Loading...
1990-06-18 TOWN BOARD,MEETING JUNE 18th, 1990 7:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT STEPHEN BOR GOS-SUPER VISOR GEORGE KUROSAKA-COUNCILMAN MARILYN POTENZA-COUNCILMAN RONALD MONTESI-COUNCILMAN BETTY MONAHAN-COUNCILMAN TOWN ATTORNEY PAUL D USEK TOWN OFFICIALS Paul Naylor, Dove Hotin, Mike Shaw PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN MONAHAN RESOLUTION TO ENTER QUEENSBUR Y BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. 349, 1990, Introduced by Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenzo. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby enters as the Queensbury Board of Health. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING -SEWER VARIANCE -KENNETH FUCHSLOCHER NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Mr. Hotin, would you explain to us what this request is, please? We've . all seen it but just for the record. DAVE HA TIN, Director of Building & Codes-What the Board has in front of them is a septic variance for permission to place a septic system 38 feet from the well verses the required 100 feet. This is a replacement of on existing system on o lot that is foiled or a system that has shown signs of failing. The system is basically placed in the some location, this is brought to current day standards which is o minimum of 200 feet... SUPERVISOR BOR GOS-You've visited this location? MR. HA TIN-Yes, that's how we found out about this ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Are you personally satisfied with the proposal as being workable, acceptable and okay? MR. HATIN-At the time without being on engineer or having an engineering degree, its no worse than what you had before, we hope it will resolve the problem we hove now, seepage on top of the ground, which has been temporarily resolved and it is bringing it up to today's s tondords ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Any other Board members have questions? COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Con we see that mop? (Mr. Hotin presented mop) COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Dove, what does the State of New York say the Deportment of Health? Have they approved this? MR. HA TIN-Yes, there's a letter in there with their approval. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-How deep is the well? MR. HA TIN-Mr. Fuchslocher is here, maybe he can ... I think it's like 300 feet deep. i SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Would you come forward sir and state your name and address, please just for the record? KEN FUCHSLOCHER-1 live on RR 1, Box 233 Bay Road, Queensbury, New York. The well is 350 feet down, straight down and there's 60 foot of casing going down into bedrock. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thank you. Any other Board members have questions? Mr. Hatin? COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Mr. Fuchslocher, how close ore you to any neighbor's well to this system? MR. FUCHSLOCHER-All right. The neighbor on my left or to the north of me is 157 feet, 4 inches to their well and that's on uphill grade. The other one is over 500 feet. I gave up at 500 feet. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Thank you. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Any further questions from the Board members? Anyone else in the public sector wish to speak? Yes, mom, please identify yourself with name and address. MRS. VA NDYKE-RR 1, Box 1382A, Queensbury. I'm the next door neighbor to the north of Mr. Fuchslocher and as I understand it this system was in place before my house was built last year and at that time the Planning Board approved my game plan with the setbacks for the well according to my design so I don't think there's a particular problem here. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thank you. Anyone else from the public? Any other Board member hove any questions? PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 7:30 p.m. RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE REQUESTED OF KENNETH FUCHSLOCHER RESOLUTION NO. 10x1990, Introduced by Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. WHEREAS, Kenneth Fuchslocher previously filed a request for a variance from certain provisions of the Sanitary Sewage Disposal Ordinance of the Town of Queensbury, such { provisions being more specifically, those requiring that there be a 100 foot separation between the obsorbtion field and a well, and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was given in the official newspaper of the Town of Queensbury and a public hearing was held in connection with the variance request on June 18, 1990, and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk advises that property owners within 500 feet of the subject property have been duly notified, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Local Board of Health grants a variance to Kenneth Fuchslocher, allowing a 3811011 separation between the obsorbtion field and the well, and a. that there are special circumstances or conditions which justify allowing the 38'10" separation between the obsorbtion field and well in that the lot size is too small to accommodate the 100' distance required, and b. that due to the nature of the variances, it is felt that the variation will not be materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of this ordinance or to other adjoining properties or otherwise conflict with the purpose and objectives of any plan or policy of the Town of Queensbury. c. that the Local Board of Health finds that the granting of the variances is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and that the variances ore granted as the minimum variances which would alleviate the specific unnecessary hardship found by the Local Board of Health to affect the applicant, and d. that the Local Board of Health imposes a condition upon the applicant that he must also secure the approval of the New York State Department of Health. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: M Ayes: Mr. Kurosako, Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO ADJOURN FROM THE QUEENSBUR Y BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. 11, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Board of Health hereby adjourns and enters the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosako, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None QUEENSBUR Y TOWN BOARD PUBLIC HEARING -REZONING REQUEST- DAVID WILLIAMS NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Is Mr. Williams here? Would you come forward and identify yourself for the record please? Yours is the property on Boy and 149? DAVID WILLIAMS-Yes. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Okay, I'm familiar with it. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Near what corner? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Right near where the fire was today. MR. WILLIAMS-Its Box 1504, Boy Road, RD 1, Loke George. We are reapplying for the rezoning. Before it was Highway Commercial when we purchased the property ... business and about a year and a half ago it changed to RR 1 or RR 3, excuse me. We would like to ho, ove it turned back'to commercial property, HC 1. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Okay, this has already been to the Planning Department and the Planning Board, is that correct? ATTORNEY DUSEK-Yes. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-The Planning Board has recommended approval? ATTORNEY DUSEK-1 believe they have. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 believe so. Warren County Planning has taken action, I believe. I think I sow that, but I don't hove it with me. ATTORNEY DUSEK-1 don't see it in front of us, but it wouldn't hove come this for to the Board unless it had and usually the Planning Board wouldn't have even taken ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-You are aware the Warren County Planning Board has approved it? MR. WILLIAMS-Yes. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-The staff, our Planning Board and Warren County Planning Board has all approved it? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Correct. Any questions by members of the Board? COUNCILMAN MONTESI-My one concern is, what are the other 3 corners? Highway Commercial? MR. WILLIAMS-Yes. l COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-They're Highway Commercial and down the rood its Highway Commercial either by zoning or ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Right across the street is Commercial. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-There can be no implication that this is spot zoning because we ore balancing out the corners. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Joan, do you have any pictures of the neighboring uses? MRS. WILLIAMS-Yes. (presented pictures to the Town Board) SUPERVISOR BORGOS-For those members of the public not familiar with this property; this is property located approximately at the intersection of Boy Rood and Route 149. Its on the north side of Boy Road and its several parcels south of the intersection. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-North of Boy Road? COUNCILMAN POTENZA-It's on Bay Rood. COUNCILMAN;K *UROSAKA-East or west? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Excuse me, its east of Boy Rood. East of Bay, south of the intersection. Any other questions from members of the Board? Any members of the public hove any comments that they'd like to make? RON DUFOUR-1 live in South Queensbury. When they rezoned it, did you guys, were you aware of them rezoning it or is this just something that they got by you? MR. WILLIAMS-Something they got by us. MR. DUFOUR-Thank you. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 think he's making a point for another purpose. Anyone else who wishes to make comment? Yes, would you state your name and address please? HANNAH MOON-1 live at 1506 Boy Rood, I'm their neighbor and I think I'm the only residential one that hasn't had a commercial ... I certainly have no objection to this what so.ever. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thank you very much. Is there anything further you would like to—' soy? MR. WILLIAMS-No. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 7:42 p.m. RESOLUTION ADOPTING DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE OF REZONING RESOLUTION NO. 350, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Ronald Montesi. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is considering rezoning certain property owned by David E. Williams, Sr. (Town of Queensbury Tax Mop NO. 51-1-40), and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified to act as lead agency with respect to compliance with SEQRA which requires environmental review of certain actions undertaken by local governments, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is on unlisted action pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, after considering the action proposed herein, reviewing the environmental Assessment Form, reviewing the criteria contained in Section 617. 11, and thoroughly analyzing the project with respect to potential environmental concerns, determines that the action will not have a significant effect on the environment, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby finds that the proposed responses inserted in Port ll of the said Environmental Assessment Form are satisfactory and approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to complete and execute Part 111 of the said Environmental Assessment Form and to check the box thereon indicating that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the annexed Negative Declaration is hereby approved and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the some in accordance with the provisions of the general regulations of the Department of Environmental Conservation. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None A bsen t: None RESOLUTION AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY DAVID E. WILLIAMS, SR. (TAX MAP NO. 51-1-40) FROM RURUAL RESIDENTIAL - 3 ACRES TO HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL - 1 ACRE RESOLUTION NO. 351, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Ronald Montesi. WHEREAS, David E. Williams, Sr. petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury for a zoning change of their property (Town of Queensbury Tax Map No. 51-1-40) from Rural Residential - 3 Acres to Highway Commercial - 1 Acre, and WHEREAS, On May 14, 1990, the Town of Queensbury Planning Board recommended approval of the petition, and WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Board also recommended approval of said petition, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this matter on June 18, 1990, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has mode a determination that the rezoning will hove no significant environmental impact, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has considered the conditions and circumstances of the areas to be rezoned, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to re-zone the property owned by David E. Williams, Sr. (Town of Queensbury Tax Map No. 51-1-40) to Highway Commercial - 1 acre, thereby authorizing all uses permitted under Section 4.020-K of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance in such area, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the zoning map for the Town of Queensbury is hereby amended to provide for the rezoning of said lands, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the requirements of Article 11 of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance and Section 265 of the Town Law, the Town Clerk shall, within five (5) days, direct that a certified copy of said changes be published in the Glens Falls Post-Star and obtain on Affidavit of Publication, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment take effect ten (10) days after said publication. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. It urosoko, Mrs. Poten zo, Mr. Mon tesi, Mrs. Monohon, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING REQUEST- KAREN SOMMER NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Koren Sommer, or representative in the room? No representative here. A member of our Planning Deportment here? I don't see a member of our Planning Department here. Okay. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Steve, if I remember correctly, this was the one that was suggested by the APA when we did Dunham's Bay ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-This is the ... okoy, I know the property. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-it's a little piece of property in there and we said they were all to be done at the some time and of course we couldn't do that one, the other ones hod the applications in ... so this is really how that request originated. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-This is on unusual request as I recall. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Unusual in the sense that its asking to be more restricted. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-It currently is Rural Residential 5 acres and they want to go to Land Conservation 10 acres. A little bit unusual request. Most people wont to go to more dense development, this parcel wants to go the other way. Is there anyone who wishes to speak about this? Board members? We just mentioned what it is. This is more restrictive rather than less. I remember when they first came to us about this. Okay, hearing no comments. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 7:45 p.m. RESOLUTION ADOPTING DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE OF REZONING RESOLUTION NO. 3S2, 1990, Introduced by Bett y Monahan who moved for its odoption, seconded by Ronald Mon tesi. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is considering rezoning certain property owned by Karen L. Sommer (Town of Queensbury Tax Mop No. 22-2-3), and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified to act as lead agency with respect to compliance with SEQRA which requires environmental review of certain actions undertaken by local governments, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is on unlisted action pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, after-considering `the action proposed herein, reviewing the Environmental Assessment Form, reviewing the criteria contained in Section 617. 11, and thoroughly analyzing the project with respect to potential environmental concerns, determines that the action will not have a significant effect on the environment, and BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby finds that the proposed responses inserted in Part ll of the said Environmental Assessment Form are satisfactory and approved, and BE'IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to complete and execute Part III of the said Environmental Assessment Form and to check the box thereon indicating that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; that the annexed Negative Declaration is hereby approved and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the some in accordance with the provisions of the general regulations of the Deportment of Environmental Conservation. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monohon, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY KAREN L. SOMMER (TAX MAP NO. 22-2-3) FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL 5 ACRES TO LAND CONSERVATION - 10 ACRES RESOLUTION NO. 353, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Ronald Montesi. WHEREAS, Karen L. Sommer petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury for o zoning change of her property (Town of Queensbury Tax Mop No. 22-2-3) from Rurual Residential - 5 Acres to Land Conservation - 10 Acres, and WHEREAS, on May 14, 1990, the Town of Queensbury Planning Board recommended approval of the petition, and WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Board also recommended approval of said petition, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this matter on June 18, 1990, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has made o determination that the rezoning will hove no significant environmental impact, and .WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has considered the conditions and circumstances of the areas to be rezoned, i i NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to re-zone the property owned by Koren L. Sommer (Town of Queensbury Tax Map -No. 21-2-3) to Land Conservation - 10 Acres, thereby authorizing all uses permitted under Section 4.020-o of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance in such area, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the zoning map for the Town of Queensbury is hereby amended to provide for the rezoning of said lands, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the requirements of Article 11 of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance and Section 265 of the Town Law, the Town Clerk shall, within five (5) days, direct that o certified copy of said changes be published in the Glens Falls Post-Star and obtain an Affidavit of Publication, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment take effect ten (10) days of ter said publication. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING REQUEST-GROSSMAN, GROSSMAN, RUBIN AND BAKER NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR BORGOS-This is the property at or near the Zayre Plaza, Ames Plaza section and this is a'request to change from Multi-Family Residential 5 acres to Highway Commercial 1 ocre. Anyone here representing that organization? BRUCE LIPINSKI-I'm here on behalf of Grossman and the rest of them. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Do you hove some sort of authorization? I think we already have that on file. MR. LIPINSKI-Yes, right. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thank you. Okay. MR. LIPINSKI-Basicsll this has been approved already b the Warren Count Planning Board, Y PP Y Y Y 9 the Queensbury Planning Board and I think the Queensbury Planning Deportment has recommended approval already. No one has raised any questions about it. I can answer any questions that you may hove. One thing that you may not know is, this property was rezoned exactly the some way as we're trying to do it now, 22 years ago. Some how it never found its way on the official map and we're trying to put it on the mop now. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Okay, all the zoning was subject to change anyway as of October 1st, 1988, so it would have been changed then. This is essentially your parking lot, is that correct? No, I'm sorry, its the other way, its in front of the parking. MR. LIPINSKI-That's right. The building now is in the ... COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-So we're actually not changing any of the use, we're just legalizing the use. MR. LIPINSKI-Thot's right. It's been used that way for the lost 20 years or so. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Long time. Okay, any comments from the Board? We've hod this for a period of time to study it. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-So what does that make the bock port then? MR. LIPINSKI-The front is commercial now, Highway Commercial and the back is multifamily ., where the store is located. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-Thot's where the problem come in. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-The parking lot is Highway Commercial and the store is Multi Family .Residential. MR. LIPINSKI-That's right. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-What was it when the store was built, Highway Commercial? MR. LIPINSKI-I believe so. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Steve, does this have o bearing on Robert Garden's behind it? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Not to my knowledge. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-What happened is that when it was rezoned ... the line was divided, the front has the commercial and the back hod the multi unit, because that's the bock end, Robert Gorden's and unfortunately the building was in the multi unit. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-But what I'm saying is what we're doing here now is not going to effect Robert Gorden's property because its not going to go that for. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-No, not according to the mop that they gave us. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Oka , an other questions from members of the Board? An questions Y Y q Any comments from the public? PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 7:48 p.m. RESOLUTION ADOPTING DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE OF REZONING RESOLUTION NO. 354, 1990, Introduced by Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenza WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is considering rezoning a portion of certain property owned by Loomis J. Grossman, Jr., Richard A. Grossman, Walter H. Rubin and Robert C. Baker (Town of Queensbury Tax Mop No. 71-1-3), and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is duly qualified to act as lead agency with respect to compliance with SEQRA which requires environmental review of certain actions undertaken by local governments, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is an unlisted action pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, after considering the action proposed herein, reviewing the Environmental Assessment Form, reviewing the criteria contained in Section 617. 11, and thoroughly analyzing the project with respect to potential environmental concerns, determines that the action will not have a significant effect on the environment, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby finds that the proposed responses inserted in Port 11 of the said Environmental Assessment Form ore satisfactory and approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to complete and execute Part 111 of the said Environmental Assessment Form and to check the box thereon indicating that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the annexed Negative Declaration is hereby approved and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the some in accordance with the provisions of the general regulations of the Department of Environmental Conservation. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY LOOMIS J. GROSSMAN, JR., RICHARD A GROSSMAN, WALTER H. RUBIN AND ROBERT C. BAKER (TAX MAP NO. 71-1-3) FROM MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 5 ACRES TO HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL - 1 ACRE RESOLUTION NO. 355, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenza WHEREAS, Loomis J. Grossman, Jr., Richard A. Grossman, Walter H. Rubin and Robert C. Baker petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury for a zoning change of a portion of their property (Town of Queensbury Tax Map No. 71-1-3) from Multi Family Residential - 5 Acres to Highway Commercial - 1 Acre, and WHEREAS, on May 14, 1990, the Town of Queensbury Planning Board recommended approval i of the petition, and WHEREAS, the Warren County Planning Board also recommended approval of said petition, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this matter on June 18th, 1990, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has mode a determination that the rezoning will hove no significant environmental impact, and WHEREAS, the, Town Board of the Town of Queensbury has considered the conditions and circumstances of the areas to be rezoned, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to re-zone a portion of the property owned by Loomis J. Grossman, Jr., Richard A. Grossman, Walter H. Rubin and Robert C. Baker (Town of Queensbury Tax Mop NO. 71-1-3) to Highway Commercial - 1 Acre, thereby authorizing all uses permitted under Section 4.020-K of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance in such area, and •BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the zoning mop for the Town of Queensbury is hereby amended to provide --j for the rezoning of said lands, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the requirements of Article II of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance and Section 265 of the Town Law, the Town Clerk shall, within five (5) days, direct that a certified copy of said changes be published in the Glens Falls Post-Star and obtain on Affidavit of Publication, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment take effect ten (10) days after said publication. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monohon, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING - NO PARKING - Main Street & Corinth Rood 7:50 p.m. NOTICE SHOWN SUPERVISOR BORGOS-This is a public hearing for proposed local laws for no parking. Let's deal with one rood at o time: Maybe Mr. Naylor will enlighten us with some new information but in any event will see how that fits in with the picture here. Let's look first at the parking an a portion of County Route 28, also known as Main Street and Corinth Rood. This would restrict parking on the easterly side, oops, I almost think it goes all the way to McDonolds, doesn't it? It goes down post McDonolds, both sides of the intersection of the Northwoy and then coming bock east all the way to the City line. Its been o while since I read it. ATTORNEY DUSEK-Yes, down to the City line. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thank you. It does go to the west of the Northwoy just a little bit. Okoy, it goes to the most easterly side of the edge of the pavement of the Rhode Island Avenue, extended across County Route 28 to the southerly side thereof. So it well take core of the congestion caused by parking at Exit 18 near McDonolds or on the other side where the tractor trailers line up across from the service stations. Would any one like to speak to the Board either in favor of or opposed to this no parking area. PLINEY TUCKER, Word 4-1 might be mistaken but I think Corinth Rood, which you call County Route 28, goes east and west, so that you'd be talking about north and south side of the street. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-North and south side of the street, east and west of interchange 18. MR. TUCKER-Do 1 understand it, from the City line to Rhode Island Avenue? SUPERVISOR, BORGOS-Correct. MR. TUCKER-Speoking about in front of the West Glens Falls Cemetery where the tractor trailers ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Correct, that's part of the area and where the tractor trailers also park near McDonolds and along that section of road. MR. TUCKER-They no longer park at McDonolds. McDonolds put a parking lot in and they go into that parking lot. The only problem we hove with McDonalds are the State trucks, they pork anywhere they wont to. Back to the Cemetery. We hove a sidewalk district in West Glens rolls. It runs all the way to the City line to the end of the Cemetery. 1 believe there is a law on the books that it's against the law to pork on sidewalks. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-I believe that's true however most people including myself didn't know there was a sidewalk there until a couple of weeks ago. MR. TUCKER-Well you would have difficulty finding it because the County can't seem to find money to come down and clean the sand off that they put there during the Winter. 1 mean, here it is June. But of course we know about that, right, we can't even get pot holes patched and ... COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-Its not our sand, it's County sand. MR. TUCKER-1 didn't say it was our sand. If it were our sand, I talked to Mr. Naylor but its not our sand. So, why, and I'm going to side with Mr. Naylor ... if you can't enforce them from parking on the sidewalk, the only thing that I can see these no parking signs ore going to do is drive the truck traffic to the side streets. Alot of people hove a concern up there that this is going to be what happens, around the restaurant area there, where they park now, is just going to drive them in on the side streets. Its going to make traffic slot more difficult. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 here what you are saying. I personally disagree with you because I think that's the reason the trucks don't pull in the parking lots, that they don't want to get off the main rood. But you have got a point, it is possible. MR. TUCKER-If I come back and tell you so in a couple of months or so ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-We'll change it bock again if we happen to go the other way. MR. TUCKER-Will you remember it? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-I'll remember it. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-Your not supposed to leave a truck's wheels on the pavement, when you park the truck your supposed to take your wheels off the pavement. MR. TUCKER-1 know George, but they're parking right there on the sidewalk there. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-But they con be ticketed for that. MR. TUCKER-They have all the time. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-They con be ticketed for it. MR. TUCKER-Yeo, but they don't and no parking signs ain't going to be ticketed either. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 believe that they will. MR. TUCKER-Aviation, Main Street and Corinth Road. This thing with Newcomb Street SUPERVISOR BORGOS-That will be the next part of this ... MR. TUCKER- ... because from the City line to Richardson Street and I drive those roads all the time, we don't hove a parking ... as for as vehicles along the side of the road. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-That's why, when we put this together as a result of a little workshop session, we said, there really isn't too much problem in other places. Now we just want to make sure we don't force it to other places. If we make no parking up a little further then the trucks might back up and park right along, still on Main Street. But we don't believe anyone will be inconvenienced by this, anyone that has a legitimate reason to be there and it will make it much safer. MR. TUCKER-Now at the Convenient Market, right across from the Cemetery, are both sides of that rood going to be posted no parking? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Correct, that's the proposal. MR. TUCKER-Alright, thank you. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-You're welcome. Anyone else wish to speak about this particular AAfon of road? Any Town Board members? Hearing none, we'll close, no we can't close the port of the hearing because it's all one big public hearing. Let me get a ruling from our Attorney, its a// one big hearing, is that correct? ATTORNEY DUSEK-They were all advertised together so you would conduct all public hearings first. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-And then take action of the resolutions, okay. The next part of this public hearing, we'll deal with Newcomb Street, a resolution to enact a local low regulating parking on a portion of Newcomb Street. Now it come to my attention today that there already is on the books, a law related to that. Mr. Dusek may have spoken about it that lost meeting but 1 don't r,ecQ11. ATTORNEY DUSEK-Yes, there is a no parking law in effect for Newcomb Street. This local law for Necomb Street would amend, I believe, let me just make sure, yes it does indicate that ordinance number 57 is superseded to the extent that it is inconsistent with this local law. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Thot makes Mr. Naylor happy, that was the concern he brought to me this afternoon, what are we going to do with the old one. So we would be talking in terms of amending the old one, creating the new one and that should take core of us. A T TOR NE Y D USEK-R igh t. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-This says, 200, between the intersection, let me just get it straight here, 'except as provided in Section 4 hereof, no motor vehicle or other vehicle or if any kind shall be allowed or permitted to park and no person sholl.pork a motor vehicle or other vehicle for any period of time, on either side of, or in the right-of-woy of all that piece or portion of Newcomb Street lying and existing between the intersection of said Newcomb Street and County Route 28, that's Main Street and a portion 220 feet north of said intersection. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Where does it stop? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Should it be east? COUNCILMAN POTENZA-No, it runs north and south. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Is north right? COUNCILMAN MONTESI-North is right. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-That's right, I'm going the other way. MR. NAYLOR-There's already 220 feet on both sides. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-No parking? MR. NA YL OR-North, already. ATTORNEY DUSEK-This gives you the exact some thing as what you have now, plus on exemption for the church. If you recall when we discussed the Corinth Road no parking, it was indicated to me that there was a concern for the church. This was my proposed solution to give them some parking on Newcomb Street because there is none now. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Okay, this shall not apply to parking on the westerly side of Newcomb Street during the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 p.m. on Sundoys.ond holidays. ATTORNEY DUSEK-Yes. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-What about funerals and weddings? ATTORNEY DUSEK-1 can't seem to come up with on answer for that one. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Let's see what Mr. Naylor has to say first. MR. TUCKER-Roberts Rules, if Mr. Naylor is going to speak, he comes to the microphone so that it comes part of the record, please. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-He has not even spoken. MR. TUCKER-He stood up and jobbered, I seen him. SUPERVISOR C ORGOS-Mr. Naylor, do you wish to speak at this time? MR. NAYLOR, HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT-1 don't like your idea of putting the parking there for the church on Sunday. Fire truck ain't going to get through there, somebody is going to burn up. That's all I've got to soy. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-I believe the parking would only be permitted on one side. MR. NAYLOR-That makes no difference, there ain't enough room to get o chicken through there when they pork now. That's for the record. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Mr. Naylor has gone on record opposing parking at any time. Is there any other comment from any other member of the public? COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-The people that live on the street don't object to the church parking. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-With all due respect, Mr. Naylor is referred to as the Town of Queensbury has colorful Highway Superintendent. MR. NAYLOR-Right, very colorful. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Any members of the Board? COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-What of the Reverend ... SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 understand he called the office today and is 100 percent in favor of this. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-To my recollection to talking to him before, he is as long as the church con park, there's no problem. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Any other comments from members of the public? if not, we'll close that port of the public hearing. Two down, one to go. Now this is a resolution to enact no parking zone on Aviation Rood. This would run from the Northwoy to Manor Drive on the north, I'm trying to think which rood on the south. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-Midnight Drive. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Midnight Drive. Both sides of Aviation Rood. Essentially it will eliminate all the parking in front of the school and the churches all the way down through post the tennis courts, right on down. An area that is typically used during church services and spaghetti dinners or whatever when there is parking available in the parking lots in that area. People decided its more convenient to pork on the road. There is a tremendous traffic hazard. Anyone wish to speak for or against that? Mr. Naylor, would you come forward again please? MR. NAYLOR-You do realize that you've got on ordinance against parking on the church side? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-1 did not until you spoke to me this afternoon. I don't know if our Attorney is awore of it. ATTORNEY DUSEK-This was mentioned to me just on the way in. I did look it up and it turns out that there was on ordinance passed in 1966 prohibiting parking on Aviation Rood between the easterly side of the junction of Cottage Hill Rood and Aviation and the westerly side of the southbound entrance to the Northwoy. A couple observations is, I think that this ordinance ought to be repeoled at this point if the Board is desirous of proceeding with this one tonight. I would recommend, that I think that they both do quite a similar job except - that the new one has been written now is much more detailed in terms of precisely identifying those areas where no parking would be allowed. I feel that it will perhaps survive the test in court if a case should ever need be. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-We discussed this earlier and I know of a few no parking signs along the area of the 2 churches. I've never seen o no parking zone in the other areas and apparently Mr. Naylor says, if the signs ever were there, they haven't been there for years but that's probably why we weren't aware of it. It certainly hasn't.been enforced. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Poul let me ask you o question, the Highway Superintendent, what kind of signal our we sending to the Sheriff's Deportment who a t them because they're allowed to park there. Now if they happen to be on Newcomb Street on a Friday night for a wedding, our we going to ticket them or not? I mean, you know, we ought to be a little more consistent as making the lows ... MR. NAYLOR-You've got to be right or left, you've got to make it stick one way or another. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-Becouse the Catholic Church and the Methodist Church have made arrangements and have parking lots for their people and have on agreement with the school, why ore we allowing it because another church has not mode those , arrangements? You can tell me that they have a problem, there land isn't big enough. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-They don't have any property. t COUNCILMAN MONTESI-But that isn't a problem so were going to make o law to make it very difficult to enforce. I mean, what is a sheriff going to do when he goes down there on J o Saturday afternoon when there's a wedding. Is he going to ticket everybody in the wedding party? COUNCILMAN POTENZA-Or o weekday when there is a funeral? I mean, there are many... COUNCILMAN MONTESI-We're not being consistent, we're not making a good low. I mean we're making a law for the purposes of safety, as you pointed out and it ought to hold through, period. MR. NAYLOR-You did up in Cleverdale, you gave them permission to park, like on summers and it got so everybody parks and nobody pays any attention. We spent over 10 grand on signs up there and they yank them up ... COUNCILMAN MONTESI-The sheriff says they're not going to patrol that anymore because it's crazy. MR. NAYLOR-It's o waste of his time. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-I think wholeheartedly we ought to hove no parking on Aviation Road. But I really don't see making no parking in areas of the convenience ... parking lot. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-There is a difference in the 2 churches and the locations. COUNCILMAN MONTESI-I know but I'm referring to the low. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-... is right on the street. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-If its imperative to the church and the parishioners and the neighbors, I would think they would be here to speak, for or against it. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Let me ask if there's anyone else here whose interested in speaking for or against? Any Board members? We'll do Aviation Rood first and then we'll come back to Round Pond Rood in a minute. COUNCILMAN POTENZA-I'm in support of the resolution for a number of reasons. The availability of parking in that area, be it group function or either church function its there and its just out of laziness that its not used. I think with the State Police barracks or substation there, its imperative that they have the clearance to go up and down Aviation Road and its certainly is not o hindrance to anyone for the no parking signs. But I think the no parking signs should go up. COUNCILMAN KUROSAKA-The situation at the West Glens Falls Church, there's no comparison. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-They're different situations. MR. DUFOUR, South Queensbury-Why can't you tell these people to sell the property they've got and relocate somewhere where there would be parking facilities? SUPERVISOR BORGOS-He's making another point. That's very hard to do, and the answer to your question, is very hard to do and ... MR. DUFOUR-But isn't a possibility? COUNCILMAN PO TEN ZA-Everything is possible. i SUPERVISOR BORGOS-We legally can't tell someone to do, something, we can only make that suggestion. MR. DUFOUR-Alright, thank you. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-He's building his case, o good attorney, I know where he's headed. Okay, anyone else who wishes to speak about Aviation Rood? Anyone in the audience? We did receive one letter from the church. For the record, essentially, its from the United Methodist Church, in favor of no parking, supporting the no parking zone on Aviation Rood. TOWN CLERK DOUGHER-Yes. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Okay, now in that some resolution, I don't know why they're lumped together, but they ore, is no parking on Round Pond Rood and I'll tell you in Laymen's language, no parking on Round Pond Rood from Birdsill Rood out to Route 9. So the strip by the Bavarian Poloce, from there to Route 9. Does not make any changes along by the Country Club where there's already no parking on one side of the rood. Anyone wish to speak for or against this particular recommendation? I don't see anyone from the audience. Any Board members? Okoy, let's close this public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 8:11 p.m. RESOLUTION TO ENACT LOCAL LAW NUMBER 6, 1990 REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF COUNTY ROUTE 28 KNOWN AS MAIN STREET AND CORINTH ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 356, 1990, Introduced by George Kurosoko who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenzo. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is desirous of enacting a Local Law to regulate parking on a portion of County Route 28 known as Main Street and Corinth Road, and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed Local Low entitled "A Local Low Regulating Parking on a Portion of County Route 28 Known as Main Street and Corinth Rood has been presented at this meeting, a copy of said Local Low also having been previously given to the Town Board, and WHEREAS, on June 18th, 1990, a public hearing with regard to this Local Low was duly conducted, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby enacts the proposed Local Low to regulate parking on a portion of County Route 28 Known as Main Street and Corinth Road, to be known as Local Low Number 6, 1990, the some to be titled and contain such provisions as ore set forth in a copy of the proposed Local Low presented at this meeting, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury is hereby directed to file the said Local Law with the New York State Secretary of State in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Low and that said Local Low will take effect immediately and as soon as allowable under low. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None LOCAL LAW NUMBER 6, 1990 A LOCAL LAW REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF COUNTY ROUTE 28 KNOWN AS MAIN STREET AND CORINTH ROAD BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AS FOLLOWS: 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Local Low is to prohibit, under penalty of fine for violation, the parking of any vehicle on o portion of County Route 28 known as Main Street and Corinth Rood. AQL Z Definitions: For the purpose of this Local Law, the words "Motor Vehicle," "Vehicle," "Person," and "Pork" shall hove the some meaning as set forth for the definitions of such words in the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York. 3. No Parking on County Route 28 Known as Main Street and Corinth Rood: No motor vehicle or other vehicle of any kind shall be allowed or permitted to park and no persons shall park a motor vehicle or other vehictes for any period of time on, on either side or in the right-of-woy thereof, of all that piece car portion of County Route 28 in the Town of Queensbury (said road identified or known as Main Street on the easterly side of New York State Route 87 and Corinth Road on the westerly side of New York State Route —� 87) lying or existing between the intersection of County Route 28 and the Town of Queensbury/City of Glens Falls municipal boundary line in the Town of Queensbury, and the intersection of County Route 28, and a projected line created by and following the projected direction of the most easterly side of the edge of the pavement of Rhode Island Avenue, as extended across County Route 28 to the southerly side thereof. a. Penolty: - Any person violating any provision or paragraph of Section 3 of this Local Law, shall, upon conviction, be punishable for a first offense by o fine not to exceed $25.00, and for a second offense by a fine not to exceed $50.00. In addition to the aforesaid penalties, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury may institute any proper action, suit, or proceeding, to prevent, restrain, correct, or abote any violation of this Local Low. 5. This local low shall take effect immediately upon filing thereof in the Office of Secretary of State. RESOLUTION TO ENACT LOCAL LAW NUMBER 7, 1990 REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF NEWCOMB STREET RESOLUTION NO. 357, 1990, Introduced by George Kurosoko who moved by its adoption, seconded by Betty Monahan. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is desirous of enacting a Local Low to regulate parking on a portion of Newcomb Street, and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed Local Low entitled "A Local Law Regulating Parking on o Portion of Newcomb Street" has been presented at this meeting, a copy of said Local Low also having been previously given to the Town Board, and WHEREAS, On June 18th, 1990, a public hearing with regard to this Local Low was duly conducted, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby enacts the proposed Local Low to regulate parking on a portion of Newcomb Street, to be known as Local Low Number 7, 1990, the some to be titled and contain such provisions as are set forth in a copy of the proposed Local Law presented at this meeting, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury is hereby directed to file the said Local Low with the New York State Secretary of State in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Low and that said Local Low will take effect immediately and as soon as allowable under low. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos J Noes: Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi Absent: None LOCAL LAW NUMBER 7, 1990 A LOCAL LAW REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF NEWCOMB STREET BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AS FOLLOWS: 1. Purr ose: The purpose of this Local Low is to prohibit, in some instances, under penalty of fine for violation, the parking of any vehicle along a portion of Newcomb Street in the Town of Queensbury. 2. Definitions: For the purpose of this Local Law, the words "Motor Vehicle," Vehicle," "Person," and "Pork" shall hove the some meaning as set forth for the definitions of such words in the Vehicle and Traffic Low of the State of New York. 3. No Parking on a Portion of Newcomb Street: Except as provided in Section 4 hereof, no motor vehicle or other vehicle of any kind shall be allowed or permitted to pork and no person shall park a motor vehicle or other vehicle for any period of time, on, on either side of, or in the right-of-woy of all that piece or portion of Newcomb Street lying and existing between the intersection of said Newcomb Street and County Route 28 (Main Street) and a point 220' north of said intersection. 4. Exemption: The prohibition herein set forth shall not apply to parking on the westerly side of Newcomb Street during the hours of 8:00 a.m., and 1:00 p.m., on Sundays and holidays, when parking shall be permitted on said side of Newcomb Street. 5. Ordinonce No. 57 Superseded., Ordinance No. 57 of the Town of Queensbury, entitled "No Parking Zone on Newcomb Street" is hereby repealed as of the effective dote of this Local Law. 6. Penol ty: Any person violating any provision or paragraph of Section 3 of this Local Low, shall, upon conviction, be punishable for a first offense by a fine not to exceed $25.00, and for a second offense by a fine not to exceed $50.00. In addition to the aforesaid penalties, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury may institute any proper action, suit, or proceeding, to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate any violation of this Local Low. 5. This Local Low shall take effect immediately upon filing thereof in the Office of the Secretary of State. RESOLUTION TO ENACT LOCAL LAW NUMBER 8, 1990 REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF AVIATION ROAD AND COUNTY ROUTE 17 (ROUND POND ROAD) RESOLUTION NO. 358, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by Ronald Montesi. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is desirous of enacting a Local Low to regulate parking on a portion of Aviation Rood and County Route 17 (Round Pond Road), and WHEREAS, o copy of the proposed Local Low entitled "A Local Low Regulating Parking on a Portion of Aviation Road and County Route 17 (Round Pond Rood)" has been presented at this meeting, a copy of said Local Low also having been previously given to the Town Board, and WHEREAS, on June 18th, 1990, a public hearing with regard to this Local Law was duly conducted, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby enacts the proposed Local Law to regulate parking on a portion of Aviation Road and County Route 17 (Round Pond Rood), to be known as Local Law Number 8, 1990, the some to be titled and contain such provisions as ore set forth in o copy of the proposed Local Law presented at this meeting, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury is hereby directed to file the said Local Low with the New York State Secretary of State in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Low and that said Local Low will take effect immediately as as soon as allowable under law. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None LOCAL LAW NUMBER 8, 1990 A LOCAL LAW REGULATING PARKING ON A PORTION OF AVIATION ROAD AND COUNTY ROUTE 17 (ROUND POND ROAD) BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN BOARD VF THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY AS FOLLOWS: 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Local Law is to prohibit, under penalty of fine for violation, the parking of any vehicle on a portion of Aviotion Rood and County Route 17 (Round Pond Road) in the Town of Queensbury. 2. Definitions: For the purpose of this Local Low, the words "Motor Vehicle," "Vehicle," Person," and "Pork" shall hove the some meaning as set forth for the definitions of such words in the Vehicle and Traffic Low of the State of New York. 3. No Porking on Aviation Rood and County Route 17(Round Pond Rood): No motor vehicle or other vehicle of any kind shall be allowed or permitted to park and no persons shall park a motor vehicle or other vehicle for any period of time on or on either side or in the right-of-way of: A. All that piece or portion of County Route 17 (Round Pond Rood) in the Town of Queensbury, County of Warren, State of New York, lying or existing between the intersection of said County Route 17 and the most easterly side of the pavement edge of Route 9 and the intersection of said County Route 17 and a projected line created by and following the projected direction of the most westerly side of the pavement edge of Birdsall Road as extended across County Route 17 to the southerly side of the right-of-way thereof. B. All that piece or portion of Aviotion Rood in the Town of Queensbury, County of Warren, State of New York, lying or existing generally between the intersection of Aviotion Road and the most westerly most portion of the pavement of the entrance ramp to New York State Route 87 Southbound(The Adirondack Northwoy Southbound), and the intersection of said Aviation road and Manor Drive, on the northerly side thereof, and Midnight Drive thereof on the southerly side thereof, said area being more specifically described as all that piece or portion of Aviation Road, described as Aviation Rood, the northerly side thereof and right-of-woy thereof, beginning directly across from the southwesterly corner of the intersection of Aviation Rood and the pavement of the entrance ramp to New York State Route 87, Southbound (Adirondack Northwoy Southbound) and thence proceeding from said intersection on the said side of Aviation Road in o westerly direction too point where said Aviotion Rood intersects with the easterly side of the pavement of Manor Drive, and al/ that piece or portion of Aviation Rood described as Aviation Road, the southerly side thereof, and right-of way thereof beginning at the intersection of Aviation Rood and the easterly side of the pavement of Midnight Drive, and thence proceeding from said intersection on sold side of Aviation Road, in on easterly direction to a point where said Aviation Rood intersects with the westerly side of the pavement of the entrance romp to New York State Route 87, Southbound, (Adirondack Northwoy - Southbound). 4. Penalty: Any person violating any provision or paragraph of Section 3 of this Local Law, shall, upon conviction, be punishable for o first offense by a fine not to exceed $25.00, and for a second offense by a fine not to exceed $50.00. In addition to the aforesaid penalties, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury may institute any proper action, suit, or proceeding, to prevent, restrain, correct, or obote any violation of this Local Low. u�_1), w S. This Local Low sholl take effect immediately upon filing thereof in the Office of the Secretary of State. DISCUSSION -SPRINKLER SYSTEMS DAVE HA TIN mode presentation of proposed sprinkler low. Noted that he has available for the public, copies of the proposed local low. Town Board heard comments from the public. No decision was made to go to public hearing. OPEN FORUM 9:15 p.m. TOM LECOMB, Jerome Avenue-Noted concern with excessive noise, the problems he's had in his neighborhood and the lock of a noise ordinance in the Town of Queensbury. (Read to the Town Board, the Glens Falls City Noise Ordinance) Questioned the Town Board on their feelings regarding o noise ordinance. SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Noted that similar concerns have come before the Town Board many times, like loud music, motor bikes, trail bikes, 3-wheelers. The Town Board is in favor of controlling noise. Town Board agreed that this should be mode a priority, have the Attorney research and put together a proposal. BARBARA BENNETT, Dixon Road-Exploined that she had gone to the 2 movie theaters belonging to Hoyt, over the post weekend and before the movie, they ask the audience to contribute to the Jimmy fund for cancer. Its seen before the movie, the lights are on and they come around with canisters to collect money. Noted that the Jimmy fund is a clinic in Boston. Would like to know whether they should be allowed to do this? Town Attorney would like to research and hove on answer within the next day or so. COUNCILMAN MONTESI spoke to the Town Board regarding 3 homes on Meadowbrook Rood, one belonging -to Mr. Kilmartin and 2 belonging to the Green's, that would like to hook up to the sewer system. Would like to know whether there are some possibilities. Town Board held discussion and felt that although there were some alternatives, they were substantially expensive. Mike Shaw noted that there's rock ledge present in the area which would definitely requiring blasting in order to put in any piping. Supervisor noted that it would be less expensive and foster for the residents to put in their own systems. OPEN FORUM CLOSED SUPERVISOR BORGOS-Noted the U.S. Senior's Notional Golf Tournament in Town at the Glens Falls Country Club and the Town has proclaimed the next 3 days as U.S. Senior Golf r Tournament Days. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION APPROVING MINUTES RESOLUTION NO. 359, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenza who moved for its adoption, seconded by Ronald Montesi. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby approve the Town Minutes of May 7th, June 1st and June 12th of 1990. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Mr. Kurosoko (June 1st & 12th) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THREE PARTY CUSTODY AGREEMENT WITH GLENS FALLS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY AND FIRST CHICAGO TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK r RESOLUTION NO. 360, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenza who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11 of the General Municipal Law, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury may authorize the Chief Fiscal Officer, Mr. Stephen Borgos, to deposit or invest moneys not required for immediate expenditure, in special time deposit accounts or certificates of deposit, issued by a bank or trust company located and authorized to do business in the State of New York, provided.-,that such time deposit or certificate of deposit sholl be payable within such time as the proceeds sholl be needed to meet expenditures for which moneys were obtained, and provided further that such time deposit account or certificate of deposit be secured by a pledge of obligations of the Unites States of Americo, and WHEREAS, said Section 11 of the General Municipal Low also provides that investments may be mode in obligations of the United States of Americo or in obligations guaranteed by agencies of the United States of America in certain instances, and also provides that the governing board may also authorize the Chief Fiscal Officer to turn over the fiscal custody and safekeeping of all evidences of the investments mode pursuant to Section 11 of the General Municipal Low to any bank or trust company incorporated in the State or any National Bonk located in the State, or any private banker duly authorized by the Superintendent of Banks of this State, upon the compliance of certain conditions set forth in said Section 11, and that the Town Board may, further, authorize such other activities as may be authorized in said Section 11, and WHEREAS, o three-party custody agreement has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, which three-party custody agreement concerns the Glens Falls National Bonk and Trust Company, First Chicago Trust Company of New York, and the Town of Queensbury, and a copy of the some has been presented at this meeting, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby approves the three-party custody agreement and hereby further authorizes the Town Supervisor, as Chief Fiscal Officer, to execute the agreement and place the official seal of the Town of Queensbury, as may be necessary, upon the agreement, and take such other and further actions as may be necessary to fully effectuate the terms and provisions of the agreement and otherwise make investments as provided for and allowed by Section 11 of the General Municipal Low of the State of New York. i Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoka, Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes., None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 361, 1990, Introduced by George Kurosako who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenzo. WHEREAS, certain departments have requested transfers of funds, and WHEREAS, said requests have been approved by the Town of Queensbury Accounting Office, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the funds be transferred as listed below: TOWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FROM TO AMOUNT A-115-1420-440 A-1 75-1420-414 $250.00 (Town Attorney (Travel) Contractual) SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE FROM TO AMOUNT ,,-1,1 l A0451220442 A0451220401 $500.00 (Troining/Educotion) (Office Supplies) HIGHWAY'DEPARTMENT FROM TO AMOUNT D 165-9785.600 D 165-5130-204 $1,500.00 (Installment Purchases) (Heavy Equipment) D 165-5130. 146 D 165-5130. 100 49.00 (Mechanic) (Highway Machinery) TAX RECEIVER FROM TO AMOUNT A0651330203 A0651330401 $1,500.00 (Computer Soft wore) (Office Supplies) WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT FROM TO AMOUNT S43858730176 S43858130440 $6,000.00 (Wastewater Technician) (Contractual) Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON QUEENSBURY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT-BAY ROAD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 362, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosaka WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is desirous of establishing on extension to the Queensbury Consolidated Water District to be known as Boy Road District Extension No. 1, and WHEREAS, a mop, plan and report has been prepared regarding the said extension of the existing Queensbury Consolidated Water District, such extension to serve on area along the westerly side of Boy Road some 650 to 1,300 feet northerly of Blind Rock Rood, which area consists of a lot of 20,000 square feet upon which a home is situated and on approved subdivision tract of 16.9 areas where a high density residential development is planned and which tract is further identified as Cedor Court, and WHEREAS, the map, plan and report has been filed in the Town Clerk's Office in the Town and is available for public inspection, and WHEREAS, the mop, plan and report was prepared by Charles H. Scudder, Consulting Engineer, Box 792, Glens Falls, New York 12801, on engineer licensed by the State of New York, showing the boundaries of the proposed extension to the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, a general plan of the water system, a report of the proposed water system and method of operation, and WHEREAS, the said mop, plan and report shows the water mains, gate valves, and hydrants, and appurtenances together with the location and a general description of all public works existing or required, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury desires to establish the said proposed water district extension pursuant to Article 12A and consolidate the some with the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, pursuant to §206(A) of the Town Law of the State of New York, and WHEREAS, some proceedings were previ, 'y undertaken by the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury to establish the proposed water district extension pursuant to Town Law Article as 12A, but not completed and the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury desires to rescind any previous inconsistent resolutions or parts thereof adopted on this regard and proceed with the estoblishment and consolidation of the proposed district extension as previously described, and WHEREAS, the facilities set forth in the aforesaid map, plan and report have been installed but not yet placed into service with the exception of a fire hydrant, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Attorney of the Town of Queensbury notify the Deportment of Environmental Conservation, the Department of Health, and any other involved agency which may have previously been notified, of the desire of the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury to complete o review pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and establish the aforesaid water district extension as set forth in the preambles hereof, and of the desire of the said Town Board to continue to act as lead agency and to review this project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and ascertain whether there are any objections by said agencies to the Town Board continuing as lead agent, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, when notifying the aforesaid agencies, the Town Attorney shall send a copy of this resolution, the previously described mop, plan and report, Part I of the Short Environmental Assessment Form presented at this meeting, and any other documentation of the applications that may be necessary or useful, and BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: 1. The Town Board shall consider establishing the proposed extension to the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, the some being previously described in this resolution; 2. The boundaries of the proposed extension of the Queensbury Consolidated Water District are as follows: All that certain parcel of land situate in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, located westerly of the easterly line of Boy Rood, in said Town, and which parcel is bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the westerly bounds of Boy Road at a distance of 685.5 feet northerly of the centerline of Blind Rock Road, and which point of beginning is the southeast corner of lands of Gerold V. and Delores W. West; running thence from the place of beginning, in a westerly direction for a distance of 200 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said lands of West; thence in a northerly direction for a distance of 100 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of said lands of West; thence in a westerly direction, along the division line between Lot 39 of the First Division of the Queensbury Patent on the South and Lot 40 of said potent on the North, and along the southerly line of lands of Arthur E. and Gertrude E. Thornton, and the northerly line of lands of Continental Insurance Company, for a distance of 964.4 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe marking the southwest corner of said lands of Thornton; thence in o northerly direction, along the westerly line of said lands of Thornton, and the easterly line of lands of Glens Falls Real Estate Company, for a distance of 770 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of lands of Charles R. Barber; thence in on easterly direction, along the southerly line of said lands of Barber, and the southerly line of lands of Harry C. Prutsmon, et al., and along the northerly line of said lands of Thornton, for a distance of 1527 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of Bay Rood; thence in a southwesterly direction, along said westerly line, for a distance of 175 feet, more or less; thence easterly, crossing Boy Road, to the southwest corner of lands now or formerly of Ellen J. Hillis; thence southerly, along the eosterly line of Boy Rood, for o d/stonce of 345 feet, more or less, to the easterly extension of the southerly line of said lands of West; thence westerly, crossing Boy Rood, to the place of beginning, and containing approximately 18 acres, more or less; 3. The improvements to be included and made a port of the proposed district extension are generally water distribution facilities for the above-described parcels, said improvements including water mains, gate valves and hydrants, and said improvements are more fully set forth in a mop, plan and report on file with the Town Clerk of the Town of Queensbury; 4. All proposed new water mains and appurtenances hove been installed by the subdivision developer and shall be turned over to the Town of Queensbury without charge if and when the proposed water district extension is approved; 1 5. It is reported that all proposed water mains and appurtenances have been installed in full accordance with the Town of Queensbury specifications. 6. The maximum amount expended for the said improvement will not be or is not greater than $65,000.00, said amount paid or to be paid by the developer and at no cost to the Town of Queensbury, the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, or the proposed district extension; 7. There will be no financing of the proposed water district extension improvements by the proposed district, the Town of Queensbury or the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, the developer will contribute towards existing facilities, and parcels in the proposed district will contribute toward existing debt of the Consolidated Water District as herein set forth; 8. In accordance with §206(A) of the Town Low of the State of New York, all of the expenses of the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, including all extensions heretofore or hereafter established, shall be a charge against the entire area of the district as extended; 9. The map, plan and report describing the improvements is on file in the Town Clerk's Office, for public inspection; 10 The Town Board of the Town of Queensbury shall meet and hold a public hearing at the Queensbury Activities Center situate at 531 Bay Road, Queensbury, Warren County, New York on the 9th day of July, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the map, plan and report for said water district extension, and to hear all persons interested in the proposal, and to take action as is required and authorized by low; 11. The said Town Board hereby rescinds any previously adopted, inconsistent resolutions or parts thereof relating to the establishment of the extension district proposed by this resolution; and 12. The Town Clerk is directed to cause a copy of this Order to be duly published and posted as required by Town Low Section 209-d. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT APPLICATION REGARDING BAY ROAD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 363, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosako. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is presently considering the approval and authorization of an extension to the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, such extension to be known as the Queensbury Consolidated Water District - Boy Rood Water District Extension No. 1, and WHEREAS, other involved agencies exist, including the Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Conservation, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to complete and file an application for Public Water Supply Permit and a joint application for permit with the Department of Environmental Conservation and Deportment of Health, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby authorizes the Town Supervisor of the Town of Queensbury to complete, sign and execute the aforesaid applications on behalf of the Town of Queensbury, the Queensbury Consolidated Water District, and the Bay Road Water District Extension No. 1, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor of the Town of Queensbury is hereby authorized to execute oAy other forms or applications that may be necessary to secure the necessary permits, including, but not limited to, any Environmental Assessment Forms or other forms required by the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monohon, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS AND AMENDMENT TO TOWN BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 364, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury has recently leased a building to be used as a Justice Court Building for the Town of Queensbury, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to expend certain funds for the development of the building and for payment of rent due for the lease of the aforesaid building, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby authorizes a transfer of the sum of $23,000.00 from the Contingency Account Line of, the General Town of Queensbury Budget for 1990 to A-0351110440 (Miscellaneous Contractual - Town Court Account), and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby increases appropriations in Account No. : A-1451624444 (Justice Building Miscellaneous Contractual) in the amount of $15,000.00 and increases Appropriated Fund Balance in the like account with the source of funding to be from the Unappropriated Fund Balance, and the 1990 Town of Queensbury Budget is hereby amended accordingly, and BE IT FURTHER -- RESOLVED, that the Town Supervisor for the Town of Queensbury is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever action and make whatever entries ore necessary in the accounts and records of the Town of Queensbury to effectuate the obove-referenced transfers and otherwise make the funds transferred available for expenditures in the obove-referenced accoun ts. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosaka, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monohon, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None Town Board discussed present phone situation at the Town Office Building, Town Attorney recommended not to allow NYNEX to continue work or hook up on the 25th of June, until the Supervisor has time to review the proposals. COMMUNICATIONS Bid-Opening #2 Fuel Oil (on file in Clerk's Office) RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT BID FOR #2 FUEL OIL, KEROSENE, AND DIESEL FUEL J RESOLUTION NO. 365, 1990, Introduced by Ronald Montesi who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosaka. WHEREAS, the Director of Purchasing for the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York, duly advertised for #2 fuel oil, kerosene, and diesel fuel, pursuant to Town of Queensbury specifications, and 14P , 4ihil ' WHEREAS, the firm of The King Service, Inc., has submitted the lowest bid for the #2 fuel Oil, o copy of their bid being presented at this meeting, and WHEREAS, Doreen M. Dougher, Town Clerk, has recommended that the bid be awarded to the aforesaid bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED, that the . Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, hereby awards the bid for #2 Warren County, New York, fuel oil, kerosene, and diesel fuel, to The King Service, Inc., and that said #2 fuel oil, kerosene, and diesel fuel, will be paid for from appropriate accounts in each department from the 1990 - 1991 budgets. i Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None Bid Opening - Con troct #7, Central Queensbury Quaker Rood Sewer District - Grinder Pumps The Belden Company, Inc. 5% Bid Bond $494,416.00 20 Belden Rood Rutland, VT 05701 Non-Collusi ve A ttoched Schultz Construction, Inc. 5% Bid Bond $508,079.00 Pine Crest Eleven Industrial Park Round Lake, NY 12151 Non-Collusive Attoched Town Board held discussion and agreed to hold off awarding bid to allow the Attorney time to research original contract documents and cost estimates. Town Attorney spoke to the Town Board regarding a request from a resident a Mr. Shriner, who had contacted himself with a request for no parking on Dunham's Bay Rood, which is being over crowded by boats being parked on the sides of the road. (presented pictures to the Town Board) Town Board agreed there was a question whether it was a Town rood or not and requested the Town Clerk and A ttorney to research to see who owns the rood. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AUDIT RESOLUTION NO. 366, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. RESOLVED, that the Audit of Bills appearing on Abstract June, 18th, 1990, numbering from 90-2689 to 90-2956 and totaling $279,361.26 be and hereby is approved. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenza, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION CALLING FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION RESOLUTION NO. 367, 1990, Introduced by George Kurosoko who moved for its adoption, seconded by Marilyn Potenza. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby enter into Executive Session to discuss Personnel, Real Property Acquisition and Litigation. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO ENTER REGULAR SESSION OF THE TOWN BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 368, 1990, Introduced by Betty Monohon who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourn from Executive Session and enter into Regular Session of the Town Board. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION TO RETAIN NORTHEASTERN APPRAISORS RESOLUTION NO. 369, 1990, Introduced by Marilyn Potenzo who moved for its adoption, seconded by George Kurosoko. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby retains the services of Northeastern Approisors for appraisal on four parcels in the Town of Queensbury, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this appraisal work sholl .not exceed $700.00 and to be paid for from Engineering Professional Services, Account A 125-1440.440. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION CALLING FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION RESOLUTION NO. 370, 1990, Introduced by George Kurosoko who moved for its adoption, seconded by Betty Monahan. RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby moves in Executive Session to continue discussion of Personnel, Real Property Acquisition and Litigation as in previous Executive Session. Duly adopted this 18th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Kurosoko, Mrs. Potenzo, Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan, Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: None No further action was taken. On motion, the meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, DARLEEN M. DOUGHER TOWN CLERK t TOWN OF QUEENSBUR Y