Staff Notes_6 21 16 S,TAFF' N' OTE, S
PLANNING BOARD
JUNE 21 , 2016
1 uueeuasfauuy PEauu:uairu Board enda
First Regular Meeting. 'Tuesday,June' 1, 211f0 Time 7 11 prn
Queensbury Activities Center @742 Bay Road
Approval of Minutes,
a
Dates- April 26,. 016&Apri 128,,2016
Planning Board ecoaaumendations.
Applicant(s) RONALD & CYNTHIA,, Application `q p'e Site Placa PZ 57-2016
MACICOWIAK
�Owner(s) Sameas applicant S RQ R Type I Type Il
......
Agent(s) q,.lutehivas Engineerha Lot siZ.e $I acres
Location 9 Meru Hall Drive 'hard. 1 � Zoning Classifieatiowt R
... .. .... . ... ..... ....... . .
Tax IDNo, 299,11-1-31 Ordhiauace Referenced 179-6-060
Cross,Ref ronce Howse remrrvatio ws SP -14., SP Warren Co. Referral NI
74-14,AV -14, AV 59-15
Public Hearing as/a for reerarrurrneuadatl ut Site Information CEA(portion)
lSag ,4_Qgggr p igil App Iicaaut proposes a new 440,sup, ft. garage to'be 1.5,.11,3 ft.high with a two car garage, located on exisfing gravel
area- Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-060 of theZoning Ordinance,work within 60 feet of 15%-slope$hall be subject to Platinin Board
review and approval. Variance: Relief is u'>equested fou°second', auapSe acrd seth�aclr. Plan gingBoard shall provide reerrrrarraendation to
i the Zoning hoard.of Appeals.
Applicant(s), CIJONG S. CONWAY � p plication 5( pe Site Plan PZ, 147-20 16Freshwater
�.__. 16
® _ __ ...__. _� . _ _.. _..
Wetlands Permit P'� 148 _ __...__1
weer(s) Sarne as applicant SEAR Type llalu"sted
e r s Dennis Macplroy Lot size 1,62 acres
Location 633 Bay Road Ward;2 Zoning Class ifieatiioua,
Tax IDNo, 296,7-1-11 Ordinance Reference ['79-3-040, Chapter94
Cross 1 .eference U B 6-1989, SP 3 - 1, u,'t 95- Warren Co.Referral � June 2016
90, ,AV 118®'8 , AV PZ 160-7016 I
_ ......... . ..
Public Hearin � n/a for recommendation Site lruforrnation Wetlands(portion)
�
Project Desceiptign. Applicant proposes to update an existing seeeuud structure of'a 627 suq ff. building for an office and per
service where offirw is 358 sq. 11, and services 269 sq. ft, Project includes instillation of a 139 sq;., ff. accessible ramp to the front of �
tlae Ibuaildiug,. Pursuant to Chapter 1'79-3 0& Chapter 94 of the Zoning,Ordinance new cornmercia:l use and construction within, 100
ft. ofa.wetlan&5 hall be subject to Plarioi:ng Board review and approval. "Vauriance. 11i.ep.ief is sought for setbkks. Planning Board
p g Oard of`A paeala.....
shall provide a rccauaaaa�rerurpatiututi tar.�tmlue�' ruun. ..... . . . _ _.. ..
Applicant(s) 14N'M'. LI' (,JJE, TR'Q' 1 Application "Type Subdivision PZ 154-2010 Preliminary
Stage
Owner(s) Salrno as applicant sF.QR,'rYpe Unlisted I
Agent(s) Hutchins,Engineering g Lot sizes 19,73 acres
Location State . 149, Oxbow,', I IM Rd. � _.'w a,a I � Zoning lassiiieatitom: RR.-3A
. .. _........ _.. _. _, _. .................
_ _....... . _.
Tax ID NO- 289..6-1-7 Ordinance Deference 183
. .
Cross Roferernee i ' t B e'Z 79-16 ketch plan, 'SP 14-- Warren Co. 'Referral � n/a
2001 4,9,acres mining;AV 1''L155-
A X016
_. .
Pehlke Hearing n/a for recorn mendation Site Information
Site
p'ro,,.cj�,ct �
,mmmm _ — pplican7t proposes a five lot subdivision of 14.73 acre parcel with associated site word including private road
C��c�rut�tia����:
onto Oxbow Hill Road, installation of septic and wells, tat clearing and stormwater management. Site includes slopes greater thaun, '
15%, Lot sizes are: Lot I — 3 acres; Lot 2 - 3.2 acres, Lot 3 - 3.6 acres; Lot 4-4.1 acres and Lat 5 - 5,5 aeTes, Puorsuuant:to Chapter
183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivisions shall be subject to, Planning Board review and approval, Variance: Relief sought for
density, lot width and road fronytage. Planning Board shall'provide a recommendation totlue or�irnpp Board ofAppwa s,
New Business:
Applicant(s) .RAN E1`�fC"EC'�1�i
'RT I ' E T LL � plication Type Site plan 1'Z [49-2016
uwaers pealt Te 1Unlisted'
acerimeri�Agen s Lot size 2,91 ai�,res �
N
Location 235 Carinth Road '' ard. 4 Zoning Classification:: CLI.
"Tax ID No. 309.13-2-28 Ordinance Ordinuanvice Reference 179-3-040
Crass Reference ' ar n Co. Deferral June 20116
Puub]ic Hoaring June 21,2016 Site information
Prr'act I escri tiaunr: Applicant proposes a new retail building,�2 ,200 sap. fit. recreational building for Sky Zone Trampoline, including
N a mezzanine area in the building. Pursuant to Chapter 174-3-041 ofthe Zoning Ordinance, new coanmercial use shall be subject to
Plannuin Board review and approval
Applicant(s) 1I I7u BMATTISite Plan R' � 153-�10�1fi �
Owner(s) Same as applicant SIS R Type Unlisted
, rut(s) uta l 'Lot size � 3,45 acres
Location 1602 State Route 4 Ward: 1 ZoningClassification- Cl
......... .
"Tax ID No, 288,8-1-11.2 Ordinance Reference: 179-3-040
Cross Referenuce L 015-446septic alt.,2013-582.thruu Warren Co,, Referral Juane 2016
i 588 cabin alts 2012-545 comm.
m. .
alt., porches/balcunies
Public Hearing i June fit,20,16Site Iofbnnation r
i
Project Description. Applicant proposes to install four new cabins,and a sto age shed.. ach c4bin is to be 310' ua 30' with a dock of '
x30'. In addition, a 30' uu fi -sired is proposed and site work, for imtallatkn, of buildings proposed. Applicant Inas also completed w
filling and clearing prior to approvals. Pursuant to Chapter 174-3-1140, of the Zonirig,Ordinance, new construction shall he subject t t
Planning,'Board review and approval.
I Applicant(s) TAHASSUM aOppfieation Type I Site Plan(Modification) PZ 157-2016
SHEIKH i
O
wru u(s) S Petroleum Inc. �Ep Type Unlisted-ReaffirmQR of 60-3/15 �
Agen't(s) Zach Mon'me, Winchip Lot size 3,63 acres
Engineering
l eucat:u mti I985Mate Route 149 I +bard: Zoni:n Classification. 'N'C
Tax I No. I 2663-1-711; Ordinance Deference 129'-9-120
1 u°ass Reference m ... � �,V 2 -15, P 36-"21115 { WarrenCo. 1�ef mt Juno 20,16
Public Hearing June 211,2016 Site Information
Project Descrip�tierm; applicant proposes to amend site plata to include a 144 sq. ft., storage sited addition on Route 9L side and IT
24' storage area at east side of building. access for 144 sq. fl, is outside and acre.5s for 12' x " area isinside and outside. Original
approval was, fair fuel service station with canopies. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-120 of the Zoning Ordinance, modifications to, an
approved site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval,
Any further business which may be properly brought before th.e.B rd-
Minutes of April 26"" and April' 28th
Draft resolution — grant/deny manures approval
side Plan PZ 57-2011,15 @ 9 Glen Haill HailDrive
No Public Hearing
Draft resolution Planning Board recommendation
to the Zoninig Board of
Town of Queensbua-y Planning Board
Community, Development Departni�ent StaffNotes,
June 21, 2016
�Site Plan PZ 517-2016 RONALD & CYNTHIA MACKOWIAK/9,Glen Hall It&
Zoning 'Waterfront Residential-WR
SEAR Type 11
Material Review- application, survey, elevation drawing, floor plan
Parcel 11istoly. House renovations SPP-14, SP' 74-14, AV 8-14, AV 58-15
Requested Action
Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief for second garage, height and setback.
ResD,lutions
I� PIT recommendation to Zoning Board
Project Description
Applicant proposes a new 440 sq, . garage to be 1.6ft 8 in. high with a two car garage, located on an existing
gravel area. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, work within 50 feet of 15% slope shall
Ike stibject to Planning Board review and approval.
Staff Comments
Localion-The project is located at 9 Glen Hall Road where the applicant proposes a 440 s,q R garage over an
existing gravel area. The parcel contains,areas of 15% slope and a portion of the propeilyis, in the Critical,
environmental area,
ArrangeMent- The parcel contains a recently renovated single:family home and.previous site work for stormater
and, septic system.
Site and Building esign- The applicant proposes,to remove a I55, sq if temporary canvas shed and to construct
a 440 sq ft single story garage,. The site willmaintain an.existing 290 sq ft canvas shed that is used for storage
of boating items., The new garage:will be located on the existing gravel. surface and, orient so the garage doors
are facing,away from the shoreline. A boulder wall. is proposed on the north. side and stone filled trench is
proposed on the south side. There is,a single door that would be facing the lake and will allow the residents to
access an existing walkway to the house. The applicant does not propose any new landscaping or lighting on
the site.
Elevations—This plan has 'Been revised from two story structuiv to a one story structure. The height to be 16 tl
8, in.. The plans,include information for the garage door and access door.
Floor plans—The floor plan,s show an open area for the garage floor and rafters
Nature of .urea Variance
The garage is proposed to be 6.6 ft and 7.2 ft on north side and I O�.I ft,and 8,1 It on the south side where a 20, ft
setback is required. In addition,the applicant is requesting a height variance where 16 ft is,the maximum height
allowed and 16 ft 8 in is,proposed,
Summary,
The Planning Board is to provide:a recommendation to the ZBA in.regards to the reqUest for relief from
setbacks,and height requirernents.
THE
Ch7NoCountry Office azm -.Tz- E , rth 375,Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 1,2804
P- (518) 812-0,513 F: (518) 812-2205
COMPANIES www.chazeincornpainies.corn
Pdourl to be caproyee ovwouf Hudson Valley Office (845),454-S9190
En,ginee�rs
Land$vrwgVor,5 CapiW lDistrict office (51,S)2734055
Manners
trivironmentall Profassiorva�s
Landscane Architects
Jv n e 9, 2016
Mr.,Craig Brown
Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer
Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road
Queensbury, New York.128D4
Delivered via email only: CraigBequeensburv.net
Re: Ronald& CynthiaMackowicrk
Town of Queensbury, Warren Counity, New York
Chu en Project#91600.33
Queensbury R'ef. No:PZ 5 7-2'015
Dear Mr. Brown'.
The Chazen Companies (Chazen) has received a s�ubmlssjon package from your office for the above
referenced project. The Applicant intends to construct a garage. Submitted information includes the
following:
ID Site Plains prepared for 'Ronald & Cynthia MackoWria,k", prepared by Hutchins Engineering,
dated December 14, 2015 and last revised May 13, 2016;
41 Survey Ipiamn titled '"Map of a Survey made, for Ronald B IMackowlak Cynthia F. Mackowiak",
prepared by Van Dusen & teves,dated September 29, 2009 and last reviis,ed May 13,2016;
Project cover letter,, prepared by Hutchins Engineering, dated May 13, 20161; and,
A site plan review application and short EAF.
Youir office has requiested that we limit our review to the design of stormwater management and
erosion and sediment control items as it relates to compliance to toical, state or relevant codes and
regulations. Based upon ouir review of the information provided, Chazen,offers the following comment$
for the Town's coo nsiderat lon,
Stormwater Management&Erosion,and Sediment Control;.
L It appears that the proposed site improvements disturb less than one (1) acre and thus the
proJect Is, not required to obtain coverage under the NfYSDEC 5RDES General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (GP-0-15-002). Comments related to the
proposed stormwatier mianagement and erosion and sediment control features, proposed for the
site are offered below-.
Chazen E ngineefing, Land'Surveying&Landscape Archifechire Ca,� 0,F C,
canagen Envinmvnenr.a? 'erg es,Inc.
The,Chazen Camp anes, Inc,
Ta wan eaf Queensbury
Pornald&CV%hia Mackin ak
Page 2
2. Dietalls for the propici e'r'osion and sedli ment controls described in the "Erosion & Sediment.
Control Metes" have not been provided. Additionally, the Ilncatiu n, of eirosiion and sediment:
controls,shall bile shown on the plans.
. Notes regarding site stabilization have been provided hol ever" the type' of girass ,seed and
application rate was not:spec[fied. pplicant to add thisinformation to the plans.
4. It does not appear than sail testing has been performed to confirm adil vertical):separation
to se,asnnal hii h groundwater. As such,, soil) testing should) be provided to d rn nstrate
separation.Oluir off iice does not tape exceptirun to so!I testing irriun ,at th:e cr~mmencernienit of
construction (results should be furnished to the To n). 'fie note that if adequate separation,to
groundwater is not available following r sults of the testing,,'changes to the plian will be required
and may be sui ject to additiona6 site plan review,
In the event the Planning Board or Town staff have any, questions or regvire additional Information,
please do,net hesitate't;o contact me at(518)824-1 ,.
Sincerely,
Sean M., Doty" I .E., LEED AP,CMS45
Principal
Manager,er, Municiipal Engineering Services
c« Sunny Sweet, Town Planning Office Administrator(via emauill)
Laura Moore,Town Land Use Planner (i emall)
Mpu� r ry � a� 9,�ruaa -aa' of gfwbuq%l-Pm-a*15aanaid .Qa5'a-203S•�macMnwdmw,,za��.meo�e
I, JuiMWlj0'0op I ]I kc
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Pla�nning .Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Area Variance PZ 59-2,016 RONALD & CYNTHIA M.ACKOWIAK
Tax Map ID 289,11-1-331 /Property Address,: 91 Glen Hall Drive /Zoning: WR
The applicant has submitted an application for the following- Applicant proposes a new 440 sq. fl. garage to be
15.83 ft. high with a,two car garage, located, on existing gravel area. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-0,60 of the
Zoning Ordinance, work within , feet of IS,% slope shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval.
Variance. Relief is requested for second garage and setback. Planning Board shall provide reconimendation to
the Zoning Board of Appeals,
The Town. of 4 ueensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of'Appeals for projects that require both, Zoning Board
of Appeals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has, briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
applicat�ion as, well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that:
MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNWGI-11111111111BOARD TOTH
NG BOARD
WNJBOR� D OF APPEALS AREA VRI
FOR ARIA CE NO., P,Z lib RON &ALD, CYNTHIA
MACKO,WIAK. Introduced by who moved its adoption, seconded by .;, and
a) The Planning Board, based on a firnited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated with current Project proposal -
OR
b) 'The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has identified the following areas of concern:
I)
Duty adopted this 2 1'day of June, 2016 by the fa[towing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
1111opm 5 1I&761-8-720 1 5 18-745.4437 i 742' 13ay RoLd, QuQoWlitu'y, N Y 12804 V,ww%v.qUCCnsbtkry..no
Site Plea PZ147-2016 & Freshwater Wetlands
ermilt PZ 148-2016 633 Bay Road
No pudic rigg
Draft e l ii Planning Board recommendation
to the, Zoning Boar
Town of Queensbury Plann,ing, Board
QL Community Development Department Staff Notes
June 21, 2016
Site Plan PZ, 57-2016 RONALD & CYNTHIA MACKOWIAKJ 9 Glen Hal I Rd/
Zoning Waterfront Residential-WR
SEType II
Material Review, application, survey, elevation drawing, floor plan
Parcel History: House renovations SP914, SP 7444, AV 844, AV 58-15
Requested Action
Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief fdr second garage,, height and setback.
Resolutions,
1. PBR recommendation, to Zoning,Board
Proiect Description
Applicant proposes a new 440 sq� ft, garage to be 16ft 8 in. high with a two car garage, located,on an existing
gravel area. Pursuant to Chapter 1'7''x'- -060 of the Zoning Ordinance, work within 510 1,"eet of 15%slope shall
be subject to 'Planning Board review and approval.
Staff,comments
Location-The project is located at 9 Glen. Hall Road where:the applicant proposes,a 440 sq ft garage over an
existing gravel area, The parcel contains areas,of 1,5% slope and a portion of the property is in.the Critical
enviromnental area,
Arrangement- The parcel contains a recently renovated single fhmily,home and previous site work for stormater
and septic systern.
Sire and Building Design- The applicant proposes to remove a 15 5 sq ft temporary canvas shed and to construct
a 440 ,sq ft single story garage. The site will maintain,an.existing 2910 sq ft canvas shed that is,used for storage
of boating iterns. The new garage will be located on the existing gravel sutface and orient se the garage doors
are facing away from,the shoreline. A,boulder wall is proposed on the north side and stone filled trench is,
proposed on the south side., There is a single door that would be facing the lake and will allow the residents to
access an existing walkway to the house, The applicant does not propose any new landscaping or lighting on
the site.
Elevations—This plan has been revised from two story structure to a one story structure, The height to be 16 ft
8 in,. The plans include information for the garage door and access door.
Floorplans—The floor plans, show an open area for the: garage floor and rafters.
Waivers requested include g. site lighting, h. signage, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o, commercial alterations/
construction details, q,. soil logs, r. construction/dernolition.disposal S., snow.removal
Nature of Area Wriance
The garage is proposed to be 6.6 ft and 7.2, ft on north side and 10.1, ft and 8.1 ft on the south side where a 20 ft
setback is required. In addition, the applicant is requesting a height variance where 16 ft is the m,axim, um height
allowed and 16 ft 8, in is, proposed.
Summarx
The Planning Board is to provide a recommendation to the ZBA in regards to the request for relief from
setbacks etbacks and height reqUirreMen'tS'
June 3. 20,10
Mr. Craig Brown, Administrator
'Town of Queen8bury Planning Board
742 Bay Road
Queensbury,New York 128104
Re',Junec 2016 Planning Board Appl ma Lions
Dear Craig-,
/M comments regarding the agenda for the June 2016 Pkillaing Board Applications.
633,_Bay Rd—SBL X96�.7-1-11
This project is located within the QueonsbLlly consolidated water district and sufficient water is
available to meet domestic needs,
The water line is to be inspected prior to backfill.
If roick leftis found during the gaup and service: line, the cost ofthe hammering will.
be added to,the cot of tap/m,eter,. Additional COM ofcapper will be charged beyond 6�O".
According to Chapter 136-5 of the TownCodi� each building on a building lot is to,have its own
lateral. If the applicant's agent mquests a variance ,From this requirement,a request in writing
mustbe made to the Director ofWasteivamr, The reguirement eliminates,the possibility of
problems in the future by a shared lateral!, beween nvo different property owners if property is,
subdivided,.
SKYZONFT
1—H—ANTOLINE P4M=-Lf3-L_�09.1,3-2-2
* Public sewer is Unavailiable. If public se� ,,cr becoclues available,parcel will, be required by Town
Code to hook up to,public sewer.
a This project is located widain the Queensbw-y consolidaled water district and Sufficient water is
available;to meet domestic neeft.
0 'T'he:wat"line is to be insped cd prior to bac 1,,0 111,
tip eri n(eil den UWaste water Director
CT14
Cc. Scott Burnard, QWD En ineering Dc paro nt�,n i
File
Jun16-14
Warren County Planning Departnient
Project Review and Referral Form
Reviewed by Deparfinen,t on.June 9, 2016,
Project Name: Conway,C11ong S,
Owner: Chong S. Conway
ID Number: II "-1u1-SPR-'147
County Project#- Jun16-14
Current Zoning:
Community: Outensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes to upciale an existling second structure of a 627sq. ft. building for an office and personal service
where office Is 358,sq.ft. and services Is 2,69 sq.ft. Project Includes Installation of a 139 sq ft.accessible ramp the
(ront of the bullding.,
Site Location:
633 Bay Road
Tax,Map Number(s).
296.7-1-11
The Issues hiere appear to be of,a Iluacsp nalure,Involving local Issues,without any slonlincanI Impacts
on :&,nbsp�Couin1y properties,or resouxas.. , is recommends no county Impact based,on,the Infoirmallon
submitted'Anbsp,according tolhe sugoested reviewcMeria of NYS GeneTal Municipal LawSectlong 239 applied to
the proposed project.<br/>
,Local actions Ila date Of any).;
Clounty PlatuAng Department:
�NCI
LocalAction:1FInal,Disposition:
arren,gounty planning Department Dike S"Jigned, Local Offlel'al Date&9ned
PLEASE IMURNTIHS FORM TO Trus"WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Wt'r"iN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION
J 16.15,
Warren County Planning Department
Project Review and Referral Forni
Reviewed. by Department on Jung 9, 2016
Project Name- Conway, Chang S.
Owner-, Chong S. Conway
ID Number: OBS-16-FWW-148
County ProjecO.- Jun16-16
Cuirrent Zoning- 01
community. Queensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes to update an exist[rig second st=lure of a 627 sq ft building for an uffice and "fsonal serAce where
offloe Is 358 sq ft andl services Is 269 sq ftgnbsp;Project,Includes Installatlon,of a 139 sq,I'll accessible ramp to,the front
of the building
Site Location-
633,Bay Road
Tax,Map Number(s).
2063-1-11
to Not es.-
The Issues here appear to be of a,local nature Involving local Issues,without any slignificant Impacts
on&pbsp, ounty properflas or rasoumes,Anb6p-, Sillaffrecommends,no county,Impact based on Ilia Information
submIttedMbsp, accordll�ng to the suggested rapt orliteTle of NYS,General Municipal Law Sectlon 239,applied to
tbe ,,,,proposed pnJect. cbr A-
Local actions to date (if any):
County Planning Department.
NCI
Laical Action.10nal Disposition:
P
�4
C unty Planning.Department Igned, Local OMNI Date Signed
Wlarrrc 10
PLEASE RETURN'HIS VORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PL4NNINO 1314FARTM ENT WITHIN 16,DA Y$OF FINAL A4 CTJON
Q
7 0A
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RE SOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Area Variance PZ, 160-2016 CHONG S. CONWAY
Tax Map ID 296.7-p-11 /Property- Address: 033 Bay Road /Zon,i qg: 0
The applicant has submitted an application for the fella wing: Applicant proposes to update an existing second
structure of a 6127 sq. fl. building for an office and, personal service where office is 358 sq. ft. and services,269,
sq. ft. Project includes installation of a, 139 sq. ft. accessible ramp to the front of the building. Pursuant to
Chapter 179-a"1- , & Chapter 94 of the Zonine g Ordinance new commercial use and construction wi thin 100 ft.
ofa wetlands shall. be subject to Planning Board review and approval, Variance: Relief is sought :Cor setbacks.
Planning Board shall pro vidle a.recommendation,to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The Town, of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that requireboth Zoning Board
of Appeals &Planning Board, approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the, relief Teq'uest in. the variance
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that-,
MOTION TO MA KEA RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF O�F THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE
ZONING BOARD 0F .APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO., PZ 160-2016 CHONG S. CONWAY,
Introduced by--who rnoved its,adoption, seconded by ; and
a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any signiticant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal -
OR
b) The Planning Board,,based on a limited review, has identified the following areas,of concern:
1)
Duty adopted this 2 1",dad of June, 01 'by the fo I lowing, vote-
AYES:
NOES:
Phone- 5 18.36 I.5220 I Fax, 5 1I 8_745.4437 J 7,12 Buy R,mxLQkxcwsibttryNY 12804 1 www_(ImcnAmtrnot
Subdivision Preliminary Stade PZ 154-2016 State
Route 149 & Oxbow Hill Road
No public Hearing
Draft resolution Pl nein Board' 'e+ I�"r"mM e ni
to, the Zoning Board of
Town, of Queensbary Planning Board
Community Development Department StaffNotes,
June 21, 2016
Subdivision PZ 154-2016 1014N M., 14UGH TRUST f' - Preliminary 'Staged"Oxbow Mill Rd,
Glenn Lake Rd, State Route 149/None Rural Residential 3 acres-RIS-,
SEQ'R Type Unlisted,
Material. Review: application, narrative,, storm water pollution prevention plan, subdivision plans
Parcel Histor :� 'SUB PZ 79-16kizetelr platin, Sly 14-20014.9 acres mining; AV P 1 -2016
Requested Action
l .eeorrmmendatiorn to the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief sought for density, lot width and road frontage.
Resolutions
I. PBRrecormnendation to Zoning Board
project Description
Applicant proposes a five lot subdivision of a 19.73 acne parcel with associated site work including private road
onto Oxbox Dill. load, installation of septic and wells, lot clearing and stormwater management. Site includes
slopes greater than 15%, Lot sizes are: Lot 1 —3 acres, Lot 2 - 3.2 acres, Lot 3 _ 3.6 acres; Lot 4 - d„1 acres and
Lot 5 - 5.5 acres. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of flee o ni:rn , Ordinance, suubnlivisions shall be subject to Planning
Board review and approval.
Staff Comments
The applicant proposes to a five lot subdivision of a 19,73 ac parcel located in the Rural Residential Tluree Acre
zoning. The project is located along Route and, Glen Lake lead with the access to be On Oxbow Hill Rd.
ketelu Flare review; The applicant completed slketclu plan.in March of 2016.
Preliminnar l .eview: Preliminary ' plat subdivision let layouut shows the five lot arrangement. Layout plains
shows the overall proposed lots, and then each individual lot. The individual lots detail the well and septic
systems to be installed along with the driveway and house locations. Construction details and Landscape plains,
are not applicable as, no physical change to the site is proposed. Clearing plan —tine applicant has, shown
disturbance: limits for each lot. Grading and, erosion plans —plans, show information for each let as related to the
steep slopes on each. site. The Environmental report the ,applicant has completed, a Long Environmental
assessment review,. A deed Inas been submitted with the application. Stonnwater management —a s ppp has
been prepared and under,review. Fees —per application. Waivers —no waivers have leen requested.
Nature ofarriancu e
The prq ect as proposed requires relief from density where the parcel contains, steep slopes and 10.41 ac of the
19,73 ac site is a buuilddble area, three of the parcels require let width relief' here 400 pt is required and Lot 1 is
proposed to have 255 ft„ Lot 2 proposed to have: 245 ft, and Lot 3 proposed to have 257 ft. Relief is also
requested for Road frontage where required is Til ft and our the private drive proposed for Lot 2 is 306.3 ft and
Lot 3 proposed is. 33 .7 ft..
wrrrnr na
The Fla is to provide a rewrn menndation to the ZBA in regards to the applicants request .for density,, lot width,
and road frontage.,
I O�
���.� �� .��� ���������� North Country fcei
-Cbawn 3,75 Ray Road, Queensbury, NY12804
� '+' � I �� E P. (518)8,12-05,1 F, (''518) $12-2205
w�ww,chaaencorrupain ies.com
�'whss�o 1^uw d';.az�rad�iro nr,u' dYa°ir^ea°�� 77
Eo unieemn, Flo son ValleyOffice (845),4,54-3980
Land sutwreyors Capital District Offlice ( 18) 273-001
151ainini,eirs
Fun*on nenitau Professionals
n awnd$CaDe Arwchiire-rts
June 8,,2 16
Mr. Craig Brown
Zoning,Administrator ani Code Compliance Officer
Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road
Queerns ur~y, IN ew ork 12,804
Delivered via email only;CirajgB aluueensbu[y.unet
Re,: John M.. Hughes Trust Subdfivision
Town of Queens r , 'Warren County, New York
ho wen Project#9160,0.34
Queensbury Ref#PZ 1;54-2' 15
Dear lair. Brown:
The Chnazen Companies (Chaaeo) has received a submission p-acEage from your office for the above,
referenced project. The applicant interuds to, snubdividle ai 193acre paircell into S lots., Submitted
information includes the following:
• Slite Planus .and Detains preparedby Hutchens Engineering, vari,ouus date's and last revised May 16,
2016
• S-tormwater Management Report prepared by Hutchens Engineering,datedi May 16,201
• Subdivision Revue"Application,,dated May 16 201E aandl,
• Long EAI",dated May 16 2016.
Your office has requested that we II'irnit ouur review to the dlesi ni of storrnwwraiter system as it relates to
compliance to Unocal, state or relevant codes and reg ullatlorn& (Rased uupon ouir irevilew, Chaizen offers time
following comments for the Tow, ri consideration;
Storrruwatwer I' ,airna errnent& Erosion and Sediment Control:
1. The total disturbance for thnis, project Is unclear, however, based on information provided in the
S PPP the project will result in the creation of 1.141 acres of impervious surface. Therefore the
projIect requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan lS"VByPPPj in
accordance with, U-0-15-002 that Includes erosion and sediment contmofs as well, as post
constru ictionu stormwater management practices. A, Stormwater Management (Report has been
provided, Comments relating to the 5torrmwater livil,anagement Report are offered below,.
2. The S'+ ''(PPP (and EA,F) do not include information ree a riding,the total d ist uriban ce which wwvviIII result
i m this, projiect.The SWPPP shall he updated with thrls Informatloru.. ,Additionally, if the project
hazia n Environmental Services, Inc.
Towin or Queensbury
john lM.flughes Trust Subffivis�bn
hire 8,2016
2
will result in a total disturbance greater than 5 acres a phasing pillan which,shows how disturbance
krill be limited to less than 5 acres at any given time shalil be provided.
3It appears that so me of the post deve lop menit s uibcatich me nts have been incorredly routed in,the
HydiroCAD model. Specifically ly the,following:
ng:
• Subcatchment 10S is modeled draining, to the northerly design point. It appears this
catchment actually drains to the westerly design,point.
• Subcatchment 13S is rnodeled draining to the norther[y design, point. it appears this
catchMient actually dra,irts to the southerIV,design point,
• Subcatc:hment 1,45 is, modeled draining 'to, the, northerly design point. It appears this,
catchment actually drains to the westerly design point.
4It appears that the roadside swale near pond 6P is gradledl such that the pond is bypassed by the,
swale.The grading should be revised accordingly.
5, Per section 5. .3 of the NYS S,MDM If the infiltration, rate of the underlying soil is greater than 5"
per hour 't of the WQv shall be pretreated prior to entry into an infiltration facillity. Sizing
Information for the 6P and 7P forebays was not provided (Le. Qv callculations for each
subcatchment).Additionally,it appears some infiltration basins do not iniclude a forebay although
they have been Included in the HydroCAD model (8P_1P)., The Applicant shall provide the
requested information and revise the plans,as needed.
S. Infiltration trenches are modeled as part of the stormwater management systern for 8P thror ugh
13P. Hlowever,the trenches are,not depicted on the site plain.Additionally,details have not been
provided for the proposed trenches. Please update the plains accordingly,
7. The 1-lydro,CAD model indicates that 6P and 7P consist of a, forebay which discharges to an
linfiltratilon trench. However, basedon, the grading provided on Sheet S2 it appears that runoff
from, the foriabays will drain to the roadside swale and infiltration 'trench simultaneously. The
grading shall) be revised such that runoff direct to these forebays is directed to the infiltration
trenches prior to,discharge to the roadls id e sw a le,
8. It appears in:some cases that the post development subtatchment boundaries do not accurately
depict areas tri buta ry to their res pect ive stormwater,controls,.5 pecifica Ily, based on the provided
grading the following subcatchments 7S, , 9S, 12S, and 145 will,not fullly drain the stormwater
controls as modeled in HydiroCAD, The runoff analysis shall be reviiised to reflect anticipated site
conditions, Spot elevations may be used to clarify the intent of site,grading—Additionally,, a inote
shall be added stating that roof utters ain d lea diers,w III be used as need ed to direct runoffto each
respective stormwateir control.
9. The location of the emergency overflow for each infiltration basin is not shown on the site plans.
Additionally,details for emergency overflows have not been provided.The plans shail be updated
w ith the locations and cletal Is for the emergency ove rf lows.,
-H.1344094 Joke.M,,HL@hax7ruix%916W34-Tofin
Town c4 QueensIbuiry
John M.Rughe$Tm5k 5ubdiYi5iQn
lune%20116
pae 3
10, The SWPPP states that rain gardens are proposed for this project, however,dletafls and locations
for the rain gardens have not been,proVided.Applicant to,clarify and revise as needed.
11- Inn accordance with Pa rt III I A I of the G eneral Permit a cc py,of thecompleted NI01 shall be included
in,the SWPPP,
12- IIn accordance with, Part I1LX2 of the General Permit the Applicant shall provide an, erosJon, and
sediment control plan, which shows the location of all proposed erosion and sediment controls,
Additionally,tine construction specifications provided for sliftfence in the NYS,SSESCshall be adidedl
to the siilt fence detail provided on sheet ST
13,. IIt appears that there is an increase in, runoff volume during the 2S-year rainfall; event for
subcatchment A. The stormwafter control plan shall be revised such that the requirements of
Section 179-6,-08,0.0 are met..
14. Section 2.0 of the SWPPP discuisses, the soil types found at the site and references an attached
soils map; however, it does, inot appear that the map has been included. The SWPP'P shall be
uipdated accordinglify.
15. Section 8.0 of the SWP'PP indicates that OPRHIP has been, consulted regarding thiis, project andl a
Phase I study is required.The Applicant shall include correspondence from OPRHP inidlcating,that
there will ble no adverse impacts to cultural resources in accordance withi Part I.F.8 �following
OPRHP's review of the Phase I study).
'16. The proposed wells for lots 3, 4,, andl 5 are ]located within 100 feet of infiltration devices. IPer
Section 6.11 of the NYS SM IDM, 1 nf ift ratio n facilities,shall be located a minimum of 100 feet f rorn
water supply wells. Applicant to revise the llocation of the wells accordingly.,
17, It appears that some of the proposed finished grades, will exceed a 1�1 slope however, slope
stabililation details; have not been provided for these, areas:. Applicant to provided details
regarding the stabill izat lo n of thee slopes,
In the event the,Planning,Board or,Town staff have any questions or require,additionall information,,
please do not hesitate to contact me at (518)8,24-1926,
Sincerely
Sean Mi. Doty, P.E.,LEER AP, CIIVIS4S
Principal
Manager, M u n icipa I E ngi nee ring,Services
cc: Sunny'Sweet, Town Planning,Office Administrator(via ernaill)
Laura Moore,Town Land Use Pllainner(via e-mail),
HuChas 0H.dou
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE
TORM Of Queensbury
742 Bqy Road, Queensbury, NY 12804
PLAN REVIEW
John M Hughes Trust
Ox Buy Dill
PZ-154-2016
6/1312016
Plan revise based on site plan submittals:
FNI has no comments atthis time. Copy of the drawings provided. t
L
Michael J Falmer
Fire Marshal
742 Bay Rued
u Bens uur" 12804
fiiemar li,al@q ue i,u ury.net
,('j a ),� h o I's o ly i f., �on e.° 518-761-82 u F a x y5 8- 45-443
rTu ,rru ,p��
I
�a
l ,
r y „
Home of Natural Beauty-A Good Place to Live'
TOWN OF QUIEEKSBURY 7'42 BAY ROAD NSUEENBUiRY NY 12804 X18 761 X206
MICHAEL J PALMER, F4R,5:MARSHAL GARY K STILLIMAN. IDEPOTY RRE f AR,SI-9;AL
OFFICE, OF THE FARE MARSHAL
6/13/2016
Bay Budge Fire Cornipany
Chief Patrick Melon
Re Hughes,su b-diviisivain
Chief,
I have provided a copy of the prQposedl Hugh8S sub-division, planned for Ox Bow IHlllil- V have not submitted
comments to the Planning Board because the NY Fire Code section 5,03.1.1 spedfimallly exempts one and two
famruuly dwellings r gu latedl under the, Residentlall Cade.
The driveways and turnarounds provided should provide areas for fire apparatus to revs-rs>2,travell.
Please fa'ci free to contact me with any qu.m salon r concu:rnsi.
Regards,
Michael J P'almar
Fire mars al
Town of Queensbury
firemarsh,al@queensbuijry.net
eenl buiry.net
5118 7618206
Fri r C M ra Off i Ce . p h 0 a e 118-761-82 0 F a x, 52 -145)-44'
Celebrating Our ter entennin]
1762-.2012
z fl
' own. of Queensbury Planning Board,
RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeal's
Area Variance PZ 155-2016 JOHN K HUGHES TRUST
Tax Map ID 289.6-1-7 /Property, Address: State R, 149 & Oxbow Hill M / Zoning: RR-3A
The applicant has suhinitted an al,)plication for the: following: Applicant proposes a five lot subdivision. of a
1933 acre parcel with associated site work including private road onto Oxbow Hill Road, installation of septic
and wells, lot clearing and stormwater management. Site includes slopes greater than 15%. Lot sizes are- Lot
I — 3 acres,; Lot 2 - 3 2 acres, Lot, 3 - 3.6 acres; Lot 4 - 4.1 acres,and Lot 51 - 5.5 acres. Pursuant to Chapter 183
ofthe Zoning Ordinance, subdivisions shall be subject to, Planning Board review and approval- Variance:
Relief sought for density,, tot width and road fivutage. Planning,Board shall provide a recommendation to the
Zoning Board of Appeals,
The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 1,79-19-0170 J 2 b. requires, the Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board
of Ap�peals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application as weH as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and, surrounding community,
and found that:
MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHAIX OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO T14E
ZONING BOARD OF APPEAIIIAS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. PZ 155-21016 JOHN M. HUGHES
TRUST. Introiduced,bwho moved its adoption, seconded by ; and
a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified, any significant adverse impact,,,, that
cannot be initigated with.current project proposal -
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on a limited review,has, identified the following areas of concern;
l'),
Duly adopted this 2 1"day of Juane, '201the following,vow
AYES:
NOE&�
Phone, 5118-761.x!220 � Fav 51 ,745,44,37' N 742 Bay Road, Quensbury. NY 1280vw,(Iueensbury,,net
Site Plan PZ - 016 @ 235 Coring Road
Public Hearing Scheduled
SEAR Unlisted
Draft resolution — ran flan approval
..........
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
ow June 21,, 20,16
Site Plan PZ 1,49-20,1,6 RAN ENTERTAINMENI', LLC/ 253 Corinth Rd/
Zoning Commercial Light Industrial -CLI
SER Type Unlisted
Material Review. application, stormwater report, elevation dra,%vings,, site plan drawings #1-6.
Parcel 11istory- no,parcel history found
Requested Action
Planning Board review and approval for a new retail building, 22,200 sq., ft. recreational building for Sky one
Trampoline, including a mezzanine area,in the building.
Resolutions
1. SEQR
�2. PB decislon
Pro'�ect Description
Applicant proposes a new retail building 22,20�O sq. ft. recreational building for Sky one Trampoline,
including a mezzanine area,in the building, Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new
commercial use shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval.
Staff Comments
Location-The project site is located on.Corinth Rd between Carey Industrial Park and Stewart's, Shop.
Site plan o verall-The parcel configuration has been, adjusted with neighboring properties fora 13 4 ac parcel.
The building is to be 220 11 by, 100 ft,with the parking area in the frant of the building. The plans show two
curbeuts
Site layout and utili,typla - The plans, show the location of water and sewer lines. The applicant has alternative
plans for sewer until the municipal line is installed.
Grading and drainage plan lSedimenr and erosion controt-The plans; indicate 2 ac of disturbance includes,
installation of stormwatermeasures for the building and parking,area. The plans,show the clearing limits to the
front half of the,property. The applicant has prepared a stormwater pollution prevention plan that is under
review,
Landscape plan The plans shows areas,of lawn at the front and sides of the building. The planting areas are
focused on the front of the property, parking area, and building front. The board, may consider additional
plantings to match the scale of the building at 45 ft. The applicant has, included property line pilantings
Arborvitae, Winged Euonymus along the front east border near an existing residence and, limited tree removal
along the east property line. The code identifies a 50, ft buffer between recreational and residential uses where
the board may consider waiver for Less than 5 0 ft. The board may consider marking trees i n the field prior to
clearing to confirm the east Property line clearing.
Lighting 1q -The plans show five pole lights, with cutoff fixtures and sidewalk lighting. The lighting types are
provided on Sheet 5. The building,is to have wall mounted lights at the doors. The footcandles average is 1.9
FC where 2.5 is the maximum.
D-affiel Parking- The applicant proposes to construct 64 parking spaces and to hold 14 spaces 'in reserve where
78, spaces,are required. The applicant has indicated the operation of the facility will not need the total 78
spaces. The board may consider requesting a dedicated area on, the plans, be noted as the 14 spaces "not to be
constructed at this time"'
Signage —The applicant proposes a free standing sign with landscaping at the east curbcut access,. Signage
design was not provided. The building is also to have signage—the applicant has been informed that the signage
will need to be code compliant or request a variance, Currently no dimensions are provided for the signage.
The board may consider requesting additional signage detail for both the wall and free standing--confirmation
code compliant.
Elevafiovs—The applicant provided a rendition of the proposed building however no dimensions or building
colors were provided., 'The board may consider requesting elevations,with ditnensions, and color'scheme.
.Fare orplans—flans provide the layoutof thetrampolines and uses. Also included is the layout of the mine
area.
Summary
The applicant has completed a, site plan, review application for the construction ofa 22,000 sq ft building and
site development for a,Trampoline Recreation Facility. The board may consider further discussion on plantings,
buffer waiver, banked parking spaces, signage, and elevation dimensions.
THE
North Country Office
375 Bay Road,,Queensbury, NY 12804
P:(5,18)812-0513 F: (518) 812-2205
COMPANIES www.chazencompaniesr-orn
flu�fjd I'n be Emphr�e�'
lludson'Valiey Office J8451 4,54-39M,
Land yoft
Caiplital Mstrict Office (51,13)273-0055
S,urves q
PlIannets
fn0roinmental PrQfe5iMaIS
un�and4cave Architects
June 14, 2016
Mr.Craig Bron
Zon]ng Ad rni n ist rato r and Code Com p I iaince Officer
Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road
Qoeensbory, New York 128,04
Delivered via email only:!Zr�PB
Re: RAN Entertoinment LLC,Sky Zone T�ampoflne Park
Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York
Chozen Project#9160031
Queensbury Ref#PZ149-2016
bear Mr, Brown:
The Chazer Companies (Chazen) has received a submission package from, your office for the above
referenced project. The applicant intends to construct a 2-2,200 square feet building,Including an access
drive and parking. Submitted iniformatibn includes the Wlowlng:
Site Plans and Details prepared by Nace Engineering, P.C., dated May 15, 201 a,
Short F-AF,
Project Narrative;
40 S,tormwater Management Report prepared by Nace Engineering, P.C..,, dated May 2016;and',,
a Site plans Review Application.
Your off iice has requested that we limilt our review to the design of stormwater system, as it relates to
compliance to [Ocal, state or relevant codesand regulations. Based upon our-review, Chazer offers the
fol lowing corn ments for the Town's,consideration.;
Stormwaiter,Management& Erosion and Sediment Control:
1. The project proposes to disturb an area of a1pproximately 2 acres. Typically,commercial projects,
that disturb greater than 1-acre of land are required to obtain coverage under NYSDECs,SPOES
Genera I Permit for Sto rmwater Discharges.f or Construction activities (GIP-01-15-002). However, if
a given site that disturbs more than I-acre of land, meets certain criteria relating to discharge of
runniff, it can be exempted from coverage under the permit. That criteria [is identified in item 2
of NYSDEC's "Frequently Asked Questions About Permit Requirements for the PO S' Generat
Permit (GP-D2-01)1 for Stormwater Discharges from Constructibn Activities" Version 3.0 dated,
September 12, 2006,which reads as follows:
Chazen LOOO$uNeying& �andsr"Ve AmNteaure
Chazen,EnWronmenlal Servkes,hic.
T1w Chazon Coerranies,Inc
Town of Queensbury
RAN Ennlertalnment LI C,Sky ZoineTrampoRne Plack
Jiune'14,2016
"2. Is perm,it coverage requiredif there is neo discharge,to surface waters, i.e. runoff infiltrates
Into the grol
A: if the owner con adequately demonstrate that there is no poltentild1for a disch,arge from their
construction site to Waters of the United States Olt to 0 municipal separate storm,sewer system
that discharges to Waters of the United States, the onswer generally i5 no. Discharges of
stormwater to graundwaters are exempt from permitting reqla[rements unless the Department
determines that such discharges (or doss of discharges) are signiftant contributors of poll"ition.
To date, thleDepartment has not determinecithat constirl site dischargles to groundwater
are significant contributors of pollution.
in order to, demonstrate that there is no potential for a discharge from a construction, site, the
owner must perform the necessary modeling and site, assessments (soil testing, infiltration test,
hydrology, etc.) to support their position. The Department willreqvire that this information be
submitted for oil construction sites we encounter that have not gained coverage under the
generalpermit.
When,making the demonstration that all dischorges,from, the site woulfd be to groundwo ter, the,
owner must consider each of the follo winig,
v A,ll phases ofconstruction, including the commencement of -soil disturbonce with no post
construction controls in place.
- Riunofffromiail recorded storm events (lyll, 100 yr, etc.).
- Frozen ground conditions ffsoil disturbance is possible during periods when the ground is
frozen.
-Changes in site topography resulting from grading operations Icuts,andfffl$),
Permitted air not permitted, ony, such dikhorge that couses or contributes to 0 vfdtation of as
water quality stondardlincluding a groundwoterstandord) is a violation Pf.State law.'
Based on the. I information above, the Applicant has stated that the sits~ does not need
coverage under GP-0-1501102. Further Information supporting the Applicant's claims are required
to complete revi-ew of the project. Comments related to the additionall information required as
well as other comments relating to the storrawater management plan are offered below:
2, Does the Applicant Intendl to construct when the ground is frozen? If so, will dis,charges, reach a
natuirall water body?
3. Under Article 6 of Chapter 1,79 of the Town, Code, Section 1,79-6-080 states that the storm water
drainage plans shall analyze impa,cts,of the project using-at least a 50-year return, interval storm
for cornmercial projects. It is noted however, that the Applicant has not pirovided a complete
existing conditions stormwater model (existing condition, su bcatchiment. map, time of
concentration flow paths...). An existing conditions model shall he provided such that pre-
development conditions can be cumpared to post�develo piment conditions to demonstrate
compliance with the noted prow vis io ni.
4. The post-develiopment HydroCAD model does not provide distinct inflow value depths, which
Indicates that the time span of 5-20 hours may not be sufficient. TheApplicant shall revise the
time,span such that the fulteffects of each storm vire realized.,
TimnialiqueenshurA91600.32,F21491-231S RAN -RAN
Town of Qw,eerlsbury
RAN Entertaiinmont LILC,Sky Zane Tramppliine Park
June 1.4,20V5
Pap 3
5, 4 Y51DEC recornmends, for aill projects that seek exemption from coverage under GP-0-15-0012
wander the provisions of 2006 FAQ Item 2,, that MS4s shOlUld be extremely vigilant in observing
construction activities to ensure discharge, from the site does not, enter natuirail waterbodies.
NYS DEC has further stated lin a, previously held phone conversation with our,offIce that any sites,
that dlid not obtain permit coverage under GP-01-15-002 under, the noted exemption, that
ultini do cause discharges into natural waterbiodles would very likely be assessed fines by
NYSDEC in accordance with those !set for in ECL/SPDES GP-0-1.5-002. As, such we recommend
that both the Applicant make frequent inspection of their site to,ensure clischarges,to,a natural
waterbody do not occ!ur, and that the Town do the,same during construction, such that fines can,
be avoided.
6. Section 6,16,of the NiYS S�MDM states that infiltration practices shall inever serve as a sledim eint
control device during site construction phase. It appears that the temporary sediment trap
Q,,0100 CF), Is located within infiltration basin P. The Applicant should revise the design to,
conform to Section 63.6.
7. The, Applicant shall revise the stormwater report, to, include a maintenance aSrreement in
accordance with Section 147-10 of the Town code, If and as requIred'by the Town.
8. Two deep,soil test pits,were performed and the results are shown on sheet SP-2. IIt applears that
the deep soil test pits were not performed to an adeqivate depth to confirm the 3 feet of
Separation to seasonally high grou ri r/bled rock for Infiltration devices In accordance with,
section 6.3.1 of the NYS $MDM- For instance, TP#7 has, an existing ground elevation of
approximately 383.5% and was, performed to a depth of 1OW' or roughly 374,5"; drywell #3 (5P)
has a bottom elevation of 374.7" — requiring a deep test pit to a depth of approximately 371,7',
TP#1 has an existing ground elevation of appiroximaitely 384 , and was performed to a depth of
126" or roughly 373.5'; drywell 01 and #2 (213 and 3P) has a bottomi elevation of 372Z —
requiring a deep test pit to a depth of approximately 369.2'.
Chazen would not take exception to testing being performed at the start of construction.
However, it shall be noted that If any design changes oiccuir because of discovered inconsli
in soil conditions,, the project may be subject to additional site, plan review. The Applicant shall
not ify the Town prior to a dvancing the soil testing;suich,that the Town earn witness the test inig, if
they so choose. The Applicant shall perform the testing in, conformance with section 63.1 and
Appendix D of the NYS M11i
9. The stormwater management report mentions pretreatment using,oversized catch basins but it
does not appear, pretreatment calculations are provided for the stormwater management
facilities. Section 6.,3.,3 of the NYS, SMD,M states the requirements for pretreatment to
infiltration clevices/facilities, and the Applicant shall provide pretreatment calculations showing
conformance to,Section 63.3.,
10. The overall watershed boundary should not be limited to the subject property hive; it shalil
include the entire watershed tributary to each Subicatchment/Desigln Point. Pursuant to this the
Applicant should revise the boundaries appropriately. USGS topagraphic4l information can be
lused"for offilte areas.
P2145e=t FLAN
Tom'l of Quit 2nsbury
RAN EM42rtaiiinimeirtnk,6.2C,Sky 13 ne TrampQliine Park
June 14,20,16
p'eige 4
Fin general, It appears that off lte areas to the west may be tributary to the site and onsite areas
to the souuith may be tributary to the site, proposed swalles" and stormwater management facility
4P and 511 .
11. It appears that there is not enough topographic information demonstrate stor water will not
discharge from the proposed depression at the west-central portion of the site (especially
during frozen grow ind conditions). The Applicant to clarify or provide additional topographic
inforimiation.
12. It is, noted that:the loll test,information on sheet SP-2 lists the stabilized Infiltration rate at bath
test pits. The stabilized rata for test pit 1 was 10" iini 45 seconds and test pit 2 was 18" In I
rninuute and 35 seconds„ It its obvious that the soils are very well draining; on site, however it is
unclear if the tests were performed in accordia;nce with Appendix D of the II YS ';SMDMl (24''"
rinjinuri water depth inside: a " PVC pipe). We kindly note/request that the Applicant's,
engineer ensure that all fu iiture tests In accordance with the NYS Sl4wlll, M, (it is recognized that the
tests could have been performed in accordance with the NYS SMDM, but as the data is
presented it is unclear)..
13, The Applicant uses an exfiltration rate of 80 lnches/houur for the infiltration basins and an
exfiltration rate of 2001 inches hou r for the drywells. The Applicant to clarify why two different
infiltration rates with a wide margin were used since it appears that the underlying souls
throughout the slue are similar in composition,
14. The North Infiltration Basin (fl') has elevations ranging from 38,21 to 383.30, The eche of the
parking near 1P has elevations ranging from 383.1 to 383.2, which would Indicate that 113"s
staple/storage includes, portions of the impervious parking airea. This does not appear to be the
Applicant's,design iintent and',the,applicant shall revise the stage/storage elevations accordlin,8lhy.
15. It clues not appear that ai detail wais provided for the infiltration basins.,The Applicant to provide
a, Mail for the infiltration basins 'that 'includes construction specifications, maintenance, and
operation requirements iin accordance with Section, 6.3 of the New York State Storrnwater
Management Design Manual.
16. The HydroCAD model does not appear to include aili storrnwater design features that include the
following:
a. The caitch basins (CB1 and B2) within su bc-atchrnent 2 and 3, as 'well as the pipes,
conruiectIng the catch i basins to the dry wrellls;" are not modeled.
b. The swale and catch basun C63)within suubcatchrnent 3", as well as the pipe connecting
the catch bais,in,to the dlrywvell" are not modelled.
c. The sw+valles,within suubcWatchiment 4 are not mocieled.
The Appllicanit shall revise the proposed condition I-lydroCAD model accordingly,
aGdS-'R ,vrrof ,PZZ -2016Ci.AN Enreamnfn�re�ri�#'rr '�Pofw�: ,.fir;�u.9[.!�,a,�iF�mer� en eaw!eam,mie,,,.��mu�mCn:�,mn.:m.d'ha��
70W11 of Qufoensbufy
RAN Entertainment LLC,Sky Zone!Trampoline Park.
Juna 14,WIG
Page.5
17., It does not appear that a pre-devetopment,watershed map was provided and the Applicant shall
submkt a pre-development watershed map that includes all design points. Also,,the existing site
is modeledl as one suibcaitchment (EXI$T.), however it is difficult to verify because an, existing
conditions maip was not provided.
Since a section of itern 2 of NYSDECs aFrequently Asked Questions About Permit Requirernents
for the SPDES General Permit (GP-02-611) far Stormwater Discharges from, Construction
Activities" states, "Ail phases of construction, including the commiencement of soil disturbonce,
w1th no post construction controls in place'" The existing condition, stormiwater model Is
required,
The existing,subcatchment(EXIiSTI.) is listed at 2.,07 acres,of Woods.,When considering all phase$
of construction, the commencernent of soll disturbance will not include wolods Since tree
rear aval wrwailll commence before construction of tht site beings, (according to, the construction
seq uie incing)and the Hydro AD m Mel s hou lid reflect this Condition.
Conctuisions and Recommendations
It is,our opinion that the applicant should provide clarlification for the above iterns and incorporate the
changes in,subsequent plan,submissions.,
if you have any,quuestio ns iregarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me at (51:8) 824-1926.
Sincerely,
Seam IM. Doty" P.E., LEED AP, 4S
Principal)
Ma nage r, Mi unicipa I E ing!nee ring Services
cc: S,u in ny Sweet, Town Pla nn ling Office Adimi nistrator(via email))
Laura Moore,Town Land Use,Planner (via a-ni
File
IR M'ARSHAL'S FFICE
742 Bad Road, Quev sbuny, NY 12804
" Dame of raIrcr,a $ Be'ara:ity ..; A Good Place Io Lrzac "
PLAN REVIL, W
RAN Ent f'1t P,Z-149-2016
/25/2016
Plan review based on site ,submittals:
FM has no site issues at this time
Michael J Palmer
Fire Marshal
742 Bad' Road
Queensbury 12804
F r v n r°s h ra l"�q Office - P h o ra a, 5°1 --763-8206 - F a x: 58-745-4437
June 3.1 2016
Mr, Craig Brown., Administrator
Town of Quecnsbury Planning hoard
742 Bay Road
QueensbuTy,New York 12804
Rel. June 2016 Planning Roard Applications
Dear Craig:
My comments regarding,the:agenda far the June 20 16, Planniag Board Applications,
633 Day Rd—_S)3L 296.7-1-11
• This project is located within, tile Queensbury cortsolidated water district and sufficient wawr is
available to meet domestic needs.
• The water line is to be inspectM pdor to backflill,
• 1fruck ledge: is fbund during the tarp and service I hw, the cost of the hammering will
be added to the cost oftap/meter . Additional cost of copper will be:charged beyond 60'.
• Acoord'ing to,Chapter' '136-5of the:Town Code each building on a building,lot is to have its own,
lateral. If the applicant's agent requestsa variance From dais requirement,, a request in writing
must be made to the Director of Wastewater, The requirement eliminates the possibility of
problems in the future by a shamd taterat becween two different property owners if property is.
Publio sewer is unavailable,. If public sea vu bicomes availabk-,, parcel 'will be required by Town
Code to,hook up to public sewer.
This,prqjcct is located,within t�he,Queellrsbwy consolidated water district and suffickmt water is
available to meet damtstio needs.
The:water line is to be 1 nsplected prior ie bai;kfi 11.
ChristoplierT.. HaiTington
Stil)ei-iiitci,ideiitJWistewater Director
CTH
Co., Scott BULmard, QWD Engineerijig Departnicni
He
C d
ow
Town of'Queensburry Planning Board
SEQR RESOLUTION— Grant Positive or Negative Declaration
',Sitz PI an PZ 149-2016 RAN ENTl�RTAINM ENT, LLC
Tax Map, ID 309.13-2-28 /Property Address- 235 Corinth Road I Zoning: CIII
The applicant proposes a new retail building, 22,2001 sq, 11. recreational building f Sky Zone 'rrampoline,
including a, rnie:zzanine area in the: building, Pursuant to, Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new
commercial use shall be subject to, Planning Board review and approval.
The Planning Board has, determined that the proposed projectand Planning Roard action is, subject to, review
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act;
The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation
Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of
Queensbury;
No Federal or other agencies are involved;
Part 1. of the hart EAF has, been completed by the applicant;
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planni ng
Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and,
therefore, am en,vironmental impact staternent need, not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is,
issued.
MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECI,ARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE
PLAN PZ 149-201,6.1 RAN ENTERTAINMENT, LLC' Introduced by _ who moved, for its adoption,
seconded
As per the resolution prepared by staff.
1. Part H of Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board.
2. Part III of the Short EAFhas been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board.,
Or
Part III of the: Short EAF is, not necessary beicause the Planning Board didnot identify potentially
moderate to large impacts.
Du ly adopted this 2 1"day of June, 20116 by the: following, vote
AYES:
NOES:
Phone, 51 S.'761..8220 1 1a x-- 518,74 5,443 7 1747 Bay Road, Qi i ee nsbu ry. N Y 12804 ({ WW kV.(I Uunsb u ry,i,iei
�11 "d
2
Town of Qutensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION —Grant /Deny Site Plan Approval
SITE PLAN PZ 149-2016 RAN ENTERTAIII' ENT, LLC.
Tax Map ID09 13-2-28 /Property Address; 235 Corinth Road / Zoning: CLI
The applicanthas, submitted an application to the Planning card far a new retail building, 22,200 sq. 11.
recreational bluilding .for Sky Zone Trampoline, including a mezzanine area in the building, Pursuant to
Chapter 179-3-040of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial use shall be subject to Planning Boird review
and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9- 0, the Planning
Board has determined that this proposal satisties the requirements as; stated in the Zoning,Code;
As required by General. Municipal Law Section 2,39'-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren,
County P'lanning .Department for its recommendation;
The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the Mate
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted to SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination
of Non-Sigrifficarice
The Planning Board. opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 6/21/2016, and continued the;
public hearing to 6/21/201 , when it was closed,
The Planning, Board, has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments,
made at the public hearing and submitted in writing,through and including 6/21/2016;
The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations, and standards
set J."orth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval,
MOTION TO APPROVE J DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 149-2016 RAN' E,NTERT'AINMENT.
LLC- Introduced bwho inoved for its adoption, seconded by
According to the d1raft re-solution preparedby Staff with the following.
1) Waivers requested granted/denied;
2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with (his resolution.
a,) Ilie limits ofolearing will constitute a no-cul buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall
be installed around, these areas and field verified by Comrnunity Development staff;
b) If applicable,,the Sanitary Sewer connection, plan must be submitted to the: Wastewater
Department for its, review, approval,peri-nitting and inspection;
c) If curb cuts arebeing added or changed a driveway permit, is required. A building permit will not be
issued until the approved driveway perinit Inas beery provided to the Planning Office;
d) If application was, referred to engineering then Engineering sign-offrequired prior to signature of
Zoning Administrator of the approved plains*
Page 10`2
Phone: 518,761,.8220 i Fax,,. 518,745.4437'742 Bay Road. Queensbury. NY 12804 , war ww,queensbuiry,no
1l'"required, the applicant uruuust submit copy of the following to, the Town.
a. The project l i l (Nota ice ofIntent) fuer coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDESGeneral
Permit freuru Construction Activity"'"" prior to the start of any site work.
b. The prqjeet NOT Noli e Irl,"TermiAnatio n upon completion of the,project
e. The applicant must maintain on their project site, is r review by staff'
L The appre�ved final plans that have: been stamped by the:Town Zoning Administrator.
These plans must include the project S,WPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention 'Plan)
when such a platin was prepared and approved;
ii. The project NO] and proof of coverage under the current YSDEC SPDELS, General
Permit, or an individual SPDES permit is rased for the project if required.
1) Final approved plans,, in compliance with the Site Plan, mut be submitted to the C rrurnnu,uuni
Development Department lnel"bre any further review by the Zoning ,dministrat r or Building and
Codes personnel;
gThe applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Buildhig Perrrnit
and/or the beginning of any sitework;
h Subsequent uuernt :issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with
this and ail rather condi tions of this reso I ution,;
i) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according,to tine,appro ed plans,to be pmvid d
pdor to issuanceof the certificate of occupancy.
j), This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on thefinal planus
Duly adapted this 2 l"day of Juuune, 2016, by the following, urate:
ES:
NOES-
Page 2 of
Phone: 18.761.82ZO, ; Fax,. 5:18,745.44371742 Say Ili ad. Queensbury,NY 128041 r.guueen,abunry_net
Site, Plan PZ 153-2016 @ 16102 Stag Route
Public Hearing Scheduiled
SEAR Unlisted
Draft resolution grant/deny Mite plea approval
......................
Town of'Queens,bury Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
June' 1, 20 16
Site Plan PZ 153-2016 RASHEED BH TTI (King Hendrick Motel)/ 1602 State Ro�ute 91
Zone Commercial Intensive -CI
SEQR Type Unlisted,
Material Review. application, Site plan sheets I-,5, storinwater report
Parcel History. 20,15-446 septic alt.; 2013-582 thru 588 cabin alts; 20121-545, comm. alt.
porches/balconies
Requested Action,
Planning Board review and approval to install four new cabins and astorage shed. Each cabin is to be 30'
with a deck of 6' x 30". In addition, a 30' x 20' shed is proposed and site work for, installation of buildings
proposed.
Resolutions
1. SE-QR
2. PB decision
Proiett Description
Appli cant proposes to install four new cabins and a storage shed. Each cabin is to be: 3 0' x 3 0' with a deck of 6'
x 30". In addition, a,: ' x 20" shed is proposed and site: work for installation of buildings,Proposed, Applicant
has also completed filling andelearing prior to approvals. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning
Ordinance, new construction shall be subject to Plarming .Board review and approval, The project site is
currently part of an ongoing enforcement action for starting site workwithout necessary approvals.
Staff Comments
Localion-The project site is located on the east side of Route 9 past the outlets going north.
Arrangement- The project includes the construction of 4 new cabins and will maintain the exisfing 2 ,story 8 unit
apartinent building, 12 cabins single bedrooms and, 32-bedioorns), a house with an office building, and a
single story motel building (,3 units).
�Rle Design- The new cabins are located on the north side of the property and will be:900 sqft with a 18'0 sqft
porch. The new cabins will utilize the one way access travel lane for the existing cabins on the northside of the
property.
STignage and light ing—no changes to the ex isti ng site Ii htira or signage is proposed
,91e condifions-The area of the new cabins, septic area and storrnwater are part of a clearing activity that was
identified by Code Compliance fdr wofk without approvals. The plans show the total fill on the site is 995
cubic yards,where 437 cy are frolTsite and the remaining is fromonsite. The applicant has, applied fOr site
plan review for the project area to be developed as,part court discussion.
TraffielParking- The applicant has four curb cut access points on the site. The site plan,shows the axisting,
parking,to be 29 spaces and to be increased to 37 parking spaces,
,L—
Grading, and drainage plan Secliment and crosi,on control -The applicant has subinitted. a storm water
i-nanageinent plan that indicates the disturbance on the site is 0.94 acres. An Infiltration basin and grass swale:s
are proposd to accommodate runoff for the project area. Silt flencing will be installed fbr the sedii-nent arid.
erosion contro'l. The plans, include installation ofa retafnIng, wall at 24 inches in two locations,—near to units, F,
F, G, H and near the!proposed septic system.
Landscape plan—no add itional. landscaping is proposed.
Building Elevations—The plans show,the cabin elevations and dor the height to be 16 ft 10 +./- in.
Floor plans -The fl plans show the arrangernentof the two beds, bath and access door.
No, waivers were requested.
Summary
The applicant has, coinpleted a site plan application for the site preparation, and construction of4riew cabins and
a storagp shed for the King,Hendrick I' rat
�2
THE
North Cbun try Office
Cham 3,75, Bay Road,,Queensbury, ICY 12804
P: (518) 812-0513 F.- (518) 812-2,205
COM PAN I�ES
www.chazencompaniesx0m
E ;in r5 Hud5on Valley Office (945)454-3980
rkee
nand$uwY0yorS E-MARLED Caplital Di5tri ct Office (518),273-0055
Enw1iranimental IPrclesslorrnans
Landstwe Ardiftects
June 14,, 7016
Mir.,Craig Brown
Zoning Administrator and Cradle Compliance Officer
'Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road
Queensbuiry, New'York 12804
Delivered via email only: CraigBequeensburV.net
Re: Rosheed Bhatt.i®Kinig Hendrick Motel
Town,of Queensbury, Warren Countj6 New York
Chazen Project 4;91600.32
Queensbury Ref#PZ153-2'0116
Dear Mr. Brown,
The Chazen Companies (Chazein) Ihas received a submission package from youir office for the above
referenced. project. The applicant Intends to construct four cabins.and ashedl. Submitted linformiation
includes the following.
a Site Plans,titled "Raisbeed Bhatti" prepared bV Dickinson Associates,dated May,14, 2016;
Stormwater Mannagement Report prepared by Dickinson Associates,,dated May 12,2016;
Short W;
Town of Queens bu ry Site Plan Appl iicatilo n;
Your office has requiesteld that we review the design of stortrwater system It relates to compliance to
local,, state or rellevant codes/regulations and general practice. Based upon our review, Chazen offers
the following comments for the,Town's consideratJon.
Stormwater Management&Erosion and Sediment Control:
1. According to the Short E the proposed site improvements; disturb less, than one (1) acre and
thus,the project is not required to obtain coverage unider the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for
Storrnwater Discharges from Construction Activity (U-0-15-002). Comments related to, the
proposed stormwater management and erosion and sediment cointr<fl featores,proposed for the
site are offered below:
2. Section 17'9-6-080 of the Town of Queensbury Zoning codle states that a stormwater drainage
plan shall analyze the iimpaicts, of the project using at least: a 50-year return Interval rtoirrn for
Chazen Eagineeang, Land Surveying&Landscape Ajrtn tacture ca., U.P.C,
Chazen E-nvironmentad seryas,Inc.
11he Chazen canvarl�esfnc
Town 43r Queen5l uw rn^
Ra shieed Bh'gittl
June Jin,21016
Pe
Commercial projects. The 50-year design 'storm shall be added to the stormwater analysis
presented In the SWPPIP, It is noted that the Applicant provided an analysis for the 100-year
storm with a ralnfall depth of 53'. According to the Coirnell extreme precipitation estimates, the
0-year, 24-hour storm has a rainfall depth of 5.05'. It is noted that the CPv, Op, and Qf Table in
the S P'PP indicates cfs as unit of volume (appears to be a typo). ,also at ;suiibcaitchrment C it Is
unclear if stoairrnwater runoff is m1lti;gatedN the Applicant to clarify.
3. It is requested that the Applicant provide the total limits of disturbance on the site plans.
4. It Is requested that the Applicant label the existling contours on the plans.
5. It is difficult to dliscer'n how ru i noff from cabins E/F and' iW/D are conveyed to Infiltration 2P, the
Apipllicant'to clarify,.
. It is di'l'fiu"r.ult to discern how the entire lit post development sunbcatchment is conveyed to
Infiltration 2P.The applicant to clarify.
7. The northern, fill area on, ,sheet 4, does not appear to involve any change's in proposed ground
elevatiicnn the Applicant to clarify that the arnouint of fill is miiniimall elinou hint to change any
elevations.
S. It appears that the infllltratioan basins and grading can the easterin part,of the site are steeper than
gYt (h,w). gage 2A of the New yo rk Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment
ontrcoll (NYS SSPS) states, "All slopes steeper than 3r1 ffi;v), or 33.3. , as well as pen irrueter dikes,
sediment brnsirns or traps, and embankments shall upon corrpfetion, be irrnmedirntely stabilized
with sod, seed and anchored strawy muJl h, or other oa,pproved stobilizotion measures (RECP). The
,applicant shall rev[se the site plan to indicate areas steeper 'than 3.1 that require ire RE CP and
provide a detall of the Pt ' P.
It is requested that the Applicant clarify what the rectangies with max" are intended to Indicate on
the plans.
10, It does knot appear that the proposed grading is complete for the Infiltration basins and grassed
lune s ale, however it is difficunlit to discern without the existing conitouJrs labeled.The Applicant
to label all proposed contours.,
11: It does not appear than erosion controls as well as temporary and permanent soil stabilization
are depicted on the site plan or details.The Applicant shall revise the site plan to Include erosion
and sediment controls (i.e. silt fence and stabilized construction entrance!) in accordance with
the latest version, of the New'York.Stator Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment
Control.
t2. The Applicant: shall provide a det,aill for the rip rap stabilization, on the fill bank called out on
sheet 2.
'c:�RrmleelCaP '.W S11�+��w!WiG 1dN� 'town of
Town Of,Quetnsbury
Rasheed 91hatfi
June 14,2016
Page 3
13. The percolla�tion tests yielded a stabilized rate of 3 min 20, sec/inch, and 3 miin 15 sec/inch
according to the percolation,test results on sheet 1. Both of the stabilized rates are less than the
20 inch/Kour eAltration rate utilized In the HydiroCAD model., The Applicant to revise 'the
exfIltration irate based on the percolation test results�.
Conclusions and Recommendations
It is ou r o pi inio n that the applica int should provide clarification for the a bove ileums a nd incor-pa rate the
changes in,subs,equent plan,submissions.,
if you have any questions regarding the above, please do niot hesitate to contact me at 1(518)824-1926.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Duty,,P.E., LEED AP,Cd" 54S
Prinicipall
Manager, Municipal Engineering Services
cc: Sunny Sweet,Town Planning Office Administrator(via emall)
Laura, Moorejbwn Land Use Planner(via e-mail)
File
ra� n,0 PZ153,2016 Allashadd
FIRE L'S OFFICE
742 Bay Road, Queensbury, )" 12804
�q p
N'� o pn eo a � Pd l a Fy Bea Pd t y , A Good Place to L P "v e rr
PLAN PREVIEW
Rasheed Matti
1 02 Route Nine
P'Z-13-2016
55/201
Plan review based on. site submittals:
FM has no site issues at this time
Michael J almer,
Fire Marshal
742 tray Road
Queensbury NY 12804
ri,ret-narsh,al@queensb,ury.net
i t t� rz r i h a I's O,ff i s c. P'h oa a c: 57,8-762-8206 W F a x: ,518-745-44,37
Warren County Planning, Department jual'647
Project Review and Referral Forto
Reviewed by Department onhtne 9, 2016
..................
Procet Name: 5hatti, sheed
10,weer; Raisheed Shattl
10 Number: QBY-16.SPR-162
County ProjecO: Jun16.17
Current Zoning.- Cl
Community: Queensbury
Project Description.
Applicant proposes Installation of four now cabins and a storage sheid, Each cabin Is,to be 30'X 0"with dock of 6"X 30',
In,Wdition. a 30P X 201 shed Is,proposed end s1te work for,Inst nation of buildlings pfoposed. Applicant has also
comp[etad fiffi[ng andl clearing prior''lo approvals.
Site, Loegfion:
1602 State Route 9
Tax Map Numbeil's);
288.8.1.11,2
StaffiNotes;
The Issues here appear to be of'a local nature Involving local Issues-without any sIgnIficant Impacts,
onAnbsp-, ,County piroperfies or resources, , Staff recommends,notounty Impact based on the Information
submIlIWAnbsp;according,to the suggestecl review 01terla of NYS GanerW Munic1pal Law,Section 29 applted to
the : proposed projpct,, <br)>
Local actions to date (if any).
County Planning,Department;
NU
Local Action:lFinal Disposition:
zd/4'. jog
Warrof County Pl9nning Department #ate Sigsked Local.Oifficial Date Signed
PLEA' ;E RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WA RREN COUNTY PLA NNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
SEQR RE,SOL171ON— Grant Positive or Negative Declaratio.1.1,
Site Plan PZ 1513-2016 RASH.EED 1314AI-I'l
Tax Map ID 28,8.8-1-11.2/ Property Address: '1602 State Route 9 /Zoning- Cl.
The applicant proposes to install four new cabins and a storage shed. Each cabin is to be 30' x 30' with a deck.
of 6' x 30'. In, addition, a 30,' x 2,0' shed is proposed and site wcork .for installation of buildings proposed.
Applicant has also completed filling and clearing prior to approvels. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-0,40 of the
Zoning Ordiriance, new construction shall be subject to, Planning Board review and, approval.
The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is stibJect to review
under,the State: Environmental Quality Review Act;
The Proposed action, considered by this Board is, Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation
Regulations implernenting the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the 71"own of
Queensbury;
No Federal or other agencies are involved;
Part I of the Short.EA F has been completed by the applicant;
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning
Board as lead agency that this project will result in no signifificant adverse impacts on the environment, and,
therefore, a,n environmental impact staternent need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is
issued.
MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATIOI' NEGATIVE DECLARATION FSR SITE
PLAN PZ 153.2016 RAST EED BHA I, nt oduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by
As per the resolution prepared by staff.
1, Pad III of the Short EAE has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board.
2. Part III of the Short EAF has been reviewed and, completed, by the Planning Board.
Or
Pact III of the Short EAF is, not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify Potentially
moderate to large impacts,.
Duty adopted this21"day of June, 20,16 by the rollowing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Phom51�L701.8220,� Fax, 51 ."745,4437 1742 Bay Road.Queevisbury,NY 12804 a www,queQnsliury,net
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
'RESOLUTION —Grant / Deny Site;PlanApproval
SITE, PLAN P'Z 153- 01 ,SHEED BB ATTI
Tax Map 11 : 288. -1-1 t®2 /Property Address. 16,02 State Route 9/Zoning: C I
The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board to install four, new cabins and a stonage
shed. Each cabin is to be 3k' x 30' with a deck of 6' x 30'. In addition, a 3,0' :x 20" shed is proposed and site
work for installation of buildings proposed. Applicant has also completed filling and clearing prior to
approvals. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new construction shall be subject to
Planning Board review and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zorung Code-Chapter 179-9-01810, the Planning
Board has deterinined that this proposal satisfies the requirements,as stated in the Zoning Code;
As required by Genei.-al Municipal Law Section 23,9-m the site plan application was referred toi the Warren
County Planning Department for its recommendation;
The Planning board has reviewed the potential elivironinental. impacts of the project., pursuant to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQ,RA) and, adopted a, SA Negative Declaration— Determination
of'Non-Significance
The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 6/21/2016, and continued the
public hearing to 6/21/2016, when it was closed.,
The Planning, Board has reviewed the applicationmaterials submitted by the applicant and all comments,
made at the public hearingmnd submittedin writing through andincluding 6/21/2016;
The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and sstandards
set forth.in Article 9 of the.Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval,
MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ, 153-2016 R.ASHIKED RHATI; Introduced
by who movedfor its adoption, seconded by
According to,the draft resolution prepared by Staff with,the following,
1. Adherence to the items,outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution.
a) The limits, of clearing will constitute a no-cut ibuffer one, orange construction f".'encing shall
be installed around these areas, and field verified by Community Development staff-,
b) If applicable, the Sanitar-y Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater,
Department for its review, approval, permitting and, inspection;
c) If curb cuts are being added, or changed a.driveway permit is required. A building,permit will not be,
issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office;
d), If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of
Zoning Administrator of the approved plans,
Page I of 2
Phout-. 518.761.8220 i Fax 518,745.4437;742 Bay Road. Quieensbufy. NY 12804 1 www.queeiisbuir,y,.net
e) If required, the applicant inust submit a copy of thollowing to, the Town.
a., The roject N(M (Notice of Intent) flor co�vera under the current "NYS,DEC SMES" General
P I gle
Permit ftorn Construction Activity"' prior to the:start of any site work.,
b. The project NOT(Notice of Termination) upon completion of the pr(w ect;
c, The:applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff':
L The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Ad rninistrator,
'rhese plans must include the project SWPPP (Stornn Water Pollution Prevention Plan)
when such a plan was prepared and approved;,
ii, The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDE S General
Permit, or an individual SPpermit issued for the project if required,
1) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submittedtar the Community
Development.Depattment before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and
Codes personnel;
g) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit
wid/or the beginning of any site work;
h), Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with
this and all other conditions of this resolution;
i) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is,developed acco;rding to the approved plans to be provided
prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
J) This;resolution is,to be placed in its entirety on the final plans
Duly adopted this 2 1"'day of June, 2016, by the following vote:
AYES.-
NOES:
Page 2 of 2
Pho,mt: 518-761.8220 p Fax,. 518,745,4437 742 Bay Road Quielenisbiury. NY 12804 q www,quieensbury.:not
Site Plan Modification Z 157-2 985 State
Route 149,
Public Hearling Scheduled
SIE,QR, Unrated rm SEAR of' 6/23/2015
Draft resolution, — g en site elan approlval
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
"ern mu Development Department Staff'Notes
June: 21, 2016
Site Plan PZ 1.5 7-20,16 (Mod.) TOBASSUM (TOBY) SHEIKH/985, State: Route: 149/
Zone Neighborhood Commercial NC
SEQ R Type Unlisted --Reaffirm SEQR of 6/23/15
Material Review-. application, site plandrawing,, floor plan drawing, elevation drawing
Parcel History: AV 29-15, SP 36-2015
WguestedActioll
Planning Board review and approval to, amend, site: plan to include a 144 sq. ft. storage Shed addition. on Route
9L side and 12' x 24' storage area at east sidle of building.
Resolutions
I. Reaffi,rm SEQR,
I P'B decision
Pi'm[ect Description
Applicant proposes to amend site plan to include a 144 si ft. storage shed addition on Route 9L side and 12' x
:4' ;storage area at:east side of building. Access for 144 sq, ft. is outside and access for 12' x 24' area is inside
and, outside, Original approval was (,,'or ('40 service station with canoplies, Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-120 ofthe
Zoning,Ordinance!, modificatillons to an approved site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and
approval.
StaffComments
Location-" "he .site is located.at the corner of Route 1.49 and Route 9L on.a 31.631 ac parcel.
Arrangement- The applicant proposes to maintain the configuration of the fuel canopy andthe convenience
store. The addition of the 144 sq ft shed is to be located on the corner of the building northwest side. The!
1.2x24 sq ft shed addition on the east side ofthe building is similar to the approved plans.
Site Design- The applicant has indicated the 144 sq ft shed is to be used by the food service tenant for,storage
and, can only be accessed from outside the building. 'The 12.X24 storage building can be access frorn both the
interior and exterior of the store. 'The shied is, for the property ownersite maintenance s,uch as lawnmower,
shovels etc.
Building, Signage, &Ie cry niditions, "raj ficlolarking, Landscaping, Lighting—the: applicant proposes no, other
changes to the she as approved in June of 0,1 1.
summan.
The applicanthas completed a site plan application for the modification to the approved site plan to include two
storage building,additionis.
Jnllnl, -1
Warren rear ount Planning Department
Project Revise and Referrat Form
Revicived by Rapartritent on June 9, 2016
Project Nmuc- Talbass=Shelkh
Owner'; ASHD Petroleum Inc
ID Nurnbcr;. -16- -P -157'
Current Zoning: NC
ouru,runnuunity..0 ueensbuiry
Project Description:
Applicant(proposes toy par a+nd site plan to Include ai 1144 sq tt,storage Shed)addition on route,9L,side and 12"X 2W
storage area,at east sidle of building. Access for 144,set.ti. lig outside and access for 1 °X 24'area Is ln,side and outsldic.
Original approval was for tu4all service station With canopies,
SiteLocation:
985 Statin Rmito 149
Tux.Map N urm ber(n)-.
6q -1ffi "
Staff Notes,
The Issues ituaro appear to be of a local nature in olvI rg Iocal'Issulas,'without any,significant impacts,
on : Coun,ty properties or rasources.Mbsp, Matt recommends,no county Impact basad on the Information
su mIt'ted rubsp; according to the suggested review criteria of'NYS General Munl ipall Law Soction,239 applied to
thegnbsp:: roposed projaotw -4br i'
Local actl[ons;to Data (if any):
I
County Planning Diepartmcnt:
NCI
Local Action:/Fina I Disposition:
I
12
'Warre0county Planning Department rate Signed, Le, s,t Official Date Signed.
PLEASE RETURN THIS FOII T'O"L`F1EWAr REN COUNTY PLANNING DPA RTME T WITHIN 10 DAYS,OF FIVAL ACTION
Dc"
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
SE,QR RESMUTJON—Reaffirrn Previous SEQR
Site 'Plan Modification PZ 157- O1 TATA SU (Toby) SHEIKH.'
Tax Map ID 2663-1-78 / Propetty Address: 985 S,tate Route 1.49 / Zoning: NC
The applicant Proposes to alnend site plan to include a 144 sq. ft. storage shed addition on Route 9L side and
12' x 24' storage area at east side of building, Access tbr 144 sq, I is outside and access for 12" 24" area is,
inside and outside. Original approval was Ior fuel service station with canopies,. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-1.20,
of the Zoning Ordinance, modifications, to an approved site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and
approval.
The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review
under the State Environmental QualitReview Act;
y t
The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation
Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of
Qtleensbury;
No Federal. or other agencies are involved;
Part I of the Short EAF has been cornpleted by the applicant;
Whereas, the Planning Board adopted Resolution Site Plan 36-2011,51 on 6/23/2015 adopting SEQRA
determination of non-significance, and;
Upon review of the informat]onrecorded on the EA F", it is the conclusion of the Town of ueensury Planning
Board as lead agency reaffirms that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment,
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need, not be prepared. Accordingly, this, negative deu laration.
is issued.
MOTION TO, REAFFIRM NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSE D S'ITE PLAN
MODWICATION PZ 1 7- 016 TABSSU M (TORY) SH:FI KHJntroduced by who moved `or its
,adopt,ion, seconded by _ _;
Duly adopted this 21"day of June, 2 0 16 by the fo 1.1 owing vote:
AYES
OE
Phone, '.518,761 S220 Fax: 51 1.743..1+1.37 �742 Bay Baud,QmTwditiry, NY 1281 04
81" G.�o.M� A"�ra,;:uruann a,uw l°oA±w A � �in.i
'T'own of QUeensbury Planning board
11 ESOLU"11 1 4 Grant/Deny Site Plan Approval for
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION PZ 157-2016 q" BAS ISU I: (T BY) SHEIKH
Tani Map 11).266.3-1-7 J Property Address: 98 'State Route 119/Zoning: 'NC
Tile applicant leas snubnuitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Afticle 9 of'the
Yawn zoti,ing Ordinance to am.endl site plan to include au 144 sq. ft., storage,, shed addition on Route 9L side and 'r X
4' storage area at east side of building, Access for 144 sq, fk_ is outside and access for 12' x 4' arrear is inside and
outside. Original approval. was for fiuel service station. with canopies. Pursuant toChapter 179-9'-120 of tine Zoning
Ordinance, modifications to an approved site plana shall be suul eet to Planning Board ri�Mew and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has
deternninned that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in tine Zoning Code;
,s required by General Municipal Law Section 239-in the site plan application was referred to the Warren County
Planning,Department fuer its recorrnnrrerndationn
The Planning Board Inas reviewed the: potential environmental impacts of the project, Pursuant to tine State
1„nviron nneuntal Quality Review Hart. ( EQR,A) and adopted a SE.QRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-
Significance
The Planning Board opened a public hearing; on the Site plan application on 6!21120,16 and continued tine public
hearing to 1/2016,„when it was closed.,
The Planning Board has reviewW theapplication materials su br itted by the applicant and all comments rrnandde at tine
public hearingand,snubmitted in writing through and including 6121/2016,;.
The Planning Board detertniunes that the application complies with the review connsideratiarnn.s and standards snit forth in
rtiele 9 of the Zonin Ord ina nee for YSite P[an approval,
MM ION TO Al'PROVE/ DISA111"ROVE SITE6 PLAN MODIFICATION Pz 157-2016 TABA SS UM ('TQ ,Y
)[1Q)CMM, Introduced In who moved for its adeptionr, seconded In
Per the drab provided by staff eanrnditio ed unPon tlue followirup eo:nditions:
l) Modification is,associated with approvals grated for Site Plan 316-2015.
.
Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-unp letter sent with this resolution.
a) Final approved plans, in coinpliancz,with the Site Plane, must be sunbmi,tted tar the ".-err mun nuitwy Development
Department before any fnnrther review by the Zoning Administrator or Buildingand Codes personnel;
h) The applicant must n"anueet. Nvith Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Pernnit and/or tine
beginning of any site work;
e) Subscquent issuance ol=f utther pernnnits, including,building permits is dependent on compliance with this and
all other conditions of this,resolution
d) Resolution to he placed onfinal plans in its entirety and legible.
Du ly adopted this 2 F4 daisy of qunrne, 2046 by the fo I[owing vote:
YE&
NOES.
Pt7rrrne, 518.7 1.8220 4 IFarc:. 518-745.4437G 742 Etat' Rash„ Quee nsbuiry,.NY 128,041 www..queensbury.net