Application a�.'
gmdae�
June 25, 2002
Dear Queensbury Board Members,
I am requesting waivers for the following: No change to the landscape,
grading, stormwater management or lighting as there is no change to any
exterior structures or traffic flow. There are no public restrooms posted and
hours of operation would basically be daylight hours.
We are currently and have been for almost ten years running a towing and
2 repair facility from 20 Sweet Road in Queensbury. Last fall we downsized to
just a towing facility from which I answer phones and dispatch calls. I found
myself with an empty reception area that I would like to utilize as a display
and VERYsmall retail area for pre packaged home-made candy and
collectibles.
Our tow trucks as always are parked in front and on the side of the
building in between calls as they are needed. What 1 have proposed for use of
this small space will not generate more than I to 2 vehicles at any given time,
which is considerably less than when the repair shop was in full operation.
Z Thank you for your consideration,
Deb
ra Marsh
1/15/02 • Plan Review
At the direction of the Planning Board Chairman on 10/1/01, please note the following message — "The
Planning Board will not accept additional information during the applications review. Additional
submissions will result in the application being tabled for further staff and engineering review."
Applicant Name
Tax Map No.
Zoning Classification
APA,CEA
Zoning Ordinance Compliance Section:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1 J fE b F / x i 's' Q o o rn Fo i _ )>w s Pt a y
dke-A A-'136 ke—Ai Ak,"
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES: / Is
_-/{,
FtCcy�l a / n�� — ( InSIG�-G � OI[1G1
2W ct aA�k 2 rk'L! aG,n SwtI/
,v` C (., w Aivt m�,1�
Li e,& A?I ' oca�o+
Z Date(s)of Pre-Application Conference
Applicant Initials
Staff Member Initials
Nothing stated in this meeting is to be construed as an approval or disapproval. The sole intent of the pre-
application meeting is to address submission requirements and to identify potential concerns. All content of
submissions is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized designee.
1/15/02 • S&lan Review
General Information
Application No. (Office Use Only)
Project Location: a 0 Sw=e 7- e er-3s t' u y
Tax Map ID: 9 t, . , -i - i -U 4
Zone Classification:
Compliance with Zoning Ordinance Section:
Detailed Description of Project:
(include current & proposed use): Ou L2eaTL y Lo cRr,o a o F Ta L ,tiJ, - ll'
F7l+CiL , T`J l{ou Sc'O , NS, Dc 14 8AV
loc4L i,> Like TV USe tM?ry 2r ct V7/aJ Qocm Fo b s�'cR� Smgc� TR
fiLCA FOR 39Le OF i'F'C-VAckAC'Ep ,lom6-,nADe CAN7y v Qo7�e�7i Rees
Modification to existing Site Plan, Yes: No: X
(If so,indicate Site Plan No. & approval date)
Square Footage of proposed structure: Flo eN-0,46 e"
Applicant: Iq�-H fh 14s2 SH
Address: I I GL EN Lo o C 1� d t-
2� uEcnsi3ui�y /J U
Home Phone: 79d -qpp 4 3
Work Phone/Fax: IM - fSoll, FAX '798-7LFP a-
Applicant's Agent:
Address:
Home Phone:
Work Phone/ Fax:
Property Owner: ��A A) /,J c EKS
Address: 13i /fJaN7-.2/3 A �
a tic cNs6twp- �1Y /alloy
Home Phone: 79a - 7aa
Work Phone/ Fax:
Directions to Site: 7-1i 4
L&-,fT TukC ) o to-m su -eT An Rr rRRFFc- c-µ— 4 RA IV C-1heA6-r
r e) , , 6-rt i PL--N n: � f3AKE,�V
1/15/02 • Alan Review
Site Development Data
Area/Type Existing sq. ft. Proposed Addition Total sq. ft.
sq. ft.
A. Building Footprint
4500 ��� y50o
B. Detached Garage
/i1 a - -
C. Accessory Structure(s)
D. Paved, gravel or other _
hard surfaced areas 32�0D 3�6G�
E. Porches/Decks A1/4
F. Other
Total Non-Permeable
(Sum A through F)
Parcel Area
Percent Non-Permeable
Total Non-Permeable/Parcel Area
Setback Requirements
Required Existing Proposed
Front(l)
Front(2)
Shoreline
Side Yard(1) o qlc
Side Yard(2) e,OA 6 71-NcT/u
Rear Yard (1) P16fo se 0
Rear Yard 2)
Buffer/Travel Corridor
Height
Permeability
Sign Setback
No. of Parking Spaces
`7
5�a
i
a�
�S�
� 4
J
Y
J �I
v �
T
fir. hs
Qj
w � �
a
o a-
o �b
N
H
0
4
�Y�
Parcel Information
Municipality: Queensbury
New Tax Map Number: 296.17-1-44
Old Tax Map Number: 71.-2-3
Location: 20 SWEET RD IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
Frontage: 0.00000 THIS MAP AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED
AS IS AND WARREN COUNY MAKES NO
Depth: 0.00000 WARRANTIES OR GUARAN EEST EXPRESSED
Acres: 0.96000 • OR IMPLIED,INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF
TITLE NON-INFRINGEMENT,
Property Class: 430 MERCHANTABILITY,AND THAT OF FITNESS
Owner: WEEKS GEORGE FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE CONCERNING
THIS MAP AND THE INFORMATION
Current Land Assessment: 75000 CONTAINED HEREIN. USER ASSUMES ALL
RISKS AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR
Current Total Assessment. 161800 DETERMINING WHETHER THIS MAP IS
Neighborhood Code: 403 SUFFICIENT FOR PURPQSES INTENDED
Year Built: 1960 GIS MAPS ARE NOT LAND SURVEYS'
Square Footage: 0 This GIS ma w ter generated using data acquired the
v is en County p p Nro r
Stories: 0.00000 WarrendpolPlanningcepadmentfrom venous
Bathrooms: 0.00000 sources area is intended Doty for eserenpe,on purpose al,planning
area preseninclude
lable date for a stated
Bedrooms: 0 non had to apes reliable date forand
should
puestaec,this map is not intended for and bjeds
Sewer: private of be used to establish boundaries,ro lines, yo other
i at opens
on
Water: Comm/ ublic ortopoNdaanyxcannyraenauny
p ypherPneeded an naweered axavaaonorany
Utilities: gas&electric other Purpose Man engineeredaDr
Heat: .le it document or 9 d by needed to assu required
p that ry
Style: anchor that cenam amadathe are rear.
BOOK: Warren County Real Propen,Tax-2031 Roll. Building Footprints
Page: nerepampilednot bendupdatedorna aptosmrery.
Sales Dates:
Sales Prices:
Y4MS1
YOS, p Bo
0,6 _- w
,55 SWEET
I
1
50 Ao m
75 .i
p5.`A ROPO 105
Fa0 19
.`..
205 ,5
SWEEP — ,b5
15 ,A
%t9191' •� � y ` � r%
296.17
5
I
75
i
S
2.90 A
1:1200 8 N
1/15/02 • Alan Review
Checklist—please prepare a map depicting existing and proposed conditions. Failure to complete the following
checklist or include all required information may result in a determination of incompleteness and a delay in the
processing of your application
PR NA wR Address Each Item
GENERAL
.X A. Title,name, address of applicant&person responsible for preparation of drawing
X B.North arrow, Tax Map ID,date prepared and scale(minimum 1 in. =40 ft.)
.X C. Boundaries of the property plotted to scale,zoning boundary
x D. Location of principal structures, accessory structures with exterior dimensions
E. Location of site improvements incl. outdoor storage areas, driveways (existing & proposed) parking
J01< areas, etc.
X F. Setbacks for all structures and improvements
x G. Elevations of proposed structures
WATER& SEWER
A. Location of on-site sewage disposal facilities, design details, construction details, flow rates, and
number of bedrooms proposed
B. Location of water supply (i.e., well) and septic on adjoining lots with separation distances to existing
or proposed on-site water supply and septic
X C. Separation distances for proposed sewage disposal system to well and waterbodies
D. Location and description of existing public or private water supply (well, lake, etc.). Method of
securing public or private water, location, design and construction of water supply including daily water
X usage
E. Percolation test location and results
PARKING/ PERMEABLE AREAS
A.Number of spaces required for project including calculations and justification
B. Number of existing parking spaces, number to be removed, number to maintain and type of surfacing
X material e. ., gravel,paved)
C. Provision for pedestrian and handicap access and parking
x D. Location and design details of ingress,egress,loading areas and cutting
E. Location and character of green areas (existing and proposed),modification to green area, buffer zone
X to remain undisturbed
F. Lighting, location and design of all existing or proposed outdoor lighting
ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS
A. Location of on-site & adjacent watercourses, streams,rivers,lake and wetlands
K B. Location of proposed &existing: utility/energy distribution systems(gas, electric,solar,telephone)
C. Location, design and construction of all existing and proposed site improvements including: drains,
culverts,retaining walls, fences, fire&emergency zones and hydrants
D. Location and amount/portion of building area proposed for office, manufacturing, retail sales or other
X commercial activities
x E. Signage: Location, size, type, design and setback
x F. Waiver Request: provide letter with application requesting any waivers
G. Commercial / Industrial Development requires submission of a Landscaping Plan, Stormwater
X Mana ement Plan, Grading Plan and a Lighting Plan
x H.The Bd. may request other elements as considered necessary.
I. Identify any Federal, State or County permits required for the project.
J. Please submit record of application for approval status of all necessary permits required from Federal,
X State and County officials.
Legend: PR— Provided; NA—Not Applicable; WR—Waiver Requested
/ D
1/15/02 Site Plan Review
Signature Page
This Page includes the Authorization to Act as Agent Form, Engineering Fee Disclosure, Other Permit
Responsibilities and Agreement to provide documentation required.
Complete the following if the OWNER of the property is not the same as the applicant
Owner's Agent Form
Owner: TE R A) tJ c-e es
Designates: o &J E e r e b . Q u c ENsAwzy
As agent regarding Variance a Site Plan Subdivision
For Tax Map No.: a94, 7Section I Block 1fq Lot
Deed Reference: c Pa��
ge��Date
SIGNATURE: L wner) (I a a—fDate)
Complete the following if the; LICANT is unable to attend the meeting or wishes to be represented
by another party:
Applicant's Agent Form
Owner:
Designates:
As agent regarding: Variance Site Plan Subdivision
For Tax Map No.: Section Block Lot
SIGNATURE: (Owner) (Date)
Engineering Fee Disclosure: Applications may be referred to the Town consulting engineer for review
of septic design, storm drainage, etc. as determined by the Zoning or Planning Department. Fees for
engineering review services will be charged directly to the applicant. Fees for engineering review will
not exceed$1,000 without notification to the applicant.
Please Note: Other permits may be required for construction or alteration activity subsequent to approval
by the Zoning Board or Planning Board. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain any additional
permits.
Official Meeting Minutes Disclosure: It is the practice of the Community Development Dept. to have a
designated stenographer tape record the proceedings of meetings resulting from application, and that
minutes transcribed from those tapes constitute the official record of all proceedings. If there is a
discrepancy between such record and the handwritten minutes taken by the designated stenographer, the
handwritten minutes shall be deemed the official record.
I, the undersigned, have thoroughly read and understand the instructions for submission, agree to
the submission requirements and completed the checklist.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: � ZLa �� Date e
SIGNATURE OF AGENT: Date
13
r-/le, C 04O� •T//610�
I/15/02 + Site Plan Review
14.164(1 UIIS1—Tut 12
• PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 617.20 SEAR
3 S - C) Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION(TO be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. APPLOANTeg
ZTSOn 2. PROJECT NAME
S. PROJECT LOCATION:
municipality =A)S 13 1.1 A- Coupty ko _
4. PRECISE LOCATION ISlrael address and road Inlnae,U0ns,VWMn9M landmark.,ate.W provide MW
aD ScjEc% &DI 0,14CEPJ1614 eu per!
OFF 4,7-q Ajo AlMAy h U
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:
❑Nsw ❑Eapanalon RModlllcatImMaxsralion
a. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
Ve4y sMRu-
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED.
Wtially Ultimately
S. WILL PROPOSED ACnION COMPLY VAIN EXISTING 20Nexi OR OTHER EXgSnNG LAND USE RE9TRICr10Ns?
10 Yn /MNo If NM GWlbs Wetly'
ltII L.L pl Lib S iTi? fL/YN ,etZli4rV
9. WHAT 13 PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY I�OF PROJECT?
❑aeald w enusi ❑Indtd l'
al c011Yw-Y ❑Apoclittun ❑PalaForesUOpen apace ❑Dew
D"Cribc
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL
STATE OR LOCAL)?IT�
❑Yp 9 No H yea•list agwrcy(y and parmnhpprovaN,
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION NAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
❑Yu FNo If yes,not agency none and prmlu"W wal
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REWIRE MODIFICATION?
❑Yea t ❑No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Appllmllt/sponaof o,im paw , C�—
Sanalum a—
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complste the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
f/15/02 + Site Plan Review
•PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT(To be completed by Agency)
A DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR PART 517.67 if Van.coordimte Ito rtaHew Proofing and use the FILL EAR
(3Yea mHo
B.WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART$17.67 If No.a nepNlw MWatbn
may be Supr6edeA by another Involved spray.
❑Yes No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may as handwritten,It legible)
Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, no"Was,misting traffic paltrrw, solid wastes production or disposal,
Potential for tar0610n,drainage Of flooding Problorra7 Explain briefly.
X1i lea
C2 Aesmetio agrleultural archaeological,historic.orother natural of al sa
uces: wmm a ces:or unity neighborhood character?Explain briefly.
W/)- 114
CA Vegetation or fauna,f"shallflsh wwildifle species,signitksol hablude,or threatened or andarlpered notation?Explain briefly.
n
0 •_
C6.A tommunitya existing plans w goals as
officially adopted,or a charge in use or rc intensity of use of land or other natural resoues?Explain briefly
AM /
CS Grasp%subsequent dmbpment,or related act"las likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly.
0 #0 .
C& loop tarn,short term,Curra6alM,a c/h//a({r//lNleeis not identified in CI1S?Explain briefly.
C7. Other is(Including efnnges in usi d ehhsr4quantity or type N wrgH7 Explain briefly.
D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA?
❑Yea Erato
IIS THERE OR ISrrr TTHHERE LIKELY TO BF�CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
❑Yes Ia NO If Yet.explain briefly
A v
PART RI—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For Each adverse effect klemmed abaft,dstarmine whether R IS substantial,large,important or otitenwtse significant
Fads effect should be assessed In connection with its(a) setting(Le.urban or ruin):(b)probability of.occurring;(t)duration;(d)
IrrerersiWgty,is)geographic scope;and M magnitude.It necessary,add attscMtents or refarerws supporting materials.Ensure that
explanations contain sufficimt detail to show mat all reievent adverse Impacts have Wen ideniffled and adequately addressed.If
question D of Part 11 wu Checked yes,the dalermtnatlon and significance mat waivate the polemist hope"of the propoeW action
on the erlvlraunerr al cha ticteristice of the CEA.
❑ Check this box If you have Identified one or more potentially Isrge or significant adverse Impacts which MAY
occur.Than proceed directly to the FULL FAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In arty significant adverse environmental Impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting this determination:
l� t
ry� le pen y
inlrrl type N Reipona Ica xr L�� Old e bparoi a OF e
,puU,re of a k,Lead Agency
plower arturt.F,.,firpona, e o kr
Date
2
Town of Queensbury
Planning Board �-
Department of Community Development
Staff Notes
Reference: Site Plan Review No. 35-2002
Applicant: Debra Marsh
Location: 20 Sweet Road
Zone: Highway Commercial Moderate (HC-MOD)
Meeting Date: July 16, 2002
Proiect DescrilDtion:
Applicant proposes to use a portion of an existing building for retail sales.
Criteria for considering a Site Plan according to Section 179-9-080 of the Town
of Queensbury ZoningOrdinance:
1. Does the proposed project comply with the requirements of the Zonin¢
Ordinance?
Retail sales in the HC-MOD zoning district require Site Plan Review before the Planning
Board.
2. Will the proposed use be in harmony with the intent of the ordinance,
specifically, could the location, character and size of the proposed use
increase the burden on the supporting public services and facilities?
The proposed use would have a minimal impact on public services.
3. Will the proposed use create public hazards with reeards to traffic, traffic
congestion or the parking of vehicles and/or equipment or be otherwise
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the persons residing or
working in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the town?
No public hazards related to traffic or the parking of vehicles is anticipated as a result of
this proposal.
4. While considering any benefits that might be derived from the project; Will
the proiect have any undue adverse impact on the natural, scenic, aesthetic,
ecoloeical, wildlife, historic, recreational or open space resource of the town
or Adirondack Park or upon the ability of the public to provide supporting
facilities and services made necessary by the proiect?
The use of an existing building should not have any adverse impacts of this type.
ApplicantMarsh •
Date July 16, 2002
Page -2-
The following general standards were considered in the staff review of thisxoject:''
1. The location, arrangement, size, design and general site compatibility of buildings,
lightin and nd si ng_s.
No new buildings, lighting or signage is proposed with this application.
2. The adequacy and arrangement of vehicular traffic access and circulation, including
intersections,road widths,pavement surfaces, dividers and traffic controls.
This site currently has open access from both Sweet Road and Montray Road.
3. The location, arrangement, appearance and sufficiency of off-street parking and loading.
The site appears to be able to provide adequate off street parking.
4. The adequacy and arrangement of pedestrian traffic access and circulation, walkway
structures, control of intersections with vehicular traffic and overall pedestrian
convenience.
Pedestrian traffic for this project is not an issue.
5. The adequacy of stormwater drainage facilities.
No information on stormwater management has been provided, and the applicant has
requested a waiver from providing such information.
6. The adequacy of water supply and sewage disposal facilities.
The water supply and sewage disposal systems are not at issue with this application.
7. The adequacy, We and arrangement of trees, shrubs and other suitable plantings,
landscaping and screening constituting a visual and/or noise buffer between the
applicants and adjoining lands, including the maximum retention of existing vegetation
and maintenance, including replacement of dead or deceased plants.
No landscaping plan has been submitted, and the applicant has requested a waiver from
this requirement.
8. The adequacy of fire lanes and other emergency zones and the provision of fire hydrants.
Not applicable to this project.
9. The adequacy and impact of structures, roadways and landscaping in areas with
susceptibility to ponding, flooding and/or erosion.
No new structures are proposed that would cause flooding or erosion.
Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
Applicant Marsh • •
Date July 16, 2002
Page-3-
Parcel History (construction/site plan/variance,
A towing business currently exists at this location.
Staff comments:
The applicant proposes to use an area of an already existing building for retail sales. The
applicant is seeking several waivers(Stormwater Plan,Landscaping Plan, Lighting Plan).
Access management at this location could be improved by better definition of entrances/exits on
Sweet Road as well as Montray Road. One option is construction of a guardrail along Sweet
Road, as well as Montray Road. Another option is providing landscaped areas along both road
frontages to better define access areas.
SEAR Status:
Type: Unlisted. A Short Environmental Assessment Form has not been submitted.
Site Statistic Confirmation:
The existing buildings at this location meet setbacks for the HC-MOD district. Permeability is
below what is required, however since no new construction is proposed, a variance is not
required.
Planning Board
Community Development Department Staff Notes
Ju102-25
Warren County Panning Board
Project Review and Referral Form
Reviewed by Board on July 10,2002 �1 ` '
Project Name: Debra Marsh RECEIVED
ED
Owner: Jean Weeks
ID Number: QBY-02-SPR-35 JUI. 1 6 200Z
County Project#: Ju102-25 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
Current zoning: HC-Mod PLANNING OFFICE
Community: Queensbury
Project Description:
Applicant proposes use of empty reception room for display and small retail area for sale of pre-packaged home-made
candy and collectibles. Towing business still exists inside 4 bay garage.
Site Location:
20 Sweet Road
Tax Map Number(s):
296.17-144
Staff Notes:
The applicant requests site plan review for the utilization of reception area of an existing towing business to operate a
retail space. The applicant would like to sell prepackaged home made candy and collectibles. The property is not directly
located on Route 9 and the use does not appear to generate any additional traffic beyond the existing business. The plans
show the location of the retail space in the existing building.
Staff does not identify an impact on county resources. Staff recommends NCI.
Local actions to date(if any):
County Planning Board Recommendation:
No County Impact
No County Impact
Local Action:/Final Dispensation (Provide reason if local action is contrary to Warren County Planning Board recommendation):
Warren County Planning Boar Date Signed Local Official Date Signed
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION.
TOWN OF QUEENSBURY
742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-5902 518-761-8201
RESOLUTION WHEN DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANCE IS MADE
RESOLUTION NO. 35-2002. Introduced by Catherine LaBombard who moved for its
adoption, seconded by Robert Vollaro:
WHEREAS, there is presently before the Planning Board an application for:
DEBRA MARSH
WHEREAS, this Planning Board has determined that the proposed project and Planning
Board action is subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED:
1. No Federal agency appears to be involved.
2. The following agencies are involved:
NONE
3. The proposed action considered by this Board is Unlisted in the Department of
Environmental Conservation Regulations implementing the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and the regulations of the Town of Queensbury.
4. An Environmental Assessment Form has been completed by the applicant.
5. Having considered and thoroughly analyzed the relevant areas of environmental
concern and having considered the criteria for determining whether a project has a
significant environmental impact as the same is set forth in Section 617.11 of the
Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations for the State of New York,
this Board finds that the action about to be undertaken by this Board will have no
significant environmental effect and the Chairman of the Planning Board is hereby
authorized to execute and sign and file as may be necessary a statement of non-
significance or a negative declaration that may be required by law.
Duly adopted this 1-& day of July 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Vollaro, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Seguljic, W. Ringer, Mrs. LaBombard, Mr.
MacEwan
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mr. Strough
"HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY . . . A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE"
SETTLED 1763
0 •
Town of Queensbury Planing Board 7/16/02-D. Marsh
RESOLUTION APPROVING
SITE PLAN NO. 35-2002-DEBRA MARSH
RESOLUTION NO. SP 35-2002
INTRODUCED BY: Larry Ringer
WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION:
SECONDED BY: Robert Vollaro
WHEREAS, an application has been made to this Board for the following:
Site Plan Review No. 35-2002 Applicant: Debra Marsh
Type: Unlisted Property Owner: Jean Weeks
Zone: HC-Mod
Location: 20 Sweet Road
Applicant proposes use of empty reception room for display and small retail area for sale of pre-
packaged home-made candy and collectibles. Towing business still exists inside 4 bay garage.
Change in use requires Planning Board review and approval.
Warren Co. Planning: 7/10/02
Tax Map No.: 296.17-1-44
Lot size: Q98 acres/Section: Art, 4
Public Hearing: July 16, 2002
WHEREAS,the application was received on 6/26/02; and
WHEREAS,the above is supported with the following documentation and inclusive of all newly
received information, not included in this listing as of 7/12/02:
7/16 Staff Notes
7/10 Warren Co. Planning
7/9 Notice of Public Hearing
7/3 Meeting Notice
WHEREAS, pursuant to Art. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the Town of Queensbury a
public hearing was advertised and was held on July 16, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has determined that the proposal complies with the Site Plan
requirements of the Code of the Town Queensbury(Zoning); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the environmental factors found in the Code of the
Town of Queensbury(Zoning);and
Town of Queensbury Planning Board 7/16/02-D. Marsh
WHEREAS,the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered
and the Planning Board has adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration; and/or if application is a
modification, the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been
considered; and the proposed modification(s) do not result in any new or significantly different
environmental impacts, and,therefore, no further SEQRA review is necessary; and
WHEREAS, approval of the application means that the applicant can now apply for a Building
Permit unless the lands are Adirondack Park Jurisdictional or other approvals are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT
RESOLVED,that
We find the following: The application is hereby approved in accordance with the resolution
prepared by Staff and is subject to the following conditions:
1. Any future expansion of this or any other retail operation at this location would be referred
back to the Planning Board for Site Plan Review, and
2. Waiver requests for landscaping, grading plan, stormwater management and lighting be
granted, and
3. All conditions are to be noted on the final approved plans submitted for the Zoning
Administrator's signature in a form to read as follows:
Plans have been approved under authority of a resolution adopted 7/16/02 by the Planning
Board of the Town of Queensbury,New York with the following conditions:
Duly adopted this 16th day of July,2002 by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Vollaro,Mr. Metivier,Mr. Seguljic,Mr. Ringer,Mrs.LaBombard,Mr. MacEwan
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mr. Strough
Cc: D. Marsh
11 Glenwood Avenue
Queensbury,NY 12804
Warren Co. Planning
1340 St.Rt. 9
Lake George,NY 12845
SY,not- .........ICA Ikip 70 N VIC lot ilk ORK 24 3(d NS WIT. fx IWow MKI Whysmum
-77......VGA I"T A tog A Ain Y!lost Is 1 1113 4 vivo oil up lit- IIToo,UT 0101 Wn_ - .90- ;whist!a II7j IMom,.........
.. ...........
77--IX9
...........
-- -----------
C<
UIT
-------.....
77