Loading...
Staff Notes Packet STAFF NOTES PLANNING BOARD, APRIL, 24,12018 oftice owl 742 B @ y R c.), c'i, ("I'll e e @ u,,.t,)�''«l r env P N Y i 2 y300 Ar TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD SITE PLN -2 17 DDDJ ENTERPRISES Tax Map IIS: 308.12-1-7.13,-7.1. 7.1 /Property s: Lot 3 West Drive Zoning: CLI The Planning Bei approved Site Plan 26-2017 on May 2, .' 017 for a contractor storage yard and construction of an 8,000 sq. fl. enclosed pole barn, for equipment and material storage fer contractors' yams. Project includes additional site clearing for outside storage and a new mess road from Luzerne Ind. through n easement with the adjoining, lots. Project disturbs more than. an. acre and is subject to a SWPPP Project is associated with site prolan modification of'SP 3.2016 parcel 308.12-1-7.2 for access. Request is made for n extension'to MOTION TO APPROVE EXTENSION FOR SITE PTS -2017 QQDJ ENTERPRISES,. Irntreduced by who moved for its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted,this ' day of April, 2O1 by the following vote: AYES; NOBS PIu ne�� 51 9.70L9220 1 7 am 5 M7,15.4437 N 7.12Nay Ro ict,Queer mbury, NY 1280,1 RUCINSKI HALL ARCHITECTURE Ronald Richard Rcin ski Ethan Peter Hall 134 dui ,avenue Glens Falls, NY 12801 Voice 5118 7410268 Fax 5187410274 Email ephall@nycap_rr_wm DI' DJ Enterprises— Luzerne Road Storage Building 9 April 20118 Laura, Moore—Town, of Queensbury Planning Department 742 Bay Road Queensbury NY 1,2804 Re- Approval extension L,aur,a, At the above noted project Imation, the Owner DDDJ Enterprises is, requesting an extension of the site plan approval as we are waiting the final sign-off from the Town Engineer, the revised drawings have been sou bm'itted and It is our understanding that the project engineer, Kevin Hastings, is in the process of formulating a response letter ter accompainy the revisedplans to the Town Engineer for review. It is our understanding that this letter will be delivered to the Town this week., If there, are any addftional questions please call to discuss., Regards, than Peter Hall Architect Yw :%Ffoward COnsirlicliork,umm Road St 9 Apr 2018.doc Site l -20,18 @ 3 Grp l Drive Seavey E l gust. Public Bari Scheduled S El QR I Draft resolution — grant/deny site plan, approval .................. Town of Queensbury Planning Boar(] Community Development Department Staff Notes April 4, 201l 8 Site Plan 14-2018 SEAVEY FAMILY TRUST 3 Glen Hall Drive/ WR—' aterfro nt Residential/ Ward I SEQR Type 11 Material. Review: application,, narrative, revised -site plan drawings, height sketch, previous elevations, and floor plans Parcel History. 206-753 derno of cibin/porch, AV 8-2018 ReqWrested,Action Planning Board review and approval for a(revised) 1,0 19 sq. ft. (footprint):, 2,035, sq,. ft. floor area home. Resolutions I. Planning Board decision Pp Applicant proposes a (revised) 1,019 sq. ft. (footprint), 2,035 sq. ft. floor areaK home. Project includes site work, terraced grading firom.Glen Hall, or with.walkways to new borne. Pursuant to Chapter 1,79-6-05,0 & 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, hard surfacing within 50 ft. of shoreline and construction,within 50 ft. of 15% slopes shall be subject.to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments a Location-The site :is located at 3 Glen Hall, Dr. aff of Hall Rd and Tee Hill Rd. * Arrangement-The projmt site is,currently vacant, and has received a septic variance. * Site Design- The applicant proposes a 1019 sq ft footprint home with a deck area facing the shore. The road side of the parcel will be terraced with two sets,of step sections. Applicant should confirm.step sections construction or detail type. * Site layout and atility pian,—The project plans indicate the site disturbance 7,685 sq ft. The project includes installation of holding tan,ks,through a septic variance granted, 11 /2017'. A new will is to,be installed on the shore side of the home. * Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control —The plans show terraced areas with retaining walls, infiltration trenches along the parking area and the new home and planting areas near the shore. * Landscape plan—The planting bed is to include annual and perineal plants. The plans list possible shoreline plant species. * Elevations The plans show the height of tine home to be 26.96 ft. New elevation drawings should be provided as the house is a different location,on, the property. Floor plans-!'rhe floor plans indicated two bedrooms on the lowr level with a walk out area. 'rhe tipper i level is to include a great room and a walk out upper deck area. Pursuant to, Section. 179- -050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on, its own initiative or at the Written request of an applicant,. The application lanrrun i�leuntit�,ed "I equaireuunenn,hs�' outlines the items t appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either, requuested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or .has not addressed theitem/ left check box blank., This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, rn traffic, o. commercial alterations/' construction details, p floor plans, q. soil lags, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature Y'Variance Granted with.conditions 4/18/18 1' home to be located 12 l frorn the Burke property lame and 6 ft from the ansle property line, a screening partition, will,be installed on the deck stairs and deck on the Burke side of the'property, 3)13 plantings 6 ft in height to be installed at the sleek stair.area on Burk side of the property,4)a drywell to be installed in area.agreed upon by the neighbors near the existing right of sway, ),construction to occur to minimize interruptions to :neighbors access to their properties and no early than 7arru,, well location to be evaluated based on location of neighboring holding tanks., The home is to be 9 fl fiom the shoreline where a 50 f1 setback is required..and the site is to be 69.5%%permeability where a 75%permeability is req,uni:red. Sitminary The applicant has completed a site plan application for the construction of.a nein home,. Revised planswill need to be submitted for staff and engineering review. Section. 17 -6mm 0—Construction on slopes project oeeuurs within It of 15% slopes,. Section 179-6-0,50—pill or hard surfacing within 50 ft of the shoreline. i l eetitn lji for w PBR d 1 J1 ; ZBA.: /28;l18tah:leul, 4Jl8f 1 ° , , M W iowr THE ✓I forth Country Office Ke ® 375 Say Road,Qmueensb ury, NY 1 '80+4 u www.chazencompanies.com parnles.com 9'f c,u and r abe r�,tjipu rs Hudson Valle Office 1845)4545 l� r LoSuers Capital District offices (518)273-00,5'5 Planners Environmental Profession is Lara cave ArCrhnmucts February 08, 2018 Mr.Crai;g Brown Zoning Admiinistratorand Code Compliance Officer Town of'Queensbury 7'42 Bay Road Queensbury,,New York 12B04 Delivered moria email only: CraigBegueensbury.net Re: Seavey Family Trust Town of Queeni l+ arrrerm a.,orl'M New York az ern Project#91800,0 Queensbury Ref' P1 -a0'18 Dear Mir. Brown; The Chazen Companies (Cha:zmen) has receiv d a submission package from your uafflce for the above referenced project. The applicant inter ds to construct a new si ngle-fa m ily home. Snubm Itted information includes the f (low in • Site plans and details tithed "New Residence for Seave -- 3 GlenHall Ruud" prepared by Nace Engineering P,C,, dated January 1E, 2 18; • Project narrative letter prepared by Little, nrnnor&IBo rice, P.O., dated January 16, 21018; • Architectural Plans dated December 2017,:and; • 'Town of Queensbury Site Plan Application; Your office has requested that we reviewerthe design of stormwwrater system It relates to compliance to local,state or relevant r.,ndes regmulations and general practice. Based upon our review,Chazen offuers the following comments for the Town's consideration, Storrinwater,Management rrment Erosion and Sediment trolls 1, According to the Site Flans time proposed site Improvements disturb less thain one (,1) acre and thus the project is not required to obtain,coverage sunder the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for 5torrrrwwiater IDischarges from Construction tiv ty (GIP-0-15-002).-002). C+orr mernts related to the proposed storrmwater management and erosion and sediment control features proposed for the site are suffered below.- 2, aelowww;2, it is noted that NYSDDH Appendix 5-13.7, Table 1 states time required minimum separation, distances to protect waterwells fr rn contarninatiorn.,Table,1 lusts a required minimum separation distance of 50 feet fuer "Surface water recharge absorption system with no automotive-related ted p''pazen Engineefing, LandSu"ying&Landscaple a mNtecl'me Go., D. C, azen ErpWro nrrperul'af arvico�„ Inc. nw 'f oxen dCompana esy frac: Town est Q ueia nsburV Seawey FamillyTuust f6ruaTy 0%201J3 Page 2. Waves" .and a distance Of 100 flet for "5urfdce wastewater recharge absorption system, constructed to discharge storm water form parking farts,, roadways or drivewayso. Lands 1'F of ansle (north) and Burke (south grater wells appear to be within 1feet of the storm,water ,controls of 68 ne'w parking area. Also,, subnote 5 of Table I states 'When these contamination sources are located'in coarse gravel or are located upgrade and in the direct path of drainage to as water well, the water well Oall fae located at least,200feet a aaly rom the closest part of these sources."'The ppllIcant to revise accordingly4. ,Also,with respect to well placement, ppe ndi 5-13.7 Table 1 states that wells shwalll be separated from lakes by a minimum of ,5-feet.The prc'p'casedl wiell appears to,be 17-feet from lake. As such the app'llicant should revise'the location,of the well to demonstrate n,strate compliance. The silt fence dletail provided on sheet P'-5 does not appear to,be in conformance with the most recent standard from the NYS SSESC. The Applicant to rewal:se accordingly. 4. There appears to he a proposed grading for a drainage swrale and dry ell at the, stione drive intersection. The Applicant to describe, the drainage area to, the 'drywell arnd the intent of the proposed grading to the dryw+wrell., S. It appears there'is only one row of silt fence proposed at the hake front.This may not be adequate to, protect the lake from sedlirnentation. The Applicant should) consider adding an additional row of silt fence'at;the latae front. 6. A stabilized construction a ntrarnce dares not appear to be depicted on the slue plans,T'he Applicant to show the location aa'f the stalbiHzed construction erntrarwc . antlluslons and Recommendations It is our opinion that the applicant should provide clarification for the above iteirrns and incorporate the changes in subsequent plan submissions. ions. if you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me at(511') 824-11926. Sincerely, Sean M. 'Darty, P'.E.,, LEE D AP, CMS4S Principal Director, Municipal Engineering Services cc: Sunny Sweet, Town, PlainnIng Office Administrator(via email) Laura Moore,Town, Land Use Planner,(via,e-rrnail� �':wF" lucPoa,w �fEIS H 49w 1�7:A1 'p-T..Q sbuE',iw,NG',1 6-'T� #;njjIV'�fwwSS"k 1l r)V k 'Town of Oueensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION— Grant/Den�y Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN 14-2018 SEAVEY FAMILY TRUST Tax Map ID: 289.11-1-27'/Property Address: 3 Glen Hall Drive/Zoning: WR The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Bu rd„ Applicant proposes as (revised) 1,019 sq. ft. (footprint), 2,035 sq. ft. floor area home. Project includes site work, terraced grading from Glen Hall, or with walk waysto new home. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050 & 179-6-O6of the Zoning Ordinance, hard surfacing within ., of shoreline and construction within 50 ft. of 15% slopes shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval, Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-:9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies,the requirements,as stated in the Zoning Code; The Planning Board opened as public hearing on the Site plan application on 4/24M18 and continued the public hearing to 04/24/2018,,when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials, submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the:public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 04/24/2018; The Planning Board deternidnes that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APP RQVC / DISAPPROVE, SITE PLAN14-2018 SEAVEY FA?MLY TRUST; Introduced by_who moved for its adoption. According to the draft,resolution prepared, by Staffwith the following: 1) Waivers requested granted/denied; 2. Adherence to the:items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this reso:lution.. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be instal led around these areas and field verified by Com inunity Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection, plan must be: submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval,permitting and,inspectiow, c), if curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required, A building,permit will not be issueduntil the approved drivew permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering,then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing room, s and proposed roorns in the building and site improvements; Page: I of 2 Phone: 518,761.8220 , Far 5,18-745.44,37 ! 742 Bay Road,Queembury, NY '12:8041 wwv.queen,sbufpiet f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice:of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPD ES General Permit from ConstructionActivity" prior to the:start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff- i. The approved final,plans,that have been stamped by the Town.ZoningAdministrator. 'These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and, approved; ii. The project.NO] and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDE S General Permit, or an, individual SPDE S permit issued for the project if required,. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan,,most be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning,Administrator or Bui Iding and, Codes personnel; h) The applicant must ineet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building, Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building,permits,is,dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certify that the site Plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed,in its,entirety on the final plans .Duly adopted this 241h day of April, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES, PA ge 2,of 2 Phone: 518,761.8220 Fax 518.74 5, " 17,42 Bay Road. QueensWry. NY 12804' www,,quoensbkjry,net Site Plan 25-2018 @ 99 Seeley Road GI , Peggy Bielak Public Hearing, Scheduled SEQ„R 11 Draft resolluntion — giant/deny site, plan approval Town of'Queensbury Planning Board et Community Development Department Staff Notes April 24, 2018 Site Plan 25-2,01.8 GERARD GY BJELAK 99 Seeley Road I —Waterfront Residential SEI Type 11 Material Review: application,, site plan ei sting and proposed, elevations and floor plans Parcel History- 2,06-753 derno of cabin/porch, AV 8-2018 .e crested Action Planning Board review and, approval for a 1,598, sq, ft. addition—includes an attached garage, then 903 sq, ft of outside porch, enclosed porch,covered porch entry and outdoor kitchen area. Resolutions, 1. Planning Board decision Project DCSSKiLt Lon Applicant proposes a 1,598 sq,. ft., addition—includes an attached garages there 9,03 sq. ft, of outside porch, enclosed porch,covered porch entry and outdoor kitchen area,. Existing home is 3,781 sq. ft. floorarea and proposed is 6,629 sq. ft. floor area. Project include large:amount of grading for driveway and placement of attached. garage:and other site work. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-con,fbm, ing structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments • Location-The project site is located at 99 Seeley Rd -off of Cleverdale and Rockhurst Rds. • Arrangement- The site has an existing home to remain and the detached garage is to be removed The addition will include a garage,,alterations to the interior for garage placement, andspace:above the new garage:area.., • Site Design-The applicant has,indicated the location of the new garage:addition will require grading to match the alignment of the existing home. • Building—The garage addition is to be 1,598 sq ft and the plans show the removal of 541 sq ft detached garage. The existing open porch area,is 65,6,sq ft and will be improved with 903, sq ft with about 440 sq ft of open deck then-36 sq ft covered/overhang porch, 256 sq ft screen porch area and 167 sq ft out door kitchen • Site conditions-The:applicant has shown.the existing conditions of the site and the areas to be graded for the addition. e Site layout and utility plan—The applicant has indicated the home draws water from the take, the septic system is sized for 5 bedrooms and the loft area. The applicant is aware when the four bedrooms over the garage are to be completed.a building,permit and a septic alterationpermit will, be required. The septic syste,m will need to be updated with additional disposal field, a new tank in series with the existing tank, a new pump but at this time the system is sized .for the 5 bedrooms and loft area per the applicant's representative:. a Grading and drainage plan, Sediment and, erl control —The plans, show 20,209 sq ft Of the site: is,to be disturbed 1"Or construction of the addition, removal of the existing garage, the outdoor patio area and associated site work., The applicant is reviewing the amount of site disturbance and will update plans accordingly. The applicant is to provide a stormwater management report, for the site work., a Landscape plan—The plans show the plantings to be removed and the new plantings to be installed along the driveway and to the :front of the home. 'This includes 14 trees, andplanting beds aroundtau e riew outside plorch area. 0 Site fighting plan—the applilicant.has indicated (,here is to bile residential lighting under the canopy for the Ilew garage., a Elevations —The plans show the view of the:home existing and proposed with photios of the c ui rent arrangement. a Floor pla,ns—The plans show the layout of the existing and proposed., The:addition to the right side of the home on the first floor includes the screen in perch.that expands the: second floor master bedroom area Ptirsuant to ection 1791-9-0510, the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the: written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear, on the site plan, or included as attaclunents, At, the time: of application, the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item rnot applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box, blank., This includes the, follow items listed under nnirem, ents, of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, k. topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r. constructionYdernolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature of Variance Granted 4/18`/18. 'the applicant proposes a garage addition to an existing home. The addition is to be located (revised 13 ft 7 in),rare ft 1 -in from the side property line where:as 20 ft setback is,required. summa�Ey The applicant has completed a site planaapplicati.on for the construction of an addition. 17he applicant is provide a stormwater report for the site for engineering review. Meeting HistoEy: PB: PBR 3/17/1,8; ZBA 3/1S/18; Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTIONGrant/Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PIAN 25- l ERARD & PEGGY BIEL I . Tax Map ID. 227.17-1-4 / Property ,,address: 91 Seeley Road/Zoning: WR The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board,. Applicant. proposes a '1,598 sq. ft. additicorn.—includes ars attached garage, there 903 sq.. ft. cif outside perch, enclosed porch, covered porch entry and outdoor kitchen area Existing home is 3,781 sq. fl. floor area and propmd is 6,629 sq. ft. floor area. Project imneluude large amount of grading for driveway and placement of attached garage and Bother site work. Pursuant too Chapter 179-.3-040 of the Zoning rdi mince, expansion of"a non-confon. ti trur tura in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Beard has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code, As, required by Genera. Municipal Law Section 239-mmn the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning,Department fon`its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on, the 'bite plain application on 04/24/2018 mind continued the public hearing,to 04/24/2018, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and ,all comments made at the public hearing;and submitted in writing thro gh and including 04/24/20 18; The Planning ]hoard determines that the application complies with, the review considerations and standards set forth in Article of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Main approval, MOTION T APPROVE / DISLPPROVF,, SMPLAN -2018 GERARD, & PEGGY-LIE LAK; Introduced b who moved for its adoption. ,According to the draft resolution prepared by, Staff with the following: 1 'Waivers requested granted/denied; , Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up leiter,sent with this resolution. a The limits ofelearing will constitute a.no-cut 'buffer zone, orange construction, ferueing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by onurnnuurnit ' ;Development staff, b) if applicable,the Sanitary Sewer connection plain must be submitted to the ''wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; e If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway pen nit is required. A building permit will not, be issued until the approved,driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved pians; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks meted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements; Page t of Mom,: 514,761,8220 Far. 518,745.4437 '742 Bay Road, QUe,041ungy, NY 12804 , w,ww:qp eens,bury,-n t f) If required,the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town- a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current `NYSDEC SLOES General Permit from Construction Activity" priorto the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on,their project,site, for review by staff, L The approved final plans thathave been stamped by the Town, Zoning drninistrator®. These plansmust include the:project SWPPP" (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The:project l and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES, General Permit, or an individual SPINE S permit issued for the project if required. g) Final, approved plans, in compliance with the Site:Plan, must be submitted to the ommunity Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit ancVor the:beginning of any site work; i) Subseq'uent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and.all other conditions of this resolution, As-built plans,to,certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 20 day of April, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES. Page 2 of 2 Phonez, 518.761.8220 fax� 111,745.4 n37 742 Ray Road, Quene-risbury, NY' 12804 1 wyw,,queensbuq,net Site Plan 24-20,18 @ 388 'C 1 . Road Jiason Southwood Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Iii Draft resolution grant/deny site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staft"Notes April 24, 20 18 Site Plan 24-2018 JASON SOUTHWOOD 3 8 8 Cleverdale Road / It.— Waterfront Residential /Ward I SEQR Type 11 Material Review- narrative,, application,elevations, survey, elevations survey and photos Parcel History, 93128-1132 demo; 93273-3287 sf w/garage; SP 51- O12 deck R Muested Action Planning Board review and approval to maintain already, constructed enclosed second story 240 sq,., ft. porch addition., Resolutions 1. Planning Board decision PI:oject DescEiRfig Applicant requests to maintainalready constructed enclosed second story 240,sq. ft. porch addition. The existing home is 1,446 sq. ft. where the floor area was,2,112 sq. ft. and now is 2,352 sq. ft'. doer area. Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-0 10 of the Zoning Ordinance,, expansion of'a non-con.forming structure shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff comments & Location- The project site is located at 388 Cleverdale Rd—towards end, * Arrangement-The:site has an existing home and no site changes,occurred. 0 Building—Thehome is an,existing multi level ho.me were the applicant converted a second story open porch to an enclosed porch. * Site conditions�The applicant has not proposed any site changes. The pbotos.Prov ided show the pre-esting open porch and current enclosed porch. 0 Elevations=The plans submitted show the elevation view of the home with flicaddition. A survey with spot elevations was provided. The height of the addition is 2 8 1/10 ft. e Floor plans,—the:plans submitted show the interior arrangement of the home with the new enclosed porch area as a sunroom. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the wfitten request of an applicant. The application fom, identified as "'Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time ofapplication the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the iternnot applicable or has not addressed the item/ left 6eck box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h,. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, 1, landscaping,, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction,details, p boor plans, q. soil logs,t construction/dernoliti on disposal', s. snow removal. Nature of Variance Granted 4/18/18. The BA was provided the minutes of the planning board meefing of4/17/18 and staff provided an overview of the discussion. The applicant requests,to,maintain an enclosed 240 sq 1`t 2,d floor porch. Converting the open porch to an enclosed porch the new construction is located 36.5 ft froiii the shoreline where a 510 .ft setback is, requir4 13. ft from the North side -where a 15 ft setback is required, height is 28 1/10 (1 when 28 ft is the maximuni allowed mid floor area is,increased from 2,H 2 sq ft to 2,352 sq 11 where! 1,191*8 7 sq fl. Sum man The applicant has completed a,site plan application for an already constni,cted 2nd floor enclosed sun porch. Meeting Hisjqrt. PB- PBR4/17/18; ZBA.4`/181,/18;, - 2 - Town of Queensbury Planning board RESOLUTION Grant/Deny Site Plan, Approval SITE PLA 24-201,18 JASONUTHWO 1 Tax Map ID: 226..8-1- / Property Address. 388 Cleverdale Road!,Zoning,: WR The applicant has submitted an.application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article ' of'the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant requests to maintain already constructed enclosed second story 240 sq. ft. porch addition. The existing home is 1,446 sq. ft. where the floor area was 2,11 s . ft. and now is 2,32sq. f1., floor area., Pursuant to Chapter 179-13-010 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion. of a non- conforming structure shall be subject to Planning Board reviewand approval.. Pursuant to relevant sections of the ' "own of Queensbury Zoning ode-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning ode As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-un the site plain application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plain application on O4/24/2018 and continued the public hearing,to 04/24/2018,wvhern it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant .and all comm, ernts made at the public hearing and submitted in writing throughand including 011:41201 The Planning Board determines, that the application complies with time review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zornirng Ordinance for Site Plan.approval;, MOTION TO APPROVE f DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 24-:2018 JASON SOUTH' it OOD Intru�dutieed y who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions. 1 Waivers request grant denied: Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) 1f application was referred to engineering, them engineering sign-off reuired prior to signature of Zoning;Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on time site lan/sur"vey, ,oor plants and elevation for the existing;rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site:Plain, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building.and Comes personnel; d The applicant must meet with Staff ,after approval and prior to issuance: of Building Pernnit and/or the beginning of any site work; Page I of Phone: 518,741.8220 Fax: 518,745,443,7 7'42 Bay Rood, Quu etis uuury, NY 8804 www'-queeiisbkjry,iiet e) Subsequent issuance of further Permits, including building permits is dependent on compl `ith this,and all other conditions of this resolution; f) As-built plans,to,certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the, certificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Duly adopted this 24'h day of April, 2018 by the following vote AYES: NOES: Page of�2 Phone,: 518.761.8ZZO,; F'ax: Sla-745.4437, 742 Bay Road, Que�ensbury, NY 12804 � www ,queenow"yxiet Site 128-20, oodchuck Hill Road Randolph Ji r & Denise Bardin Public Hearing Scheduled SEQR I I Draft resolution - grant/deny site plan approval Town of'Queensbury Ptanning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes April 24, 2018, Site Plan 28-2018 RANDOLPH JR& DENISE BA 'ISI N 97 Woodchuck Hill Road /LC-I OA Land.Conservancy 10 Acres/ Ward I SPQR Type 11 Material Review: application, site drawings, elevations, driveway information Parcel History:: ria Rea ested Action Planning Board review and approval to construct a 2,755 sq, ft. (footprint) home on an. 18.81 acre vacant parcel. Resolutions 1. Planning Board decision Proiett Des,cripti2n Applicant proposes to construct a 2,,755 sqm ft. (footprint) home on an 18.8,1 acre vacant parcel. Parcel is accessed through a shared drive across two southerly parcels at the end of Woodchuck Hill Rd. Project also includes driveway construction, utilities, wastewater& stormwater management. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6- G60 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction within 5 0 ft. of 15% slopes and, driveway gxeater than 101/6 shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff COMLnents' • Location-The project site is located 97 Woodchuck Hill —towards the end of Woodchuck Hill Road. • Arrangement-The applicant proposes,to construct a shared driveway,that will be used to,access the 19.81 ac parcel to construct a single family home. * Site Design-The project includes work within 5 0 ft of 15% slopes and the const,ruction,of a driveway that will be greater than 10% in certain areas. The Mans indicate the driveway to be 540 ftand originally part of a logging road. • Building—The construction of the home includes a 2,755 sq ft foot print with,walkout basement area, main floo�r with an open great room,and a second floor with bedrooms. The project includes,an attached garage. Elevation drawings and,floor plans of'the garage will need to be provided. • Site conditions-The submission indicates the site is wooded with light.underbrush mid,has slopes of'1(I%- 2 Vii" 0%- 20%over the project site. The plans note a wetland area on the site as an A'P.A GIS layer wetland where the driveway work is within, 100 ft of the boundary. Additional inforniation will need to be provided,to determine if the wetland boundary field delineation is within 100 A f proj ect is withi n 100 ft then a, freshwater wetlands permit will be required. • Site layout and utility plan-The applicant intends to bring electric from the road,end to the home. The plans show the location of the septic: system and well.. • Sediment and erosion control,, Grading and drainage plan—The submission includes a stormwater pollution. prevention plan,plans also show the detention area for the home and northerly part of the driveway runoff. The lower portion of the driveway will be addressed with ditch line improvements and cheek dams. • Landscape plan—the plans indicate areas of disturbance will be seeded lawn area. * Elevations ..The elevations indicate the home is to have a walk out basement area with the main floor,and second floor including a, great room and bedrooms. Plans should be updated to reflect the height with the topography to confirm, the height to be less than 35 ft., In addition,,plans should include the elevation views and height of the garage, * Floor plans--'Me:floor pilans show the first and, second floor as seen from.the front of the home. Ibe floor plans should be revised to show the 'walk out basement area and the garage.. Pursuant to Section 179-4-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its ow n. initiative or at the written request' of an applicant. The application fbirn identified, as, "'Requirements" outlines, the itcrnsto appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the itern/ left check blox blank, This includes the follow items listed under Requirements, of the applicant's application: g. site: lighting, h, signagp, I landscaping, n. traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r, construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Nature of Variance Granted 4118/18. The applicant construction of a single family home. The home location is on a Parcel with.no physical road frontage and access, is through two adjoining parcels. sgmm M, The applicant has completed a site plan application for the construction of a new home,"rith a driveway with portions greater than 1.0%. The plans will needto be revised to show the garage elevations, height infortnation for hath the garage and the horse including topography elevations,floor plans for all floors,of the home:and garage. The applicant is aware the wetland information will need to be verified and may require additional review,by the planning board. PB: PBR 4/17/18; ZBA 4/18,/18; to%11 Lk I',l Y'b'".' "w 4 Pe,'wiao. Town of Queensbury Planning Bow. RESOLUTION—Grant f Deny Site Plan Appr°o el I'TE PLATA 8--2018 RANDOLPH Ili& DENISE h BA I1 Tax Map IIS: 252.-1-33, -57,& - /Property address. 97 Wo chumck ILill Road iZoning: LC_I The applicant his submitted an application to the Planning Board. Applicant proposes to Construct a 2,755 sq. ft. (footprint) home on an 18.81 acre vacant pal,. Parcel is accessed through a shared drive across two southerly parcels at the end of Woodchuck Mill Rd. Project also includes driveway construction,,, utilities, wastewater & stormter mnagement. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-060 of the Zoning Ordinance, construction within 50 f. of 15% slopes and driveway greater than 10% shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of + uaeernsbuary Zoning Crude-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning. Board loris determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in theZoning,Code; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site: plan application on 04/24/201 .and continued the public hearing to 04/24/2018, when it was closed, The Planning Board :has reviewed the application materials submitted 'by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted, in writing through and including, 4/24,2018; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plain.approval, MOTION TO APPROVE J DISAPPROVE SM, PLAN 2018 RAND1 LPH JR & DENISE , IN;Introduced by who rrmooved.f r its adoption According to the drag resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1Waivers requested granted/denied; . Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a The limits ofolearing will constitute a no-coat buffer zone, orange a const uction fencing shall be installed around these areasand field.,verified by Community Development staff, b If applicable,the. Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater ater Department for its review, approval, permitting,and inspection; c If curb cut's are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A buailding,permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of .honing,Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and s tbuaol,s noted on the site plan/survey,, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building an, site improvements page 1 of Phone- 5,18.761,8220, Fax: 5118,745,4437 742 Bay Road. Qupeii,sbury, NY 12804 1 w .qu eensbwy.not f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the:following to the:Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent)for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDE S General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work, b. 'The project MOT Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c., The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff; i. The approved final. plans that have been starnped by the'Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) 'when such a plan was prepared and,approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current'NYSDEC SPDE S General Permit, or an individual SPIES permit issued for the project if required. g), Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan,:, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Pennit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further,permits, including building pen nits is,dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plans to certif that the site plan is developed according,to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. .k) This resolution is to be placed in its,entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 241b day of April, 2018 by the following vote: AYES. NOES: Page 2 oft Pholio: 518,10.1 2,20 1 Fax: 518.745-4437 742 Bay Road. Queensbury. NY 128041 wwwqueensbury,iiet Subdivision Sketch Play -20,18 , Big Boorn Road Clear Brook, LLC No Public Hearing Scheduled S,EQR, Unlisted Orae resolution — r a eny subdivision sketch plan approval To,wn of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staft Notes April 24, 2018 Subdivision Sketch Plan 4-2018 CLEAR,BROOK, LLC Big Boom Road /WR— Waterfront Residential / Ward 4 SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, subdivision and aerial photo of site. Parcel History: nn/a. Reguested Adi2n Planning Board review and approval for a, 15 lot residential subdivision of 148.6 acre parcel with lots,ranging in size from,2,28 acres to 4 .8 acres. Resolutions 1,. SEQR 2. Planning Board decision Project Description Applicant proposes a 15 lot residential subdivision of'148.6 acre parcel with lots ranging,in size from 2.28 acres to 48.8 acres. Project is located,within 500 ft., of Northway Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Chapter 18,3 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments The applicant's submission shows all 15 parcels to have road frontage on Big Boom Road. Parcels 13, 14 and 15 each have wetim A areas to that will need to be delineated. The plans show the location of the 500 ft Northway Overlay Zone and the setback lines for each parcel. 'The plans do not show house locations but the applicant has indicated some would be within the overlay zone and others would he outside of 't. The: aerial photo also shows, the amount of vegetation on the existing site where the application has indicated clearing would be associated with the:homes and driveway area. The Do ,sireauirements for WR include:the follonj�fror�n- 179-4-010 Residential Design Requirements Q Water1ront residential design. New residential subdivisions, construction and/or development in the WR Zoning,District shall comply with the followiAg requirements. �J) Subdivisions. (a), Existing stone walls, established hedgerows and/or mature tree lines shall be preserved and utilized for establishment of lot lines and considered in the lot layout for design of subdivisions, where practicable., (1)) Flag lots are not allowed. (c) Private streets,are not allowed but driveways shared by no in, ore than four lots may be allowed upon Planning Board approval, provided that such driveway is appropriate for the location and a sufficient maintenance agreement is provided. (d) The minimum, shoreline frontage for each lot shall be 1.5 0 feet and shall be measured along the mean high- water mark of the shoreline. (ii) All proposed subdivision plats shall show the proposed locations for all dwellings, accessory structures, wells and septic fields for Planning Board review and approvalas part of the subdivision application process. I I I Proposed building locations and site clearing shall be reviewed,with consideration of views from,the water to shore as well as from inland areas to the water. Septic system plans shall be subinitted as part of the subdivision process, or subsequent site plan review process, and be fully designed. and approved prior to any constructionorsite preparation or clearing activities. All development., he minimum setback from the mean high-water line of the shoreline f all. buildings and structures shall be a minimum of 50 feet or,the average setback of the dwelling structures,onthe two adjoining lots,, whichever is greater. � 1, 'The p]aceinent of all bui Idings and structures, except docks and boathouses, shall be screened by vegetation or landscaped or located in such a rruanner so that the view of the buildings, or structures from the water and to the water is filtered or obscured and the visual impact is minimized. (c) All patios and walkways between a residence and the shoreline shall be constructed of permeable materials, wherever practicable. (d) Construction on any land in the WR District shall be carried out in such a manner so as,to minimize the erosion that may be caused by such activity. I I Construction, excavation and site clearing activities shall be carried out in the shortest time possible and best practice erosion.and stormwater management shall be required. 121 A plan, for such management sball be approved by the Code Enforcement Officer and implemented prior to the commencement of any construction, excavation or site cleaning activities. 131 Shoreline areas, except beaches, shall not be exposed without vegetation for longer than the time period designated by the Code Enf6rcernent Officer and, when exposed for such allowable time period, shall adequately be,protected from erosion., (c) Lighting devices shall be oriented and limited so as to minimize disturbances on surrounding properflesan.d so as not to unreasonably diminish or obstruct views from the water or to the water, (3) Conversions of seasonal res,idences. A conversion of a dwelling,structure that had been previously used for seasonal purposes to a year-round residence shall be considered a change of use and shall, require site plan review prior to such conversion,as well as compliance with the following. (a) The septic system, servicing such residence or,the proposed system shall.rug all present, applicable health code requirements and plans shall be submitted, and approved,. (b, In no case shall the conversion be allowed to exp� and,the existing exterior dimensions of the existing p dwelling structure:by more than 1/3 of the existing building floor area, and, all minimum setbacks, must be met. (4) Shoreline alteration. No person shall construct, place, expand,, alter or replace any seawall without first applying for,and obtaining, site plan approval from the Planning Board. In addition, site plan approval is required for any filling, grading, lagooning, dredging, ditching and/or excavating within the district where such activities affect a cumulative area greater than 2.011 square feet. Thefollowing standards shall apply to the f6regoing activities: (a) General standards. �[I JThe activity shall not alter the natural contours of the shoreline., 12f The activity shall not disturb shoreline vegetation except in a minimal way. Where vegetation is destroyed, 6med or removed, it,shall be restored or replaced with indigenaus,vegetation listed in § 179-8-040C. Stabilization shall be in,accordance with.the United States Soil and Water Conservation District engineering standards and specifications. 131 The activity shall be carried out in a manner designed to minimize erasion, sedimentation, and impairment of fish and wildlife habitat., 141 The activity shall be designed and carried out to preserve or enhance the aesthetic features of the shoreline: area to be disturbed. 1-91 Allapplicable federal, state and other governmental agency pennits, shal I be obtained. (b) Specific standards, I I I Ffilling. No fill shall be:placed in this district except as associated withshoreline Protective structures, beach replenishment, agricultural uses or other uses approved by the Planning Board. Any fill placed in this district shall be:protected against _218-201 1 b'% 1.,..1, . No 101 1 121 Dredging. There shall be no removal or rearrangement of materials, in the water, except at those locations where such removal or rearrangement is found to be beneficial to existing,shoreline conditions,, uses, and water 2: quality and clarity, Where dredging is permitted by the Planning Roard,, soil materials, shall not be deposited in this district unless approved by the Planning Board. 171 Seawalls. The addition, expansion or replacement of any type of seawall shall be discouraged, except in the case where the alternative of shoreline restoration to a natural state is impossible due to excessive slope or severe erosion problems, a condition to be determined by the ZAning Administrator. Construction. of seawalls shall not be per pitted for only aesthetic reasons., '"When perrnitted, seawalls shall not exceed 16 inches in height, as measured from the stationary mean hig,h-water mark, and, shall be:constructed of native stone or wood. Treated lumber shall not be used below the mean high-water mar�k. Seawalls greater them 100 square feet in area shall also require a shoreline setback variance. (e) Tree cutting and land clearing regulations. 'The purpose of the tree cutting and land clearing regulations is to protect scenic beauty, control erosion andrieduce e:fflue.nt and nutrient flow from the shoreline area. These provisions shall not apply to the removal of dead, diseased or dying t�rees,or to other,vegetation that presents safety or health,hazards. Within this,district, the removal of vegetation, including,trees, shall be permitted on shorefront lots, provided that the following standards are:met: I I I The requirements oil"Chapter 147 of the Code of the Town of Queensbury may be applicable to land disturbance activities in this district. 121 Existing vegetation on a site is to be maintained whenever possible. 131 As,part of any permit submission, a survey of existing vegetation, to include all trees,with a diarn.eter breast height of three inches or greater,, shall be provided for the developm, ent site. Vegetation to bile rrnaintained or rernoved shall be identified. [41 Site:clearing shall be designed-to impact the least amount of existing vegetation,possible and only so as,to accommodate proposed structures, site infrastructure and reasonable use of outdoor spaces to include walks and small lawn or open areas. [a], No more than 309/a,of the existing vegetation may be removed from a site. [b1 Clearing of existing vegetation shall be accomplished in a manner that retains trees and ground cover and understory plantings in intact groupings of individual plants,rather than leaving single large trees susceptible to sun scald, wind throw and soil compaction. Sufficient protection of'such groupings requires no construction. activity at a minimum,of 10 feet outside of the dripline of tree canopies. in addition, tree roots, greater than four inches in diameter shall, not be severed. I'lel With new construction, clearing shall be limited to a maximum of 20 feet from.the foundation line or base line of proposed residential or commercial structures,, with screen,trees and vegetation preserved within that buffer to,the greatest extent possible; 10 feet maximutin,from the edgy of accessory bui Idings. [d], Unless otherwise demonstrated as necessary, all soil, retention shall be accomplished with natural and vegetative stabilization methods rather than with structural means. lei Clearing and trenching for utilities will be kept to the minimum width practicable or 15, feet maximum. Where abloveground utilities may be sufficie ntly screened, they may be employed; otherwise,underground utility access and,connection.willbe required. Visible clear-cuts are prohibited; if necessary under excepi conditions,vegetative plugs,will be employed to satisfactorily reduce their visual impact. [fl All utilities (to include but not be limited to on-site wastewater treatment, storni management systems, wells, etc.) shall be sited in.a manner to limit the contiguous clearing. [g], Where site features and vegetation are unavoidably impacted by new construction, the vegetation and topography associated with essential site features and fimctions shall be restored to a condition which will replicate:immediately or over time the existing conditions which were impacted and restore those features to their effective fimictions. 151 ,any change in grade of four inches or more,around existing trees, in CEA areas requires the construction of tree wells, if the grade is to be raised,or a retaining wall, if the grade is to 'be lowered to prevent daniage and/or subsequent death to the tree. Within 15 feet extending inland from all, points along the:mean high7water mark,no vegetation may be removed, This area.shall be maintai ned as an undisturbed.natural 'buff,er strip. Thio; distance shall be measured. in the folloill manner: Lake George: perpendicular and horizontal from the mean high-water mark and inland. Other water bodies: perpendicular and horizontal from the shorre I i ne and inland.,I : ,'$ i,"i-( H J The general exception to,the above standards shall be:an allowance for lake access,and beaches. The: creation of a contiguous,clear-cut opening,in the buMr strip shall not exceed 1%off the shoreline ftontage on any individual lot or a maximum of 50 linear feet, whichever is less. The clear-cut shall be angled across the lot so as to allow,for a view and access,but reduce:runoff. Pedestrian pathways,shall be located within this view corridor. 181 If not part ofa view comidor, pedestrian paths (access areas to beach or dock) shall be firnited to four feet and must be constructed of permeable materials such as paving stones, woodchips or composting decking with drainage slots. 191 Dead,, diseased or dying,trees may be removed only if they constitute a hazard and must be replaced (with reasonably similar vegetation)within six months if the approved site plan or shoreline vegetation minitnurn requirements are not being met,. I101 Where a shoreline lot owner violates this section, the Code En forit Officer,9hall require total revege:tation so as to create,a biuMr strip area which is in compliance with this section. i(d) Use of fertilizers. Fertilizer use within 50 feet of the shoreline is probibited. Where:allowed, fertilizers shall. have a phosphorus content of I% or less and contain slow-release nitrogen. (e) Provisions for access. Within this district,the following minimum shoreline fiontages,shall he required for deeded, easement, right-of-way or other contractual access to the shoreline for three or more lots, parcels, or sites,or multifarnily dwelling units not having separate and distinict ownership of shore frontage: ['1 I Site:plan review and approval by the Planning.Board pursuant to the standards below. [21 A plan shall be submitted showing areas for swimming, recreation, docking, building placement,parking and landscaping. 13J Compliance with the provisions of this section and this chapter. 14] Such use shall not significantly impair the natural appearance of said parcel; shall not,overcrowd the parcel or-the adjacent water surface; shall not produce unreasonable noise or glare:to, the surrounding properties; and shall not pose any substantial hazards. 151 The first three lots, sites or dwelling-units, shall require a total of not less than 75 feet of shlorrelinefrontage, and each additional lot, site or dwelling unit shall require an additional five feet of shoreline frontage. 161 Waterfront parcels may,be:developed for contractual access for five or more lots or units only if those lots or units are part of an overall development plan for land that is located, adjacent to the waterfront parcels,. 17 1 Each parcel used for contractual access shall, measure at least the:minimurn lot area for the zoning district vrLre the access is proposed and, shal I measure an average depth of 100 feet from the mean high-water mark, 181 No structures other than toilet, changing facilities, and picnic shelters, shall be constructed on,the waterfront parcel. The total. combined, square fbiatage of all,structures shall root exceed 1,000 square feet. 1.91 Corrunercial activities of any kind are prohibited. 10 1, Parking areas shall be landsicapedand shall be slet back fr-om the shoreline a rninimum of75 feet. Subdivision/Site plan & Variance items The plans have also identified varia,rnces that may be needed this include § 179-4-035 Interstate Highway Overlay District. —no new residential subdivision.of land. § 179-4-0Frontage—lots 13, 14,15 may be subject to review for by access—they have road frontage but it is not clear if each lot would have physical access to Big Room Rd § 179-6-050 Shorefine- hard surfacing within 50,ft of the shoreline—wetland boundary may need site plan Chapter Freshwater Wetlands Pen-nit o�rk within 100 �k of the wetland requires a wetlands,permit. Summa Chapter 183 Axticle provides an, outline of the review procedures for sketch plan— The Planning Board, shall study the sketch plan.in conj unction with the maps and information as may, be appropriate to determme if the proposed subdivision includes,areas where there are severe limitations,to, development. The Planninsurd shall make advisory recommendations which shall be:applicable to the proposed subdivision. Meeting HigqM, P,B I meeting; Site Plan 3 -218 Sate Route Adirondack Factory Outlet P u� tic Hearing Scheleld SEAR Unlisted Draft resolution — gra,nt/den,y site plea approval Town. of Queensbary Planning Board QLI Conimuriity Development Department Staff Notes . pH1 .4, 2018 Site Plan 3 0-20 1.8 ADIRONDACK FACTORY OUTLET 144-4 State Route 9/CI — Commercial Intensive/ 'ward. I SEQR Unlisted Material Review- narrative, site plan application, storm Ater report, elevations. Parcel History: SP 3-21009', SP 37-2015,many others Reauested Action Planning,Board, review and approval for removal of 13,675 sq. ft. building at front of Adirondack Outlets and to construct new 1.2,706 sq. ft. building on, southwest comer. Resolutions L SE QR 2. Planning Board decision, Proicet Destription Applicant proposes removal of 13,675 sq. ft. building at front of Adirondack Outlets,and to construct new 12,706 sq. ft, building on southwest comer. Project will have both buildings 75 ft. from front property line. Project work includes,new fagade area for existing building, site work grading,, landscaping and stormwater for new building. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance,new commercial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review andapproval Staff commeaft Location-The project is,located at 1444 State Route 9 and, is known as the Adirondack Factory Outlets Arrangement- The plans show the removal of approximately 13,675 sq ft of existing building that included stores such as Under Annor and Timberland shoes. A 1.2,706 sq ft building,swill 'be constructed on the south side of'the property at a,75 ft setback. o Site Design- The plans show the location for the:new building and the rearrangement of parking for the front of the building,and 0 Building—The building plans show the, front elevation of the renovated main building and the view elevations,of the new building. * Signage-signage areas,or dimensions,are not shown on the plan and will be subject to staff review and previous sign variance plans,. a Site conditions-The site conditions will be similar as the new building is proposed in an area that was previously parking. # Traffic-The applicant has shown the parking to be:351 spaces on the site: for the existing building and new building. The internal traffic flow at the front of the site includes and interconnect to the North property so pedestrians and vehicle traffic can occur betweenn properties-encourage pedestrian traffic and vehicle to remain parked on site. Site layout and utility plan—utilities will be updated to connect to the new building area as needed. Grading and drainage plan, Sediment and erosion control ­Theproject has been provided to engineering f6r review and comment. The applicant has indicated the stormwater management will be addressed with exist�ing dry wells and new ones to be installed in, areas near the new building. Landscape plan —the plans show the new building to, have a lawn area at the .ftont facing,the sidewalk. Additional plantings are proposed around the new building. Site fighting plan —The plans thow the existing pole lights in the Parking area and five new wa.1.1 lights will be added to the building. o Elevations-The,elevations show the view fronts indicating the height of the main portions of the building are 29 .ft 3 in and the tower features, are at 40 ft. The favade colors are provided with drak green clapboard sideing, field stone at the building base, and white trim. Floor plans—Floor plans where not shown,the board may request floor plan, arrangement for the existing and proposed. Pursuant to Section 179-9-0,50 the Planning Board, may grant waivers onits own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form. identified as "'Requirements" outlines the item,s to, appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application. the applicant has, either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: k,, topography,, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor,plans, q. soil logs,r. constructionYdemolition disposal s. snow removal. Sum=ry The applicant has completed a site plan application for the demolition of 13,675 sq ft portion of an existing building, construction.of new buildi,ng at, 12,706 sq ft andassociated site work. Mpefing-His= PB: I" meeting w���l�'�mtiti_ War r� rn County Planning Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Depaar°tinent as April, +9, 2118 Project Marne. Adk Factory Outlets, Owner Adk Factory Outlets ID Nuumbl er. QBE"'®118- PR- 0 County Project#: ,pr1 - l `,Current ZoningCl- (HC-INT) urnrunraunit : Queensbury Project,Description; Applicant proposes to remove current astern-most storefronts and add new retail space in, southwest corner of pared, Site Location-, 1 444 State kit g Tax Map 'uurrber(s); 88.t rii- Staff Notes: The Warren CountyPlanningi Department finds that the project will not createany sigruiticafn#unter- uun[ ii al or county-wide impels to the items identified Vire GML§239. 1 nf orma I Reeoarnmeindation: Warren County Planning Staff, suggests that the Queensbury Planning Board eoru iders,astaing tie applicant to provide,a. clearly defined pati tai the Factory Outlet Mall. Local.actions to sate (if any): County Planning Department: N 11 Local Action./Final Disposition: 411=1r111' Warren County PlaunIng Department Date Signed Lueat Oficial Date Signed PLWE RETURN THIS FOW TO,THE WARREN COUNrY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS"Of FINAL ACTION rn Chmn' orth Country Office .._ 375 gay Road,Queensbury NY 12804 COM P aE P. (519)912- 3 - , 19,47-201� 7,LARS www.chazencompanies.carn Prm:rwy'rn err EeT47kiyer^Gvvyu:Ya'C Hudson Valley Office 'S) -3 Ergnneers Land Su✓Irveyors, Capital District Office (518)273-0055 Planners lEnvironmental Professionals LandKam Ar6hkects April l 12,2018 Mr.Craig Brown Zoning Adm Inlstrator and Code Corn plliance Officer Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road ueensb ury,New York 12884 Delivered via email only. Arai n,eensbu .matt Re: Adirondack Foctory Outlet Town of Queerrsbu'M Worren County, New York "bonen Prqj�#91800,17 Queensbury Ref#S P30-201$ Dear M r. IlBro w+n: The Chazen Companies (Chrazen), has revel ed a wbmission package from your office for the above referenced project. The applicant intends to iredeyvetop an existing building by demolishing a portion and adding 12, SF of inew building south of the existing. Submitted information includes the following: Site plans and Details prepared by Hutchins,Engineering,dated Larch 7,20113; torrnwwaterPollution Prevention'Plan prepared by(Hutchins Engineering, dated March 30, 211118; 6 Short EAP prepared by Hutchins EngIneerirn,g„ dated Larch 7,2018;and, M Site Plan Application dated March 1,4.,201& Your office Inas requested that we limit our review to the design of storrmv+water system as It relates to compliance to local, state or relevant codes ,and regulations. Based upon our review, Chazein offers the Mowing comments for the Tovwn!s consideration:. Storrrnw ater Management&Erosion.and Sediment Control. 1. The project proposes to disturb 11 acres of land and therefore requires the preparation of a tonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S PPP) in accordance with GP-0-15-002 that includes erosion and sediment controls as well as post construction storax water management practices.. Corm titer management report and SWPPP have been, provided. Comments related to the proposed stormwwater management and erosion and sediment control features proposed for the site are offered below: . Section 17"-0 of the Town Code, states that stormwwrater drainage plans shall analyze the impacts of a project using at least a 0-Year return storm, with regards to (both runoff rate and volume=for couv mercial projects.The Applicant has provided a i-Year analysis,. Chazen Engineering, Land Sweying&Landscape AmhReclum Co-,D�PC. manna EnvhmentW Sefwres,Inc, The Chazen Companies, orae. Town of Quetnsbury Adirondaick FaCtOry Outlet April 12,ZD18 Page 2 9. It is noted that the project appears to fall within an archeological sensitive area according to the short F. The Applicant to revise the,SWPPP'tin include the required documentation per I.F.8 of the General Permit, 4. Pond 2P on the existing conditions subcatchment map does not appear to be labelled. Pond 1P (same ponding area as 2P') does notappear to, be labeled on the proposed condition.$ subcatchment reap.TheAppIlcarrt to show oin reaps to verify the Hyd roCAD model.. S. It is difficult to discern what pretreatment.techniques are proposed prior to the drywe Ills; the SWRPP does not appear to Include a pretreatment discussion or calculations, The Applicant to revise atcording[V. 6. It does not appear that the full effects of the storm are realized based on the 5" sign in, the HydiroCAD model.The Applicant to revise the tim e span of the storm such that the fulleffects are reall4ed. 7. It is difficult to discern If the proposed grading is shown on the site, plan. Also,, disturbance is proposed in post-development subcatchment 3, however proposed grading is, not depicted to, siu bsta nitiate,the stoirmwate'r design.The Applicant to revise accord ingly., 8. In accordance with 147-10,D th,eire,does not appear to be a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement included in the SWPPP. The Applicant shall coordinate with, the Town to, determine If' a mal nte nance agreement is required, if so,provide a draft agreernerit for the'Town's review, 9e There does not appear to be an,NOI Included in the,SW'P,PP,.The Applicant to,provide a draft NOL 10. There does,not appear to be a,concrete washout detaill.The Applicant to provide. 11. There does,not appear to be a,construction entrance,depicted on the plans,or a detail sheet,The Applicant:to provide. �12, There doles not appear to be a SWPPP preparer ceffification statement Included in the SWPPP. The Applicant to provide,a SWPPP prepare'r certification. 13. There, does, not appear to, be Inspection requirements pursuant to Part IV,C2 of the General Permit.The Applicant to provide the Inspection requiremeints. 1.QueensburOWLSODA7-7-Qa%� sbuy-5Pa&NIO AdkmdwO,racwV OuitkiVNr.%REVIEW%91IW17-Adimndark F'actam Ton of CjueensbuQ, Adirondack Factory outlet Aplill.12,2018 Pag4e 3 In the event the Planning Board or Town staff have any questions or require additional information, please do not fiesitate to contaict mie at(518)S-24-19126. Sincerely, —rp�5— Sean M. Doty, P.rE., LEE D AP,CMS4S Printipal Director, Municipaf Engineering Services cc: Sunny Sweet,Town Planning Offlice Administrator(via emall) Laura Moore,,Town Land Use Planner(via e-mail) F'ile T,QAp?@*ftrAMMJ7-T'. AdkondaA FmtarF Owtl!lkENGVIWILW)$IBM,17,AOtMock Fadow 5X-k3hom u U �:IIatiQ�iR,,B �i�da"a"1tl.901�,GN"°w. , "d,1N°°•.�. Town of Queensbury Planning 'Board QR RESOLUT10N—Grant positive or Negative Declaration S'I'TE PLAN 3 0-2018 ADIRO RACK FACTORY TLET Tax Map :113. 288.12-1-;2 , -23 1 Property address: 1444 State Route 9 /Zoning: C1 The applicant proposes removal of 13,675 sq. ft. building at front, of Adirondack Outlets and to construct new 12,706 sq. ft. building on southwest canmer. Project will have bothbuildings. 75 fl. from front property line. Project work includes new fa ade area for existing building, sitework grading, landscaping and storrnnwater for new building. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 sof the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and' Planning Board action, is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental ornservatiorn Regulations, implementing the State Environmental Qnuualityr Review Act and the regulations of the 'Town of Queensbury; No Federal or other,an erncies.are involved, Part 1 of the:Short lEAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the irnfbrinnatiorn recorded on this E F, it is the conclusion oftbe°1`owrn of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment and, therefore, an environmental impact statement meed not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued,. M,OTl .N TO TPOSITIVE 'L T'Tt3°l' IT . TI" DECLARATION I.I. SIT PLAN 0- awl. , IPS!NDACK FACTORY OUTLET Introduced b who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Paart.II of the short 11E p'bass been reviewed and completed by the Plnaannniog hoard. . Part III of the short IE ,F has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. Gr :Part III of the short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duty adopted this "day of April, 2018 by the following vote: ,AYES: CFS' ; Flhone�-' 518,761-8220 p Fax- 51&745A437 � 712 13-ay Roacl.okio iw�bur)`.' Y I? 04 d mh,,w,(Iocen bitry.cwo d i1;94NV'�9NN tutl8r,! � 'u.'° GG"I.GVi,.'llAl n ��, pc„:w,. Tow of Queensbury Planning Bayard RESOLUTION,-Grant/Deny Site Plan Approval, SITE DEAN 0-2018 ADIRO RACK FACTORY UT1.ET Tax Map ID: 28'8.12-1-22, - /Property .drys: 1444 State Rout '/Zoning: ;1. The applicant has submitted. an application to the Planning Board, ;applicant proposes rein al of 13.,6 '5 sq. R. building at front of Adirondack Outlets and to construct new 12,706 sq. ft., building on southwest corner. Project will have both buildings 75 ft. from front property line. Project work includes new fagade area for existing building, site work grading, landscapi:ung,and, storm water for new building, Pursuant to Chapter 179- 3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance„ new commercial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the 'Town of Queensbury Zoning Cock-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated, in the,owning Crude; As required by General Municipal, Law Section, 239-in the site plan application was referred to the 'warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; ."Vibe Planning Board has reviewed the potential en 'ir nrnental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act P RAand adopted a SE, Negative Declaration - Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan, application on 4/2412018 and continued the public hearing to 04/24/2018, when it was clod, The Planning :Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and .all cornnments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through,and including 04/24/2018; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APP D I APPRQVE SIT'E, DPL 9-2018 ADIRONDACK FACTORY UTLET Introduced b who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared.by Staff with the following, 1) Waivers requested granted/denied; 2. Adherence to the iterns outlined in the t'cll w-aup letter sent with this resolution.. ra) The limits of clearing will constitute ano-out buffer zone, orange construction, fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Communky Development staaffi� b) if applicable,tate Sanitary' Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department ent frac its review,approval, permnnitting,.and inspection, Page t of 2 Phvia� 5118,761,8220 Fax, 18.745.4437 742 Uy Road Quaish rya NY 1 804 p www.quc nsbtVYAM. c) If curb,cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required., A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has, been provided, to the Planning Office; d) If application wasrefeired to engineering then Frigineering sign-offrequired prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans,, e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks,noted on the site plan/survey,, floor plans, and elevation f6r the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements;- f) If required, the applicant must s,ubmit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project NOI (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current, "'NYSDE,C SPDE S General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site:work. b. The project NOT (Noticeof'Tea nination),upon completion of the project, c. The applicant must maintainon their project site, for review by staff; i. The approved final.plans that have been stamped,by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans,must include the project WPPP toren Water Pollution Prevention Plan) whe,n s,uch,a.plan was prepared and approved; ii. 'The project NON and proof of coverage under the current NYS' DEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final, approved plans, in compliance with,the Site Plan,must be suibm, itted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning, Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; In The applicant must meet with. Staff, after approval, and prior to issuance of Building Prmit andJor the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent,issuance of further permits, including building pen nits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j), As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to, be provided prior to,issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) Thisresolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans, Duly adopted this 241h day of April, 2018 by the following vote-� AYES. NOES: Page of 2 Phone: 518.761,8220 1 Fax: 5:18,7415.4437' 742 Bay Road. Queensbury, NY 12804 N w w,w.quse ensbur y.net Discussion Item 2,-20,,18 3 Stade Route, 149 Cumberland Farms, Inc. No Public caring Schedulied — discussion only Town of Queensbary Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes April ' , 2018 Discussion 1-2018 CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. 3 State Route 149/ CI—Commercial intensive / Ward I SEQR 'Unlisted (ria for discussion) Material, Review: updated narrative and site plan Parcel History: (-8) UV 1,377 1988; Disc 9-2017 Reauteste tion Planning Board discussion of a proposal to remove existing, ice cream/snack bar business and replace with, a 5,275 sq. ft, convenience store. Proleco escription, , Applicant pr poses to remove existing ice crearnIsnack bar business and replace with a 5,2x'5 , ft. convenience store. Applicant has,updated infonnation. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, discussion with the Planning Board may be requested by the applicant. Staff"COMMORIts The applicant has provided a revised site plan with the fuel canopy having additional setbacks—Route 9 at a 75 �ft setback and Route 149 with a 56.6 ft setback. The fuel canopy size was reduced from 22 ft X,1 to ft X 171 ft. T�he applicant has also provided additional traffic infonnation in regards to discussions with outside agencies and NYS DOT. Code sections for review are noted below: Section 179-3-04Y Establishm-ent of zoning d Commercial Intensive (Q. The CI Districts comprise that area of Queensbury that already has intense commercial development. The purpose of this district is to provide for continuing infill development of this type, while encouraging the overall improvement and appearance of these areas. Section, 179-7-050 A.Desi districts, (1) Route 9 North District: between Sweet Road and the Town"s border with the Town of Lake George. Commercial variety best describes this section of Route 9. The southern end has large and small retail offerings, interspersed with restaurants, convenience stores, gas stations, a fun park, an RV park, an outdoor drive-in, theater. Amid this 'section is the Six Flags' The Great Escape. North of this theme park is the counts municipal center and beyond that a cluster of outlet malls, intersected by Route 149, an important ruralroute to Vermont, The North, Route 9 corridor, while an improvement over the lower section, still lacks, continuity and sufficient greenery, especially within parking areas. It is,the community's desire to, insist on Adirondack-themed designs with more creative parking design and landscaping, so that the building, parking, and landscaping visually share space. For example, parking lot lighting should be antique4hemed similar to the existing sidewalk pedestrian lighting. No one aspect of commercial developments located here should be dominant. Locating track routes,, loading docks, and employee parking in the rear will allow opportunities for more landscaping to the front and sides of the building. From Mont,ray Road to, Round Pond Road, low-impact commercial development abuts a residential zone along Route 9's south side., Future development in this area should,remain low-impact and transitional in effect. (2) Route 9 North District. (a) Timber-frame structures,with unique and ingenious natural expressions of materials,, creating a Cottage/cabin feel that blends into the natural scenery. h.) Meticulous craftsmanship and innovative use of materials are essential components. (c)Natural finishes, large windows, use of natural exterior elements in the interior, great rooms, and massive stone fireplaces are common elements of this Style,, (d).May include the following.: [II Steep roof pitches. [21 Large roof overhangs. (3) Naturally finished materials such as twig omamentation, notched logs andnatural bark, split spruce branches,arranged insunburst and diamond patterns. 14] Exposed structure,post brackets, complex, naturalistic railing and baluster design, large windows, stone chimney,s and building elements. 15] Log or split log buildings,. ih7 0 Hi AAA 1 T'he architectural guidelines In the Route 9 North District are to emphasize an Adirondack style. Variance items The project may be Subject to area variances,for setbacks,where the parcel is considered to have two fronts requiring 75 ft setback from the fiont and a rear setback of 25 ft to the ren aini I ng property lines SUM= Pursuant to Chapter l7' -9- 0 of the Zoning Ordinance,.applicant may present a sketch to receive comments and feedback from the Planning,Boar& Megfin&ffistory. Previous PB discussion 12,/2018 —now updated info.