Loading...
Staff Notes Packet ZBA Mtg. Wed. January 24, 2018 L'Otaff Notes ZBA Meeting Wednesday, January 24, 2018 Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Meeting; Wednesday, January 24r 2018 Time: 7 D- 11;00 pm Queensbury AcfivitieS Center-742 Boy Rocid Agenda subject to change and may be found at: www.q Ljeensbury.net NEW Bfl51NF.S5: A Ticant s Michael& Karen LeBlanc Area V"m"No 7 .AV4-2019 Owner(s) Michael& Karen LeBlanc SEORA lI Agent(s) rda Lot Size 2.57 Acre(s) Location U Warren Lane Zoning MDR Ward No. Ward 3 Tax Id No 308.6-1-67.1 Section I79-S-020; 179-3-04{1 Cross Ref Z-AV-55-2017•P-SUB-15-2017 Final Sts a s►rren County Plamning rda Public Hearing Jaauary 24,2015 Adirondack ParkApikey DA Project Description Applicant proposes construction of a 560 sq.t detached one door garage. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the M DR 7onin district_ A iicont s D.Paul Kruger Aren Variance No Z.rAV-2-2018 Owners D.Paul Kruger SEQRAT a 11 A s Maria Krugcr Lot Size 0.89 Acre(s) Location 56 McadowbmokRoad Zoning MDR Ward No. Warn 2 Tax Id No 303.5-1-39 Seetiort 179-3-040 Cross Ref AV 34-2009 Warren County Planning Jartuary 2018 Public Hearing I JanuLuj 24 2018 Adirondack Park Agency nfa Project Description Applicant proposes oonstruotion a 1,092 sq.ff single-family home with a 404 sq_ff.attached garage and associated site work. Relief re nested from minimum setback requiren=ts for the KDR zoning district. Applicant(s) Tabassum Sheikh!ASAD Petroleum Sign Variance No Z-SV-2-2418 Owners Tabassum SheM SKQRAL Type Uuli te5d Agent(s) foe w Sime 3.63 s Location 985 State Route 149 Zoning AIC Ward No. Ward 1 Tax id No 1 26b.3-1-78 Section Chapter 140 Cross Ref SIGN 742-2017 Freestanding Sign, [SP-PZ 157- Warren County Planning January 2018 01 aka SP 36-2015)):ASV 29-2015 Public Hearing I January24.2018 Adirondack Park Agency ALD Froject Description Applicant prolwses to add one tenant panel of 7,23 sq.ft to the permftted 54.58 sq_fl.freestanding sign fDr a total of 61,81 sq, it. Relief regucstcd frorn maximum freestanding sign size allowable at a 25 ft,setbwk from the road. A Iican s Al Signs for Adirondack Trust Co. Sign Variaace No MV-1-2018 Owners Adf wdackTmst Co./Dew Kalligm SEQRA Type Unlisned Agent(s) AJ Sips Lot Size 1.54 Acre(s) Location 376 Bay Road Zoning CI Ward No. Ward 2 Tax 14 No 296.20-1-45 Section Cita ter 140 -- Cross Ref 1CrN 648-2017;SP 21-2008 Warren Coun Planning Jams 2018 _ rubtienearing I January 24,2018 Adirondack Park A n aln Project Description Applicant proposes to remove ex ivft 44 sq,ft,monument sign to be replaced with a new 71 sq,R.monument sign. Relief requested from maximum allowable sign size for a fiustandi ! monument sign), Any further business that the Chairman determines may be properly brought before the Zoning Sward of Appeals. LLSue Hemingwayti24 18 Year ZBAVanuary 201 SIFista]Z13A Agenda W cd.,January 2.4.2018 version 1221.2017,-dacx Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.. 4-2018 Project Applicant: Michael & Karen LeBlanc Project Location: 34 Warren Lane Parcel History: PUB-15-2017 Final Stage,AV-2017 SEAR Type. Type U Aleeting Date: .January 24,2018 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes construction of a 560 sq. ft. detached one door garage. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 establishment of districts-dimensional re uimements The applicant proposes construction of'a detached garage where the setback is to be 10 ft on the west side and a 25 ft setback is required. Criteria for considering su Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Ta�vn ]f mow: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an arca variance, Fusible alternatives may be considered limited due to the location of the existing home and driveway area. . Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered moderate relevant to the code, Relief is requested for 15 ft on the west property line. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or enviroamental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. S. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, The difficulty may be considered self-created Staff comments• The applicant proposes to construct a detached garage associated with their existing single family home. The applicant has explained the existing garage was to be removed as part of the subdivision and left them with no garage. The garage is for their vehicles and storage. The plans show the location of the hotne and the ptoposed garage. Zoning.Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 lhmM ofQWmj.sbory Area Variance Resolution To: Approve / Disapprove Applicant Name: Michael & Karen LeBlanc File Number: A -4-2015 DRA17- Locatiolik- 34 Warren Lane Tax Map Number: 308.61-67.1 BA Meeting Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the 'Town of Queensbury has received an application from Michael & Karen LeBlanc. Applicant proposes construction of a 560 sq. ft. detached one door garage. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 establishment of districts-dimensional requirements The applicant proposes construction of detached garage where the setback is to be 10 ft on the west side and a 25 ft setback is required. SI-QIP Type Ii—no fiuther review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on January 24, 2018; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 ofNYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows: PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is f is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because . Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not 122ssible. 3. The requested variance is 1 is not substantial because 4. There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. Is the alleged difficulty i 1 is not self-created because b. In addition the Burd finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the mquested variance would outweigh (Lipproyal) / would be outweighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; S. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV4-2018 Michael & Karen Leblanc, Introduced by , who moved for its adaption, seconded by DuIy adopted this 2e day of January 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance Na.: 2-2018 Project Applicant: D.Paul Kruger Project Location: 56 Meadow brook Road Parcel History: AV 34-2009 SEQR Type: Tire II Meeting Date: ,January 24,2018 Description of Proposied Project: Applicant proposes construction a 1,092 sq, ft. single-family home with a 400 sq. ft. attached garage and associated site work. belief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requircrnents for the MDR zoning district. Section 179-3-044 establishment of districts-dimensional recauirements The applicant proposes construction of a new single family home with an attached garage where the setback is to be 22.2 on the north side and 223 on the south side where a 2.5 ft setback is required. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination,the board shall consider- 1. onsider:1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited due to the lot configuration with a lot less than 100 ft in width. . Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered minimal relevant to the code. Relief is requested for 2..8 ft on the north and 2.7 ft on the south. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created Staff Co The applicant proposes to construct a new single family hoine with an attached garage and an entry porch on a vacant parcel. The project includes associated site work for installation of utilities, connections to municipal water and sewer, driveway and construction of'the home. Plans show a typical home with elevations, J ani"S Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by DepartmeinI on Jan usr y 9, 2015 Project Name- Kruger, D. Paul Owner: Kruger, D. Paul YD Number: OBY-I8-AV-02 County Project#: Ja+l16-08 Current Zoning: MDR Community: Oue ensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes construction of a 1,092 sf single family home (anticipate single-story) with a 400 sf attaohed garage_ Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Site Location- 56 Meadowbrook Fid Tax AUp Number(s)- 3013,5-1-89 Staff NoteF' The Warren DountyPIanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal o county-wide impacts to the items identified in GML§239. Local actions to date (if any): County Planning Department: NCI Local Acdon:JFanal Disposition: 1116/2018 e4e�'� Warren County Planning Department hate Signed Loral Official Date Signed PLEASE RETURN TMS FOR141 TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Y4l=10 DAYS OF FIN&L ACTION Zonivg Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Town of Queensbury+ 742 Say Road Queensbury, NY 12804 ( 1 ) 761-8 23 8 Area Variance Resolution To: Approve 1 Disapprove Applicant Name: D_ haul Krugeic File umber- -A - -2018 Location; 56 Meadowbrook Road Tax Map Number: 303.5-1-89 ZBA Meeting Date: Wed., January 24, 2018 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received ars application from D. Paul Krager. Applicant proposes construction a 1,092 sq. ft. single-family home with a 400 sq. ft. attached garage and associated site work. Relief requested from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning. district, Relirf Required; The applicant requests relief from minimum setback requirements for the MDR zoning district. Section 179-3-040 establishment ofdistrEcts-dirnensional requirements The applicant proposes construction of a new single family home with an attached garage where the setback is to be 22.2 on the north side and 22.3 on the south side where a 2.5 ft setback is required, SEQR Type IT—no further review required; public hearing was advertised and held on January 24, 2018; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified ars Seetion 179-14-080{A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows: PLR THL; 1}RAFT 11R(}V1DED BY STAFF 1. There is I is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternativf s are and have been considered by the Board. are reasonable and have been included to minimize the,req OR are not._possible. 3. The requested variance is 1 is not substantial because 4, There is / is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district's 5. Is the alleged difficulty is I is not self-created because . In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh (Vproval) / would be outweighed by denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; . The Board also proposes the following conditions: a) b) a c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS I MATT A MOTION TO APPROVE � DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-2-2018 D. Paul Kruger, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 24h day of January 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Dotes Sign Variance No.: 2-2018 Project Applicant: Tobassam Sheikh /A AD Petroleum Project Location: 985 State Route 149 Parcel History: SIGN 742-2017 Freestanding Sign,PZ157-2016,SP 36-201.5,SP23-2.001 M,AV29-2015 SEAR Type: Unlisted Meeting Date: January 24,2018 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant proposes to add one tenant panel of 7.23 sq. fL to the permitted 54.58 sq. 1t. freestanding sign for a total of 61.81 sq. ft. Relief requested from ma ximurn freestanding sign size allowable at a 25 ft. setback from the road. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief from maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign. Section 140-6 Sigps for which permjts are re uired The applicant requests to construct a new 61.81 sq ft sign where 60 sq ft is the maximum free standing sign allowed at a 25 ft setback. Criteria for considering a Sign Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change wiI1 be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this sign variance. Minimal impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. . Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than a sign variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered to reduce the sign to a compliant size. . Whether the requested sign variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered minimal relevant to the code. Relief is requested for 1.81 sq ft in excess. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project as proposed may have minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the district. $. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes construction of a 61.81 sq ft free standing sign. The applicant has a permit for the 54.58 sq ft sign and an additional panel the free standing sign exceeds the 60 sq ft sign allowed at a 25 ft setback- The plans show the location and design of the sign. The calculation includes the Sunoco logo where the space between the bottom of the logo to the sign is counted as part of the sign square footage. Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral form Reviewed by Department on January 9, 2018 Project Name: SheNh. TabassumlA AD Petroleum Owner- Sheikh,Tabassum fD Number; QBY-18- V-D2 County Project#: Jan-18-D9 Current Zoning: N Community: Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes to add orae tenant panel of 1.9 sf to the existing 64 sf freestanding sign for a total of 61.98 sf. Relief requested from maximum freestanding sign size allowable at a 25 ft setback from the road. Site Location: 986 State Route 149 Tax Map Numbers): 26x.8-1-78 Staff Dotes: The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any si gnifica nti nter-m u ni ci pal ar county-wide impacts to the items identified in G M L§269. Local actions to date(if any)- County Pianning Department: NCI Local Actionffinal Disposition: 1116MI S Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Lo-cal Official Date Signed FLEAsE RETURN TInS FORS'!TO nIE WARREN COUNTY Pl.,IN"xJKG DEPAR'tME'gr Wlrn[IN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION Qt- Inning.Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution Fawn of Queensbury 742 Bay load Queensbury, NY 12804 (513) 761-8238 'rou'+l OcQuemmbury Sign Variance Resolution To: Approve 1 Disapprove Applicant Dame: Tabassum Sheikh 1 ASAD Petroleum File Number- Z-S - -2018 Loeation: 985 State Route 149 Tax Map Number: 2663-1-78 ZBA Meeting Date: Wednesday, Januar. 24, 2018 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application frorn Tabassum Sheikh I ASAD Petroleum for a variance from Chapter 140 of the Sign Code of The Town of Queensbury. Applicant proposes to add one tenant panel of 7.23 sol. ft. to the perrniued 54.58 sol. ft. freestanding sign For a total of 61.81 sq, ft. Relief requested from maximum freestanding sigh size allowable at a 25 ft. setback from the road. ReliefRequired: The applicant requests relief from maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign. Section 140-6 Sins for which permits are required The applicant requests to construct a nein 61.81 sol ft sign where 60 sq ft is the maximum free standing sigh allowed at a 25 ft setback. SEAR Type: Unlisted I Resolution 1 Action Required far SE R] Motion regarding Sign Variance -S -2-2018 Tabassum Sheikh !ASAD Petroleum based upon the information and the analysis of the above supporting documentation provided by the applicant, this Board finds that this will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact. So we give it a Negative Declaration, Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted 241 day of January 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: A public hearing was advertised and held on January 24, 2018# Upon review of the app lication materials, inforrnation supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 2617 ofNYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows: I_ WilI an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or will a detriment to the nearby properties be created by the granting of the requested sign variance? INSERT RESPONSE . Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an sign variance? INSERT RESPONSE 3, Is the requested sign variance substantial? INSERT RESPONSE 4. Will the proposed sign variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? IN SERT RESPONSE 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created? INSERT RESPONSE b. In addition the Board Ends that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outweigh 1 would be oulwe-ighed bar the restil ting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; }lased on the above findings I make a MOTI N TO APPROVE !DENY Sign ' ariance - - -2018 Tabassum Sheakh f A AD Petroleum Fntroduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by As per the resolution prepared by staff with the following; A. <insert conditions 1 comments : B. The variance approval is valid for one (1) year from the date of approval; you may request an extension of approval before the one (1) year time frame expires; , If the property is located within the Adirondack Park, the approved variance is subject to review by the Adirondack Park Agency (APA). The applicant is cautioned against taking any action until the APA's review is completed, D. Final approved plans in compliance with an approved variance must be submitted to the Community Development Departrnem before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building & codes personnel' E. Subsequent issuance of further permits, including sign permits are dependent on receipt of these final plans; F_ Upon approval of the application; review and approval of final plans by the Community Development Department the applicant can apply for a sign permit unless the proposed project requires review, approval, or permit from the Town Planning Board and/or the Adirondack Park Agency, Lake George Park Commission or other State agency or department. Duly adopted this 241h day of JanuaiT 20I8, by the following vote: ,OYES: DOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development [Department Staff Notes Sign Varinnec No.: 1-2018 Project Applicant: ASI Signs (for Adirondack Trust Co.) Project Location: 376 Bay Road Parcel History: P21-2008 SEQR Type: Unlisted Meeting Date: January 24,20184 Dewrip#ion of Proposed r'rajcet: Applicant proposes to remove existing 40 sq. ft. monument sign to be replaced -4th a new 71 sq , monument sign. Relief requested ftorn maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign (monument sign). Relief Required• The applicant requests relief from maxiinum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign (monument sign). Section 1406 Signs for which permits are required The applicant requests to construct a new 71 sq ft sign where 45 sq ft is the maximum free standing sign allowed, Criteria for considering a Sign Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town I�zxw: In making a determination, the board shall consider- 1. onsider-1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this sign variance. Minimal impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. . Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can he achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than a sign variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered to reduce the sign to a compliant size. , Whether the requested sign variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered moderate relevant to the code. Relief is requested for 26 sq ft in excess. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project as proposed may have minimal impact on the env ironmental conditi ons of the district. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes to remove an existing 41 sq ft free standing sign to place a 71 sq ft monument sign. The new signage rearranges the logo and text with the sign structure connected to the base. The plans show the location and design of the new sign. Warren County Planning Department Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Department on Jan aar•y 9, 2018 Project Name: AJ Signs(icor Adk Trust a) Droner: Adirondack Trust Co.Dean KolIi9an irD Number: QBY-1 8-SV-01 County Project#: dan18-10 Current Zoning: Cl Community: Queensbury Project Description: i Applicant proposes removing existing 40 sf monument sign and replace with a new 71 sf monument sign. Belief requested from maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign (monument sign)_ Site Location: 376 Bay Rd Tax MapNumber(s). 296.20-1-46 Staff]dotes: The Warren CeuntyPlanning Department finds that the projew will not create arty significantinter-mun16pal or courny-+aide impacts to the items identified in G ML§239. Local actions to date(if any): °County Planning Department: NCI Local Action;/Final Disposition: ��. 1/1612018 Warmn County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed PLF ASE RETUILN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF MAL ACTON Zoning Board of Appeals—Reenrd of Resolution Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 TOMI of{ ccq�st�ur} Sign Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name: AJ Signs for Adirondack Trust Co, File Number- -SV-1-2018 I.oeation: 376 Bay Road Tax Map Number- 296.20-1-45 RA Meeting date: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from ,4J Signs for Adirondack Trust Co. for a variance from Chapter 140 of the Sign Code of The Town of Queensbury. Applicant proposes to remove existing 44 sq. fl. monument sign to be replaced with a new 71 sq. ft. monument sign. Relief requested from maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign (monument sign). Relief Requested; The applicant requests relief from maximum allowable sign size for a freestanding sign(monument sign). Section 140-6 Signs for which permits are.Mquirred The applicant requests to construct a new 71 sq ft sign where 45 sq ft is the maximum free standing sign allowed. SEAR Type: Unlisted [ Resolution 1 Action Required for SEAR] Motion regarding Sign Variance Z-SV-1-2018, AJ Signs for Adirondack Trust Co. based upon the information and the analysis of the above supporting documentation provided by the applicant, this Board finds that this will not result in any significant adverse enviruamental impact. So we give it a Negative Declaration, Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 2e day of January 2018,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: public hearing was advertised and held on January 24, 2018; Upon review of the application materials, infomiation supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows. 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or will a detriment to the nearby properties be created by the granting of the requested sign variance? INSERT RESPONSE Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, otheT than an sign variance? INSERT RESPONSE 3. is the requested sign variance substantial? INSERT RESPONSE 4. Will the proposed sign variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? INSERTFLESPONSE 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created? INSERT RESPON SE . In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would outu�1 would be outwei 51hed by the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community: 7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary Based on the above findings I make a MOTION TO APPROVE I ]DENY Sign Variance SV-1-21118, Ad Signs for Adirondack Frust Co., Introduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by As per the resolution prepared by staff with the fallowing: A, <insert conditions l comments>: B, The variance approval is valid for one (1) year from the date of approval; you may request an extension of approval before the one (1) year time frame expires-, O. If the property is located within the Adirondack Park, the approved variance is subject to review by the Adirondack Park Agency (APA). The applicant is cautioned against taking any action until the APA's review is completed; D. Final approved plans in compliance with an approved variance must be submitted to the Coramurifty Development Department before any farther review by the Zoning Administrator or Building &. cedes personnel' E. Subsequent issuance of farther permits, including sign permits are dependent on receipt of these final plans; F. Upon approval of the application: review and approval of final plans by the Community Development Department the applicant can apply for a sign permit unless the proposed project requires review, approval, or pen-nit from the Town Planning Board and/or the Adirondack Park Agency, ire George Park Commission or other State agency or department. Duly adopted this 240' day of January 24, 2018, by the following vote: AYES DOES: