1988-09-20
~
QUEENS BURY TOWN PLARRING BOARD
Regular Meeting: Tuesday, September 20, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Richard Roberts, Chairman
Joseph Dybas
Peter Cartier
Frank DeSantis
Hilda Mann, Secretary
Susan Levandowski
Victor Macri
Paul Dusek, Counsel Daniel Ling, Ass't. Town Planner
Quentin Kestner, Town Designated Consultant, Engineering
Mary Jane F. Moeller, Stenographer
PLANNING DBPARTMBRT BUSINESS
Lee York, Town Planner reviewed the revised SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICA-
TION with the Board and requested comments. Mr. Cartier suggested the
following changes be made:
1) Page 5. 4th Para.: -A complete application is necessary for placement
on the Queensbury Planning Board Agenda.- The phrase should be placed
at the top of the page. in caps. underlined and bold type.
2) Page 6. Item D: Phrase -Existing watercourses.- Be revised to state:
-Existing watercourses. wetlands and other water bodies.-
Reason: Watercourses refers to stream. canal (flowing water). If it
is not flowing. there would be no requirement for Site Plan.
Ms. York presented Quentin Kestner's proposal that the Board divide
responsibilities for reviewing upcoming agenda items. The purpose is to
relieve each member of the Board of the responsibility for visiting each
site. In summary. the Board felt that they would best serve each appli-
cant if the sites were visited independently. Reason: Conflict of time
schedules, if a person were to get sick, have an emergency, etc.. the
project would not be properly represented, lack of knowledge and opinion
by the entire Board. Therefore, the Board suggested that it continue in
its present manner.
Ms. York reviewed with the Board meetings which she has had with
Planners in other parts of the State. regarding the manner in which the
planning/Zoning Boards' applications/meetings are carried out. The reason
for the meetings was to determine if there are more appropriate regula-
tions, which can be applied to applications in the Town of Queensbury (ie:
limited number of applications/meeting. limit time of meeting. cut the
meeting off at a predetermined hour, carryover applications. increase
number of meetings/month). Mr. Roberts pointed out that this topic had
been discussed previously, but there has not been enough time for the
Board and Staff to fully implement the suggestions.
1
The Board does have the ability to Table an application and. at that
point. the applicant should be made aware that if he/she agrees to Table
the project. the 45-day time period is automatically extended.
Ms. York requested that the Board members reviewed the Planning Board
Procedural Manual and make any revisions regarding the meetings that it
deems necessary. so the Manual can be adopted.
Mr. Roberts called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. The
minutes of the August 16 and September 8. 1988 will be voted on at the
Special Meeting scheduled September 27. 1988.
OLD BUSINESS
SUBDIVISION NO. 1-87, PRELIMINARY STAGE
1, .:m -Be;
Dixon Heights. Phase III
The project is 58 lots on the northeasterly side of Dixon Road, north
of Halfway Brook, UR-10.
Mr. Roberts reviewed previous events of the project. There was a spe-
cial meeting held on site. at which there were two members from the Plan-
ning Board. most of the Town Board, Building and Planning Departments. As
a result, there was a recommendation by the Town Board incorporating agree-
ments made on-site, allow three entrances to the subdivision (previously
two would be allowed), make the most southerly entrance (at Phase I) a
right-turn only access point. Reason: The neighbors advised the Board
that the entrance is not satisfactory, in addition, the Board realized
that the entrance was not built as approved. There is a 24- water line
across the property which necessitates a high bank, which cannot be cut
down. Because of this, the site distance is not at the corner is not
good. The other two entrances would be much better and would take some
traffic off the Phase I entrance.
Frank Walter represented the applicants, C & L Realty Associates. The
development work will be handled by Massulo Brothers (Carmen and Lewis),
builders. Prior to discussing Phase III, Mr. Walter presented an overall
layout of Dixon Heights. The Northway is to the east, there is a 100 foot
Scenic Enhancement Easement that the State of New York purchased some
years ago. Halfway Brook is to the south. Phase I consists of 38 units,
Phase II consists of 52 to 54 units. The road through Phase II, which was
not in the original proposal, will be cut to to Dixon Road. Previously,
there was going to be a cul-de-sac, however, with the unsafe determination
of the access at Phase I, it was decided to make this an entrance. Phase
III will be 58 units at the North end of the subdivision, with a road cut
to Dixon Road as originally proposed.
2
~
Phase III water will be obtained from the Queensbury water district,
waste water will be disposed of in individual septic systems for each four-
plex or duplex, storm water will be handled with catch basins, sewers,
infiltration on site, overflow will be discharged to a retention basin.
The Queensbury Water Department is satisfied with the water supply, there
is a SPDES permit from DEC, Charles Scudder, consulting engineer reviewed
the waster water and approved. with the exception of the final road config-
uration (letter on file). Quentin Kestner approved limiting the Phase I
entrance to one-way and allow the Phase II and III entrances.
Mr. Roberts advised that the Town Board made a resolution regarding
three road cuts (Exhibit A). Legally, Mr. Dusek affirmed that the Town
Board can make the Phase I roadway a one-way street, however, he did not
know what the time frame would be. Mr. Naylor, Highway Superintendent,
also approved the two full-service entrances and the southerly one-way
entrance. Because of the safety problems at Phase I, Mr. Cartier re-
quested that the road designation be changed as quickly as possible. Mr.
Walter said he felt that would be done when the Town accepted the Phase
III roadway, which might not be until 1989, however, he felt maybe the
Town could be petitioned to do it sooner. The Board did not feel it
advisable to have only one two-way road at Phase II serving the Phases I
and II.
Public Hearing Opened:
June Burke: 140 Dixon Road
Ms. Burke requested to know what has caused a melt area approximately
at the intersection of Dixon Road and Phase II entrance. She was con-
cerned about the safety of the area, especially since there was an acci-
dent in that location last Spring. It was suggested that perhaps there is
poor drainage at that point, Mr. Naylor explained that it was the only
place in town at that time of the year that had ice. The Highway has
taken care of the situation.
Public Hearing Closed.
There was a discussion regarding the Phase I roadway. which is to be
ONE-WAY IN with no egress. Mr. Naylor stated it is his legal opinion that
the one-way designation should be done immediately, because of the poor
site distance on the intersection with Dixon Road. There would be two DO
NOT ENTER signs at the intersection of Old Mill Lane and North Court (cul-
de-sac) and two ONE WAY SIGNS at the intersection of Dixon Road and Old
Mill Lane.
Mr. Macri moved to APPROVE Subdivision No. 1-87, Preliminary Stage.
Dixon Heights, Phase III, based on the agreed development of the third
access road, and the developer's agreement to turn the existing Old Mill
Lane and the westerly end of the intersection with North Court to ONE
WAY-IN from Dixon Road.
3
Seconded by Mr. DeSantis.
Passed Unanimously
SUBDIVISION NO. 9-87, REVISED FINAL STAGE
D ,8 ßJ
q,-;),
Westwood, Phase II
The application is to change the roadway alignment for the site
located at Glenwood Avenue, UR-5.
Mr. NIck Sciartelli of Morse Engineering represented the project. He
stated that there is a tree which the developers would like to save. The
tree is located just over the line separating Phase I and II, therefore,
in order to save the tree. the alignment of the road would have to be
moved approximately five feet east. The tree would then be just off the
shoulder line. The roadways are l3 feet lanes with 5 foot shoulders. The
distance between the centerline of the road and the tree would be about l8
feet. The cluster of buildings on the east side would have to be skewed a
small amount to accommodate for the setback from the road; Mr. Sciartelli
verified that there is room for this to be done. Mr. Kestner reviewed
his letter of 9/l9/88, he felt the tree is worth saving and recommends
approval of the concept.
Public Hearing: no comment
Mrs. Levandowski moved APPROVAL of Subdivision No. 9-98, Westwood,
Phase II, Revised Final Stage, in order that the developers receive their
roadway alignment as requested, in order to save the tree.
Seconded by Mr. Dybas.
Passed Unanimously
NEW BUSINBSS
SITE PLAN NO. 45-88
Patrick L. and Christine A. Seelye
The application is for an addition of a bathroom and two bedrooms
(second story) to the residence, SFR-30.
Mr. Patrick Seelye represented the project and advised the Board that,
after completion. there will be three bedrooms, living room. main bath
4
room, half-bath, one bedroom will be eliminated.
Letter from neighbor, Mark Schachner, did not object. Warren County
Board approved without comment.
Concerning sewerage disposal, Mr. Seelye advised Mr. DeSantis that the
system was put in 20 years ago and that it is in good condition. The tank
was cleaned within the last three years, it is l,OOO gallon cement
holding tank with a l,500 gallon dry well on the lake side of the house
(lOO feet from the lake). Mr. Roberts pointed out that the site is
pre-existing, nonconforming. Staff noted the septic/well separation is
close and the number of bedrooms is being extended. Mr. Seelye mentioned
the only problem with the house is the roof is pitched flat. and he will
be changing the pitch.
Public Hearing: no comment
The property is 45 feet wide, lOO feet back from the lake. The addi-
tion would not obstruct the neighbors to the rear because the house sits
on a hill. There have been no area objections. The land is top soil.
J. Sweet cleaned the septic system; it is sufficient for three bedrooms.
Mrs. Mann moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 47-88. Patrick L. and
Christine A. Seeyle. The request is reasonable use of the property and it
seems to meet all codes.
Seconded by Mr. Macri.
Passed Unanimously
SITE PLAN NO. 35-88
Thomas J. and Marybeth T. Babcock
The purpose is to knock down the existing house to the first level and
build a new structure on top at West Glen Lake, Glen Lake Road to Birch
Road to Chestnut Road, SFR-30. Applicant is building a two-story, single
family dwelling to be used on weekends and for a few weeks in the Summer
Season.
Mr. Murray Forth. agent for the applicants, explained that plans are
to extend the second story four feet, thereby creating an overhang of four
feet. The reason is to make the bedrooms larger. Mr. Roberts pointed out
that this approval would be subject to a Variance approval from the Zoning
Board of Appeals, he stated the applicant should have received the Vari-
ance before presenting the Site Plan. Mr. DeSantis was concerned that the
information regarding the septic system was not explicit, except to say
-Everything OKI- Mr. Forth stated he did not feel the Babcock's know the
5
'----
-.../
makeup of
the system.
bedroom house
What about the
the system, and admitted that he does not have information on
Mr. DeSantis wanted to know if it was big enough for a four-
(which usually requires a larger system). Is it a dry well?
leach field?
Mr. Ling stated that there is no more than l5 feet between the house
and the retaining wall, and there is a stone basement which is very wet.
The land slopes down hill; the well is approximately 30 feet from the
septic tank.
The Board feels that there is not enough information being presented
with which a rational decision could be made. In addition, Mr. Dybas
requested that a professional engineer come before the Board and state the
condition of the system, especially in regard to an increase in bedrooms
and that wetness of the land, J. Sweet, who cleaned the system, is not a
professional engineer.
PUblic Hearing Opened:
Calvin Powers: Neighbor to the north, Lot #10.
Mr. Powers explained that on the southern boundary of the building is
9 feet from the Corrigan property line, and on the the northern corner the
building is 7.5 feet from Mr. Powers' property line, a distance to which
Mr. Powers objects. He was informed that the present foundation is 7.5
feet from the line.
Mr. Ling explained that this is an addition to a nonconforming struc-
ture, nonconforming lot, nonconforming setbacks. Mr. Forth explained that
the reason for the 4-foot extension is because the size of the house is
very small.
Public Hearing Closed:
The
Thomas
system.
planning Board and Mr. Forth agreed to TABLE Site Plan No. 35-88,
J. and Marybeth T. Babcock, for more information as to the septic
SITE PLAN NO. 36-88
Carol Freihofer
The proposal is to change an existing roof-covered entrance porch
an interior foyer, to change the existing pine-needle lawn into a
patio, and to change an existing landscaped area into a car port.
location is 9L to Cleverdale Road, to the very end of the Road, LR-1A.
into
wood
The
John P. Matthews is agent for the applicant and verified to Mr.
6
--
Cartier that all measurements are actual. Two Variances will be needed:
there is presently a 9-foot setback from the southern corner of the car-
port to the neighbor, F. & J. Alexy, also there is a change in use of the
existing porch to an enclosed room in the building. The deck will be
pressure-treated slatted wood.
Public Hearing: no comment
Staff comments from Dan Ling were to approve the proposal, with a com-
ment that the proposed doorway for the deck serve as an emergency exit.
(Presently there is one outside door in the house.) Mr. Matthews verified
to the Board that he met with Mr. Alexy to discuss the application, and
Mr. Alexy had no objections.
Mr. DeSantis moved APPROVAL of Site Plan NO. 36-88. Carol Freihofer,
subject to the Variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals and based on
Staff's recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Cartier.
Passed Unanimously
SITE PLAN RO. 37-88
Richard A. Hughes
The application is for an addition to the Doctor's Office at 308 Bay
Road, HC-15.
Charles Johnson of Richard E. Jones Associates represented the pro-
ject. Correspondence: Warren County approved without condition. Beautifi-
cation Committee approved. Mr. Kestner reviewed his letter of 9/19/88
(Exhibit B). Mr. Kestner suggested a storm water management plan with
three dry wells. The new parking facility should not be constructed over
the septic system. until the Town sewer district is available and the
building is connected. The project is on schedule, so the sewers might be
available in about November. He would like to see less paving, and more
grass area, let the water go back into the ground, therefore, there would
be no change in drainage patterns.
Regarding the handicapped, Mr. Cartier was informed that there are is
an interior corridor available.
Public Hearing: no comment.
Mr. Dybas moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 37-88, Richard A. Hughes,
with the recommendations of the Town Designated Consultant/Engineer incor-
porated into the project and as having no negative impact on the area.
7
~
Seconded by Mr. Cartier.
Passed Unanimously
SITE PLAN NO. 38-88
Empire Video Superstore
Movin' Movies
The application is for a Video Store. retail space rentals and sales
of video movies, Route 9, Upper Glen Street, PC-1A. Location is south on
Route 9 towards Glens Falls, on the right hand side - just beyond the
Grand Union.
Mr. Charles Mench represented the project and affirmed that the site
is that of the former Rustler Restaurant. Plans are to lease the building
from Joseph Nigro and there will be no change in dimensions. Regarding
sewerage, there is a pumping station, however, there will be hookup to the
Town facilities. There will be no poster boxes.
The Board's main concern was site permeability, Mr. Mench did not know
the percentage of permeable area, only that there is green area around the
building and the 50 feet in front. For l.7 acres, Mr. DeSantis averaged
the permeability to be .00l% of the requirement. There was a general
feeling among the Board that parking was more than adequate and. with the
change in tenants. it would be an opportune time to improve on a poor
situation. A safety suggestion was made to remove ten parking spaces on
the north side of the building, so that cars would not be backing into
moving traffic. Mr. Mench mentioned that the Video Store is high volume
and felt that the ten parking spaces would be needed. However, it was
pointed out to Mr. Mench that there is sufficient parking available in the
entire shopping complex, and he was advised to work with the neighboring
businesses on the parking problem. If there is a change in parking, then
the entrance to the store will be moved.
Mr. Macri felt that it would be important to incorporate into the
presentation for the Site Plan parking for not only the Video Store, but
the bank. At that time, the Board would be able to make a decision as to
how many parking spaces would be necessary and suggest in what manner
permeability could be restored to the site in the form of green area.
Presently, there is aging blacktop, which is broken up and full of
potholes. Mr. Cartier requested to see handicapped parking designated on
the plan, it is already marked at the store.
Public Hearing: no comment
Correspondence: Warren County modified with conditions (Exhibit C).
8
The Board and Charles Mench, representative, agreed to TABLE Site Plan
No. 38-88, Empire Video Superstore, Movin' Movies, Inc., because of the
necessity of a new parking design and more permeability.
SITE PLAN HO. 39-88
Harry R. and Linda A. Baker
The application is for an addition of two decks, one situated on the
north side of the house and one situated on the east side of the house,
located off Route 9L at the mouth of Dunham's Bay, LR-3A. Also proposed
are two separate additions to the dwelling. The applicant proposes to
tear off a wing on the south side of the house and replace with a larger
addition, another addition is proposed for the west side of the house.
Harry Baker represented his application and was accompanied by Dean
Howland. builder. Of concern was the amount of bedrock, although Mr.
Baker said not too many trees would have to be cut to complete the
proposed construction. There will be a 1000 gallon tank and a proposed
pump station.
Mr. Ling commented that the structure is nonconforming as to setbacks,
with less than the required frontage. The large amount of bedrock is the
biggest concern. The applicant will be going before the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
Mr. Baker remarked that the sewerage system will be situated in the
same location as the previous effluent tank; there was a holding tank and
grinder pump. The water was pumped up the hill into a dry well; the soil
was sufficiently permeable. For perc tests, some holes were were 3 to 4
feet deep, the ground is very uneven. Morse Engineering based the design
on 7 minute perc tests, and tests of 1 to 3 minutes. Soil will be brought
in to level the entire area. There will be nothing substandard in the
construction, everything will be an improvement.
Public Hearing: no comment.
Mr. Cartier moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 39-88. Harry R. and Linda
A. Baker, pending approval of the Variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals
on September 28, 1988.
Seconded by Mrs. Levandowski.
Passed Unanimously
9
Chairman Roberts adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
CfìdJ4Þ: ~
Richard Roberts, Chairman
/ò/;t!JY
Dite /
c¡ oi 6.f{
Date
10
-
"---"
~
RESOLUTION-REGARDING CUL DE SAC AT DIXON HEIGHTS AND RECOfIŒNDATION TO PI..ANlfING BOARD
FOR THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
RESOLUTION NO. 333. Introduced by Mrs. Marilyn Potenza who moved for its adoption. seconded
by Mrs. Betty Monahan:
WHEREAS. C & L Realty Associates who are presently developing the Dixon Heights Subdivision
have approached the Town Board for the Town of Queensbury concerning the use of lands
presently owned by the Town of Queensbury to create a cul de sac for the end of a road
known as Tiffany Lane. which road presently intersects ~ixon Road. in the subdivision
of Dixon Heights. and
WHEREAS. members of the Town Board. accompanied by some members of the Planning Board.
the Town Highway Superintendent. the Town Engineer. the Town Attorney. the developers
and their attorney and engineer. visited the site of the proposed cul de sac and reviewed
the proposal on-site as well as another proposed cut onto Dixon Road. and a presently
existing road cut for Old Mill Lane.
NOW. THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED. that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is not in favor of the use of
lands owned by the Town of Queensbury for a cul de sac at the end of Tiffany Lane as
proposed by the developer and.
BE IT FURTHER
r
RESOLVED. that the Town of Queensbury. in an effort to clarify its position concerning
road cuts for subdivisions in the Town of Queensbury. hereby states that it is its position
that road cuts be minimized whenever possible. and that all subdivisions should have
at least town (2) road cuts. however. it is not necessary that there be only two (2)
road cuts into any particular sUbdivision. as the number of road cuts should be based
upon the conditions existing on the roadway and in the subdivision at the time said road
cuts are considered by the Planning Board and
BE IT FURTHER.
RESOLVED. that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury after consideration of site distance,
road conditions. comments made by a local resident. hereby offers as recommendation to
the Planning Board of the Town of Queensbury for its consideration. such recommendation
being that the Planning Board for the Town of Queensbury consider allowing three (3)
road cuts onto Dixon Road upon the condition that Old Mill Lane be made a one-way road
leading into the subdivision and the Jown Board. if requested by the Planing Board. will
seek to impose said one-way designation on Old Mill Lane upon following due legal process.
Duly adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mrs. Potenza. Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan. Mr. Borgos
Noes: None
Absent: Mr. Kurosaka
Æ: 'K (+-1 ø. I ..,.- ¡:;. f
~~'.~;." ~"'4íUi.~"ínJINiC~Urli-·r"'-~;;:'.'''';'-
-;0,' '...·f;~,:::;"~~j,<;<:i:-,~[;;¡.¡.r~~::.",~,
-.
: : . . t '.
J. D"rl~en H. ÐouRher, TO"'n Clerk 0" the TO"'n of QII..e""bury. Warren County.
N..... York, do hereby eertlfy thftt t h"v~ comrnred the foregoing vlth the
otl~I"1I1 ruolutlon u 1I1It"d ..bov.. ",1"rtp-It ..t" t'U~ lIIf'etlng
O(~the To Board or the To,", or Q\I"rullbury held on t'rle 9 dlty or
. I9Æ ~ Itt ",hleh II qllorum Wft. rrellent And thAt the
IInmf', I .. correct tran.cr1rt thereho", find o( the ...hole orllln81 thereoC
tn ""t...
JPI WitNESS TIIER.F.OF,
or Queenøbury. thll
I:
~
E
A
L
"I
. .
.'
.
1 heve hereto Id "'1 hRnd and the G!^L of uld Town
1 ~ dAY of Q)..O-1· . 19 ¿.;V ..
SIGHED. __iJfA&J.L.<Jl1 ¿trt"'---
"..rle"n H. Dougher
Town Clerk
Town of Queen.bury
<,;
k-y.¡.i--II3¡ T iJ';J.-.-
'.
. .
--
ESTABLISHED IN 1955
KESTNER ENGINEERS, P. c.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
JOSEPH A. KESTNER. JR.. P.E., L.S.
MARK L. KESTNER, P.E.
QUENTIN T. KESTNER, P.E.
ANTHONY M. KESTNER, B.S.
ONE KESTNER LANE
TROY. NEW YORK 12180
518-273-7446
K. WAYNE BUNN, P.E.
JAMES J. SHAUGHNESSY, P.E.
JEROME THORNE, S.E.T.
September 19~ 1988
Ms. Lee York
Senior Planner
Town of Queensbury
Queensbury Town Office Building
Bay at Haviland Road
Queensbury, NY 12801
RE: Town of Queensbury (TE) site Plan No. 37-88
Doctors' Offices at 308 Bay Road ~_
~~ -. ----.-.-..~
Dear Ms. York: ;OÞ·.. ¡("
I have reviewed Drawing No. 5-1 of the subject site plan fO~\
adequacy of water supply, sanitary sewers, and storm-water\i<~
management facilities. I would advise as follows: \
1. The facilities of the Queensbury Water District are
available to the site and presently serve the
existing structure. It is indicated on the drawing
that there will be no increase in existing water
use, and therefore; water service to the site is
adequate.
2. The existing facilities are served by an existing
on-site, subsurface disposal system. The facilities
of the Central Queensbury Quaker Road Sewer District
should be available to the site by late Fall of
1988. The 4" PVC building sewer shown on the
drawings should be changed to 6" diameter to conform
to existing Sewer District Standards. The new
parking facilities over the existing septic system
should not be constructed until the Sewer District's
facilities are available, and the building's service
is connected.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING
WATER, SEWAGE. AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
FEDERAL/STATE GRANT APPLICATIONS .
PRECISION SURVEYING AND GROUND CONTROL TELEVISION PIPELINE INSPECTION, METERING & SAMPLING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
¡¿XII-I@/7 ./31
J'i:'~~"~;-""".~~" '-,...~
"í'
~
~
/'
Ms. Lèe York, Senior Planner -2-
September 19, 1988
3. The new parking area will increase site runoff, and
it is indicated that all flow will be directed to
the rear' of the site and then drained to an existing
culvert on Bay Road. No calculations were provided
for storm-water detention. I would suggest that a
storm-water detention plan be provided perhaps in
the form of installing at least three 8 foot
diameter dry wells with interconnecting piping.
Such a system should accommodate the increased area
runoff. The architect may submit an alternate plan
if he so desires.
Sincerely,
KESTNER ENGINEERS, P.C.
~~~~
Quentin T. Kestner, P.E.
Vice President
QTK/cp
cc: Dan Ling, Assistant Planner
All Planning Board Members
k X#/ßI7 Iß.¡
,;"",.JftII <~_J.J_,."._,,!_" -,(,,-,,~J:':.~~~'I"'!II":'~"~
~
'-'
WARREN COUNTY
/ îI '
!flY r¡ i
Ii.. ¡. ·-..fl.·.i..
Ii ~'
..... <-
<,",,< 'h ,<
('i .' I.t r";.'.." .<..<
Ij" )</< ,< I'd
I' ¡,. Ii {'../ ,/
I::';,'::U ¿ J
,< _~t:)1i'lH'! 'C'["': ('ìUEEN!:'r.n; :-<\'
PLA N N I fiI~FBÔA'j¡Q?h'Îi')
w:;;:nG~~~;~: ~.";'~:.~\~:~~.r · '. >:t<~i988' L"
rclCpOO/lC ~16·161·6~ 10
DATE: September 14, 1988
RE: SPR38-88
TO: Queensbury Planning &
Zoning Office
Town Office Building
Bay & Haviland Roads
Queensbury, NY 12801
Cent lemen/Ladies:
At a meeting of the Yarren County Planning Board. held on the 14th.
day of September, 198~ the above applicat10n for a Site Plan Review to
operate a v.ideo store for retail space for rentals and sales of video
movies in a 5000 sq. ft. building.
Empire Video Superstore
Route 9
w~s reviewed, and the following action vas taken. Recommendation to:
( ) Approve ( ) Disapproval ()() Modify with Conditions (
R~turn
Comment:
,
)J¡) /"£,¿¿s T/-/I1:t J/¿;N~ /1J?(,)~0.5-êò /3J /'ffljJ¿tl#N ¡l ¡Jf ïfev¡/.!w,vJ /JJ Z':'N//~ t
/JÒ.n4;¡.,¡j;hi'q-/o . ".' L
'/¿ /,0 v/..:;H¿ /Z/Yl/N/': L(;;U-'/'£.,/¿>rl/'I")'./If T#;j--r h/¿~ A/R(')N L/ók./'> L/ONS II/'
( #5,S¿: /YE /3 ¿ 'Þ'A J
. ~ óJ( /',; ~/ä~ S ,íJ'£ é â,//ll/#;piLr(). j//JÆN9.ßC/.: ßO/l /I1ðRc¡;t.lr, .
'i-' /'fI-¡}¡h //Od
--~~~_2S~[~~~b~~¿q_~P¿l__~~~~~~_________________________----------
It is the policy of the ~arren County Planning Board to follow the
procedures of the New York State Ceneral Municipal Law, Section 2J9-H,
with regard to Municipal Zoning actions that are referred to and reported
thereon. The following are procedural requirements that must be adhered
co:
1.) The ~arren County Planning Board shall report its recomroendat ion~
to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement
for such actions. If no action 1s taken within thirty (JO) days
or agreed upon time. the municipal agency may act vithout such
report.
If the recommendation 1s for disapproval of the proposal. or
modification thereof, the municipal agency shall not act contrary
to such action except by a vote of a ~ajority plus one of all the
me~bers thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully
setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions.
Wichin seven (7) days after the· final action by thl' municipal
agency having jurisdiction on the reconunendations, modific¿ltioll~;
or disapproval of ß referred IMtter, such municipality iI~;"1\"V
shall f lle a report with the Wßrrcr¡;g,0 ntY?Hl'l;;¡¡;;..n I AOl\rd on
the ncc~~5nry (orm
t?)(H/~/TC
....,...".,... ."",..'<. ~ i.'~""'~~~"",",~ ·1"~4.t.w.J.-i':'"",\",...~U?"H' 1!i~~~~~'t~.\'~.
2. )
3.)
~:\"V'\)~:'.";";~'ë"·'-'Ii!"t