The URL can be used to link to this page

doc20170427152301 PLANNINGBOARD STAFF NOTE'S MAY 2, 2017 Queensbury Planning Board Agenda First Regular Meeting: '�"nncstlTay, M:I,,,y Ifi,„201'7/'Time 7— 11 PITY Queensbury Activities Center @ 747 Bay Road Tabl�sl 7itrntns . ............ ............. .... Applicant(s) FRANK PERR TTA,JR.,, Application-Ty" . ._ � Site.Plan 4-2017.. OtiFldrttType: �, _ _ er�s) ' arrt�e as alit _� ... p T � '� y .. � , II _...... _... _.. „ .._.... .. Agernto. .. .... .._ De,n ais 1 acElroy I lot sib 5.52 acres Location. Asseunnbly fwnairut� .� d, Ward. I Zonuno , lassibcattou '�W" acres' Tax ID lVo. .. X39 7 Ordinance Reference 179-3-040 _ _ _..... . _..... 0 Cross lReference Sunset Hill UB 11-9 ,SP 3S-2104 'warren Co. Deferral Jarnunary 2017' boathouse 1suunudecki AV 4-21117 c Public Hearing January 24,2117, March 28,2017, Site Information AHA,LGPC, Wetlands M ay ml 211117 � l Description REVISED). Project � --_,_. ..--- .. .. ....... . . ... .... ., .. __ . ...... .._ .... I p Applicantt pToposes a 3,467 sq.ft.(footprint),8,625 sq.fl. (floor area)single family home, Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-04O of the Zcvning rdinaance,major stoTmwater and prgject within 50 ft, of 15%slopes shall be subject to Planning I Board review and approval. Planning board Recommendations ....... Applicant(s) REG TIS C 4 Aptxlieatioa Type She Plan 33-201 Owner(s) � Dark Bay l�uopertiu s� Laru�r Davis i aEQR Thr +I- pe I I t(s) Fluutchinnsuniuueeriux 1_ Q of sig 1. 9 acre/22 amore V Location 3300 State Itt.91 arnl. 1 orniung Classification' p _._ ....... Tax 11)No, '239.111-1-27.1 r.-27.2I rdltuaaace I�ef�reuuce � 1 T� 3 1417 .. . .... ... Cross Reference AV 31-2017 � ..Warren Co.Referral ATel 20 1 7 ....... ... _ ._-.. ..Public Hearing aha for recommendation �._She Information APA, take Gacc Park Com nission Project Demription: Applicant proposes 1,810 sq, Mt, floor area, 885 sq. ft, footprint single family dwelling, This includes a boundary lot line adjustment for the new home with a shared curb cut to the adjacent parol. Parcel 239.1.8-1.27.1, will r-edunce a 1.5 ac Parcel to 01 acre and increase parcel 239.18-27.2 to 0.81 acre, House construction narilI be and parcel 239,18-1-27 2 and associated site work on both parcels. Project subject to major storrnn at>er in LOP. Parsuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new cm, tru°ction within 0 fl:. of 15% slopes small, be subject to Planning, Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for reduction, of �non- connfornnpnig size parcel to less conforming size, Planning Board shall provide a:r ommendatiott to the Zoning Board of Appeals.. .. ..._._.......m A ls .._ IIAKL _. ... . . 2017 tsan 39 _m twnrsl..._._ Mary&" i1-limn Carey r Pw 3 YP _..w... a Unlisted l can sig ,2fr acre �' e°1s�__ ....._.. ...; �enais t'�z �lroow�° ...._ ...... __. _ ...._.. _ . .. ._ _.__... ..m.. ..... ._....... . ._ . ., .. Location l Corinth Road(Nwest of#3.10) _ ..... �.m °"d. .t .. 0._.Zoning Classilicationn: CLI... E Tax 1D No, . _. . . 30 8-16-1-54 Ordiranct Referenee 1 179-3-040 F Cross Refffence V AV 36-2017 Warren Co. Referral un1a fear surladivisioln11,11 � Public RcaripR.... . ..n1a for recoraniendation Site Iuyforniatian Project Description: Applicant proposes construction oraa 4450 sq,ft,storm building. Project includes a single drive aisle around lanullding with aurae access to Corinth Road_ The site wil l be cleared to install stornrn ater,drive aisle and planting. Purrsuuant to Chapter 171-3-010 of the Zoning rdinancc,construction ofa storage building shall be subject to Planning Board review and,approva L Variance; I lief'is requested for setbacks. Platnnin f3oaurd shall pvidc a recommendation tothe Zoning Board of,Apnwpeals, .. . . Applicant(s) JAMES BE7u.TY Application Type Su division Preliminary Stage 7-2017 _ Subdivision Final Stere 8-70'17 Owner(s) 1,lar°s 1nar�; Inc,&%/a Sunnyside 1'ar'3 i SEQR Type Unlisted ,agent(s) fort size. 1I1.67,acres _ La atioan; 168 Sunnyside Road 'lard: V Zurnin,g E'Va ificatiaura: MDR Tax Ill No 290,5--1-50Ordinance Reterence Chapter 183 Cross Reference 19913 car detached garage, 195_ Warren Co.<Referrall nnla for subdivision laddition to rapt, bldg-,2004,septiz SP 42-93; SP 13- f OI S El cc, installations fair night use-,A '35-- 2;0 17 Public lllearirnp n'l � __ �. _._ a far re,corrurncndlation Site Information 7 Project Elescr'iptiotc ,pplicarit propanes subdivision of a 10.8 acre parcel into two Vats—one 0,33acre and one V0.53 acres. App Iitant requests waiver from sketch'plan. The apartment latrnldnang wiII be on the:033,acre parcel and the;go]f'course and associated buildings to be on the 10.53 acre parcel: Pursauant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance,sanbdivisioat of land shall be subject to Planning Board rewiew arnd approval,. Variance: Iteiief is rc uucsted for lot si we.density,permeability&setbacks. PlanminsBo ;d shall provide a reco�annttendation to the Zonirug Board ofAppua�als. .. w . .... ......... .. ..... . . laFlicant(s) .... ... m GLENN 1�URI�A 111�� I Applicalion"Type Vrite Plan�@kladifcativaun�3�-�i117m ... .... Owner(s) I Creat Este'1'lnern'ae park I SEAR."Fypc i Unlisted Agent(s), nla Lot size 10A acres7I/V acre(using only 4,500 sq_fl.) j Location 117,2 State Route� Ward: 2 j Zoning Classil7ca4ion., Cl Tat D o, 24e5.12-1 Y4 Ordinance Reference 179-3-040, 17 -'5m020 Cross Reference SP PZ 265-71116,AV'aft-21117 ''Farren Co. Referral May 2017 Pubic Hearing i nfa for recoutarnend,�atioru Site fn%rmatiom Project,Description- Applicant proposes to maintain wood carving business and relocate a 160 sul, ft, shed, which includes a 411 q� ft, parole on the 1 shed;. Project includes relocation of display areas and to add landscapt lighting to,dainae on scuul tuures/display8. Project still includes exterior tree art business, removal of chain link t�nce to Instal rope and wood post fencing along with use of barn tutee for storage- Pursuant to Chapter 1'7'9-3-040 179-5-020 of the Zoning Ordinance, modilicatiort to an approved:site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval_ Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks, Planning W shall prinvide a recommendation to the Zonlrtg Board of Appeals Id Musing, . . _ ......... .. .... . ..... Applic41tnos) EAtJC Pfht1U,, Application'Type 1 Subdivision Preliminary Stage 6-2017 Subdivision Final Stage 91-2017 Freshwater Well tads V erini It 2.21117 ..... . Owner sbSame as appiicant SF ' 1 e Unlisted Got size 18,91 acres Agends� _ aa ninecuing... _ ... ..m...... . ......... Locatioun ! End of Island View& Riverside Drives War& 4 VS� Zonin Cification, WR Tax,IDNo, 3019.14-1-46 J flrrlinanceReflerence j Chapter183 Clapser9 Cross Reference SUB 1-2010 sketch,.AV 34-20110,A'u,r' Warren Co, Referral n1a . ..16-2017 Public 11ear1mp, �4y 16,2017 Site Information Wetlands Q Project Dewription: Applicant:proposes a fbuur lot subdivision—lots I,7„&3 access is from island View Drive and Got 4 acces3 is 1`rom Riverside Drive. Lot I —43 acres„loot 2-2.1 acres,Got 3 —2.1 acres, Lot 4—q.4 acres. Project includes easement for access and maintenance —will be included as conditions of subdivision. Apphearut realuests stoatanvvater and site plan for each lot as they are solld, Waiver is requested from sketch plan for 4 logit, Fmoposall. Pursuant to Chapter 191 of the Zonimg Ordinance,Subdivision Oflland shall lie subject to Planning Board review and approval. ®w Applicant(s) STEPHEN,CAROL& ANDREW Application Type Site Plan 13-2017 Owner(s) Sarne as Applicants SEQR Type Type fl Agent Curtis D. Dybas Litt size .24 acre Location 10 Hernlo.k Road Ward- l Zoning Classification- WR Tax ID No. 289,10-1-32 Ordivaance Reference 179-13-010, 179-3-040, t r u sReference1 5tta1992 beth iit.t AW 13-20 17 rrenoReferral: ! a .. . .... Puha lie Hil arirug I fluty IA,20,17 Site Information CEA ... ... -- Project Descriptiom Applicant proposes a second floor renovation reinoving existing 5,72 sip„fi, and constructing proposed 570sq. ft, 6 second floor with office area and rua ster bedroom, New construction does not meet shoreline setbai k and expansioii cataruc iaf(aruinin,g, Project includes an existing parch renovation +/-sip- if..for new entryway and open porch. Pursuant to Chapter 179-1 -010 & 179-3- 040 of'the Zoning Ordinance,expansion,in CF-A< Mali be subject to Planning Board reviewand uappru_vap- _. Arty further business which uaag-ty be properly brought before the Board- Minutes of March 2 111 & March Draft r ' l I li — grant/deny minutes e approval Administrative Item Seaton Property RIIrwg (A-I 'Treeworks) Site Plea 27'-2017 Special � e Permit 7-2017 308 & 310 Corinth Road Public Hearing Scheduled Draft resolution — Flaming Board to table until July 2 , 2017 Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development.Department Staff Dotes May 2, 2017 Site Plan 7-2017 Seaton Property Holdings Special Use Permit 7-2017 308 & 3 10 Corinth lid. /0111 -mm Commercial Light Industrial /'ward SEAR Unlisted Material Review: Application, Plan sets C I-C6 and -1 to A-3, machinery detail, stormwater ater report and, stornrr ,ater pollution prevention plain.. Parcel History P 27-2.0elf storage bldgs., SP 65-2013A.-I Tree Irks, DISC 1-2,017; AV -2017 Requested, Action Application to be tabled to the second planning board meeting :in July with information, submitted by June l nn. Application was tabled at the Zoning oard of Appeals meeting on 4/19« Resolutions 'l. SEQR 2, Planning Board decision Project Description Applicant proposes operation of a wood processing facility with a new 15,4011 sq. ft. enclosed pole barn for wood products and to install two 1,2.114 sq. ft. kilns units on the site. Project includes merger oflocs 308.16-1- , -56, -5 8 &. 1, Project includes continued auto facility for C& I automotive and cnurreunt use ofexpanded material storage arca. Project includes maintaining,4 existing bnrildirn; s on,the merged properties, additional clearirng, installation of a gravel parking area and material storage area(lugs, woodchips etc.). Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and 179-14-440 of the Zoning Ordinance, light manufacturing—wood products, legging company, and Special Use Permit for wood product facility shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff comments, • Location-The project location is at:348 and.314 Corinth Rd where there is an existing a od products, activity occurring at 308 Corinth Rd. • Arrangement- The project arca,contains four parcels that.are to be merged. The existing buildings on the site are two homes, a residential garage, an.operating,auto repair building and a ftiturre building,to be constructed fbr'equipment storage for -1 Treeworks. The new building is to be located on the crurrent. parcel 308.164-58. • Site Design!-n-The existing buildings are to remain, with no changes toaccess or associated area. The applicant has indicated.the equipment storage building 5,000 sq ft is to be built in the future. The previous site plain included the cleaning ofproperty for storage of wood material. The applicant proposes to expand the log storage area—an approximate area should be included.on the plans. Additional storage areas noted on the plains ate a wood chip and vehicle storage pad area.--note approxi mate area should be noted on the plans. • 13uuildin —the pr feet is for a 1.5,00ft building. The plains show overhead doers on the east side of the building and on the northm-side of the buuildirn ., I ,a Signa,ple-the applkant should clarify signage as there was no information, provided, on Cl. a Site conditions-The existingsite has buildings,and lawn area to the road side and the applicant has cleared additional area for the log,storage where the current project inctudes more site clearing,, The plans shows sorne vegetation to remain on the east border and north border about 30 ft. The west bard appears to be cleared to the property line. The applicant.should provide a clearing plan to confirin the vegetative buffer distance that is o remain. * Traffic- The applicant has indicated the site would accommodate 30 vehicle spaces,—:the plans do,not delineate parking,areas for the wood processing operation, the existing homes, and the exisfingauto repair. The plans,should be updated showing.parking'. * Utility plan—the applicant has indicated the new building will be connect to a septic system—plaws should be:updated to show septic. Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control-The applicant has, submitted a stormwater report ande storrnwater pollution prevention plan for engineering review and comment. The project, includes site work of 4.82 ac and about 153, 202 sq,ft of storage area, driveway, and building footprints. Landscape plan—no site landscaping is proposed. Site lighting plan —light poles area shovni on Sheet C I and building lights on A2. Additional infbimation on fixtures will need to be provided. Elevations—Elevations show the building at 29 ft and the application indicates a 40 ft building—information should clarify height. Floor plans—The floor p�lans show a 240-1.1- sq ft office area and 1081 sq ft restroom area—the:remainder of the bui Id ing is an open floor plan. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers, on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The applicant proposes no, waivers, The board should clarify if landscaping will be requested. p'ecial Use PermitH't ria- . special use permit is required as outlined in section 179-1001tl ener°al criteria: Harm, ony with the Comprehensive Plan —The project is located in a commercial light industrial, zone where the applicant has provided supporting materials ouut the sig and operations f the wood processing use.. The new use is consistent with a lighting industrial use Compatibility —the project site is in a predominately mixed use area associated with commercial, health care,. light industrial uses, and stera, e., Access, circulation and parkin --the applicant proposes to maintain the existing access orateCorinth lid. — parking for the uuses, should be clarified, The applicant has indicated employees pick up, or trucks f-aom the project site for tree service work, In addition, some erunployees will remain Tann site for the firewood process mg. Infrastructure and services —the plains should show ori-site septic and utility connections s fiver electric/ as, water and communications. Environment and natural fbatuures —tine applicant, has indicated the new project activities will occur internal and will not,cause odor or noise. Long-term effects—the proposed project bnn s a new processing,operation to the area,. ecufie Qriteria W Sawofills, chipping rruiils, and palll ndlls. Sawinifl, chipping or palleindlIs are allowed on,lots o al leas,100 acres any size. refrained as SAWMILL, CHIPPING and PALLET LET MILL -Any building, site or place used For the cutting or milling ef'raw timber into,dimensional lumber, pallets, chips or other wood d produucts) G Lot size -n qumired 100 a;c proposed 9.54 Nature of Va rias ce Tabled at 4/19 meeting., The applicant, requrests variance Iot size requirements eats of a legging operations procession wood where a 100,ac is requited and the project area is 9.54 ac Summary Application is to be tabled to the second planning board meeting in July pending zonirn board review, The Board should consider additional information for storage areas of materials size, landscaping,,utilities —septic, si,gna e, and parking. Also to include as a condition parcel merger 30,816-1-55,56,58 1„ Meetrxn HistgM PB 4/18/1.7; ZBA 4/19/1 I THE North Country Office Cba, e 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 .K.4 P: (518) 812-10,513 F.- (518) 812-22015 CPAN I ES www.chazencompainles.corn Hudson Valley Office (845)454-3980 Land SuryeVm CO PiUl I D!5tr!Ct Office (518) 273-01055 Planners Envirwimental Professionalb Landscatie Archftects April 12, 2017 Mr. Craig Brown, Zon ing Ad m inistiratoir and Cade Compi lance Officer Town of Queensbury '742 Bay Road Queensbury, New York 12804 Delivered via email only,: CraigB@gue,ensbur°y.net Re., SeotanProperty HoldingslA-I tree works. LLC Towpf Queensbury, Worren Coen tj4 New York Chazen,Project#9160,0.19 Queensbuty Ref#SP27-2027 Dear Mr. Brown, The Chazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submission package from your office for the above referenced project. The apipl icant I ntends to redevelop an existing comirnercla I property 1 nto a new, fad lity to, proicess timber and timber-relateld products. The proposed work Includes the construction of a new processing facility, wood drying kilns, gravell driveways and parking areas, and related site features,. Submitted information includes the f6flowin& Site Plans and Details prepared by Kevin L. Hastings., P.E., undated; Stormwateir Pollution Prevention Plain prepared by Kevin L. Hastings, P.E., dated March 2017; Stormwateir Management System Engineering Report by Kevin L. Hastings, P.E., dated March 10, 2017; Pre-and Post-Development Drainage Maps prepared by Kevin L. Hastings, P,E.,dated March 10, 2017; and, Site Plan Review Application dated March 13,2017. Yong off ice has requested that we limit our review to the design of storrinwater system as it relates to compliance to local), state. or relevant codes and regulations. Rased upon our review, Chazein offers,the following comments for the Town's con side ration: Stormwater Management&Eroslon and Sediment Control. 1. The project(proposes to disturb an area of great than 1.0 acres and requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plain (S PPP) in accordance with GP-0-15-002 that includes erosion and sediment controls as well as post construction stormwater management practices.., ha en Enginearing-LandSuNe�ying&Landscape Architecture Co., D.P.C- Chazen EnvironmowiW Srvkes, Ina ThoChazen Corropanies, Im, Tlj,wjl of Gieert5buryr A-1 Treeww1ofks,,LLC' poral 12,2017 Page 2 Storrvn,u,vater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP'PP) has been provviided. Comments relating to the torrnwater Management Report.and SWPPP are offered) be[ow. It does not appear that documentation was provided) per Part LF A o f the SPIDES General iPerrruit concerning construction, activities that may affect threatened and endangered species. The applicant shall provide the Town with any documentation regarding the above determination and Incorporate the same,Into the ` PPP puursuuant to part LFA of the SIPDES,General Permit I It does not appear that documentation was provided per part 1AS of the!SIRDES General Permit conceirning construction act,lvities that may affect an historic property(although the applicant has !indicated that a review of historic resources has been performed).The applicant Shaul provide the Town with documentation regarding;the above determination and incorporate the same into the WPPP'pnrursuuant to Part I.P.'g of the SPDES General Permit. Soil testing its required for the proposed infiltration, practices to confirrn that NYS SMDM design parameters are met with respect to separation from,groundwater,soil type,and infiltration rates, The applicant has indicated that some of this testing has been performed. The applicant shall perforin all required spill testing for each of the two, proposed infiltration practices, and submit applicable results. S, A legally binding and! enforceable maintenance agreement meat ma be executed bet een the facility owner and the Town ensuring that proper maintenance measures will be implemented for all proposed storrn titer rnanagernent practices as specified in Town code sections 147-10D if the Town,chooses. A draft of this agreement should be provided to the Town for review and shall be included in the SWPPIP. Vin, detail for inlet protection is included in the site plans and a discussion of inllet protection is included in the S' rPPP.' however, none are shown on the Proposed Grading Plan (Sheet C-3).The applicant to clarify if and where inlet protection measures are to be installled. T. The applicant has indicated in the SWPPP that tree planting its proposed as,a green infrastructure practice. Howe err„tree planting does not appear to be proposed according to the site plans.The applicant to clarify., S, The proposed land cover throughout: the site is unclear 'from Sheets C-2 or Sheet -1, The applicant to clearly indicate proposed gravel driveways, / parking areas,, lawn areas,, and any. landscaping areas,The Hydro,CAD model will then be reviewed for conslstency with the proposed cover types. . The source of ilnfbrmnation for the storm,water management practice identified in the HydroCAD rnodlel as 1P (existing storrnwvater basin), is not evident. The applicant to Indicate applicable elevations and dimensions of this practice o, the plains. 10. The appl"scant has modeled the post-development condition of Suubcatchmenwt 1'S (southern portion,of the situ`as,passing through the existing sto�rmwater basin and then to Discharge Point A. However.,the pre-development stormwater model does not include this stormwater basin the suu;brdatchment discharges directly to Diischarge Point 1.). It appears that the post-di8veloprnent �I r��m%w 1 G 3 9 1 IAISi-A',{dwEeash i'3 T'..Quee sbwrgy.-927-2017 ex6mrs raWerc:yW�PI�I��swl l q�1G�ID�.�JJL.ba ��r mrbs,9R�T•74��7_'4G15^ "�d_w1dCCa Town of Queensbury AM1 TieewoArks,a LLC April 12r 2017 Pago stormwater model may ower-predict onsite storage capacity by including this basin where it was not included sunder pre-development conditions.'The applicant to clarify. IL Infiltration / detention, practice 21) (st�ormwater management basin in central portion of the site) is modelled with a spillway at elevation 5040 at the wrest slue of the basin„ However,the inlet to this practice at the northeast corner appears to be at a similar elevation. The applicant to add spot elevations to the inlet and confirm the spillway,elevations to provide safe conveyance in an extreme storm event, 12. Infiltration/detention practice 2P is modeled as a detention pond with a deep sump catch basin conniecti,ng this practice to an underground infiltration bed.The elevations of the catch basun and infiltration bed are not defined, ,and this portion of the practice is not included in the HydroCAD model,The applicant to clarify. 13. Sftornmwater management practice 3113 is labdled on the Proposed Graiding Plan (Sheet '- ) as a sediment basin but its modeled in the HydroCAD model as,an infiltration practice.,The iw'JYS SMDM indicates that infiltration practices must be protected from sedimentation and compaction during construction to function as designed. The applicant to clarify the Ipruurpose of thils practice and describe how any proposed Infiltration practices will ince protected dluring construction. .4. The proposed grading of stormwater management practice 3P, is unclear, The, HydroCAD rnodel models this basun from 505.0"to 508.1W.The proposed 'r 507a'r and 508'contours pass through the proposed wood drying kilns and continue to the south such that the basin is not bounded on the southern sidle.The applicant to darif . 15. The applicant. appears to propose a stormwater detention, of infiltration practice (practice P) within a good ship storage area. The applicant to clarify, how storage is oriented) such that the capacity of the stormw titer management practice its not impacted. 16. The applicant appears to have not included W,CLv or Mv calculations in the SWPPP or Stormwater Management System Engineering report. The, applicant to subunit applicable calculations to the Town,to verify that Ni YS ' MOM requirements are met. 17. The applicant appears not to, have included a Notice of Intent.� 1). The N" OI is tobe submitted to the Town,and included in the SWPPP. 18. The MYS SMDM describes pretreatment requirements for inflitrafion practices and requires pretreatment of 10 of the WQv for infiltration practices in soils with,an inffilltration rate above 5 inches houur,The applicant to clarify how pretreatment is achieved., 19, The applicant shalll revise the SWPPP to include a discussion of the function, of the proposed stormw ater rnainagernent system in, frozen conditions with consideration given to the NYS, SIVIDNVi'"s cold)climate design guidance for the chosen practices. z�*Q;"4%991rddb-91'799%917W.W1"T-QomnabvrV"IIP,&.9•T,AMmimbury-SP27-2f:TSeatonkapdrdVH�d�ln�.�"wvPP��aw�15�RGd1�-�Y,]�.T'�ee^�aeWas„SN'T.3'��iF„�I'd�'9' ,li.Li;dpr� TQwwn of Queensbury A.1 Treeworks,LLC ApRHl 12,2017 Pane 4 Conclusions aind Recommendations In than event the Planning Board or Town staff have any glues.tlo ns sir require additional irnformatio n, please do not hesitate to contact me at (5,18),82:4-1926. can M. Doty, P.E., t.EED AFS, CM Principaf Manager, MunldpaI Engineering Services cc; Sunny Sweet,,Town Planning!O iic drrnirnistrator (via er nall), Laiu«nra Ma lore,down Land Use Planner(via'e-mull) File T-CSrun urc� ?GIRP%1.9�T,Qvoombury'5' 27.201.7�Sopt4W91'Pfop"+rAo'Moak#Ort¢a,"k' �°�1�Md.i�'-dL-:1,„'�'mearrararks,�3PS°'�m.#�'1�,��¢Il'�•�W1�',a,Cl.d�k Warren C'ount,y Planning Department Project Review and Reforal Forin Reviewed by Department on April 7, 2017 ProjetNt Name Seaton Piropleirty Holdings, LLC Owner. Seaton Property Holdings, LL III Number: QBE""'-17-SPR-31/S U -7 County Projei t . Aprl7-4 , Current Zoning: QU community; Queensbusy Project Description- Applicant proposes to bluild a now firewood processing facflft „ rain wood storage yard, wood hip storage yard and o grade vehicle parking area. Pollen bard will l be 115,000 sill ft and used for wood Product rnd gallate. Project includes a xl OU'aquaiiprmarnt builldii n IPravi,alus approval xpir di Atte Location: 308 & 3110,CoOnth Rdl TMap Number(s): 308,16-1- :,516,58 61 Staff'Notes: The issues tura appearto be of a local nature involving fell issues 1thourt anyslrni'fi nn irrnp artscrn County properties, or r sources, State rocurrnrn nds no count impact based cnntha information subrnitted according tothe suggested review critaida of NY neral Municipal Law Section 239 applied to the proposed project., Local actions 0)chute(if any): County Manning,Department, NCI Local Action:/ "'leu al Disposition: 4110/2017 Warren County Planning Department haute Signed Local Official Date Signed. PLEASE RE,TURN THB rOrc V)THE WARREN COSY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WLTHI N'ISN DAYS OF FINAL AC`f1ON I'01,Pfll Of Ccin,�tnti4rflt-y E)evefcppnteu;it Office,d 4 2 B a y R D a d, Q iL i e e s,t)�.�,r py, 1",41 Y 128 0 e-1 Town, of QueensburPlanning Board RESOLUTION—Tabling. Site Plan 27-2017 & Special Use Perrnit 7-2017 SEAQ ON PROPERTY HOLDINGS Tax.Map ID 308.16-'1- , -S6, - -6,1/Property Address,: 308 & 3 10 Corinth Road /Zoning CLE MOTIONTCS TABLE SITE PLAN 17-2,017& SPECIAL USE PE IRMIT 7-2017 SEATON PROPERTY HOLDING ,Introduced bwho moved for its adoption, seconded by—; Tibled until the July 25, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Duly adopted this 24 day of May, .017 by the following,vote: AYES, NOES- PhoiiQ, 518,761 52201 Fax- 51 ,745, 4"43'7 � 742 Bay Ra),,,id, Q�xensbury, NY' 12804 David P. ie Site PlaIn 24-2017@ 3 Stevens Road P�ubli'c HearingScheduled SEAR. Type I' Draft, resolution — grant/deny site plan approval' Town of Queenshury Planning Board F ommun City Development Department Staff Notes oa, May 2, 2017 Site Plan 24-2017 David P. Discern 3 Stevens,Road/MDR—Moderate Density Residential /Ward 4 SER Type 11 Material Review: application, septic information, floor plan f6t basement area and upper level area, elevations, survey include in file packet Parcel History: SP 35-1991, SP 4-19 2, AV 23-2017 Requested Action, Planning Board review and approval to ma�intain a 4-unit apartment building where 3 units received approval. Resolutions 1. Planning Board decision Proiect Description Applicant proposes to maintain a 4-unit apartment building where 3 units received approval. Previous approval Ira 1991 for a duplex and in 1992 for a third unit. No changes are Proposed to the site or building. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance,request to,maintain a,41h apartment unit to existing structure shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff opau ments • Location-The existing building is located at 3 Stevens Road off of Corinth Road south side. • Arrangement- The existing building is,located,at the end of Stevens Road and the site contains existing site development. There is a 1887 +/.- sq ft existing garage and a parking area, for the existing tenants. • Building—The existing 'building is approximately 2,53 0 sq ft footprint) with a 306 sq ft floor area for the 4 units that are existing • Signage-There is no signage at this,time • Site conditions-The applicant has,indicated there is no plans to alter the existing site or building, * Traffic-The site already has existing tenants that access the building through Stevens Rd and no new traffic is,anticipated. • Site layout.and utility plan—the applicant has provided the:site plan information showing the location of the existing septic system arrangement onfirm septic system compliancefor the number off nits. • Grading.and drainage,plan and Sediment and erosion control—there, are no changes for the site and should confirm existing,tree line area to remain as part of project. • Landscape plan-to be reviewed for compliance • Site lighting—to be reviewed to confirm compliance • Elevations—The plans provided are from the 1992 materials and is,the, same:as the recent photo in real property., • Floor plans—The Plans are provided,from the: 1992 submission materials and is as described by the applicant Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers n its, own initiative or at the written reqLICSt of an applicant. The application Cont identiflied, as "Requirements" outlines the items, to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application. the applicant has either, requested waivers, indicated the item u�not applicable or has, not addressed the itern/ left check box. blank. 'This includes, the follow items listed, under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site: lighting, h. signage, j. storrawater, k. topography, Llandscaping, n traffic, o, commercial alterations/construction details, p floor Plans, q, $oil logs, r. construction/dernolition disposal s,. snow removal, Natu�re of''! aur'iance Granted 4/19. The:applicant proposes to maintain a 4 unit apartment.building where current regulations,of the MDR zone require a min.imurn of 2 ac per unit if not connect to Town sewer and water, The existing building is only connected to water and the site is 2.28, ac where, 8 acs would be required. summaEy The applicant has completed a site plan application.requesting ,approval of a.pre.existing 4Ih unit for a 4-unit apartment building. MettipIllistory- PB, 4/l8A7; Zl3- A4/l9/l7 .o% -v Town of Queensbury Planning,Board, RESOLUTION— Gi-ant /Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN 24-2017 DAVID P. DISCENZA Tax Map ID: 308.20-1-18 /Property Address,- 3 Stevens Road/Zoning: MDR The:applicant has submitted an, application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to,Article 9 of the Town zonirkg Ordinance for: Applicant proposes,to maintain a,4-unit apartment building where 3 units received approval. Previous approval in 1991 for a duplex and in 1992 for a third unit. No changes are proposed to the site or building. Pursuant to Chapter 1,'79- '-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, request to maintain a 4"apartment unit to existing structure shall, be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Plarming Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department fior its recommendation; The Planning, Board has, reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted aSE .Negative Declaration.— Determination of Non-Significance The Planning, Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/02/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/022017, when,it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed, the application matedals submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public,hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05,102/2017, The Planning Board determines that the application com,plies, with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE /DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 24-2017 DAVID P. D1,SCENZA-,,Introduced by who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the followingeonditions: 1) Waivers request gtanted/denied: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution,. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; h) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site planJs,urvey, floor plans and elevation for the existing,rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by theZoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; Page I of Phone: 5118,761,8220 q Fax,, 513.745,4437 1 742 ,8,ay Road Queensbury, NY 1280A wvw.queensbury.net d The applicant nnunst meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit. and/or the beginning of any, site work Subsequent issuance: f f rthcr permits,, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this,and all gather conditions, of this resolution; f) , ,,s-hnuilt plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approve' d plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; :Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible., Duty adopted anis 2nd day of May, 2017 by time, following,vote- AY : NOES: Page 2 of hoiw: 18,761-8220 1 Fax: 518,745,4437 a,4437 'i 74Z Bq Road, Qu u7sbvey, NY 12804 Pw° w,queennsbuJry.n t Chris rte Site Plan 5-2017 @ 10,67 State Route 9 Public Hearing Scheduled SIE',QR, Unlisted Draft resolution — grant/deny site p�lanapproval Town of Quee:nsbury Planning Board Commbait y 'Development Department StaffNotes May2, 2017 Site Plan 25-2017 Chris Carte 1067 State,Route 9/Cl — Commercial Intensive /' Ward 2 SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, site plan drawing, elevations, faqad,e detail, photo of existing building PatelHistory: Several signs, interior alt., AV 24-2017 Requested Action Planning Board review and, approval for a new fagade on an existing 6,000 sq., ft. building for a new addition, of 125 sq. ft. and width of 24 inches, Resolutions 1. S.EQR 2. Planning,Board decision ProJect Description Applicant proposes a new fagade on,an existing 6,000 sq, ft. building for a new addition of 125 sq. ft. and width of 24 inches. Project includes new parking arrangement. Pursuant to Chapter 179.3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance,reuse of existing retail.building,, now parking and new facade shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff comments • Location-The project is located at 1067 State Route 9 adjacent to the existin.g Wood ,arae store. • Arrangement- The project involves the upgrade of an existing building exterior and to add additional parking to coincide with the adjacent property to the south. • Site Design- The project includes utilizing the existing building and parking area. The applicant proposes additional 4 spaces with sidewalk access to the front door. Building—The applicant proposes front facade alteration with a wood detail that,is similar to appearance to the store on the southside, Wood Carte. The current fagade is a mix brick appearance and the new would ibex wood.siding with new entry fKade face. The existing covered entry will be removed. The width of the new fade is 24 inches. Signage-There is a detail of the signage location.but final test leas not been provided,fdr the:facacde. The building site has an existingfree standing sign that may require a sign variance if the panel is,to be changed, 'rraffic- The buildinis to be associated with the current operations of the Wood Carte furniture store for 9 sales of furniture, The applicant proposes to utilize the existing rear parking area and appears that it would access the current Wood Carte furniture access drive. Site layout and utility plan—There is no changes in the utilities ; existing bld ld,irkg is connected to Town sewer and water. Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control- There are n.o changes,to the site: Landscape plan- The applicant proposes removal of existing lawn area, at the front of the building for, parking. No additional landscapingis proposed. Site lighting plan—No changes to the existing site lighting is proposed; the board should request clarification if there is to be building lighting. Elevations- The applicant has provided a sketch.of the fagade appearance fro in frontside and side view. Floor plans—The applicant has indicated the interior of th,e building will be set up f6r furniture sales similar to the neighboring building,. Pursuant to Section 179-9-0,50 the Planning Board may grant waivers oil its, own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlines, the items to appear on tile site plan or included as, attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank.. This includes, the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r, constl-uctioll/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature of Variance Granted 4/19. The proposed new facade will be located 41.3 ft from the front property line where a 7 5 setback is required. Permeability is to, be 18.3%,where 30% is,required and, existing was 20.5%. Summary The applicant has completed a sitePIan application for the construction of a new facade and to add additional . parking on the property. Meeting Histo •: PB4/18/17; ZBA 4/1,9/17 Warren County Planning Department Project Re!view and Referral Form Reviewed by, Department on April 7, 2017 ProjectName; Carta, Chirls, r Owner: Caine, Chris; County Project#. APH 7-36, CurrentZoning: CII Community:: luueensbu,ury Project Description: Nlew wooed fa adde for improved appearance and additional par drug. Will continue to be retain space!,, SiteLocation: Rt 9 botween Agway and The Wood Carte Tax Map Number(s): 296„ -11-'5 Staff'Notes: The issues fume appearto be of a 10coll nature involvIng incall issues,without ani significant impactson ,County properties or resources. Staff recommends no county Impact Ibased ontlhue information submitted aixording to the suggested review criteria,of NYSGeneral Municipal Law Section 239 applied to the proposed Iprojent. Local actions to date (if any)- County Planning„Department, Il Local Action:/Final Disposition: 4�11 el 411 CV2017 Warren County Planning Department Dante Signed Local Official Dante Signed PLEASE HI a FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITRIN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION J 7 12. 13 Town,of Queensbury Planning,Board SEQR RE,SOLUTION—Grant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 25-2017 CHRIS CARTE Tax Map ID: '2"6."x'-1- /Property Address: 1067 State Route 9/Zoning-, C1 The applicant proposes a new Me ade on an existing, 6,00sq,. ft. building for a new addition of 1,25 sq. and width of 24 inches. Proj ec-t includes new, parking arrangement. Pursuant to Chapter-17 -3-040, of the Zoning Ordinance, reuse of existing, retail building, new parking and new facade shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning, Board has determined that the proposed pmiect and Planning, Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality keview Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Cowervation Regulations in the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part I of the Short EA F has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this FB F, it is, the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Boardas, lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts, on the environment, and, therefore, an enviromnental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. M!2:r10N TO GRANT� .A POSITIVE DECLARATION OR, NEGATIVE, DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN25-2017 CHRIS CARTE,Introduced by_who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared, by staff. L Part II ofthe Short EAF bas been reviewed and completedby the Planning Board. ,2. Part III of the Short E has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short E. ;F is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 74 day ofMay, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phone: i18.76LS220V1-av nu@�NN 'YIkv�Vl+ d I: o,`t,lld, Town of uueen,shuary Planning Board RESOLUTION - Grant/Deny Site PlanApproval SITE PLAN -2017 CHRIS CARTE fax Map ID: 296..9-1- /Property Address: 1067 State Rout 9,/Zoning: CI The applicant has submitted, an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article of the Town zoning Ordinance nannce for: Applicant proposes a new facade on an existing 6,000 sq. ft. building for anew addition of 125 sq,. ft. and width of 4 inches. Project includes new parking arrangement. Pursuant to Chapter 179- -040 of the Zoning Ordinance, rinse of existing retail it ing, new parking and new farad shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-0801, the Plannin Board has determined,that thisr poral satisfies,the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code,, As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance 'The Planning. Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/02/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/02/2017, whern it was closed, '.p"'he .Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/02/20 17, The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth inArticle 9 of the Zoning,Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE I DISAPPROVE IT PLAN 2:5-2017 CHR11 CARTE, Introduced by who moved for its adoption; Per the drab provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions:. 1 Waivers request granted/denied: Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. If a,plicatioun w as referred to engirneerin , then engixneering,si,gun-offu uuired p�ror signature of ,'honing;Administrator of the approved plans; b Pinnal approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing roams and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c Final approved pnlans„ in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any funr'ther reviews by the Zoning ,administrator or Building and Codes personnel; Page t of2 Phon 548,761,8220 1 Fax:; 1 18.74 s„ 443,7 1 7'42 Bay Road. Queensbury. NY 12 04 www.queeiisbuiry.,net. d) The applicant must med with. Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work, e) Subsequent issuance of Cu rther peri-nits, including building,permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolut'lon.; f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed, according to the approved plans to be provided prior,to is,suance of the cerfificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to,lac:placed on final plans, in itsentirety and legible. Duly adopted this 2 nd day of May, 2017 by the rollowing vote: AYES, ES- 2 of 2 Phione. W-761.822:0 Fax: 518,745.4437 742 Bay Road, Quoensb,ury, NY 12804 , ww'w,que,9nsbury,ni?t DDDJ Enterprises Site Plan 2 -2017 @ Lot #,3' West Drive Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Unlisted Craft resolution -- gent/deny site, planroves .......... Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes May 2, 2017 Site Plan 26-2017 DDDJ Enterprises Lot #3 West Drive/ CLI Commercial Light Industrial /'ward 4 SE-QR Unlisted Material Review: application, plan sets C-I to C-6 and A-1 to A72, storrawater report and storniwater pollution prevention,plan. Parcel History: SP PZ 93-20 1 4 800 sf cold storage, SUB Mod. PZ I I 0-2016;,DKC SUB 4-2012 3 lots, LH SUB 18mm 0 lots, SP 1,0-2004 Storage bldgs., SP 5-2012 material storage area; Disc. 2016;AV 25-2,,017 Requested Action Planning Board review and approval of'a contractor storage yard and construction of an 8, sq. ft. enclosed pole barn for equipment and material storage for contractorsyard. Resolutions 1. SEQR 2. Planning Board decision PL-ojeetDestp Jption Applicant requests approval of a contractor,storage yard and construction of an 8,000 sq. ft, enclosed pole barn for equipment and material storage for contractors" yard. Project includes additional site clearing for outside storage and a new access road from Luzerne Rd..through an easement with the adjoining lots. Project disturbs more than an acre and is subject to a WPPP. Project is associated with site plan modification of SP 93-2016 parcel, 308.1 -1-T 1,2 for access. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, contractors' yard and new,building shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. �tnff Comments • Location-The project site is the rear lot at the end of West Drive, near to the 'Lu erne Storage Buildings at �240 Luzerne Road. • Arrangement- The project consists of construction of an 8,000 sq ft contract-or's,storage building. The project is located as lot 3 of the DKC Holdings Sub 4-2012. 'The project includes access by easement on the west side of the property and a request for a variance for road frontage on west drive., e Site Design- The plans show the existing location of a soil stockpile. The plans show extensive clearing on the site were additional infonnation or locations noted for exterior equipment storage should be noted on the plans. • Building,—The building is to be 30 ft in,height and contain an office area and restroom. area. The remainder of the,building is for vehicle storage. Overhead doors are shown on each end of the building, one side is,to have windows and the other side two man doors are proposed, • Signage-The:applicant has indicated there willbe no signage for the project. • Traffic- The applicant has, indicated there are 4 dedicated parking spaces at the building. Clarification of the required parking should be addressed —as total parking has not been identified. rhe site has,a 208 sq ft office area with a 1 ]7 badaroom.area then the remainder is 7,675 sq It is veh i cle storage. Proi ect may be considered a construction company where 2 spaces for the office area and then 1. space per corripany vehicle will be required, • Utility plan -The applicant proposes a wastewater systern. Information on water., communications, and electric will need to be shown on,the plan.. Comments havebeen received from thea Department requesting additional information on the water-connection. • Grading and drainage plan —the plans indirate significant site clearing and grading is to occur. The plans show a portion of the:site to be already cleared and a note indicates there is existing topsoil being stored at the site. The plans on sheet:C® do not indicate tine faunal grading to occur on the site. The grading plan should be updated, to reflect the final grade over the site. • Sedimentand erosion control —Slieet CS show location t'silt fence and sediment trap areas. • Landscape plan—The applicant has indicated the project occurs on a wooden lot where a portion of the site has been cleared where topsoil storage area exists. The applicant intends to limit clearing to,the property line areas with some buffers 'ten select trees near to the building to be:saved. The storm anter plans shows areas to be lawn. 'The,plans note a 50 ft buffer at the north property, fine and on the east property line for 5,50 ft /, The west property line only shows a.30 ft buffer where a 50 ft buffer w�ould be required adjacent to a residential subdivision. • Site lighting—Six. wall mounted lighting fixtures, are to 'be installed on.the building ends with overhead doors. No pole lights are proposed, Light fixture to be noted on final plans, • Elevations—Elevation plans, show the overhead door locations,at the end, of the building then windows on one side and two doors on.the other side. • Floor plans—The floor plan shows the location of the office area, restroorn area. Pursuant to Section 179-9-05101 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the VM*Ien request of an applicant. The submission should. be clarified for item such as snow removal, snow removal, ,grading, landscaping and buffer. Nature of Variance Granted 4/19 with condition a permanentnon-lexclusive casement be established for access to Luzerne Road. The applicant requests'variance fuer road frontage where 71.64 ft is provided and I 01O ftisrequired for the Commercial Light Industrial zone Sum The applicant has completed a.site planapplication for the:construction of a 8,0010 sq ft building and to use the site for construction yard storage of materials and equipment. The Board should consider req:uiring additional information for site grading, site:clearing, storage area size and use, waivers,from buffer requirement,, and 'water connection—also the grading,and storage will need to be clarified as the stormwater plan and site plan arenot the same. Meeting History. loll .4",/18/l7; ZBA4A9/1'7 2: THE North,Coun try Office Cha e t 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY' 12804 K L (5,18)812-0533 F: ,(518) 812-2205 COMPANIES www.chaze,inclompanie�s.com EnVnam Hudson Valley,01fic(* (845)454-398,0 �and Surveyors, Capftai district Office 273-oos5 Planners, EnvirainmentaE ProfesslonWs, ILandscane Architects April 12, 2017 Mr. Craig Brown Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance officer Town of Queeinsbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, New York 12804 Delivered via,email only: Crail ftueeasbury.net Re: DDLY Enterprises Town of Queensbury, Worren County, New York Chazen Project#91600.18 Queensbury Ref SP 2017 Dear Mr. Brown: The Chazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submission package from our office for the above referenced project. The applicant Intends to redevelop an existing,commercial property into a new facility to process timber and timber-related products. The proposed work, includes the construction of a new processing facility, wood drying kilns, gravel driveways and parking areas, and related site features, Submitted information includes the following: 6 Site Plans and Details prepared by,Kevin L. Hastings, P.E., undated; 0 'Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Kevin L. Hastings, U.,dated February 2017; 0 Stormwater Management System Engineering, Report by, Kevin L. Hastings, P.E., dated February 14,2017; and, a Site Plan Review Application. Your office has requested that we limit our review to the design of stormwater system as It relates to compliance to local, state or relevant codes and regulations. Based upon our review, Chazen offers the foltowing comments for the Tcvwn's consideration- Stormwater Management Eirosion and Sediment Control: 1. The project proposes to disturb,an area of great than: L0 acres and requires the preparation of a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (S PPP) in accordance with GP-0-15-002, that Includes erosion and sediment:controls as well as post construction storm water management practices.A Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (S PPP) has been provided. Comments relating to the Sto rmw,ater M a nage me nt Report and SWPPP are offered below. Chazen Engineering, Land Survej#ng&Landscape Architedure Ca,D,A C. Chazen ErrWranmentaf Servtos,Inc- The Chazen Companies,disc. Town of quepn5,bmry DDDI Enterprises Aprij 22.,2017 2. It does not appear that documentation was provided per Part LFA ofthe SPIDES General Permit, concerning construction actIvities, that may affect threatened andl endangered species., The applicant shall provide the Town,with any documentation regarding the above determination,and incorporate the same Into the SWP'PP pursuant to Part LFA of the SPIRES General Permit. 3. It does not appear that documentation wais provided per Part LF.- of the SPIDES General Permit concerningicoinstruction,act�i'vit�l,,es that may affect an historic property(althiough the applicant has Indicated that a review of historic resources has been performed).The applicant shall provide the Town with docurnentation regarding the above determination,and incorporate the same into,the SWPPIP pursuant to Part LF-8 of the'SPIDES General Permit. 4. Soil testing, is required for the proposed Infiltration practices to confirm that NYS SMDivl design parameters are met with respect to separation from groundwater,soil type, and infiltration rates., The applicant has, indicated that same of this testing has been performed. The applicant shall perform all required soil) testing for each of the two proposed infiltration practices and submit applicable residlts. 5 A legally binding and enforceable, maintenance agreement may be executed between the facility owner and the Town ensuring that proper maintenance measures will be implemented for all proposed stormwaiter management practices as specified in,Town code section 147-10,0l if the Town,chooses. A draft of this agreement should be provided to the Town for review and shafl be Included in the,SWPP'P'. 6l, The applicant has stated in thie "P'PP that silt fence Is to be installed downs,lope,of all disturbed areas but has, not shown slit fencing on the eastern boundary of the site (downslope from a portion of the disto rbed'area)o n the Erosion and: ed!me nt Co ntrol Plan(Sheet C-5).The applicant to clarify. 7. The applicant has incIllicated in,the WPPP'that tree planting is proposed as agireen infrastructure practice. However,,tree planting doles not appear to be proposed according to the site plains,The applicant to clarity. 8. The stormwater model does not appear to account for the, entire, limilts of disturbance,. The Hydro,CAD model is limited in area to the proposed development on the north side of the site where the 80' x '100" storage building is proposed, but does not include portions of proposed gravel access roladls to the south. The applicant to revise the scope of the stormwater model to account for all proposed disturbance. 9. The SWPP'P and Storm,water Management System Engineering Report describe the proposed g;ralvell driveway,5 as being pitched to convey runoff to one, of the two proposed stormwater management practices,(detention ponds/ infiltration bed1s). However, the grading plan does not seem to reflect th[,s design intent as It appears,that significant portions of the proposed gravel driveways are graded to drain offs1te,without treatment or detention,. The applicant to Clariflyl, 10, The SWPPPl aindl Storm,wait�er Management System Engineering Report claim an, 11.8% reduction in, impervious area from existing, conditions to proposed. However, this doles not appear T.Oweiraw,rwA'91700.18-I Opeensbury-SP26,M17 'T'own of Queensbury DQQJ EnterpOses AprW 12,2017 P'ai,ge 3, iconsistent with what is shown on the site plans, which do not indicate any removals and do propose new impervious areas.The applicant to,clarify. 11, The modeled land covers and resulting, curve number calculations in, the storrnwater, milodel do not appear consistent with the site plans and may overestimate the existing conditions curve numbers and/or underestimate the proposed condition curve numbers.,The applicant to clairify, Specifically- 8. The existing cover modeled for pre-ideve lopme nt,su bcatchme nt 3S seems to significantly overestimate the surface area of existing gr'avell surfaces. The applicant has entered a gravel surface area of 17,361 sf In the existing conditions model, or roughly 33% of the total subcWchrnent area, when it appears that the actual gravel surface area in this subcatchmient Is closer to 10% of the total surface area. This is also apparent from comparing the gravel areal in pre-development subcatthment 3S to that in the past.. development subcatchiment 6S, which ought to be the same or, similair. The latter is modeled at 5.,302 sf - a significant reduction over existing conditions which does not appear to be accounted for,bV,the proposed work. b. The existing cover modeled for pre-development subcatchiment 4,S seems,to significantly overestimate 'the surface area of existing gravel surfaces,. The applicant has entered a gravel surf-ace area of 18,121 sf, in the existing conditions model, or roughly 22% of the total subcatchment area, when it appears that the actual gravel surface area, in this suibcatchment is closer to 12% of the total surface area. This is also apparent from comparing the gravel area in pre-development subcatchment 4S to, that in the post- development subcatchment 7S, which ought to be the same or sirnflar. The latter is modeled at 8,971 sf - a significant reduction over existing, conditions, which does, not appear to be accounted for bly the proposed work. c. Pre-development subcatchment:,5S appears to be identical In area and land cover to post- development subicatchment 8S. However, these two subcatchments are modeled differently in the HlydroCAD miodel; subcatchment 8S, is modeled with, less gravel area, than existing subcatchment 5S,. �12. The,location of the spillways,for stormwater management practices;IP and 2P(1D' long by 2'wide weirs according to the Hydro,CAD model) are unclear in,the site plans.The applicant to clarify the location of emergency spillways and provide safe conveyance for extreme storm events. �13. Infiltration / detention practiices IP and 2,P are described and d1rawn as detention ponds with a deep slurnp catch basin connecting each practice to an underground infiltration bed. The elevations of the catch basins and infittration beds are not.diefined,and this,portion of the practice is not included in,the HydroCAD imodel.The applicant to c�llarify. 14, The NYS SMDM indicates that infiltration practices must be protected from sedimentation and compaction during construction to function as clesigned. The applicant has indicated on the Erosion aind Sediment Control Plan (Sheet C-5) that these areas are proposed as tem porairy sediment traps during construction. The applicant shall clarify how the proposed infiltration practice will be protected duirinig construction. "bps echavtii'7'Y�-41795W 1" T.MUQQrkshUnA9j1QPjP•7,Qw*jIftth"'-5P3'r- T DCOY lEnterpr7kesVNGkglgC.10-DDDJ-Enterpri5e._ 2j, Town of QveeflAury 000J Enterpi6ses Apri$12,2017 po'ge!4 15., The appllicaint,appears,to have not included WQv or RRv calculations in the SWPPP'or Stournwater Management System Engineering Report. The appllicainit to s,ubimit applicable calculations, to the Town to verify that NYS Si' DM req u ire'mie n ts a r'e rnet. 115. The applicant appears not to have included a Notice of Intent phi 1). The N101 is to be submitted to the Town and included in the SWPPP. 17. The applicant shall revise. the SWPPP to include a discussion of the function of the proposed stormwater management system In frozen candItions with consideration given to the NYS SM Dl '''.s climate'desigln guidance for the chosen practices. In the event the Planning Board or Town staff have ainyquestions,or require addlitionall information, please do not hesitate to contact me at(518) X24-1 26. Sincerely, Sean M. Day, P,.E., LEED AP,CMS4S Principa[ Manager, Municipal Engineering Services cc. Sunny Sweet,Town Planning Office Administrator (via email) Laura Moore,Town Land Use Planner(via e-mail) Ffle -7.Queersb"^�91700,11-7.Qensbury-SP26-2017 DDDJ 4" To of Queensbury Planning Board SEER RESOLUTION rant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 26-2017 DDDJ ENT:ERPRISES Tax Map ID. 308.12-147.13,-71 & 7.12/Property Address: Lot 43 West Drive/,Zoning- CLI The: applicant request approval of a contractor storage yard and construction of an 8,000 sq,. ft. enclosed pole barn for equipment and material storage for contracto.rs' yard. Project includes additional site clearing for outside storage and -a new access road, from Luzerne Rd. through an easernent with the adjoining lots. Project disturbs more than an acre and is subject to a WPPP'. Project is associated with site plan, modifitation. of SP 93-2016 parcel 308.12-1-72 for access, Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, contractors' yard and new building shall, be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has, determ, ined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is, Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part I of the Short FAQ has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the:Town of Queensbury Plann�ing Board, as lead agency that this Project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the: environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Acoordirigly, this negative declaration is issua, MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 26-20,17 DDDJ ENTERPRISES, irutrodunced by who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Fart 11 of the Short EAF has,been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAS"bas been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short E is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 2"' day offMay,, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phone: 518-761.8220 A 1`:ax, -i 18,745.,](,137 17412 Bay Road, Queensliury, NY MD4 1 W%VWAJUWQflS1X1y.J1Qt nth;,° b'� ou0 rkd�r. '�ri=dY�.ull . LI3. �N� w . �wdti Town of Qucensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION--Grant /Deny Site Plan.Approval SITE P'L - 0171 DDJ ENTERPRISES Tax Map ID: 308.12-1-7.1 3,-7.l & 7.12,/ Property Address: Lot#3 West Drive /Zoning: CLI The applicant has submitted an application, to the. Planning Board:, Applicant requests approval. of a contractor storage yard and construction of an 8,000 sq. ft, enclosed pole barn for equipment and material storage for contractors' yard. Project includes additional site clearing for outside storage and ra new access road from Luzerne lid. through an easement with the adjoining, lots. Project disturbs more. than an acre and is subject to a SWPPP. Project is associated with ,site plan modification of ,P -2016 parcel 308.12-1-7. for access. Pursuant to Chapter 179.3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, contractors' yard and new building shall be so,Nect to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensberry ZoningCode-,Chapter 179-9--080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As, required by General Municipal Law Section 2.39-rn the site plan application was referred to the 'warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning, Board has reviewed the potential environmental imps acts of the pioject, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ( RA) and adopted, a SEQRA Negative Declaration— Detennination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 0 0 017 and continued the public bearing to 0,5/02/2,017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted, in writing through.and including 05/02/2017; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLA 26-2,017 17 DJ ENTERPRISES* Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staffwith the following: 1) Waivers requested granted/denied; ,. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The 1'imits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community(Development staff; b) If applicable,the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department fbr its review, approval,permitting and inspection:; Page t of Phone: 518,7611.8,220 ; Fax: 518.745.4437'B 742 day Road. QuLlensbuiry. NY 11 80 ; www.queensbury.mNt c,) If curb cuts are being added, or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has, been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering,then Engineering, sign-off'required prior to signature of Zoning,,AdministTator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have diinensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans, ,and elevation for the existing roorns,and proposed rooms in the building and site improvetrents;- 0, If requir4 the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a.. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES Genenal Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site, work. b, The project NOT(Notice:of Termination) upon completion of the project; c, The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff. L The:approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These:plans must include the project WPPP Storm 'W'ater Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii., The project NOI and proof"'of coverage under the cur rrentNYSDEC SPD ES General Permit,, or an,individual SPDES permit issued for the project if reqt1ired, g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site P'lan, must be submitted to the Com.munity Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff, after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the begftining of any site wor.k; i) Subsequent issuance of further pewits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this,resolution; As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according,to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy., k) This resolution is to be placed in its,entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this,2 d day of May 2017 by the following wrote; AYES,. NOES: Page 2 of 2 Phone: 518.761,8220 1 Fax: 518.7454437' 742 Bay Road, Queensbury. NY 128,04 ; www.,queensbui,y.net James R. GIInig Site Plan, 29-2017 @ 462 Ridge Road! ,g Schedulled SEQR Unlisted draft resolution — grant/deny sitela n approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board CommunilOPm w y Develp ent Department Staff Notes May 2, 2017 Site Plan -2017 James R. Glendening, 462 Ridge Road/MDR—Moderate Density Residential / Ward 2 SEQR Unlisted Material Review- narrative, application, survey, site:photos, elevations, site drawings C-Ito C-2 and A-1, - 10, -1,,A- 10,1,A-4,01 Parcel History: SP 41-88 w[UV, DISC 4-2017; AV27-2017 Ike nested Action Planning Board review and approval for construction of a 165 sq, ft, new entryway addition and a 465 sq. ft. new covered walkway for the entryw,ay access. Resolutions 1. SEQR 2. Planning Board decision Piect Description, Applicant proposes construction of a 165 sq. ft. new entryway addition and a 465 sq. . new covered walkway for the entryway access. Project includes new s.ignage, parking arrangement, landscaping, stormwater,clearing, and other site work. Pursuant to Chapter 1.79- 3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance,new faqade and new entryway shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments Location-The project is located at 462 Ridge Ave near Beacon Hallow Way. Arrangement- The existing building and site will be updated for improved access on the site and building,. Site Design-,The project includes redevelopment ofthe existing site, parking area and building area., Building—The new additions include 165 sq ft new entryway area mid a 465 sq ft covered walkway, The renditions show the location of the walkway to,the new parking area, Signage-The plans show the free standing sign location and design. Traffic- Theans show the existing site to have 17 parking. aces anal d the new parking arraignment will Pi p allow for 26 spaces. In addition, the plans show the existing drive area will remain and will connect to the new parking area- Site utility plan—The existing power line is proposed to be buried. The site has an existing septic system— location should be shown on plans. 0 Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control—The plans show the proposed stormwater features for landscaped swales, landscaped berm, infiltrationlretention areas,and edge drain locations, o Landscape plan—The applicant proposes new landscaping and to retain some of the existing vegetation on the site. 'The narrative includes a request for a 10 ft landscape buffer to the north of the property. During discussion the applicant had explained that the northern neighbor is the same as the animal hospital, The plans show a line of shrubs to be planted in this area as part of the project.. The site also includes pedestrian walkway from the parking area. * Site lighting plan-The plans, show the existing pole lights at the front access drive, two new pole lights, in the new parking area, and building ligh,ts to rernain. * Elevations—The applicant has, provided the elevation for the fagade and new entryway covered walkway and door. * Floor plans-,The floor plans provided are for the: new entryway area., Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers, on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant The application form identified as, "Requirements"' outlines the items to appear oil the site plan or included. as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested. waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the itern, / left cheep box bla,nk This includes, the fibilow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, .[. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, n construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature of Variance G�vaunted el/19., The new entryway to be constructed at the fi-ont of the bui Iding is to be located 63.9 ft,from the front property line where a 75 ft setback is Summar The applicant has completed a site plan application for the redevelopment of the buildinfdaand, site asite of the 9 Adirondack Animal Hospital including parking, trail flow, signage, sidewalk improvements, storm water and covered walkway also including buffering and site landscaping. Meeting Histoly'. PBR,4/19/17; ZBA 4119/17 2 - THE Chadv North Country Office e 3 7 5 Bay Road,Qu ee in sbu ry, NiY 12 804 K,04 11- — P, (518) 812-0513 R �518) 812-2205 COMPANIES www,.lch�a�zen,cornplan,ies.rom Enoneers H u idson Va 111ey Office (845)454-3980 Land Stimeyors Cipfta[District Office 1519) 273-005.5 Planners Environmental Professionals Landscaoe Architects April 11, 2017 Mr.Craig Brown Zoning Adm inistrator and Code Crampl ia nce Off icer Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, New York 12804 Delivered via emiall only.CraigB@_q!jpqni V,n -et Re., Adirondack Animal Hospital—James R. Glendening 462 Ridge Road I-own of Queensbury, Warren County, New York Chazen Prci 91700.16 Queens,bury Ri�f#SP29�-2017 D,ear Mr. Brown., The Chazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submission package from your office for the above referenced project, The applicant intends to construct a front facade and site Improvements to the existing property. Submitted information indudesthe following-, • Site Plans and Details prepared by Jarrett Engineers, PLLC, dated March 2017; • Cover letter prepared by J MZ Architects wind Planners,dated March 15,2017; • Ptooir plan and relevation perspective plan by J Architects and IPlanners, dated March 15, 2017; • Topograp hic su rvey,of G le nde n ing,Realty., LLC,dated Niovem be r 22,2016; • Short EAF,and; • Town of Queensbury Site Plain Application; Your office has, requested that we review the desigin of storm water system it relates to compliance to local, state or rellevaunt codes regulations and general practice. Based upon our review, Chazen offers the following comments for the Town's consideration: Stormwater Management&Erosion and Sediment Control: 1. It appears that the proposed site Improvements disturb less than one (1), acre and thus the project is not required to obtain coverage under the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater discharges from Construction Activity (GIP-0-15-002). Comments related to the proposed stormwater management and eirosion and sediment control features proposed for the site are offered below: Chazon,Fe7ginoe", Lon d'Survo)#ng&Undscapie,fthilocture Co�, 0.P C, Chozon E,�ivftnrnent,915virvicos, Inc, The Chazen Companjas, Inc. Town of Queensbury AdirondaGk Animal Hospital—Iames R.GlendL ning Aprill 11,201'17' Page 2 2, Section 179-6-080, of the Town, Code, states that stoirmwater clirainage plains shaH analyze the impacts, of a projectusiling at least a 50-year return interval storm with regard's to both runoff rate and volume for commerclail projects. Section 179-6-080 prescribes that Stormwater, management be, designed so that post-development runoff rates and volumes; are equal to oir less than pre-development runoff. It does not appear that the storm water calculations provided on sheet C2 analyze the -50-year storm. The 50-year storm depth according to the CoirneIVNRCS extreme precipitation data is 5.1,9" depth for a 24-hour duration, storm. All stormwate'r features for newly constructed implervious surfaces shalll be designed for the 50-year stiorrn to conform to Section 1719-61-0,80, If the town does not take exception, the stormwater features for existing impervious areas could be designed to a more frequent stormsince it appears that it is an improvement from the LzAsting condition (Le. Landscape Swale Device,ffi),. It does not appear that a pre-development 'versus post-development map and anal,,ysis are provided to ensure conformance With,Section 179-6-080.,The analysis shall be provided with the next submission. 3. The Appllicaint should provide,the total limits of disturbance on the site plans. 4. It does not appear that a stabilized construction entrance is depicted on the plans.The Applicant shaill revise the plans to, include a stabilized construction entrance and linclucle a detail that conforms to the New,York State,Standarcis and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control. 5. A legally binding,and enforceable maintenance agreement may be executed between the facility owner and the Town lensuriipg that proper maintenance measures, will be implemented for all proposed stormwater management practices as specified in Town rode section 147-1.01D if the Town chioosos. A draft of this agreement should be provided to the Town for review and shall) be included in the SWPPP. 6- The Applicant provides multiple types,of s,ledliment control barrier details (earth, dike, hay bales, sill fence, compost filter sock, stone dike)., but the plans do not specify which, is, proposed,. The Applicant to clarify. 7. The Applicant shalll prolvide, more detail on the proposed storm,wate'r features. it is difficult to discern any emergency overflow and/or proposed outlets. 8. The Apphcant shall. provide a stormwater narrative that explains the intent of the design, site gra,cling, site soils, and groundwater levells. For Instance, Is there intent for the stiormwater features to act as Infiltration devices; if so, have soil tests been performed and where is the pre- treatment located. The stormwater narrative should clarify that storrnwat8r will sheet flow across,the new parking,areas to stormwater features, not by a closed pipe systern. The stormwaiter reportshould Include descriptions of the existing and proposed drainage areas. QuansburA517019a6- Town OfO-Ueensbury Adirondack A,nimall liospital—Jamief,R.,Glandaning Apfill 1,2017 Page 8 91, it is difficult to discern if work is proposed within the New York State right-of-way; the Applicant to clarify. IIf work is,proposed within the state's right-of-way, the Applicant.51hafli coordinate with the state toobtaIn,a Highway Work IPermiit. 10, It dloes not appear that test pits, were perfoirme�d. The Applicant shall perform, test pits, within the limits o the proposed stormwateir features to note any seasonally high groundwater or bedrock conditions,. 11. The silt fence should be extended to the east of the proposed infiltration/retention basin,. Conclusions and Recommendbtlions It is our opinion that the applicant should provide clairification for the above Iterns and incorporate the than es in subsequent darn .5 uomissions. if you have ainy questions regarding,the,above, please do, not lhesItate to contact me at (518) 824-1926. Sincerely, Sean M. Doty, P,E., LEE D A,P,CM545 Principal Manager, Miunicipal Engineering Services, cc: Suinny Sweet,Town,Planning Office Administrator(via ernail) Laura Moore,,Town Land Use Planner(via e-maill) File Queensbury-SP2�,2617 Warren oun Planning r int Project Reviewand,Referral Form Reviewed by Department ori April 7, 2017 Project Name. GlendeninglAdk Animal Hospital Owner: lend piing/Ad Animal Hospital IPS Number: (B '-17- PR-, CurrentZoning: MDR Community: Quelensbury Pj cte,,wrilntiorn. ;pplic nt proposes toadd a srrnalll 165 sq.ft. addition, flagade renovation (nein covered sidewalk & pitched root), additional parking and new signage for Adirondack Animal Hospital, Site Location- 462 Ridge Rd Tax Map Number(s): Staff Notes: The issues es mere appearto be of a local nature in olui g local Issues without any significant Impactson County properties, or resources. Staff recommends no coluinty impact t based onthe irnforrnatian subm,itteld according to the suggested review criteria of NYSG n ral Municipal Law Section 239 applied, to the proposed project- Local actions,to date (if am ), County Planning;De rturn nt Ill Local Action:/Final Disposition: Warren County Planning,Department Oahe Signed Local Official. Date Signed PLEASE PSETURN T1rgS FORMTO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEP IC TIT FUN 10 DAYS OP FINAL AMON Town of Queensbury Planning,Board SEAR RESOLUTION —Grant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 29-2017 JAMES R. GLENDENING Tax Map ID: 297.19-1-1 /Property Address: 462 Ridge Road / Zoning. MDR The applicant proposes construction of a, 165 sq. ft. new entryway addition and a, 4,65 sq. ft. new covered walkway r the entryway access. Project includes new signage,parking arrangement, landscaping, storm.water, clearing, and other site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179- 3-040 of the Zoning, Ordinance, new farade and new entryway shallbe subject to Planning,Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed Project and Planning, Board action is subject to review under the Stag Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action, considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other,agencies are involved; Part I of the 'Short EAF has been completed, by the applicant, Uponreview of the: it recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result, in no significant adverse impacts on, the environment, and, therefore, an enviromiental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TRANT A, POSITIVE DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 29-20,17 JAMES R. GLENDENING .troduced by who moved for its adoption. .,.In As,per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part 11 of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Pring 2. Part III ofthe Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Or Part III of the Short EAE is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially .moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 2"' day of May, 2017 by the following vote. Al NOES: P lunw,: ;18,7618220� Fav 5 B.745.,'1-117 V 742 Bay Ra aLL OuecnsburN%NY 12804 J ow � o v,n ok� I, � r^d"�SC'V'��tlCNifV�, Xaa." v„phrq"II�B. 2➢8 BsBBi.:"` Town of Queensbury Planning board RESOLUTION'...,,Grant/ Derry Site Plan Approval SITE PIAN 9-2017 JAMES R. GLENDENING Taus Map ID: 297.18-1-1 /Property Address: 462 Midge Road/Zoning: MD The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning hoard: Applicant proposes construction n of a 165 sq. ft. new erntn wwray addition and a 465 sq. ft. new covered walkway for the entryway access. Project includes new signage, parking arrangement, landscaping, stormwater, clearing, and other site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179- -040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new fa a,de and new erntrywayP shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoing; Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning :Berard has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; ,As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-rnn the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Plant n l epartrrnernt for its recommendation; The Planning :Board has reviewed the potential err ironnrrnerntal impacts ofthe project, pursuant to the State E nvirornrunerntal Quality Review Act ( fi RA) and adopted a SPQR. Negative Declaration—Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/02/2017 and eorrtirnuAed the public hearirn to 0 / x° 117, when it was closed, The Planning board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments, made at the public heating and submitted in writing through and including 05/02/2017; The Planning Board deten nirnes that the application complies, with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO AI'PRO'VE, / DISAPPROVE SITSITIK PLAN 9-2017 JAMES R. LENDEl` I ; Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft:resolution prepared by Staff with the following: l) Waivers requestedgranted/denied; . Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution,. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cuutufler zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff-, lu If applicable,the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater, Department for its review, approval,permitfing,and inspection; Pae I of: Phone: 518.761.822:0 Fm 518,745_4437 ,742 Bey R'naund, QuLaensbury, NY 12804 1 www.quPensbury,net c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is, required, A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required pricer to, signature of Zoning Adnninistrafor of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dirnensions, arid, setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans, and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the: building and site improvements;- 1) If required, the applicant, must submit a copy of the following to the:Tow w a, The project NOI (Notice of hitent) for coverage under the current "'NYSDEC: SP'DES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b� The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review,ley staff- i. The approved final,plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator, These plans must include the project SWRPP (Storm Wter Pollution Prevention,Plan) when such a plan was,prepared and approved; ii., The project MOI and proof of cera under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SITES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan., must ire submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building,and Codes,personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i), Subsequent issuance of further.permits, including building permits, is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the,cerfificate of oceunpanncy. k) This resolution.is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this,2"d:day of May 2017 by the following vote: AYE S: NOES: Page .of 2 Photie: 518761.8220 ' Fax518,,745.4437 742 Bay' Rud Queeiisbury, NY 12804 www.(Itjnensbtopm Stewart's Shops Corp. Site "ln 30-2017@ 977 Stene Route 149 Public HIlearing Scheduled SEAR Unfisted Orae resolution — great/deny, site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board et Community Development Department Staff Notes May 2, 2017 Site Plan 30-2017 STEWARTIS SHOPS CORP., 977 State Route 149 /NC—Neighborhood Commercial FWard I SER Unlisted Material Review: application, stormwater, site plan drawings, survey, elevations, floor laps Parcel History: SP 35-1989 new construction; 2003 mod, & AV 18-2003 for gas islands/canopies; 20,09 mod. for 600 sf addition; AV26- 17 ]Eleraunested Action planning Board review and approval for dernolition of 2,292 sq. ft., convenience storewith fuel to build a new 3,69'5 sq., ft. convenience store,with a 2,360 sq. ft. canopy to have 4 islands/8 fueling positions® Resolutions 1. S EQR 2. Planning Board decision. P,roj"t Description Applicant proposes,demolition of 2,292 sq., ft. convenience store with fuel to build a new 3,6,95 sq., ft. convenience store with a 2,360 sq, ft, canopy to have 4 islands/8 fueling positions. First phase wi.11 be store construction with associated site work, then demolition of present building,& carhop to install new canopy. Project includes site disturbance greater than an acre and associated site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 176-4-030 of theZoning Ordinance new convenience store with fuel shall be subject to Planning Board review and, approval. Staff Comment's Location-'The project is located at 977 State Route 149 at the intersection of 149 and 9L. Arrangernent- The site currently has an existing'2,292 sq ft,convenience store that is to be:demolished after the new store of 3,695 sq ft is to be constructed. The existing fuel canopy is also to be dernolished to construct a 2,360 sq ft fuel canopy. Building& Site:Design- The site work will include placement of the:building in a new orientation to face: the intersection of'Route 149 and, Ridge Rd. The same orientation with the fuel canopy would also occur facing the intersection. The new parking areas would be along the front of the building—south and east side then additional parking along the Ridge Rd side, Signage-The applicant proposes a 42 sq ft monument sign. The:sign is to be internally illuminated and to have a stone face:base:for the monument sign. The wall signs are to be 17 sq ft and internally illuminated. o Traffic- The applicant proposes 29 spaces shown at the building area. There are 8 fueling positions, under the canopy. The applicant has indicated the traffic flow arrangement would allow for the tourist traffic flow, for the area, 0 Site layout and utility plan- the plans show the existing well to remain and a new septic, system to the rear of thebuilding to be installed. 0 Grading and drainage plan.& Sediment and erosion control—the project activities disturb more than I ac and the applicarit has completed a stormwater pollution prevention planthat is under review and coin.ment by the Town designated engineer., L,andscape plan—plans show typical shrub ,.P lantings, perennials along with, 7 maple trees., —The board may consider requesting additional tree planting., Site lighting plan --The plains show 13, pole lights on the site—will need to confirm height. The site is to also have wall lights, soffit lighting and canopy lighting. The site average is, to be 1.29i foot candies that is under the 3.0 1,"oot candies for gas station service areas. Elevations—the plans show the building to be 23114 in height. "I'llen color scherne to beclapboard cobble stone with white column and fascia features and a stone veneer base. Floor plans —the plans detail the location of the service and customer areas for the interior of the building. Putsuant to Section, 1791-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its, own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The applicant has requested no waivers. Nature orf Variance Granted 4/26117 with conditions,a fence and plantings be placed along the west property line, light spillage to be minimized to the west, and no *king signs,to be installed, on Route! 149 pending DOT/ minty review and approval for signage. The applicant requests variance for setback relief for the canopy location. SUM,= The applicant has completed a,site plan application for the Construction of a new Stewart's store, associated canopy and site work. Meeting History,, PB R 4/19/17; ZBA 4/19/17 Zoning Board of Appeals—Record oflution own of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,,NY 12804 ( 1'8) 761-8238 Town,of(tucen.5111wry Area Variance Resolution To: Approve with Conditions Applicant Name: tewart"s Shops Corp. File Number- Z-A - 6-201 Location: 977 State Route 14 Tax Map Number: 266.03-1-11 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday, April.26,2017 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Stewart's Mop's Corp. Applicant proposes demolition ofexisting 2,292 sq. ft. convenience store with fuel pumps and construction of new 3,695 sqft. convenience store with a 2,360 sq. fl. canopy to have 4 fuel islands for a total of8 fueling stations. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements and from the Travel Corridor Overlay setback requirements, Planning Board Site plan Review fuer new convenience store with fuel service., The applicant requests relief from setbacks in the,NC zone(Neighborhood Commercial). Section 179-4-030 travel, corridor oyerlavRoute 149 The applicant proposes a 44 fl_setback where:a 15 ft setback is required for the canopy—on Route 149,. Section_, - . 0 establishmnemt of districts-dimmional re uuirerne:mts NQ zong, The applicant proposes a 27 ft setback where a 40 ft setback is required for the canopy—on Ridge lid. SI-QTS Type 11—no further review required, public hearing was,advertised and held on Wednesday, April 26, 20 1.7; Upon review of the application materiels, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 67 f NYS "Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we fund as follows: 1. There is not an undesirable change in the character of the neigfnborhood nor a detrirmentto nearby properties since were simply expanding to a small de, ree what already exists and we are, in fact, moving some of the boundaries back„ 2. Feasible aGltermetives have been, considered but are, not reasonable because they don't meet the requirements of the applicant.. . The requested variance i n t substantial. It's moderate at best because all of the elements, actually exist right now. Page I of Applicant,Name:! Stewart's Shops Corp. File:Number- Z-A'V-26-2017 Location: 977 State Route 149 4. There is, not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. In fact we think that some of the environmental conditions are going to be improved with improved stormwater managcment. 5. Is the alleged difficulty is of course self-created. C. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (approval) the resulting detriment to (he health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community, 7. The Board, also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimurn necessary, 8. The Board, also proposes, the following conditions: a) The applicant needs to provide a pence and planting to isolate the neighbor to the west as per the findings of the Planning Board. b) The applicanti e needs, to bias his fighting to the east so that, there is minimal lighting heading to the west towards the neighbor., c) The applicant seeds to pursue signage to eliminate parking and protect the neighboring properties of Stewarts. d) Adherence to the iteins outlined in the follow-up lettersent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FIND[NOS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-2&2:017, Stewart's Shops orp. (Chris Pottetj, Introduced by Michael McCabe, who moved for its adoption, seconded by Harrison Freer; Duty adopted this 26 h day of April 2017 by the following vote: AYES- Mr. Underwood, Mr, Henkel, Mr. Kuhl, Mr. McCabe, Mr. Freer, Mr. Jackoski NOES: Mr. Urrico Page 2 of�2 7-12, B, I L I %., I",,Y I �n Town.of Queensbury Planning Board SEQ R REi SOLUTION—Grant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 30-2017 STEWART'S SHOPS, CORP. Tax Map ID: 266.3-1-11 / Property Address: 977 State Route 149 /Zoning,: NC The applicant proposes demolition of 2,292 sq. ft. convenience store with fuel to build a new 3,695 sq. ft, convenience store with a 2,360 sq. ft. canopy to have 4 islands/8 ffieling positions. First phase will be store construction with associated site work, then deniolition. of present building & canopy to install new canopy. Project includes site disturbance greater than an acre:and associated site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 176-4-030 of the .'Zoning Ordinance new convenience store with fuel shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval, The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, The proposed action considered 'by this Board is Unlisted in the: Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing, the State Environmental Quality Review Act and, the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved, Part I of the'Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the, information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town.of Que!ensbury Planning, Board as lead agency that this project will result in no, significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an, environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVIE DECLARATION OR, NEGATIVF, DECLARATION FOR ITE PLAN 30-2017 STEWART'S SHOPS CORP., Introduced by_who moved for its adoption,. As per theresollution prepared by staff. 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Roard. 2. Part III of the Short EAF'has been reviewed and completed by the Planning,Board. Or, Part, III of the Short EF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 24 day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES NOES: flhone� 5AX.7(i 1-8220� I-ax: 5 18.745.4437 a 742 Bay Road,Quccnsbury, NY 12804 1 k6 o: ME'kNI �uI11 ; H.�N %w; Town of Queensbury Planning;Board RESOLUTION— rant nt I Deny Site flan Approval SITE PLAN 30-2017 STEWART'S SHOPSCORP. 'Tax Map ID:. 266.3-1--'11 /Property.,address: 97 7 State Route 149 !Zoning:NC The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board. Applicant proposes demolition of 2,292 sq. . convenience store with fuel to build a new 3,695 sq. pt. conveniernee stone with a$2,360 sq, ft., canopy to have 4 islands/8 fueling positiorns. First phase will be store construction with associated site work, then demolition of present building&,canopy to install, new canopy. Project includes site disturbance greater than. an acre and associated site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 176-4-030 of the Zoning Ordinance new convenience store with l"nel shall he subject to Planning,Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning, Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning,Code; As required by General Municipal Law 'Section 9rm the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation;; The Planning board has reviewed the potential enviromnental irnpacts of the project, pursuant to the State: Environmental Quality Review iew ,et ( RA) ,and adopted a S QRA Negative e Declarrat;:ion— Determination of Non-Significance The Plarniing Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/02,2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/02/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made,at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/02/201'7 The Planning board determines that the application complies with the: review considerations and standards set forth in Article of the coning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPI. ] / DISAPPROVE IT'E PLAN 0-2017 ' TEWA' T'S, SHOPS CORP.; P'.; Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following'. I Waivers requested granted/denied; 2. Adherence to the items outlined in tine follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a The linnits of clearing will constitute a no-out buffer zone,, orange construction fencing shall he installed around these areas and field verified by orr m unilt, Development staff, h If applicable, the Sanitary 'Sewer connection plan must he submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval,permitting and inspection; Page toF Phoru : 518,,761,8220 , Fax. 518-745.4437 ? 742 Bey Road. weerusbury, ICY 12804 ' r ,queerisbuuirtr-r7 t. c) Ifeurb cuts are being added or duan ed a driveway permit is required. A building permit: will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been. provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sig-n-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e), Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks,noted on.the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing,rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements;- f) if required, the applicant must submit a,copy of the following to the Town- a. `l he NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SP'DE,S, General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon Completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project Site, for review by staff: i. The approved final planus that have been stamped by the Town Zoning,Adrninistratoir. These plans must include the project SWPP'P (Slorm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. '17he projeet'NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC S,PDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES, permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan,must be submitted to the Community Development Department beforeany further review by the Zoning Administrator or,Building and. Codes personnel; h) The: applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Perm, it and/or the be, of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including buildiqg permits is dependent on Co.rapliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to cerfil` that the site,plan is developed according to the approvedplans to 'be provided prior to issuance of the certificate ofocc4pancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on thefinal plans Duty adopted this,2"day of May, 20 17 by the following vote: AYE : NOES: Page: of 2 Phone: 5,18,7'61.8220, Fax- 51S.745,4437 742 Bay Road. Queensbury, NY 12804 www.quensbury-tiet Robert Fulmer Site Plea 31-20117 & Freshwater Wetlands Permit. 3-20117 @ 54 Country Club Road' Public Rearing Schedule! SEAR Type I Orae resolution great/cleny site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board Communi ty Development Department Staff'Notes May 2, 2017 Site Plan 31-2017 ROBERT FULMER Freshwater Wetlands 3-2017 5 4 Country Club Road / SFR I A/MDR.— Single Farnil y Residential I acre minimum/Moderate Density:Residential /Ward 2 SEAR Type 11, Material Review- application, survey,elevations Parcel History: SP 34-2007, AV 39-2007, FWWI-2007 all for 2,050 addition; AV 29- 2017 Reguested Action Application to be tabled to the second planning board meeting in June with information submitted by May 15`b�. Application was tabled at the Zoning Board, of Appeals, meeting on 4/26. Resolutions I. Planning Board decision Pr2ject Description Applicant proposes to construct a three door, 1,100 sq. ft. detached garage. Pursuant to Chapter 179- 3-040 & Chapter,94 of the Zoning Ordinance, work within I 00ft. of wetland shall lac su,b*t to Planning Board review andapproval. Staff Comments o Location-Project site is at 54 County Club lid. a Arrangement-The proposed 1,100 sq ft detached garage is to be located 59 ft from the exi sting wetland pond area and 61 ft from the wetland area on the west property line. * Building, Elevation& Floor plan—The plans,show the garage to have 3-garage doors and an open floor plan. The garage is to be 20 +/- ft in heijgbt,r The applicant has indicated there will be no stairs, or pull down stairs and the rear of the building is to be the same as the front without doors. There is to Ike a man door on. the south side of the building. 0 Site conditions-The applicant has provided a survey with delineated, wetlands on the site. The applicant has indicated a NYSDEC permit has been applied for and received. a Site layout and utilitr plan—The applicant proposes to connect electric to the garage. There is to be no water or septic connection. * Grading and drainage plan& Sediment and erosion control-The location of the garage is in an ope!n area on the lot and no clearing is anticipated. The board may discuss the use of silt fence around the pond and wetland area during construction to minimize any potential runoff towards the pond or wetland. The applicant has,indicated runoff firorn the new garage will be infiltrated into the lawn area at the eaves of the building. * Landscape plan—no new landscaping is anticipated. There is,no new hard surfacing to the garage proposed the area is to remain lawn. 0 Site Ii hting plan—exterior figbting is not proposed. The board may request confirmation on exterior lighting as the garage is to be connected to electric. Pursuant to Section 1.79-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers, on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant, The application form identified as "Requixements" outlines the items, to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has citherr requested waivers, indicate!d the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank., This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's, application: f. public and private ("br parkin.&T storage etc® g,, site lighting, h. signa,ge,, k. topography, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, q. soil logs, r. construction./demolition disposal s. snow removal,. Freshwater wetland The applicant proposes,the construction of the second garage within the 100 ft buffer of the pond and, wetland area. The applicant has indicated no work is to occur in the wetland or the pond area and me sures will be implemented to minimize any runoff. Nature of Varia:nce Tabled 4/26,The applicant proposes to cons,truct a second garage that is,to be detached herthere is an existing attached garage to the existing home. SUMMaLy 'The:application is to be tabled to the second planning,board meetingin June pending z,1 review of project. Meeti .g Histor : PBR 4/18/17, ZBA 4/19/17 _.y NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENMRONMENTAL I ERVATI ON Di+dl on of envimmmont, r daerpIf s.Reglar, 232 Golf Course Road„Warrensburg,NY 10288 e RIMS)6,23Q,82 d R(513)623 360 April 1 '; 2017 Robert rt Fulmer 54 Country Club, Road Queensbury, iwo4 ViaE-mail to&Ul s"ts t Re: DEC Per, #'5-6234-003,15/00007 ueensbury , Warren (Co.) Deer Parr,nitee- Encllos d is the New,York State Department of Environmental ental nsery ation " epartmentp) permitfor the above referenced project, irssued in accordance with the applicable provisions of the EnWrronmentel Conservation Lau CECU). It is,the responsibility of the permittee and their agent to read and comply with still permit conditions and referenced plans. If your have any questions regarding the terms and conditions of the permit, please contact,me at (518) 623-1288. As noted within the perrrft, you midst notify the Ldepsrtment'st least hours prior to commencing work on your 'ogect; please also be advised that you must post the erralosed' permit sign at your construction site, This permit is valid) only far the activity expressly euthori ed.. Work beyond the scope of the permit �eel will be considered as,work,without a perd�irt. Failure to rrdply'with these termsma be s aviolation of the ECL. Work done under,this pwmd is subject to Inspection by Department staff'. This,permit does not eliminate,to the need.to obtain approvals required trorn dither agencies, Sincerely, Kevin R. Bliss Deputy Regional ional Permiit A,drninistra for Enclosures eoe w/enc. DEC Division of Lew Enford nident Jed Hayden, DEC Nawyofficr-fl M. d r3 Aho, Environmental conservaidon. Co" rte' m 4� . 0LU - . Ljj (D cu . CL E e c: +— � ca '0 E = — ,� O cc 4-1 0 „ w m Co w cu .� 01 0 ' , ., . ow ' 4— 1 r . .� 0 _ - r 0 E V . C r Town Of Queensbttry 742 Bay Road, Queensbury,, NY '12804 Town of Que:ensbury Planning o d RESOLUTION -Tabling Site Plan 31-2017 &Freshwater Wetlands,Penni t 3-2017 RO.BERT FULME Tax Map l 296„14-1-4 / Property Address. 4 Country ClubRoad,lZoning: SFR. 1,A./MDR MOTION TO TABLE SIVE PLAN 1-20,17 & FRESHWATER '' TLANDS :P:E'RMTT 3-2017 ROBERT`' F"'ULME& Introduced b Ino moved for its adoption,, seconded b Tabled until.the nun 7, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Duly ,opted this ”' day of May,2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Phone: 518.761.8?20 ,, FIIX: V . 4i,.-,1.137' 17,42 13ii ^ I�oiid, Qttceiisbiir° .,N '