Loading...
1989-04-20 ---.. QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD APRIL 20, 1989 INDEX . APPLICANT PAGE Site Plan No. 27-89 Pro-Craft Excavating Inc. l. Site Plan No. 24-89 Adirondack Industrial Park Inc. 4. Subdivision No. 6-1989 Karen Witte & Cathy Cloutier 6. Site Plan No. 28-89 John Matthews 9. Site Plan No. 26-89 Robert Pusz 10. .. '-- .,--- ,..1, ---/ QUEENSBURY PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING APRIL 20, 1989 7:35 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT RICHARD ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN FRANK DESANTIS VICTOR MACRI JOSEPH DYBASS JOHN GORALSKI, PLANNER PAT COLLARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS W. NACE, TOWN CONSULTANT/ENGINEER TOWN ATTORNEY-PAUL DUSEK MEMBERS ABSENT HILDA MANN, SECRETARY PETER CARTIER KEITH JABLONSKI NEW BUSINESS SITE PLAN NO. 27-89, TYPE ß, LI-1A, PRO-CRAFT EXCAVATING, INC. SOUTH ON BIG BA Y ROAD, APPROX. 1/3 MILE TO PRO-CRAFT, INC., OFFICE PRESENT USE: CONSTRUCTION YARD FOR HEA VY EQUIPMENT, TOPSOIL, STORAGE AND VACANT, PROPOSED USE: SAME BUT IN ADDmON, TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WOOD DEBRIS (I.E. STUMPS, TREES) TO BE "CHIPPED" AND CARRIED OFF SITE. (WARREN COUNTY PLANNING) TAX MAP NO. 137-2-3.4 SECTION 4.020 N LOT SIZE: 5.14 ACRES TED BIGELOW REPRESENTING PRO-CRAFT/LOU PALMER PRESENT VICE PRESIDENT OF PRO-CRAFT MAP SHOWN TO THE BOARD TED BIGELOW-Plans for a new recycling system which Pro-Craft would like to purchase and operate in the Town of Queensbury, and other communities. (Picture of machine on file, and an outline of its operation). The Pro-Craft site consists of the 5 acres they have with the new building that was built 2 years ago and the parking lot and have approximately 4 acres behind it with a topsoil stock pile behind it which fluctuates in size depending on the time of year. They would like to put a gravel road in to get to the back of the site which is approximately 486 feet from the main road. They would like to set the machine up right in the center of the back of the site, the machine is approximately 10ft. by 40 ft. They would like to have a temporary stock pile of the materials that come in put it through the "chipper" and then have another temporary stock pile of the mulch. They're looking at setting the machine up on a temporary basis, they hope that they will be able to build in several different communities in the north country, and have an arrangement with communities whereby they would contract to have stumps, trees, brought into the different landfills and wherever the communities designate they would come in a certain day of the month and chip the stuff up. The mulch that goes through it and comes out is the by-product and then sold to landscapers or used for erosion control. The machine does about 200 yds. an hour, it reduces it by a ratio of 7 to 1. JOSEPH DYBASS-Asked if he had the decibel rating for the machine? TED BIGELOW-They don't go up much, just four to five decibel's, partly because once it starts up you don't get that much noise when the product is actually going through the machine. Its either a Caterpillar or a Cummings engine that runs this. VICTOR MACRI-Asked if a loader was going to be involved. TED BIGELOW-Their will be a loader involved, it will be noise that they already have at their site. The site is zoned light industrial. The site that they have is L shaped and it sits back. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked what kind of back yard is there? TED BIGELOW-This is land owned by Northern Distributing where they plan on putting their park, this land (refers to map) was bought by D'Ambrosio Textile, and this other land is a warehouse. This machine will sit right in the back of the middle of the site which will be 150 feet either way. This was all trees, when the plan was done their was an existing tree line there, and what they have now is just about what you see in the plans. They left a 30 foot ~ '-- ",- , ./" ~.. buffer of trees. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN BILL THREW-Owns property to the south. I would discourage myself from this because of the noise involved in this in my particular area. TED BIGELOW-Asked if he has actually seen the machine in operation? BILL THREW-I have gone to demonstrations. TED BIGELOW-Asked what brand of machine he was looking at? BILL THREW-Their was stump drain, stump drainer, wood master, they are all powered by either Caterpillar or John Deere. TED BIGELOW-This machine is either Caterpillar or Cummings. The noise involved is no more than what you would have with a diesel engine in a heavy piece of equipment. RICHARD ROBERTS-The decibel ratings are high when its just the engine. TED BIGELOW-This particular site We thought was a good site because it sits far off the road and in the woods. In the decibel ratings it was taken at the power unit and at the property 20 feet. JOSEPH DYBASS-You start at 10 feet and you go to 100 feet. TED BIGELOW-it gives you the decibel ratings at various distances. FRANK DESANTIS-Where the machine is where your dropping these stumps from a loader onto the grate and then putting them in the chipper, is there a possibility of just scrapping out an area that may be lower in depth and setting the machine down in it? The sound is trapped in the hole to a degree. JOSEPH DYBASS-The topsoil stock pile would probably help you out if it is a significant height. LOU P ALMER-I could do that. TED BIGELOW-This operation is not going to be a 5 day operation. This machine is a $3,000 a day machine, and their is not enough material in Queensbury to make this profitable, being mobile they have plans to move in to different communities. LOU PALMER-In aU clearing jobs the machine will be moved on site. LOU PALMER-If it were on the site four days here, I would say this would be close to right. It takes an awful lot to make the machine work. JOSEPH DYBASS-Asked what their hours would be? LOU PALMER-We would work only an eight hour day. FRANK DESANTIS-Asked how many yards would be in a dump truck that was full of stumps? LOU P ALMER- Your talking about 16 yards in a truck, I can take seven of those trucks and reduce it to one by putting it through the machine. VICTOR MACRI-Asked if it was 200 yards an hour with the inproduct? LOU PALMER-The inproduct. TED BIGELOW-It is 200 yards now maximum going in and it reduces it to about 1/7th of that on the other end. FRANK DESANTIS-There would have to be 160 trucks coming in and out in order to have enough stumps to chip. THOMAS NACE-Over a period of a week you have these 160 trucks itls still a reasonable amount of traffic. TED BIGELOW-The plans submitted with this on the drainage plans (explained to Board where the drainage will run) they don't plan on altering this, except they were going to suppress this - --3 --' about 2 feet, so that the drainage would come across here (refers to map) it wouldn't cause a problem. The drainage was done by C.T. Male Associates, and they recommended that this area where the material was to be stock piled should be suppressed. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked about the burm against the west end against the trees you are constituting building a burm, asked if this is something that could be continued? TED BIGELOW-Part of the reason for ENCON getting into this is because of the new regulations. VICTOR MACRI-Asked if their will be a point in time that there will be a constant stock pile, and how often he plans on turning over the stock pile? LOU P ALMER-I don't think there will be a constant stock pile, it is really hard to say, I can't visualize that much stuff coming in. TED BIGELOW-With the amount of material that the machine can process, I don't think their would be a constant stock pile. BOARD ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FIRE CONTROL TED BIGELOW-Their is a hydrant right in front of the property. VICTOR MACRI-Maybe their is a need for a loop going out to the property so that their is a hydrant closed to the stock piles. JOSEPH DYBASS-You have a way of separating the dirty from the clean? LOU PALMER-Yes. We are going to have to do this so we can have a product that we can sell. The dirty stuff would be at ground level. The clean stuff we would mulch up, it will be separated. PUBLIC HEARING TO REMAIN OPEN ENGINEER REPORT Thomas N ace, See Attached. DISCUSSION HELD TED BIGELOW-Pro-Craft does own a tanker where they could keep the pile wet. THOMAS NACE-Our concern is with the material they would stay there for a period of time. FRANK DESANTIS-You need to talk with a fire company in that area and advise them that you have something like this, ask them what they think is necessary. TED BIGELOW-The hydrant would be approximately 600 feet from where the machine actually sits. FRANK DESANTIS-That is to far. RICHARD ROBERTS-Would like Bill Bodenwiser to take a look into this. THOMAS NACE-Burming around the property boundary may not be very effective, its to far away from the machine. TED BIGELOW-We would have to take out what vegetation their is to put it in. FRANK DESANTIS-If you can drop the site where the machine is you don't have to move anything. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked Bill Threw if this was something he would agree with if they put the machine down into a pit? BILL THREW-Yes. I think it will work if they do this. The noise is only my problem. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from David Cook, Millwork Company, dated April 17th, 1989, (On File). Warren County Planning Board, approved, staff raised questions about dealing with noise levels after approval, hours of operations, etc. Also questions thresholds for the amount of chip debris could be stock piled and for how long as well as how much untouched material could be brought ........... -- A to the sight. STAFF INPUT Notes from John Goralski, Planner, See Attached. DISCUSSION HELD TED BIGELOW-The stump and brush pile mentioned in the staff notes, saying it doesn't look very well, it has been sitting there since the building has been built. The comments as to Pro-Craft's properties, they have by far the best looking property of Big Bay Road. As far as the screening goes with the trees I am assuming that any properties that he develops he would leave some kind of buffer. With the restrictions of the hour of operations I don't think ,!"e .have a problem with that. The site is more than adequate in size for the operation, and It SItS back far enough, it is zoned light industrial all around it. Pro-Craft takes pride in the way it looks and operates. VICTOR MACRI-Believes the Board has to deal with the hole site. THOMAS NACE-Offered to send an engineer out to look at the site with one of Pro-Craft engineer, and maybe we can come to terms with the existing problem. MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN NO. 27-89, PRû-CRAFT EXCAVATING, INC., Introduced by Joseph Dybass who moved for its adoption, seconded by Victor Macri: Tabled by request of the applicant for more sufficient information, with Planning Board approval. Duly adopted this 20th day of April, 1989, by the following vote: A YES: Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Macri, Mr. Dybass, Mr. Roberts NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Cartier, Mr. Jablonski, Mrs. Mann SITE PLAN NO. 24-89, LI-3A, TYPE ß, ADIRONDACK INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., LOT 60, COUNTY LINE ROAD, NEXT TO ORKIN PEST CONTROL ON SOUTH SIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 20,000 SQ. FT. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON WARREN/WASHINGTON COUNTY I.D.A. LAND. 10% OFFICE SPACE, 90% WAREHOUSE SPACE. 10,000 SQ. FT. WILL BE LEASED OUT AS TENANTS BECOME AVAILABLE. (WARREN COUNTY PLANNING) TAX MAP NO. 55-2-20 SECTION 4.020 N LOT SIZE: 4.021 ACRES JOE CLARK PRESENT/PART OWNER OF ADIRONDACK INDUSTRIAL PARK DESIGN SHOWN TO THE BOARD JOE CLARK-Last year we started construction with one building on Lot 59, south of the PBS complex. This year we have plans to get a little more involved in it. We own Lot 60, and 58, 57, and 56. On Lot 60 we propose a 20,000 square foot building, we don't see any changes to the grade. Showed to Board the building that he has in Colonie, (pointed out where fire hydrants are located). Their is more than enough parking for light industrial space. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if other plans were made for the additional buildings? JOE CLARK-Not before we do all of the planning. This building (refers to design), is a very small building it is only 2,000 square feet, (pointed out where roadway is and access is), this will always be private. We intend to someday build a road U shaped and down around, we own up to PBS, we have been talking to PBS about if their is someway to intertwine our operation, so they could get into ours and we could get into there's. Their are separate lots right now, their will be a permanent easement to the lots with an access, that will be part of the deed. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked that at the present time would he still have the other driveway? JOE CLARK-We will still have the small driveway. RICHARD ROBERTS-They are awfully close together, it would be better to combine them with a wide blacktop driveway, it would be nice to limit the road cuts there. JOE CLARK-Eventually if this ever becomes a reality we would do that. THOMAS NACE-Asked if it would be possible to use the existing road cut for your new building? _. -'5 ''"'--- ---' JOE CLARK-It would be easier to take this (refers to drawing) then take that one out. ENGINEER REPORT Thomas N ace, See Attached. DISCUSSION HELD Joe Clark-Refers to engineer report, comment number one. The way the letter is suppose to read is, 10% of the two 5,000 foot tenants, which is my construction company, and Video Electric will have 10% of there 10,000 feet will be office. We're only going to have 500 foot of office. THOMAS NACE-That needs to be clarified. If it is only 10% office space then we have to have adequate parking. FRANK DESANTIS-We also need to know what your going to do with the other 10,000 square feet, of the 10,000 you have plans for your going to have 10% office and 90% warehouse. Your not quite sure of the rest, this impacts on parking primarily. JOE CLARK-Asked what the requirement was on parking? JOHN GORALSKI-Office is I per 150 spaces. FRANK DESANTIS-1O,OOO square feet of office space your going to need 66 to 67 spaces, and their is no way from what you have shown you can do this. VICTOR MACRI-Your going to have to plan for the maximum parking, we need to know how your going to construct it. JOE CLARK-I think the way this Board would have to work would be to approve each tenant that comes in. RICHARD ROBERTS-If it is a change is use, your saying that 90% of that is going to be warehouses so the parking is not going to be a problem. If would have to make the changes and then he would have to come back. JOE CLARK-Asked what kind of parking was allowed for industrial? JOHN GORALSKI-One for each two employees on a maximum working shift, plus one space for each company vehicle. FRANK DESANTIS-What you would see would be a restriction on your site plan approval, you would have allowable up to 2,000 square feet of office space in the building, you come up with a tenant your are going to exceed that threshold, which would be he would want 4,000 more of office space, your going to need the minimum for site plan. VICTOR MACRI-We do not want to see more parking than what is necessary. JOHN GORALSKI-In a light industrial zone office is not an allowable use, unless its an office building in excess of 10,000 square feet. The uses that they presently have are allowable uses and it would have to be a similar use going into that building. It couldn't be just specifically office space. JOE CLARK-As to the drainage, I believe, that the drainage on this whole site when this came into effect for site plan review, most of this drainage is all taken care west of the Warren I.D.A. where they divided all the properties that why we have a drainage which runs down to the front of the whole property. THOMAS NACE-It shows most of your property with the drainage to the rear. JOE CLARK-I show that it starts from the middle of the building going forward, and the rest I haven't change any of the drainage. I think that I also show drainage to the back of the property which I have 300 feet there. With the amount of land that I have before it ever went out it would go in. The ground goes down, instead of the water rushing out, we would put it at the end of the drain. RICHARD ROBERT-The problem is that we don't know the extent of the engineering that has been done when the whole area was developed. Their is an overall storm drainage plan as part of the industrial park. What I'm saying is that some of this work, I think, has already been authorized. '-- '-- ../6 / -_/ THOMAS NACE-On your Drainage Report, the numbers show that their is a 44% increase in run off for the whole site, maybe what your taking for front has been accounted for in the industrial requirement. What your taking to the rear may work, I don't know, their is not enough data to say whether it will or won't, without increasing run off to the back of these sites. FRANK DESANTIS-Basically as a rule what we have is that all storm water drainage stays of your property. I understand, that your putting it on your property, but we require that you show us that it stays there. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if Thomas Nace, felt if the Drainage Report was inadequate? THOMAS NACE-It is inadequate if I am going to review the numbers and agree with the numbers. There is not enough information for me to say that your're not going to increase run off on the site. JOE CLARK-As far as the grading plan we are not going to change it, everything was set up to follow existing. Your only taking of a change of 6 inches, so you don't change the grading plan for this. THOMAS NACE-There were no final grades shown so we didn't know if you were raising the building a couple feet above the existing ground. FRANK DESANTIS-Our problem is that we usually see existing and finished grade levels. You show a difference over the building of at least four feet. JOE CLARK-On comment number four, of the engineer report, their is water and sewer tapes under lot. FRANK DESANTIS-We need to know where the tap is on your site. CORRESPONDENCE Beautification Committee approved, Warren County Planning Board approved. Glens Falls Independent Living Center letter, dated April 19, 1989, concerning handicapped parking. (On file) STAFF INPUT Notes from Lee A. York, Senior Planner, See Attached. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN NO COMMENT PUBLIC HEARING TO REMAIN OPEN MOTION TO TABLE SITE PLAN NO.24-89, ADIRONDACK INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC.,Introduced by Joseph Dybass who moved for its adoption, seconded by Victor Macri: Tabled due to insufficient information, as mentioned in the Engineer Report, and Staff Notes. Duly adopted this 20th day of April, 1989, by the following vote: A YES: Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Macri, Mr. Dybass, Mr. Robert NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Cartier, Mr. Jablonski, Mrs. Mann SUBDMSION NO. 6-1989, KAREN WITTE CATHY CLOUTIER, PRELIMINARY STAGE, MR-5, TYPE: UNLISTED, WEST SIDE BAY ROAD, DmECTL Y ACROSS FROM ACC, SOUTH OF NORMAN FERGUSON'S RESIDENCE WHICH IS LOCATED AT 428 BAY ROAD CATHY CLOUTIER PRESENT PARTNER WITH KAREN WITTE/LEON STEVES VANDUSHEN AND STEVES CATHY CLOUTIER-Would like to purchase this property from Mr. Ferguson's as an investment. STAFP INPUT Notes from Lee A. York, Senior Planner, See Attached. "--. "-- ENGINEER REPORT Thomas Nace, See Attached. DISCUSSION HELD JOHN GORALSKI-Refers to comment number one of engineer report. The question is if this is not used as a residential lot does it apply? RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if she was thinking of some commercial operation for this site? CA THY CLOUTIER-It is possible. FRANK DESANTIS-If you do have it as residential we're saying that your going to need a variance or 160 feet of lot width. CATHY CLOUTIER-With residential their is a problem? FRANK DESANTIS-Their is a problem with the size of the average lot width with this layout of this parcel for residential use. LEON STEVES-I think we have addressed the numbers required in the plan that has been submitted as the typical uses of the lot width size. In the front we are showing 8 parking spaces. FRANK DESANTIS-Your showing a 1500 square foot building. Asked if the municipal sewer up Bay Road were to be considered, would this lot be to small to put a septic system on it with 10 parking spots? LEON STEVES-I have shown two guidelines where the 1,000 gallon septic tank would be I have also shown gravel only on this. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if it is a reasonable request to grant the wavier? FRANK DESANTIS-I have a problem with the septic system. RICHARD ROBERTS-How much more is needed besides the perc test. FRANK DESANTIS-You have a 1500 square foot building you have to have 10 spaces, asked if there was enough space? THOMAS NACE-No, he only has eight. FRANK DESANTIS-He has enough area to show ten. THOMAS NACE-Maybe, its going to be tight. LEON STEVES-I could push the parking to the south and then gain two spots in the front so that the configuration possibility is there. THOMAS NACE-OK. We have ruled out residential use. RICHARD ROBERTS-We ruled out residential use, except for a variance. JOHN GORALSKI-You cannot claim a hardship for a variance if it is a self-created hardship. I would suggest by subdividing this lot in this way that this is a self-created hardship. You might want to put on the final plat that this would only be used for non-residential use. RICHARD ROBERTS-We are dealing with a very small lot very close to a stream that needs to be protected. The intent of the internalization is to try to limit road cuts and restrict development. LEON STEVES-Asked in the requirements of double width is that strictly applied, the proximity of Mr. Ferguson's house it would require that his frontage be at least 250 feet to maintain that his privacy. The 250 feet plus the 75 feet, we have 325 feet, which is double the road frontage. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if we could average the two of them together? JOHN GORALSKI-No. When you subdivide you won't have that. You need double the lot width of every lot. "---.. .--- ./ -"'" THOMAS NACE-Have a problem with the septic system. Their is a general standard in the Sanitary Sewer Ordinance, that no competent of a leaching facility shall be located under driveways, roads, parking areas, or other areas subject to heavy loading. This would mean that you have to have a variance in order to develop it. JOHN GORALSKI-Not sure as to whether lot is developeable in this way without a septic variance. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN MR. FERGUSON-Not sure as to what you mean? RICHARD ROBERTS-We found some small detail problems, Leon thinks he can solve them. MR. FERGUSON-I'm not the only one who has been bothered by this. RICHARD ROBERTS-Its going to hurt a lot of people. It already has. MR. FERGUSON-I have a man from Whitehall, I think I could sell it to, now what am I going to tell him. I have been paying taxes on that place since 1960. What do I do now, I'm in a box. RICHARD ROBERTS-On the other side of your house is there room enough to have the necessary frontage. MR. FERGUSON-Down where this young lady wants to build, you can blame the beavers. TAPED TURNED MR. FERGUSON-I don't know if I can add anything, I hope I can live there. RICHARD ROBERTS-That your pretty safe on. MR. FERGUSON-I don't know if it is or not. Can anyone of you say that we're really going to have a sewer up there? RICHARD ROBERTS-We think so. FRANK DESANTIS-The Town Attorney, was in attendance with us two nights ago, I asked him when are we going to have the sewer on Bay Road. He told me that their has been a map, plan, and report, and that their are a few more details to be worked out, concerning right- of-way etc. He then told me he anticipated the Town Board, to hold the first of a couple public hearings in June of this year, and that's as far as he would go. The next question I asked him was exactly the same one you just asked me. We don't have an answer for when it is going to be there. MR. FERGUSON-What would you advise at this stage, I just do nothing? FRANK DESANTIS-I think that you have to have plans that would be viable without a sewer, in case, one never comes by. MR. FERGUSON-I'm not sure I understand you. JOSEPH DYBASS-You better plan on your own septic system for now. MR. FERGUSON-I've got a septic system there. JOSEPH DYBASS-The girls if they buy that, they have to make sure they have enough property to put a septic system on. That's the key. MR. FERGUSON-On the east side of Lake George, from Plum Point, to Pilot Knob, I was the original building expector with the Town, and I had jurisdiction from Plum Point, all up through there. I have step in some of those places, I asked them to tell me where the location of the septic tank was, many of these were old people, they didn't live here, I asked them to point out to me where approximately where it was, they said they didn't know. All of those probably in fairly recent years was a huge big hole dug in, a lot of rocks in there, and that was their septic system. RICHARD ROBERTS-We understand that. We know that their are serious problems elsewhere, but we are addressing your problem as best we can. The Town is considering, Lake George. MR. FERGUSON-I have owned property there since 1927, on Lake George, and we gave it away ,-. ..-'.J '- -.. a few years ago. This young lady and her partner can't start the house now? RICHARD ROBERTS-This is a two stage process. Tonight was preliminary and we have to do it again next month for final stage, whenever we can get the paper work done. I guess we think it is a buildable project. MR. FERGUSON-What is the greatest distance you can get from that stream where the septic system is? LEON STEVES-100 feet is the minimum distance. RICHARD ROBERTS-That is the minimum, that's not what he asked, how far can you get? LEON STEVES-I'm right back to 100 feet. JOSEPH DYBASS-Your're all right there. MR. FERGUSON-I understand that, I'm sure I read somewhere 200 feet. RICHARD ROBERTS-it depends on how fast the perculation test is, it is 200 feet some places, especially Lake George. MR. FERGUSON-Thank you. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION TO APPROVE SUBDMSION NO. 6-1989, PRELIMINARY STAGE, KAREN J. WITTE, CATHY CLOUTIER,lntroduced by Victor Macri who moved for its adoption, seconded by Frank DeSantis: Based on the review of the enclosed environmental assessment form it was determined that their was no environmental impact. The applicant will have to follow our engineer recommendation on the understanding that the building will be reduced in size of 1,200 square feet and the perculation information will be provided and additionally the accommodation to the lot layout will be made in order to accomplish the minimum width lot size. This parcel will be limited to commercial development. Duly adopted this 20th day of April, 1989, by the following vote: A YES: Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Macri, Mr. Dybass, Mr. Roberts NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Cartier, Mr. Jablonski, Mrs. Mann SITE PLAN NO. 28-89, JOHN MATTHEWS, 300 BAY ROAD, MODIFICATION, TYPE 0, HC-lA, TO REVISE EXISTING APPROVED SITE PLAN (NUMBER 45-88) BY REDUCING THE SIZE OF THE ADDITION AND MOVING REDUCED AREA TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. GENERAL OFFICE: 4,900 SQ. FT. (WARREN COUNTY PLANNING) TAX MAP NO. 61-1-34 SECTION 4.020 K LOT SIZE: 1.76 ACRES MAP SHOWN TO BOARD JOHN MATTHEWS PRESENT RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if John Matthews, wanted to amend the previous approval? JOHN MATTHEWS-Yes. What I had was a 1500 square foot approval on the Glenwood Avenue side, the people that were renting the rear space as a kitchen, now have that space available to make best use of the rear of the building, I would like to take a portion of this addition, (refers to map), and put it on the other side. The other problem that I found in the process of findings pipes underneath the property, I found that their is a six inch sprinkler line in the area where I originally proposed to put the addition. I haven't changed any of the parking, any of the landscaping. I am going to use the same existing paved area. I have the sewer system hooked up, I removed all the old on site septic tanks. RICHARD ROBERTS-You haven't finished doing what was talked about outside this grey area. JOHN MATTHEWS-I have tabled that temporarily, I have had another proposal from someone to possibly make a building in there, nothing has come through on it yet. I have used some topsoil from a previous job to maintain the grade level. .,-- '---" ~ ----- FRANK DESANTIS-This has all been worked over. JOHN MA TTHEWS-I have been gradually doing some work in the back corner. FRANK DESANTIS-Asked if it has been touched by a machine? RICHARD ROBERTS-He had approval. JOHN MATTHEWS-Most of what you see there now, I have just put in the sewer. FRANK DESANTIS-Asked if it was his intention that this was going to stay pretty much the way it is? JOHN MATTHEWS-Grassed over. What I did was just reuse the topsoil for landscaping that I am going to do around there. RICHARD ROBERTS-Asked if he was asking to amend just a portion of the previous approved plan? JOHN MATTHEWS-Correct. The only portion that I want to amend is just the building. VICTOR MACRI-If you have revision to a existing site plan you should revise that site plan. The file should have the latest drawing. STAFF INPUT Notes on file, from John Goralski, Planner, See Attached. CORRESPONDENCE Warren County approved. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN NO COMMENT PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN NO. 28-89, MODIFICATION, JOHN MATTHEWS,lntroduced by Frank DeSanits who moved for its adoption, seconded by Joseph Dybass: Staff has reviewed this it has no effect on the any of the prior reviewed criteria, he is just moving a couple of hundred of square feet on each side of the building. No impact on parking, or municipal utilities. Duly adopted this 20th day of April, 1989, by the following vote: A YES: Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Macri, Mr. Dybass, Mr. Roberts NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Cartier, Mr. Jablonski, Mrs. Mann SITE PLAN NO. 26-89, TYPE n, HC-lA, ROBERT PUSZ, BAY ROAD, ACROSS FROM CRONIN ROAD, FOR RETAIL SALES, APPROX. 924 SQ. FT. OF HARDWARE AND FENCE PARTS. (WARREN COUNTY PLANNING) TAX MAP NO. 59-1-17 SECTION 4.020-0 LOT SIZE: 20,100 SQ FT. MOTION TO STRIKE SITE PLAN NO. 26-89, ROBERT PUSZ, FROM THE RECORD,lntroduced by Frank DeSanits who moved for its adoption, seconded by Joseph Dybass: For two reasons; (1) Primarily the application was incomplete and insufficient, (2) The applicant did not appear before the Board this evening which is now 10:00 p.m. We had asked at the start of the meeting and no one responded. Duly adopted this 20th day of April, 1989, by the following vote: A YES: Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Macri, Mr. Dybass, Mr. Roberts NOES: None '--- /J --" '-- ABSENT:Mr. Cartier, Mr. Jablonski, Mrs. Mann FURTHER BUSINESS AGENDA CONTROL DISCUSSION HELD Agreed to have two meeting per month, with four categories. Two categories would be major categories, two minor categories. Would handle nine new items a month; two residential subdivisions, one commercial subdivision, three commercial site plans, three residential site plans, one commercial subdivision. If old business got cleaned out then we would do new business. Would handle a maximum of ten new businesses a month, if eight of it is old business on agenda then we would handle two new business that month. INTRODUCED AN INFORMAL MOTION ON AGENDA CONTROL, FORMAL MOTION TO BE FOUND IN MAY 2, 1989, MEETING. On motion the meeting was adjourned. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Richard, Roberts, Chairman TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Bay at Haviland Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-9725-518-792-5832 fILE G~.-/1' April 20, 1989 NOTE TO FILE JOHN GORALSKI, PLANNER Application Number: Site Plan Review No. 27-89 Applicant/Project Name: Pro-Craft Excavating, Inc. The applicant wishes to place a stump grinding machine on his property. This would involve the storage of stumps, trees, and the processed materials on the site. This use is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This may have an impact on traffic on Big Bay Road if large trucks will be transporting material to and from the site. The Board should also consider the noise generated by the truck traffic. Another noise related concern is the noise made by the machine. The hours of operation and the mitigative measures the applicant will take should be noted. The major concern of Staff is the stock piling of material. There must be some assurance that this will not turn into a stump dump. The applicant indicates that there would be temporary storage of debris on the site. This would be very hard to enforce. If material is stored for any length of time it will begin to decay. This would cause an odor and possibly contamination of ground water. It would also be an eyesore. It should be pointed out that the disposal of stumps and wood debris is a serious problem. If the property rights .of the sWTounding property owners are protected, this could be the first step in a solution to this problem. J G / sed "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY. . A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 , ".,. ~ RI, --sacIATES, PC. 'ro,,---, .rING ENGINEERS 21 BAY STREET POST OFFICE BOX 838 GLENS FALLS, NY 12801 518' 793·4141 uw... '- ..,....... ._~ ~~~1!~ FilE COPf-J PLANNING" ZONINC DEPARTMENT April 17,1989 RFA #89-5000 Ms. Lee York, Senior Planner Town of Queensbury Office ßuilding Bay/Haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12804 Ref: Pro Craft Excavating - Site Plan No. 27-89 Oear Ms. York: We offer the following comments on the above-referenced project: 1. Drainage calculations are included and provide for on-site storm water detention. 2. Some thought should be given to fire protection/management 9iven that wood debris to be chipped will stored on site. It may be advisable to get input from the West Glens Falls Fire Department for their recommendations. 3. NYSDEC has advised the applicant that permitting may be requi red for temporary storage of wood debri s. We assume the applicant will coordinate this directly with DEC. Very truly yours, RIST-FROST ASSOCIATES, P.C. '.---. --.... Thomas W. Nace, P.E. Project Manager TWN:mg cc: Town Planning Board Members $ GLENS FALLS, NY' LACONIA. NH .. WARREN COUNTY ,'.. . .. Telephone 518· 761·6410 - ,. f....&:. uuH-' PLANNING BOARD ;~;j ~~\V7i r: ' '. ....)J ~ ~ ' I. '198~ g . 1'·-' '---- '- Warren County Municipal Center Lake George, New York 12845 DATE: April 13. 1989 RE: Pro-Craft Excavating ,~,;~c: & ZONIN' .~ ,-"',' "'-~ I&,tdT TO: Queensbury Planning & Zoning Office Town Office Building Bay & Haviland Roads G 1 Que~Lnsbµry. NY 12804 ent emenl ad~eš: Big Bay Road SPR II 27-1989 At a meeting of the Warren County Planning Board. held on the 12th day of April . the above application for a site plan review for an existing construction yard plus a temporary storage of wood debris to be chipped and carried off-site. was reviewed. and the following action was taken. Recommendation to: ()<) Approve ) Disapproval ( ) Modify with Conditions ) Return Comments: ISSUES Staff raised questions about dealing with noise levels after approval, hours of operation. etc. Also questioned the thresholds for the amount of chipped debris that couls be stockpiled & for how long as well as how much unchipped material could be brought to the site and by whom. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is the policy of the Warren County Planning Board to follow the procedures of the New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-M, with regard to Municipal Zoning actions that are referred to and reported thereon. The following are procedural requirements that must be adhered to: 1.) The Warren County Planning Board shall report its recommendations to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement for such actions. If no action is taken within thirty (30) days or agreed upon time. the municipal agency may act without such report. 2.) If the recommendation is for disapproval of the proposal, or modification thereof. the'municipal agency shall not act contrary to such action except by a vote of a majority plus one of all the members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions. 3. ) Within seven (7) days after the final action by the municipal agency having jurisdiction on the recommendations. modifications or disapproval of a referred matter, such municipality agency shall file a report with '""'\ 1 . - ~ the Warren County Planning Board on the qec S~~Y.!,~~r~ ¡ OR / I' "L '- \ chl~;n Vincent Spitzer, Vice Chairman ¡ TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Bay at Hav1land Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-9725-518-792-5832 fILE C&r~- April 19, 1989 NOTE TO FILE LEE A. YORK, SENIOR PLANNER Application Number: Site Plan Review No. 24-89 Applicant/Project Name: Adirondack Industrial Park, Inc. The application is for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. on over 4 acres in the Warren Washington Industrial Park. The intent is to lease the storage space for light industrial uses. The application states that 10 percent of the building will be office space and 90 percent will be storage space. The Ordinance allows a principal building of up to 12,000 sq. ft. per acre for single story structures, therefore the submission is in compliance with this portion of the requirements. The parking is computed under j. - storage which requires one space for every one thousands square feet of gross floor area plus one space for every company vehicle. This requires 20 spaces for the gross floor area and an undetermined number for company vehicles. I feel that at 50 proposed parking sites there will be a sufficient number. The setbacks and permeable area set forth in the LI-3A zone have been complied with. The Industrial Park has its own sewer system according to Tom Flaherty. In this case the applicant should verify that they can tie into the system. Sanitary facilities in a warehouse have to be provided depending on the number of employees. The drainage report prepared by Arthur C. Pakatar, on page 4 has a series of conclusions and recommendations. From a planning stand point, these should be made part of any approval of the site plan. I will defer to the Town Engineer to comment on them from an engineering stand point. LA Y /sed "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY. . . A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 .' It '~ RIST~,-- .>SócIATES, PC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 21 BAY STREET POST OFFICE BOX 838 GLENS FALLS. NY 12801 518, 793·4141 N.... '" ........-.. ~~aWíš'1 ~ APR 181989~~ fiLE COpy .-' --/ PLANNING . ZONINc.. DEPARTMENT April 17~ 1989 RFA #89-5000 Ms. Lee York~ Senior Planner Town of Queensbury Office Building Bay/Haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12804 Ref: Adirondack Industrial Park - Site Plan No. 24-89 Dear Ms. York: Our comments on the above-referenced project are as follows: 1. The app 1 i c ant 's 1 et t er of March 28 proposes a 20 ~ 000 SF facility of which 10% is office space and 90% is warehouse space. However, the site plan indicates 10,000 SF of ware- house and 10,000 SF of office space. If the latter is true, the off-street parking ordinance will reauire more spaces than shown on the plan. 2. The drainage report is not complete in that no provision is made for on-site detention or other means to reduce peak flows caused by development. 3. No grading plan is shown. 4. Sewer connection is not sized and tie-in location not iden- tified. 5. Site access is from the adjoining parcel, not from the pub- lic road. Is an easement or right-of-way to be provided? Very truly yours~ RIST-FROST'ASSOCIATES, P.C. . -t-I Thomas W. Nace, P.E. Project Manager TWN:mg cc: Town Planning Board Members e GLENS FALLS, NY, LACONIA. NH , WARREN COUNTY FilE C' .~ 'r -' 1 ~ ., f·----ø ':"';' ! '- PLANNING BOARIJ'~\,t¡I)' ~~I ., c./: , ,,,' Warren County Municipal Center 'i~8~J , lake George, New York 12845 ~elephone 518·761·6410 i ::::0:,'; ....".. DATE: April 13, 1989 RE: Adirondack Industrial Park TO: Queensbury Planning & Zoning Office Town Office Building Bay & Haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12804 Gentlemen/Ladies: County Line Road SPR II 24-89 At a meeting of the Warren County Planning Board, held on the 12th day of April , the above application for a site plan review for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. light warehouse building on Warren/Washington County IDA land. was reviewed, (A... Approve ¿~ents : and the following action was taken. Recommendation to: ( ) Disapproval ( ) Modify with Conditions ( Return --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is the policy of the Warren County Planning Board to follow the procedures of the New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-M, with r~gard to Municipal Zoning actions that are referred to and reported thereon. The following are procedural requirements that must be adhered to: 1.) The Warren County Planning Board shall report its recommendations to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement for such actions. If no action is taken within thirty (30) days or agreed upon time, the municipal agency may act without such report. 2.) If the recomm"¡dation is for disapproval of the proposal, or modification thereof, the' municipal agency shall not act contrary to such action except by a vote of a majority plus one of all the members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions. 3.) Within seven (7) days after the final action by the municipal agency having jurisdiction on the recommendations, modifications or disapproval of a referred matter, such municipality asency sha~l f~l~ a report with the Warren County Planning Board on the n~ce$sary Iform~ (- I ! r I j.!,' OR I ,/ Vincent Spitzer, Vice Chairman , '- r-' ( Cf;f!f~~- ...-, ;'. ; ;:;;:y,~. W' -~ .--' ...,w~ \0 .,Iõoi. ~~;9~ PLANNING. ZONIN( DEPARTMENT April 19, 1989 fILE GOPY Mr. Richard Roberts, Chairman Queensbury Town Office Bay & Haviland Road Queensbury, N.Y. 12804 Dea~ Mr. Roberts: Re: Adirondack lndùstrial Pa~kt Inc., 24-89 The Glen~ Falls Independent Living Center would like to þoint 0ut that in considering this office build- ing for approval that prGper pa=ki.ng and c~çb cuts be placeJ. ,\:;::.:<:.-.S 1n ~!iÇ cu:.lcì:'nç: .....r.;,l11d ffiEéHI ":!cù[,,-,!: ê::.:)I; ~idths and accpssicle rest reoms. If I ~ÐY be uf assi~t~nce, plG~~e do not h~~itace t~ call me at 792-3537. .. . ., :-OJ_ n:,:':cc:..y I ~~ Harvey Raymond Architectural Barrier Consultant HR:nc Quaker Bay Center, Corner of Quaker & Bay, PO Box 453, Glens Falls, NY 12801, Voice (518) 702·3537 ITY TOO (518) 792-3548 .' TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Bay at Haviland Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-9725-518-792-5832 FILE t1n1 April17,1989 NOTE TO FILE LEE A. YORK, SENIOR PLANNER Application Number: Subdivision No. 6-198 'I Applicant/Project Name: Karen J. Witte/Cathy Cloutier PRELIMINARY STAGE This application is for a two lot subdivision on the west side of Bay Road. The property is cUITently used as a residence. Old Maids Brook traverses it. The intention, as states on the application is investment. The applicant has made a request for the Board to waive the requirements for water supply and septic details. The reason given is that it is being purchased for investment and any use would come back before the Board as a site plan review. The subdivision will comprise of 2.08 acres. The portion to be purchased by Witte and Cloutier will be 13,460 sq. ft. (1/4 - 1/3 acre). The plan submitted does itidicate that the property could support construction and maintain setbacks. LA Y /sed "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY. . A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 , -- r ~ H,- . .-<>QCIATES. PC co~nNG ENGINEERS 21 BAY STREET POST OFFICE BOX 838 GLENS FALLS, NY 12801 518' 793-4141 UINI\ \" W&.~. ...'"' ~~~!~ fiLE COpy ...../ .-' PLANNING & ZONINC DEPARTMENT April 17, 1989 RFA #89-5000 Ms. Lee York, Senior Planner Town of Queensbury Office Building Bay/Haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12804 Ref: Witte and Cloutier - Subdivision No. 6-1989 Preliminary Plans Dear Ms. York: The following are our review comments on the above-referenced project: 1. Section 4.0453 of the Zoning Ordinance requires residential lots fronting Bay Road to have twice the normal frontage; in this case 160 feet would be required. The Ordinance is not clear, however, on whether this requirement applies to all uses in the MR-5 Zone or just residential uses. 2. Driveway entrance must be 20 feet wide. 3. A percolation test is not shown. This test should be done at the time of subdivision in order to demonstrate that an adequately sized disposal system can be installed, particu- 1 ar 1 y on sma 11 lot s. 4. The appl icant has requested waiver of water supply and sep- tic details until site plan review. If the Planninq Board grants this request, other information should be included such a<:: a. Grading/erosion control pl an with measures to protect Old -Maid's Brook from sedimentation. b. Site specific drainage calculations, landscaping and clearing, dimensions and layout of drive and parking area. @ GLENS FALLS. NY' LAOONIA, NH ¡ , ~ '-....-. , _/ Ms. Lee York Town of Queensbury Ref: Witte & Cloutier Apr il 17, 1989 RFA #89-5000 Page 2 c. Realizing that the site plan shown is conceptual, locat- ing seepage pits underneath parking areas is allowed by NYSDEC but is not the preferred solution if another location can be found. Very truly yours, RIST-FROST ASSOCIATES, P.C. { Thomas W. Nace, P.E. Project Manager TWN:mg cc: Town Planning Board Members FILE Cfir - ..-' TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Bay at Haviland Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-9725-518-792-5832 ~ April 17, 1989 NOTE TO FILE JOHN GORALSKI, PLANNER Application Number: Site Plan Review No. 28-89 Applicant/Project Name: John Matthews FOR MODIFICATION This application is for a modification of Site Plan No. 45-88. The applicant wishes to replace the approved 1,500 sq. ft. addition with two smaller additions totaling 1,500 sq. ft. through comparison of the new plan and the old plan. It does not appear that this modification will change any of the criteria in Section 5.070 and 5.071 JG/sed , "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY. . . A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 WARREN COUNTY .~ 1f ~ . r ~L. t- çt~ ~. '- PLANNING BOAI')~V~I' Warren County Municipal Center 198~ ) . Lake George, New York 12845 Telephone 518· 761·641 0 ,~~ ZOt~p·; , .. '·~M~· DATE: April 13, 1989 RE: John Matthews TO: Queensbury Planning & zoning Office Town Office Building Bay & haviland Roads Queensbury, NY 12804 Gentlemen/Ladies: 300 Bay Road SPR II 28-1989 At a meeting of the Warren County Planning Board, held on the 12th day of April , the above application for a site plan review to revise existing approved Site Plan bv reducini the sixe of the addition & movin~ reduced area to the opposite side of the building. was reviewed, and the following action was taken. Recommendation to: (JC) Approve ( ) Disapproval ) Modify with Conditions ( ) Return ¿mments: . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is the policy of the Warren County Planning Board to follow the procedures of the New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-M, with regard to Municipal Zoning actions ~hat are referred to and reported thereon. The following are procedural requir~ments that must be adhered to: 1.) The Warren County Planning Board shall report its recommendations to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement for such actions. If no action is taken within thirty (30) days or agreed upon time, the municipal agency may act without such report. 2.) If the recommendation is for disapproval of the proposal, or modification thereof, the'municipal agency shall not act contrary to such action except by a vote of a majority plus one of all the members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions. 3.) Within seven (7) days after the final action by the municipal agency having jurisdiction on the recommendations, modifications or disapproval of a referred matter, such municipality agency shall fi~e a report with the Warren County Planning Board on the \re..~ss.a¡ìrY fa 't J '. // .í . OR '." i ~ \, Vincent Spitzer, Vice Chairman ¡ ---- ..-/ TOWN OF QUEENSBURY Bay at Haviland Road, Oueensbury, NY 12804-9725-518-792-5832 April ZO, 1989 NOTE TO FILE LEE A. YORK, SENIOR PLANNER Application Number: Site Plan Review No. 26-89 Applicant/Project Name: Robert Pusz This application is for a change in use of an existing structure in an HC-1A zone. The property is adjacent to Quaker Electric on Bay Road. The intended purpose is stated as hardware and fence parts store. The Beautification Committee has disapproved this submission and the report is attached. The application indicates that there are 10 parking spaces on site. They are not indicated on the plan. After a site visit it was still difficult to determine if there were indeed 10 spaces. The applicant indicates that he will be able to use Quaker Electric's parking lot. If this is the intention then the applicant will have to prove that there is sufficient parking for both businesses. It will also be necessary for the Board to have a written agreement between the parties as to parking aITangements. Since the purpose of the facility will be for hardware sales and fence sales there is the potential for outside displays and storage. The Board should make stipulations on these matters as this is a highly visible area. Given the inadequacy of the information supplied on the plot plan I would recommend that the applicant be required to: 1. Respond to the Beautification Committee. 2. Resubmit and address all the items (A-Z) on the checklist. I want the Board to be aware that the checklist states that items A-J must be submitted and items K-Z shall be included if applicable. At staff review it was recommended that all commercial site plans be required to complete A-Z. Staff would like to institute this policy, with your permission. LA Y /sed "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY .. A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 ,. ,~ TO'Ii N OF QUEENSBURY COMMITTEE FOR COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION >! Î,___ -~ "'..... .. Robert L. Eddy, Chairman 17 Owen Avenue Queensbury, N. Y. l280A Mrs. Arthur J. Seney, Secretary 8 Queensbury Avenue Queensbury, N. Y. 1280E TOr (X) Warren County Planning Board Datel (X) Queensbury Town Planning Board ( ) Queensbury Town Zoning Board of Appeals (X) APplicant 4/10/89 Re: Site Plan #26-89 Robert Pusz Bay Road We have reviewed the request for:( ) Variance, ( ) Site Flan Review, ( ) Other - and have the following recommendations: ( ) Approval (X) Disapproval This application has been disapproved by our Committee as data for landscaping, screening and plantings for the above applicant for a Site flan Review or Variance has not been submitted or is incomplete. Would you please, therefore, refer the applicant to our Committee for approval of its plans prtor to granting the application pending bcfore your Board or before construction permit has been granted. You and the Building Department will be notified just 3.~C; 800::-1 as plans have be8n approved by us. Respectfully S~bmitted, ~~ .;ç~ '~~f: ~ C~ çr-~ I..¡o bert L. £day Chairman " IR ~ AI~ ..6OCIATES. PC CO~"",\.T1NG ENGINEERS 21 BAY STREET POST OFFICE BOX 838 GLENS FALLS, NY 12801 518· 793,4141 , vWIlt \" ....~..... ....w- ' ~~~!l~~ FilE copt----· PLANNING a ZONIN( DEPARTMENT Apri 1 17, 1989 RFA #89-5000 Ms. Lee York, Senior Planner Town of Queensbury Office Buildinq Bay/Haviland Roads - Queensbury, NY 12804 Ref: Robert Pusz - Site Plan No. 26-89 Dear Ms. York: We have revi ewed the above-referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. The site plan shown is rather sketchy. It only indicates the existing building and property lines. There is no dimensions or data given for driveways, parking areas, landscaping or drainage. 2. The app 1 i cant notes that park i ng lot next door for Quaker Electric may be userl. Does the zoning ordinance allow required on-site parking to be provided on an adjacent lot not owned by the applicant? Very truly yours, RIST-FROST ASSOCIATES, P.C. '-... Thomas W. Nace, P.E. Project Manager TWN:mg cc: Town Planning Board Members $ GLENS FALLS, NY' LACONIA. NH WARREN COUNTY ðE _ -ojY -.-' -- PLANNING BO~J,~œ:YlŒ:iì Warren County Municipal Center '198~ J<~ Lake George, New York 12845 Telephone 518·761-6410 ,,;'.:: & ZONIW ,.", " ·~·-"I"I!:N'" DATE: April 13, 1989 RE: Robert Rusz TO: Queensbury Planning & Zoning Office Town Office Building Bay & Haviland Roads Qu~ensbury, N.Y. 12804 Gentlemen/Ladies: Bay Road SPR II 26-1989 At a meeting of the Warren County Planning Board, held on the 12th day of April , the above application for a site plan review for retail sales of hardware and fence parts. was reviewed, and the following action was taken. Recommendation to: ( ) Approve (/) Disapproval ( ) Modify with Conditions ( Return Comments: Application was denied based on the fact that there was inadequate information submitted as to parking, landscaping & use of out buildings and how matera1 would be stored outside. Access should be eliminated form Bay Road & should enter through Quaker Village. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is the policy of the Warren County Planning Board to follow the procedures of the New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-M, with regard to Municipal Zoning actions that are referred to and reported thereon. The following are procedural requirements that must be adhered to: 1.) The Warren County Planning Board shall report its recommendations to the referring municipal agency, accompanied by a full statement for such actions. If no action is taken within thirty (30) days or agreed upon time, the municipal agency may act without such report. 2.) If the reco~endation is for disapproval of the proposal, or modification thereof, the municipal agency shall not act contrary to such action except by a vote of a majority plus one of all the members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary actions. 3.) Within seven (7) days after the final action by the municipal agency having jurisdiction on the recommendations, modifications or disapproval of a referred matter, such municipality a~ency s11,al1 fil a report with the Warren County Planning Boatd on the n7:rss~r~,)~rm! OR -:-z. -, / . "- Vincent Spitzer, Vice Chairman McGilvray~ , -~ ',- '--- . / é " ~~:" ''-_-/,-// . ":.~ ,..- ... .~" }¡Þf~ ~ APR191~/J ...... PLANNING a ZONIN" DEPARTMENT " ~.. :. .- April 19, 1989 FILE COpy Mr. Richard Roberts/Chairman Planning Board Queensbury Town Office Bay & Haviland Road Queensbury, N.Y. 12804 ~ear Mr. Roberts: Re:Rober;c Rusz; No. 26-89 The Glens Falls Independent Llving Center would like to remind the board and all concerned that this retail space needs to be made accessible to the disabled. With proper planning this can be done. I= I h1óY be of h·~ltJ, do:, ; ': h ¿"3 L tat e >Or ,-",J ~all~ .s ~ Il ':: ~ :." ~:- f ' ~imoc.. A r: chi t e c t u r a 1 2 ê:. ;:- r 1. ..: (.:= Q ï: .J 'J 1 tan t: ¡~ [J, : n c Quaker Bay Center, Corner of Quaker & Bay. PO Box 453, Glens Falls, NY 12801, Voice (518) 792-3537 TTY TOO (518) 792-3548 ,