Loading...
04-04-2022 MTG#10 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 509 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING MTG#10 APRIL 4, 2022 RES# 135-142 7:00 P.M. B.H. 28-32 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT SUPERVISOR JOHN STROUGH COUNCILMAN ANTHONY METIVIER COUNCILMAN GEORGE FERONE COUNCILMAN TIMOTHY MCNULTY BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMAN HARRISON FREER TOWN COUNSEL MARK SCHACHNER, ESQ. TOWN OFFICIALS HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT, DAVE DUELL DEPUTY HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT, MARC DEMERS PRESS LOOK TV SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Called meeting to order... PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN GEORGE FERONE 1.0 RESOLUTION ENTERING QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. 135, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Timothy McNulty RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns from session and enters into the Queensbury Board of Health. Duly adopted this 41h day of April, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Freer PUBLIC HEARING—SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF JAMES DENOOYER PUBLICATION DATE: MARCH 25, 2022 AGENT LUCAS DOBIE, HUTCHINS ENGINEERING, PLLC SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Reviewed Resolution before opening public hearing. Is the Applicant or the Agent for the Applicant present? Please introduce yourself for the record. LUCAS DOBIE, HUTCHINS ENGINEERING-This is a pretty simple project. There are two old camps that have been rehabbed a little bit. They have cleaned up the property. To do the right thing they are getting rid of the two leaching cesspools that are on the lakeside of the parcels. They are approximately fifty to seventy five feet off the shore. There is not really good space on the property to put an absorption field. We thought the simplest solution is a holding tank system. Two, two thousand gallons concrete tanks. Water in is water hauled out. We will REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 510 re-plum the two houses on the lakeside. We will put a grinder pump station there to pump around the house up to the holding tanks. The holding tanks have a high water alarm shut off on it. It is a lake water supply for the homes. It is a pretty simple project. We believe it is a good solution for the property and a nice improvement to the environment there. I would be happy to answer any questions the Board may have. I am here to ask for your approval. We would like to do the construction this spring. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Any questions for the Agent or Applicant? COUNCILMAN FERONE-No. It is pretty clear what we saw today. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We have a public hearing on this tonight. Is there anyone present who would like to speak to this application for Sanitary Sewage Disposal Variance for James DeNooyer of 3308 State Route 9L? Seeing none. I don't see any attendees. I will close the public hearing and entertain a motion. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No public comment PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RESOLUTION APPROVING JAMES DENOOYER'S APPLICATION FOR SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCES RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 28,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS, James DeNooyer (Applicant) filed an application for variances from provisions of the Town of Queensbury On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, Chapter 136, §136-11 which requires applicants to obtain a variance for holding tanks as the Applicant wishes to install a holding tank system consisting of two (2)holding tanks, each with a capacity of 2,000 gallons,for a total capacity of 4,000 gallons, and WHEREAS, the Applicant has also applied for additional variances from Chapter 136 to allow placement of the: 1. Grinder pump station to be 34' from the Lake George shoreline in lieu of the required 50' setback; and 2. Force main to be 34' from the Lake George shoreline instead of the required 50' setback; on property located at 3308 State Route 9L,Dark Bay in the Town of Queensbury, and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk's Office published the Notice of Public Hearing in the Town's official newspaper and the Local Board of Health duly conducted a public hearing concerning the variance requests on Monday, April 4th,2022, and WHEREAS,the Town Clerk's Office has advised that it duly notified all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 511 1. due to the nature of the variances, the Local Board of Health determines that the variances would not be materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of this Ordinance or other adjoining properties nor otherwise conflict with the purpose and objectives of any Town plan or policy; and 2. the Local Board of Health finds that the granting of the variances is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and are the minimum variances which would alleviate the specific unnecessary hardship found by the Local Board of Health to affect the Applicant; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Local Board of Health hereby approves the application of James DeNooyer for variances from the Sewage Disposal Ordinance to allow installation of a holding tank system consisting of two (2)holding tanks, each with a capacity of 2,000 gallons,for a total capacity of 4,000 gallons with placement of the: 1. Grinder pump station to be 34' from the Lake George shoreline in lieu of the required 50' setback; and 2. Force main to be 34' from the Lake George shoreline instead of the required 50' setback; on property located at 3308 State Route 9L, Dark Bay in the Town of Queensbury and bearing Tax Map No: 239.18-1-26, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to forward by certified mail a certified copy of this Resolution to the Adirondack Park Agency for its review, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that this approval Resolution shall not be effective until 30 days after such notice to the Adirondack Park Agency and shall be subject to review by the Adirondack Park Agency during such period. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer PUBLIC HEARING—SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF ROBERT AND JEAN TARRANT PUBLICATION DATE: MARCH 25,2022 NO ACTION TAKEN AGENT LUCAS DOBIE, HUTCHINS ENGINEERING, PLLC AND ROBERT AND JEAN TARRANT SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Reviewed Resolution before opening public hearing. LUCAS DOBIE, HUTCHINS ENGINNERING-The property has been in the family since the 1940's. It is my understanding it is one of the older homes on Cleverdale. It is in pretty rough shape. It is on piers that are leaning. It is really not financially viable to rehab the old place. We originally looked at doing the septic for it last year and then decided to pursue doing a teardown. The proposed new house will be smaller in footprint than what is there. This is quite rare. I do not think I have done that before. We are centering it more on the lot. We are pulling it back from the shore a couple of feet of what is there. All the homes in that neighborhood are pretty much tight right up to the shore generally within thirty-five feet or so. We understand we have to pursue the area variances and site plan review. We needed to start with our septic. If we don't have a septic, REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 512 we don't have a project. We are proposing the Puraflow Enhanced Treatment System and Absorption Field. This is a special peat fiber filled chamber that you pump up to from your septic tank. It is a liquid effluent pump station. It is pumped to the pods where it trickles filters down through to get the enhanced treatment before it gets into the stone absorption bed. It is a very reliable system. There are a lot of them around the lake. I just spoke with their installer Chris Crandall. He has done several of them on the southern basin and around Huletts Landing.In my opinion,it is probably the best Enhanced Treatment Absorption Field. I know that we have talked about Aerobic Units and that sort of thing. I feel that this is a very reliable and nice clean system. The amount of variances are a function of the geometry of the parcel. We feel we have the best layout of the absorption field given to the west there is a well directly across the road. This is what is driving where we locate the field. Our stone for the absorption bed is compliant to that well and to the shoreline setback. It is right at a hundred feet on each of them. We have to count the fill because that is how it is with the Code. This is what makes the variances more intrusive than they are in my opinion. The site soils are decent for Cleverdale. The groundwater table is about three feet so we do have to level up the area behind the new house. It will be the lawn area and you will see the three pods. This is our proposal. We have the neighbors support for the well across the road. He did sign the application for the release. I feel that it is a nice project. A nice improvement for the neighborhood. We are here to ask for your approval for the septic variances. We would like to pursue our area variances and Planning Board submissions. I would be happy to answer any questions the Board may have. Thank you for your time tonight. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Questions from the Board before we open the public hearing. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Do the units have to be cleaned out every few years? MR.DOBIE-Every fifteen years is the manufacturer's guidelines. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-Not that we are going hold you to this. How do you go about making sure that it happens? Does the system just...what exactly occurs if you do not clean them out? MR.DOBIE-I think that they would get built up with the biomass over time Tony. I think you would see it in your pump running harder. To your point, the responsibility is on the homeowner. We do have one that is about fifteen years old on Pilot Knob. It has been very reliable. We have another one on Rockhurst,which is probably ten or twelve years old that there were not many problems with them. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Two concerns that I have expressed on the site. One is without exception we are making almost everybody get an ETU in terms of the pretreatment before it goes to the absorption field. Puraflow is a good absorption field. The other concern that we had was that would you rather have a variance from the lake or a variance from the neighboring well. The neighboring well is almost at an even level with this.I don't think there would be much flow in that direction. I think it would be towards the lake. This is the proposed house, which you are using the same footprint as the older house, which is a violation. You would have to get a variance from the setback for this new house. You are proposing to use the same footprint,but it doesn't meet current standards and you are rebuilding the house. It is a new house. I would hate to see a situation where the ZBA doesn't look at this favorably in terms of allowing a variance from the setback. Then you might use an excuse that the absorption field is down the way as approved by the Town Board. I would not want that to be the case. I would like to see a pretreatment and if we could move the absorption field back a little bit closer to the road. Before I open the public hearing, Lucas is there, anything else you want to say before we open the public hearing. MR. DOBIE-I would like to clarify the new house is somewhat smaller than what is there. That is an improvement. Pulling it back from the lake a little bit I understand the concern. To me,I would rather protect the neighboring well than the lake for the setback.Professionally myself since that is...water right there. We are kind of balancing the two if you will between the shoreline setback and the well. We are trying to sandwich right in between the two as best we could. I would ask if you have a feel for us pulling the field closer to the well if you had a magic number in mind? SUPERVISOR STROUGH-The other thing I was concerned about is if the ZBA does not give you your variance,you are going to have to move the structure. Is the field going to be in the way? I mean it is not as likely to be in the way if the ZBA ask you to move it back to be more in line with Code. Let us see what the public has to say. Any member of the public wish to speak to this the Sewage Disposal Variance Application of Robert and Jean Tarrant?I will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No public comment PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Any thoughts on this Town Board? REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 513 COUNCILMAN MCNULTY-I think we should give the Engineers and the owners a chance to talk about the ETU and some of the suggestions you just made. Based on my limited knowledge. I think if the ETU was added your concerns about the water going into the lake it would be screened one more time before it got to the field. I think we should give them a chance to discuss it before making a decision. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I agree to that. Is everybody okay with the proposal as is because if there is enough we can vote. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-I am fine with it. I think what is ultimately going to happen you are probably going to have to come back to us at some point with a modification after the house is designed correct. If that is the case,is that a problem? I guess this is the cart before the horse type thing. COUNCILMAN FERONE-It is unfortunate they have to get this done. COUNCILMAN METIVIER-It is a terrible position for them to be in. I don't want to send a message to the Planning Board or the Zoning Board that we are not willing to work with them. Send them with something. If they have to come back to us with a modification or what have you can we do that? TOWN COUNSEL, SCHACHNER-The answer is yes. Whether it is a result of our Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals review or some other instance or occurrence or change an applicant is certainly allowed to come back and seek modification of a Board of Health Septic System Variance Approval. Obviously,there is no obligation to grant the modification assuming that the modification is a better treatment,better design, and better location in furtherance of all of our goals. There is no reason an applicant could not seek a modification and you would reasonably review that. You can also if you like in any of several fashions you can try to make clear to the Zoning Board of Appeals that you do not necessarily feel that again if you are heading for approval. I am not telling to do this I am just outlining options. You could tell the Zoning Board of Appeals that you are not necessarily suggesting that this is the best location and that you would have to speak in the abstract,but you would be willing to consider modification if a proposed modification results from the Zoning Board of Appeals review. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Having said that,too in the past we almost require pretreatment.The Lake George Park Commission one of the standards that they are putting before the public for their consideration has not been approved yet. It is to make a pretreatment units ETD's standard for all shoreline properties. I am not so sure I am comfortable with the exception here. We did receive a last minute email. I did forward it to you at the last minute. I just received it, too. Chris Navitsky the Lake George Waterkeeper for the Lake George Association does not favor this. He feels it does not need to have a setback from Lake George variance. In other words moving it another eight feet he would be more comfortable with it. (Email received 4-5-2022 from Chris Navitsky, P.E. Lake George Waterkeeper on file in Town Clerk's Office) We made so many others go back and put a pretreatment unit in. Lucas is not here all the time so he does not know that. He does a good job engineering it. I like Tim would be comfortable saying Luke can you at least give us a pretreatment unit and come back. We will not act on this, George. COUNCILMAN FERONE-I agree. I would feel much more comfortable. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Would you do that just fine tune this a little bit. MR.DOBIE-Yes sir. Just table it and let us regroup. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We just will not act on it. Just resubmit a modify plan to us. We can do it as soon as our next meeting if you can get it together. MR.DOBIE-Let us regroup we will fine tune and come see you again. PUBLIC HEARING—SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF JASON A.GOTTLIEB PUBLICATION DATE: MARCH 25,2022 AGENT DENNIS MACELROY, ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, LLP JAASON GOTTLIEB SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Reviewed Resolution before opening public hearing. DENNIS MACELROY,ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PARTNERSHIP-Just to reinforce what you have said John. This is a three bedroom home out at the end of Cleverdale. We have designed a system that as a replacement system to an older system that has been maintained over the years. The owners feels that it is appropriate to step up to the new technology for the betterment for the property and the lake using an Enhanced Treatment Unit a Fuji Clean CE5 in this case. Then in addition using an Infiltrator Chamber Disposal System, which allows that system to be located. In this case,partially two of the three trenches would be located under the driveway. Because all of that is pushed as far back on the property,it results in a bunch of variances as you REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 514 read off. The important one is the eighty-foot setback to the lake. There are others that involve setbacks to the property lines both to the north and the south and the roadside. We tried to put together a proper design. One that is not dissimilar from others that have been proposed and approved on Cleverdale and other locations around the lake. I would be glad to answer any questions from you. I would mention there have been discussions with an Engineering Representative from one of the neighbors. A neighbor to the south the Davidsons. We have discussed a couple tweaks as it were to this design that would perhaps make their concerns a little less. The installation of a liner wrapped around the south end of that dispersal field to help create a barrier. That is one that has been discussed with the owner and he is certainly willing to go along with it. We are also going to try to push the field ever so slightly. It really only amounts to two feet maximum that would increase that separation on the south end to the property line of three feet. Those are the two further mitigations measures that we have discussed with Mr. Jarrett in this case. It doesn't increase any variances. It may only decrease the requested variance number two. We will change that from one foot to three feet. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Would that change anything to the north property line? MR.MACELROY-No. Those tanks are the determining components that dictate that setback. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I understand that your neighbor would feel better if we did install that impermeable barrier or liner on the south end of the absorption field. In order to do that you would have to move the absorption field two feet so that the absorption bed would be three foot from the southerly property line instead of the required ten-foot setback? MR. MACELROY-Correct. As long as the liner is not considered a setback issue. In that case, I believe the setback dimensions....the way they were. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Questions for the applicant or applicants Agent before I open the public hearing? MR.MACELROY-Jason would like to say a few words. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Certainly. MR. GOTTLIEB-I just wanted to add very quickly. Many of you might recall that Dennis came on my behalf to the Town Board seeking a septic variance in October of 2015.Back then,as it is today,I am trying to upgrade my system to make a difference for the lake and also to improve my property. For the past seven years, we have maintained our system and have confidence in its ability to preserve water quality. It works fine,but it is old and antiquated. My view has been and it continues to be that risk mitigation is a much better approach than risk management. After the holes in the Lamberts approval Dennis and I discussed when visiting this application similar to the holes are plans utilizes the best ETU technologies available and we are looking to do this for the after mention reasons. I appreciate your consideration. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Thank you. I will open the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We did receive several following emails one from George Yund in support of the Gottlieb's application. Heidi Schille in support of the Gottlieb's application. Anne and Ben Campbell in support of the Gottlieb's application. Jeff Hole in support of the Gottlieb's application. Steve Haraden in support of the Gottlieb's application. Bill Wetherbee in support of Gottlieb's application. (On file in the Town Clerk's Office. I will open the public hearing. Is there any member of the public here tonight wish to speak to this septic variance application? Please identify yourself for the record. PAUL VERCESI, 391 CLEVERDALE ROAD-I think, I spoke the last time the Gottlieb's were putting in a new type of system. I realize that things are changing. However, I have owned by house for fifty years or more. Fifteen years ago,I retired so I spend a lot of time up there. I personally drink the water. My daughter and son-in-law and my three granddaughters drink the water. They spend the whole time during COVID 19 drinking the water. We all drink water from the lake. My belief is never put anything in the water. These new so-called septic systems,I am not against change. I have...technology,laptops and everything. Nobody knows when you do these things how pure or how safe if the runoff is not monitored. If it whines up in the lake what would be the consequences ten or twenty years from now for the life of the lake or the people drinking water? Holding tanks are okay so they don't put anything in the water. Due process you have to pump them all the time. I can understand any system especially the State and everyone wants to give bonuses to try to update the systems. Apparently, the Town monitors my system. The Gottlieb's and Bill Davidsons system, I know John Mason takes care of my house. Somebody comes and puts pellets to make sure it is working properly. The big question is not for anyone that can guarantee what is the effect if the system works perfectly well and stays in the three tanks, two tanks it is purified. How would you put it, I am not a technical person. I owned a Hardware Home Center so I am not into technics. Whatever the technical aspirations of these systems even though they seem very ideal nobody knows when there is an excessive amount of rain, absorption of other water in the ground. Just like when the temperature changed so quickly to fifty-five, sixty degrees my ice REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 515 melted and was not being absorbed in the ground you had mud around anywhere there was grass. Nobody can predict when these systems are working whether Fourth of July,Labor Day,tons of people come then suddenly there is an overflow. My question is what of a control do you have even though the overflow that comes out of the supposedly tank goes into the lake? Is there alert systems that notifies the Town or anybody checking or the owner? That okay your tanks for the system is not purifying the water the way it is supposed to do. Nobody can predict what the overflow is going to be. I always worry about the liquid. I think I asked this question three years ago when the Gottlieb's did this before. You go on certain places in certain Countries where they put chemicals in the water. It is like when I used to drive down to Florida sixty years ago. There was a horrendous taste of sulfur in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Then they come out with all new systems you don't taste that. Nobody knows how they purify the water with the chemicals what it will do to the body twenty years from now. Nobody can really be sure of that. With that thought,if a system apparently my neighbors the Gottlieb system is working. Their complaint the last time because they pump a lot, but it does work and it is not going in the lake. Since it is in such a small lot so close to the neighbor on the north and to the south. If it was not working and it was really doing some damage to the lake, I would think fine. I would be very apt to say we will try something like that. If it is working, why look for trouble by doing this. It may seem like an idea to present so that you are into the wrong thing if your house....you are ecology safe you are contributing a better potential to the lake. I personally would not most of these systems they say you can drink the water that comes out. They put chemicals in to kill the bacteria. I personally would not want to drink that. I don't think anyone here would either. Thirty years ago,the hottest thing in the houseware business was Teflon pans. Then all of a sudden, the Teflon starting coming off. Then all of a sudden, they said it was starting to cause cancer. You cannot buy Teflon pans now. I think I have a granite stone pan. Lee has a Le Creuset pan that is not Teflon but it is coated so nothing sticks. Twenty years from now how do they know the same thing as Teflon is going to come out again?We do not know what these consequences will be. Although it sounds very safe now. Since I drink the water, I am not happy about that. Also the same thing of putting barrier for the south side. I would think it should be on my south side to north side also. I don't know if the septic is that far it is just the tank. Maybe the Board should entertain putting a barrier since I am only four,five feet away. He is asking for a four-foot variance last time he asked for one foot. I don't know if it is not as close or no potential or need for it. If there is any kind of a chance, I would ask for a barrier on the north side so it doesn't go into my basement. I wouldn't want to have his overflow. Not that I am implying that he has a lot of gatherings,but he has a lot of functions just like everybody on the lake. If it goes and overflows,I would not want it in my basement. I would...that maybe we should look into if this is necessary.I am not an expert. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Are you in the old Ashley house? MR. VERCESI-Yes the old Ashley house. I bought it from Jane and Fred Alexy. His mother lived in that house. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Okay. MR.VERCESI-They do test my septic system. I am very paranoid because I drink the water. I want to make sure it is working. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-We will ask the Agent to respond to your concerns. I have a list of them. I will go through and make sure they are covered. MR. VERCESI-I admire that there are new systems. It is like when you go on a Cruise Ship the water is treated. Nobody knows what you drink in that water.That is why a lot of people drink bottle water. I personally don't drink bottle water I drink the lake water. I do have a purifier that kills bacteria,but I drink the lake water. In that sense,if his system was malfunctioning even though he likes to modernize he has more money than me. He puts fancy danzy stuff and he wants to modernize the system if it is really working I don't see any benefit for taking the chance of potentially putting something in the lake if it is not monitored properly or if portions of these systems fail not only for his house,but the house across the street. I would like to keep drinking the water. Especially for my three grandchildren. Two are in High School and one a freshman in College they drink the water. I do not want to see that in fifteen years from now, they cannot have children or God forbid they get some disease. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I will have the applicant respond to your concerns. MR.VERCESI-Thank you. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Who would like to go next? WILLIAM F.DAVIDSON, 387 CLEVERDALE ROAD-I just want to say that I admire the intent to improve the sewage treatment system,but I am not so sure this is the answer. We went through this on October 19,. I would ask the Board Members to please reread the minutes of that meeting. Many valid concerns were raised and I think they are still valid today. I am especially concerned, however, with the variances that they are seeking especially within one foot of my property. I am concerned that the seepage will go into my property and into the basement area where I have my water treatment and a hot air furnace. You are asking for one foot REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 516 off the property line. The building is also quite close. I had a conversation with the New York State Health Department today in their schedule out of Appendix 75-A. Separation distances ten feet from the property line is their recommendation or their rule. Twenty feet from the dwelling. They said even though they may give a little variance to systems that are replacing antiquated systems they would never go below five feet. This proposal is asking for one foot. That is too much. That is ninety percent reduction. It has to be more than that. Even if there are other measures taken to abate the seepage on a good Fourth of July weekend or Labor Day weekend or whenever the usage could be so intense it would seep into my property and into my basement, those are essentially my concerns. The proximity and the tremendous percentage or reduction in the side or the property line variance close to my property are my major concern. As was recommended back in 2015 I personally think as Mr. Vercesi has pointed out holding tanks solve the problem completely. Holding tanks are in affect for neighbors in that area. The Schille's across the street from me have holding tanks. I think that is the ideal way. Thank you. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Thank you. Yes, sir please come forward. JEFF HOLE, 390 CLEVERDALE ROAD-I am here in favor of the applicant the Gottlieb's. I am supportive of their efforts to improve their septic system. I am a firm believer of progress over perfection. This is a good step forward. I know they are asking for quite a number of variances,but I think their efforts to improve their treatment is the right one for residents of the lake. I am hopeful that others will continue to try and make these improvements for their own properties. I appreciate their efforts and would ask the Board to consider. Thank you. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-Thank you. Anybody else like to speak to the Town Board about this variance application? I will close the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE Discussion held regarding the questions and concerns of Mr. Vercesi and Mr. Davidson relating to the Gottlieb's variance. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-I am going to reopen the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED MR.VERCESI,391 CELVERDALE ROAD-My question is I am assuming if it is not chemical there must be something to kill the bacteria in the water,which would be probably ultraviolet or something to that effect. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-There is aerobic bacteria. They do their job. You do want them. Then there is anaerobic bacteria without oxygen. They will do a different job. Your basic system just gets an anaerobic treatment. This gets both anaerobic and aerobic. Then when they are done you are not killing those bacteria's because you want them to do their job exiting the unit going to the infiltration bed then it gets treated for pathogens. The water entering the infiltration bed is basically clean. MR.VERCESI-I was just thinking if it wasn't chemical,it was ultraviolet.Then if there were,a ten-day outage of power the system would not work. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-There are no chemicals. MR.VERCESI-Okay. Thank you for letting me ask the question. SUPERVISOR STROUGH-You are welcome. Anybody else,then I will reclose the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING RECLOSED DISCUSSION HELD BEFORE VOTE After further discussion,the Board agreed to amend the Resolution changing variance number two as follows: to change the absorption bed to be 3' from the southerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback instead of 1' foot. Add to the Resolution a condition of approval that an impermeable barrier be added to the south side of the proposed system. RESOLUTION APPROVING JASON A. GOTTLIEB'S APPLICATION FOR SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCES RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 29,2022 REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 517 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr.Timothy McNulty WHEREAS,Jason Gottlieb(Applicant)filed an application for variances from provisions of the Town of Queensbury On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance,Chapter 136 to install a replacement wastewater treatment system with its components proposed to be located as follows: 1. Absorption bed to be 80' from Lake George in lieu of the required 100' setback; 2. Absorption bed to be 3' from the southerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 3. Absorption bed to be 1' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 4. Absorption bed to be 3' from the foundation in lieu of the required 20' setback; 5. Sewer line to be 7' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 6. Tank to be 1' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 7. Tank to be 2' from the foundation in lieu of the required 10' setback; and 8. Tank to be 4' from the northerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; and 9. Sewer line to be 2' from the foundation in lieu of the required 10' setback; on property located at 389 Cleverdale Road in the Town of Queensbury, and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk's Office published the Notice of Public Hearing in the Town's official newspaper and the Local Board of Health duly conducted a public hearing concerning the variance requests on Monday, April 4th,2022, and WHEREAS,the Town Clerk's Office has advised that it duly notified all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that 1. due to the nature of the variances, the Local Board of Health determines that the variances would not be materially detrimental to the purposes and objectives of this Ordinance or other adjoining properties nor otherwise conflict with the purpose and objectives of any Town plan or policy; and 2. the Local Board of Health finds that the granting of the variances is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and are the minimum variances which would alleviate the specific unnecessary hardship found by the Local Board of Health to affect the Applicant; and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Local Board of Health hereby approves the application of Jason A. Gottlieb for variances from the Sewage Disposal Ordinance to install a replacement wastewater treatment system with its components to be located as follows: 1. Absorption bed to be 80' from Lake George in lieu of the required 100' setback; 2. Absorption bed to be 3' from the southerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 3. Absorption bed to be 1' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 4. Absorption bed to be 3' from the foundation in lieu of the required 20' setback; 5. Sewer line to be 7' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 518 6. Tank to be F from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; 7. Tank to be 2' from the foundation in lieu of the required 10' setback; and 8. Tank to be 4' from the northerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; and 9. Sewer line to be 2' from the foundation in lieu of the required 10' setback; on property located at 389 Cleverdale Road in the Town of Queensbury and bearing Tax Map No: 226.8-1-2 with the condition of approval that an impermeable barrier be added to the south side of the proposed system, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Enhanced Treatment Unit(ETU) shall be maintained by the property owner in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations for the life of the system, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to forward by certified mail a certified copy of this Resolution to the Adirondack Park Agency for its review, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that this approval Resolution shall not be effective until 30 days after such notice to the Adirondack Park Agency and shall be subject to review by the Adirondack Park Agency during such period. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF ROSEANNE WEISSEL RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 30, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHEREAS,the Queensbury Town Board serves as the Town's Local Board of Health and is authorized by Town Code Chapter 136 to issue variances from the Town's On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, and WHEREAS, Roseanne Weissel (Applicant) has applied to the Local Board of Health for variances from Chapter 136, §136-11 which requires applicants to obtain a variance for a holding tank system, as the Applicant wishes to install a holding tank system consisting of two (2) holding tanks, one with a capacity of 1,500 gallons and one with a capacity of 2,000 gallons, for a total capacity of 3,500 gallons,thus meeting the required minimum capacity of 3,500 gallons, and REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 519 WHEREAS, the Applicant has also applied for additional variances from Chapter 136 to allow the: 1. well to be located approximately 70' from a neighboring wastewater absorption field in lieu of the required 100' setback; and 2. holding tanks to be buried behind a retaining wall due to site constraints in lieu of being buried under natural grade within a 50' radius of the installation; on property located at 75 Hanneford in the Town of Queensbury, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Town of Queensbury Local Board of Health will hold a public hearing on Monday, April 18'', 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, to consider Roseanne Weissel's sewage disposal variance application concerning property located at 75 Hanneford Road in the Town of Queensbury and bearing Tax Map No.:227.18- 1-37 and at that time all interested persons will be heard, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health authorizes and directs the Queensbury Town Clerk to publish the Notice of Public Hearing presented at this meeting and send a copy of the Notice to neighbors located within 500 feet of the property as required by law. Duly adopted this 4 h day of April, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Ferone NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Freer RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL VARIANCE APPLICATION OF BETTY SPAWN RESOLUTION NO.: BOH 31, 2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Timothy McNulty WHEREAS,the Queensbury Town Board serves as the Town's Local Board of Health and is authorized by Town Code Chapter 136 to issue variances from the Town's On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance, and WHEREAS, Betty Spawn has applied to the Local Board of Health for variances from Chapter 136 to install a new enhanced treatment on-site wastewater treatment system with certain components of it to be located as follows: 1. Absorption field toe of fill to be 2' from the northerly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 520 2. Absorption field toe of fill to be 1' from the easterly property line in lieu of the required 10' setback; and 3. Absorption field toe of fill to be 73' from the well and absorption bed to be 81.4' from the well in lieu of the required 100' setback(s); on property located at 26 Knox Road in the Town of Queensbury, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Town of Queensbury Local Board of Health will hold a public hearing on Monday, April 18'', 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, to consider Betty Spawn's sewage disposal variance application concerning property located at 26 Knox Road in the Town of Queensbury(Tax Map No.: 239.7-1-22) and at that time all interested persons will be heard, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Local Board of Health authorizes and directs the Queensbury Town Clerk to publish the Notice of Public Hearing presented at this meeting and send a copy of the Notice to neighbors located within 500 feet of the property as required by law. Duly adopted this 4 h day of April, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Strough, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Freer RESOLUTION ADJOURNING QUEENSBURY BOARD OF HEALTH RESOLUTION NO. BOH 32,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Timothy McNulty RESOLVED,that the Queensbury Board of Health hereby adjourns from session and enters back into the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury. Duly adopted this 4 h day of April, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Metivier, Mr. Ferone, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Strough NOES: None ABSENT:Mr. Freer 2.0 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR FOR RESOLUTIONS ONLY(LIMIT-3 MINUTES) No Comment 3.0 RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION APPROVING RE-PURCHASE OF CEMETERY LOT IN PINE VIEW CEMETERY FROM MARY GRANT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 521 RESOLUTION NO.: 136,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY : Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS, the Town of Queensbury Cemetery Commission previously sold a cemetery lot in the Pine View Cemetery to Mary Grant in Horicon Plot,Lot No.: 32-A, and WHEREAS,Mary Grant has requested that the Town's Cemetery Commission buy back such lot,and WHEREAS, the Cemetery Commission and Cemetery Superintendent have recommended re- purchase of such lot and approval by the Town Board, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves of the Cemetery Commission's re- purchase of a cemetery lot in the Pine View Cemetery from Mary Grant in Horicon Plot,Lot No.: 32-A for the amount of$650, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Cemetery Superintendent to arrange for payment of such amount to Mary Grant and properly account for the sales in the Town's books and records, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Cemetery Superintendent and/or Town Budget Officer to take any other actions necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO SPECTRUM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ASBESTOS INSPECTION SERVICES RELATED TO THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 32 HOMER AVENUE RESOLUTION NO.: 137,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 522 SECONDED BY: Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS,by Resolution No.: 240,2021,the Queensbury Town Board authorized an advertisement for bids for the demolition of the structure on property located at 32 Homer Avenue and also authorized Spectrum Environmental Associates, Inc., (Spectrum)to provide an"RFP draft for use to bid the project"for the amount of$250 in accordance with Spectrum's June 14, 2021 Proposal for Asbestos Inspection Services (Proposal), and WHEREAS, by Resolution No.: 304,2021, the Town Board accepted and awarded the bid for the demolition of the structure, and WHEREAS, the Acting Director of Building and Codes Enforcement has requested Town Board authorization to remit payment to Spectrum for all of the services Spectrum successfully provided to the Town as delineated in Spectrum's Proposal and as set forth in Spectrum's 3/22/22 Invoice 916477 substantially in the form presented at this meeting in the total amount of$3,845, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes, ratifies and directs payment to Spectrum Environmental Associates, Inc., (Spectrum) for all asbestos inspection services Spectrum successfully provided to the Town as delineated in the preambles of this Resolution, Spectrum's June 14, 2021 Proposal and Spectrum's 3/22/22 Invoice 916477 substantially in the form presented at this meeting in the total amount of$3,845, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs that payment shall be paid from Account No.: 001-3650-4400 Demolition—Misc. Contractual and assessed by the Town Board against the real property, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Budget Officer to transfer$3,845 from the General Fund Undesignated,Unappropriated Fund Balance to Account No.: 001- 3650-4400 Demolition—Misc. Contractual, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor, Acting Director of Building and Codes Enforcement and/or Town Budget Officer to take any and all action necessary to effectuate all terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION APPROVING RE-PURCHASE OF CEMETERY LOTS IN PINE VIEW CEMETERY FROM JANE DURKIN LIVING TRUST REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 523 RESOLUTION NO.: 138,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY : Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS,the Town of Queensbury Cemetery Commission previously sold six(6)cemetery lots in the Pine View Cemetery to Jane Durkin in Seneca Plot,Lot Nos.: 9-C(2 lots)and 9-D and 2-E(4 lots), and WHEREAS, the Jane Durkin Living Trust has requested that the Town's Cemetery Commission buy back such lots, and WHEREAS, the Cemetery Commission and Cemetery Superintendent have recommended re- purchase of such lots and approval by the Town Board, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves of the Cemetery Commission's re- purchase of six(6)cemetery lots in the Pine View Cemetery from the Jane Durkin Living Trust in Seneca Plot, Lot Nos.: 9-C(2 lots)and 9-D and 2-E(4 lots)for the total amount of$1,600, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Cemetery Superintendent to arrange for payment of such amount to Darleen Summers, Trustee of the Jane Durkin Living Trust, (address of 27 Gentry Hill N. Apt. C, Queensbury, New York 12804) and properly account for the sales in the Town's books and records, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Cemetery Superintendent and/or Town Budget Officer to take any other actions necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF HIGHWAY MONEYS RESOLUTION NO. 139,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. George Ferone WHEREAS,in accordance with New York State Highway Law§284,the Queensbury Town Board wishes to authorize an Agreement between the Town Board and Town Highway Superintendent for the Expenditure of Highway Moneys relative to moneys levied and collected in the Town for the repair and improvement of highways and received from the State for State Aid for the repair and improvement of highways, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 524 RESOLVED,that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves and authorizes an Agreement for the Expenditure of Highway Moneys between the Town Board and Town Highway Superintendent relative to moneys levied and collected in the Town for the repair and improvement of highways and received from the State for State Aid for the repair and improvement of highways in form acceptable to the Town Board, Town Highway Superintendent, Town Budget Officer and/or Town Counsel, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor, Town Board and Town Highway Superintendent to execute such Agreement, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to file a fully- executed original Agreement with the Queensbury Town Clerk and the Warren County Department of Public Works and file copies of the fully-executed Agreement in the offices of the Town Highway Superintendent and Town Budget Officer, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor,Town Highway Superintendent and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022 by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REFURBISHMENT OF PUMP #3 AT MEADOWBROOK ROAD PUMP STATION BY DOTY MACHINE WORKS RESOLUTION NO.: 140,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS, the Queensbury Wastewater Director has advised that it is necessary to refurbish Pump 93 at the Meadowbrook Road Pump Station(mechanism), and WHEREAS, the Wastewater Director requested and received quotes for such mechanism and the lowest quote is from Doty Machine Works dated December 1,2021 in the amount of$9,755 for basic repairs, and WHEREAS, the Wastewater Director has requested additional funds/budgetary cost of$7,000 for unforeseen repairs,for a total repair cost not to exceed$16,755, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 525 RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby authorizes the refurbishment of Pump 93 at the Meadowbrook Road Pump Station by Doty Machine Works in accordance with its quote dated December 1,2021 presented at this meeting in the amount of$9,755 for basic repairs plus an additional budgetary cost of $7,000 for unforeseen repairs for a total cost not to exceed$16,755, to be paid from Account No.: 032-8120- 4400, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes the Town Budget Officer to take all actions necessary to amend the Town Budget and effectuate the transfer of$16,755 from Fund 932 Undesignated Fund Balance to Account No.: 032-8120-4400 to fund such work, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor to sign any needed documentation, and the Town Supervisor, Town Wastewater Director and/or Budget Officer to take such other and further action as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer RESOLUTION APPROVING AUDIT OF BILLS -WARRANT: 04052022 RESOLUTION NO.: 141,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Anthony Metivier WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr.George Ferone WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board wishes to approve an audit of bills presented as Warrant: 04052022 with a run date of 03/31/2022 and a payment date of 04/05/2022, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby approves the audit of bills presented as Warrant: 04052022 with a run date of 03/31/2022 and a payment date of 04/05/2022 totaling $1,530,050.03, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Town Supervisor and/or Town Budget Officer to take such other and further action as may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 526 NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer 4.0 CORRESPONDENCE None 5.0 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR(LIMIT-4 MINUTES) No Comment 6.0 TOWN BOARD DISCUSSIONS COUNCILMAN MCNULTY(WARD IV) • The Comprehensive Land Use Plan Committee Meeting was held on Tuesday. It will be one of the subjects of the Workshop next week. I will have some details and layouts for the Town Board on how to go forward. • Corinth Road Traffic Study. We are getting close to the end. They have asked for some final comments. I hope that by the next meeting I can present their draft comments. COUNCILMAN FERONE(WARD III) • Reminded everyone, that spring is here. Asked everyone to be mindful of their speed around Town. Children are out riding their bikes doing more things on the road. There will be a lot more activity around. • Replaced one of our speed signs on Dixon Road due to an accident. I hope to talk to you regarding purchasing a few more. COUNCILMAN METIVIER(WARD I) • Nothing to report SUPERVISOR STROUGH • Spoke regarding the press release by NYSERDA. • Stu Baker, Senior Planner is putting together a Steering Committee to the firm that was awarded to help in updating the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. We are looking for residents to volunteer. If you would like to be on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan,submit an email to s! uai'�IY0 qu r i'�slsur'\,,net or phone call of interest to(518)761-8222. • Water Superintendent, Chris Harrington would like everyone to know they will be doing hydrant flushing starting April 18, 2022. They are starting early this year because they do not want to be flushing the system when people are trying to water their lawns. • Attended the Bay Ridge Fire Department and Bay Ridge Rescue Squads Banquets. Thanked all the volunteers who are there helping to give us fire protection and helping us with our emergency services. These people are so dedicated to helping other people. I can say thank you a hundred times it will not be enough. We are very lucky to have these teams in the Town of Queensbury working for us. • There is going to be a Memorial Day Parade on May 30, 2022. The Remembrance Ceremony will follow the Parade. It will be in front of the YMCA in Crandall Park in front of the Victory and Peace Monument. Anyone who has an organization that wants to be part of that Parade you would have to get in touch with me. I will send you an invitation. You send the invitation back to me. If you want to be in the Parade,you have to produce a theme that is going to pay respect and homage to memorialize those who lost their lives fighting for our freedoms. • Volunteers are needed for the Homebound Seniors Meal Delivery Program. If you are interested, please call(518)761-6347. • Rabies Vaccination Clinics are scheduled for Saturday, May 14,2022 at the Queensbury Community Center,742 Bay Road 10:00-Noon.Saturday,July 16th,2022 Chester Fire House,State Route 8 10:00- Noon. Saturday, August 13, 2022 at the Queensbury Community Center, 10:00-Noon. Saturday, September 17, 2002 Chester Fire House 10:00-Noon. Saturday, October 15, 2002 Queensbury REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING 04-04-2022, MTG#10 527 Community Center 10:00-Noon. Saturday, November 5th, 2022 Queensbury Community Center 10:00-Noon. RESOLUTION ADJOURNING REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING RESOLUTION NO. 142,2022 INTRODUCED BY: Mr.Timothy McNulty WHO MOVED FOR ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr.George Ferone RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Queensbury hereby adjourns its Regular Town Board Meeting. Duly adopted this 4th day of April,2022,by the following vote: AYES: Mr.Ferone,Mr.McNulty,Mr. Strough,Mr.Metivier NOES: None ABSENT:Mr.Freer Respectfully Submitted, Caroline H. Barber Town Clerk Town of Queensbury MINUTES PREPARED BY KAREN O'BRIEN, DEPUTY TOWN CLERK II