Loading...
Staff Notes Planning Board Mtg Tues., July 24, 2018 PLANN � NG BOARS STAFF NOTES J U LY 241 2018 Site Plan 47-2018 @ 362 Cleverdale Road Larry Steinhart Public Hearing Scheduled SEQR Type II Draft resolution- grant/deny site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes July 24, 201 Site Plan 47- 018 LARRY STEHART 362 C:leverdale Road 1 W1 —Waterfront Residential / Ward 1 ECR Type II Material Review: application, site drawings, elevations Parcel History: 2013-547 Septic Alt, Requested Action Planning Board review and approval for 136 sq, ft_ single store addition to existing 1156 sq. ft. (footprint) home. Resolutions I. Planning 13oard decision Project Description Applicant proposes 136 sq. ft. single story addition to existing 1156 sq. ft. (footprint) home. Existing home has FAR of 2,007 sq. ft. and proposed is 2,143 sq. ft. Project includes removal of some existing hard surface areas. Pursuant to Chapter 174-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of norn-conforming structure shall be subject to Plarming Board review and approval. Staff ornDIcRts • Location-The project is located at 362 C}leverdale Ind. a Arrangement- The parcel contains an existing home, garage, walking paths • Site Design- The 136 sq ft addition is to be located on the road side of the home. * Building—The plans show the addition to be in an infilI area on the front of the home. The addition is to be 12 ft in height. The addition will expand a bedroom and bathroom area on the first floor. • Site conditions-The applicant has included areas of patio to be removed from the site and replaced with planting beds or lawn area. Site layout and utility plan—There are no changes to the existing utilities on the site. The septic system was upgraded in 2013. • Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erasion control- The plans show the limits of disturbance to be about 825 sq ft. Silt fence location is rioted on the plans. The plans also show an eave trench area Landscape plan—There ai-e areas noted on the plan where existing patio is to be removed and planting beds are to be installed. Elevations —The plans show the addition to be one story 12 ft in height and 136 sq ft. The addition is to have a similar appearance as the existing structure. Floor plans —The plans shows only the first floor bedroom and bathroom expansion. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified a " equirernen&' outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left cheek box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application. g. site lfgb6ng, h. signage, k. topography, n traffic, o, commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal s, snow removal. Nature of Variance Granted 7118118. Zoning Beard granted approval with condition addtlionalplantings be added with derails ro be provided by the Planning Board. The applicant proposes a single story addition that requires relief from the north side setback proposed is 7.6 ft where a 2.0 ft setback is required. Relief is also mquested for Moor area where 2 3.7 % is proposed and 22 % is required Summary The applicapplicant has completed a site plan application for the expansion of a non-conforming structure in a Critical Environmental area for the construction of a one story 136 sq ft addition. pending Zoning Board review and decision. Meeting Histor . PB: 7l17l18; ZBA. 711 118; {-"���x�ar�t.��3i1}' I)c��.lc������c•itt {)!'Eicc 742 kite Road, OWC114-4iry, NY 12804 Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION— Grant I Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN 47-2018 LARRY STEINHART Tax Map ID: 22 .12-1-64/Property Address: 362 Cleverdale Road /Zoning, WR The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes 136 sq. it. single story addition to existing 1156 sq. ft. (footprint) home. Existing home has FAR of 2,007 sq. ft. and proposed is 2,143 sq. ft. Project includes removal of some existing hard surface areas, Pursuant to Chapter 17 -3 0 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-conforming structure shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan appliedion was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 07/24/2018 and continued the public hearing to 07/24/2018, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted its writing through and including 07/24/2018; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE I DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 47-2018 LARRY STEINHART." Introduced b who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted/denied: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c) Final approved plants, in compliance with the Site Plan, roust be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; Page 1 of 2 Phone: 518.761.8220 Fax; 518745.4437 742 Bay Road. Queensbury. NY 1204 : ww-queensbury.net e) Subsequent issuance of further pemnit% including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; } As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Duly adopted this 241h day of July, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Page 2 of 2 Phony: 516.761.8220 . Fax; 516.745.4437 742 Bay Road. Queensbury, NY 12804; www,quHnsbury.net Site Plan 49-2018 & Freshwater Wetlands Permit 4- 1 @ CherryTr Large (South side) Michael Chrys Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Type II Draft resolution- grant/deny site plan approval k Town of Queensbury Planning Board omrnunity Development Department St,affNotes July 24, 2018 Site Plan 49- 018 MI HAEL CHRYS (37 Southside, of Cherry Lane Freshwater Wetlands 4-2 018 Cherry Tree Lane/WR—Waterfront Residential 1 Ward 1 SEQR Type II Material Review. application site drawings, building elevations, Part<el History, FW 11-2008 Requested Action Planning Board review and approval to construct new single family home, 896 sq. ft, (footprint) with.a 160 sq ft covered porch and 2112 sq ft, floor area. Resolutions I. Planning Board decision Project Description Applicant proposes to construct new single family horne, 896 sq. ft, (footprint) with a 160 sq ft covered porch and 2112 sq ft. floor area. Project includes site work for septic, storm water, and site grading. Project has a permeable driveway. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, project work within 100 ft. of a wetland boundary shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments * Location-Property is located on the South side of Cherry Lane—currently vacant parcel. (Forest Lane South on plans) * Ai-rangement- The lots are wooded and a portion to be cleared for the house development. * Site Design- The project plans indicate 10,000 sq ft of disturbance to occur. The home is to have a permeable parking area and a walking path to the home. The front of the home is to have a covered porch. * Building — The building is to be single story to the front and two story to the rear. • Site conditions-The existing site is sloping from the roadside to the wetland area. * Site layout and utility plan—The site is to have onsite septic and a well installed. • Grading and drainage pIan and Sediment and erasion control- The submission has been forwarded to the Town designated engineer for review and comment. The grading and clearing are shown to include about 10,000 sq of disturbance. Grading and silt fence areas are shown. * Landscape plan —The applicant has shown a clearing limit on the site that maintains a small border toward Cherry Lane and tree clearing to the gear of the home for a infiltration basin, no work is to occur in the wetland • Elevations—The elevations indicate the home to be 27 ft 10 IA in. Elevation pIans to be reprised to show the topography points for the original and proposed. Floor plans The plans indicate the house is to have one bedroom on the main floor and two bedrooms in the basement floor level. Pursuant to Section 179-9-050 the Planning board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requiremen&' outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, n traffic, s. snow removal. Freshwater Wetlands The wetland total is about 5.68 ac on the parcel and extends beyond the property—plans will aced to be updated to reflect the lot size of 7.27. The plans show work within 50 ft of the shoreline of the wetland to include two drainage basin areas and the new home. Summary The applicant has completed a site plan application and a freshwater wetland permit for the construction of a 1,056 sq ft home with a 2,112 floor area. Weting Histo . 11�' meeting; C'0111111 Lill it% ikVC10])Mellt ()I'licc Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION Grant 1 Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAIN 4 - 018 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 4-2018 MI HAEL CHRYS Tax Map ID: 226.19-2-201 Property Address: Cherry Tree bane 1 Zoning: WIC The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: Applicant proposes to construct new single family home, 896 sq. ft. (footprint) and 2112 sq. ft. door area. Project includes site work for septic, stormater, and site grading. Project has a permeable driveway. Pursuant to Chapter 17 -3-040 and Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, project work within 100 ft. of a wetland boundary shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 17 J-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 2.3 J-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 0712412018 and continued the public hearing to 07/24/2018, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 07/24/2018; The Manning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site flan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLANT 49-2018 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 4-2018 MI HA.EL )F R S; Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) Waivers requested granted/denied; . Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable,the unitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements; Pagel of 2 Phone. 518161,8220 Fax, 518,745,4437 1 742 Bay Road_ Queensbury, NY 12804 www.queensbury.net f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a, The project N I (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity„ prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; e. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: L The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NOI and proof of coverage under the current NYSDF-C SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan,must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; j) As-built plays to certify that the site play is developed according to the approved plants to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adapted this 241h day of July,2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOFS: Page 2 of 2 Phone: 518.761.8220 . Fax. 518.745.4437 742 Bay Road, Oueensbury. NY 12804 www_queensbury_riek Site Plan 50-2018 & Freshwater Wetlands Permit 5-201$ @Cherry Tree Lane (North side) Garner Holdings Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Type II Draft resolution- grant/deny site plan approval Town of Qaeensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes July 24, 2018 Site Plan 5 0-2018 GARNER HOLDINGS (48,4 -North side Cherry Lane) Freshwater Wetlands 5-2018 Cherry Tree Lane/ WR—Waterfront Residential / Ward 1 SEAR Type II Material Review: application site drawings, building elevations, Parcel History: FW 10-2008-35342, FWW 10-2008-35343, Requested Action Planning Board review and approval to construct new single family home, 896 sq. ft. (footprint) with a 160 sq ft covered porch and 2) 12 sq. ft. floor area. Resolutions 1. Planning Board decision Proiect Description Applicant proposes to construct new single family home, 996 sq. ft. (footprint)with a 160 sq ft covered porch and 2112 sq. ft. floor area. Project includes site work for septic, stortn ater, and site grading. Project has a permeable driveway. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, project work within 100 ft. of a wetland boundary shall be subject to Planning Board review and.approval. Staff Comments * Location-Property is located an the North side of Cherry Late umently vacant parcels. Parcels are to he merged as part of project. Board should include as a condition.. (Forest Lane;North on plans) Arrangement-The lots are wooded and a portion to be cleared for the house development. • Site Resign- The project plans indicate 10,000 sq ft of disturbance to occur. The home is to have a permeable parking area and a walking path to the home. The front of the home is to have a covered porch. « Building—The building is to be single story to the front and two story to the rear. Site conditions-The existing site is sloping from the roadside to the wetland area. Site layout and utility plan—The site is to have on site septic and a well installed. Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control —The submission has been forwarded to the Town designated engineer for review and comment. The grading and clearing are shown to include about 10,000 sq of disturbance. Grading and silt fence areas are shown. • Landscape plan—The applicant has shown a clearing limit on the site that maintains a mull border toward Cherry Lane and tree clearing to the rear of the home for an infiltration basin, no work is to occur in the wetland • Elevations The elevations indicate the home to be 27 ft 10 '4 in. Elevation plans to be revised to show the topography points for the original and proposed. * Floor plans—The glans indicate the home is to have one bedroom on the main floor and two bedrooms in the basement floor level. Pursuant to Section 17 -9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The. application form identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, n traffic, s. snow removal. Freshwater Wetlands The permit indicates the wetland total is 7,900 sq ft. The plans show work within 50 ft of the shoreline of the wetland to include a drainage basin and the new home. Summary The applicant has completed a site plan application and a freshwater wetland permit for the construction of a 1,056 sq ft home with a 2,112 floor area. The board may consider a condition that lots are be merged. Meeting History:istory:: 1'meeting; 'f(] 4`11 t)['0L1Cet1ShUry 01111Inti111l1V %.—. i I)cl�kr Y N p Inc IIi �li'11 c:V [] 142 €3�,i Jioad. Qt s 1ishur _ Y 1 12f,0 1 Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION— Grant /Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN 50-2018 &. FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 5-2018 GARNER HOLDINGS Tax Map ID: 22 -1 -1-4 & -491 Property Address: Cherry Tree Lane/Zoning: WR The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: Applicant proposes to construct new single family home, 896 sq. ft. (footprint) and 2112 sq, ft. floor area. Project includes site work for septic, storm water, and site grading. Project has a permeable driveway. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 and Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, project work within 100 ft. of a wetland boundary shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal sadsfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; s required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 07/24/2018 and continued the public hearing to 07/24/201 ,when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public bearing and submitted in writing tl7rougb and including 07/24/201 ; The Planning Board determines that the application complies vAtb the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordiinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE I DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 50-2018 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT -2018 GARNER HOLDINGS; Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following. 1) Waivers requested granted/denied; . Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter seat with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing wilt constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable,the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, pesrritting and inspection; c) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to the Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements; Page I of 2 Phone: 518.761.8220 1 Fax: 518.745.44371 742 Bay Road, Queensbury. NY 12804 ww _queen5Wry.net If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town'. a. The project N01 (Notice of Inwnt) for coverage under the current "NYSDF-C SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; c. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff. i. The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans must include the project SWPPP (Storm WateT Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and appro-Fed; ii. The project N01 and proof of coverage under the current NY SDEC SPDFS Gpmeral Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required, g) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan,must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; b) The applicant must meet with Staff' after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits, is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; J} As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed in its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 24"` day of July, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: FIDES: Page 2 of 2 Phone. 519,761.8220 ! Fax; 518-745.4437 742 Bay Road, Queensbury. NY 12804 1 www.queensbury.net Site Plan 45-2018 @ 9 Carey Road Hudson Headwaters Health Network Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Unlisted Draft resolution- grant/deny site plan approval Town of Queensbu ry Planning 13oxrd QL Community Development Department Staff Notes July 24, 2018 Site Platy 45-2018 HUDSON HEADWATERS HEALTH NETWO K Carey Road / CLI— Commercial Light Industrial ! Ward 4 SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, site drawing, shed detail i Parcel History; 310-2415 New office, CC490-2016 Office alt., PZ 51-201 fence; Requested Adinn Planning Board review and approval to remo-ve a 10' x 12' storage shed and to place a 392 sq. f, storage, sired in similar location—southeast corner. Resolutions t. SEQI 2. Planning Board decision Pro!ect Description Applicant proposes to remove a 10' x 1 ' storage shed and to place a 392 sq. ft, storage shed in sinailar location — southeast corner. Storage shed height is approximately 11'6". Shed will have electric for indoor lighting, no exterior lighting anticipated. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 &. 179-5-02 0 of the Zoning Ordinance, sheds in non-residential district shall be subject to PIazining Board review and approval. Staff Comments • Location-The project site is located at 9 Carey Rd and the project is associated with the Hudson Headwaters Administration building. • Arrangement- The parcel is 2.16 ac and contains an existing 24,818 sq ft building. The existing 120 sq ft shed would be removed and the 3 92 sq ft should would be placed in the southeast side of the building, + Building—The shed is to be 14ft x 28 ft and witb a double door. The preexisting sired is 1 I ft 6 inches in height. There is to be electric connection to allow for an interior light. • ignage-There are no signage changes proposed. • Traffic- The plans indicate there are 100 parking spaces for the site and the new shed with a new sidewalk access will take up about 3 parking spaces, The existing Administration building requires 83 spaces. o Site plan overall —The plans shove the location of the shed on the property and minimal site disturbance where the shed is to be placed. • Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control—The applicant has indicated there are no changes to the existing stormwater and the existing system can accommodate the runoff from the shed and sidewalk area. Landscape plan—no change in the existing landscaping is proposed_ • Site lighting plan —no change in site lighting—there will be lighting inside the shed for staff to store files. Elevations and Floor plans The applicant has provide an image of the proposed shed and has indicated the inside of the shed is for storage of files. Pursuant to Section 17 -9-050 the Planning Board may grant waivers OD its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the itern/ left crack box blank. This includes the follow items listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, 1. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. Surnmary The applicant has competed a site plan application for the removal of an existing shed and the placement of a 392 sq R shed on the property for the storage of records. MeetingI istory; 1' muting; -1-n Wn t)I'Q uee11`,hllV), t`{)mnItmity 1)eve IopI11Ct)t 0I'liC - 742 Bay l mad. ( uccnshury. NY 12904 Town of Queensbury Planning Board SEAR RESOLUTION N—Grant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 45-201 HUDSON HEAD ATERS HEALTH NETWORK Tax Map ID: 308,1 -2-2.3 I Property Address: 9 Carey Road 12;oning, CLI The applicant proposes to remove a 10' Y. 1 ' storage shed and to place a 392 sq. ft. storage shed in similar location — southeast corner. Storage shed height is approximately 11' ". Shed will have electric for indoor lighting, no exterior lighting anticipated. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 17 -5-0 0 of the Zoning Ordinance, sheds in non-residential district shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of ueensbury; No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on Ws EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Queensbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore. an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATION DR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 45-2018 HUD ON HEADWATERS HEALTH NETWDR Introduced by who moved for its adoption- As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Part I I of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. . Part III of the Short EAF has been revi ewe d and completed by the Planning Board. Or Patt III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adapted this 24 h day of July, 2018 by the following vote: AFS: NOES: Phone: 518.761,8220[ Fax; 518.745.4437 1 742 Bay Road, Queensbury,NY 128N I www-queensbury.net 1'0W1101 LIUL7111.11L11'Y To%�,m of Queensbury Planning Board ESOLUTI N — G ran( / Deny Site Pian Approval SITE PLAID 45-2018 HUDSON HEADWATERS HEALT14 NETWORK Tax Map ID: 308,1 -2-2.31 Property Address: 9 Care} Road/Zoning. CLI The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site flan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to remove a 10' x 12' storage shed and to place a 392 sq. ft. storage shed in similar location — southeast corner. Storage shed Height is approximately 11' ". Shed will have electric for indoor lighting, no exterior lighting anticipated. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-5-020 of the Zoning Ordinance, sheds in non-residential district shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Plaiuling Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by ,eneral Municipal Law Section 39-m the site plan application was referred to the Waneen County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planking Board has reviewed the potential environmental impaots of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SE RA) and adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration — Determination of lion-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 07/24/2018 and continued the public hearing to 07/24/2018, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 07/24/2018; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE / DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 4 - 018 HUDSON HEADWATERS HEALTH N1♦,TWORK Introduced by who moved for its adoption. Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions. 1) Waivers request granted I denied: 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution Duly adopted this 24"' day of July, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOF = Phone, M.761.8220 . Fax: 518.745.4437:742 Bay Road.Queensbury. NY 12804 1 ww ,queensburi.net Site Plan 52-2018 @ 398 Corinth Road TNT Corinth Road, LL Public Hearing Scheduled SEAR Unlisted Draft resolution- grant/deny site plan approval Town of Queensbury Planning Board ow Community Development Department Staff Notes July 2.4, 2018 Site Plan 5 -2018 TNT CORINTH ROAD, LL 398 Corinth Road /CLI — Commercial Light Industrial / Ward 4 SEQR Unlisted Material Review: application, site drawings, storra ater pollution prevention plan, stormwater report, floor plan and elevations Parcel History- SP 63-1 90, SP 6-1992, AST 4-2010; Requested Action Planning Board review and approval for 12 buildings —4 buildings at 3,000 sq :ft, 4 buildings at 4,500 sq 1t, 3 buildings at 3,750 sq ft and 1 building at 4, 750 sq ft for 148 units and associated site work. Project also includes request to maintain and operate an existing restaurant building. Resolutions 1, SER 2. Planning Board decision Protect Description Applicant proposes 12 buildings—4 buildings at 3,000 sq ft, 4 buildings at 4,500 sq ft, 3 buildings at 3,750 sq ft and 1 building at 4, 750 sq ft for 148 writs. Site is 8.60 ac and disturbance is 5.59 ac. Project includes 50 ft buffer to the east side residences. Project includes upgrade to existing parking area and adding new parking area for the storage facility. Project will maintain existing restaurant currently not operating. Project includes new storm water—applicant to apply for apply for NYSDEC waiver. Pursuant to Chapter 17 -3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial constmetion shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Staff Comments • Location-The project site is at 398 Corinth Road. Arrangement- The existing site is wooded area to the rear of the property with an existing restaurant building and parking to the front of the property. * Site Design-The plan is to construct twelve new self storage buildings, associated site work for drive aisles, parking, stormwater, lighting,and Iandscaping. The project includes installation of 6 ft height chairs link fence around the storage area buildings with gates for access. • Building—The project includes the following building types buildings with 4 at 3,000 sq ft, 4 buildings at 4, 00 sq ft, 3 buildings at 3,750 sq ft and 1 building at 4, 750 sq ft Site conditions-The existing wooded site area is to be cleared with a 50 ft vegetative buffer on the east side and north side then on the west side vegetation to remain on the property line. • Traffic- The plans indicate there is parking for 62 self storage spots and 50 spaces for the restaurant. The plans also detail the number of self storage units to be 148 units noted for 12 buildings. • Site layout and utility plant The applicant has indicated there is no sewer or water for the units and only electric is supplied for lighting. • Grading and drainage plan and Sediment and erosion control —the applicant has submitted a stormwater report and a storm water pollution prevention plan. The applicant may pursue a waiver from the N SDE for s ppp requirements. The site is relatively flat and the plans show the grading to occur to accommodate catch basins, sloping of the pavement to channel stormater,cave trenches on the buildings and on site drainage basins. * Landscape plan—The applicant has proposed to maintain a 54 fli buffer beginning with the second storage building to the rear of the property on the east side. The first part of the property on the east side existing restaurant and parking area then along the first storage building is to be 11 pine or spruce trees to be planted, The applicant is aware of items from neighboring properties located on the parcel and the plan indicates arrangements with those owners will be further discussed. • Site lighting plan two new light poles are to be installed at 20 It in height with cut off fixtures. The wall fixtures are also cut off fixtures and there are to be 51 installed as shown on sheet 2. • Signage—The site plan shows the location of an existing sign. The submission packet did not include signage detail for the restaurant or the self storage buildings. The Board may consider requesting clarification on the signage proposed for each use. Elevations—The plans show the elevations with the units along the buildings and units at the ends. The buildings are about 15 ft in height • Floor plans- The plans show the unit arrangement on the interior of the buildings. Pursuant to Section 179- -050 the Planning Board may grant waivers on its own initiative or at the written request of an applicant. The application form identified as "Requirements" outlines the items to appear on the site plan or included as attachments. At the time of application the applicant has either requested waivers, indicated the item not applicable or has not addressed the item/ left check box blank. This includes the follow it= listed under Requirements of the applicant's application: h. signage, q. soil logs, r. constructionlclemolition disposal. Summary The applicant has completed a site plan application for the construction of 12 new self storage buildings, site work for storm water, landscaping, and lighting. Project includes maintain an existing restaurant building for future operation. The board should consider requesting information about site signage and landscaping buffer between neighbors to the front of the property. Meeting History: 1' meeting; THE Gba Km, North Country Office 375 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 CO 1P11 I ES E-IVY 1 D P; (518) $1 -0513 F: (518) 012-2205 yy wv w.r-hazencompanie.5.com Engineers Hudson Valley Offi ce (945)454-3980 Land Surveyors Capital District Office (518) 273-0055 Planners Environmental Professionals taedstwe Architects July 17, 2018 Mr.Craig Brown Zoning Administrator and Code Compliance Officer Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road QueenSbury, New York 12804 Delivered via email only: C ra ig B e a u8ensbu ry.net He, TNT Corinth Ro47d, LLC Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York Chazen Project#91800.29 Queensbury Ref 4SP52-2018 Dear f+l1'r. Brown: The Chazen Companies (Chazen) has received a submission package from your office for the above referenced project. The applicant intends to develop 12 new self-storage buildings on an 8.6 acre site. Submitted information includes the following: * Site plans prepared by ABD Engineering, dated June 15, 2018; * Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by ABD Engineering,dated June 15,2018; • Stormwater Management Report prepared by ABD Engineering, dated June 15, 2018; • Short EAF prepared by ABD Engineering, dated June 15, 2018; and, Site Plan Review Application dated June 15, 2018. Your office has requested that we limit our review to the design of Stormwater system as it relates to compliance to local, state or relevant codes and regulatio€rs. Based upon our review, Chazen offers the following comments for the Town's consideration- Stormwater Management&Erosion and Sediment Control: 1. The project proposes to disturb an area of approximately 5.6 acres.Typically,projects that disturb greater than 1-acre of land are required to obtain coverage under NYSDEC's SPDES General Perrnit for Stormwater Discharges for Construction Activities (Cl'-0-15-002). However, if a given site that disturbs more than 1-acre of land, meets certain criteria relating to discharge of runoff, it can be exempted from coverage under the permit. That criteria is identified in item 2 of NYSDEC's "Frequently Asked Questions About Permit Requirements for the SPOES Generof Permit(CP-02-01) for Storrowater Discharges from Construction Activities"Version 3.0 dated September 12, 2006, which reads as follows: 0hazen Engrrreubdog, Laird Surveying&Landscape Architecture Co., D.R c_ Chazen Envimnrrrenfai Services. inc_ The CNzen Gomponles. iric- Town of Queembury TNT Corlp th Road,LLC July 17,2018 Pam 2 #2. is permit coveragre required if there is no discharge to su4ace waters,i.e. runoff infihrates into the ground? A: if the owner Corr adequately demonstrate that there is no potentfai for o discharge from their construction site to Waters of the drifted States or to a municipal aepamte storm sewer syEtefn that discharges to Waters of the United Mates, the answer generally is no. Discharges of stormwater to grourrdwaters are exempt from permitting requirements unless the Department determines that such discharges (or class of discharges) are significant contributors of pollution. To date, the Deportment has not determined that construction site discharges to groundwater are srgnlflcont contributors of pollution. in order to demonstrate that there is no potenticrl for a discharge from a construction site, the owner mast perfvrrn the necessary modeling and site assessments (soil testing, infiltration test hydrology, etcj to support their position. The Department will require that this information be submitted for all construction sites we encounter that have not gained coverage under the general permit. When rnaking the demonstration that all discharges from the site would be to groundwater, the owner midst consider each of the following: - All phases of construction. including the commencement of soil disturbance with no past construction controls in pierce. • Runoff from oll recorded storm even N(1yr, 10 yr, IDO yr, etc.). • Frozen ground conditions if soil drstlrrbance is passible during periods when the ground is frozen. • Changes in site topography resulting frorn grading operations(cuts andfills)- Permitted or not permitted,ony such discharge that causes or contributes to a violotion of o water quality standard(including a groundwater standard)is a violation of State law.' 2- Based on the FAQ information above,it appears that the Applicant is not seeking coverage under GP-0-15 2. The following notes are ChazerVs findings from the submitted stormwater documents: a. The stormwater management repart does not include a pre-development model. A pre- development model is required as all phases of construction must be considered, including the commencement of soil disturbance with no post construction controls in place.Conformance to the FAQ abav4�!will be reviewed once a pre-development model is provided. b. it N unclear if soil disturbances will occur during frozen ground conditions. If soil disturbance is proposed during frozen ground conditions the pre-development model (once provided) and post-development model shall reflect frozen ground conditions in the s u bcatchme nts and infiltration devices. Does the Applicant intend to wnstruct when the ground is frozen? If so,will discharges reach a natural water body? if it is proposed that soil disturbances will not occur during the frozen ground season,we recommend that the Town consider adding soil disturbance restrictions, from roughly November 15 to the following April 1,to the site plan approval. npMWJS%91HD13.9 s9WOIHM.aa•T.CL wnafiury}91ammj-r-Quoa bury-3Ps2-2W TNT rArlmhRaadLLLNENG1R,,iew�Mga24-TNTQr$hthRoaff,tLC_srsx,2oia-Mie-07- 17_tl.ft x Town of Queen sbury TNTOUTin1b Road, LLC Judy'17,2018 13ag2 3 c. The post-development model roes not include the entire site, specifically the northern extent of the Site to. be cleared. The pre-development model (once provided) and the post-development model shall be revised to include the entire site and include topographic information for the entire site. d. The post-development subcatchment reap appears to indicate off5lte runoff frorn the eastern half of the existing diner, The Applicant to clarify if offsite runoff Occurs at any portion of the existing site. e_ The post-development subcatchment map does not appear to model all design points (see previous bullet) for the entire site. The pre-development and post-development subcatchment maps and HydroCAD model shall include all design paints_ f. Although it is difficult to discern, it appears offsite areas may be tributary to the infiltration practices proposed On the western portion of the site, The subcatchment boundaries shall not be limited to the property lines but shall include the entire tributary area to each practice. The Applicant to rev se the pre- and post-development maps to include all offsite areas (USGS topographic Information can be provided for offsite areas). Rue to the insufficient information detailed above, conformance to the requirements of the FAQ cannot be reviewed at this time_The stormwater ma nagerrwent report and HydroCAR model will be reviewed once all required information is provided. 3_ Section 179-6-080 B & C of the Town code states, "The stormwater drainage playa shaff onalyre the impacts of the project using at least a twenty- five-ye ve-ye or return interval storm for residential projects and a fifty-year return interval storm for commercial or industrial projects, and usif�g the analysis procedures fry the Town of Queensbury Subdivl51on Regulations." "Aif storm water monogemer?t plans shall be designed so that post-develvpmL*nt run-off rates airy{ volumes are equal to or less than pre-development run-off. Post-development direction of flow and tyre of discharge shall he tine some as pre-development coo ditlons." The Applicant did riot provide an analysis of the 50-year storm but did provide analysis Of the 100- year storm,The Applicant should provide the 50-year storm analysis.The 100-year storm analysis was reviewed in lieu of the 50-year storm, Comments relating the stormwater management report and fiydfo CAD model are as follows. 4. If the project is subject to the General Permit, part II C 3. of the GP-0-15-002 states the requirements foe projects that disturb greater than 5 acres of soil at any one time. It unclear if the disturbance is to be phased so that it does not exceed 5 acres at any One time, The applicant to clarify- If there is more than 5 acres disturbed at one time the Applicant Shall provide written DEC approval, notes stating that a qualified inspector Wilk inspect the site at least two days every 7 days, and a note stating the decrease in time from disturbance to stabliization- The Applicant to clarify. 2:1�raler��9f80d91A95'49i�pa94-T -T.4uamAur4-P52-3]191MLaFirnhR404,LLC1EM�lRay"a MGM2}iNTOarimbRoatLLgJFW_431H MJ&-07- 17_U_du Town of Queensbury TNT Corinth Road,LLC July 17,2018 Page 4 5. If the project is subject to the General Permit,there does not appear to be a disturbance phasing plan per Part II.C.3.c of the General Permit. The Applicant shall provide. 6, There does not appear to he an MS4 acceptance form provided in accordance with Part I LC.5.The Applicant to provide. 7. If the project is subject to the General Permit, it does not appear that the SWPPP Includes the inspection requirements that are prescribed in Part IV.0 of the General Permit.The Applicant to revise the SWPPP a€cordingly. 8, The disturbance area does not appear to be depicted on the site plans. The Applicant to revise accordingly, J. According to the short EAF the site is located near an environmental site rernediation project.The Applicant to clarify that the conta rn ination Is not on the site and that the rem edia#ion systems and/or plan do not involve tN! project's parcel. 10. it is noted that the project falls within an endangered and threatened species sensitive area according to the short EAr_ The Applicant to provide documentation per I.F.4 of the General Permit,if the project is subject to the General Permit. 11. There does not appear to be a draft NO provided. The Applicant shall provide a draft N 0 1 with the SWPPP in accordance with Part III.A of the General Permit, if the project is subject W the General Permit. 12, Part III.B.2.c.iv.d and a state soil testing and infiltration testing results shall be provided in the SWPPP. It does not appear that sail test or infiltration test results were provided. Due to this conformance with the separation distance requirements and the infiltration rate requirements prescribed in the S DM cannot be reviewed at this time. The Applicant to provide soil and infiltration test results that are in conformance with Appendix D of the SIUIDIM. 13, There does not appear to be an existing condition plan (and pre-development subcatchrnent model) provided in the Applicarnt's submission.The Applicant shall provide an existing conditions plan (and pre-development subcatchrnent model) including topographic information for all areas tributary to the site, including off--site areas. For the off-site areas USGS topographic information can be used. 14. There sloes not appear to be sufficlent topographic information provided on the drainage and grading plan to know if aA stormwater is directed to a stormwater management device. The Applicant shall add more spot grades or add more pre pased contour information, For instance, between baildings 6 and 9 is a spot grade of 102.3,the pavement slopes towards Cb#4 that has a rim elevation of 10:..1, which suggests a contour of 102 should be between these two features; however,a 102 contour is not shown.The Applicant to revise accordingly. 15. There sloes not appear to be any information regarding the existing gravel surface which is proposed to be utilized as a construction entrance_The Applicant shall provide a plan a detail for review of the existing gravel surface in accordance with the NY5 SSEC. L'1nr� 1&180P91899'49i9CORD-T,Qweras6w 9)Aoo.29-tdu asl wy-M -20111TMTC4"hFoa4' LorIrmhXu d,U(c sP&2S 18�20M-ot- �,7_41,doa Town of quee nsbury TRTCarinth Road,LLC luny 17,201& ?age 5 16. It is unclear what pre-treatment devices are provided prior to entry to the infiltration practices per Section 6.3.3 of the SMDM. The Applicant to clarify and prov de pretreatment calculations, for all infiltration devices, in conformance with Section 6.3.3 of the SMDM. 17, A legally binding enforceable maintenance agreement may be required between the facility owner and the Town ensuring that proper maintenance measures will be implemented for all proposed storm water management practices In accordance with 147-10.11) of the town code. A draft of this agreement shall be provided to the Town for review and shall be included fn the PPP, 18. There does not appear to he an infiltration basin detail and the Applicant shall revise the site plans to include an infiltration basin detail in accordance with the NYS SMDM. 19. The eresion control notes on sheet 2 do not reference the NYS SSESC and shall be revised accordingly. 20, There does not appear to be an analysis of the proposed closed storm sewer system. The Applicant to provide an analysis of the proposed closed storm Sewer system ana lyzfng at least the 10-year storm In the event the Planning Board or Town staff have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (518) 824-1926_ Sincerely, 7P5 ,5-- Sean M. Doty, P.E., LEER AP, C MS4S Principal Director, Municipal Engineering Services cc, Sunny Sweet, Town Planning Office Administrator(via email) Laura Moore, Town Land Use Planner (via e-rnail) File g}prq}�r}��ie[as�sss�4�eoo.00•T.Qa 0whury1ft%D29-LQmeemSurq-SP52-NNTNTQrinkhMad, CariMNRoaq,LLC_srS�7Pla_aaie-0J- 17-LLdacx FIRE MARSHALS FFI � rLIED Town of Q ueela,sb?srif 742 Bay Road, Q1ieensbiiry, NY 12604 " 14onue of Nalroral Beanty „- A Good Place to Live " PLAN REVIEW TNT Corinth load LLCX 98 Corinth Road Site 52 - 201 12101 SITE PLAN The following comments are based on review of drawings: a Please provide detail of Fire Department turn around based on Appendix D of the JF .. • As a side note, the plans indicate that customers will be directed to the office at the other Corinth load location. The office in question has not been completed and has not received an inspection for Certificate of Occupancy from the Fire Marshal's office. Further, the permits for the original Corinth Road site have expired, and notices sent to the owner for renewal have not been responded to. Michael J Palmer Fire Marshal 742 Bay Road ueen bury NY 12804 firemarshal a queensbury.net Fire Marshal 's Officc - Phone: 518-761-8206 ■ Fax_ 578-745-44,97 {rrcrrrlshrr2 grr eshi��t�l. r f - WWRI,qHrrenSbxrn(.net - 742 Bay F, oa - '.'Y 12904 Town of Queensbury Planning Board SEAR RESOLUTION— Grant Positive or Negative Declaration SITE PLAN 5 -20 18 TNT CORINTH ROAD, LLC Tax Map ID: 308.1 -1-3 /Property Address; 398 Corinth Road f Zoning, CLl The applicant proposesM buildings — 4 buildings at 3,000 sq. ft., 4 buildings at 4,500 sq. ft., 3 buildings at 3,750 sq, 1I. and 1 building at 4,750 sq. ft. for 148 units. Site is 8.60 ac and disturbance is 5.59 ac. Project includes 50 11. buffer to the east side residences. Project includes upgrade to existing parking area and adding new parking area fore the stoi-age facility. Project will maintain existing restaurant currently not operating. Project includes new starmwater—applicant to apply for apply for N SDEC waiver. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3- 040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial construction sbail be subject to Planning Board review and approval. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act; The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of No Federal or other agencies are involved; Part 1 of the Short EAF has been completed by the applicant; Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, it is the conclusion of the Town of Quecnsbury Planning Board as lead agency that this project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an enviromnental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. MOTION TO GRANT A POSITIVE DECLARATION OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SITE PLAN 5 -2018 TNT CORINTH ROAD, LLC. introduced by who moved for its adoption. As per the resolution prepared by staff. 1. Dart II of the Short EAF bas been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 1 Past III of the Short EAF has been reviewed and completed by the Planning Board. 0r Part III of the Short EAF is not necessary because the Planning Board did not identify potentially moderate to large impacts. Duly adopted this 24t1s day of July, 2 01 8 by the following vote: AYES: TOES 11bone= 51 K.7fi 1.82201 Fax- 5 IS-745.4 437 1742 Bay Road, Queensbrry.NY 1 2804 1 www-gwLn-shury,net ,}AIL (rCQLICC11�ibun 742 11'1 V I «a(i. Qlltrcit4bury, N Y 128o Town of Queensbury Planning Board RESOLUTION —Grant /Deny Site Plan Approval SITE PLAN 5 2-2018 TILT CORINTH ROAD, LLG Tax Map ID. 308,1 -1-3 /Property Address: 398 Corinth Road /Zoning: CLI The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: Applicant proposes 12 buildings — 4 buildings at 3,000 sq. ft., 4 buildings at 4,500 sq. ft., 3 buildings at 3,750 sq. ft. and 1 building at 4,750 sq. ft. for 148 units. Site is 9.60 ac and disturbance is 5.59 ac. Project includes 50 ft. buffer to the east side residences. Project includes upgrade to existing parking area and adding new perking area for the storage facility. Project will maintain existing restaurant currently not operating. Project includes new stormwater-- applicant to apply for apply for NYSDEC waiver. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, new cornmeircial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code- hapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality review Act (SE RA) and adopted a E RA Negative Declaration — Determination of Non-Significance The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 07/24/2019 and continued the public hearing to 07/24/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 07/24/2018; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE f DISAPPROVE SITE PLAN 52 2018 TNT CORINTH ROAD LLO; Introduced by who moved for its adoption. According to the draft resolution prepared by Staff with the following: 1) Waivers requested gmte&denied; 2. Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sett with this resolution. a) The limits of clearing will constitute a no-cut buffer zone, orange construction fencing shall be installed around these areas and field verified by Community Development staff; b) If applicable, the Sanitary Sewer connection plan must be submitted to the Wastewater Department for its review, approval, permitting and inspection; Page 1 of 2 Phone: 518-761.8220 Fax: 51$-745A437 742 Bay Road. Qui�ensbury. NY 12804 1 www.queensbury.net e) If curb cuts are being added or changed a driveway permit is required. A building permit will not be issued until the approved driveway permit has been provided to tht Planning Office; d) If application was referred to engineering then Engineering sign-oft`required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; e) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvernents;- f) If required, the applicant must submit a copy of the following to the Town: a. The project N01 (Notice of Intent) for coverage under the current "NYSDEC SPDES General Permit from Construction Activity" prior to the start of any site work. b. The project NOT (Notice of Termination) upon completion of the project; e. The applicant must maintain on their project site, for review by staff: i, The approved final plans that have been stamped by the Town Zoning Administrator. These plans roust include the project SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) when such a plan was prepared and approved; ii. The project NO[and proof of coverage under the current NYSDEC SPDES General Permit, or an individual SPDES permit issued for the project if required. Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; h) The applicant roust meet with Staff` after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; i) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all otber conditions of this resolution; j As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. k) This resolution is to be placed its its entirety on the final plans Duly adopted this 241 day of July, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Page 2 of 2 Phone. 51&761.8220 1 Fax; 518.745.4437 - 742 Bay Road, Queensbu€y, NY 12504 -.vw,queensbury_n9t