C.T. Male.05.21.2001uD/Zi/ui is:4r rAd Di8 too izuv l.. I. RM1 4J UUL
0 0
C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES, P.C. )#9
50 Century HIII Drive, R O. Box 727, Latham. New York 12110-0727 /.� �'
518.786.7400 FAX 5w 18.786.7299 ww.chnafe.com u L�
May 21, 2001
Mr. Chris Round D
Director of Community Development RECENE
Town of Queensbury
742 Bay Road MAy p i 2001
Queensbury, New York 12804-5902
TO%AIN OF
Re: Site Plan 13-2001
pJ N NG OFFICE R. Scherfnerhorn Properties, Inc. - North Country Day Care
Dear Mr. Round:
We have reviewed the resubmission package for the above referenced project. The
package consisted of a comment response letter dated May 14, 2001, revised plan sheets
S-1, 5-2 and S-4 (latest revision date May 14, 2001), a revised printout for detention
pond # 2 and two plan sheet (TS1 and TS2) showing the design of the temporary
sewage disposal systems.
We have reviewed the above mentioned documents and feel that the comments
outlined in our April 27th letter have been adequately addressed.
Regarding the plans detailing the temporary wastewater disposal system and offer the
following comments:
1. The septic tank, wet well and overflow tank should be shown on the Layout and
Utility Plan (S-1)_ The overflow holding tank appears to be located in a paved area.
Consideration should be given to relocating these structures to minimize
disturbance during abandonment.
2. The forcemain routing across Lot # 4 should be coordinated with the proposed
layout for Lot # 4. Specifically, the forcemain should be routed around the buried
stormwater infiltration area.
3. Based on the contours shown, the shallow trench system should be rotated 90
degrees so that the laterals are parallel with them-
4. Assuming the worst case scenario that the Baybridge pump station is not
constructed, the plan should show a potential expansion area, as required per
NYSDOH regulations.
5. The test pit data for TP#2 shows miscellaneous fill in the critical zone, i.e. in the zone
2 feet below the proposed trench bottom. The percolation test result was obtained
from an area outside of the system footprint where "sandy fill" was observed.
Additional information about the soil at TP # 2 is warranted to classify the
"miscellaneous fill" and to determine the percolation rate of this soil.. Otherwise the
system should be relocated to where the suitable soils were found_
Architecture a Building Systems Engineering • Civil Englneedng • Environmental Services • Survey & Land Informaflon services
UD/21/Ul 14;46 ra 010 IOD
1
�VVV
C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Mr. Cn Round
Page Z
If you have any questions related to our comments, feel free to call our office.
Sincerely,
C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES, P.C.
kJ
R_ Edwards, RE_
Manager
C: Applicant
k:lpgetl5100B2t2190RYntprGtBdSVptlhwunyy�ycafebMMien�q 52t.ot.aa