The URL can be used to link to this page

October 25, 2016 Staff Notes Packet STAFF NOTES OCTOBER 25 ,1201, 6 Queensbury Planning Board Agenda Second Re ular hw'seting, Tuesalayr,October 25,2 017Thye 7-11 pin Queensbury Activities Center @ 742 Bays Road Old Business: ppliaant(s) ,JULIE JrdkRVIS,A MIKE BAIRD Application"Type. Plan P 1220-20116 0 01ts ite a PZ 221-2014u Owner isj lwlikce Baird SEQR Type Unlisted u Agent(s) Let size 1.4 acres _.. 1 ocati n 414 Cor[aelwr Road -Wlard. 7onin,g Classification: CLI Tax I No. 3f18.15-1-14 � Ordinance Reference 17'9-3-11441,& 17940-040 Cross R fererace ( ��311 �,SIS�r2 9t1.�w� 1'a 219-2016 � Warren,baa, dietl�rraal October 2ttl1�u ........ .. ... Public Flcarirpg October-15,2016 Site Information ... . .. ... Proiect Descriptiom Applicant propcscs to utilize a 30 rm 6fp sq.ff.paortion of anexisfing an—existing2,530 srp.'11. building for a;drag I tnnel. Project includes a 454 sq. ft.fenced in area,wwritla,access W buaildinS„ Prpject subject to a special use permit for kennel use. Pursuant to chapter 179-3-0and 179-110- 040 GF the Zoning Ordinance,kennels shall be subject to Plannimg,Pinard mvicww and approval Applicant(s) .._ HAROLD,D.GORDON,.... pplieatirrn Type N Site flan p -21116... _ _ z vwncr 's) Same as applicant SEQ.R TypepN Type 1G . d Ageut(s) Mon azetos Lot sage � Y 1.69 acres 1"a alion 2780 State Route 91. '+hard: 1 Zoning Classification, WR Tax ID No., 239,12-2-89 3 rdimaa ce Reference ; 179-3-040, 179k.6-050 tvruss Rcfercmce j SP PZ 228mm2016;BOTH 133-2016 Warren Co.Referraul October 20,16 (boathouse with sund k;Legacy' P I 21114-01'59 and S11'':34-21111,3); 111) 21394-363 deck;BP 92-645 carport; Bl"911-412 swunroorn addition;BP 5- 356 SP'D;BP 91-1147 addition Pulxmie Fkearing October 25,2016 Site 1nronnatiora r AIIA.,CEA Project Description: Applicant requests approval of an already constructed 120 sq. ft.dock attached to a dock. Project replaces co verde pard area with new deck configuration- Pursuant to Chapter 179 3-640 of the Zoning Ordinan ,hwd surfacing fo�r a decks on shoreline shall be subject to P lanning Board review aamd approval. A butilld1ng,pennit was issued and tdeternainedl that a variance and site Plan review are necessary afar die fact, New Business: Applicant(s) LEGACY LTw1D HOLDING , _ Application Type i ke Plan p'Z 230-21116 I. LLC .... d Owner(s) �. Sarre ams applicant i ._ 1GQR Tyke Unlisted .... gen0s) Jarrett En inecrs,PLLC Lot size .S4 acre;.61 acre; ,39 acre;,70 acre; 1,.,23 acre. Portion _.� tat;kine lots to be merged:=3.41 ,acres _ _. _ _ Location 13aybmad (give _. 1�r'amud; 2 Caning t"lassitucation: N. _._ _ . .. .. .. _ ... Tau 1D No. 296,11-1-48,,49,54,55,60 Ordinance Referemcc 179-3-040 _._ Cross Reftrenec Baybridge Subdivision SUB 15- Warren Co. Rcterral Oetebcr 2016 2006,SP'4-2011,SP 4-2008 October 25201 Sbte lntl�rta7ati�m _. ...._. wetlands Public 1learing_ _ _ .. .. .......___ _. ._ Project Description Applicant proposes a partial 3 story,27 unit senium hettsing facility with aus&ociated site work for parking,stornawwraater control and landscaping, Project involves lot mine tadjuustnients for lots 1,2,3, 7, ,,,9, 13 & 1.4. A portion of the existing pathway is to be increased in width. and to be paved Within 501'1.of the strC=fair eater,getacy access. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-1140 aW 179-6-050 of the Zoning Ordi-nanae,senior housing. rmuth-familyhousing and fill Or hard surfacing within 50 ft.,of a stream iihall be subject to Planning Board review and approval, Project includes suubdlwisiora modification for lat line adjustments for current site plan and,SP 4-20111v .... . __ Applicani(s) M WHAEL, ELA IN E FEENEY Appli4atfon Typei Site Plan PZ 231-2016 Fresh.water Wetlands Pari-nit PZ 23 2-20 16 Owner(s) Same as applicant ,SE,QR1,yve Type II Agcnks)' Dennis MacElroy 5.6 acres, Location Loc Bart Mountain Road Ward: I Zoning Classi fleat ion:RR 3A Tax ID No. 2,52.0-1-21 Ordinance Reference Chapter 94, 1796 - -060 .......................................... ....... Cross Reftre= n/a WwTen Co., deferral October'20 16 .. ......................... ................................. .... ... Public Hearing 0vtober 215,2016 Site InibrMationAPA,wetlands,stream,LGPC .............. ......................--—-—------- ----------- Project Description- Appdi nt propozes to Cansintel a 2, sq.fk,.(footprint)sin 1c Famfly home with attachcd garage on a.5.6 acre+/-lot where the project Occurs W'I d,h,10,ft.of 15%slope. The prpjcct includes a stream crossing and work within,an NPA wedand. Project is Subject to DEC for stream crossing and.A.P'Ajurisdidion fbra previousenforcement action for wetland disturbance, Project disturbs greater Uian I arc stud astorrnwater report and SWIT are part of the submission. Pursuant to Chapter 94, 179-6-060,o1"the Zon ing Ordinanec,construction within 510 ft of shoireJ ine and withi a 50 A. in 15%slope shall be sUhtJ4:ct to Planning Board review and approval- — —------------- Any further business whiell Erma y be piroperly broulght beforethe Board- Revised 1011-4116, 10/20116, fc)wri of (.,,,)ueen!sbtmrVy' Con�irnu,n�ty Devcdoprrm�,a. Office 742 Bay [`,Zoacl, NY 12804 TOWN OFQUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD, RESOLUTION—APPROVAL OF REVISED APLICATION FOR. SITE PLAN REVIEW MOTION TO APPROVE REVISE Q APPLICATIONFOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD; Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 25'h day of October, 2016 by Ilse follo(wing vote: AYES; NOES: Phone. 5 1 V761,8220 i kax- 518-745,44,371742 Bays. Road, QueensbLivy, NY 12804 1 Nkmwquccnsbury.wt Site Plan PZ 220-2016, & Special Use Permit PZ, 22,1- 2016 Corinth Public, Hearing Scheduled SEAR Unlisted Draft resolution r nt a site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning,Board Community Development Department Staff to October 25, 2016 Site Plan PZ 220-2016 Julie Jarvis & Mike Baird/ 414 Couinth.Road/ Special Use Permit P'Z 221-2016 Commercial Light Industrial -CLI SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, site plan. A, deed B, 5/27/92 survey, 9'/22/98 survey C, 8.5x1 I site drawing D, floor plan E,, requirements for site plan F, site plan review G, sign information Ii, waiver for area Variance survey 1, fence photo J, building photo :1 special use permit L, and area variance questions M., Parcel History: AV 30-90, SP 62-90, AV PZ 219-2016 ftuestedActio n Maiming Board review and approval to utilize a 30 x 60, sqd ft. portion of an, existing 2,530 sq. ft. building ],,'br a dog kennel. Resolutions 1, SEQR review 2. Planning Board decision Project Description Applicant proposes to utilize a.30 x 60, sq. ft., portion of an existing 2,530 sq. ft. building for a dog kennel. Project includes,a 454 sq. ft., fenced in area with access to building. Project subject to a special use permit for kennel uuse. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and 179-10-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, kemiels; shall be subject,to, Planning Boa, d review and approval, Staff Comments Site Plan Review Location-The project site is at 414 Corinth Road Arrangement-A portion of the coirunercial building is, to, be used for dog kennel operation Site Design- The plot plan shows the: location of the:existing building and the portion to be used. The: plans show a fenced in area to be constructed as,part of the use:of the building., Building—The existing sign business,will remain and operate in the front portion of the building. The dog kennel will operate atthe rear portionof the building and all, kennel operations,will occur in the rear portion. Signage-The applicaunt:haus provided a photo simulation of the signage showing the kennel and sign business, for a 36 sq ft total. Site conditions-The site currently has a 2,530 sq ft building and an.existing residence on site. The new fence is to be installed as part of the kennel operations. Traffic- Seven parkingspaces are provided bot the sign business and kennel business. The existing horric has two parking spaces. The site has a total of 9 spaces. Elevations —the applicant has provided photos off'the exterior of the building and simulation of fence enclosure Floor plans—the interior of the building appears to have 8 boarding spaces. The applicant has estimated the nurnber of dogs that could be accommodated, would, be 35 this includes dogs sharing kennel, space ie rnedium dogs in one space and smaller dogs in their own space,. Tine boarding, spaces are knee wall height. Pursuant to Section, 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request ofan applicant. The application farm. identified as "Requirements outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either, requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ Itft check box blank. This includes the follow item, s listed under Requirements :f the applicant's application; g. site lighting,j., stormwater, k. topography, I. landscaping, ii traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition, disposal s. snow removal, Special Use PermitCriteria" A special use permit is required as outlined inn the Section 179,-1 -070 for kennel use. H,armony w,it the Comprehens,ive Plan- 'The proj mt is lc ated in the Commercial Light Industrial 'where the focus is for the mix of commercial and light industrial use in the sarne area,. 'The project site: is located on a site that has Preexisting uses including a commercial sign business and a,residential use., Con�palibfflfy —The proposed use may be considered compatible with the surrounding uses that includes an existing dog training, church, residential, light industrial use and commercial, The use may be considered cornatible infill. p Access, circulalion and parking- The: site is preexisting and parking area is not line but calculated. The applicant hasindicated that clients stop for only long enough to drop off or pick up their dog. lhf�astrvena-e and services -"flue site is preex isting a�nd the applicant has indicated the fence is to be installed as part of the project. Environment and natteralfeatures the site is preexisting whet e the new fence area would be used for dogs. Long-term effects —The applicant has indicated the kennel service will be beneficial to the area as the existing residence needs and the growth in the tourist accommodations in the area, Natureof Varianc�e Granted 10/19/2016. 'The applicant requests relief f6r kennel use being less than 200 R from the, property lines, and lot less than 10,ac, Also more than one principal usein the Commercial Light Industria] zone CLI, SUmMa_q The applicant has completed asite plan review and special use permit for the operation, of a dog kennel. The dog kennel will be:within an existing, building and, only aportion of the building. The sine currently includes an existing sign business and aresidence. � ii"IItlRC'tl"9BV1lP"" C� "^� Yu��.wB�d,°NGS 4 n�arH�„a„ Town of Queensbury Planning Board. E IS RESOLUTION— rarn't.Positive or Negative:Declaration SITE PLAN PZ 220-2,016 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 221-2016 JULIE J RIS , MIKE BAIRD Tax, Map Ili; 308.15-1-44 /Property Address: 414 Corinth ]bond JZoning: CLI The applicant proposes to utilize a 30 x. 60 sq. ft. Portion of an existing, 2,,530 � 1 . building for a dopy kennel.. Project includes, a sup. ft. fenced in area with access to building. Project subject to a special use pernnit for kennel use Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and 17 -10-040 l,,”the Zoning Ordinance, kennels slxa:ll be subject to Pla nrnirng hoard review and, approval. The Planning Turd Inas detern-ninned that the proposed, project and .planning Board action is suubjee't to review under the State Environmental Quality Rev:iew.Act,, The proposed action considered b' " this board is [.Misted in the Department of Environmental rnservatiorn Regulations implementing, the State Envitora nerntal Qu4bly Review het and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; ry; No Federal or other agencies are involved, Part 1 of the Short EAF Inas been completed.by the applicant, Upon review of the information recorded on this E F, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no, significant adverse impacts on the ernvirornmenmt' and,therefore, anenvironmental irrnpaet statern•neunt meed not be prepared. Accordingly, this oeggtive declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATION IO R NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 220-2016 & SPECIAL, USE P'EI P'Z 221-2,016 JULIE JARVIS MIKE ILIA Introduuced,by ,,....- who moved l~ r its adoption. .s per the resolution prepared by staffi 1. Part I1:of'the Short EAF Inas been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. . Part III oil:the Short EAF Inas been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part 11.1 of the Short IAAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to ]lame impacts, Motion seconded by uuly adopted this "" days of October, 2016 by the following vote: AYES- NOES:ES-NO 5 48.761,87"47 1 1"a'l�„ 518.745.4437412t: 'I'own of Queensbury Planning Board 4 ,ES01,A)TION- Grant/ Deny, Approval SITE PLAN PZ 220-201,6 & SPECIAL USE PERMITPZ 221-20,16 JULIE JS & MIKE BAITD Tax Map ID: 308.15-1-44 /Property Address. 414 orinth Road /Zoning- CLI The applicant has submitted an application to the Plarming Board, for Site Plan approval pursuant to, Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to utilize a 30 as 60 sq. f . por tion.of an existing 2,530 sq. ft. building for a dog kemiel. project includes a 454 sq. ft. fenced in area with access, to buildin& Project subj ect to a special I use permit: for fennel. use. Pursuant 'to Chapter 179-3-040 and 17 9-10-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, kennels shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the 'Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 1,79-9-0810, the Planning Board has determined that this,proposal satisfies,the requirements as stated, in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site planapplication was, referred to the Warren. County Planning Department for its rmornmendation; The Planning Board has revie wedthe potential environtnental impacts of the project., pursuant to the State Envirorumental. Quality Review Act (SEARA) and, adopted a SI]QRA Negative: Declaration - Determination of Non-Signi.ficaunt e The Planning Board opened a public hearing an the Site plan application. on 1 /25/2016, and continued the public hearing to 10/25/2016, when it was closed,, The Planning Bear:d has teviewed the: application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing,through and including 10/25/2016; 'The Plarming Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations, and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SrfE PLAN PZ 220-20,16 & SPECIAL, USE PERMIT PZ 221-2016 JULIE JAR VIS & MIKEA BAIRD Introduced by -,who moved for its adoption; Per the:draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions. 1) 'Waivers request granted/denied: 2) Adherence to the items,outlined in thin follow-up letter sent with, this resolution. a) Final approved plans,, in, compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted tothe Community Development Depan lment before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; b) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and, prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; c) Subsequent issuance,of further permit's, including buildirig, permits,is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; Phone� 518,761.8220 1 Fax- 51&745A437 7412 Bay Road. Queen5buiry, NY 112t,04 , www,queensbuirv,ne?t d) Resolution to be: Placed on final plans in its, entirety and legible. Motion seconded, by Duty adopted this 25" day of October. 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phono: 5�18 761,8220 Fax: 518.745.4437 742 Bay Rudd. Gueensbury. NY 124,04; ww w'.queen Our y-net bite ''Van, PZ 2; - 016 @ 27801 State Vit. 9 Public Hearing Scheduled SPQR Type, 11 Draft resolution _ grant/deny site plan approval, Tow nof Queensbury Plannin� Board :9 Community .Development Department Staff Notes, Octo'ber'25, 2016 Site Plan PZ 2,28-2016, Harold D. Gordon/2280, State Route 91„/ Waterfront Residential zone -WR SEQ R Type 11 Material Revie '. application, survey, site drawing, dock and deck drawing. Parcel History-, SP PZ 228-2016; BOTH 133-20 16 (boathouse with sundeck; Legacy BP 2014- 0,59 and SP 34-2013); BP 2004-363 deck; BP' 92-645 carport; SP 88-412 sunroam addition; BP 85-356 FD; BP 91-847 Addition Requg$tedl Action Planning Board review and approval o f an already constructed 120 s,q., ft. deck attached to a dock. Resolutions 1. PB decision Proied Description Applicant requests approval of an already constructed 120 sq. ft. deck attached to a dock. Project replaces concrete pad area with new deck configurati on, Pursuant to Chapter 1.79 3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, hard surfacing for a deck on shoreline shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments Locadon-The applicant proposes to comp I ete the construction ol"a 120 sq ft deck that is attached,to a newly constructed dock, Arrangement- The applicant had received a building pen-nit for the dock construction.where a portion of the dock along the shoreline needed to be adjusted to be on the land. The applicant was,informed zoning review for an area variance and site plan were required for the Project. Sile Design- The plans show the deck area to be completed —a portion of the deck has been, started. The applicant has,indicated there was a concrete area at the shore that was removed where the new deck was started. The dock has been completed and will have:a sund,eck—the planning board, no longer reviews docks/sundecks/boathouse on Lake George. The site currently has two large evergreens and assorted plantings near the shoreline where no other plantings are proposed,. Pursuant to Section 179-9450 the Planning Board may grant waivers, on own initiative oinitiative or at the written. request of an applicant, The application form identified as "'Requirements outlines, the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At, the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, in. signage, J. stonnwater, k. topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o, commercial alterations/constructiondetails, p floor plans, q, soil. logs, n constructionideinolition disposal s. snow removal. Nat-ure of Variance G minted 1011 '/20 I .The applicant,requests relief for the 12 0 sq ft deck that is at the shoreline where a 5O ft, setback is required. The Lake George Park Commi ssio�n staffhas discussed with the applicant the adj ustments to relocate the constructed dock to a compliant location. The applicant had an updated survey showing the deck setback distances of 23.4 ft on the north side and a 19.3 f1 on the south side:where a 25 ft setback is required,. SuMmary The applicant has comp�leted, a site:plan review application for the request approval for an already constructed 1,20 sq if deck at the shoreline. 1 4�t.s p0p'd ANG "� �"�p,mu•V"�° R uryd:,B�i.py""gyp ry OI�iYIi%VB IVVf`," MDQ"',uy'�{iu'vN iVN"Q�l V hV X14'°:" Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUT10N—Grant/ Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN PZ 228-2016 HAROLD LD D. GORDON Tax Map IIS: 239.12-2-88 /Property Address:, 2,780 State Rt. 9L/ oninGn The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to article q of the Town zoning rdinanee for. Applicant requests approval of an already constructed 120 sq, ft, deck attached to a dock. Project replaces concrete pad area with new deckorifi unration. Pursuant to Chapter 179, 3-0410 of the Zoning Ordinance, hard surfacing, for a deck on shoreline shall be subject to Planning Beard review and approval. A building penTnit was issued and deter niuned that a variance and site plan review are necessary after the fact. Pursuant to relevan;t sections of the Towyn of Quee:nsbury ZoningCode-Chapter 1791-9-0,80, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; .s required by General Municipal Law, Section q'-nnn the site plan, application was referred te~a the Waren County Planning Department ut for its reconnnnnaendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quafit, Review Act LQ ), and adopted a EQRA Negative Declaration— I eterrnination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened au public hearing on the Site plan application on 10/25/2016 and continued the public hearing to 1.0/2512016, when it was,elos'ed„ The Planning :board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and.submitted in writing through and including 10/.5/2016; The Planning Board determines, that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAIN PZ 228-2016 HAR01,Q D. I" • Introduced by, who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staf conditiouned upon the following conditions: 1") Waivers request graun1ed1deunie4m ,) Adherence to the items outlined in the followwP-uup letter sent with this resolution. a Final approved plans, in compliance with theSite Plan„ must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the ,'honing Administrator or Building and Codes personnel b The applicant must meet with Stall` after approval and prior to issuance: of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; c) Subsequent issuance of further perinnits;,k including building permits is dependent on compliance w ith this and all other conditions of this resolution; Phone: 518.761,8220 1 Far 518,745,44,37174Z Bay t2aad, Queensbury, NY 12804 p wwww q eeunsl ury,net d), Resolution to be placed on final plans, in its entirely and legible. Motion seconded by Duly adopted (his 25"' day of October, 20,16 by the fbllowing vote" AYES: NON : Phone; 518,76L8220 d Fax, 518,745,4437 p 742 Baiy Road Queeansbar y, NY' 128014 1 www'.qjeensbury.nPet Site Plan PZ, 2301-20 .6 @1 Baybridge, ire Public I Hearin Sl . SEQR Unlisted Draft resolution — gram s site plan approval THE North Country Office Cba eE M All-ED, 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 1,2804 'x// P- (518) 812.0513 P (518) 812-2205 COMPANIES www.,cha�zencompatnies.com Enigjineers Hudson Valley Office (845) 4S4-3980 Land Surveyors Capital District Office x518) 273-005S Manners Environmentall Professionals Landscane Architects October 13, 20,16 Mr. Craig Iron n Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Offiter Town,of'Quioeinsbuiry 742 Bay,Road Queerisbury, New York 12804 Delivered via eirnail only.,. Craigg@queensbury.net Re: Legacy,Land HoIding, LLC T6wn of Queen5bvry. 'Wdrren County, N8w York CCozen Project#91500.45 Queensbary Ref#PZ230-2016 Dear Mr. Brown, The C�hazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submI55ion, package from your office for the above referenced project. The applicant intends to construct a building containing a 27 senior housing units with associated parking, recreational amenities, 'walking paths, lighting, and municipal Wility connections. Submitted informiat�ion includes the,folfowingo a Site Plans and Details titled "Legacy Land Holdings, LLC Fairfield Senilor Housing?P by Jarrett Engineers, PLL C, dated September 13, 2016; 0 SWPP,P titled "Fairfield Professional Office Subdivision", by Jarrett Engineers, dated May 15, 2007 alndl aimerided on September 2,016; 0 Prevlbuis Site, Plan titled "Stormwater ,/ Grading Plan, Commercial SubdNtslon Fairrield Professio n a I Off ices" by Jarrett— Ma rtib Engineers, dated July 2007; 0 Town of Que-ensbury Site Plan Review Application; a Project Narrative by Jarrett Erigineeirs dated September 15, 2016, 0 Impervious Area Calculations e-mail from Tom Jarrett to,the Town,dated August 18, 20,16; 0 OPRHP'Cover flan,and; 0 Requirements,for Site Plan Approval dated 58pteimber 14, 20161 Your off ice has requested that we limit ouir review to the design of storm water system as it relates to compliance to locall, state or relevant codes and regulations, Based upon our review, Chaz8ri offers the following comments for the Town's consideration Chazon Enginaering, Land SurveyWg&Landcape Axhftacture Co.,D PC Chazen Environmental SeMbes, Inc, The Chazen CompaMes, Ma Towri of Queensk vrV Legacy'Laind AoIdIngs,LLC October la,2016 P'aige,2 Stormwat!er Management&Erosion and Sediment COntr&:� 1. The project proposes to disturb, an area of 2,6 acres that is part of a, 17 lot professional office subdivision referred to as, FairfiLtfld Professioriadl Office Subdivision, which, appears, to be permitted b'y a, 5WPPP prepared by J'arret Engineers on (May 15, 2GO,7 unde'r GP-02-011. The origirnall 17 lot subdivision and stoirmwater system was,previously approved by the Town and we understand that the site, still has General Permit (GP,-02-01) coverage under an open N�oticle of Intent (NOI). The Applicant has, amended the previous WPPP narrative in September of 210,1 6. The amended S, PPP does not propose any structural change,$ to the previously installed storm, water system, as described In the third paragraph of introduction section ofthe SWPPP: 'As of September 21016, two commercial projects occupy 3 of the originally approved 16 subdivision lots,, and a proposed senior housing project will occapy 5 additional lots. The existing and currently proposed development includes less impervious area than, odyinallyplanned(an'd designed) for the -5ubdivk5ion, therefore no Modifications to the existing stormwater management system serving the subdivision are necessary."' The Applicant has provided impervious area ea Icu llat ions, in an a-mail to the Town dated August 18, 2016, comparing the orlginall subdivision and the proposed, Fairfield Senior Housing. The comparison shows a net decrease by 11,380 square feet.The Applicant states, "The net result of the above exercise [comparison of impervious areas] shows that the ofiginal subdivision design more than occommodates the,current proposal." Comments relating to the SWPPP amendment and documents provided are offered biellow. 2. The Applicant should clarify what areas were Included for the "driveways/parking, areas" impervious area calculations presented in the email. Specifically, clarification as to whether or nolt the Impervious, areas associated) with the shared parking area located south of Saybridge Drive were included; andl if the future parking areas, (associated with, the proposed buildling) were iincluded in,the implervious,area calculations. 3. It is requested that the Applicant provide the s,ubcatchment summary from the Hydro AD model from the, 2007 SWPPP, just for the proposed development area, to compare to the currently proposed impervious area calculations. 4. The site plans,do not Include a grading or site plan for the shared parking area located south of Baybridge Drive. Does the Applicant wish to construct the parking area under this site plan? If so it is recommended that the Applicant provide site/grading, plans for the area. 5. The Applicant has Iprovided a copy of the NYS OPRHP Project Review over form completed by the Applicant for the proposed project. The Applicant should provide the determination, letter and any additional documentation from 0PRHP to the Town. 6, The proposed erosion and sediment control plans for the current proposal should be amended into the original SWPPP as the proposed change constitutes a "modification" of the existing SWIPPR. Town,of Que"sbuN91600A5,-P2230-2016-Lma^cy Laiind,KbIdTiMA, Town of Ooaansbuiry Legacy Land Holdings,LIC ortlqber 3,n16 page.; In:the event the Planning Board or Town staff have any questions or require additional information, please do not hes,itatie to,cionitact me at(518)824-1926. Sincerely, Sean M. Doty, IPX., LEI AP,CMS45, Principaili Manager, Municipal Engineering Seirvfc8s cc. Sunny Sweet.,Town Planning Office Administrator(via email) Laura Moore,Town Land Ilse Planner(via e-mail) File Town of Gk*amba#V915DD.45-PZ23D-22H-Lezary Land H6Wing3� OU16-20 Warren County Planning Department Project Review, and Refell-ral Forrn Reviewed by Departi.nent on October 13, 2016 Project Name; Legacy Land Holdings:, LILA 0,VVnLr. Legacy Land Holdings, LLC ID Number- OBY-16-SPR-230 COUnty Projeet#: 001 -20, Current Zoning: undeveloped �Conirnanity: Queensbury Project,Description: Applicant proposes to,construct a 3-story, 35 unit senior housing facilit�y. 'Site Location: 'Baybridge Dr e rax Map Number(s): 29,6.11,-148, 49, 5�4., 55, 60 Staff Notes: The issues here appear to be of a loQal nature involving local Issues without any significant impacts un, Gounity properties or resources. Staff recornmends no county impact based on the information submitted according to, the suggested review criteria of NYS General Municipal Law Section 239 applied to the proposed project. Local actions to date!(if any) County Planning Department. NCII Local Atflon:fflinal, Dislwsition: 10113120116 Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Officiall. Date Signed PLEASERMURN THIS FORM TO,TIIr WARREN COMIN PLANNING REPARTMENr WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION �. trbUVVtl�OVfffVll ;" �N^"a t'��P��4NN's"qN�, � Rkd�N,."h.." .„ R Town f" ureerns;bnar .Planning board SEQR RESOLI_JT.101' —Grant Positive or,Negative ative Declaration ITE PLAN PZ 2.30- 016 LEGACY LAND HOLDINGS, LL Tarr Map IIS: 296„11-1-4 81, 4' , 4,, 55, 60 J Property Address: Baybrid e Drive Zoning: Applicant proposes a partial 3story, 27 unit senior housing facility with associated site work for parking, stonnwater control and landscaping, Project involves lot lime adjustments, for lots 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 13 & 14, portion of the existing pathway is to be increased in width andto be pawed within 50 ft. of the stream for emer gency access, Pursuant to Chapter 1.7'9-3-040 and 179-6-05,0 of the Zoning Ordinance, s niou° housing, urrrrtli-fia,m,ily housing and Fill or hard surfacing within 50 ft. ofa, stream shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Project includes, subdivision modification for lot line adjuustnnents for current site plan and P 4- f111 The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Plarnnirng, Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Reviewer Act The proposed action considered by this Board. is Unlisted in the Department of Enviromnental Conservation Regulations implementing the 'State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the d`a'wn of Queensbury; 'N'o Federal or other agencies are involved Tart 1 of the Short EA has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information reworded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Tannin Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environrnernt, and, therefore, an envirornnnenta:l impact staternent need, not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued, MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DLARATI N FOR SITE PLAN P,Z 230-20,16 LEGACY LAND HOLDING LLC; Introduced by who moved f" r its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff: t Part 11 of the Short E li has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. :. Part Ill of the Short E 1~'has been reviewed and eornnpleted by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short :EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Motion seconded by Duly adopted this "'day of October, 201,fn b the following wrote: AYES: NOES: Phone: S 1.8,761 12210 1 Fax, 519.745.,44,,17 �742 Bay, Rrntd, Queensbury, NY 12904 1 my ry,[let I% Town of Queensbury Planning Board RES0UJTION— Grant /Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN PZ 230-201.6 1,,EGACY LAND HOLDINGS, LLC Tax Map ID: 296.11-1-48,49, 54, 55, 601/Property Address. Baybrill ge Drive I Zoning: 0 The applicant has, submitted an application to the Planning Board for'. Applicant proposes a partial 3 story, 27 unit senior housing facility with associated site work for parking, stormwater control and landscaping, Project involves, lot line adjustments for lents 11 2) 3:v 71 81 9, 13 & 14. A portion fthe existi ng Pathway is to be increased in width and to be paved within, 50 k of the stream for emergency access. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and 179-6-050 of the Zoning Ordinance, senior housing, mutli-family housing and fill or, hard surfacing within 50 ft. of a stream shall be subjectto Planning Board review and approval. Project includes, subdivision modification for lot line adjustments for current site plan and S,P 4-2011. Pursuant to relevant iections of the Town of Queen,sbury Zoning ode-C`hapter 179-9-080,, the Planning Board has deterrnined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required, by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; Tile Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of'the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality, Review Act (SEQRA), and adopted a, SEAR Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning, Board opened a public hearing on the Site planapplication on 10125/2016 and continued the public hearing to, 10/25,12,016, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application. materials submitted by, the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through a�nd including 10/25/2016,; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and, standards, set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TOAPPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 230-2,016 LEGACY LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Stall`with the fo I lowing: 1), Waivers requested granted/denied; 2., Adherence to the items,outlined in the follow-up letter,sent with this resolution. a) 'The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange: construction �rencing shall Ane installed around these areas and field verified bCommunity Development staff.; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, pennitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed, a,driveway pennit is required. A building perinit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; P'qge I of 2 Phonc 518,761,8220 � Fax 5118,745.44,37 1742 lBay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 NwwwqueenOury,net dy If application was,referred to engineering,then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning dm, in,istr ter of the approved plans; e If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the 'ro on: ua. The project NO1 (Notice of Intent) 1'2r coverage under the current "l" YSDE ; SPDES General Permit from Construction activity" prier to the start of any site work. b. "17he project NOT (Notice fTermination) upon completion ofthe project; e. The applicant mast maintain Dino their projieet site, for review by staff- i. The approved final p�luans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Adr n:inistrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when.such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOT and proof of coverage under the current'l YSDE ' SPDES General perurnit, or,an individual SPDES,permit issued fuer the project if required. f Final approved plans, in compliance vvith the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by tine ZoningAdministrator or Building.and Codes pernruel g The applicant must meet with Staff' after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit rud/or the,beginning of''any sitework; h) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building,permits is dependent on compliance with this,and, all other conditions,ofthis resolution; i ,s-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plan s to, be provided prior to issuance of'the certificate of occupancy. .l This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Motion was seconded by Duly adopted this uun day of October, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: l` : Page off' Phunneu 518,761,8220 p Fax. 516:745,4437 V 742 Bay Road,, Quetean l fury, NY 128041 '.quueonsbuary.n t Site Plan ,PZ, 231-2016 & Freshwater Wetlands Permit PZ 232_-2016 @1 Lockhart Mountain Road Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Ul to ' Craft resoluti — gran site plan approval _..............__............_._........................... ....... ....... .................. Town of Queensbury Planning Board. Community Development Department Staff Notes October,25, 2016, Site Plan PZ 231-2016 Michael & Elaine Feeney/ Lockhart Mountain Rd/ FWW PZ 2,32-2016 Rural Residential 3 acres- RR3A SEQ R Type 11 Material Review. application, freshwater wetland permit,, sheet I overview, sheet 2 grading,plan, sheet 3 driveway profile,, sheet details, sheet 5 stream crossing details, and an aerial view Parcel History: VIM �Reguest,ed Action Planning Board review and approval, to construct a 2,600 sq. I.I. (tbotprint) single family horne with attached. garage on a 5.6acre+/- lot where the project occurs within. 50 ft. of 15% slope. Resolutions L PB decision Projett Description Applicant proposes to construct a 2,600 sq., ft. (footprint) single fArnily ho me attached garage on a 5.6 acre +/- lot where the project occurs within 50 ft., of 15% slope. The project includes,a stream crossing and work withinanAPAwetland. Project is subject to,DEC for stream crossing and APA jurisdiction.for a previous enforcement action for wet'la,nd, disturbance. Project disturbs,greater than I acre and a stormwater report and SWPPP are part of the su'bmission. Pursuant to, Chapter' 4, 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction within 50 ft., of shoreline and within ft, in 15% slope shall be subject to Planning Board review and approvall.. Staff Comment$ Location-The vacant tint is between existing residential house numbers 201 and 185 on Lockhart Mountain Dr.. The project is within the Adirondack Park and Lake George Basin. Arrangement-The project includes construction of a,2,600 sq ft home with a height of 35 ft, a new driveway with a crossing over a wetland/stream. area, the installation of a septic system and well. The proJect area also contains areas of 15% slope. ,Site Design-The project includes disturbance of 15 ac where the amount of disturbance is also subject to a major stormwater permit. The driveway construction includes grassed swales and the home includes, a,stone trench, for stormwater management. The plans also call for retaining walls,near the driveway entrance, house site:and septic area. Grading and drainage/Sediment and erosion control plans—A stormwater control report has,been provided and is being,reviewed by the Town Engineer. The Plans show the location of the erosion control measures to be installed for construction. Freshwater 'etlands permit. The plans show the delineated wetland area and cross section details of the stream crossing. The permit indicates the wetland area is 0.5 ac and the existing driveway access in the wetland area will disturb 1,040 sq fl of eland. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its oinitiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check. box blank. This includes the follow items listed under .eq wire mei.its of the applicant's application: g,., site lighting, In.. signage, I., landscaping, n 7traffic, o. commercial afterations/ construction details, p floor plans, r, construction/demolition disposal s. now removal, Stnnma�Ey The applicant haompleted a site plan review application and, a freshwater wetlands ptu-mit for the site development for a single family home, The project involves the disturbance 1.5 acres requiring a rnaJor s,tormwater permit, a, portion.of existing wetlands 1,040 sq ft is bein,g utilized for the driveway work that involvea stream crossir1g, andwork within 50 ft of 151% slopes. -Z - a:tt -1" Warren County Planning Department Pr eet Review and Referral Foriii Reviewed by De artuient t ittoter 13, 2016 ProjectName: Feeney, Michael h ael laine Owner: Peered, Michael & Elaine ID Number: -1 - PIR- ' 1 County Project4; Det1 a1 uiarrentonin�„; RR- v� Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to buil"d a SFD with attached garage on vacant 5,6,acre lint. Site Location ILockhaad Mountain Rid Tax Map Number(s): 252 -'l- 1 Staff Notes�: The issues here appearto be of a R eah rnature involving loca] issueswithout any 8ignifiozird irnpla t on County propel,ties or resouroes, Staff recommends no eau my irrup etba ed on the information submitted according to the suggested ted review crRteriaof NYS, General Winieipal Law Section 239 applied to,the proposed prejieet. Local actions to date (if ani): County Planning Department: NCI Local Action:Xiinal Disposition: 10113/20 1I 5 i Warren County Planning,Department Date Signed Local OfFicial Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FOO RM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTIO THE North,Country Office Cba te 375 Bay Road, Qoeensbury, NY 12804 K,y P:, (518),812-0513 P: (518) 812-2205, COMPANIES ,,, www.chazericornpan,ies.com Hudson Valley Office (345) 454-3980 Land 5urveyor5 Capital District Office (51.8) 273-005S Planners EoWronrnentall Professionals LandscaDeArchitvus October 1 2016 Mr. Craig Brown Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer Town,of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, New York 12804 Delivered via email only-,Lrai,X B, uegn1bur .Ogl, _@ g_ Re: Michoe]& Elaine Feeni�y Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, Chazen Project#91600,46 Queens,bury'Ref#PZ'231-21,0116 Dear Mr. Brown: The Chiazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submission, package from your office for thin above referenced project. The applicant intends to construct a single family horne with attached garage and driveway. Submitted Informaition includes the following: 0 S,iite Pans ns titled "M ithael Feeney,",by E D P, LLP, d1aitedl Septem, ber 8, 2016;, 0 Stormwater Control Report, by,EDP, LLP, dated September X016; a S'WPPP, bly EDP, LLP, dated August 2016,; a Town of Queensbury Site P'llan Application; 0 Project narrative, by EDP, LLP,dated Septembleir 15, 2016P and; a Town of Queensbury Freshwater Wetlands Permit Applications. Your office has, requested that we limit our review to the design, of storm'' ater systern, as it relates, to compliance to, local, state or relevant codes,and regulations. Based jupon our review, Chazen, offers the following comments for the Town's iconsideration, Stormwater Management& Erosion and Sediment Controk 1, The project proposes to disturb, over 1 acre, of land and requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, (S PPP) in accordance with GP-045-002 that includes erosloin and sediment controls. A Stormwater Pollution, Prevention Plan (SWP'P'P) has, been, provided. Comments relating to, the Stormwater Management Report and SW'PPP are offered below. It 15 not:edl that construction of single family homes, (between 1, and 5 acres of disturbance) not located in one of the watersheds listed in, Appendix C of the, General Permit or Chazen Foigimenny, Laod Surveying&Landscape Atchitecture o.s D�R C. chat EnWronmenIM servkes, Mc, The Chazoo Cornpannes, Inc, Town of Queensbury Mkbaiel&Elaine Feaney Octqbef 7,3,2016 Page 2 not direally discharging to one of the 303(d),segments,listed'in Appendix E of the General Permit are not required to incIllude (post-iconstructlbri storm titer management practices. 2. This, profect falls within the Lake George watershed and will be subject to the requirements of Section 1,47-11 of the Town code, for Projects within the Lake Gleoirge Park. The project proposes to disturb over 15,0001 square feet and is considered a "major" project. 3, Section 179-6-080 of the Town COdle, states, that stormwater drainage plans shialli analyze the impacts of a project using at least a 251-year return inter all storm wilth regards, to, both runoff rate and vdIume fair residential projects. 4, The Applicant shall depict the time of concentration, flow paths for the existing and proposed subcatchments on the drainage rriap5. Also, It appears, additional tributary area to the site may, exist,, (past the western, property Ibourndary. A5 such, the Applicant should provide additional information regardinig the watershed boundary selected or,expand the watershed to any further western extents, 5. The HlydroCAD model does not provide distinct inflow depths as evidenced by the ">", which indicates,a time span of 5-20 hours may not be sufficient. The Applicant to remise the HydroCAD time span so the fuH effects of the storm are realized, 6, The Applicant shall ensure,the specific erasion control measuires, prescribed Section 147-11-1I are included in the erosion control) notes (i.e. 147-11-J(3)(b) and (c)). 7. It appears that swales #2 and 3, are within 100 feet of ths onsite wetlarid. Section 147-11- 1(3)(c)[4] states, "Infiltration den'i e.5,for major projects, shall be located a minimum of 1100feet from Lake George and any down-gradient drinking water suppfy, lake, river, protected stream, water well, pond, wetland;—," The Applicant shall revise the design to conform to 147-11- 1(3�)(c)(4) or request avariante for the same., & Page 5 of the Applicant's S,WPPP., regarding, endangered or threatened species as required by Part l,R4 of the SPIES GP-0-15-002, indicates a letter has bean directed to NYSDEC New York Natural Heritage Prograrn requesting they providle a determination. The Applicant shall provide the town with any documentation regarding the above determinations and incorporate the same into the SWPPP pursuant to section i Part I.F.4 of the SPIRES General Permit, ,9., The Applicant shall depict a stabilized construction entrance on the erosion and sediment control plan, and provide a detail in, accordance with the! New York State Standards and Siplecilf icattons for E ros,ion 10. The eave trench is modeled at a depth of 3, feet but the detaill on sheet 2 depicts a, depth of 2, feet; the Applicant to,revise accord'inglIV. 11. The Appillicant should consider modellfing the roadside drainage chainnels and provide, a detail of the roadside drainage channels,. Are temporary check dams needed? Does the swale need to be! Mined?Should permanerit check dams, be err played 00-Tr i®f -H231-2016-Mitpmel'&E131M LLIACtx town of Queensbury MV ichaell&Va ine Feeney October 13,2CU page,3 12� The site plans depicts, retaining walls aloin, the driveway(7 feet max and 6 fleet max) as designed by others. Page 448 Retaining Walls of the New York Standards, and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (July 20,16 edition) states, "The desi#n of any retaining wall structure must address the aspects of foundation bearing capacity" sliding, overturning, drainage and loading systerns. These are complex systems that should' be designed by a licensed professional erg irreer."The Applicant shall ensure the retaining,walls are designed in conformance with the NYSSES . The retainiing wall designs shall be submitted to the town for review once completed, 13. The existing and proposed culvert design in the HydroCAD model does, not take into acrount inlet/outlet conditions as, wefl as entrance losses, on the Inlet structure., This will most liikelly require the Applicant to miodell the ponding condlitions upstream and downstrearn of the culvert. The Applicant shall revise the culvert conditions in the Hydro,CAD model to reflect the actual) conditions. Also, according to,than pipe trench cletafll, the invert of the props-ed culvert is fillied by 7'-, this shaill be reflected in the culvert design in the HydroCAD model. Also, what is the basis of design for the cuilvert? ls it intended to,convey a 100-year storm event? 14., Once the IHydlroCAD rrmodel has,been revised Ibasedl on the above comments, conformance to the folltowing "rnafjor" project design requirements will be performed- Section 147-11-1(3)(c)[11 states, "Starmwater control measures shall be designed so that there will be no increase in runoff volume form a ten-yea r-frequenicyltwenty-fo,ur-hour r-dura tion storm eventfollowing development over the predevelopment volume.'. Section 147-11-1(3)(c)[21 states, "For storm events exceeding the ten-year design storm, the, stormwater controlmeasures shall function to attenuate peak runoff flow rates for a twenty-, five-year-frequenary stoare to,be equf7l to or less than predevelopmen t flow rates.M 15., Section 147-114(3)(c)[3] states "Infiltration devices shall be designedsuch that the &ittom, of the system will be a minimum of two feet above the .5easonal high, groundwater level' to be reaHzed following development." itt does not appear that test (pits, were performed at the proposed location of the infiltration devices. The Applicant to, perform test pits and update! the! SW'PPP and plans with the results,to ensure conformance with 147-11-1(3)(c)131. 16, Se,ctiorii 147-11-1(3)(c)J6] states, "Infiltration devices shall bedesignedbased on the infiltration capacity, of the sails present at the project site." The Applicant shall perform falling head permeability tests in accordance with Appendix D of the storrmwater de!sigln manual to confirm, the eAltration, rates used in the HydroCAD model. 17. Table 1 of Appendix 5B, of the: H Staindards, for water wells indicates; a minimum separation distance olf SO feet from "Surface, w9terrechorge absorption system with, no, automotive-related Wastes.," Portions of the eavie trench, appear to be! within 50 feet cif the proposed water well). The Applicant shall" revise the design to conform to the DOH standards. TPWnoFQuRRn5Ourv\IJ,IiFOM4r.,PZ231-20� Michmig Elaine ONK TDwn of Queensbury UichaW&Elaine Feeney Ottaber 18,20116 Pag,e 4 In:the event thie� Plainning Roard or Town staff have any questiom,or require addjtlonall information, plea:51e do not hesitate to contaict me at.(518)824-1926. Sincerely, Sean M. Doity, P,E., LEED AP, CMS4S Principall Manager, Municipall Englne8iring Service's c;c: Sunny Sweet,,Town Planning Offilce Administrator (via email) �Lauri Moore,Town Land Use Planner(via e-rnall) File ,c Town of Queensbury Planning,Board RESOLUTION' Grant/Deny Approval SITE PLAN PZ 231-2016 & FRESHWATER WE"I'LANDS PERMIT PZ 232-2016 MICHAE1, & ELAINE FEENEY Tax Map ID: 252,04-21 /PropertyAddress: Lockhart Mountain Rd., / Zoning: RR3A The applicant has submitted an application to the: Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 ofthe Town zoning Ordinance f6r: Ap licant proposes to construct a 2,600 sq� ft, (footprint' sin le family p g home with attached garage on a 5.6 acre +/- lot where the project occurs within 50 fi» of 151% stope. The project includes, a stream crossing and work within an APA wetland. Project is subject to DEC fbr stream crossing and AP.A.jurisdiction f-br a previous, enforcement action for wetland disturbance. Project disturbs greater than. I acre and a, stormwater report and SWPPP, are part of the submission. Pursuant to Chapter 94, 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction within 50 11. of shoreline and within 50 ft. in 15% slope shall bcsulject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections, of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 17949-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code, As required by General Municipal Law Section 2N-m the site plan application was referred to the WatTen County Planning Department for,its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential envirorunental impacts, of the project,, pursuant to the State EnvironTnental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted, a, SEQRA Negative Declaration - Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan. application on 10/25/2016 and continued the public hearing to 10/25/2016, when it was closed, The Planning 'Board, has reviewed the application rnaterials, submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public bearing and submitted in writing through mid including 101/25/2016,; The Planning Board determines that the application. complies with. the review considerations and standards set,forth in Article 9 of the Zoining rdinance for bite Plan appmval, MOTION TO, APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 231-2016 & FRE Id ;I WETLANDS PERMIT PZ 232-2016 MICHAEL & ELAINE FE E NEY-, Introduced by -who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request gMU1;dtd0iqd. 2) Adherence to the iten.is outlinedin the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. Page I off'2 PhDne': 518.761.8220 [ Fax:; 518.145.44371742 Say Road, Queensbury. NY 11280,41 www.qui�,Ltnsbury.net a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering,sign-off rrequired prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approve!d plans; b) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the:Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning.Admi ni strator or,Building and Codes personnel; c) 'rhe applicant must meet with Staff after approval,, and prior to issuance of Building Pen-nit and./or the beginning ol"any site work; d) Subsequent issuance of further peimifts, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; d) As-bui It plans to celli fy that the site plana is developed accordi ng to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate cate of occupa�ncy. Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Motion seconded by Duly adopted this 25"' day of tber., 201,6 by the 1"011owing vote: AYES,w NOES: Mono. 5118.761.8220, Far 518.745.44,37 174 IBay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 l www.queensbuiry.net