Loading...
1985-03-12 60 TOWN BOARD MEETING MARCH 12, 1985 TOWN BOARD MEMBERS Mrs. Frances Walter-Supervisor Mr. Daniel Olson-Councilman Dr. Charles Eisenhart-Councilman Mr. Daniel Morrell-Councilman Mrs. Betty Monahan-Councilman Mr. Wilson Mathias-Town Counsel PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN OLSON —1 PRESS: G.F. Post Star GUESTS: Ms. Howard, Rev. Storms, Mr. Wm. Threw, Mr. Williams, TOWN OFFICIALS: Mr. Paul Naylor, Mr. Mack Dean, Mr. Rick Bolton MEETING OPENED 7:37P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS MOBILE HOME APPLICATION OF DARWIN A WILLIAMS JR., 71 Briwood Circle to locate a moible home on Luzerne Road Tax Map No. 125-1-15, owner of property M. Robert A. Nelson ... Hearing Opened 7:38 P.M. Mr. Williams was present (A letter was read by the Supervisor from Mr. Charles A. Trombley...on file) Queensbury Town Board To whom it may concern. I live approximately 250 feet north west of this proposed trailor site. Due to my work schedule I am unable to attend this public hearing so I am sending this letter to inform you that I am opposed to this trailor site as I believe it will tend to decrease the value of my home. When I bought my land I was informed by the seller that I would not be permitted to place a trailor on this land. Thank you. ss Charles A. Trombley MR. RALPH KNICKERBOCKER-I adjoin this proposed mobile home site...I am opposed to a trailer going there. When I bought the property, you could not put a trailer on the property, we are building our property up and trying to upgrade it and make it better than before, I feel that a trailer put there would bring down my property. MR. ROBERT WIMETTE- I live east of the proposed mobile home site...Opposed to the mobile home...when I purchased the property mobile homes were not allowed. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-Noted that he had visited the site...there is a mobile home 200 yards one way and another on the corner of Luzerne and Burch a quarter of a mile away, so I cannot say that there are no mobile homes in the area. The staking of the mobile home is back in the woods to some degree but not enough to cut off the site of the home. The site does not have the mobile home environment there are some but it is mostly individual residences. COUNCILMAN OLSON-I have visited the site, 1 feel that it would be a better use of the lot to put a residence there instead of a mobile home. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-Does Mr. Williams own the land? MR. WILLIAMS- No, Mr. Robert A. Nelson—letter of agreement to sell, submitted with application. .. MR. WM. THREW-Noted that in his deed it is stated that you cannot place a mobile home on the property....the mobile home on the corner will be moved this month it is only a temporary placement... TOWN COUNSEL-In a subdivision that covenant would be intended to apply to a group of lots. Anybody else to whom that covenant or restriction applied could bring an action, in that sense a private right, I think that the Board should give some consideration, it should show some weight, I do not think that you should ignore the fact... COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Once a restriction has been placed on a lot, that restriction stays forever... TOWN COUNSEL- As long as there has not be an affirmative action to say that it is no longer valid because of a change in character... COUNCILMAN EISENHART-It does not matter how many people own the property in between? TOWN-COUNSEL-That is right. SUPERVISOR WALTER- Mr. Williams, were you aware of a restriction in the deed? MR. WILLIAMS- No...Mr. Nelson did know I had plans to place a mobile home on the lot and did not say there were any deed restrictions... COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Who was the previous owner to Mr. Nelson? MR. WILLIAMS- I believe Mr. Bennett. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-Who originally owned your property and put in the deed restrictions? UNKNOWN-Wayne Herald MR. WILLIAMS- If I put my mobile home on this piece of property it will not look any worse than anything else that is there, Mr. Threw has a business there, my property is not going to hurt him any. I plan on having a nice place there, I am trying to get my wife out of the trailor court for health reasons. He is there making a living, I just want to live there. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- Mr. Williams, what kind of siding do you have on your trailer? MR. WILLIAMS-Aluminum siding...(showed photos of mobile home) MR. KNICKERBOCKER-Noted that he had spoke to Mr. Clements and was told that Mr. Greeno was allowed to place a mobile home on a temporary basis only in this area...a permanent house should be there to blend in with the rest of the area. SUPERVISOR WALTER-asked for further comments hearing none the public hearing was closed....7:54 P.M. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES RESOLUTION NO. 5T, Introduced by Mr. Daniel Olson who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Morrell: RESOLVED, that the Town Board Minutes of February 26, 1985 be and hereby are approved. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None i Absent: None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 58, Introduced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Dr. Charles Eisenhart: WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury is in the process of undertaking a re-appraisal i 62 of the values of the real property situate within the Town, and WHEREAS, the appraisal firm of Cole-Layer-Trumble Company of Dayton, Ohio has submitted a proposal for the cost of re-appraising commercial and industrial property in the Town, and WHEREAS, prior to the completion of the re-valuation of commercial and industrial properties it is in the interest of the Town of Queensbury to obtain appraisals of specific properties within the commercial and industrial classification, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Supervisor is authorized to execute letter agreements with Cole-Layer-Trumble Company for appraisals of real property located within the Town of Queensbury. Duly adopted by the following vote: , Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None COUNCILMAN EISENHART- Have we had other quotes? SUPERVISOR WALTER-Mr. LaRose did go out and talk with several companies and he felt this company had the best reputation... Discussion was held regarding the billing for preparation of the the re-valuation... SUPERVISOR WALTER-There was $100,000 budgeted for this project and the ball park cost has come in at less than three quarters... OLD BUSINESS Application of Faith Bible Church to operate a Stump Dump...Public Hearing was held on February 26, 1985 ... We had asked that the developer prepare a map of the proposal and this has now been submitted... I TOWN COUNSEL-There is no question that the SEQRA applies in an instance like this. ... In reviewing the application, particularly when I looked at the map that was submitted by the applicant on March 6th you can see that this project is part of a larger scale development. I think that the Board has to consider even this application for a disposal facility, you can't treat that in a vacuum, you have to be aware of the other aspects of the project that are going on. As Reverend Storms has explained to me many of the items that are set forth in the plans are projects that if they are to occur are going to happen eight to ten years from now. I think he is concerned that we do not hold up this application until we can get a better handle on it. I think that for purposes of applying to SEQRA at the very least I' feel the Board should determine that they are the lead agency on this application. I think that the next step would be to meet with the applicant to get a better handle on exactly the scope of the project. I think you have to come to grip with the fact that there may be a significant impact on the environment such that it would require an Environmental Impact Statement. The proposed resolution would comply with the SEQRA time table procedure in establishing yourself as the lead agency and I think that is beneficial to the applicant, dealing with you locally than opposed to DEC, Dept. of Health and DOT or other State Agencies... COUNCILMAN EISEN HART-Looked over the proposed site...it looks to me like an excellent place to dump stumps, it looks like a good move to dump, of course to be done with restrictions garbage and whatnot should not be allowed. I can see no reason in my own mind for saying no. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN- I think we should go through the paper work, we have to make sure there will be no environmental repercussion. COUNCILMAN OLSON-Noted that the Stump dump is a small area of the proposed plan... TOWN COUNSEL-I think that you have to have more information in front of you before you can say that there is a finding of nor significance, you could have what is called a conditional negative declaration where you say if you comply with the 63 following rules we are going to find that there is no significant impact. REVEREND STORMS-If the Town becomes the lead agency what kind of relationship does that place us in with the Town and how might that effect the seperation of Church and State? TOWN COUNSEL-I would not attempt off the top of my head...it would seem to me there is no built-in exemption in the SEQRA process for an applicant that happens to be a church, I think it will either be the Town or some representative of State government, that is going to be there, it is just begging the question. I would suggest that we are going to require this applicant to obtain a permit... REVEREND STORMS-The reasons I am asking this is because all over the country..churches are saying our first amendment right supercedes zoning laws...I wonder if we are putting ourselves-in a compromising position if we say we allow the Town Board — of the Town of Queensbury to be Lead Agency and determine if we can practice our religion a very sacred part of which is placing the dead on sacred ground. ..� SUPERVISOR WALTER-My own thought would be that it would be stretching the point because we have an application on hand for a stump dump which means that you would be in effect disposing of organic material. I do not understand the connection with practicing religion? REVEREND STORMS-It does relate to the use of our Cemetery ... our plan is to be able to drive into the Cemetery without having to back out. ..similiar points have been made across the country, the Church has the right to determine the use of their properties as they feel God leads them to do this, rather than a government agency telling them how to use their properties. ... TOWN COUNSEL-This is a very good question, but I do not think anybody provided any kind of hard clear answer to it, if there is I do not know of one...at this point, it is my recommendation to the Board that they proceed under the assumption that they do have the authority to permit this particular application... COUNCILMAN OLSON-With the Town being lead agency you can move things faster on a local level than I think you would find the State government moving to make a determination. COUNCILMAN MORRELL-If we follow this procedure and we get the determination from Encon and DEC that there is no problem, do we cease to become the lead agency, do we ever sever our ties? TOWN COUNSEL-One of the reasons that we are doing this is to speed things up. What SEQRA said if you do not notify the Commissioner of these other Agencies that you are lead agency, even though you give them a permit, anyone else has the right to come on in and say we have some jurisdiction over this project you have to give us ... you have to go through the hoops all over again. What this resolution does is put ENCON on notice that you as the Town Board are going to be the lead agency and they have 15 or 30 days to object to it. The benefit of this is that you have one reviewing agency instead of several. MR. THREW-What is triggering this with SEQRA? TOWN COUNSEL-Your permit. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING LEAD AGENCY AND COMPLIANCE WITH SEQRA REGULATIONS FOR FAITH BIBLE CHURCH RUBBISH DISPOSAL FACILITY RESOLUTION NO. 5 Introduced rodu t ced by Mrs. Betty Monahan who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Olson: WHEREAS, Faith Bible Church has made application to the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury for approval of a permit for a facility for the disposal of rubbish in accordance with Ordinance Number 6, and WHEREAS, on January 29, 1985, a permit application was filed with the Town, which application included a long form environmental assessment form, and WHEREAS, on February 26, 1985, a public hearing was held on the aforesaid application, and 64 WHEREAS, on March 6, 1985, a map of the area for the proposed facility was filed by the applicant in order to provide the Town Board with additional necessary information, and WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed facility, when considered as a part of the plan for the development of Faith Bible Church Ministries Center may have a significant effect on the environment, and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury, as permit issuing agency, and because of the local significance of the proposed project is the appropriate lead agency, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury is determined to be the lead agency for purposes of compliance with SEQRA in the review of the application of Faith Bible Church for a rubbish disposal facility, and it is further resolved that, notice of this determination be forwarded to the applicant, the Commissioners of Environmental Conservation and the DEC Region 5 Office in Warrensburg. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent:None Discussion held on the application of Darwin Williams to locate a mobile home on Luzerne Road...it was the consensus to table the application until further information regarding deed restrictions can be brought forth.. RESOLUTION TO TABLE RESOLUTION NO. 60, Introduced by Dr. Charles Eisenhart who moved or its adoption, seconded by Mrs. Betty Monahan: RESOLVED, that the Mobile Home Application of Mr. Darwin Williams Jr. to locate a mobile home on Luzerne Road be tabled until further information can be obtained regarding deed restrictions. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Dr. Eisenhart, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: Mr. Olson, Mr. Morrell Absent:None COMMUNICATIONS -Mobile Home Application of Michael and Shelly Gale-resubmitted from last meeting-location of proposed mobile home Leo Street... RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 61, Introduced by Dr. Charles Eisenhart who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Morrell: WHEREAS, MicMwl and Shelly Gale have made application in accordance with paragraph 2 (c) Section 4 of an ordinance of the Town of Queensbury entitled ORDINANCE FOR THE REGULATION OF MOBILE HOMES AND MOBILE HOME COURTS IN THE TOWN OF QUEENSBURY, WARREN COUNTY, NEW YORK, to locate a mobile home outside at property situated at Leo Street, and j WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that said application complies with the requirements of said ordinance, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that the facts presented in said application are sufficient to justify further consideration by this board, therefore be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to the provisions of the above mentioned ordinance, 65 the Town Board shall conduct a public hearing on said application on March 26, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. in the Queensbury Town Office Building, Bay Road, and that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give proper notice of said public hearing in accordance with the provisions of said ordinance. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None -BID OPENING-WATER CONNECTION MATERIALS-OPENED 2:00 P.M. ON MARCH 5, 1985 LeValley McLeod, Inc. Schenectady, N.Y. Non Col. attached $8,347.51 Vellano Bros. Inc. Latham, N.Y. Non Col. attached $7,249.88 L&C Municipal Sales Johnstown, N.Y. Non Col. attached $7,326.13 Robert E. Spence Syracuse, N.Y. Non Col. attached $8,438.59 -Ltr. Water Dept. requesting that the low bid of Vellano Bros. be accepted. RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT BID RESOLUTION NO. 62, Introduced by Mr. Daniel Olson who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Morrell: WHEREAS, Mr. Thomas Flaherty, Water Supt. for the Town of Queensbury did recommend that we advertise for bids for Water Connection Materials and WHEREAS, four bids were submitted and received and opened at the specified time and place by the Director of Purchasing/Town Clerk Donald A. Chase and such bids were then turned over to Mr. Flaherty for his recommendation and WHEREAS, Mr. Flaherty by letter has recommended that Vellano Brothers Inc. of Latham, N.Y. be awarded the bid in the amount of $7,249.88, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queenbury hereby accepts the bids as mentioned above and be it further RESOLVED, that the financing for such materials is in the 1985 Water Department Budget. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None Absent: None -The Office of Kenneally and Tarantino delivered a rezoning request on property on Sherman Avenue and Luzerne Road to be zoned SR20 (Ltr. read and placed on file) L MR. DENNIS DICKINSON-Gave a presentation of the proposed project (used map of the area) The property in question is approximately 56 acres running between Sherman Avenue and Luzerne Road. The property is split between LI-lA and SR-20. Across the Luzerne Read from our property is a UR-10 zone. We request that the property be rezoned residential either ten or twenty. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Have ypu looked to see if that is in the Water District? i 66 MR. DICKINSON-The Northeasterly corner of the property is in the Sherman Avenue Water District, the Queensbury Water District is not located on this property. COUNCILMAN OLSON-You are talking single family dwellings? MR. DICKINSON-Yes. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-You are going to run a road between Sherman Avenue and Luzerne Road? MR. DICKINSON-That is what we would like to do, we would like to do it in phases with the intention that finally you will be able to go from Sherman Avenue to Luzerne Road. COUNCILMAN M•ORRELL-Will you have problems with the Niagara Mohawk right of way? M MR. DICKINSON-No COUNCILMAN OLSON-Are you familiar with our requirements with regard to accepting roads? MR. DICKINSON-Some of your requirements yes, to standard and paved. COUNCILMAN OLSON-The utilities will be place first. MR. DICKINSON-Yes. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-If that all goes residential, and then when we have a chance to bring in light industrial on each side, you guys are going to come in and say hey, we do not want that there, it is ruining our residential character. MR. DICKINSON-You have it zoned light industry, we are asking to have this residential knowing fully well that light industry is allowed on either side. COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-In the future are you going to come in and try to say we think you ought to rezone that because we do not want light industry, we do have to leave places in the Town of Queensbury for light industry and I think you should be aware of it. MR. DICKINSON-Our intention is to develop this if we can get it rezoned and our assumption is that this will remain light industrial. Obviously you felt that there was a need for it and I am sure you are not going to eradicate it because we want a portion of it. COUNCILMAN MORRELL-Once it is developed and your obligation ceases because it is all new owners on individual parcels of land and industry wants to go in beside this, you do not have an obligation to anyone because it ceased the new homeowners would now complain that there property values we be degraded because light industry would be beside it. MR. DICKINSON-I think you are approaching this backwards, if this is rezoned residential and people come in to purchase, are going to purchase lots in here knowing fully well that this is zoned light industry. COUNCILMAN OLSON-They should know it, but they will not until someone goes in. COUNCILMAN EISENHART-Would this be spot zoning? SUPERVISOR WALTER-No, because what you would be doing would be extending either the UR-10 or SR-20. MR. DICKINSON-This is a high intensity residential area already, as you can see. MR. PAUL NAYLOR,HIGHWAY SUPT.-How many roads will you be putting in there? MR. DICKINSON-Probably a street going from Sherman Avenue to Luzerne Road with a couple of streets with loops... SUPERVISOR WALTER-It is the consensus of the Town Board to turn this project I 67 over to the Planning Board for their recommendation... -Ltr. Thomas Flaherty to attend the Spring Meeting of the AWWC at Guilderland, March 28, 1985... the request is for the Water Supt., Deputy Supt., Maintenance Supervisor, and One Operator... Discussion held-A discussion was held in regard to establishing a policy on how many key personnel from a department can attend meetings at the same time...the aspect of safety and emergencies was brought out...a policy will be discussed at the water committee level... RESOLUTION TO ATTEND CONFERENCE RESOLUTION NO. 63, Introduced by Mr. Daniel Morrell who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Olson: RESOLVED, that permission is hereby granted to the Water Superintendent, Deputy Superintendent, Maintenance Supervisor and One Operator to attend the Spring Meeting of the Adirondack Water Works Conference at Guilderland, New York March 28, 1985, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Town Board authorizes payment of all reasonable and necessary expenses. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: Dr. Eisenhart Absent:None , -Ltr. Mohican Grange-(on file) requesting a "No-Smoking Policy" at Public Meetings held at the Queensbury Town Office... COUNCILMAN MONAHAN-I will abstain from any action on the proposed bidding on a roof project due to my affiliation with roofing contractors... (Bid forthcoming on Water Dept. Roof, bid opening on March 19, 1985) REPORTS -TOWN CLERK-Month of February -BUILDING & ZONING-Month of February OPEN FORUM 9.04 P.M. REVEREND STORMS-I would like to continue the discussion on the Stump Dump, making a couple of comments-1. If we were to fill that ravine with materials from our own property we would not be required a permit, is that correct? SUPERVISOR WALTER-Yes. REVEREND STORMS-If we use materials that may be of the exact same nature brought in from other properties, we are required to make an impact study. SUPERVISOR WALTER-Because it is a different kind of operation, and the Town has jurisdiction over the operation of dumps, which is essentially for public use. REVEREND STORMS-I hope you can see the point I am making, the exact same thing would be done in one case e as the other, but in one case there is a lot more involved. 2. I think I heard somebody say that whenthe Town of Queenbury becomes the lead agency they are required to pay any fee involved, like application fees, is that correct? SUPERVISOR WALTER-No. When we wish to engage somebody in as far as making a determination we will pay for it, if we ask you to do something, we are not going to pay for it. REVEREND STORMS-My comment is, we as a congregation have never taken one penny of government money and we never intend to take one...we do not want taxpayers money to be used on our projects... �S SUPERVISOR WALTER-If the determination is made that you are required to make an environmental impact statement then you will have to pay for it, the government does not. If it is determined that you have to do that, and you submit it to us, and we wished to have some engineers or scientists look at it then that is our expense. REVEREND STORMS-How long might this drag on? TOWN COUNSEL-At this point there is a time limit in which the Board has to tell you whether they think that this project is going to have a significant environmental impact, from the time they decide that the application is complete, it is 15 days. SUPERVISOR WALTER-1 think we have determined that we are going to have a meeting of the parties, to supply certain information that we would make a determination. SUSAN HOWARD-22 Main Street-Spoke to the Town Board about a persistant problem with rats on her property, and complainted about Mr. Lee moving his business totally on the corner... DISCUSSION HELD-Mr. Dean-stated that he had looked at the situation at Lee's, they had mentioned that they had not had a rat problem since they used an extermination process...noted that this may be a specific problem not a Town problem in terms of the general neighborhood...the Building & Zoning Dept. has exhausted its time limits, we do not have the expertise in this area...Supervisor Walter-has your department had any other calls on this problem...Mr. Dean, not since last fall...Councilman Olson requested that Town Counsel look into the problem of the increase in business at the Lee's property... MR. JAMES TROY-Is is legal to run a bulldozer on Town pavement with steel cleats? MR. NAYLOR-No MR. JAMES TROY-This was done, ...I am a taxpayer and this concerns me...(speaking about Lee's business) DISCUSSION HELD-Supervisor Walter- requested the Building Dept. to check into the special use permit regarding Mr. Lee's operations...Mr. Dean-the permit did not specify how many trucks or vehicles could be on the property at any one time...the permit requested the use of the garage for repairs and the yard for equipment storage... there is no way that I can tell these people they are in violation because there was no specific enumeration of how many vehicles could be there...Supervisor Walter-noted in regard to the Health Problem, the Town Board acting as the Board of Health could investigate the situation and then meet as a Board of Health and determine if there is a health problem and how it will be handled...also asked that if any other neighbors have this problem to notify the Town Board...if the problem is just on Mrs. Howard's property this Town Board does not have any jurisdiction to do anything it has to be a public health problem...questioned was raised about rats on Fourth Street, this could be a possible source of the rats...cars loaded with garbage...Supervisor Walter that will be checked out... MR. GALLUCCI-Asked if there was any further information in regard to the Water System request on Luzerne Road... SUPERVISOR WALTER-I spoke with Mr. Flaherty at noon, he has done some preliminary work, his ball park figure at this point is $20.00 + per thousand of assessed evaluation... noted that an engineer must be hired to do the proper engineering workup and cost estimates...noted that this is the highest the Town has ever had...this is a problem as far as Audit and Control is concerned..(reviewed the process of establishing a district, time limits and the role of Audit and Control)...the next step is for a recommendation from the Water Committee... MR. GALLUCCI-If you can give us a cost estimate, we will contact the residents on the petition and see if they are willing to go along with the costs... COUNCILMAN OLSON-Within the next two weeks we should have an answer to make a recommendation on... MR. BILL THREW-With the new filtration plant, the more water lines placed, the more money placed into the Town's pocket too...better utilize what we have. MR. GALLUCCI-Suggested that maybe, that proposed district should be expanded in order for it to be successful... 69 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AUDIT OF BILLS RESOLUTION NO. 64, Introduced by Mr. Daniel Olson who moved for its adoption, seconded by Mr. Daniel Morrell: RESOLVED, that Audit of Bills as appears on Abstract No. 85-3B and numbered 322 through 528 and totaling $211,811.37 be and hereby is approved. Duly adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Olson, Dr. Eisenhart, Mr. Morrell, Mrs. Monahan, Mrs. Walter Noes: None ! Absent: None Abstain: Mr. Olson abstained on voting Audit Number 483. N -Ltr. Mr. Brault, Building & Grounds Supt.-requesting permission to repair storage building...(on file) Discussion held-The Board requested that the storage building be repaired... On motion the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Donald A. Chase, Town Clerk