Staff Notes Packet Wed., March 28, 2018 S�Rff Noteg
ZBA Meeting
Wednesday, March 28, 2018
Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda
Meeting: Wednesdcxy, March 28, 2018 Time. 7:00- 1 IDD pm
Queensbury Activities Center- 742 Bay Road
Agenda subject to change and maybe found ct: www.queensbury.net
NEW USIN
A ltrnnt(s) Dima&MattfimSudors Arc$Varinncc No Z-AY-19-2018
()wnsr s D€sma&.Matthew Suders SE RA Type I I
A en a Bartkat Pontiff,Sl wart+3t Rhodw,P.C. Out Size 4.77 ACWS)
Location 42 Eagan Road Zoiing MDR
Ward ND. Ward 4
Tax Ed No 304.17-1A Section 179-3440
Gross Ref n1a %Varreo Colinty Plannige I Na
Public Heari 2A March 28 2018 Adirondack Park Age n/a
Pro€ect Description Applicant proposal Pw*"op 4f a 864 sq_fl,"idea ial addition with edjo-lning 32.0 sq.8_garage(condo unit). The
existing home is 2,040 sq_ft with an ambelved gwage_ The new unit would be to the rear arod well side of the horn. RcRuf requested for a
d lex structure on a Eat that does not meet the lot size re uiremenis in the MDR zoning 3istroa
A lican s Ernest Hikcrwhauxr Area'Varimice No Z-AV-I8-2018
s D&T Crmlive Pro -ea SEQRAType E E
eats D&TCYzalivc Prvplenic5 1, sbx 4.44 Acrc(s
Locatioa 323 Ridge Road Zoning MDR
Ward No. Ward 2
T�lf id-No 303.5-1.64 Sfieri6n 179-3.048
CressRer RC44-201$ Warren Coun Piennin March 2018
PublkHemring I Much 2k 2018 Adirondack Park Agency I nfa
Pro€est Desixiotion Applicant raquests to ow pooh a 96 sq,R,wand skary dormer and to construct a 72 sq_tf covered front parch to mm
existing 1.357 scl$,(floor arm home_ Relief eqkwAled from xainimwn setback fegUhnIfflis.
A nt s ]Cris D.R ieri Area Variance No 7-AV-17-2Ot8
Owner(s) Kris D.Roglieri SE R,A Type 1l
Agent(s) BanlM Pontiff.Swpmrt&Rhodes,P.C. Lot Size 14.11 ALs
Location 40 Nash R.aad Zoning MDR
Ward Pio. Ward 2
Txx id No 302.7-147 See ian 174-54=
Cross Rei AST 793-2E117;Z-AV=74=2817 Warren COUHty PlitDfliFlIZ March 2018
Public Hearing mafth 28,2018 Adirandack Park Agency o+a
Prolect Descr€ptfan Applicant proposes to constnacl a 1,00 sq_13,pergda mw0aud with the proposed pwl project Reliefmgneated(awn
maximum totals uarc fcolagu allowed for w,=sary 5truph1rrs ora the pared
A licant S) Tom=Ellsworth Area Variance No Z-AV=16-2018
Owner(s) Taprerra EEtswortli SEORA Type Il
A en s Hutchins EngimeE[rig EngineeringLot Size 0.70 Asrc(s
Lac*lion 15 Frcnoh Mountain Drive Zoning RR-3A
Ward No. Ward I
Tax Id No 288.8-E-29 Seetioa 179-3-040; 179-5-100A
Cross lief nJa Warren Coun Plannlp March 2018
PubU1 Hearing March 28,2018 1 Adirondack Park Agcucy I ALD
Prnica btiitritltian Applirant propanes oonsfiwa an of a 2,054 sq.fL ranch style,single-story duplex;one unit is proposed to b060 aq. R,
(footprint)with ouvered pordr,second unit is proposed to be 1,294 sq.$,(fomOnt)wi#h basement. Relief roques*W from minimum setback
re uiremenu and far a du kx structure on a lot that docs not meet the minimum lot size re uirnmeas in the RR-3A zoning district
Any further business that the Chairman dctcrmincs may be properly brought before the Tuning Round or Appeals.
I.;LSue Hemingway�2U 19 Year ZBAIZBA March 20193ZBA Agenda Wed March 23 2018 Fina€.docx
Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals
Community Development Department Staff Bates
Area Variance o.: 19-2018
Project Applicant: Diann & Matthew Suders
Project Location: 42 )Fagan Road
Parcel Historv. [[AI
SEQR Type: Type II
Meeting Date: March 28,2018
Description of Proposed r'ro�oct:
Applicant proposes construction of a 864 sq. ft. residential addition with adjoining 320 sq, ft. garage (condo
unit). The existing home is 2,000 sq. ft. with an attached garage. The new unit would be to the rear and west
side of the home. Relief requested for a duplex structure on a lot that does not meet the lot size requirements in
the MDR zoning district.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from a density requirement for a duplex in the MDR zone.
Section 179-3-040 establishment of districts-dimensional requirements—moderate density iresidential zone
The applicant proposes to construct an addition to an existing home converting the home where 4 ac is required
per duelling and existing is 0.77 ac.
Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Towwn Lary:
In making a determination,the board shall consider:
1. Whether an undesirable change will he produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment
to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the
neighborhood character may be anticipated from a3 single family dwelling neighborhood by adding a two
family unit.
. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered if the request
is for additional living space to the home without a second kitchen area would reduce the density request,
$. Whether the requested area variance is substandaL The relief requested may be considered substantial
relevant to the code. Relief requested is 3,2.3 acres,
4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or
enviro a nien ta I conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated.
S. Whether the alleged difficulty was self created. The difficulty may be considered self-created.
Staff Comm
The applicant proposes an addition to an existing single family home to a foam family home. The plans show the
location of the existing Dome and the addition location.
Qt Zoning Board of Appeals —Record of Resolution
Town of ueensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 ( 18) 761-8239
,,area Variarnee Resolution To: Approve r Di 'approve
Applicant Naive: Diana & Matthew Suders
File Number: - -13-2018
Location: 42 Eagan Road
Tax Map Number. 309.17-1-
BA Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Diana & Matthew
Sud en. Applicant proposes construction of a 864 sq. ft. residential addition with adjoining 320 s+ ft. garage
(condo writ). The existing home is 2,000 sq. ft. with an attached garage. The new unit would be to the rear and
west side of the home. Relief requested for a duplex structure on a lot that does not meet the lot size
requirements in the MDR zoning district.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from a density tequirement for a duplex in the MDR zone.
Section 179-3-040 establishment of districts-dimensional requirements —moderate density residential zone
The applicant proposes to construct an addition to an existing home converting the home where 4 ac is required
per dwelling and existing is 0.77 ac,
SP,QR Type 11 —no Ruther review required;
A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday, March 29, 2018;
Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon
consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267
of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows:
PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF
I. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby
properties because
2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been
included to minimize the request OR are not ressible.
3. The requested variance is 1 is not substantial because
4. Thexe is 1 is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district?
5. The alleged difficulty is 1 is not self-created because — —
6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would
outweigh (approval) 1 would be nutwcighed b denial the resulting detriment to the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood or community;
7. The Board also finds that the variauce request under consideration is the minimum necessary;
8. The Board also proposes the following conditions:
a)
b) --
c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution.
BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDING S, I MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE / DEi�1'Y AREA VARIANCE
Z- -19-2018, Diana & Matthew Suders, Introduced by _, who moved for its adoption, seconded by
Duly adopted this 2 8'3`play of March, 2 D1by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES-
Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals
ommunity Development Deportment Staff Notes
Area Variance No.: 18-2418
Project Applicant: Ernest Hilpertshanser
Project Location: 323 Ridge Road
Parcel History- RC 40-2018
SEAR Type: Type II
Meeting Date: March 28,2018
Description of Proposed Project:
Applicant requests to complete a 96 sq. ft, second store dormer and to construct a 72 sq. ft, covered front porch
to an existing 1,357 sq_ ft. (floor area) home. Relief requested from minimum setback requiremients.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from setback requirements of the MDR zone.
179-3-040 Establishment of Districts—dimensional re uirement MDR zone
The applicant proposes to complete a 96 sq ft second story dormer and to construct a 72 sq ft covered porch that
All be 15.7 ft firom the front property line where a 30 R set hack is required. {Date current dormer construction
is located 21.7 ft from the front property line and is subject to the variance to be completed)
Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law:
In making a determination,the board shall consider:
1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment
to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the
neighborhood may be anticipated.
. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited due to
the existing house location.
3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The request for relief may be considered moderale
relevant to the code. The relief requested is 14.3 ft for the porch and 8.3 ft for the dormer.
4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. The applicant has shown the location of
the home.
5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created.
Staff cammentai
The applicant proposes to complete construction of dormer and to construct a covered porch at the front of the
home. The downer under construction currently does not meet the setback at 21.7 ft where the applicant was
informed during construction the project would require a building permit and an area variance. The applicant
has provided information for the covered porch to be built in the, future.
Zoning Board of Appeals — Record of Resolution
Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, ICY 12804 ( 18) 761-8238
Town of C�ccush�ir}.
Area Variancc Resolution To: Approve I Disapprove
Applicant Name: Ernest Hilpertshauser
File Number: - -182018
Location: 323 Ridge Road
Tax Map Number: 303.5-1-64
BA Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 2.8, 2018
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the To-m of Queensbury has received ars application from Ernest
Hilpertshauser. Applicant requests to complete a 96 sq. ft. second story dormer and to construct a 72 sq. ft.
covered front porch to an existing 1,357 sq. ft. (floor area) horne. Relief requested from minimum setback
requirements.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from setback requirements of the MDR zone.
179-3-040 Establishment of Districts—dimensional requirement MDR zone
The applicant proposes to complete a 96 sq ft second story dormer and to construct a 72 sq ft covered poreb that
will be 15.7 ft from the front property line where a 30 ft set back is required. (Note current dormer construction
is located 21.7 ft from the front property line and is subject to the variance to be completed)
SEQR Type II — no ftirther review required;
A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday, March 28, 2018;
Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon
consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-O80(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267
of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation, we find as follows:
PER Ti IE DRAFT PROV II ED BY STAFF
1, There is I is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby
properties because
2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been
included to.minimize the request OR are not possible,
3. The requested variance is 1 is not substantial because
4, Where is I is not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district?
5. Is the alleged difficulty is 1 is not self-created because
In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant ftoin granting the reNuested variance would
outweigh (a royal) 1 would he outweighed b denial the resulting detrimen# to the health, safety and
welfare of the neigh of-hood or community;
7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary;
8. The Board also proposes the following conditions:
a)
b)
c) Adherence to Ilio items outlined its the follow-up letter sent with this resolution-
BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE / DENY ARl~.A VARIANCE
Z,-A -18-201K Ernest Hilyertshauser, Introduced by . who moved for its adoption, seconded by
Duly adopted this 28th days of March, 2018 by the following vote:
AYE :
NOES:
14Iar18-18
Warren County Planning Department
Project Review and Referrai Form
Reviewed by Department on March 19, 2018
Project Dame: Hilpertshauser, Ernest
:Owner: D&T Creative Properties
ID Number: QBY-I8-A -18
County Project#: Mari 8-18
Current Zoning: MDR
Community: Queensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes to complete construction of a 96 sf dormer ort second story. will include expanded bathroom &master
bedroom. Project also includes a new front porch area.
Site Location:
323 Ridge Rd
Tax Map Number(s):
303.5-1-64
Staff dotes:
The Warren CountyPIanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county- ide
impacts to the items identified in G ML §239_
Local actions to elate(if any):
County Planning Department:
NCI
Local Action:IRinal Disposition:
�� M1 311912018
Warren County Pianning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed
PLEASE RETURN TJ[IS CORM TO THF,V4ARKEN COLWTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITRIN]D DAYS OF FINAL ACTION
Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals
Community Development Department Stall Notes
Area Variance NG.: 17-2018
Project Applicant: Kris D.Roglieri
Prot Location: 40 North Road
Parcel History: AST 793-2017, -A, -79-2017
SEAR Type: Type II
Meeting Date: March 2.8,20 18
Description of Proposed )�rvjed
Applicant proposes to construct a 1,000 sq, ft. pergola associated with the proposed pool project. Relief
requested from maxinawn total square footage allowed for accessory structures ori the parcel.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from the maximum total square footage allowed for accessory structures on the
parcel.
Section 179-5-Q O Accessory Structures—perms
The applicant proposes to construct a 1,000 sq ft pergola over a proposed pool and pool patio area. The parcel
currently has 4 garages (attached 1,250, detached 390 sq ft, classic car storage 3,000 sq ft, , and equipment shed
6 sq ft). The existing wood shed is 470 sq ft and the pergola at 1,000 sq fl are the two accessory structure and
exceeds the total sq=e footage maximum allowed is 750 sq fl and proposed is 1474 sq ft.
Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law:
In making a determination, the board shall consider:
I. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment
to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this arca variance. Minor to no impacts to the
neighborhood may be anticipated.
2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered to reduce the
pergola size.
. 'Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief may be considered moderate relevant to
the code. Relief requested 720 sq f..
4. 'Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhuad or distriet. The project as proposed may be considered
to have minimal to no impact on the environmental conditions of the site or area.
S. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created,
Staff comments•
The applicant proposes to construct a 1,000 sq ft pergola structure to be associated with a pool project that is
under construction. The plans. show the location of the pergola and the artist renditions shoes t17e type of
structure to be built.
Marls-19
Warren County Planning Department
Projeet Review and Referral Form
Reviewed by Department on March 19, 2018
Project Name: Roglieri, Kris
Owner: Roglieri, Kris
ID Number: OBY-18-AV-17
County Project#: Marn-19
Current Zoning: MDH
Community: Queensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes a 1,000 sf pergola associated w{the pool construction. The pergola is a 2nd aocessory structure but
exceeds the square footage allowed_
Site Location:
40 NcTth Rd
Tax Map Number(s):
302.7-1-37
Staff Notes:
The Warren CountyPlanning Department finds [hat the project will not create any significantin[er-munidpal or county-wide
impacts to the items identified in Gfu1L§239.
Local actions to dke (if any);
County donning Department:
NCI
Local Action:/) final Disposition:
311912018
Warren County Planning Department Date Signed Local Official Date Signed
PLEASE 1RF3TURN THIS MRhi TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RITHTN 10 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION
ow Z,olaiing Board of Appeals—Record of Resolution
Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 (518) 761-8238
romk of Qavmhury
Area 'Variance resolution To: Approve/ Disapprove
Applicant Name. Kris D. Roglieri �=
4�
File Number- -AV-17-201 S
Location: 40 North road
Tax Map Number; 302.7-1-37
BA Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Kris D. Rogiieri.
Applicant proposes to construct a 1,000 sq. ft. pergola associated with the proposed pool project. Relief
requested from maximum total square footage allowed for accessory structures on the parcel.
Relief Required:
The applicant requests relief from the maximum total square footage al lowed for accessory structures on the
parcel.
Section 179-5-020—Accessory Structures dXygola:
The applicant proposes to construct a 1,000 sq it pergola over a proposed pool and pool patio area. The parcel
currently has 4 garages (attached 1,2.50, detached 390 sq 1t, classic car storage 3,000 sq ft, , and equipment shed
626 sq ft). The existing wood skied is 470 sq ft and the pergola at 1,000 sq ft are the two accessory structure and
exceeds the total square footage maximum allowed is 750 sq ft and proposed is 1470 sq ft.
S EQR Type II—no further review required,
A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday, March 28, 2018,
Upon review of the application materials, inYformation supplied during the public hearing, and upon
consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080( ) of the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267
ofNYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows:
PER THE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF
1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby
properties because
2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been
included to minimize the request OR are not possible. -
. The rerluested variance is 1 is not substantial because
4. ``here is f is not ars adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district?
5. Is the alleged difficulty is f is not self-created because
6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would
outweigh(Mroval) 1 would be outwcighcd by (denial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood or wrnmunity;
7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary;
8. The Board also proposes the fallowing conditions:
a)
c) Adherence to the items outlined its the follow-up letter sent vAth this resolution.
BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 1 DEN Y AREA VARIANCE
-A -17-201 . Kris D. Rvglieri, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by
Duly adopted this 28th day of March 2418 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals
Community Development Department Staff Motes
Arta Variance No.. 16-2018
Project Applicant: Tawar3ra Ellsworth
Project Location: 15 French MounWn Drive
Parcel History: n!a
SEAR TI l - T pe 11
Meeting Date: March 28,2018
Description of Proposed Project:
Applicant proposes construction ofa 2,054 sq. ft. ranch style, single-story duplex, one unit is proposed to be 760 sq. ft.
(footprint) with covered poach; second unit is proposed to be 1,294 sq. ft. (footprint)with basement. Re I ief requested
from minimum setback requirements and for a duplex structure on a lot that does not meet the minimum lot size
requirements in the RR-3A zoning district.
]belief leu lred:
The applicant requests relief from minimum setbacks and for a density requirement for a duplex in the RR3A zone.
e0ion 179-3-.040 eMblisbrnent_Qf districts-dimensional requirements—rur4l midWial three acre
The applicant proposes to conamet a duplex on an existing 0.68 ac parcel where 3 ac is required per dwelling. The home
is to be located 78(from the front and 66 ftto the rear where a LOU ft setback is required,then 63.5 ft from the north side
and 35 ft from the south side where a 75 ft setback is required.
Criwria far considering a Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law:
In making a determination,the board shall consider:
I. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to
nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor impacts to the neighborhood
character may be anticipated from a single family dwelling neighborhood by adding a duplex.
. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to
pursue,other than an area variance, ]Feasible alternatives may be considered if the request is for additional living
space to the home without a second kitchen area would reduce the density request. Although, new construction of
single family dwelling would require at least setback variances due to the zoning requirement of the Mural residential
3 ac zone.
3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant
to the code, belief is requested for front setback of 22 ft rear setback of 34 ft,then side setback on the north side
11.5 ft.and the south side 40 ft. Lot size relief is 5.32 acres.
4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood or district. Minor to no impact to the physical or environmental conditions in the
neighborhood may be anticipated. The project includes an on-site waste water system.
5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created.
Staff comments:
The applicant proposes to a duplex of a 2,080 sq ft(footprint) and associated site work. The plans show one unit to be 3
bedroom unit and a second unit to be 1 bedroom unit.
l4',tar18-28
Warren bounty planning Department
Project Review and Referral Farm
Reviewed by Department on March 19, 2018
Project Name: Ellsworth, Tarnarfe
Qvmer: Ellsworth, Tamarfa
11)Number: OBY-18-AV-16
County Project#: Mar18-20
Current Zoning: RR-3A
Community: Queensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes construction of single story 2084 sf building with two units-one with 760+1- (with covered porch)to
be rented and 2nd unit wJ 1187 sf with basement floor areas.
Site Location:
16 French Mountain Dr
Tax Map Number(s):
288.8-1-29
Staff Dotes:
The Werren CountyPlanning Department finds that the project will not create any significantinter-municipal or county-wide
impacts to the items Identified in G M L §239,
Local actions to date (if any):
County F lanning Department:
NCI
Local Actian;11R9na1 Disposition:
911 X12018
Warren County Planning Department Date signed Local Official Date Signed
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THS:WARREN COUNTY PLANNINC,DEPARTMENT WIYMN 10 DAYS OF FINAL DICTION
Zoning Board of Appeals —record of Resolution
Town of Queembliry 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 (518) 761-8238
Rule ;rf{ eoce�s.c��rrrw
Area Variance Resolution To: Approve 1 Disappmvc
Applicant Naive: Tarnarra Ellsworth
Rile Number: -AV-]6-2418
Location: 15 French Mountain Dri-ve
Tax Map Number. 288.8-1-2
ISA Meeting Date. Wednesday, March 28, 2018
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from Tam arra
Ellsworth. Applicant proposes construction of 2,054 sq. ft. ranch style, single-story duplex; one unit is proposed to be
760 sq. ft. (footprint) with covered porch; second unit is proposed to be 1,294 sq. ft. {footprint}with basernent. Re]ief
requested from minimum setback requirements and for a dup]ex structure on a lot that docs not rneet the minimum lot size
requirements in the RR-3A zoning district'
Relief Required.
The applicant requests relief from minlmLLm setbacks and for a density requirement for a duplex in the R 3A zone.
Section 179-3-040 establishment of districts-dimensional requirements —rural residential three acre
The applicant proposes to construct a duplex on an existing 0.68 ac parcel where 3 ac is required per dwell ing. The home
is to be located 78 f from the front and 66 ft to the rear where a 100 ft setback is required, then 63.5 ft from the north side
and 35 ft from the south side where a 75 ft setback is required-
SEAR Type II—no further review required;
A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday, March 28, 2018;
Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon
consideration of the criteria speei fled in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury'Town Code and Chapter 267
of NYS Town Law and alter discussion and deliberation, we find as follows:
PER THE DRAI-T PROVIDED BY STA FF
1, There is 1 is not an undesirable change in the eharacter of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby
properties because
.. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been
included to n,inirnire the request OR arg not possible.
3. The requested variance is 1 is not substantial because
4. There is / is not an adverse impact oil the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district?
5. Is the a]ie ed difficulty is f is not self-created because
6. In addition the Board finds that the benefit to the applicant from granting the requested variance would
outweigh (approval) 1 would be out eighcd by (denial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood or community;
7. The Board also finds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary;
S. The Board also proposes the follovi ng conditions:
a)
b)
c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution.
BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 1 DENY AREA VARIANCE
-AV-1 -2018, Tamarra Ellsworth, Introduced by , who moved for its adoption, seconded by...
Dulv adopted this 28th day of March 201 S by the following vote:
AYES
NOES: .. s� .