Loading...
SWMR(PHASE 2) 080520 Stormwater Management Report for Hudson Headwaters Health Network 27 Carey Road (Phase 2) Town of Queensbury Warren County, New York August 5, 2020 n � uIr � w M ram- 7475 FES SIO Prepared by. Engineering and 21 Corporate Drive, Suite 105 Land Surveying, P.C. Clifton Park, NY 12065 Tel: 518-371-0799 Fax:518-371-0822 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT For HUDSON HEADWATERS HEALTH NETWORK TOWN OF QUEENSBURY,WARREN COUNTY, NEW YORK A. Stormwater Management Report Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................1 1.1 Methodology for Designing Storm Water Management................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS.................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Topography...........................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Soils....................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Test Pits and Percolation Test............................................................................................................ 2 3.0 PRE AND POST DEVELOPMENT GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE......................................3 3.1 Pre-Development Area Descriptions and Discharge Points............................................................ 3 3.2 Post Development Area Descriptions and Discharge Points..........................................................3 3.3 Time of Concentration (TOC)..............................................................................................................4 3.4 Weighted Curve Number(CN).............................................................................................................4 3.5 Peak Discharges for Pre and Post Development Areas...................................................................4 4.0 PROPOSED WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS................................................ 5 4.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy................................................................................... 5 4.2 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas#1 and#3................ 5 4.3 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas#2............................6 4.4 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas#4............................6 5.0 SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................................................................................8 6.0 EXHIBITS................... ...................................................................................,..................9 Exhibit A- Graphical Peak Discharge Calculations...................................................................................10 .1 24-Hour Rainfall Intensity Table........................................................................................................ 10 2 Pre Development(CN)................................................................................................ .3 Post Development(CN) ................................................................................ 10 .4 NRCS Soil Information........................................................................................................................ 10 .5 Redevelopment WQv Calculation...................... ................................................................................ 10 .6 Pretreatment Volume........................................................................................................................ 10 Exhibit B-Hydrologic Model Simulation Using TR-55 Tabular Method...................................................11 .1 Routing Tables for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year storms with Inflow and Outflow Hydrographs 11 ExhibitC-Maps.............................................................................................................................................. 12 .1 Project Location Map...................................... ............................................................................... 12 .2 Soil Map (Figure 1)............................................................................................................................ 12 .3 Post Development Watersheds (Figure 2)........................................................................................ 12 .4 Post Development Watersheds (Figure 3)............................... ........................ .. ..... 12 .5 Disturbance Area (Figure 4)...................................................................................--..--.--.--............... 12 .6 Existing 27 Carey Road Site Plan..................................................................................................... 12 L:\PROJECTS\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796 08-HUDSON HEADWATERS\REPORTS\SWMR-PHASE 2\SWMR 8.5.20.DOCX August 2020 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1533 G5-37Hoad,J—Pa P.71 I)WS PanF 53&3)10)99/fa,:51B 311 W)] Stormwater Management Report 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hudson Headwater Health Network(HHN) is proposing an internal building modification and increased parking lot for the approximately 1.7 acre parcel located at 27 Carey Road in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County. The two existing buildings are to remain but the existing 5,000 sf warehouse/office building will be converted into 100% office space, while the existing 3 sided pull barn will be enclosed and convert into two bays for mobile medical,1 bay for truck storage and the rest of the building. No building expansion is proposed at 27 Carey Road site. This project site was previous approved by the Town of Queensbury for site development of 27 Carey Road and for sewer grinder pumps for West Mountain, West Mountain #2 and 9 Carey Road in May of 2020. As the only site plans changes to 27 Carey Road are at existing pull barn structure, this report looks at both was prior approved (Phase1) and new proposed site modification (Phase 2). As the existing 5,000 sf building will now be 100% office space, additional parking per town code will be required. In addition, HHHN would like internal roadway connectivity between their three other parcels parking lots. The proposed project will repurpose a portion of the existing parking lots and new parking lots and travel lanes will be constructed. The project will result in a disturbance of less than 1 acre thus is not subject to NYSDEC SPDES Phase II requirements for water quality and quantity. As seen in Figure 4 of Exhibit C.5 the proposed disturbance limits of this project consider the entire project area accounting for the worst-case scenario for disturbance. The stormwater management report accounts for stormwater quantity mitictation only and has been design to attenuation up to the 100-year storm event, even though the project is not subject to NYSDEC SPDES Phase II requirements. The project has been designed in accordance with The Town of Queensbury standards and the objective of controlling water quantity is to ensure that the peak rate of runoff leaving the site does not increase as result of site development. The proposed management strategy consists of utilizing and infiltration basins and they have not been designed to the Stormwater Management Design Manual (SWDM) published by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) specifications. The proposed infiltration basins will allow the sites stormwater management system to follow the general intent of NYSDEC SWDM with respect to Water Quality Volume (WQv) and Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv). While the project does not require a NYSDEC SPDES General 00-20-001 Permit, the design intent of NYSDEC SWDM was followed in the redevelopment of this parcel. The following Stormwater Management Report quantitatively assesses the pre-development and post-development runoff conditions of the site. The report documents that the proposed improvements will meet the minimum requirements of water quantity parameters. 1.1 Methodology for Designing Storm Water Management Determine contributory watershed area(s) and subsequent sub-watersheds for proposed site according to site conditions. Design a pipe layout and swales to convey stormwater to selected locations. Evaluate pre and post development stormwater runoff conditions for various storm intensities, durations and frequencies of occurrences using USDA Technical Release 55 (TR-55) methodology. Evaluate peak runoff and storage requirements for the 1, 2, 10 25 and 100-year storm frequencies. Design a detention facility to release an amount of flow that will result in no significant increase in peak discharge as a result of proposed construction. August 2020 Page 1 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1533 C-1l ,M.P kNY 13065 Ph—1-1]0 W99/fu519311®]1 ww+v mjNuom Stormwater Manaemertit Report 2.0SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Topography The existing topography is flat for a majority of the site. The topography generally flows from south to north, and stormwater runoff is allowed to infiltrate via existing dry-wells. 2.2 Soils The USDA Soil Survey was used to determine the existing soils within the project boundaries. Hydrologic soil groups were determined to analyze runoff volumes and flow rates. Soils found within the project and adjacent properties are as follows: OaC/OaB OakVille (sand soil) HSG A See Exhibit A.3 for further soil information. The information in Exhibit A.3 is depicted in Exhibit C.2, Figure-1, entitled "Soil Map"for soil delineation within the project site. 2.3 Test Pits and Percolation Test When 27 Carey Road was original designed in 2006 and the plans contained infiltration rates and deep hole test information. These results were very similar to the test pits preformed on abutting HHHN parcels. The percolation tests per the notes on the drawings, see Exhibit C.6 had medium coarse sand to a depth below elevation 375 and had a slowest percolation rate of 46 second per inch. The proposed bottom of infiltration system will be at elevation 381.0. This is also the same elevation as the functioning existing infiltration system so we can ensure that it will function as it currently does and meets the 3 foot separation required. The infiltration rate of the proposed infiltration area has been set at (20 inches/hour) in the design calculations or about a 4.0 safety factor has been used based upon the existing percolation rate of 1 inch per 46 seconds. August 2020 Page 2 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1511(, fAW.f.l—.k,.1 x065 rrw.fulx!wflFv:sxe.3xf.ren www.mi�+om Stormwater Management Repot 3.0 PRE AND POST DEVELOPMENT GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE This section describes the stormwater analysis internal to the site, including the runoff generated within the limits of the site. Analysis of upstream/downstream watershed to the receiving waters for this project site is not included in the computations for this report. The peak discharge rates represented in this report demonstrate only the expected peak flows from the delineated watersheds and do not take into account the overall watersheds. The non-delineated Pre and Post Development upstream/downstream watersheds are considered base flow and where the proposed site improvement will not have an effect on stormwater runoff. Therefore, the Pre and Post Development non-delineated upstream/downstream watershed will have the exact same stormwater runoff characteristics. 3.1 Pre-Development Area Descriptions and Discharge Points The following section describes the pre-development drainage patterns. To analyze and compare the pre- development conditions, the watershed was divided into two sub-areas. The post development watersheds have been delineated based on the discharge point and analyzed. (Refer to"Post-Development" in Exhibit C.3). The watershed designated as Pre-Development Area #1 is approximately 0.528 acres in size and drains to the existing infiltration basin (Discharge Point #1). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing building, existing parking field, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the existing infiltration basin. The watershed designated as Pre-Development Area #2 is approximately 0.527 acres in size and drains to the proposed infiltration basin (Discharge Point #2). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing building, existing parking field, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the infiltration basin. The watershed designated as Pre-Development Area #3 is approximately 0.185 acres in size and drains to the low point in the pavement (Discharge Point #3). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing parking field, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the low spot and after about 3-inches in depth the water is allowed to infiltrate in the lawn area. The remainder of the stormwater in the puddle is either evaporated of infiltrated through cracks in the pavement. 3.2 Post Development Area Descriptions and Discharge Points The following section describes the post development drainage patterns. To analyze and compare the post development conditions, the watershed was divided into two sub-areas. The post development watersheds have been delineated based on the discharge point and analyzed. (Refer to"Post-Development" in Exhibit CA). The watershed designated as Post Development Area #1 is approximately 1.052 acres in size and drains to the proposed Forebay (Discharge Point #1). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing building, existing parking field and proposed parking areas, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the forebay or directed there by a closed drainage system. The watershed designated as Post Development Area #2 is approximately 0.397 acres in size and drains to the proposed infiltration basin (Discharge Point #2). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing building, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the infiltration basin. The watershed designated as Post Development Area #3 is approximately 0.473 acres in size and drains to the low point swale/basin in between the existing parking lot and new driveway to existing pull barn structure. The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing parking field and proposed driveway, grass and woods. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly swale/basin that will send stormwater runoff to the forebay located within Post Development Area#2 watershed. The watershed designated as Post Development Area #4 is approximately 0.019 acres in size and drains to the low point (Discharge Point #4). The watershed contains impervious area associated with the existing sidewalk and grass. The stormwater runoff from this watershed sheet flows directly into the low spot and a dry-well has now been placed in the low spot to add in infiltration of stormwater runoff. August 2020 Page 3 (ioM.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1533 Gexm[paaE,[1-11.13Y.22 Vlwne:5143)10)59/fv:51B 3)10Y22 Stormwater Management Report 3.3 Time of Concentration (TOC) Times of Concentration (TOC) paths for post development were assumed to be 0.1 hours as that is the most conservative in determining post development peak runoff rates for post development areas. TOC paths were determined for pre-development subareas by using the methodology described in National Resource Conservation Service's TR-55 manual. Sheet flow never exceeded 150 feet over natural terrain for Pre- Development. A Manning's n=0.40 was used for Pre-Development areas that sheet flowed across wooded areas. Calculations for the TOC paths can be found in Exhibit B. 3.4 Weighted Curve Number (CN) Within each watershed area, cover type and hydrologic condition are compared to the Hydrologic Soil Group classification to derive a runoff curve number. Subsequently, a weighted average, or composite runoff curve number (CN) is determined. Runoff curve number supporting calculations for post-development scenarios are presented in Exhibit A.2. It should be noted that within Post Development Areas#1 the existing porous pavement areas exist at HHHN West Mountain 2 parcel (to the east of 27 Carey Road parcel). The porous pavement was assumed to be 100% impervious (or standard pavement)for the purposes of stormwater runoff calculations. 3.5 Peak Discharges for Pre and Post Development Areas Using Hydraflow Hydrographs software developed by Intellisolve®. The software uses the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), now known as (NRCS) National Resources Conservation Service, hydrologic methods to compute the 24-hour precipitation event. The runoff curve numbers and time of concentrations were computed using the NRCS TR-55 tabular methodology. The peak discharges for post development areas/watersheds are shown in the following tables. Note: the peak discharges for post development were based on TOC, Weighted Curve Number(CN) and other factors. Table-1 Pre-Development Peak Discharge(Unattenuated) 1-Year 2-Year f 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year �100-Year Watershed Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Peak Peak Flow Flow Flow CN Area TOC (Acres) (Hrs.) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Pre#1 0.001 0.002 0.045 0.147 0.286 0.486 51 0528 0.485 Pre#2 0.002 0.005 0.126 0.330 0.577 0.901 54 0.527 0.240 Pre#3 0.336 0.422 0.697 0.907 1.098 1.319 88 0.185 0.160 Table-2 Post Development Peak Discharge (Unattenuated) 1-Year 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year ' Watershed Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Peak Peak Flow Flow Flow CN Area TOC (Acres) (Hrs.) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Post#1 1.520 1.978 3.524 4.746 5.879 7.20 83 1.052 0.100 Post#2 0.239 0.366 0.828 1.218 1.595 2.057 72 0.397 0.100 Post#3 0.487 0.670 1.298 1.814 2.308 2.892 78 0.473 0.100 Post#4 0.011 0.018 0.040 0.058 0.76 0.098 72 0.019 0.100 Post Areas time of concentration was set a minimum of 0.1 hours to determine the worst-case runoff for this watershed. August 2020 Page 4 J ' M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. --33 Gexenl Roa4 Cfltan Pally NY]1065 PMM:519 3)]A)99/hc S1B3)1®)2 Stormwater Management Report 4.0 PROPOSED WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS 4.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy The proposed strategy consists of sheet flowing stormwater runoff to forebay and infiltration basin. The stormwater analysis was performed using Hydraflow Hydrographs software developed by Intellisolve®. The software uses the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), now known as (NRCS) National Resources Conservation Service, hydrologic methods to compute the 24-hour precipitation event. The runoff curve numbers and time of concentrations were computed using the NRCS TR-55 tabular methodology as describe in Section 3.0 of this report. The 24-hour rainfall amounts for Warren County are documented in Exhibit A.1. The hydrograph model is set up to simulate Post-Development Area watersheds. Exhibit CA shows a schematic of the model elements. It is the goal of the hydraulic model to demonstrate the water surface elevation within infiltration basin and dry-wells for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year storm events. 4.2 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas #1 and #3 Under the proposed condition stormwater runoff from Post Development Areas #1 #2 and #3 travels to the proposed infiltration basin. To meet NYSDEC SWDM Post Development Area #1 and #3 watershed has its stormwater runoff first travels to a forebay before stormwater runoff is allowed to flow to the infiltration basin within Post Development #2 watershed. The forebay has a sump in it before stormwater is allowed to flow to the infiltration basin via a 12-inch culvert at elevation 381.25. The sump/pretreatment has a volume of 2,957 cf between contours 380 and 381.25 (see Exhibit A.6). The size of the pretreatment is basin upon the water quality volume (WQv) associated with Post Development Area #1 and Post Development Area #3 watersheds. Using NYSDEC SWDM Chapter 9 for redevelopment in which 100% of new impervious area and 25% of existing impervious area was used to determine the WQv for this watershed. The WQv was determined to be 2,104 cf and 639 cf for Post Development Area #1 and #3 respectively (see A.5 for WQv calculation). The sump or pretreatment within the forebay exceeds the 100% WQv storage requirement as the underlining soils have an infiltration rate greater than 5 inches/hr. As stated previously, the project does not need to comport to NYSDEC SWDM in which WQv, RRv, nor the stormwater designed needs to be implemented. Hydraflow Hydrographs software was used to develop a hydraulic model of the proposed forebay. The model demonstrates that stormwater runoff is all held and discharged to the infiltration basin. The hydraulic modeling was simulated for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year storm events. The model for the forebay does not account for any infiltration and only the available storage above elevation 381.25 as the bottom 15-inches could be filed with sediment, snow or water. See Exhibit B.1 for model information and design. Table-3 Forebay Summary 1-Year 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow Flow (cfs) (cfs) Post Area#1 and#3(inflow rate) 2.007 2.648 4.814 6.560 8.187 10.09 Peak Discharge Rate to Infiltration Basin f 0.524 0.823 1.578 2.137 2.692 3.187 Max.Water Surface Elevation(WSEL) 381.64 381.77 382.17 382.47 382.74 383.03 The 100-year WSEL has been determined to be a maximum of 383.03 for forebay and the lowest elevation is 383.50. This allows for approximately 0.47 feet of additional storage within the basin. The discharge rate from via the 12-inch culvert at elevation 381.25 in the forebay is shown with the modeled labeled at"Clv A" in Pond entitled "Forebay" August 2020 Page 5 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1533 GPx 1Road,]W99/ Park I)I I)065 Plwrw:51d3) I..:Ra.:51R 311 OR]) www.lrydfun Stormwater Management Report 4.3 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas #2 Under the proposed condition stormwater runoff from Post Development Areas #1 #2 and #3 travel to the proposed infiltration basin. Stormwater runoff from the forebay form the 12-icnh culvert pipe will converge with stormwater runoff form Post Development Area#2 watershed in the proposed infiltration basin. The infiltration basin has been sized to infiltrate the 100-year stormwater event from both Post Development watersheds#1 #2 and #3. As the existing site utilizes an infiltration basin and dry-wells, no stormwater runoff was leaves the site under present condition. Therefore, the proposed infiltration basins (enlargement or new) will need to recharge stormwater runoff from the increased impervious area on the site. Hydraflow Hydrographs software was used to develop a hydraulic model of the proposed infiltration basin. The model demonstrates that stormwater runoff is all recharged in the infiltration basin. The hydraulic modeling was simulated for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year storm events. See Exhibit B.1 for model information and design. Table-4 Infiltration Basin 1-Year 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow Flow (cfs) (cfs) Post Area#2(inflow rate) 0.239 0.366 0.828 1.218 1.595 2.057 Peak Discharge Rate to Infiltration Basin 0.524 0.823 1.578 2.137 2.692 3.187 from Forebay Combined peak rate within Infiltration 0.643 1.031 2.237 2.955 3.849 4.839 Basin Max.Water Surface Elevation(WSEL) 381.40 381.60 382.22 I 382.61 382.99 383.20 The 100-year WSEL has been determined to be 383.20, which allows for 0.80 feet of additional storage volume within the infiltration basin. As all stormwater is recharged for the project site there is 0.0 cfs discharge from the site. The infiltration rate of the proposed infiltration area has been set at 20 inches/hour in the design calculations or about a 4.0 safety factor has been used based upon the existing percolation rate of 1 inch per 46 seconds. The minimum of 10% of area being required to be below frost line and its capacity and/or infiltration potential was not included in the model and the infiltration rate was set to bottom contour as these are another safety factor in the design of the system. 4.4 Water Quantity Using TR-55 Tabular Method For Post Development Areas #4 Stormwater runoff from Post Development Area # #4 will flow to dry-wells. The dry-wells are not designed to attenuate large storm events but aid in the infiltration of stormwater off. As a result of the existing grades of the site any stormwater that is generated cannot leave the site. Thus dry-wells for the project are just designed to reduce the puddles on the surface and aid in infiltration. The dry-wells in these watersheds have been designed to NYSDEC SWDM as the areas are small and existing areas are already low points. Dry-well #3 in Post Development #4 watershed a the 12-inch sump (plunge pool) around the structure frame will be used as pretreatment. The Volume of the plunge pool (6 diameter areas= 28.26 sf-grate area=5.0 sf=23.26 sf x 12" depth x .5 [triangle]) is 11 cf. See Exhibit A.5 for WQv flows from Post Development Area #3 and #4. The dry-wells have been included within Hydraflow Hydrographs software to determine the amount of puddling. August 2020 Page 6 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1333 Geuen[RoaE,Cf(tOn P+k NY11063 VM,r.5143)10)99/fav31B 3)10B]] vww.mida.a,n Stormwater Management"ort Table-5 Dry-Well#3 (Post Development Area#4) 1-Year 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow(cfs) Flow Flow (cfs) (cfs) Post Area#4(inflow rate) 0.011 0.018 0.040 0.058 0.76 0.098 Max,Water Surface Elevation(WSEL) 377.94 378.22 379.34 380.32 381.25 382.32 Dry-well #3 (DW#3) rim elevation is 382.50. As seen from Table 6 the 100-year storm event will completely recharge and no surcharging above the frame is anticipated. As the model used 20 inches/hour in the design calculations or about a 4.0 safety factor has been used based upon the existing percolation rate of 1 inch per 46 seconds, the void stone volume was not included in the model of the dry-wells and infiltration rate was set to bottom contour only, the WSEL listed in table 5 and 6 will most likely be lower. Dry-well #4 and Dry-well #5 (DW#4 and DW#5) pretreatment is achieved by the porous pavement. DW#4 and DW#5 have been installed due to puddles occurring different times of the year in the handicap parking stalls. August2020 Page 7 M,J,Engineering and (A\� Land Surveying,P.C. 1333 trexent3aatl,O(M Pu1{,Mf I]063 MgK5113)1Ai99/fa3:31H.3110ii1 Stormwater Management Report 5.OSOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY SCS TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. August 2020 Page 8 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 1533 Gexm,fl ,MI.Pak.I- Vlmrw.5163)10159IF.518 371 W22 www.ii�idl i�rm Stormwater Management Report 6.0 EXHIBITS August2020 Page 9 N rl N kI i N t i N to r+ N 01 N 00 O', 00 c-, [- 01 01 cl M 00 to oo 00 N a\ to m 4 W) v O O N M M. [-� 00 N M M ct N 0\ O N oo l-- 110 00 V) -i r- N •^ N N N M m 'mot �n � � D\ N N N c^ m ,c o0 a, ,t r- M O O m ^ CIC CIA Ic all O M N a/ L`t D1 N l� N D1 m ,__ N N N - N N ri m .4 �n �o r� p pkn O O� C 01 O N rm J\ N N oc M to kn 00 0l N N m M Z N N N M M Vl to l- 00 N N N cV M V) M [- to x N O 00 -- \O -� 00 Wn m O� oo N m 00 00 N s� it 00 N OO [ N oo ll� L) \O N l� 00 Wn C1 •-- W)0 O -- Oi c1 c w 't N d .� N O N N N cn 4 E 0) sr M 01 -- -- m m 00 O l- L N Ln M l� lL ,� ,--� ,--� •+ it it i., Lr NIf O-4 FM* y r-i �► � O N �lo a1 M 00 M a1 01 00 M �n Q o N - N N M. M. N 0� N 0\ It It N O N x 01 -1 Q 0o O N �n 0o w M O •- -� N N M M lal ^o ti Qn N \O 00 CD -- 11O D1 N lam + v, G✓ O ..4ts 7�� O �,y M N O O o i^irI UQn O m ■wo �r +fir, .� .d N N Wn Io m 00 [� [� N �t cm � 00 CD �--� M to c-, V) �. [� t- O O O m /►� •� +�., Z O 'P.4 N O 00 O N It "t - Go v O Cl. ^^� T O O O CDca ♦dca CD .C""i M, - c 0` v W o 0 0 }} L a m N p N I q O -ti U a N L. L N L. L L >> >, >> >> oc V; •� C � m C C �. —' ,n Cn 1-6 (` v G, v oc x x m C M G, M v C x A G O x N x ,n OC 00 N N N m n �^ x O N o vM �C Ln CT x vM d ,rl 00 x L L L L L ON - C ON, �o Vr v, x C � oc kn, OC CY N M M tri oc kn, C+i S �, OC oc m G M l� M� C� V V I� OC G1 V = 1 v', N re) kn C N oc I, CV C- M tr, l� 0 tn y C N OC C O N �n x M C N M [� x Mi C N it �c OC M �. V'1 CT M 'v^. C M 'vi kn a) N N N N N — N N M d" Ln � L O n N G, •--' L -' M O Vr -- M �n O� VM X O Vl OC C V) s; x O N Q M x tr L 3y L S.i L L L L L L L C C C In C C O C O C L". OO N kn N Ln 7t N N N N m N N M cr t (V — d oc CT 0- •� � x � �. �" CT G M v^. N I� M G N N N N C C --• � N N M V v, M 1� d rM C x G� -� x C C C N m (r) I� C [� x O M �^ C Q` [- O — N O C O -- N N N M o M •�1 M � M Lo � In ti^ [� G M rM G` � a a �n C M Q C CT N x V) M D CU E O o CN .r N VM N �fi N V O N m C) a 041 Lannd Surve Surveying,P.C. PROJECT# 796.08 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# OF MADE BY: ME DATE: 3/2/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Pre-Development Condition REVISED BY: DATE: AREA#1 and#2 CHKD BY: DATE: 1 Applicable Standards: 2 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55 USDA, June 1986. 3 4 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN I Weighted 5 AREA Area(feet2) Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % CN CN 6 6,282 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 23,020 27% 26.7 7 7,103 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 31% 12.0 6 9,635 Woods(Good) A 30 42% 12.6 9 0 = 0% 0.0 10 0 0% 0.0 11 0 0.528 0% 0.0 51 12 #1 0 acres 0% 0.0 13 0 0% 0.0 14 0 = 0% 0.0 15 0 0% 0.0 16 0 0.001 1 0%1 0.0 17 0 sq. mi 1 0%1 0.0 1e 1 23,020 100% 19 20 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 21 AREA Area(feet') Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet2) % CN CN 22 7,225 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 22,948 31% 30.9 23 7,523 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 33% 12.8 24 8,200 Woods(Good) A 30 36% 10.7 25 0 = 0% 0.0 26 0 0% 0.0 27 0 0.527 0% 0.0 54 26 #2 0 acres 0% 0.0 29 0 0% 0.0 30 0 = 0% 0.0 31 0 0% 0.0 32 0 0.001 0% 0.0 33 0 sq. mi 0% 0.0 34 22,948 100% 35 36 Comments: 1 Source: TR-55, Tables 2-2a,b,c. 37 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC CN.xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 Pre Engineering and 0 Land Surveying,P.C. PROJECT# 796.08 SHEET* 1 OF: 1 PAGE* _ OF: MADE BY: ME DATE: 4/10/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY DATE: SUBJECT.- Pre-Development Condition REVISED BY: DATE: AREA#3 CHKD BY: DATE: 1 Applicable Standards: 2 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55. USDA, June 1986. 3 4 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 5 AREA Area(feet) Land Use I Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % CN CN 6 6,773 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 8,073 84% 82.2 7 900 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 11% 4.3 e 400 Woods(Good) A 30 5% 1.5 9 0 — 0% 0.0 10 0 0% 0.0 11 0 0.185 0% 0.0 88 12 #3 0 acres o% 0.0 13 0 0% 0.0 14 0 = 0% 0.0 15 0 0% 0.0 16 0 0.000 0% 0.0 17 0 sq. rill 1 0%1 0.0 1e 8,073 1 100% 19 20 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 21 AREA Area(feet) Land Use I Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % CN CN 22 0 0 0% 0.0 23 0 sq.feet 0% 0.0 24 0 0% 0.0 25 0 = 0% 0.0 26 0 0% 0.0 27 0 0.000 0% 0.0 0 2e 0 acres 0% 0.0 29 0 0% 0.0 30 0 — 0% 0.0 31 0 0% 0.0 32 0 0.000 0% 0.0 33 0 sq. fill 0% 0.0 34 0% 35 36 Comments: 1 Source:TR-55,Tables 2-2a,b,c. 37 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC CN.xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 Pre (2) Eneri Land Surve ing,P.C. PROJECT# 796.08 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# —OF: MADE BY: ME DATE: 1/13/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY. _ DATE: SUBJECT: Post-Development Condition REVISED BY: ME DATE: 4/10/2020 AREA#1 and#2 CHKD BY: DATE: 1 Applicable Standards: 2 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55. USDA, June 1986. 3 4 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 5 AREA Area(feet) Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % I CN CN 6 34,657 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 45,839 76% 74.1 7 9,532 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 21% 8.1 e 1,650 Woods(Good) A 30 4% 1.1 9 0 = 0% 0.0 10 0 0% 0.0 11 0 1.052 0% 0.0 83 12 #1 0 acres 0% 0.0 13 0 0% 0.0 14 0 = 0% 0.0 15 0 0% 0.0 16 0 0.002 0% 0.0 17 0 sq. ml 0% 0.0 16 45,8391 100% 19 20 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 21 AREA Area(feet) Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % CN CN 22 5,000 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 17,291 29% 28.3 23 10,291 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 60% 23.2 24 2,000 Woods(Good) A 30 12% 3.5 25 0 = 0% 0.0 26 0 0% 0.0 27 0 0.397 0% 0.0 72 2e #2 0 acres 0% 0.0 29 0 0% 0.0 30 0 = 0% 0.0 31 0 0% 0.0 32 0 0.001 0% 0.0 33 0 sq. mi 0% 0.0 34 17,291 100% 35 36 Comments: ' Source:TR-55, Tables 2-2a,b,c. 37 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC CN.xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 POST nd 01, Engineering Surve Surveying,P.C. PROJECT# 796.08 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE* OF: MADE BY: ME DATE: 4/10/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Post-Development Condition REVISED BY: DATE: AREA#3 and#4 CHKD BY: DATE: 1 Applicable Standards: - , , 2 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55. USDA, June 1986 3 4 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 5 AREA Area(feet) Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN' Area(feet) % CN CN 6 6,773 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 8,073 84% 82.2 7 900 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 11% 4.3 e 400 Woods(Good) A 30 5% 1.5 9 0 — 0% 0.0 10 0 0% 0.0 11 0 0.185 0% 0.0 88 12 #3 0 acres 0% 0.0 13 0 0% 0.0 14 0 = 0% 0.0 15 0 0% 0.0 16 0 0.000 1 0%1 0.0 17 0 sq. mi o%l aci 1e 1 8,073 100% 19 20 Land Use Hydrologic Actual AREA Factored CN Weighted 21 AREA Area(feet) Land Use/Cover Description' Soil Group' CN'. Area(feee) % CN CN 22 14,200 Paved parking lots,roofs etc. A 98 20,600 69% 67.6 23 2,400 Urban Open Space, Good(> 75%grass) A 39 sq.feet 12% 45 24 4,000 Woods(Good) A 30 19% 5.8 25 0 = 0% 0.0 26 0 0% 0.0 27 0 0.473 0% 0.0 78 2e #4 0 acres o% 0.0 29 0 0% 0.0 30 0 = o% 0.0 31 0 0% 0.0 32 0 0.001 0% 0.0 33 0 sq. mi 0% 0.0 34 20,600 100% 35 36 Comments: 1 Source: TR-55. Tables 2-2a.b.c. 37 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC CN.xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 POST (2) Z Z O a o 09M V 0gmt, OPMV Ocow OZ"Utl OLVO , OOM I? OOMP 09mt, 0/wil 09mv 09f.` v O Cl) N M.OZ.Tb ofl 1 f _ M.OZJt,oU N O I � AL r' z m� c f0 ,r T z-Gii', M Y8Z Tb oEL I i i M.aZ.Tb.0 I{4 09MSLb OVhiBLa OEMtil4 OZCSiaCD O?vtfilr 0O'+fi31t• UGft{,�.b [7gFYi�G: 01L'Si�GS• C<7F:Sf,Ct• eSEStiL4 OCESGL" �i,' z z a a v O CO O O N_N O ca O m com d 0) 7 N ya U U) N m Cl) IL C IL V O � U m O L O N ] O _ C_ c ° + a) m s 2 ° E !• m O c mE CD cmj m 0 E m m a w C = Y a) 0.CL OI 7 E ?j 7 m .� a) — U Z O a) O_ m a m ° O LO }L, a) c6 N 0' U) E c N L t°q Q E m av m °� ao au, ° U rn o ° rC- -c N CU c N C L ? M cO L m 0 m a. Y 'R s m Q 3 m rnm o a w N d -0 m Z } N 3 o m Y O C .L.. n m C d N - N j m ¢ 3 � O m t - m CL U ° .a3N E U w Z ca a 3 ` �° m w/ Q O U N L N L a7 c a v) Z) O_ a) ca O m Q >, LOL N E rn a m ° m c o m En m 0) a m T co E > = C > C =O U T w c .46 2 U O C. w �O E > N co LL N _0 � of ° m 2 Zv ° mcoca 0 Uc v a m '° E Z ° >°,� � � m of 9 inaNiao) 2 wo aci .o a) moms d o c m o a`) a a) m ° o ° m m — 1' o � w ° 3 ay N E o o m 16 .0 m 2Q m ov m a) o � ° . " E 0) +L+ Lm. Z >, s m N .� m m io - 0 m 0O 'm d j a) O � � •� C .N. am >, a) L m `m 7 rn -0 `1Q N ._ .2 •v f0 O_ Z o c m m ur o m cA y 3 m m ° > m E m L c in E (� m y E rn TE � cn 1 E m ° U ° m �' ° o a) am � w o m E `m cmi ° 'o c ° o m m a? o m Z Q o_O m r� L o o a) � w p > mo Z U) E E) c m w v'i � � -2 w ) c f° am c'n aTi E � No o 'am c m � mr'nmcm mm � � o a.,� a`) n , — Z — � � N mEm 55 L m c O U a) m p >>m O m 0 u1 L U L .� 0 7 O LP m 0) L O L N a E U) > U 2 O_V Q m O U) U) fn O N F- U .� N Y T N Z U) > a) .o Z (n CD o Cl) U = m U a -0 o m T U cc m a m o m U r m c m a LL O o p cn a) N U) o _ T c c = N 'D -0m 'p N a J N al N O O L Z U) Q U) O_ N E « G .O >' U) N N ca N �' O_ N m C _ CL m O L a N '0 a) N U) a) UO N U) U) > O cn 2 8 O � 5 7 J m c ui R � N W J c IL i °a Q > at c c m U) CL a E a? v a) N m p N qi 9 $ O w g a pco Y v 0 0 -1 2 h a w 2 in in in US e � ut � 0 To q�i A o zU 11 Soil Map—Warren County,New York Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name 1 Acres in AOI Percent of AOI OaA Oakville loamy fine sand,0 to 1.9 100.0% 3 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 1.9 100.0% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/10/2020 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Water Features---Warren County,New York Water Features This table gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Surface runoff refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based on slope, climate, and vegetative cover. The concept indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions. It is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal. The classes are negligible, very low, low, medium, high, and very high. The months in the table indicate the portion of the year in which a water table, ponding, and/or flooding is most likely to be a concern. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/10/2020 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Water Features---Warren County, New York Water table refers to a saturated zone in the soil. The water features table indicates, by month, depth to the top ( upper limit)and base ( lower limit) of the saturated zone in most years. Estimates of the upper and lower limits are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. The kind of water table, apparent or perched, is given if a seasonal high water table exists in the soil. A water table is perched if free water is restricted from moving downward in the soil by a restrictive feature, in most cases a hardpan; there is a dry layer of soil underneath a wet layer. A water table is apparent if free water is present in all horizons from its upper boundary to below 2 meters or to the depth of observation. The water table kind listed is for the first major component in the map unit. Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration, or evaporation. The table indicates surface water depth and the duration and frequency of ponding. Duration is expressed as very brief if less than 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, rare, occasional, and frequent. None means that ponding is not probable; rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of ponding is nearly 0 percent to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years (the chance of ponding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); and frequent that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years (the chance of ponding is more than 50 percent in any year). Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration and frequency are estimated. Duration is expressed as extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours, very brief if 4 hours to 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, very rare, rare, occasional, frequent, and very frequent. None means that flooding is not probable; very rare that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is less than 1 percent in any year); rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); frequent that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50 percent in all months in any year); and very frequent that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of any year). The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and little or no horizon development. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/10/2020 Wlr Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Water Features---Warren County,New York Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. USI)h Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/10/2020 11iii1M__ Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 §{ cr u \ k ■ § a ) LL z L § % � I ¢ E ° U. / CD� k C . � . § i � 0 e 2 2 I e t) 2? co , k k coCL � 2 � )\ \ _ k k f V � o \ k = 2 C $ f # 2 za) �m . % $ Jc 0 § 2 U. � § % � I- u � \ � . CD cc 2 ClCcC c U . � @ ■ $ k� ® « k § » | I % < ■ § � ' § ¥ � U) / �J k� 2 \ §� \ CD k ■ \ \ 0 } k a ' { Lannd SuweyinngtlP.C. PROJECT# 796.07 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# OF: MADEBY: JWE DATE 4/10/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY: DATE: SUBJECT: WQV Min REVISED BY: DATE: Post Area#1 CHKD BY. DATE: Basic Watershed Data 2 90%Rainfall Event: 1.2 inches(Figure 4.1-NYS SWDM) 3 4 Rainfall Distribution Type 1, 1A, 2 or 3) 5 Watershed Area= 1.05 ac 6 Redevelopment 7 Existing Impervious Area 18,282 sf(within site) Note:Total Impervious Area for watershed#1=34,657 sf. There is a Total Impervious Area= 34,657 sf(within site) 12,582 sf of impervious area from porous pavement and 5,700 sf 9 from existing parking lot and building. 10 Net New Impervious Area 1 16,375 sf(within site) 11 25%of Ex. Imper.Area= 4.571 sf(within site) 12 13 14 Water Quality Volume,WQv min(Redeveloped,100%new impervious,25%existing impervious) 15 16 Impervious Area: 0.48 acres (100%new and 25%existing) 17 16 19 Total Watershed Area: 1.05 acres 20 21 1 = Impervious Area/Total Watershed Area 22 1 = 0.48 acres/1.05 acres 23 1 =45.8% 24 25 Compute Runoff Coefficient, Rv 26 27 Rv= 0.05+0.009*(1),where I =%impervious cover 26 Rv= 0.05+0.009*(45.8) 29 Rv= 0.46 30 31 Compute WQv, (includes both on-site and off-site drainage) 32 (Use the 90%capture rule with 1 2"of rainfall,Figure 4.1 NYS-SWDM) 33 34 WQv= (1.2in.)*(Rv)*(A) 35 WQv= (1.2in.)*(0.46)*(1.05ac)*(1ft/12in) 36 WQv(min)= 0.05 ac-ft ( 2,104 ft3) 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying,PC WQV(Min#3).xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 WQv Min Engineering and PROJECT# 796.07 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# OF: Land Surveying,P.C. MADE BY: JWE DATE: 5/13/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY. DATE: SUBJECT: WQV Worst Case REVISED BY: DATE: Post Area#3 CHKD BY. DATE: Basic Watershed Data 2 90%Rainfall Event: 1.2 inches(Figure 4.1-NYS SWDM) 3 Rainfall Distribution Type=0( 1, 1A, 2 or 3) Watershed Area= 0.473 ac 6 Redevelopment Existing Impervious Area 11,000 sf(within site) a Total Impervious Area= 14,200 sf(within site) s 10 11 12 13 14 Water Quality Volume,WQv min(Redeveloped, 100%new impervious,25%existing impervious) 15 16 Impervious Area: 0.137 acres (100%new+25%existing) ,7 16 19 Total Watershed Area: 0.47 acres 20 21 1 = Impervious Area/Total Watershed Area 22 1 =0.14 acres/0.47 acres 23 1=28.9% 24 25 Compute Runoff Coefficient, Rv 26 27 Rv= 0.05+0.009*(1),where I=%impervious cover 26 Rv= 0 05+0.009*(28.9) 29 Rv= 0.31 30 31 Compute WQv, (includes both on-site and off-site drainage) 32 (Use the 90%capture rule with 1 2"of rainfall,Figure 4.1 NYS-SWDM) 33 34 WQv= (1.2in.)*(Rv)*(A) 35 WQv= (1.2in.)*(0.31)*(0.473ac)*(lft/12in) 36 WQv(min)= 0.01 ac-ft ( 639 ft3) 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying,PC WQV(Min#3).xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 WQv Min(2) Land 3uwaying,P.C. PROJECT# 796.07 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# OF: MADEBY: JWE DATE: 5/13/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY: DATE: SUBJECT: WQV Worst Case REVISED BY: DATE: Post Area#4 CHKD BY: DATE: 1 Basic Watershed Data 2 90%Rainfall Event: 1.2 inches(Figure 4.1-NYS SWDM) 3 4 Rainfall Distribution Type=0( 1, 1A, 2 or 3) 5 Watershed Area= 0.019 ac 6 Redevelopment 7 Existing Impervious Area 200 sf(within site) 6 Total Impervious Area= 01 sf(within site) 9 10 11 12 13 14 Water Quality Volume,WQv min(Redeveloped, 100%new impervious,25%existing impervious) 15 16 Impervious Area: 0.0011 acres (100%new+25%existing) 17 18 19 Total Watershed Area: 0.019 acres 20 21 1= Impervious Area/Total Watershed Area 22 1=0 acres/0.02 acres 23 1=6.0% 24 25 Compute Runoff Coefficient, Rv 26 27 Rv= 0.05+0.009*(1),where I=%impervious cover 28 Rv= 0.05+0.009*(6) 29 Rv= 0.10 30 31 Compute WQv, (includes both on-site and off-site drainage) 32 (Use the 90%capture rule with 1 2"of rainfall,Figure 4 1 NYS-SWDM) 33 34 WQv= (1.2in.)*(Rv)*(A) 35 WQv= (1.2in.)*(0.1)*(0 019ac)*(1ft/12in) 36 WQv(min)= 0.00 ac-ft ( 8 W) 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying,PC WQV(Min#4).xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 WQv Min(2) Ql�). Land 3urveiandP.C. PROJECT# 796.07 SHEET# 1 OF: 1 PAGE# OF: MADE BY: ME DATE: 4/10/2020 PROJECT: 27 Carey Road CHKD BY: DATE. SUBJECT: Pretreatment REVISED BY: DATE: Post Development Area#1 &#3 CHKD BY: DATE: Pretreatment 2 3 Foreba Volume 4 Elevation Area Average Area Depth Volume Cumulative Cumulative Volume above Permanent 5 MSL sf sf ft cf Volume (cf) Volume(acre-ft) Pool (cf) and (acre-ft) 6 380.00 1,700 7 381.00 2,763 2,232 1.00 2,231.5 2,231.5 0.05 6 381.25 3,044 2,904 0.25 725.9 2,957.4 0.07 725.88 0.02 9 382.00 4,000 3,522 0.75 2,641.5 5,598.9 0.13 3367.38 0.08 10 383.00 5,347 4,674 1.00 4,673.5 10,272.4 0.24 8040.88 0.18 11 12 13 14 15 Post Development-Water Quality Volume Requirements (WQv) 16 Post Area#1 WQv= 2,104 cf 17 Post Area#3 WQv=639 cf 16 The proposed forebay has to have a volume of at least 100%of WQv volume or 2,743 cf. 19 The proposed forebay has a volume excess of 2,957 cf between elev 380 and 381.25.Therefore O.K. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 MJ Engineering and Land Surveying,PC pretreatment 1A.xlsx.xls 8/13/2020 RRv M.J.Engineering and p►■1/ Land Surveying, P.C. / � ts33 uass+krox,art�r„k M't3ass Ylwix51d31t.0)39/fu 31B311.W 1] Stormwater Management Report Exhibit A — Graphical Peak Discharge Calculations .1 24-Hour Rainfall Intensity Table .2 Pre Development(CN) .3 Post Development(CN) .4 NRCS Soil Information .5 Redevelopment WQv Calculation .6 Pretreatment Volume August 2020 Page 10 M.J.Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. 15334-ft E,M-PL+,NY I] PAmx 516371 Al%/Px 518.371.®R Stormwater Management Report Exhibit B — Hydrologic Model Simulation Using TR-55 Tabular Method .1 Routing Tables for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year storms with Inflow and Outflow Hydrographs August2020 Page 11 1 Watershed model Schematic HydraflowHydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019byAutodesk,Inc.v202O 1 2 3 4 6 7 CD �D ED ED CD CD r r` r 8 4e10 Leaend HX4. Origin Description 1 SCS Runoff Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff Post#1 5 SCS Runoff Post#2 6 SCS Runoff Post#3 7 SCS Runoff Post#4 8 Combine Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir Route Forebay 10 Combine Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir Route DW#3 Project: LAProjects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Hudson Headwaters\reports\SWMR- Ph 5&V&HA4dWt47 U--dfiIX22DMrey(8-5- ] H yd raft owieTab4e \Con t&adwaters\reports\SWMR-Phase 2\Exhibit B-Model\27 Carey(8-5-20)Phase 2.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Watershed Model Schematic...................................................................................... 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap............................................................................. 2 1 - Year SummaryReport......................................................................................................................... 3 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1................................................................................... 4 TR-55 Tc Worksheet........................................................................................................... 5 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2................................................................................... 6 TR-55 Tc Worksheet........................................................................................................... 7 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................... 8 TR-55 Tc Worksheet........................................................................................................... 9 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1................................................................................ 10 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2................................................................................ 11 Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 12 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 13 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 14 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay................................................. 15 PondReport- Forebay...................................................................................................... 16 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 17 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin................................................................... 18 Pond Report - Infiltration Basin.......................................................................................... 19 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 20 PondReport- DW#3......................................................................................................... 21 2 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 23 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 24 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1................................................................................. 24 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2................................................................................. 25 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................. 26 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1................................................................................ 27 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2................................................................................ 28 Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 29 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 30 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 31 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay........................................................................ 32 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 33 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin................................................................... 34 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 35 10 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 36 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 37 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1................................................................................. 37 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2........:........................................................................ 38 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................. 39 Contents CDCWj�Wed96 MES A+\MJ796.08-Hudson Headwaters\reports\SWMR-Phase 2\Exhibit B-Mode1\27 Carey(8-5-20)Phase 2.gpw Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1................................................................................ 40 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2......................................................... ........... 41 Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 42 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 43 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 44 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay........................................................................ 45 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 46 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin.................................................................- 47 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 48 25 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 49 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 50 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1................................................................................. 50 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2..........................................................................- .... 51 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................. 52 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1............................................ ............... 53 ..................... Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2................................................................................ 54 Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 55 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 56 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 57 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay........................................................................ 58 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 59 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin................................................................... 60 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 61 50 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 62 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 63 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1................................................ ......... 63 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2................................................... ................ 64 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................. 65 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1................................................................................ 66 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2................................................................................ 67 Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 68 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 69 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 70 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay........................................................................ 71 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 72 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin................................................................... 73 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 74 100 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 75 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 76 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre #1............................................................... Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Pre #2................................................................................. 77 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Pre #3................................................................................. 78 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Post#1................................................................................ 79 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Post#2................................................................................ 80 Contents COAa ed,116 MES A+\MJ796.08-Hudson Headwaters\reports\SWMR-Phase 2\Exhibit B-Mode1\27 Carey(8-5-20)Phase 2.gpw Hydrograph No. 6, SCS Runoff, Post#3................................................................................ 81 Hydrograph No. 7, SCS Runoff, Post#4................................................................................ 82 Hydrograph No. 8, Combine, Flow to Forebay....................................................................... 83 Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, Route Forebay........................................................................ 84 Hydrograph No. 10, Combine, Flow to Infiltration Basin........................................................ 85 Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, Route Infil. Basin................................................................... 86 Hydrograph No. 12, Reservoir, Route DW#3......................................................................... 87 OFReport.................................................................................................................. 88 2 Hydrograph Return Period Rc�ca� ydra w Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow(cfs) Hydrograph No. type hyd(s) Description (origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 1 SCS Runoff ------ 0.001 0.002 -- - - 0.045 0.147 0.286 0.486 Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff ------ 0.002 0.005 ------- 0.126 0.330 0.577 0.901 Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff --- 0.336 0.422 ------- -W__ 0.697 0.907 1.098 1 319 Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 1.520 1.978 ------- - 3.524 4.746 5.879 7200 Post#1 5 SCS Runoff - 0.239 0.366 - -- 0.828 1.218 1.595 2.057 Post#2 6 SCS Runoff ------ 0.487 0.670 ------- -- 1 298 1.814 2.308 2.892 Post#3 7 SCS Runoff ------ 0.011 0.018 -»---- 0 040 0.058 0.076 0.098 Post#4 8 Combine 4,6, 2.007 2.648 ------- 4 814 6.560 8.187 10.09 Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 8 0.524 0.823 ------- --- 1.578 2.137 2.692 3.187 Route Forebay 10 Combine 5,9 0.643 1.031 ------- --- -- 2.237 2.955 3.849 4.839 Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 10 0.000 0.000 ------- ------- 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 7 0.000 0.000 ------- ------ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Route DW#3 Proj. file: L:\Projects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Hudson Headwaters\reports\S V4 drRis s ,2 EVrobil2B204odel\27 Carey(8-5- C 3 Hydrograph Summary Report Fiydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak (volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 0.001 2 1440 17 ---- - ------ Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.002 2 1056 55 ------ ------ — Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 0.336 2 718 769 - -- -• Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 1.520 2 718 3,041 ------ -- - --- Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 0.239 2 718 527 ---- - --- Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 0.487 2 718 986 ------ ------ ------ Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.011 2 718 25 ---- --- ---- Post#4 8 Combine 2.007 2 718 4,027 4,6, ------ ------ Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 0.524 2 724 4,015 8 381.64 1,374 Route Forebay 10 Combine 0.643 2 720 4,542 5,9 Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 764 0 10 381.40 590 Route Infil Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 766 0 7 377.94 5.64 Route DW#3 L:\Projects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Hudsl>rF;Mbz RdEin9reph(da1SWMR- P �aV6EZW td#,Bmdm222ocarey(8-5-20) Phas 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.001 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 1440 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 17 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number = 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 - 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time(min) 5 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.400 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 90.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.57 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 29.06 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 29.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Paved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 29.10 min 6 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.002 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 1056 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 55 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number = 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.40 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #2 Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 2-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 - 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) 7 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Description} A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.400 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 65.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.57 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 3.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 14.43 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 14.43 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Paved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 - 0.00 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 TotalTravel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 14.40 min 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type - SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.336 cfs Storm frequency - 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 769 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. - 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration - 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 I 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time(min) 9 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.150 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 60.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.57 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 9.59 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 9.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Paved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 - 0.00 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0))0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 9.60 min 10 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.520 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume - 3,041 cuft Drainage area = 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#1 Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 4-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 4 Time(min) 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.239 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 527 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 I 0.40 - 0.40 0.35 - 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 - 0.05 0.00 - I J. - —_ - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 5 12 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.487 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 986 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Post#3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 6-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 - 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 - 0.10 0.05 -�. 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) F - Hyd No. 6 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.011 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 25 cuft Drainage area - 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope - 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.22 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 - 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 -— - 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 - - 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 i 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 7 Time (min) 14 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D9)2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 2.007 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,027 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 8-- 1 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 - - 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 6 15 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3138 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,0815!2020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.524 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,015 Tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 381.64 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 1,374 cuft Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 9-- 1 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _ -- - 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 Time(min) Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used= 1,374 cuff Pond Report 16 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Pond No. 1 - Forebay Pond Data Contours-User-defined contour areas.Conic method used for volume calculation.Begining Elevation=381 25 ft Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sgft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cult) 0.00 381.25 3,044 0 0 0.75 382.00 4,000 2,633 2,633 1.75 383.00 4,674 4,332 6,965 2.75 384.00 15,202 9,434 16,399 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] IB] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] IB] [C] [D] Rise(in) = 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span(in) = 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El.(ft) = 381.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = --- --- --- --- Length(ft) = 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope(%) = 0.30 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = 013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000(by Contour) Multi-Stage = n/a No No No TW Elev.(ft) = 0.00 Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic)and outlet(oc)control.Weir risers checked for orifice conditions(ic)and submergence(s) Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 381.25 0.00 •-- --- --- 0.000 0.08 263 381.33 0.02 oc --- --- --- --- 0.022 0.15 527 381.40 0.09 oc --- 0.089 0.22 790 381.48 0.19 oc -- - --• --- --- --- 0,195 0.30 1,053 381.55 0.33 oc --- --- --- 0.330 0.38 1,317 381.63 0.49 oc --- --- --- --- 0.487 0.45 1,580 381.70 0.66 oc --- -- --- 0.657 0.52 1,843 381.78 0.83 oc - --- 0.834 0.60 2,106 381.85 1.01 oc -- --- --- - - - --- 1.013 0.68 2,370 381.93 1.18 oc ... - -- -- - -- 1 184 0.75 2,633 382.00 1.34 oc - - - -- - --- 1.342 0.85 3,066 382.10 1.51 oc -- --- --- --- - - --- 1.514 0.95 3,500 382.20 1.60 oc --- - -- --- --- --- 1.604 1.05 3,933 382.30 1.70 oc --- --- --- 1 701 1 15 4,366 382.40 1.97 oc - - -- -- - --- 1.973 1.25 4,799 382.50 2.21 oc - -- - - - --- --- 2 212 1.35 5,232 382.60 2.43 oc _-_ __ - _- .. --- --- --- 2.427 1.45 5,666 382.70 2.62 oc --- -- - -- --- --- --- --- 2.624 1 55 6,099 382.80 2.81 oc --- -- -- -- -- - ... --- 2.808 1.65 6,532 382.90 2.98 oc -- --- --- --- --- 2.981 1.75 6,965 383.00 3.14 oc -- --- --- --- --- - --- --- 3.144 1.85 7,909 383.10 3.30 oc -- - --- --- -- -- --- 3.299 1 95 8,852 383.20 3.45 oc - -- -- -- ... --- 3.447 2.05 9,796 383.30 3.59 oc -- --- --- --- ___ 3.588 2.15 10,739 383.40 3.72 oc --- -- - -- -- - --- 3.725 2.25 11,682 383.50 3.86 oc - -- - -- -- - - --- 3.857 2.35 12,626 383.60 3.98 oc -- --- --- --- --- --- 3.984 2.45 13,569 383.70 4.11 oc --- --- --- -- - --- 4.107 2.55 14,513 383.80 4.23 oc - - - - -- - --- --- --- 4.227 2.65 15,456 383.90 4.34 oc -- -- -- -- - --- 4 344 2.75 16,399 384.00 4.46 oc --- --- -- - - --- .-- --- 4.457 17 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 0.643 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,542 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 10-- 1 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 1.00 0.90 - — 0.90 0.80 I 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 - 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 - 0.20 NIL 0.10 0.10 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 1800 Time(min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 18 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15 1 2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 764 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd, volume = 0 tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 381.40 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 590 cult Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infli. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 -- 1 Year Q(cfs) 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 i 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 i 0.30 0.30 0.20 I 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 -. _ �._. .. _ - .... — 0.00 0. 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 1800 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 — Hyd No. 10 Total storage used= 590 tuft Pond Report 19 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15/2020 Pond No. 2 - Infiltration Basin Pond Data Contours-User-defined contour areas.Conic method used for volume calculation.Begining Elevation=381.00 ft Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sgft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuft) 0.00 381.00 1,018 0 0 1.00 382.00 2,025 1,493 1,493 2.00 383.00 3,620 2,784 4,277 3.00 384.00 8,478 5,879 10,155 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise(in) = 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El.(ft) = 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = --- --- Length(ft) = 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 060 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfl.(in/hr) = 20.000(by Contour) Multi-Stage = n/a No No No TW Elev.(ft) = 0.00 Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic)and outlet(oc)control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions(ic)and submergence(s). Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 381.00 --- --- --- .-- ... 0.000 --- 0.000 0.10 149 381.10 -- --- --- 0.094 --- 0.094 0.20 299 381.20 .-- --- •-- --- 0.187 --- 0.187 0.30 448 381.30 0 281 --- 0.281 0.40 597 381.40 --- --- •• 0.375 --- 0.375 050 746 381.50 --- -- - --- --- 0.469 --- 0.469 0.60 896 381.60 --- -- --- 0.562 --- 0.562 0.70 1,045 381.70 0.656 --- 0.656 0.80 1,194 381.80 -- - 0.750 --- 0.750 0.90 1,343 381 90 --- -- --- --- 0.844 --- 0 844 1.00 1,493 382.00 --- -- --- 0.937 --- 0.937 1.10 1,771 38210 1.011 --- 1.011 1.20 2,050 382.20 - 1.085 --- 1.085 1.30 2,328 382.30 -- --- --- - 1.159 --- 1.159 1.40 2,606 382.40 --- --- ... --- - 1.233 --- 1.233 1.50 2,885 382.50 -• 1.307 --- 1.307 1.60 3,163 382.60 --- --- --- 1.381 --- 1.381 1.70 3,441 382.70 1.454 --- 1.454 1.80 3,720 382.80 --- -- --- 1.528 --- 1.528 1.90 3,998 382.90 --- --- --- 1.602 --- 1.602 2.00 4,277 383.00 --- .- 1.676 --- 1.676 2.10 4,865 383.10 --- --- •.. --- --- 1.901 --- 1.901 2.20 5,452 383.20 --• --- ... 2.126 --- 2.126 2.30 6,040 383.30 - --- --- --- --- 2.351 --- 2.351 2.40 6,628 383.40 --- --- 2 576 --- 2.576 2.50 7,216 383.50 .-- --- --- 2.800 --- 2.800 2.60 7,804 383.60 --- 3.025 --- 3.025 2.70 8,392 383.70 - --- 3.250 --- 3.250 2.80 8,980 383.80 --- --- •-• --- --- 3.475 --- 3.475 2.90 9,568 383.90 3.700 --- 3.700 3.00 10,155 384.00 3.925 --- 3.925 20 Hydrograph Report Hydr®flow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 Cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 766 mire Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 Cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post#4 Max. Elevation = 377.94 ft Reservoir name = DW#3 Max. Storage = 6 Cuft Storage Indication method used. Exflltrstion extracted from Outflow. Route DW#3 Q{Cfs} 0 [Cfs} Hyd. No. 12-- 1 Year 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 OM 0,02 0.01 0.01 i 0.C] 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 Time{min} Hyd No. 12 Hyd No, 7 Total storage used=6 cuff Pond Report 21 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Pond No.4- DW#3 Pond Data Contours-User-defined contour areas.Conic method used for volume calculation Begining Elevation=377 50 ft Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sgft) Incr.Storage(cult) Total storage(cuft) 0.00 377.50 12 0 0 1.00 378.50 14 13 13 2.00 379.50 16 15 28 3.00 380.50 18 17 45 4.00 381.50 20 19 64 5.00 382.50 22 21 85 550 383.00 134 35 120 6.00 383.50 300 106 226 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 Crest Len(ft) = 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 383.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 2.60 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Broad --- --- --- Length(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0-60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 20.000(by Contour) Multi-Stage = n/a No No No TW EIev.(ft) = 0.00 Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic)and outlet(oc)control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions(ic)and submergence(s) Stage I Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfl User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 000 0 37750 0.00 0.000 --- 0.000 0.10 1 377.60 0.00 --- --- 0.001 --- 0.001 020 3 37770 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- ... 0.001 --- 0.001 0.30 4 377.80 --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.002 --- 0.002 0.40 5 377.90 --- --- --- 0.00 ... --- 0.003 --- 0 003 0.50 6 378.00 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- 0.003 --- 0.003 0.60 8 378.10 ... 0.00 --- --- 0.004 --- 0 004 0.70 9 378.20 --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.005 --- 0.005 0.80 10 378.30 --- ... --• --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0 005 --- 0.005 0.90 12 378.40 --- --- - 0.00 --- 0.006 --- 0.006 100 13 378.50 0.00 --- --- 0.006 --- 0.006 1.10 14 378.60 •-- --- 0.00 0.007 --- 0.007 120 16 378.70 --- --- 0.00 •-- --- 0.007 --- 0.007 1.30 17 378.80 --- 0.00 --- •-- ... 0.007 --- 0.007 1.40 19 378.90 •-- 0.00 --- ... 0.007 --- 0.007 1.50 20 379.00 --- --- 0.00 --- --- 0.007 --- 0.007 1.60 22 379.10 --- 0.00 0.007 --- 0.007 1.70 23 37920 --- --- 0.00 --- .-- 0.007 --- 0.007 1.80 25 379.30 0.00 ... 0.007 --- 0.007 1.90 26 379.40 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- 0.007 --- 0.007 2.00 28 379.50 0.00 --- --- 0.007 --- 0 007 2.10 30 379.60 0.00 ... 0.007 --- 0.007 2.20 31 379.70 --- 0.00 --- 0.008 --- 0 008 2.30 33 379.80 --- 0.00 --- 0.008 --- 0.008 2.40 35 379.90 ... --- --- 0.00 --- --• --- 0.008 --- 0 008 2.50 36 380.00 0.00 0.008 --- 0.008 2.60 38 380.10 0.00 •-- --- 0.008 --- 0.008 2.70 40 380.20 --- 0.00 --- --- 0.008 --- 0.008 2.80 42 380.30 - 0.00 --- 0.008 --- 0.008 2.90 43 380.40 0.00 --- --- 0.008 --- 0.008 3.00 45 380.50 --- 0.00 --- - --- 0.008 --- 0.008 3.10 47 380.60 --- --- 0.00 --- 0.008 --- 0.008 3.20 49 380.70 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.30 51 380.80 0.00 --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.40 53 380.90 0.00 0.009 --- 0.009 Continues on next page..- 22 DW#3 Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 3.50 54 381.00 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.60 56 381.10 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.70 58 381.20 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.80 60 381.30 --- --- --- 0.00 --- -- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 3.90 62 381.40 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 4.00 64 381.50 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 4.10 66 381.60 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 4.20 68 381.70 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.009 --- 0.009 4.30 70 381.80 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.40 72 381.90 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.50 74 382.00 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.60 77 382.10 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.70 79 382.20 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.80 81 382.30 --- --- - --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 4.90 83 382.40 --- --- - --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 5.00 85 382.50 --- --- •-- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.010 --- 0.010 5.05 88 382.55 --- --- -- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.015 --- 0.015 5.10 92 382.60 --- --- --- -- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.021 --- 0.021 5.15 95 382.65 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.026 --- 0.026 5.20 99 382.70 -- - 0.00 -- --- --- 0.031 --- 0.031 5.25 102 382.75 --- --- --- 0.00 -- --- --- 0.036 --- 0.036 5.30 106 382.80 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.041 --- 0.041 5.35 109 382.85 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.046 --- 0.046 5.40 113 382.90 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.052 --- 0.052 5.45 116 382.95 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.057 --- 0.057 5.50 120 383.00 --- --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.062 --- 0.062 5.55 131 383.05 --- --- --- 0.29 --- --- --- 0.070 --- 0.360 5.60 141 383.10 --- --- --- 0.82 --- --- --- 0.077 --- 0.899 5.65 152 383.15 --- --- --- 1.51 --- --- --- 0.085 --- 1.595 5.70 162 383.20 --- --- --- --- 2.32 --- --- --- 0.093 --- 2.417 5.75 173 383.25 --- --- --- 3.25 -- --- --- 0.100 --- 3.349 5.80 183 383.30 --- --- --- --- 4.27 --- --- --- 0.108 --- 4.379 5.85 194 383.35 --- -- --• --- 5.38 --- --- --- 0.116 --- 5.497 5.90 205 383.40 --- -- --- 6.58 --- --- --- 0.124 --- 6.699 5.95 215 383.45 --- --- --- --- 7.85 --- --- --- 0.131 --- 7.977 6.00 226 383.50 --- --- --- --- 9.19 --- --- --- 0.139 --- 9.331 ...End 23 Hydrograph Summary ReportH ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 0.002 2 934 79 ------ ------ Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.005 2 778 149 ------ ------ - Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 0.422 2 718 968 -— - Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 1.978 2 718 3,970 ------ ------ - - Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 0.366 2 718 764 ------ — - Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 0.670 2 718 1,342 ------ ------ - Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.018 2 718 37 — ------ Post#4 8 Combine 2.648 2 718 5,312 4,6, ------ ---- Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 0.823 2 724 5,300 8 381.77 1,826 Route Forebay 10 Combine 1.031 2 720 6,064 5,9 ---- ------ Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 732 0 10 381.60 891 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 792 0 7 378.22 9.25 Route DW#3 LAProjects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Huds)rR�dtw EindrER)bfdalSWMR- Pf aV6E2k63Ai�hy,EDEMc5db802(Earey(8-5-20) Phas 24 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.002 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 934 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 79 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number - 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 f 0.08 I 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 ` 0.01 I 0.00 — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 1 25 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.005 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 778 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 149 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number = 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Oft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.40 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Pre #2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2-- 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 —i 0.10 0.09 r- 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 - 0.07 0.06 - 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 '- - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 2 26 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.422 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 968 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3--2 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 I 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time(min) 27 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.978 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 3,970 cuft Drainage area - 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope - 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4--2 Year Q(cfs) 2.00 — 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 4 28 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.366 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 764 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5--2 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 - - 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0,05 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 5 Time(min) 29 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.670 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,342 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#3 Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 6-- 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 — - 1.00 0.90 I- 0.90 I 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 - 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.10 - 0.10 i 0.00 -. _ - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 6 Time(min) 30 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.018 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 37 cuft Drainage area = 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 2.57 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7--2 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 �— 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 7 Time(min) 31 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 2.648 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 5,312 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 8--2 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 6 32 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.823 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 5,300 cult Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 381.77 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 1,826 cult Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 9--2 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time(min) Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used = 1,826 cult 33 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc,v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 1.031 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 6,064 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 10--2 Year Q(cfs) 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time(min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 34 Hydrograph Repord Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 732 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 381.60 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 891 cuft Storage Indication method used. EAltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 --2 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 -� - - — 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 10 Total storage used = 891 cult 35 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5!2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 792 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuff Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post#4 Max. Elevation = 378.22 ft Reservoir name = DW#3 Max. Storage = 9 cuff Storage Indication method used. Exflltration extracted from Outflow. c {cts) Router Dw#3 Hyd. No. 12--2 Year a (cfs) 0.10 0.10 I 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 f 0.07 i 0.07 I 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0,03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Time(min) - Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 7 Total storage used 9 cult 36 Hydrograph Summary Re Por�ydraflowl-lydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D@2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v202O r Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) i 1 SCS Runoff 0.045 2 744 510 - ------ -- Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.126 2 726 681 ------ ------ ------ Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 0.697 2 718 1,622 ------ - - Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 3.524 2 716 7,138 ------ Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 0.828 2 718 1,658 - - - -- Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 1.298 2 718 2,608 ------ ------ ------ Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.040 2 718 79 ------ Post#4 8 Combine 4.814 2 716 9,746 4,6, ------ •----- Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 1.578 2 724 9,734 8 382.17 3,373 Route Forebay 10 Combine 2.237 2 718 11,391 5,9 ------ ------ Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 830 0 10 382.22 2,103 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 846 0 7 379.34 25.6 Route DW#3 L:\Projects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Huds 1r1dftBdAa6ndreVbht9)OWMR- P a e*",8Mddb802(Earey(8-5-20) Phas i 37 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.045 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 744 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 510 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 1 0.10 ' I 0.09 I 0.08 - 0.08 0.07 0.07 I 0.06 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 0.04 A 1 - 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 = 0.01 0.00 -�. - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 1 38 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.126 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 726 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 681 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number - 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length - 0 ft Tc method TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.40 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0-45 0.40 0-40 0.35 0-35 0.30 0-30 Or 0.25 0.— 0.20 - 0.20 I 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time(min) 39 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type - SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.697 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,622 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method - TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. - 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration - 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3-- 10 Year Q (Cfs) 1.00 - 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 - 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 - 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 3 Time(min) 40 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 3.524 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 7,138 cuft Drainage area = 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) - 6.00 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor - 484 Post#1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 1.00 0.00 - ... _ —_ 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time (min) Hyd No. 4 41 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.828 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,658 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of cons. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 1.00 0.90 - 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 - 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 5 Time(min) 42 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.298 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak - 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,608 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 6-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _ - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 6 Time(min) 43 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.040 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 79 cuft Drainage area = 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 3.66 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 7-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 I 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 - 0.01 0.00 — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 7 44 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15/2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 4.814 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 9,746 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q MS) Hyd. No. 8-- 10 Year Q(cfs) 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 - _j 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Time No. 6 45 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3139)2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.578 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak. = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 9,734 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 382.17 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 3,373 cuff Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 9-- 10 Year Q(cfs) 5.00 5.00 4.00 - 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time(min) • Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used = 3,373 cult 46 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 2.237 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 11,391 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 10-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - ' 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 47 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 31»2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 830 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 382.22 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 2,103 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infll. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 -- 10 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 - - 3.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 =- 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 10 Total storage used =2,103 cuft 48 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutodesk(M Civil 3DQD 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 1 0 yrs Time to peak = 846 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post#4 Max. Elevation = 379.34 ft Reservoir name = DW#3 Max. Storage = 26 cult Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Route DW#3 a {cfs} Hyd. No. 12-- 10 Year 0 WS) 0.10 - - 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.�08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 Time(min)Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 7 Total storage used 26 cult 49 Hydrograph Summary Report, ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 0.147 2 734 1,031 - - Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.330 2 724 1,273 ------ ------ Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 0.907 2 718 2,134 --- -•- - Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 4.746 2 716 9,694 ------ --- -- -- Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 1.218 2 718 2,439 - - --• Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 1.814 2 716 3,664 ------ ------ ------ Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.058 2 718 117 ------ — Post#4 8 Combine 6.560 2 716 13,358 4,6, ------ Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 2.137 2 724 13,346 8 382.47 4,664 Route Forebay 10 Combine 2.955 2 720 15,786 5,9 ------ ------ Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 720 0 10 382.61 3,201 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 944 0 7 380.32 42.0 Route DW#3 L:\Projects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Huds )rRAkud#Mea9rWDbfe)BW MR- PI iaV6EZWatubiY,BMdM902(Earey(8-5-20) Phas 50 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5 1 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.147 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,031 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number = 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --25 Year Q(cfs) 0.50 - 0.50 0.45 - 0.45 0.40 - 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time(min) 51 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.330 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,273 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number = 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method T TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.40 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 --25 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 - 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.- 0.30 0.30 0.25 - 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 - 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 — -- 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time(min) 52 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.907 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,134 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method - TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3--25 Year Q(cfs) 1.00 — 1.00 i 0.90 0.90 1 0.80 0.80 0.70 — 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 - 0-30 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(min) Hyd No. 3 53 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 4.746 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 9,694 cuft Drainage area = 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4--25 Year Q (cfs) 5.00 + 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 i 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Time(min) Hyd No. 4 54 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.218 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,439 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 5--25 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 1.00 0.00 = - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 5 Time(min) 55 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodesM Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.814 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 3,664 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#3 Q (cfs) Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 6--25 Year 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - — -— — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 6 Time(min) 56 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc v2020 Wednesday,08/5 1 2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.058 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 117 cuft Drainage area = 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 4.48 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7--25 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 F— 0.10 0.09 - 0.09 l 0.08 = - 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - - 0.02 0.01 — - 0.01 JL 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 7 Time(min) 57 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 6.560 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 13,358 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q MS) Hyd. No. 8--25 Year Q (cfs) 7.00 � 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time (min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 6 58 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.137 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak. = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 13,346 tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 382.47 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 4,664 tuft Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 9--25 Year Q cfs} 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used ,=4,664 cult 59 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 2.955 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 15,786 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 10--25 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 -I. 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 60 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 382.61 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 3,201 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 --25 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 10 Total storage used =3,201 cult 61 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15 1 2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 Cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 944 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post #4 Max. Elevation = 380.32 ft Reservoir name = DW#3 Max. Storage = 42 cuft Storage Indication method used. ExIlltration extracted from Outflow. Route DW#3 Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 12--25 Year Q {Cfs} 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Time{mini Hyd No. 12 ! Hyd No. 7 Total storage used=42 cuff 62 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph I Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 0.286 2 734 1,624 -- ------ ------ Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.577 2 724 1,925 - - - - Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 1.098 2 718 2,611 ------ ---- Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 5 879 2 716 12,111 ------ ------ ----•- Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 1.595 2 718 3,211 ------ Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 2.308 2 716 4,681 --- - -- Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.076 2 718 154 ------ ------ Post#4 8 Combine 8.187 2 716 16,792 4,6, - - Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 2.692 2 724 16,780 8 382.74 5,825 Route Forebay 10 Combine 3.849 2 718 19,991 5,9 ------ ------ Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 848 0 10 382.99 4,251 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 944 0 7 381.25 59.1 Route DW#3 LAProjects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Huds)rRdb eicdrLrpMeYSWMR- PI a�,838UIdi MVOCarey(8-5-20) Phas 63 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08!5/2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.286 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume - 1,624 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number = 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --50 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 - 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 I 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 - 0.20 0.15 - 0.15 0.10 - 0.10 0.05 - 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) - , Hyd No. 1 64 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.577 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,925 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number = 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.40 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #2 Q (cfs) Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2--50 Year 1.00 I- — 1.00 0.90 — 0.90 0.80 0.80 I 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 - 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 2 65 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.098 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,611 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3--50 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 3 Time(min) 66 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 5.879 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 12,111 cuft Drainage area = 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4-- 50 Year Q (cfs) 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 4 Time(min) 67 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.595 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 3,211 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 5--50 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 — = 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) c Hyd No. 5 68 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc-v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.308 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,681 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 6 -- 50 Year Q(cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _ =` 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time (min) - I Hyd No. 6 69 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.076 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 154 cuft Drainage area = 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 5.23 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7--50 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 - — 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 _ 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 - 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 7 70 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 8.187 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 16,792 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 8-- 50 Year Q (cfs) 10.00 - 10.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Time(min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 6 71 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5 12020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.692 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 16,780 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 382.74 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 5,825 cuft Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 9--50 Year Q(cfs) 10.00 10.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 - — - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used =5,825 cult 72 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 3.849 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 19,991 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5. 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 10--50 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 73 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 848 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 382.99 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 4,251 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 -- 50 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 - - - - 4.00 3.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - — - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 — Hyd No. 10 Total storage used =4,251 cult 74 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3136 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 1 5 1 2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 944 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post#4 Max. Elevation = 381.25 ft Reservoir name = DW#3 Max. Storage = 59 cuft Storage Indication method used. ExflRration extracted from Outflow. Q lcfs} Route DW#3 p�cfs} Hyd. No. 12--50 Year 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(min) Hyd No. 12 - Hyd No. 7 Total storage used = 59 cuft 75 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cult) 1 SCS Runoff 0.486 2 732 2,427 — --— ------ Pre#1 2 SCS Runoff 0.901 2 724 2,791 -- - Pre#2 3 SCS Runoff 1.319 2 718 3,171 - - Pre#3 4 SCS Runoff 7.200 2 716 14,980 ------ - - ------ Post#1 5 SCS Runoff 2.057 2 716 4,155 - - — ------ Post#2 6 SCS Runoff 2.892 2 716 5,903 ------ --- Post#3 7 SCS Runoff 0.098 2 716 199 ----- ------ -- Post#4 8 Combine 10.09 2 716 20,883 4,6, ---- ------ Flow to Forebay 9 Reservoir 3.187 2 724 20,871 8 383.03 7,226 Route Forebay 10 Combine 4.839 2 718 25,026 5,9 ------ ------ Flow to Infiltration Basin 11 Reservoir 0.000 2 740 0 10 383.20 5,462 Route Infil.Basin 12 Reservoir 0.000 2 1014 0 7 382.32 81.2 Route DW#3 LAProjects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08- Huds xf;WfaadvFh146ndretfiOtMaWMR- P aVtc2hffakb�,838 ddb2O2GCarey(8-5-20) Phase 76 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.486 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 732 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,427 cuft Drainage area = 0.528 ac Curve number = 51 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.10 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 - 0.05 0.00 — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time(min) 77 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 2 Pre #2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.901 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,791 cuft Drainage area = 0.527 ac Curve number = 54 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) 14.40 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #2 Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 2-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 - - 1.00 0.90 i 0.90 I 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 I 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 - 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 - — - - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) - 78 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 3 Pre #3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.319 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 3,171 cuft Drainage area = 0.185 ac Curve number = 88 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.60 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre #3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 2.00 — 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 3 Time(min) 79 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post#1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 7.200 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume - 14,980 cuft Drainage area = 1.052 ac Curve number = 83 Basin Slope - 0.0 % Hydraulic length - 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#1 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 8.00 - 8.00 6.00 - 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 4 Time(min) 80 Hydrograph Report Hydraf low Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 5 Post#2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.057 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,155 cuft Drainage area = 0.397 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#2 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 — • Hyd No. 5 Time (min) 81 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 6 Post#3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.892 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 5,903 cuft Drainage area = 0.473 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 6-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(min) c - Hyd No. 6 82 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 7 Post#4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.098 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 199 cuft Drainage area = 0.019 ac Curve number = 72 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 6.00 min Total precip. = 6.10 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Post#4 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 - 0.08 0.07 - 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 0.04 - - 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 7 Time(min) 83 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5 1 2020 Hyd. No. 8 Flow to Forebay Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 10.09 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 20,883 cuft Inflow hyds. = 4, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 1.525 ac Flow to Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 8-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 12.00 12.00 10.00 - 10.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 - 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Time(min) Hyd No. 8 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 6 84 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 9 Route Forebay Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 3.187 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 20,871 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 8 - Flow to Forebay Max. Elevation = 38103 ft Reservoir name = Forebay Max. Storage = 7,226 cuft Storage Indication method used. Route Forebay Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 9-- 100 Year Q(cfs) 12.00 12.00 10.00 10.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 - - - ... — - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Total storage used = 7,226 cuft 85 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 10 Flow to Infiltration Basin Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 4.839 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume - 25,026 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 9 Contrib. drain. area = 0.397 ac Flow to Infiltration Basin Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 10-- 100 Year Q (cfs) 5.00 - 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time(min) Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 9 86 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk, Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08 15/2020 Hyd. No. 11 Route Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 740 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 10 - Flow to Infiltration Basin Max. Elevation = 383.20 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 5,462 cuft Storage Indication method used. EAltration extracted from Outflow. Route Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 11 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 5.00 - 5.00 I � I 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 — - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(min) Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 10 Total storage used = 5,462 cult 87 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3DQD 2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Hyd. No. 12 Route DW#3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 1014 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 7 - Post#4 Max. Elevation = 382.32 ft Reservoir name = ❑W#3 Max. Storage = 81 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exflitration extracted from Outflow. Route DW#3 Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 12-- 100 Year Q(cfs) 0.10 I 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0-04 - 0.04 0.03 j 0.03 0.02 ! 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - -_E..� -- — — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time(mint' Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 7 Total storage used=81 cuff 88 Hydraflow Rainfall Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®2019 by Autodesk,Inc.v2020 Wednesday,08/5/2020 Return Intensity-Duration-Frequency Equation Coefficients(FHA) Period (Yrs) B D E (N/A) 1 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 -------- 2 69.8703 13.1000 0.8658 -------- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 5 79.2597 14.6000 0.8369 -------- 10 88.2351 15.5000 0.8279 -------- 25 102.6072 16.5000 0.8217 -------- 50 114.8193 17.2000 0.8199 -------- 100 127.1596 17.8000 0.8186 -------- File name:SampleFHA.idf Intensity= B I (Tc+ D)"E Return Intensity Values(in/hr) Period (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 569 4.61 3.89 3.38 2.99 2.69 2.44 2.24 2.07 1.93 1.81 1.70 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 6.57 5.43 4.65 4.08 3.65 3.30 3.02 2.79 2.59 2A2 2.27 2.15 10 7.24 6.04 5.21 4.59 4.12 3.74 3.43 3.17 2.95 2.77 2.60 2.46 25 8.25 6.95 6.03 5.34 4.80 4.38 4.02 3.73 3.48 3.26 3.07 2.91 50 9.04 7.65 6.66 5.92 5.34 4.87 4.49 4.16 3.88 3.65 3.44 3.25 100 9.83 8.36 7.30 6.50 5.87 5.36 4.94 4.59 4.29 4.03 3.80 3.60 Tc=time in minutes.Values may exceed 60. rjects\MJ796 MES A+\MJ796.08-Hudson Headwaters\re orW8WMR\Exhibit C-Modei\27 Carey Road Rainfall.pc Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Storm Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr SCS 24-hour 2.22 257 0.00 3.15 3.66 4.48 5.23 6.10 SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-1st 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M.J,Engineering and Land Surveying, P.C. �• 1ss3trrvneroaA,armnvrkwrlloas N W Ic 510.3)].W 9l/Fx51Y3/1!r}3 Stormwater Management Report Exhibit C - Maps .1 Project Location Map .2 Soil Map(Figure 1) .3 Post Development Watersheds (Figure 2) .4 Post Development Watersheds(Figure 3) .5 Disturbance Area (Figure 4) .6 Existing 27 Carey Road Site Plan August2020 Page 12 - y too� �gJIL �cM.I sa- ^�+ :ilid T 3 i Ir do - a ,. a '�r +Y ■ 'i sea, +3ae.1 ��—� + �3exe .,, +saa.a I «a.. + o su +� 31uL au OR V — � , - +JB1.7 sas,J+ th +ses 1 � r � • + 1 + !~ 16 1 1 � aw aw a • G +saae 1 I l g 1 OAKVILLE SOIL 1 n OsA , l HYDROLOGIC GROUP "A" Il I Jf., .,... + a Aw Aw I I +311148 + � 1 1 » 1 +Jetie � +3eA7 I E I +JeA7 +Jdl.e a — — + +Ja17 t m� mom +30 2 t JeA7 _AR \ +311112 • l = E m z HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK SCALE 1"=40 THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CONTRACT No.;796.09— WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF No DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROJ.MANAGER: JWE MJ I'ROJ,No,:796,08 A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (ILE.) CHIEF DESIGNER JWE Engineering and SOIL MAP DATE: 1/1412U20 ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER DESIGNED BY: .JWE g FOR AN ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Y AML Land Surveying, P.C.DRAWN B FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION - LL OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: JWE C FIG I ANDIOR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS"A" 1533 Crescent Road-Clifton Park,NY 12065 27 CAREY ROAD r E 3 MISDEMEANOR TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY LL o SEAL �i386.0 / +356 1 sec' 7 s..f tl iMFLi � ♦J&e.e � � f JBSI sass +385 9 +.xis s sss.z ?•d+ 38 e] +3J p sr.. J83. + ssso � � f � sass xyr +384 7 a 36•.0 �\ +se1.s •J+ 2. E PRE-DEVELOPMENT �� - - - WilliAREA #2 - T +384.6 6 \ f I ma's I +se4s +384,8 L[y`I jp: wv 1 se.f s4T f SAS frY o + � , Jac Vl 10.5 rYt 2 w,.• O T AT l.e M t x' f PRE-DEVELOPMENT +3848 AREA #1 •af.r l/1 f +1B14 I � +J84. ­. l .� f mid + I n +384 8 tJ �, rTz J +384.6 ,a.., a.. +384 7 +.?83.� 1 PRE-DEVELOPMENT �.• �t I +3647 +384 8 AREA #3 RE - t +364.7 +�84 9 � fu ~ t 385.2 P \ V) +364 7 - +3852 � E z� SUBMITTAL REVISIONS HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK SCALE 1•-40•� / �m THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY CONTRACT No:796,06 ca; WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF No DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROJ.MANAGER: JWE Engineering and MJPROJ.No.:796.08 A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (I.E.) CHIEF DESIGNER:JW PRE DEVELOPMENT MAP E DAFE: 1114)2020 o ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER DESIGNED BY: JWE m"! FOR AN ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT P.C.AML Land Surveying, DRAWN BY: FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION � a OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: JWE AND/OR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS"A" 1533 Crescent Road-CIIfton Perk,NY 12065 27 CAREY ROAD FIG MISDEMEANOR. TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY S o SEAL -D POST DEVELOPMENT �-� ► AREA #4 E ' POST DEVELOPMENT l AREA #2 1 SA s • •" L Cn cn POST ' DEVELOPMENT l AREA #1 POST - - Cn - g DEVELOPMENT AREA #3co / v ❑ � ul 3 ` - _- � E SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK SCALE =40 a THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY THE Na,:795.08 WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF No. DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROJ MANAGER: JWE Engineering and POST DEVELOPMENT MAP rna r+RDa,No.:79d.08 w o A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (IE.) CHIEF DESIGNER:JWE L1ArE: 111412D20 Ego ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER DESIGNED BY: JWE Land Surveying, P.C. "! FOR IT ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION DRAWN BY: AML OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: JWE F I G 3 ANWOR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS'A" 1533 Crescent Road-Clifton Park,NY12065 27 CAREY ROAD E F MISDEMEANOR. TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY LLo SEAL rsrtLL ��� - = AREA ON FIG 4B n � AREA OF 1 DISTURBANCE — _ 38,700 SF 1 �• TOTAL DISTURBANCE 1 SAS, ; FIG 4A= 33,902 SF Ln FIG 4B= 1 ,100 SF ' FIG 4C= 3,100 SF r V) — TOTAL = 42,900 SF l } MAX. DISTURBANCE = 42,900 SF --, OR 0.98 ACRES LA Ln \ _ E SCALE:1"=41Y z HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK caNTRneTN9.:7s .na SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS a THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY FA' PRO]-Na.-796. a WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER ESSIONE, (LE.) No- DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROD MANAGER: JWE Engineering and DISTURBANCE AREA MAP DATE: T114/2U2U A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (I.E.) CHIEF DESIGNER JWE N� ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER Land Surveying P.C. n DESIGNED BY: JWE FOR AN ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRAWN BY: .AML 7 LL� FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: JWE 27 CAREY ROAD FIG 4A ANDIOR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS"A" 1533 Crescent Road-Clifton Park,NY 12065 IE MISDEMEANOR. TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY S o SEAL s AREA OF d AREA #3 FU DISTURBANCE AREA #4 (TYP.) A. AREA #1 � - AREA #2 TOTAL FOR SITE +, AREA #1 = 400 SF AREA #2= 50 SF • ' AREA #3=100 SF # I, � AREA #4= 250 SF AREA #5= 250 SF AREA #6= 50 SF TOTAL= 1 , 100 SF AREA #6 4 AREA #6 I v SCALE. 1"-40' THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY SUBMITTAL REVISIONS HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK CONTRACT No:796.DS �! WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF No DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROJ MANAGER: JWE Engineering and DISTURBANCE AREA MAP rAJ PROJ.Ne- 796.LIB m A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (IE) CHIEF DESIGNER:JWE DATE: 111412020 N ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER - FOR AN ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DESIGNED BY: JWE Land Surveying P.C. 2 WEST SITE FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION _7 -' DRAWN BY: AML OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: JWE 27 CAREY ROAD F�� 4B ANDIOR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS 1" 1533 CrescentRoad-Clifton Park,NY 12065 E 3 MISDEMEANOR '- f - TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY S o I SEAL - •F- AREA OF DISTURBANCE •USA STAKE P= STAR! - (TYP.) AREA #1 low! i AREA #2 1";� �. TOTAL FOR SITES i AREA #3 AREA #1 = 150 SF -�_ AREA #2= 150 SF - AREA #4 AREA #3= 600 SF AREA #4= 500 SF AREA #5= 1000 SF t AREA #6= 700 SF - = TOTAL= 3,100 SF J I . AREA #5 AREA #6 +38 Jsa o / +' +385 6 1/+3819 ts vo AREA #3 FROM FIG 4B +J86.1 x z SUBMITTAL REVISIONS HUDSON HEADWATER HEALTH NETWORK 'SCALE T=ao' THE ALTERATION OF THIS MATERIAL IN ANY CONTRACT rya-:796.08 WAY,UNLESS DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF No DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEWED BY: DATE PROJ.MANAGER:]ML MJ P(tOJ.Na:796.08 N0 A COMPARABLE PROFESSIONAL, (IE) Engineering and DISTURBANCE AREA MAP CHIEF DESIGNER: DATE: 1I14 o ARCHITECT FOR AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER DESIGNED BY: Land Surveying P.C. 9 CAREY AND 1 WEST SITES FOR AN ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT m FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,IS A VIOLATION DRAWN BY: 1OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW CHECKED BY: 27 CAREY ROAD FIG 4� AND/OR REGULATIONS AND IS A CLASS'A° 1533 Crescent Road-Clifton Park,NY 12065 E MISDEMEANOR. —— SEAL TOWN OF QUEENSBURY NY 0 I LANDS I WILUAM R NARAR CY AREY TAX MAP weTNG TEST 0 ^` , 7 LOT ARCM 74290 or ].70 scree COIN ROD — A 1w Tar tar WN:er ti" 19 AND IO NORM or � O I �� �284'BB�iB'E BI _ 1 � - 1� ems/ PROPOSM USE-LIGHT INDUSTRY- 610 FABRICATION _ n MARMM BINDING MCICl1T-90 feet - _ I m PROPOSED DULDNG"EIGHT iRe feet P1511ek111EM BDR 11vv 7 1 AM'ROXKITGY.AO'EA6T PARKING REQUIRED I DISTTIG 7R¢e 'r-- aunt N'i`!�. i GT2AlIL6 R ILO'K _ 1 Cdtl4CY SOUTH fll RCD a 1 per 2 I'�'PLOYM C14) 7 SPAGCB RCQl1WED 1� TO REMAIN i 1 1 �'''�--« ► 1 n va•.Er 1 per COWANY VDKLE CS) -5 SPACES RCQUM 1 i r4 LDOD GAL PARKING PROVDM 13 SFAGES CW/1 AGGESSIBLE) OEM T� "_� l-.i ro Roan LOT COVERAGE Provided 1'catYu / J 1 �`- \_-// id ij SWIMUE 40 # 1 f 6TORMWATER K 7 , PAVEMENT 14.235 of 1.9.2T:PAVfliENTS. cs QK rt vs^/rt BASSI -1 _ PERMEABLE AREA. 55=5 6f 74.17. C307.REOURED) WN 1 ..A , t 6* u r +tAWN - / �- S lY~ _ -gag l I — l.iti;}..;.'�f•. �,, ;Ltiy f P FRONT CN25T) 78.0 ft 50 ft SIDE CNORTH) G5.0 ft. 30 ft WE CSO UTH) 140.9 ft. 30 ft REAR CEAST) 920 ft 30 ft I ` • 1 1 oqf .. .. ' 1. WATER I I _ PROPOSED BUILDING Rr `r TOWN WATER SERVICE 15 AVAILABLE AT CAREY ROAD. DODO 5F I I AND WILL BE EXTENDED TO THE PROPOSED BULDNG. ?: i Y e ... a ► 1 TE ua,rNG B � ALONG OFF EBUILDINGWALK MOUNTED LIGHTS WILL BE ID OVERHEAD VE H 157 1 1 -BI.LDNG THE SOF�UGHTTSSGWLL�BE LOCATED ED�WIT�DOORS. q9 �o 1 CANOPY AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE. i 7 -Te* '�. ` SAfffARY SEWER 17 ! ~W i FAQ 6Ciiae_f^^—�_•._._-• ,I �1r, � °u I i LANDS N OF i CAR REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT GROUP ........ I w 1•/r' 1l r�``y _ LAWN it I I E06�S r I II � � ILA � \,,��` --� .— /'—J �WN6►1WEs �..,. � Y Iy1 �{ � � NUT AT PPNlrxi E MRCP fN NYORMT DFL.R024T I � `y F 1 K 51-4 + LANDS N/F OF AND WASHINGTON RNTES INDUSRIA DAEVELOPMENT AGENCY `` 1 1 �f6 LOCATION MAP SEPTIC SYSTEM P06N nimm rrum"W"fAwr1T DESIGN ROW -5.000 Sr LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FACIM-MAX 14 EMPLOYEES IL,�,, 14 EMPLOYEES,15 frD pc VIrLOYEE-210 GPD DESIGN ROW OWT SEPTIC TANK -LODO GALLON TANK REQUIRED MACHINE SALNRL W1 NAM MATERNL GOMPACT ABSORPTION GELD-AFRKGATION RATE-SS GAL/DAY/SO.T. y -CAM BOX fEI TGICN TYPO EXCAVATE TRCNOM M M ILr UIY5 Dru N7R0116W$2005 210 GPD a 12 GA L/DAY/SQIT.-175 SOFT.REQUIRED CORPORATION 5TOP. WIRI ARCM PATTON BA b[ MIILH YAM eaUAL -USE 2-50 FT.LONG LATEtAL5-200 SC.FT. AND STAI' '"y tOD) TO 1RE MLS 2O FT. TO NAR.�D _ THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED UNDER AUTHORITY r OLTTOt TV" !CLft STOP !t T�TOR 401� Bwn BOOARRESOLUTION OF THE TOM OF QUEENSBURY, NEW ORK WITH BY THE G 1 @w5-BBWI w SOILS DATA RECORD SOILS DATA ti F L� THE FOLLOWING coNDrnoNs 2 DRRWrM 2A s'D05IAtr TEST m 411 —MISTING TEST m#1 Y 1.THAT THE APPLICANT RECEIVE A FINAL SIGNOFF LETTER QT.LYY 09. O-T TOPSOIL 0-6" TTOPSOILTYR K COPPER PIS sill c FROM C.T.MALE I ' 7-24" LOAMY ME LIN COARSE SAND G-24" COARSE REDDISH BROWN SAND TO BUIDRG 24-9G" ME"COARSE SAND 24-114" COARSE GRAY SAND No BEDROCK MOTTLING OR GROUNDVIATER ENCOUNTERED NO BEDROCK MOTTLING OR GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED ..*ATM KAN - FA f2_3 To M MOVE rM STAMM PERCOLATION RATE' O ruts 40 e.a & "AM S >7 r0,LIFT. ABOVE RG TEST m 42 ON CL CONK.REM tvvo eILGLWIL.G"KIT. oR OL FOOT rnz O-22 LOF60l TEST m 20 SAN.,.OR 45 REOIAI[D PPL BCEIlMI C'lWlWL RICM.!! Ins ZQ' 22-55 LOAMY MEDIUM OAR COARSE SAND 10-54 TOPSOIL ALL WATER FM+GONINWTIDNS TO BE N ACOORDANCC 22-65" t�I G COARSE SAND 10-IM fNC REDDISH BROWN SAND SAN WRN CI.WMWJPtY WATM DIPAMIOR STANDARDS CIVV=6Tog CTO INK-) NO BEDROCK MOTTLING OR GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED 54-192" fNC GRAYISH BROWN SAND NO BEDROCK MOTTLING OR GROUaWATER ENCOUNTERED STABIRED PERCOLATION RATE' O Wwte 33—.1. 6TABIJEW PEROOLATION RATE' O ruts 4G secenb SMINI(-E PPE CO WTION DETAIL PIPE_MAVATION 4 9VCPIIPI.MAIL 7ANINO ADMINISMATOR DATE Dye Sp-1 TEST PITS AND PERCOLATION TESTS TEST FITS ARID PCRGOLATION TESTS BY TEST FROST ASSOCIATES NOT TO SCALE B BY MACE ENGINEERING 11/10/OG SUBMITTED FOR NORTHERN DISTRIBUTING SUBDIVISION �T1OPB STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 147 Attachment 5 SCHEDULE E Sample Stormwater Control Facility Maintenance Agreement Whereas, the Town of Queensbury ('municipality') and (the "facility owner") want to enter into an agreement to provide for the long term maintenance and continuation of stormwater control measures approved by the municipality for the below named project, and Whereas, the municipality and the facility owner desire that the stormwater control measures be built in accordance with the approved project plans and thereafter be maintained, cleaned, repaired,replaced and continued in perpetuity in order to ensure optimum performance of the components. Therefore, the municipality and the facility owner agree as follows: 1. This agreement binds the municipality and the facility owner, its successors and assigns, to the maintenance provisions depicted in the approved project plans which are attached as Schedule A of this agreement. 2. The facility owner shall maintain, clean, repair, replace and continue the stormwater control measures depicted in Schedule A as necessary to ensure optimum performance of the measures to design specifications. The stormwater control measures shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: drainage ditches, swales, dry wells, infiltrators, drop inlets, pipes, culverts, soil absorption devices and retention ponds. 3. The facility owner shall be responsible for all expenses related to the maintenance of the stormwater control measures and shall establish a means for the collection and distribution of expenses among parties for any commonly owned facilities. 4. The facility owner shall provide for the periodic inspection of the stormwater control measures, not less than once in every five year period, to determine the condition and integrity of the measures. Such inspection shall be performed by a Professional Engineer licensed by the State of New York. The inspecting engineer shall prepare and submit to the municipality within 30 days of the inspection, a written report of the findings including recommendations for those actions necessary for the continuation of the stormwater control measures. 5. The facility owner shall not authorize, undertake or permit alteration, abandonment, modification or discontinuation of the stormwater control measures except in accordance with written approval of the municipality. 6. The facility owner shall undertake necessary repairs and replacement of the stormwater control measures at the direction of the municipality or in accordance with the recommendations of the inspecting engineer. 7. The facility owner shall provide to the municipality within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a security for the maintenance and continuation of the stormwater control measures in the form of a(Bond,letter of credit or escrow account). 147 Attachment 5:1 04-15-2009 QUEENSBURY CODE 8. This agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk, County of Warren, together with the deed for the common property and shall be included in the offering plan and/or prospectus approved pursuant to 9. If ever the municipality determines that the facility owner has failed to construct or maintain the stormwater control measures in accordance with the project plan or has failed to undertake corrective action specified by the municipality or by the inspecting engineer, the municipality is authorized to undertake such steps as reasonably necessary for the preservation, continuation or maintenance of the stormwater control measures and to affix the expenses thereof as a lien against the property. 10. This agreement is effective beginning on: 147 Attachment 5:2 04-15-2009