5.13
5.13
SERVICES\\Chazen-Glen Lake Watershed Management Plan – 4-5-2021
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENGAGEMENT OF
THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO COMPLETE
GLEN LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN
RESOLUTION NO.: ________________________________________________, 2021
INTRODUCED BY: ________________________________________________
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION
SECONDED BY: ________________________________________________
WHEREAS, the Glen Lake Watershed Plan (GLWP) was completed in December 1998, and
WHEREAS, the GLWP has provided the planning basis for water quality improvements to
Glen Lake to date, including the creation of the Glen Lake Aquatic Plant Growth Control District and
subsequent efforts to control invasive species, and
WHEREAS, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has asked the
Town to create an updated Watershed Plan to provide information and recommendations to guide
future invasive species control and water quality management efforts, and
WHEREAS, a Request for Qualifications for creating a Glen Lake Watershed Management
Plan (GLWMP) was issued by the Town in March 2020 and two responses were received in April
2020, and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals for creating the GLWMP was subsequently issued in
December 2020, and two (2) responses were received in January, 2021, and
1
WHEREAS, a Committee comprised of Supervisor John Strough, Senior Planner Stuart Baker
and Glen Lake residents Dave Hodgson, Paul McPhillips and Paul Derby reviewed the proposals and
subsequently interviewed both consulting teams, and
WHEREAS, the Committee unanimously recommends that the Town Board engage the
services of The Chazen Companies for creation of a new GLWMP, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to engage the services of The Chazen Companies to
assist in the completion of the GLWMP as delineated in The Chazen Company’s revised proposal
dated April 1, 2021 and presented at this meeting, for an amount not to exceed Seventy-Seven
Thousand Six Hundred Two Dollars ($77,602), said amount being the proposed Chazen fee plus a
five-percent (5%) contingency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes and directs engagement of
The Chazen Companies to assist in the completion of the Glen Lake Watershed Management Plan for
the Town as delineated in The Chazen Company’s proposal dated April 1, 2021 in substantially the
form presented at this meeting for the amount not to exceed Seventy-Seven Thousand Six Hundred
Two Dollars ($77,602), said amount being the proposed Chazen fee plus a five-percent (5%)
contingency, and such services to be paid for from Engineering Account No.: 001-1440-4720-
0051, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs that funding for such
purchase shall be by a transfer of $77,602 from the Undesignated, Unassigned General Fund
Balance Account No.: 001-0000-0909 to Engineering Account No.: 001-1440-4720-0051 and
the Town Budget Officer shall amend the 2021 Town Budget, make any adjustments, budget
amendments, transfers and/or prepare any documentation necessary to effectuate payment, and
2
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the GLWMP project shall be overseen by a Project Steering Committee
comprised of Supervisor John Strough, Senior Planner Stuart Baker, and Glen Lake residents Dave
Hodgson, Paul McPhillips and Paul Derby, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to
execute any needed agreement for services with The Chazen Companies in a form acceptable to the
Town Supervisor and/or Town Counsel along with any necessary additional documentation, and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor, Senior
Planner and/or Town Budget Officer to take all additional actions necessary to effectuate the terms of
this Resolution.
th
Duly adopted this 5 day of April, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
3
April 1, 2021 - Proposal No. PM200.72
i,,,,
,.,,.' , ,
T-,' OW ,,
_, - - , ,.', N OF QUEENSBURY
_ ,
Integrated Comprehensive _
Glen .Lake Watershed t£
Water Quality and Habitat
1:::
Management Plan
,, ._ _ ,.. „ - --, .,,_ . ., , :40-0w,
1 �,
, t
Town of
Queensbury ,
Prepared For: Proposed By: THE
John Strough Christopher Round, AICP
Town Supervisor Vice President, Planning Chan,,
Town of Queensbury The Chazen Companies 742 Bay Road20ElmStreet, Suite 110 COMPANIE
Queensbury, NY 12804 Glens Falls, NY 12801 PioudtoBeEmpfoyee0wned
• THE NORTH COUNTRY OFFICE
1hanCivil Engineers Land Surveyors 20 Elm Street,Suite 110
— Planners Glens Falls, NY 12801
C OM PA N I E S° Environmental&Safety Professionals Landscape Architects P: 518.812.0513 or 888.539.9073
Proud to be Employee Owned Transportation Planners&Engineers www.chazencompanies.com
April 1, 2021
Mr.John Strough
Town Supervisor
Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road
Queensbury, NY 12804
Re: Integrated Comprehensive Glen Lake Watershed Water Quality and Habitat Management Plan
Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York
Chazen Proposal No. PM200.72
Dear Supervisor Strough:
The Chazen Companies (Chazen) is pleased to provide the attached scope of services, budget and schedule in
response to the Town's Request for Proposals(RFP)to prepare an Integrated Comprehensive Glen Lake Watershed
Water Quality and Habitat Management Plan ("Watershed Management Plan"). The attached scope and fee reflect
the input of the Town and the Glen Lake Protective Association representatives we've received over the last several
months. This submittal updates and replaces any prior submittals.
We look forward to working with the Town and the Glen Lake Protective Association on this important project.
Sincerely,
eAcittitIrpond
Christopher Round,AICP Paul Cummings, AICP
Vice President, Planning Services Manager of Planning Services
The Chazen Companies The Chazen Companies
P: 518.824.1938 P:518.824.1930
E: cround@chazencompanies.com E: pcummings@chazencompanies.com
Chazen Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture&Geology Co. D.P.C. (NY)
Chazen Engineering Consultants, LLC(TN/OR)
1. ittal 2
2. TableLetter ofof ContentsTransm 3
3. Qualifications 4
r A. Experience with Similar Projects 4
fi � fitt_ *, B. Resumes of Key Professionals ... 8
' . " : ` C. Availability of Staff 10
`rE
.:4*;i�'4r 1 ,- , 011 :i.: Nt 1 3 :if
^`; 8ier2 ;3 D. Quality Control 10
..,,,,,ktr.--.4'. �{ r f i� s;',I` E. References 10
, � a 4. Scope of Services and Proposed
x t , Proi 1..
ject Schedule (Revised 03.22.21) 11
�, '� li
'� 5. Fees and Compensation
17
ie� �. 4��Y.✓n f
' /y a' y �
^t �
.S —w Tm, EbiAr�+4-
�}}�P�y4i S
dS `y +x B
tx.i ��g,"".�"r"� �^1' r .^z st
1
.,,,,,..„,..„..„,....., ,,,__. .,_:_,..._
fi„: T�' 3.--ioe.ixt- ..- ---,-7,-
. ---- c
,,,4 741,t }
r
117
s x r ti:44,',..:4,4c!„,,,‘,:--ve4,1,'",1f r t , • a
i"v°*'^*`1. ..A < �iY, 'F,+4�T"��s%�k �.i[ ..
QUALIFICATIONS s.
A I EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS
Chazen has led a wide variety of watershed planning and water quality protection efforts. Our work on Lake
George includes early efforts focused on stream corridor protection, development of stormwater management
rules for the Lake George Park Commission, septic system inventory and mapping for the Town/Village of Lake
George and volunteer work to identify the source of E. coli detections impacting Million Dollar Beach. Our
Environmental staff have conducted literally hundreds of wetlands evaluations and delineations,as well as flora
and fauna surveys mapping habitats and the presence of invasive species. We highlight several key projects
including the Westbrook Conservation initiative, establishing constructed wetlands for water quality
improvement.
Byram Reservoir Water Quality & Fisheries Monitoring
Mount Kisco, NY
The Byram Reservoir is enjoyed for catch-and-release
game fishing and used as a primary water supply for Via,.
Mount Kisco. Preserving the quality of water and analyzing .f � .t ,.,..-
the significance of any changing conditions are priorities ; ,y ;?
for this community. Chazen has, for manyyears, ,. *.,r �a
conducted routine ywater quality sampling, g gauging "�. .'1. 4� �` ` "" .`
tributary flow, monitoring salt loading and providing the i[pt TM"o�°`� � . 7 ,
,,,,"' �nk °� a 1'1,,» +, .may iK il'41 ..uc, Y ill
municipality with annual reports summarizing critical r .41
, `As , F, x
observations and providing management and monitoring _ �a -$ k `
x a .ate. . .—._ s K ,,
recommendations. This program has evolved over time to - . 4 „�-� ..
,,,-" . . 5 ..a-x-_,.
focus on evolving critical performance priorities. Chazen
has also managed a fish population study and a safe yield evaluation for Byram Reservoir.
Lake George Septic System Inventory & Evaluation
Lake George, NY
The increasing presence of algae blooms off the shores of Lake George was a cause of concern for the Town and
water quality advocates. In response,the Town of Lake George established a partnership with the Fund for Lake
George and engaged Chazen to assist with the Lake George Septic System Initiative.
Town staff conducted an inspection and inventory of on- `- r Y ._
site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) within they" , ?�� .
hamlet of Diamond Point located in the Town. This initial t'� _ , , n, W
work focused on locating systems within 500 feet of the - f �, .;F -, {�
shoreline and 100 feet of streams and lake tributaries. All 'b ",. '' -} ',' r t
OWTS were located using GPS enabled, GIS collector and9 E a
general conditions were catalogued. Concurrently, water ,n. ,v 't p d, �,_° ;`
ur.;�§ a F G r r F�1 1 f-It. .
quality and algae sampling of the lake was conducted nk iiV'' ;�� €'. �$4,g,
k F, j� 1 , ,, ,Fits;
proximate to the shoreline. �i,,
Utilizing ESRI ArcGIS, a series of maps were prepared examining the variety of physical,environmental,and land
use characteristics of the upland;exploring the relationship between the OWTS conditions,water quality results
and site conditions. Using this information, risk assessment criteria were established identifying high priority
OWTS targets for corrective measures. Criteria included depth to groundwater, slopes/soils, proximity to
waterbody/wetlands, hydraulic conductivity,and the water quality sampling results.GIS was utilized to develop
a series of thematic maps exploring the relationships between the various criteria.
posy e !%Y i al m a t e IST 13 �+r*3..s"..-..,
• QUALIFICATIONS ,; t
West Brook Conservation Initiative
Lake George, NY
The West Brook Conservation Initiative's primary objectives were Fr
to improve water quality in Lake George while protecting, .,, '5 �5t
restoringand developing natural aquatic resources through `" �. itrr:7 ` 4'' '
p g q g . v
* °
creation of wetland and open water body resources in afour-acre r 4�, .., : .�_ -,,VA
•environmental educational park. Chazen accomplished these ¢ '
objectives by developing an attractive wetland system to treat a go `
stormwater runoff from NYS Route 9. P� /' - it' k.Vi3A, ;
t k c41.,,,; 'sss ..
At,
Chazen initiated this work with an alternative's analysis, concept v_i...._.,..: -q {`.r -
planning, wetlands delineation, survey and invasive species
analysis, then completed environmental and engineering design 0 s ; F=�- ; s -
and construction oversight for the project. The developed areas 4 '�,, ; ` .,"ix-` s :y
along NYS Route 9 contribute significant Total Suspended Solids ; ' ,, ,� 71:'-.
(TSS) and Total Phosphorus (TP) loads which historically ` •:
discharged directly into West Brook and Lake George. Chazen � ` '" . .k ,.
worked with NYSDEC, NYSDOT,countyand local overnments,the i .9 :s�, ," fi;$24- .'
Lake George Association and Lake George Waterkeeper,as well as , 41) 3
the US Army Corps of Engineers and Adirondack Park Agency to I
' , _ , ,'
develop this mitigation and resource management plan. We •R' -- ��. : ..,,. ;F ,, 3;
modeled stormwater hydrology and hydraulics to design how
stormwater runoff from NYS Route 9 would pass through a constructed forebay pond, shallow marsh wetland,
a secondary forebay which splits the flow to a wet pond and a demonstration gravel wetland, prior to
discharging the runoff back into West Brook. Chazen's work included designing and sizing water control
structures at inlets and spillways throughout the system.
Million Dollar Beach Water Quality &_ 'Waste»vater System Investigation
Lake George, NY
Chazen has served as Town Engineer for the Town of Lake George since 2010 and has also provided services to
the Village of Lake George and are currently designing a wastewater treatment plant for the Village.The Town
and Village have been proactively addressing sewer system improvements, investigating infiltration and inflow
(I&I) occurrences, performing TV inspections of the collection system, and slip lining the collection system.The
Village maintains the Town's collection system through a cooperative agreement.
The NYSDEC operates the Million Dollar Beach located at the south end of the Lake. The State conveys
wastewater to the Town/Village sewer collection systems. NYSDEC routinely monitors water quality at the
beach; during the summer of 2017, water quality sampling results indicated the presence of E.coli. While not
uncommon, and often attributable to the local goose population, repeated detection of possible human coli
resulted in the closure of the beach.
The Town,Village and NYSDEC initiated investigation of the collection system to identify the potential source of
the release. Chazen was asked to assist in performing the evaluation which included physical inspection of
manholes,video investigation of the sewer system,dye testing of storm system,investigation of undocumented
connections, mapping and evaluation of the sewer shed.The investigation identified a series of issues including
penetration of the sewer system by gas utilities, blockage of the system by biosolids, several undocumented
connections and other features contributing to water quality degradation.
Ud t_.c�. aa'rG""��. � �-v 3,�44"i��'^'t+ t FFr,,5 2 "ram f � .✓�c�'1 R r + *' �?e�x �.�,'�:. -4' �f �?s� .�
�J ^ra ;. i ars - u d em s. �� "�-..a x e L°t�n IO v�T �.a.,L� i ..�`cept-hUt�kas�.,'iuv
� ?phi �.,�r."-�:;�a.-!���..-�:�.c'.'s�k?�sa3�"�.�.n;� �r ,r s°� may• '�,;e" t::���• �� "•
•
QUALIFICATIONS
Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
for the Lake George Deltas Sediment fvlanagement/Shoreline Restoration Project
Lake George, NY
Chazen completed preparation of a Draft/Final Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
(Supplemental GEIS or SGEIS)for the Lake George Deltas Sediment Management/Shoreline Restoration Project
("Restoration Project"). The purpose of the Restoration Project was to remediate the deltas that have formed
along the shoreline areas of Lake George due to excessive sedimentation caused by human activities in upland
drainage areas. The Lake George Association (LGA) was established as the Project Sponsor on behalf of the
various Towns and Village surrounding Lake George and engaged Chazen to prepare the Supplemental GEIS.
The SGEIS explored alternative delta dredging/sediment removal techniques for seven deltas that have formed
at the principal tributaries to Lake George. Specifically, the SGEIS explored methods of mechanical dredging
from access pads, in-water mechanical dredging and suction-dredging. The SGEIS describes potential water
quality impacts specific to the three currently proposed distinct methods for sediment removal and sets forth
an analysis of potential significant impacts that may accrue from the proposed (and similar) methods of
sediment access, in-situ removal, conveyance, and work area custody, via operational methods not assessed
within the original GEIS.The analyses included a description and plans to manage invasive species and impacts
to fish, benthic invertebrates and aquatic macrophysics. The alternatives analysis evaluated water quality and
benthic impacts and explored the potential for creation of an unnatural and fertile lake bed from dredging
actions.
The work included scoping with involved and interested parties, and public meetings with stakeholders to
discuss the process and methodologies. Work was reported in a Draft/Final Supplemental GEIS reviewed by
NYSDEC Region 5,the Lake George Association,Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District and others.
The Restoration Project seeks to remediate deltas due to excessive sedimentation caused by human activities
from upland drainage areas while minimizing environmental impacts from the dredging.The NYSDEC,as SEQRA
Lead Agency, reviewed all documents and issued positive SEQRA Findings.
Lake George Park Commission Stream Corridor Protection Evaluation
Lake George, NY
The Lake George Park Commission requested assistance in gaining a better understanding of local perceptions
surrounding the issues of regulating tree clearing and enhanced stream corridor protection measures within the
Lake George Watershed. Chazen conducted interviews with three primary advocacy groups within the
watershed, developed and completed a survey of municipal officials and performed a literature search for
similar watershed programs.The findings and recommendations were shared with stakeholders through a series
of presentations. The evaluation was successful in establishing an understanding that local communities lack
technical capacity to address the issue and that watershed-based approach was desired.
Candlewood Solar Interconnect Project — Habitat Assessment Report
Connecticut
Chazen completed a habitat assessment investigation and report within an electrical transmission alignment in
an area approximately 15 acres in size in 2019.This work was performed to characterize habitats and observed
vegetative species; classifications were based on the 2015 Connecticut Wildlife Action Plan. A list of the plants
observed growing within the survey area was compiled, corresponding to the vascular plants of Connecticut
checklist. Six habitats and 84 plants or bryophytes were identified. This field review and report also identified
invasive species. Chazen has now been hired to complete an invasive species survey and management plan to
ensure that invasive species are not spread during construction of the Candlewood Solar Interconnect Project.
t�vk��r t�,'t' S -:�A+a a�� ' ?-�i"i tr.ic �, � ��7.,, -`h� T��7�'a ar �--•. +r�'"x^���r
� '€x._� ..t .3f, r'al � `� � �' � :: .t�.� �G'2„�"``.*.+ .z''' ��tw �` �,+�.�t
,k:...�'.:.e.."�..�.�cV`� �e��r. � v ,�* � z Ems. "R:> �_ � �� �-..: �..._..�.. ,. ..,.'�
•
QUALIFICATIONS
Lake George Data Atlas
Lake George, NY
Chazen recently completed preparation of the Lake George Data Atlas, a
project funded by the Lake George Association and the Lake Champlain/Lake ti
George Regional Planning Board.The Data Atlas is the first ever compilation
of watershed specific population, housing, land use and infrastructure data
for the 12 communities located in the Lake George Park. The Data Atlas
explores development potential (buildout) of the entire watershed and r ';`
presents this information in a highly readable graphic format. The project
involved an intensive data collection effort, a robust GIS evaluation, r �
interviews with stakeholders and a variety of public presentations across -1 c
three counties.Community profiles were developed for the 11 towns and the
village that call Lake George home and will be used to develop dialogue about . '
the Lake's future.
Darrin Freshwater Institute Finkle Brook Delta Maintenance Dredging
Bolton, NY
Chazen completed bathymetric survey of approximately 12,000 square feet around the Darrin Freshwater
Institute docks and then prepared a SWPPP, contract documents and detail sheets for the dredging program
based on the bathymetric survey and the record drawings and photographs. Chazen also prepared technical
Contract Specifications suitable for bidding with short form specifications on drawings. Chazen collected
samples from three locations within the dredging area per the NYSDEC Technical and Operational Guidance
Series for In-Water and Riparian Management of Sediment and Dredged Material (NYSDEC TOGs Nov 2004).
Sediment samples were processed and prepared for shipment to the laboratory. Laboratory testing identified
no contamination.Chazen successfully completed permitting with the US Army Corps of Engineers,NYSOGS and
worked with the Warren County Soil and Water Conservation Service (providing NYSDEC permitting).
Terrestrial Invasive Species Management Planning
Chazen has completed terrestrial invasive species studies for a series of projects in New York and Connecticut.
Here is a sampling of these efforts.
New York Transco — New York Energy Solution
Rensselaer, Columbia and Dutchess County, NY
Chazen developed a study protocol and identified densities of invasive species (and specific species that were
present) for a 57.4-mile electric transmission line corridor, evaluating approximately 1,300 acres. The general
density (high, medium, low) and the specific invasive species(s) observed in both upland and aquatic
environments was established. This data was collected using the ESRI GIS Collector application on mobile
(iPad/tablet) devices and was then developed into figures illustrating the results. These documents were
included in the October 18, 2019 Article VII filing before the New York State Public Service Commission.
Iroquois Pipeline Annual Vegetation Maintenance (2013-present)
Chazen biologists review the relative density of invasive species along the pipeline corridor as part of Iroquois's
(a utility company)annual vegetative management practices.Chazen's biologist/ecologists mark locations in the
field with flagging where invasive species densities have changed (increased). This is then a visual cue to
Environmental monitors to alter their mowing and maintenance practices. Environmental monitors and
maintenance staff clean equipment using air compressors and brushes when moving from a high-density
invasive species area to a lower-density invasive species area to control the spread.
NA4g'.�..';-4:4 ''.�*.ti 1gg�l'R ��U 0i'�`��,� ,g6't F. 41W, z`��`�':d..."���� � x �-,�i ,1; AAiT
QUALIFICATIONS IT'ocq
•
1 RESUMES OF KEY PROFESSIONALS
The following are brief introductions to the key professionals assigned to work with the Town.
CHRISTOPHER ROUND, AICP
,' Vice President, Planning Services
.!,, i 1. Mr. Round has 30 years of experience in providing land use planning and environmental
r' services to local government, institutions and private clients. As Vice President of Planning,
14,E he is responsible for the overall operations of Chazen's Planning service line and the
-� management of complex interdisciplinary projects. Mr. Round is experienced in the
development of municipal plans and land use regulations, public participation and outreach
efforts as well as securing grant funds for public and private entities. He is registered with
the American Institute of Certified Planners (ACIP),and a member of the American Planning
Association and New York Planning Federation. Prior to joining The Chazen Companies, Mr.
Round served as the Director of Community Development for Queensbury, NY overseeing
the Town's planning and permitting operations.
''', PAUL W. CUMIMAINGS, AICP, LEED® AP
Manager, Planning Services
3 1 Mr.Cummings has over 12 years of experience in practice areas focused on community and
f s' environmental planning. He has led and performed a wide variety of planning projects
:- , J,� f' ranging from comprehensive, natural resources and transportation planning,to community
revitalization and economic development initiatives. Mr. Cummings is experienced with
many funding programs and project implementation strategies. He is also well-versed in land
use law and the environmental review process. He is skilled in public participation and using
several mapping, visualization and data management technologies, including Geographic
Information Systems (GIS). Mr. Cummings is AICP and LEED°AP certified and has trained at
the National Charrette Institute (NCI).
Mr.Cummings has worked on a wide variety of water resource protection and water quality
planning projects. He has a strong understanding of the relationship of land use to water
quality and has developed a series of GIS based analyses focused on demonstrating the
impact of development on water quality, identifying high risk actions and locations, and
providing land use-based solutions focusing on reducing impacts.
' r -:, PAUL O. GUILLET PE, CFM
,: y,1 Senior Project Engineer c,� ., 1 Mr. Guillet has nearly 25 years of experience in consulting engineering in both the private
'. and public sector markets. He is a licensed engineer in New York and Connecticut and a
�i ' , Certified Floodplain Manager. He currently serves as the Region 5 Director of the New York
State Floodplain and Stormwater Managers Association. Mr. Guillet has presented at
numerous NYS Floodplain and Stormwater Managers Association conferences. He brings
expertise in stormwater modeling and mitigation design to the team.
,ux rs-iffy t � ,,tt �. - r £, ,----, r...07- 5 "f r -- .:
��jj �, ¢�3 }r�y�y�� �r ,.* z. �c g" ��r "k E' s` �° 's�€� A �i_ 3y�3g, � �"
>SY e t 7iA�c .��.. > S,7`>.����,4>`{ +W:.i:r P+ldan^waS�aa�7Ft°Y.� +:.�".a_��4:r,.. 1.Iv..J" .��u.` k� Ir.51. `rn.. >,li'et� � �n.�» ti'���yn'+. ,��Y}
QUALIFICATIONS ' f *_'
47_\- BETH A. CLEMENTS, PWS
`; Senior Environmental Scientist
iA ) Ms. Clements has over 13 years of experience as an environmental scientist specializing in
r ., „ s; g' wetlands and water resource management in both the private and public sectors. She is an
`' r--,�' ISA Certified Arborist, and certified Professional Wetland Scientist and a Professional
�� ` " Wetland Delineator. Some of her experience includes wetland delineations, field reviews,
preparation of wetland permit applications, damage control of trees and assessments of
storm damage. Ms. Clements is a member of the Society of Freshwater Science and
International Society of Arboriculture.
R. RICHARD FUTYMA
Environmental Scientist
i , Dr. Futyma, as a terrestrial Ecologist, has regularly evaluated habitats and ecological
�' communities for their ability to support rare, threatened and endangered species in New
e� York State using an ecological community classification system. He has over 40 years of
�. 4:-.V Y - experience and is recognized for his ability to identify plants and for his knowledge on plant
communities. Dr. Futyma is also very knowledgeable about invasive species and drafted the
Iroquois Pipeline Operating Companies Invasive Species Management Plan.
FRANKLIN B. MEAD, I.E.
,1 '� 3 Assistant Project Engineer
4., Mr. Meade has two years of consulting engineering experience that includes projects in
14, ,a. ,, , 4, water and wastewater treatment, collection and conveyance systems, pressure networks,
1‘,"So,..-,—:\f ',,,P`',' and site design. His responsibilities consist of CAD drafting, modeling, and engineering
'x'' / design. Mr. Meade holds an associate degree in Math & Science, Bachelor's degrees in
Chemistry, Environmental Engineering and a Master of Engineering in Civil&Environmental
Engineering.
KRITHIKA PRABHAKARAN
" r ' : ''' . Planner
Pa
,; „ "' 1,1 Ms. Prabhakaran holds a MS in Urban Planning from Columbia University and has over four
.({-), {. years of experience in planning, urban design, land use and zoning analyses, visual
Y,-ve `i,) \%,
,. ti � assessments and supporting environmental impact analysis under SEQRA and CEQR. She is
dlfris ' skilled in AutoCAD, ArcGIS and graphic communications and in development of models
assisting in project analysis.
.���r� 9 gi�e�� y' '�3 t tvh =+6�'.s , ` �[''„ ,E i& �k,F�'� $k: , ,:� "ia...�vaa''�..us�r.��' �4 F�+..`�s[. A...
• QUALIFICATIONS y n
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF
All staff assigned to the project have the expertise and capacity to fulfill the obligations of the project in a timely,
successful and professional manner. Chazen maintains a resource management program that includes four-
week, three-month, and six-month projections. The project schedule was established in concert with staff
commitments, and adequate capacity exists to complete the project in timely fashion
D I QUALITY CONTROL
Chazen is committed to quality and service at every level. One mechanism we use to achieve this goal is the
administration of our quality assurance and quality control(QA/QC)program.Chazen's QA/QC program outlines
procedures and protocols that begin at project scoping and continue through project design/document
preparation and construction.
All field notes, calculations, mapping, plans, and reports are reviewed and verified in detail by experienced and
qualified personnel prior to submittal to our clients, regulatory authorities, and review agencies. A general
review of the overall project approach is also completed by a designated QA/QC professional to ensure the
project progresses in accordance with appropriate professional standards and practices.
QA/QC PROGRAM COMPONENTS INCLUDE:
• Ongoing focus on QA/QC improvement
• Emphasis on interactive project scoping with the client at project onset
• Focus on choosing the best consultants/subcontractors
• Stressing strong communication between staff, consultant and client
• Use of a QA/QC program guide, checklists and standards
• Formal processes ensuring appropriate QA/QC Program reviews, including constructability reviews to
avoid costly redesign problems
• Establishment and adherence to standardized plan sheets
• Computer Aided Design and Drafting(CADD) standards and training
• Project Management training
E I REFERENCES
C. Waiter Lender Edward W. Branccrfi
Executive Director Village Manager
Lake George Association Village/Town of Mount Kisco
2392 State Route 9N 104 Main Street
PO Box 408, Lake George, NY 12845 Mount Kisco, NY 10549
P: 518.668.3558 P:914.864.0001
E:wlender@lakegeorgeassociation.org E: ebrancati@mountkisconv.gov
Dennis Dickinson
Supervisor
Town of Lake George
20 Old Post Road, Lake George, NY 12845
P: 518.668.5722
E: supervisor@lakegeorgetown.org
k �<�4`."�G'"�m�3� 1d�'r�,i' j�rS`�s.3 r �'T..;at x�# '�"agi
}IT i,Ya �M j`I rr g y.f� ..X 11
N'.L.��u ++":.$"`'.. �i�. �F.e,.._..,a a�l.,� .. S�'t9 •. ��d _,� !r'�S;' : $` .�.A � �+ti� ik s.-::`,J' 5t
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE I REVISED 03.22.21 'i4 ` `
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
The Glen Lake Protective Association (GLPA) has been monitoring and actively working to control the growth of
invasive species. While there are several species of concern, Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum),
Illinois pondweed (Potamogeton illinoensis), and Curlyleaf pondweed (Potamegeton crispus) are the primary
threats. The GLPA has established the Glen Lake Aquatic Plant Control District in 2011 for the purpose of
providing a funding source for invasive species control. Over the last decade, hand harvesting of milfoil and
application of aquatic herbicide (most recently Chinook) have been performed. Chemical treatment and hand
harvesting are single-phase approaches to management of these species.The GLPA, the Town and the NYSDEC
recognize the need for a comprehensive approach to control invasive species, address human activities that
affect water quality, contribute nutrients and pollutants to the Lake, and develop a long-term plan to improve
the Lake.
Project Initiation & Communications
We recommend initiating the work with a kickoff meeting with the Town, GLPA and key stakeholders (i.e.
NYSDEC).The purpose of this meeting is to understand what information is currently available, review the goals
and objectives of the effort, establish an advisory committee ("Project Team"), explore public engagement
opportunities, and define a communication protocol and overall project schedule.
We suggest that this approach will keep the Project Team informed during key decision-making milestones,
ensure that resources are programmed wisely and address project-driven goals and regulatory issues, and
effectively manage the expenditure of resources to deliver a product that satisfies the Town and GLPA goals and
objectives.
We would meet periodically with the Project Team at key milestones to provide an update,on status, solicit
input and direction on key elements (i.e. stakeholder outreach, lake user survey) and to keep all informed.
Consistent with the RFP,we propose the following:
Task 1 — Review and Summarize Existing Information
There is much data collected about the lake; it is important that this be compiled and converted to information
that will assist in decision making, not just understanding how much milfoil has been harvested, but how past
actions have limited or reduced the spread of milfoil.
Chazen will review available existing information that includes: (1) 1998 Watershed Management Plan, (2)
annual Aquatic Plant Survey, Water Quality, and Management Reports, (3) water chemistry and quality data
from annual CSLAP reports, (4) water chemistry and septic system data from SUNY Adirondack reports, and (5)
other existing reports. This information will be summarized, and key information will be presented in graphic
format to serve as a benchmark for future efforts and allow us to assess the effectiveness of past practices.
Task 2 —Stakeholder Outreach and Landowner & Lake User Survey
It is important that landowners and stakeholders be invited as partners in this effort. We recommend a series
of meetings or engagement exercises to inform participants on the planned program, key issues affecting water
quality, and human behaviors that influence water quality. At key juncture(s), we would also engage with
NYSDEC, Bureau of Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health,the Capital District Partnership for Regional Invasive
Species Management (Capital District PRISM) and other stakeholders. This could be conducted at a GLPA
meeting, Bay Road Firehouse or other convenient venue.
W,AR S."✓. M ^` nzsi. r ;"`'' +.. `..a, 14»7 � ` 'l `l ss i+ 3' ga, al
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE REVISED 03.22.21
We propose conducting a lake owner survey that would identify opinions, as well as issues and opportunities.
We also propose a survey of lake users to ensure the entire community has input when it comes to preserving
Glen Lake. We have a variety of programs and techniques to solicit information from both groups, as well as the
general public. This may include the use of conventional media outreach, direct mail, social media, the GLPA
Newsletter and website,SurveyMonkey and other platforms.We will consult with you on the most appropriate
and effective means.
Task 3—Wetlands Analysis
Chazen will review applicable local, state and federal wetland mapping currently available through GIS and
prepare a GIS map illustrating wetlands(and their sizes and regulatory status) upstream of Glen Lake within the
Glen Lake Watershed.This will be done in concert with the upland base mapping(Task 4).A brief document will
be prepared discussing the area of wetlands and their regulation by federal,state and local agencies.
A Chazen environmental scientist(specializing in wetlands evaluations)will conduct a series of site visits in order
to visually assess the general ecology and quality of habitat in the Rush Pond wetland,Great Escape Fen and St.
Mary's Bay area.This will include a general identification of the types of wetlands present and the general health
of those wetlands.
Water Quality Sampling(Revised 3.22.21)
http;:i'n n.voglc.cnm maps`g 13,_i1SZ74:73 69q•1.1.11/nil'cm
5r`Mk2`I‘S -6Fl7,.,
}
l
fir' -, . :: _�
' •.
,-'#"Y' "- 'RIZ >:€aT x ....,.0_�.a.. . dx�i'.._s<a p ai•'., e: .,ks", } s+-r`'-,e '```1, #- „ , „��`t,: .d. t.
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE I REVISED 03.22.21 r- g,
Working with the Project Team, Chazen will develop a water quality sampling program for project in
consultation with the GLPA. The GLPA has provided eight suggested locations including the tributary to and
outlet from Rush Pond,4 locations downstream from Rush Pond within the Fen and tributary to Glen Lake, and
two locations on an unnamed brook south of Rush Pond. These locations were identified in a memo and map
provided by GLPA representative Dave Hodgson. The water quality sampling program is intended to establish
a baseline on water quality within the Glen Lake watershed and wetlands system and assist with identifying
adjacent land use and upland impacts on the watershed. This program could be modified in consultation with
the Project Team and after initial tasks are completed. We understand that SUNY Adirondack, local citizen
group(s) or other entities could assume this task and, if so,our fee would be adjusted accordingly.
Based on communications with the GLPA the water samples be tested for the following parameters, and the
laboratory costs reflect these parameters:
• E. coli and Total Free Chlorine.
• Nitrate and TKN, along with total phosphorus and soluble reactive phosphorus.
• Temperature,Dissolved Oxygen,pH,and electrical conductivity.These are parameters that can be taken
with field equipment, and do not require lab analysis.
Chazen can work with the Town of Queensbury and the GLPA to further refine sampling locations and/or
recurring sampling. It would be useful for Chazen's sampling to be timed to coordinate with any in-lake sampling
by SUNY Adirondack (i.e., sampling occurring on the same date) so that results might be compared. Sampling
will need to occur in the morning so that E. coli samples can be delivered to a lab and sampled within 24 hours.
Our fees professional fees include a two rounds of sample collection with the understanding subsequent sample
event will be completed by volunteers.The analytical costs assume three sampling events at eight locations.We
would recommend that future events be conducted at key timeframes in order to gain a full picture of water
quality within the wetlands and any upland impacts, such as:
1. Spring Melt/First Flush
2. Late Summer(Dry conditions)
3. Fall (Post Leaf Drop)
Based on a review of the historic water quality data (Task 1), the biological field review, and the water quality
sampling, we will analyze the water quality health of these areas. A summary of these findings will be
incorporated into the draft Integrated Comprehensive Glen Lake Watershed Water Quality and Habitat
Management Plan (Task 6).
Task 4A— Upland Mapping & Analysis
This task involves an analysis of land cover, land use and development patterns, related infrastructure
(particularly stormwater infrastructure), and natural resources mapping. Fortunately, a significant amount of
this information exists, and our effort would require working with project partners to compile the data. This
mapping would be utilized to prepare a model of the watershed to include delineating drainage sub catchments
within the watershed and developing hydrological modeling based on soil conditions,slopes, and land cover to
identify areas that may have more harmful impacts to stormwater conditions.
Utilizing this mapping, as well as information collected during the Review of Water Quality Data (Task 1),
Wetlands Analysis (Task 3), the Septic System Survey (Task 5), and Project Team input, we would conduct a
series of site visits to identify potentially problematic areas, site-specific issues and uplands sources impacting
water quality.This is an interactive process.
4k.,,_. .sIrr W,: ?7 ;,xTp7,,
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE I REVISED 03.22.21 r
Task 4B-Watershed Pollutant Loading and Transport Analysis (added 03.22.21)
Under this task, we will develop a pollutant loading and transport model for the Glen Lake watershed.
The analysis will be performed using the industry standard EPA-SWMM software package. The model will
generally consider dry-weather pollutant buildup over different land uses, pollutant wash-off from specific land
uses during storm events, routing of water quality constituents through the drainage system, and reduction in
constituent concentration through treatment in storage units or by natural processes in pipes and channels. The
model will track the total nitrogen, total phosphorus, biological oxygen demand (BOD), and total suspended
solids (TSS).
The model will include major existing conveyances and stormwater management features. These features will
be identified based on lidar topography and orthoimagery, and to the extent possible will be documented
through a field visit. However,detailed surveys of these features will not be performed under this task.
To the extent possible,the model will be calibrated using the water quality sampling data collected under Task
3 of this proposal. In addition,the model will incorporate much of the mapping data obtained under Task 4A of
this proposal.
The model will be suitable for use in analyzing the effectiveness of various mitigation measures, including street
sweeping, zoning changes, future development, and the construction of stormwater management practices
(including green infrastructure) within the watershed. However please note that the analysis of specific future
improvements is not included in this scope.
As part of this task we will prepare a watershed pollutant loading analysis report,which will document the data
and assumptions that have gone into the model.
Task 5 — Develop Enhanced Septic Survey
The plan should examine the lake's potential vulnerability to septic pollution and unmanaged stormwater
releases. Queensbury is a MS4 community and the Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
(WCSWCD) has mapped stormwater outfalls for the Glen Lake Watershed.We would build on these efforts.
This work includes developing an inventory of existing on-lot septic systems within a select area of the lake(e.g.,
500 feet from the shoreline), and creating a conditions assessment matrix based on relevant questions asked
during the lake owner survey, review of building permit data, and GIS data.This would help to identify where
older or unknow systems are located. Following this effort, GIS mapping would be used to conduct a site-
suitability analysis that highlights favorable and unfavorable conditions for on-lot septic systems. Finally, these
two (2) database layers would be processed to identify where high priority areas are located (i.e.,where there
are old or unknown systems and poor conditions for on-lot septic systems).
Septic System Survey
It is helpful to produce a map depicting the relative age of septic systems, assuming the oldest systems are
typically undersized, prone to failure and present the greatest potential risk to water quality.The Town can then
consider whether to perform more complete physical surveys of septic systems.The Town has prepared a draft
survey instrument, and this would involve mailing a form requesting landowners provide key information.This
could also be completed online (i.e.Survey Monkey).
'� �" as#, �c-� �'�' �, ,� ,i�w „� �F
�is ',�` t` 7 ,r 3„� >`'' -7,# n ,e"�E%''aia"§",a
��,�r.�ie�sfi[��'-';.�..�..�2��a...f�a �� � ��'9'`�.,�'; �'`i" �.a�`��-.vi3:�..T"i��'�� � . .. i '€�
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE I REVISED 03.22.21 r
Task 6 - Development of a Draft Integrated Comprehensive Glen Lake Watershed
Water Quality and Habitat Management Plan
This final task includes a summary and synthesis of the work completed. The Plan will be developed in
collaboration with the Project Team as we move through the data collection and problem-solving process. We
will engage the Project Team to identify recommended watershed management practices. This includes
upland/terrestrial and aquatic initiatives.The results of the water quality sampling,the upland analysis and the
pollutant loading and transport analysis, and the septic system survey will be presented and form the basis for
recommendations. The Plan will be crafted in a manner that satisfies NYSDEC comprehensive planning
requirements, will support and attract funding opportunities, and can be referenced locally for day-to-day
efforts ranging from new land use practices, infrastructure maintenance and improvements, and community
stewardship.
The Draft Plan will identify key issues that are affecting the lake and rank those in importance. We envision a
matrix of issues and link those to recommendations that may consist of specific management strategies,
remedial efforts, and regulatory measures. Should hand harvesting continue and, if so, at what
locations/frequency? Should benthic mats be employed? Should the Town institute a septic system inspection
and upgrade program?These questions(and more)should be explored and solutions identified.
We note that all mapping data would be prepared in GIS format and be made available to the New York State
Invasive Species Unit, as well as the state database iMapinvasives as suggested in the New York State Invasive
Species Comprehensive Management Plan.
rr'se "` -w',_ a#+'*.® .fh"yt$$'n f,- si`S...s r��:eti,x Y;•
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE I REVISED 03.22.21 nF�
PROJECT SCHEDULE
,.�lnte» ats= .Co .rehe.nsive� ' -" <.f`" $ �.
. g "_ d rn _ lean LakeWaters.e „titer Qughty,and ao'tat M' na s «_
•, rry,"..€ e.<n°- 1 s�. .as - °:ti:c ! t ,y� p.µ geTl:2nt4fl?• h x»g e. "h''' 2"., ,",5 ;rL'. '. "
." .a H ..».�... 'w. L{' �n '�,. .� x 4^'7-�+ ,`-�sy, ag••;'� r�'4 �d w- xc
e , s"a .'�i. °�;*'r 'Y ,c '"• . .3 4 .,c,»y 77 we , , `0.a' ., ,,,6,.•.
. ilk+ p ` '
4:=..s�''" x--- '�'ex,rvx, . A�'�.CiHE�ULEr �»'� �`�,., �,�,+*� „� . �' �£..� ��„� ca '.°d� .&at.
March April May June July August September October November
Task
1-Review and Summarize Existing Information*
2-Stakeholder Outreach and Landowner&Lake User Survey
3-Wetlands Analysis ,
4A-Upland Mapping&Analysis
4B-Watershed Pollutant Loading and Transport Analysis
5-Develop Enhanced Septic Inventory
6-Development of a Draft Integrated Comprehensive Glen
Lake Watershed Quality and Habitat Management Plan
*Note:This preliminary phase will involve engaging with the NYSDEC to confirm requisite criteria for the watershed managment plan
eeting
�2k-^^�c tee.., "` `` 3r,�-"; ila hx r," . y,..,o w- ;,.;'�. ;r ;,":` "!�'." 3 .,..F v.R,i•, ' l' i,e ^.:'.. w ."x�-.. ,',�.y�, �4v... r, "y»"�` :;r»'r• „x.. .'•rk<,
9 ;°a+,•d ". eh r ♦ ;-, ".`o.» ;. „ t Vic` ,.. ,;, 3 x *;: "'.. ^.•�;,,.'� A..,..,* r "',x .e. y y'y?-k;.. a Y�'«i,,, a ;.... t"'e.
Y��zw_�.J:,,.:,'n' :+..w•a.1.S:,ff'..»x ' .Cn,.��7_.-„r".k:,...,e' aw�n.�,,.r,., FS..m*....3^`.e,�s.,.,., e�.,. .;?2•.. ..:t_ ...�ao,.. ...,.�...�a,.ck:u'x kr...a..,_ .,eF,a.w.�'._.,..r.....,..3aA....+ ,�,.�: . ...,.lt�r�.,,vrsw.,x��"wn..Y..Y°o-'ilr'-,la._w:w,-,��'qyi'�
FEES AND COMPENSATION I REVISED 03.22.21, 14,,5Z
Integrated Comprehensive Glen Lake Watershed Water Quality and Habitat Management Plan
FEES AND COMPENSATION(Revised 03.22.21)
—
_ o a
Sa�::w� . s;*. 4 ,,�� a .�..n i. �i._a 5�h.{*^� y �" v;:"P.x., 5, `�•."r. s E .. '� r•'„"e*�no ka'a;:.' «�e , .:, r ,,�
a� .:3 €` „„ i a:.i.:, a." xa '`27, ' ' ,,. ,.,;. r.,-ar • •u 4. E ,.. e ,.,.9, r`?. r x ?
�.; C+R'xR�a e .. r,:,_ � x �� ,<< `x� f a . +,p x ,... ,�P;aul Cu mi� s � x,'+ �. x $. ^:.:4` 34,-.
,,.• .,.,to- 6,, ,- � g, � _,:`c ���.,.. �iCrifFilkak�,.„ ^Richard=Frlt ma ':Feel'=S' a r� ':�@ � :•4..
a •#yL. ' e - _: team Member.r- -&- . ,a r gChrisRound"t`AICP : d"' ... �.�r .t ,.. ,, r Y d ci nasty . ,
�r� a ,, '°,v r k ,Paul Guillet„PE FrankbnrMeade. :, 6 r .tt: .4, x
AS�• ��. .. �f=,:,'� ,r`" .° . �a.�* .w rye_. ,:-r., _�- r +AIGP° �� s�;-, h .��.s• "�' k�'" o �*'� ':"r, ,z,`,4 .e'�rask:Totals� Eee "�Tas
, ,"0 ,: , `if, o, a + . 'Nr.,, *.w„.,a_ j s,, airs �*,, ids° h. ,*el. 5. '6e�a haka"Yan 44, '',`1, -, "s`.En meer ,, aby ik
yw4[a,-. ems -?..y;a.. x�5.f-rk„�ae.w«.,.+Q ,a*`S�. ,.. �-," .« _,.r :*M4e s �..cz'E;ta 3:.' `�. � -� � D r�s�':5 •q Cn&` k'tr+.w°�.m ,;�, g ,,,'� .„ �r �'`'`�, 6c,,W.
Project Manager Pollutant Research,GIS, Water Quality
Role QA/QC Pollutant Loading Wetlands Analysis Sampling,Upland
Team Leader Loading/Modeling Engagement
�' Y 0 "r ami ,, ek A 0'. - "l� ?whom
_ _ na ys�s
1.Review and Summarize Existing Information 2 12 0 0 24 6 0. 44 $4,618
2.Stakeholder Outreach and Landowner&Lake Use Survey 1 30 0 0 50 0 0 81 $8,362
3.Wetlands Analysis 1 4 0 0 2 28 56 91 - $8,828
4A.Upland Mapping&Analysis 1 16 0 0 40 12 40 109 $10,634
4B.Watershed Polllutant Loading 1 4 64 100 8 0 8 185 $21,602
5.Develop Enhanced Septic Inventory 1 24 0 0 60 0 16 101 $10,002
6.Development of a Draft Integrated Comprehensive Glen
2 24 4 0 40 8 0 78 $8,412 Lake Watershed Water Quality and Habitat Management Plan
Total Person Hours 9 114 68 100 224 54 120 689
Charge Rate $182 $121 $170 $86 $91 $103 $91
Fee By Individual $1,638 $13,794' $11,560 $8,600 $20,384 $5,562 $10,920 $72,458—
Total Professional Fee $ 72,458
Reimbursable Expenses(Est.at 2%) $ 1,449 Travel,Mileage,etc.
Lab Costs $ 2,400 3 Round Sampling/8 Locations
Total Fee $ 73,907
�ai o r..re•h +,..5x.. 2 T+�e. .} k ,75" tty.+ , r.t.i ' e,....;.:"...r:; 5 e,.,,t�r`am `.P,, 2 ti .'ili."tr'Cry'� `. -"t5 pEff e;�,;�'#, '�vt B�t�••4a -,—'& # T=r x,5?.,.-r qi
N ti
q12. yt.'�s. r,e.aK . >d�5 n.x._Aa..t1,ayu:td, n,�fi2;Tre :. w, .ra:,.s, ti,.;w,5f.%.,, .t s.s�:c,.., P #t� ,_isri�a , it ;w , .c»... .. , a .4" k� w1,-:
,� t._,,i ufe u�'a _ :1 c•Ya aau� 4 , "
--
7
. tr
7:7-..-.-;'4^'%;.. •
• ti'f- P, :‘ ! . 1.,"•
I
• ' ' . ' plAntztprar-,: • t ''
,,,,,4,,,,,,
, .--.-,,- '. -.., -„.. ,,,,,-,--=,3-
., r..! . - , 7,-i•./. .4•:,... #',., • A.. - ..-.-....,40•, -,- ,, : ,,.-. _ , ,,,,... , 4
t, ‘1,.. ' " ' ',44A I-4';'1..t''', . T ' ''' :'' ''''''' ', ',I. i Aki '. ).n 4,4„.;tel- 4,44„?,"1"."."--' 1 ••,,, “4"#:,,
j ' ...•' .4...;•'4 —t, '.7"''',0-';.., , ' ''' 'i. 11. ,' ,, .. ,, ,1 .4 -" .1.1•4•' ','', ,,••. P"' '4-'-.4 t,-, '''.41','17';',.- rie, :eq*.,:,;4-.•„-..; - . ,•
r
,.,T •-` . rt,isir" .`..,-;:' -.- -* '4' ' 4...,41;*': '. 1(4-'f-r*,-t. . * - l' 'A f•,':'.,,Z
r,$.„,,,,,,,#.4t"-- .4.'- ,' . • .,,-- .,--1,,,"t• .--ie;,,,.,-,*! ,Ae' ''' .-- -f 1 A ‘r* -44":".,*•'2 ',•-,t. ''' ''. - • --711 , g• ,e,, ' r :„4"1.1: . ", ,•
L•4.,.• '•'' ' •r•-: ''''•:':' -4.it 1 i'.-*?-4,zN „t . 1 , ....„1' . 'ilk- .,,, • '/4.,,,,01'" pia: ..,„fr-44,-- • ‘', '',*;40 •,4 'o'lL'''Ill _:::- '',,•,t,,• '.1,,re-e-'-',4 .,—,+,1•7-'4/5.,"
....0 ife ,e,,-;,,,17.,, i; :4,,,,,,,t,14;r7, +": ',$hel.{,:•,, ,"r't ". I:f" •,!"_14,,,, ' ;.• 'ffli.r',. '"'`,",;•,y),‘ r".4-'' -4-4, 4.,....74';'?•4,..`"';P:iii'ie:r'-1•Fg'. tte- --,,,,,y< -,
t 11
,.. 4. , calopti, ,,, •. .4..'.....,t •,.:14::-,,!,r_ric.X., t .. ';I*'-',. ,,• '. 4'14' ' ' 1.,:. a v., ir%..1'‘ tio,,, 2,..'''..t,A,;::,,,, :ittei 1,"71AiNit taa, •tItit ,la«
y'',...1 ',;,-, . ,,, -,- .if - /UP„, 13(i*,/t4it,P,r,4,. '''4, ,,,,.,it r -1,- ,,..,,:,..t.,t,(4, „ ,„ - ,,_.1 ,,,...-3,,: v.,,,,..,, ,..,,„,,,,,,,,„-„100,...ei-1,4 ,- , •-- I
0.•":II, ,,,..• 4..'w,.... * ,f ,,,r,et',,,,NoW,.' 1.1,*,,,i, .1,iir . :.,,,,,,,,t, ,,,„ 4 or ,, ,, ,,,- ., .,,,x, .0,„ri, ,,,iev.*::„.,- ,- h- ., w ,„ ,.
...-, --01-k,;,'"'''',,. ' , , ii.,...'••-•%,'"-, "`.4,-- it4 '''..A,•.+At., tr .4 i!,„, *-1; , . ,.-..- ,,*4 , •; ', ,,,tr,i;.r„*'' ',',4"'"-r' ' 3*; .14,-; t,-, .1. ' ' tAlit":'* • '''
3 . «ix' ',',,,t'.- -, ,1 ,r,v3, ":: •.r.r. • 1.„0.-4-),.elt. ., ..,.- ,,,,, , , "Art „ ,. - - -
..„, t , _ 1, •, f,,,, • .02, r,.4 ,4 ,, t.,,,. ,, A- , .
6
-LC if-.,"" . ' 'w;r1-‘ .;'•-:
ftt.
.."-'4" --- c- it..,;:', ,i '''' ..;' • .' ."'"' rifik- i an' "4."..., "4; Ty* ,,*1 - .„' --.- ,1),-- ii., „,:c.,. 4. # - . 1 r f,-.,,,,.-
. ...• _i _. i. .,--, 1 ,./"4-. .! ;',,...-,..t. it ,A,,,,,.... . .,,, .., „„,„......, ,,... :, .„„.„,, , ...\ ,,,„,,, 41'.' 4:,,k. .4-...t.- -
'' ' - 4 t:'2••••_.etiA -11;`,' 'L.,' ' iP ''''',t.t. 114i -,' 7 •:',* 't"* „,.''V •,„•••..ii`v , ''elkitli -`,.-' .t,..z. f*"."14 je..i.s,: iv,. i ,/,,-. _.,14:<., --,:',,t. ,11
..4,
.,_,„...,,,,,,,, , ,, „ ',II, 7, "••;!. „,.ys,•':-' "4, ,',..1 or , ,4'.6 I., 1-.. ,, ,i4,14.,.....4014,F,A,.. At, - A,I* . 17,t. i---_w, 1.
.14
t.,,,.?, Z..v.t 'k;let.4‘‘"; , ',17! "Leili:-. 4'4.. , "': ; ,-''' ' )4 1 i .. ,-.- ...-i. .- .0 vz---,•,---t.w.-ti...11 %, if 5; .1..s:,:t; ,
, it,,..-,_ ,. -74f 't *"',' , 7..i.`/- .0"'"' ' "r, ifr 1:-"ky.i - ' 1 'AO' '4,41..-Y.Zt,•24. ..,,s,, i !',-1,''ol* j e; , ...,' s".''• - tiii....k,t .?!.•,;•1 f Jr 4,„ ii
.,i, • •0.:;).,,r,.,,,4 ."4,.),1,-,r,r, : /.14.7y, 4 ',1:,,.' . . ,7 )4,-;:-.4::?„,-o,,,..44-7, l',74/1.-„,...,,,,',4-1,t."1.4?.::',.. ...et:it,-- • ,,p-to,,,?„,....titt-4,-, -..„0.:,.tr,„;;;;;',...-, -,,-.,e,-=, _
.11-;-,-, , ..1/4,.. ..7.--,..kif_3,,,, „„1,4,;;;;„,,i;--t:?-.,-.,t-4.-•--,,,,0% 4,,,i,i1, .';',..41- ,,,,,•,:;-,.' `....., 1,-.,,, •'°A.4,, 40'..tai 0,4„7, ..P.7°,,t° :-:,.1...3.:;„ ° Art11,::),4:44-',,,,''1 41 441-''
011 1 , It
il.;- ti,•'-?1:;,;r1'55'- JR-8-1'"44-41.,' 1..,..; v.4*".. 4,'.14`';,_1.--A5 two.- . ',,,e, • 1-,';,!**-1,f -...:5,-40.k..,.-.1,,i',,,,cii .t. ./.44•--;,- . rt-3:4i.a,t',A.;.i,'.,,y,...ft,
„..if
,i -,,,,v„,;:,.. ft: 7,.,y07, -..:,..,, 4 ,,,,,v.,:o. ,,-/-4 ,:-A. -4..„- • i', . -,,. t-: -4kt,-, .1.-,,l, . 4 .„,,io„..t. 4;:e: e.,sir,,,- ' -Vi
•
,......., , P a.,:,., y ,, „44**VV. 1- , . .i.,..,_.",; ' ,,,,.14 o''at " ''''., ''4..o'' Ir.-a``o ' rlfr-,7-1'-"A. «:«itis '''' itio•f tto' 1' '',vi'JP t •.°'4'''''. '
.,..i ,., • 4 ,p•rt r „,,I.,,,,4.y. ..,,it 4re,•_,•u.„,47-4 ., 1.... fi,,*_. _,,t"- •ow ',Ilk ,"'%lir 4tV„,;VIVO, ''''', 14,',44.„.3. ...„fe .%4 .1;,441r.',0%%•:',,,,"4::';'.1.',X111:itir' 4f:
%. lik ,r,/i e", :* .fAA 1, 1.7-.-.-7.vo-, '`o,i'e''' '0's .....14.1 A..f.‘''.. ' '-' %/k f•,. 4.•,, .••,,T, . 1.4,".- ,'t 0.,-,Jr !. -4,'".t.,
ti. ' '..V tr-„,.. ,, ..,;'k'flrf- ov •• ,41, ' ' '""=1-s 'ilt*oe IL. i' "Ikiii41:441,-.',,t 4..$ A 7.-J.,
..,
«A 'ao- ',.$11tr 4,....-7.1 ' ' -; t «*- I.,' *.1.4„,' . .‘,...- ir-yrt.,_, ,„ .i,,,,,„„41..A.4„. w ,,,, ,, .4- Th• ,--•.i,- --.
,,, ir , >, ' _ ,-4.,,. 4 , • - - -v-1,.,, - ,_„,l , . . .....,,,- Nr,, ` top.-„,.. . e -. • . -•,,, 4,4 . •-.-...-# •.....iF -'i., . k
, II -,A, f 4,.i..•;..; . .- _ •.„#* .44. -.4.1%-V•4 - .• 'f ''•• • i..,,,."..i A ..-?,- fi'z *' 3.- '• 4*. „
e .
:116,- er. 4) tr4ebt '''' l'"4., ,A.' .. ',,-Y-44,, 14-,,,,f4y...,-is,. ,-,-1,WY..4 , 4,-.#7k•-., "wl'if:V.'-:',11,t ...„,_, -t;',,,,,.. )., , - - ---
f
,,t4f , .,,,,...,,..-?,,,,,,., . ... ..... !.* .. -- ,., - • A.--.,•t' • ,.-1, - - .,.., -fox.. -.4,, . , .,e.y.y. t « tja r«.0. '', li., tir .4.-,' '-• - 1,...,.)
.., ,,-"'`..4g",,,,r1",,, ' _ .* .,`4,, ax; at, ,,:44-1_,, ',,,/,.''', ,r"..g. „Fx.,_ 1,;',i-, ,A• i'ir, ,t,,33 ,, , . it,_04'P 1 .. i ,..-,r
r ...-,..„.4v474,-- 44,"P`.low: s,*- . 4.-44(4.* ,---,4. ' i- -' : t• 1`4§1'4' '
V•1 ,, tr.s,k, ,;,.,.i....,, 17..:0,,, .4 , r1.?4,„:.«1« ''.;, f ,4_„.' ,, ,,k :"1 t';4 .1"'''. -e'
ill . e'31t*,,., , • 1411:.-,t.P::41:14,.., ':' i — ' -:- "` ' fa" . . ,-v •4: .,,ei';',4
'( 1
,s,.. e.i. ,*, •„,..p4es:,.,,-.4,, „Air-0- f*v‘ 4,.? . I ' . a''., ,tt67.1 ''','r'41S 74°i
i 4:."" '. - •, . '-Ar4C:4
1 ''', ''''_;;;_.......srangia17....._,--' ie
' -4'..f«— trr•ct.;-«$,:3 !',• '' - ' --- .
o°I
'' -----.`;7- lk,' 1----'' -, ,..c.„..:,
,,,
--- - ...
1 _
, ..
- ...... -p- , - _... -.,'; :. ,^, off..-.4,.., ...--- -
_____
- ', TY,-'-'/ , •.-‘,.• ,-.1-' ,c.''''...!,',-..-17:',.'7,'',';,•-••:, •,:- '' t ----,-,:,.. .,---'' -_:_..- - -„,- - - .. ..,;:,-.-
, ; •,-, •,. -, - ,1‘,_La-, -.4.1.-- --,-..10,.. _-,.- 17, • ;;.. ._-. ------ -
, _ _.....
__. -
,----- AK omgass
10,-,, •1- -- .-. ...tez•"-zi•44,fi?ra,-- --"") .•• ' '`"r- *-----7:-`"?
7.,*.. ._ _..„...-.•144....z.,, : - . ....-",..--0----• ..,..-------
,,,,,01° '..y-'* ,*.•,_'' ' ' ,""...::4,,,,,s,- -----4--' , -." •t,';,--•=t'- '',,---
................,,/. 7:._._--. — ., .,,,.,v2-1.70,:.•-•.:---.4•••••.---...,
..t4t'r` ,.., •-•-•-•--, '.', ' -,,,,....-.:•7,,,,"c.,Xz., -•_4•:.s:it••,:a141-_-;,47,1• ••...:
,........,_..,---- v.... ----- -"•N
- ,,'''',..'* ' , '" .-•-P-7,-'it.*-V,,Z r •Ir-4-11,,wk,,,,,-_ -
• ,.---
___--
THE
www.chazencompanies.com ChaKen
888.539.9073 COMPANIES
Proud to Be Employee Owned