Loading...
05-18-2017 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING MAY 18, 2017 INDEX Site Plan No. 22-2017 Fastrac Markets, LLC 1. Special Use Permit 5-2017 Tax Map No. 309.13-1-35 Subdivision No. 10-2017 John M. Hughes Trust 2. FINAL STAGE Tax Map No. 289.6-1-7 Site Plan No. 38-2017 Chris Mackey 6. Tax Map No. 308.16-1-54 Subdivision No. 7-2017 James Beaty 10. PRELIMINARY STAGE Tax Map No. 290.5-1-50 FINAL STAGE No. 8-2017 Site Plan Modification 32-2017 Glenn Durlacher 11. Tax Map No. 295.12-1-4 Site Plan No. 37-2017 Meghan Cesari 13. Special Use Permit 8-2017 Tax Map No. 240.9-1-8.1 Site Plan No. 36-2017 Michael & Pamela Smith 17. Tax Map No. 290.-1-94 Site Plan No. 39-2017 Ronald & Linda Ball 21. Tax Map No. 295.10-1-31.12 THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING 1 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MAY 18, 2017 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT STEPHEN TRAVER, CHAIRMAN GEORGE FERONE, SECRETARY JAMIE WHITE BRAD MAGOWAN DAVID DEEB JOHN SHAFER, ALTERNATE MICHAEL VALENTINE, ALTERNATE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR-CRAIG BROWN TOWN COUNSEL-FITZGERALD, MORRIS, BAKER, FIRTH-MIKE CROWE STENOGRAPHER-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. TRAVER-Okay. It's just after seven. We will call the meeting of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board together for this evening. This is the 11 th meeting for 2017 and the second meeting for the month of May. We do have a couple of Administrative Items to begin with, and I should mention that, before we get started, at the table at the rear of the room you'll find some agendas for tonight's meeting. There are number of applications, if not all of them, that do have public hearings. MR. MAGOWAN-Excuse me, Mr. Chairman, this is the third meeting in May. MR. TRAVER-You're right. We had a Special Meeting. Thank you for that. I stand corrected. All right, the 11th meeting for the year and the third meeting for May. In any case, there are agendas at the rear of the room on the table. I would ask, I almost forgot myself, if you have a cellphone please turn the ringer to vibrate so we're not interrupted by that, and we begin with a couple of Administrative Items. MR. FERONE-There's one plan that's withdrawn, Site Plan 21-2017 for Fastrac Markets, LLC. The Quaker Road location has been withdrawn. So there's nothing that needs to be done on that. MR. TRAVER-Right. So if there's anyone in the audience tonight that's here to hear or present to the Planning Board in public discussion anything about the Quaker Road site for Fastrac, that application has been withdrawn. Okay, and the second Administrative Item. MR. FERONE-The second Administrative Item is Site Plan 22-2017 and Special Use Permit 5- 2017 for Fastrac Market Corinth Road location. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM TABLING OF SITE PLAN 22-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5-2017 FASTRAC MARKETS, LLC (CORINTH RD.) TO JUNE 20, 2017 MR. FERONE-We're pushing a motion to table that Site Plan, 22-2017 and Special Use Permit 5-2017, Fastrac Markets. RESOLUTION TABLING SP #22-2017 & SUP 5-2017 FASTRAC MARKETS, LLC Site Plan 22-2017 & Special Use Permit 5-2017 FASTRAC MARKETS LLC Tax Map ID: 309.13-1-35 / Property Address: 220 Corinth Rd. / Zoning: CI-18 MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN 22-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5-2017 FASTRAC MARKETS LLC, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan: Tabled until the June 20, 2017 Planning Board meeting with information due by May 15, 2017. Duly adopted this 18th day of May 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver 2 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right, and next we move to our regular agenda. The first item is Old Business, John M. Hughes Trust, Subdivision Final Stage 10-2017. OLD BUSINESS: SUBDIVISION FINAL STAGE 10-2017 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED JOHN M. HUGHES TRUST AGENT(S) HUTCHINS ENGINEERING OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING RR- 3A LOCATION OXBOW HILL RD. & GLEN LAKE RD. APPLICANT PROPOSES FINAL STAGE FOR A 5-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A 19.73 ACRE PARCEL WITH ASSOCIATED WORK INCLUDING PRIVATE ROAD ONTO OXBOW HILL ROAD, INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC AND WELLS, LOT CLEARING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. SITE INCLUDES SLOPES GREATER THAN 15%. LOT SIZES ARE: LOT 1 — 3 ACRES; LOT 2 — 3.2 ACRES; LOT 3 — 3.6 ACRES; LOT 4 — 4.1 ACRES AND LOT 5 - 5.5 ACRES. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 183 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION OF LAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SUB SKETCH PZ 79-2016, SUB PREL. PZ 154-2016, AV PZ 155-2016 WARREN CO. REFERRAL N/A FOR SUBDIVISIONS LOT SIZE 19.73 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 289.6-1-7 SECTION CHAPTER 183 LUCAS DOBIE, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Craig, do you want to give us a summary on that? MR. BROWN-I'll try. I think this is some clean up. There's some outstanding items to finish up Preliminary and Final on the subdivision. I think we're talking about Chazen comments, engineering comments that are outstanding. Is that what we're doing here? Sorry. MR. TRAVER-That's all right. I know that we looked at this in 2016, 1 believe, and there were some variances that you had approved at that time. Do you want to introduce yourself for the record and bring us up to speed? MR. DOBIE-Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and good evening, Board. For the record, Lucas Dobie with Hutchins Engineering and Mr. Hughes the project owner and builder since the Korean War is with us and he's not slowing down so he's got the property, and we did work Sketch Plan last March, and then we worked through our Area Variances, SEQR and Preliminary approval from this Board in June of last year, and we sat tight a little bit on it and brought it back to life in the winter. Been through two rounds of engineering comments. We last submitted two weeks ago for the final four comments. I have not received any further correspondence, but I'm comfortable that we can work through the engineering and I'm happy with the project and am here to ask for your Final approval, hopefully, and answer any questions you folks might have, and thank you. MR. TRAVER-Okay, and we did do Preliminary Stage on this, I believe, last year, right? MR. DOBIE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-So we're just here for Final this evening. MR. DOBIE-Correct. MR. TRAVER-Okay, and no changes, obviously, between Preliminary and tonight, in the layout or design or anything? MR. DOBIE-That's correct. The plans look identical. They're just some fine tuning for some of the engineering comments, and we've prepared fully detailed individual lot plans since the Preliminary, but the house locations haven't changed. The lots haven't changed, the road hasn't changed. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Understood. Thank you. Questions from members of the Planning Board? MR. VALENTINE-Just looking through Laura's April notes, and just for my own purpose of getting used to what's required here, her notes say that if there's a homeowners association involved those documents are to be provided to the Planning Board. Have they come to the Board or to Counsel to look at? (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. TRAVER-1 believe that they submit materials to the Planning Office to look at for a homeowners association. Isn't that right, Craig, in terms of procedure? MR. VALENTINE-There's a private road. I'm just wondering if in those documents they've been filed with the Department of State yet and do they have a budget set up for the five homeowners for sharing the cost of maintenance of the road, whether there's insurance on that property, whether there's a master deed also. MR. BROWN-If that question's for me, that's a great question. None of that information has been submitted to us at this point. Certainly if you guys feel more comfortable taking a look at some draft materials, obviously it's not going to be final materials until they get the subdivision done and it gets filed as part of the subdivision, I would think, but you could ask for some draft materials if you want to make sure the easements are in place, maintenance and whatever, other kinds of easements, or you could make it a condition of approval that stuff gets submitted to whomever for review. MR. MAGOWAN-Doesn't usually the builder owns all the rights and that until the last house is done, and then the homeowner's association is drafted up? MR. TRAVER-Yes, from my experience, a homeowners association is a separate body. They have their own board that gets elected. They develop, you know, really their own by-laws, and they can't do that, or begin that process, until they have the approvals. MR. VALENTINE-Well, they can't, the one reason I brought it up, too, is if we give them approval tonight, there can't be any sales until the document has been filed with the Department of State, but the other thing I brought it up for is because it is a private road and that liability insurance, those issues, and then also agreement among five homeowners at some point, do they all know that they're going to be sharing in the cost of the maintenance of that road, and also whether there's an insurance involved with the road. MR. TRAVER-Right, and again, my understanding from past experience is that as the lots are sold, that's part of the understanding that the perspective buyer would be confronted with, that this is administered by a homeowners association that they contribute to and that type of thing. Do you have any additional comment for us on that? MR. DOBIE-1 think you explained it very well, Mr. Chairman. 1, personally, have some experience with that from my development and you're correct that it's the by-laws, if you will, the covenants are developed by the owner, which would be Mr. Hughes, and then it would be presented to a purchaser at that time and it's my understanding that everything would be filed with the Secretary of State, what they call the CPS-7, which is three forms, and then at the closing everything is incorporated into the conveyance deed in reference to all those articles, and it's understood that, with the private road, Mr. Hughes understands that we've got this legal work to do before. MR. VALENTINE-The size of this subdivision being only five lots, what would be called a diminimus document. It's not going to be big. MR. DOBIE-Right. There's no offering plan. The homeowners association doesn't own anything for the maintenance of the road. MR. TRAVER-Yes, and there's nothing in the draft resolution but I guess we could add a condition that the homeowners association be formed, and there are regulations governing homeowners associations as well to meet the requirements of the Department of State. MR. DOBIE-Correct. MR. TRAVER-And so there are parameters under which they have to function to have their application for existence be accepted. MR. FERONE-Well, do we want to say when we expect that HOA to be developed? Usually it's before the first lot is sold. MR. TRAVER-Yes, or we could say according to regulations governing homeowners associations. That way we're covered either way. MR. MAGOWAN-Because I'm sure Mr. Hughes knows what he's doing. I'm sure he's done it a few times. 4 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) MR. DOBIE-Just to be clear for the record, that's going to be the basic homeowners association, not a full blown with the owning the rec space and all that. MR. FERONE-According to State guidelines? MR. TRAVER-Yes, that's fine. MR. DEEB-So all you have is the road? MR. DOBIE-Correct. The road and the stormwater areas. MR. DEEB-Yes. MR. TRAVER-All right? Any other questions or comments? MR. SHAFER-One question, Mr. Chairman. Chazen had four comments in April of this year. Have those all been rectified and taken care of, Lucas? MR. DOBIE-We re-submitted two weeks ago, Mr. Shafer. I'm confident we're there. I don't have the official signoff at this point. MR. TRAVER-Signoff is part of the approval. Okay. We do have a public hearing on this application this evening. Are there members of the audience that would like to address the Board on this project? PUBLIC HEARING OPEN MR. TRAVER-I'm not seeing any. Craig, do you know if there were any written comments submitted? MR. BROWN-1 do not believe that there are. No, I'm not finding any. MR. TRAVER-1 don't recall anything. Okay. Thank you. Then we'll go ahead and close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-This is a SEQR Unlisted action. MR. FERONE-Did I hear you say that you thought SEQR was already done? MR. DOBIE-1 believe we went through the Long Form last June. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Yes, we do have a resolution for that. Craig, can you double check in the file and see if we have a SEQR process that's been performed on this? MR. BROWN-1 can. Yes, typically it's done during Preliminary. MR. TRAVER-Yes, and that's what the applicant is indicating as well. I don't have anything. MR. DOBIE-We did put the resolution on the cover sheet, if that would help at all, Mr. Chairman. MR. TRAVER-You have a resolution. Then we need not, then that's an error on our part. MR. BROWN-Yes, there was a Negative Declaration June 23, 2016. MR. MAGOWAN-You showed up with your A-game tonight. MR. DOBIE-We try. MR. DEEB-Do you want to re-affirm SEAR? MR. TRAVER-We don't need to if there aren't any changes. All right. So we need not deal with the resolution. So really all we have, then, is the resolution regarding Final Stage. Are there any questions, any further questions that any of the members of the Planning Board have for the applicant on this subdivision? 5 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. MAGOWAN-So since it's on, so it's Number One for the requirement. So do we scratch it or? MR. TRAVER-Well, we're not scratching it. We performed the SEQR already. MR. MAGOWAN-So should he state that? It's on this resolution. MR. DEEB-It says that it was performed. MR. TRAVER-Yes, there's a resolution in the file. MR. DEEB-We adopted it. MR. BROWN-Yes. When you get to that point, if you want to, there's a choice between Negative and Positive. You want to cross out Positive because it was a Neg Dec that was issued. MR. DEEB-Okay. MR. BROWN-And then go down through the other choices. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. FERONE-Also, Craig, on Staff Notes it says waivers. There were no waivers requested, but on the resolution it says there were waivers for stormwater, grading, landscape and lighting. MR. BROWN-1 don't think there are. It looks like all the stormwater's done on this plan. Grading is done on this plan. MR. TRAVER-And there's no lighting. MR. DOBIE-And the lighting doesn't pertain in this, with the subdivision, I wouldn't think. MS. WHITE-They'll go through when the individual lots when they come through for Site Plan Review. MR. BROWN-Well, they won't be coming back for Site Plan for each lot. Not on this subdivision. MS. WHITE-But it will be addressed as far as building, when they apply for a building permit? MR. BROWN-Absolutely. MR. TRAVER-So we can say that there are no waivers. MR. FERONE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-So I guess we're ready for a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDIVISION FINAL STG. 10-2017 JOHN M. HUGHES TRUST A subdivision application has been made to the Queensbury Planning Board for the following: Applicant proposes final stage for a 5-lot subdivision of a 19.73 acre parcel with associated work including private road onto Oxbow Hill Road, installation of septic and wells, lot clearing and stormwater management. Site includes slopes greater than 15%. Lot sizes are: Lot 1 — 3 acres; Lot 2 — 3.2 acres; Lot 3 — 3.6 acres; Lot 4 —4.1 acres and Lot 5 — 5.5 acres. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter A-183, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; A public hearing was scheduled and held on 05/18/2017; This application is supported with all documentation, public comment, and application material in the file of record; 6 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MOTION TO APPROVE SUBDIVISION FINAL STAGE 10-2017 JOHN M. HUGHES TRUST, Introduced by George Ferone who moved its adoption. 1. The requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered and the Planning Board has adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration; and if the application is a modification, the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered, and the proposed modification[s] do not result in any new or significantly different environmental impacts, and, therefore, no further SEQRA review is necessary; 2. No waivers have been requested. 3. The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff 4. Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Planning Board Chairman. 5. The applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a) The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit or for coverage under an individual SPDES prior to the start of any site work. b) The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; and 6. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: a) The approved final that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; and b) The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project. 7. Final approved plans, in compliance with the Subdivision, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel. 8. The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work. 9. Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; 10.As-built plans to certify that the subdivision is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; 11. That the HOA for the development be developed according to State guidelines. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. You're all set. MR. DOBIE-Thank you very much, Board. MR. TRAVER-All right. The next item on our agenda, also under Old Business, is Chris Mackey, and this is, on the agenda it's listed as Unlisted, but I believe it's Type II. SITE PLAN NO. 38-2017 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED CHRIS MACKEY AGENT(S) DENNIS MAC ELROY OWNER(S) MARY & WILLIAM CAREY ZONING CLI LOCATION CORINTH ROAD (WEST OF # 310) APPLICANT PROPOSES CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,450 SQ. FT. STORAGE BUILDING. PROJECT INCLUDES A SINGLE DRIVE AISLE AROUND BUILDING WITH ONE ENTRANCE. THE SITE WILL BE CLEARED TO INSTALL STORMWATER, DRIVE AISLE AND PLANTINGS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 7 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE BUILDING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE AV 36-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL MAY 2017 LOT SIZE .26 ACRE TAX MAP NO. 308.16-1-54 SECTION 179-3-040 DENNIS MAC ELROY, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Good evening. MR. MAC ELROY-Good evening. Ready for me? MR. TRAVER-Yes, we are. MR. MAC ELROY-Okay. Thank you. I'm Dennis MacElroy with Environmental Design here representing Chris Mackey the applicant for this property on Corinth Road. Chris is under contract to purchase this property. It's a small lot, 75 feet wide, 150 feet deep. Sort of an unusual a-typical lot size along that corridor and in that zone. It's a Commercial Light Industrial zone, but nonetheless the setbacks that apply to all the larger lots still apply to this one. So we're in a situation of needing to get variances that. Last night at the ZBA we received those variances. So we're back tonight. Chris to my left. We have proposed a plan that shows the storage building that he desires, 2,450 square feet, and within that 75 by 150 foot deep lot we've placed it basically in the center. We've achieved the front setback, the normal 50 foot front setback, but we're shy on the two side yard setbacks which normally are 30 feet. We've received approval for the 20 foot setback. There will be a looped gravel surface driveway that would provide access to all sides of the building. The building is intended to be for private storage, not a business. He's provided for stormwater management. There would be water service provided through municipal water that runs right along Corinth Road on that side of the road. We will supplement vegetation. If you've seen the map, there is a fairly good amount of vegetation on that lot as it exists, and Chris certainly wants to retain as much of that as possible, and I looked closely at it since I was here on Tuesday and there's a fair amount of vegetation that is right along the boundary line. So I think even though we're squeezed a little bit in that area, we'll be able to save some of that more significant vegetation to supplement as needed. Again, as mentioned we're providing some stormwater management in both of the front corners and the rear. Lighting would be typical building mounted lighting, LED type fixtures, over entry doors and garage doors. MR. TRAVER-Were there any amendments to the plan as a result of the Zoning Board review, or is this just what we looked at on Tuesday? MR. MAC ELROY-Correct, no changes. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. MAGOWAN-You mentioned municipal water. MR. MAC ELROY-Water in, water out. Well, that service would be for maintenance work or whatever that Chris may desire to have a hose or something on the site. It's not required, and at this point at least not intended to have any restroom facilities. In the future, I don't know if we discussed this last night or two nights ago. MR. TRAVER-Yes, a holding tank. MR. MAC ELROY-Yes, that would be the logical solution to that, but that would require going to the Board of Health sometime in the future if that's what Chris finds to be advisable. MR. TRAVER-And we wouldn't even need to condition that. MR. MAGOWAN-That's a big garage. MR. TRAVER-It is. MR. MAC ELROY-There were a couple of ZBA members last night. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, I guess when you go big, you go big. MR. TRAVER-All right. Any other questions for the applicant before we go to the public hearing? 8 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. DEEB-Chris, I'm just curious. I'm a little leery of the size of the building on the small lot, and I just, I was looking for a lot more details than what we've got. Could you give me some idea of what you're going to store in there? CHRIS MACKEY MR. MACKEY-Sure. A 38 foot regulator, offshore fishing boat, a Hacker Craft, a Donzi and a handful of classic cars. MR. DEEB-See, I wasn't aware of that the other night, and that was, because you weren't here, and that does ease my mind a little bit. MR. MACKEY-Yes. MR. DEEB-All right. Okay. Thank you. MR. TRAVER-1 think we were kind of speculating that it would be. MR. DEEB-We were speculating, but we didn't know. I didn't know, nothing against you. Because I hate to see mechanical items go in there, a backhoe and loader. MR. MACKEY-1 understand. MR. DEEB-Okay. Thank you. MR. MACKEY-Sure. MR. TRAVER-All right. Any other questions from the Board at this point? We do have a public hearing on this application. Are there folks in the audience that wanted to address the Planning Board on this application before the storm cuts the power? All right. Are there any written comments in the file? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. BROWN-No, there's no public comment. MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you. All right. Then we will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. BROWN-Mr. Chairman, I just did have one clarification in the Staff Notes, just because everybody was talking about it just now. The site lighting. There's a recommendation in here, I see in Laura's notes, about final plans should include lighting, fixture type, foot candle and the number of units, which is all fine, and if your approval condition if you get in that direction, which is what it sounds like. MR. TRAVER-Lighting detail? MR. BROWN-Well, just a note that there should be compliant lighting. In these types of buildings people do the wall packs and they're really supposed to be cut off fixtures and just for clarity. I'm sure Mr. Mackey's going to be all over it, but,just good belt and suspenders. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you for that. It's already been added. All right. Any other questions or concerns from members of the Planning Board? I guess we're ready for a motion. MR. FERONE-Ready for a motion? MR. TRAVER-Yes. RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN # 38-2017 CHRIS MACKEY The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: Applicant proposes construction of a 2,450 sq. ft. storage building. Project includes a single drive aisle around building with one entrance. The site will be cleared to install stormwater, drive aisle and plantings. Building to have multiple overhead doors. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction of a storage building shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. 9 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/18/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/18/2017; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 38-2017 CHRIS MACKEY; Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) No waivers requested 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements;- f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans I) That the building should have compliant lighting. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Ferone, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Shafer, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE 10 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. TRAVER-All right. You're all set. MR. MAC ELROY-Thank you very much. MR. MACKEY-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-All right. The next item on our agenda, also under Old Business, is James Beaty Subdivision Preliminary Stage 7-2017 and Final Stage 8-2017, and are the applicants here? MR. DEEB-I don't think he's here. MR. CROWE-They didn't get their variances. MS. WHITE-So it didn't pass the Zoning Board last night. MR. DEEB-I had a feeling. SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY STAGE 7-2017 & SUBDIVISION FINAL STAGE 8-2017 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED JAMES BEATY OWNER(S) HARS PARS INC. d/b/a SUNNYSIDE PAR 3 ZONING MDR LOCATION 168 SUNNYSIDE ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES SUBDIVISION OF A 10.86 PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS — ONE 0.33 ACRE AND ONE 10.53 ACRES. APPLICANT REQUESTS WAIVER FROM SKETCH PLAN. THE APARTMENT BUILDING WILL BE ON THE 0.33 ACRE PARCEL AND THE GOLF COURSE AND ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS TO BE ON THE 10.53 ACRE PARCEL. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 183 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION OF LAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE 1991 3 CAR DETACHED GARAGE; 1995 ADDITION TO APT. BLDG.; 2004 SEPTIC ALT.; SP 42- 93; SP 13-2005 ELEC. INSTALLATIONS FOR NIGHT USE; AV 35-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL N/A FOR SUBDIVISION LOT SIZE 10.69 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 290.5-1-50 SECTION CHAPTER 183 MR. TRAVER-So we'll table this, then. MR. CROWE-Yes. They tabled the ZBA I believe until June. MR. BROWN-At the Zoning Board their variance was tabled. So we'll just table them until, I think Laura probably left me some crib notes here. MR. TRAVER-1 think they're tabled to June. MR. DEEB-Did they say why, Mike? MR. CROWE-Yes, there was concerns with the degree of the requested. MR. BROWN-A small lot. MR. DEEB-Yes, I had a feeling. MR. CROWE-And the septic field for the apartment building is on the other parcel. MR. TRAVER-Okay. We didn't pick that up. We were just going through the Area Variance. MR. BROWN-So what we'd be looking for is to table them to the second Planning Board meeting in July. MR. TRAVER-That would be July 25th. All right. Just so folks are aware, that motion would be to July 25th and they'll be appearing, I guess, before the ZBA hopefully in June, right/ MR. BROWN-1 think they were also tabled to July. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. BROWN-The meeting before that in July. MR. TRAVER-Gotcha. MR. BROWN-That's why the second Planning Board meeting. 11 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) RESOLUTION TABLING SUB PRELIM STG & FINAL STG. 7-2017 & 8-2017 JAMES BEATY A subdivision application has been made to the Queensbury Planning Board for the following: Applicant proposes subdivision of a 10.86 acre parcel into two lots — one 0.33 acre and one 10.53 acre. Waiver requested from sketch plan. The apartment building will be on the 0.33 acre parcel and the golf course and associated buildings to be on 10.53 acre parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. MOTION TO TABLE SUBDIVISION NO. 8-2017 FINAL STAGE JAMES BEATY, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by John Shafer: Tabled to the Planning Board meeting of July 25, 2017. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. One more item under Old Business is Glenn Durlacher, Site Plan Modification 32-2017, who was also heard by the ZBA last evening, I believe. SITE PLAN (MODIFICATION) 32-2017 SEAR UNLISTED GLENN DURLACHER OWNER(S) GREAT ESCAPE THEME PARK ZONING CI LOCATION 1172 STATE ROUTE 9 APPLICANT PROPOSES TO MAINTAIN WOOD CARVING BUSINESS AND RELOCATE A 160 SQ. FT. SHED, WITH A 40 SQ. FT. PORCH ON THE SHED. PROJECT INCLUDES RELOCATION OF DISPLAY AREAS AND TO ADD LANDSCAPE LIGHTING TO SHINE ON SCULPTURES/DISPLAYS. PROJECT STILL INCLUDES EXTERIOR TREE ART BUSINESS, REMOVAL OF CHAIN LINK FENCE TO INSTALL ROPE AND WOOD POST FENCING ALONG WITH USE OF BARN AREA FOR STORAGE. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 & 179-5-020 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP PZ 265-2016; AV 30-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL MAY 2017 LOT SIZE 10.48 ACRES/1.5T" ACRE (USING ONLY 4,500 SQ. FT.) TAX MAP NO. 295.12-1-4 SECTION 179-3-040, 179-5-020 GLENN DURLACHER, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Hello, again. MR. DURLACHER-Hello, again. MR. TRAVER-So, how did it go? MR. DURLACHER-Very well. All set. I received the approval. MR. TRAVER-You received your variance. Were you required, as a result of your discussions with them, to make any changes in your plan, or is it the same as what we looked at Tuesday evening? MR. DURLACHER-It is exactly the same. MR. TRAVER-It's the same. How did you make out with the, we had some discussion regarding the lighting. Can you acknowledge those suggestions? Have you incorporated those into your plan, the lighting on the, I think it was a horsehead? MR. DURLACHER-Yes. Just low voltage lighting. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. DURLACHER-If that's okay. MR. TRAVER-Any questions for the applicant before we open the public hearing? All right. There is a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone in the audience that's here this evening to discuss this application with the Planning Board? No? Are there any written comments, Craig, that you're aware of? 12 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. BROWN-No, not that I'm aware of. MR. TRAVER-All right. Then we'll go ahead and close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-This is a SEQR Unlisted action, with a Short Form having been filed. MR. FERONE-We have a resolution to re-affirm a Negative Declaration. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Then we can go ahead and make that SEQR resolution. RESOLUTION TO RE-AFFIRM NEGATIVE SEQR DEC. SP MOD. 32-2017 GLENN DURLACHER The applicant proposes to maintain wood carving business and relocate a 160 sq. ft. shed, with a 40 sq. ft. porch on the shed. Project includes relocation of display areas and to add landscape lighting to shine on sculptures/displays. Project still includes exterior tree art business, removal of chain link fence to install rope and wood post fencing along with use of barn area for storage. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-5-020 of the Zoning Ordinance, modification to an approved site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Whereas, the Planning Board adopted Resolution SP PZ 265-2016, on 12/22/2016 adopting SEQRA determination of non-significance, and Upon review of the information recorded on the EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency reaffirms that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO REAFFIRM NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN (MODIFICATION) 32-2017 GLENN DURLACHER. Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan; Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right, and next we go to the Site Plan approval. MR. FERONE-Do we want to list the additional condition about the low voltage lighting? MR. TRAVER-Yes. I think we should. We had quite a bit of discussion on that and we came to a good resolution, and we're ready for that motion when you are. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP MOD. 32-2017 GLENN DURLACHER The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to maintain wood carving business and relocate a 160 sq. ft. shed, with a 40 sq. ft. porch on the shed. Project includes relocation of display areas and to add landscape lighting to shine on sculptures/displays. Project still includes exterior tree art business, removal of chain link fence 13 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) to install rope and wood post fencing along with use of barn area for storage. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-5-020 of the Zoning Ordinance, modification to an approved site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/18/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/18/2017; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN (MODIFICATION) 32-2017 GLENN DURLACHER; Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted: Stormwater, topography, landscaping, commercial alterations, construction details, floor plans, soil logs, construction demolition disposal and snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; e) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. h) That the lighting that is requested should be angled, low wattage lighting which would be used on displays on the property. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. You're all set. 14 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) MR. DEEB-Good luck, Glenn. MR. DURLACHER-Thanks so much, everyone. MR. TRAVER-Next on the agenda we move to New Business. We have Site Plan 37-2017 for Meghan Cesari. NEW BUSINESS: SITE PLAN NO 37-2017 SPECIAL USE PERMIT 8-2017 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED MEGHAN CESARI OWNER(S) CLEVERDALE VENTURES, LLC ZONING NC LOCATION 2660 STATE ROUTE 9L APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A 528 SQ. FT. ENCLOSED PORCH TO AN OUTDOOR SEATING AREA AS A COVERED PORCH WITH RAILINGS. PROJECT INCLUDES 10 NEW SEATS AND TO MAINTAIN 25 EXISTING SEATS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, NEW FOOD SERVICE AND BUILDING ALTERATION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SP 64-95; 1997 320 SQ. FT. ADDITION; SEVERAL SIGN PERMITS WARREN CO. REFERRAL MAY 2017 LOT SIZE 3.144 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 240.9-1-8.1 SECTION 179-3-040 MEGHAN CESARI, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Good evening. MS. CESARI-Good evening. Meghan Cesari, owner of the Cleverdale Store and we're proposing to remove the outdoor structure or the lattice area of a porch and put a, make it an open eating area, adding 10 seats. That's pretty much the extent of the project. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So you're just really changing a little bit of the shape, but more of the use of that area. Right? MS. CESARI-Right. MR. BROWN-Officially for the record, the reason for the review is to add food service/restaurant component to the use. That's how this all started. Well, it started out in a different direction and it ended up with food service. So I just wanted to go on record that's the reason for the review is to add the food service component. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MS. WHITE-So there's no existing food service? MR. BROWN-1 mean, if you go and get a sandwich at the deli, I think there's a couple of tables inside that you can sit, but this is a more formal seating area. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MS. CESARI-We're proposing to do table service. MR. TRAVER-Okay, and that doesn't require, well, yes, it does require a Special Use Permit, right? MR. BROWN-That's the food service use that we're adding, yes. MR. TRAVER-All right. Very good. Questions from members of the Planning Board? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, why did it take you so long? MR. DEEB-Did the Health Department have to get involved with this? MS. CESARI-Not that I know of. They may. I can find out. They may. MR. TRAVER-Yes, not because of this change, but I think initially. MS. CESARI-I already have, I deal with the Ags and Markets right now who does all the inspections. We deal with the Health Department for our water system already, the Department of Health. 15 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. TRAVER-Well, I think for the food service prior, that pre-existed, they need those approvals, but for this expansion that they don't. MR. DEEB-Okay. That's all I was worried about. I didn't want to see any glitches come in later on. MR. TRAVER-Yes. MS. WHITE-Well, they might come in and inspect. MS. CESARI-They may. MR. TRAVER-Yes. MS. CESARI-Well, the Ags and Markets already does all that for the kitchen. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Any other questions from members of the Planning Board? MR. FERONE-1 mean it seems to be a fairly simple project. The applicant is just removing some lattice and utilizing the area that's somewhat underutilized. Nothing structural. MR. TRAVER-Yes, it makes sense. Okay. Well, we do have a public hearing on this application. Are there folks in the audience that wanted to address the Planning Board about this application? I'm not seeing anyone. Are you aware of any written comments, Craig? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. BROWN-We have one note that was returned on a public hearing notice that's from W. Kraft, "Great idea. Work done on property so far looks good." MR. TRAVER-Okay. So we have a positive comment. We do have, this is listed as SEQR Unlisted, and we have a Short EAF that's been submitted. Do members of the Planning Board have any concerns with, I'm sorry, I should close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-Are there any environmental impacts that members of the Planning Board are concerned with that might have an effect on the SEQR resolution? MS. WHITE-It says there's no change in lighting. So can we assume that the existing lighting is compliant? MR. BROWN-No, I wouldn't automatically assume that. MS. WHITE-Because the pictures don't, I mean, the pictures seem to be non-compliant, but maybe I'm just. MS. CESARI-The pictures it shows that, they do face down. MS. WHITE-They do face down? MS. CESARI-Yes. MS. WHITE-Okay. It's just the, you know, I just wanted to make sure. MR. TRAVER-And this project would be reviewed by Building and Codes, right, as their? MR. BROWN-Yes, but they don't look at the lighting. That's under the jurisdiction of this Board, the authority of this Board. So if any additional lighting is proposed in the future, you can make it a condition that it has to be compliant lighting. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right, well then we do have a SEQR resolution if you want to go ahead and propose that. RESOLUTION GRANTING A NEGATIVE SEQR DECLARATION SP 37-2017 SUP 8-2017 CESARI 16 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) The applicant proposes to convert a 528 sq. ft. enclosed porch to an outdoor seating area as a covered porch with railings. Project includes 10 new seats and to maintain 25 existing seats. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new food service and building alteration shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 37-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 8-2017 MEGHAN CESARI, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part II of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 2. Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right, and next we move on to the, we have one more resolution that deals with your actual site plan and the special use permit. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 37-2017 & SUP 8-2017 MEGHAN CESARI The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to convert a 528 sq. ft. enclosed porch to an outdoor seating area as a covered porch with railings. Project includes 10 new seats and to maintain 25 existing seats. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new food service and building alteration shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/18/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/18/2017; 17 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 37-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 8-2017 MEGHAN CESARI; Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted: Stormwater, topography, soil logs, and snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, C) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; e) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. h) Any additional lighting to be added to the project would be Code compliant. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-Now you're approved. MS. CESARI-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-All right, and next we have Site Plan 36-2017 for Michael and Pamela Smith. SITE PLAN NO. 36-2017 SEAR TYPE TYPE II MICHAEL & PAMELA SMITH OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING MDR LOCATION 146 CHESTNUT RIDGE ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES A 2,706 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT) BASEMENT WITH WALK OUT AND 3 CAR ATTACHED GARAGE. PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR PROJECT INVOLVING THE ROCK WALL. THE ROCK WALL SECTION IS TO BE MOVED SO HOUSE AND SEPTIC CAN BE PLACED ON SITE. THIS SECTION IS TO BE MOVED TO THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO EXISTING ROCK WALL AREA. REMAINING WALL IS NOT TO BE MOVED. PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION 4-2008 CONDITIONS, ALL LOTS ARE TO HAVE SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR HOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE PZ 29-2015 SUB (PRELIMINARY STAGE) WARREN CO. REFERRAL N/A LOT SIZE 4.7 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 290.1-94 SECTION 179-3-040 & SUB CONDITION MICHAEL & PAMELA SMITH, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Good evening. MR. SMITH-Good evening, Board. My name is Michael Smith. This is my wife Pam. We're here tonight to seek the Board's approval for a new single family residence that we're hoping to build on 146 Chestnut Ridge. 18 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. TRAVER-Okay. One thing I noticed, and I can remember there was some discussion about this area of Chestnut Ridge Road within the past two years, and there was a concern, I think that it might have been on the part of the Town historical society or something, it had to do with the stone walls. Evidently they were constructed by some local famous person or something or other, and I just happened to notice in your application you're talking about re- locating 70 feet of the stone wall and moving it and re-establishing it at the south property line. Is that accurate? MR. SMITH-Correct. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So how are you going to do that? That also came up with a prior application. There was a concern that they were just going to be thrown in a pile. MR. SMITH-No, Mr. Chairman, the previous owner has already removed 80 plus feet of the wall that you're speaking of. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. SMITH-They also removed approximately 10 feet of the wall the runs parallel to the roadway. That will be closed off. The only opening in the wall will be for the driveway access as noted on the plans. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. SMITH-The addition 70 plus or minus feet of that wall, some of it is tree stumps that are buried under high brush and stuff. It looks like a wall in there, but some of it isn't wall. The 70 plus or minus feet will give us enough access to put the house foundation in along with the septic system, and we'll move that 70 plus or minus feet to the south wall. There's very little of a south wall there in existence as of today. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So are you going to have a stone wall builder do that? I know it sounds silly, but are you going to actually move the wall, or are you just going to make a pile of rocks? MR. SMITH-We're going to move the wall. I'm the wall builder. MR. TRAVER-You're the wall builder. Okay. MR. MAGOWAN-Have you read up on it? MR. SMITH-No, but I will. MR. MAGOWAN-It's kind of amazing. It's quite a site, and these old timers just, and once it goes in there, I mean, no cement. It's amazing how long. MR. TRAVER-And that's why I think as I remember, you probably remember those discussions, too. I think that's why they were so concerned, and I don't know if it's these walls, but it's certainly that Chestnut Ridge area. MR. MAGOWAN-Who's the previous owner? MR. SMITH-Mr. Hoyt. MR. MAGOWAN-Yes. MR. DEEB-That's the name. MR. MAGOWAN-This is it, because on this plan right here, there's that stone wall that we were talking about, and they wanted to move it over to here. MR. DEEB-And there was some legal. MR. TRAVER-And that was a couple of years ago, right? Yes, and I think that application was withdrawn. MR. DEEB-Yes, it was. 19 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) MR. TRAVER-Okay. So here we are again. So it's kind of, I guess, the same concern as far as the wall is concerned. I really don't recall having, other than the previous applicant, I don't remember having addressed the issue before, of a wall. MR. MAGOWAN-He kind of gave us because being the historical wall and wasn't there a reverend or a minister? MR. TRAVER-Yes, I don't remember the name, but there was a famous. AUDIENCE MEMBER-The preacher nero? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes. Wasn't he the big stone builder up in that neck of the woods? AUDIENCE MEMBER-Yes, I think they couldn't verify that those particular walls were established by him. MR. MAGOWAN-Okay. MR. TRAVER-All right. Well, are there any other questions for the applicant at this point from members of the Planning Board? We do have a public hearing on this as well. Not hearing any at this point I'll go ahead and open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience that wanted to address this Board on this application? Craig, are you aware if there's any? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. BROWN-I'm finding no public comment. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Well then we'll go ahead and close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-This is listed as a Type II SEAR. So no SEQR review is required. So I guess the only question that might exist would be whether or not we wanted to do any condition with regards to the wall. I don't really know the answer to that. I don't know what we would want MR. DEEB-How would that apply? MR. TRAVER-Well, the point is in their application they're saying that they're going to re-locate the wall. MR. DEEB-Yes, and that's on his property. MR. TRAVER-Right, but that's part of the application that we have to approve. Right? So if they're re-locating it, that's a process. That's not just demolishing it. That's taking it apart, moving it and then building a stone wall. MR. DEEB-It's on the site plan. MR. TRAVER-Right. I understand that. MR. DEEB-He's going to move it. MR. TRAVER-1 understand that, but I think if there is a question it would be, does that require. MR. DEEB-A really good back? Yes. MR. TRAVER-Yes, well, and also I think what was raised when this was before us two years ago was that it required, if it was even a good idea to move it, it required some expertise to re- create it. MR. DEEB-But that's not relevant to us. MR. MAGOWAN-The wall goes right where you want to build the house? MR. SMITH-Correct. That's the lower edge of it. That's approximately 300 feet down my house from the roadway. 20 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. MAGOWAN-Write down this name. Rodger Weeks. He's re-built his wall on Ridge Road. He might be able to give you an idea. He's right on dead man's curve on Ridge. MR. SMITH-1 think he's related to Randy? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, Randy's two houses down, or up. MR. FERONE-So, Mr. Chairman, is there a concern that there's a historical significance or something here? MR. TRAVER-No, the only thing, the only, I mean, that wouldn't, if the wall that they're talking about moving has some historical significance, first of all we don't absolutely know that. I do remember that there was some comment a couple of years ago there was a large number of people actually that were very alarmed that this wall would be basically destroyed. My only I guess question or what I had been thinking about was the idea of, if they were just saying they were going to move the wall or take it apart or whatever, that's one issue, but if they're talking about re-locating it, I'm just, you know, by approving that we're saying that that's going to be done, and presumably that's going to be looked at. MR. BROWN-Yes. Absolutely. If the worry is that the wall's not going to be re-constructed, I think the way the application is submitted it's re-locate. The applicant's got a statement on the record that his plan is to re-locate it and re-build it. MR. SMITH-Yes, I've got to do something with the rocks. MR. BROWN-When we go out to do a final site inspection, we're going to look to see that that wall has been re-located and not just piled up in a corner. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. BROWN-1 mean if you approve it as submitted, I think you're okay. I think you're safe. I think that's what Mr. Deeb was trying to say. MR. TRAVER-That was the only thing that I picked up on was that it was a re-location. MR. BROWN-Yes. MR. TRAVER-All right. MS. WHITE-But it did sound as if the applicant is committed to doing that. MR. TRAVER-Yes. Okay. Then I guess we're ready for a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 36-2017 MICHAEL & PAMELA SMITH The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes a 2,706 sq. ft. (footprint) basement with walk out and 3 car attached garage. Project is subject to site plan review for project involving the rock wall. The rock wall section is to be moved so house and septic can be placed on site. This section is to be moved to the south property line to existing rock wall area. Remaining wall is not to be moved. Pursuant to Subdivision 4-2008 conditions, all lots are to have site plan review for house development and shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/18/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/18/2017; 21 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 36-2017 MICHAEL & PAMELA SMITH, Introduced by George Ferone: Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers requestrg anted: Site lighting, signage, stormwater, topography, landscaping, traffic, commercial alterations, construction details, floor plans, soil logs, construction demolition disposal and snow removal 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution 3) That the 70 feet of rock wall that is being taken down will be re-located and re-built at the south property line. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. You're all set. MR. SMITH-Thank you. MR. DEEB-Good luck. MR. TRAVER-All right. The next application we have also under New Business is Ronald & Linda Ball, Site Plan 39-2017. This is also a SEQR Type II. SITE PLAN NO. 39-2017 SEAR TYPE TYPE II RONALD & LINDA BALL AGENT(S) HUTCHINS ENGINEERING OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING RR-5A LOCATION WEST MOUNTAIN ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,415 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT) SINGLE FAMILY HOME. PROJECT INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF 700 +/- SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY TO BE GRADED TO A 12% GRADE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-6-060 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 50 FT. OF 15% SLOPES (DRIVEWAY GREATER THAN 10%) SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE SUB 3-2008; AV 19-2008 WARREN CO. REFERRAL MAY 2017 LOT SIZE 7.02 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 295.10-1-31.12 SECTION 179-6-060 TOM HUTCHINS, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. MAGOWAN-Are you all alone tonight? MR. HUTCHINS-Well, to tell you the truth he told me he was on his way at the beginning of the meeting. MR. MAGOWAN-He might have gotten stuck. AUDIENCE MEMBER-Is there any power in Queensbury right now? MS. WHITE-According to my partner who works for National Grid, no, there's no power in Queensbury, at least not at the end of Queensbury. MR. TRAVER-Wow. MR. BROWN-So the substation on Queensbury Ave.? MS. WHITE-The substation on Country Club. That one is out. MR. TRAVER-All right. Good evening. MR. HUTCHINS-Good evening. I'm Tom Hutchins, Hutchins Engineering, here on behalf of Ron and Linda Ball, and I do expect Ron tonight. This is a single family residence, on one 22 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) seven acre lot. One residence, one lot. No variances. The challenge here is obviously it's a 700 foot driveway, and there's a fair amount of elevation change. As far as the house site is concerned, it's a three bedroom house, standard septic system, water supply well. A portion of this property is in the water district, and in my conversations with the Superintendent it's basically the owner's option because Queensbury can't provide water at the minimum required pressure to this residence. So if he wants water, if he wants municipal water he can get it, but he has to install booster pump capabilities within the house. MR. MAGOWAN-So the house is higher than the tank right next door? MR. HUTCHINS-The house is, well, it's not higher, but it needs to be 60 feet lower or so to get to get 20 PSI, or 30 PSI. MR. TRAVER-And that's what you typically have in a household is 20 or 30 PSI? MR. HUTCHINS-I believe its 30 PSI minimum they have to be able to provide. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. HUTCHINS-Which is not a lot of pressure. It might be 40. MR. TRAVER-I always wondered what my own, because a couple of years ago we switched to Town water and I always wondered what the pressure was. So the issue, the main reason you're before us is because of the driveway, the driveway slopes, the house is approximately. MR. HUTCHINS-Right. The drive, we've done what we feel is a real good design. I don't know if you've been there or not. There is a driveway there now. It's drivable. It's 16 to 17% at its steepest portion. We are completely re-building it, that lower portion. MR. TRAVER-The switchbacks help a little bit. MR. HUTCHINS-We're putting a switch back in, and part of the issue in grading this out is right now the drive comes down at a fairly significant slope right through the right of way, and we've got to transition that with a flat section. When you do that, then you're in cut already before you start heading up. So there's a fair degree of cut. We've graded it to 12%, which is not a crazy slope. There's a lot of 12% driveways in Queensbury, but because of the cut to get that initial two to three percent transition that we're in cut all the way up to the second turn. From there we're following an existing drive up to the house site. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. HUTCHINS-Stormwater. The upper portion of the property, there's a natural area there. It's a beautiful area for stormwater treatment. It's a natural area. We're going to berm it. It'll be undisturbed. It doesn't impact anybody. It's great for the upper section. The lower section we have to run ditch lines and we've got a couple of drywells and catch basins at the base of the property. I don't believe I had anything else to, there is obviously a complete grading plan. There's a profile on the last sheet. You can see what I'm talking about on the cut of the drive. The dashed line is existing grade along that centerline. So you can see we're in five to six feet of cut for a little while. MR. TRAVER-It's going to be interesting in the wintertime. MR. HUTCHINS-It'll be much better in the wintertime. I mean, yes, it'll still be a tough driveway in the wintertime. It's 12% steep if there's ice on it. MR. MAGOWAN-Make sure the plow's up on top of the hill, right? MR. TRAVER-Yes. MR. HUTCHINS-But part of that is why we have, the transition at the intersection of the road is very important. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Questions, comments from members of the Planning Board? MR. DEEB-Well, I see Mr. Ball's not here. I was just wondering if he was still concerned about the cell tower and the tank exploding and catching fire. MR. HUTCHINS-I've heard that discussion. 23 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) MR. DEEB-I just had to bring it up. I'm sorry. He was so concerned about it and he's building his house right next to it. MR. TRAVER-He's not concerned about it anymore. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, Dave, I also met him at church on Sunday. It's amazing how many people you meet when you go to church, and I did bring that up to him. I said I can't believe you're building a house up next to there and we, you know, we laughed about it, but he's always wanted to build up there. MR. TRAVER-After all that now you can be able to take advantage of the water. MR. DEEB-It's kind of ironic. MR. HUTCHINS-In that discussion I had with water. It's still not out of the question that he may utilize Town water and run a line up and put the booster tank. We've shown it with the well. MR. MAGOWAN-Either that or he might be able to, you know, talk to Just Water and they can just, you know, use his driveway. MR. DEEB-That's right. Because he wouldn't have to adjust either, if I remember correctly. MR. MAGOWAN-No, I have to say it is quite a driveway, but if that's a dream and it doesn't bother him. MR. DEEB-Well he can handle it. MR. MAGOWAN-You'll do everything in your power to, you know, make it as. MR. HUTCHINS-1 think we've done everything we can to make it as nice a design as we can. Obviously slope is rise over run. So the longer you make the driveway the flatter you can make it, and I think we've hit a nice balance here. We could have gone a little further with that switch back, but then it's longer, and we might have gotten it to 11% or 10 and a half foot, but it would be another 100 feet long. MR. MAGOWAN-So his directions are turn off West Mountain Road and it's a half a mile up the hill. MR. HUTCHINS-Seven hundred feet. MR. TRAVER-Right near the water. All right. Any other questions or comments? MR. FERONE-1 had a couple of questions, on the Short EAF. Usually Question Two is answered yes. I usually see the answer in here is the Town of Queensbury or Town of Queensbury Planning Board. MR. TRAVER-There he is. RONALD BALL MR. BALL-It took me a long time. Trees down everywhere. All of West Mountain Road. It's terrible. It really is. I saw a pickup truck squashed on West Mountain Road there. Huge trees. MR. MAGOWAN-That wind was howling. MR. TRAVER-So welcome. State your name for the record, please. MR. BALL-Ronald Ball. MR. TRAVER-All right. So we've already received a lot of information about your application. We talked about the driveway, the approximation of steep slopes, the stormwater. We commented on your deciding to build so close to the water tower. Do you have anything to add? MR. BALL-Not really. I've been through a lot. Fifteen years ago I wanted to build up there. 24 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) MR. TRAVER-Since you made the effort to get here, I just wanted to make sure. MR. HUTCHINS-The only, it probably should indicate Warren County Highway for a drive permit, although there is a drive there. That's the only. MR. FERONE-On Question Two. MR. HUTCHINS-Yes, on Question Number Two. Yes. MR. FERONE-And then Number Twelve it says is it an archeologically sensitive area, and it said yes, but I don't know, has that area ever been developed or? MR. HUTCHINS-That question comes up on an EAF Mapper, and there is an inquiry into SHPO. We have to do that to get coverage under the Stormwater Permit and that inquiry is in place and I saw an e-mail on it earlier today, but I'm not sure, but, yes, when we do these forms, now the State does a number of the questions for you. If it's in a sensitive area, and if that answer is yes then you have to proceed to Office of Parks and Recreation. MR. FERONE-And then on 17 it says does stormwater discharge to the adjacent property, and the answers were yes, it says roadside drainage. I know on your map you're showing some stormwater management there. So what would be flowing onto West Mountain Road? MR. HUTCHINS-Any overflow from the drywell structures, I mean, it falls into a wooded area, but it would ultimately, I mean, right now in those terms right now the whole site drains to West Mountain Road, half the site drains to West Mountain Road. MR. VALENTINE-What's the station for the turnaround in the driveway? I mean, is there a distance requirement? MR. HUTCHINS-Five hundred feet. MR. VALENTINE-That's what I was figuring it was, and that's at 0? MR. HUTCHINS-I don't have stationing turned on on there, but, yes, the whole driveway is 700 feet. MR. VALENTINE-1 was looking at a profile for station. It's not a big thing, but roughly in that 500 foot distance then? MR. HUTCHINS-Yes, because where the slope breaks is right about where that is, 450. That's the natural place for it, and, yes, we have to have those every 500 feet. MR. TRAVER-All right. Any other questions, comments from members of the Planning Board? MR. MAGOWAN-I also like the design of the house and the layout. So I can see that you put some thought into the place. MR. TRAVER-We do have a public hearing on this application this evening. Is there anyone here to address the Planning Board on this application? I'm not seeing anyone. Craig, anything? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. BROWN-No public comment. MR. TRAVER-No written comment. So we'll close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-This is SEQR Type II. We do have a draft motion. I guess we can go ahead and proceed with that. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 39-2017 RONALD & LINDA BALL The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: Applicant proposes construction of a 3,415 sq. ft. (footprint) single family home. Project includes development of 700 +/- sq. ft. driveway to be graded to a 12% grade. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-060 of the 25 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/18/2017) Zoning Ordinance, construction within 50 ft. of 15% slopes (driveway greater than 10%) shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 05/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to 05/18/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 05/18/2017; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 39-2017 RONALD & LINDA BALL; Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1. Waivers requested granted; Signage, traffic, commercial alterations and construction details, but note that the project is residential, different than commercial projects. 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements;- f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18th day of May, 2017 by the following vote: 26 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/13/2017) AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. You are all set. MR. BALL-Thank you. MR. MAGOWAN-Did you hit Round Pond Road? Can I get home? MR. BALL-No. I swear, every road. I started over and I turned onto, by Great Escape, Martha's, they had all kinds of fire trucks there and ambulances. I don't know what was going on there. Round Pond Road, that was all blocked off. MR. HUTCHINS-Well there's something right up here, isn't there? MR. BALL-Yes, right out here in the intersection. Blind Rock Road is all blocked off. You can't cross that way. I came down Country Club Road. MS. WHITE-Were there any issue on County Club, or is that clear? MR. BALL-I couldn't get out. I couldn't tell, but you could see there were a lot of. MR. TRAVER-All right. Before we move to adjourn, I just wanted to alert members of the Board that I'm calling for a Planning Board workshop at 6:30 p.m. for a half an hour before our next Planning Board meeting which would be on June 20th, if you could make a note of that, please. MR. DEEB-Do we get a reminder? MR. BROWN-About the workshop? Yes, you're going to have a workshop in June. MR. TRAVER-That's good. MR. BROWN-Absolutely, it'll go out, yes. MR. TRAVER-Please drive carefully going home. It sounds like it may be a bit of an adventure for some of us, and we'll entertain a motion to adjourn. MR. BROWN-Mr. Chairman, just a question. I know we talked about before the meeting started a conversation about policies and procedures. MR. TRAVER-Yes. MR. BROWN-1 would recommend that you do that on the record since it's business of the Board. It should be conducted in opening meeting rather than off the record. So just putting that out there for discussion. MR. TRAVER-Well, what I would offer in response is that our workshop would be about how we might go about doing that, and then any discussion about making real changes would be part of the regular Planning Board meeting. MR. BROWN-Okay. So we're not going to do that tonight. You're going to do that at the workshop? MR. TRAVER-Correct. MR. BROWN-Okay. Io thought you were going to have that discussion tonight. I'm sorry. MR. TRAVER-No, no. That's going to be for the workshop, and again, just to let folks know, one of the things that's going to be a part of that discussion will be looking at our by-laws. I don't anticipate that we'll be proposing any changes, but if you have an opportunity between now and 6:30 on the 20th, if you could glance at our by-laws which are on the website, it would be appreciated, and we've already got a motion to adjourn. We stand adjourned. Thank you, everybody. Drive safely. MOTION TO ADJOURN THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF MAY 18, 2017, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan: 27 (Queensbury Planning Board 05/16/2017) Duly adopted this 16th day of May, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Valentine, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE On motion meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Stephen Traver, Chairman 28