Staff Notes Packet PL,A, N� N' ING' B4OARD
MARCH 13 , 2018
STAFF NOTES[
Minutes ofdJ " rd 23
Draft resol — /deny mi approval
Sit' Ian -2018, 9 Gamete Lane
William Bonnie, Thomas
Public Heiaring Scheduled
SEAR 1
Draft resolution — grant/deny site plan royal
'Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
4W March 13, 2018
Site Plan 17-2018 WILLIAM &BONNIE THOMAS
9 Gervista 'Lane (2'$9.1 X1-1-35) / WR— Waterfront Residential /Ward I
SEQ'R Type 11
MaterizI .Re view- application, narrative, survey existing and proposed, site drawings, Stora water and
information on adjacent parcel.
Parcel history: 1994 replace dock;AV 13-2018; SP 16-2018 & AV 12-2018
Reauested Actio
Planning Board review and approval to construct a new driveway gmater than 101% slopes avid to connect the driveway to
the adjoining lot(289.10-1-36).
1. Planning Boadecision
Project Descrigti"
Applicant proposes to construct a new driveway greater than 10%slopes,and to connect the driveway to the adJoining lot
(2,89.1,0-1-36). Project will allow a,"esstoparcel 289.10-1-.36through parcel 289,10-1-35. Driveway existing is 2,1611
sq. ft. and an additional 83 5 sq- ft. to be,added to total 3,0135 sq.ft. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050& 1,79-6-060 of the
Zoning Ordinance construction of driveway on a slope of 10%or more shall,be subject to Planning Board review and
approval.
Staff!ggrm_rneuuts
0 Location-The project is located at 9 Genista.Lane,off of Glen Like Rd.
G Site Design-The plans show an existing driveway area to be reconstructed ftom.2160 sq ft to 3034 sq ft. The:plans
show the grading areas from Genista drive to the house locations,
0 Site conditions-The driveway reconstruction is the only activity proposed on the site—no changes to the home. 'The
existing driveway currently exceeds the 10%slope and the new driveway is to be 12.5 %slope.
Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control—The plans show the, location of drywell and catch basin.
The driveway area near the hoine is to have a wing swale. The applicant had provided an update for engineering that
is currently being reviewed.,
Pursuant to Section 179-9-01511thePlanning Board may grant waivers on its own, initiative or at the written request of, an
applicant. The application forin identified as "Requirements" outlines the, items, to appear on the site plan or included as
attachments, At the time of application the:applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has,
not addressed the item/ left check box blank.. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements,of the applicant's
application: g. site: lighting, h. signage,, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction doa
plans,q.soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal 8,. snow removal.
Nature of Variance
(Granted 2/28/18)Applicant proposes new remistructed driveway hard surface with site, permeability of 40..9% where:
75% is required.,
Su ma
The applicant has completed a site plan application for the construction of a new driveway at a grade greater than 10%,
Section 179-6-060—Construction on slopes—constructing a private driveway 10%or greater. Meeting History.- PBR:
2/13/18;ZBA: 2/28/18;
THE
North Country Office
F Cheg A7ED375 Say Road,Queensbury, NY 12804
P. (518)812-0513 F: (518)812-2205
COMPANIES www,,,c,ha zen corn panies,co rn,
wP;oyee Ovme.'.d
Er veers, Hudson Vailley Office (845)454-3980
Land Suroe"rs Capita I District Office (518) 273-0055
Planners
Environmental Professlopals
tandscme Architects
February 07,2018
Mr..Craig Brown
Zon!ng,Ad mi n istrator and Code Compi lance Officer,
Town of Queensbury t
742 Bay Road
Queensbury,
, New York 12804
Delivered;via email only.LLa&BL@n ugenst,"ry,net
'
Re: Judkins Family Trust& William and Bonnias (Ae Th
Town of Queensbury. Warren Caunt)r New York
Chazen Project#91800M
Queensbury Ref#SP16-20.18 and SP17-201 8'
Dear Mr. Bron wn.,
The Chazen Companies (C�hazen) has received a submission package from your office for the above
referenced project, The applicant intends to demolish Its existing residence and construct a new three-
bedroom farrifly residence.Additional site work includes reconstructing the driveway,which will partially
cross the neighboring parcel to the east(Thomas parcel).Submitted information.Includes the following:
& Site, Plans and Detalls, prepared by Hutchins Engineering, dated January 16 2018.,
0 Stormwater Management iReport, prepared by Hutchins Engineering, dated January 15, 2018,
and;
* Site Plan Application dated January 5, 2018.
Your office has requested that we limit our review to the desJgn of stormwater system as it relates to
compliance to local, state or relevant codes and regulations. Based upon our review, Chazen off .rs the
following comments for the Town's cc nside ration.,
Stormwateir Management& Erosion and Sed Iment Control:
I. The project proposes to disturb an area of approximately 0.40 acres of land and therefore, the
project Is not required to obtain coverage under the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (GP-0-15-002). Comments related to the
proposed stormwater,management and erosion and,sediment cMrof features proposed for the
site are offered'below;
2. It does not appear that operation and maintenance procedures for the proposed stormwater
Management controls(dry,wells arndl infiltration trenches)have been included The applicant shall
Chazefi,EnVneefinq Land'Surveong 4"ndscapo ArchftwtumCo,D.P.Q.
Chazen Envftnm9n,1W Setvkes, Inc.
The Chazen Campaaies,, Mr,
Town of Quimmmsb-nary
dna n uns/Tho mas
a=e,b U2,rVO7,2018
Page 2
update the pllans/storm water management, report to, include the required operation and
maintenance procedures in accordancel with Section 147-10,of the Town Code.
3. Soil testing shall be performed, to confirm infiltration rates used (40 in/hr and 20 in/hr for dry
wells and Infiltration trenches, respectively) and adequate separation from seasonally high
groundwater or bedrock for the proposed Infiltration practices, in accordance with Appendix D of
the New York Statin 5torrm rater Management Design Manual (NY'SSMIDl" ),
. according to Section 6,3.3 of the NYSSMDM pretreatment rmust he provided prior to ientry to an
Infiltration, facility. Proposed pretreatment provisions for the drywells, shall be Included and
discussed in,the'Storm aster Management Report.
5. The Grading and Drainage Plan indicates a 6" PVC equalizer pipe connecting the two dry wells,
however it does not appear that this pipe its Included in the hydrocad model, Additionally, the
primary outlet devices indicated,in the hydrocad model(horizontal orifice/grate)for the dry wells
and infiltration trenches, are either not consistent with the elevations shown on the plan, or are
not shown on,the plans at all. Pilease review and revisel accordingly..
. Pipe inverts for ail proposed structures shall be indicated)can the plans.
7, The applicant shall execute a (maintenance agreement that shall be binding on all subsequent,
larndowrwrners served by'the stormwurater ma n agem e nt facility,In acro rddancewith Section 14'7-10,0f
the TownCode; if rmecli ulred by the Towwrn.
B. It does not appear that neighboring,ring, r on site, water wells are depicted on the site plan. The
Applicant to,clarify that the subject property and neighboring properties pull wawrater,directly from
the lake for potable water sarvice. Please note, that the proposed) stormwater features, if
applicable, shall meet the required separation distances as prescribed in Section, 5-B.7 oaf'the
Appendix 5B hliy DCT regulations.
There does not appear to be a retaining gall detail for the wvalI proposed north of the proposed
house., Page 4A,8, Retaining Walls,of the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and
SedimentControl! j,luiy 2016 edition) states, "Thel design of any retaining urnw''-oll structure must
oddress the ospects offoundation bearing capacity, sliding, overturning, drainage iand loading
s stears. These are complex systems that should be designed by o ficensed prof ssionol engineer:"
The Applicant should pr"dde a retaining wall design designed by a Hcensed professional with
supporting calculations and soil conditions for re'uidewrw*and comment.
10. It appears there is only one row of silt fence proposed at the lake front,.This may not be adequate
to protect the lake from sedimentation. The Applicant should) consider addling an additional row
of silt fence at the lake firo,nt.
11, The Applicant to depict, and provides a detall,,for the site construction entrance.
3':�ypro�erla"y'L� SGA 1B9 ,°9Y��TI, -'T', eenllburA'9180000-7,,,Q~ibjgr 5P'16-2018.MiJklRsFmisnply "�skw N'1�"� & dt1.6'..V4u9fPk6ru;,1"M moaa,aPltl ;iF-2TiL�„7191Bap2 'iJ-L,d r
'Tow n of Queensbury
Ajdkim/Tbia,mm
February 07,201
Page 3
In,the event the Planning IBoa,rd or Townstaff have any questions or require additional information,
Ipleas.e do,not Ihesitate to,contact me at(518) 824-1926.
Sincerely,
Sean, M. Doty, P.E., LEER AP, CPMI
Prin6pal
Director, Municipal Engineering Services
cc: Sunny Sw�Ot,,Town Planning Office Administrator(via,ernait)
Laura Moore,Town Laindl Use, Planner(via e-maill)
File,
T.QMq*njbgj)Nqj8OOuBO-I Qpeerdshwy-SP16,2019 Judkim Pamly
uk , an Fwd r,.�tu,.�d . v-u.uu�
� vacwa�oti�uwaul� 8 Yd, ti ''�oupUGN'Nu"u'u� 9° "eBr�u. .,
Town ofQueensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION Grant/Deny Site Plan Approval
Site Plan 17-20 1,8 WILLIAM & BONNIE THOMAS
Tax Map IIS 289.1 -1-3 5 & -3 6 /Property Address: 9 Genista Lane/Zoning:: WIC
The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board to construct anew driveway greater than
IM/4 shapes and to connect the driveway to the adjoining, lot (289.10-1-3b), Project will allow access to
parcel 289.10-1-36 through parcel 289,10-1-315. Driveway existing stin is 2,160 sq. ft. and an additional 875 sq.
fi; to, he added to total 3,035 set. ft. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050 & 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance
construction of driveway on a slope of 1.0% or more: shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval.
Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050 & 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance construction of driveway on a slope of
1. /o or more shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning
Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code,
As required by General Municipal Layer Section, 239'-rrr the site plain application was referred to the Wan=
County Planning Department for its recommendation;
The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 03/1312018 and continued the
public hearing to 03/13/2018,, when it was closed,
The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials, submitted by the applicant and all, comments
made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 03 13 2018;
The Planning Board determines that theapplication complies with the review considerations and standards
set Barth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Ilan approval,„
MOTION TO APPROVE / DI PLROE SITE PLAN 17-201 'WILLI M. & HONnE THOMAS
Introduced b _ who moved for its adoption.
,according to the draft resolution prepared by Staf`with the following-
1) Waivers requested granted/'denied„
. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution.
a The limits of clearing, will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall
be installed around these areas and field verified by CommunityDevelopment elopment staff;
h If applicable, the Sanitary° Severer connection play, must 'he submitted to 'the Wastewater
Department for its review,, approval, permitting and inspection„
Paget of 2
Phone. 518.761.,8220, FaX:: 5118,745.4 137 '742 Bay Road,,Quueens,b ury,NY 1280 www.queensbury.net
e) if curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be
issued until the approved driveway permit has been, provided to the PlaruninOffice;
d If application was referred to engineering there Engineering sign-off required prier to signature re of
Zoning ,dmirnistr t r nfthe approved plans,
e Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on,the site pla.n/suun°vey, 'floor planus
and elevation :for the existing rooms,and proposed rooms,in the building and site i preveunernts;p
f if required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town:
. The project'1 OI (Notice of Inteunt) for coverage under the euurrennt "NYS' D C SPI)ES General
Permit frown.Construction Activity" prior to the start ofany site wore.
b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project;,
e. The applicant must maintain on their project,site, fuer review by staff-
i, The approved, final plans that have been stamped by the Town.Zoning Administrator..
"T"hese plants must include the project SWPPP turn Water Pol:luntio n:P"reventio n Plan
when such a plan, was prepared, and approved,;
ii. The prcJeet NOI and prooaf of coverage under the current Til "' lJupC SPDES General
Permit, or an individual SPDRS permit issued for the project if required,
Final. approved planus, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to, the Co nnnnnu nit
Development Department before any fuxrther review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and
Codes personnel;
h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prier to issuance of Building Permit
and/or the beginning of any sitework;
i' Subsequent uent issuua nee of further permits, including building pernnnits is dependent on,compliance with
this and all other conditions ofthis resolution.;,
jAs-built plans,to,certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to he provided
prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy,
lc) This resolution is to he placed in its entirety on the final plans
Duly adopted this 131h day of March., 20 1 by the following vote:
,YES::
NOES:
Page 2 of
Pherie° 518,761-8,2210� Fax: 518.745, 437 ;742 Bay Road, Qa cru buury, NY 1128 + wwwqueerisbury,nEit
Site Plea 6-2018 @ 15, Genista Lane
,Jiudkins Family Trust
Public Hearing Scheduled
S .R 11
Draft resolution — ggrant/deny site plan approval
..........
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Community Developrnent Department Staff Notes
March 13, 2018
Site Plan 16-2018 .loll: KINS FAMILY TRUST
15 Genista Lane/WR— Waterfront Residential /Ward I
,SEQR Type: 11
Material Review: application, narrative, survey existing, and proposed, site drawings, stornmater and
information on adjacent parcel.
Parcel 11i story: BP 99273 Rebuild Dock; AV 12-2018; SP 17-2018 & AV' 13-2018;
Requested Action
P I ann ing Board review and approval for removal of a 550 sq., ft. (I 100 sq. ft. floor area) horne to construct an
832 sq. ft. (1664 floor area') home. Workincludes, hard surfacing within 50 ft. of shoreline and occurs within 50
Vof 15% slopes, Project includes reworking driveway on applicant parcel and adjoining parcel.
Resolutions
L Planning Board decision
Proied Description
Applicant proposes removal of a 5150 sq., ft® (1100 sq. ft. floor area) home to constiuct an 832 sq. ft. (1664 floor
,area), honie. Work includes hard surfacing within 50,ft. of shoreline and occurs within 50 ft. of 15% slopes,.
Project includes reworking driveway on applicant parcel and adjoining,parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 1.79-6-0,50
& 179-6-060 of the Zoning,Ordinance, construction within 50" of 15% slopes and hard surfacing within, 510", of
shoreline shall be subject to Planning Board,review and, approval, Pursuant to Chapter, 179-6-0510, & 179-6-060
of the Zoning,Ordinance, construction, within 5,0' of 15% slopes and hard surfacing within 50' of shoreline shall
be subject to Planning,Board review and approval.
Staff Comments
0 Location-The project is located at 15 Genista Lane off of Glen Lake Rd.
a Site .Design- - The existin,g dwelling with the associated patio and walkway wo,uld be removed. The project
involves a new driveway design that occurs on, both the applicant's pro.perty, and the neighboring property
X289.10-1-3.5;1, a new septic system flor the applicants' site and, site grading on, a majority of the lot. The
plans also indicate retaining walls to be constructed at the driveway area, a concrete/wooden exterior
stairway on the east side, and a ground level patio 325 sq ft on the shore side of the home.
* Building— The new horne is in similar location as the original building and is aligned with the adjacent
homes on either side.
Grading and drainage plan Sediment and erosion control —The plans show the grading to occur on both lots
,and erosion control for the sites., The stormwater information indicates a combination of drywiells and
infiltration beds are to be installed on the site to manage stormwater, The applicant had provided an update:
for engineering that is currently,being reviewed, In addition, the applicant has provided details of the
shoreline patio— 325 sq ft and to be constructed of pavers, gravel, aggregate! and fabric.
Landscape plan —the ap licant has noted planting, beds near the shoreline and a range of' lantings,that may
p p
be installed in those areas,
* Elevations —The plans indicate the height is to be 27 ft 10 in and show all, 1"bursides of the proposed
structure,
* Floor plans —The plans show the home to have 3, bedroms on the first floor. The lower level will h the
great room area and a walkout basement to a ground level, deck area.
Pursuant to Section 179-9-0,50 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written
request of an applicant. The ap�plication forrn identified as, "Requirements," outlines the items to appear on the
site plan or included as attachments., At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers,
indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow
items listed under Requirements, of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h, signage, n traffic, o,
commercial alterations/ construaion, details, p floor pl,ans, q, soil logs, r, construction/demolition disposal 8,
snow removal,
Nature of" ariance
(Granted 2/28/18)Applicant proposes, the new construction to be 20 ft frown the shoreline w.here a 50 ft setback
is, required and the home is to have side setbacks, of'l 0, ft on the east and 7.8, ft on the west where 1.5 ft is
required. Relief is also Tequested for road ftontage as the site Nvill be accessed through the neighbors, parcel
reconstructed driveway.
Summary
The applicant has complete -m application for site plan to remove: an existing dwelling and to construct a new
dwelling, associated site work and driveway work on.the adjoining property.
Section 179-6-060—Construction on slopes—project occurs within 50, ft of 15% Slopes.
Section 179-6-050—Fill or hard surfacing within 50 ft of the shoreline.
Meeting Histojy: PBR: 2/13/18; ZBA: /28/18;
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION—Grant I Deny Site Plan Approval
Site Plan 16-2018 JUDKINS FAMILY TRUST
Tax Map ID: 289,10-1-36 & -35 /Property Address: 15 Genista Lane Zoning- WR
The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for removal of a 550 sq. ft. (I 100, sq., it.
floor area) home to construct an 832 sq. ft. (164 floor area) home. Work includes hard surfacing within. 50
ft. of shoreline and occurs within 50 ft. of' 15% slopes. Project includes, reworking driveway on applicant
parcel and adjoining parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050 & 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance,
construction within 50' of 15% slopes and hard surfacing within 50" of shoreline shall be subject to Planning
Board review, and approval. Pursuant to Chapter, 179-6-050 & 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance,
construction within 50' of 15% slopes and hard surfacing within 50' of 9horeline shall, be subject to Planning,
Board review and approval.
Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning, Code-Chapter 179- -080, the Planning,
Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code;
As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren.
County Planning,Department for its,recommendation;,
The Planning Board opened a, public hearing on, the Site plan application on 03/13/2018 and continued the
public hearing to 03/13/2018,, when it was closed',
The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments
made at the public bearing and s,ubmitted in writing through and including 03/1,3/2018;
The: Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerationand standards
set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval,
MOTION TQ APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN, 16-2018 JUDKINS FAMILY TRUST;
Introduced by who moved for its adoption.
According to the draftresolution prepared by Staff with the following:
1) Waivers requested grantedidenied;
2. Adherence to the iterns outlined in the:follow-up letter sent with this resolution.
a) The lim,its of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction, ,fencing shall
be installed around these areas,and field verified by Cor.mmunity Development staff-,
'b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted, to the Wastewater
Department for its review, approval,pem, itting and inspection;
Page 1, at"'
Phone: 518.761.8220, Fax: 518,745,4437, 742 Bay Road, Queensbuiry, NY 112804 I, www .queensbury,net
c) If curb cuts are being added or changed, a drivewaY petm,it is required., A building permit will not he
issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office;
d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of
Zoning Administrator of the approved plans;
e) Final approved plans should have dimensions andsetbacks,noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans
and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improv ements;
1) 1frequired, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Towm
a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPIDES, General
Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work.
b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination)upon completion of the projject;
c. The applicanti-nust maintain on their project site, for review by staff
i. The approved final plans that:have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator.
These p.lans must include the project SWPPP (Storm, '`1 ter Pollution Prevention Plan)
when such a plan was prepared and approved;
H. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDRC SPDES General
Permit, or an individual SPDE S perrnit issued for the project if required.
g) Final approved plans,, in compliance,with the Site blain, mustbe submitted to the Community
Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and
Codes,personnel;
h) The applicant must meet with Staff after, approval and. prior to issuance of Building Permit
and/or the beginning of any site work;
i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with
this and all other conditions of this resolution;
j) As-built:plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided,
prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy,
k) This resolution is to be placed in its,entirety on the final plans,
Duly adopted this 13 1h day of March, 2018 by the following vote:
AYES
NOES�:
Page 2 of 2
P'hon&,,, 518.76118220 Fax: 51&745.4437742 Bay Road, Queensbury. NY 12804 wv w.queenoury,net
Site Plain 20-2018 @ 2 G I rive
William roar
publicNo hearing
Draft roui lanning Board recommendation
to the Zoning Board of Appeals
................................
Town of uee�nsbtiry Planning Board
et Community Development Department Staff Notes
March 13, 2018
Site Plan 20,- 01 8 WILLIAM MINER
2 Glendale.Drive:/CI—Commercial Intensive/ Ward 2
SEQR Unlisted
Material Review- application, narrative, site drawings, use variance information
Parcel History: 2003-372 Sign; Demo 498-2017 interior only; PC 510-2017 res. construction; UV I-
2018;,
RE,guested Actin
Recommendation to the Zoning.Roard of Appeals for refief requested for apartments in a CI z,one.
Res2lutiffl
1. Planning Board recommendation
Proiect Deseriotion
Applicant proposes toniaintain two existing apartments and create two new apartments on the first floor and
two new'apartments on the second, floor. Project located in Comniercial. Intensive zone does not allow
apartments. Applicant is applying for,a,use:variance—project will be subject to site plan if use variance is
granted. Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-conforming use or
structure shall be subject to Planning Board review and.approval. Variance: Relief is requested for apartments
in a,CI zone. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments,
• Location-The existing,building is located at 2 Glendale Drive off of Route 9.
• Arrangement- The site currently has a 4,398 sq ft building that contains 2 apartments. The floor area of the
building is 8,79,6 sq ft. The zoning is Commercial, Intensive where 30%of the site or a maximum building
allowed on the site wu ould be 4,312 sq, ft floor area.
• Site Design- The plans indicate site changes to occur are for access to the,building and parking
arrangements. 'The applicant has not provided a survey of the:site indicating the lot arrangem, ent, size, or
building locations.
• Building—The submissionshows different building details for the:existing and proposed. The first floor
was previously the floor shop and has additional storage area. The first floor is to be converted to 2
apartments, lawn equipment storage area, utility rooms,, a foyer,for apartment IA(downstairs) and 13
(upstairs). The front of the building shows entry doors for existing apartments A and 2B (upstairs), The
applicant proposes to convert existing storage spaces into two additional apartment upstairsnoted as 2C and
2D with the new entry stairway on the east side of the building (parking area side)
• Signage-No signage is proposed
• Traffic- The applicant has shown the existing gravel drive aisle and parking spaces for tenants (12 spaces).
The applicant has shown visitor parking (5 spaces) on the side of the building along Glendale Dr, The
applicant has not included a survey and it is unclear if the visitors parking is located on the road or on the
applicant's property.
Site layout and utility plan- The applicant has indicated the building is to be code compliant - note the
building with apartments will need to be updated with a sprinnkler,s stennl per building and codes.
Grading and drainage plan Sediment and erosion control Theme are no changes proposed, to tine site.
Umi dscape plan—There are no changes proposed to the site
Site lip htin plarn —the applicant has not included any additional information out lighting
Elevations
ti
ley ons and Floor plans—true applicant has provided site drawings. showing the existirn, and proposed
Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written
request ofan applicant, The application form identified as "'Requirements, outlines the items to appear on the
site plan or included as attachments,.. t the time of application. the applicant Inas either requested waivers,
indicated the iterrx not applicable or has not addressed the ite nn/ left check; faux blank. 'This includes the follow
items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g, site lighting, h.. signage, j. stcrmwvater, k.
topography, 1, landscaping, rn traffic, e, commercial alteratiorn0 constTuttion details, .p floor plains, q. soil lops,r..
construction/demolition disposal s, snow removal.
Nature rad'Use and Area Variance
The applicant proposes to expand an existing non-ccunfornnirn use of commercial building that has two
existing,apartments,to,add four additional apartnnents— pnartment usage is not an allowed use in the Commercial
Intensive:one, Relief is re uuested tc expand a nonconfonning use of 2 apartrnnernts to 6 apartments in the
rrnmerci;al intensive zone.
surnmary
The Planning Board is to provide a,recommendation to the ZBA in regards to the request for a use variance for
adding-four additional apartments where residential use are not allowed,
Meeting,1 : l't meeting;
FIRE MAOFFICE
742 Bay Road, Owensil,ury, )' 12804
" Houre of Natural Benrity — A Coad Place to Live "
"LAN RE, VIEW
CKT Enterprises LLC (William Miner)
Route
Site 0- 20:1
/262'0'18
SITE PLAN
The following comments are based review of ar, gs:
a FM has no site issues, at this time
Fire Marshal
742 Bay Road
Queensbuq NY 12804
firenimbal@queensbury.net
"i r c M a r s It dr I 's 0f f i c c
-pyP h o rr e: 518-ryy61-20,6 �-yp pp�y'a�tlup,�y¢518-74,,5-4437
rr�,���r1u V•�d'd FViF x'cY� ���'��M P��W6®���f�� � NI�AI��Y ALN.�'fW 6��Pkr.A M.�tl;BA q�.dNL,$
a,,. NwIIMBG'"VNVVM�'mX,
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Plarming Board Recommendation to Zoning Board of Appeals
Use Variance 1-20,18 WILLIAM I
Tax Map ID: 302,7-1-24,/Property Address: 2 Glendale Drive:/Zoning, C1
The applicant has submitted an,application for the following: Applicant proposes to maintain two existing
apartments and create two new apartments,on the first floor and two new apartments on the second floor,
Project located inCommercial. Intensive zone does notallow apartments. Applicant is applying for a use
variance —project will be subject to site plan if use variance is granted. Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-010 of the
,Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-conforming use or stnicture shall,be subject to Planning Board review
,and,approval. Varianee: Relief is requested for apartments in a C1 zone. Planning Board shall provide a
recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals
The Town f Queensbuiry Zon�ing, Ordinance,, per Section, 179-9-070 J b. requires the Planning Board to
provide: a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board
of Appeals & Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance,
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that:
MOTION TOMAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNIN_G BOARD, TO,THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR USE VE, N
ARIANCO. 1-2018 WILLIAM MINER. Introduced by
who moved its adoption, and
a) 'The Planning Board, 'based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts, that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal,
OR
b) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has identified the,following areas of concern:
1)
Duty adopted this 13t" day of March, 20,18 by the following vote:
AYE-S:
NOES:
Phone: 51&761,8220JFax: 518-'7,1544;i7l742BiyRo,,t(1,,Otweiis,1i,Lji-y, NY
Site Plan -2018 @ 2934, State Route
Michael Srir
public heairing
Orae rluii — Planning Board recommendation
to the ,Zoning Board of Appeals
Town, of Queensbury Plannin� Board
9
Community' Development Department Staff Nofes
March 13, 2018,
Site Plan 1,1-x01.'8 MICHAEL SERTNI
2934 State Route 9L/ WR— Waterfront Residential / Ward I
SiEQ R Type 11
Material Review-, application, site plan drawings, stormwater inforination
Parcel History; RC 717-2017 alterations; SEP567-2017septic aft., .AV
Requested Action
Recommendation to,the Zoning,Board of Appeals for relief sought for setback & penneability.
Resolutions
1. Planning Board recotritnendation
Proitict Description
Applicant proposes removal of existing camps to construct 1,008 sq. ft. hom, c at 2,284 sq. ft. floor area. Proj ect
includes,new septic, site work for house and driveway. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040,& 179-6-060 of the
Zoning Ordinance, construction within 510,ft. of 15% �slopes shall be subjlect to Planning Board review and
approval Variance: Relief is sought, for setback &permeability, Planning Board shall provide a
recommendation to the Zoning, Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments
Location-Project site is located at 293141 State Route 9,L
Arrangement- The plans include the removal of an existing 1020 sq ft (footprint) home to constructed a
1 A04 sq ft(footprint) at a'2,2 8,9 sq ft floor area towards the center of the parcel.
Site Design- The plans show the house location and, the site work to be completed. The site has.an exisiting
retaining wall noted on the plans,towards road side of the property. The wall should be described in height
length and width as paurt old the drawings,. The:natural stone wall tio be installed should also include the
length. The applicant has indicate a majority of the site work is to occur road side of the property (140 fi+/-)
and the remaining area between the shoreline and ruin" home is to remain on touched due to the steep slope
with,existing vegetation. The site wor:k includes, installation of a septic system, driveway,house, and,
pathways at the side and house front.
Building—The applicant has indicated the home is to be 27.8 ft from.the lowest adjacent parade® The home
is to be two, stories with the first floor,having the eating area and great roorn then the second floor with
bedrooms. The plans also, show a covered,screen perch on the shorefine side and a covered porch entry on
the road side of the parcel. Theshoreline porch, showis a porch.entry area that is to be landscaped steps
access. The plans do not indicate a crawl space or a basement—the application should clarify if it will be on
slab, or if there is to be a crawl space.,
* Site layout and utility plan —The plans show the location.ofseptic system to be on the north side of the
home, The water supply is currently drawn from the lake and will be the same with the new home.
* Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion.control —the:plans show silt fence locations,and two
shallow storm aster depression areas. The storinwater locafionsMll. need to,be updated as to what is being
directed to the areas.
* Landscape plan—,the applicant has indicated typical residential plantings will be installed around the home
the type and quantity to be selected later. The applicant has also,indicated the shoreline area will remain as
currently is due to the steep slopes.
Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its wn, initiative or at the written
request of an applicant. The application, form, identified as, "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the
site: plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers,
indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. 'This includes the follow
items listed under Requirements of the applicant's, application: g. site fighting, h.., signage, k, topography, 1.
landscaping, n traffic, o. tonunercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plan,s,, q. soil logs, r.
construction/demolition disposal s., snow removal.
Nature of Area Variance
The applicant proposes the new home to be 17.7 ft ftom the north property line and, 17 fin to the south property
line:where a 2,0 ft setback isrequired. The permeability proposed is, 721 % where a '75 %permeability is,
required.
SUMMa
The planning board is to provide a recommendation to the ba inregards to the relief requested for setback and
permeability relief The Board may request additionM, clarification—permeability, stoat water management',
confirm slab or crawl space.
Section 179-6-060,—Construction on slopes—project occurs within 510, ft of 15% slopes.
Meeting Hi§M: I"m, ceting;
uu'o° tl?A R,Y� 4 ��tlii�,gB.''4,riV.hJl"�
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Planning,Board Recommendation to .�ornirng,Board of Appeals
Area Variance 11-2018I H ERINI
Tax Map ID: 239.20-1-1' /PropertyAddress: 2934 State Route 9L JZoning: WR
The applicant has submitted an ap licatiorn for the folio irng: Applicant proposes removal of existing camp to
construct 1,008 sq. ft. home at 2,284 sq. fl. floor area. Project includes new septic, site work for house and
driveway.. Pnursuannt to Chapter 179-;3-040 & 179-6-060 of the Zo nirngr"dirnarnce, construction within0 ft. of
15% shapes shall be subject to Planning,Board review and, approval. Variance: Relief is sought for,setback
permeability. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals,
The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section, 1.79-9-0X70 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board, of,appeals for pmjects that require both Zoning board
of Appeals & Planning Board,approval
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that.
MOTION TO MAKEA RE-COMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO TITS
ZONING, BOARD OF APPEALS FOR.AR.EA VARIANCE NO. 11-2018 MICHAEL SERINI. Introduced
by who moved its adoption, and
a 'rhe Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts, that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal.
OR
b The Planning Board„ based Tann a Iirrn:ited review, has identified the f6lIowing areas of concern:
1
Duty,'adopted this 131h day of March, 2018 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Phonc:: 5.1&76l, 8220 1 Fax, 5n8.745,4437 1742 Bay Rmkd, ti(hQ oLxuy, NY 112804 Q w tiw°ww°.quftursbury-no
Site 'l 21-2018, 55 Mason Road
Michael! Ba ' r"
public herring
Diresolution — Plainni'ng Board recommendation
to the Zoning Board of Appeals
.............. -11.............
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
et Community Development Department StaffNotes,
March 1 , 2018
Site Plan 21-2018 MICHAEL BADERA
55 Mason Road/ WR— Waterfront Residential/Ward I
SEQR Type II
Material Review: application, survey, architectural deck draining, sunroom drawings
Parcel History: 8 P 46-95, SP 59-96, AV 83-96,AV 5 5-96, AV 41-95, SP 5 0-.201"7,AV 74-2017, SP 66-
2017, AV 15-2018
Reguested Action
.Recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief sought for expansion of a non7COnfOnning structure,
shoreline setbacks and floor area.
ll esolutLon
L Planning Board recommendation
Proiect Description
Applicant proposes a 198 sq. ft. enclosed s,unroom addition on southwest side ofthenew proposed deck.area..
Existing home floor area,is 6,611 sq. ft. and will increase to 6,809 sq. ft. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-
13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance,expansion of a non-conforming structure: shall be subject to Planning Board
review and approval., Variance. Relief is sought for expansion of a non-conform�in,g structure, shoreline
setbacks and floor area. PlanniAg Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appealse
staffComments
• Location-The project is located at 55 Mason Road off of Cleverdale Road.
• Arrangement- The applicant has an existing home and a recently approved deck addition.
• Site Design-The deck is to be 749 sq ft and the sunroorn will be installed as part of the deck area as 198 sq
ft.
• Site conditions-the site conditions are not proposed to change.
• Grading and drainage plan.and Sediment and erosion control all work is to occur on the deck and house—
no site work on the, ground to occur.
• Elevations and Floor plans—the information submitted shows the existing and proposed deck conditions.
Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers, on its, own initiative or at the written
request of an applicant, The application form identified, as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the
site, plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested, waivers,
indicated the item not applicable or has :not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow
items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application,. g. site, lighting, h, signagp, j. storm atter, k.
topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/constructiondetails, p floor plans, q. soil, logs, r.
construction/demolition disposal s, snow removal.
Nature of AreaVariance:
The applicant proposes the sunroorn additionto be 4ft, I I in from the shoreline where a 50 ft shoreline is
required. The.plans show the beach area as an indentation on the shoreline t6wards the home and the remaining
portion of the shoreline being further froin the horne on either side of the beacih.
SUMMa
The planning board is to provide a recommendation to flie zba.in regards to the relief requested for setback
relief
Meetjuxjj�istor ; I" meeting;
2
wu%A I Ih"
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION N -P"lan nin c rd Recommendation to Zoning Beard of Appeals
Area Variance 1 -2018 MI 14AEL I. BADER
Tax Map 11): 2X 1 -1-20 / Property , , dress� 55 Mason Road f Zoning: WR
Tlne applicant has submitted an application for the following. Applicant proposes a 198 sq. ff. enclosed su nroom.
addition on southwest side of the new proposed deck area. Existing home floor area is 6,6 11 sq. ft„ and will
increase to 6,809 sq. 1P. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040& 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of
non-conforming structure shall 'be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: belief is sought
for expansion of a non-conforming structure, shoreline setbacks and floor area. Planning Bard shall provide a
recommendation to the Zoning Board ofAppeals.
The Town of Quee:nsbu�ry ZoningOrdinance, per Section 1.79-9-070 J 2 bµ requires the Plarming Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board
of', ppgds Planning,Board,approval;
The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance
application, as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood nod and surrounding onunuarnit ,
and found that:
MOTION N T MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON B IALF' IAF TRE, P IN 130ARD TO THIE
ZONING BOARD R APPEALS FOR AREA 'V'AI2I .N . 15-2018 MICHAEL AEL J. BADERA.
Introduced by who moved its adoption, and
a The Planning Board, based on a limited review, Inas net identified any significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal.
b) The Planning Board,based on,a limited review, has identified the following areas of concerto-
l)
Duly adopted this 130' day of'March,2018 by the following vote:
AYES.
NOES
n'4rooncw. 5 18.76 L8220 I Fax 5 18.744 A 437 W 742Bay R aad, o ute nsbttry, NY 12804 Q wwwM,amr,�l�Ir w"rN�talai°�.rw�t
S division Prel . Stege 3-2018 @ 45 Ogden Road
Ricard & Sharon Bapp
No public hearing
Daft rslii inig Board recommenclation
the ii Board of Appeals
...............................
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
March 13, 2018
Subdivision Prel. Stage 3-2018 RICHARD & SHARON BAPP
45 Ogden Road/Moderate Density Residential /Ward 4
SER: Unlisted
Material Review- application, survey, narrative
Parcel History- 2016 Septic Alt.; AV 21-2018
Regunrested,Action
Recommendation to theon�ing Board, of Appeals for relief sought for creation, of two lots less than 2 acres and
setbacks on lot I existing home.
Resolutions
1. Planning Board recommendation
Project tioan
Applicant proposes to subdivide a 1.37 acre, lot into two lots of. acre and .46 acre. The existing home i s,to
remain on larger lot (Lot 1) and smaller,lot (Lot 2) to be sold with future buyer,to complete construction details
for house size, location of driveway, clearing, grading and erosion control. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the
Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance:
Re]iefis sought for creation of two lots,less than 2 acres and setbacks on lot I existing home. Planning Board
shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning,Board of Appeals.
Staff Comments
Sketch Plan-requesting waiver from sketch
Pro
jiminmAeview-
Layout plans -the plans show the existing conditions on the site including the topography, setbacks and a
clearing area. The clearing area shows the location of the home,well, septic and driveway area.
Construction details-The plans show the locations of the new home anddriveway area.
Landscape plans-the number of lots does not require landscaping.
Clearing plan -The applicant has indicated the 0.92 acre parcel has an existing how me and the site is to remain
the same. The proposed lot of 0.46 ac is, to sell and the: applicant has shown a home and septic system can be
placed on the property-showing a cleared area for the placement.
Grading and erosion plans -The plans do not show site grading and theapplicant is requesting a waiver from
stormwater management due to the lot configuration.being level
The Environmental report-the applicant has completed a Long Environmental assessment review for 2 lots.
Storinwater inanageinew --the applicant has not provided as stonn.water management report and has requCsted a
waiver. The plans indicate less than I acres of landdisturbance that is Proposed on the project site.
Fees—per application.
Waivers—the applicant has requested waiver 1' or storin.water and grading,
Open Space—there is no proposal for open space .
Sire at —the plans show no street but an new curb cut will need to be obtained.
attire of Area Variance
The applicant proposes t�o subdivide a I,3 7 acre lot into two lots of.! acre and .4acre where relief is bei ng
requested for creating,an parcel less than two acres. Relief is also requestedforside setbacks for the existing
home that is 18 ft setback and as 25 ft setback is required then front setback where the horne is 9 ft setback.an.d.
30 ft is required,
SAMMa
The Planning,Boardis,to,provide a recommendation to the ZBA in regards t�o,the request relief fr creating a
parcelless than,2 acres in the:Moderate Density Zone and setbacks for the existing home,
Meeting History. I'meeting;
ko od
Town of Queensbury Planning Board
RESOLUTION -Planning Board Recommendation to Zoning Pard of Appeds
Area Variance 21-201 8lCHARI)& SHARON BAPP
Tax Map ID: 3W 19-1-2q.1 /Property Address: 45 Ogden Road /Zoning: MDR
'The:applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to subdivide a 1.37 acre lot
into two lots of.92 acre and .4acre. The existing home is to remain on larger lot (Lot 1) and smaller lot (Lot
2)to be sold with future buyer to complete construction details for house:size, location of driveway, clearing,
grading and erosion control. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision ofland shall be
subject,to Planning Board, review and approval. Variance: Relief is soughtfor creation of two lots,less,than 2
acres and setbacks onlot I existing home. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning
Board of Appeals.
The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to
provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects thal require both Zoning Board
of Appeals, &Planning Board approval;
The Planning Board has briefly, reviewed, and discussed this application,, the relief" request in the variance
application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community,
and found that:
MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF QF THE PLANNING BOARD Tq) THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPE,ALS FOR ARE A VARIANCE NO. 21-20 1,8 RICHARD & NHARPN RAPP.,
introduced by who moved its adoption, and
a) The Planning, Board, based on a limited review, has not identiftetl any significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated with current project proposal.
OR,
b) 'The Planning Board, based on a limited, review,has identified the following areas of concern.:
1)
Duty adopted this 1.3'h day of March, 2018 bythefollowing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
1111onc. 518.7b 1.82 2 a,N [.'.,Lx: 519,745A437 9742 Bey Road, Qukmisbury% NY 1-180-1