doc20170420141848 PLANNING BOARD
STAFF NOTES
APRIL 2t) ,, 2017
aaeen bwy Planning Roerd agenda
Second Regular Meeting; Tuesday, A brit 2 , 21117 f Time 7— 1.1 pra
ueensbuury Activities. easter @ 742 Bay Road
III VI EQ 04/04120117
Tabled Items:
_. ..
Applicaauwt(s) HILL T"E&LION . application Type Site Plan I7-201 7 _
CERN Sp ial Use Permit 3-247",017
d rucr( � David&Lisa Dcster ..SEQR Type Type 1I
�T° 1.. ._ . .. Tracer Clathicr .. . '.Lot sig l,I acres
Location hard: I........ . _. _..m. � _,Z0niaa "I s'afi t a:
_ .....
Tax 11 No, 20-17-1.5 PTlieuanceRef acs. .......� ..t.a` ..10-d 0
Cross Reference AV 21-7414.SP 21-2014 Res. Warren Co.1 ferral n/a
Septic Alterations,AV 15-2017 j
Information �^
I..bloc.PI91 I.u& .1191. h 2 17,April ,2 17 __... _Sits Info __.. �_ ...... .. .. .. .......
Project Descriptiow Applicant,proposes to itwstall a 40' x 4'deck and a pathway from Ash Drive to dock location. Project is considered 1
al Class A marina,as dock is for more than one owner—'a total of toter, Project is part rata court order for property owner,to install.
Pursuant Chapter 179-101-040 of we Zoning _......_. ... _ .... __.Planning i approval.
..... tug(�rdirtatw>ce�Mass marines shall be subject to lalamaruuam Boaa�d a�ew�uew�w and as ro.,.. . ..___
Planning Boorul P,..gq ri IttM, ,rl,�d9f.le:w .,
........
prprlicant(s)...... STP'Ir�A T® SHOPS CORP. � �ppl:icatioa Type � Site Flan 30-2t1I7
_ _.....
D�wncr i ___._ .� .Sarna as appllcarut ®.. ......_ ......® ._ i S'Di Tie Hued.. _. ......e.�
Agen s Charles Mihail,Stewart � Lot.size � 1.72 acnes
. .. ., _ ... .. . _ .................... . ........ .
Location 977 State Route 1 I lord: I Q nein Classification. HC
Tax-111a-No. 266.37111! H' rdinan e l fer= B 1719-13-04011&1
Crass Peferenee, SP 3 -1989 new construction;2003 mod.. `aa reua Co"Itefeurral April 2417
AV 15-2003 for gas:islandskan epics;
2449=4w for 600 sf addition;AV26-2' 17
... . ... .. . ..
Pub ie Hearing.®.I na for recounmendation __....__. _ ®__...� ._.Site Infor atiour , APs..,,.,. ®.___ ._.__ _„_ _._.....
wProject Descriptlom Applicant proposes demolition of 2.„292 sq. ft, convenience store with fuel to build a new 3,695 sq, ft. convenience
store;with a,x,360 sip. ft., canc!py to have 4 islands/8 fueling positions.First phase will be store construction with associated site work,
then derniolition of present, building&canopy to install new canopy. Project includes site disturbance greater than an acre and associated
site work., Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 176.4-0130 of"the Zoning Ordinance new convenience stm, with fuel shall he subject to
Planning Board review and approval. Variance, Relief is sought for setbacks. Planning Beata shall provide a recommendation to the
oniuugBoard,of appeals.
Applicant(s) ROBERT 1F°I1LI'b E,R Application Type Site flan 31-2017
Freshwater Wetlands Permit 3-2017
.... .......... ...... _.,._._._
Owner(s) ante as atplicartt.. _...._..._ ... .... . ” T _ . T .11 . .. .. .... .............. ....�
erwts n+a Lot si d 3e2 acrs
La.. _ _.... ..
tion _. ._� Coarntry Nuala Road � .aril. � ouiaw lassaficatuen. p 1ANDR
Tax ID No. 296,144-49 Crdinarwce F�eferenoe 17'9-3 ,Chapter 94 . . �
Cross Reference SP 34-2007,AV 39-2007, FWWI- Warren Co. Referral April 2017
2447 all for 2,050 addition;AV 29-
201,7
Public Hearing 0 n/a.Pear recon ndation ; 'Site Informatiron � wetland
_ _ .. _ _.._. . _.... ... _. _.
Project description. ,applicant proposes to,construct a three door, 1,l 100 sq. fu. detached garage. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3040
Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance,work within 100fl.of wetland shall be subject to planning Board review and approval, Va Hamace t
Relief for a second garage., planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of',o�pp�eaIs,
.. ._._... ... �
�a�ra rApplicant(s)
i � Bay l'� ��eu�ti�s l�. Davis 'Application�'���'Pc' Site trVar�33-2��1°2 1
r77I'll IY ale 11 ..
AgemI'lluulsJ' I I tuut�cluimus 1:mugirmeerimu 1111111.. , Lot sum { 1.59 acre/.22 sacr
Loeatiogl 3,300 Stele Rt. 9L Ward., 1. J Zoning Classifucat"ona �
TaxID1' o. .2, 9.1$-1-2'x.1,-27,2, Ordinance N 179-3-0411 _tl
Cross Reference ; AV 31-2017 l Warren Cb.Referral � laril.,2t117.
..
1"ugallc Hearing. Na for recominendation . . .. _Site Information _ � PA,Lake Geo!p..Park Commission
ProjeQt Description: Applicant,proposes 1,810 sq. ft. floor area., 885 sal. ft.. footprint single family dwelling. This incIuu4C4+ S a boundary lot
line adjustment for the new haamne with a hared,curb cut to the adjacent parcel,. Parcel 239.18-1-27.1 will reduce a 1.5 am parcel to 0.91.
aware and iulcr ase parcel 239.18-27.2 to 0.81 acre. House construction will be on parcel 239,1&1-27.2 and associated) site workon both
parcels, Project subject to rrualior stoumwater in .LGP. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-0140 of the Zoning Ordinance, uueW construction within
5 fl:. of 15% slopes shall be subject: to Plan�ning hoard review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought, for reduction of non-
confdrTniqg size parcel to I ss con f forming size. Planning,Board slualI provide a reca�ru mendation to the runing Board of Appeals,
....
Applicauut(,$) TJE HE,N,CAROL ANDREW supplication Ty pl itc Plant 13-2017
R1 LETTE
"Owner,(s) `', ' amne as Applicauuts 'S t l Type.. � ,1 ype..11-......
.g at(s� _� w�kis . Dybas Last size N ,24 acre
Imatitmrm 111 Hemlock Road w'°'ard. 1 _. Zoniuu .. lassifficatmaaru;...W
. _I
"Tama llL3 l o. ]"289,10-1-32 rdiruaruce.RefIIerence 1'7'9-1 -01101111, 179-3-11111 1 1 1 G
Cross Reference 1991, 1992 Matin alt,; AV 13-2017 I WarrentCo, Ri f rm
Public Hearing uta for recommendation bite Information
.. .. ....
Project Description. Applicant proposes.a second floor renovation removing existing 572 sq. ft.,and constructing proposed 570 sq, ft,
second floor with office area,and master bedroom. New construction daces not uneet slncare;line setback and expansion nonconforming,
Projovt includes an existing porch renovation 9 /-sal.ft. ff6r new entryway and open porch.. Pursuant to,Chapter 179-13-0110& 179-3-
040,
79-3-
0 4 ,of the Zoning,Ordinaunce,expansion in a EA shall lie subject to Planning Board review and approval. Varisnce: Relief is stamr ltt
for se,tback,5 wind F planning Board shall.provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
-Any ff urther business which may be properly brought before the Board-
Site Plan 1,7-20,17 & Special Use Permit 3-2017 @
94 A,sh Drive,
Public Hearing Continues
SEQ,R. Type Ii
Draft resolution — grant/deny site plan & special
use permit approval
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
at Community Development,Department Staff Notes
April 25, 2017
Site Platin 17-20117' billiard, Tyrer, born . Cerny
Special Use Permit -2017 94 Ash Drive/ R—Waterfront Residential/ 'ward 1.
Ll . Type ll
Material Review: application, special use permit criteria -class a marina regunirerrnennts, photos,
tenant map,dock and path iunlnnnnationn
Parcel History: AV 2 -2014, Sly 21-2011 lies. & Septic Alterations, AV 1 -2017
l e nested Action
Planning board review and approval to install a 40' x 4' dock and.a pathway from Ash Drive to dock location.
Resolutions
1_. Planning board decisions.
2. SEQR
Project DescripAion,
Applicant proposes to install a M'° x ' dock and a pathway from Ash Drive to dock location. Project is
considered a Class A marina, as dock is for more than one owner a total of four. Project is part of a court
order for property owner to install. Pursuant to Chapter 179-10-040 of the Zoning Ord%nannee� Class A marinas,
shall be subject to Planning g Board review and approval.
Staff'comments
• Locon-The project site is at In Drive off of Mena Lake Rd.,
o Arrann emernt-The project includes the development of path from the ash drive arear to the shoreline area
them the removable dock will be placed in the water at a precise location.
• Site Design- The applicant has indicated.the path is to be a d ft wide grass path the follows the propene lime
from Ashe Dr. to the shoreline, There is to he a new privacy fence along the east side of the pats that is to
be 125 +/- ft in length and provides screening,to the buildings on the propenes. The applicant has explained
the removable dock placement is on the existing concrete retairsinwall at the shoreline. The applicant has
included,photos showing the previous dock and the arrangement in water and out of water.
• Site plass overall —The project installing a loot path and
placement of the:removable dock are part of a�counu
order. The project includes plarnti n .s and a privacy fence.
Pursuant, to Section 17'9-9-050 the Plannnisng Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written
request, of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the
site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers,
indicated the item not applicable our has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow
items listed. under Requirements of the applicant's application:: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. sto ua water, k.
topography, rn traffic, o. commercial, alterations/ construction details„ p floor plains, g. soil logs, r.
construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal.
Nature of Area Variance
Variance was granted 3/2,2/17. The project invo Ives placement ot"a dock that will not ine:et the reqi.1 ired 20 ft
setback where the applicant proposes to maintain the previous /- ft
S,pecia,l Use Permit General Criteria-
A special use permit is required as outlined in the Main Street Section 179-9-070 for placement of pal-king on
the side and front of the building,instead of the rear.
Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan — Class A Marina is, an allowed use in the Waterfront Zone through a
special use pennit. The project involves reestablishment: of a dock for four tenants as waterfront access can be
direct or through easement.,
Compatibility- docks along the waterfront are common and provide acce:ss,to the water.
Access, circulation and parking —The court order does not allow for parking and the applicant has designed a, 4
foot walking,path. The tenants that have access,to, the dock have homes,within walking distance.
Infrastructure and services —the court order outlines the path and dock location. The dedicated area is to be
maintained by the non-waterfront property owners.
Environment and natural features —the applicant has indicated the access to the dock would be a grass path and
additional plantings would include hostas and low lying vegetation,.
Long-term eff.ects —this area was previously u"- for the dock and, access to the dock 'this application
reestablishes the use of the dock. The: applicant has indicated the Class A Marina, review would establish the
pre-existing use.
Specy7c criteria for Class A marinas.
All, marinas shall comply with the standards for Class A and,Class B rnarinas as,adopted by the Lake George,
Park Commission in 61 N'YCkk Part 46, as may be amended. Class Brnarinas shall not require a special use
perrnit and do not require the approval of the'Town Planning Board.
CLASS A MARINA -CODE'EXCERPT FOR MARINA 0 UTSIDE Or, PARK
As defined, in the regulations of the Lake George Park Commission, .... which provides services oir berthing
places for vessels by engaging in any of the f011owing-
Class, A Marinas
(61) The storag%,berthing or mooring of two or more moto rized 'vessels and/or non-motorized vessels IS
feet in length or,more not registered to the owner of the property, regard less of remuneration or profit.
as General requirements,.- Not applicable
(b) Specific Requirements. No Class A marina shall be constructed, expanded or operated without providing the
following-
,(I) Restrooms, including, toilet facilities,, for the use by customers, which shall be available at all times
from May I to October 31 of each ,dear. The applicant/ten ants homes are within walking distance of
the dock and have access to restrooms at their homes.
(2) One on-site parking space or adequate off-site parking, fbir each vessel berthed. Where the Class A
marina offers rides, instruction or water-based recreation for, a fee, adequate parking must be provided
for oustomers of the Class A marina, The applicant/tenants homes are within walking distance of the
dock and no site parkl in is proposed.
(3), An adequate storage area for trailers or the storage of trailers, shall be -prohibited. 'The
applicant/tenants homes are within walking distance of the dock and trailers art stored at the
homes.
2 J
(4) Where applicable, proof of complialice, with New Yo�rk State fire code: standards and DEC bulk
storage standards, for the storage of gasoline and hazardous materials. If applicable, no permit
application shall be complete until proof of compliance is submitted to the Commission. Not requested
as part of this proposal. No storage of materials are proposed.
(5) For each Class A marin,a with a petroleum sales, facility, a, plan relative to the inspection and
maintenance! of petroleum storage facilities and all associated equipinent, and, ap a su es
, propri�te mea, r
relative to spill prevention and countermeasures. Not requested as part of this proposal. No
petroleum sales area proposed.
(6) Adequate garbage and debris disposal facilitieswith leak proof containers,, which 'Must be properly
maintained. App licant/tennots will assist with site maintenanec.
(7) Facilities '(or the disposal of sanitary wastes from vessels with on-board sanitary equipment
includin& Not applicable-boats do not have sanitary on board.
(8) A boat cleaning area that, is designed, operated and maintained in such a manner to prevent
contatnination ofthe waters of the Park shall be provided, or boat cleaning shall be prohibited, No boat
washing,activity is proposed.
) .ill Class A marina owners, or operators engaged in the rental of personal. watercraft (P' C) as that
term is defined in Section 646- 23 (a) (3) of this Title upon the waters of Lake George shall inaddition
to, the regulations, governing PWC contained in Subpart 646-2 of this Title comply with the following
regulations: There is no rental of person watercraft proposed..
Snmniary
The applicant has completed, a site plan application, special use permit to operate a class an marina with 4
tenants.
Meeting HistM.-P'BR 3/21/17,, PB Tabled 3/28/17; ZBA 3/22/17
" i��wonunowo�Awy 1 1mpr�n�u:wlt (K]iti°:
Town of uueensbrury Planning Board
RESOLUTION— Grant/Deny Site Plan Approval
Site Plan 15-2,017 & Special 'Use Permit 3-20117 HILLIARD, T RE , L ERNY
Taus Map TTS. 289.17-1-, /Property,address* 94 ,ash Drive f Zoning: WR
The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article
of the Town zon�in,g Ordinance for: Applicant: proposes to install a 4 ' x 4' dock: and a pathway from. ash
Thrive to dock location,, Project is considered a Class.A marina, as dock is for moi re than one owner— a total
of four. Project is part ofa court order for property owner to install. Pursuant to Chapter 179-1 -040 of the
Zoning Ordinance, Class.A marinas shall be suibJect to Planning Board review and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury x nin Code-Chapter 179-9-08,0, the Planning,
Bard has determined that this proposal satisfies therequirements as stated in the Zoning Code;
As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren
County Planning Department for its recommendation;
The Planning Bogard has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant: to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act RAand adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration— Determination
ofNon-Significance
The Planning Hoard opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on. 3128/2017 and continued the
jpuablic hearing to 125/2017,when it was closed,,
The Planning Hoard Inas reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments
made at the public hearing;and submitted in writing,through and including 04/25/20 17
The Planning, Turd, determ, ines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards
set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning,Ordinance for Site Plan approval,
MOTION TO PPTTOVE / DISAPPROVE OVE STT"L PLAN 15-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT -2 f7
HILI T LYON N L ' ° Introduced by who moved for its adoption,.
Per the draft provided by staff eonnAtioned upon the following,conditions:
1 'Waivers,request ranted/denied:
2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow--rap letter sent with this,resolution,
ash If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of
Zoning ,administrator of the approved plana,.
b) Final approved plains should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site planlsuurvey, floor plansand elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements,
c Final approved plains,, in, compliancewith the Site Plan„must be submitted to the Community
Development Department before any further review by the Zoning, Administrator or Building and
Codes personnel;
Page I of 2
PhonLn 3, 516,,761,8220 Far 518,74 x.4437 74Z Bay Road, Queensbunay, IRS" 12804 I ww .quee�nslbuQ ,net
d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issua, nee of Building Permit
and/ r the beginning of any site work;
6) Subsequent issuaunce oft,"urther pen-nits, including building peen nits is,dependent on compliance with
this,and all other conditi,ons of this resolution;
f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided
prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy;
g) Resolution to be:placed, on final plans in itsentirety and legible.
Dtily adpted this, 25111 day of Aperil, 2017 by the following vote:
AYES-
NOES:
Page 2 of 2
Phane: 5118.7611.8220 p Fax., 5118,745.4437 i 742 Bay Road. Queen5bury. N:Y 12804 9 wwwqueensbury.net
Site flan 2 -2017 @ 977 State Route 149
Public Hearing
Greiff resolution Planning Board recommendation
to the ZiAppeals,
T'own of Queensbury Planning Board.
ow Community Development Department Staff Notes
Apri 125, 2017
Site Plan 30-2017 Stewart's Shops Corp.
977 State Route 149/NC—Neighborhood Commercial/ and I
SQR Unlisted
Material Review. a-
pplication, stormwater, site plan drawings, survey elevations, floorplans
Parcel History: SP'35-1new construction; 2003 in,od.. & AV 18-2003 for gas islands/canopies;
2009 mod. for 600 sf addition; AV26-2017
...........
Reguested Action
Recommendation to,the Zoning Board o1`, ppe is for relief requested for setbacks.
Resolutions,
1. Planning Board recommendation
Project Description
Applicant proposes demolition of 2,292 sq. tt convenience store with fuel to build.a new 3,695, sq. ft.
convenience store with as 2,360,sq. ft. canopy to have 4 islands/8 fueling positions. First phase will be store
construction with, associated site work, then demolition of present building & canopy to insta,11 new canopy.
Project includes site disturbance greater than anacre and associated site work,. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 &
176-4-030 of the,Zoning Ordinance:new convenience store with fuel shall be subject to Plam.ing Board review
and approval. Variance-, Relief is sought for setbacks. Planning Board shall provide as recom.M.endation to the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments
• Location-The project is located at 9�77 State Route 149 at the intersection of 149 and L.
• Arrangement- The site currently has an e:xisting 2,292 sq ,t convenience store that is to be demolished after
the new store of 3,695 sq' ft is to be constructed. The existing fuel canopy is, also to be dem,olished to
construct a 2.,360 sq ft fuel canopy,
• Building& Site Desin- The site work will include placement of the building:in as new orientation to dace
the intersection,of Route 149 and Ridge Rd. The same orientation with the fuel canopy would also occur
facing the intersection. The new parking areas would be tdong the front of the building--south and east side
then additional Parking along the R�idge Rd side.
a Signage-Theapp plira nt proposes as 42 sq ft monument sign, The sign is to be:internally illuminated and to
have:a,stone face base for the monument sign. The wall signs are,to be 17 sq ft, and internally illuminated.
• Traffic-The:applicant proposes 29 spaces shown at the:building area. There are 8 fueling positions Under
the canopy. The applicant has indicated the traffic,1]ow arrangement would allow for the tourist traffic flow
for the area.
• Site layout and utility plan- the plans show the existing well to remain and a new septic system to the rear of
the building to,be installed.
• Grading and drainage plan& Sediment and erosion control —the project,activities disturb more than. I ac and
the applicant has completed a stormwater pollution prevention plan that is under review and comment by the
Town designated engineer,
* Landscape plan—plans show typical shrub plantings,perennials along with 7 maple trees. —The board may
consider re:questing additional tree planting,
* Site lighting plan—The plans show 13 pole lights-o the site—will need tin confirm height. The site �s to also
have,wall lights, soffit lighting and canopy lighting., The site average is to be 1.29 footcan.dles that is under
the 3,0,foot candies for gas station service areas.
* Elevations,—the plans show the buildi ng to be 2 3 ft 4 in height. Then color when to be cl ap'board cobble
stone with white coluinnn and fascia features and a stone veneer base.,
* Floor plans,—:the plans detail the location of the service and customer areas for the interior of die building.
Pursuant to Section 17'9-9- O the Planning Board may, grant �waivers on, its own initiative or at, the, written
request of an applicant. 'The applicant has requnes,ted no,waivers,
Nature of Varjance
The:applicant requests va�riance for setback relief for,the canopy location.
Summary
The Planning Board is to provide a recommendation to the ZBA in regards to the request for relief for the
setback relief from.the:front property line,
Meeting Hi for First meeting
SHE
North Coun"Office
Cba
K,ere. t 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804
�® P: (518) 812-0513 F:, (518)812-2205
COMPA,NIES www.chazencompan[e,s.com
o bv 641,wrd Hudson Va 1111ey Office (945)4541-3980
Land Su
Engineers rs Capital District Office (519)273-0055
rveyo
Planners
Environmental Professionals
LarkdscaDe Architects
April 13, 2017
Mr.Cra'ig Brown
Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer
Town of Queensbury
742 IBay Road
Queenisbury, New York 12804
Delivered via email only: CraJgBt@queen1bury net
Re: Stewart's Shop(Route 149 and Ridge Road)
Town of Queen5buqWarren County, New York
Cfrozen Project#9170,0.14
Queensbury'Ref#SP30-201 7'
Dear Mir. Brcwrn:
The, Chazen Companies, ( hazer) has, received a submission package from your office for the above
referenced project. The applicant intends to ire-develop the existing Stewart's Shop, located on site.
Submitted Information includes the foltowing:
• Site Plans and Details prepared by Stewart's Shops,dated February 01,2017;
• Executive Storrinwater Surnmary, prepared by MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C., dated
March 2017;
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by MJ Engineering and Land Surveyi�ng. P.C.,
dated March 10, 2017;and,
0 Site Plan Review Application,Short EAF and Project Narrative.,
Your office Ihas requested that we Ilmit our review to the design of stormwator system as it relates to
compliance to local, state or relevant codes and regulations. Based upon our review, Chazen offers the
following comments for the Town's consideration:
Stormwater Management& Erosion,and Sediment Control,
L The project proposes to disturb an area of 2.2 acres, (according to the N01) and requires the,
preparation of a Strormwater Pollution Prevention Plan [SWPPP) in accordance with GP-0-151-002
that includes erosion, and sediment controls as well as, post construction stormwater
management practices. A Storrinwaler Pollution Prevention Plain [SWPPP) has been provided
our relating to the SWPPP are offered below.
2. Section, 179-6-08li of the Town Cocle, states that stormwateir drainage plans shall analyze the
impacts of project using at least a 50-year return Interval storm with regards to both runoff
ChaZWT Engbeering, Land Surveying&Londscape Architecture Co,. 0�R C
ChazenEnvifonmental Seryes, Inc.
The Chazen,Comparties,, Mc.
Town of Queensbury
Stewart's 5filip's JRou te'14 and Ridge Road)
April 1%20,17
"age 2
rate and volaarne fior commercial projects. Section 179-15-080-C states that all stormwater
rnarna ernent plains shall be designed so that the post-development run-off rates and volumes
are equal to or less than pre-devellopm,e'nt run-off. The .Applicant shall provide analysis which
demonstrates that the post-development 50-year stor i rates and v'olu iirmes are equal to or less
than the pre-development condition.
,° This, project falls within the Lake George watershe"d and will be subject to the stormwater
management requirements set forth in, section 147-11 of the Town code, for projects within the
Lake George Park.
4. Section 147-11-1(3)(c)[1] state's„ 'Sto'rmwater control measures shall be de,sirue sup that there
will be no increase in runoff volume form a ten,-y eia ;fregq encylt +ear " r°-hco r-d'ution, storm
e'vernt following development over the pnredevelopmernt volume.'
Section 147'-'11-II(3)(c)[2] states, 'For storm events exceeding the tern-year design storm, the
stormwater control measures shall function, to attenuate peak runoff flowrates for a twenty-,
dune-year-frequernawyr;stor to be equal to or less than predevelopmen it flow rates."
it appears that theApplicant's intent is to detaln, and infiltrate the entire 100-year storm, but it
is standard practice for the initial review letter to include the "major" project stormwater
requirements, to informs the Appulipcarnt of the requirements for projects withirn, the Lake George
watershed.
5. The Applicant shall include on the plans and details dernonstr-ating compliance with,Section 14-
11--1(3')(c)(S) of Towyn code, which status: "Infiltration deviae,s ,shall be designed' to, extend ra
minim um of 1 of the infiltration surface area below the prevailing;frost depth or four feet
(which ver is greater)in corder to provide infiltration during minter man ths''
61, Section 147-11-1'(3)(c),[41 states, ".,.; tarmwater recharge areatus shall he ionated o mirnirnnna'm of
1 , et from the subsurface treatment .s ;stem of a wastewater treatment ,system unless it, is
demonstrated that a lesser separation will not adversely offea the functioning of such leach
field's."The leach field) appears to be within 25 feet of the infiltration basin. The pp'llicant shaill
revise the design or demonstrate that a lesser separation will not adversely affect the
funictioning of the leach field.
7, It appears that page 3 of the,NOl is'Incorrect and shalll be revised.
& The contractor / suahcontractor certification statement does 'not match the certification.
staternernt In the General, Permit ( P-0-15-002). The Applicant shadll revise the certification
statement to match the statemne'nt in Part 111A.6 of the General Permit.
9. Section 7' of the S iPPP General Permit irn `drrra'ratio ns references correspondence from.
NiYSOPRHP and NYSDEC regarding historical places, and Endangered Species. it does not appear
that correspondence was provided, the Applicant to clarify.
10,. The W'Qv calculation,sh'ee't uses a rainfall event of 1.015 inches which does not match Figure
4.1 of the Ir YS 'Sl Dl M. It is nnoted that the NYS DEConline storm,water mapper does not appear
L.1. Z44 T,gdueen:sburdpn�d�3�
Town af Queenisbuiry
Snew,vf s Slhiop5(Route',145 and Ridge Rua-d)
Aped 18,�2I017"
Page
to be updated to match Figure 4.1, of the 2015 Design, Manual. It appears the project falls within
the 1.2"19011 percentile rainfall.
A full review of the W`Qv, RRwu, and pre-treatment calculations will occur once the 0tn percentile
storm,depth is revised.
11. It dunes not appear that the post-devellolpirment watershed model matches the drainage plan and
post-development drainage reap. First, it appears that subcatchrment 1B i's missing in the model,
Second it appears that suubcatchrment 1 �suubcatchrnent that contains the rear basin) is routed to,
the front basin and not the rear basin.Third, it appears from the drail na,ge/gr"a,diin g plan that the
front basin (near Route 1491) is routed to the rear basin via CBC, however it does not appear that
the basins are routed this way in the,Hydrafio ' model.The Applicant shall revise the Hydraflow
model accordirnglly.
Also, it does not appear that the suubcatchrmernt input data (area,CIN,Tc) priintouuits were included
in the Lilydraflow model.The Applicant shall include all the Hydraflow,suabcatchrruernt data for the
pare-and post7developrnent conditions.
full review of the routing andl nater quuantity,calculations will be reviewed once the Hydraflow
model Its revised.
12, It does not appear that existing conditions l-Iydraflow model was provided. The Applicant to,
ci'a riif .
13. The.Applicant:shall show the analysis,points)on the pyre-and post-development drainage, rnaps„
14. 'p'er Section 7.3 Test Pits and Percolation Test the deep soil test pits were not performed to
depth to confirm the required 3 feet separation to seasonally hii h groundwater and/or bedrock,
Sheet -4 provides the results of deep test. pit D1 and D12 however it does not appear that the
locatiions of the test pits areshown.n.The Applicant to revise sheet 5-4 to show the deep test pit
locations.
15. A Ile ,allly binding and enforceable maintenance agreement may be executed (between the facility
owner and the Town ensuring that proper maintenance measures will be implemented for all
proposed stormwater management practices as specified in Town code section 147-10,.D if the
Town chooses, A draft of this agreement should be provided to the Town for review and shall
be Included lin the 5"4 PPP..
16, The infiltration basin receives runoff from the entire site and the infiltration basin is located
within about '70 feet of the neighboring water well located to the west, The front infiltration
basin receives runoff from a portion,of Ir,'a.y,5. Route 149 and the,front infiltration basin is Located
within about 20 feet of the on-site water well]. According to Table 1 Required Minimum
ep,aratrnan Distances to ,ratea Water Wells From Contamination of part 5 Standards for Water
n"ellls of the NYS DOH,water wells sha,lll be separated a minimu rnn (horizontal distance of 10D feet
from surface wastewater recharge absorption system constructed to discharge storm water
from parking lots, roadways or driveways; with an additional note that, states,, "When those
contamination sources are l'n rated in coarse gravel or are located upgrade and in the,direct path
Q nmburA91700,14-7.CWaersbury-5P3' -a"' 175uEthrart'z 5�m�p'§�GEM 6'��4ffiE�eLd,Suetwrnsrh.,^S RW-SM➢ffi7 MflF- -ffiffi:,,1ffi',.d�
Town of flueenisbury
Stiewart's Shops fRoute 149 and Ridge Roadl)
Apird 13,2017
Page 4
of droinage to a water well, the water well shall be located at least 200'deet away from the
closest part of these sources." Section 147-11-1(3)0)[4] states, "Infiltration devices for major
project,5 sholl be located a minimum of 100 feet from Lake George and any doiwn-g�radlent
drinking, 'water supply, lake, river; protected stream., water wel), pond, wetland, a 5eporation of
more thion 100 feet may be required in case.5 where contaminotion of the water supply h5,
possible due to highly permeable soils, shallow groundwater and 5imflar .situations. The
separation distaince shall be a mini mum of 50 feet from upgradien t water supplies.,"
The Applicant shall revise the design to conform to the NYS DOH waiter ell required separation
distances,and town code requirements,
In the event the Planning Board'or Town staffhave any questions,or require additional Information,
please do not hesitate to contact me at (5,18),824-19126.,
Sincerely,
Sean M. Doty, P.E., LEED AP,C1S4S
Principal
Mainager, Municipal Engineering Services
cc: Sunny Sweet,Town Planning Office Administrator (via email
Laura Moi Town Land Use Planner (via,e-mail)
File
Z;"ptvjftu,%9179M,1799k917GQAD-1'.011
Warren County Planning Department
Pro,ect Review and Referral Form
Reviewed b Department on, April 7, 201.7
Project Dame: Stewart's Shops Corp.
Owner: Stewart'"s hops Corp.,
ID Number: QBY-17-SPRAO
County )P"r jet :. Apr17_ 4
Current Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial,
Community: Queensbury
Project l scriptioru:
Redevelopment of existing shop. Applicant proprDs ds to expand from 2,972 sq ft store, existing fuel canopy 900 sq it
with four fueling g ppositions to a 3,816 sq,ft store, 31,22,14 sq ft fupu.iing canopy, eight f uelinig positions.
Site Location:
on:
Northwest Gagner nt Rt 1 49 andl IfRiid e Rdl
Tax Map Number(s):
266.03-11-11
Staff Notes;
The issues:here appearto be of a. local nature involving iueeal issues witbolut any significant impa, tsorw countly properties
or resources. Staff recommends no county impact based onthe information submitted according tui they suggested review
criteria of NYSGenerall Municipal Law Sevction ,39 applied to the proposed project.
Local curt Ions to dote (if a.ruy),
ounty Planning Department:
NCI
L.oca:I Action:/rina;l Disposition-
4/10/20117
'i arreun County Planning, epartrnent irate Sigved Leal Official tial Date Signed
i
PLEASE RETURN THUS]FORM TO THE, WARREN CO0WrY PLANNING DEPART MENT 'TTHN to.D!AYS Or, FINAL ACTION
74 Brae Road, Qtieenshury, NY 12804
Hoaaae of a, tasras1 8easraIy ... Goasd I' Iarcc toy
PLAN REVIEW
Stewart's
ou,,t / 149
S - 201
/27/20'17
The following comments are lased on. revs of'tlme submitted platy:
1 has no site issues at this time.
Fire Marshal,
Michael J Palmer
Fire Marshal
518 761. 8 206
firemarshal@queensbury.net
R a°as M as r s Jr as f "s 0 ff i c e - P h as as e: 18-76-8206 F as;V 7 8-745443
� � rd�r�r���x��@f�"d��'���7r�r� .net
�rra�,.�
7412 13,1
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recom, mendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Area Variance 26-2017STEWART'S SHOPS CORP.
Tax Map ID: 266.3 A-11/Property Address: 977' State Route 149 /Zoning. NC
The applicant has submitted an,application for the following-, Applicant proposes demolition of 2,292 sq. .
convenience:store with fuel to build a new 3,695 sq. ft. convenience store with a 2,360 sq. ft. canopy to have 4
islands/8 fueling positions. First phase will be store construction with associated site work,then dem.clition of
present building &canopy to install new canopy. Project includes site disturbance greater than an. acre and
associated site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 176-4-030 of theZonin,g Ordinance new convenience
Mere,with fuel shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought.for
setbacks. Planning Board, shall provide a recommendation to the Zo.ning,Board of Appeals.
The Town, of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-0�70 J 2 b., requires, the Planning, Board to
provide as written recommendation to the: Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board
of Appeals& 'Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application as well as, the potential, impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
andfound that:
MOTION TO MAKE A R-ELC OfflMENDATION ON BEHALF OF 'THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE
ZQNING BOARD OF APPE&LS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO.,26-2017 STEWARTIS HOP RP.:
Introduced by who,moved its adoption, and
a) The Planning Board, based on, a limited review, has not, identified any significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal.
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on a limited review,has identified the following areas of concern:
I)
Duly adopted,this 25h day of April, 2017 'by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES,
Phone: 51 .761.8220[ I`ax: -54 8.745,44371742 Bay Road, QeensbUry, NY 12804 �wm-w.quee risbury-Niel
Site Pian 31-2017 &, Freshwater Wetiandsrmit 3-
2 54 Cwtr Club Road
No Public Hann
Draft resolution Planning Board Irtin
to the, Zoning Board Appeals
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Gk Community Development Department StaffNotes
April 25, 2017
Site Plan 31-2,01.7 Robert Fulmer
Freshwater Wetlands 3-2017 54 Country Club Road /SFR I A/MDR—Single Farni ly Residential I acre/
Moderate Density Residential / Ward 2
SEQ R Type 11
Material Review: application, survey, elevations
Parcel History- SP 34-2007,AV 39-2007, FWW1-2007 all for 2,050 addition;AV 29-
2017
..........
Rgquested Action
Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief for a second garage.
Resolutions
1. Planning Board recommendation
Pp. ject Description
Applicant proposes to construct a.three door, 1,100 sq. ft. detached garage. Pursuant to Chapter 179- 3-040
Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, work within l 0. of wetland shall be subject to Planning,Board review
and approval. Variance: Relief for a second garage. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments
• Location-Project site is at 54 County Club Rd.
• Arrangement-The proposed 1,1110 sq ft detached garage is to be located 59 ft from the existing,wetland
pond area and 61 from the wetland area on the west property line.,
• Building,Elevation & Floor plan—The plans show the garage to have.3-garage doors and an open floor
plan. 'The garage is,tin 'be'20 +/-ft in height. The applicant has indicated there will be no stairs or pull down
stairs and the rear of the building is to be the same as thefront without doors. There is to be a man door on
the south,side of the building.
• Site conditions-The applicant has provided a,survey with delineated wetlands,on the site. The applicant has
indicated a,NYS EC permit has been applied for and received.
• Site layout and utility plan.The applicant proposes to connect electric to the garage. There is to be no
water or septic connection.
• Grading and drainage plan & Sediment and erosion control- The:location of the garage is in an openarea on,
the lot and no clearing is anticipated. The board may diseuss the use of silt fence around, the pond and
wetland area during construction.to minimize any potential runoff towards the pond or wetland, The
aP plicant,has indicated runoff from the:new av
garage will be infiltrated into the lawn area at the ewes of the
building,
• Landscape:plan—no new landscaping is anticipated. There is nonew hard surfacing to the garage proposed
the area is to minain lawn.
• Site lighting plan—exterior lighting is,not proposed. The board may request confirmation on exterior
lighting as the garage is,to be connected to electric.
Pursuant to Section 1.79-9-050 the Planning Board may giant waivers on its own initiative or, at the Written
request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements," outlines the items to appear on the
site plan or included as attachments, At the time of application the applicant has either requested, waivers,
indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the itern/ tell check, box b�lank, This includes the t-ollow
items listed tinder Requirements of the applicant's, application, g. she lighting, h. signagge,, k. topography, n
traffic,, o,, commercial alterations/ construction details, in floor plans, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition.
disposal s. snow removal.
Freshwaterwetland
Tine applicmit proposes the:construction of the second gara,ge within the 1 GO ft buffer of the and and wetland
area,. T lie:applicant has indicated no work is to occur in the weland or the pond area and measures will be
implemented to minimizt any runaff.
Nture of Variance
The applicant proposes to construct a second garage that is to be detached where:there is an existing attached
garage to the existing horne:.
SUMM'a
"the planning board is to provide a recommendation to the ZBA, in regards to the relief re:quested for a second
garage.
Meeting His!gM First meeting
pr17- 9
Warren County Planning Department
Project Review and Referral 'Form
Reviewed by Department on April 7, 2017
Project Name: Fulmer, Robert
Owner- FUIrner„ Robert
ID Number; Q,BY.17-SPRY- ,'I
County Pro t#,. Aprl7'-'
Current Zoning: SFR IAIMDR
community.: QR ueensbuur
Project Description-,
Applicant proposes to build a door 1„ttl0 sq ft detached garage. Project su abject to variance for second garage, Subject
to www iand setbacks.
Site Location
54 Country Club Rd
T'ax Map Number(s).
Staff Nauss,
The issues here appearto be of a local nature involving Racal issues without any significant irnpactson County,properties
or resources, Staff recommends no county impact based undue Information submitted according to the suggested review
criteria of Rw YSGeneral Municipal nicipal R_aw ection 239 applied to the proposed project.
Local actions to date(if any):
County Planning Department;
NCI
Local Atha n ./Fanal Disposition;
4/1012,017
et�'�- '" R
Warren County Planning,D eplartmnt ate Sign,W Local Offlicial Date Signed
PLEASE IMTUR " HIS FORM TO THE WAR4 E, COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIEN 10 DAYS OF FINAL rMY,C`m'dON
C,ornmorlilY IV,doplllcnl (Alik
712 1 any Rm. acl, uNIY 12804
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Area,Variance 29.-2017 ROBERT FULMER
Tax Map ID: 296.144-49 /Property Address, 54 Country Club Road/Zoning, SFR 1, '°MD
The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to constructa three door,
1,100 sq. ft- detached garage. Pursuant to Chapter 179 3-040 &Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, work
within I 00ft. of wetland shall be subject to Planning.Roard review and approval. Vanance: Relief for a
second garage. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the: Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning, Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board
of Appeals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on, the neighborhood and surrounding, community,
and found that-
MOTION TO MA!LE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THEJ PLANNING BOARD TO TH
ZONING BOARD, OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANC—F—, NO. 29-2017 ROBERT FULMER:
Introduced by_who moved, its adoption, and
a) 'The Planning Board, based on a li'mited review, has not identified an.y significant adverse impacts, that
cannot be mitigated with ciL=nt project proposal.
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has identified the following areas of concern:
1)
Duly adopted this 250' day of April, 2017 by the following vote-
AYES:
NOES:
Phone: .518-761.8220 1 Fav 519.745-44337 II 742 Bl ay Road, Queenqbury, NY 1,2 ,04 1 wwm%qUeensbury.liet
Site Plain 33-2017 3300 Shite Route 9
A li ring
Draft resolution Planning Board recommendlation
to the, Zoning Board of Ail
Town of'Queen,sbui-y Planning Board
Community Development Department tnnlf"Notes
: purl , 2017
Site Ilam 33- 017 reg'T'eresi
3300 State Route 9TH/WR—Waterfront Residential /Ward l
SEQR Type 11
Material Review: narrative, application, survey, site plata drawings
Parcel History: AV 31-20,17
Rea ested Actlmm
Recommendation, to the Zoning board of appeals for construction of a 1,810 sq. ft. floor area, 885 sq. ft.
footprint single family dwelling.
Resolutions
1:. Planning Board recommendation
Proieet Desgription,,
Applicant proposes 1,810 sq. ft. floor area, 885 s . ft. footprint single fami ly dwelling. This includes
boundary lot line adjustment for the new home with a shared curb cut to the adjacent parcel. Parcel x,39.1'8-l-
27.1 'will reduce a 1.5 sc panel to 1.0 acre and increase parcel 239®18-27.2 to 0.80 acre,. House constructicnn.
will be on parcel 239.118-1-27.2 and associated site work on both pcels. Project subject to major storrrnv ter
in LGP. Pursuant to Chapter 1.79-3-040 ef'the Zoning Ordinance, new construction within 50 �ft. of 15% slopes
shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. "l 'ariance: Relief is sought for reduction.of non-,
conforming,size parcel to less conforming size. Planning Roard shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning
Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments
o Location- Project site is at 330Th State Route 9L
* Site Design- The plans slue the lot lune adjustment for the new parcels where the 1.5 ac parcel beirng.
reduced to 1.0 arc. The lot l.0 enc) will contain an existing,3 bedroom one-story home,' -bedroorru one stoat
cabin and, a.3 'bedroom two-story. Theadjoining lot:27.2 will be 'increased to 0.80 ac where a new 3
bedrorm home is proposed.
Site layout and utility plan—The plains show the:new home krill have on-site septic and a lake drawn water
lune. Other utilities will be communications and electric will be provided fiunrm existing connections. The
plans also show the septic and lake drawn drinking grater location for the adjo;ining lot.
0 Grading and dirairnagO plain& Sediment and erosion.control —The plans show extensive grading where the
new honne will be located that extends to the adjoining lot,.
Landscape plan—'flee plans show a.vegetation plain for the east;side of the honrne including white pine,
spruce and hemlock.
0 Elevations,—The elevations show a 28 ft in height building. 'The lake side area contains the,walk.out
basement doors and above is an open deck area.
i
Floor plans —I'he floor plans show the basement and main floor area. 'rhe home is to have a waIkout
basement area with 2-, bedrooms. The main floor is to have a, bdroom, great room area, and kitchen area.
Pursuant to Section 17'9-9-050 the Planning Boaid may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written
request of an applicant. The aPP lication fbrm identified as "Requirements" outlinesrnapp
the to ear on the
site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requstd waivers,
:indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ leficheck box blank. 'This, includes the follow
items listed under Requirements of the applicant's, application.: g. site lighting, h. signage, n, traffic, o.
commercial afterations/construction details, r, construction/demolition disposal s, snow removal.
Nature of Variance
the applicant proposes to locate a stormwater device less than 100 ft from the s,eptic system 22 ft :i s pi oposed.
Relief is also requested.for further redUction of a non-conforming parcel from 139 ac to L00 ac
Sumrna:
The planning board is to provide a recommendation to the zbe in regards to the relief requested for storinwater
device setback and the reductio:n of an existing non-conforming Parcel.
Meeting History- First meeting
THE,
North Country Office
Cba el 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12,804
K.,04 P,, ,(518,) 812-0513 F:(518) 812-22,0�5
COMPANIES www.ch-cizenr-omipanles.1rorTi
Hud mn Valley Office
Engirs (845)454-3980
nee
Land Suirveyors Capital District Office (S18) 273-0,055
Planners
Enivkronmental Prossionals
Landuane Archftects
Apr,!112,2017
Mr. Craig Brown
Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer
Town of Queensbuiry
742 Bay Road
Queensbury, New York 12804
Delivered via email oipi Craif.gB@queeinsbu,ry.net
Re: GregoryJ. Teresi
Town of Queensbury, Worren County, New York
Chazen Project#91700.15
Queensbury Ref. No:SP33-201 7
Dear Mr. Brown.,
The Chazen Companies (Chazein), has received a submission package from your office for the above
referenced project, The Applicant intends to construct a new 3-bedroom residence, Submitted
information includes the following:
• Site Plans titled "Dark Bay Properties, ILI<C& Lawrence Davie, prepared by Hutchins Engineering,
last revised dated March 25, 2017;
• Survey plan titled 'Dark Bay Properties LLC& Lawre nce Davie', prepared by Vain Dusen &Steves,
dated March 8,2017;
• Project narrative letter, prepared by Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., dated March 15,
2017;
• Architecture Plains by Rutinski Hall, undated; and
• A site, plan review application and short EAF.
Your office has requested that we limit our review 'to the design of storrnwater management and
erosion, and sediment control items as, it relates to compliance to local, state or relevant codes and
regulations. Based upoin our review of the information provided, Chazen offers the following comments
for the Town'sconsideration:
Storrinwater Management& Erosion,and Sediment Control-
L The proposed' site development disturbs less than I acre of land and will not be subject to
NYSIDEC Phase 11 Storrinwater Regulations, However, this project falls within the Lake George
watershed and will be subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in section
147-11 of the, Town code, for projects within the Lake George Park. The project proposes to
disturb approximately 13,000 square feet, which typically is a "minor' projea but the project is
proposed on slopes that exceed 15% or greater see 147-11.E(2)(a[21� and therefore can be
Chwon Efigineefing Land Sumeying&Lara 5cape Architecture Co-D.P.C-
Chazer)Enviroemnitat Servicag, A=
The Chazen CompaWas, ft.
TOWil Of Queem bury
Gregory I,Terie^.si
April 12,2017
iPap,+a 2.
treated as 'major" project if the ZoningAdministrator/Town,deers appropriate. It appears;that
the Applicant's engineer has, developed the storm rater management plan based upon Major
project requirements, Our comments regarding the plan are offered below..
The proposed) embankment west of the proposed driveway is sloped at (1V:1,;5t1) and the
embankment ends approximately 5 feet off the southeast corner of an existing 1 story home,.
Section 17'9-6-0,70,B(8) ,doll and erosion control states" "Cuts and fills shall not endanger
adjoining property rnor divert water ornto the property of others." There does nolt appear to be
sufficient detail that the proposed embankment conforms,to 1,79-6-070.13(8).The Applicant shall
revise the plain to include provisions to ensure conformance to 179-6-070,13(8).
3. The Hydro AD model dries not provide distinct inflow depths as Indicated by the `>"a the
Applicant to revise the time span of the storm or Vd'roC,A,, parameters to ensure the full
effects of the storm are real'ize'd.
.4. Hydlro,CAD pond 2BP stone trench has an error for the golds which is modeled as 0.4 not 4
the Applicant to revise,
. The Applicant depicts silt Soxx behind the silt fence, however the sift Soxx installation Is not
mentioned in the 'Sequence of Construction or Erosion and Sledliment Control features lin the
stormwater management report. The Applicant to revise.
. The proposed stone fulled infiltration trench under the paused pairking area its modeled with 5
Inches/hour enrfiltration rate in HydroCAD., The embankment the paused parking area is on, Is
assumed to be compacted to be stable and support the anticipated loading, which will greatly
decrease the infiltration capacity of the fill lolls, The Appllicant should clearly identify the
specification for the fill sails proposed) to be used in the area that will support the parking area
and enclose the infiltration chamber. Danes the applicant intend to perform infiltration tests
Cance the area is graded/sultable for the installationof the infiltration chamber?'
7. Sect lon 147-11(i)(3)(c)(31 of the Tolwn, crude states "Infiltration deviates shall be designed such
that the bottom of the system will be as m�irnilaaa:m of two ,feet oboure the seasonal )nigh
groundwater level realized following developmernt," Test pit 1, performedin the limits of the
proposed wastewater system," indicates that mottling was located four feet below, the existing
surface (317") at a depth of 343" and therefore equating to a separation distance depth of 345'.
The bottom of the rain gardens is proposed' at a depth of 343" and may not conform to Section
1 7-11(l)(3)(c)[3] based on test pit f (con.sidlerin , that the groundwater elevation likely m1mics
the grade elevations). As such we recommend that the Applicant perform additional testing
within the rale hardens to determine the seasonally high groundwater levels at the specific
features and provide the data to the Town. We do not take exception to the additional testing
taking place at the commencement of construction, unless otherwise directed by the Towyn.
8, Section 1„47-11(11)1�3)(c)[4) of the Town code states that "I n iltration devices for major project
shall be iaacote^d o minimum nirrnawm of 100 eet from Lake,George and any down-grodi nt drinking water
supply, lbke, river, protectedstream, water,well, pond, wetland; o separation of more than 10
feat may be re airediin cases where contama irnaatlorr of time water supply is possible dace to highy
permeable soil, shallow groundwater and similar situations, The separation distance sholf lie Baa
minimum of 50,feet firom asp- raadlernt mater supplies. Designs shall mitigate adverse effects, that
groundwater recharge will have on adjacent wells, water supplies, waa- tewaater treatment
d'"c a ts"h iTf. -9c'139'4'4'Y'7'pd. ,'4 Qooemsl""e91708.1.5-T',Queeimsbury SM,2D12' red femea lSA�.."�1� .}5 d3.4P!Y.' �htlWm 9L:� g7-C -912'„f ,.d�cx
Town of Queensbury
Gregory ll„TeireM
Aprrll 12,E 20117
page 3,
systems, buildings, roadways, properties and storm water ccnrrtrcl m,8asuasre, ; torrr water recharge
area's sh l be located a mirar!rruum of 100 Fleet from the subsurface treatment system of
wastewater treatment system unless it is demonstrated that a lesser separation will not
adversely affect thefunctioning of such leachfields." The Applicant has nrndlicated in the project
narrative that "in addition, re,iief is requesteld from Chapter 147-111 f3),( )[41 Frere X00 deet of
horizontal sep'eration is required between a strarruw ter recharge area and 0 surr surfbce
wastewater treatment system. As that stoma water management devices are da wngradr!entfr m
the wastewater aabsrrrption field and a n enhanced treratmernt wastewater system is proposed, the
MPs will not have an adverse impact upon the wastewater systerrn.' Oven thi's reasoning
offared by the Applicant, ourr office ta kes no exception to the va riance requested.
9. The infiltration t�renichi receives runoff from, the proposed driveway; ac'cording to Table 1
Required Minimum Separation Distances to Protect Water Wells, From Contamination n gaff Part 5
Standards forWater Wells off the NYS DOH, water wells shall be sep-arat'ead a rninirnurum horizontal
distance of 100 feet from surface wastewater recharge absorption system constructed to
discharge storm water from parkin lams, rioadlw ays or driveways.s. The Applicant to clarify that
there are net any,neighboring wells within 100 feet of the infiltration trench.
Conclusions and Reco mimendations
It, is our opinion that the applicant should provide dairifiicsation for the, above iterrns and incorporate the
changes in subsequent plan submissions,.
If you have any questions regardling the above, please de not hresiitate to,contact Erle at(518) 824- „
Sincerely,
Sean M. Doty, P.im., LEED'AP'„ CMS4S
Principal!
Manager, Municipal Engineering Services
cc. Sunny Sweet, Town Planning Oiffice Admirnistrator(moria email)
Laura Moore,Town Land Use Planner(via ernalil)
e.'P rsirerts m; 4¢ 179 y'T477.'f7-'T�QueemshurAgl?M.1,`.,I.Qwn",,Akwk+-5F"' ,P6'd1T'ASN' TSA'atgrvai kFN 9�T .1�-'P9d 2 '1' rmig7arroz aiWl'1'7-iJfl-'1�_k'1+T�x'a.
Warren County Planning Department
Project Review and Referral Form
Reviewed D panr°turnent.on April 7, 20,17
Pror;� Tt Name: Tere i, Gregory, IDark Bay Properties
Owner: Davis, l- wremnae
ID Number: 0BY-17-81DR-33
County Proj"t#- Apri 7-35
Currentoning: WR
Community: Queensbury
ProjectDescription:
Boundary Me adjustment,, Construction n of now,single family residence on vacant, rarcei( .1 -1-' '7- ,) and shared
curb,gait to minimize traffic im pa t"Thais is an alterative plea to,building a singlefamily residence on vacant lot(239.18-1I-
7- ) as it pre erntl ,exiete (022 Aerre ) which would nicht require a i nt size variance but the mnel hbor(C Christopher
Freiinnter) feels would ld bn an impact and would require an additional curb cult on State Rt
Site Location
Ci Mete- Rt 9L (23P.18-1-271
'pa int p ,r ll (2,39.18-1-27-2) to the east of 239.18-1-27.11
Tax Map,Number(s)-
239.118-11-27.1
umb r(s)-2' „118-11-2x',1
Staff Notes:
The Issues here ep eerto be of aloca[nature involving I0 cal is,5u s without any significanA im pactso n County properties
,or resources, 'Stant recommends no county impact based on•nthe information submitted a=rding to the ru gested review
criteriaof YSGenerel Municipal Laws Se tib n 239 applied to,the proposed project.
Local actions to Trate(if sin :
County Planning Departrrucnt.
Ni
Local Actior>:Ninal Disposition:
4/101/201
Warren County Manning Department Dante Signed Local Official Date Signed
"LEASE REIVRN THIS FORM TO°TIIIE W RVXN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NVIT'HIN app DAYS OF FINAL ACTION
742.1 lki-y Road. 12'1804
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RE SOLUTION -Planing Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Area Variance 3 1-2017 GREG TERESI
Tax Map ID. : 239.18-1-27.1, -27.2,1 Property Address: 11 State Route 9L/Zoning: WR
The:applicanthas,submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes 1,8 10 sq. ft. floor area, 885 sq•
ft. footprint single family,dwelling'. This includes,a boundary lot line adjustment for the new home with a
shared curb cut to the adjacent parcel. Parcel 239.18-1-27.1 will reduce a 1.5 ac parcel to 0.91 acre and increase
parcel 239.18-27.2 to 0.81 acre. House construction will, be on parcel 239.18-1-27-2 and associated site work
on both parcels. Project subject to major storm wtiter in LGP. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning,
Ordinance, new construction within 50 fi. of 15% slopes shall be subject to Planning Board review and
approval. Variance: Relief is sought for reduction of non-conforraingsize parcel to less,conforming size.
Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The: Town f Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Plaming Board 'to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals fbr projects that require: both Zoning Board
of'Appeals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and,found.that:
MOTION TO MAKE ARECL)MMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING,HQARD TO THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR A VARIANCE 1" 0.31-2017 GRE G TERE SI: Introduced by
who moved its adoption, and
a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified. any significant adverse mpacts that
cannot be:mitigated with,current project pro p p
osal.
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on a limited review,has identified the:following areas of concern.
1)
Duly adopted this 2P day of April, 2017 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Phone- .50 9-76 1,8220& Fax: 5 &745.4437 1742 Bay NY 12804 �www,queepisbury.net
Site '� 13-2017 @ 10 Hemlock Rodd
Public Iriig
Draft resolution Planning Board recommendation
to the Zoning BoardAppeals,
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Community Development Department Sta "1 tes
April2 5, 20 17
Site Plan 13-2017 Stephen, Carol & Andrew BOdette
10.14emlock Road/ WR—Waterfront Residential / Ward I
SEE R Type 11
Material, Review: narrative, application, survey, site plan drawing,floorplan,and elevations
Parcel History: 1991, 1992 bath alt.; AV 13-2,017
'Requested Action
Recommendation to the Zoning Roard of'Appeals for relief sought for setbacks and FAR.
Resolutions
1. Planning Board recommendation
rroject Description
Applicant proposes a second floor renovation removing existing 572 sq. & and constructing,proposed 570 sqe ft.
second floor with office area and master bedroom. New construction.does not meet shoreline setback and
expansionnonconfortning. Project includes an existing porch renovation 98 +/- sq. . for new entryway and
open porch. Pursuant to Chapter 17'9-13-010 & 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion in a CEA shall
be:subject to Planning,Board review and,approval,. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks and FAR- Planning
Board shall provide a,recommendation to the Zoning,Board, of Appeals.,
Staff Con went$
0 Location-The home:is located at 10 Hemlock Rd, off of Glen Lake Rd
0 Arrangement- Thee existing site willremain unchanged the major improvement is,to the second floor area f
the home. There is also a 98 sq ft porch that will be renovated to allow for a new entryway and open porch
area.
0 Building,—The plans show the existing access to the basement area,will be:relocated for the updated
entrance:area—to be located to a new hallway area- 'The first floor is adjusted for the existing covered porch
will now have an porch and,new entry to the house that allows for entry into the:garage. The first floor is
also maintaining both bedrooms,on the first floor, two bathrooms access to the existing deck facing the
shore. The alterations on the first floor include the living area, 3-season porch, alcove area to be updated
with kitchen area, great-roo m.and dining area in an open.floor plan,. The second floor to be removed
completely then replaced with a master bedroom, office area, bathroorn.area and relocated stairway.
0 Site conditions-The applicant has indicated there is to be permeable pavers to be installed in front of the
existing garage and eave trenches all the west,and east side of the home.
* Elevations—The applicant has provided elevations and photos showing the existing,and proposed views of
the home,
Floor plans—The submission shows the arrangement of each floor existing and proposed.
Pursua�nt to Section 179-940510 the Plannin,g Board may grant waivers on, its own initiative or at the written
request d an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlinesthe items to appear on the
site plan or included as attachments., At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers,,
indicated the item not a,pplicabile or has not addressed the item/ left, check box blank. This includes the follow
items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application- h. signage, J. storm water, ki. topiography, n
traffic, o commercial alterations/ construction details, r, constructilon/dernolition disposal.
Nature of Wriance
The second floor area is to be located 25 ft from the shoreline her a 50 ft setback is required. Relief is also
requested for floor area where proposed is 26.7% and required is 22%.
SUMMaiEY
he Planning Board is to Pro videa recommendation to the ZBA in regards to the request for relief frrn, the
setback requirements and f1loor area l'the WR zone.
Megifing H
Lsto.ty., First,PB meeting,
w0641 1)tl,"(�L I CCCI-,J)I I I_1V
LE f I I. )e v Q I'�I II "I k�e
74'7� 13�i�y1�ol)atl. (,hieenslnvy, N111" 1 '2,804
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning,Board, of Appeals
Area Variance 13-2,017 STEPFIEN, CAROL,& ANDREW BODETTE
Ta,x Map I.D. 289.10_1- 2 /Property Address: 10 Hemlock Road/ Zoning: WR
The applicant has submitted anapplication for the following, Applicant proposes a second floor renovation
removing,existing 572 sq. ft. and constructing proposed 570,sq. ft. second floor with office area and master
bedroom. New construction does not meet shoreline setback and expansion nonconformiag. Project includes,
an existing porch renovation 98 +1- s ft. for new entryway and open porch. Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-010 &
179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion in as CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and
approval. Variance. Relief is sought for setbacks and FAR. Planning Board sal all provide as recommendation
to the Zoning Board,of Appeals.,
The Town of Queensbury Zoning, Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board, to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals fo�r projects that require both Zoning Board
of Appeals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
,application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that:
MOTION TO MAKE A Ml' MDA ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BQA, RD "T+ THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPE ALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. 13-2017 S"TIP HEN,, CAROL &
ANDREW BETTE: Introduced by who moved its adoption, and
a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts 'that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal,
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on as limited review,has identified the following areas of concern-,
1)
Duly adopted this "' day of April, 2017 by the Ulowing vote:
AYES-
NOES:
Phone: 51 ..701-82,2 � 9ix- .518.74.5,;4437 x'74? Bay Road,Queensbury, NY 12904 1