Loading...
1988-09-20 ~ QUEENS BURY TOWN PLARRING BOARD Regular Meeting: Tuesday, September 20, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Present: Richard Roberts, Chairman Joseph Dybas Peter Cartier Frank DeSantis Hilda Mann, Secretary Susan Levandowski Victor Macri Paul Dusek, Counsel Daniel Ling, Ass't. Town Planner Quentin Kestner, Town Designated Consultant, Engineering Mary Jane F. Moeller, Stenographer PLANNING DBPARTMBRT BUSINESS Lee York, Town Planner reviewed the revised SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICA- TION with the Board and requested comments. Mr. Cartier suggested the following changes be made: 1) Page 5. 4th Para.: -A complete application is necessary for placement on the Queensbury Planning Board Agenda.- The phrase should be placed at the top of the page. in caps. underlined and bold type. 2) Page 6. Item D: Phrase -Existing watercourses.- Be revised to state: -Existing watercourses. wetlands and other water bodies.- Reason: Watercourses refers to stream. canal (flowing water). If it is not flowing. there would be no requirement for Site Plan. Ms. York presented Quentin Kestner's proposal that the Board divide responsibilities for reviewing upcoming agenda items. The purpose is to relieve each member of the Board of the responsibility for visiting each site. In summary. the Board felt that they would best serve each appli- cant if the sites were visited independently. Reason: Conflict of time schedules, if a person were to get sick, have an emergency, etc.. the project would not be properly represented, lack of knowledge and opinion by the entire Board. Therefore, the Board suggested that it continue in its present manner. Ms. York reviewed with the Board meetings which she has had with Planners in other parts of the State. regarding the manner in which the planning/Zoning Boards' applications/meetings are carried out. The reason for the meetings was to determine if there are more appropriate regula- tions, which can be applied to applications in the Town of Queensbury (ie: limited number of applications/meeting. limit time of meeting. cut the meeting off at a predetermined hour, carryover applications. increase number of meetings/month). Mr. Roberts pointed out that this topic had been discussed previously, but there has not been enough time for the Board and Staff to fully implement the suggestions. 1 The Board does have the ability to Table an application and. at that point. the applicant should be made aware that if he/she agrees to Table the project. the 45-day time period is automatically extended. Ms. York requested that the Board members reviewed the Planning Board Procedural Manual and make any revisions regarding the meetings that it deems necessary. so the Manual can be adopted. Mr. Roberts called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. The minutes of the August 16 and September 8. 1988 will be voted on at the Special Meeting scheduled September 27. 1988. OLD BUSINESS SUBDIVISION NO. 1-87, PRELIMINARY STAGE 1, .:m -Be; Dixon Heights. Phase III The project is 58 lots on the northeasterly side of Dixon Road, north of Halfway Brook, UR-10. Mr. Roberts reviewed previous events of the project. There was a spe- cial meeting held on site. at which there were two members from the Plan- ning Board. most of the Town Board, Building and Planning Departments. As a result, there was a recommendation by the Town Board incorporating agree- ments made on-site, allow three entrances to the subdivision (previously two would be allowed), make the most southerly entrance (at Phase I) a right-turn only access point. Reason: The neighbors advised the Board that the entrance is not satisfactory, in addition, the Board realized that the entrance was not built as approved. There is a 24- water line across the property which necessitates a high bank, which cannot be cut down. Because of this, the site distance is not at the corner is not good. The other two entrances would be much better and would take some traffic off the Phase I entrance. Frank Walter represented the applicants, C & L Realty Associates. The development work will be handled by Massulo Brothers (Carmen and Lewis), builders. Prior to discussing Phase III, Mr. Walter presented an overall layout of Dixon Heights. The Northway is to the east, there is a 100 foot Scenic Enhancement Easement that the State of New York purchased some years ago. Halfway Brook is to the south. Phase I consists of 38 units, Phase II consists of 52 to 54 units. The road through Phase II, which was not in the original proposal, will be cut to to Dixon Road. Previously, there was going to be a cul-de-sac, however, with the unsafe determination of the access at Phase I, it was decided to make this an entrance. Phase III will be 58 units at the North end of the subdivision, with a road cut to Dixon Road as originally proposed. 2 ~ Phase III water will be obtained from the Queensbury water district, waste water will be disposed of in individual septic systems for each four- plex or duplex, storm water will be handled with catch basins, sewers, infiltration on site, overflow will be discharged to a retention basin. The Queensbury Water Department is satisfied with the water supply, there is a SPDES permit from DEC, Charles Scudder, consulting engineer reviewed the waster water and approved. with the exception of the final road config- uration (letter on file). Quentin Kestner approved limiting the Phase I entrance to one-way and allow the Phase II and III entrances. Mr. Roberts advised that the Town Board made a resolution regarding three road cuts (Exhibit A). Legally, Mr. Dusek affirmed that the Town Board can make the Phase I roadway a one-way street, however, he did not know what the time frame would be. Mr. Naylor, Highway Superintendent, also approved the two full-service entrances and the southerly one-way entrance. Because of the safety problems at Phase I, Mr. Cartier re- quested that the road designation be changed as quickly as possible. Mr. Walter said he felt that would be done when the Town accepted the Phase III roadway, which might not be until 1989, however, he felt maybe the Town could be petitioned to do it sooner. The Board did not feel it advisable to have only one two-way road at Phase II serving the Phases I and II. Public Hearing Opened: June Burke: 140 Dixon Road Ms. Burke requested to know what has caused a melt area approximately at the intersection of Dixon Road and Phase II entrance. She was con- cerned about the safety of the area, especially since there was an acci- dent in that location last Spring. It was suggested that perhaps there is poor drainage at that point, Mr. Naylor explained that it was the only place in town at that time of the year that had ice. The Highway has taken care of the situation. Public Hearing Closed. There was a discussion regarding the Phase I roadway. which is to be ONE-WAY IN with no egress. Mr. Naylor stated it is his legal opinion that the one-way designation should be done immediately, because of the poor site distance on the intersection with Dixon Road. There would be two DO NOT ENTER signs at the intersection of Old Mill Lane and North Court (cul- de-sac) and two ONE WAY SIGNS at the intersection of Dixon Road and Old Mill Lane. Mr. Macri moved to APPROVE Subdivision No. 1-87, Preliminary Stage. Dixon Heights, Phase III, based on the agreed development of the third access road, and the developer's agreement to turn the existing Old Mill Lane and the westerly end of the intersection with North Court to ONE WAY-IN from Dixon Road. 3 Seconded by Mr. DeSantis. Passed Unanimously SUBDIVISION NO. 9-87, REVISED FINAL STAGE D ,8 ßJ q,-;), Westwood, Phase II The application is to change the roadway alignment for the site located at Glenwood Avenue, UR-5. Mr. NIck Sciartelli of Morse Engineering represented the project. He stated that there is a tree which the developers would like to save. The tree is located just over the line separating Phase I and II, therefore, in order to save the tree. the alignment of the road would have to be moved approximately five feet east. The tree would then be just off the shoulder line. The roadways are l3 feet lanes with 5 foot shoulders. The distance between the centerline of the road and the tree would be about l8 feet. The cluster of buildings on the east side would have to be skewed a small amount to accommodate for the setback from the road; Mr. Sciartelli verified that there is room for this to be done. Mr. Kestner reviewed his letter of 9/l9/88, he felt the tree is worth saving and recommends approval of the concept. Public Hearing: no comment Mrs. Levandowski moved APPROVAL of Subdivision No. 9-98, Westwood, Phase II, Revised Final Stage, in order that the developers receive their roadway alignment as requested, in order to save the tree. Seconded by Mr. Dybas. Passed Unanimously NEW BUSINBSS SITE PLAN NO. 45-88 Patrick L. and Christine A. Seelye The application is for an addition of a bathroom and two bedrooms (second story) to the residence, SFR-30. Mr. Patrick Seelye represented the project and advised the Board that, after completion. there will be three bedrooms, living room. main bath 4 room, half-bath, one bedroom will be eliminated. Letter from neighbor, Mark Schachner, did not object. Warren County Board approved without comment. Concerning sewerage disposal, Mr. Seelye advised Mr. DeSantis that the system was put in 20 years ago and that it is in good condition. The tank was cleaned within the last three years, it is l,OOO gallon cement holding tank with a l,500 gallon dry well on the lake side of the house (lOO feet from the lake). Mr. Roberts pointed out that the site is pre-existing, nonconforming. Staff noted the septic/well separation is close and the number of bedrooms is being extended. Mr. Seelye mentioned the only problem with the house is the roof is pitched flat. and he will be changing the pitch. Public Hearing: no comment The property is 45 feet wide, lOO feet back from the lake. The addi- tion would not obstruct the neighbors to the rear because the house sits on a hill. There have been no area objections. The land is top soil. J. Sweet cleaned the septic system; it is sufficient for three bedrooms. Mrs. Mann moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 47-88. Patrick L. and Christine A. Seeyle. The request is reasonable use of the property and it seems to meet all codes. Seconded by Mr. Macri. Passed Unanimously SITE PLAN NO. 35-88 Thomas J. and Marybeth T. Babcock The purpose is to knock down the existing house to the first level and build a new structure on top at West Glen Lake, Glen Lake Road to Birch Road to Chestnut Road, SFR-30. Applicant is building a two-story, single family dwelling to be used on weekends and for a few weeks in the Summer Season. Mr. Murray Forth. agent for the applicants, explained that plans are to extend the second story four feet, thereby creating an overhang of four feet. The reason is to make the bedrooms larger. Mr. Roberts pointed out that this approval would be subject to a Variance approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals, he stated the applicant should have received the Vari- ance before presenting the Site Plan. Mr. DeSantis was concerned that the information regarding the septic system was not explicit, except to say -Everything OKI- Mr. Forth stated he did not feel the Babcock's know the 5 '---- -.../ makeup of the system. bedroom house What about the the system, and admitted that he does not have information on Mr. DeSantis wanted to know if it was big enough for a four- (which usually requires a larger system). Is it a dry well? leach field? Mr. Ling stated that there is no more than l5 feet between the house and the retaining wall, and there is a stone basement which is very wet. The land slopes down hill; the well is approximately 30 feet from the septic tank. The Board feels that there is not enough information being presented with which a rational decision could be made. In addition, Mr. Dybas requested that a professional engineer come before the Board and state the condition of the system, especially in regard to an increase in bedrooms and that wetness of the land, J. Sweet, who cleaned the system, is not a professional engineer. PUblic Hearing Opened: Calvin Powers: Neighbor to the north, Lot #10. Mr. Powers explained that on the southern boundary of the building is 9 feet from the Corrigan property line, and on the the northern corner the building is 7.5 feet from Mr. Powers' property line, a distance to which Mr. Powers objects. He was informed that the present foundation is 7.5 feet from the line. Mr. Ling explained that this is an addition to a nonconforming struc- ture, nonconforming lot, nonconforming setbacks. Mr. Forth explained that the reason for the 4-foot extension is because the size of the house is very small. Public Hearing Closed: The Thomas system. planning Board and Mr. Forth agreed to TABLE Site Plan No. 35-88, J. and Marybeth T. Babcock, for more information as to the septic SITE PLAN NO. 36-88 Carol Freihofer The proposal is to change an existing roof-covered entrance porch an interior foyer, to change the existing pine-needle lawn into a patio, and to change an existing landscaped area into a car port. location is 9L to Cleverdale Road, to the very end of the Road, LR-1A. into wood The John P. Matthews is agent for the applicant and verified to Mr. 6 -- Cartier that all measurements are actual. Two Variances will be needed: there is presently a 9-foot setback from the southern corner of the car- port to the neighbor, F. & J. Alexy, also there is a change in use of the existing porch to an enclosed room in the building. The deck will be pressure-treated slatted wood. Public Hearing: no comment Staff comments from Dan Ling were to approve the proposal, with a com- ment that the proposed doorway for the deck serve as an emergency exit. (Presently there is one outside door in the house.) Mr. Matthews verified to the Board that he met with Mr. Alexy to discuss the application, and Mr. Alexy had no objections. Mr. DeSantis moved APPROVAL of Site Plan NO. 36-88. Carol Freihofer, subject to the Variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals and based on Staff's recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Cartier. Passed Unanimously SITE PLAN RO. 37-88 Richard A. Hughes The application is for an addition to the Doctor's Office at 308 Bay Road, HC-15. Charles Johnson of Richard E. Jones Associates represented the pro- ject. Correspondence: Warren County approved without condition. Beautifi- cation Committee approved. Mr. Kestner reviewed his letter of 9/19/88 (Exhibit B). Mr. Kestner suggested a storm water management plan with three dry wells. The new parking facility should not be constructed over the septic system. until the Town sewer district is available and the building is connected. The project is on schedule, so the sewers might be available in about November. He would like to see less paving, and more grass area, let the water go back into the ground, therefore, there would be no change in drainage patterns. Regarding the handicapped, Mr. Cartier was informed that there are is an interior corridor available. Public Hearing: no comment. Mr. Dybas moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 37-88, Richard A. Hughes, with the recommendations of the Town Designated Consultant/Engineer incor- porated into the project and as having no negative impact on the area. 7 ~ Seconded by Mr. Cartier. Passed Unanimously SITE PLAN NO. 38-88 Empire Video Superstore Movin' Movies The application is for a Video Store. retail space rentals and sales of video movies, Route 9, Upper Glen Street, PC-1A. Location is south on Route 9 towards Glens Falls, on the right hand side - just beyond the Grand Union. Mr. Charles Mench represented the project and affirmed that the site is that of the former Rustler Restaurant. Plans are to lease the building from Joseph Nigro and there will be no change in dimensions. Regarding sewerage, there is a pumping station, however, there will be hookup to the Town facilities. There will be no poster boxes. The Board's main concern was site permeability, Mr. Mench did not know the percentage of permeable area, only that there is green area around the building and the 50 feet in front. For l.7 acres, Mr. DeSantis averaged the permeability to be .00l% of the requirement. There was a general feeling among the Board that parking was more than adequate and. with the change in tenants. it would be an opportune time to improve on a poor situation. A safety suggestion was made to remove ten parking spaces on the north side of the building, so that cars would not be backing into moving traffic. Mr. Mench mentioned that the Video Store is high volume and felt that the ten parking spaces would be needed. However, it was pointed out to Mr. Mench that there is sufficient parking available in the entire shopping complex, and he was advised to work with the neighboring businesses on the parking problem. If there is a change in parking, then the entrance to the store will be moved. Mr. Macri felt that it would be important to incorporate into the presentation for the Site Plan parking for not only the Video Store, but the bank. At that time, the Board would be able to make a decision as to how many parking spaces would be necessary and suggest in what manner permeability could be restored to the site in the form of green area. Presently, there is aging blacktop, which is broken up and full of potholes. Mr. Cartier requested to see handicapped parking designated on the plan, it is already marked at the store. Public Hearing: no comment Correspondence: Warren County modified with conditions (Exhibit C). 8 The Board and Charles Mench, representative, agreed to TABLE Site Plan No. 38-88, Empire Video Superstore, Movin' Movies, Inc., because of the necessity of a new parking design and more permeability. SITE PLAN HO. 39-88 Harry R. and Linda A. Baker The application is for an addition of two decks, one situated on the north side of the house and one situated on the east side of the house, located off Route 9L at the mouth of Dunham's Bay, LR-3A. Also proposed are two separate additions to the dwelling. The applicant proposes to tear off a wing on the south side of the house and replace with a larger addition, another addition is proposed for the west side of the house. Harry Baker represented his application and was accompanied by Dean Howland. builder. Of concern was the amount of bedrock, although Mr. Baker said not too many trees would have to be cut to complete the proposed construction. There will be a 1000 gallon tank and a proposed pump station. Mr. Ling commented that the structure is nonconforming as to setbacks, with less than the required frontage. The large amount of bedrock is the biggest concern. The applicant will be going before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Baker remarked that the sewerage system will be situated in the same location as the previous effluent tank; there was a holding tank and grinder pump. The water was pumped up the hill into a dry well; the soil was sufficiently permeable. For perc tests, some holes were were 3 to 4 feet deep, the ground is very uneven. Morse Engineering based the design on 7 minute perc tests, and tests of 1 to 3 minutes. Soil will be brought in to level the entire area. There will be nothing substandard in the construction, everything will be an improvement. Public Hearing: no comment. Mr. Cartier moved APPROVAL of Site Plan No. 39-88. Harry R. and Linda A. Baker, pending approval of the Variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 28, 1988. Seconded by Mrs. Levandowski. Passed Unanimously 9 Chairman Roberts adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. CfìdJ4Þ: ~ Richard Roberts, Chairman /ò/;t!JY Dite / c¡ oi 6.f{ Date 10 - "---" ~ RESOLUTION-REGARDING CUL DE SAC AT DIXON HEIGHTS AND RECOfIŒNDATION TO PI..ANlfING BOARD FOR THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY RESOLUTION NO. 333. Introduced by Mrs. Marilyn Potenza who moved for its adoption. seconded by Mrs. Betty Monahan: WHEREAS. C & L Realty Associates who are presently developing the Dixon Heights Subdivision have approached the Town Board for the Town of Queensbury concerning the use of lands presently owned by the Town of Queensbury to create a cul de sac for the end of a road known as Tiffany Lane. which road presently intersects ~ixon Road. in the subdivision of Dixon Heights. and WHEREAS. members of the Town Board. accompanied by some members of the Planning Board. the Town Highway Superintendent. the Town Engineer. the Town Attorney. the developers and their attorney and engineer. visited the site of the proposed cul de sac and reviewed the proposal on-site as well as another proposed cut onto Dixon Road. and a presently existing road cut for Old Mill Lane. NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is not in favor of the use of lands owned by the Town of Queensbury for a cul de sac at the end of Tiffany Lane as proposed by the developer and. BE IT FURTHER r RESOLVED. that the Town of Queensbury. in an effort to clarify its position concerning road cuts for subdivisions in the Town of Queensbury. hereby states that it is its position that road cuts be minimized whenever possible. and that all subdivisions should have at least town (2) road cuts. however. it is not necessary that there be only two (2) road cuts into any particular sUbdivision. as the number of road cuts should be based upon the conditions existing on the roadway and in the subdivision at the time said road cuts are considered by the Planning Board and BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED. that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury after consideration of site distance, road conditions. comments made by a local resident. hereby offers as recommendation to the Planning Board of the Town of Queensbury for its consideration. such recommendation being that the Planning Board for the Town of Queensbury consider allowing three (3) road cuts onto Dixon Road upon the condition that Old Mill Lane be made a one-way road leading into the subdivision and the Jown Board. if requested by the Planing Board. will seek to impose said one-way designation on Old Mill Lane upon following due legal process. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mrs. Potenza. Mr. Montesi, Mrs. Monahan. Mr. Borgos Noes: None Absent: Mr. Kurosaka Æ: 'K (+-1 ø. I ..,.- ¡:;. f ~~'.~;." ~"'4íUi.~"ínJINiC~Urli-·r"'-~;;:'.'''';'- -;0,' '...·f;~,:::;"~~j,<;<:i:-,~[;;¡.¡.r~~::.",~, -. : : . . t '. J. D"rl~en H. ÐouRher, TO"'n Clerk 0" the TO"'n of QII..e""bury. Warren County. N..... York, do hereby eertlfy thftt t h"v~ comrnred the foregoing vlth the otl~I"1I1 ruolutlon u 1I1It"d ..bov.. ",1"rtp-It ..t" t'U~ lIIf'etlng O(~the To Board or the To,", or Q\I"rullbury held on t'rle 9 dlty or . I9Æ ~ Itt ",hleh II qllorum Wft. rrellent And thAt the IInmf', I .. correct tran.cr1rt thereho", find o( the ...hole orllln81 thereoC tn ""t... JPI WitNESS TIIER.F.OF, or Queenøbury. thll I: ~ E A L "I . . .' . 1 heve hereto Id "'1 hRnd and the G!^L of uld Town 1 ~ dAY of Q)..O-1· . 19 ¿.;V .. SIGHED. __iJfA&J.L.<Jl1 ¿trt"'--- "..rle"n H. Dougher Town Clerk Town of Queen.bury <,; k-y.¡.i--II3¡ T iJ';J.-.- '. . . -- ESTABLISHED IN 1955 KESTNER ENGINEERS, P. c. CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOSEPH A. KESTNER. JR.. P.E., L.S. MARK L. KESTNER, P.E. QUENTIN T. KESTNER, P.E. ANTHONY M. KESTNER, B.S. ONE KESTNER LANE TROY. NEW YORK 12180 518-273-7446 K. WAYNE BUNN, P.E. JAMES J. SHAUGHNESSY, P.E. JEROME THORNE, S.E.T. September 19~ 1988 Ms. Lee York Senior Planner Town of Queensbury Queensbury Town Office Building Bay at Haviland Road Queensbury, NY 12801 RE: Town of Queensbury (TE) site Plan No. 37-88 Doctors' Offices at 308 Bay Road ~_ ~~ -. ----.-.-..~ Dear Ms. York: ;OÞ·.. ¡(" I have reviewed Drawing No. 5-1 of the subject site plan fO~\ adequacy of water supply, sanitary sewers, and storm-water\i<~ management facilities. I would advise as follows: \ 1. The facilities of the Queensbury Water District are available to the site and presently serve the existing structure. It is indicated on the drawing that there will be no increase in existing water use, and therefore; water service to the site is adequate. 2. The existing facilities are served by an existing on-site, subsurface disposal system. The facilities of the Central Queensbury Quaker Road Sewer District should be available to the site by late Fall of 1988. The 4" PVC building sewer shown on the drawings should be changed to 6" diameter to conform to existing Sewer District Standards. The new parking facilities over the existing septic system should not be constructed until the Sewer District's facilities are available, and the building's service is connected. MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING WATER, SEWAGE. AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FEDERAL/STATE GRANT APPLICATIONS . PRECISION SURVEYING AND GROUND CONTROL TELEVISION PIPELINE INSPECTION, METERING & SAMPLING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ¡¿XII-I@/7 ./31 J'i:'~~"~;-""".~~" '-,...~ "í' ~ ~ /' Ms. Lèe York, Senior Planner -2- September 19, 1988 3. The new parking area will increase site runoff, and it is indicated that all flow will be directed to the rear' of the site and then drained to an existing culvert on Bay Road. No calculations were provided for storm-water detention. I would suggest that a storm-water detention plan be provided perhaps in the form of installing at least three 8 foot diameter dry wells with interconnecting piping. Such a system should accommodate the increased area runoff. The architect may submit an alternate plan if he so desires. Sincerely, KESTNER ENGINEERS, P.C. ~~~~ Quentin T. Kestner, P.E. Vice President QTK/cp cc: Dan Ling, Assistant Planner All Planning Board Members k X#/ßI7 Iß.¡ ,;"",.JftII <~_J.J_,."._,,!_" -,(,,-,,~J:':.~~~'I"'!II":'~"~ ~ '-' WARREN COUNTY / îI ' !flY r¡ i Ii.. ¡. ·-..fl.·.i.. Ii ~' ..... <- <,",,< 'h ,< ('i .' I.t r";.'.." .<..< Ij" )</< ,< I'd I' ¡,. Ii {'../ ,/ I::';,'::U ¿ J ,< _~t:)1i'lH'! 'C'["': ('ìUEEN!:'r.n; :-<\' PLA N N I fiI~FBÔA'j¡Q?h'Îi') w:;;:nG~~~;~: ~.";'~:.~\~:~~.r · '. >:t<~i988' L" rclCpOO/lC ~16·161·6~ 10 DATE: September 14, 1988 RE: SPR38-88 TO: Queensbury Planning & Zoning Office Town Office Building Bay & Haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12801 Cent lemen/Ladies: At a meeting of the Yarren County Planning Board. held on the 14th. day of September, 198~ the above applicat10n for a Site Plan Review to operate a v.ideo store for retail space for rentals and sales of video movies in a 5000 sq. ft. building. Empire Video Superstore Route 9 w~s reviewed, and the following action vas taken. Recommendation to: ( ) Approve ( ) Disapproval ()() Modify with Conditions ( R~turn Comment: , )J¡) /"£,¿¿s T/-/I1:t J/¿;N~ /1J?(,)~0.5-êò /3J /'ffljJ¿tl#N ¡l ¡Jf ïfev¡/.!w,vJ /JJ Z':'N//~ t /JÒ.n4;¡.,¡j;hi'q-/o . ".' L '/¿ /,0 v/..:;H¿ /Z/Yl/N/': L(;;U-'/'£.,/¿>rl/'I")'./If T#;j--r h/¿~ A/R(')N L/ók./'> L/ONS II/' ( #5,S¿: /YE /3 ¿ 'Þ'A J . ~ óJ( /',; ~/ä~ S ,íJ'£ é â,//ll/#;piLr(). j//JÆN9.ßC/.: ßO/l /I1ðRc¡;t.lr, . 'i-' /'fI-¡}¡h //Od --~~~_2S~[~~~b~~¿q_~P¿l__~~~~~~_________________________---------- It is the policy of the ~arren County Planning Board to follow the procedures of the New York State Ceneral Municipal Law, Section 2J9-H, with regard to Municipal Zoning actions that are referred to and reported thereon. The following are procedural requirements that must be adhered co: 1.) The ~arren County Planning Board shall report its recomroendat ion~ to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement for such actions. If no action 1s taken within thirty (JO) days or agreed upon time. the municipal agency may act vithout such report. If the recommendation 1s for disapproval of the proposal. or modification thereof, the municipal agency shall not act contrary to such action except by a vote of a ~ajority plus one of all the me~bers thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions. Wichin seven (7) days after the· final action by thl' municipal agency having jurisdiction on the reconunendations, modific¿ltioll~; or disapproval of ß referred IMtter, such municipality iI~;"1\"V shall f lle a report with the Wßrrcr¡;g,0 ntY?Hl'l;;¡¡;;..n I AOl\rd on the ncc~~5nry (orm t?)(H/~/TC ....,...".,... ."",..'<. ~ i.'~""'~~~"",",~ ·1"~4.t.w.J.-i':'"",\",...~U?"H' 1!i~~~~~'t~.\'~. 2. ) 3.) ~:\"V'\)~:'.";";~'ë"·'-'Ii!"t