Loading...
Staff Notes 8.24.22Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development Department Staff Notes Area Variance No.: 39-2022 Project Applicant: Gianni Simone Project Location: 20 Apres Circle Parcel History: SUB 12-2018 SEQR Type: Type II Meeting Date: August 24, 2022 Description of Proposed Project: Applicant requests to be tabled to the September meeting for a Full board. (Tabled to September 21s) (Revised — additional garage details) Applicant proposes to construct a 702 sq. ft. detached garage on a site that has an existing home with a garage. The house footprint is 2,182 sq. ft. with the attached garage footprint of 600 sq. ft. No changes to the existing home. Relief requested for second garage. Relief Required: The applicant requests relief for second garage. The parcel is in the MDR zone in an approved subdivision of SR- 1A. The lot is 1.16 ac. Section 179-5-020 garage The new garage is to be 702 sq. ft. with space for two cars and an attic storage area above with a height of 27 ft. 4 inches. The site has an existing attached garage of approximately 600 sq. ft. where only one garage is the maximum allowed. Criteria for considering an Area Variance according to Chapter 267 of Town Law: In making a determination, the board shall consider: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of this area variance. Minor to no impacts to the neighborhood may be anticipated. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Feasible alternatives may be limited due to the location of the existing garage. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The relief requested may be considered substantial relevant to the code as only one garage is allowed. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The project will have minimal to no adverse effects or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. The difficulty may be considered self-created. Staff comments: The applicant proposes construction of a second garage on a parcel with an existing home and attached garage. The plans show the location of the garage and photos of the area on the property. In addition, the applicant has provided elevation and floor plans of the garage and is designed to match the existing home.