Loading...
Burnett Family Letter February 21, 2016 To: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board From: ,hili, Shari and Andrew Burnett as Administrators of the Estate off avid Burnett Re: Applicants: Burnett Family TrUSt & E"state of David Burnett Request for subdivision approval I I Andrew Drive Dear Zoning Board, We are the Administrators of our father's(David Burnett) estate (the "Estate"), As explained within the subdivision application filed by the Burnett family Trust (on behalf ofour uncle Steven Burnett), our father's estate owns a one-hal f interest in the property located at ) I Andrew Drive(the "Property"). The Burnett Family Trust (the "Trust'") owns the other one-half interest. The Property has been in our family for over 100 years. 'File Property contains two cottages both of which were constructed in the 1920s. One of the cottages has been used by Steve's family for the past several decades and the other by OUr family, It is our understanding that tip until 1987 the Trust cottage was on its own parcel and the Estate"s cottage was on a separate parcel, Via deed in 1987 our grandfather combined the two parcels to create the existing single parcel owned by our uncle Steve and our father as tenants in common. Unfortunately with the passing of our fattier circumstances have changed, As a result, the Estate needs to sell its share of the Property, This cannot be done unless subdivision is granted, As can be seen by the survey provided to the Board, the Property can be easily subdivided into two parcels. Our uncle Steve continues to enjoy his cottage, soinething that lie has done since he was a child. Accordingly, a subdivision would not only benefit the Estate, it would also benefit Steve/the Trust. We understand that the Board has concerns with the relief sought, However, subdivision will not change the use of the Property nor will it increase the density as anyone buying tile Estate's parcel would be simply using it in the same manner as our family has since the 1920s. This is a very unique situation and will not create a precedent for others in the Town, This is not a situation where subdivision is sought %o that one of the parties can build a new cottage/house thereby increasing density. Instead, we are simply seeking to return the Properly back to the way it was pare-1987.. jmwog wl) On your website, you post the following questions regarding an application for an area variance: 1. Will granting this variance produce an undesirable chats in CII'MIACM-01' a detrillUnt to the neighborhood? Answer: No. IfSUbdivision is approved there wilt be no changes whatsoever in the character of the neighborhood. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be gained by, any other feasible alternatives? Answer: No. Both pat-ties had previously commenced partition actions in the Warren County Supreme Court,, Aller someadditiorral discussions it was agreed that subdivision approval would be sought. If subdivision approval is denied and the matter is retU111Cd to the COUI-t then the parties will be lell with either an order from the Court granting partition. or alternatively,an order firorn the Court requiring the stile ofthe Property as as whole, The sale of the Property as as whole would negatively inipact hath parties(frust and the Estate)and WOLdd deprive the"frust frorn retaining the property that has been in the Camily lbr over l 00 yearsa 1 Is tile relief reqUCsted substantial to the Ordinance requirements? Not based upon the historical use of the Property. Again, the reliefsought is uniclue as are, tile facts,and circurnstarices of this Propeay. No precedents will be set. 4. Will the relief requested have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? No,not atalt. We are not seeking to increase density or change the use of the Property. (,-,verythirig will remain the sarne if sUbdivision approval is granted except that there will be M new deeded owners of tile portion now used by the Estate, 5. Is the relief requested a result of a self-created diffiCUlt)'? No. The cottages have been used as is since the 1920s and tile CUrrcrit pat-ties had nothing to do with inerging the previous two parcels into one in 1987, Thank you 'for your consideration on this matter. Again, if subdivision approval is not granted then both the Estate and the Trust will be adversely affected both financially and personally as the Trust will be deprived of its ability to utilize the Property as it will have to be sold. Very truly yours, Juli,Shari and Andrew Burnett..