The URL can be used to link to this page

Staff Notes_ 12 20 16 PLANNING BOARD STAFF NOTES DECEMBER 2, 01, 2016 Queensbury Planning board Agenda u First Regular Meeting. Tuesday,day, Decenm ber•2G,2(1116/Time 7'— 11 prru QrUeensbaury Aotiwities Center @ 742 Bad"Road Approval of Mnpt�s Dates-October 18,2016& October 25,201 ftinistrative Item Nominations for Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary FUD Site Plan 57-2015 Queensbury PwI ners, extension.for one year to December7017' Tabled Items opic�an.t s ,w h1CHAM—Q_RMAh ®�_...._.._. Appficatnmn...Type �uadivisnov drolretg � ' PZ 2017-701 6 rbdsuon Final Rta a PZ 25q,- 6 _.— jwwmer s ��. aurae as�_wfadiu�ant �� 1 w, lJurlusaed m � �. er i p lace tm ir�uwrrin . A ... LotW�si .m �4..crarss p l L catirra BonnerDruae 'u?r' rd 3 Zonin, lassificatm rm MDR _ F Tax ID No, 295,11-1-5 ordinance Reference Crasrs eferen ceA P 2fp7 201u6 UB V0-1'9,65 � WarrenCo,, Referral mals I 'amrlolirr Iti lmrni0rc halloww 'reek) Pubo lic Hearrnn,&+_.,_J2etobgg V r are ber 20,,�I�1� Brite Information Project Description: Applicant proposes a subdivision of a 2_54 acre,parcel into:3 Vats(revised). Project is for three s;imgle-fairiuly homes, Proposed lot sizes: Lot.V to be 0.40,ac,„L%7 to be 1,.23 ac,and Lot 3 to be 0.610 ac wwrith a harramrrerheadl on Lot 2, Puraject pitaclam&S,waterline extension and septic systerns for each I%, Applicant has received an area variance for 3 lots, Pursuant to Chapter I83 ofthe Zoning Ordinance,sarbdivisiora of lland shra.IV be su!j to plat loarol mewreaw amus appraw aV, Planning Board Recommendation Va - _.. pp icant(sl Puff Vd EL t i d� I dP f Application Type bite V�dara �� 3l' 2016 freshwater Wetlands Permit PZ�32 "°HCl16 ---- ..—_� — _.�__— x.m._ .. _ ........... Owner s panne as a Imcmrnt I A^er,tsetwmms Proy.- of sig O;lr acres —_ ---- l<t IJP rn Lanciclrtrrt Mountain dtoaut arull Ianirus a�Va tr RR 3A --_� ., r srfnarat�o _�.,® �— tNc_I 1.� .I,,..._.— _—� IgrdinanccReference haptur lT60 dross P.cfcneuace m� m rm�a b 1 —� October 7�l _ erk.e¢nh�em 2tk 2fI,I� '1arren La,� l$ef�er APA, ..,� �"ublrc pilcaruau qa tobcr 2 2016. Project o Applicant proposes to conrs'rui;b a 2.,600 sq.ft. footpriirntf single family attac cd.garage an,a, fa luta Infornnaa�omr _ pp I >`u l � � � ,. home�ulh gwtlaah k —.,...:., ._. Project Description.-, a �,fi nncrc �� lot where the project occurs�wwithin;411 .of 15%slope, 'Inre project includes a.s re'anratros5in g and work within an APA wwedamad. Project is subject to DEC for strearn crossing and APAjuri,sdiction for to previous enforcement action for waedand disturbance. Project disturbs greater than I acre and a stonrtWatcrY' reports and SWPPP are pan of ffie;submission, Parsurant to Chapter'94, 179-6-0601 ofthe:Zoning Ordinance, construction wilhVn 0 ft.oaf shorcVine amid. within 50dl_ in 'I�%slope shall be su bject to Planning Board rev iow and ap�proval. 'Variunnce: Rol i ef is sotm nt Torr storm water devices less than 100 ft. f� from wwetland. PIannh 03carmd slrall paibc sa meon7nrne gatiran tc ilia Zoninr turd„ A. peals. A A alicamrt sMI C�IAIt'L&lLQJj,,V n Zy��._. � ate P]an PZ 25t-`016,E a Owners App �.Iicrurt. _� -- 1. ._ —_. ......... ....� _ —�1__. ..w� _..__._ _ w...�.__ ...., , .__._... A errs s t«trrtus[�. � bas Lot sr� ..�. _^�I acre—^ — _ _ .. Location Road � paQIIi Classfflcadow. WR rosseferenru.e �1-��V31 „_. �.a.C"�rrncc VTC V3-t3V� rd!nance , , c &AV 3-20 1 6ra8 dormer, I Warren ferral ri"a I AV PZ°�57,W7t1 Vb S,la Vei,iornr Co.ra Public HeAmrg�z nta dcrr recorunnnro nrlltntion N uatuon��' SEA Project Oescrilpfion. Appllcarut proposes 572 sq. I't attached garage-aa id 1413 sq-ff. addition for kitchen area to,an existing, 1,012 SRI IL (&Olprtnrt)„ 1 ,711__. A,.(floor arena)home,'The garage wwilI have a loft area for storage and stairs ins i e,gara ge.frr mes& project;maclvudes kiaelaenn expansion,and renovation for a master bedlroori�n on again floor. Pursmoot to Chruptcr 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance,expansion,of nornconfor¢nirrp structure in a CEA shall lie surbjeet to Planrming Board review and approval_ Variance: Raliefis sought for Setbacks,floor area ratio and pernneabillity. Pllanain,g Board sh4lll prr,widc a rS ot7urnac.nedanticn to tlpe onua .r+i o Ap Appmlictamt(s) IJRIA _S,EN ,Applicatuoiu Typle te Plan PZ 258-20 16 .,__..— u~ara0l Use Pernik PZ 259-2016 Owner _. _.. �A Cis Todd�`rrirnni, Size ,h _ _. uC r� 2,92 acres �.am�atlm atm 1540,Route Dassi caii ma CI Reference 17 1�1 �, t79-3 0140 ID No, 28�� V t��,�� S t-V� � C�rdu�uarree Cross Reference SP 49-89,'SP 33-8 ,AV 51-89 AV Warren Co. Referral December 2016 102.-89 BF hiterlor alt., fr csarammdi;u g si Vro.b uaiOdim �Im A'V DM260-2016 . Public Hearing n1a fbT roum�nrendlatiorm �S�ire 1Gmt+arYnatia�n � IfmavcV corridor overlgy�29 Projectesa,ri,pdon AppHca�ut',prcposes to renovate an usaring 12,000 sq,ft_building for MOOT showing range. In,domr range tc haye,3 bays,retaail space;2 classroom areas and au storage area. Prr�;l=inelludes new facade amend ua 1,200 sq.ft.addition to aussist with bay length. Puuiju"ct iareltiu�es ert�ri�r ren0vationS,-aruew lights,sidim,g rwid sione facade. Project subjieetten special use: rmiut. Pursumt to Chapter 179-10-0,70 cfthe Zoning Ordinance,inance,meow l commercial nest shalt/be subject to Planning Board ru.vrieavr and approvaaD, Variamam Reliefi,s sought for setbacks for new addition. Planning fbaard shaalV prGvide a reecampmendation tc the Zonln Board 0 P Is. I" , --_ lin atiorm 1 e �alreamat —L—_RD .� TM pp , ._ � la 201! Site Plan V 27 __....... . Omvarmer s __Samea,Ivp icant _� SP f a h William Mason �_ Lot size J Cis acre Loo at:urun 11 Seneca i rive„ ieverdala ' and D — _ �ummua lassafication R 1A: . x, �.. � .. ,. ,� a�Vunan � efc�rau� —1 rt,:, _ " l D No. 139,8-1-25 i ]M I O roans' ei rr n '945 2 3917 septic December l r i Arman �, deferral Public Hearin 1 a"a for r ctrmmn,mmendatiR � Site information �,w ��. PA, L �P _... Project Deser pp p t,seecrud strum addition,56 sq. f..two landings to anrexistin 768 sq ,(FootPr,n � �.iptieut; Applicant proposes��'� sq, l' � 1nt/floar area)home., Project Burs within CEA. Project is part ofTa,kunde ^adla uruaster pian,. Pursuant to Chapter 1793-040& 179-13-010 of the Zoning,Ordinance,expansion of nonconfortning strmuuttire mvrtmi.n a CEA crone shall be subject to Planning Board review and approNal, V;u'au-ianeC Refiefis Sought for FAR,penneabil'ity orad setbacks, Planning VBolard shall provide a reconim-gendlatlon to the Zrautii.ur New Business: Type_ Site Plan PZ 262-2016 .. .. �,,, 'I'i�cammt�s� � " K, �"�1I�T �,'� � Typee rv„ T1 eaµmaV Use 1'crrrmut PZ 23-20116 Owner s Sarne as a lmeamt Unlisted 1mateimi—ply SV1 A em l s: ns Dorm aateerim Lot size !� 1 a rs 1. ,,,,..... _ I. __... ...._.__.® 1(a 1Local1em PVaamruefrumd 1d WR 1 42 e �. 1791-10-07q?,. t/7 -3 ft4f1 ..._.. � _ umv�m� �"RassuV"ucatmurm: 3gta� D,� _ ______]_Ordinance Reference .—_ l6,Se tic LD1. 4 armtuu ,� �.ass'��.efercm� S�P_,�DI ., referral iecermmber ] Public .eaflnro� � �-: m 4 ��1�' Site Information P 'P� VAP � 1 e ,p OmP aI a,pprovai for Circe operation of .,..,.�� DW.... _....� �_....._...._.. u Project Description: Applicant requests fa 5 slip Class A roarina. Project includes existing duck configuration .for 5 berthing;spaces,parking,other cloirem�ents for Class A marina and a now septic system, Project Subject to Special Use Peranrt. Pursuant to Chapter 17 -10-070 '& 179-3-04101 ofthe Zoning Ordirtance,Class A marinas shall be subject to Planning Board review and a reval. Ampy..Vu.u..a_mt s — � l' 4T r� � Applucataem�ype Site Plan P'��57®201 I WORK � a wvo cr_( Somme as_a lit ant S _A&5 Associates. Lotsi .. ..��. Richard E. poor 6..5�acres Location 16 1 "af oa Ward: cumaru 'lassificat:ion: I��1 ��,� _ 7rtlinarmce l a 10 cw f1 t/3l eI`cremce V74 X178 �—_._ b Cross Refe � r�eur�ce 31fp-2 � alt, ... 2016 C4 -20 II office ww°c uce, WarrenCo. Referral D�'ecermm cr Public Ede::. cerin, _ cainhem flu 2016 Vauiatamuatran Project Description- Applicant proposes 240 Ilof 6 f high vinyl, fencum,g to be located on the "t side of propeftto screen from adjoining busiuuess. Pursuant to Chapter 179-5-070,a f the nrmin, r•dinance�,, fences in a CLI ne s;hall be subject to Planning,,Board revue an#ap rel°. ..:_ -Any fnrtherb�usiness which may be properly Drought bel"m the]Beard - Minutes of October 18th & October 25th Draft resolution — grant/deny minutes approval Administrative Items : int]o ns of Off i ce rs fo r th e P la,n ran ng Board, 20,17 M olion to nominate Chairman Draft resolution — great/deny nomination Motion , nomin Vice-Chiairman Diraft resolution — great/deny nomination Motion nominate Slecrietiary Draft resolution — grant/deny grant/denynomination Town of Queensbury Community Development Me 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 Town of Queensbury P'lann'ing Board RESOLUTION — NOMINATION OF OFFICERS FOR THE PLANNING BOARD FOR MOTION TO NOMINATE FOR.CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING BOSRIF ., ntroduced1� by who roved Farr Its adoption, seconded b Duly adopted this 0' day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NNE - CE IRI AN: MOTION TO NOMINATE FORVIC&CHAMAN OF THE PLANNING BOARD FOR Introduced by who owed for Its adoaptl nF seconded by Baty, adopted this 0' ay of December, 2016 by the following 'vote.- AYES. ote:AYES. HIE ; E RET RY. MOTION TO NOMINATE FOR SECRETARY OF TELE PLANNING; BOARD FOR 2CA,7. Introduced by who moved for Its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 2,91 day of December, 2016 by the ffollo ing vote. AYES: NOES: Cc-- Town Bard Phone. 518.761.8220 j Fax-, 518.745.443711742 Bay Road,Queensbury,NY 1 80 1 wvww,qu censbu .n t PUD Site Plein 5 -2 �1Corner Blind Rock Road & Bay Road Draft, resolution,tion gran "deny one year, extension MEYE R, ,,,,.,FULLER P IL L C A An m- CY5, Matthew F. Fuller, Esq. Howard 1. Krantz, E,sq. Jeffrey R. Meyer, E,5q. 19'46 2015 Mary-Ellen E. Stoc6�ell, Esq. Deoember 9, 2016 Craig Brown,Zoning Administrator Chris Hunsin.ger, Chairman Plarming Board, To of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, New York 1,2 8 04 Re: PUD Site Plan 57-2015, Queensbury Partners Dear Craig, Chris and Planning Board members- I am wTiting this,day to request a 1, year extension to PUD Site:Plan 57-2015. We are still progressing through permits and final project financing, and it is my clients' intention to break ground in the $piing of 201.7. 1 respectfully request the Planning,Board extend the approval granted on January 20, til' , a copy of which is enclosed, and I appreciate your consideration of ,this request, Sincerely, Mattliew F. Fuller, Esq. mFUJleK(a,fljgyV:fiAI2r.com 101 017"AWA�p 1. LAKE GE(DR43E, NY 12e4G 2'Inn Town of t; uneenslnurry 10 office copy r rn�rnnuurrot I eve:lurprrreun� owl A T' NT " O O f" ��, lDa(e: January 20, 2016 COMMEN CING ANY SITE- WORK) SE RE�AD AND UNDERSTAND Re: Site, plan 57-2015 THIS ITT I Er ERA Caner ofBay & Blind ocklio w� s Queensbury �Y Partners, � ,n _ n��,�h °J "quo �o 4 r I� moved ,�'la nsMake a copy f compliance let ei, rrre., ti n ryt hn�aar ,,6 eand sub10 mit trr i — tltrtlru er lie for lin4uapprOvr - rl copy will be returned to be posted. err sit . 2',» ill giru ecrirng Fee To be paid unupOrr receipt; 110 Final signatures will be given on tine plans until all crigincering flies, have pial. 3. l'" � r r rnw�arl - �rrrrt u °uru nd� u� - a warlulianceOfficel. rre tl�e mrinpr v pl ans, lro v fru suukmrrnitt l t the Planning office phase contact Bruce I-rank.,nk., od rinnp;lirrrmee f1�m r° rrt I- fir rn pre-u rrstuuu tiO n nweting before any work is stalled, and at any timnne I�umium tin site �dev lunpmnn rrt slnrrrrl l rnrn cane°nstr iunts� concerns or questions arise. Cir, Frank will monitor 111C site dcv lrrpunnerrt dere ughOtIt the project for ernarnnplirumn a with your approval; howeve?% see rle-arr 5, . s-built darts lA/or Cerlife ulirnrr must be surbrrultt d to this office frnr review and lnprovmnl prior to tine issuance of Final sign-off from time Zoning l epartme nt and/or/or rr Ccrtificatcof Occupancy rn If there erre no r lod f recti res or changes frrrruun tie approved platin provide a ccitificalion from project designer. ri If them are ntinouur rrrrwcti&arti rrs or changes from the approved plan provide revised site plans w4il eerlifi atiunrn that the changes are acceptable from project designer. yrs inay , crlentaally, approved irrtrrtstr al v l . If them #rr•e major modifications or changes from the approved plate provide revised site plans with certification that the changes are acceptable from project designer. his will likely require re- p rrrval b the-, Planning ��" erryl ["age I of 2 Phone: 5 IS-761-8220 1 Fax 518.7'45-4,4371 742 Bay Road, Oueenshury NY Oknd I 5. werealiol, ]?cc $950 per lot /divellinh, unit is payable aa� Pen nit (fifllbrinatriOrlal)" Notes: 111C aPProval is valid for one (1) year from the date of approval. You may request an extension of api,vovant before the one (1) year time frame has, expired if you have not yet applied for a bufldin I ,n urther peri-nits, including Ouilding. peffliks Is commenced signiticant site work, Subsequent i,ssUa ce of f g permi or dependent on conip]iance with this and a1l other conditions Ofthis re-5olution., I"fi is 0 free wi I I be perform i ng necessary i nspections related tO Site i ssues, Li—of B u i Win g Code issues, t111.0 aoull (lie duration of the project. Coriiplction ofa nd continued compliance with all details and conditions of appl-oval, arc MqUired in order 10 Mccive andmaintain allprovals. 1'1 as contat the Building & C(xjes offirce at 518-761-8256 fOr their requirenienis regarding submission of a building pernlit. 7 Sill L Craig Brown Director of Planning & Zonisg Zolling Administrator OAS ]'age 2 of 2 Fhom: 51'8®7 1-8221 17av 51 S-745-4437 1742 Rav Atmet lopI N1-jq I' '41W11 Of Queensbury Planning Board RE'-SOLUTION Girvjkjjt Site Plan Approval for PUD Site Plan 57-2015 QUE-ENSBURY PARTNERS Tax Map 1D., X89.19-1-23 Througil -35 / Property Address: Corner ofBay &, Blind Rock Roads ZA,)ning, Planned Unit Development MOTI, IN TO'APPROVIE PUD SITE, PLAN 57-201rk 01JEEKSBURY 11AR`i NIntroduced by Paul Schone wolf whomom ed for its adoption, seconded, by Stephen Traven The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board Alor Site Phin approval pursuant to Article 9 Of tile Town Zoning Ordinanec for: a Planned Unit Developinent (PUD) consisting of of business retail and multi-familcues. The proposed mixed use: density is for 142 residential uinits and 56,180 sq. fit. of commercial space. Activities also include land' di sturba,nce for installation of a parking areas!, parking garage, sidewalks and drive areas along with a.%-Ociated infrastructure and utilities fM the project. Pursuant to Chapter 179.12 PUD of tile zon.ing ordinance, Planned Unit Developments are subject to Planning Board review and approval, Ibc IIIJI) is subject to the fol!lowill, 21, 2015: 9 conditions of the 'roval Board legislative approval granted on I)ecember a. Residential density. No more than 142 residential dwelling tinits ars set Jbrth on tile plans and specifications shall be permitted. b. Comirtercial density. No more than 56,180 sqI'arc fbe( Shall be permitted. c. Site Plan Approval, Site 1)[811 approval will be:required 1 all developtnent of tile project. & phase HT Approval. Army construction f6r' Phase III shallrequire approval from the Tovni Board for conformityy with the P lanned Unit D,evelopmen I contained herein and shall require site plan approval from (lie Plann.ing Board. e. Setbacks: L Setbacks alo'lig Blind Rock Road shall be no less, than 53 feet. iL Setbacks along Bay Road shall be no less than 75 feet, provided that this shall: not include roar hangover, light fixtures, deck overhangs, and provided that pergolas shall be permitted, off'Blind Rock Road as shown on drawing L2.2--Layout,, iii. Setbacks from all wetlands for building locations shall be at least 75 fect, L Height Lirrlits: i. For the corn merci al/resident!a] structures, height shall be limited to 54 feet. g. Modifications. Any changes to the plans and specifications shall require Site Plan approval. Phone. 5W761-8220 I Fax: 518-745,44371742 Bay Road, Queensbury,, NY' 1,28,04 1 www4ueertsbury,net relevillIt seefions of'IlleTOW"i 01'Queensbury Zoning ct,)dc-Chaptcr ,Clic Planning Board has detcrininedthaO-sa t this pr s0IMCS flic requiremenis as�stated ill the Zoning Code; As required by Generki I MUnicipal Law Section 239-ni, tllC site plan application was retbried' to the warrell County Planning Department flor its recom niendati oil; ']'he Planning Board, fins reviewed (he potential crivironmental il"Pacts of the project pu:rsuant to tile State E'VIvironniental Qual ity Review Act (S,EQRA)and rcaffirmed a SEQR,A Negative Declaration— DetertIlination of No n-Signi ficance 0,11 (0clober 20 and October 2 7, 201 S); I'liel"lanning Board spelled as public bearing on the Site Plan application,on December 15, 2015 and continued the pu bi ic hearing tQ January 19, 20 16, whC11 it was closed, I'lle Planning Board has reviewed the application nuatcrials submitted by the al)Plicant andall C0111flients made at, tile public hearing and, submitled in writing through and including January 19, 2016- Ule Planning Board deternibles that the application coillpfics with tile reviewconsiderations and standards set Forth in Article 9 of tile Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, This OPPrOvaI, is subject to tile following conditions: I. The firni is of clead n,g showt, oil the applicant's plans Will I consti t ute a nay-east, bUffier zotle. D11"ing Construction, oninge eonstruction fencing shall be installed around these airs;asand field veriffed byCOIII�Intraity lcvcjOpjrlClII, Stiff ta Any sanitary sewer caanectioll plan must be submitted lo (lie Wastewater I)ep, lilent ror its review, allproval, permitting am] ins ecti 1, art p 0z I Wcurb cuts are added or changed,a driveway perimit shall be rwltzired, A building,penni, will not be ucd until the approved driveway permit fins been submilled to the Kanniptg office, 4. Engineering qi,gn-off shall be required prior to sigruitum of Zoning Administrator on the approved plans. 5. A right-tiuni lane shall be installed at the corner Of Bay Itoad and Blind Rook Road at the inception of construction. 6. All construction tratTic shall use Bay Road. 7. If required, copies Of tile f0flowing will be submitted to die:Planning Office; Project Notice of Intent (NO.J) for coverage under the! currcrit "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Construction Activity"prior to die start of any site work; Project Notice of Terri-thiation (NOI) upon completion of the project. Ilie,following must be n1aintained oil the pipject, site for review byToval to a. Approved final plans that have been stamped by the Zoning Administrator, including the Stormwater Pollittion Prcvention Plan (SWPPP). In. Prefect N and PrOQf0f Coverage under the current NYS DEC SMES General Pe.rm,it �fir COXISIniction Activity or am individual SPDE S pertilit issued for tile project. Phow : 518.7042ZO[Fat 518-745,44371742 Bay Road.Queensbury,NY IM041 www-qu"nsbumnat 9. Final approved Plans in cr.nlpliance With ally site J�Iajl app l',ov�lj 111t1't be 81-611litte(I to ("()"111111111ity1 eti clop lrrerrt DCjm I-I Ellen I Wfore any further review by the Zoning Administrator or 13 u i Id ing and Codes pier sonne 1. 10., The PrOiccl, lJONTlop er, and co'ntractOr Must 111CCI, wilh, Planning Department Stalf after approval arEd prim to i-Mance of any building permit and/or the beginning of any site WO& 11. Sttbsequent issuance Of further permits, including building pertnits, is depend'ent oil conipliance Nvith the foregoing conditions. 12. As-built plans to mlify that the site plan is developed according to the apl?roved plans is to be provided prior to the j."uance ofany cerfifiente,of occupancy. Duly adopted this 19"'day ol'January, 2016, by the followfilg vote: AYES: Mr. Traver, Mr. Pcrone,, W Magowan, Mr. Scll()ncwOlf,,Ms. White, Mr. 1-un NOES: NONI�I' ABSENI". Mr. Ford Cc., Page 3,of 3, PWne: 18,761.8220 1 Fax. '518.74,5A437 i 742 Bay Road,Queensbury.NY 12804 1 wwmqueensburynet Town ot' Queermbuxy Cory,,m'itmity Development Offic,e 7,42 Bay Road, QLM1r;MSbLH-y, NY' 128,04 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION—GRANT'/DENY EXTENSION REQUEST SITE PLAN 57-2015 QUEENSBURY PARTNERS CORNER BLIND ROCK ROAD & BAY ROAD/ZONING PUD The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town Zoning Ordinance for: a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of office, business retail and multi-family uses,. The proposed mixed use: density is for 14.2 residential units, and 56,180 sq. ft. of commercial space. Activities also include land disturban.ce for installation of a parking areas, parking, garage, sidewalks and drive areas along, with associated infrastructure and utilities, for the project. Pursuant to Chapter 179,1,2 PUD of the Zoniii.g Ordinance, Planned Unit Developments are subject to Planning Board review and approval. MOTION TO APPROVE A ONE YEAR EXTENSION FOR SITE PLAN NO. 57-2015 QUEE NSBURY PARTNERS, Irrtr duced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 20'h day of'December, 20 16 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phone: 57 8.761-8220� 1,av 5 1&745,4437 1742 Bily Road,Queensbury, NY 12804 1 Subdivision, PreI u Stage PZ 207-2016 Subdivision Final Stage PZ, 256-2016 @ Bonner Dri. Public ire, Continues SEQR Unlisted Draft resolution — rant/deny subdivisioln, prelliminary stage approval Draft resolution — grant/dieny subdivislon, na stage approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board, Community Development Dep artmentStaff Notes December 20, 2016 Subdivision Prelim.. Stage PZ 207-2016 MICHAEL DORMAN Subdivision Final Stage PZ 256-2016 Bonner Drive/MDR-Moderate Diensity Residential / Ward 3 SEQR Unlisted Material Review: narrative, application for preliminary, survey, subdivision layout Parcel History- AV PZ 209-20,16; SUB 10-1965 (Franklin Manor & Shallow Creek) Rectuested Action Planning Board review and approval for proposed subdivision of a.2.54 acre parcel into 3 lots (revised), Project is for three single-family homes. Proposed lot sizes: Lot I to be 0.40 ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ac, and Lot 3 to be 0.60 ac,with a hammerhead on Lot 2. Project includes waterline extension and septic systems for each lot. Resolutions 1. SEQR.-long form 2. Preliminary Stage Planning,Board decision 3. Final Stage Planning Board decision Project Description Applicant proposes a subdivision of a 234 acre parcel into, 3 lots (revised) Project is for three single-family homes. Proposed lot sizes: Lot I to be 0,40 ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ac, and Lot 3 to be 0.60 ac with a hammerhead on Lot 2. Project includes waterline extension,and septic systems for each lot. Applicant has received an area variance for 3 lots. Pursuant to Chapter 1,83 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be: subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments Staff Cqnlments The:applicant proposes a three lot subdivision of a 2.54 acre parcel located in the Moderated Density Zone. The project is located at the end of Bonner Drive. Sketch Plan review. The applicant has requested a waiver,from sketch. Preliminar e view: Preliminary plat plat subdivision lot layout shows the three lot arrangement. L---y%g&qJ& Layout plans-shows the three building lots, water line location, septic areas and road extension. Construction details-provided is a sample road section Cxi�adiniidei-osictipleiiis-approxiniate areas for the road development and the waterline extension are shown, Clearing plan--the amount of clearing to, is shown to accommodate the driveway,septic and the new homes. ,The Environmental report-the applicant has completed, a Long Environmental assessment review. Storinwaler inanogernent—the applicant provided lirnited information for the road development and eave, trenches for the houses. The appikant has provided a stounwater pollution prevention plan—being reviewed by the town engineer. Fina qvicky—Final Plat-subdivision for 3 lots. SlalelCounfy agancy-Planning and Zoning Board is the only agency for three: lotro osedsubdivision, P P Ofho- plans reports -the applicant has, supplied information for stormwater management, road extension and waterline extension. Protecled open space -none proposed. Nature of'Vaiinnce Granted., The project as proposed requires relief from lot size where, 2 ac is mquired. Lot I to be OAO ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ac, and, Lot 3 to be 0.60,ac with a hammerhead on Lot 2. Sumnia T'he applican�t has completed the preliminary and final stage applications for subdivision review of a 3-lot subdivision. THE North Country Office, Cba e t ILED 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 128,04 EMA P,:(518) 812-0513 F: (51.8)812-2205 COMPANIES K, www.chazencompanies.com Hudson Valley Office (945)454-3980 Engineers, Laind Surveyors Capita[District Office (518)'2 "3-0055 Planners Environmental Professlan,als Undscam AriNtects December 13, 2016 �Mr. Craig,Brown Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer Town of Queensbury 742 Say Road Quieensbury, New York 12804 Delivered via email only:Crajg8@q ue n 5,0viry.npt Re: Dorman8onner Drive Extension Subdivision, Town qf'QueensbuqWarren Caunt)4 New York Chazen Project#91600.4,2 Queensbury Ref#SP207-2016 Dear Mr. Brown: The, Chazen Companies (Chazen) Ihas, received the latest submission responding to technical comments offered by,Chazen on August 5, 2016. Based upon,our review, Chazen offers the following comments for the Town's,consideration, Stormwate r Manage ment& Erosion and Sediment Control: 1 In response to comment 2 of Chazen'Ps August 5, 2016 letter',the Applicant has included the 25- year storm to the Hydro AD model. Information supporting the stormwater design and Hydro AD model are missing (see comments 5, 7, 80 9 and 11)and therefore a full review of the 25-year storm will occur once the changes to the design/model are made. Section 179-6-080 of the Town Code, states, that storm;water drainage plans shall analyze the impacts of a project using at, (least a 25-year return interval storm with regards to, both runoff rate and volume for residential projects. 2. In response to comment 3 of Chazen'�s August 5, 2016 letter, EAF section, E.V indicates the site is located in an archeological sensitive area. it does not appear that documentation was provided per Part LF.8 of the SPIDES General Permit concerning construction activities that may affect historic property.The Applicant shall provide the Town with any clocurnentation regarding the above determination and incorporate the same into'the 5WPPP pursuant to Part.LF.8 of the SPDES General Permit. 1 A response to Chazen's August 5, 2016 comment letter was, not provided and therefore it is unclear how the Applicant will address comment 4 of said letter which stated, Section 6.3.1 of the NYS SM DIM states, "The bottom of the infiltration facility shall be separated byat least three feet vertically from the seasonally high voter table or bedrock layer, as documented by on-site .soil testing. (Four feet in soil source aquifers)." It appears that the bottom of the drywells would C,hazes Engineering,Land Surveying&Landscape Architecture Co., D.R C. Chazes Environmental Service,%,inc. The Chazen Cal"Parlies, Inc, Town orf Quetn5bury Df;Man—BCniner'DrIve Extensnon December IS,2016 Page� be at an elevation of 88% and test pit #1 was performed to a depth of 87". As such, additional testing, must be performed to confirm adequat8separation from seasonally high groundwateir. Chazen would not take exception to testing being performed at the start off construction, ilff the Town will allow it. However, it shall be noted that if any design changes occur because of discovered Incon5istenry in soil conditions, the project may be subject to additional site plan review. The Applicant shall notify the Town, prior to, advancing the 5oll testing; s,uich, that the Towin can witness the testing, if they so choose. 4. it is noted that the Applicant proposes to convey the! proposed roadway extension to the Town following clonstruction. Additionally, it is, assumed that the roa,d1way dlrainage (drywells and associated perfolrated equalization pipe.) will be conveyed with the road. As such, it is recommended that the Town Highway Superintendent review the potential use of the, perforated equalization pipe at the site'. Incertain circurnstances, their use, can lead to clifferential settlement off the road, If not properly constructed/sulited for the soil conditions, It is, our recollection that the Highway Superintendent typically evaluates this during construction., 5, Existing grades along Bonner Drive are not depicted on sheet 5-2, therefore it is difficult. to determine what portion of the existing Bonner Drive roadd contributes runoff to the- proposed drywells. The Applicant to provide sufficient existing grades along, Boniner Drive to show what areas contribute to the proposed drywells. 6. It does not appear,that an I'101 submitted with the SWPPP in accordance with GPO-15-002. The Applicant to provide the NOl for review. 7. The HydroCAD model does not provide distinct inflow va,lue depths, (as indicated by the ">" sign) which, indicates that the time span of 0-24 Ihours may not be sufficient. TheApplicant to r8vise the tirne span such,that the full effects of each storm are,reali2ecl, 8. The Hydro CAD model cannot be reviewed at this time because the proposed condition watershred map does not show any subicatchmants, eave trench, locations, or time of concentration lines,. The drainage routing cliagram cannot be confirmed / revIewed wit�holuit this information. The Applicant to revise the proposed coo ricildon map accordingly. A full review, of stormwater rates) volumes, and W'Q-V/RRv r-akulations will be performed once the HydroCAD rnodel wcarn be reviewed. 9The HydlroC,AD model uses arbitrary elevations for the dry walls and eave trenches. it is requested that the Applicant to revise the Hydro,CAD model with actual elevations. M The contractors and subcontractors certification statement on the second page of the, SW'PPP does not match,the required certification statement In Part III.A.6 of GIP-0-15-002.The Applicant to r8visie the certification statement accordingly. 11, The Eave trenches aren't depicted on the site plans or proposed condition watershed plan., The Applicant shall depict all post'-roinstruttion storm rater management devices on the site plains. Tvpm 40 -PZ207-2016 Vkho*ji Town of Qu,un5bury ti tin—Bonner Drive Extenson December 13,2016 Page 3 In the evient the Planning Board or Town staff hiaive any question,5 or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (5,18),824-1926. Sincerely, Sean M. Dioty, P,.E., 'LEER AP,CMS4S Principal Manager, Municipal Engin Bring Services cc: Sijininy Sw8et,Town Planining,Office Administrator (via emall) La,uira Moore,Town, Land Use Planner(via e-rnafl) File Tum ,of qud� slburv\916M.42-P2207-2016 Michoyel 1'0,% N") Cry 1tNe(.-i�s b OF V 01lice 742 Bay 1 -1 Q Town of Queensbury Planning Board SEQR RESOLUTION—Grant Positive or Negative Declaration Subdivision Final Stage PZ 256-2016 Michael Doman Tax Map ID; 295.11-1-5 /Property Address: Bonner Drive/,Zoning: MDR, The applicant proposes a subdivision of a 2.54 acre parcel into 3 lots (revised). Project is for three single- family homes. Proposed lot sizes: Lot I to be 0.40 ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ac, and Lot 3 to be 0.60 ac; with a hammerhead on Lot 2. Project includes waterline extension. and septic systems for each lot,. Applicant has received an area variance for 3 lots. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review.Act; The proposed action, considered by this Board, is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are invdIved; Part I orf the �EF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion oftine' "own of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environniental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A POSITWE DECLARATION OR NE GATIVE DECLARATION FOR SUBDIVISION FINAL, STAGE PZ 256-2,016 MICHAE L DON, Introduced by _ who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part 11 of the Long E has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2, Part III of the Long EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or fart III of the Long EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did, not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Motion seconded, by only adopted this 20" day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYES; NO Phone 5 18.76,1 M20 jl 9ax! 518.745.447 d 747 Bay Road,Qwcnsbury, NY 12804 1 11 11f,Quv'Qnsl)�1 1-Y Officl, 7-12 11ay Road,,Qu cunsbu ry, N' ' 12804 Town of Queensbury Planning Board RE,SOLUTION—Approve/Deny Subdivision Preliminary Stage PZ 207-20116 Michael Dorman Subdivision Tax Map ID: 295.11-1-5 /Property Address: Bonner Drive/Zoning: MDR A subdivision application has, been made to the Queensbury Planning, Board for the following: Applicant proposes a subdivision of a 2.54 acre parcel into 3 lots (revised). Project is for three single-family homes. Proposed, lot sizes: Lot I to be 0.40 ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ac, and Lot 3 to be 0.60 ac with a hanunerhead on Lot 2. Project, includes waterline extension and septic systems, for each lot. Applican.t, has received an area variance for 3 lots. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sectionsof the Town of Queensbury Z,ening Code,Chapter A-1 83, the Pian ning Board, has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; The requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered, and the Planning Board has adopted a SEQRA Negative/Positive Declaration A ptiblic bearing was scheduled and held on, October 18,,20 16 & December 20, 2016;, This application is supported with all documentation, public comment,and application material in the file of record; MOTION TO APPROVE I DISAPPROVE SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY STAGE, PZ 20772�016 Introduced by who moved its adoption. Motion seconded by Duty adopted this 200 day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYE : NOES: 518.761-8220 1 Fav 18,745A437 1742 Bay Road, Queenshury, NY 12801, 1 1''] Ohl'1, L a"L!e 11. b I 0,1"k, 7 2" I'a k t i ek, i s 1)k i-y, N V 1 .°X80,4,, T'a'n of Queensbury Planning,Board RE SOLUTION-AnpmvLe��Disa�rovq Subdivision Final Stage PZ 256-20 16 Michael Dorman Tax Map ID 2;95.11-1- / Property Address: Bonner Drive/ Zoning: MDR A subdivision application, has been made to the Queensbury Planning Board for the following: Applicant proposes a subdivision of a 2.54 acre parcel. into 3 lots (revised). Project is for three single-family homes. Proposed lot sizes: Lot I to be 0.40, ac; Lot 2 to be 1.23 ae, and Lot 3 'to be 0.60 ac with a harnmerhead on Lot 2. Project includes waterline extension,and septic systems for each lot. Applicant has :received an area variance:for 3 lots,. Pursuan,tto Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning,Board review and approval., Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town ot"Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter A-1 , the Plaming Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; A public hearing was scheduled an,d held on.October 18, 2016 & December 2,0, 2016„ This application is supported with all documentation,, public comment, and application material in the file of record; MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPRQVE SUBDIVISION F'INAL STAGE PZ 256-2016, MICHAEL DQRMAN, Introduced by -who moved its adoption. 1, The requirements of the State Environmental Quality,Review Act have been considered and the Planning Board has adopted a SEQRA T atra l esitni eDeclaration; and if the application is a modification, the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered, and the proposed modification[s] do not result in anynew or significantly different environmental. impacts, and, therefore, no 'further SEQRA review is necessary; 2. Waiver requests':ranted I denied, storm water mgmt.,, grading, landscaping&fighting plans; 3. The limits, of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified, by Community Developmen.t staff, 4. Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Planning Board Chairman. 5. The:applicant must submit a copy of the,following to,the Town: a), The project NOI (Notice of intent) for coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDE S General Permit or for coverage under an individual SPDE S prior to the start of M site work. b) The:project NOT (Notice of Termination)upon completion of the project; and 6. The:applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff. a) The approved final that have been stamped, by the 'Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project WPPP (Storm, Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; and b) The project NOI and proof of coverage under the currerit NYSDEC S,PDE S General, Permit, or an individual SPDE S,permit issued for the project. Phc,)rw' 5 18,761,8220 1 17tim 518.745,4437�742 Buy Road.Queensbury, NY 12804 d WWW.ClUeensburyji,I� 7, Final approved plans, in compliance with (be Sabdivision, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Buildin,g and Codes personnel. 8. The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and, prior to issuance of Building Permit andYor the beginning ofany site work. 9. Subsequent issuance of fbi-ther permits, including building permits is, dependent on oompliance with this and all other conditions of this,resolution; 10., As-built plans,to certify that the subdivision is developed according to the approved plans to, be provided pdg�r to, issuance of the certificate of occupancy; Motion seconded by busty adopted this, 20" day of December,, 20,16 by the following vote: .YES: NOE& Phou: 518,76152210,BFkkv bite '�l n Z 231-2016 & Freshwater' w I n Permit PZ 232-2016 @ Lockhart Mountain Road PublicNo Hearing Draft resolutionPlanning r recommendation the Zoning Board of Appeals tra,ffic, o. �commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature of Variance The app�licant requests relief installation of stormwater,devices less than 100, fifirom the wetland. Summary "I'he Planning B�oard is to provide a recommendation to the,ZBA in regards setback requirernents,�for stormwater device ftorn a wetland. 01'fici� 742 llalv @2844 Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION -Planning,'Boand Recommendation to Zoning,Board of Appeals Area Variance PZ'254-2016 Tax Map ID 252._1- 1 / Property Address. Lockhart Mt. Road /Zoning: RR 3A The applicant bas submitted an application for the followin& Applicant proposes to construct a 2,600 sq,. . (footprint) single family home:with attached garage on a 5.6 acre +/- lot where the project occurs within 50 ft. of 1,5% slope. The project includes a stream crossing,and work within an APA.wetland. Pr9j ect is subject to DEC for stream crossing and,APA j urisdiction for a previous enforcement action for wetland disturbance, Project disturbs greater than I acre and, a stormwater report and SWPPP are:part of the submission. Pursuant.to Chapter 94, 1 �-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction within 50 ft. of shoreline and within 5 0 ft. in 1.5% slope shall be:subject to Planning Board review and approval. 'Variance: Relief is sought for stormwtiter devices less than 100 ft. from wetland. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Sedion 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the: Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board, approval; 'The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project, on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that. MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEH ALF' SMF THF, PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE PZ 254-2016 MICHAEL & ELAINE FEENEY: Introduced by who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has, not identified any significant adverse impacts, that cannot be mitigated with current,project proposal - OR b) 'The Planning Board, based on a limited review,has identified the:following areas of concern: I Motion seconded by Duly adopted this 2& day of December, 2016 bythe following vote- AYES: NOES: Phomw; 518.761.8220 Iax: 5 18.745.4,417 � 7,12 Bay Rood,Qmxnsbury, NY 12804 (!w%Nrxv,qkj",i1:Sbury.net Site Plan PZ 251-2016 @ 9 Flemlock Road Public Hearing Draft, resolution Planning Beard recommendation to the Zoning Board of' Appeals Town of Qjieensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes December 20, 2,016 Site Plan PZ 251-2016 MIC HAE L & 14OLLY DANSBURY 9 Hemlock Road / WR—Waterfront Residential/ Ward I SEQR Type 11 Material Review: application,narrative, existing and proposed conditions, survey ,P Parcel History: P4-2001 & AV 3_2001 ax g dormer,AV PZ 2.52-2016 Reguested.Action Recommendation to the Zoning Board of'Appeals for area variance required relief requested for setbacks, floor area ratio and permeability. Resolutions L Planning Board recommendation Pr2ject Description Applicant proposes 572 sq. ft. attached garage and 148 sq, ft. addition for kitchen area to an existing 1,012 sqm ft., (footprint), 1,782 sq. ft. (floor area) home. The garage will have a loft area for storage and, stairs inside garage fdr access. Project includes kitchen.expansion and renovationfor a master bedroom on main.floor. Pursuant to Chapter 179'-t -04 0 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of nonconforming,structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance. Relief is sought for setbacks, floor area ratio and permeability. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Staff Comments Location-The:existing home is, located on the north side of Glen Lake off of Glen Lake Road on Hemlock Road. Arrangement- This is a preexisting 1,012' sq ft home with a 225 sq (I detached garage. The proposed,project includes construction of an attached 572 sq ft garage and a 148 sq ft kitchen area addition. The existing detached garage would be removed. The floor area square footage is 1,7'82 sft where the total new floor area would be 2,332 sq ft. Site Design- The addition is to be on,the north,side of the home. The first floor area involved is the existing, kitchen, a bedroom and covered porch—where the bedroom and kitchen will be flip flopped and will be adjacent to the new attached garage. Building—The garage is to be single story at 21 ft in height with, a storage space in the rafter area. The plans 'show,two sets of stairs inside the garage: one for access the storage area and the other to access the existing basement area. The building exterior is to be consistent with the existing home. Site conditions-The project site is 0.21 ac parcel. The applicants plans notes the area of parking,area, home, garage and septic. The applicant proposes to use permeable pavers,in designated areas of the driveway,— turnaround, front area of garage and entry path. A detail of the permeable paver will need to be provided as part of the project. The applicant has explained the septic tank will need to be relocated. The stormwater from the addition is to 'be directed to eave trenches on the east side oaf the home. Landscape pla —The property has two tier lawn/planted area between the shoreline and the home. 'rhe existing oak and maple on the plans are to,remain—the new well location will make this a challenge. E levations and Floor plans-The plans show the existing and proposed conditions ofthe home. The relocation of the kitchen and bedroom on the first floor allows for access to the garage addition. The storage area is shown on the garage floor plan.Ian. Pursuant to Section 179-9�-050, the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant, The application orm identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item, not applicable or has not addressed the itern/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements, of the applicant's application: h. signage,j. strmwater, k. topography, m. land use districts,, n traffic, o. commercial alterations,/conn structi on details, qsoil logs, s. snow removal Nature of Variante 'The: applicant requests relief fdr setbacks on the east side where 20 ft is required and 6.67 ft is Proposed. Relief is also requested for floor area her 22% is the maximum allowed and, the applicant proposes 25.,2%,. The site prqjiect area currently has, 56.4 % permeability and increasing to 58,.6% -no relief required for permeability but it is,noted there is an increase due to the addition of permeable pavers. Summary The Planning Board is to, provide a recommendation to the ZBA in regards setback requirements for setback and, floor area relief requested. 742 ]�.oad. N� 12R0,1 Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance PZ 251-2016 Michael & Holly Dansbuty Tax Map ID: 289.10-1-31 /Property Address: 9 Hernlock-Road /Zoning- WR The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes 572 sq. ft. attached, garage and 148 sq,. ff addition for kitchen area to an existing 1,0 12 sq. ft. (footprint), 1,782 sq. ft. (floor area)home. The garage will have a loft area for storage and stairs inside garage for access.. Project includes kitchen expansion and, renovation for a master bedroom on main floor. Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of nonconforming structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning,Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks, floor area ratio and permeability. Planning Board shall. provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The To of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 1.79-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recomm, endation, to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals, & Plann ing Board approval; The Planning, Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief' request in the variance application. as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: MOTIONT0, MAKE ARECOMMENDATION, ON BERA,LF OF THE PLANNING H-0A-RD TO THE ZONING BOARD, OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE PZ 251-20,16 MICHAEL & HOLLY DANSHURY: Introduced by who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on, a limited review, has not identified any, significant adverse impacts that cannot be:mitigated with current project proposal - OR b) The Planning Board,based on a limited review,has identified the following areas,of concern: 1) Motion seconded, by Duly adopted this 20"' day of December,2016 by the fallowing;vote: AYES: NOES- Phone-., 51 8,36LS220 Q Fax: 518,745.44,371742 Bay Road,Queensbury, NY 12804 1 wiviml ueetisbury.net Site Plea PZ 258-2016 & Special Use Permit PZ 259.- 20,16 @ 1540 State Beate 9 No Public Hearing Draft resolution Planning Board relcom mend ation to e Zoning Board of Appleal ............ Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department to Notes December 20, 2016 Site Plan PZ 2,58-2016 BRIANOLESEN Special Use Perris itP7,259-201.6 1540 'tate Route:9/ CI— Commercial Intensive/ Ward, I SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, special use permit details, site plan drawings, floor plans Parcel History. SP 49-89, ' P 33-89, AV 51-89, AV 102-89 Bp's interior alt., freestanding sign, building demo, AV PZ 260-2016 Requested,Action Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for area variance relief sought for setbaclas for news addition. Resolutions 1. Planning Board recommendation Proiect Deagp:pfion Applicant proposes to renovate an existing 12,000 sq. ft. building for indoor shooting range. Indoor range to, have 3 bays, retail space, 2 classroom areas,and a storage area. Project includes new facade and a 1,200,sq. ft, addition to assist with bay length. Project includes exterior renovations—new fights, siding and stone facade. Project subject to special use permit. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-070 of the Zoning Ordinance,, new commercial use shall be subject,to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks,for new addition. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning board of Appeals. Staff Comments Location-The project site is at 1540 State Route:about 2 mile north of the Route 9 and 149 intersection. The existing building is vacant and had been a previous gym facility as well as,seasonal use by Spirits Halloween. Building—The site contains an existing 12,000sq ft building that will be converted to an indoor shooting range facility. The interior will altered to have 4 firing range tunnels,retail space area,two classrooms and a storage area. Signage-The existing frame work for the:new signage: is proposed to be:used. Site conditions-The project site contains two parcels. The 1.8 ac parcel has an,area of paved parking with some unlined andlined parking,spaces,also contains residual land. The other parcel is 1.33 ac with the 1200 sq ft building and also has unlined and lined parking spaces. The applicant has indicated security is to be setup outside the building and the interior of the building as part of'the special user Permits requirements., The addition wil I be located at the south end of the building at 1,200 sq ft Tralfic-The plans indicated,there are 34 parking,spaces on the site:that are lined and 27 spaces unlined for a total of 6 1, spaces,. The applicant has explained, the arnount of traffic generated would not be more than the uses that had already been on the site., Siteplan overall—The plans show the interior of the building with the training, office, retail and tunnels, The exterior plans show the proposed fgade and addition on the south side of the building. Landscape plan andSile fighlingpIan—The plans showy the landscaping areas,and areas to remain wooded or lawn areas. The plans show the existing site lighting that is to remain. The applicant has indicated, exterior security will be installed as required by the:special use:permit. Signage—signage information was not included in the submission materials—staff would suggest,signage information be provided. lelvations and Floor plans- The plans show afront fagade view and the interior arrangement of the building. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050, the Planning Board may grant waivers on its, own initiative or at the written reqluest of an, applicant. The application form identified as, "Requirements" outlines the items to appear nein the site plan or included as attachments, At the time of application the applicant has either, requested waivers, indicated the itein not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box 'blank., "Mis includes the fb,llow items, listed under Requirements of the applicant's application.. g. site lighting, h. signa. ge, J. storinwater, k. topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plains, q. soil logs,r. construction/demolitillon.disposal s. sin ow removal, Special 'Use Permit General Criteria: A special use permit is required filar on with the Comprehensive Plan, —The zoning ordinance was, recenily, amended to include indl shooting, range Compatibility —All activities of the, interior shooting range are, proposed to be interior as required by the criteria and no,anticipated'hnpact ansurrounding commericiatusages,is anticipated, Access, circulation and parking —The applicant has indicated there is no change with the current site access, parking and trqffic circulation for the proploseduse. Infrastructure and seices—There is no iniactsi anticipated on public infrastructure or services. Environment and natural features,—The proposed project retrofits an existing building with interior andexterior modificarions. The site conditions will remain as is with no additions to,Parr inn or fighting on the site" The priql.ecir does include, uptMilifed landscaped areas an the site. Long-teri-n effects —The qpplicant intends,to, have layear, iotindol)c,r-aiion,fbi- ?-esidents andtourists- The facH4 operations willai include training and retail sales. Special 1i P'ermit Specific Criteria: Spoirtsman,"s clubs/fli rangts. (1) Indoorfiring ranges. (a) Distance requirements. I,1) Ind,001Tfiring ranges shall not be located within 600, linear feet, measured from building to building, of an establishment licensed to, dispense intoxicating or nonintoxiciatirig liquor,nor shall it bile in a building'that: dispenses liquor.-Thfa e cility is greater than 600fifrom, nearest entity of liquor salesand ahas stated in the application no liquor-will be dispensed. (2J .1ndoor firing ranges shall be not be permitted within 600 linear feet, measured from building to building,of a school,, public park or place of worship. Thefacilityis greater than 6010fifton; the nearest building, Ofar school etc., (bi) The design a:nd construction of'the firing range shall completely confine all bullets and other projectiles within the building andin a controlled manner, The design and construction of the firing range shall be certified by a registered engineer in the State of New York, The certified plans shall include the specifications and construction of the bullet tri ceilings,, exterior and interior walls and floors, The certified plans shall state, what type, maximum caliber, and power of ammunition the range is designed to totally confine. The prqject when constructed will be required to have an engineering, sign-qffJbr the specifications ideniffied. Wajf would include thisitem as a eon itiaarr as part of the review, The applicant haus indicated the design is based on the, criteria of the NkA 'is Range Source Manual. (c) No ammunition shall be used in the range that exceeds the certified design and construction specifications of the firing range. The applicanthas indicatedonly pistol caliberfirearms,lo be used and only with animunition sold at Meftwility, (d) Firearms stored on the premises must be stored and secured under lock and, key hen not in use and when the range is,closed for business. The applicant has indicated the Federal fi'irearms License requires vecure storage -where thefacility,will store iiems in glass cabinets. Thefiaciliiy willalso bemonifored ky C"entrally Moniforea",41arm System. (e),During organized shooting or training events, on-site supervision shall be supplied at,all times by an adult with credentials as a firearms, instru,ctor or range safety officer. This individual shall be responsible for the conditions of safely and order on the firing line and the premises. The applicant has indicated Range Staff will have NRA Range Saftly Officer or as comparable Slate orfiaderally issued certification. (f) On-site instructionash all be given only by certified firearnis instructors. Current ceilificates for firearms instructors shall be made avwllable for inspection upon request. ne applicant has indicated t instruclors must be, cerlifiled as an NRA Pisrol Instructor. In addition, Law Eqforcement are, c(,ritfled to provide instruction,NYS'Dept 9f Crim,Mal Justice toproWde insiruction. (g)An outside security plan for the general grounds shall be submitted to the Planning Board or designee for review and approval. The applicant has indicated an alarm, stem is to be, installed on site. This 14411 include motion sensors, glass by-eakst,vmrs, panic buttons and as CCTFsystem.for interior and exterior moniloring- (h) The transport of firearrns,on the Premises,to the premises and ftorn the premises shall conform to applicable state laws and regulations. Both State and Federal liven seshave requirements.for transportation, that will be met asindicaled by the applicant (i) Minors shall not be allowed in the range unless accompanied.by an adult at all. times. This provi I sion shall not be interpreted to prohibit minors from participating in,as firearm safety class whichis supervised by an adult instructor. Th,e applicam has indicated minors,under are allowed under supervision of as parent or legal guardian that meet the requirenients of the facility. 01) Indoor firing ranges shall not sell or dispense intoxicating liquors, nor shall they be in a building,which contains a business that sells or dispenses nonintoxicating or intoxicating liquors, The applicant has indicated ,no alcohol will be provi,ded and f 'believed to be under the iqfluence will not be allowed use of thefiacility., (k) Noise: [I] No indoor firing range shall be pennitted or operated in such as m anner which causes the exterior noise le:vel to exceed the ambient noise level by more than five decibels during daytime hours nor more than three de6bels during nighttime hours. "I'lie indoor firing range shall be designed, engineered and constructed so as to ensure compliance with this section. All soundpioofing shall comply with acceptled industry standards. (2] The permit applicant shall be responsible for establishing and reporting to the Town the ambient noise level of the proposed site before the issuance of a,n indoor firing range permit. The Planning Board shall designate: testing times, for the arnbient noise levels based on approved hours of operation. Such testing shall be conducted to include an average of multiple readings,taken over the prescribed period of time. [3] Once an permit is issued for the indoor firing range, the noise level at the facility while guns are being. discharged shall be measured at least annually from the closer of: [a] The property line; or [b] A point 111 fieet, ass measured from the closest exterior point of the building, to any adjacent property owner's residence or place of business, whichever is closer. [41 The sound level meter used in the conducting nod,se evaluations,shall, meet the American National Standard Institute's standard for sound meterr an instrument and associated recording,and analyzing equipment which will provide equivalent data. The ap , plicant has indicatedthey idll be using the s°ervices ofAdirondack Enviromnenial,5ervices to on'duc, noes e sampling. The applicant has suggested the following: J) Anhour sarnple al the,sile, to eslablish a baseline to be conducted al the properly line due to the closen ajjtedstruclin-e is across the street on Route 9 a, The Baseline should be conductea"prior w tourisisoason and then during tourist season due to the large sealconal fluctuation qfirajfic on Route 9, Stap would suggest the board include the following as part Of the review. 1) Sound measurements are to be done prior to the indoor firing range to,be open a. Daytime hours b. Evening hours 2) Soundproofing urnaterials, and nois,e rating coefficient should be included or similar reporting method, should be Provided. 3) Sound measurements are to be conducted annually and reported to the Planning Department and Planning Board for review 4) Engineering sign-off required. 'The certified plans shall.include the speofflications,and construction of the bullet trap(s), ceilings, exterior wid, interior walls and floors. 'The certified plans shall state what type, maximum caliber, and power of ammunition the range: is,designed,to totally confine. Nature of Variance The applicant requests refief''for the oonstruction of a 1,200 sq ft addition for setbacks. Front,proposed 53ft 6in where a 75 ft setback. is required, side yard south proposed 6.51 ft where 20 ft is, required, and rear setback proposed 16.4 ft, where 25 ft setback is required. SU-Mma!:L The Planning Board is to provide a.recommendation to the ZB,A in regards setback requirements for,the addition in the Commercial Intensive zone CL -4- Brian lesen Site Plan 258-2016 and SUP,259-2016, 'Special Use Permit General Criteria 179-10-070 1. Ina brief summary, the town's comprehensive plan seeks,to; minimize visual clutter, curb or eliminate disruption of the: natural environment, set design standard keeping with the Adirondack theme, minii-nize excessive parking lots ley sharing,,common space, promote foot and bicycle traffic between, establishments and e�nsure the safety and well, being of the town. and it"s residents. Considering our site: is already established some ofthe plans desires are beyond our control, Other issues we are addressin head ion to either in eet or exceed the plans, goals. Aside frarn a sm al I '15 foot add ition, to the existing building no other changes will be made to the appearance or environment at the site, The building fayade itself will receive a complete make over including cultured stone, natural t'imber framing and simulated cedar composite siding. We will continue to utilize the exisfing signage and replace it with a more fitting look. The landscaping will be totally rep�laced. and enhanced to compliment the buildings,appearance: and the surrounding flora. In terms of pavement and permeability our site is approximately 130,000sf, 41,0100 of which are non pen-neablie and of that 28,000 is asphalt paving. This square footage represents roughly 21%, of the site, which is a low percentage considering what typical new development would utilize. The parking lot which is set below the Rte 9 and therefore not a distraction is more than, adequate f6r,our needs and we foresee no, need to every have to expand, it. Rte 9, north of Rte 149 seems to rnark an end to the continued nolthward march of commercial develop ment. 'rhere is extensive undeveloped land and several vacant buildirkgs. Additionally,, sidewalks and bike:paths end at that intersection. We believe our business,has the potential to spur on further development of that stretch of the Rte 9 corridor. Although the road shoulder is wide along our property and could provide a walking or riding surface to our site it could create an ijnsafsituation. The addition of sidewalks would be a major under taking and would certainly require State resources, The safety of our staff,, customers and residents is of our utmost concern, there usuallyare no second chances when dealing with firearms. Our facility will be designed and constructed to the RA's current standards for an indoor range, We will util,ize a,state of the art air filtration system that utilizes HEPA technology to, remove 99.99% of all containments generatedinside the range. In essence the air leaving the range will be cleaner than the air coming in. Daring hours of operation the range and store will be staffed with a professional staff possessing law enforcement, military or NRA trainin&, A security and CCTV system will be installed to add an additional layer of security. 2. Our project promotes tourism and adds, an additional venue: for visitors and residents to partake in a time honored tradition with deep roots in the north country, The shooting sports can,be and are enjoyed, by people from all Socioeconomic backgrounds. We are repurposing a currently vacant structure and with a small addifion to the foot print, turning the entire site in to what we believe is a needed and, sought after venue. The site,, in the past has, supported, venues with a similar use; Recreation/Entertainnient. The substantial exterior upgrades we are proposing will bring the site up to par,with the rest of the surrounding ,properties, Brian Olesen Site Plan 258-2016 and SUP 259-20,16 Special Use Permit General Criteria .179-10-070, cont 3. The traffic flow into, thru and outof the, site are more the sufficient, safe and accommodating,to the proposed use. Currently, we have a, large parking lot with approximately 61 spaces and as required 2 handicapped spaces. The lot is plenty wideto allow easy entry and exit of the individual spaces. The flow pattern within the site is logical and flows from front to rear and back out again., Access to the site is provided by a single curb cut and allows for,entrance and exit of Rte 9frona either direction. Sidewalks within,the site aide pedestrians, in accessing the facility While keeping them Dut of the traffic flow. There are no sidewalks north of Rte 149 or that service our site, 4. Currently flie site utilizes a private well and septie systems. Both of which were more than adequate for tli,e prior businesses which had much higher vokime of usage. This site also is supplied by National Grid with both electricity (208 3 phase), and. natural gas. 'Time Warner will supply intemet, phone and cable tv. Regular trash/dunip,ster service will 'be hired to remove trash and rubbish frown the facility, An exterior CCTV system, will aide in crime prevention. An outside lawn service will be brought in to mow, mulch and provide up keep of the landscaping, 5, The currently has, a 12000,sf structure and approximately 28,000sf of pavement. Theremainder of the site is a mixture of green space comprised of turf grass, trees, and, a gravel pull off'. The contour of the site is mostly level with portions that slope away from Rte 9. During construction of the proposed addition we will utilize silt fence and hay bales to eliminate any chance Of sediment run-aff from the disturbed ground. & As, we saw at our Green Island Facility once the concern over having a shooting range in our "back yard" subsided the impact to the suiToounding community was overwhelmingly positive., Local deli"s, sump .shops and coffee shops all saw increases in business from both our customers; and store ernployees,. The elected officials of''Green Island have been nothing but surprised and pleased with our impact on the community. Similarly, to date there has not been a single complaint raised in.relation to our business,. Like them yourself or not people do like guns and do like to shoot them. Our facility will afford people the oppoilunity to do so in a safe, chinate controlled and supervised setting,, Our Green Island facility has nurnerous members who regularly travel as much as 510,miles to use the range:. Our typical custorner tends to have a decent amount of disposable income which we believe they will freely spend at other local businesses, before and after visiting the range. 'We in to turn this venue: into a destination much like a Bass Pro Shops or abelas. The pul,l thrum benefit that is a associated with these stores is well documented and we believe our store will produce similar itsufts. New York has less then half a dozen public indoor ranges, people, will corse from far,and away to anuli zethis facility. l��ct -9iS Warren County .planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on December 5, X016 Project Name: le8e!n, Brian Owner- Flintlock Corp ID umber: BY-1 -SPR-258 County Project#: D�an1 6.08 Current Zoning: C1 community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to renovate e lstirn buildIng Into a shooting range and retail firearmq. Site cation: 15,40 Rt 19 Tax Map urnbier(s).; 288.8-1-13 &2 .8-i -14 Staff Notes- The issues Dere appearto be of a Moral nature Involving local I8sues without any a ig n[ficant.impar sun County prop dies ,or resources. Staff recommends no eo�unty impact based onithe information submitted according to the u�ggested review, criteria of NYS neral Municipal Law Section 239 applied to the proposed project, Loacoi actions to date Qin'any' County Plaanning,Department: N! i Local Act on:fFinal Disposition- 12/7'12016 i positii n- Warren Caunty Plan,nhi,g Department parte Signed Local Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THis Fffltm TO THE WARREN COUNTY Y @'TANNIN DEPA]ITMEN°T"WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL,ACTION 1"'c vo,i i oQ i i c r:d)t i r.y T-1121 [lay Ou,ccusl:-iur,,, N )" 12804, Tov*qi of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals Area'Variance PZ 2601-2016 Brian Olesen Tax Map ID, 288.8-1-1 -14/Property Address; 15,40 State Rt., 9 /Zoning. CI The applicant has submitted an application fog`the following.. Applicant proposes to renovate an existing 12,000 sq. ft. building for indoor shooting range. Indoor range to have 3 bays,retail space, 2 classroom area's and a storage area. Project includes new facade and a 1,200 sq. ft. addition to assist with bay length. Project includes exterior renovations,— new lights, siding and stone facade. Project subject to special use permit. Pursuant to Chapter 1,79-10-070,of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial use shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks for new addition. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179- -070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the: Zoning Board, of Appeals for projects that req*re both Zoning Board of Appeals &Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the: relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that® MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLAN ING 130ARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL'S FOR AREA VARIANCE PZ 260-2016 BRIAN, OLE SEN: Introduced by who moved its adoption,and a) The: Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts, that cannot be mitigated ith current project proposal - OR b) The Planning Board,based on a limited review,has identified the following areas of concem 1) Motion seconded by Duty adopted this 20111 day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phone: 518-761,8220 1 ]"'ZIV 51&745,4431�742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 1 Site elan PZ 267-216 , 10 Seneca Drive, Cleverdale Public Hearing Draft resolution — Planning Board recommendation to the Zoning Board, of Appeals Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes December 20, 2016 Site Plan PZ 267-2016 RICHARD, MASON I Seneca Drive/WR—Waterfront Residential/Ward I SEQR Type 11 Material Review: application, floor plan, elevations, photos, septic details, FAR site summary, takundewide survey 1984, house lot survey 11/18/16 Parcel History: 94572-3917 septic Reguested Action Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for area variance required relief trom FAR, permeability and setbacks. Resolutions 1., Planning Board recommendation. �Proiect Description Applicant proposes 8 sq. ft. second story addition, 56 sq. ft. two landings to an existing 768 sq. ft (footprint/floor area)home. Project occurs within CEA. Project is part of Takundewide master plan. Pursuant to Chapter 1.793-D40& 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a nonconforming structure within a CEA zone shall,be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for FAR, permeability and setbacks. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Staff Comments Location-The existing home is located at 10 Seneca Drive that is within the Takundewide housing development off of Cleverdale Rd, In 2003 the Planning Board adopted an MO with Tali undewide HOA outlining activities for,future development. Building—The existing home is 768 sq ft and the apIiii1cant proposes a,second story of 768 s qft- The applicant also proposes two landings at exiting entry ways-32, sq ft west side and 24 sq ft south side. The applicant has indicated the expansion would allow for three bedrooms where there,are currently 2. Site cora ditiom -There are 32 cabin/homes shown on the plan. Also noted on the plans are the septic locations. The expansion would require an additional tank,and the applicant has indicated they would be able to connect to, the community septic system as well. Elevations and Floor plans-The applicant has provided photos showing the existing one story building and building design showing the second floor. The floor plan show the existing first story with kitchen, living room area, an existing r'oo.m and bath area. The second story is proposed to have the 3 bedrooms, along with storage,, bathrooms and a washer and dryer closet. Pursuant to, Section 179-9-0150 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form. identified as "Requirements7 outlines the items to appear on. the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item. not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow iterns listed under Requirements of the applicant's application. g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwate:r, k.. topography, 1. landscaping, m. landuse district, n traffic, o cornmercial alterations) construction, details, r. ce nstruction/dernolition dispasal s. snow removal. Nature oto"Variance "T he applicant proposes two landing entryways wherethe west at 32 sq ft is 6.7 ft fr uru the property line and the second landing at 24 sq ft on the souu;thside is proposed to be 5.5 ft where a 1 ft setback is re uired on all sides of the property, In addition relief is requested for peirneabilit here 64 % is proposed where 75% is required. Floor area is prope,sed to be 11/o based on the lot size where % is the mai uurrn allowed —the applicant has explained the parcel is pert of an, existing HOA where amajority of the 18,.7 acres is common.area ffor the association urnembers—in addition the master pian indicates, the 18.7' ac is to be considered during true request for s house expansion with the 110A. Summary T'lhe planning,board is to provide as recommendation n t the zoining board of appeals in regards to the request for setback relied', penn,eability and floor arca ratio. l Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by RepartN ent,on December 5, 2016 ProjectName: Mason, Wilium Owner;, Mason,, Richard ISD Number. QBY1 -SPR-267 County Project##: De-c16-10 Current Zoning; WR 1A Community-pity- Queens u.ur Project lDescripti not Applicant proposes;767 sq ft 2nd story addition, 56 sip ft:two landings. Site Location. 10 Senaca Dr Tax Map l u in er(s): Staff Notes: The issues Here appe rto be of a local, nature Involving local issues without any significant im ac,sarn County properties or resources, Staff rcromr neuids no county impact based onthe information submitted according to the suiggested review criteria of NYSGeneral (Municipal Law,Section 239 applied to the proposed project. Local actions to date (if a nlr')z County PlanningDepartment: NCI Local ct on./Finat Disposition- 12/7120,16 4"�- ' 'e'� Warren County Planning Department Dote Signed Local Offlicial Date:Signed PLEASE RETURN"T' IIl FORM.TO,"GC"HE WARREN COUNTY T°'TrANNN G DE AltTMEN'P"' I1C`HIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION 1 41 ill.,e 7,42 B'a� Ro":�d, OLD�CIISI)Ul'-V, NY 1 -80-4 Town, of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board,of Appeals Area,.Variance PZ 266-2016 William A., Mason Tax Map ID: 239.8-1-25 / Property Address: 10 Seneca Drive/Zoning- WR The applicant has submitted an applicationfor the following: Applicant proposes 768, sq. ft. second story addition, 56 sq. ft. two, landings to an existing,768 sq. ft. (footprint/floor area) home. Project occurs within CEA. Project is part of Takendewide master plan. Pursuant to,Chapter 1793-040& 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a nonconforming structure within aEA zone shall be:subje�ct to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for FAR, permeability and setbacks. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The ToArn of Queensbury Zoninr:dinanee, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of'Appeals. for projects that require both. Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board app�roval, The Planning Board has briefly reviewedand discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential im� acts of this project on the nei hborhood. and surrounding community, .P g and found that - L4QUON TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, FOR ARE A VARIANCE PZ 266-2016 WILLIAM. A. MAN: Introduced by who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has, not identified any significant adverse 'im,pacts, that cannot be mitigated with current project proposal OR b,) The Planning Board, used on a finuited review,has identified the following areas of concern: I) Motion seconded 'b 'Duty adopted this 2W"day of December,2016 1:y the following vote-. AYES,: NOES Phone'. 518.76 1.8220� R'tv 5 M745A4371 742 BaY RoItL NY 12804 G wAvw,qtwcnstwry,,im Site Plan PZ, 262-2016 , Special 'Use Permit3- @1 63 Hanneford Riad Public Hearing Scheduled SE,QR Unlisted Draft Resolution — ` /deny site plan & special use permit approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Sta.ff Notes Decem ber 20, 2016 Site,Plan PZ 262-2016 ANN K. STOR.ANDT REV. TRUST Special Use Permit PZ 263-2016 63 Harmeford Road / WR— Waterfront Residential / h'''ard I SEQR 'Unlisted Material Review:, narrative, application, special, use permit criteria,narrative, site photos and :marina photos, site plan drawing Parcel History: EP-61 -2016 Septic Alteration Reguested.Action, Planning Board review and approval for the operation of a 5 slip Class A marina. Resoluflons L SEQ.R--short fonn 2. Planning Board decision Pro ied Description Applicant requests approval for,the:operation of a 5 slip Class,A marina, Project includes existing dock configuration for 5 berthing spaces, parking,other,requirements f Class A marina and a new septic system, Prpjed subject to Special Use Permit'. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-070 & 1,79-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, Class A marinas steal I be subject to Planning Board review and approval.. Staff Comments Location- The project is, located at 63 Hanneford lid with the marina having,on Pilot Knob Road. Arrangement-The applicant has,been working with the Lake George ParkCon.uniission in regards to requirement to obtain approval for a,Class A.Marina. The applicant has explained that the marina was apre- existing use when the property was acquired in 2007. Site Design-The applicant has detailed the existing site conditions and the manna. A septic systern had been installed, in October 2016. The plans show parking for the homeowners being 2, spaces and, 6 spaces for dock clients The applicant as indicated dock clients will have access to the restroorns in the home. The plans show the marina has an, existing five slips. There are no changes,to the project site:or marina area. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers upon review of the site plan review requirements checklist. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addresser) the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirem, ents of the:applicant's application.j. stormwater, and, k. topography. General Criteria for a.Special Use Permit listed below: A. Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan: Class A Manna is an allowed use in the: Waterfront Zone through a special use:permit. The applicant has,explained this is a pre-existing use and they are working with the ]L P' in regards to obtaining approval to continue the use. D. Compatibility: The proposed Class A Marina has,an existing docking system with 5 slips and a boathouse. This is similar to the neighboring docks and boat bouses. C—Access, circulation and parking: The project plans show the 8 parking spaces that can be used by the horneow-ner and dock efients, Dock clients have a, stairway access to the marina, from the parking area. D. Infi.-asiructure and Services. The applicant does not propose any changes to the existing conditions an the site or marina. E. Environment and natural features; The project is,pie-e.xisting and, no changes to the marina, and natural envimiunent of the area are proposed, F. Long-term effects: The applicant has indicated the Class A Marina review would establish, the pre existing use and then, compliance with the LGPC. Specific criteria for Class A marinas. All marinas shall comply with the standards for Class A and, Class .8 I mannas as adopted by the Lake George Park Commission in, 6 NYCRR Part 646,as Unna, be amended. Lake Georgg Park Commission Excerpt.... Section 646-1.2 Class .A Marinas. In addition to the: requirements of other sections of this Subpart, all Class A marinas servicing the waters, of Lake George shall comply with the following: (a) General requirements, (1) 'No person shall construct, expand, or operate a Class A manna servicing the waters of Lake George, or alter or expand the nurnber or type: of services or recreational activities offered without obtaining a pennit from the cornmission, ar if a permit has been issued for the subject facility, a modification to the permit for that facility which authorizesthe new or expanded services or recreational uses. Pennits, shall be issued for a maximum of five years., Applicant is workingwith the Park Commission to establish the pre:existing marina urse� (2) 'No, permit shall be issued for the construction, operation or expansion of a quick launch, .racility which was not in existence and operating, or far which no pennit was issued,, prior to the efTective date of these regulations. The applicant does not propow a quick, launch facility and the site does not have the means for quick launch. (3) Permits issued pursuant to Section 646-1.2, (a) (1) of this 'Title may be issued only to the owner ol' the facility or in the altern.ative to a lessee of the facility and shall authorize activities and uses at that facility. A permit may not be relocated to other facilities unless a permit for the different facility has been issued by the Commission. Marina permits will be modified to reflect a sale or transfer of the facility to another owner, subject to a determination, by the Commission that the facility is in accordance wi,th the requirements of this Subpart and permits issued in accordance: with this Subpart. Lakeftnt marina facilities at separate locatior under common ownership shall require separate permits pursuant to Section 64 -1.2 (a) (1) ofthis Title., Applicant proposes to operate a slip marina. (4) Special Permits. . special permit is a permit granted by the Commission to operate any new recreational activity as defined in Section, 646-14 (1), of'this Title or the recreational activities, or uses contained in Sect''on 646-1.4 of this Subpart. Special permits are not transferrable to another location and shall not be leased or transferred to another location, facility or operator,. (b) Specific Requirements: No Class, A marina shall be constructed,, expanded or operated without providing the following- (1) Restroorns, including, toilet facilities, for the use bcustomers, which shall be available at all times Froom May I to October 31 of each year,. The applicant proposes a restroom available at applicant homes, on Ha nneford Rd. (2) One on-site parking space or adequate off-site parking for each vessel berthed, Where the Class A marina offers rides, instruction or water-based recreationfor a fee, adequate parking must be Provided for customers of the Class A marina. The applicant proposes 8 parking spaces. 6,for dock clients and 2 for landowner. (3) An adequate storage area for trailers or the storage oftrailers shall be:prohibited. The applicant does not propose the storage oftrailers on the site. -2- (4) Where applicable, proof of compliance with New Yo�rk, State fire code standards and DEC bulk storage standards for the storage of gasoline and hazardous materials. if applicable, no permit application shall be: complete until proof of compliance is submitted to the Commission. The applicant does not propose bulk storage or the storage of gasoline or hazardous materials. (5) For each Class A marina with a,petroleum sales facility, a plan relative to the inspection and maintenance of petroleum storage facilities and all associated equipment, and appropriate measures relative to spill prevention and countermeasures. Such plan shall include: (i) the ins,pection,of all plumbing and related pumping equipment, notless than daily, to guard against leakage of petroleum products into the waters of the Park; (ii) the training of each person pumping motorfuels in procedures to guard against the spillage of such motor fuels into the waters of the park and procedures,to iespond to a spill; and (iii) the maintenance, in close proximity to the pumping facilities, of such equipment as is, necessary to respond to any spill Upetroleurn Products into the waters, of the Park or on to land or structures where it may flow into the waters of the Park,. i-iiii.—NOT APPLICABLE TO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSAL FOR FIVE SLIPS (6), Adequate garbage and debris disposal facilities with leakproof containers, which must be property maintained. The applieant has indicated the garbage and recycling are located at the boathouse and emptied regularly. (7),Facilities for the disposal of sanitary wastes, from vessels with on-board sanitary equipment including- (i) on-site pump out facilities, or proven access to pump, out facilities, for use by vessels which use the services of the Class A marina; and, (ii) facilities for the disposal of waste frorn portable marine toilets, or proven access to such facilities, for use by vessels which use the services of the Class A marina. Such facilities shall be designed, installed,, operated and maintained intained to, prevent the discharge of contaminants from marine toilets to the waters of the: Park or the ground froin which they may flow into thewaters, of the Park. For the purposes of this paragraph, vessels using the services, of the Class A marina Miall include vessels which moor, dock or are quick lau�nched by the marina, Written proof of access to disposal facilities for a period equal to the life of the permit shall be required. Off-site facilities must be located within a reasonable distance from the Class A marina. �i-ii...NOT APPLICABLE TO THE,APPUCANTS PROPOSAL FOR.FIVE SLIPS (8),A boat cleaning area that is designed, operated and maintained in such a manner to, prevent contamination of the waters of the Park shall be provided, or boat cleaning shall be prohibited. No boat cleaning is proposed on site— (9) All Class, A marina owners or operators engaged in the rental of personal watercraft (P,WC) as, that term is defined in Section 646- 2.3 (a) (3) of this Title upon the waters of Lake George shall in addition to the regulations, governing PWC contained, in Subpart 646-2 of this Title compel y %vith, the following regulations: (i) The owner or operator of a PWC shall ensure that prior to operation all users of PWC have read the rules and regulations governing their operation as, contained in this Subpart, as well as, Subpart 64,672, of this Title. All users shall sign a form prepared by the owner or operator that indicates the user has read said rules and regulations. The owner or operator shall maintain written records, that, the above: requirements have been complied with.. The records,are subject to inspection by the Commission upon reasonable notice. iii) If the PWC is part of',a rental fleet or group, of PW s, a tour guide shall operate a vessel with the fleet or group, (iii) A fleet or group shall not consist of more than six, (6) PWC. The tour guide shall guide the operations and behavior of the fleet or group. The tour guide shall not be in charge of more than one: (1) fleet or group at any time. Wfi..NOT APPLICABLE TO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSAL FOR FIVE SLIPS 'Summary The applicant has completed a site plan application and special use,permit for the operation of a 5 slip Class A Marina. Dec16-09 Warren County Planning Department Project Review a�nd Referral Form Reviewed by, Departmen,t oji, December . , X01,.6, Project No me: Ann K ~ toran t Rev. Tru_rst. Owner: Ann 'k .StoTa,nidt li ev. Truest ID Number: -16- PIR-x,62 County P'r ject . Ria 1 -0, Current Zoning: ', Community: Queensbury nsbumy Project Description: pplkant requests approval for the operation of a 5,slip class manna. Site I ocati n: 63 Hanneinrd Rif Otey & Pinot 'Knob, Rid Tax Map N'umbe:r(s)r 227.18-142 Staff 27.1 -1- Staff Notes: The issues here appearto be of a local nature involving local issues withotA any significant impactsnn County pr partiies or resources,. Staff recommands. nen cuuinty impact based nnttue information submitted according to the suggested review criteria of NYS,Gen rail Municipal Law lia�n 2:39 appliedto the proposed project. Local nc;t;.iuq m to date (if any)- County Planning Department- NCI partment-N R LocalAction:/Final Di position- 411' 112/71201116 Warren County Phinning D partrnurut DateSigned Local Official Prate:Sipped. 13 Town of Queensbury Planning Board SEQR RESOLUTION— Grant Positive or Negative Declaration Site Plan PZ 262-2016 & Special Use Pennit PZ 2163-2016 Ann K. Storandt Rev. Trust Tax.Map ID: 227.18-1-42 �Prpefty Address: 63 Hanneford Road /Zoning- WR The applicant requests approval for the operation of a 5 slip Class A marina. Project includes existing dock, configuration for 5 berthing spaces,, parking, other requirements for, Class A marina and a new septic system. Project subject to Special. Use Permit Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-070 & 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, Class A marinas shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board actionis subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is, Unlisted n the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Qualitns of theT : own of y Review Act and the regul.atio Queensbury; No Federal. or other agencies are involved; Part I of the: Short E has been completed by the applicant, Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the To of"'Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that, this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement meed not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issue& MOTION TO GRANT APQS1TfVE DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 262-2016 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 263-2016 ANN K. STORANDT REV. TRUST Introduced by who,moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff". 1. Part 11 of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board, 2. Part III of the Short EAF'has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Motion seconded by Duty adopted this 20'4, day of December, 2016 by the following,vote: AYES: NOES, 11ho,ne: 5 18.761-U2 '1, 1°ax; 5 18-745A437 1742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 1 www,queensbury.not k"txld' Que "�'N)ury' r" 12""104 Town, of Queensbury,Planning,Board R.'ESOLunON-Grant/Deny Approval SfFE PLAN PZ 262-2016& SPECIAL USL7PERMIT PZ 263-2016 ,ANNK. STOPLANDT REV. TRUST Tax.Map ID. 227.18-142/Property Address: 63 Hanneford Rd. /Zoning: WR The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for,Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant requests approval for the operation of a 5 slip Class A marina. Project includes existing dock. configuration for 5 berthing spaces, parking, other requirements, for Class A marina and a new septic system. Project subject to Special Use Permit. Pursuant to Chapter 179Al -07 & 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, Class A marinas shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined,that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in.the 7.0ning Code; As required by Gieneral Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation;, The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review .Act (SEQRA) ,and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration- Determination of Non-Significance The Planning, Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 12/ 2016 and continued the public hearing to 12/20/2016,when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials subrnitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 12/20/2016; The Planning Board, determines that the application complies, with the review, considerations, and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 262-201PECIAL USE PERMIT PZ 263-2016 ANN K. ST REV. TRUS�l L- Introduced by -who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon,the following conditions: 1) Waivers request grantedIdenied: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application wall referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further,review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; Page I of 2 Phione. 5M761.8,220 1 Far 518,745-4437 742 Bay Road.Queensbuiry,NY 12804 1 www.,qui?ens,btiry.net c) The applicant n�nust meet with Staff Alen- approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site:wor.k; d) Sub,sequent issua�nce of further permits, including building permits is,dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this,resolution; e) s,built plans to certify that the site plan, is developed according to the app�ro�ved plans to be provided prierr to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, Resolution to lie ,P laced on.final pla,ns in its entirety and legible. . Motion seconded by Duly adopted this Wh day of December, 2016 by the following voW AYES: 'NO�ES. Paget eft Phone! 5118.76L8220 Fax,,. 5,18,745,443717'42 Bay Road. Queor,sbury. NY 12801 1 www,queensburymet Site 'Plan PZ 257-2,0116 @ 161 Carey Road, Public Hearing Schecluiled SEAR Unlisted, Draft Resolution — grant/deny site plan approvall Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development DepartmentStaff Notes December 20, 20 1 6 Site:Plan PZ 257-2016 HUDSON HEADWAXER HE T11 NETWORK 161 Carey Road/ L1—Commercial Light Industrial/ Ward 4 SEER Unlisted Material Review: application, fence cut sheet, site plan drawing Parcel History; CC310-2015 New office, CC490-2016 Office alt_ Beg uested Action Planning Board review and approval for 240 ft. of 6 ft. high, vinyl fencing tea be located on the west side of property to screen from. adjoining business. Resolutions 1, SEQR- short form 2. Planning Board decision. PMject Description Applicant proposes 240 ft. of ft. high vinyl fencing to be located on the west side of property to screen, from adjoining businem. Pursuant to Chapter 179-5-070 of the Zoning Ordinance., fences in a CLI zone shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff"Comments Site details-The applicant proposes to install a 240,ft privacy fencin gon the west property line. The applicant has provided a plot plan showing the location of the fencing. The fencing is,to be 2 ft from the property line and is in line with existing parking area on the west side of the parcel. There are no additional plantings or lighting in the: area of the fence. The applicant,proposes the fencing to screen the parking area. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The: application form, identified as "'Requiremen&' outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application. the applicant has, either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application. g,. site fighting, h. signage, i. utilities, i stormwater, k. topography, 1. landscaping, p, floor plans, q. soil lop, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Summary 'The,applicant has completed a site plan application fbr the installation of a 240 ft privacy fence on a portion of the western property line, , Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on December 5, 2016 Project Name- Hudson Headwaters Healthy Network Owner:; Hadl orw Headwaters Heaitlh Network ID Number:, BY-1 '- PR-'2'57 County Pr jest##: Dee16,-11 CurrentZoning- GLI Comm,unity., Qluueensbu ry Project Description: pplh ,ant proposes lInstalllation of 6 ft high vinyl fending to be Ioeat dl an tlhe west 8id8 of property t '8reeni from adiloin.ing siifgn company business. Site Location: Carat' Hd Tax Map Nurnber�s): ta,ti"l Notes- The issues here appearta be of ai loch nature Involving local I'ssu s,without anysignificant uma tson County properties, or resources, 'Staff recommends no county impa t base onthe infrarmationsubmitted accordin i to the suggested review riteriia of C YSGenaral Municipal L;aw Section 239 applied to,the prop sed project. Local l actions to date (if any). County Planning Department: NCV Local Actio w: °incl Disposition: /1Z11 12/712016 Warren N ua.ity Planning D pmartnient Date Signed Local Officiai Date Signed Owner: ID Number: ounty Pro eet##: Current Zoning: PLEASE RETURN THIS F tp t t°`HE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING M2PdwyR'°I'P ENT WI'THIN 10 DAYS!OF FINAL ACTION uiI f )t I Cc,I LA lun-.'v 7'k-' P,o,�l(I u ee ri s 1-1 A,I n'v. ��Y 1 280,4 Town of Queensbury Planning Board SEQR RESOLUTION—Grant Positive or Negative Declaration Site Plan PZ 257-2016 Hudson Headwater Health Network Tax Map ID: 3019.13-2-31.2� Property Address: 161 Carey Road /ZoningCLI I The applicant proposes 240, ft of 6 ft. high vinyl fencing to be located on the west side of property to screen from adjoining business. Pursuant,to Chapter 179-5-0710 of the Zoning, Ordinance, f6nces in a CLI zone shall be subject to Planning Board, review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action, is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered, by this Board is Unlisted, in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part I of the Sh,ort,EAFhas been completed by the applicant-, Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF', it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse: impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an envirotimental. impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration, is issued., MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVEi DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN PZ 257-2016 HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETO K Introduced by who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. I. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short, E has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did, not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Motion seconded by Duty adopted this 20" day of December, 2016 by,the following vote: AYES: NOES,: Phanc: 51&761. 7'29 1 Rix. 518.745A437 lI 742 13-uy R(xid, QL14;C1W11E[), NY 128104 1 www.qw;vnsbkn'yxv( NY �280d Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION—Girant/Deny Approval SITE PLAN PZ 257-2016 HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK Tax Map ID: 309.13-2-31.2/ Property Address: 161 Carey Road,/ Zoning: CLI The applicant has submitted an application to the PlanningBoaTd for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9, of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes 240 k of 6 ft. high vinyl fencing to be located on the west side of property to screen from adjoining business. Pursuant to Chapter 179-5-070 of the Zoning Ordinance, fences in an CLI zone shall be subject to Planning,Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179- -080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposa,l satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project pursuant to the State Environmental, Quality Review .het (SEQRA) and adopted a, SLA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on, 12)20/20,16 and continued 'tire pub,lic hearing to 12J20/2016, when it was closed; The Planning Board has reviewed the application matenals submitted by, the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing,and submitted inn.writing,through and including 12/20/2016; The Planning, Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9,of the:Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan, approval, MOTION 'TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN PZ 257-2016 HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NFTMIntroduced by, -who,moved for its adoption; Per the drall provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request grant J/denied: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this,resolution. a) If application wall referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning,Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans, in compliance with.the Site Plan,,must be submitted to the our Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel, c) The applicant must meet wit,h Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; Pago I of 2 Phone. 5,18.761.8220 j Fax-, 518.745,4437 d 742 Say Road,Queimsbury. NY 12804 ; wwmquet,�nsbury.net d) Subsequent issuance offurther permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions opt is resolution; e) Asi-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance oft e certificate of occupane ; YJ t) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Motion secondedby, p 9 Duly adopted this 20" day of December 2016,by the fol I owin vote: AYES: NOES: Page 2 of 2 P,hone, 518 761.822:0, Fax: 518,745,4437 , 742: Bay Road, Queensbury', NY 12804 www,queiisbury,net