Loading...
1974-09-19 SP 1.$6 Special Meeting September 19, 1974 Members Present: John Austin Supervisor Daniel Olson Councilman Robert Barber Councilman Gordon Streeter Councilman Councilman Harold Robillard and Town Counsel J. David Little were absent. The meeting was opened with a salute to the flag. Supervisor Austin asked the clerk to read a letter from Pete Mosher of 1 Luzerne Road, Glens Falls, N.Y. To: The members of the Queensbury Town Board Re: Application before the Queensbury Planning Board , Wednesday, September 4, 1974 of Clinton Mosher, DBA Pete Moshers, for a variance, in order to construc0a new and better garage on our vacant lot adjoining the lot now being used. Gentlemen: We feel the remarks made by board member John E. Sinnott, both at the meeting and published in the local newspaper, degrading our home and business was completely uncalled for. We do have parts around our GARAGE- not shed, but as you must be well aware, we have a license to sell used cars and used parts. Both the local and State license. You must also be aware of the over abundance of stealing that is going on in the Town of Queensbury as well as the surrounding counties. Therefore, in order to protect our parts; radiators, starters , generators, etc. they must be stored in our garage and bus near our home so that they a]Fe not stolen. Also parts that are off and waiting for customers. Even with this precaution, parts are taken and as yet, the Town Police have not apprehendec the one or ones doing it. Mr. Sinnott chose to degrade our home and business, both at the meeting�j and in the ,ocal newspaper, and yet requested a denial to our attempt to put up a nicer ooking building, finished off with the same Color-Lac siding as is on our 4use, making a more acceptable appearance to our neighbors and those traveling by our area. My intent was to file the required applications and build my garage according to the laws. I did not, nor do I now intend to insult or ridicule any member of the Town Board, or any of its appointed officials. I believe that as a taxpayer and a business man of many years in the Town of Queensbury, that I should be allowed to improve my business and my property, as long as it is within reason, without being insulted or degraded by any member of any board that I have to contact to achieve my goal. I still would like to build my garage, and would appreciate your advice on how this can be done, without being prejudged before the facts are presented, or without being further insulted. Used Cars and Used Parts are needed, even by "some" of the people on the Town Board, and we would like to stay in business, as this is how we make our living, but we do not feel we should be degraded in any manner for trying to make our living selling Used Cars and Used Parts, or by living in the wrong section of the Town of Queensbury. Respectfully, /s/Pete Mosher /s/Mrs. Helen Mosher Mr. Austin requested a copy of this letter be submitted to the Chairman of the Town Planning Board and that a report be made back to this Board. A memorandum was received from the Chief of Police in reference to the possibility of needing another School Crossing Guard. The survey was made at the Intersection of Aviation Road and Route 87 at the northbound entrance ramp. 187 Copy of the memo to be given to Police Committee to see if another crossing guard is necessary. A petition for the annexation to the Town of Lake George of territory adjoining said town, in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York was presented to the Town Board. Mr. Barber requested that it be referred to the Town Counsel and a report brought back to the Town Board. Copy of the petition was placed on file in the Clerk' s office. PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF LAKE GEORGE OF TERRITORY ADJOINING SAID TOWN, IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY, WARREN COUNTY,' NEW YORK FOR PRESENTATION TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF LAKE GEORGE AND THE —TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY. PURSUANT to Article 17 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York, as amended, the petitioners herein, petition for Annexation, to the Town of Lake George, all of the territory which is not in the Town of Lake George, which is in the Town of Queensbury, New York, which adjoins the Town of Lake George, and which is described in Paragraph "2" of this petition and petitioners state therefor as follows: 1. The Town of Lake George is an Incorporated Town in the County of Warren and State of New York. The territory of said Town is shown on the Tax Map entitled Town of Lake George, Warren County, New York attached hereto and marked Schedule A. 2. Petitioners petition to have annexed to said Town, territory in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, which territory adjoins said Town of Lake George, said territory, which petitioners petition to have so annexed is shown on an outline map marked on Schedule B hereto attached. 3. The petitioners herein are the owners of the majority in assessed valuation of the property in said territory assessed upon the last preceding Town Assessment Roll of the Town of Lake George. 4. The number if inhabitants of said territory adjoining the Town of Lake George, which territory the petitioners petition to have annexed to said Town of Lake George is approximately Twenty-five. 5. Attached hereto and marked Schedule B is a map of said territory adjoining and sought to be annexed to said Town, on said map, Schedule B, each separately owned, integral part of said territory is indicated. 6. Attached hereto and marked Schedule C is a list showing of each separately owned, integral part and the assessed valuation of said territory as the same appears on the last preceding Town Assessment Roll of the Town of Lake George. 7.Attached hereto and marked "Exhibit D" is an outline map showing Town of Lake George as said Town would be extended were said adjoining territory annexed to said Town. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the said petitioners, in the presence of a witness, hereunto severally affix our names and sign the foregoing petition on the dates written beside our names. (Copy on file in the office of the Town Clerk) RESOLUTION ADOPTING REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING THE RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS ON THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENCIES RESOLUTION NO. 227, Introduced by Mr. Olson who moved its adoption secon ed by Mr. Barber. RESOLVED, that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 88 of the Public ;,_Officers Law, the following regulations are hereby adopted establishing the rules and procedures governing the public access to records of the Town of Queensbury and its authorized agencies. Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this regulation is to set forth the methods and procedures governing the availability, location and nature of those records of the Town of Queensbury and its authorized agencies subject to the provisions of Article 6 of the Public Officers Law, known as the Freedom of Information Law. Section 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this regulation: (a) the term "record" or "records" means any file, memorandum, document or other writing required x.88 by law to be made available for public inspection; (b) the term "payroll record" means an itemized record setting forth the name, business address, title and salary of every officer and employee of the Town of Queen-sbury or its authorized agencies; (c) the term "workday" mean any day except Saturday, Sunday, a public holiday of a day on which the Town of Queensbury Office Building is otherwise closed for general business; (d) the term "Fiscal Officer" means the Town Supervisor - or his authorized representatives. Section 3. Procedure for obtaining records. (a) The Town Clerk or his authorized representative is hereby designated as the Records Access Officer for all Town Records. (b) Any person wishing to inspect and/or obtain a copy of any such record, other that a payroll record, may make application to the records Access Officer. Such application shall be in writing on a form to be prescribed by the Records Access Officer. Blank forms may be obtained either personally on any workday at the Town Clerk' s - Office or by mail, addressed to such office. Completed forms may be submitted to the Records Access Officer either personally at such office on any workday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. or by mail, addressed to such office or to such other office as the Records Access Officer may specify on the application form. Upon receipt of such an application, in the proper form and at the appro- priate time, the Records Access Officer shall search for the record requested. If he determines that the record requested is not in his - custody, the Officer shall advise the applicant, as the case may be, (1) that the record does not exist, (2) that the record is in the custody of another specified agency, or (3) that the record was in his custody but has been lost. If he determines that the record requested is in his custody, he shall either (1) produce the record for inspection at his office (and, if so requested and upon payment of the appropriate fee, shall make and certify a copy of the record) , (2) advise the applicant that the record is in his custody and make arrangements for inspection and/or copying at a later time, or (3) deny access to the record as provided in section 7 of this regulation. The Records Access Officer, in his discretion, may waive compliance with any formality prescribed by this subdivision, including the use of application forms. (c) The Fiscal Officer shall be the Town Supervisor or his authorized representative. Any bona fide member of the news media wishing to inspect and/or obtain a copy of such payroll record may make application to the Fiscal Officer in writing on forms prescribed by the Town Supervisor. Application to inspect and/or obtain a copy of such payroll record shall be made to the Fiscal Officer by the m6d5er-npebsanally on any workday during regular working hours at the office of the Fiscal Officer at the Toyfn Office Building, or such other place as he may direct. Upon receipt of such an application, in the proper form and at the appropriate time, and upon production by such member of appropriate identification, the Fiscal Officer shall search for and produce for inspection the payroll record. If the member requests a copy of such payroll record, the Fiscal Officer shall provide him with one. Section 4. List of records. On behalf of the Town of Queensbury, the Records Access Officer shall maintain and make available for in- spection and copying at his office a current list, reasonably detailed by subject matter, of the types of records produced, filed or first kept in the Department on and after September 1, 1974. Such list shall be in conformity with such regulations as may be promulgated by the Committee on Public Access to Records. Any person desiring a copy of such list may requestea copy thereof personally or by mail and one shall be supplied to him. 1$g Section 5. Fees. The fee for photocopies of records shall be one Dollar ($1.00) per page not exceeding 9 inches by 15 inches in size. The fees for other types of copies or transcripts and for certifications shall be such reasonable amounts as the Town Board shall establish. Notwithstanding the above, the Records Access Officer may, in his discretion, waive all or any portion of the fees authorized by this section for any record or class of records. Section 6. Prevention of invasions of privacy. In accordance with the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Public Officers Law and in conformity with such guidelines as may be pro- mulgated by the Committee on Public Access to Records regarding the prevention of unwarranted invasions of personal privacy, the 'Records Access Officer may delete fcam any record identifying de- tails the disclosure of which would result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy prior to making such record available for inspec- tion and/or copying. In the event that one or more deletion is so made from any document, the Records Access Officer shall provide written notice of that fact to the person given access to the re- cord. If the record is such that the personal matters cannot be fully deleted without substantively affecting the record or the identifying details cannot be effectively deleted, the Records Access Officer shall deny access to such record as provided in section 7 of this regulation. Section 7. Grant or denial of access to records. If the Records Access Officer determines that an application to inspect and/or copy, records pertains to information required to be -disclosed under paragraph a,b,c,d,e,f,g,t)or i of subdivision 1 of section 88 of the Public Officers Law and not exempt from disclosure as an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or otherwise, he shall grant the application. If the Records Access Officer determines that an application to inspect and/or copy records pertains to other information not exempt from disclosure as an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of otherwise, he shall grant the application '-unless he determines that to do so would adversely affect the public interest. If the Records Access Officer determines that an application to inspect and/or copy records pertains to information specifically exempted from disclosure by paragraph a,b,c , or d of subdivision 7 of Section 88 of the Public Officers Law or under section 6 of this regulation pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 of .such law, he shall deny such application. In denying any application to inspect and/or copy records the Records Access Officer shall indicate his reason for such denial and shall advise the applicant of his right to appeal to the Town Board;' Section 8. Any person whose application to inspect and/.or copy records has been denied pursuant to section 7 of this regulation may appeal such denial to the Town Board. Such appeal shall be in writing and must set forth; the name and address of the applicant; the specific record(s) requested; the date of the denial; and the. :-._.;. . reasons given for such denial. The Town Board shall, upon receipt of a written appeal, immediately review the matter and affirm, modify or reverse the denial. If the Town Board affirms or modifies the denial, it shall within 7 days of receipt of the appeal: (1) communicate its reasons for such affirmation or modification to the person making the appeal; and(2) inform such person of his right to appeal such affirmation or modification under Article 78 of thh-Civil —Practice Law and Rules. Section 9. Effective date. This resolution shall take effect immediately. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Mr. Barber, Mr. Streeter, Mr. Austin. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Robillard. 190 RESOLUTION TO APPOINT DOG ENUMERATOR FOR 1974 RESOLUTION NO. 228, introduced by Mr. Austin who moved its adoption seconded by Mr. Streeter. WHEREAS, annually in September of each year the Town Board of each town shall appoint a resident or residents or designate the Police Department to prepare a list of persons in such town owning or harboring dogs, therefore be it ' RESOLVED, that James Davison be and he hereby is appointed Dog Enumerator under the provisions of Section 108 of the Agriculture and Markets Law for the year 1974. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Mr. Barber, Mr. Streeter, Mr. Austin. Noes : None. Absent: Mr. Robillard. RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE ATTENDANCE AT CONFERENCE RESOLUTION NO. 229, introduced by Mr. Streeter who moved its adoption seconded by Mr. Austin. RESOLVED, that J. Arthur Norton and Gilbert Mellon be authorized to attend a meeting of the New York Planning Federation sponsored by the Planning and Zoning Institute to be held at Grossingers on Oct. 20-22, 1974, and be if further RESOLVED, that the necessary and actual expenses of such attendance is a proper town charge. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson , Mr. Barber, Mr. Streeter, Mr. Austin. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Robillard. RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CONTRACTS RELATING TO Y E S PROGRAM FOR 1975 RESOLUTION NO. 230, introduced by Mr. Olson who moved its adoption secon e by treeter. RESOLVED, - that the Town of Queensbury continue joint participation in the YOUTH ,1EMPLOYMENT SERVICE (YES) Program during 1975 with the City of Glens Falls and the Village of South Glens Falls, and that the Town Supervisor be and he hereby is authorized and directed to apply for state assistance under such program, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized to execute contracts with the City of Glens Falls and the Village of South Glens Falls, to provide for the joint municipal sponsorship of the program under which arrangement the City of Glens Falls shall be the disbursing municipality for all three communities; and under which the Town of Queensbury' s share of the support of said program shall be in the wDunt of $1,500.00. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes; Mr. Olson, Mr. Barber, Mr. Streeter, Mr. Austin. Noes; None. Absent: Mr. Robillard. To RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT BID ON WATER DEPARTMENT MATERIALS SPECIFICATION NO. 74-4 RESOLUTION NO. 231, introduced by Mr. Barber who moved its adoption seconded by Mr. Streeter. WHEREAS, Thomas Flaherty, Water Supt. , did request the Town Board to advertise for bids for water department materials to complete proposed extensions of the Aviation Road and West Mountain Road and WHEREAS, the Board did advertise for bids and bids were received and opened September 12, 1974 from Canron Inc. Warren Pipe Division, Griffin Pipe Products Co. , United States Pipe and Foundry Co. , and Robert D. Spence Inc. and then turned over to Mr. Flaherty for his recommendation , his determination being that Canron Inc. was the low bidder, therefore be it "RESOLVED,- that the bid be awarded to Canron Inc. for water department materials to complete proposed extensions of the Aviation Road and West Mountain Road. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson. Mr. Barber, Mr. Streeter, Mr. Austin. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Robillard. Mr. Austin opened the meeting to the public. Mrs. Pauline Tougas opened . the discussion inquiring about the pit that is being constructed at the landfill. She asked if there were going to be any information meetings. Mr. Austin replied that the town is considering the creation of an industrial waste site, a special site at the landfill where Hercules can dump their material. Mr. Austin said that tests are being made and as soon as all the tests are completed, which could take another 3 weeks, the town. will set a date for an information meeting. Mrs. Tougas asked why the- work is being done before the information meeting. She also mentioned that part of the landfill is a part of the Adirondack Park and the town must have their approval also. Mrs. Tougas expressed concern about the pigment that Hercules was dumping and also leaving along the roadside on Ridge Road. Mr. Austin stated that the Health Department has tested this material and it does not constitute a hazard. Test wells are being driven and if they become polluted then we will go one step further and create another shield. (reference to pit) Mrs. Tougas stated that by the time you create another shield your water will become polluted and then it is too late. Mr. Austin explained. that this material,at present, is not being dumped in the pit. The material that is going to be dumped in the pit, stated Mr. Austin, is a sludge that is presently being stored in lagoons at Hercules. It is not coming to the Landfill presently. I say again that the material that is being placed on the Landfill presently, the residue that is left in these empty containers, I duo not know that it is not material that has been purified and I ask the Town Engineer if he has any knowledge of this material. The matdcial that they now dump there. is normal trash generated by the plant, stated Mr. Buckley. There is included in it some residue of the pigment they sell. The material is not toxic and is acceptable to be placed on landfill the same as, any other general material. -- Mrs. Murray remarked that she has been up to the dump and has picked up some of these pigment containers, these containers she has in her possession in her garage. She indicated that she was asked to leave the landfill area where they were dumping this material. There is a bulldozer there covering the material imediately. Mr. Austin explained that Hercules is using the landfill the same as any other landowner and the material that they are dumping there is periodically checked by ENCON. Mrs. Murray stated that they were not shown this section of the landfill, that they were only showed the pit area. She remarked about the meeting that the Board had with ENCON this afternoon and stated to Mr. Austin that he should know all about it. Mr. Austin asked, "I should know all about what"? :192 Mrs-. Murray said to Mr. Austin that he should know what is being dumped in our landfill. Mr. Austin said that he did know what is going up there. Mrs. Murray said "What about the samples in my garage"? Mr. Austin statetat hat he would be very glad to see them. Mr. Austin said he would be up to her house to pick up the samples for testing. The question asked why is the pit being dug. Who gave the permission for them to do it? Who is baying for this to be done? Mr. Austin stated that- the cost of the pit and the wells are being paid for by Hercules and in addition they- will pay the town an annual fee of $19000.00. The feeling of the people attending is that nothing should have been done until an information meeting was held. Mr. Austin stated that no industrial waste has gone into that pit of the nature that the pit is being created for. Mrs. Murray asked about the pigments that have been dumped up there for years and also along Ridge Road in front of their homes. She asked is that material dangerous. Mr. Austin stated that the Board feels that there is nothing toxic about those materials and they are the ordinary things that come to landfills. Mrs. Murray said that she had an informal analyses made of the material by a chemist who has been with Hercules for 35 years and he said. it was dangerous stuff. Mr. Buckley said that ENCON has asked for more data on the solubility of what is being dumped there. The question was asked as to when the last periodic check was made of the landfill. Mrs. Murray asked that Hercules not be involved in the testing. That would be like asking the "Fox to watch the chickens". Mr. Buckley said that the water sampling program is about to begin. Mrs. Tougas stated that if the wells are polluted in the homes around the landfill area, is the town prepared to face a law suit, or would the town buy up all those homes so that the people would not haup tbestay there. Mrs. Tougas said that it would not take pollution long to hit her well. She was only a quarter of a mile fmn the landfill. Mr. Streeter asked Mrs. Tougas if she had any information about an under- water stream that went from the landfill down to her house. She said "no" She asked Mr. Streeter if he had any information and he said"absolutely not." Mrs. Tougas said that, all. she knows is that she is downhill from the landill and water runs downhill. Mr. Buckley state*hat the -gfson the wells are being drilled is to see in which direction the groun� How is. Hercules designed this pit and submitted the plans for ENCON for their approval. In order to insure that the pit will not leak any toxic material a lining of clay will be used. The question was asked how- come Finch Pruyn is dumping there now. Mr. Austin explained that this was a joint effiort with South Glens Falls and the City of Glens Falls recognizing the problem that Finch Pruyn had in regard with the removal of their material. They have had to clean up their area there because of the laws of water purity and each community agreed to take a portion of this material in their landfill. It was a decision of the Highway Supt. upon recommendation of the Town Board. Mrs. Tougas said the smell from the material dumped by Pruyns is .really bad. She also stated that the people in that area are forgotten people. The roads are bad and there is a definite need for streetlights. Mr. Murray asked why we are taking on the problems of creating a joint ---� landfill with Glens Falls. This is a Glens Falls problem and West Glens Falls should get after Glens Falls but not after Queensbury to take Glens Falls garbage. We do not want Glens Falls problems on Ridge Road stated Mr. Murray, we have our own. Glenn Gregory told the board that there are 28 loads coming out of Pruyns in a 24 hour period. There is no landfill in the Town of Queensbury that is going to take that kind of garbage very long. Mrs. Murray asked that we have an informational meeting as soon as possible on this issue. Mr. Austin said we will have a meeting when we have the results of the tests that will be learned from the drilling of the wells. i A request was made to have a full time checker at the landfill to see that no one outside of Queensbury was dumping there. Mrs. Tougas complained about the junk cars and tires that have been dumped on the Russell Harris property and along the Jenkinsville Rd. Mrs. Tougas asked if the Board could stop Hercules from dumping any more material at the landfill until it is tested. Mr. Austin stated he was not sure if it could be done legally. Mr. Buckley said that we could ask them to stop voluntarily any disposal of the pigment material. They must take their everyday trash in order to operate. Mr. Austin said he would be willing to check into this matter. Mr. Olson asked Mr. Buckley to check and see if the Health Dept. would check on the material that they are now dumping. Mr. Murray asked that the State make .the .tests. Mr. Murray stated that Mr. Barber at last weeks meeting stated that Glens Falls was dragging their feet in regard to the joint landfill. Mr. Barber stated that he did not say that Glens Falls was dragging their feet. Mr. Barber -said that we are dragging our feet because there was an attempt by the previous administration of this board to have a combined landfill. The present members of this board took up the momentum to look at the practicality of that same type of philosophy looking at Glens Falls and Queensbury as a combined unit. A lot of work has been done on behalf of the Town Engineer and other people. My statement last week was we were dragging our feet because we could not give Glens Fallstkfi appropriAtee statistics as far as cost is concern, therefore they have not made a decision. Mr. Streeter read the pertinent part of the minutes from the last meeting; " Mr. Barber stated that we are at fault to because we have not given the city a concrete proposal on a joint landfill base. I would like to have this board put forth a proposal to the City of Glens Falls for a joint landfill. " Mr. Barber stated that he is calling for a joint landfill not necessarily at Ridge Road. The question was asked how long Hercules was going to be dumping and the answer was given,as ten years. A report in 1972 from an engineering firm stated that the town dump could not be used as a joint landfill. Mr. Austin replied that the town has acquired more land since that report. Mrs. Renner stated that the term Joint landfill means something to her. She feels that it will be a big problem for the Town of Queensbury. Mr. Barber stated that he has declared himself to his fellow board members ineligible to vote on any matter pertaining to Hercules. I have done this previously because of my involvment and I make this statement now as a citizen of Queensbury and not as a Town Board member. I am concerned about the development of the whole problem as far as the town is concerned. We are in the business of hauling, as you all know, and occasionly we make mistakes and even though I am a town board member I would like you all to know that the police agency in this town has given a number of summonses=_bo my personnel. My personnel have been directed to cover the .loads and when they are caught personnaly by me they are terminated and they pay their own summonses. Any question coming before this board pertaining to Hercules� I will not address myself nor will I defend the position of Hercules because I have a contract with them. This I owe to the public because I am an elected official of this town. It is difficult for me to sit up here as a Councilman without taking that position. I could not be a good elected official If I did not take this position. Councilman Robillard called Mr. Austin this morning and he had a conflict tonight and he was very upset about the special meeting. Mr. Austin told Mr. Robillard that he did not think anything controversial would come up tonight. This brought a bit of laughter from the people attending. Mr. Barber left the meeting at this point. The people asked Mr. Barber to slow his trucks down on Ridge Rd. Mr. Barber assured them he would talk to his men. Russell Harris remarked about the cars on his territory and asked the town if they had another car crusher program they could be disposed of. Mr. Austin remarked that the crushed cars are being used in the landfill as a leach "area for the dumping of sewage. 19 4 Russell Harris explained the flow of some of the streams in the area of the landfill. Mr. Olson explained that he was available for any one who calls for assistance anytime. Mr. Austin stated that an information meeting will be properly publicized and will probably be held in three or four weeks. RESOLUTION-TO APPROVE AUDIT :BSS RESOLUTION NO. 232, introduced by Mr. Austin who moved its adoption seconded by Mr. 0 son. .F RESOLVED, that the Audit of Bills as listed on Abstract No. 74-9A and numbered 1220 and totaling $1.000.00 is hereby approved. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Mr. Streeter and Mr. Austin. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Barber, Mr. Robillard. On motion the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Donald A. Chase Town Clerk REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 1974 MEMBERS PRESENT: Harold Robillard Acting Supervisor Daniel Olson Councilman Robert Barber Councilman' Gordon Streeter Councilman John Austin - Absent Supervisor J. David Little Town Counsel Meeting Opened 7:30 P.M. Salute to the Flag. GUESTS: Lillian Nicholson-League of Women Voters, Le,_e: Colusuan, Greta Johnson, Joseph Kestner, Qufntin Kestner Bid Opening-Contract #18 Standpipe foundation, access road, waterline and valve pit-Notice Shown. . .Bids Opened 7:30 P.M. Quintin Kestner read the bids. . . Howard A. LaRose General Contractor 267 Warren St. Glens Falls, N.Y. Bid Bond 5% $53 ,219.00 Laquidara, Inc. P.O. Box 264 Ballston Spa, N.Y. Bid Bond 5% $47,600.00 Fisk Equipment Corp. P.O. Box 32 Hudson Falls, N.Y. Bid Bond 5% $60,000.00 Acting Supervisor HaroZA Robillard-turned the bids over to Joseph Kestner for his recommendation. . . Mobile Home-Public Hearing Eli Thorpe of R.D.#1 Lake George, New York to locate a mobile home on Glen Lake property owned by Eli.Thorpe for a one year permit-Building Inspector recommended approval. .. Hearing Opened 7: 31 P.M. No one spoke for or against the application Closed 7:32 P.M.