The URL can be used to link to this page

Staff Notes Packet ZBA Mtg. Wed., June 19, 2019 �tt�.�� t�� 1� M��t�� 0 9 �� 11 � 9 � � � Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda MeaTing: Wednesday, June 19. 2019 lime: J:00- l 1:00 pm Queensbury Aciiyiiles Cantor—742 Boy Rood Agenda subject to cho nge and may ba found ot: v✓ww-gveansbury.net Ann val of env¢[ notes: April l0 ffi 245 May 22 ffi 3Q 2019 OLD BUSINE55- A lieant s Al¢x 8e Mieheily Wilcox Aroa Varisnc¢ No LAV-14-2019 Owners Thomas Dubois SE RA (I A rnt s Na Lot Slac 1:93 Acres Location Com¢r Walkup Roatl 8c Moan Hill Zoning RR-3A Ward No. Road-Ward I Taz Id No 298.20-1-3 S¢c[ion 1p9-3-040 C rose R¢T SP 16-2019:AV 3?-2018(voided). Warren County Planning April 2019 DISC 1-20I9 Publie Hoar(a A ril 1 O 2019�]anc 19 2019 AdirondacR ParR A ¢ Na ProJve<Dascriptiou Applicant pmposys coustmotion of a 3,616 sq.R.rwisetl Roma 3,320 sq.R.sittglcfamily home witM1 as iat¢d st¢woek. Thc house to be caneteuc[ed is bca[¢d within 50 R.of l5%slopes. The sits includes gradin8.lot cl¢aring£or housq septic and well. Relief is sought For s¢[bveks in a RA 3A mn¢£or a Io[size of 1.93 sores. Planning Boartl: Sit¢Plan Rvvicw enquired for constmction omurring within 50 R.o£15^/0 slo NEW BUSINESS- A Rcavt s Reece Audol h Ar¢a Variave¢ No 20-2019 Owv¢r s R¢¢c¢Rutlol 1[ SE RAT II A ¢vt s David Hutchinson Lot Siz¢ 0.21 Acre s Locatiov 24 Nacy Road '! ving WR Wsrd No_ Ward 1 Tax Id No 289-6-1-34 S¢ctiov 1�9-3-040 Crosa R¢F SP 29-2019 Warren Couv Piavvin Na Public H¢arivg May 22,2019 Tablad5 AdirovtlacK ParK Ag¢vcy Na Jun¢ ]9 2019 Pro1¢¢t D¢acrlvtivv Applicant proposes[o r isYing`/a story r of area of 392 sq.R.and to c nstruct a'715 sq.R-second-story addition to m¢vxistin ho RelieF re astad 8om Flo r Ar¢a Ratio and eabilit nts. A iicavt s Ca<h Sw¢¢t Area Variavc¢ No 22-2019 Owv¢r s Cath 8waat SE IiA T I[ A vt s Va[tDusen ffi Steves Lot Sla¢ O_46 Acr[: s Locatiov l07 M¢adowbrook Road-Ward 2 T vivg MDR Wsrd No_ Tax Id No 296.16-1-5.3 S¢c[(o IO9-3-040� 1J9-5-020 Croaa R¢f 5B 9-1995; BP 99-172 SPD; BP 98- Warr v County Pianving Juna 2019 408 d¢ck Public Heariv Jun¢ 19 2019 AdirovdacK ParK A Na Proi¢et D¢s¢rivtiov Applicant proposes.c ns[ructiov of a 596 sq. R.attacl[ed garage to an existing 986 sq.R.Footprint home. Relief ¢steel Pro setback r nts. Page 1 oF2 Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Meeting: Wadnasdoy, June 19, 2019 Time: 7:00- 1 1:00 pm Quaensbury AcftvlHas Cenier—742 Boy Rood Agando subject to chonga and mqy be found oi: www.queensbury.net A itcant s Marc Gary¢ Ar¢a Var{anc¢ No 23-2019 Owv¢r s Stac¢ Oarvc SE RAT 11 A ent s Sonathan C.La ¢r Es BPSR Lo[Siz 4.59 Acre s Loca[iou 50 Grand Vi¢w Dr.Lot 9.Hiland Zonivg¢ PUD Ward No- Es[a[es Subdivision-Ward 1 Tax Id No 289.16-1-10 S¢ctio 1�9-5-020 Cross R¢f RC VO-2019 SPD' SB'J-2005 Warrev Coun Piaoviv Na Public Hcario Jurt¢ 19 2019 AdirovdacK ParK A ¢ Na Proicct Descrlvtion Applicant proposes construction of asingle-family dwelling with Z attached garages. The garages are 5�6 sq. R- and 624 sq-R.with a hallway coxmection of 16l sq. R.For a total of 1,361 sq-R. Relief requested Rom number of allowable garages sidence/ a ccl- A ticant a An o D s Inc- Area Variavc¢ No 2']-2019 Owners An �o D s Inc. SE RAT II A ent s Daniel W.R a PE Lot Siz¢ Acre s Location 603 Qu¢msbury Avenue T.onivg CLI Ward No, Ward Tax Id No 29'].8-1-30 S¢ctio 1�9-4-040 Crosa R¢f SP 19-2030'AV 25-200Hq SP 33- Warren County PisvnGng Sunc 2019 2009:SP 3"]-2006.SP 20-200Q AV 52-2006q AV 26-2002�SP 19-2002q SP ]9-2002 mod.-SP IS-92 Public Hea�'iv Sune 19 2019 AdirovdacK ParK A a Na Proicct D¢scriotion Applic rtt propo s damoliiion of a portion of the c isting m n building and a nstruction of a 8,586 sq. R-2- story addition toe isting oF£ace- Project i eludes c nstruction of a 1�500 sq.R.pavillion£or company events. R¢li¢f requested from setbacK and sfiorelin¢setback r< rtts. Any further business that khe Chairman determines may be properly brought before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Page 2 of 2 Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community <7avalopm ent Department Sioff Notes Area Variance No.: 14-2019 Project Applicant Al¢x 8c Michell¢Wilcox Project Locatiovc Corner Walkup Road 8c Moov Hill Aoad Parcel History. 6P 16-20195 AV 32-2018(voided)i DISC 1-2019 SEQR Typ¢c Typ¢II M¢¢Hng Dat¢: June 19,2019 D¢acription of Proposed Pro"¢ct: Applicant proposes construction of a 2,616 sq. R. re -sed Roma 3,320 sq. R_ single-{ily home with associated site work. The house to be c nstructed is located within 50 R. of 15% slopes. The site includes grading, lot clearing for house, septic and well. Relief is sought£or setbacks in a RR 3A zone£or a lot size o£ 1_93 acres_ Plarvraing Board- Site Plan Review required£or construction occurring within 50 R. of 15^/o slopes. A¢li¢f A¢ r¢d- The applicant requests relief for setbacks in a Rural Residential 3 acre zone£or a lot size o£1.93 acres_ Section 199-3-040 Dimensional requirements The applicant proposes to locate a home 59.60 R Rom Walkup Road, 64J8 R Rom Moon Hill Road, and ']5 R Rom the West property lice where a 100 R setback is required for each. Criteria for conaid¢ring an Area Variance ordin to Chapter 269 of Town Lawc In makiag a determination,the board shall conaid¢r 7_ Wb¢th¢r an undesirable change will b¢produced is the character of the neighborhood o a detriment to a arby properties will b¢created by the graatiag of this area variaac¢_Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood character may be anticipated. 2_ Whether the b¢netlt sought by the applicaat can b¢ achieved by s method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other rhea sn area variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered limited due to lot size of 1_93 ac parcel 3_ Whath¢r the requested a rianc¢is subatantiaL The relic£requested may be considered moderate relevaat to the code_ Relief is requested for setback oa Walkup Road of 42.4 R_ on Moon Hill Road of 35.22 R. and on the West property line of 25 R. 4. Wh¢th¢r th¢ proposed variance will hav¢ a adv¢rs¢¢ff¢ct or impact on th¢ physical o ¢nvironm¢atal coaditioas is the aeighborhood or distriM. Minor to no impact to the physical or vial c editions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. The project includes stormwat¢r management for the site and a waste water system. The applicant has located the dome at the top of the slope. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was s¢lt=¢r¢at¢d. The difFiculty may be considered self-created. Staff¢omm¢ats= The applicant proposes to construct a now home and associated site work. The applicant lies submitted information on the site c editions of the parcel—topographic survey. The plan show the grading stormwater anagement and a septic system. The applicant has removed the construction access on Walkup Road and all construction activiti¢s will be from Moon Hill Aoad. The house location and new driveway are also shown to have the access from Moon Hill Road. Zoning Board of Appeals Community development De pc�rtment Stoffi Notes Zoning Board of Appals—R¢cord of Resolution Town o£Queensbury �42 Bay Aoad Queensbury,NY 12804 <518j "161-8238 ian-n.>lt Lmcns nu±� Area Variance Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Nam¢. Alex 8c Michelle Wilcox Fil¢Numb¢r: Z-AV-14-2019 �_ Location: comer of Walkup and Moon Hill Roads Tax Map Number. 2']8.20-1-3 ®�q ^� ZBA Meting Date. Wed_, June 19, 2019 ��ii Y� The.Zoning Board of Appeals of tlae Town of Queensbury has received an application for Al¢x 8c Michell¢ Wilcox. Applicant proposes construction of a 2,616 sq_ R_ revised Roma 3,320 sq. R. single-£ily home with associated site work. The house to be c nstructed is located within 50 R. o£15%slopes. The site includes grading, lot clearing £or house, septic and well. Relief is sought for setbacks in a RR 3A zone£or a lot size o£ 1.93 acres. Planning Board: Site Plan Review required for construction occurring within 50 R. o£15^/o slopes. Relief R¢ uir¢d- The applicant requests relief for setbacks in a Rural Residential 3 acre zone for a lot size of 1_93 acres. Section 199-3-040 Dimensional requirements The applicant proposes to locate a home 5"1.60 R from Walkup Road, 64.']8 R Rom Moon Hill Road, and']5 R Rom the West property line where a 300 R setback is required for each. SBQA Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on April 1'],2019 and re-advertised on June 19,2019; Upon review o£ the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon sideration of the criteria speci£ed in Section 1"19-14-080(Aj of the Queensbury Town Coda and Chapter 26'] of NYS Town Law and after discussion aad deliberation, we £and as followsc PER"IT-ZE DRAFT PROVIDHD BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to aearby properties b¢caus¢ 2_ Feasible alternatives a and have been considered by the Board, are.r nable and have bean included to minimizetlte reouest OA are.not ucssible. 3. The requested variance is/ is not substantial becaus¢ 4. There is / i not an adverse impact oa the physical or environmeatal conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5. The alleged di££aculty is/ is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board £nds chat the bene£at to ttve applicant from granting the requested v - e would utwei¢h (aaarovall / would be outwei¢hed by (de -al) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and wel{a o£the neighborhood or community; ']. The Board also {nds that the variance request under consideration is ttae mmrmum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a� bj , c� Adherence to the items outlined in the£allow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS Z MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY AREA VARIANCE Z-AV-14-2019 Alex @ Michelle Wilcox, Introduced by who moved £or its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted ttvis 19°^ day o£Sune 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Quee nsbalry Zoning Board of Appeals Community �eveloPment �eportmont Stott Notes Area Variavc¢No.c 20-2019 Project Applicaut: R¢¢ce Rudolph ProJtct Locatiov: 24 Nacy Road Parcel History: SP 29-2019 SEQA Typca Typc II M¢¢ting Dat¢: Jun¢ 19,2a19 D¢acripHon o£Propoa¢d Project: Applicant proposes to r fisting % story r o£arca o£392 sq. R_ and to c nstruct a 915 sq. R. second-story addition to the existing home. Relic£requested Rom Floor Area Ratio and permeability requ rements_ R¢li¢£Rtquir¢d- The applicant requests relic£Rom setbacks,Floor Area Ratio and permeability requirements_ Section 199-3-040-dimensional requirements "1'lte applicant proposes to remove the a fisting % s and story to construct a new full s and story_ The new second story is to be located 1 R 5 inches£ram the south property lin a 12 R setback is required. The site permeabiliTy is proposed to be '10.6% where 95% is required. The Roor area proposed is 3,184 sq R(30_S%� where 2,300 sq R(22^of is the maximum allowed. Criteria for conaidar:n a Area Variance cordlvg to Chapter 26'1 of Town Law: in making a d¢t¢rmiaatioa,the board shall consider l. Whether an vad¢sirabl¢ change will b¢ produced in the character o£th¢neighborhood or a detriment to a arby properties will b¢created by the granting of this area variant¢. The pr jeer may be considered to have little ton 'mpact on the neighboring properties. 2. Wh¢th¢r the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible£or the appiitan<to pu other rhea a anance_ The feasible alternatives may be limited due to the location o£the a fisting home and lot size.v 3. Whether the requested a ubstanHaL The relic£may be c sidered substantial relevaat to the code_ The side setback relic{is 11 R 8 inches and the Roor area is 8.46%in excess o£the maximum allowed_ 4. Whether the proposed v will have an adverse effect o mpact on the physical or m¢ntai conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project as proposed may be considered to have minimal impact on the a ntal conditions o£the site or ar 5_ Whether the alleged difiicuity was self-created. The project as proposed may be considered sel{_created_ Staff commeata- The applicant proposes to add']15 sq R second story addition to the existing 9']3 sq R<£ootprint)home. o£ living spat¢to ilre £arst Roor 938 sq R home£or additional living space. The plans show the location o£the addition to ffie home. The elevations and Roor plans show the arrangement o£the home_ There are no change to the site. The application was tabled previously pending a septic certification_ Zoning Board o£Appeala—Record o£R¢solution Tower o£Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 <518) 761-823$ In„m M(L«ne , Ar¢a Varianc¢R¢solution Toe Approve/Disapprove Applicant Nam¢: Reece Rudolph File Number: AV 20-2019 Location: 24 Nacy Road Tax Map Number: 289.6-1-34 ZBA Meting Dat¢: Wednesday, Sune 19, 2019 ®R� ts� The Zoning Board o£Appeals o£tI-t¢Town o£Queensbury has received an application£rPo�m R¢¢ce Rudolph_ Applicant proposes to remove existing ''z story r b£area o£392 sq. R. and to constmct a 715 sq. 13. s nd-story addition to the existing home. Relief requested iiom Floor Area Ratio and permeability requ rements o R¢li¢f R¢quir¢d- The applicant requests relic£from setbacks, Floor Area Ratio and permeability requirements. Section 179-3-040-dimensional reauirements The applicant proposes to remove the existing % second story to construct a new full second story. The new and story is to be located 1 8 5 inches from the south property lice were a 12 8 setback is required. "1'lie site permeability is proposed to be 70.6% where 75% is required. The floor area proposed is 3,184 sq 8 <30.5%� where 2,300 sq 8(22%� is the maximum allowed. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on Wednesday Mav 22_2019: Jun¢ 19_ 2019 Upon o£ the application materials, iii£oi-itiation supplied during the public hearing and upon consideration o£the criteria speciSed in Section 179-14-080<Aj o£the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 o£NYS Town Law and aRer discussion and deliberation, we 13nd as follows: PER TFIE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1_ There is / i not an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties bec 2. Feasible alternatives err¢ and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the request OR are not possible_ 3_ The requested variance is/ is not substantial b¢caus¢ 4. There is / is not an adverse vmpact on tree physical or envirotittiental conditions in trie neighborhood or district? 5_ The alleged di£{iculty is /is not self-created because 6. In addition the Board {tads that the bane{vt to ttae applicant from granting the requested variance w uld outweigh (annrovall / would be outweighed by (deniall the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community; 9. The Board also Fnds that the variance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: aj b� cf Adherence to the items outlined in tho follow-up letter sent with this resolution_ BASED ON TFIE ABOVE FINDINGS I M4KE A MOTION T APPROVE / DENY V NCE NO. 20-2019. Ree ¢Rudolph.Introduced by who moved £or its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 19°M1 day of Tuae 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community development De Portment Staff Notes Ards Variance No.v 22-2019 Project Applicant Cathy Sw¢¢t Project Location. 170 M¢adowbrooK Road Psrc¢l History: SB 0-1995� BP 9'1-102 SFD: BP 98-4118 d¢cK SEQR Typ¢: Type II M¢¢ting Data Jun¢ 39,2019 Deacriptiou of Pro os¢d Proj¢ch Applicant proposes c nstruction o{a 5']6 sq_ 8. attached garage to an exis<ing 986 sq. i3. {ootprint home. Aelie£ requested from minimum setback requirements. R¢li¢f Re aired: The applicant requests relic{from minimum setback requirements£or the SA-lA zone. Section 199-5-020—Cara¢e The applicant proposes a 5']6 sq 8 attached garage to an existing home. The garage is located ']_5 ft£ram the north property line where.a 15 R setback is required. The pamel is located in Subdivision Richard Schextzaerhorn 9-1995 aad parcel was zoned SA-lA where side setbacks were 15 R. Criteria Yor coaaid¢riag as Area Variance ording to Chapter 26'l of Town Law: In maKfng a daterminatioa,the board shall consider: l. Whether as vad¢sirable change will b¢produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to a arby properties will b¢created by the granting o£thie area variance. The proposed garage may be considered to have mammal impact on the character of the neighborhood area. 2. Wh¢th¢r the b¢n¢£t sought by the applicant c a be achieved by some method, £easibl¢for the applicant to pursue, other tbaa a Feasible alternatives may b¢considered limited due to the existing home location on the sit sad the driveway. 3. Wb¢th¢r the requested area varisac¢.is substantial. The relief request may be considered to be minimal relevant to the code. The relief is requested '�S t}. 4. Wh¢th¢r the proposed variance will have an adverse ef£t or impact oa the physical or eatal conditions is the neighborhood or distriM. The requested variance may have minimal to no adverse impact o£[he environrrrental condi<ions in the neighborhood. 5_ Wh¢th¢r tha all¢g¢d difHcu\ty was s¢l£cr¢at¢d_ The requested variance may be considered to be self ci eared. Staff comm¢nts- "I'he applicant proposes a 24 8 x 24 8 garage addition to an existing home. The plans show the garage addition as to be placed over existing pavement and to be attached to the north side of tlae home_ Zoning Board of Appeals Community development Deportment Sfoff Notes Zoning Board of App¢ais—Record of R¢aolutiov Town o£Queensbury 742 Bay Road Que¢nsbury,NY 12804 (518) 761-8238 Area Variance R¢soiution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Name. Catby Sw¢¢t File Number. AV 22-2019 = O�H Location: 17'] M¢adowbrooh Road Tax Map Nvmbar: 29616-1-53 ' ZBA M¢¢ting Dat¢: Jun¢ 19, 2019 The Zoning Board o£Appeals of the Town o£Queensbury has received an applic tion fa-om Cathy Sweet. Applicant proposes construction o£a 576 sq. $. attached garage to an existing 786 sq. R_ Footprint home_ Relie£ requested From minimum setback requirements_ R¢li¢FR¢quir¢d- The applicant requests relief 8om minimum setback requirements for the SR-lA zone_ Section 179-5-020—Garage The applicant proposes a 576 sq R attached garage to an existing home. The garnge is located 7.5 R From ttte north propea-ty line where a I S R setback is required. "1'he parcel is located in Subdivision Richard Scheazvverhorn 7-1995 and parcel was zoned SR-lA where side setbacks were 15 R_ SEQA Type II—no fiirdaer review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on June 19, 2019; Upo review o£ the application materials, in£ox�tnation supplied during the public hearing, and upon sideration o£the criteria speci£ed in Section 179-14-080(Aj o£the Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 o£NYS Town Law and aRer discussion and deliberation,we Fnd as Follows: PER TIIE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STA F'F 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character o£ the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives a and have been considered by the Board, ar reasonable and have been - included tom a the re est OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/is not substantial because 4. There is / i not an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district? 5_ The alleged difficulty is / is not self-created because 6. In addition the Boazd finds that the bene£t to the applicant {m granting the requested variance would outweigh (avnrovall / would be outweighed by Cdenial) the resulting detriment to the health, safety and welfare o£the neighborhood or community; ']. The Board also £ands that the variance request uader consideration is the minimum necessazy; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions: a� b) c� Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON TfIE ABOVE FIIVDIN08_ L M4KE A MOTION TO APPROVE / DENY AREA VARIANCE NO. 22-2019, Introduced by who monad£or its adoption, seconded by : Duly adopted this 19a' day o£June 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community l7evelopment Deportment Staff Notes Ar¢a Variavc¢Nos 23-2019 Proj¢ct Applicants Marc Garvey P raj¢ct Locafiova 50 Grand Vi¢w Driv¢ Parc¢l Historys RC 190-2019 SFD> SB 0-2005 SEAR Typ¢s Typ¢II M¢¢tivg Dates Jun¢ 19�2019 D¢acri tiov of Propos¢d Proj¢ct- Applicant proposes construction o£a single-£ily dwelling with 2 attached garages. The garages are 596 sq. R. and 624 sq. R. with a hallway connection o£161 sq. R. £or a total o£1,361 sq. R. Relie£r¢quested £ram number of allowable garages per residence/parcel. R¢B¢Y R¢quired- The applicant requests relie£Hom number o£allowable garages. Section 1']9-5-020—Garaee The applicant proposes to construct two garages attached to a single-£ily home under construction where only one garage per dwelling is allowed. Crit¢ria Yor conaid¢ring an Area Variavc¢ ccordiv to Chapt¢r 269 of Towv Laws In maMag a d¢termiaatioa�th¢board shall coasid¢r l. Wh¢th¢r a adeairabl¢ chaag¢will b¢produc¢d in the charact¢r o£th¢ aeighborhood o a detrim¢at to a rby prop¢rti¢s will b¢ created by the gr atiag of this area yariaac¢. Minot to ao impacts to Sae neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whoth¢r th¢ beae£t a ught by th¢ applicant can b¢ achi¢ved by a m¢ mMhod. f¢aeibl¢ For th¢ applic at to pu � oth¢r than an arcs variance. Feasible alternatives may be considered to reduce the number o£garagesu¢ 3. Wh¢th¢r th¢ r¢qu¢st¢d area varianc¢is aubataaHal_ The request£or relie£may be substantial where only one garage is allowed. 4. Wheth¢r th¢ propo ¢d will have an adv¢rae ¢££¢ct mpact on th¢ physical or ¢ntal c aditioas via nth¢ neighborhood or district Minor toano impact to the physical or enviroraaraental conditions in the neighborhood may be anticipated. 5. Wh¢th¢r the all¢g¢d dif£culty was s¢1Scr¢at¢d. The di££vculty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant requests to have two garages attached to a -ngle£ami/y that i nUy under consTruction. The plans show the location o£the two garage and a hallway that will c nnect Hvem. The project i sideted two garages as the coratecting hallway i not accessible by a vehicle. The applicant has re ved a building pertz:it for each o£the spaces to be constructed as the one considered storage is being proposed as the second garage Zoning Bocerc9 of .4ppeols Community l7evelopment Department Staff Notes Zoning Board of ApP¢als—Record of Resolution Town of Que¢nsbury 742 Bay Road Qveensbury;NY 12804 <518j 761-8238 (n�„rs.N(lrc nshuw Area Variance A¢solution To: Approve/Disapprove p Applicant Name: Marc Garvey �� Fit¢Number: 23-2019 Location: 57 Grand View Drive Tax Map Number: 289.16-1-30 ZBA M¢¢ting Date: Jun¢ 19,2019 The Zoning Board o£Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has r eived an application Marc Garvey_ Applicant proposes construction of asingle-family dwelling with 2 attached garages. The garages are 576 sq. R_ and 624 sq. R. with a hallway connection o£161 sq- R. for a total of 1,361 sq. R. Relief requested from number of allowable garages per residence/parcel. Rel'¢f Re u red: The applicant requests relief from number o£allowable garages_ Section 179-5-020—Gara¢e The applicant proposes to c nstruct two garages attached to a s ngle-family home under construction where only one garage per dwelling is allowed. SEQR Type II—no further review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on June 19, 2019; Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080<A� of tha Queensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and aRer discussion and deliberation, we fund as {lbws= PER TfIE DRAT"I'PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There is / is not an undesirable change in the character o£ the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties because 2. Feasible alternatives are and have been considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been acluded to minimize the rec uest OR aze not nossibl¢_ 3. The requested var:anc -s /i of substantial because 4_ There is / is not an adverse vmpact on the physical or ertvvromnental conditions in the neighborhood or district'l 5. The alleged difficulty is / is not sal£_created because 6. In addition the Board fads That the benefit to the applicant From granting the requested variance would t h f D / Id b tw h d by Cdeniall tkae resulting deviment to the health, safety and welfare o£the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also £ands that the yaziance request under consideration is the minimum necessary; 8. The Boazd also proposes the Following conditions: aj b) , c) Adherence to the items oatlined in the Follow-up letter sent with this resolution. BASED ON TfIE ABOVE FINDINGS I MAKE A MOTION TO .APPROVE / DENY AREA VARIANCE NO. 23-2019, Invoduced by , who moved £or its adoption, seconded by Duly adopted this 19'^day o£Jame 2019 by the Following vote: AYES: NOES: Town of 4ueensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community l7evelopment Deportment Staff Notes Area Var:anc¢No.: 29-2019 Proj¢¢t Applicaat: Ang:oDynamics,Inc. Project Locat:ove 603 Qu¢easbury Av¢vu¢ Par¢al History: SP 30-2010; AV 25-2008; SP 33-200"]q 3P 3T-2006: SP 20-2006;AV 52-2006> AV 26-2002p SP 19-2002; SP 19-2002 mod.;SP 15-92 SEAR Typ¢: Typ¢D M¢¢t:ng Dat¢: June 39,2019 Dr:s¢ri t:on of Pro os¢d Project: Applicant proposes demolition o£a portion of the existing main building and c nstruction o£a 8,586 sq. R. 2- story addition to existing office. Project includes construction o£a 1,500 sq_ Ropavillion for company events. Relief requested iiom minimum setback and shoreline setback requirements. R¢li¢f R¢q uiredc The applicant requests relie£8om minimum shoreline setback requirements. Section 1']9-3-040—Dimeasional r¢auiremenTs The applicant proposes a 1,500 sq R pavilion to be located 25.3 R 8om the shoreline where a']5 R setback is requ r¢d_ Crit¢ria for covaid¢ring av Ar¢s Var:aa¢¢ ordia to Cba tar 26'7 of Town Lawc In making a d¢t¢rminatioa,the board shall consider 1. Wh¢tb¢r an und¢sirabl¢Chang¢will b¢ produc¢d in th¢ charact¢r of the a¢igbborbood or a detrim¢nt ton arby properties will be cr¢at¢d by the greeting of this area vartav¢¢_ Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated_ 2_ Whether the b¢n¢f9t sought by the applicant can b¢achiev¢d by aom¢ m¢thod, f¢asible For th¢ applicant to pursue, other than an area variant¢_ Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the existing co�guration o£the parking and buildings on th¢ sit¢. 3. Wh¢tb¢r the r¢qu¢st¢d a a varfan¢¢ is aubstavtfal. The relief may be considered moderate relevant to the code. The relie£is 25 R 4_ Whether the proposed v will have a adverse¢fY¢ct or impact on th¢physical or cnvironm¢ntal conditions in th¢ neighborhood or district. The project as proposed will have minimal impact to th¢neighborhood. 5_ Whether th¢alleged dif£aculty waa self created_ The ditt3culty may be considered s¢1£created_ Staff commeatsa The applicant proposes a pavillion£or employee events_ The plans show the location o£the pavilion_ Zoning Boord of Appeals Community development Deportment Staff Notes Zoning Board of Appals—R¢cord of Resolution Town o£Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury,NY 12804 (518� 761-8238 �n..n ov,t..� .,.n....� Area Varianc¢Resolution To: Approve/Disapprove Applicant Nam¢. Angio Dynamics,Inc. _ Fil¢Numbor: 27-2019 =_ Location. 603 Queensbury Avenu¢ ��6�-��"-�'�Y Tax Map Number: 297.8-1-10 ZBA Meeting Dat¢: June 19, 2019 The Zoning Berard of Appeals o{the Town o£Queensbury has received an application{rom Angio Dynamics, Inc_ Applicant proposes demolition o{a portion of the existing main building and consv aaction o{a 8,586 sq. R. 2-story addition to existing o££ce- Pr ject includes constmction o{a 1,500 sq. R.pavillion£or company events. Aelie{requested{rom minimum setback and shoreline setback r¢quirements_ R¢li¢f Re u red: '1"lac applicant requests relic£from minimum shoreline setback requ-rements. Section 179-3-040—Dim sional requirements The applicant proposes ae1,500 sq R pavilion to be located 25.3 R from the shoreline where a 75 8 setback is required.. SEQR Type II—no fivrther review required; A public hearing was advertised and held on June 19, 2019; Upon - o{ the application materials, m{or-iraation supplied during the public hearing and upon consideration o{the criteria speci5ed in Section 179-14-080<A� o£the Qvaeensbury Town Code and Chapter 267 o{NYS Town Law and a8er discussion and deliberation,we£md as follows= PER TILE DRAFT PROVIDED BY STAFF 1. There vs / i of an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties b¢c 2. Feasible alternatives are and have beea considered by the Board, are reasonable and have been included to minimize the reouest OR are not possible. 3. The requested variance is/ is not substantial b¢caus¢ 4. There is / i of an adverse ampact on the physical or enyironmeatal conditions in the neighborhood or district'l S The alleged dif£aculty is/ is not sei{-created because 6. In addition the Board £ands that the bene£t to the applicant {om granting the requested v e would t h ! 1l / ld b tw - h d by (denial) ilre resulting detriment to the health�asa£ety and welfare o£the neighborhood or community; 7. The Board also £nds that the vaziance request under consideration is the mammum necessary; 8. The Board also proposes the following conditions= a� bj , c) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution_ B SED ON TFIE ABOVE FINDINGS I MAIrE A MOTION TO APPROVE / DENY AREA VARIfaNCE NO. 27-2019, Lrtroduced by who moved£or its adoption, seconded by c Duly adopted this Sune 19, 2019 by the {)lowing vote: AYES: NOES=