Loading...
07-25-2017 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A z ')/z" I.�r� QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING JULY 25, 2017 INDEX Subdivision No. 7-2017 James Beaty (Hars Pars) 1. PRELIMINARY STAGE Tax Map No. 290.5-1-50 Subdivision No. 8-2017 FINAL STAGE Site Plan No. 27-2017 Seaton Property Holdings 1. Special Use Permit No. 7-2017 Tax Map No. 308.16-1-55, -56, -58, & -61 Site Plan No. 31-2017 Robert Fulmer 2. Freshwater Wetlands 3-2017 Tax Map No. 296.14-1-49 Site Plan No. 52-2017 David & Morgan Stanhope 3. Freshwater Wetlands 4-2017 Tax Map No. 296.15-1-1 Site Plan 49-2017 Garden World Associates, LLC. (Cont'd Pg. 16) 5. Tax Map No. 302.5-1-50 Site Plan No. 45-2017 Aviation Hospitality, LLC 5. Special Use Permit No. 10-2017 Tax Map No. 302.5-1-96.1; 302-5-1-93.1 Discussion &Vote Planning Board Bylaws, Policies & Procedures 14. THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. �Qa.ueeir.n,rulr::a.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING SECOND REGULAR MEETING JULY 25, 2017 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT STEPHEN TRAVER, CHAIRMAN CHRIS HUNSINGER, VICE CHAIRMAN GEORGE FERONE, SECRETARY DAVID DEEB BRAD MAGOWAN JAMIE WHITE JOHN SHAFER, ALTERNATE LAND USE PLANNER-LAURA MOORE STENOGRAPHER-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. TRAVER-All right. Good evening. No one in the audience. We'll call the meeting of the Queensbury Planning Board to order. This is the second meeting of the month of July and the 15th meeting for 2017. We have some administrative items to begin with. First is Subdivision 7-2017 & Final 8-2017 for James Beaty. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SUBDIVISION PREL. 7-2017 & FINAL 8-2017 JAMES BEATY (HARS PARS) — EXTEND TABLING TO SEPTEMBER 2017 MEETING. MR. TRAVER-They're seeking an extension of the tabling to a September meeting. MRS. MOORE-So you're going to table them until the second September meeting. MR. TRAVER-The second September. Okay. That would be the 26th MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-All right. Is there any discussion on that extension? Okay. Then I guess we're ready to entertain a motion. MR. FERONE-Okay. RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION FOR SUBDIVISION FOR JAMES BEATY MOTION TO EXTEND TABLING OF SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY 7-2017 & FINAL STAGE 8-2017 JAMES BEATY. Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. Tabled to the September 26, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-Next we have another Administrative Item, Site Plan 27-2017 & Special Use Permit 7-2017 for Seaton Property Holdings. SITE PLAN 27-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 7-2017 SEATON PROPERTY HOLDINGS — EXTEND TABLING TO FUTURE PLANNING BOARD MEETING MR. TRAVER-An extended tabling to a future Planning Board meeting. Laura, don't we need a specific date for that? MRS. MOORE-So you're going to again table this one to the second meeting in September. �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. TRAVER-The same one? Okay. So that would also be 9/26 as proposed. Anyone have any questions or concerns about that? All right. Do we have a motion? MR. FERONE-We do. RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION FOR SP 27-2017 & SUP 7-2017 SEATON PROPERTY HOLDINGS MOTION TO EXTEND TABLING OF SITE PLAN 27-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 7-2017 SEATON PROPERTY HOLDINGS, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. Tabled until the September 26, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. Also on the updated agenda you'll notice there is an Administrative Item listed as the Proposed Updates to the By-Laws, Policies and Procedures. We'll move that to the end of the agenda if we could. If the Board is even ready to proceed on that. So we'll move to the regular item we have. The first item on the agenda is a Tabled Item, Robert Fulmer. SITE PLAN NO. 31-2017 FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 3-2017 SEAR TYPE TYPE II ROBERT FULMER OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING SFR-1A/MDR LOCATION 54 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A THREE DOOR, REVISED 924 SQ. FT. DETACHED GARAGE. 1 PROJECT INCLUDES REMOVAL OF 1,800 SQ. FT. BLACKTOP PAD. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 & CHAPTER 94 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, WORK WITHIN 100 FT. OF WETLAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. SP 34-2007, AV 39- 2007, FWW 1-2007 ALL FOR 2,050 ADDITION; AV 29-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL APRIL 2017 - NCI SITE INFORMATION WETLAND LOT SIZE 3.2 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 296.14-1-49 SECTION 179-3-040, CHAPTER 94 MR. TRAVER-And this application is also due to be tabled, until September, is this also to be tabled to September? MRS. MOORE-Right. The second meeting. So you will definitely have a second meeting in September. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. And there is a tabling motion on that as well, and this was, I guess for the applicant to consider continued alterations that in his proposal. MRS. MOORE-Correct, and you will also have to open, there's a public hearing that was scheduled for that. So it's left open. MR. TRAVER-Okay, and that is still open from our discussions. Correct? Or do I need to open it tonight and leave it open? MRS. MOORE-You're leaving it open. It's been open since May. MR. TRAVER-Since the May 2nd meeting. Okay. Very good. Thank you. All right. Then we have a motion RESOLUTION TABLING SP 31-2017 & FWW 3-2017 ROBERT FULMER MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN 31-2017 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 3-2017 ROBERT FULMER, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan: Tabled until the September 26, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: 3 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir/ Board 0A"7z"0/z AYES: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right, and then under Old Business, David & Morgan Stanhope. SITE PLAN NO. 52-2017 FRESHWATER WETLANDS 4-2017 SEAR TYPE TYPE II DAVID & MORGAN STANHOPE AGENT(S) JOHN R. CANNEY IV, ESQ. OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANTS APPLICANT PROPOSES A NEW 3,604 SQ. FT. SINGLE FAMILY HOME, WITH LOWER LEVEL, MAIN FLOOR, GARAGE AND SITE WORK. THE PROJECT OCCURS WITHIN 100 FT OF A WETLAND. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040, CHAPTER 94 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 100 FT. OF A WETLAND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE 2007-337 BP VOIDED 9/2015; AV 45-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL JULY 2017 SITE INFORMATION WETLANDS LOT SIZE 4.43 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 296.15-1-1 SECTION 179-3-040, CHAPTER 94 MR. TRAVER-1 understand they have also requested to be tabled, and this application to be tabled until the August 15th meeting. Correct? MRS. MOORE-Correct. MR. TRAVER-Okay, and that was basically, not because of a problem with the application, but they didn't have represented that they wanted to attend this evening. Right? MRS. MOORE-Correct. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. TRAVER-So then, and you passed out a recent tabling motion for that. MRS. MOORE-Also note that you will have to open the public hearing because the public hearing has not been opened on this one. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you. MRS. MOORE-And it will be left open, and if there's any other information that the Board feels necessary that I can pass along to the applicant, you could do that. At one point we talked about stormwater information and so if the Board feels that the Board may need to focus on providing, or ensuring that there's stormwater information or details with their application, you should mention that. MR. TRAVER-Yes, I think didn't we request that, or, no, there was discussion about whether or not we wanted the engineer to review that, and I think it was decided that we did not. Correct? MRS. MOORE-Correct, but I mean in light of the fact that it is within a wetland area. It's up to the Board, again, if they wish to have it reviewed by the engineer, but the applicant should at least present information about the 25 year storm for residential projects, and that has not been done yet. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Well let's take that in order, then. For the David and Morgan Stanhope, Site Plan 52-2017 and Freshwater Wetlands 4-2017, we will open the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MR. TRAVER-And having no one in the audience this evening, is there any written comments, Laura? MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments at this time. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Then we will leave the public hearing open for that, and they've requested to be tabled to the August 15th, 2017 meeting, and question, recommendation by Staff, do we want them to be prepared to discuss stormwater along the lines of the impacts, potential impacts for a 25 year storm? How do the Board members feel? I remember we discussed whether or not we wanted the Town Engineer to review it and I think we decided that we didn't feel that was necessary, but there were concerns about stormwater. 4 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. DEEB-Well if they presented a stormwater plan, what's the sense of doing that if we're not going to have the Town Engineer look at it? MR. TRAVER-Well, and that was part of our discussion I think. So how does the Board feel on that? We can have conditions, obviously, on a tabling motion. MR. HUNSINGER-Personally I'd be more concerned about the sewer extension than stormwater, personally. MR. TRAVER-Well, I think we would condition that, approval would be conditioned on that in any case, right? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. TRAVER-So do we want to add conditions to the tabling motion for the August 15th? The only other concern I would have, Laura, is they've already passed the deadline for submission for August. So if we're adding conditions, how are they going to be prepared for that presentation? MRS. MOORE-It's supplemental information. MR. TRAVER-Supplemental. Okay. MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-Clearly if we ask the Town Engineer to get involved we're not looking at anything in August. It probably would be at least September if not October. MRS. MOORE-Right, but I mean there's a potential of when Staff meets with the applicant, if the applicant provides information that as Staff I feel should be reviewed at the engineer level then I may forward it to the engineer. There's other stuff that as Staff I can review certain stormwater elements that, you know. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So really what you're suggesting is that we consider asking the applicant to provide stormwater information related to the 25 year storm? Okay. Why don't we add that as a condition, then, unless people are opposed to that. MR. FERONE-I didn't think that was necessary. So I don't know what the Board feels like. MR. TRAVER-Well, I remember discussion that we didn't feel that it was necessary for it to go to the engineer, but there was concern about stormwater because we did talk about, I think Mr. Magowan was talking about the protection of the wetlands during the construction phase and they had offered to put double layers, as I recall, on there. So there was discussion about it, but when I hear a recommendation from Planning Staff I'm tempted to kind of go with their recommendation. MR. FERONE-Sure. Yes. MR. DEEB-And I agree with that. MR. FERONE-I mean I understand the concern during the construction phase. It's just, I drove by that property again. It seems to be low. I mean, there's more water that's going to run on that property than runoff that property. Again, unless they decide to really fill. MR. TRAVER-Well, they talked about bringing in 1500 yards of fill if I recall, and if, and I don't disagree with you as far as the topography there, but if that's the case, then they should have no difficulty providing information. Right? So let's add that to the condition and see if it passes, and people can vote against it if they object. MR. HUNSINGER-They were also going to provide additional drawings. MR. TRAVER-Yes. Silt fencing. MRS. MOORE-They're aware of that. MR. TRAVER-Yes, so we should have a lot more information when they return. MR. SHAFER-They were going to move the driveway. I:~ �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. TRAVER-Yes, well they had offered to do that and that would be part of the updates. Yes, that was a big improvement. MR. FERONE-Okay. MR. TRAVER-All right. So are we ready for a motion? RESOLUTION TABLING SP 3 52-2017 & FWW 4-2017 DAVID & MORGAN STANHOPE MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN 52-2017 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 4-2017 DAVID & MORGAN STANHOPE, Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption, seconded by David Deeb: Tabled until the August 15, 2017 Planning Board meeting. The motion is also conditioned that the applicant will provide stormwater management documentation covering a 25 year storm event. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right, and next we have on our agenda under Old Business, Garden World Assoc., LLC, Site Plan 49-2017 SITE PLAN NO. 49-2017 SEAR UNLISTED GARDEN WORLD ASSOCIATES, LLC OWNER(S) SAME AS APPLICANT ZONING CI LOCATION 537 AVIATION ROAD (SILO) APPLICANT PROPOSES 400 SQ. FT. DECK WHERE EXISTING 270 SQ. FT. EXISTING DECK WILL BE REMOVED. NEW DECK IS TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING 8 TABLES (16 SEATS) AND TO ADD TWO NEW TABLES (4 SEATS). THE PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES A NEW 64 SQ. FT. ENTRYWAY OVER AN EXISTING RAMP. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179- 3-040 & 179-4-080 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, EXPANSION OF OUTDOOR DECK FOR SEATING AND ADDITION OF COVERED ENTRY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE 1995 ROOF; 1996 INT. ALT., 1999 GREENHOUSE DEMO., 2000, 2012 INT. ALT.; AV 44-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL JULY 2017 SITE INFORMATION TRAVEL CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE LOT SIZE .76 ACRES TAX MAP NO. 302.5-1-50 SECTION 179-3-040, 179-4-080 MR. DEEB-They're not here. MRS. MOORE-And they're not here. MR. TRAVER-And they're not here. So maybe they heard we were in the process of tabling some applications. All right. Well let's, we'll leave that one for now and we'll move ahead to Aviation Hospitality, LLC Site Plan 45-2017 & Special Use Permit 10-2017. SITE PLAN NO. 45-2017; SPECIAL USE PERMIT 10-2017 SEAR TYPE UNLISTED — COORDINATED AVIATION HOSPITALITY, LLC AGENT(S) BOHLER ENGINEERING OWNER(S) PCGF NEWCO, LLC ZONING ESC LOCATION 524 AVIATION ROAD APPLICANT PROPOSES CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 62,620 SQ. FT. (FLOOR AREA), 4 STORY, 92 ROOM HOTEL WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING. PROJECT INCLUDES A CONNECTOR ROAD ON ADJOINING PROPERTY TO AVIATION MALL RING ROAD. HOTEL WILL BE LOCATED ON A PARCEL OF GREATER THAN 2 ACRES. INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT WILL BE A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN 302.5-1-96.1 AND 302.5-1- 93.1 WITH THE FORMER REDUCED TO 2.0 ACRES AND THE LATTER TO BE INCREASED TO 4.31 ACRES. PROJECT INCLUDES WORK WITH AMBROSIA DINER FOR ACCESS AS LOT DOES NOT HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE ON ROUTE 254. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-9-040 & 179-10 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, NEW COMMERCIAL USE IN THE ESC ZONE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE DEMOLITION PERMITS FOR FORMER HOWARD JOHNSON BUILDINGS 2002, 2005 & 2010; SP 40-2008, SP 29-2009, DISC 6-2017, AV 42-2017, SV 6-2017, SP 47- 2017, SP 48-2017 WARREN CO. REFERRAL JUNE 2017 LOT SIZE 4.57 ACRES, 1.74 ACRES (UTILIZING 2.5 ACRES) TAX MAP NO. 302.5-1-96.1, 302.5-1-93.1 SECTION 179-9-040, 179-10 6 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z CHARLES DUMAS & JOSH O'CONNOR, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Hello again, gentlemen. MR. DUMAS-Hello. MR. TRAVER-Welcome back. MR. DUMAS-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-When we last spoke you were off to the Zoning Board. MR. DUMAS-It was a good evening. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Very good. Well, welcome back and do you want to give us an overview of where we're at, and state your name for the record again, I'm sorry. MR. DUMAS-Sure. Yes, Charles Dumas. I'm an attorney with the Lemery Greisler law firm. I have with me Bhavik Jariwala who is the managing member of Aviation Hospitality, Mark Nadolny with Creighton Manning Engineering and Josh O'Connor with Bohler Engineering. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. DUMAS-Yes, we were here on the 18th. You granted a Negative Declaration. You approved two components of the project, consisting of the modification to the Ambrosia Diner site plan to reconfigure that driveway out onto Aviation Road, and you also approved the modification to the Aviation Mall site plan to enable the connector road down to the ring road. You referred us to the Zoning Board. We went to the Zoning Board the following night and received approval for the three signs on the building, the setback from Aviation Road as to the monument sign, and the variance that was required as to frontage because we had a keyhole lot if you will. MR. TRAVER-Right. MR. DUMAS-So we're back here this evening. We would hope to have our Special Use Permit granted, our lot line adjustment granted and Site Plan approved. I recall I think last time we were here there was some question about lighting, and I think, Chris, I think you were interested in talking about lighting. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, right. MR. DUMAS-We're prepared to do that this evening, and answer any other questions you might have about the site plan and the process. MR. TRAVER-So, just to refresh, we have reviewed this project actually a couple of times, and I won't even count when it was proposed at the other exit, but in any case, as a result of your meeting with the ZBA there were no changes to the project. What we have before us remains what is proposed. MR. DUMAS-Essentially, yes. MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you. MR. O'CONNOR-Mr. Traver, with an exception. The detail we talked about, recognizing there is some discrepancy in the size of the signs. All of the signs as approved were in a smaller sign. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. DUMAS-And that's what was applied for. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So there was just some confusion in the drawing then. MR. O'CONNOR-That's right. The smaller sign is shown on the elevation. That was approved in three instances. 7 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. TRAVER-Okay. Very good. Thank you for that clarification. MR. DUMAS-And we were, it was suggested to us by the ZBA that if during the course of construction we needed to return for modification to the size of one of the signs they would entertain that. MR. TRAVER-Okay. And then, Laura, you'll need updated plans to reflect that, right? MRS. MOORE-Yes. As part of their final plans they will submit the updated sign information and the locations. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Well, let's talk about the lighting issue that Mr. Hunsinger was concerned about. There was some spots on the lighting plan, well, go ahead. You were evidently coming prepared to discuss that. What are you offering? MR. DUMAS-I'd like to turn that over to Josh. MR. TRAVER-Sure. MR. O'CONNOR-The specific concern as it was read, and pardon me if I don't understand it, was in regard to the porte cochre and the down lighting. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. MR. O'CONNOR-My impression would be that, well, if you could speak, what is your specific concern? MR. HUNSINGER-Well, it was too bright. MR. O'CONNOR-The lighting is developed in consideration of providing, the essence of it is it's lit as an exterior space to an extent, not as bright. It's for life safety, and so that people can see into the trunks of vehicles for unloading, disembarking, etc. This is the Hilton standard with an exception. We actually have two fewer lights than the Hilton standard for this canopy, and it is also the same package that we had at Exit 18. It's the same lighting package for under the canopy. MR. HUNSINGER-So you have some hot spots that are, I'll just read the ones I highlighted. One's 29, 1 can't tell if it's .7, 33, 35, and 39. MR. O'CONNOR-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-And just for reference a gas station canopy that we recently approved, the brightest that that is, and I would think that under a gas canopy where you have to read your ATM card would need to be brighter than underneath this where you're just getting out of your car. MR. TRAVER-Yes, you're handling volatile fuels. MR. HUNSINGER-The brightest location identified is 18.9. MR. O'CONNOR-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-So there's quite a distance between that and, you know, 39. It's almost double. MR. O'CONNOR-Yes, and that does seem high. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. So that was my concern. MR. O'CONNOR-1 think that's a fair concern. We can look again at how it's modeled. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. O'CONNOR-It may be how the grid is rotated in the modeling. It may be that we have a light that's not selected correctly. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. 8 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. O'CONNOR-We can look again at that. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, I mean, there's been multiple times when we've had discussions about, especially with the LED lights where they say, yes, we can just swap out, you know, with over wattage. MR. O'CONNOR-Is there a lighting number that you provide, you know, is there any direction you can provide us as far as a target? MR. TRAVER-What if we were to say 20 max? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, and in looking at this again I had missed some that were 36 and 30. Part of the concern is, and it might sound kind of silly, but you go right from 2.3, and these are the readings just immediately outside of the porte cochere, 2.3, then you hit 4.9, then you hit something I can't read and then you hit 35. So within a very short distance you go from pretty dim to very bright, and that's really the concern. MR. O'CONNOR-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-So if there's a way to, I mean, I don't know if 20's the right number. MR. O'CONNOR-We can take a harder look at that. I'm not an expert at lighting. MR. HUNSINGER-And I'm not either. MR. O'CONNOR-So I'm remiss to over promise on this one. I can say we will take a hard look at it and be more sensitive to those hot spots and that sharp increase. I don't see a reason why we can't reach a more reasonable level under the canopy. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. Great. That's all I was looking for. The rest of the lighting I thought looked fine. It fades right out when you get to the property line and within the parking area, we're looking at reasonable numbers. You hit 9.7 and 10 that are directly underneath the lights. I don't think that's unreasonable. MR. O'CONNOR-We'll look at that. MR. HUNSINGER-All right. Thanks. MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you. Any other questions or concerns? MR. SHAFER-Yes, I have a question about internal signage. At what point, and maybe it's already finalized on your site plan, will some of the internal signs be finalized? For example, I noticed at the beginning of the connector road over to the Aviation Mall there's a sign that says proposed turn sign west on Route 254. I'm not sure people will know Route 254 in their heads very well, certainly I'm not sure people staying at the Hotel who don't live around here. MR. O'CONNOR-Right. MR. SHAFER-Obviously people turning left out of the Hotel, left out of the Aviation Mall traffic signal are headed toward the Northway. So I would ask you to take a hard look at the internal signage from the standpoint of the people staying at the Hotel. How will they need to be guided to wherever they're going? If they're going to Lake George and they don't want to go up Route 9, obviously they should go the Northway. MR. TRAVER-Yes. MR. SHAFER-And I don't see any signs that say 1-87. MR. O'CONNOR-Understood. MR. SHAFER-1 don't see it on this drawing. MR. O'CONNOR-They are not on there, Mr. Shafer. MR. SHAFER-Okay. Out at the end of the driveway for the Hotel with the right turn, you can only take a right turn onto Aviation Road, there should be a sign there that says right turn only. 9 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. O'CONNOR-We will, as I understand it, as far as the highway directional signage, we are going to need to provide signage around this intersection that directs people down our connector road for 87 and for westbound on Aviation Road in particular, and we don't show that now. We will need to have that on the next iteration. MR. SHAFER-Out at Aviation you should be right turn only. So people don't try to sneak through there and make a left like we do now. MR. O'CONNOR-That would be part of the DOT, that sign would be standard with DOT. Yes, we will have that sign. MR. TRAVER-Any other questions or concerns on the Site Plan and Special Use Permit? Well, hearing none I guess we're ready for a motion. MR. HUNSINGER-1 guess it's worth adding, you know, since we focused on so few things, I mean, I really like the design and the color scheme. MR. DUMAS-The Home2 is a really neat product. It's crisp, it's clean and it's appropriate. I think the color scheme for this particular part of the area is really quite appropriate. MRS. MOORE-The public hearing is still left open from last week. MR. TRAVER-And we have already done SEAR. MRS. MOORE-You did SEAR. We included just so you had it as a reference. That's why it's in there. MR. TRAVER-Very good. All right. Well, if there are no more questions, and there's no further written comments? MRS. MOORE-No written comments. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN NO COMMENT PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-Then we'll close the public hearing on this and entertain a motion. MR. FERONE-Motion to approve Site Plan 45-2017 and Special Use Permit 10-2017 for Aviation Hospitality, LLC, Introduced by myself, according to the draft resolution prepared by Staff. We do have waivers. MRS. MOORE-There were no waivers this time. MR. FERONE-No waivers. Conditions are final site plan is to cover signage size issues so they are consistent. The applicant will also attempt to review lighting under the portico in relation to brightness. MR. TRAVER-All right. We have a motion. Do we have a second? MR. MAGOWAN-Second it. MRS. MOORE-1 will note that the waiver that's noted is the applicant has proposed 10% interior landscaping where 15% is identified. So it's a landscaping waiver. So there was one. MR. TRAVER-We'll amend that motion. MR. MAGOWAN-I second the amended motion. MR. TRAVER-Okay. We have a motion made and seconded. Any discussion? MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, I mean, the only discussion is, is there a number that we want to put on the lighting? MR. TRAVER-Yes, I mean, you had pointed out the number of a recent canopy for fueling is 18, and they were advocating that they wanted it virtually household lighting for unloading trunks °10 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z and so on. So the number that came in my head was a max of 20. That's, but that was purely arbitrary. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. Do you have any suggestions? MR. DEEB-You have to remember, too, that it's pretty well off the road, the site itself. MRS. MOORE-It is off the road. MR. DEEB-So I wouldn't care if it were a little higher than 20. Because I don't think it's going to have that big of an effect. MR. FERONE-1 think as long as you were going to look at it because there's such a variance. MR. O'CONNOR-And this is where we do need to speak with a lighting professional on this, and the architect has someone we can talk to. I think it's important that we, and again, being personally ignorant of what the standard is, that we provide lighting that's consistent with National Standards for lighting this type of exterior space, and again, not having those numbers in hand, I don't want to say 20 if the insurable appropriate standard is 22. 1 just don't know what that number is. MR. HUNSINGER-All I know is we have had multiple conversations in sort of detail with gas stations, you know, the canopies, the gas station canopies and we hear, you know, this is the national standard, this is the safety standard insured, and there's been a lot of discussion about that. MR. O'CONNOR-My gut would be that that's appropriate. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes. Right, but I'm like you, you know, if it comes out at 24 or 25, that's a lot better than 39. MR. O'CONNOR-Sure. MR. HUNSINGER-So I don't know if there's a number per se. MRS. MOORE-1 mean, you can say less than 39, and that's a valid number. MR. MAGOWAN-Or say less than 30. MR. FERONE-That's what I was going to say. MR. DEEB-Well you don't know what the national standards are. None of us know what the national standards are. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, we know what the Town Code is, though. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, I know what they're trying to achieve. When people come off the road from driving in the dark it's inviting to see this brightness, you know, and they're half asleep getting their stuff out of the back of the car. It doesn't spill over, you know, it doesn't spill out from the canopy. I think maybe the lighting they picked in there for the height of the canopy might be the intensity of it. Because it's not a far spill out on it. MR. TRAVER-Well, and it's possible it's a programming error in generating the light plan. Maybe they put in the wrong. MR. FERONE-That's what I thought. MR. TRAVER-1 mean, I think if they've offered to look at it. It doesn't seem to jive with what we've seen in other examples. So, you know, the odds of it just being a glitch I think are not insubstantial, but I'm not opposed to putting a number on it either. I just think it might be putting them in a difficult situation. MR. DEEB-As Laura said, you could say under 39. 1 think you could even say under 35. I'm 35 is way too much at this point. I mean, if you say under. MR. HUNSINGER-No matter what number we select it's going to be arbitrary. MR. DEEB-It's going to be an arbitrary number. There's nothing we can do about that now. �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MR. O'CONNOR-But that said, I think it would be fair to say that we will address the lighting and look at it in light of national standards, and verify that it complies with accepted lighting rates for this type of application. MR. HUNSINGER-Well my issue is you should be looking at it in light of the Town Code. MR. O'CONNOR-Okay. MR. HUNSINGER-And, you know, the national standard might be, although I know the lighting plans were, when the lighting ordinance was adopted we apparently used national standards. That talks about 10. MRS. MOORE-So automobile, I'll throw these up these up here. Automobile lots are, the guidance is 20. So is it going to be brighter than an automobile lot? MS. WHITE-Twenty sounds appropriate, then. MR. HUNSINGER-So is that an average, though, Laura? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. HUNSINGER-So you might not be far off from that now. MR. TRAVER-Well that was the number that was in the back of my head for some reason, traveling around, was 20. MS. WHITE-Well now you know why. MR. TRAVER-All right. So where are we on that? We want to put something in the resolution. MRS. MOORE-And it says loading and unloading areas. MR. TRAVER-And that's Town Code? MRS. MOORE-That could be interpreted as loading, unloading for delivery vehicles or is it unloading and loading for other items? MR. TRAVER-Well these are delivery vehicles. They're delivering humans and their cargo. MR. HUNSINGER-So what's it say? MRS. MOORE-It says 20. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. SHAFER-Average? MRS. MOORE-Right. MR. TRAVER-And that's Code? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. DEEB-So as long as it's consistent with Town Code we should be okay. MR. O'CONNOR-Yes. MR. DUMAS-One would think. MRS. MOORE-Let me just clarify. The Board has the opportunity to give guidance to the applicant what value you'd like to see. If you feel that it's similar to another application, if you feel like an automobile lot is a value that you can comprehend and visualize and you want to give that guidance to the applicant you can. So it's a discussion between you and the applicant and the Board because there's discretion given to the Board. MR. TRAVER-Well, if we say that it meets Town Code, that should cover it. Right? �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MRS. MOORE-But it's not specified. MR. TRAVER-All right. So we're back to 20 again. MRS. MOORE-Less than 39, greater than 20. MR. MAGOWAN-Let's put a number on it and they'll make it work. MR. HUNSINGER-Yes, that's an average lumens underneath the canopy. MRS. MOORE-Correct. MR. MAGOWAN-Twenty-seven point two nine. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, what the Town Code says is 20. MR. TRAVER-All right. MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, but the problem is, you know, an auto mart there, you know, looking at a vehicle, you're not looking for your daughter's pacifier that fell underneath the seat after traveling eight hours to come here, you know. You need a little bit more light. So, you know, personally it's a little high but it doesn't spill out and it's bright. You might end up putting a dimmer on it anyway. So really I say anything under 30, and you've got to put a number on it. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Well, we've got a couple of numbers bouncing around. We've got anything under 30 and we have Code guidance which is 20. What's the feeling of the Board? MR. DEEB-I tend to agree with Brad. MR. TRAVER-Anything under 30? MR. DEEB-30. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. DEEB-Because you're talking average. MR. TRAVER-Right. Understood. MR. HUNSINGER-So what do you want to say no spot greater than 30? MR. TRAVER-Yes, right. MR. MAGOWAN-No spot greater than 30. MR. TRAVER-No spot greater than 30. MR. O'CONNOR-That's very reasonable. MR. DEEB-That would work. MR. HUNSINGER-And I'll bet your average is going to be close to 20. Because you have spots that are within the entrance, they're not within the porte cochre that are 9.5, 9.7. MR. O'CONNOR-1 think that's reasonable. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Let's try that motion again, then. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, we can just amend it. MR. FERONE-We'll modify the motion that the applicant. MS. GAG LIARDI-Excuse me, but it would be clearer for me if you could just do the motion over. Thank you. MR. FERONE-For you, Maria. '13, �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir.y II::II irnirnliirn,� IBoard 0A"7z"0/z MR. TRAVER-Anything for Maria. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP #45-2017 & SUP 10-2017 AVIATION HOSPITALITY, LLC The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board proposing construction of a new 62,620 sq. ft. (floor area), 4 story, 92 room hotel with associated parking. Project includes a connector road on adjoining property to Aviation Mall ring road. Hotel will be located on a parcel of greater than 2 acres. Included in the project will be a lot line adjustment between 302.5-1-96.1 and 302.5-1-93.1 with the former reduced to 2.0 acres and the later to be increased to 4.31 acres. Project includes work with Ambrosia Diner for access as lot does not have road frontage on Route 254. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-040 & 179-10 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial use in the ESC zone shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 07/18/2017 and continued the public hearing to07/25/2017, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 07/25/2017; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 45-2017 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 10-2017 AVIATION HOSPITALITY, LLC; Introduced by George Ferone who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) Waivers requested granted; 10% landscaping 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements;- f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir.y II::II irnirnliirn,� IBoard 0A"7z"0/z g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans 1) Final site plan will cover signage sign issue. m) The applicant will comply that lighting under the portico will not be greater than 30 foot candles Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. You're all set. MR. HUNSINGER-Good luck. MR. DEEB-Good luck. MR. DUMAS-Thank you. MR. DEEB-Where's Troelstra? They aren't here. They know they're supposed to be here, right? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. MAGOWAN-1 want to thank you guys for picking a better spot. I'm so happy that you pulled out of 18 and brought it up here. MR. TRAVER-There's still no sign of our friends from Garden World. Should we? MRS. MOORE-You can move forward on your discussion about your By-laws, and then I'll give them a call. MR. TRAVER-And see if they come. All right. We did, in reviewing the agenda and discussing it with Laura, I did ask her to give her a draft resolution to approve the changes that I proposed to the By-laws and the Policies and Procedures, if the Board is ready to move on that. It seemed like tonight with a lighter agenda it might be a good time to review and act on those if the Board is ready. So I don't know what the will of the Board is on that, or if you've had a chance to read those. MS. WHITE-1 didn't see anything that was, other than what we talked about. MR. TRAVER-That was my goal. MR. FERONE-1 had a question. So it says the annual meeting of the Board shall be the last regular meeting in the month of December each year. At such time the Planning Board shall elect officers and conduct such other business as is necessary. Now in the sense of electing officers, the secretary and vice chair are fine, but isn't the Chair a recommendation to the Town Board that has to be approved. MR. TRAVER-It is. MR. FERONE-Should that read as such? MR. MAGOWAN-1 didn't get mine. MR. TRAVER-One of these? Sorry. It was e-mailed. I have it somewhere I'm sure. I mean, I wrote it so I know what it says. Yes, it is still an election. The Board is still electing that position. It's affirmed by the Town Board. It does, it is in the way of an election. I also sent '115 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z this to both the Town Supervisor and the Code Enforcement Officer and I didn't get any questions on that. I wanted to let them know that we were considering, potentially considering this, but I think my thought is that the meeting is clear, but certainly the Board can change the language. MR. FERONE-1 would say if they didn't have any problems with it, then. MR. TRAVER-I'm not aware of any. Laura, do you see any problem with that wording? Okay. All right. I mean, the intent is that we have it done at a specific time, that the members of the Board and the public for that matter know in advance when it's going to take place. That was one of the concerns. The By-laws were incorrect to begin with because they had the annual meeting in January, which would be kind of late. Now the one thing I did consider, to address your concern about the chairmanship, I put something in there to the effect that at the organizational meeting, which is the first meeting in January, we would affirm the officers, because there might be, the Town Board might have somebody else take over as chairperson. So at that point we would say, okay, we're going to acknowledge that here are the officers of the Planning Board for 2018 or whatever year it happens to be, and then the policies and procedures I just changed to reflect the detail of how that would take place, the idea that it would be the responsibility of the chairperson to poll the current officers, find out if they wanted to be re-considered for another term. If not, and we had talked about, and I looked at the By- laws and the chairman does have the ability to create committees. So basically if there was an officer that said, you know what, I really don't want to do it anymore, then likely the chairperson would make them the chair of the nominating committee that would then try to speak to others who might want to be in that office for the following year, likewise the chairperson if they decided they didn't want to continue to serve then they would announce and likewise there would be a nominating committee created that probably the outgoing chairperson would chair or somebody that would try to come up with a candidate that would be put on the ballot for the chairmanship, and the other concern was, you know, things can happen between November and the last meeting in December. So I put in there highlighted I think that in any, no matter what happens with the existing officers or nominating committees, there still are nominations from the floor before any voting takes place. So there's quite a number of different and transparent ways, I believe, that candidates for the various offices can be voted upon. I mean, that was kind of the goal, and also to layout a time line so people would be clear as to when it was going to happen and what was going to happen, and that's what I said I would do. MR. MAGOWAN-1 think you did a very nice job. MR. DEEB-Good job, Stephen. There's a lot of contingencies. You did a good job. MR. TRAVER-Well then if the Board feels comfortable with this, there is a draft resolution. I see Mr. Magowan didn't get one. It was e-mailed out today, I believe. MRS. MOORE-The resolution was but the information was in the earlier packets. The resolution is new today. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Yes. So we do have a draft resolution. If people are okay with that we can go ahead and move on that, I guess, Mr. Secretary. RESOLUTION RE: UPDATE TO PLANNING BOARD BYLAWS, POLICIES & PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the Queensbury Planning Board adopted Bylaws, Policies and Procedures (hereinafter "Bylaws") on April 24, 2001, and WHEREAS, these Bylaws were last amended on October 17, 2006, and WHEREAS, Section III(C)(5) defines an annual meeting to be the first regular meeting in the month of January of each year, and Section III(C)(6) defines procedures to be followed at such meeting, and WHEREAS, at a workshop meeting on June 27, 2017 the Planning Board agreed to make changes to the annual and organizational meetings, and WHEREAS, in discussion at the regular meeting of July 25, 2017 the Planning Board determined that it prefers to hold the annual meeting on the last regular meeting in the month of December of each year, along with additional procedures to be followed at such meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: '16 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z That the Town of Queensbury Planning Board hereby amends Section III(C)(5) of its Bylaws to read as follows: "The annual meeting of the Board shall be the last regular meeting in the month of December of each year. At such time the Planning Board shall elect officers and conduct such other business as is necessary." That the Town of Queensbury Planning Board hereby amends Section III(C)(6) of its bylaws to read as follows: "The annual organizational meeting of the Board shall be the first regular meeting in the month of January of each year. At such time the affirmation of the officers shall take place, new members of the Board are recognized, the dates of regular meetings for the upcoming year shall be designated and the Planning Board shall conduct such other business as is necessary." That the Town of Queensbury Planning Board hereby amends Section I under Policies and Procedures to read as follows: IA. Annual Meeting As the presiding officer of the Planning Board, the Board Chairperson shall endeavor to ensure that there is continuity in the leadership of the Board in the form of it's' officers. By the final meeting of the month of November, the Chairperson shall poll the current Vice-Chair and Secretary to ascertain whether they wish to be nominated to serve for another term. At the final meeting of the month of November, the Chairperson shall announce their own intentions as to whether they wish to serve another term as Chairperson. Any officer willing to serve another term will be placed in nomination by the Secretary at the Annual Meeting prior to the vote. Note that at the Annual Meeting prior to any voting the floor will also be open to any additional nominations for any office to be voted upon. When all nominations have been made, the Chairperson will close the nominations and move that the voting take place. If there are no additional nominations for any office, the Board my vote on the entire slate of officers. In the event that an elected officer does not intend to accept nomination, the Chairperson shall, no later than the final meeting for the month of November, appoint a Nominating Committee to select a candidate to be nominated for that office at the Annual Meeting. Any Nominating Committee thus created shall report their results to the Secretary and the Board by the first meeting in December. At the Annual Meeting, the Secretary shall place in nomination the results of any Nominating Committee. Note that at the Annual Meeting prior to any voting the floor will also be open to any additional nominations for any office to be voted upon. When all nominations have been made, the Chairperson will close the nominations and move that the voting take place. If there are no additional nominations for any office, the Board my vote on the entire slate of officers. IB Organizational Meeting Prior to the Organizational Meeting in January, all new members shall receive copies of the following items; - Planning Board Bylaws - Policies and Procedures - Town of Queensbury Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Copy of the Town of Queensbury Code - Zoning Map Educational materials as received from time to time will also be distributed. Amendments or revised documents will be distributed upon final adoption. Per the Planning Board Bylaws, the annual meeting will serve to recognize officers for the year, new members and adopt the proposed meeting schedule for the year. The Planning Board shall also conduct such other business as is necessary. Resolution introduced by Chris Hunsinger who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone. Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. And then regarding Garden World, we've already missed our 7:30 deadline. So do we want to table them to August 15th or do you want to reach out to them and find out why they are missing? ,1.7 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A"7z"0/z MRS. MOORE-1 was just trying to find a phone number I could depend on. MR. DEEB-I don't think it's fair for us to wait for them to get here, either. MR. TRAVER-Yes. I think they've missed their window on that, Laura. So I think at this point we're looking at a tabling motion. MRS. MOORE-Okay. And you can table them to the first or second meeting in August. It's fine. MR. TRAVER-And I apologize. I did not have a chance to look at the draft thing. I had a contract that was all over the house. MRS. MOORE-The first meeting there is now four items. This would be the fifth item. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Then if the Board has no objection, why don't we table Site Plan 49-2017 to the August 15th agenda, and we can entertain a motion to do that. RESOLUTION TABLING SP #49-2017 GARDEN WORLD ASSOCIATES., LLC The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes 400 sq. ft. deck where existing 270 sq. ft. existing deck will be removed. New deck is to accommodate existing 8 tables (16 seats) and to add two new tables (4 seats). The project also includes a new 64 sq. ft. entryway over an existing ramp. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-4-080 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of outdoor deck for seating and addition of covered entry shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN NO. 49-2017 GARDEN WORLD ASSOCIATES, LLC, Introduced by John Shafer who moved for its adoption, seconded by Chris Hunsinger: Tabled to the Queensbury Planning Board meeting of August 15th Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. HUNSINGER-1 would just point out, I'm not going to pick on Staff because it's the Board's responsibility as well. In the application, in the general information, there's no phone numbers or e-mail address or anything. MRS. MOORE-He's been called. I know that there's a card in the Zoning Board file. That card did not get placed in this file. MR. HUNSINGER-Well, it's the applicant's responsibility to fill out the application. MRS. MOORE-I've called him and said you need to come in and complete this application. MR. HUNSINGER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-So I have made that call. MR. DEEB-The onus isn't on us. It's on them. MR. TRAVER-All right. Then before we adjourn the only thing I would ask is, Laura, can you have Staff update the Bylaws, Policies and Procedures and send the updated version to all of us and post it on the Town website? MRS. MOORE-Yes. We can do that. MR. TRAVER-Thank you. Is there any other business before us this evening? Well, then we'll entertain a motion to adjourn. MR. HUNSINGER-So moved. '18 �Qa.ueeir.n,ruba.uir."/ Board 0A z ')/z" I.�r� MR. FERONE-Second. MOTION TO ADJOURN THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF JULY 25, 2017, Introduced by Chris Hunsinger who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Ferone: Duly adopted this 25th day of July, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Ferone, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE On motion meeting was adjourned. MR. TRAVER-We stand adjourned. Thank you, everyone. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Stephen Traver, Chairman '19