Section One t
r�
MAR o4
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
and
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN NARRATIVE
NYSDEC GP-010-0-001
Prepared for:
27 Silver Circle, LLC
27 Silver Circle
Tax Map #'s 309.17-1-17.2
Town of Queensbury
Warren County, New York
Prepared by:
Hutchins Engineering
169 Haviland Road
Queensbury, NY 12804
October 15, 2013
Revised: December 3, 2013
•
Certification Statement
To be signed by contractors performing the site construction.
I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the
SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector
during a site inspection. I also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the
terms and conditions of the most current version of the New York State Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System ("SPDES") general permit for stormwater discharges from construction
activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water
quality standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate
information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and
could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings.
Name:
Company:
Title:
Signature: Date:
Each Sub-Contractor or additional Contractors completing site work must
also sign below:
Name:
Company:
Title:
Area of Work & SWPPP Responsibilities:
Signature: Date:
Name:
Company:
Title:
Area of Work & SWPPP Responsibilities:
Signature: Date:
Project Description
The project consists of the construction of three wood framed storage buildings, with
sizes of 80'x 180', 80'x 200' and 40'x 200'. Also proposed is a small expansion
(20'x40') to an existing office building, asphalt surfacing and the construction of a gravel
surfaced storage yard.
A boundary line adjustment is proposed between the existing subject parcel (parcel
17.2) and the southerly adjoining parcel (parcel 13), in which 5.5-acres will be added to
parcel 17.2, enlarging this parcel to 8.93-acres. The project is located at 27 Silver
Circle and off of Big Bay Road, in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York.
The limit of disturbance for total build-out of the project totals 5.95-acres.
Existing Site Conditions
Presently, the entire project site (8.93-ac) is 25% impervious, with the front portion of
the parcel containing the applicant's commercial/industrial electrical business,
consisting of an office building, large warehouse building, storage yard and extensive
landscaping. The rear portion of the site consists of a mixture of open, earthen surfaced
space and lightly wooded evergreen forest.
The existing drainage patterns for the project area are towards the southerly and
westerly portions of the site, to a series of natural low areas, in which the runoff is
infiltrated. Runoff from the southwesterly portion of the site flows southerly offsite. The
front portion of the site in which no changes are proposed, is not evaluated in the
stormwater models. Slopes over the southerly portions of the site generally range from
1-3%, from the north to the south.
Site soils are mapped as Oakville loamy fine sand, HSG-A which are deep, well drained
sandy soils on outwash plains. Several deep soil test pits encountered medium and
coarse sands with very rapid infiltration rates.
Existing Conditions Summary—After Boundary Line Adjustment:
Total Project Site Area: 8.93-Acres
Total Buildings Coverage: 36,585 SF
Total Asphalt & Gravel Surfaces: 62,195 SF
Total Impervious: 98,780 SF
Existing Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site- Link 1 L (Easterly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.17 cfs 0.009 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.74 cfs 0.032 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 1.18 cfs 0.050 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 1.46 cis 0.062 acre-feet
Existing Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site- Link 2L (Westerly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cis 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.0 ofs 0.0 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
Existing Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site- Link 3L (Southerly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cis 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.01 cfs 0.010 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.03 cfs 0.022 acre-feet
Existing Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site-Link 4L (Southeasterly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.02 cis 0.015 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.70 cfs 0.091 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 3.90 cfs 0.191 acre-feet
Existing Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site-Total Site Runoff
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.17 cfs 0.009 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.76 cfs 0.047 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 1.89 cfs 0.151 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 5.39 cfs 0.275 acre-feet
Proposed DevelORment
Proposed Conditions Summary:
Total Project Site Area: 8.93-Acres
Total Buildings Coverage: 69,095 SF
Total Asphalt & Gravel Surfaces: 184,230 SF
Total Impervious: 253,325 SF
Proposed Stormwater Management
NYSDEC SPDES requirements for stormwater discharges from construction activities in.
accordance with GP-0-010-01 must be applied to the project. Runoff from the two
proposed northerly buildings and asphalt areas will be captured in a series of catch
basins and will be piped to a vegetated pretreatment basin. Runoff from the gravel yard
area and southerly building will flow to a perimeter vegetated swale, which will convey
the runoff to vegetated pretreatment, which will be constructed adjacently to the south of
the gravel storage yard.
A catch basin with an elevated rim will be installed within the southerly pretreatment
basin, which will allow the runoff to pond to the water quality volume level prior to
entering the catch basin. The outlet from the catch basin will be piped into a 20'x125'
subsurface stone infiltration bed, which is sized to infiltrate the 100-year design storm
event.
Runoff calculations have been prepared utilizing SCS TR-20 methodology and
HydroCAD analysis software for the 1-year, 10-year, 50-year and 100-year Type-II
simulated rainfall distributions. Criteria utilized in the analysis are summarized as
follows:
Design Storm Events:
1-year, 24hr, Type-II distribution, 2.2"
10-year, 24hr, Type-II distribution, 3.8"
50-year, 24hr, Type-II distribution, 4.8"
100-year, 24hr, Type-II distribution, 5.4"
Proposed Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site — Link 1 L (Easterly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.10 cfs 0.006 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.39 cfs 0.019 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.59 cfs 0.029 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.73 cfs 0.035 acre-feet
Proposed Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site- Link 2L (Westerly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
Proposed Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site- Link 3L (Southerly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
Proposed Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site-Link 4L (Southeasterly)
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.0 cfs 0.0 acre-feet
Proposed Conditions Calculated Runoff from the Site-Total Site Runoff
1-year design storm (2.20") 0.10 cfs 0.006 acre-feet
10-year design storm (3.80") 0.39 cfs 0.019 acre-feet
50-year design storm (4.80") 0.59 cfs 0.029 acre-feet
100-year design storm (5.40") 0.73 cfs 0.035 acre-feet
The developed site has been modeled as a series of subcatchments (drainage areas)
and ponds, as shown on the HydroCAD drainage diagram. Full results of stormwater
runoff computations are attached to this report. The results of the stormwater models
show that the proposed vegetated pretreatment practices and infiltration bed are of
adequate capacity to receive runoff from the 100-year storms without overflowing and
provide rate and volume reductions for the`design storms.
Water Quality Volume
The water quality volume (WQv) as required by NYSDEC is designed to capture and
pre-treat the 90% rainfall event and is calculated as a function of the impervious areas
of the drainage subcatchments for the project site.
Subcatchment Required Provided Location
1S 11,220CF 11,230CF - 1P 1P
7150 CF
3S 7105 CF (3190 CF-3P, 3P, 1 P
3960 CF- 1 P)
Note: A total of 15,190 CF of storage is provided in 1 P below the catch basin rim.
Runoff Reduction Volume
The runoff reduction volume (RRv) as required by NYSDEC has the design goal to
reduce the calculated WQv through approved "green infrastructure practices" or
infiltration practices. As the entire 100-year design storm is infiltrated in the subsurface
infiltration bed, the RRv design goals are met.
Channel Protection Volume
Channel protection volume (Cpv) as required by NYSDEC requires the extended
detention or infiltration of the post-developed 1-year, 24-hour storm.
Subcatchment Reouired Provided Location
1S 1570 CF Infiltrated 1AP
3S 8495 CF Infiltrated 1AP
Overbank Flood Control
Overbank flood control as required by NYSDEC requires that the peak developed
discharge rate from the 10-year, 24-hour storm not exceed the pre-development rate.
Existing peak 10-year storm discharge: 0.76 CFS
Proposed peak 10-year storm discharge: 0.39 CFS
The 10-year storm calculations show that the overbank flood control requirement is met.
Extreme Storm Control
Extreme storm control as required by NYSDEC requires that the peak developed
discharge rate from the 100-year, 24-hour storm not exceed the pre-development rate.
Pre-developed peak 100-year storm discharge: 5.39 CFS
Developed peak 100-year storm discharge: 0.73 CFS
The 100-year storm calculations show that the overbank flood control requirement is
met.
Town of Queensbury Requirement
The Town of Queensbury requires that the peak developed discharge rate from the 50-
year, 24-hour storm not exceed the pre-development rate.
Pre-developed peak 50-year storm discharge: 1.89 CFS
Developed peak 50-year storm discharge: 0.59 CFS
The 50-year storm calculations show that the Town of Queensbury requirement is met.
Endangered Species
In accordance with Part I.D.4 of GP-010-0-001, an inquiry was made to NYSDEC for an
endangered species impact determination. A letter of no impact upon endangered
species from NYSDEC which was received for a previously proposed project upon the
southerly parcels 12 &13 is included as an attachment in this report. Parcel 17.2 is fully
developed and contains a large, existing commercial/industrial electrical business. The
portions of this project which will occur upon parcel 17.2 will be situated over previously
disturbed areas, thus there will be no impact upon endangered species on this parcel.
Archaeological Resources and Historic Places
In accordance with Part III.A.8 of GP-010-0-001, a letter of no impact upon
archaeological resources from NYSOPRHP which was received for a previously
proposed project upon the southerly parcels 12 &13 is included as an attachment in this
report. As disturbances upon parcel 17.2 will occur over previously disturbed areas,
there will be no impact upon cultural resources on this parcel.
Construction Phase Erosion Practices
Practices to be implemented during construction for erosion and sediment control
include silt fencing and temporary sediment basins in various portions of the total
disturbed area. Silt fencing will be placed across slopes (on the contour) in all areas
downgrade of disturbed areas. Temporary sediment traps will be utilized in areas
where construction phase runoff concentrates.
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
Erosion and sediment control measures will be incorporated into the construction of the
project. These practices will comply with the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation publication entitled "New York Guidelines for Urban and
Sediment Control' (the blue book). The following temporary erosion and sediment
control devices are to be utilized:
Sediment Control Fence
Silt Fence shall be used to control erosion from sheet flow on slopes not to exceed 1 on
3. Concentrated flows shall not be directed toward the silt fence. The silt fence must be
installed parallel to the contour lines to eliminate drainage along the fence.
Temporary Sediment Basin
Basins will be excavated below each house site and seeded with ryegrass to accept
stormwater runoff from the construction site allowing sediment to settle out. Sediment
traps shall be constructed in the location and be of the size and type specified to collect
sediment laden stormwater.
Temporary Seeding
Land that is stripped of vegetation will be seeded and planted as soon as possible. Any
area that will remain cleared but not under construction for 10 days or longer will be
seeded with a ryegrass mixture and mulched to stabilize soil until construction resumes.
Temporary Diversion Swales
Temporary diversion swales shall be constructed either to divert clean stormwater runoff
from newly graded areas or to direct sediment laden runoff to a sediment trapping
device.
Dust Control
Measures for dust control during construction shall be implemented as needed. Daily
water sprays will be used during dry conditions. In addition to water sprays, temporary
mulching, temporary seeding and covering stockpiles with tarps shall be implemented
when necessary.
Control of Litter. Construction Debris and Construction Chemicals
During the course of construction, the site shall be kept clear of debris and litter which
could be transported by water or wind. This material shall be picked up daily and shall
be stored in waste debris containers where it will be securely held.
All petroleum products or other waste contaminants which are water soluble, or could
be dispersed and transported by stormwater, shall be stored in covered containers and
be regularly removed from the site and properly and legally disposed of. All petroleum
or other hazardous materials shall be stored and handled in conformance with NYSDEC
spill prevention and containment requirements.
Sequence of Construction
Prior to the start of construction, the contractor shall install the sediment control fence
along the low side of each area to be disturbed to contain runoff from the construction
site.
Temporary sediment basins are to be constructed as shown on the plans and shall
collect stormwater runoff from all areas of proposed road and utility construction. The
temporary sediment basins shall be a minimum of 3600 CF per acre of disturbance.
Basins shall allow collected water to filter into the existing soil; if necessary, sediment
will be cleaned out of the basins to maintain their infiltrative capability.
Following the completion of all planting and the establishment of all grass areas, any
collected sediment and sediment control fencing shall be removed. Any debris from the
perimeter of the site shall be removed and dispose of all waste material shall be
disposed of in a legal manner.
Maintenance of Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Devices
The sediment basins shall be inspected at least weekly and after every rain event by the
contractor. When 50% of the volume of the basin is full, the contractor shall remove
collected sediment and dispose of properly.
The contractor shall inspect the sediment control fence weekly and after every rain
event and remove trapped sediment and maintain the devices such that they are in
good working order.
Operation and Maintenance Plan
The property owner and their successors will be responsible to provide the maintenance
in the forebay, retention areas and stormwater structures. Maintenance includes
trimming of vegetation in the forebay and retention areas and sediment removal in the
stormwater structures. Trimming should be performed as needed throughout the
spring, summer and fall, typically monthly or semi-monthly. Sediment removal and
inspection of the stormwater infrastructure should be performed annually.
Permanent Erosion Control
All pervious areas shall be graded, topsoil installed and seeded or planted as soon as
practical, but in no case shall finish graded soils be exposed for more than five days.
Seed beds shall be mulched with straw and plant beds shall be mulched with pine bark
mulch. Seeded areas on slopes over 1:3 shall be stabilized with erosion control
blankets as specified on the plans.
Attachments
Location Map
Soils Map
SHPO sign-off
Endangered Species sign-off
Water Quality Volume Calculations
Draft NYSDEC Notice of Intent
Draft MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form
Subcatchment Map — Existing Model
Subcatchment Map — Proposed Model
HydroCAD
Existing & Proposed Conditions —Type-II 24 hr Rainfall = 2.2" (1-year), 3.8" (10-year),
4.8" (50-year), 5.4" (100-year)
f
t' 45 P3St
�> I
! J
O _ �i'tens ,ARV .f:
// \
- SITE
I
']CS 4T -
/ J
: ILI
V
LOCATION MAP
ll, t
3 �
y
Y F
c
4 fir: i"
i tr y
£ � � � yN;� sS • ��'�"'3J�:� anti,_ ,mho yx�sf'.
h
x �
1
a
� a
f Andrew M. Cuomo
3cver
Weer
Rose Harney
New York State Office of Parks, s�
Recreation and Historic Preservation
istore Preseri=mr =eid Sancces Su au • ?3ebies IsIxic. PC 3cX 138 is ar `:2.a YcrS 12'38-C'99
5'3-237-3643
sarra.ryspafia.ccn
17 '`' 7
An 211_
NL-, Michael 1. O'Connor
Little & O'Connor Aao yeys, P.C.
19 W. Note Dam Street_
PO Box 898
Glems Falls,N Y i 28O i
Re. SEQRA
WMua^Threw Property Development
Town of Queensbtzy, Warren County
12PROO993
Dea:Mr. O'Connor:
The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preserra on(OPRE ) has reviewed the latest
i<formation submitted for this project(letter from NE,chael 1. O'Conaer dated 16 April 2012).
Olu review has been iv actor".a-ce with the State Env romne:`:al Quality-Re-,iew Act(S=QUA).
Based on the information pro sided, OPRIT recommends that the planned project w' have No
Impact on culnu l resources listed or eligible for listing ou the State or National Register of
r storie Places. This recon emendation pertains only to the Area of Patenrat Effects (APE}
described in the submitted materials. It is not applicable to any other portion of the project
property. Should the project design be changed OPR IP recommends tur+aer cons+.rltatlon with
` this office.
These comments are those of the Field Services Bureau and relate only to Historic/Culnual
resources.They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that
may be involved is or near your project Such impacts must be considered as part of the
enviresnmeutal review of the project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act
QN+Yor_c Environmental Conservation Law Article 8) and is implementing reglrlations (6
U NYCRR Part 617)'
If you hA-e any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.
� 4
Phone: 5A237-8643 x3276; FAX: :18-233-9049
Em.,i : hi h,.Per32ARxuks.u'✓.�4'i
?n=gcai -""ed"$ J "°A`
New York State Department of Environ rental Conservation
Bureau of Wildlife
232 Gwf Cc R, a r: sv 3E
P- cre J'7 23 _2'R: FAX: ±a 1°
e's
NL. tl c,:aet J. 0 Connor
Litt:e anal O'Cormor A o-izys a_ La
PO Box 893
e.0 i a1,s, tiir ._3v:-i1;z75
Re_ W illiana Threw
Queensburt-, NA, —Site Plan
Tax Niap Parcels: 309.17-1-12 aad 309.17-1-13
Dear 10r. O'Connor:
As per_eour rNuest I pet_br—med an endangered and threatened species determination for:4e
above-describecd parcel located on Bi Ba,' Road Tow-n of Q4ee sbury, Warren County.
ycearding to the Nvx York State\a sra=i?eritage Database,there are no kn ,:r.occu r aces of
Cdr: or SI3.,.-:.ac.. • aCMals 3r p ':tJ, S'cz:iS.c.afI_ ra-unral r:OI:lail:i*teS, OF other ii_'tEt:Ca^ii
Fabitars, on or Li the u ;edia'_e *<i,inin- s C t these parcels_
Tlie absence of data does not ,wean tha- ,are or state-fisted species, nam-al cornnnini7es or C'3er
>i-_zai;- cant habimrs do riot exist on or adjacent fo tCe proposed site. For frost sacs.
cornprea=si%'e field surveys have rot beer,cond-azied. For these reasors, l cannot provide a
defrost: e state on the presence or absence of rare or state-lis`ed species, catural coZi nuniiies or
i?iher i1�'ti tc;atii [;3tllral cOFnn:itT.utk.3- Z 1us i:'roamer should not be substituted for on-site
surveys that may be r..3uired For environme.^.t3l assessment by local _overnalents or Other
egulatory age^ties.
I would like to dark Tittle and O'Connor for their interest in protect ng New y'ork's natural
resources. if you ;sa e any questions please -act^t hesitate to contact rate at(5 t 91 C_3-':?41.
Sincerely,
led i-iaiden
i�I 1d:1'te BiolCzist
Water Quality Volume - Individual Subcatchments
WQv= Water Quality Volume
P =90% Rainfall Event(Design Manual Pg 4-2)
Rv=0.05+0.009(I)where I is%impervious Cover: Rv minimum=0.2
1 =Percent Impervious Cover
A=Area of Site In Acres(Contributing Area)
SUBCATCHMENTIS SUBCATCHMENT3S
Inputs Inputs
P= 1.0 P= 1.0
I = 31.6 1 = 77.2
A= 9.24 A= 2.63
Calculated 402,550 SF TOTAL Calculated 114,490 SF TOTAL
calc Rv= 0.33 Rv minimum=0.2 talc Rv= 0.74 Rv minimum=0.2
app Rv= 0.33 app Rv= 0.74
WQv= 0.258 Acre-feet WQv= 0.163 Acre-feet
WQv= 11,218 CIF minimum WQv= 7106 CIF minimum
F6154147110
NOTICE OF INTENT
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
_ Division of Water
_ 625 Broadway, 4th Floor NYR"____
Albany, New York 12233-3505 (for DEC use only))
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Under State
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit # GP-0-10-001
All sections must be completed unless otherwise noted. Failure to complete all items may
result in this form being returned to you, thereby delaying your coverage under this
General Permit. Applicants must read and understand the conditions of the permit and
prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prior to submitting this NOI. Applicants
are responsible for identifying and obtaining other DEC permits that may be required.
-IMPORTANT-
RETURN THIS FORM TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
OWNER/OPERATOR MUST SIGN FORM
Owner/Operator Information
Owner/Operator (Com an Name/Private Owner Name/Municipality Name)
2 7 S I L V E R C I R C L E L L C
Owner/0 erator Contact Person Last. Name (NOT CONSULTANT)
G R O S S
Owner/0 erator Contact Person First Name
J O S E P H
Owner/Operator Mailing Address
2 7 S I L V E R JCjIjijC L E
city
Q U E E N S B U R Y
State zip
N Y 1 2 8 0 4 -
Phone (Owner/O erator) Fax (Owner/operator)
erator)
5 1 8 - 7 9 2 - 0 2 1 6 - � -
Email (Owner/O erator)
J G R O S S c] G R O S S E L E C T R I C I N C C O M
FED TAX ID
m - (not required for individuals)
LPage 1 of 14
0739147113
Project Site Information
Project/Site Name
12171 S I L V E R C I R C L E S T O R A G E / Y A R D A R E A
Street Address (NOT P.O. BOX)
2 7 S I L V E R C I R C L E
Side of Street
0 North 0 South 0 East O West
City/Town/Village (THAT ISSUES BUILDING PERMIT)
Q U E E N S B U R Y
State Zi County DEC Region
NY 1 2 8 0 4 - � WAIRR EN LJ
Name of Nearest Cross Street
B I G B A Y R O A D
Distance to Nearest Cross Street (Feet) Project In Relation to Cross Street
1615101 0 North 0 South 0 East •West
Tax Map Numbers Tax Map Numbers
Section-Block-Parcel
1310 9 1 7 - 1 1 - I I I 1 1 3 0 9 1 7 - 1 1 1 3
1. Provide the Geographic Coordinates for the project site in NYTM Units. To do this you
must go to the NYSDEC Stormwater Interactive Map on the DEC website at:
www.dec.ny.gov/imsmaps/stormwater/viewer.htm
Zoom into your Project Location such that you can accurately click on the centroid of
your site. Once you have located your project site, go to the tool boxes on the top and
choose "i" (identify) . Then click on the center of your site and a new window containing
the X, Y coordinates in UTM will pop up. Transcribe these coordinates into the boxes
below. For problems with the interactive map use the help function.
R Coordinates (Eastin ) Y Coordinates (Northing)
6 1 0 6 1 6 1 6 4 7 1 9 1 4 1 0 1 9 1 5
2. What is the nature of this construction project?
0 New Construction
0 Redevelopment with increase in impervious area
O Redevelopment with no Increase in impervious area
LPage 2 of 14
F265214711.2
3. Select the predominant land use for both pre and post development conditions.
SELECT ONLY ONE CHOICE FOR EACH
Pre-Development Post-Development
Existing Land Use Future Land Use
O FOREST O SINGLE FAMILY HOME Number of Lots
O PASTURE/OPEN LAND O SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION
O CULTIVATED LAND O TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL
O SINGLE FAMILY HOME O MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
O SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION O INSTITUTIONAL/SCHOOL
O TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL O INDUSTRIAL
O MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ! COMMERCIAL
O INSTITUTIONAL/SCHOOL O MUNICIPAL
O INDUSTRIAL O ROAD/HIGHWAY
0 COMMERCIAL O RECREATIONAL/SPORTS FIELD
O ROAD/HIGHWAY O BIKE PATH/TRAIL
O RECREATIONAL/SPORTS FIELD p LINEAR UTILITY (water, sewer, gas, etc.)
O BIKE PATH/TRAIL Q PARKING LOT
O LINEAR UTILITY O CLEARING/GRADING ONLY
O PARKING LOT O DEMOLITION, NO REDEVELOPMENT
O OTHER O WELL DRILLING ACTIVITY * (Oil, Gas, etc.)
O OTHER
*Note: for gas well drilling, non-high volume hydraulic fractured wells only
4. In accordance with the larger common plan of development or sale,
enter the total project site area; the total area to be disturbed;
existing impervious area to be disturbed (for redevelopment
activities) ; and the future impervious area constructed within the
disturbed area. (Round to the nearest tenth of an acre. )
Total Site Total Area To Existing Impervious Future Impervious
Area Be Disturbed Area To Be Disturbed Area
5. Do you plan to disturb more than 5 acres of soil at any one time? O Yes •No
6. Indicate the percentage of each Hydrologic Soil Group(HSG) at the site.
A B C D
l 0 0 % LLU a LM o LL-L] o
7. Is this a phased project? 0 Yes O No
Start Date End Date
8. Enter the planned start and end EH / H / � _ [E / � /
dates of the disturbance 1 2 O 1 2 0 1 3 0 4 3 0 2 0 1 5
activities.
LPage 3 of 14
F3213147113
9. Identify the nearest surface waterbody(ies) to which construction site runoff will
discharge.
Name
H U I D I SC) N I R I V E R
9a. Type of waterbody identified in Question 9?
O Wetland / State Jurisdiction On Site (Answer 9b)
O Wetland / State Jurisdiction Off Site
O Wetland / Federal Jurisdiction On Site (Answer 9b)
O Wetland / Federal Jurisdiction Off Site
O Stream / Creek On Site
O Stream / Creek off Site
O River On Site
A River Off Site 9b. How was the wetland identified?
O Lake On Site O Regulatory Map
O Lake Off Site O Delineated by Consultant
O Other Type On Site O Delineated by Army Corps of Engineers
O Other Type Off Site O Other (identify)
10. Has the surface waterbody(ies) in question 9 been identified as a p Yes No
303(d) segment in Appendix E of GP-0-10-001?
11. Is this project located in one of the Watersheds identified in
Appendix C of GP-0-10-001? O Yes *No
12. Is the project located in one of the watershed
areas associated with AA and AA-S classified O Yes •No
waters?
If no, skip question 13.
13. Does this construction activity disturb land with no
existing impervious cover and where the Soil Slope Phase is O Yes O No
identified as an E or F on the USDA Soil Survey?
If Yes, what is the acreage to be disturbed?
I - I -M-D
14. Will the project disturb soils within a State
regulated wetland or the protected 100 foot adjacent O Yes 0 No
area?
LPage 4 of 14
F3644147111
15. Does the site runoff enter a separate storm sewer
system (including roadside drains, swales, ditches, O Yes •No O unknown
culverts, etc) ?
16. What is the name of the municipality/entity that owns the separate storm sewer
system?
17. Does any runoff from the site enter a sewer classified O Yes •No O Unknown
as a Combined Sewer?
18. Will future use of this site be an agricultural property as
defined by the NYS Agriculture and Markets Law? O Yes •No
19. Is this property owned by a state authority, state agency, O Yes •No
federal government or local government?
20. Is this a remediation project being done under a Department
approved work plan? (i.e. CERCLA, RCRA, Voluntary Cleanup O Yes a No
Agreement, etc.)
21. Has the required Erosion and Sediment Control component of the
SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS ® Yes O No
Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control
(aka Blue Book) ?
22. Does this construction activity require the development of a
SWPPP that includes the post-construction stormwater management
practice component (i.e. Runoff Reduction, Water Quality and • Yes O No
Quantity Control practices/techniques)?
If No, skip questions 23 and 27-39.
23. Has the post-construction stormwater management practice component
of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS •Yes O No
Stormwater Management Design Manual?
LPage 5 of 14
I 6582147115
24. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was prepared by:
• Professional Engineer (P.E.)
O Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)
O Registered Landscape Architect (R.L.A)
O Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC)
O Owner/Operator
O other
SWPPP Pre arer
H U T C H I N S E N G I I I N I E I E I R I I I N I G
Contact Name (Last, S ace, First)
H U T C H I N S I T O M
Mailing Address
1116191 H A V I L A N D R DTI
City
Q U E E N S B U R Y
State Zi
N Y
Phone Fax
5 1 8 - 7 4 5 - 0 3 0 7 5 1 8 - 7 4 5 - 0 3 0 8
Email
T HUTCH I N S @HUTCH I N S E N G I N E E R I N G C O M
SWPPP Preparer Certification
I hereby certify that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for
this project has been prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the GP-0-10-001. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect
or inaccurate information is a violation of this permit and the laws of the
State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or
administrative proceedings.
First Name MI
T O M
Last Name
H U T C H I N S
Signature
Date
m /m � �
LPage 6 of 14
F3317147118
25. Has a construction sequence schedule for the planned management
practices been prepared? ! Yes O No
26. Select all of the erosion and sediment control practices that will be
employed on the project site:
Temporary Structural Vegetative Measures
® Check Dams O Brush Matting
O Construction Road Stabilization O Dune Stabilization
O Dust Control O Grassed Waterway
O Earth Dike ®Mulching
O Level Spreader O Protecting Vegetation
O Perimeter Dike/Swale O Recreation Area Improvement
O Pipe Slope Drain 0 Seeding
O Portable Sediment Tank O Sodding
O Rock Dam O Straw/Hay Bale Dike
® Sediment Basin O Streambank Protection
O Sediment Traps O Temporary Swale
® Silt Fence ® Topsoiling
O Stabilized Construction Entrance O Vegetating Waterways
O Storm Drain Inlet Protection
Permanent Structural
O Straw/Hay Bale Dike
O Temporary Access Waterway Crossing O Debris Basin
O Temporary Stormdrain Diversion O Diversion
O Temporary Swale O Grade Stabilization Structure
O Turbidity Curtain ® Land Grading
O Water bars O Lined Waterway (Rock)
O Paved Channel (Concrete)
Biotechnical O Paved Flume
O Brush Matting O Retaining Wall
O Wattling O Riprap Slope Protection
® Rock Outlet Protection
Other O Streambank Protection
LPage 7 of 14 J
F1520147112
Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice (SMP) Requirements -
Important: Completion of Questions 27-39 is not required
if response to Question 22 is No.
27. Identify all site planning practices that were used to prepare the final site
plan/layout for the project.
O Preservation of Undisturbed Areas
i Preservation of Buffers
O Reduction of Clearing and Grading
O Locating Development in Less Sensitive Areas
O Roadway Reduction
O Sidewalk Reduction
O Driveway Reduction
O Cul-de-sac Reduction
O Building Footprint Reduction
O Parking Reduction
27a. Indicate which of the following soil restoration criteria was used to address the
requirements in Section 5.1.6("Soil Restoration") of the Design Manual
(2010 version) .
S All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with the Soil
Restoration requirements in Table 5.3 of the Design Manual (see page 5-22) .
O Compacted areas were considered as impervious cover when calculating the
WQv Required, and the compacted areas were assigned a post-construction
Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) designation that is one level less permeable
than existing conditions for the hydrology analysis.
28. Provide the total Water Quality Volume (WQv) required for this project (based on
final site plan/layout) .
Total WQv Required
M- 4 2 1 acre-feet
29. Identify the RR techniques (Area Reduction) , RR techniques(Volume Reduction) and
Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity in Table 1 (See Page 9) that were used to reduce
the Total WQv Required(#28) .
Also, provide in Table 1 the total impervious area that contributes runoff to each
technique/practice selected. For the Area Reduction Techniques, provide the total
contributing area (includes pervious area) and, if applicable, the total impervious
area that contributes runoff to the technique/practice.
Note: Redevelopment projects shall use Tables 1 and 2 to identify the SMPs used
to treat and/or reduce the WQv required. If runoff reduction techniques will not
be used to reduce the required WQv, skip to question 33a after identifying the
SMPs.
LPage 8 of 14
F2281147117: Table I Runoff Reduction (RR)" Techniques
and Standard Stormwater Management
Practices (SMPs)
Total Contributing Total Contributing
RR Techniques (Area Reduction) Area (acres) Impervious Area(acres)
O Conservation of Natural Areas (RR-1) . . . ='= and/or=.=
O SheetflowBuffers/Filters
It Riparian =-�
Buffers/Filters Strips (RR-2) , , , , , , , , , , and/or
O Tree Planting/Tree Pit (RR-3) , . . . . . . . . . �•� and/or O Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (RR-4) - • and/or
RR Techniques (Volume Reduction)
O Vegetated Swale (RR-5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ORain Garden (RR-6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Stormwater Planter (RR-7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Rain Barrel/Cistern (RR-8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Porous Pavement (RR-9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Green Roof (RR-10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity
O Infiltration Trench (I-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Infiltration Basin (I-2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ODry Well (I-3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41Underground Infiltration System (1-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9 5 3
OBioretention (F-5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ODry Swale (0-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standard SMPs
O Micropool Extended Detention (P-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OWet Pond (P-2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Wet Extended Detention (P-3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Multiple Pond System (P-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OPocket Pond (P-5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Surface Sand Filter (F-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '
O Underground Sand Filter (F-2) - - - - • - - - - • • • - - • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . • -
O Perimeter Sand Filter (F-3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '
O Organic Filter (F-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OShallow Wetland (W-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
O Extended Detention Wetland (W-2) '
O Pond/Wetland System (W-3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Pocket Wetland (W-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Wet Swale (0-2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LPage 9 of 14 J
F3859147119
Table 2 - Alternative SMPs
(DO NOT INCLUDE PRACTICES BEING
USED FOR PRETREATMENT ONLY)
Alternative 3MP Total Contributing
Impervious Area(acres)
O Hydrodynamic . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OWet Vault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Media Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O Other
Provide the name and manufacturer of the Alternative SMPs (i.e.
proprietary practice(s) ) bein used for WQv treatment.
Name
Manufacturer
Note: Redevelopment projects which do not use RR techniques, shall
use questions 28, 29, 33 and 33a to provide SMPs used, total
WQv required and total WQv provided for the project.
30. Indicate the Total RRv provided by the RR techniques (Area/Volume Reduction) and
Standard SMPs with RRv capacity identified in question 29.
Total RRv provided
4 3 0 acre-feet
31. Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the
total WQv required (#28) .
If Yes, o to • Yes ONO
g question 36.
If No, go to question 32.
32. Provide the Minimum RRv required based on HSG.
(Minimum RRv Required = (P) (0.95) (Ai) /12, Ai=(S) (Aic) ]
Minimum RRv Required
=•=acre-feet
32a. Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the
Minimum RRv Required (#32) ? O Yes ONO
If Yes, go to question 33. _
If No, the sizing criteria has not been met. Contact Regional
Office stormwater contact person to discuss next steps.
Note: Use the space provided in question #39 to summarize the
specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100%
of WQv required (#28) . A detailed evaluation of the specific
site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of the
WQv required 028) must also be included in the SWPPP.
LPage 10 of 14
I 2152147I14
33. Identify the Standard SMPs in Table 1 and, if applicable, the Alternative SMPs in
Table 2 that were used to treat the remaining
total WQv(=Total WQv Required in 28 - Total RRv Provided in 30) .
Also, provide in Table 1 and 2 the total impervious area that contributes runoff
to each practice selected.
Note: Use Tables 1 and 2 to identify the SMPs used on Redevelopment projects.
33a. Indicate the Total WQv provided (i.e. WQv treated) by the SMPs
identified in question #33 and Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity identified
in question 29.
WQv Provided
=.=acre-feet
Note: For the standard SMPs with RRv capacity, the WQv provided by each practice
the WQv calculated using the contributing drainage area to the practice
- RRv provided by the practice. (See Table 3.5 in Design Manual)
34. Provide the sum of the Total RRv provided (#30) and
the WQv provided (433a) .
35. Is the sum of the RRv provided (#30) and the WQv provided
(#33a) greater than or equal to the total WQv required (#28) ? O Yes O No
If Yes, go to question 36.
If No, the sizing criteria has not been met. Contact
Regional Office stormwater contact person to discuss next steps.
36. Provide the total Channel Protection Storage Volume (CPv) required and
provided or select waiver (36a) , if applicable.
CPv Required CPv Provided
=.=acre-feet =.=acre-feet
36a. The need to provide channel protection has been waived because:
O Site discharges directly to tidal waters
or a fifth order or larger stream.
40 Reduction of the total CPv is achieved on site
through runoff reduction techniques or infiltration systems.
37. Provide the Overbank Flood (Qp) and Extreme Flood (Qf) control criteria or
select waiver (37a) , if applicable.
Total Overbank.Flood Control Criteria (Qp)
Pre-Development Post-development
�• 7 6 CFS L -T• 3 9 CFS
Total Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Of)
Pre-Development Post-development
�• 3 9 CFS EM 7 3 CFS
LPage 11 of 14 J
F1373147118
37a. The need to meet the Qp and Qf criteria has been waived because:
O Site discharges directly to tidal waters
or a fifth order or larger stream.
O Downstream analysis reveals that the Qp and Qf
controls are not required
38. Has a long term Operation and Maintenance Plan for the
post-construction stormwater management practice(s) been ®Yes O No
developed?
If Yes, Identify the entity responsible for the long term
Operation and Maintenance
P R O J E C T O W N E R
r39 Use this space to summarize the specific site limitations and justification
for not reducing 100% of WQv required(#28) . (See question 32a)
This space can also be used for other pertinent project information.
LPage 12 of 14