board (along with a Freshwater Wetlands Permit and Stormwater Management Permit) by Cellco Partnership dlb/a Verizon Wireless("Verizon Wireless")to construct and operate a 86' Wireless Telecommunications Facility (with an additional 5' of RF transparent pine branches) near 441 Lockhart Mountain on lands owned by Lost Chalets,LLC (Tax Parcel No. 265.-1-52) in the Town of Queensbury,New York(Verizon Wireless' "Pilot Knob" site) Dear Craig: In accordance with §179-5-130(M) of the Town of Queensbury Communications Facilities Law, Verizon Wireless agrees to remove the wireless telecommunications facility and related improvements relating to the above-referenced Project if the facility becomes obsolete, damaged beyond use or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for a period of four(4)consecutive months. Additionally, Verizon Wireless agrees to post a demolition bond to insure that the tower shall be removed in accordance with the Town of Queensbury Communications Facilities Law. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 585-321-5435 Sincerely, 490 Kathy •omponio, onsultant Verizon Wireless Writer's Direct Number: Tel: 585/721-8514 14514924.1 MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING,P.C. 508 Femcastle Drive Downingtown,Pennsylvania 19335 Cell:610-220-3820 Fax:610-458-8612 www.millenniumengineering.net Email:pauldugan@comcast.net July 12,2013 Attn: Rick Andras,RF Engineer Verizon Wireless 225 Jordan Road Troy,NY 12180 Re: RF Safety FCC Compliance of Proposed Communications Facility Site Name: Pilot Knob,Proposed 86'Monopine Near 441 Lockhart Mountain Road,Lake George,NY 12845(Town of Queensbury,Warren Count}) Dear Mr.Andras, I have performed an analysis to provide an independent determination and certification that the proposed Verizon Wireless communications facility at the above referenced property will comply with Federal Communications Commission(FCC)exposure limits and guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields(Code of Federal Regulation 47 CFR 1.1307 and 1.1310). As a registered professional engineer I am under the jurisdiction of the State Registration Boards in which I am licensed to hold paramount the safety,health,and welfare of the public and to issue all public statements in an objective and truthful manner. The proposed communications facility consists of a proposed 86' monopine. The proposed Verizon Wireless antenna configuration from the information furnished to me consists(1)700 MHz(LTE)antenna(CSS X7C- FRO-860-2i or equivalent),(1) 850 MHz(CDMA)antenna(A:CSS X7C-865-2i,B/G:CSS X7C-FRO-860-2i or equivalent),(1) 1900 MHz(CDMA)antenna(A: CSS AXP19-60-0D,BIG:CSS AXP20-45-0D or equivalent)and(1)2100 MHz(LTE)antenna(A: CSS AXP19-60-0D,B/G: CSS AXP20-45-0D or equivalent) on each of three faces(total of 12 antennas)spaced with azimuths of 50/130/330 degrees on the horizontal plane with a centerline of 82' above ground level and mechanical downtilt of 0 degrees for 700 MHz and 850 MHz and 2 degrees for 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz on each face. Transmitting from these antennas will be(1)700 MHz LTE wideband channel, up to(8)850 MHz CDMA channels,up to(3) 1900 MHz CDMA channels and (1)2100 MHz LTE wideband channel per face. The following assumptions are made for reasonable upper limit radiofrequency operating parameters for the proposed facility due to Verizon Wireless antennas alone to account for all licensed frequency bands: • (1)700 MHz(LTE)transmit antenna per face at 0-10 degrees mechanical downtilt • (1)850 MHz(CDMA)transmit antenna per face at 0-10 degrees mechanical downtilt • (1) 1900 MHz(CDMA)transmit antenna per face at 0-10 degrees mechanical downtilt • (1)2100 MHz(LTE)transmit antenna per face at 0-10 degrees mechanical downtilt • (1)700 MHz LTE wideband channel/face at 40W max power/channel before cable loss/antenna gain • (8)850 MHz CDMA channels/face at 20W max power/channel before cable loss/antenna gain • (3) 1900 Mtlz CDMA channels/face at 16W max power/channel before cable loss/antenna gain • (1)2100 MHz LTE wideband channel/face at 40W max power/channel before cable loss/antenna gain Page 1 of 10 • The facility would be at or near full capacity during busy hour Using the far-field power density equations from FCC Bulletin OET 65,the power density at any given distance from the antennas is equal to 0.360(ERP)/R2 where R is the distance to the point at which the exposure is being calculated. The given equation is a conversion of the OET 65 power density equation for calculating power density given the distance in feet and the result in metric units(mW/cm2). This calculated power density assumes the location is in the main beam of the vertical pattern of the antenna. After making an adjustment for the reduction in power density due to the vertical pattern of the transmit antenna,the calculated ground level power density is at or below 21.1.W/cm2 at any distance from the antenna system of Verizon Wireless. This calculation uses parameters greater than what they have defined as their initial and typical operating parameters for this facility. The"Upper C Block"700 MHz(LTE)transmit frequencies(746-757 MHz),which Verizon Wireless is licensed by the FCC to operate,have an uncontrolled/general population maximum permissible exposure(MPE)FCC limit of 497µW/cm2. The`B Band"850 MHz(cellular)transmit frequencies(880-894 MHz),which Verizon Wireless is also licensed by the FCC to operate,have an uncontrolled/general population MPE FCC limit of 587µW/cm2. The"F Block" 1900 MHz(PCS)transmit frequencies(1970-1975 MHz),which Verizon Wireless is also licensed by the FCC to operate,have an uncontrolled/general population MPE FCC limit of 1000 p.W/cm2 or 1 mW/cm2. The`B Block"and"F Block"2100 MHz(AWS-LTE)transmit frequencies(2120-2130,2145-2155 MHz),which Verizon Wireless is also licensed by the FCC to operate,have an uncontrolled/general population MPE FCC limit of 1000µW/cm2 or 1 mW/cm2. Therefore,the exposure at ground level at any distance from the structure would be substantially below 1 %of the FCC exposure limits due to Verizon Wireless antennas alone. The extremely low ground exposure levels are due to the elevated positions of the antennas on the structure and the low power which these systems operate. See Figures 1 and 2 in back of this report which discuss the relationship between height,proximity or distance,and orientation to level of electromagnetic field exposure. In order to corroborate our calculations,the antenna and operating parameters were modeled with Roofview using reasonable upper limit exposure analysis parameters to allow for usage surges and future growth of the major wireless carriers. The model was set to the 1997 FCC occupational exposure limit standard with 100% uptime and using the"near/far spatial average model". The proposed antennas were modeled with respect to ground level. As shown from our Roofview plot,no areas of the ground level around the base of the proposed structure have the potential to exceed 20%occupational maximum permissible exposure(MPE)due to the mounting locations and the lower power which these radio systems operate. Therefore,no further exposure access controls are warranted or recommended at this time. From the standpoint of RF exposure,the presence of Verizon Wireless would not preclude the future addition of other tenants or licensees including emergency or other municipal services which benefit the public from collocation on this structure.There is a substantial margin of safety to allow for the addition of transmit antennas of other communications services.Keep in mind that continuous exposure at 100%of standard is considered by the scientific community as just as safe as 1 %of standard since the exposure limits themselves contain a large margin of safety. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(ICNIRP),which is an association under the International Radiation Protection Association(IRPA),established exposure limits or guidelines in 1998 similar to the FCC limits. The ICNIRP is a formally recognized non-government organization in non-ionizing radiation for the World Health Organization and the International Labour Office. While the ICNIRP has no jurisdiction over FCC licensees,the composite ground level exposure of the proposed communications facility will be below 1 %of the ICNIRP exposure limits. Page 2 of 10 In summary,the proposed communications facility will comply with all applicable exposure limits and guidelines adopted by the FCC governing human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields(FCC Bulletin OET 65). Federal law(FCC Rule Title 47 CFR 1.1307 and 1.1310)sets the national standard for compliance with electromagnetic field safety. The FCC exposure limits are based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements(NCRP)and,over a wide range of frequencies,the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE)and adopted by the American National Standards Institute(ANSI). Thus,there is full compliance with the standards of the IRPA,FCC,IEEE,ANSI,and NCRP. General Information on Electromagnetic Field Safety Verizon Wireless facilities transmit and receive low power electromagnetic fields(EMF)between base station antennas and handheld portable cell phones. The radiofrequency energy from these facilities and devices is non- ionizing electromagnetic energy. Non-ionizing,unlike X-Rays or other forms of potentially harmful energy in the microwave region, is not cumulative over time nor can the energy change the chemical makeup of atoms(e.g. strip electrons from ions). "Non-ionizing"simply means that the energy is not strong enough to break ionic bonds. Safe levels of electromagnetic fields were determined by numerous worldwide organizations,such the International Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection,a worldwide multi-disciplinary team of researchers and scientists studying the effects of non-ionizing radiofrequency energy such as that emitted by base stations or cell phones. The FCC did not arbitrarily establish their own standards,but adopted the recommendations of all leading organizations that set standards and research the subject such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE),American National Standards Institute(ANSI),and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements(NCRP). When Verizon Wireless is located on an antenna structure such as a self-supporting lattice type tower, lattice tower,guyed tower,watertank,etc.the antennas are typically 10 meters or more above ground level(10 meters= 32.81 feet). With the relatively low power and elevated positions of the antennas on the structure with respect to ground level,the maximum ground level exposure can rarely approach 1 %of the applicable FCC exposure limit regardless of how many sets of antennas are collocated on the structure. For this reason,the FCC considers the facilities"categorically excluded"from routine evaluation at antenna heights above 10 meters(or above 32.81 feet). Categorical exclusion exempts a site from routine on-site evaluation. However,the facility is not excluded from compliance with the federal exposure limits and guidelines. The types of facilities used by Verizon Wireless typically elevated on antenna structures(away from access to close proximity,i.e.greater than 10 meters or 32.81 feet)simply cannot generate ground level exposure levels that approach the limits under any circumstances. From a regulatory perspective,the FCC has sole jurisdiction over the regulation of electromagnetic fields from all facilities and devices. The FCC has established guidelines and limits over emissions and exposure to protect the general public. The FCC also has certain criteria that trigger when an environmental evaluation must be performed. The criteria are based on distance from the antennas(accessibility)and transmit power levels. CONCLUSIONS: 1)The proposed communications facility will comply with electromagnetic field safety standards by a substantial margin(well below 1 %)in all publicly accessible areas. This includes the base of the proposed structure and any areas in proximity to the proposed structure. Page 3 of 10 2)Verizon Wireless takes appropriate measures to ensure that all telecommunications facilities(including this proposed facility)comply with applicable exposure limits and guidelines adopted by the FCC governing human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields(FCC Bulletin OET 65). 3)In cases where such compliance exists,the subject of electromagnetic field safety is preempted. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that: "No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement,construction,and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the[FCC's] regulations concerning such emissions." Telecommunications Act of 1996, §332[c][7][B][iv]. Respectfully, �; N �y q * if ' ,,I v Y.E. } Paul Dugan, - �y� �'�taA. ' -� Registered Professional Engineer �,o �� New York License Number 79144 Page 4 of 10 FIGURE 1: Diagram of Electromagnetic Field Strength as a Function of Distance and Antenna Orientation Directional Panel Antenna _ _ Main direction of signal s propagation is directed — ) on the horizon at Angle below horizon, 0 antenna height Wireless Communications—v Antenna R Structure 4 X ►.__T_ Ground Level n The above diagram illustrates the conceptual relationship of distance and orientation to directional panel antennas used in wireless communications. At the base of the structure(x=0), the distance R is a minimum when the angle of the direction of propagation 0 is a maximum. As one moves away from the antenna structure, the horizontal distance X increases as well as the distance R to the antennas while the angle below the horizon decreases. For this reason, electromagnetic fields from these facilities remain fairly uniform up to a few hundred feet and continue to taper off with distance. As noted in the report, the electromagnetic fields from these types of facilities are hundreds of times below safety standards at any distance from the antenna structure, making them essentially indistinguishable relative to other sources of electromagnetic fields in the environment due to the elevated heights of the antennas and the relatively low power at which these systems operate. Page 5 of 10 FIGURE 2: Graph of MPE Contribution vs. Distance %General Population MPE vs. Distance -e—VZW MPE Contribution —FCC Limit W E 0- 100 m I- c c O 0 80 as 0. x O. o w d 60 6. to c E • a- (..9 0 3 E 'x 20 <v 1 0 o 'o 5 o <lo moo 00 90 00 ,yo 00 00 �o �o �o 00 00 bo �o ,yo 60 00 �o eo �yo 60 00 'L ti ti o e N a h h o 6 0 1 A e , o 0 0 ,o Distance (ft) The above graph represents the contribution of Verizon Wireless to the composite electromagnetic field exposure level at any distance from the base of the structure. The contribution of Verizon Wireless will remain well under 1% of the FCC general population maximum permissible exposure (MPE) at any distance as shown. Page 6 of 10 ROOFVIEW PREDICTION ANALYSIS—PILOT KNOB (with respect to ground level) N PROPOSED PROPOSED », VZW VZW _�� _ ALPHA FACE GAMMA FACE —► �,/ �' )'` PROPOSED VZW BETA FACE Page 7 of 10 • ROOFVIEW PREDICTION ANALYSIS—PILOT KNOB (with respect to ground level) Statistical Summary %MPE SQ. FT. %SQ. FT. 4900 100.00 % of total ROOF Area 0 .20 4900 100.00 % of Selected Area 21 - 100 0 0.00 % of Selected Area 101 - 1000 0 0.00 % of Selected Area 0 0.00 % of Selected Area Roof Area 4900 sq. ft. Max %MPE 0.2 Min %MPE 0.0 Using Near/Far Spatial Avg Model With FCC 1997 Occupational Standard MPE=Maximum Permissible Exposure Page 8 of 10 DECLARATION OF ENGINEER Paul Dugan,P.E.,declares and states that he is a graduate telecommunications consulting engineer(BSE/ME Widener University 1984/1988),whose qualifications are a matter of record with the Federal Communications Commission(FCC). His firm,Millennium Engineering,P.C.,has been retained by Verizon Wireless to perform power density measurements or calculations for an existing or proposed communications facility and analyze the data for compliance with FCC exposure limits and guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Mr. Dugan also states that the calculations or measurements made in the evaluation were made by himself or his technical associates under his direct supervision,and the summary letter certification of FCC compliance associated with the foregoing document was made or prepared by him personally. Mr.Dugan is a registered professional engineer in the Jurisdictions of Pennsylvania,New Jersey,Delaware,Maryland,Virginia,New York,Connecticut,District of Columbia,West Virginia and Puerto Rico with 29 years of engineering experience. Mr. Dugan is also an active member of the Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers,the National Council of Examiners for Engineering,the National Society of Professionals Engineers, the Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers,and the Radio Club of America. Mr.Dugan further states that all facts and statements contained herein are true and accurate to the best of his own knowledge,except where stated to be in information or belief,and,as to those facts,he believes them to be true. He believes under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. A Paul Dugan,P.E. Executed this the 12th day of July,2013. Page 9 of 10 PAUL ALLEN DUGAN,P.E. 508 Ferncastle Drive Downingtown,Pennsylvania 19335 Cell:610-220-3820 Fax:610-458-8612 Email:pauldugan@comcast.net Web Page:www.millenniumengineering.net EDUCATION: Widener University,Chester,Pennsylvania Master of Business Administration,July 1991 Master of Science,Electrical Engineering,December 1988 Bachelor of Science,Electrical Engineering,May 1984 PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Engineer in the following jurisdictions: ASSOCIATIONS: Pennsylvania,License Number PE-045711-E New Jersey,License Number GE41731 Maryland,License Number 24211 Delaware,License Number 11797 Virginia,License Number 36239 Connecticut,License Number 22566 New York,License Number 079144 District of Columbia,License Number PE-900355 West Virginia,License Number 20258 Puerto Rico,License Number 18946 Full member of The Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers (www.afcce.org)January 1999 to Present Elected to serve on the Board of Directors for 2006-2007 Full member of The National Society of Professional Engineers(www.nspe.org)and the Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers(www.pspe.org)June 2003 to Present Currently serving as State Director on the Board of Directors of the Valley Forge Chapter and the South East Region Vice-Chair for the"Professional Engineers in Private Practice"Executive Committee Actively participate in Chester County ARES/RACES(CCAR www.w3eoc.org)which prepares and provides emergency backup communications for Chester County Department of Emergency Services, March 2005 to Present Full member of The National Council of Examiners for Engineering (www.ncees.org)May 2001 to Present Full Member of The Radio Club of America (www.radio-club-of-america.org)December 2003 to present PROFESSIONAL Millennium Engineering.P.C.,Phoenixville,Pennsylvania EXPERIENCE: Position:President,August 1999 to Present(www.millenniumengineering.net) Verizon Wireless,Plymouth Meeting,Pennsylvania Position:Cellular RF System Design/Performance Engineer,April 1990 to August 1999 Communications Test Design.Inc.,West Chester,Pennsylvania Position: Electrical Engineer,May 1984 to April 1990 Page 10 of 10 r Print this page Notice Criteria Tool The requirements for filing with the Federal Aviation Administration for proposed structures vary based on a number of factors: height, proximity to an airport, location, and frequencies emitted from the structure, etc. For more details, please reference CFR Title 14 Part 77.9. You must file with the FAA at least 45 days prior to construction if: • your structure will exceed 200ft above ground level • your structure will be in proximity to an airport and will exceed the slope ratio • your structure involves construction of a traverseway(i.e. highway, railroad,waterway etc...)and once adjusted upward with the appropriate vertical distance would exceed a standard of 77.9(a) or(b) • your structure will emit frequencies, and does not meet the conditions of the FAA Co-location Policy • your structure will be in an instrument approach area and might exceed part 77 Subpart C • your proposed structure will be in proximity to a navigation facility and may impact the assurance of navigation signal reception • your structure will be on an airport or heliport • filing has been requested by the FAA If you require additional information regarding the filing requirements for your structure, please identify and contact the appropriate FAA representative using the Air Traffic Areas of Responsibility map for Off Airport construction, or contact the FAA Airports Region/District Office for On Airport construction. The tool below will assist in applying Part 77 Notice Criteria. Latitude: 43 25 Deg M 45.45 S I N Longitude: 73 Deg 40 M 22 62 S I W J Horizontal Datum: I NA063 Site Elevation (SE): 952 (nearest foot) Structure Height (AGL): 90 (nearest foot) Traverseway: I No Traversew ay (Additional height is added to certain structures under 77.9(c)) Is structure on airport: E No Yes Submit Results You do not exceed Notice Criteria. I I i i I j i i i 1 1 i i i. I i I i I i i I i I i i I I I f I i i i I I I i i *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Results Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude 43-25-45.4 north Longitude 073-40-22.6 west Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGL) 27.4 Support Structure Height (AGL) NaN Site Elevation (AMSL) 290.3 Structure Type MTOWER - Monopole July 4. 2013 RE: Celico Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless'Applications to the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury to Construct and Operate an 86' Wireless Telecommunications Tower and Ancillary Facilities on Lands Owned by Lost Chalets,LLC Located Near 441 Lockhart Mountain Road (Tax Parcel No.265.-1-52)with Access Over Tax Parcel Nos.252.-1-5.1; 252.- 1-15; 252.-1-5.2; 252.-1-13.1; 252.-1-11; and 252.-1-12 in the Town of Queensbury,Warren County,New York(Verizon Wireless' "Pilot Knob" site) Dear Sir or Madam: As the title owner to a portion of the real property which is the subject of the above- referenced applications(the"Applications"), I have reviewed and hereby acknowledge and consent to the Applications and corresponding site plan on behalf of Top of the World Golf Resort, Inc. I also consent to the submission of application materials by Verizon Wireless, in connection with the above-referenced project,to both the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury in order to ensure the project's compliance with land use/zoning regulations. In addition,both the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury and members of their respective staffs are hereby authorized to enter the above-referenced real property owned by Top of the World Golf Resort,Inc.,as described in the Applications, for the purposes of conducting investigations, examinations,tests,and site evaluations as necessary,at reasonable times and with advance notice where possible,to verify the information contained in or related to the above-referenced Applications. TOP OF I RLI) i f - ORT, IN'. By: .4f 6 f /gataktip� Print:. 1=410 Its: PCS Id 14x)9019.1 July )1 2013 RE: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless'Applications to the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury to Construct and Operate an 86' Wireless Telecommunications Tower and Ancillary Facilities on Lands Owned by Lost Chalets,LLC Located Near 441 Lockhart Mountain Road (Tax Parcel No.265.-1-52)with Access Over Tax Parcel Nos.252.-1-5.1; 252: 1-15; 252.4-5.2; 252.4-13.1; 252.-1-11; and 252.4-12 in the Town of Queensbury,Warren County,New York(Verizon Wireless' "Pilot Knob" site) Dear Sir or Madam: As the title owner to a portion of the real property which is the subject of the above- referenced applications(the"Applications"), I have reviewed and hereby acknowledge and consent to the Applications and corresponding site plan on behalf of Lost Chalets, LLC. I also consent to the submission of application materials by Verizon Wireless, in connection with the above-referenced project.to both the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury in order to ensure the project's compliance with applicable land use/zoning regulations. In addition, both the Adirondack Park Agency and the Town of Queensbury and members of their respective staffs are hereby authorized to enter the above-referenced real property owned by Lost Chalets, LLC,as described in the Applications, for the purposes of conducting investigations,examinations, tests,and site evaluations as necessary, at reasonable times and with advance notice where possible,to verify the information contained in or related to the above-referenced Applications. LOST H 0 TS, LLC By: r ,---. eltei Print-d =me:_J its: Pl�r�J eejr- 14508714/