1974-02-06
1.
QUtEdSBuRl lL/JJNING BOf."RD MII\UTES
QUEENSBù'RY TOWN OFFICE BUILDING - FEBRUARY
Presiding. . . . J. Arthur Norton, Chairman
Present _ . . . . G. Mellon, Secretary, S. Richardson,
Guest . . . . . . H. Boynton _.
~ .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Regular Meeting - 8:00 P.M.
Variance ~342~ ,Tê.Y Wassel - to place a mi~.:ed occupancy .þuildlng'·
1 commercial and residential) with a 20 ft. front setback in;1Ïl~eu
of the required 50 ft. on the property 51 tuated at East Sidê-i9f'" .
Route 9. Recommend approval of this Variance on motion by R,o};>erts.
5:co~ded by Richardson. Motion carried. Recommend appr<?v.¡:¡!w.;for~~"¡
tne 20 ft. setback inasmuch as it would create a harclship on~':the
applicant since he has alreé'dy installed the foundationof;;thé '.
building, having gone throuc:h the Lake George Planning Boarcl:.'feeling.
that his land wãs in Lake Gèorge. It Vias fe! t that there -wóûld.'~.?:,!;.
probably be no real problem with traffic. As to the mixed'~occupandy'
of the building we will again recommend approval as this isa~art of'
the same variance. Inasmuch as there is an existing private);"(fwelling
near by we can see no real· problem here ~nd people llving.,;~lj,ë:se
might be of some benefit. We also qucst~oned another part,~"gf~the
Ordinance which says that there should not be. more thanÒº~ll~'>
principal building on a zoned lot. We see thJ.s as a moot'p~Q!Ðt.)
a s all "that would be needed here would be to combine th~se,.:t~~o ..
buildings and he cöuld accomplish the same thing, sinc~. tn' '~are
.legal structures in this zone. . ',' <)'~'~""
" , ,'_ " ' , " , ," ,_ . :; , ',' "',. "" " .', ' '_ ' ,.~':' ,i. ::' ',,: ,,',,' :'
V~~ance #343. Wal tar Loett€~.Èi. (~Ç.hn Mason) - .t. 0' PlaCe.·.. "8...... ...,..,"............ ..'.'.
23 ft7"front setbôc:k in lieu 0 t c required 30 ft. on th, p~rty':;;:1
$i tuated at RockhurGt Road . RecoImnend approval of this ,~i~,wl~lrJ
apparantlynot be ~ny clo$erto the road than the other·~I"M",F..,J19,7}š·,;:~~':,',:;!
structures along this road. . Also, we f~el thls should go;;~!tere.:,¡!I;,t'.,¡
the Adirondack Park AgencYê; S it seems "'0 be under thelr'jpr .... dictlo!!., ,
as an expansion of an existlng building. .The, $etba~keho~, ··C?t,!>.f '<.f
any closer,to the property line then Coval's which 1.S adj,!, ..', '.1.
the south or Roemer which is two lots north of this prope
there are other pì:'cperties in the area that have less set,
Motion for approval by Roberts, seconded by Mellon. Ric:Þ"
abstained Norton voted in ~~greement. Did not have a'quo
but will to the of the Zoning Board of Appe
. ., "'l~T';,; ¡,.
2.
,. .,' ..~
,.,'1 ¡:~¡ ::"",:::_:'),,~~,::": ,'~:: '