Loading...
09-17-2019 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING FIRST REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 INDEX Site Plan No. 44-2019 The Glen at Hiland Meadows, Inc. 3. Freshwater Wetlands 4-2019 Tax Map No. 296.8-1-3 Site Plan No. 58-2019 Joseph & Cynthia Didio 6. ZBA RECOMMENDATION Tax Map No. 239.20-1-7 Site Plan No. 62-2019 George Hearst, III & Christine Hearst 9. ZBA RECOMMENDATION Tax Map No. 226.19-1-79 & 226.19-1-74 Site Plan No. 55-2019 Boguslaw Bielecki 12. MODIFICATION Tax Map No. 309.9-2-6 Site Plan No. 60-2019 Glenn Durlacher 15. MODIFICATION Tax Map No. 295.12-1-4 THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED MINUTES AND ARE SUBJECT TO BOARD AND STAFF REVISIONS. REVISIONS WILL APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING MONTH’S MINUTES (IF ANY) AND WILL STATE SUCH APPROVAL OF SAID MINUTES. 1 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING FIRST REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT STEPHEN TRAVER, CHAIRMAN CHRIS HUNSINGER, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID DEEB, SECRETARY BRAD MAGOWAN JAMIE WHITE MICHAEL DIXON, ALTERNATE MEMBERS ABSENT JOHN SHAFER MICHAEL VALENTINE LAND USE PLANNER-LAURA MOORE STENOGRAPHER-MARIA GAGLIARDI MR. TRAVER-Let me welcome everyone to the Town of Queensbury Planning Board meeting for Tuesday, th September 17. Hard to believe it’s September already. This is our first meeting for the month of September and it is meeting number 18 for 2019. I want to let Board members know that following our regular agenda this evening we have a brief training that Laura is going to provide us of about 10 minutes or so on Workplace Violence. We have two administrative items. One is, you should have before you a draft resolution that I wrote, that I wanted to discuss with the Board. This would make a change in the way the agenda is established. We currently have, as you know, classifications for tabled items, Planning Board recommendations and New Business and what I’m asking the Board to consider is a change in that agenda to add a category for Unapproved Development. This I think would help identify that category of application. It would help, you know, there’ve been a few instances where you see something on the agenda and it isn’t necessarily clear. I think it will call, perhaps, some attention to the issue and I have a draft resolution. Does anyone have any comments on that suggestion before we entertain a resolution? MR. MAGOWAN-I would just like to say I like that idea. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. MAGOWAN-It brings more attention to it. So we have a better understanding at the beginning. MR. TRAVER-Yes. Any other comments? All right. Then I have a draft resolution. RESOLUTION APPROVING NEW AGENDA CLASS FOR UNAPPROVED DEVELOPMENT The Planning Board has previously identified applications which contain unapproved development. The Planning Board wishes to identify, in advance, those applications which may contain unapproved development. The meeting agenda for Planning Board meetings has historically been divided into sections which categorize applications into at least three categories, those being Tabled Items, Planning Board Recommendations and New Business. The Planning Board believes it would be useful to create a similar category specifically for unapproved development and therefore directs that the formal agenda for Planning Board meetings be expanded to subdivide a section of the agenda into applications which fall into the category of unapproved development effective with the meetings beginning in October of 2019. MOTION TO APPROVE CHANGE TO EXPAND THE MEETING AGENDA CATAGORIES, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption. Seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 17th day of September, 2019, by the following vote: 2 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MRS. MOORE-You’re missing, Maria doesn’t have a copy of your resolution. So you might need to read it word for word. MR. DEEB-I’ll read the whole resolution. MRS. MOORE-Thank you. AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you, everyone. The remaining administrative items approval of minutes thrd from July 16 and July 23 of 2019. rd MR. DIXON-I’ve got to abstain from the 23. MR. DEEB-I’ll do them separately. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 16, 2019 TH MOTION TO APPROVE THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 16, 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Jamie White: th Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Deeb, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSTAINED: Mr. Magowan ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine July 23, 2019 rd MOTION TO APPROVE THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 23, 2019, Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, seconded by Chris Hunsinger: th Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSTAINED: Mr. Dixon, Mr. Magowan ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-All right. Thank you, and we move now to our regular agenda item, and before we begin I’d like to do this before I forget again and ask that people in the room who have electronic devices either turn them off or silence them so they won’t interrupt our meeting, and with that the first item on our agenda under Tabled Items is The Glen at Hiland Meadows, Inc., Site Plan 44-2019 and Freshwater Wetlands Permit 4-2019. I understand you have some new information for the Board to review tonight. TABLED ITEM SITE PLAN NO. 44-2019 FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 4-2019 SEQR TYPE: UNLISTED. THE GLEN AT HILAND MEADOWS, INC. AGENT(S): RICHARD E. JONES ASSOCIATES. OWNER(S): EDDY PROPERTY SERVICES/GLENS FALLS HOME. ZONING: PUD. LOCATION: 39 LONGVIEW DRIVE. APPLICANT PROPOSES THREE PROJECTS FOR THE GLEN AT HILAND MEADOWS. PROPOSED IS A 20,897 SQ. FT. 3 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) (FOOTPRINT) TWO STORY 41,794 SQ. FT. (FLOOR AREA) ADDITION TO THE MAIN BUILDING WITH 28 INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS. ALSO PROPOSED IS A 5,016 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT) SINGLE STORY WELLNESS CENTER ADDITION TO THE MAIN BUILDING. SEPARATELY, A 25,268 SQ. FT. (FOOTPRINT) SINGLE STORY NEW BUILDING FOR A MEMORY CARE FACILITY FOR 30 RESIDENTS. PROPERTY ALSO INCLUDES ASSOCIATED SITE WORK FOR THE PROJECT. PROJECT OCCURS IN AN EXISTING PUD AND THE GLEN AT HILAND MEADOWS HEALTH FACILITY. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 & CHAPTER 94 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, NEW COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 54-99, SP 30-2006, SP 50-2007, SP 54-99 PUD. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: N/A. LOT SIZE: 45 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 296.8-1-3. SECTION: 179-3-040, CHAPTER 94. RICHARD JONES & BRENT STEENBURGH, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MRS. MOORE-So just as a reminder this project has three projects involved. A 28 unit independent living addition, a memory care unit separately, and then a wellness center to also be constructed within the building and the applicant has met, or not met but has had discussions with the Town Engineer and has submitted a revised set of plans for this Board to review and during that time they review it for the upcoming agenda in October, it’ll go back to the Town Engineer. My understanding is that there’s details to be worked out. MR. TRAVER-So in anticipation of the Board needing time to review the application and also comments from Town Engineer, we will be tabling this application tonight, but if you have anything that you would like to address the Board regarding the revised plans, please do so and state your names for the record for our minutes. MR. JONES-Yes. For the record Richard Jones. I’m the architect working with The Glen at Hiland Meadows, and with me here is Brent Steenburgh, the professional engineer for the project, the Civil Engineer. MR. TRAVER-Good evening. MR. JONES-Basically as Laura had indicated we have addressed the comments from the Fire Marshal. We did get comments from the Water Department. I’m not sure if they. MR. STEENBURGH-They were addressed as well. MR. JONES-Yes, they were addressed, but I’m not sure, were they responded to? MRS. MOORE-I have not heard from Mr. Harrington yet. So we’ll follow up. MR. JONES-Okay. Yes, and with regard to the engineering review for the Town, we’re down to nine comments, seven, I’m sorry, I stand corrected. So we have seven comments left and basically over the last two weeks Brent has had a series of discussions with both the Town Engineer and Craig Brown, the Zoning Administrator, and basically we think at this point we’ve got everything worked out. There was additional site testing done approximately two weeks ago. The engineer had requested that we do some tests which were done on site, basically to indicate the permeability of the site which is sketchy at best. So those have been completed and I know Brent has worked out the SWPPP now so that we’ve addressed the concerns for the Town Engineer. As I stated at the last meeting, the approval for the project is very important to The Glen because they have to submit their plan to the State Department to get an approval for the Offering Plan and they cannot start marketing units until they have that. MR. TRAVER-Sure. MR. JONES-So right now I believe that our original schedule had indicated an approval no later than October so we’re hoping at this point that at the October meeting, and I’m hoping we can get on the first meeting for that agenda. MRS. MOORE-The first or the second. We had discussed the second one, but if there is a preference for thnd the first one which is October 15 versus October 22 . MR. JONES-I guess when will the Town Engineer get the revised information that we submitted? MRS. MOORE-This week. So you submitted it yesterday. It’ll go to them this week. 4 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. JONES-Okay. So we can anticipate something probably shortly within a week after that? MRS. MOORE-Within a week potentially. Now that it’s in the queue, it’s already being reviewed, this is just part of the process versus not a new application. So that it should have a different turnaround time. MR. JONES-Okay. All right. thnd MR. TRAVER-So having the option of the 15 or the 22, is there a significant difference for you between the two? th MR. STEENBURGH-I would prefer the 15 if possible just from a timeframe standpoint for the applicant. th MR. TRAVER-Will that work agenda wise, Laura, the 15? MRS. MOORE-Yes, MR. TRAVER-Okay. Well we actually, you know, our process as we began with working out issues with the engineer typically tends to expedite these type of applications. So this will presumably with everything from the engineering standpoint, I know we’ve looked at the plans quite extensively, and the updated information will be distributed by Staff tonight and we’ll certainly be prepared to review and th discuss that with you then on the 15. MR. JONES-Yes. The only real issues left, there are no planning issues right now from Laura and the Planning Department. So it’s basically just the engineering review from Chazen that we’re waiting for. MR. TRAVER-Yes. I mean I guess the only caveat is, and it doesn’t sound like it’s going to be an issue, that occasionally engineering will result in changes that impact the plan. It doesn’t sound like that will happen in this case, but that’s why it isn’t over until it’s over. MR. JONES-Yes, and I realize that. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Then do Board members have any questions or comments for the applicant before we do a tabling motion? All right. Then I guess we’re ready for a motion. MS. GAGLIARDI-And you’re still leaving the public hearing open? MR. TRAVER-Yes, thank you for that. Yes, there is a public hearing. I should do that before we actually entertain the motion. My apologies. We do have a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone that wanted to address the Planning Board this evening on this? I’m not seeing any hands. Are there any written comments, Laura? PUBLIC HEARING OPEN MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments at this time. MR. TRAVER-Okay. All right. Because we’re tabling, the public hearing, just for the information of the public, the public hearing will remain open and be available the next time this application is reviewed on th the 15 of October. Thank you, Maria. So with that, we have a tabling motion. RESOLUTION TABLING SP # 44-2019 & FWW 4-2019 THE GLEN AT HILAND MEADOWS The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board: The applicant proposes three projects for the Glen at Hiland Meadows. Proposed is a 20,897 sq. ft. (footprint) two story 41,794 sq. ft. (floor area) addition to the main building with 28 independent living units. Also proposed is a 5,016 sq. ft. (footprint) single story wellness center addition to the main building. Separately, a 25,268 sq. ft. (footprint) single story new building for a memory care facility for 30 residents. Property also includes associated site work for the project. Project occurs in an existing PUD and The Glen at Hiland Meadows Health Facility. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & Chapter 94 of the Zoning Ordinance, new commercial construction shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN NO. 44-2019 & FRESHWATER WETLANDS PERMIT 4-2019 THE GLEN AT HILAND MEADOWS, INC., Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption, Tabled to the October 15, 2019 Planning Board meeting. 5 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) th Seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-All right. You’re all set. We’ll see you next month.. MR. JONES-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-We now move into the next section of our agenda which is Planning Board Recommendations to the Zoning Board of Appeals, and the first application on that part of our agenda is Joseph & Cynthia Didio, Site Plan 58-2019. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: SITE PLAN NO. 58-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. JOSEPH & CYNTHIA DIDIO. AGENT(S): ANDREW DIDIO. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: WR. LOCATION: 2966 STATE RT. 9L. APPLICANT PROPOSES A 174 SQ. FT. SINGLE STORY ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING DECK AND UNDER THE MAIN FLOOR DECK. PROJECT INCLUDES ADJUSTING OUTSIDE STAIRS AND ADDING NEW STAIRS TO PATH AT GRADE. THE EXISTING HOME HAS 1,096 SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT, NEW FOOTPRINT TO BE 1,270 SQ. FT./EXISTING FLOOR AREA 2,096 SQ. FT. (28%) AND PROPOSED FLOOR AREA TO BE 2,230 SQ. FT. (30%). PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE IN A CEA SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. VARIANCE: RELIEF IS SOUGHT FOR SETBACKS, FAR, AND EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE IN A CEA. PLANNING BOARD SHALL PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 10-2018 525 SF ADDITION, AV 14-2018, 2003-112 DOCK, 2003-347 DECKS, AV 37-2019 WARREN CO. REFERRAL: SEPTEMBER 2019. LOT SIZE: .17 ACRE. TAX MAP NO. 239.20-1-7. SECTION: 179-3-040, 179-13-010, , 179-6-065, 179-8-010. JOE DIDIO, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-So this applicant proposes a 174 square foot single story addition over an existing deck and under the main floor deck. The existing deck, only a portion of that deck is being used. The existing home has a 1,096 square foot footprint. The new footprint would be 1,270. The existing floor area is 2,096 square feet. That is at 28% and the new floor area would be 2,230 square feet, which is at 30%. The variance relief requested is for setbacks, Floor Area Ratio and expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. MR. DIDIO-Good evening. I’m Joe Didio. I own the property. We were here in the spring if you recall, I’m sure you probably don’t, but we originally submitted to the Board for a second story addition. Required Area Variances for yard setbacks, height, gross floor area. The proposed addition was, the increase in square footage of the house was 565 square feet. The ZBA was opposed to the project as previously submitted for the height variance. it seemed excessive, and the Floor Area was too excessive for the allowable by lot size. So taking this Board’s recommendation actually we have the minutes from the spring, we have devised these plans, instead of going up over our second, over our living room/dining room, out from the bedroom area we’re down now expanding slightly a basement area out to the side about two feet, two and a half feet. I can’t remember, but anyway, going from 565 square feet to 174 additional square feet. You can see from the attached drawing we’re going out over the existing deck so we’re not increasing the footprint. There’s no height variance needed because we’re not going up any longer. The only variance that we need for setback is due to there’s an overhang, a cantilever. We’re coming out underneath that and a stairway that runs underneath that cantilever tends to flop outside. So I guess that brings us closer to our neighbor’s lot, empty lot. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you for that introduction. Questions, comments from members of the Planning Board? 6 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. DEEB-You scaled it back. MR. DIDIO-Yes, way back. I have the minutes. I think Mr. Hunsinger asked couldn’t we do it lower, closer to the lake because we are setback so far and we have all that so that’s what we did. Lost some living space, but we’re getting the bedrooms that we need. MR. TRAVER-Okay. And again, the applicant this evening is here for the variances which is the setbacks, Floor Area Ratio, and expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA. So we’re making a recommendation to the ZBA. Does anyone have any comments or questions for the applicant or comments regarding referral to the ZBA? MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, I do, Mr. Chairman. I read on the back of the on-site engineering letter, and it said that the, attached you’ll find two copies of the wastewater treatment system. I didn’t get them. Did anybody else get them? MR. DIDIO-The wastewater treatment system is up by 9L. It’s on the other side of the house. It’s a brand new Clare system that we just had installed this spring/summer. MR. MAGOWAN-Okay. MR. DIDIO-It’s been inspected and operational for, you know, six months, I don’t know, eight months. It’s a new Clare system as suggested by the Town and again we received a grant from the Town to assist us in paying for that. MR. MAGOWAN-Good, but I mean it’s up to 450 gallons per day? MR. DIDIO-I’m not sure of that. MR. MAGOWAN-Well I think that’s what the 450 gpd means. MR. DIDIO-Okay. MR. MAGOWAN-The gpd is gallons per day I think. MR. DIDIO-None of that, I mean we’re staying at three bedrooms. So it’s not like we’re, and that’s what it’s rated for I guess. Again my son is the engineer, the environmental scientist who’s at another meeting this evening and he will be with me hopefully. MR. DEEB-You’re not increasing bedrooms. MR. DIDIO-No. MR. DEEB-The bedrooms are the say as they were before. MR. DIDIO-Yes, exact same bedrooms. MR. MAGOWAN-You’re just moving them down lower. MR. DIDIO-Yes, moving them down lower. We have no basement. We have no garage. So one very, very small bedroom is becoming a storage space. MR. TRAVER-Anything else? MR. MAGOWAN-No thank you. MR. TRAVER-Any other questions or comments before we entertain a motion? MR. MAGOWAN-The other thing I’d like to say, Mr. Chairman, is reviewing the pictures and in looking at that puppy, it’s come a long ways for a rock. You’ve done a nice job and your letter really explained you’re trying to do all you can. I do like the sprinkler system in this picture there, but it really looks like you’ve tried a lot to secure from there down to the lake. So I want to thank you for all those pictures. MR. TRAVER-Any other discussion before we entertain a motion? I guess we’re ready for a motion. 7 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) RESOLUTION RE: ZBA RECOMMENDATION RE: AV # 37-2019 DIDIO The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes a 174 sq. ft. single story addition over an existing deck and under the main floor deck. Project includes adjusting outside stairs and adding new stairs to path at grade. The existing home has 1,096 sq. ft. footprint, new footprint to be 1,270 sq. ft. / existing floor area 2,096 sq. ft. (28%) and proposed floor area to be 2,230 sq. ft. (30%). Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks, FAR and expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. 37-2019 JOSEPH & CYNTHIA DIDIO. Introduced by David Deeb who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated with current project proposal. th Motion seconded by Michael Dixon. Duly adopted this 17day of September 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Magowan, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-You’re all set. You’re off to the ZBA. MR. DIDIO-Thank you. I’ll see you next week I guess. MR. TRAVER-Next also under Planning Board Recommendations we have Site Plan 62-2019 for George & Christine Hearst. SITE PLAN NO. 62-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. GEORGE HEARST, III & CHRISTINE HEARST. AGENT(S): HUTCHINS ENGINEERING. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: WR. LOCATION: 244 LAKE PARKWAY. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO MAINTAIN A 1,480 SQ. FT. HOME WITH NEW DECK 144 +/- SQ. FT., SCREEN PORCH 143.75 +/- SQ. FT., ENTRY PORCH 84 +/- SQ. FT., DORMER ON SECOND FLOOR, NEW BASEMENT AND A NEW FOUNDATION FOR THE EXISTING HOME. FLOOR AREA EXISTING IS 2,135 SQ. FT. AND PROPOSED IS 3,895 SQ. FT. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE IN A CEA SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. VARIANCE: RELIEF IS SOUGHT FOR SETBACKS. PLANNING BOARD SHALL PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. CROSS REFERENCE: 2015-480 SUNDECK, BOTH 212-2015. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: SEPTEMBER 2019. SITE INFORMATION: CEA, APA, LPC. LOT SIZE: .44 ACRE & .2 ACRE. TAX MAP NO. 226.19-1-79 & 226.19-1-74. SECTION: 179- 3-040, 179-6-065. TOM HUTCHINS & MATT CIFONE, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-Okay. So this applicant proposes to maintain their existing 1,480 square foot home and then add three new additions. This includes a new deck of 144 square feet, a screened porch of 143.75, an entry porch of 84 square feet, and then enlarge the dormer on the second floor. The main component of this project is that there’s a new basement, new foundation being installed for the home. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Thank you. Good evening. 8 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. HUTCHINS-Good evening, Board. Tom Hutchins of Hutchins Engineering with builder Matt Cifone. We’re here on behalf of George & Christine Hearst at 244 Lake Parkway. They have a 1920’s era camp on this property that they wish to improve. They wish to keep the structure but they’re going to essentially completely renovate the interior, construct a new foundation beneath the structure and there’s a couple of porches and screened in areas and a deck that would be in addition to the floor area, in addition to the basement area which now counts as floor area. The reason we’re here is because although the building is 51 and a half feet from the shoreline, the property to the north is 80 feet from the shoreline which puts them, which makes their average setback 65 feet instead of 51. Somewhat uniquely the applicant also owns the property to the north which is, because of that distance from the lake, is what presents him with a structure that is not compliant because his other house is 80 feet from the lake. So in theory he could build a 30 foot deck on his house to the north and then he wouldn’t have to ask for a variance, or not really in theory. He could do that, but that’s not what they propose to do. So we’re seeking your support with a variance request to the Zoning Board of Appeals, to maintain the structure at 51 and a half feet from the lake in lieu of the calculated 65 foot setback. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MR. HUTCHINS-And we’ll open that for questions. Anything you want to add? MR. TRAVER-Questions from members of the Board? MR. MAGOWAN-You’re basically just raising the house. MR. HUTCHINS-Correct, constructing a foundation. MR. MAGOWAN-Have you got a house lifter or are you going to do it? MR. CIFONE-We’re going to have somebody lift the house up, yes, a company. MR. MAGOWAN-You as Cifone? MR. CIFONE-No, Larmon. MR. MAGOWAN-Larmon. I was going to say, because I did it once. You don’t want to do it. It was interesting. Let’s put it that way. So basically from what I understand you’re just going to lift it there and then you’re going to add on some porches. MR. HUTCHINS-Correct. And the project also includes a new compliant wastewater system. MR. MAGOWAN-I’m happy to hear that. MR. TRAVER-So you’re literally going to jack up the house, work underneath and then lower it back down again, basically. MR. CIFONE-Yes. MR. TRAVER-A few years ago I read an interesting article about a company that moves like really, really giant structures and pieces of equipment and their motto is if we can get it loose we can move it. I thought that was pretty amazing. It’s quite something. MR. MAGOWAN-This Larmon company it’s amazing. They come in and the next thing you know it’s up. Do they do the digging or do you do the digging? MR. CIFONE-Chris Crandall is going to do it. MR. MAGOWAN-Okay. Yes, they usually they just come and they eye beam it across and it’s all computerized. They have a truck and it’s up. MR. TRAVER-Yes, it’s amazing. MR. HUNSINGER-Well let us know when you’re going to do it. MR. TRAVER-Yes, we’d all like to watch. Wow. 9 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. DEEB-It’s the numbers. You have to acquiesce to the numbers and that’s what you’re doing. You’re not moving it at all. It’s the same distance. MR. TRAVER-Yes, it’s purely a setback issue. So do any members of the Board have any concerns regarding the referral to the ZBA for the setback issue? MR. HUNSINGER-Well, let me ask the question, though. I mean if you’re going to jack the house up, how hard would it be to move it, though? MR. DEEB-You’re talking probably 16 feet. MR. HUTCHINS-I mean it would be additional work to re-locate it. MR. TRAVER-A lot of extra work probably. MR. HUTCHINS-Yes. MR. CIFONE-It would change the integrity of the property, the way it’s always been. That’s one big thing he’s trying to preserve. He could take it down and build a new place, but he wants to preserve the structure of the house. MR. HUNSINGER-It seemed like an obvious question to ask. MR. TRAVER-Yes. Interesting. It probably could be done but it would probably be double the undertaking. MR. MAGOWAN-Yes, it’s one thing jacking it up in the air and leaving and then lowering it back down on the foundation and getting it up and then building the foundation and then moving it back. MR. TRAVER-And then what do you do with the old foundation. MR. MAGOWAN-It’s all piers. MR. HUTCHINS-It’s on piers, yes. MR. HUNSINGER-We used to live across the street from a house that they moved for a flood control project. They moved it, it was a couple of miles, and when we’d tell people in town where we lived they’d say by the house that was moved. We thought it was recently, but it was 30 years ago. It was so memorable. MR. TRAVER-Yes. Well especially then what a thing it was. I saw and have a documentary about the creation of Sacandaga Lake and that shows pictures of a lot of buildings being moved. Back in those days in the 30’s it was really something. All right. Any other questions or concerns regarding the referral to the ZBA on this variance for setbacks? I’m not hearing any. So I guess we’re ready for a motion. RESOLUTION RE: ZBA RECOMMENDATION RE: AV # 38-2019 HEARST The applicant has submitted an application for the following: Applicant proposes to maintain a 1,480 sq. ft. home with new deck 144 +/- sq. ft., screen porch 143.75 +/- sq. ft., entry porch 84 +/- sq. ft., dormer on second floor, new basement and a new foundation for the existing home. Floor area existing is 2,135 sq. ft. and proposed is 3,895 sq. ft. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 of the Zoning Ordinance, expansion of a non-conforming structure in a CEA shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Variance: Relief is sought for setbacks. Planning Board shall provide a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Town of Queensbury Zoning Ordinance, per Section 179-9-070 J 2 b. requires the Planning Board to provide a written recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for projects that require both Zoning Board of Appeals & Planning Board approval; The Planning Board has briefly reviewed and discussed this application, the relief request in the variance application as well as the potential impacts of this project on the neighborhood and surrounding community, and found that: 10 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR AREA VARIANCE NO. 38-2019 GEORGE HEARST III & CHRISTINE HEARST. Introduced by David Deeb who moved its adoption, and a) The Planning Board, based on a limited review, has not identified any significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated with current project proposal. th Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-You’re off to the ZBA. MR. CIFONE-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-We next move to the section of our agenda under New Business and the first item under New Business is Boguslaw Bielecki, Site Plan Modification 55-2019. NEW BUSINESS: SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 55-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. BOGUSLAW BIELECKI. AGENT(S): ETHAN HALL. OWNER(S): SAME AS APPLICANT. ZONING: CLI. LOCATION: 120 LUZERNE ROAD. APPLICANT PROPOSES A 1,749 SQ. FT. +/- FOOTPRINT ADDITIONS TO AN UNDER-CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PROJECT OF 33,800 +/- SQ. FT. THE ADDITION WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS PROPOSED AT THE FRONT TO CONNECT THE BUILDINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING ONE ELEVATOR. THE PROJECT REMAINS THE SAME WITH THE REMAINING WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS AND THE TWO REAR BUILDINGS. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-9-210 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 64-2017. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: SEPTEMBER 2019. LOT SIZE: 12.92 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 309.9-2-6. SECTION: 179-9-120. ETHAN HALL, REPRESENTING APPLICANT, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-This project involves a 1,749 square foot footprint addition to an under-construction building project of 33,800 square feet. The addition will be constructed between the two buildings proposed at the front to connect the buildings for the purpose of installing one elevator. This project was previously approved in 2017 where there were two I guess long buildings with no connection. They were each proposed to have an elevator and this way this resolves the issue and costs less money. MR. TRAVER-Sure. Okay. So the buildings that were previously approved are still being built. You just want to make an addition that would allow them to be joined together. MR. HALL-Correct. For your records Ethan Hall. I’m a principal with Rucinski-Hall Architecture, here tonight representing Boguslaw Bielecki. Yes, basically once he got the bill for the elevator and once he saw what the bill for the two elevators was going to be he said, wow, I can build one elevator and a building between them for less money than the two elevators combined. So that’s really where we’re at, and it gives him the ability to conjoin the two office buildings in the front. If somebody wants more than what’s available in that one floor he can connect them through and let them use more than one. Once we got laying the building out, I mean when we initially looked at it he was considering phasing the project, doing one of the buildings first and then once that was up and running building the other building. When he got to looking at the site work and the price of the building he said I’m going to buy them both and get them both under construction, which they are, footings and foundations have been started, and then he got the bill for the elevators and he said I’m not buying those because there are two elevators, the two rear buildings, the back, the two rear buildings in the back also have freight elevators in them because those were looked at for manufacturing. So instead of buying four elevators he’s going to buy three elevators. So that’s really where we’re at with. Fairly minor change but it does trigger. MR. TRAVER-Well we appreciate your coming to discuss it with us. 11 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. HALL-Certainly. MR. TRAVER-Questions, comments for the applicant? MR. MAGOWAN-Ethan, just a quick question on the elevators. Is a freight elevator a lot cheaper than a human elevator? MR. HALL-It is because there’s not as much creature comforts in them so to speak. MR. MAGOWAN-All right. MR. HALL-It’s more or less of a steel box that moves up and down and you don’t care how much you thrash around in it. MR. MAGOWAN-All right, but it still has its safety factors. MR. HALL-Yes, but it doesn’t have the Formica finishes. It doesn’t have the carpet in it. It doesn’t have the tiles or the lights, you know, the high intensity LED’s. They’re, compared to a personnel elevator that’s going, it’s considered four stops because you’ve got the ground floor and two above. So it’s considered a four stop elevator where the other one is only a two stop elevator. It’s a little more expensive. MR. TRAVER-More doors and all that stuff. MR. HALL-More doors and more operating mechanisms. Like I said, once we got pricing for elevators, let’s do one. MR. MAGOWAN-I have to say, though, you know before with the two separate buildings I liked the courtyard effect and everything, but I really think having it tied in together would look nicer aesthetically and also work more functionally for him with the tenants and everything. MR. HALL-I think it’s going to work out well for the tenants. MR. DIXON-I think it’s a very attractive solution. MR. HALL-Thank you. MR. HUNSINGER-Has he identified any tenants? MR. HALL-He’s working on a couple of them but he doesn’t have anything solid yet. He’s got to get, the actual, the pre-engineered metal buildings, two big pieces, two high bay pieces, he’s already purchased them and they’re sitting on site waiting to get everything finished. So we’re kind of a on a roll with this thing. As soon as we get this, hopefully get approval tonight, he can continue on down the road. It’s his intent to get those two pieces up and use that as his staging areas to build the rest of the buildings. Get something under cover and dry this fall and hopefully get the rest of it on the way. MR. TRAVER-All right. It seems very straightforward to me. Are there any other questions before we entertain a motion? This is a SEQR Type II. There is a public hearing on this application. Is there anyone in the audience? Mr. Durlacher, would you like to comment on this application? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED GLENN DURLACHER MR. DURLACHER-I don’t like elevators. MR. TRAVER-Do you have any written comments? MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments for this project. MR. TRAVER-All right. Then we’ll close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 12 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. TRAVER-I guess we’re ready to entertain a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP MODIFICATION # 55-2019 BOGUSLAW BIELECKI The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes a 1,749 sq. ft. +/- footprint additions to an under- construction building project of 33,800 +/- sq. ft. The addition will be constructed between the two buildings proposed at the front to connect the buildings for the purpose of installing one elevator. The project remains the same with the remaining warehouse buildings and the two rear buildings. Pursuant to Chapter 179-9-120 of the Zoning Ordinance, modifications to an existing site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 09/17/2019 and continued the public hearing to 09/17/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 09/17/2019; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 55-2019 BOGUSLAW BIELECKI. Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted: g. site lighting, h. signage, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, r. construction/demolition disposal, s. snow removal as those items have been addressed in the original site plan. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; e) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. Motion seconded by Brad Magowan. Duly adopted this 17th day of September, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-You’re all set. 13 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. HALL-Thank you very much. MR. TRAVER-Next under New Business we have Glenn Durlacher, Site Plan Modification 60-2019. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 60-2019 SEQR TYPE: TYPE II. GLENN DURLACHER. OWNER(S): GREAT ESCAPE. ZONING: CI. LOCATION: 1115 STATE RT. 9. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO USE 748 SQ. FT. OF THE EXISTING 1,250 SQ. FT. GREAT ESCAPE BARN FOR STORAGE AND WORK AREA, SPECIFICALLY FOR TREE SCULPTING BUSINESS. THE EXISTING BUSINESS MAINTAINS A LEASE AREA FOR OUTDOOR WORK AND DISPLAY OF TREE SCULPTING. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO USE THE BARN FOR A WORKSHOP AREA FOR THE BUSINESS. THE BARN WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR STORAGE IN 2016 APPROVAL. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 179-3-040 & 179-9-120 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PLANNING BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CROSS REFERENCE: SP 32-2017, AV 30-2017. WARREN CO. REFERRAL: SEPTEMBER 2019. LOT SIZE: 10.48 ACRES. TAX MAP NO. 295.12-1-4. SECTION: 179-3-040, 179-9-120. GLENN DURLACHER, PRESENT MR. TRAVER-Laura? MRS. MOORE-This project is for the applicant to use a portion of the existing Great Escape barn for storage and work area. The building is 1,250 square feet and he’s proposing to use 748 square feet and the Fire Marshal and the Building and Code Director have communicated with Glenn and there are some things that he needs to address in reference to being Code compliant and he’s aware of those items as far as I know. If not he’s going to continue talking with them, but this is, originally we allowed the applicant to use this for storage and now the applicant proposes to do some work in there. MR. TRAVER-Okay. MRS. MOORE-And just as a note, and I did not realize this. It’ll probably be brought up, but apparently when this electronic copy was given to us it was scanned in backwards and I apologize for that because when I saw it it was correct. It was the other way around because I saw the hard copy before it was copied. So I’m not quite sure why that happened, but I apologize for not catching that. MR. TRAVER-In my office we have some copy machines where when you make a copy you put the print down and we have one bigger one which also does everything else that you have to put it in right side up and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve e-mailed myself blank pages. So I know how that works. Good evening. MR. DURLACHER-Good evening. So I’m here to see if I can. MR. TRAVER-Start by stating your name for the record if you don’t mind. MR. DURLACHER-Yes. I’m Glenn Durlacher. MR. TRAVER-And so you are expanding. MR. DURLACHER-Yes. MR. TRAVER-Congratulations. MR. DURLACHER-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-I must say personally I go by your site periodically and your artwork is really quite amazing. MR. DURLACHER-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-Yes, congratulations on all that. So you are just expanding the amount of space you have to use space basically like an indoor workshop? MR. DURLACHER-Yes. MR. TRAVER-As Laura mentioned there are some outstanding issues I guess with the Fire Marshal or whatever that need to be resolved. Do you feel comfortable you can address those concerns? 14 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. DURLACHER-Yes, well I’ve talked to Dave Hatin and he talked to Mike the Fire Marshal to see exactly what we need to do and I’m going to do the, it just basically requires a non bondable heating system and an exhaust like a dust collection, a fire extinguisher. MR. TRAVER-Okay. Yes, dust can be explosive. MR. DURLACHER-Yes. So a fire extinguisher and I have to raise the entry level by an inch. So it’s nothing outlandish. MR. DEEB-Is it expensive? MR. DURLACHER-Not really. I mean it probably totally costs around $500. So I’m renting from The Great Escape and I told them I’m going to take care of it. So I think they’re fine with it. MR. DEEB-Have you priced it? MR. DURLACHER-I’ve priced it. Yes, no, I’m taking care of the expenses. MR. DEEB-You don’t want any surprises. MR. DURLACHER-Yes. It has to be semi reasonable. MR. MAGOWAN-So are you predicting a colder winter, Glenn? Can you be our Farmer’s Almanac and tell us what’s going on this winter? I’m going to be shocked to not see you outside in your coveralls. MR. DURLACHER-What I’ve been telling people is that, mainly with rain, if you give me $50 I’ll stop it from raining, and for $100 you get the deluxe dance. So anyway, this would just make life a lot easier. MR. MAGOWAN-It seems like a nice location for you. I hope to come out of Round Pond Road all the time. I live right around the corner. It’s always nice to see you and I like the flow of people always there, some eating the ice cream. So I hope they don’t dribble anything on your woodwork. MR. DURLACHER-I have a golden retriever and when they come over with the ice cream I tell them that he won’t bite you if you give us ice cream, but his tail is wagging. So he’s not very helpful for me. MR. MAGOWAN-But I’m glad it’s worked out well for you. At Great Escape they haven’t really done much with the old zoo. Wasn’t it Animal Land? Animal Land. MR. DURLACHER-Yes, Animal Land. MR. MAGOWAN-I mean I remember hearing the animals back there. MR. DURLACHER-Actually the adult children now of the original owner came by about like a month ago and were telling me about where things were and it was quite interesting. Like there used to be a coy pond out back. They kind of dammed it. MR. TRAVER-And there was a bear pit out there. Pau, Jr. was a friend of mine when I was a kid. We used to, when we had nothing better to do our parents would basically confine us to Animal Land for the day. So we would hang out and watch the pig races and feed the geese. That was a lot of fun. It’s interesting because Paul Lecarre, Sr., when my parents had parties at our house on Pine Point, whenever he came by he would always bring an exotic animal. Always. It was usually like an Ocelot or sometimes it would be like an owl or a snake or something like that, but I remember that as a kid just sitting on the floor being amazed at this guy that would come in and bring these wild animals. It was really neat. He was neat guy. MR. DURLACHER-So that was the owner then. MR. TRAVER-Yes. That was Paul, Sr., and then Paul, Jr. may be the person that stopped by to visit with you, was my age. We went to school together. MR. DURLACHER-These, the woman and fellow that stopped by, they’re probably in their late 40’s I’d say. 15 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) MR. TRAVER-Okay. No, not my age. I’m much younger than that. Anyway. I digress. So we have a public hearing with no public. So we’ll open the public hearing. Laura, are there any written comments? PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MRS. MOORE-There are no written comments. MR. TRAVER-All right. Then we’ll close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MR. TRAVER-Does anyone have any further comments on the application for the record? We’re ready to entertain a motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING SP MODIFICATION # 60-2019 GLENN DURLACHER The applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval pursuant to Article 9 of the Town zoning Ordinance for: Applicant proposes to use 748 sq. ft. of the existing 1,250 sq. ft. Great Escape barn for storage and work area, specifically for tree sculpting business. The existing business maintains a lease area for outdoor work and display of tree sculpting. The applicant proposes to use the barn for a workshop area for the business. The barn was previously approved for storage in 2016 approval. Pursuant to Chapter 179-3-040 & 179-9-120 of the Zoning Ordinance, modification of an existing site plan shall be subject to Planning Board review and approval. Pursuant to relevant sections of the Town of Queensbury Zoning Code-Chapter 179-9-080, the Planning Board has determined that this proposal satisfies the requirements as stated in the Zoning Code; As required by General Municipal Law Section 239-m the site plan application was referred to the Warren County Planning Department for its recommendation; The Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site plan application on 09/17/2019 and continued the public hearing to 09/17/2019, when it was closed, The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials submitted by the applicant and all comments made at the public hearing and submitted in writing through and including 09/17/2019; The Planning Board determines that the application complies with the review considerations and standards set forth in Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance for Site Plan approval, MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 60-2019 GLENN DURLACHER. Introduced by David Deeb who moved for its adoption; Per the draft provided by staff conditioned upon the following conditions: 1) Waivers request granted: g. site lighting, h. signage, n traffic, o. commercial alterations/ construction details, r. construction/demolition disposal, s. snow removal. 2) Adherence to the items outlined in the follow-up letter sent with this resolution. a) If application was referred to engineering, then engineering sign-off required prior to signature of Zoning Administrator of the approved plans; b) Final approved plans should have dimensions and setbacks noted on the site plan/survey, floor plans and elevation for the existing rooms and proposed rooms in the building and site improvements, c) Final approved plans, in compliance with the Site Plan, must be submitted to the Community Development Department before any further review by the Zoning Administrator or Building and Codes personnel; d) The applicant must meet with Staff after approval and prior to issuance of Building Permit and/or the beginning of any site work; e) Subsequent issuance of further permits, including building permits is dependent on compliance with this and all other conditions of this resolution; f) As-built plans to certify that the site plan is developed according to the approved plans to be provided prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy; g) Resolution to be placed on final plans in its entirety and legible. 16 (Queensbury Planning Board 09/17/2019) th Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-You’re all set. MR. DURLACHER-Thank you. MR. TRAVER-Very good. Well that concludes our regular agenda, and Laura, you have training for us. MRS. MOORE-You can adjourn because it’s nothing for the minutes. MR. TRAVER-Okay. So we’ll entertain a motion to adjourn. MR. HUNSINGER-So moved. TH MOTION TO ADJOURN THE QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2019, Introduced by Chris Hunsinger who moved for its adoption, seconded by Stephen Traver: th Duly adopted this 17 day of September, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Deeb, Ms. White, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hunsinger, Mr. Magowan, Mr. Traver NOES: NONE ABSENT: Mr. Shafer, Mr. Valentine MR. TRAVER-We stand adjourned. Thank you, everyone. Thank you, Laura. On motion meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Stephen Traver, Chairman 17