Loading...
06-18-2019 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) QUEENSBURYPLANNING BOARD MEETING FIRST REGULAR MEETING .TUNE 18, 2019 INDEX Subdivision No. 1-2019 Jeremy Entwistle & Cassie Leonard 2. PRELIMINARY STAGE Tax Map No. 265.-1-73.1 Site Plan No. 29-2019 Reece Rudolph 3. ZBA RECOMMENDATION Tax Map No. 289.6-1-34 Site Plan No. 36-2019 AngioDynamics, Inc. 7. ZBA RECOMMENDATION Tax Map No. 297.8-1-10 Site Plan No. 34-2019 Carol Wright 10. Special Use Permit 1-2019 Tax Map No. 226.12-1-83 Site Plan No. 37-2019 David Stanhope 13. FWW Permit 3-2019 Tax Map No. 296.15-1-1 Site Plan No. 35-2019 Randy Gross 16. Tax Map No. 303.16-1-33 THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTHS MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. 1 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING FIRST REGULAR MEETING JUNE 18, 2019 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT STEPHEN TRAVER, CHAIRMAN DAVID DEEB, SECRETARY BRAD MAGOWAN JAMIE WHITE MICHAEL VALENTINE STEVEN JACKOSKI, ALTERNATE MICHAEL DIXON, ALTERNATE MEMBERS ABSENT CHRIS HUNSINGER JOHN SHAFER MR. TRAVER-Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Town of Queensbury Planning Board meeting for Tuesday, June 181". This is the first meeting for the month of June and Meeting Number 12 for 2019. Thank you to Steve and Michael for bringing us up to strength this evening for covering for Chris and John that weren't able to join us. We have a couple of administrative items. Before I do that, please note the illuminated exit signs. If we have an emergency, that is the way out. If you have an electronic device, please turn it off or turn the ringer off so we won't be interrupted by it. Thank you. So two administrative items. We have an approval of minutes for the three meetings we had in April, April 16, 23, and 30. I believe we have a resolution to that effect. MR. DEEB-Bef ore I do the resolution, is anybody going to abstain from any of the minutes? Which one? MR. MAGOWAN-The one I didn't make. MR. DEEB-I'll do them separately. MR. MAGOWAN-We don't have enough if? MR. TRAVER-It's not that. It just keeps the record clearer. If you're not abstaining from all of the minutes. MR. MAGOWAN-Which one wasn't I at, Maria? MS. GAGLIARDI-I'm not sure. MR. MAGOWAN-I know I missed one. MR. VALENTINE-If you had read the minutes, you'd know. MR. DEEB-All right. MOTION TO APPROVE THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 16T", 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Michael Valentine: 2 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSTAINED: Mr. Magowan, Mr. Jackoski ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-Next we can do the 23"d MOTION TO APPROVE THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 23'd, 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Michael Valentine: Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSTAINED: Mr. Jackoski ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-And next and lastly the 30t" MOTION TO APPROVE THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 30t", 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan: Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Dixon, Magowan, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSTAINED: Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-All right, and we have one other administrative item, and that is a request to further table Subdivision Preliminary Stage 1-2019 for Jeremy Entwistle & Cassie Leonard. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM SUBDIVISION PREL. STAGE 1-2019 JEREMY ENTWISTLE & CASSIE LEONARD - REQUEST TO FURTHER TABLE. MR. TRAVER-And I see by the accompanying letter, Laura, that they're just finishing up some preparations for a presentation and they would like to come back in July. MRS. MOORE-That's correct. They did submit on the July deadline to be on July. I would suggest July's first meeting. MR. TRAVER-The first meeting. Okay. So the first meeting in July would be the 16t". So we'll table until July 16, and we have a motion to that effect. 3 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. DEEB-All right. RESOLUTION TABLING SUB # 1-2019 PRELIM. STAGE ENTWISTLE & LEONARD A subdivision application has been made to the Queensbury Planning Board for the following: Applicant proposes a two lot subdivision of a 54.8 acre parcel into a 3 acre parcel for a new single family home and a 51.8 acre parcel with an existing home to remain. Applicant proposes several waivers at preliminary stage including clearing plan, grading and erosion control and stormwater. Pursuant to Chapter 183 of the Zoning Ordinance, subdivision of land shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Tabled on 3/26/19;request to further table. MOTION TO TABLE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY STAGE 1-2019 JEREMY ENTWISTLE & CASSIE LEONARD. Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan. Tabled until the July 16, 2019 Planning Board meeting with submissions already made. Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-Next we move to the next section of our agenda. The first section being Planning Board Recommendations to the Zoning Board of Appeals and the first item being Reece Rudolph, application Site Plan 29-2019. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: SITE PLAN NO. 29-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. REECE RUDOLPH. AGENT(S): DAVID HUTCHINSON. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: WR. LOCATION: 24 NACY RD. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REMOVE HALF STORY ROOF AREA OF 392 SQ. FT.TO REPLACE WITH A SECOND STORY OF 715 SQ. FT. THE ADDITION IS TO HAVE TWO BEDROOMS AND BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRS TO BE CONVERTED TO OTHER LIVING SPACE. THE HOUSE IS A PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE. NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE SITE ARE PROPOSED. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3- 040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE IN A CEA SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. Variance: Relief is sought for FLOOR AREA RATIO AND permeability REQUIREMENTS. PLANNING BOARD SHALL PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. CROSS REFERENCE: 91653-2495 SEPTIC ALT. 1991. WARREN CO. PLANNING: N/A. SITE INFORMATION: CEA, GLEN LAKE. LOT SIZE: .21 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 289.6-1-34. SECTION: 179-3-040. DAVID HUTCHINSON, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-So this application was tabled at the previous month's meeting because we were waiting for a septic certification letter, and at this time all the Board members received that via e-mail. We do have a hard copy in the file. So the applicant has received that and the application can move forward as Planning Board recommendation. The applicant 4 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) proposes to remove a half story roof area of 392 square feet and replace with a full second story of 715 square feet. The addition is to have two bedrooms and a bedroom downstairs is to be converted to other living space. The house is considered pre-existing, non- conforming and the relief sought is for setbacks and permeability. At this time I don't think height is involved anymore. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MR. HUTCHINSON-Hi, my name's Dave Hutchinson. I'm a representative for Reece Rudolph. I apologize he wasn't able to make this meeting tonight. Essentially the way the building's laid out now, the second floor has eave storage space in the front and back of the house and what he's proposing to do is remove the second floor, make the side wall straight and capture that space. It's about 250 square feet. That would just be a little more space to have upstairs. We would keep within the footprint of the existing house and add a raised deck area off the back upstairs bedroom. We're asking for a one percent decrease in the permeability from what's existing now as a variance and two, two and a half percent of the Floor Area Ratio decrease I guess you could say. The second floor interestingly is only a few feet into the setback. The portion of the building that is in the setback right now mostly is not being added on to if you will. You can see that in the site plan in the hatched in area of the second floor. MR. TRAVER-There's no change in the footprint. Right? MR. HUTCHINSON-Right. MR. TRAVER-You're just adding some height. MR. HUTCHINSON-Right. MR. TRAVER-And the reason for the variance on the setbacks is essentially it's a pre- existing. In other words, you're not decreasing the setback. It just comes up again as an issue because you're modifying the site. MR. HUTCHINSON-Exactly. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. HUTCHINSON-Presently that corner of the building is a few feet over the setback. When we make that wall straight up it will still be a few feet into the setback. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. VALENTINE-Is that the same rationale in the permeability? Because you said a decrease in permeability. MR. TRAVER-Yes, essentially the same issue, yes. And height is a new one. Have you had an opportunity to look at the Staff comments? MR. HUTCHINSON-Yes, I did. MR. TRAVER-Can you comment or discuss with us under landscaping the shoreline buffering? MR. HUTCHINSON-I sure can. Interestingly, I wish I had a photo of it, but about 20 feet ironically back from the shore there is a buffer area presently that has at least three full grown trees in the eight to twelve diameter range and then medium landscaping and shrubs and smaller plantings already and that covers the full width of the property, and then 5 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) there's, from that lake edge of that buffer to the lake about 20 feet is flat and a grass area. MR. TRAVER-So there isn't a buffer at the shoreline. It's setback from the shoreline. MR. HUTCHINSON-Right. I think historically probably the property was such that you had furniture down there at the water's edge and so over the years it was kept flat. I don't know, that portion has been flat historically and then it severely slopes right up and just as it's starting to slope there's sort of a natural buffer there now. Our hope is that that's catching the stormwater naturally and what does make it through that flat area is allowed to permeate into the ground. If it's a good idea to enhance that existing buffer or move some of that further towards the lake, I can certainly look at that. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Questions, comments from members of the Board? I'm not hearing any. When this was tabled originally back in May, May 29t", we did open a public hearing and kept it open pending, in the expectation that we heard tonight. So I will ask is there anyone in the audience this evening that would like to address the Planning Board on this application? I'm not seeing anyone. Laura, are there any written comments? PUBLIC HEARING OPEN MRS. MOORE-There's no written comments. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Then we will close the public hearing. MRS. MOORE-No, you can't close it yet. It's still in the Planning Board Recommendation phase. Sorry. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Just looking at the agenda it says that we already had a public hearing. MRS. MOORE-Right. It still remains open because you're still in the Planning Board Recommendation phase. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Now I understand what you're saying. All right. So we will not close the public hearing. Thank you for that clarification. All right. So that will remain open pending Site Plan Review. Understood. All right. So how do Board members feel about the variances that are being sought? No increase in the footprint, no change in the setbacks really. Avery tiny improvement in permeability. How do people feel about the shoreline buffering? You heard the representation of what's there. MR. MAGOWAN-Well like he said there is a hill that comes down and the steps are there, and I have seen some of the vegetation on the bottom. What I guess I'd like to see is, since this is for a recommendation, let's see what they can come back with for the final there, just increasing that vegetation. Because that's one of the things that we ask for, you know, you're absolutely right with it coming down it's going to absorb. It goes in the flat area, but we do ask for, when we're doing this, and since you're asking for some variances, not because you're asking for them, but one of our codes is to increase our vegetation to protect our lakes. MR. TRAVER-One of the things that might work, since you do have, as you mentioned, this historic buffer that's there, would be maybe at the shoreline, at the shore side of this flat area you mentioned like some low bushes or some hedging or something that would help infiltrate, be a further buffer to any infiltration of stormwater going into the lake. That probably would help, even if it were just a few feet wide. Do you know what I'm saying? MR. HUTCHINSON-Yes. 6 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. TRAVER-Because grass doesn't tend to do that very well. MR. HUTCHINSON-I think probably his plan, as far as renovation, is also to renovate and landscape as well, and I can only assume he's enhancing that buffer area, just to clean it up. I think probably just in presentation wise adding to the lakeside, do you think it's okay that that enhancement of it, to filter it further, is it okay from the water's edge to hit it just as it leaves the hill and then that's good. To leave that a little open? MR. TRAVER-Well my concern is, and I'll let others comment. Generally the concern is that if you have a grassed area going right to the lake that very likely is going to result in some stormwater runoff going into the lake. So the idea is to have a buffer at the lake edge. I mean it sounds like the buffering you have uphill from that is going to help a great deal. So I don't think you need anything massive, but if you could have even a row of hedge type of thing there, something that would just interrupt that, you know, between the grass and the water. MR. MAGOWAN-The sheeting of water. MR. TRAVER-Yes. MR. MAGOWAN-Especially like, you know, when the ground's still frozen and we have the heavy rains, and if it's all pitched towards the lake, you know, nothing goes in the ground. It goes out, but if you have that little small, you know, little six inch berm and a little, you know, planting, then it will stop it and will go into the ground. It's not just for summertime it's wintertime between the thaws and the freezes. MR. DEEB-Your thought of extending what's there out. That still won't stop the sheeting, like Brad said. If you put a buffer at the Lakeshore. MR. TRAVER-Right at the water's edge. MR. DEEB-It would be a better buffer. MR. TRAVER-You would still have the lawn area, the flat lawn area. MR. DEEB-Right. MR. TRAVER-So if you can work on that and be back for Site Plan, presumably, after you get through the ZBA for the variances. So think about that and maybe you could have something and discuss it with us further when we get to that stage. Tonight we're really only addressing the variances, but often something like this needs to be discussed, just to give you a heads up that it's a concern. MR. HUTCHINSON-Yes, I've got you. MR. MAGOWAN-So a little bit of a plan. I mean it doesn't have to be an elaborate one, but we don't want it on the back of a napkin either. MR. HUTCHINSON-No, I can update my site plan to show planting there. I can even identify the type of plantings. MR. TRAVER-And Town Staff, Laura for example, can help you with that as well, if you wanted to get some feedback in advance. So how do Board members feel about the setbacks, the permeability and the height variances? 7 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MRS. MOORE-It's a floor area, sorry, there's no height. It's a floor area ratio variance. MR. MAGOWAN-I'm all right with it. MR. DEEB-I'm fine with it. There's not many changes. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Then I guess we're ready for a resolution. RESOLUTION RE: ZBA RECOMMENDATION RE: AV 20-2019 REECE RUDOLPH The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to remove half story roof area of 392 sq. ft. to replace with a second story of 715 sq. ft. The addition is to have two bedrooms and bedroom downstairs to be converted to other living space. The house is a pre-existing non-conforming structure. No other changes to the site are proposed. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non- conforming structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks, permeability and height. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. 20-2019 REECE RUDOLPH. Introduced by David Deeb who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated with current project proposal. Motion seconded by Brad. Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-You're off to the ZBA. MR. HUTCHINSON-Thank you all for your time. I appreciate it. MR. TRAVER-Next under Planning Board Recommendations we have Site Plan 36-2019 for AngioDynamics, Inc. SITE PLAN NO. 36-2019 SEQR TYPE: UNLISTED. ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. AGENT(S): DAN RYAN, PE. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: CLI. LOCATION: 603 QUEENSBURY AVENUE. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEMOLISH A PORTION OF THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING (6,890 +/-SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT)THAT IS ONE STORY TO CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY, 8,586 SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT OFFICE ADDITION. THE PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES A 1,500 SQ. FT. PAVILION FOR COMPANY 8 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) EVENTS. APPLICANT REQUESTS WAIVERS FROM SITE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. VARIANCE: RELIEF IS SOUGHT FOR SETBACKS OF PAVILION. PLANNING BOARD SHALL PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 37-2006, SP 33-2007, SP 17-2010.E WARREN CO. REFERRAL: JUNE 2019. SITE INFORMATION: WETLANDS. LOT SIZE: 12.97 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 297.8-1-10. SECTION: 179-3-040. DAN RYAN, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. The applicant proposes to demolish a portion of the existing office building currently at 6,890 square feet which is a one story to become a two story, 8,586 square foot footprint office addition. The project also includes a 1,500 square foot pavilion for company events. The pavilion requires setback relief from a pond. So the relief is specifically for the pavilion. MR. TRAVER-Gotcha. Okay. Good evening. MR. RYAN-Good evening. Dan Ryan here representing the applicant, AngioDynamics. We are proposing basically a two story office building project. I know they've been before this Board for prior approvals for similar designs. This one's a little bit scaled back in terms of size, and strategically they've decided to tear down portions of the existing building to construct that area with the new office facility. What we're here before you today is for the recommendation to the Zoning Board for the setback variance. This is related to a detached outdoor pavilion structure. Currently they have a very small employee outdoor break area and they also do host several events there at their facility. MR. TRAVER-There's a tent there, right? MR. RYAN-They have a tent there quite frequently. I think if you've been by there you've probably seen it in that exact same area where we're proposing on doing it. So this is really just a more permanent solution. It's just a small 50 by 30 structure, slab on grade with a pavilion roof system. Obviously decorative so that it looks nice. Really there's not a lot of place on this property that is setback compliant let alone shoreline compliant as well. So this is really the only place that there's enough space to locate it and it is where they already use the area for the same amenity. MR. TRAVER-Right. MR. RYAN-And ultimately I think they felt that this would be a good offer for their employees and what they need as well as try and put it still in the location that is convenient for accessing it as well. MR. TRAVER-I think it will look better than a tent. MR. RYAN-Yes, definitely, there's no question about that. MR. TRAVER-And that pond I think is a manmade pond. Is it not? MR. RYAN-It started out as stormwater pond many years ago it was just a channel or depression and as more and more area has been getting developed it's accumulated more retention. So it's controlled by an outflow now. All that was done in prior project works. 9 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) All of that drainage system was re-worked and I think maybe Building Five on this site, there was a lot of drainage improvements done then. MR. TRAVER-I know the ducks like it. I see ducks. MR. RYAN-Ultimately I think they feel like it's a, mathematically the variance might seem like it's a 75 foot shoreline setback to that water body. We're proposing 25.3, but it's as close as we can get to the parking area and it's in the largest spot of green area that's not within the existing parking area. So there's not a lot of other options without removing parking or asphalt in another area of the site and then people are hanging around the parking lot, and it is a nice setting where they're putting it. So that was kind of important to them. MR. TRAVER-It is. MR. RYAN-I'd be happy to answer any other questions. I know I'll be back after the variance is worked out. Hopefully it gets approved and we'll be back before you for Site Plan. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Questions, comments from members of the Board? MR. MAGOWAN-No. I'm just happy that they're staying. Being a manmade pond, it does look nice there, and like I said, I know the pavilion. I mean I remember back in the PBS days. So it's a great asset to have over there and I don't have any questions for him. MR. TRAVER-Any other comments? Any questions for Dan? Okay. I guess we're ready for a resolution. RESOLUTION RE: ZBA RECOMMENDATION RE: AV-27-2019 ANGIODYNAMICS The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to demolish a portion of the existing office building (6,890 +/- sq. ft. footprint) that is one story to construct a two story, 8,586 sq. ft. footprint office addition. The project also includes a 1,500 sq. ft. pavilion for company events. Applicant requests waivers from site lighting and landscaping. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, commercial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks of pavilion. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. 27-2019 ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. Introduced by David Deeb who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated with current project proposal. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18t"day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Dixon, Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, 10 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-You're off to the ZBA. MR. RYAN-Okay. Thank you. MR. TRAVER-Next we move to New Business on our agenda, and the first application is Carol Wright, Site Plan 34-2019 and Special Use Permit 1-2019. NEW BUSINESS: SITE PLAN NO. 34-2019 SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. CAROL WRIGHT. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: WR. LOCATION: 304 CLEVERDALE ROAD. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO RENT TWO BOAT SLIPS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE OWNER'S BOATHOUSE. THE BOATHOUSE IS USED FOR OWNER'S KAYAK AND CANOES. THE SITE PLAN NOTES THE GARBAGE, RESTROOM ACCESS AND PARKING FOR TENANTS. NO PUMP-OUT IS NECESSARY AS BOATS DO NOT HAVE BATHROOMS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 & 179-10-070(G) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CLASS A MARINAS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: N/A. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: JUNE 2019. SITE INFORMATION: CEA, LGP, APA. LOT SIZE: .19 ACRE. TAX MAP NO. 226.12-1-83. SECTION: 179-3-040, 179-10-070 (G). CAROL WRIGHT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-All right. The applicant proposes to rent two boat slips on either side of the owner's boathouse. The boathouse is used for the owner's kayak and canoes. The site plan notes the garbage, restroom access and parking for tenants. There's no pump out necessary as the boats do not have bathrooms on their boats. The applicant has gone through the Special Use Permit criteria and completed that information. The specific criteria outlined for Class A Marina. They identify specifically Lake George Park Commission excerpts and the applicant has completed that and the applicant has also reviewed with the Lake George Park Commission to complete their application process. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MS. WRIGHT-Good evening. Carol Wright representing myself. MR. TRAVER-So you're interested in renting your boat slips, not an uncommon thing in that area and I understand you have neighbors that are already doing that. Correct? MS. WRIGHT-Right. I also have three letters from neighbors supporting the application. Can I give them to the Board? MR. TRAVER-Yes, you can give them to Laura and we'll add them to the record. So these are boats that do not have overnight. So they don't need a pump out and you're going to give the renters access to the restroom. You're not selling gas. You're not operating a quick launch facility. Questions, comments from members of the Planning Board on this? 11 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. DIXON-I had a question regarding parking, because I know it's a very narrow street. Are you anticipating parking right in front of the garage? MS. WRIGHT-We have four parking spaces and we've just given two of them to the renters. That's off the street on the grassy area. MR. MAGOWAN-Carol in your picture I notice that the screen's down in the picture here. That's an awfully big kayak and canoe you have in there. MS. WRIGHT-That's a really old picture. That screen is pretty much in tatters. We're about to remove it. MR. MAGOWAN-I wasn't worried about the screen. I was looking at the stern of the boat in there. It looks a little bigger than a kayak or a canoe. MS. WRIGHT-That's an old picture from when there was a family boat. We don't have that anymore. MR. MAGOWAN-You don't have that old wooden thing anymore? MS. WRIGHT-No, that's what the picture is, with the window. MR. MAGOWAN-I'm questioning you to see what you're going to come back with. MS. WRIGHT-That was sold about 20 years ago. MR. TRAVER-Actually I don't think it technically matters what they store in there. MR. MAGOWAN-Well this is kind of like the third bedroom on the second floor near the library. I don't have a problem with this. You're not selling gas. As long as the parking's not on the road. We'll make a stipulation on that, right, no parking on the road? MS. WRIGHT-That's clear with them, yes. MR. TRAVER-There is a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone that wants to address the Planning Board on this application? I'm not seeing anyone. I know you submitted a couple of comment letters. Did you want to read them? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-This is addressed to the Planning Board. "Relative to the above referenced Special Use Permit application, as immediate neighbors to the north of Carol Wright please be advised we have no objection whatsoever with the Planning Board granting said permit. We have known Carol and the Wright family for decades and, not only are they excellent and responsible neighbors but are also great stewards of Lake George and advocates for its' preservation and sustainability. Sincerely, Robert L.Tarrant Jean T.Tarrant" And they're at 308 Cleverdale Road. The next one also addressed to the Planning Board, "Welcome, no objections", and this is from Terry Freihofer. This is addressed to "To Whom It May Concern: We live next door at 302 Cleverdale Road. We support the request for the boating arrangement and have no objection. Susan Livingston Douglas Livingston" MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you, Laura. So we closed the public hearing. Are there any other comments or questions for the applicant from members of the Planning Board? I guess we're ready to entertain a motion. MR. DEEB-Okay. 12 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 34-2019 SUP # 1-2019 CAROL WRIGHT The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to rent two boat slips on either side of the owner's boathouse. The boathouse is used for owner's kayak and canoes. The site plan notes the garbage, restroom access and parking for tenants. No pump-out is necessary as boats do not have bathrooms. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-10-070(G) of the Zoning Ordinance, Class A Marinas shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation,- The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 06/18/2019 and continued the public hearing to 06/18/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 06/18/2019; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 34-2019 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1-2019 CAROL WRIGHT. Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption. Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request ranted: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, I. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. 3) Parking is limited to grassy parking spaces and not on the street. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 18"day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-You're all set. MS. WRIGHT-Okay. Thank you very much. 13 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. TRAVER-The next application is Randy Gross, Site Plan 35-2019. MRS. MOORE-Randy's not here at the moment. I did e-mail or text him and ask him if he himself or someone else was coming. So can we move him to the end of the agenda until I hear from him? MR. TRAVER-Sure. So then we'll set that one aside and we will hear David Stanhope, application Site Plan 37-2019 and Freshwater Wetlands Permit 3-2019. SITE PLAN NO. 37-2019 FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 3-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. DAVID STANHOPE. AGENT(S): JON LAPPER. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: MDR. LOCATION: 148 SWEET ROAD. APPLICANT PROPOSES EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT OF A 14 X 32 POOL WITH A PATIO SURROUNDING IT TO TOTAL 1, 217 SQ. FT. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-6-050 & CHAPTER 94 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, WORK WITHIN 100 FT. AND HARD SURFACING WITHIN 50 FT. OF WETLANDS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 52-2017, AV 45-2017. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: JUNE 2019. LOT SIZE: 4.4 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 296.15-1-1. SECTION: 179-6-050, CHAPTER 94. JON LAPPER, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT; DAVID STANHOPE, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Good evening. MR. LAPPER-Good evening, everyone. For the record, Jon Lapper with David Stanhope. David is a new resident of Queensbury. He built this house at the corner of Sweet Road and Country Club about a year ago. They have a young son and he commutes every day to the Granville Barracks as a State Trooper which is a half hour commute but a nice commute. They've got a large four acre piece of property, some of which is wetlands and they'd like to put a pool in so we had to submit these two applications. It's very close to the house. Very low impact on the backyard. There's no standing water. It's not that kind of wetland. Nothing will impact the wetland. It's just the buffer area and the application that we submitted, looking at the map, the minimum distance to the wetland, it's just in one spot where it encroaches closer to the house, but the vast majority is much farther from the wetland. So as stated in the application the paved area around the pool would be a lot of the permeability. So we don't see this as a great impact. We'd be happy to answer any questions. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Questions, comments from members of the Planning Board? MR. MAGOWAN-I'd like to say, I know it's been a long haul getting your house there but it really does look nice. MR. LAPPER-Thank you very much. MR. MAGOWAN-After everything we've been through and the shuffling back and forth, I know it was a headache with the wetland delineations and this and that, but placing it, it really looks nice, and then when I saw this, I said now they want to put a pool in. I said no wonder you brought in the heavy hitter, but I don't, you've really placed everything right there and it looks good and you're making all the concessions to be the best. I feel pretty good with it. That's all I have to say. MR. TRAVER-Other questions for the applicant? MR. DIXON-Is it going to be a standard pool or is it going to be one of those salt water pools? 14 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. STANHOPE-Just a standard pool, not salt water. MR. TRAVER-Salt water pool? MR. DIXON-I believe that there are salt water pools out there. MR. LAPPER-That's like the latest thing. MR. TRAVER-Really? MR. LAPPER-So you don't have to use the chlorine. MR. TRAVER-When I lived in St. Croix there was a resort called St. Croix by the Sea and they had this huge swimming pool and it was shaped like the island but it's freshwater. So you had like ten feet away it was saltwater and then the pool was freshwater. It was kind of interesting. I never heard of the other way around. That's interesting. We do have a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone in the audience that wanted to address the Planning Board? Yes, ma'am. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED PAULA NORTON MRS. NORTON-Hi, Paula Norton, 41 Country Club, just up the road from David and I am in agreement with him. It's a great asset to their home. No issues with it. I myself have a pool. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Maybe he was inspired by your pool. Very good. Thank you very much for your comment. Are there any written comments, Laura? MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments. MR. MAGOWAN-I do have one more question. The pool, is it a fiberglass or is it going to be lined? MR. STANHOPE-It's actually a commercial grade pool, which is nice. It's a steel surrounding concrete and then it's an insert that goes into it. MR. MAGOWAN-Right. So a liner. I'm just concerned, when you dug, how deep was the water table? MR. STANHOPE-It's actually deeper than they had previously thought it was going to be. It's five and a half, six feet down. MR. MAGOWAN-Okay. So, good, so you're going to have a shallow pool. MR. STANHOPE-Yes. It's not that deep. It's only six feet at its deepest. MR. MAGOWAN-All right. MR. TRAVER-So we will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. LAPPER-One other thing I would like to mention. When we spoke today David asked me what the setback is from a house to a pool and I know that that's 10 feet, and the way this 15 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) was designed it's nine feet. So we may need one more foot of relief on the back, but the plan that Laura has shows nine feet from the house, between the pool. MR. TRAVER-Instead of 10. MRS. MOORE-Did you file for the building permit? MR. LAPPER-No. MRS. MOORE-Okay, well that will come up at that point. MR. LAPPER-We want the permit to be correct. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Yes. You want it to be correct. So noting that minor change, does that add to anyone's concern? MS. WHITE-There's just the concern that it is still within 50 feet of the wetland, and that's there for a purpose. MR. TRAVER-Noted. MR. MAGOWAN-So closer to the house better. Is that what you're saying? MS. WHITE-Me? No. MR. TRAVER-Is this a SEQR Type II, Laura? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. LAPPER-Yes. MR.TRAVER-Okay. So no review under SEQR is required. I guess we're ready for a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 37-2019 SUP # 3-2019 DAVID STANHOPE The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes excavation and placement of a 14 x 32 pool with a patio surrounding it to total 1,217 sq. ft. Pursuant to Chapter 179-6-050 & Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, work within 100 ft. and hard surfacing within 50 ft. of wetlands shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation,- The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 06/18/2019 and continued the public hearing to 06/18/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 06/18/2019; 16 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 37-2019&FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 3-2019 DAVID STANHOPE. Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption. Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request ranted: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, I. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, p floor plans, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. Motion seconded by Michael Dixon. Duly adopted this 18"day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Traver NOES: Ms. White ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-You're all set. MR. LAPPER-Thanks, everybody. MR. TRAVER-Next we have Randy Gross, Site Plan 35-2019. SITE PLAN NO. 35-2019 SEQR TYPE: UNLISTED. RANDY GROSS. AGENT(S): HUTCHINS ENGINEERING. OWNER(S): NEW BEGINNINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH. ZONING: CM. LOCATION: 487 DIX AVENUE. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO INSTALL A 900 SQ. FT. CONCRETE PATIO WITH A 900 SQ. FT. CANOPY FOR OUTDOOR SEATING. THE CANOPY IS TO HAVE CLEAR VINYL SIDING THAT CAN BE ROLLED DOWN OR UP DEPENDING ON WEATHER CONDITIONS. THE EXISTING INDOOR SEATING AND THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING IS LIMITED TO 45 SEATS TOTAL. PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES 117 SQ. FT. WALK-IN COOLER TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE (FRONT OF EXISTING BUILDING). PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179- 3-040 & 179-9-120 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: SUB 19-2005, SP 19-2008, SP 25-2009, SP 21-2010, SP 17-2011, 2008-615 CHURCH; SP 6-2019. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: JUNE 2019 (TOWN OF KINGSBURY). LOT SIZE: 15.29 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 303.16-1-33. SECTION: 179- 3-040, 179-9-120. RANDY GROSS, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-So this applicant proposes to install a 900 square foot concrete patio with a 900 square foot canopy for outdoor seating. The canopy is to have clear vinyl siding that can be rolled down or up depending on the weather conditions. The applicant is limited to 45 seats total. The application shows, the floor plan shows inside and outside seating as needed and then the applicant also proposes a walk in cooler that is to be located at the southwest side, front of the existing building. There may be discussion this evening in reference to lighting and the signage that he's proposing. We've had some a-mails that we 17 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) shared back and forth so I'm going to let Randy take the lead on what type of lighting he's proposing. As far as I know at this time it's considered compliant. MR. TRAVER-It is considered compliant? MRS. MOORE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-I saw that it was up cast. MRS. MOORE-Yes, but now he's changed his mind at this time. That's why I'll let Randy take the lead. MR. GROSS-Good evening. Did they provide any photos for you? MR. TRAVER-We have plans. MRS. MOORE-No, I didn't get any information. MR. GROSS-All right. The material, first of all, is polished aluminum diamond plate, which is really reflective. MR. TRAVER-You're speaking about the sign now. MR. GROSS-The sign itself, and each letter is 47 inches tall and the sign's length is 31 and a half feet, and the way that we are attaching the sign to the roof, it's a standing seam steel roof. So because of the ribs it's very conducive to anchoring, and what we're doing for the top rail as an anchor is creating a straight line that's level that will extend out over the sign. I'm estimating two feet that we can put an LED, the only thing I would liken it to would be a shop light, but a single LED strip that would be attached to an aluminum angle liner, and that would then cast light down as opposed to up, which is against the desires of lighting across America. So in short that's answering that question. MR. TRAVER-So the lighting will be compliant. The sign I understand has already been reviewed and is compliant. MRS. MOORE-Is considered, yes, it's already in the permitting review. MR. TRAVER-So that was my main concern with the lighting when I saw that it was up cast. That's a definite no, no. So you're taking care of that by making that downcast. MR. GROSS-And I don't think the lumens, the amount of light, foot candles that we're going to have, is going to be, because of reflection. MR. TRAVER-And the light is going to be very close to the surface. MR. GROSS-Yes, so it won't be like a parking lot light lamp that lights up a huge area. It'll be very appropriate. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right, and then the outside seating. There was one comment I noticed by the Fire Marshal that you needed to have an exit required to the public way. I guess that's just basically so that if people are in there, particularly if you have the bad weather material down, that there's a way for people to exit in case of emergency. MR. GROSS-As the area is right now, there are three different sidewalks that exit that patio from. 18 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Questions, comments from members of the Planning Board? MR. MAGOWAN-I have a couple. One, if you throw on the side panels on the canopy, does that block the exits? MR. GROSS-These are, these panels are sections. So if that is of a concern, that's something that can be addressed just by leaving it open. MR. MAGOWAN-Well, what I'm saying is if it's not, you know, I've seen them. I'm looking, my concern, and I didn't see it in the Fire Marshal letter, and I meant to put a call in, things sometimes just get away from me, but this is the picture that you have of the canopy, right? This is a vinyl canopy. MR. GROSS-Yes. MR. MAGOWAN-All right. And my concern is that we had another business locally that did this and the Fire Marshal, what is the fire retardant nature of this vinyl? MR. GROSS-That's already been, because when we first gained use of this property, we had to provide tents that were, that meet that standard. So I'm familiar with. So in my searching for tents, I am providing that the tent material will be at that standard. MR. MAGOWAN-All right. Because what I'm looking at is the same one that I bought at like Amazon for my parties that, you know, and of course when I set up I always put a super duper sprinkler system on and connect it to my pool so I have plenty of water, but I mean I just didn't see that in the Fire Marshal's letter and I didn't want to see it, and then down the road they say, so we just want to make sure that that is a fire retardant tarp or canvas or whatever. MR. GROSS-Yes, and to address that egress question, I would anticipate that at most there would be three sides that would be closed and one to the north would be left open completely, so for egress as well as there's a doorway to the inside of the building. MRS. MOORE-So I did speak with the Fire Marshal also and the question, and you've addressed is that there is an access outside and he's leaving that north end or at any one point in time, one of those ends or the sides needs to be left open besides the entry into the facility. So he's discussed that. MR. GROSS-And it's really only for the pleasure of being outdoors. It's not like we're trying to be out there in inclement weather. MR. MAGOWAN-No, but you will push it into the fall season a little bit more and you could probably put it in, my concern is that you'll get one of those little heaters there that do quite well, and that's why I'm looking for the fire retardant and I didn't happen to see it in his letter and I didn't want it to come down on you later on. MR. TRAVER-We do have a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone that wants to make comment to the Planning Board on this application? And I'm not seeing anyone. Are there any written comments, Laura? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments. MR. TRAVER-All right. Then we'll go ahead and close the public hearing. 19 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-This is also a SEQR Type II. So no SEQR action is needed. Are there any other questions for the applicant before we consider a resolution? MR. DIXON-Just a quick one. Any changes to the lighting? Are you putting any lighting outside the canopy? I didn't see any. MR. GROSS-Likely it will be this LED rope light, something that's very. MR. TRAVER-The lower wattage rope lighting. MR. GROSS-Yes, very low. MR. DIXON-I'm assuming those are just going to be plug-ins. So do you have easy access to outlets? MR. GROSS-Yes. We do have outdoor outlets already in place. MR. VALENTINE-I have one other thing, Mr. Chairman. It's just for concurrence among our paperwork. The resolution states that the canopy is 900 square feet. It's also noted as 900 square feet in the notes, but then in the rest of the paperwork it says 1,000 square feet. So I'm not sure which is the right size. MR. TRAVER-Laura, can you clarify that? MRS. MOORE-So the patio itself is 900 and the canopy is going over the top of that. So it's approximately 1,000 square feet. MR. TRAVER-Okay, because it's not going to be perfectly flat. So it's got more square footage. Yes. That makes more sense. MR. VALENTINE-The resolution would you just change that to 1,000. MRS. MOORE-Update it to 1,000. MR. TRAVER-Anything else? I guess we're ready to entertain a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP # 35-2019 RANDY GROSS The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to install a 900 sq. ft. concrete patio with a 1000 sq. ft. canopy for outdoor seating. The canopy is to have clear vinyl siding that can be rolled down or up depending on weather conditions. The existing indoor seating and the proposed outdoor seating is limited to 45 seats total. Project also includes 117 sq. ft. walk-in cooler to be located at the southwest side (front of existing building). Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-9-120 of the Zoning Ordinance, modification to an existing site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; 20 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 06/18/2019 and continued the public hearing to 06/18/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 06/18/2019; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN 35-2019 RANDY GROSS, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption. Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request ranted: g. site lighting, h. signage, j. stormwater, k. topography, I. landscaping, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, q. soil logs, r. construction/demolition disposal s. snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. Motion seconded by Michael Valentine. Duly adopted this 18" day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Shafer MR. TRAVER-You're all set. MR. MAGOWAN-Well we're glad you decided to show up. MR. TRAVER-Is there any other business before the Planning Board this evening? MR. VALENTINE-No. MRS. MOORE-No. MR. TRAVER-Then I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. MR. DEEB-So moved. MOTION TO ADJOURN THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Brad Magowan: Duly adopted this 18t" day of June, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Magowan, Ms. White, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Jackoski, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE MR. TRAVER-We stand adjourned. Thank you, everybody. 21 (Queensbury Planning Board 06/18/2019) On motion meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Stephen Traver, Chairman 22